User:DGG/appreciation received

nice things, with pictures

Socratic Barnstar

		The Socratic Barnstar
		You sir are very wise and raise excellent points.[1][2] Your appeal to Mill's maxim is particularly insightful and apt, while demonstrating your actual understanding of the referenced material. For example, you properly (but not in accordance with popular convention) refer to it as a "liberal" maxim. It would be a great help if people were more familiar with the intellectual ground already tread regarding many concepts and governance issues we address. Vassyana (talk)

Guidance Barnstar

		The Guidance Barnstar
		For providing intelligent and thoughtful guidance to the Wikipedia community! Ecoleetage (talk) 16:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Running Man Barnstar

		The Running Man Barnstar
		For fair support Kay Körner 20:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Invisible Barnstar

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Thank you for your continued work and assistance on Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles, referencing and generally cleaning up articles that have needed attention for a long time. Your good work goes unseen unless someone disagrees ;) Jeepday (talk) 13:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar of Diligence

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		I hereby award you this Barnstar of Diligence for your extraordinary contributions to the AfD process, whither the D be speedy or slow! Dreadstar † 06:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

DGG was inducted into The Hall of The Greats

much appreciated. I understand the significance. DGG (talk) 21:11, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes, you are our prize fighter against deletionists, a blood sport that rivals mixed martial arts. Not to mention all the work you do on sources, improvements, references, the list goes on and on and on.... Thank you, DGG The Great. --David Shankbone 20:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Thanks for showing polite patience... sometimes I get carried away Roscoestl (talk) 02:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

CPR Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Recovery
		For your dedication in trying to salvage otherwise-deletable articles, you are awarded the Barnstar of Recovery. --Nlu (talk) 08:22, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

The Working Man's Barnstar

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For your consistently well-thought out and tireless contributions to the discussion aspect of WP:AFD, I bestow you with The Working Man's Barnstar. You deserve it. SorryGuy Talk 03:04, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Tireless Contributor Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Even though we have conflicting viewpoints on articles (e.g. Turuaga DRV), I think you're an exemplary editor and should be an example for the more disruptive inclusionists on Wikipedia - you're proof that you can have such a strong viewpoint without being disruptive or cantankerous. (also given to LGRDC, because I enjoy discourse with both of you) Sceptre ^(talk) 01:54, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Invisible Barnstar

New Focus at Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Thank you for your continued work and assistance on Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles, referencing and generally cleaning up articles that have needed attention for a long time. Your good work goes unseen unless someone disagrees ;) Jeepday (talk) 11:58, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

The Mensch's Barnstar

I was ferreting around for a Defender of the Wiki award, but stumbled over this one which looked nicer. I was always impressed at what a succinct and cool word mensch was, which has no real less-than-a-bunch-of-polysyllabic-adjectives-equivalent in (gentile) english :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

		The Mensch's Barnstar
		To DGG for being a mensch (what else), being there at AfD and always arguing sensibly and maturity, and without a skerrick of flippancy, which can be hard...and for telling it like it is at times. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Original Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Although we fundamentally disagree in many respects about content criteria, I find it impossible to have anything less then the greatest respect for your work and contributions Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:43, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For giving expert advice on how to improve ones' work. Thank you. LAZZO (talk) 03:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar

		What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar
		For User:DGG/LR. Hope to find that on WP:RS soon. (Maybe I'll put it there myself.) ScienceApologist (talk) 20:43, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

The Special Barnstar

		The Special Barnstar
		For making Wikipedia grow, be reliable, and professional by sharing his experienced knowledge. For working tirelessly in benefit of human kind. For not looking down at unexperienced editors, and giving them the same importance and sharing his knowledge with them getting nothing in return. For enforcing neutrality and fairness. --03:34, 23 March 2008 (UTC)Sebastian Palacios (talk)

Editors Barnstar

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For general good work at WP:AFD. Stifle (talk) 09:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Article Rescue Barnstar

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		For declining speedies on articles i deemed beyond saving, and at the same time improving those articles so that they meet the guidelines, i award you this little shiny :) Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 17:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Random Acts of Kindness

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		DGG you are one the best Wikipedians .I have came across despite differences in standards and even opinion you have been a true gentleman,helpful,kind and very good human being. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:05, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Diligence

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		I've noticed many of your valuable contributions to discussions on WP and wish to acknowledge your community service. Johnfos (talk) 04:05, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Well said

		The Wiki Wiffle Bat
		For the most clear-headed statement I've read on Wikipedia in a long time, I award you a wifflebat in thanks. Nealparr ^{(talk to me)} 06:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Regarding [3], well said. --Nealparr ^{(talk to me)} 06:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

X clamation point has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! '
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Here's an image and some sentiment

		The Barnstar of Integrity
		Not just because of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Schlund (3rd nomination) but because DGG is an editor who holds to a very strong sense of ideals and acts accordingly. You may not always agree with DGG, hell, you may not even like DGG sometimes, but you always respect DGG, because he is someone with personal integrity. For me, Wikipedia is a better place because of DGG. Hiding T 12:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Well said, and seconded : ) - jc37 12:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Islamic Barnstar

		The Islamic Barnstar
		for all you have done, thankyou 124.178.43.53 (talk) 10:30, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Sunday

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		You definitely deserve this :P Meetare Shappy ^Cunkelfratz! 23:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Happy DGG's Day!

