Jump to content

User talk:Deku-shrub

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GnocchiFan (talk | contribs) at 22:50, 18 June 2024 (Notification: listing of Brexit means breakfast at WP:Redirects for discussion.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Alpha Bay

Hi, You undid a news text edit from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AlphaBay that referred http://alphabaymarket.com/ as the source. Your reason for the deletion was " More reliable source needed". In your objective view Reference number 4 on that Wikipedia page (http://www.alphabaymarket.net/alphabay-market-review/) is reliable source? If yes then exactly how those two sources are different in their "reliability"?.

Removed the other instance of the link Deku-shrub (talk) 17:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help with "Group selfie" section for the Selfie article?

Hi Deku-shrub, I see from Talk:Selfie that you were looking into the possibility of putting together a section for the article about group selfies. I recently prepared such a section, at the behest of Huawei, who have coined the term "groufie" to refer to such images. Because of my conflict of interest, I won't add the section myself. Instead, I posted it at Talk:Selfie for other editors to review. Do you think you might have time to take a look at it and, if things look okay to you, take the section live? I'm also certainly open to any questions or comments you have! Cheers, ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 15:26, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Giorgio A. Tsoukalos - Aliens.png

Thanks for uploading File:Giorgio A. Tsoukalos - Aliens.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:01, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BLP violation

This edit is a violation of the WIkipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, if you put it back I will block you immediately. Dreadstar ☥ 23:36, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Latest stage of submission to the Speaker's Commission on Digital Democracy

Hello there. I thought I would drop you a note as you kindly took part in the first stage of the efforts to crowdsource a submission to the Speaker's Commission on Digital Democracy. The second stage is now live and can be seen here. It would be great if you could help with putting together the submission on the second theme, which relates to representation. Also, if you have any suggestions on how we can widen participation, that would be very helpful. Thanks again for all of your help. Stevie Benton (WMUK) (talk) 11:23, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Contras may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • adversaries of the real-life Contras.<ref>{{cite AV media notes|title=Ａ－ＪＡＸ～コナミ・ゲーム・ミュージック　VOL.4 (A-Jax: Konami Game Music Vol. 4|type=booklet|publisher=G.M.O. Records / Alfa Records|id=28XA-201|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:22, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 17 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Political party membership in the United Kingdom, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages National Front, Green Party and British People's Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Web blocking in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Geraint Davies. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 3 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Hello, Deku-shrub. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Schematica (talk) 03:55, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Web blocking in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Websites blocked in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BPI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

I have asked that the page be protected, so that consensus can emerge before additional changes, rather than us essentially reverting each other contentiously. CorporateM (Talk) 13:00, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The complaint is that you are edit warring at Digital Citizens Alliance. If you wish to respond, you can do so at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Deku-shrub reported by User:CorporateM (Result: ). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 13:38, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of YTS.re for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article YTS.re is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YTS.re until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ukexpat (talk) 15:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Giuseppe Vatinno, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amon Twyman listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Amon Twyman. Since you had some involvement with the Amon Twyman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of websites blocked in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BPI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coin-Mixing Service

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Coin-Mixing Service, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mixing_service.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:21, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Hi,

I noticed you created Silkkitie and Abraxas (market) redirects to Darknet market. They should only really redirect there if that article mentions them (like Silk Road 2.0 is mentioned at Silk Road (marketplace)). Are you planning to cover them there? They were also in Category:Darknet markets, but redirects only typically take maintenance categories (WP:RCAT). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am still midway through writing the notable history of Darknet markets where they be mentioned, as will other markets of note as a stumble across them in my research. When I'm done there should be no remaining pages looking like that Deku-shrub (talk) 21:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for all the work you've been doing to darknet and related areas of Wikipedia. Still plenty of work to be done, of course, but it's nice to see these pages get some attention they've needed for a while. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I have no idea what to do with this accept give these words of appreciation :) Deku-shrub (talk) 19:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing. :) It's just sort of like a form of "credit" on Wikipedia (see WP:BARNSTAR). They aren't used as much as they used to be (since the "thanks" feature launched)... — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moving instead of normal redirects?

