Jump to content

Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DeadEyeArrow (talk | contribs)
m Reverted 1 edit by 63.3.22.129; Rmv request, it's a move we need to fix a cut and paste, not a merge. (Edit made with TW)
Line 19: Line 19:
===2008===
===2008===
====March 2008====
====March 2008====
* [[Armstrong (tickler) oscillator]] into [[Armstrong oscillator]], duplicate articles on the same subject. See [[Talk:Armstrong_oscillator#Merge_proposal]]. —[[User:%D0%90|A]] 17:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
* [[List of English monarchs]] and [[List of British monarchs]]. Discussion see [[Talk:List of British monarchs]]. [[User:Angusmclellan|Angus McLellan]] [[User talk:