DGG has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as DGG's day!
For being one of our more sensible, clueful users,
enjoy being the Star of the day, DGG!

Cheers,
bibliomaniac 1 5
03:36, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

If you'd like to show off your awesomeness, you can use this userbox.

It's about time! ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Not that you need it...

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Every time I post a note on RSN, it is DGG who gives the most informative, thoughtful, helpful and context-providing comments. I believe that this is because he is actually a robot, the perfect machine of editing and reliable-source-noticeboarding, built by genius aliens to help make the world a better place by helping wikipedia not suck. But I have no citation, so please forgive my original research and accept this barnstar in spite of my obvious insanity. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 13:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Awesome Wikipedia Dayn

DGG/appreciation received's Day!

User:DGG/appreciation received has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as DGG/appreciation received's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear DGG/appreciation received!

Peace,
Rlevse
~

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Mazel tov! Bearian (talk) 00:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Can I chime in? Gefeliciteerd! Drmies (talk) 02:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Much deserved! --ThaddeusB (talk) 05:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Congrats DCG... Keep up the good work :) -- Tinu Cherian - 09:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Happy your day !!!! Pohick2 (talk) 17:44, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Rescue

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		For tirelessly rescuing articles from deletion discussions. Also, for giving me a new outlook on how to view inclusions/deletions. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 16:04, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Great userpage

		The Excellent User Page Award
		I just want to say that I greatly enjoyed reading your userpage - probably because so much of it is both true and in need of saying. Thanks, Ben Aveling 08:45, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Name dropped in an off-wiki article

Ribbon 1 • Ribbon 2

DGG here is a little sun to help brighten your day. LA @ 05:11, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Dear DGG...I was reading Where oh where has my trivia section gone? which lead me to "Should Wikipedia include trivia?" which lead me to "The Charms of Wikipedia" where Nicholson Baker dropped your user name in the final section of that article. I just thought you might like to know. Have a nice day! LA @ 20:12, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

I am much less patient now. Some of the above messages about failed compromises at fiction and the challenged compromise high schools may give some idea of why. DGG (talk) 23:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Keep up the good work. Bearian (talk) 23:55, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Well, it seems the high schools compromise still holds. DGG (talk) 06:06, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar
		For taking your time and rewriting copyright violations at Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. Your work there is noted and much appreciated! The leftorium 20:23, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar notice

		The Socratic Barnstar
		I shall have to award you a barnstar for this comment, aptly pointing out how to many, consensus means "everybody who is correct". Stifle (talk) 09:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Also, have you read User:MZMcBride/Memes? Stifle (talk) 09:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar s

		The Original Barnstar
		For being consistently active in all sorts of deletion discussions, and keeping an entire segment of Wikipedia running smoothly, even if we don't always agree. Keep it up! –Juliancolton \| ^Talk 05:10, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

		The Discussion Barnstar
		Awarded to DGG for calm discussion to try to resolve a policy and practical matter and bringing up astute observations to help others have a deeper understanding of Wikipedia Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 02:15, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Fruit

Happy newish year, DGG, from your evil deletionist nemesis, mwahaha. Hoary (talk) 01:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

how to help

moved from user:ikip.

You will help much more by adding at least one source and removing the tag, than by being provocative. Don't behave like the opposition. DGG ( talk ) 10:24, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

The Socratic Barnstar

The Socratic Barnstar is awarded to those editors who are extremely skilled and eloquent in their arguments.

This barnstar is awarded to DGG. Thank you for the excellent advice. More than any other editor on wikipedia, everytime you give me advice, it gives me serious pause.

I know it annoys you that I quote you so much, but it is because you have such a talent of eloquently expressing the root and essence of any given situation, in a way that in four years, I have never seen another editor on Wikipedia be able to do.