Hi I noticed you keep moving articles instead of redirecting (for example Darknet markets): why is that? Isn't the proper way to go about that to place this on the articles?: #REDIRECT [[pagetoredirectto]] --Fixuture (talk) 23:28, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it then was persuaded to switch it back Deku-shrub (talk) 23:29, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aphex Twin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darknet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on a proposed deletion

Hi Deku-shrub, can you give your comment at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Institute_for_Ethics_and_Emerging_Technologies regarding the article's proposed deletion. Thank you, Waters.Justin (talk) 17:42, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shadow (software)

Hello Deku-shrub,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shadow (software) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 19:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Reply

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

  • it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you provided some references, I'm not convinced how reliable they are, but in any case you give no text to show how it meets notability as defined in the link.
  • it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Your article consisted entirely of what the software claims to do. Without any history, evidence of notability or other facts, it's just a sales pitch
  • Not a reason for deletion, but just one external link to the company (and "link" should be lc in the heading)

I'll restore the text here shortly Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:59, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Black market

Hey, I'm asking this from you since you've made impressive edits to the Darknet market article. Can you have a look at these edits made recently to the Black market article? It looks to me like it's out of place or undue in the lead section and it's unsourced, though maybe you have a better idea of what to do with that material or where to put it. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 13:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - but should the online component have its own section within the article rather than just in the header? Deku-shrub (talk) 14:10, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's great, thanks. And, um, I'm not sure. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 14:22, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clearweb

A tag has been placed on Clearweb, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Compassionate727 (talk) 15:13, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Darkode

Hello Deku-shrub,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Darkode for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 21:09, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rescator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ukrainian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ahmia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ahmia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MopSeeker FoxThree! 23:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RM closed as malformed and on wrong talk page

Sorry if you want to move Carding (disambiguation) over the baseline you need to use a multi-move template on Talk:Carding. Cheers In ictu oculi (talk) 07:23, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Garbage Picking to Dumpster Diving Move/rename should be reverted.

Greetings, I understand the good faith intention, but you missed a few things about the garbage picking article. Garbage picking is not the same as dumpster diving and you should revert your move, please. I posted on the talk page on the article a few things about this. Thanks. Centerone (talk) 00:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Politics and technology

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Politics and technology, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Category:Politics and technology. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:29, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nik Cubrilovic

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nik Cubrilovic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 04:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ontologyspace

Hey how's it going over in the UK?

Wondering why there's no article on Jamie Bartlett here.

Watched the ted talk recently.

--Fixuture (talk) 22:25, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Fixuture: I don't follow, you mean this page? Jamie Bartlett (journalist) Deku-shrub (talk) 08:58, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
K, thanks for the top note on the article, didn't find it. --Fixuture (talk) 10:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 5 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Skunked term

The article Skunked term has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NEO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 19:12, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You'll never take it alive! Deku-shrub (talk) 19:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Skunked term
added links pointing to Media, Literally, Jewfish and Decimate

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for your interest in Tor.

I think if a rename is proposed again, perhaps after some months, then naming it Tor is best. If there is another discussion then I will post notices for different WikiProjects to get more comments. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bluerasberry: Thanks! Deku-shrub (talk) 17:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Darknet market, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PGP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Category:Politics and technology into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:21, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization

Hi! Thanks for your improvements in the categorization of transhumanists. Good work. I was wondering, would it be better to categorize people in only Category:American transhumanists, and remove Category:Transhumanists? (same for other nationalities)? Leaving them in both wouldn't hurt, but using only the more specific category is more common I think. Gap9551 (talk) 22:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think the unstructured list has a place, but that would be List of transhumanists. However I would want to maintain that list with a bot first before removing the root category. So yes in principle, but not just yet. Deku-shrub (talk) 22:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, that sounds good. A list article would be useful. Gap9551 (talk) 22:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Pizer

A tag has been placed on David Pizer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wait But Why for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wait But Why is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wait But Why until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 07:58, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Dark web. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! TvojaStara (talk) 19:16, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Deku: Appears this kicked off again in a moderated fashion this time so if you wanna chime in that's cool. -- dsprc [talk] 19:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Deku-shrub! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:02, Saturday, February 20, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Dark Net

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The Dark Net, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 00:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shadow (software)

A tag has been placed on Shadow (software) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 09:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Ransomeware history.png

