Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.

Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit

this header: view • edit

Current requests for protection

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

La Sierra University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Frequent vandalism from multiple IP users. They typically replace the linked text to the University to go to their other site trying to mislead Wikipedia visitors and phish them. Brianweedster (talk) 04:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Liquor Control Board of Ontario (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Vandalism from 70.24.174.139, 76.71.40.219 and 99.235.176.172, possibly motivated by the LCBO considering strike action. Robertbyrne (talk) 01:54, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigma^msg 02:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

List of InuYasha characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary Semi-protect IP continues adding original research and personal opinions, and reordering article against consensus; IP keeps changing every few hours so warnings and blocks are not helping -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:02, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -Royalguard11(T) 01:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Philippines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Protection reporting possible vandalism on Philippines by sockpuppetry users or unknown editors distrupting the article. Please investigate this issue. Thanks Orsahnses talk 00:01 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Cutco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary Semi-protect. To protect article from being written in favor/against of the subject by anyone. Cutno (talk) 00:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -Royalguard11(T) 00:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Philippines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Permanent protection. Possibly involved in an edit war/content dispute. Previously locked seen here [1].--23prootie (talk) 22:42, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Honour and Passion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism from Singaporean banned user ColourWolf. Arbiteroftruth ^{Plead Your Case} 20:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined, It's not obvious vandalism. If there's something more going on, I'd suggest listing the case at Sockpuppet Investigations so that the matter can be fully considered. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 21:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Kate Gosselin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Jon Gosselin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Article has been pummeled with drive by vandalism/original research since the couple announced their divorce. I think a temporary semi-protection until this blows over a bit would be helpful. Thanks for any help. 13² 20:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

I've added Jon Gosselin to the request as well. --13² 20:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined, for now. I like those hidden comments you added, let's see if they help. If not relist or drop me a note. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 21:20, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Lady Gaga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temp Semi Protection - The moment semi protection expired vandals returned. The crap about her being a hermaphrodite isn't going to go away anytime soon, so, in the interests of BLP, this needs semi protecting again. — Please comment R² 19:25, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sigh, let's try it again. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 21:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Chuck Monroe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Protect against creation. This article has been deleted three times and the user doing so has been repeatedly warned. – Zntrip 18:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. The article has not been recreated since its (very recent) AfD deletion. Three deletions in 13 months is hardly repeated recreation justifying the use of some salt. Bencherlite^Talk 18:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Wang Dan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Daily one-timer IP vandalism. It may be masqueraded as a genuine content dispute, but vandalism of the first paragraph shows it's bad-faith vandalism. HkCaGu (talk) 17:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Attack Attack! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect 30 days. Came off of 7 day semi-protection due to 4chan, aleady has seen several incidents of vandalism again. (some registered users do the 4chan vandalism, but it's enough less that it is controllable) tedder (talk) 17:17, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Cornell College‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect, please, to stymie a mildly persistent IP-hopping POV-pusher. --ElKevbo (talk) 14:25, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:The Cool Kat (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protect, ever since i went on 6-month semi-wikibreak, socks of indef-blocked users have been bombarding my talk page. The Cool Kat (talk) 14:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Randomness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. The usual relentless schoolkid vandalism ever since this came back off semi. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 14:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Mary Surratt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Permanent semi-protect. This article has been under IP vandal attacks regularly for at least 4 months, since I have watching it since February 15, 2009, with well over 40 incidents concerning this particular vandalism alone. The IPs change somewhat, but all originate in Australia, and the action is always the same - revert the removal of specific content that grows a small amount with each revert, starting with changing the word "gasping" to either "farting" or "flatulence" and now reverting the removal of a rather disturbing description of Surrat's hanging. The article was semi-protected for a brief period in April but vandalism resumed when that expired. It's just gotten much too old and much too ridiculous and much too time-consuming. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 07:24, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of four months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't think indefinite protection is called for just yet. If we need to, we can revisit the issue in a few months. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Without personally reviewing the history, "40 incidents" in "4 months" means this article is being vandalised 10 times per month. Revert, block, ignore. ⟳ausa کui ^× 11:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