I am not the first nor the last editor to remind you of this incredible gift you have, but I among the most grateful. Thank you for being such a guiding star for so many editors in this project. Ikip ^{Frank Andersson (45 revisions restored):}_{an olympic medallist for f**k's sake} 16:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Special Rescue Award for saving from AFD the Albanian participants in the Declaration of Independence of Albania

		The Rescue from Deletion Barnstar
		I, Sulmues, award DGG with this star for saving Rexhep Demi Azis Tahir Ajdonati, Veli Gërra, Jakup Veseli, Zenel bej Begolli, Dervish bej Ipeku, Hajdin bej Draga, Bedri bej Ipeku, Dhimitër Zografi, Zyhdi Efendi Vlora, and Taq Tutulani from AFD. Since the AFD went well, all these articles are to be considered as if you owned them...Thank you for your helping Wikipedia be a better place!-- sulmues> (talk)--Sulmues 15:17, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Peace and love

Socratic Barnstar

		The Socratic Barnstar
		This edit, particularly the last two paragraphs, is brilliant and I felt obliged to applad it. Reyk _YO! 07:30, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

prods

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		For your wonderful work sourcing prodded articles such as Brian Roberson Ϣere SpielChequers 05:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Something for you

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is for finding a reference for Al-Sulaim. Sincerely, your friend, GeorgeLouis (talk) 15:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

User Page Barnstar

		The Excellent User Page Award
		For enriching Wikipedia by maintaining over half a meg of unarchived wisdom on your talk page, stretching back over two years and covering 282 separate conversations, and by thereby giving potential commenters time to carefully consider and improve their proposed remarks and develop the virtue of patience while they wait for the page to load. DustFormsWords (talk) 01:04, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

The Barnstar of Integrity

		The Barnstar of Integrity
		Thank you for your good work and you surely deserve this honor. IQinn (talk) 06:08, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Imersion has given you a cupcake! Cupcakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cupcake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Great comment in the Ideal .. DRV. Hope you like cupcakes! I was goign o say you are a courageous guy, but then I read your position paper on POV. Very thoughtful!^†

A bowl of strawberries for you!

For your extensive digging at D. C. Reddy. I did checked for sources and all I could find was this. You deserve this Solomon7968 18:41, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

An apple pie for you!

Happy 4th of July to our fave scholar! FeydHuxtable (talk) 10:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For being one of the wisest thinkers on wikipedia in regards to content development and assessing notability. You don't strike me as the sort who cares about barnstars but what the heck, your presence on here is big, I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks that. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks for your encouraging words, even when I messed up! jsfouche ☽☾Talk 01:41, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

Thank you for letting it stay;) Well,i have already been criticized by some that i categorize cemeteries/burial grounds by religion/denomination but it really helps people who are interested in genealogy,as most of the time the religious affiliation is related to ethnicity (Baltic Germans=Lutheran,Russians=Orthodox etc.) Most of those cemeteries in the West are non-denominational/non-sectarian or multi-confessional today but that was not the case before the WWII Evangelidis (talk) 18:11, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		Thanks for your efforts to preserve articles about notable topics. Northamerica1000 (talk) 13:47, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

That was a nice thing you did

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For taking the time and trouble to explain to Frwrldpce why his articles were deleted. Many reviewing admins would just have hit the delete button and been done with it, but you went the extra mile. Yunshui (talk) 20:53, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	For finding a way to clearly and concisely explain what was to some invisible and to others so obvious that they couldn't find the words on Wikipedia_talk:Civility. causa sui (talk) 21:29, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

A beer for you

Thankyou for participating in my request for adminship. Now I've got lots of extra buttons to try and avoid pressing by mistake... Redrose64 (talk) 16:04, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Dude, You Rock

Thanks for the kind, helpful info about "speedy deletion". I can get refs in the page in 9 days... over this weekend. YOU ROCK!! :D Thanks again, WinkJunior (talk) 23:17, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

2012

A barnstar for you!

	The Real Life Barnstar
	Thank you for all your positive comments, constructive criticism, and leadership at WP:NYC this weekend. Bearian (talk) 02:38, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Hello DGG, I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian. SwisterTwister talk 06:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for your help! It's been a looooong time since I did New Page Patrol and it's clear I need to review a few things. Rob Banzai (talk) 01:55, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		The Schools Barnstar
		Thanks for your assistance at the Mudd Library Edit-a-thon!Undead q 14:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Beer On Me

		A beer on me!
		Thanks for your prudent and speedy assistance in improving the project! — *Keithbob* • Talk • 21:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks a bunch for reviewing the Article on A2Z Group. Do you have any suggestions for improvement? Any areas that needs to be expanded? by William Emmanual | Send me a Message 05:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Thanks for your involvement with 5 base yoga - You have tipped the issue from a problem to a solution! BO; talk 01:46, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

A cute kitten for you sir!

