Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 407: Line 407:
::How about just remove "sportscaster"? Many would probably know that Garagiola was later a sportscaster anyway, esp. since his sportscasting career eclipsed his catching career by a significant margin. [[User:William I of Schenectady|William I of Schenectady]] ([[User talk:William I of Schenectady|talk]]) 02:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
::How about just remove "sportscaster"? Many would probably know that Garagiola was later a sportscaster anyway, esp. since his sportscasting career eclipsed his catching career by a significant margin. [[User:William I of Schenectady|William I of Schenectady]] ([[User talk:William I of Schenectady|talk]]) 02:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
::*[[Image:Symbol possible vote.svg|18px]] The article says " number of losses were the worst for the franchise since the 1890 season" and "Since 1952, the only non-expansion team to finish worse has been the 2003 Detroit Tigers" but doesn't provide a cite for either statement. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 09:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
::*[[Image:Symbol possible vote.svg|18px]] The article says " number of losses were the worst for the franchise since the 1890 season" and "Since 1952, the only non-expansion team to finish worse has been the 2003 Detroit Tigers" but doesn't provide a cite for either statement. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 09:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
:::*Refs added. [[User:William I of Schenectady|William I of Schenectady]] ([[User talk:William I of Schenectady|talk]]) 11:23, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[[Image:Begum.jpg|right|100x100px]]
[[Image:Begum.jpg|right|100x100px]]
*... '''[[Ali Saleem]]''' ''(pictured)'', also known as Begum Nawazish Ali, is the first ever [[cross-dress]]ing Pakistani man to have gained popularity amongst the religious leaders in the country? - Article expanded five-fold and self nominated by <span style="color:steelblue;border-bottom:1px solid green;">Arun Reginald</span> ([[User talk:Arunreginald|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Arunreginald|contribs]]) 07:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
*... '''[[Ali Saleem]]''' ''(pictured)'', also known as Begum Nawazish Ali, is the first ever [[cross-dress]]ing Pakistani man to have gained popularity amongst the religious leaders in the country? - Article expanded five-fold and self nominated by <span style="color:steelblue;border-bottom:1px solid green;">Arun Reginald</span> ([[User talk:Arunreginald|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Arunreginald|contribs]]) 07:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:23, 13 May 2008

George Kunkel
George Kunkel

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page. Eligible articles may only be up to 5 days old; for details see these rules.

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Instructions

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or expanded (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles that have been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools", then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. (The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.)
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • preferably cited in the article with an inline citation.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely-licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as [[Image:image name |right|100x100px| Description]] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]] and ~~~~
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|July 4}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
[[Image:Symbol confirmed.svg|18px]] Yes No problems, ready for DYK
[[Image:Symbol question.svg|18px]] Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined
[[Image:Symbol possible vote.svg|18px]] Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix.
[[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|18px]] No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

2024-07-04T00:00:00Z

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on May 13

i see no problems - hook is good, article is well written and sourced, meets character limit. Hook is in article, but as two separate statements: both are however reffed. BG7 10:53, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
perhaps:
... that a meeting had to be held before Dr. Seuss's Yertle the Turtle and Other Stories was published by Random House as it contained the word "burp", which was then considered vulgar?
Hows that for an alt hook?
however, i'm not too sure that it meets DYK's guidelines. It's not new, and it doesnt' appear to have expanded five-fold. BG7 10:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
alternatively ... that in order to get around the prohibition on foreign lace imports into England in the late 1600s, mechants smuggled in Brussels lace calling it 'Point d'Angleterre' or "English point"? new article, self nom Loggie (talk) 07:31, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 12

Need to boldface new article. Daniel Case (talk) 21:28, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This may be a snappier alternative wording, if you like that sort of thing:
... that tomatoes were not grown in Japan until 1899, when Ichitaro Kanie germinated the 150 billion yen Kagome Company?
Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 04:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does Wikipedia aim to have an article on every serial killer?--Wetman (talk) 15:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If they're notable. Of course we do. Kafziel Complaint Department 02:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's much better than my original suggestion. Thanks! Kafziel Complaint Department 02:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
File:Con Un Mon in Morgantown KY.JPG

Articles created/expanded on May 11

Frankly, this hook is unremarkable, uninteresting and unimportant. I'm working with Ldud to find some better ones...any suggestions are welcome, too! BobAmnertiopsisChitChat Me! 02:20, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
or,
or,
It would be a rather dreary hook, especially for a midnight update. *wink* Maybe make a hook from the Edgar Allan Poe connection; of course, making something less dreary by adding Poe is a bit odd.--Bedford 14:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd argue that, since the majority of Poe's work is comedy or adventure, adding Poe isn't necessarily dreary but, then again, I've read his full collection. I was hesitant to add the Poe connection because, well, there have been too many Poe DYKs (I wonder whose fault that is?). Even so, here's the alternative:
Thanks for the nom: I'm sure a better hook would be:

