User talk:Clive sweeting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Clive sweeting, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Deb 16:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

Please wikify[edit]

Dear editor, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for your recent contributions. I would like to ask you, however, to format your new articles according to Wikipedia style and include links to other articles in your new additions. Also, you might want to add stub tags to smaller articles, making it easier for other editors to find and improve your new additions. Happy editing! ---Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 12:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome![edit]

Welcome! I noticed your comment on Saint Caesarius of Arles. Many of Wikipedia articles are taken without much updating from much older encyclopedias. Sometimes that means that they are actually very outdated. I always take any article which says that it was taken from the Catholic Encyclopedia or the 1911 Encyclopedia Brittanica (sp) with a very large grain of salt, especially if it hasn't been edited much by other people. If you have the resources and will to fix up such articles, you are encouraged to. Frankly, I find these articles to be very frustrating, since sometimes they contain very outdated information, and information which is presented as fact which is little better than myth. You'd be helping Wikipedia and other curious people if you could update articles. I hope you enjoy your time here, and feel free to ask me any questions you might have. Mak (talk) 18:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

R G C Levens[edit]

You have recently re-created the article R G C Levens, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. --stephenw32768<talk> 19:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

SEERI[edit]

SEERI has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this organization or company might not yet be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 06:16, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Instructions to nominate an article for review. ~ trialsanderrors 20:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Charles Dowsett[edit]

I came across this article while Wikifying today, and saw your comments on the talk page about notability. I didn't put the notability tag on this article, but my guess is that it's there because the article is extremely short (only two sentences) and not referenced. If you have more material on the subject, please add it (and cite your sources). RedRollerskate 05:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

P g westlake[edit]

A tag has been placed on P g westlake, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ArglebargleIV 19:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Before attempting to recreate this page I should be grateful to know where the earlier article has gone----Clive Sweeting Ps A restored and slightly increased article has been deleted without any apparent reason being given or a discussion of suitability----Clive Sweeting


Little context in Bishop of Raphoe[edit]

Information icon.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bishop of Raphoe, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bishop of Raphoe is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bishop of Raphoe, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:02, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

A request[edit]

Clive, can you take a look at Wikipedia style? The additions you're making to Bishop of Raphoe and other articls are useful, but it would also help if you could format your text so that it fits with the style of the article and Wikipedia editing standards -- thanks!!! -- ArglebargleIV 11:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Gwynno james[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

A tag has been placed on Gwynno james requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. αѕєηιηє t/c 14:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Gwynno james[edit]

I have nominated Gwynno james, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gwynno james. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. αѕєηιηє t/c 16:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of John Morgan (bishop)[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

A tag has been placed on John Morgan (bishop) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ziggy Sawdust 19:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008[edit]

Information.svg Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, John Morgan (bishop). While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you. Triwbe (talk) 11:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Restoration of John Morgan (bishop)[edit]

Hi there. I saw you recreated the article with comments instead of content. I've restored the article's last good version, then added tags to address the concerns held. Please read these concerns carefully. Most importantly is the concern of notability. Morgan must pass the criteria for notability or he will not be able to keep on as an article. This may include the Welsh version as well. My recommendation to you is to read the tags on the article carefully and address the concerns as quickly as possible. I will tag with {{inuse}} so that you can work on it for a while without it being tagged for speedy deletion before you're finished. Any questions, feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. Cheers and happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 11:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dean of Llandaff[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

A tag has been placed on Dean of Llandaff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 18:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Dean of Llandaff[edit]

Hi Clive. I have restored this article and tidied it up. If you add "wikilinks" to notable people, places or concepts in articles you create (ie, [[London]] rather than London produces London) it will allow people to get a sense of context for the articles. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia - I am sorry you had to navigate Deletion Review! Neıl 15:00, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. It helps if you sign your comments on talk pages with four tildes - like so: ~~~~. Please feel free to get in touch if you have any questions or problems in future. Best, Neıl 09:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Gabriel Hebert[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Gabriel Hebert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 15:23, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Geoffrey Hugo Lampe[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Geoffrey Hugo Lampe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. llamadog903 (talk) 13:13, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Your RfA review page[edit]

I'm not sure, but I think what you meant to do is edit Wikipedia:RfA Review/Question/Responses here and add the following single line at the bottom of the page:

* [[User:Clive sweeting/RfA review]] added by ~~~ at ~~~~~

Hope this helps. — Athaenara 18:45, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Marcel Richard[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Marcel Richard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 07:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Subhalmaran[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Subhalmaran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds 09:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to French people, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. El Greco(talk) 21:01, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Laudian Professor of Arabic[edit]

Thanks for recently creating Laudian Professor of Arabic. Some people have since added some links and I have added some more. However, the names

both just link to disambiguation pages, where the right people don't seem to be represented. Is it possible that they have wikipedia pages under slightly different versions of their names? Also, my information is that D. S. Margoliouth took the post in 1889, while you have 1899. What was your source? You must be right----Clive SweetingSamuelTheGhost (talk) 22:26, 1 August 2008 (UTC).