Just wanna thank you sir for being unbiased and allowing my page (List of telenovelas of GMA Network) to exist. Again, thank you, sir and God bless:)

Doubledutch781 (talk) 02:40, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations

		100000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that very few editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

This user has earned the
100,000 Edits Award.

```Buster Seven Talk 13:17, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

unfortunately, not as impressive as it might seem, considering that 10 or 20% of them are just to correct my own typos. DGG ( talk ) 03:43, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your help with the Stevens Institute of Technology article. Another editor came in at the end when you get tied up, but your feedback throughout was critical to the structuring of the page. I learned a lot about proper writing and editing from your feedback, and I really appreciate your help and guidance. QueenCity11 (talk) 21:15, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For your ongoing work at deleting spam and resumes. Bearian (talk) 18:57, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you! =

	The Civility Barnstar
	For your comments at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Geo_Swan_and_AfDs. Bearian (talk) 00:20, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Great stuff on your user page! I've never really seen another user go so in-depth into his philosophies and thoughts on WP as yours does. :)

Arjun G. Menon (talk · mail) 11:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hey David! This barnstar isn't for anything specific, it's just to say that I appreciate your hard work, thoughtful approach, and consistent sincerity all over Wikipedia in general, and with the education program in particular. Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 14:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For you extra work on Lutsk National Technical University, rather than just deleting it. Mdann52 (talk) 15:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

For being one of my WikiRoleModels. I have been watching your edits for a very long time, and without getting too touchy-feely, I thought it was time to let you know that. Many times when I have been frustrated or faced with a hard decision, I have had the thought "WWDGGD?"...so thank you for that. You've been there for me even when you weren't aware of it. Be well, DGG. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 23:52, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

2013

A starbarn for you!

		The da Vinci Barnstar
		Superb maintenance of your own talk page archives! Tito Dutta (talk) 05:17, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

#smwwiki panel

		The Real Life Barnstar
		Thanks again for appearing on the discussion panel at Social Media Week NYC; it was a great conversation and I'm glad you were part of it! WWB Too (Talk · COI) 13:00, 26 February 2013 (UTC

Some baklava for you!

I am fresh out of wiki kittens; please accept this cake as a thank you for your support, kind words and thoughtful comments during my (now withdrawn) RfA. What doesn't kill me... Cheers, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Some falafel for you!

Thanks for your Guide lines for Islamic Azad University Khorasgan Branch. I will try again. Please check it soon Mehrnazar (talk) 08:15, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

A beer for you!

You made a very appropriate edit on 23:49, 5 November 2011‎ on the Mankind Project article--you removed a lenthy addition that was, as you noted, quite promotional in nature. I've been a member of MKP for 12+ years and credit the organization with helping me transform my life in many positive ways. However, puffery has no place for an organization that emphasizes Integrity and Authenticity. Cheers!

Mark

P.S. If you don't imbibe in alcoholic beverages, a fine tea or exotic coffee will be offered. :0) Mark D Worthen PsyD 09:08, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Precious

keep articles
Thank you for your efforts to keep articles, such as this piece of culture, for your love of libraries, for sharing resources, and for your thoughts on elucidating, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (25 April 2009, 25 June 2009)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:54, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Barnstar

		Wikipedia Ambassador Barnstar
		For your extensive efforts both as an Ambassador and in other capacities on Wikipedia, I award you this barnstar. You and I do not always agree on specific matters, but your qualities of humility and devotion are admirable and I am thankful for your contributions. Neelix (talk) 14:39, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	For your great work on Jack Ernest Vincent!. :) – →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 05:34, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	thank u 3bdulelah (talk) 07:05, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

This Barnstar is for showing the right path. Sourov0000 (talk) 00:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

There is some discussion about whether your cookies got deleted so I thought I should offer a replacement. :-) Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:43, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	I award the Special Barnstar to DGG for giving an exceptionally detailed answer on Talk:Cossack Research Center regards to titling. RainCity471^{report my errors}_{list of failures} 18:41, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	The mensch barnstar. For listening, although my idea is doomed I know. Fondest regards to you and yours. Irondome (talk) 03:13, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Many thanks for your thorough work on my AfD candidates above. Cheers! — Keithbob • Talk • 07:38, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

From London

2014

Please add this to your collection.

		The Original Barnstar
		The original barnstar. The one for old-school Wikipedians who defend the traditional values. I look up to you, and aspire one day to be as good as you. Guy (Help!) 01:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

I am fresh out of wiki kittens; please accept this cake as a thank you for your support, kind words and thoughtful comments during my (now withdrawn) RfA. What doesn't kill me... Cheers, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Nice job at Colonial Properties.

Bearian (talk) 22:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Your hard work is seen and appreciated, for many years now. Thanks, David, for sticking it out: may you never retire, for our sake. Drmies (talk) 14:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Just wanted to thank you for your efforts at WP:AfC. Your comments have helped expedite the reviewing process and lend clarity to the promise of the submissions. Cheers! — MusikAnimal ^talk 19:57, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

...And if you don't drink I'll gladly offer you a cup of tea or brownie in instead :) — MusikAnimal ^talk 19:58, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