Thanks for uploading File:Ransomeware history.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Pipcu-project-sunblock.png

Thanks for uploading File:Pipcu-project-sunblock.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:34, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Agora phishing login.png

Thank you for uploading File:Agora phishing login.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Carding screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Carding screenshot.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:DarkMarket screenshot.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:DarkMarket screenshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:25, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Decentralized autonomous organization

An article that you have been involved in editing—Decentralized autonomous organization—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 17:46, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Screenshot of AOHell.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Screenshot of AOHell.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Darknet market, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GDS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 June 14#File:Screenshot of AOHell.jpg

I noticed that you undid my edit on Carding (fraud) because you disagreed with or did not understand the decision at FFD, linked in the title. When I closed the discussion, I did see and read your objection. I had the option to participate in the discussion or close the discussion, but am not allowed to do both. Because of the large backlog, small number of administrators working on FFD, and clear-cut policy decision, I chose to close the discussion.

Since I noticed your edit, I have stopped other work on wikipedia until I could address your concerns, and I will try to do so here. Wikipedia's goal is to be a free content encyclopedia, and over the years that goal has built up a lot of policies and procedures around Non-free content (what's allowed, where it is allowed, et cetera). The official policy portion is documented at Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria and point #8 is the specific point of policy that User:Stefan2 mentioned when nominating this non-free screenshot for removal from the article, "8. Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." He used shorthand in his nomination, and someone likely should have clarified for you when you left your comment.

In terms of Carding (fraud)#1980s–1999, I believe Stefan2 feels and most of the people who patrol non-free image use would likely agree that for most users reading that section of the article that seeing a screenshot from AOHell does not make them understand the topic any better than if the screenshot is not included in that section. If they were curious about AOHell, it is wiki-linked and the screenshot is available in the article about the software. If you feel that this screenshot somehow adds to their understanding, I would be interested to hear how.

Currently, the image is also in violation of WP:NFCCP#10c as well. As part of my work when closing the discussion, I removed the rationale you added for this article from the image description.

I hope that I have explained well enough for you to understand and re-remove the image from the article yourself. If not, I welcome questions and discussion.  ★  Bigr Tex 22:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve BioViva

Hi, I'm Cotton2. Deku-shrub, thanks for creating BioViva!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Bioviva....reversed HER cells... Close to advertising, peacock and violating NPOV. Please rewrite in wp:NPOV style.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Cotton2 (talk) 20:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at Talk:BioViva Deku-shrub (talk) 20:22,24 July 2016 (UTC)
As I stated, medical claims require better sources. Cotton2 (talk) 00:22, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Cotton2 (talk) 00:22, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BioViva

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BioViva requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://bioviva-science.com/2016/04/21/first-gene-therapy-successful-against-human-aging/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sunmist3 (talk) 19:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Video on demand#Role of piracy and peer to peer neutrality disputed

In revision 600778626 on 23:07, 15 March 2014‎, you added text about copyright infringement to the page. I've disputed the neutrality with Template:POV section. See Talk:Video on demand#On section "Role of piracy and peer to peer" NPOV for discussion. Relevant policy is WP:NPOV. 80.221.159.67 (talk) 12:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Posthumanism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Hughes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Natasha Vita-More, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alcor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, AlphaBay Market

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, AlphaBay Market. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – AlphaBay. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at AlphaBay – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 17:56, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Deku-shrub. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Darknet Markets

Template:Darknet Markets has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:27, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:A Syrian Love Story

Hello, Deku-shrub. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "A Syrian Love Story".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Zupotachyon Ping me (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dark web, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Deletion of large portions of existing content, with insufficient justification. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 12:36, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:More United has been nominated for discussion

Category:More United, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tim! (talk) 19:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for opinion

Sir, can I request your opinion on the discussion "Timeline of computer security hacker history" which is located on my talk page? Please leave your opinion/comments on my talk page instead of here if you have one. Mdikici4001 (talk) 02:55, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 28 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Had enough of experts listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Had enough of experts. Since you had some involvement with the Had enough of experts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 20:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Phishing

The RFPP request got archived before I got a chance to reply so I thought best to reply here. Full protection should only be used sparingly on articles and certainly not indefinitely since then nobody can edit the page. Once that expires on Monday I'll switch it back to indefinite pending changes. Hopefully as they were unsuccessful in getting the link to stick they'll give up. If it continues, one alternative would be to move the infobox to a template and permanently protect that. It's a bit of a bodge, but the situation with onion links is fairly unique and this would make it much easier to spot any attempts to change the link as it would mean adding the full infobox back. SmartSE (talk) 10:41, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Smartse: cheers! Deku-shrub (talk) 13:12, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Sky-Fraud) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Sky-Fraud, Deku-shrub!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Are you able to look over article and address improvement tags?