Thanks. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 16:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Eryl Thomas[edit]

Why have you removed details of the offence for which Eryl Thomas had to resign his archbishopric? It was a huge scandal at the time - and indicative of the times, it possibly wouldn't happen now - and what is more is the truth, as one suspects you know. As it is it reads as if he resigned because he got a speeding fine or the like. Wikipedia must carry all the facts about a person, not just be a hagiography. Bedwasboy (talk) 06:00, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Additions to Culture of France[edit]

I have moved your recent additions on Catholicism to the talk page of Talk:Culture of France. Feel free to move them back once verifiable sources/references for the material are added. Remember, the wikipedia needs to be free of original research. Also: please use edit summaries on all your edits. Thanks - NYArtsnWords (talk) 23:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Deleting the word "Turkish"[edit]

Please stop deleting the word "Turkish" from Montreux Convention Regarding the Regime of the Turkish Straits and Turkish Straits. In the first case, you're breaking the link to Turkish Straits; in the second case, "Turkish Straits" is a straight translation of the term Türk Boğazları and the sentence you're leaving behind is nonsensical ("The term Straits (Turkish: Türk Boğazları) in northwestern Turkey refers to the two narrow straits that connect the Sea of Marmara..." I don't know if this is a case of Turcophobia or whatever, but it needs to stop. -- ChrisO (talk) 09:30, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Tree of Jesse window[edit]

A pic for the gallery would be nice! Amandajm (talk) 09:30, 23 September 2008 (UTC) A photograph of the Lady Chapel now features

Speedy deletion of Nikolaos P. Xionis[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Nikolaos P. Xionis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Unforgiven24 Talk|Contribs 13:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Oxford University deletions[edit]

Greetings! You keep making comments about a rash of deletions in the Oxford University page on the main page of WikiProject Universities. That's really not the proper place to raise those sorts of issues. You're welcome to start a new section on talk page of that same project, though. Cheers! Esrever (klaT) 02:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

I moved your comment from the main page to Talk. Please use the Talk page in the future. --ElKevbo (talk) 15:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Xexakis, Nikolaos[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Xexakis, Nikolaos, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The article does not assert any particular notability of the subject

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Regards, Constantine 05:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Church of England[edit]

Hello, in your edit] to the Church of England, you removed a large amount of material, including links to other wikipedias and external sites. I assume that this was a mistake on your part and reverted the entire edit. LovesMacs (talk) 14:55, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

French National School for the Judiciary[edit]

See Talk:French National School for the Judiciary. Thanks. --Edcolins (talk) 18:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

John Smith (bishop)[edit]

I have added some information, categories and a reference to this article. I note that the date of death you gave is different from that given by Le Neve, but I don't have access to your sources, so feel free to change if you are confident of the date -- or make any comments necessary. --Boson (talk) 17:41, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Cardiff[edit]

Hi Clive. I noticed you made a number of recent changes to Cardiff, one of which has been reverted by another editor, and some of which I have amended. A lot of work is being done on this article (not by me, I hasten to add), to try to bring it up to Featured Article standard. It is therefore particularly important that, when editing, the added content is of an exceptionally high standard. The prose used must be "engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard" and all claims must be verifiable and supported by inline citations. None of your edits provided citations, and I have marked these as being required. When you get the chance, hopefully soon, can you please provide the citations required. If you need any help on how to do this I will be glad to assist. Just leave a note here and I will keep a watch out. I know it's not easy getting your head round the various wikipedia conventions and the multitude of style guides, and we all slip up from time to time, so don't worry too much about it. Most articles are nowhere near Featured Article standard, so it isn't usually a massive problem. Skinsmoke (talk) 16:31, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Information.svg Hello Clive sweeting! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3,163 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Nikolaos P. Xionis - Find sources: "Nikolaos P. Xionis" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR · free images · wikipedia library
  2. Demetrios Tzerpos - Find sources: "Demetrios Tzerpos" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR · free images · wikipedia library
  3. Christodoulos Sabbatos - Find sources: "Christodoulos Sabbatos" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR · free images · wikipedia library
  4. Michel Meslin - Find sources: "Michel Meslin" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR · free images · wikipedia library
  5. Georges Gilson - Find sources: "Georges Gilson" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR · free images · wikipedia library