** definitely on the short side, needs more references and the current ones formatted. gren グレン 00:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 10

The New York Vauxhall Gardens in 1803
The New York Vauxhall Gardens in 1803
Stalin, Roosevelt & Churchill
Stalin, Roosevelt & Churchill
I've notified the author. There should be ample time to fix up the citations. --PFHLai (talk) 01:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for comment. Used Template:cite web for as many refs as possible. Please review now. --gppande «talk» 15:02, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good besides one which is broken and I will try to fix. gren グレン 17:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've included 2 pix. The first is the house and the second is the driveway. I like the 2nd more, but since the house is the focal point of the plantation I included it. APK yada yada 22:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
... that David Letterman brought velcro into the national spotlight when he proved that with enough velcro a man could be hurled against a wall and stick?
... that juniors in a high school in Florida were rewarded for academic performance with the chance to go don velcro suits and go velcro jumping?
... that velcro figured in a failed strap-on device for impotent men?
... that astronauts have a patch of velcro inside their helmets that acts as a nose scratcher?
I like this hook--Bedford 14:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
... that Velcro employees are required to use the term 'Velcro brand hook and loop fasteners' to describe their product?
... that the manufacturing process used to create silent velcro for the United States Army is a military secret?
I like this hook--Bedford 14:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I count a 4.43 expansion, which I personally would allow, especially on a topic which would likely be on a CD version of Wikipedia. The trivia section should be merged into a pop culture section, with suitable references.--Bedford 14:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That was the one section I had left untouched 'cause I didn't know what to do with it/didn't want to have to find references for... However, I've done it, and doing so has increased the lenghth, and perhaps increased the quality- does it look better now? Loggie (talk) 18:04, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Everything looks good. 4.5x expansion. However, when I pasted it onto Word, and with my Firefox spellchecker, both say Velcro should always be capitalized. Is that so?--Bedford 19:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the OED has it, as a verb, both capitalized and uncapitalized, and as the 'proprietary name for....' strictly capitalized. The free dictionary has the verb as always lowercase, and says both are an option for the noun. So, I'm not sure- my best guess is that when mentioning Velcro brand it should be capitalized, but if the single word "velcro" could be replaced with "hook and loop fastener" than it needn't be, though I know the Velcro corporation would strongly disagree with me. Loggie (talk) 19:54, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mechlin lace
Mechlin lace
Everything looks good to me, although others would demand inline cites at the end of more paragraphs.--Bedford 05:04, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW - I have worked on this article more and added more sources.Dave (talk) 22:15, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Valenciennes lace
Valenciennes lace
the architect, George A. Frederick, has an article now. The 1860 design was delayed and begun in 1867: why not "completed in 1875"?--Wetman (talk) 15:30, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
File:Lord.JPG

Articles created/expanded on May 9

Fixed the link, and the article was moved from my user space into article space in May 9, which I was under the impression qualified it as "new" on that date. scot (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subscript text

Bert Haney
Bert Haney

Articles created/expanded on May 8

Washington C. DePauw
Washington C. DePauw
Would that man happen to be Washington C. DePauw (pictured)? --PFHLai (talk) 08:26, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it would be.--Bedford 16:07, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Reference verified but way too short. Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nor is this anywhere near long enough, nor is this fact even in the article. Daniel Case (talk) 02:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Cited source doesn't say anything about it being their most succesful single. Daniel Case (talk) 02:20, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Kilkenny Castle
Kilkenny Castle
Length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on May 7