The Young Turks (talk show) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection. A persistent vandal operating under similar user accounts has been messing with this page for three days. Requests to stop resulted in him opening another user account, and he shows no sign of relenting. Bueller 007 (talk) 05:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Tyc2012 and Tyc1989 blocked by Toddst1. Might want to file a WP:CHECKUSER to wash out any other socks. DMacks (talk) 07:31, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Cenk Uygur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection. A persistent vandal operating under similar user accounts has been messing with this page for three days. Requests to stop resulted in him opening another user account, and he shows no sign of relenting. This is a living bio, so it's critical that it be protected. Bueller 007 (talk) 05:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Tyc2012 and Tyc1989 blocked by Toddst1. Might want to file a WP:CHECKUSER to wash out any other socks. DMacks (talk) 07:31, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Noel Fielding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. This was semi-protected for a month but only a few days after expiry, IP vandal / fix wars are back. Cavrdg (talk) 05:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Grief porn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection Article is subject to Edit-warring by anon IPs. It might be helpful to semi-protect it for a few days, which will bring the anons to the artiucle discussion. Arcayne (talk) 01:08, 23 June 2009 (UTC)`

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 07:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

List of programs broadcast by Nick at Nite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection constant vandalism of false info --Caldorwards4 (talk) 02:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:57, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

List of programs broadcast by TV Land (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection constant IP vandalism of false info --Caldorwards4 (talk) 02:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Gary Greenhill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection Article is subject to constant vandalism as another user explains on the discussion page. 17pdr (talk) 01:08, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I did block the IP inserting the defamation, though. Enigma^msg 02:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Chile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection Currently there are several established editors edit warring on that page. Some of them have made constructive contributions to the page, but at this point it seems like they're not willing to use the talk page to discuss their differences. The article is currently semi-protected due to severe IP vandalism, but because of the on-going dispute I think it would be appropriate to fully protect it so that these editors can cool down and perhaps use the talk page to sort things out. Please an administrator look into this article. So that an warning can be given to the offending parties else protect the page. Likeminas (talk) 18:17, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Current requests for unprotection

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Youth United (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotect. Please refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_March_10 I, being a different individual seek to recreate the article of this organization with all the Wikipedia policies to be taken into consideration, so unprotection of the page Youth United is sought to create this page again as per Wikipedia policies. Regards Maihunggogoi (talk) 20:50, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Recommend decline. Probably sock and has already posted to DrV and spammed multiple admins trying to get this article done as a "different individual". -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:08, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Please create a sourced version of this article in a subpage or your userspace. When this is done, please make the request again, or ask any administrator to move the page for you. I noted that Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) userfied this page here more than three months ago. If sources exist to create a proper article, please add them there. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 21:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Rationality sought. I intend to write about an Organization which works for the welfare of the Society in certain part of India, and do not intend to write about any controversial topic. A lot of third party sources have already been put up on the official website(www.youthunited.in), which can be incorporated in the new article. Please Unprotect the page to enable the recreation of the article, as everything would be written in a way that is agreeable to Wikipedia policies. Please don't violate the whole notion of creating articles freely over Wikipedia, especially when this article is about a notable Non-profit organization which is working for Society Welfare and not about topics such as porn, controversial religion views or any other stuff. It is beyond my mental subtleties, as why I am being barred to write an article about a Notable Charity Organization. Maihunggogoi (talk) 23:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Ronnie Radke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotect. If Craig Mabbitt warrents his own page then so does Ronnie Radke; I feel that the page should be safe from abuse now too. Perhaps give it another chance? --Faint Brushfire (talk) 17:08, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined The DRV on him has only just closed, with a clear consensus to allow recreation only as a protected redirect. Unprotection certainly won't happen without a draft article showing independent notability and not using criminal convictions to demonstrate notability - see the issues raised at the original deletion debate. Bencherlite^Talk 19:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Michelle Belanger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotect. The IP accounts have been adding sourced material, example:[2]. I assume the edits were not closely examined. SilkTork *^YES! 07:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: I suggest awaiting reply from DragonflySixtyseven (talk · contribs) on their talk page. I'd rather not overturn it before they had time to explain it. Regards SoWhy 08:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

