User:Excirial/Dashboard/Content
| 4 | Normal | |
| 3.68 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 19:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC) | edit | |
Reports
[edit]User-reported
[edit]- The authentic Irish Jacobite (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – WP:NOTHERE. LTA. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 18:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- 71.185.54.22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 21:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- 82.65.145.77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – longterm disruption. FMSky (talk) 21:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2A02:587:811B:8800:B852:7DC6:4164:1408 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) persistent disruptive editing after final warning. signed, Willondon (talk) 21:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Pero coo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2402:8100:3871:E299:F546:923:8D3A:6D2B (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Block evasion by 2402:8100:384E:22D0:F546:923:8D3A:6D2B (talk · contribs) / 2402:8100:3863:7729:B1B8:81D9:1675:B22A (talk · contribs). AntiDionysius (talk) 21:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 1 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 3 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 2 |
| Possibly contested candidates | 4 |
| Other candidates | 9 |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 3 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 47 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 10 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 40 items
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
- August 30 (Friday) (0 open / 64 closed / 64 total discussions)
- August 29 (Thursday) (0 open / 47 closed / 47 total discussions)
- August 28 (Wednesday) (0 open / 51 closed / 51 total discussions)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: High level of IP and auto-confirmed vandalism who are changing the box office figures that is not said in the source. Some of these auto-confirmed accounts have also got multiple warnings. Please add an increased level of protection to this page. RangersRus (talk) 21:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- This should be extended-confirmed-protected. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The page has had a significant level of IP vandalism/unsourced additions for a while now. Also the subject of a possible transfer so is likely to attract more unconstructive editing Michaeldble (talk) 22:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The page has had a consistent level of IP vandalism for a while now - would suggest a longer protection Michaeldble (talk) 22:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-Protection: Constant incorrect edits based on rumors and probably on fandom preference.The actress hasn’t confirmed a relationship with actor Fred Hechinger so it shouldn’t say they’re dating based only on paparazzi photos. Jvlslvr (talk) 23:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Blocked user used own userpage to make homophobic attacks. It doesn't help that user has a homophobic name. Please also delete user's contributions as they contain offensive personal attacks. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Can't edit own talk page, should be all set. GoodnightmushTalk 18:14, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: requesting Extended Confirmed Protection per ARBPIA. history of problematic edits from non-ECR users Rainsage (talk) 00:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, including possible sockpuppetry. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obvious abuse of multiple accounts. Cysquatch (talk) 03:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 03:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started again after the protection from page was removed. Sid95Q (talk) 03:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – About a day from harassment. SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 03:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by new users and IPs. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued and ceaseless IP vandalism changing details to conflict with the given sources and that which conflict with the company's website for factory locations. Zinnober9 (talk) 04:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The talk page has been edit protected before, there's an IP user from Germany who is showing stalker-like behaviour, disagreeing about Arjona's personal life. Now they're calling her names. Perhaps a somewhat longer edit protection this time? The talk page is barely used and the IP user needs to cut it out real fast. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 05:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – This is the user page of a banned user, which is being targeted by WP:LTA/HR socks gaming extended-confirmed permission to vandalise this EC-protected page. As this page belongs to a user who was banned more than four years ago, I think we should just apply indef full protection so that the LTA vandal has less things to do. — AP 499D25 (talk) 06:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – This is the user talk page of a banned user, which is being targeted by WP:LTA/HR socks gaming extended-confirmed permission to vandalise this EC-protected page. As this page belongs to a user who was banned more than four years ago, I think we should just apply indef full protection so that the LTA vandal has less things to do. — AP 499D25 (talk) 06:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to recent events going on the following subject, a lot of IPs are vandalizing the article. James Conan Niag (talk) 06:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unsourced or otherwise questionable edits by IPs. Janhrach (talk) 06:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Frost 07:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – continued block evasion from IP and new users. Happily888 (talk) 08:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users changing ownership repeatedly. Adriazeri (talk) 11:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Adriazeri (talk) 11:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Notable alumni from the school's post-1980s being removed discriminately. HM2021 (talk) 13:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Caste disruptions