thanks. Brownies are better than tea, but beer is better yet. DGG ( talk ) 03:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Good catch at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Alexander (lawyer). Bearian (talk) 19:29, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Precious again

keep articles
Thank you for your efforts to keep articles, such as this piece of culture, for your love of libraries, for sharing resources, and for your thoughts on elucidating, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (25 April 2009, 25 June 2009)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:54, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 453 recipient of my Pumpkin Sky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:40, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Thanks for your help in closing the discussion held at "Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Bird common name decapitalisation". Coreyemotela (talk) 09:43, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

\

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	"It's easier to do it than explain it, so I'm going to revise & accept the article" --- more people should do this more often. Much more often! (Though I hope that you're going to watchlist it afterwards as well.) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For the many helpful, informed comments on deletion debates, AfC drafts and other matters. —Tom Morris (talk) 06:45, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you.

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For tireless devotion to temporarily restoring articles being considered at deletion review -- RoySmith (talk) 15:30, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks for your help! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:45, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Du erhältst einen Orden!

	Der Gute-Laune-Orden
	I liked your sorta quick and dirty approach on the Saturday Night special ;) Serten (talk) 17:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

solid, 2007 to 2014

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar

Thanks, really, for your longterm solid participation in wikipedia, including in generally under-appreciated support area contributions. I found myself "thanking" you for a recent AFC action, and i realized i still appreciate your really decent comment in an AFD long ago. Your comment was positive about a topic that I had worked on, but especially struck me as professional and was helpful in allowing me to see that Wikipedia can be a decent place. That editorial processes can work and have reason prevail, even amidst the crazy randomness of an environment where "anyone can edit". That was in 2007 when i was just getting started, and it made a difference. Thanks! --do ncr am 14:32, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Articles for Creation barnstar
		This is for your considered contributions to the process, all of which are delivered well. I do not always agree with you but I appreciate your voice and actions. Fiddle Faddle 18:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Congrats on winning the Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2014. Bearian (talk) 20:41, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Ditto! --EEMIV (talk) 18:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for an amusing article. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

thanks; but which? DGG ( talk ) 22:52, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

2015

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your tireless new page patrolling. Esquivalience ^t 02:30, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

For all the abuse you are getting at AfD.

Bearian (talk) 20:46, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

For the last year or two I have been deliberately trying to stretch deletion process a little in both directions, to see if consensus is changing. To keep things responsive, somebody's got to, and better me than someone with a coi. DGG ( talk ) 22:18, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thanks for reverting a Speedy at Make It Cheaper, which obviously deserved to be fully considered. I wish more Administrators were as rational. Yours sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 05:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

2016

Some dim sum for you!

Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thanks David. All appreciation and for guidance. Light2021 (talk) 20:46, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

nice things, without pictures

Has this account been compromised ?

Evidence: You just agreed with me. This is unprecendented. Please relinquish control of this account to the real DGG immediately. Someguy1221 00:24, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

if you'll look at my deletion log, you'll see my dark side shows itself itself every day, generally when I start editing. After I get that expressed, I go on in the way you normally think of me. DGG (talk) 01:14, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Not only did he agree with me earlier today, he even voted 'Delete' on an AfD (admittedly on one of Billy's articles, but even so...). I agree this pattern of events is most peculiar and warrants a full investigation. — iridescent 01:20, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:AN post about you

Sorry on behalf of all involved for not notifying you, that was a terrible oversight on all of our parts. If it helps, the conversation, as you likely read, focused not on you but rather on Zscout's block of the editor(vandal?) who complained about you. Good luck with your vandals...--CastAStone /^/(talk) 17:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry I missed this [4] as I was out of town and off line. Bearian (talk) 20:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Ha

Ever been accused of being a deletionist before?--Kubigula (talk) 06:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

See [5]. And once or twice before. Makes my day each time, as the saying goes. DGG (talk) 06:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

"Hive mentality"? That's a good one. I'll have to remember that. 0:) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 06:47, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

That is priceless. Both the accusation and the phrase. You must be doing something right, David. Thanks Kubigula, that made my day also. — Becksguy (talk) 01:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Namecheck

Don't know if you've already been alerted to this? Go and search the text for DGG. Kudos! Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 17:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

You are famous

(Kim Dent-Brown mentioned this above, a little cryptically, on 29 February 2008)
See here, if you have not seen it already.--Filll (talk) 23:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Nice ! --Hu12 (talk) 00:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

