Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.

Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit

this header: view • edit

Current requests for protection

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

La Sierra University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Frequent IP vandalism. IP users are frequently adding links to http://www.educatetruth.com, seemingly trying to drive traffic to that site. Brianweedster (talk) 06:40, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Mr. Troop Mom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Request temporary protection. Page is being flooded with IP and New User vandalism. Over 50 edits in the past hour. Inomyabcs (talk) 06:38, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Antarctica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection vandalism. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 06:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma^msg 06:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Stan Ridgway (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect: This page is trolled by an unregistered user, Geekoo, who removes information in a manner that suggests that they are either Ridgway themselves or someone close to him. The most common removal is Ridgway's full name, which is cited in other sources and is certainly encyclopedic. This back and forth removal/addition has caused a small edit war on this page. Ronark (talk) 05:41, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined We don't protect because of one editor. I suggest warning Geekoo for edit-warring. Enigma^msg 05:56, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Laird (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism. Persistent removal of passage by a series of IPs all within same range. JNW (talk) 04:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm also going to look into a rangeblock. Enigma^msg 04:50, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Amanda Bynes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 03:27, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigma^msg 06:36, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:12.38.4.10 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection user talk of blocked user, Using to be harrassing and annoying. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined I reblocked with talk page editing disabled. Enigma^msg 01:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Collectonian (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Being hit by Bambifan101 again. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:16, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Flyguy649 ^talk 01:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

The Princess and the Frog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, And another new target of Bambifan101's socks. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigma^msg 01:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Mary Poppins (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Being hit by User:Bambifan101 sockpuppets yet again. One missed in earlier drives, but guess he was running low on targets. Long term please. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:51, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigma^msg 02:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Girl Got Game (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Being hit by User:Bambifan101 sockpuppets yet again. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:51, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigma^msg 01:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

The Aristocats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Being hit by User:Bambifan101 socks. Please do long term protection. If questions, ask or see related Long Term Abuse report. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigma^msg 02:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Warner Music Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism. Due to recent controversy surrounding the group, as many as 4 edits per day are vandalism. IPs and registered users alike have completely deleted the contents of the page and replaced it with slander. Imperatore (talk) 00:54, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma^msg 01:38, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection. The page is getting out of hand due to edit diputes between users frantically editing in old, inaccurate information, and the ones correcting it according to the new information coming from the movie having been premiered in select locations. We're getting about 30 edits an hour, 90% of them from unregistered users. uKER (talk) 23:38, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cirt (talk) 23:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Xinyu (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Permanent full protectin. Indefinitely blocked troll is using his Talk page to make attacks on Barack Obama in violation of WP:BLP. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Ann B. Davis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, This article has been the persistent target of insertion of irrelevant non-article specific trivia. It has been removed multiple times by multiple editors but to no avail. The issue is compounded by the fact that although the re-insertion appears to be by multiple anonymous IP editors, the consistency of behavior and edit summaries to revert the material, appears to be from one editor using a dynamic IP of some sort or an IP masking program. It has persisted to the point that it has become vandalism to a WP:BLP. Please semi-protect this article to allow respite to the multiple editors who have to futilely watchdog this and discourage the vandal. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:08, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cirt (talk) 23:47, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

User:(npcserver)/Sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

full protection dispute. (npcserver) (talk) 22:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined, there appears to be no such dispute relating to the sandbox page. Jamie^☆S93 22:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Singapore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, Once every few months, I have to come here and beg somebody to semi-pp this article page due to those persistent anon IP vandals (please check the page's edit history if you don't trust me!), my question now is... can we get a better deal here? Please help to semi-pp it... indef if possible because I really hate to trouble people all over the place for this sort of trivial matter. Dave1185 (talk) 21:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cirt (talk) 21:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Antonio Cromartie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, IP editing, adding in irrelevant information, edit warring. RF23 (talk) 20:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No vandalism today. SoWhy 20:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

In a Perfect World... (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection dispute, Edit war between a registered user and IP-hopping user. — Σxplicit 19:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 20:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Disney Sing Along Songs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Massive number of edits by 67.86.56.32 (talk · contribs) and other anonymous users including some vandalism and content removal, over a few weeks, being reverted over by several editors. Believe temporary protection may be warranted --Mysidia (talk) 19:22, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. SoWhy 19:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Giovani Dos Santos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Heavyish vandalism by multiple IPs. Govvy (talk) 19:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 19:40, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Mikheil Saakashvili (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-Protect - persistent ip vandalism recently. --Kober^Talk 18:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 19:00, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

