User talk:Dreamy Jazz: Difference between revisions
Line 596: | Line 596: | ||
:{{u|DanDvo}}, unfortunately there are not many independent references in the draft. It would be good if you could find more. [[User:Dreamy Jazz|Dreamy <i style="color:#d01e1e">'''Jazz'''</i>]] 🎷 <sup>''[[User talk:Dreamy Jazz|talk to me]]'' | ''[[Special:Contributions/Dreamy Jazz|my contributions]]''</sup> 09:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC) |
:{{u|DanDvo}}, unfortunately there are not many independent references in the draft. It would be good if you could find more. [[User:Dreamy Jazz|Dreamy <i style="color:#d01e1e">'''Jazz'''</i>]] 🎷 <sup>''[[User talk:Dreamy Jazz|talk to me]]'' | ''[[Special:Contributions/Dreamy Jazz|my contributions]]''</sup> 09:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC) |
||
Thank you for your comment. Unfortunately I am bit cunfused what exactly do you mean. As I understood I need to remove all references on independent articles, is that correct? By the way have you noticed external links with intedependent articles?--DanDvo (talk) |
Thank you for your comment. Unfortunately I am bit cunfused what exactly do you mean. As I understood I need to remove all references on independent articles, is that correct? By the way have you noticed external links with intedependent articles?--[[User:DanDvo|DanDvo]] ([[User talk:DanDvo|talk]]) 13:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:03, 23 April 2019
|
This is Dreamy Jazz's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Auto-archiving period: 15 days |
This is Dreamy Jazz's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Auto-archiving period: 15 days |
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
thank you for your work Siredthea (talk) 02:54, 29 March 2019 (UTC) |
- @Siredthea: thanks. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 11:54, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Message to North America
@Northamerica1000: You would probably need to keep the noedit code on the box header subpages, as many old portals tried to use noedit but couldn't when the parameter was not passed to the template. Removal would mean the reverted portals would then not be fully how they were supposed to be before they were upgraded. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 08:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- All right, and thanks for the heads up. Would you mind helping out in removing the G6 notices from the box header and box footer pages? It would really help out.
- The G6 tag is preventing the reversion of automated portals to pre-automated versions. Due to a lack of <noinclude> markup on the pages, the deletion notice appears repeatedly on main portal pages when attempting to restore original portal content. It's clear that the community is not digging the automated versions, but many are for reverting to pre-automation versions of the portals. The presence of the tag on hundreds of pages is preventing this from occurring. North America1000 08:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Northamercia1000: I'm blocked and don't have AWB anymore. If you want me to help (and I have the time to help now), I would need to be unblocked and (probably) need AWB access restored. I won't be back at my computer for a few hours, but when I am I'll post here. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 09:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Since it's a self-requested block, you should be able to be unblocked by just about any admin, no problemo. However, since I'm involved at this point, others may possibly consider it inappropriate for me to perform the unblock. Per the rationale of Swarm at your block log, getting unblocked should be easy. North America1000 11:14, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done below. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 11:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Requested for AWB rights. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 12:24, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- I'll do some when I have the AWB rights. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 13:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Northamerica1000, all portal pages should now not have the deletion notice. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 13:55, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- All right, and thanks very much for the follow-up. There may be more if others placed them, but those can be removed as they're found. Thanks again, North America1000 21:35, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Northamerica1000, I used "What Links Here" to the deletion page. It should have (and did) catch others using my deletion notice (however, deletion notices which were created by others and did not link to my page won't have been caught (but I don't think there were any)). Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Way cool, even better. Thanks for coming out of your retirement! North America1000 21:40, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Northamerica1000, I used "What Links Here" to the deletion page. It should have (and did) catch others using my deletion notice (however, deletion notices which were created by others and did not link to my page won't have been caught (but I don't think there were any)). Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- All right, and thanks very much for the follow-up. There may be more if others placed them, but those can be removed as they're found. Thanks again, North America1000 21:35, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Since it's a self-requested block, you should be able to be unblocked by just about any admin, no problemo. However, since I'm involved at this point, others may possibly consider it inappropriate for me to perform the unblock. Per the rationale of Swarm at your block log, getting unblocked should be easy. North America1000 11:14, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Northamercia1000: I'm blocked and don't have AWB anymore. If you want me to help (and I have the time to help now), I would need to be unblocked and (probably) need AWB access restored. I won't be back at my computer for a few hours, but when I am I'll post here. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 09:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Unblock request