No fair! I want my own newspaper article mention. :-) Carcharoth (talk) 00:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Just vandalize the Signpost.--Father Goose (talk) 10:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations

You were mentioned in a book review here Congratulations on it and id like to give you a barnstar but i belive you are the first editor to recive the honor of being in a book review. so id like you to make one........ get back to work now Rankun (talk) 22:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

I hope you don't let all this fame go to your head DGG :) --Pixelface (talk) 08:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Fame

seen your NY Book Review usernamecheck? Near the bottom. Johnbod (talk) 18:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Old news I see! Why are they online a three weerks before the publication date, i wonder? Better than another barnstar anyway. I'm incredibly patient too, & hope to see something on the Master of the Playing Cards one day! Johnbod (talk) 20:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

You've been invoked

In the New York Review of Books, no less: Nicholson Baker mentions you as a "patient librarian". Cheers! Her Pegship (tis herself) 03:48, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Funny that among librarians I am considered to have a noticeable lack of patience -- guess it depends on the surrounding environment. (smile) DGG (talk) 03:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

"Webisodes" and the like

Nice to see we can occasionally agree on something! --Orange Mike | Talk 17:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Challenge Award - fame at last? =

Have you seen the mention you got in Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Science/Newsletter/May 2008? :-) Carcharoth (talk) 23:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I was just about to mention this. Thanks for starting Gunther Stent!--ragesoss (talk) 00:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Since he was my advisor, I sort of felt guiltt not having done it.DGG (talk) 00:33, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Shameless theft

Hi I have quoted you on my user page. It is attributed, but please remove it if you'd rather it were not there. pablo_hablo. 15:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

thanks for noticing it ! DGG (talk) 17:14, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

It's been there a while, I've only just got round to confessing! It just seemed to succinctly sum up a way forward away from all the

"You have no standards"
"Well you would say that because you want to delete everything"
"Inclusionist!"
"Deletonist!"

rubbish that forms so much of too many talk pages. Mind you, I won't be arguing in favour of articles about 10lb hammer's toes, left, right or hammer any time soon. pablo_hablo. 19:34, 21 May 2009 (UTC) (with respect to: "Until we have AI, we need to use ours —DGG, discussing how to use Google intelligently")

Appreciation

Just a note of gratitude for the fine work you do, as exemplified in your post at WP:EL#Shmoop, and many many elsewheres. You deserve a herd of barnstars, and much emulation. Thanks, repeatedly. -- Quiddity (talk) 06:43, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Superiority Complex?

Instead of going around Wp tagging pages as "may be not notable" in some sort of superior way, why not put some effort in and improve the articles yourself? Albatross2147 (talk) 02:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

there are 2000 articles a day submitted to Wikipedia. About 1/2 are totally unacceptable. Of the other 1/2, probably about 200 need major improvements. I try to fix up one or two a day. "may not be notable" means that someone has some reason to doubt it. I will add such a tag if , for example, another editor has placed a tag for deletion as hopelessly non-notable, and I don't think its quite as bad as that. But what article or discussion are you referring to--we usually don't work in the same areas, so I'm a little puzzled? DGG (talk) 02:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

AH-HA!!! You're obviously one of them-there evialllllll deletionists, DGG! --Orange Mike | Talk 21:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

And see above , the section "Ha." That's why I haven't archived this: I want to display my credentials. DGG (talk) 21:46, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

YouR my hero

I am so impressed with your work on wikipedia. Your thoughtful contributions have been showing up everywhere. The way you carry yourself in conversations is inspiring. It is no wonder that Colonel Warden recently called you a "model of intelligent and discriminating inclusionism...quite influential in forming policy". Thank you. travb (talk) 01:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Extinct editors

this must be one of the funniest AfD comments I ever came across! Owen× ☎ 16:35, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Too long, but you read it anyway

Thank you for your very courteous comment of support at WP:RFC/PAID#Statement by TheGrappler. It's extremely reassuring to find that somebody actually spent the time to read through the "tldr" section, cogitated upon it, and found it worthy of comment (and indeed praise, though for the time I invested in writing it, I would have been pleased even to receive a criticism!). Rather like you, I'm a reasonable person with a studiously considered (but hopefully open-minded) approach to Wikipedia; unfortunately I'm not so good at expressing that approach concisely! I've long admired your tactful and intelligent contributions, so your words were especially appreciated. Regards, TheGrappler (talk) 00:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

I want to thank you. In the past week, several people had an opportunity to show the true content of their character. Your conduct was an inspiration. When several others were loosing their heads, you conducted yourself with the highest standard of integrity and dignity.Dave (talk) 03:25, 11 July 2009 (UTC) P.S. I'm well aware that among the chaos were some legitimate issues. Rest assured I will do my best to fix them.

Kudos

I just wanted to compliment you on your tact. Good form! — Ched : ? 02:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, and glad it is already resolved. Best, --A Nobody^{My talk} 05:51, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

You probably know about it

But in case you don't: last "briefly" mention here: Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-10-26/In the news. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 16:23, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Well done

Well stated (and reasoned). //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 00:44, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

I created resource room, and appreciate your help in making sure it wasn't deleted by a newbie who seems to be trigger happy (a self-described "deletionist"). Also, I did read your note on the fact that it needs to be expanded, but I am new to this, and want to make sure it is done right. Just when I lose my faith in this site, a person like you comes and makes sure good articles stay!

