Jump to content

Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PumpkinSky

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wizardman (talk | contribs) at 15:25, 27 February 2012 (→Articles 1 through 20: collapsing). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Contributor copyright investigation

This CCI cleanup subpage has been opened because concerns of multiple point infringement have been substantiated and further steps are necessary to address the serious risk of copyright violation from the listed contributor. Listings are not intended to imply a presumption of bad faith on the part of any contributor, as copyright laws vary widely around the world and many contributors who violate Wikipedia's copyrights policy do so inadvertently through not understanding it or the United States' laws that govern it.

If you are here because of a note on an article's talk page explaining removal of text, please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline.

Instructions

All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at Wikipedia:CCI#Open_investigations to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

  • {{CCI-open|Contributor name|Day Month Year|completed=yes}}

Text

  • Examine the article or the diffs linked below.
  • If the contributor has added creative content, either evaluate it carefully for copyright concerns or remove it.
  • If you remove text presumptively, place {{subst:CCI|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page.
  • If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place {{subst:cclean}} on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
  • If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with {{subst:copyvio}}, linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.
  • To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place {{subst:copyvio|url=see talk}} on the article's face and {{subst:CCId|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.
  • After examining an article:
  • replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with indication of whether problem was found (add {{y}}) or not (add {{n}}). If the article is blanked and may be deleted, please indicate as much after the {{y}}.
  • Follow with your username and the time to indicate to others that the article has been evaluated and appropriately addressed. This is automatically generated by four tildes (~~~~)
  • If a section is complete, consider collapsing it by placing {{collapse top}} and {{collapse bottom}} beneath the section header and after the final listing.

Images

  • Examine the images below. For free images:
    • Does the image look non-free? Is it likely the uploader is the copyright holder?
    • Is the image properly licensed and sourced? Be aware of images that say "this image is licensed under X" without specifying who created it.
    • Do a reverse image search using TinEye. Check the license of the source page. Compare the last modified time with the (Commons) upload time.
    • Do a Google image search for phrases that describe the image's contents.
    • See Wikipedia:Guide to image deletion#Addressing suspected copyright infringement on dealing with cases of possible image copyright infringement. There is no need to open a possibly unfree files listing. Administrators may delete images from multiple point infringers presumptively in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Evaluators who are not administrators may section images into a "deletion requested" section for administrator attention.
  • For non-free images, determine whether each image meets our non-free content criteria.
    • Note that Commons does not accept non-free content.
  • Annotate the listing with the action taken, e.g. if the image was tagged no source write "no source"; if the fair use claim is deemed ok you can write "OK fair use".

Background

See WT:CCI thread for immediate background. Also see WP:Contributor copyright investigations/Vanished 6551232 for other investigation page of this editor. Amalthea 19:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution survey

PumpkinSky (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

This report covers contributions to 729 articles from timestamp 2011-07-07 23:02:13 UTC to timestamp 2012-01-30 01:58:46 UTC.

Articles 1 through 20

Extended content

Articles 21 through 40

Extended content

Articles 41 through 60

No violations found in subject edits in this section --SPhilbrick(Talk) 16:07, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 61 through 80

Most are good edits. Found one copyvio by Pumpkin, and one by someone else.

Articles 81 through 100

all good edits - refs, formatting, one or two sent. additions, no c.p. found

Articles 101 through 120

All checked: references and some text. No copyvio. - Bilby (talk) 06:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 121 through 140

All checked: referencing and minor text additions. No problems detected. - Bilby (talk) 05:54, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 141 through 160

All checked: mostly referencing, some text. Minor concerns with text addressed. - Bilby (talk) 05:32, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 161 through 180

All checked: mostly referencing, some text. No copyvio detected. - Bilby (talk) 04:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 181 through 200

All checked, mostly gnomish work and referencing, some text. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 03:56, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 201 through 220

No violations found in subject edits in this section --SPhilbrick(Talk) 19:29, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 221 through 240

All good and constructive edits, mostly adding refs for sourcing

Red XN All good and constructive. Amalthea 22:24, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 241 through 260

all good edits, no text added (refs, wikilinking) The Interior (Talk) 03:32, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 261 through 280

All fine. Mostly referencing, ref formatting. Some text that checked out ok.

Articles 281 through 300

No violations found in subject edits in this section --SPhilbrick(Talk) 14:52, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 301 through 320

All clear. No copyvio - mostly gnomish work. One instance of linkvio now removed.

Articles 321 through 340

All OK mostly helpful minor edits and 2 prod tags Montanabw(talk) 21:10, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 341 through 360

Articles 361 through 380

all constructive gnomish edits

Articles 381 through 400

same as above, dablinks

Articles 401 through 420

All checked. No copyright violations Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 18:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 421 through 440

Articles 441 through 460

Articles 461 through 480

All are minor, gnoming edits. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:39, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 481 through 500

all minor edits (wikilinking) The Interior (Talk) 03:35, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 501 through 520

all checked, all constructive minor fixes and improvements

Red XN Amalthea 23:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 521 through 540

all checked, all constructive minor fixes

Red XN Amalthea 23:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 541 through 560

These can't be copyvios by virtue of sheer size; checked them anyway: useful copyedits.

Really, these can't be copyvios. Drmies (talk) 04:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 561 through 580

Extended content

Articles 581 through 600

All checked, gnomish edits, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 03:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 601 through 620

All checked, gnomish edits, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 03:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 621 through 640

All checked, gnomish edits, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 03:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 641 through 660

All checked, gnomish edits, some content removals, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 03:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 661 through 680

All checked, gnomish edits, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 681 through 700

Articles 701 through 720

Extended content

Articles 721 through 729

all checked, no problems

Red XN only deletions and trivial syntax cleanup. Amalthea 21:30, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This report generated by Contribution Surveyor at 2012-02-01T18:59:21+00:00 in 0.46 sec.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations/PumpkinSky&oldid=479130629"