Dreamy Jazz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Although I am still busy IRL, I want to remove my self-requested block. This is partially due to the need for my help in the project in certain circumstances (including above), but mostly because the self requested block hasn't really helped me to focus on real life and I would prefer to be unblocked if the block hasn't helped me to keep away from wikipedia. Sorry if anyone is annoyed with how I have been indecisive on this. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 11:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Done! Yamla (talk) 12:14, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Also I am coming out of retirement, because I plan to come back one day in the future to more regular editing and saying I am retired isn't right when I plan to come back. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 11:48, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Welcome back! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 21:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Undeletes
Hello Dreamy Jazz, per your request at WP:IANB, I've restored your common js and css files. Please take note, your files include imports from other pages that may have changed since you imported them. If you have issues you can deactivate your common.js file by using this link. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 15:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: thanks. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 15:33, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Tags
I'm having problems finding some of the G6 templates for the Portal:Kylie Minogue portal. I've checked all the subpages, and subpages of those subpages, but several persist on the main portal page. Maybe you can figure it out?! North America1000 20:24, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Northamerica1000, the deletion notice was still present on the box-header subpage. I have not been able to do a run of pages with the deletion notice yet as I don't currently have permission to use AWB, but have requested it back. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. I thought I removed it from there, but apparently I spaced out about it. Time for a break. North America1000 20:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Northamerica1000, maybe a cup of tea might help. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. I thought I removed it from there, but apparently I spaced out about it. Time for a break. North America1000 20:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Just so you know, part of this process has been reverting the portals back to versions prior to when the automation tinkering began. These portals in an automated form stand a chance to be deleted, even if previous versions exist, because I'm of the opinion that some users just don't research by looking at revision histories. It's pretty clear at MfD at this point that many people don't like automated portals. A worst case scenario is that a portal with significant curation, that is presently automated or has aspects of automation in it, will be then WP:EAGERly nominated for deletion and then deleted per a flurry of multiple "per nom" !votes, without any consideration taken regarding previous versions. So, since it sounds like you plan on helping out, what do you have in mind? Are you only going to revert the additions of the G6 tags, or are you also going to work on portal reversions? Just need to know, so I can plan accordingly. North America1000 21:09, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Northamerica1000, I can do both. I was waiting for AWB access to do the removal of the deletion notices. I am technically still busy, but a AWB run here and there isn't much to ask. I don't know really where to start with reverting automation replacement, so I won't unless there is a list of portals needing converted back into their previous formats. I can only think of using the list of all portals archive pages and looking for portals with subpages, but this may not catch all portals. In answer, I'll run with AWB every so often over portal pages linking to the deletion page and I'll do what I can in reverting portals back to the old versions. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:17, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Northamerica1000, I am generating a list of portals which existed before 4-22-2018 (using Wikipedia:WikiProject Portal/List of all portals/Archive/4-22-2018) and are in the category Category:Single-page portals. This should catch most of them. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- I think there is an easier way, with the following 2 "What links heres:" Number 1 and Number 2. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- @UnitedStatesian: that is what I was already going to do for the first task. The second task of reverting automated portals back to their non-automated version is what I was dealing with above and can't be done with that method. Sorry for any confusion. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- I think there is an easier way, with the following 2 "What links heres:" Number 1 and Number 2. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Northamerica1000, I am generating a list of portals which existed before 4-22-2018 (using Wikipedia:WikiProject Portal/List of all portals/Archive/4-22-2018) and are in the category Category:Single-page portals. This should catch most of them. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the input anyway. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
@Northamerica1000: here is the list. I used a quick and dirty python script to compare the category and the archived list. I would like to say that this will hopefully cover all portals, but there may be false positives and missed portals in this list, so it isn't comprehensive: Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 22:06, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the extra data. I'll look into it more later. North America1000 22:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Message from Abhishekx7
i wont do the removal of tag on srvrr but you must understad that its not advertising — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishekx7 (talk • contribs)
- @Abhishekx7: Yes. It. Is.