This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Reference verified; too short. Daniel Case (talk) 21:45, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I apologize for sounding hostile, that was not my intention. Given the inappropriateness of the hook, and that Redmarkviolinist is an experienced editor with admin aspirations, I figured this was some kind of joke. – jaksmata 14:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Garagiola was the catcher in 1952 and became a sportscaster later in life, right ? The hook seems to say the catcher doubled as the sportscaster for the team. Is it just me? (With the catcher wearing a microphone under his helmut and doing play-by-play when he should be calling for pitches and directing the infield defence, no wonder the team sucked!) I tried to rewrite this hook to clarify and previewed, but I didn't like what I've typed, so I ain't saving any of my alt.hooks. I'm leaving a note here and hope someone can fix this. --PFHLai (talk) 01:54, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How about just remove "sportscaster"? Many would probably know that Garagiola was later a sportscaster anyway, esp. since his sportscasting career eclipsed his catching career by a significant margin. William I of Schenectady (talk) 02:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article says " number of losses were the worst for the franchise since the 1890 season" and "Since 1952, the only non-expansion team to finish worse has been the 2003 Detroit Tigers" but doesn't provide a cite for either statement. Gatoclass (talk) 09:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
File:Begum.jpg
  • The source (LA Times) says "[one religious leader] liked his show". The article says "some even love his show". The hook here says he "have gain popularity amongst the religious leaders". It went from fact to deceptive exaggeration awfully quick. – jaksmata 15:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have enhanced the article again by adding another source where it says " even the country's religious leaders have appeared undisturbed, even amused ..." by Begum antics. Nevertheless, I think you are right; the above fact should go more like: ... Ali Saleem (pictured), also known as Begum Nawazish Ali, is the first ever cross-dressing Pakistani man to have gained acceptance in the conservative Islamic nation of Pakistan? - Arun Reginald (talk · contribs) 17:06, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can't verify the other source due to internet filtering where I'm at right now. Yes, it's frustrating, but there's nothing I can do about it. Someone else will have to check it. – jaksmata 16:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The second hook sounds okay, but you will need to provide a cite for it, I can't see one, in fact the Blade article says cross-dressing males are a long-established tradition in Pakistan. Gatoclass (talk) 09:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*... that Welsh soprano Amy Evans last sang in public at age 91 and was the last surviving original cast member of a Savoy Opera when she died in Baltimore, Maryland in 1983 at age 98? -- self-nom Drhoehl (talk) 03:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 6

... that in 1905 Lithuanian elites demanded that the Russian Empire create a country based on Ethnographic Lithuania, although ethnic Lithuanians were less than 30% of the proposed population? – jaksmata 15:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, sounds good, thanks! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 23:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think for balance you will have to mention in the article that Poland's position was that it wanted to annex the whole of "ethnographic Lithuania" and give the Lithuanians there "a degree of autonomy", otherwise the account may look one-sided. Gatoclass (talk) 03:12, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ummm, that's incorrect. Polish government recognized the Lithuanian right for self-determination - on territories where Lithuanians had a majority. While Poland proposed a federation to Lithuania (see Międzymorze and krajowcy), it never tried to annex it - even through it easily could (due to overwhelming numerical military superiority). Polish-Lithuanian War was fought only over the disputed border territories and involved a small part of the Polish Army, Poles never had any intention of taking over purely Lithuanian territories (Józef Piłsudski, supporter of the federation, in particular was vehemently opposed to any such idea due to his sympathy for Lithuanians, and his opponent, Roman Dmowski, had little need for non-Poles in his idea of a state).
"Never tried to annex it" is questionable in light of the Polish attempt to er, annex, all of Lithuania in August 1919 [1] - also "Pilsudski then tried in August 1919 to overthrow the Lithuanian government in Kaunas, but his plotters found no...." [2] (Timothy Snyder) This attempt is further referenced in Sejny Uprising. Complex issue, multiple tags on article. Novickas (talk) 16:04, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That said, now that I reread Jaksmata hook, it is not entirely correct either, as the Great Seimas of Vilnius demanded wide autonomy, but not independence. Do also remember that the article and hook is not about Poland nor the Great Seimas of Vilnius but about the ideological concept of the "ethnographic Lithuania". --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 05:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, that was incorrect, I didn't read far enough into the reference. However, the reference does say that there was conflicting census data over Vilnius (which presumably the war was fought over) with Russian data showing a tiny Polish minority while German data showed a Polish majority. So if the war was fought over Vilnius, it appears that each side had census data showing their claim was the stronger. So perhaps that should be in the article instead. Gatoclass (talk) 06:57, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
On reflection, there's no way I am going to be able to resolve this as I am simply out of my depth on this topic, so I've handballed it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Lithuania and asked them to comment. If no-one there objects, then I'm happy to see the article run. Gatoclass (talk) 07:07, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Current hook is not supported by text; using one statistics but ignoring others is POV, article as it stands is OR, for other issues see talk, M.K. (talk) 08:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I do object completely - this article has big factual errors. My major objection is that the article does not even try to explain what does "ethnographic" mean and why was it considered "ethnographic", and what exact territory was called Ethnographic Lithuania. I can only say, that the borders (supposedly changing, as presented in the article, although no timeline is presented) in the article clearly do not correspond with Ethnographic Lithuania, recognized as such since middle of 19th century.
Furthermore article mentions Ethnographic Lithuania in the lead and soon jumps into Lithuanian territorial aspirations evaluation without even providing a link between article’s name and the developments in 1918-1920, rushes into dubious not sourced allegations and WP:SYN on forced re-Lithuanization.
And even furthermore, the article is written without attributing one's evaluations, just providing them as facts (i.e. referencing, not attributing). I do have much more questions and objections, they are presented on article's talk page and no comprehensible answers are provided. --Lokyz (talk) 12:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also