[edit]- Abhira people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Vrishni (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent WP:CASTE disruption by different sock networks for years (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kroshta, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/True History 369), unlikely to stop anytime soon. Considering the sanctioned topic area and the EP at Yadav (with which the socking is connected) asking for the same here. Gotitbro (talk) 13:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Targeted by now-blocked vandal Mouchkjhh (talk · contribs) and their collection of rotating IPs performing identical vandalistic, unexplained edits. See also WP:ANI#Disruptive edits in politics-related articles. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Continued editwarring on infobox image, open discussion on talk page. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. C F A 💬 16:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. C F A 💬 16:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Biggest city in the Eastern China Gigalopolis? Making it suspictible to heavy vandalisim pending changes protection please 2603:8001:6940:2100:3231:35E2:C35B:EC74 (talk) 17:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- I want indefinite semi protection 2600:100C:B058:5B21:40A0:BDDA:48A9:C843 (talk) 17:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Everytime, the users who are unaware of policies, change the caste of the subject. This need to be under watch as many a times, it goes unnoticed. Admantine123 (talk) 17:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism that changes the location to Cambridgeshire despite maps listing this place being in Bedfordshire. QUICKWITTEDHARE CONVERSE 18:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yamato (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Talk:List of One Piece characters (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry and disruptive editing, for more information check the SPI. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 18:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Increasing number of disruptive IP edits within the past 24 hours, making changes contrary to a highly reliable source. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism (edit warring). Mzwanele Manyi is senior member of South African parliament and is a controversial, South African, political figure. His public profile is linked to his credibility which needs to be protected from unbalanced and inaccurate commentary. Mzansiknightsa (talk) 19:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Dawnseeker2000 21:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dancing with the Stars (American TV series) season 33 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent, chronic disruptive editing by IP editors. Pinging Ponyo. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 11 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC) |
| 19 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC) |
WP:RFPERM (rollback)
Rollback
[edit]- CosmLearner (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! I request for the permission - Rollback. ZeetBaralWiki 15:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 09:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Vasil3fonov (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello to anyone concerned.
I am requesting rollbacker rights, having done so before without the knowledge of having to warn users after undoing their edits, and I believe I now have a substantial track record of doing so ever since promising to fulfill that role. I now also have a good idea of how to use tools such as Twinkle effectively, which have greatly helped my work against vandalism.
Thanks for taking your time to read my request. Best regards, Vasil3fonov (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 17:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- You are still consistently failing to notify editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 09:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- The three sole examples of me not doing it from the past month and a half, which you are referring to, are the same single person, making the same changes over and over to player statistics tables through different IPs for the past 12+ months. I looked up different pages that match the categories of the ones I've undone, and the user has been warned multiple times, to no effect, making the same edit again and again. They then stop editing from that IP and start doing the same exact edits from a new one. They have been warned multiple times by multiple users for the exact same edit yet still repeatedly undo other users' work without any explanation when they are clearly in the wrong. Examples of this are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, etc., etc.; some of those edits were way over a year ago, and I am only referencing the ones that the user has been warned for (there are thousands of other such cases from tens, if not hundreds of different IPs) that they haven't been warned for by users who revert their edits. In this case, I have decided that reaching out to the user is futile and I believe that in such extreme examples, that should be an option. What is the point of a warning the user when it is clearly proven that they will keep doing it from new IPs and never read the original talk page anyway?
- I have not failed to warn a single other user for the time period since I had promised to do so, which I believe is the whole point of rollback rights in the first place. I strongly believe that this specific, and definitely irregular, case is not sufficient to justify the denial of the rights. However, this is just my point of view on the topic and if you really believe that I am in the wrong and that I should repeatedly (
and foolishly) warn the same user for the same thing that they will not stop doing, and expecting a different result, then maybe I do not really need rollback rights in the end if that is to be your final verdict. - Thanks, Vasil3fonov (talk) 11:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- You are still consistently failing to notify editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 09:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- OhHaiMark (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I believe I'm experienced enough to have this right. OhHaiMark (talk) 21:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 09:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for account creator.