The Stig (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-Protect - Given the editing and vandalism history of the article with people trying to "out" The Stig by attaching names of racing drivers, I feel the ongoing drama before the lead-up to the episode tonight is of some concern.--293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 18:08, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 18:57, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Iceland (supermarket) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection, Page a target of sockpuppets. Needs protection to stop disruption. MITH 18:04, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 18:56, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Template:Supermarkets in Ireland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection, Page being contioniuously targeted by sockpuppets, needs protection. MITH 18:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 18:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Stilwell, Oklahoma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect Consistent vandalism; only edits are persistent attempts to introduce one non-notable. JNW (talk) 18:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 18:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Jesse49 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection user talk of blocked user, User is an indef blocked sock of User:Dingbat2007. User has been using his talk page as a "toy" to create infoboxes and information of fake television stations. This is a misuse of the talk page. Requesting indef block of talk page. NeutralHomer • Talk • 17:33, 20 June 2009 (UTC) 17:33, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. SoWhy 18:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Current requests for unprotection

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Christopher Gilbert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Christopher Gilbert has been locked deleted. on a user page i have a proposed page for this poet: [1] appears notable to me. Pohick2 (talk) 01:39, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

i have also made an edit request to the talk page: Talk:Christopher Gilbert Pohick2 (talk) 02:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

thanks, hopefully the good content will deter the bad. Pohick2 (talk) 14:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: Reviewed and done by MSGJ (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). SoWhy 20:56, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Disney XD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Super Smash Bros. Brawl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection goes to Disney XD & Super Smash Bros. Brawl!--151.199.133.61 (talk) 13:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: Ask the protecting admins, PeterSymonds (talk · contribs) and Stifle (talk · contribs), first please. If you just want to correct something, you can use {{editsemiprotected}} on the talk pages as well. SoWhy 19:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

The Fox and the Hound (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and {{la:One Hundred and One Dalmatians}}

These have been protected FOR MONTHS and need some unprotection. I wanna try to revert this edit to The Fox and the Hound as it looks dubuious, and merge 101 Dalmatians (1961 film) with One Hundred and One Dalmatians. Skylab's little chicken (talk) 20:47, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Please contact the protecting administrator, Tanthalas39 (talk · contribs), to request unprotection. Regards SoWhy 21:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Replyed back at Sowhy's talk page. Skylab's little chicken (talk) 21:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Please deny all. This is Bambifan101 yet again. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:43, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Fulfilled/denied requests

Pizza Hut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temp-Full - Edit warring. There was an article on the web that stated Pizza Hut may be changing its name to The Hut, so several contributors moved the article and edited the word pizza out of it. The problem is that the article was about a rumor the company might change the name, and it has been going back and forth between the edits. (A second article clarified it to be a new concept by the company) It needs a week to work its way through the news system to confirm or deny the truth of the name change. --Jeremy (blah blah) 16:18, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined, one IP has been blocked and one has stopped. SoWhy 18:51, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

1953 Iranian coup d'état (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protection dispute, Edit warring despite a lack of consensus, with a dozen reverts and partial reverts in the last few days.--Kurdo777 (talk) 15:40, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'll keep an eye on it. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Total Drama, The Musical (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect Although brand-new, it already seems to be a target for IP vandals like its sister articles Total Drama Island and Total Drama Action (which is also semi-protected). --BlueSquadronRaven 14:18, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 18:46, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Status of religious freedom by country (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect Edit-war between two anons. -- Jeff3000 (talk) 13:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. by Nishkid64 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). SoWhy 18:45, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Amber Lee Ettinger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Re-adding of libelous categories by anon. Rob (talk) 13:19, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's probably just one user, but with ISP that keeps changing the IP. DMacks (talk) 14:11, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Jizya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-Portect Constant edit warring from IPs, constant disagreements with IPs and registered users. Semi-Protection for 30 days.--Lanternix (talk) 12:24, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. by Nishkid64 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). SoWhy 18:44, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Template:Football kit/doc (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