The IPs have also been adding lots of stuff that's sourced to vanity presses / PR sites / the like. DS (talk) 21:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Two IP accounts have edited the article. 173.88.195.71 made this edit, which remains in the article. The other IP is 208.125.152.228, who appears to have been making good faith edits. If there is an issue with the sourcing that should be taken up directly with that IP account. If that IP account is found to be violating policy and won't respond to discussion, then warnings should be issued, and if those are ignored, then the IP account should be blocked. There is no general vandalism taking place, and IP edits like this appear to be in good faith, and are not potentially contentious or defamatory. Concerns about spam are addressed with warnings first - see Wikipedia:Spam#Warning_spammers - though I'm not convinced that there is a spamming issue here. I agree that some of the sources are questionable, though that's a matter for discussion, not blocking the editor, nor preventing all other IP accounts editing the article for the rest of the year. SilkTork *^YES! 22:31, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Crank That (Soulja Boy) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection, protected since February 2008. Should be safe since interest in this song is very low compared to the time when vandalism was very frequent here. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 04:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Done –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Mariah Carey discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

The Mariah Carey articles were protected due to incessant sockpuppeting by JuStar and Petergriffin9901, which was making it impossible to keep track of an area that was becoming seriously compromised. The protection discussion is here. Note that is specifically calls out Max24 as an editor that has been trying to keep the area clean. Max24 has since cleaned up a copy in his sandbox. I have spot-checked his changes, and they appear to be accurate. The sandbox is at User:Max24/Mariah Carey discography. Here is his request for me to review it and take care of dealing with the editing under protection. Support for Max24's efforts is on Talk:Mariah Carey discography#I'm Requesting a Change. I think it is important to take this opportunity to establish a baseline article for this heavily vandalised area.—Kww(talk) 02:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

 Done Thank you to you and Max. Enigma^msg 02:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Fulfilled/denied requests

Template:North America topic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This template should be unprotected because routine changes need to be made to it. For example, Greenland is now a sovereign state. Also, the protector of the template is the sole supporter of a controversial merge between this template and Template:South America topic and the merge suggestion cannot be removed even though the suggestion has drawn no support since its origin back in February. Neelix (talk) 12:39, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Not unprotected. Too visible and too easily broken to be vulnerable to vandalism. However, I agree with you about the merge proposal notice and I removed it. Consider requesting specific edits below, here. Tan | 39 15:26, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Disney XD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Super Smash Bros. Brawl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection goes to Disney XD & Super Smash Bros. Brawl!--151.199.133.61 (talk) 13:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: Ask the protecting admins, PeterSymonds (talk · contribs) and Stifle (talk · contribs), first please. If you just want to correct something, you can use {{editsemiprotected}} on the talk pages as well. SoWhy 19:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

The Fox and the Hound (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and {{la:One Hundred and One Dalmatians}}

These have been protected FOR MONTHS and need some unprotection. I wanna try to revert this edit to The Fox and the Hound as it looks dubuious, and merge 101 Dalmatians (1961 film) with One Hundred and One Dalmatians. Skylab's little chicken (talk) 20:47, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Please contact the protecting administrator, Tanthalas39 (talk · contribs), to request unprotection. Regards SoWhy 21:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Replyed back at Sowhy's talk page. Skylab's little chicken (talk) 21:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Please deny all. This is Bambifan101 yet again. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:43, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined Requester indef-sock-blocked. DMacks (talk) 06:48, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Jehovah's Witnesses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection Edit warring over content, with repeated deletions of sourced text. JNW (talk) 00:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined User hasn't reverted since being warned on his talk page. Relist if he comes back. ⟳ausa کui ^× 00:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Centereach High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection, high level of recent IP vandalism. Request 24-hour semi-protection. ERK ^talk 22:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma^msg 23:05, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Korn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection, IPs continuously making edits regarding the genre, which a conflict was recently concluded.--F-22 Raptor ^IV 20:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Done by User:Malinaccier. Enigma^msg 20:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I was getting there! :p Malinaccier (talk) 20:49, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Flo Rida (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection vandalism, a lot of recent vandalism - 4 IP's in 12 hours. A couple of the IP's didn't get completely reverted immediately. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 19:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma^msg 20:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