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Deku-Shrub,

By reading the article on wikipedia on Zero-day exploits I noticed that a paragraph sounded like advertising for Symantec. After watching the changelog of the article i noticed that you were the one that added it. After further research, I found you did the same on other articles like Ransomware.

If you are indeed related to Symantec, please consider staying neutral and not adding references to this company in articles. Neutro (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:51, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe I added that, could you link the diff? The discussion on Ransomeware was because I wanted to add an image. Deku-shrub (talk) 14:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer. There you go: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zero-day_(computing)&oldid=662810780 An image is good, just saying that imho it would be more neutral to say "antivirus companies" instead of precising Symantec in the articles, where you can still put a reference to Symantec website to justify it :) Neutro (talk)

The contents of the edit is actually coming from a manual merge of Zero-day attack. The merge should have been better commented and managed. Regarding the image, I wanted a timeline, it's the best one that exists. Deku-shrub (talk) 16:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bremoaner listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bremoaner. Since you had some involvement with the Bremoaner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 20:47, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brexit cereal listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brexit cereal. Since you had some involvement with the Brexit cereal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 20:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brexited listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brexited. Since you had some involvement with the Brexited redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 20:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brexiting listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brexiting. Since you had some involvement with the Brexiting redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 20:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brexitish listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brexitish. Since you had some involvement with the Brexitish redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 20:50, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brexpocalypse listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brexpocalypse. Since you had some involvement with the Brexpocalypse redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 20:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brexshit listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brexshit. Since you had some involvement with the Brexshit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 20:52, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remainiac listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Remainiac. Since you had some involvement with the Remainiac redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 20:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remainic listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Remainic. Since you had some involvement with the Remainic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 20:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remaniac listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Remaniac. Since you had some involvement with the Remaniac redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 20:54, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sod the EU listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sod the EU. Since you had some involvement with the Sod the EU redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 20:54, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Timeline of computer security hacker history#Really suitable for inclusion?

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Timeline of computer security hacker history#Really suitable for inclusion?. 198.98.51.57 (talk) 04:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Timeline of computer security hacker history#Listcrufts removal

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Timeline of computer security hacker history#Listcrufts removal . John1234ou812 (talk) 04:47, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:UK Chemical Research

Hello, Deku-shrub. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "UK Chemical Research".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 21:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Red room animation popup.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Red room animation popup.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of CoinTelegraph

The article CoinTelegraph has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (media) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:51, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CoinTelegraph for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CoinTelegraph is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoinTelegraph until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:16, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Nival_(company)#Nival got hacked last year. Encyclopedic to include?

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Nival_(company)#Nival got hacked last year. Encyclopedic to include?. Pavel Novikov (talk) 07:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dark Reading (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:39, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Deku-shrub, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:39, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dark Reading has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dark Reading. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 15:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coinscrum

The article Coinscrum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be a meetup.com group based out of London regarding Bitcoin. Not notable; references are mostly trivial mentions or promotional, and some don't even mention this group.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Frumpy (term)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Frumpy (term) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hummerrocket (talk) 00:02, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Deku-shrub. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of All-Party Parliamentary Intellectual Property Group for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All-Party Parliamentary Intellectual Property Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-Party Parliamentary Intellectual Property Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:17, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dark Reading concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dark Reading, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shadow (software) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shadow (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadow (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:53, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dark Reading

Hello, Deku-shrub. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dark Reading".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Violations report listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Violations report. Since you had some involvement with the Violations report redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 11:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Human Longevity (disambiguation)