semi-protection high-visiblity template, New users constantly play with the strip colours in here, usually changing them to whatever team they support. This isn't productive and occasionally results in the examples getting broken. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 18:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Shakira discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-Portect Constant edit warring from IPs, constant disagreements with IPs and registered users. Semi-Protection for the period of 30 days should do it. NOT Full protection, Semi. Exact same situation with Shakira ISTHnR | Knock Knock | Who's There? 09:30, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 18:40, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Shakira (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-Portect Constant edit warring from IPs, constant disagreements with IPs and registered users. Semi-Protection for the period of 30 days should do it. NOT Full protection, Semi ISTHnR | Knock Knock | Who's There? 09:22, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 18:39, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Fallen (Transformers) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism + blanking. AcesUpMaSleeve (talk) 05:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 18:39, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Duncan Norvelle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Anom IP vandalism. // A Raider Like Indiana 04:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Did this one and the related two not long ago. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Farah Pahlavi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. Persistent anon switches IP-addresses to vandalise the page. Parishan (talk) 03:56, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Allen3 ^talk 09:37, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. AcesUpMaSleeve (talk) 03:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined While there is a large amount of anonymous activity on this page, the majority of it appears at this time to be constructive edits with only minimal vandalism. --Allen3 ^talk 10:18, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Altaf Hussain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Article is of a controversial Pakistani politician, is being frequently targetted by IP vandals to disparage them. Fences&Windows 02:24, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - KrakatoaKatie 03:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Up (2009 film)‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, for 14 days or so would be nice. Due to frequent hoax/vandal edits from numerous new and anon users, which seems to be the case on this and many other Pixar-related film articles currently (with UP being popular at the box office, this is to be expected, I'm sure.) SpikeJones (talk) 01:31, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jamie^☆S93 02:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

List of film trilogies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, Same as the duologies. One user adding redlinks, no articles and grouping unrelated films together. Darrenhusted (talk) 23:32, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. KrakatoaKatie 03:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Poverty in Pakistan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection ip User:70.112.205.43 and ip 24.28.79.43 are both seperate editors who are prolific socks who have been baneed but keep coming back they constantly pov push on the article and i have tried and failed to stop them i am taking the chance now to ask for protection against there attacks as they may soon come back yet again there are other articles too which they attack 86.154.149.144 (talk) 23:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC) I also require urgent help in containing both the socks attacks please could some one assist in protecting the articles they attack please ensure that you undo the edit they make and then protect as you can see both the users have a nexus of pov pushing and when one gets blocked the other jumps in to re insert the pov edits 86.154.149.144 (talk) 23:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Here is the proof of ip 70 being a sock of Hkelkar [2] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.154.149.144 (talk) 23:32, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Please see User:Thegreyanomaly/Nangparbat the evader. This ip is a warring sock of banned user Nangparbat. It would undermine the credibility of wikipedia if admins were to use technical means to support the edits of a banned user.24.28.76.153 (talk) 23:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

See now he attacks admins as i said before once ip 70 gets blocked ip 24 pops up to rescue the pov this is surely blatant proof of sock nexus 86.154.149.144 (talk) 23:41, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

See This edit summary by the Pakistani sockpuppet.24.28.76.153 (talk) 23:42, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I unwittingly stepped into this mire and just as quickly extricated myself - too messy for someone not familiar with the situation and I don't have the hour required to determine which IP is which. Sorry if you see actions on my part that don't seem complete. Tan | 39 23:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

see this edit by the indian pov pushing Hkelkar[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/70.112.205.43]and his sock pal Disallowedtoveiw[3] very similair edits proof no doubt of sock nexus 86.154.149.144 (talk) 23:53, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I just blocked both editors for disruptive editing. That was surely enough of that nonsense. Tan | 39 23:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. by Nishkid64 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). SoWhy 18:33, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

List of film duologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, One user (User:86.156.235.250) is obsessed with adding films which have not been made to this page. Despite my best efforts he/she is not willing to talk about it, and deliberately and wilfully ignores WP:NFF. A few days break would be handy. Darrenhusted (talk) 23:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. - KrakatoaKatie 02:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Madiga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, Page has seen a high number of "undo" edits - probably just 2 dynamic IP users, as it alternates from 86.x.x.x and 70.x.x.x.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

IP70 XXX is a sock of banned user Hkelkar just to let admins know 81.158.129.71 (talk) 00:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

IP 86.x.x.x is sock of banned troll Nangparbat.24.28.72.170 (talk) 00:04, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Observe attempt to WP:CANVASS supporters [4].24.28.72.170 (talk) 00:10, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Observe nexus of Hkelkar aka ip 70 xxx [5] and ip 24 xxx aka Disallowedfromveiwing [6] both are using dynamic ips to push the same pov over the same articles this is getting very tiresome I shall deal with Hkelkar(ip70) and Disallowedtoveiw(ip24) have fun boys while you can ;-) 81.158.129.71 (talk) 00:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. by Nishkid64 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). SoWhy 18:37, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Power Rangers: RPM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. IPs keeping adding unconfirmed information, stuff that hasn't happened, etc. ---Shadow (talk) 05:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined, most IP edits seem good-faith improvements SoWhy 18:37, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Starship_Troopers_3:_Marauder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism Page has consistently been vandalized by a dynamic IP user. The individual refuses to discuss edits, and seems to cycle between simply adding linkspam (a fansite) to removing parts of the article to slant the page's POV from neutral to one in which the movie is purported to have been very very good (reviews are mixed at best). In the past, a semi-protection of a couple weeks has seemed to quiet the vandalism for that period of time, and a subsequent set of 2 or 3 weeks. Considering the consistent nature of this vandal (returning again and again for the same purpose over many many months now), perhaps a slightly longer period of semi-protection could delay the attacks for a longer time? Thanks in advance for the help. JasonDUIUC (talk) 22:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