The Main Event Mafia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection IP's adding unsourced info, specifically that Samoa Joe has joined the group (Joe helped out one of the members last night, but there is no source that this means he will joing their group). TJ Spyke 19:11, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma^msg 20:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Sallie Ford (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection user talk of blocked user, User just using to basically act silly/be annoying and abuse the unblock template. Sockpuppet of user banned the other day who did the same kind of stuff and ended up having to have that page locked too. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

• User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. –xeno^talk 18:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Characters in Resident Evil 4 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Edit war caused by 97.106.45.230 (As well as several sockpuppet accounts and IP's in the 97.106.*.* range), and a few disagreeing users. Dengarde ► Complaints 18:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Fully protected until dispute is resolved. Malinaccier (talk) 20:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Modern Warfare 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection - IP vandalism resumed shortly after the expiration of the last round of semi-protection, and appears to be on the rise. -- Commdor {Talk} 18:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma^msg 18:18, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Mario Gómez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection It was semi-protected for three days but after the protection ran out, IP vandalism (from the 125.24.*.* range) started again. --Jaellee (talk) 17:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for one week. Malinaccier (talk) 20:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Joan Miró (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection Persistent vandalism, from numerous IPs, many of which are coming from the same educational (!) institution, a longterm contributor of vandalism. JNW (talk) 13:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Done It was protected for one day by another administrator. I've also blocked 212.248.245.16/28 for a month. - Rjd0060 (talk) 14:04, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Template:Winx Club (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection. Some unregistered users are making this template a fancruft ground. JSH-alive ^{talk • cont • mail} 12:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:06, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Neda Soltai (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Full Protection This is starting to get out of control, so I'm going to request full protection for 24 hours until things (hopefully) settle down some. There's some edit warring going on (including a second page move within the last 24 hours), this is obviously an emotionally charged issue for many (which may be right, but is out of place herE), and the talk page is turning into a forum and link farm (especially by anon IP users.

By the way, in regards to the page movement, is there a procedure for that someplace (like how there is a procedure for page deletion)? I think that the talk page would be a decent place to discuss it, but if there's a dedicated procedure for issues related to page naming conflicts then I'd like to see it. Thanks.
— Ω (talk) 07:33, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I've move protected the page for a day, and protected the redirects for a day. Since I've edited the page, anyone who thinks protection is inappropriate should feel free to un-do it. Tom Harrison ^Talk 12:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Morphou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protecion The following articles have been frequently targeted over the last week by multiple sockpuppets of User:VivaNorthCyprus and should be semi-protected in order to prevent the frequent re-insertion of POV vandalism by ever new sockpuppets of the same user :

• Geunyeli
• Kioneli
• Lapithos
• Lefka
• Lefkoniko
• Louroujina Salient
• Mandres, Cyprus
• Morphou
• Ortakioi
• Trikomo, Cyprus

Passportguy (talk) 00:05, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined, Report is stale (no fault of the editor, but no one saw it at the bottom of the queue). No vandal edits today. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 21:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Princess Protection Program (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary Semi-protect. Many unconstructive edits by anon IPs and registered users recently, speculation, misinformation, and blanking of sections. I request this article to be temporary Semi-protected until the movie premiers in the US. Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 22:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. by PeterSymonds (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). -Royalguard11(T) 02:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)