The article Human Longevity (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not needed per WP:TWODABS. A hatnote linking to Human longevity is sufficient per WP:DIFFCAPS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:07, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Control copyright icon Hello Deku-shrub, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Global Drug Policy Observatory have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 08:01, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moved your new content to Global catastrophic risk

Hi, I moved the table you inserted in Existential risk from artificial general intelligence over to Global catastrophic risk, since the source specifically states "global catastrophic risks"; personally I think it needs a rewrite into prose though if it remains, it's not very comprehensible to our readers as a standalone table and could use stronger sources. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 04:38, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People associated with Anonymous has been nominated for discussion

Category:People associated with Anonymous, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:45, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zoom floof listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Zoom floof. Since you had some involvement with the Zoom floof redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Onel5969 TT me 20:43, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Hi! I've seen your work. Can you help me update an article about UG Nazi the hacktivast group?

There is some outdated information that needs to be updated. My email: angogaru@gmail.com

Thank you! Angogaru (talk) 02:08, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, why do you need emailing? I suppose I could put together a private article for you but I don't count as a reliable source. What are you after exactly? Deku-shrub (talk) 16:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Remainia listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Remainia. Since you had some involvement with the Remainia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 17:41, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tired of experts listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tired of experts. Since you had some involvement with the Tired of experts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 13:53, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Twitter suspensions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twitter suspensions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twitter suspensions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wumbolo ^^^ 18:52, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of Common Misconceptions

I appreciate your addition of references. I'm honestly at a loss for what Bryn is looking for, evidence-wise. There is another example above, and one I think that was archived where he has taken the same tack. No source meets the criteria, nothing can show it is a common misconception, it is never enough. I asked him specifically what he is looking for, but I don't think I'm going to get a good answer (maybe I'm being a bit cynical). Thoughts? Squatch347 (talk) 17:09, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I replied, it'll be interesting to see how this pans out :) Deku-shrub (talk) 19:43, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Seems he has dropped it. Thoughts on moving forward? I think we are good enough to add back at this point. Squatch347 (talk) 20:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The argument needs to be built up consistently and fully from the referenced individual articles and pass any challenges there. If that succeeds, the results can shore-up the case for adding to the misconceptions list. Deku-shrub (talk) 21:18, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Deku-shrub. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Deku-shrub. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Turing Church listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Turing Church. Since you had some involvement with the Turing Church redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Nowak Kowalski (talk) 19:05, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of CryptoCoinsNews

Notice

The article CryptoCoinsNews has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this site is notable or has non-negligible third-party coverage. Mostly self-references. A single somewhat-RS (though specialist) about a single incident.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 11:39, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CryptoCoinsNews for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CryptoCoinsNews is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CryptoCoinsNews until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 00:40, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BitBlender listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BitBlender. Since you had some involvement with the BitBlender redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Christian75 (talk) 14:45, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sky-Fraud

Notice

The article Sky-Fraud has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NWEB.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 20:50, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brexit means Brexit listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brexit means Brexit. Since you had some involvement with the Brexit means Brexit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mstrojny (talk) 10:50, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Colored coin

Notice

The article Colored coin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. Has never been well-cited; the one cite is literally a press release. WP:BEFORE shows actual numismatist sites, and crypto sites; Google Scholar search shows nothing I could find either. This is an idea that was slightly fashionable in Bitcoin circles several years ago, and just doesn't seem to warrant an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 07:11, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Connected contributor

I hope you don't mind, but I have added you as a "connected contributor" on Transhumanist Party. If there are other articles where you have a conflict of interest you might want to tag those as well. Bitter Oil (talk) 21:45, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Was that too subtle a hint? Bitter Oil (talk) 16:44, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deku-shrub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I sometimes edit on my corporate VPN which pushes my traffic out of AWS

Decline reason:

Then you will have to confine your editing to when you are not using the corporate VPN; using a VPN to edit is not permitted. 331dot (talk) 10:49, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"Wikifiddling" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikifiddling. Since you had some involvement with the Wikifiddling redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 07:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blackhatworld