Sources show that the company aims to collaborate with google in future and that it would make data transfr lot more simple.
without at least several independent and reliable sources is 100% advertising. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 09:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
i will change it, sorry for that, please dont delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishekx7 (talk • contribs) 09:25, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Abhishekx7: It isn't just that though. There are other reasons, such as there are no sources for this company (except from the companies own pages), so it isn't notable. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 09:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
that is a new company, it may not be refrenced, numerous articls ar not refernced for vrious reasons, that dosn't make them advertising — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishekx7 (talk • contribs)
- @Abhishekx7: That is not an reason for keeping the article. Wikipedia articles are only kept once they have the sources. Also because you are keeping on removing the speedy deletion tag, you have been reported to the administrators, who will decide whether to block you. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 09:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Abhishekx7:, Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit, but only if they follow the rules and edit competently. It is up to you to read the rules and follow them, and to edit competently. If you don't, it may be considered disruptive and you may be blocked. Your recent edits have been disruptive and constitute sufficient reason to block to prevent further disruption. If you are blocked and edit without logging in you may be banned permanently for block evasion, which means you can never come back. Please take this as a relatively friendly warning, and either learn the rules and follow them, or don't edit here, It is your choice. If you think you are right and everyone here is wrong, it is your responsibility to prove that with sufficient evidence from reliable sources before continuing with disputed edits. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 10:57, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you for reviewing my user page JeffreyDutch (talk) 11:56, 11 April 2019 (UTC) |
- @JeffreyDutch: thanks. I'll put this in my appreciation page. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 11:58, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
New Section
Hope you reconsider deleting my post. Wiki4206969 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki4206969 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Wiki4206969 Dreamy Jazz is not a sysop and, as such, cannot delete/undelete pages. See WP:REFUND, although it is unlikely to be undeleted. Kb03 (talk) 16:17, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello!
I appreciate the welcome, I will be sure to check out this Teahouse when I have more time, thank you :) Eluxplosion (talk) 18:41, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Eluxplosion: your welcome. Don't hesitate to ask questions if you have any. Happy editing, Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 19:47, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Copy/Paste
Greetings and thank you for your review. I had originally tried to edit the sf.citi wiki using my current draft copy however it was redacted and I was told to reach out to one of you for editing. So I created a draft with that same copy.
msjones (talk) 20:59, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Mserikajones, if the content is the same which was removed from the article, it is a direct copy and paste from sources. This isn't allowed. If it is your own words, a report showed that several sentences were also present in their own website. I would advise that you remove anything which you have copied and pasted. Also, a AfC editor will come along soon to approve or reject the draft you have submitted. They will most likely reject it, as it is written in a promotional way. For example
sf.citi helps uphold the San Francisco legacy of supporting innovative thinking and serving all San Franciscans.
with the only source to their own website is very promotional. My advise is to try and write the draft in a way which is less promotional. This may mean rewriting the entire draft, but this may have to be as the draft won't be accepted in the way it is currently written. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
This is terrific additional context for me to give back to sf.citi - I'm honestly just formatting this. I'm really enjoying learning! Thank you again. msjones (talk) 21:10, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
G13
Here you replaced a G13 tag that another editor had removed with an edit summary of "still editing". I don't see how that's appropriate; could you please explain? Huon (talk) 22:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, I missed that you reverted yourself later. Huon (talk) 22:08, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Huon, it's fine. I had been dealing with speedy deletion notices removed, reinstated this one, but then realised it could be removed if the editor planned to improve it. So I reverted myself. Happy editing, Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 08:06, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Regarding Wikipage Approval
I have created wiki page. Please help me to approve this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Noble_Hospital_Pune — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinaybhutada1986 (talk • contribs) 10:07, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- As noted by Dlohcierekim, you have not shown how the hospital is notable. Although you have added two sources, it isn't enough to show that the hospital meets our notability guidelines for organisations and companies. The main point from our guideline is
A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject
. Currently, I don't think that you have shown this. Also because the hosptial exists, does not mean that the hospital is inherently notable (so it means that you need to prove that the hosptial is notable and not that it just exists: See Our guideline on "No inherent notability"). Also you have not responded to my notice about your suspected paid editing. You need to disclose if you are being paid in any way for your contributions to the draft. Details on how you can do this are at your talk page. Please respond before making any more edits.
- The page will be approved, when (and only when), you have showed that the hospital is notable. This can be done by finding more sources which are independent and reliable. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 11:21, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Message from DAVOS 669
Why is it our account wanna be deleted DJ? DAVOS 669 (talk) 19:58, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- DAVOS 669, Hello. I marked your userpage for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria as it is a
userpage being used only for promotion or publicity, with a username that promotes or implies affiliation with the entity being promoted
. Wikipedia is not a web host and such what is on your userpage is not allowed. Note that your userpage being marked for deletion does not mean that your account will be deleted, but means that the page User:DAVOS 669 is marked for deletion. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:07, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
thanks
We understand DAVOS 669 (talk) 20:10, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- DAVOS 669, ok. If you need help, you can ask me. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:11, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
how can we upload pictures on this account?
