User:Liz/Admin dashboard
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- 65.88.88.200 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 2603:8080:E500:11E5:9793:4829:6B16:6BC8 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Your concise reason (e.g. repeated vandalism of History of Pennsylvania). 47thPennVols (talk) 22:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Level II. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:11, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Page protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- N3al tabbonmoh anwar w mimi 6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) SPA dedicated to POV-pushing and disruptive editing [1][2] + WP:LOUTSOCKing on Battle of the Nobles[3]. Skitash (talk) 01:05, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Warned user. Next stop will likely be an indef. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Page protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- 79.155.153.252 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) WP:LOUTSOCK of N3al tabbonmoh anwar w mimi 6. Skitash (talk) 01:05, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Page protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:29, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 3 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 0 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 1 |
| Other candidates | 32 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 5 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 12 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Pronouk (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Porn" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Note on file The word "porn" is sometimes part of Thai and German names - check google for legitimate uses before blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Bambie818 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "bambi|teletubbies" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- FiltrationService (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Starcee De Blogger (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Policy224 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- AnyIdeasForAUsername? (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- HojatRahimipage (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Implied to be a single purpose account who's objective is to create a "Hojat Rahimi", "page". Only edits have been on Draft:Hojat Rahimi. Seems to meet the criteria for being a promotional username, per the caveat of the second sentence in WP:USERSTAGENAME. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:22, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Extended confirmed protection: Two reasons after Daniel Case had changed protection to auto confirmed: (1) WP:ARBEE due to Russo–Ukrainian War and (2) WP:ARBPIA under the scope of the 2023 Israel–Hamas War as evidenced here. 70.51.215.103 (talk) 03:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't put it on ECP since a) it's not directly relevant to the Israel-Hamas war, and b) while it undeniably touches on RUSUKR that is not the central focus of the article; it's considerably broader. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of original research by anonymous editor. Ken Gallager (talk) 12:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 64.223.134.136 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. From the article for one week. Daniel Case (talk) 00:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2409:4073:200B:A8F6:293C:B4C8:B5CC:BCD4 (talk) 12:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @2409:4073:200B:A8F6:293C:B4C8:B5CC:BCD4: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 00:58, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent adding either unsourced or poorly sourced material by sock hopping IP addresses. There are numerous IPs that have made edits and I'm certain one of them is the same person as they all come from Santa Cruz. In fact, a year ago I requested that page be protected because of a particular editor making similar edits.[4] Now it looks like that editor is making edits while logged out. Kcj5062 (talk) 13:57, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 181.188.160.0/19 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from article for a week}} Daniel Case (talk) 01:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing - the same user who vandalised the page with my Care Bears fan shows in the past has been vandalising the page again after the six month protection expired. Refuses to listen even after I posted a talk page post. Luigitehplumber (talk) 17:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 86.15.45.211 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 02:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High risk of IP vandalism due to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Israel-Hamas war. MagyarNavy1918 (talk) 20:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- It is not clear to me that this is a CT article. Hillel International is not protected either. Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Just created today, in any event. Daniel Case (talk) 02:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I would like to request protection for this page due to ongoing issues with persistent vandalism. Multiple anonymous or unregistered users are frequently adding and removing information, much of which is unsourced and unreliable. Despite efforts to revert these changes, the disruptive edits continue to occur at a high frequency, undermining the page's reliability and integrity.
I believe that semi-protection would help prevent further disruptions and allow for constructive, cited contributions from established editors.
Thank you for your consideration. Krishnpremi (talk) 21:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article hasn't been edited at all in six days. For disruptive edits you have to go back even further. Daniel Case (talk) 02:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Past instances of transphobic vandalism including dead-naming the Author of the webcomic 2601:586:8201:5750:39F1:DFDF:DB8C:A279 (talk) 22:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS under GENSEX. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Daniel Case: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: More disruption again ‹hamster717🐉› (discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠) 22:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Two editors have been going back and forth since June. Either this article needs a week of full protection, or some heavy warnings need to be given out. But it needs to stop. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mike Allen 22:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 22:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 23:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent Disruptive editing disruptive editing Growing persistent disruptive editing such as adding citations needed to a lead section goes against the ordermanual of style as well as removing parts of the Info on the Page fixed it so many times and IP users keep changing it users doing this as well. Disputes and disagreements keep occurring time to protection to be added.. Protection was added for 3 weeks but was removed by someone for whatever reason Mikey551415 (talk) 01:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Yes, me. I semi-protected the article yesterday; it will remain protected until the 26th. There have been minimal edits since that protection.- Also, the article had never been protected before; as for it being removed, well, three weeks is one of the options we have, so it probably just expired.
- More to the point, it sounds like you are getting confused here. Are you talking about another article? Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism and sockpuppetry. Skitash (talk) 01:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Long term edit-warring dynamic ips and inexperienced editors. --Hipal (talk) 01:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring about the number of sales Trade (talk) 01:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Empty Legacy section ThatTechGuy2008 (talk) 19:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Done I've removed that empty section. If that's not what you had in mind, please read WP:ER for instructions on how to make an edit request. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank You. ThatTechGuy2008 (talk) 20:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]
| 10 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC) |
| 16 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- SerChevalerie (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Been on Wikipedia for a few years now. Mainly created BLPs. Requesting for autopatrolled rights to reduce the backlog of new page patrollers. I declare that I've understood verifiability, notability and copyrights. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
On hold. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, the user's talk page history is back. This can now be evaluated normally. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sir MemeGod (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been an editor since 2020, but only really started ramping up my edits in February of this year. I have made 320+ pages (at least 4 of them are from redirects), 166+ of which have been in the last 6 days (as of August 29). Another user (Ryan shell) suggested that I should apply. The only major issue that my articles have had in the past was me using AI, which I have acknowledged was wrong and promised not to do it again to an administrator, who worked with me on how to properly find info for articles without using AI. Most of my articles are stubs, and I feel like they can clog up the New Pages Feed a bit. Since I know this will be brought up, of the 4 pages I have started that have been deleted, one was an April Fools joke page that I didn't realize wasn't allowed, one was from an AfD, and the other two are from the above AI issue. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC) Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([8]). — MusikBot talk 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done. The concerns from the previous decline are still a bit too recent considering this permission which essentially says that your articles don't need a second pair of eyes. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ktkvtsh (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Experienced and frequent editor. Knowledgeable in article creation and assessment. Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:10, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Ktkvtsh: Would you care to explain why you think your creation Mario Acampa was recently deleted at AfD? Additionally, could you explain how Boler's Inn passes the notability guideline for buildings? None of the three sources cited seem to have the significant coverage required to meet the guideline's standard. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- I created Mario Acampa as a translation from Italian when I first started editing. I was not fully aware of all standards and guidelines at that time.
- For Boler's Inn, I believe that it qualified due to it's listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Ktkvtsh (talk) 14:05, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. It's generally accepted that a property on the NHRP is thoroughly documented, or it wouldn't have been listed in the first place. The nomination form lists 14 sources in its Bibliography section. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:18, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'd missed WP:MAPOUTCOMES earlier. I don't have any further concerns! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:41, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. It's generally accepted that a property on the NHRP is thoroughly documented, or it wouldn't have been listed in the first place. The nomination form lists 14 sources in its Bibliography section. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:18, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. I'm concerned that a lot of your articles are very short (barely a sentence or two) and BLPs at that. I'd prefer to see some experience creating more substantial articles and fleshing out thin ones before saying that your creations don't require any input from patrollers whatsoever. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Floppykart (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Meets minimum critera, prolific article creator, with no articles ever deleted (or even nominated for deletion, AFAICT). Mach61 23:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Chaotic Enby (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Requesting autopatrolled for Chaotic Enby. Trusted user who already has NPP rights, articles are consistently well-written and well-sourced. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
File mover
[edit]- Jax MN (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I regularly upload image files, and occasionally notice typos that I would like to correct with non-controversial moves. Jax MN (talk) 21:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]
- James Allison (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been editing since 2005 with over 15,000 edits without incident. I am requesting this permission so I am able to perform round robin moves when necessary. I am also open to assisting at WP:RM. James (talk/contribs) 21:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- @James Allison: I'm not seeing any problems, but you don't really have a lot of recent activity regarding moves. Do you expect to get much use out of this permission? Elli (talk | contribs) 19:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- ZeetBaralWiki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! I have read Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes. I want to become a pending changes reviewer. ZeetBaralWiki 15:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose...has weak grasp of copyright/license, verifiability, and MOS. We're only a week-ish out from their block for contradicting citing sources and copy-pasting from AI. DMacks (talk) 18:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Jy Sandford (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I edit AusPol pages, and I'd like to be able to approve edits made to them :) No stress if I need more of a track record of edits - I totally understand. Jy Sandford (talk) 23:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- ZeetBaralWiki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! I request for the permission - Rollback. ZeetBaralWiki 15:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Vasil3fonov (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello to anyone concerned.
I am requesting rollbacker rights, having done so before without the knowledge of having to warn users after undoing their edits, and I believe I now have a substantial track record of doing so ever since promising to fulfill that role. I now also have a good idea of how to use tools such as Twinkle effectively, which have greatly helped my work against vandalism.
Thanks for taking your time to read my request. Best regards, Vasil3fonov (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([9]). — MusikBot talk 17:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- OhHaiMark (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I believe I'm experienced enough to have this right. OhHaiMark (talk) 21:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links