Appreciate your effort for wiki pages but what was the reason for undoing my edit? Again I'm showing you full respect so there is no reason to get in an edit war :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by VediKboy (talk • contribs) 18:50, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can't use the site itself to establish notability of something like that, you need third party coverage Deku-shrub (talk) 14:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Floof listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Floof. Since you had some involvement with the Floof redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 209.237.105.108 (talk) 15:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Catstodian listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Catstodian. Since you had some involvement with the Catstodian redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 209.237.105.108 (talk) 15:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hugbunter listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hugbunter. Since you had some involvement with the Hugbunter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 209.237.105.108 (talk) 15:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"TORCH (search)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect TORCH (search). Since you had some involvement with the TORCH (search) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:57, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Floof" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Floof. Since you had some involvement with the Floof redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. OcelotCreeper (talk) 17:16, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Santrex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santrex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santrex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GirthSummit (blether) 18:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Wirehead (science fiction" listed at Redirects for discussion

Information icon A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wirehead (science fiction. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 14#Wirehead (science fiction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Not a very active user (talk) 11:05, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Supernatural

Not sure if you knew but you are mentioned in the newest episode of the podcast Supernatural, which is about Besa Mafia. IntoThinAir (talk) 21:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@IntoThinAir: Thanks!

Proposed deletion of London Futurists

Notice

The article London Futurists has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. Negligible RS coverage; WP:BEFORE shows passing mentions and some pundit quotes from the founder in RSes - nothing actually about London Futurists. Lots of non-RS sources though. If there's RS coverage of he topic, I didn't find it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 23:44, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Twitter Locked or Suspended.webp

Thank you for uploading File:Twitter Locked or Suspended.webp. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. 122.2.10.69 (talk) 02:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dark.fail for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dark.fail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark.fail until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:56, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Babylon (marketplace)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Babylon (marketplace). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 2#Babylon (marketplace) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

!

The Barnstar of Integrity
For addressing some unique topics Charles Juvon (talk) 23:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Project BARSOOM

Notice

The article Project BARSOOM has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 21:34, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Hell (forum)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hell (forum) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 16#Hell (forum) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ZFT (talk) 22:37, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Cyber Anakin § A mountain out of molehill?

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Cyber Anakin § A mountain out of molehill?. 45.136.197.235 (talk) 19:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

Happy New Year!

Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, Deku-shrub!

The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Wikipedia friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:46, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Estonian transhumanists has been nominated for merging

Category:Estonian transhumanists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:40, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of websites blocked in Turkey moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of websites blocked in Turkey, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 17:13, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vll opn

gts lls 197.215.154.190 (talk) 02:10, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Initial Access Broker

Information icon Hello, Deku-shrub. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Initial Access Broker, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BadBIOS

Notice

The article BadBIOS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BadBIOS has zero substantial, if any, evidence for its existence outside of pre-existing yet much more well-documented viruses of similar nature. After the discoverer of the virus dumped data across all the machines that had been supposedly infected with it, there have been zero findings of any malicious programming within any of it. The entire basis for this malware's existence is dependent on the story that was told by its supposed finder. This already makes it hoax-worthy. The virus is claimed to be capable of infecting multiple different BIOS variants (i.e., EFI, UEFI) injected through different operating systems (Mac, Windows & Linux) all in one. This is already an impressive feat for a virus to pull off. A virus doing this through auditory infection methods has never once been documented. Viruses that do spread through isolated machines are called 'Air-gap malware.' There is an article on them as well. However, most of these pieces of malware utilize external hardware such as USB sticks. Auditory ones do exist [and even thermal ones!], but none to the scale 'BadBIOS' is claiming to achieve. Unless intentionally disabling certain firmware protections on all devices (i.e., only signed firmware be loaded onto the system), it could go from an incredibly difficult virus to program with an inconsistent form of infection to impossible.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Freakmenn (talk) 20:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Initial Access Broker

Hello, Deku-shrub. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Initial Access Broker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Rationalization (sociology" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Rationalization (sociology has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 10 § Rationalization (sociology until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of websites blocked in Turkey

Hello, Deku-shrub. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of websites blocked in Turkey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"48 Hours (TV series" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 48 Hours (TV series has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § 48 Hours (TV series until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Brexit means breakfast" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Brexit means breakfast has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 18 § Brexit means breakfast until a consensus is reached. GnocchiFan (talk) 22:50, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deku-shrub&oldid=1229830787"