Jim Steele (talk) 19:18, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

It is messages like your's that help me keep my own faith that my work here is worth the effort it takes. DGG ( talk ) 20:15, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

A note

Hi David. I haven't had many occasions to interact with you of late, but I wanted to express my appreciation for your good work on the encyclopedia. Take care and enjoy your holidays. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:52, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year David. I've been reminded of your outstanding contributions to the encyclopedia building effort over the last few days in coming across several of your insightful comments. Thank you very much for your good works. I hope you have a very healthy and happy 2010 ...and beyond. If you're able to go easy on the doughnuts and bacon, (and stay out of the political tussles) I'm sure you'll be fine! :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:30, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Appreciation

Thanks for your fantastic contributions. I'm truly impressed by your remarkable stamina. You are a great source of inspiration, I'm unlikely to be the only person thinking so. Power.corrupts (talk) 23:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Great comments. I am so proud to know you and to be your friend. Bearian (talk) 02:50, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

t at the afd. There's also WP:WikiProject Libraries. DGG ( talk ) 16:42, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Just a small note

Just spent a better part of an hour reading and scanning your user page, I applaud your Honesty, Sincerity, Insight and your Intelligence. I think if there were "required reading" for new editors on WP, your user page would be it. Thank You for your inspiration Mlpearc (talk) 17:51, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

No Sir just wanted to let you know how I felt after reading your page. Again Thanx 71.254.135.106 (talk) 23:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry Sir I left the aboved message without realizing I was not logged in, Sorry Mlpearc (talk) 23:24, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

2011

BLP mess

DGG, Thank you for your kind thoughts and encouragement. Maurreen (talk) 04:08, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

About: your eloquent summary of what does and does not improves this project

Hi DGG, or if I may be so bold, David,
You wrote at WP:AN/I Archive691: <block quote>There is more than one valid way of working here. Some people prefer to create only high quality articles, even though they may do very few of them. Some prefer to create many verifiable articles of clear notability even though they may not be of initially high quality. As this is a communal project, I think every individual person is fully entitled to do whichever they prefer, and the thing to do about people who prefer otherwise than oneself is to let them work their way, while you work yours. The only choice which is not productive is to argue about how to do it, rather than going ahead in the way that one finds suitable.</block quote> Many ^[who?] editors include a statement about their attitudes to editing on their user pages. I am not one of them, that is until I came across what you wrote. I would really like to include this on my user page. While I can add anything at all I like to my user page subject to WP:USER PAGE, I nevertheless ask for your permission to add the quote. OK with you? I'm fine if you decline this.
--Shirt58 (talk) 12:37, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Of course. DGG ( talk ) 21:04, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

"What DGG says"

David, that was great. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 20:03, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your help about "How to do it and avoid deletions"

Blueena (talk) 04:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Though most of the articles I've created are being proposed for deletion, it's really happy to receive your message about "how to do it and avoid deletions". The message includes many detailed suggestions and I believe it must have taken you a lot time. Once again, many thanks!

Thank you

Thank you for the effort you put into the close at WT:MOS#Bird common name capitalisation. There were a lot of words to read and to write. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike talk 03:57, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Indeed. It was a sprawling debate that'd been going on in multiple forums for so long it's hard to get a complete sense of it without a lot of reading. Thanks for putting in the time and thinking it through. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 04:00, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Hear, hear! A very generous donation of time to get your mind round a long-long-long meandering debate with loads of distractions, and very brave to tackle one where people feel so strongly. I think you did an excellent job. --Stfg (talk) 10:14, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

~~Right, you're off my Xmas card li-~~ As much as I hate the result, I appreciate with the time and effort put in to possibly one of the most detailed closing rationales I have read. Despite apparent appearances to the contrary, I do support the idea of a global Manual of Style and conformity and am content to abide by the decision. Agree with the idea of some sort of bot to enact this. Cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:28, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

I would have preferred a different outcome, but your arguments were really well-done and respectful to all positions. Kudos for you. --Enric Naval (talk) 11:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, DGG. You've put a very contentious issue to rest, and probably for good. As ever, I'm flattered when people think I'm you. --BDD (talk) 16:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

A very most excellent example of gentle mop-wielding, though I am sure that some members of the species Gallus domesticus minoris will consider that the end of the Wikipedia is nigh. Guy (Help!) 19:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Ditto, I just wanted to thank you as well although I followed the discussion from a distance (I think it had more than enough active participants). Admins can get a lot of flack but when one takes on settling such a sprawling debate, knowing that no matter what one decides, there will be some very unhappy editors, I can only say thanks. And providing such a thoughtful rationale (rather than a sentence-long decision), is admirable and helps the decision "stick"...ambiguity would have only resulted in further challenges to your decision. Instead, if individuals do want to overturn this decision, they know that the burden of providing evidence resides with those wishing to change the status quo, and there has to be a substantial case to do so. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:14, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