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:19, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tardieu, Michel[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Tardieu, Michel has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RadioFan (talk) 12:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tardieu, Michel[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Tardieu, Michel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 12:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ano Ilisia[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Ano Ilisia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WackyWace talk 17:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

For future reference...[edit]

If you wish to challenge the speedy deletion of a page, please write {{hangon}}, do not just write "hangon" in the page or it might go unnoticed. ;) Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 20:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 April 30[edit]

I've reverted your May 8 and May 9 edits to Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 April 30. Your comments came well after the close of the discussion in question, so they really can't be added. If you wish to contest the May 6 deletion of Michel Tardieu, you should talk to the deleting admin, JzG (talk · contribs), who may have been unaware of the deletion review discussion. (The log of Tardieu, Michel has the prior speedy deletion and a link to the DRV.) — Scientizzle 21:49, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

advice[edit]

The article on Ano Ilisia, though incorrectly speedied, is unlikely to be kept at the end without some actual references. Please give some at the deletion review; some people will not reverse an incorrect speedy that wont pass afd. As a general rule, it saves a lot of trouble to add refs immediately when you write an article. DGG ( talk ) 23:05, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Michel Tardieu[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated Michel Tardieu, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel Tardieu. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Guy (Help!) 09:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Edward Synge[edit]

I just patrolled this page, and I have a question. Do you plan to expand the article with more information about Edward himself, or is this page about his family in general? If it's going to be about the family rather than about Edward specifically, it should probably be moved to a different name such as "Synge family" or something similar. Please let me know. You can reply here: I will be watching this page. Thanks! --Auntof6 (talk) 08:51, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Marcos Manoles[edit]

Hello - I just encountered the above on new page patrol and wanted to add some references. However, a web search for the name is returning absolutely nothing. Do you have any sources you can reference in the article to demonstrate that its subject meets notability criteria? Was a different spelling of his name sometimes used, for example? Without references to reliable sources the page is liable to be proposed for deletion, so if you could add some you'll very likely prolong its life on Wikipedia. Gonzonoir (talk) 10:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marcos Manoles[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Marcos Manoles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No credible, third-party sources, no indication of any wider notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine 20:47, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi there: I've added a question to this article's talk page because there are still no references sufficient to verify the article's claims - if you have a look there you'll see some pointers on the kind of sources we'd need. Thanks. Gonzonoir (talk) 15:29, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
I've restored the article as you requested, because articles deleted through proposed deletion can be restored per anyone's request (and the deletion itself can be contested by anyone for essentially any reason), but the article still is unsourced and as you see above there don't seem to be any sources to be found for this individual. I'll be taking the article to Articles for Deletion so that it can be discussed whether or not to delete the article, you can argue for its inclusion there. I will notify you when the discussion begins, thank you. -- Atama 22:06, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Marcos Manoles for deletion[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A discussion has begun about whether the article Marcos Manoles, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcos Manoles until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Atama 22:22, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Christodoulos Sabbatos[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Christodoulos Sabbatos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N, WP:V -- can't find reliable, secondary sources on which to demonstrate the notability or existence of this putative academic under the WP:GNG, etc.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. je deckertalk 20:11, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Christodoulos Sabbatos for deletion[edit]

The article Christodoulos Sabbatos is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christodoulos Sabbatos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. je deckertalk 16:46, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Demetrios Tzerpos restored as per request[edit]

Demetrios Tzerpos has been restored as a contested proposed deletion at your request. However, as an unsourced BLP (something which was pointed out to you eleven months ago), the article, as it exists, is in violation of Wikipedia's WP:BLP policy requiring that statements about living persons be verified (WP:V) by reliable sources (WP:RS), and without those sources, I or another editor will feel forced to send the article towards Articles for Deletion in the near future, the best way to preserve the information you've provided at Tzerpos is to add those citations. I have nothing against you nor Mr. Tzerpos! Just show me the citations, and we'll be on the same side of this discussion! By the way, one thing I should note--there's no requirement that the reliable sources for this article be in English. Where reliable secondary English sources are available that's preferred, but if part of the challenge is finding references in English, but (say) Greek references are plentiful, then that's fine. Have a great day, and please leave me a note at User Talk:Joe Decker if you have questions or concerns. Thanks! --je deckertalk 16:57, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Demetrios Tzerpos for deletion[edit]

The article Demetrios Tzerpos is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demetrios Tzerpos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 20:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Notability of clergymen[edit]

Hi, I started a discussion as to the notability of clergymen at Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Clergymen, your input is welcome. J04n(talk page) 15:26, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gerard Daucourt[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Gerard Daucourt has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. France3470 (talk) 16:21, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Saint Ephrem Ecumenical Research Institute[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Saint Ephrem Ecumenical Research Institute has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 21:03, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Please note that St. Ephrem Ecumenical Research Institute was re-instated after an earlier discussion----Clive Sweeting