Wanna upload album arts and pictures DAVOS 669 (talk) 20:11, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- DAVOS 669, you can upload your own images at Wikimedia commons. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:23, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
and how long will it take for this account to appear on google
Can you upload music using Wikipedia DAVOS 669 (talk) 20:18, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- DAVOS 669, the account won't necessarily appear on Google. What you need to do is create a draft article following the steps at Our article wizard. However, from what I can see your music group "DAVOS" is not notable for Wikipedia. For it to be notable, it needs to have been talked about in several independent and reliable sources (see our notability guideline for more information). Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:22, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Merca City
Hi there,
1) Here is the Information ref regarding City of Merca Population, (@Dreamy Jazz:) , It's the Fifth Biggest City population wise.
2) Merca Is the Capital City of Lower Shabella Region :
Here are the Reference and will add more soon with ref too
Thank you very Much Cheers ! Capital City Merca (talk) 21:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
References
- @Capital City Merca: Hello. You can add back the material as long as you place the citations in with the information. You can learn how to do this by looking at Our introduction on how to add references. If you have any more questions or are unsure how to do this after looking at the guide, don't be afraid to ask me. Happy editing, Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 22:13, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Firo Solutions
Hey, i think this company is very innovative and are doing unique things, therefor i believe they should have a article on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firoarticle (talk • contribs)
- @Firoarticle: Hello. You need to find independent and reliable sources (e.g. news reports from newspapers not connected to the company). Just sourcing the company in question (Firo solutions) is not enough and your draft won't be accepted until you add these sources. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 10:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
alright, thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firoarticle (talk • contribs) 10:59, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Firoarticle: Please respond to the message I have left on your talk page. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 11:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
uchi no maid
the japanese source cited for uza maid outright has it as monthly action so im not sure what source im meant to be adding...? ann got it wrong for whatever reason (see further http://uzamaid.com/books.html, or just the japanese wikipedia page really). 82.14.209.237 (talk) 19:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- It says in the source that it is
Manga Action
. The source you provided above I could not translate, but could not see anything resemblingmonthly action
. Please find a source to counteract this, which is used to support it. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)- But the line in the Comic Natalie article reads "8月25日発売の月刊アクション10月号(双葉社)では [...] 中村カンコ「うちのメイドがウザすぎる!」の連載が始動する。", with 月刊アクション being Gekkan Action/Monthly Action? There's no mention of it being published in Manga Action (漫画アクション), which is a different bi-monthly magazine, at all (and the same is true on the website I linked). 82.14.209.237 (talk) 20:13, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
It is literally in the text of the page. Use control and F to search forDreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:15, 22 April 2019 (UTC)漫画アクション
on [1] and it is there.- Ah i misread it. I see what you mean. Ignore above. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing it and talking with me on my talk page about it. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:17, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- I have reinstated your edit. Thanks and happy editing, Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:19, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing it and talking with me on my talk page about it. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:17, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Ah i misread it. I see what you mean. Ignore above. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- But the line in the Comic Natalie article reads "8月25日発売の月刊アクション10月号(双葉社)では [...] 中村カンコ「うちのメイドがウザすぎる!」の連載が始動する。", with 月刊アクション being Gekkan Action/Monthly Action? There's no mention of it being published in Manga Action (漫画アクション), which is a different bi-monthly magazine, at all (and the same is true on the website I linked). 82.14.209.237 (talk) 20:13, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kofi Mole Post
Hi,
I was notified that you rejected a post I created for Kofi Mole.
Please let me know what it is that needs to be worked on or changed ?
Best Regards, Aminu Yunusah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aminuben (talk • contribs) 23:13, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Daniel_Kobe_Ricks_Jr#23_April_2019 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- ToBeFree, thanks for opening. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 09:47, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Please review my article
Hello, thank you for your effort and time that you have with my article about Jakub Tencl. I have made a change according to your instructions. Also, I have tried to add a bit more information so the neutrality could be met. Can you please review this article once again? --DanDvo (talk) 05:41, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- DanDvo, unfortunately there are not many independent references in the draft. It would be good if you could find more. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 09:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment. Unfortunately I am bit cunfused what exactly do you mean. As I understood I need to remove all references on independent articles, is that correct? By the way have you noticed external links with intedependent articles?--DanDvo (talk) 13:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)