I am hoping that you won't need to clarify that the consensus finding doesn't only apply to birds, but you might; there's a (smaller and quieter) camp who want to always capitalize moths/butterflies and dragonflies, and another in favor of doing the same with common names of British (and I think Australian) plants. The debate may have focused on birds, but that focus should be scene as license to capitalize non-bird species common names. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 08:39, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Well Written

Thanks for the strong and well written argument on Kovesdy discussion. --S.Buntout123 (talk) 04:28, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

RFA

Many thanks! Giant Snowman 20:18, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!

For cleaning up City University of Seattle! Your editing expertise is much appreciated and respected by this lowly Huggle jockey. Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 00:12, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

I have just begun. DGG ( talk ) 03:43, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

"What DGG says"

David, that was great. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 20:03, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

It is good to know that my efforts have been noticed... particularly by a user who, when I see his user names on edits and efforts, I have come to simply assume that something necessary was being done properly. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:43, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Your ANI comment

"the problem will settle itself": that's the kind of thing my father used to say. I don't know how often he was right about that, but given that today is the third anniversary of his death I find those words extra striking. So often your comments are like oil on turbulent water, DGG: keep it up, in good health. Drmies (talk) 05:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

2014

Hey!

Hi, David,
It was a pleasure to meet you, face-to-face, and hear your presentation. Are your slides posted on the Wikiconference page? I'm really interested in the stats you shared about the state of AfC in 2007 vs. 2013. I think it's so important to be aware of the changes occurring on Wikipedia as it evolves over time in order to gain an accurate long-term view of where things are headed. Thanks again! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

I just saw a note that you contested the prod of the Talk:Capt. William Bull Tavern. I thank you for that! I've been going about researching different properties and making a bunch of Good Articles in the process, bringing all that I am able to find with my research to bear on these types of articles. It may be small now, but I'll likely have it at Good Article Nominations before too long. Thanks for halting the deletion of a notable and (very much historic) property, I probably would not have been able to recreate it easily if not for your action. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 21:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

general

You, DGG, are incomparable. I have seen the range and depth of issues that you contend with, everything from Wikipedia-as-performance-art-NOT, to reining in the young lady who was using Wikipedia to write her autobiography, viz. What Wikipedia is not: Facebook!!! I agree, by the way, regarding those wretched professors who assign their students to vandalize Wikipedia as part of a university-level course. I read one such account, maybe THE canonical account, as I hope there are not multiple instances of professors doing such things, in the Chronicle of Higher Education the other day. You know Magnus. the extraordinary toolserver contributor by way of German Wikipedia, correct? He is of sufficient stature as a scientist that he got his own BLP article, although his countrymen on German Wikipedia deleted it as "not notable"; the temerity of them! It wasn't as though he wrote it himself. Anyway, I noticed on his talk page, that someone was writing some pseudo-science crud article about a ladies food and health book. Remember, I am a lady, so I can say these things. Magnus has a PhD in biochemistry. So, in this message, the WP editor wanted to use a copyrighted image about the ladies food book's author, from Flickr. She asked Magnus to make the account holder on Flickr re-license the image so that she (the WP editor) could use it in her article here on WP! Can you believe that? I mention this because I noticed your civil and courteous response to the young lady's edict to you, "not to mess up" her autobiographical page about her poems. Sigh! You need the "Patience of a Saint" Barnstar. Magnus probably does too. I am so happy I ran across you, and selected others, here on WP! I wish we could all meet one day, you and Andreas and the kindly man who owns pigs and lives in Thailand, and Snowy Susan (whom I've missed), and the good CPA From L.A. and my new acquaintance, the hillbilly, and a few others that I have since triangulated with on the Twitter. We would talk and tell stories of our Wikipedia adventures and laugh and... I will stop now. Again, thank you so much, for all that you do. I wish I could too. --FeralOink (talk) 14:44, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Charleston Conference

David, I'm currently attending my first Charleston Conference. Nearly everyone I talk to here about Wikipedia mentions you. Chuck Hamaker sends his regards. Best, The Interior (Talk) 23:04, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

You just saved a WP editor

Helsinki_County_Prison. Had already given up on Wikipedia... 88.112.32.173 (talk) 06:42, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

2015

2016

2017

Request for guidance

Dear Sir, I cannot tell you how happy I am feeling by directly communicating with you. You definitely posses more understanding about WP, its policies and about editing. I will surely take your guidance as there will be need. Till this time in my editing history, I have not met any one who takes pain to explain things in so much of detail. In this whole painful process, I am happy that I got to know a person like you, from whom I can request for guidance if I am stuck up somewhere or if I think that I will get stuck up in future about that particular thing. One thing I got to know while dealing with deletion process is - if there is deletion discussion, or deletion of an article, there is no point in fighting over it at that time. If the article is really notable, someone will propose it sooner or later and the process will take care of itself. Trying to defend a particular article much aggressively is not advised, I would say. Also there is no point in trying to recreate it by the same person again. I will read more of your work and your discussions to find more guidance and will consult you as needed. Thanks a lot once again for you time to explain things in so much detail. -- Dr.Abhijeet Safai (talk) 07:30, 10 October 2017 (UTC)