In the intervening period of time, the same dynamic IP vandal has come in and vandalized the page again. Is there a reason that this request hasn't been acted upon in over 12 hours? Thanks in advance. JasonDUIUC (talk) 15:36, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 18:35, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Wexford Collegiate Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection vandalism, Article has seen a ridiculous amount of vandalism in the past few days, and not all of it from IP users either. Showing no signs of letting up. If full protection is not an option, I'm requesting semi-protection at least. —LedgendGamer 21:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If autoconfirmed editors vandalize, those can be blocked one by one. Enigma^msg 22:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Persecution of Christians (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection dispute, Requesting semi-protected indefinite protection (1-2 weeks?). Some sort of edit war between IP editors. I've managed to get them talking to some extent, but it's devolving again. I'll handle the edit war, I just need page protection to help stop the reverts. I think the correct wrong version to leave it at is this. tedder (talk) 20:16, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Brought to you courtesy of Mazca (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (congrats BTW, welcome to the ranks :) ) Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 04:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Gerald Walpin firing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

full protection vandalism, Users repeatedly introducing copyright violations; see WP:ANI#ChildOfMidnight. Sceptre ^(talk) 20:13, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined Best to keep this at ANI. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 20:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

2009 FIFA Confederations Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection Target for sneaky vandalism, changes to incorrect scores and information, massive speculation added and similar problems. I have been working on the article, so I'm requesting protection here for a neutral admin to decide. Would probably be required 28 June 2009 but anything is probably useful at this point. Regards SoWhy 19:55, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma^msg 20:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Rosa DeLauro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Since this diff in late April, this page has seen about 44 edits, of which a full 15 are vandalism, nearly all of which are exactly that same edit (and nearly all of which come from IPs starting with 99, usually 99.18 and 99.147). That makes about one-third of all edits vandalism, and another third reverting those. I have no idea why, but it's excessive. ~ Amory (user • talk • contribs) 19:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigma^msg 19:55, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Day26 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection vandalism and edit warring. The IP's want to fight me on the record sales when they do not have sources. I keep on rolling back, but this is becoming an edit war. The only source they've had to back up their claim was a forum in france, not very reliable. IHelpWhenICan (talk) 19:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined, seems to have stopped by now. SoWhy 18:34, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Nerissa Corazon Soon-Ruiz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Request Semi-Protect, repeated inclusion by anonymous users of unsourced negative content.Martinlc (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Tough one. It may need a semi because the IP is dynamic. It's clearly one user. Maybe an admin is willing to apply a rangeblock? I blocked the latest IP. Enigma^msg 19:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

(ec) I semi protected it for 2 weeks because this seems an ongoing violation by a dynamic IP. Feel free to revert protection if you think it necessary. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 20:00, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Michael Cooke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Request Semi-Protect, anonymous user (who often creates one-day accounts as well) is repeatedly vandalising this article multiple times a day, for over a week, removing information, changing quotes and adding likely-spurious invented details. Sherurcij ^{(speaker for the dead)} 16:32, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined The vandalising IP had previously been blocked; the individual making these edits is doing so in good faith and appears to be removing poorly sourced negative material. It is unfortunate that they have been repeatedly reverted and given a vandalism warning; I have reinstated their revert. CIreland (talk) 14:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Walter Cronkite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection dispute, Dispute about "reliable sources" regarding his reported illness. Willking1979 (talk) 16:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't want to decline this yet, as it will probably need to be protected, but based upon discussion at ANI this hasn't reached that point yet. Need to keep an eye on this though.---Balloonman ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 16:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Depleted uranium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, Edit warring by acknowledged COI, SPA, registered yesterday to edit war on this article and file SSP report on several users. See Special:Contributions/RadTek. Abd (talk) 13:05, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Fully protected for three days. Tan | 39 14:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

British Isles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection dispute, Edit warring. Despite previous page protection and lack of consensus, an editor keep on adding his content. MITH 12:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. by another admin. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Max Mosley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism on a high trafficked article. Apterygial 09:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma^msg 14:18, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Ilham Aliyev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite full protection dispute, This page requires protection due there are lots of vandalism and users keep adding irrelevant information. NovaSkola (talk) 04:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined Far from being lots of vandalism, the article has not been vandalized in four weeks. Enigma^msg 14:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)