Speedy deletion nomination of Jules Leroy[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jules Leroy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:08, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joseph Hajjar[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Joseph Hajjar has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe deckertalk to me 21:31, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Frederick Percy Harton[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Frederick Percy Harton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 03:12, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Edward Tenison[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Edward Tenison requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AKS (talk) 18:01, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


Status and Advice[edit]

As reviewing administrator, I removed the tag; he became a bishop , which is always notable . But it would help to add some references to specific pages of some modern source, & links to scholarly articles, not just a primary source. This is especially true when the article makes a judgment, as this one did.


In fact, if you kept this in mind for all of your articles, it would help avoid unwarranted nominations for deletion. For authors with published books, I usually add a reference to their individual books on WorldCat (or similar).

Remember that 95% of the editors here do not understand or appreciate the academic humanities, especially those parts of it related in any way to religion. I & the others who do understand will help your articles avoid deletion, but it would help if you wrote them so completely from the start as to make the importance obvious. DGG ( talk ) 00:34, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Tenison is in the Dictionary of National Biography, and the clue to that is the page linking to it from Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/DNB Epitome 56. The DNB is being posted (in its old edition) at Wikisource, and volume 56 is one of the volumes now complete (the project to post the first edition is now about two-thirds done). I mention this because the DNB article s:Tenison, Edward (DNB00) is useful here, and the text can be used (with the {{DNB}} template). I've added the link to Edward Tenison, naturally. For more on the DNB here, see WP:WP DNB. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Greetings from Vicipaedia[edit]

Good afternoon, Clive. I thought I'd leave you a message here because I haven't seen you on Vicipaedia recently. Just to say that I'm glancing through a set of biographies at present, some of which are Welsh, many of which are yours. I will be editing them -- only lightly, because I like the way you write Latin! -- but mainly to ensure that place-names, other people, universities and what not are properly linked. Of course, if you notice that I make any mistakes, correct them. Best wishes Andrew Dalby 11:44, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Order of the Garter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Strong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:44, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bernard Coulie[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Bernard Coulie has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. §FreeRangeFrog 18:51, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Adamantius (journal) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bernard Coulie, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Georgian and Armenian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eutherios of Tyana, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cerf, Diatribe and Alexander of Hierapolis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eutherios of Tyana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schwartz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook[edit]

Hello Clive sweeting,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:15, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication why this would be a notable book. No article on the Congress exists. If kept, the article needs a much better title

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 14:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of E T Davies for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article E T Davies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E T Davies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. miszatomic 14:42, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Joseph Hajjar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Hajjar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Hajjar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444Talk 19:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

{{Unreferenced}} tag on Christine Mohrmann[edit]

Information icon4.svg

An editor has tagged Christine Mohrmann, an article which you have created or worked on, as {{Unreferenced}}. Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia, but when adding content (particularly for facts and figures), please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing, especially when adding information about living persons that is even remotely contentious. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – Fayenatic London 22:30, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph A. Munitiz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leuven University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Norman Powell Williams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lady Margaret Professor of Divinity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Florent Du Bois de Villerabel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Enos and Aenos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Jean-Pierre Batut#Questionable source[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Jean-Pierre Batut#Questionable source. Thanks. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:16, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jean-Pierre Batut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Council of Nicaea. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Edit summaries, please[edit]

Hello, Clive. Here are a couple of general editing suggestions for you to consider:

  • Please make a habit of providing an edit summary when you make a change to an article. Doing so makes it easier for your colleagues here to understand the intention of your edit.
  • Plus, it will be easier for you and your co-editors to collaborate on articles if, instead of making multiple consecutive edits in rapid succession on an article, you use the "Show preview" button to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits. This keeps the page history of the article less cluttered.

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric talk 16:15, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Manlio Simonetti[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Manlio Simonetti has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Lakun.patra (talk) 15:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Popular Patristics Series[edit]

Hello, Clive sweeting,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Popular Patristics Series should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Popular Patristics Series .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 19:08, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michel Spanneut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nord (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armenian Genocide recognition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Bryce (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Claudio Moreschini[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Claudio Moreschini has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 15:39, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

I did not delete your page[edit]

So you can't quite ask me to restore it as it was a admin. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 02:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Florent Du Bois de Villerabel[edit]

Hello. Could you please add in-line references throughout Florent Du Bois de Villerabel? I am interested in finding out more about this archbishop and will try to find some references, but it would help if you referenced what you added. The content is very controversial and if not referenced, it will be deleted. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 11:26, 1 June 2015 (UTC)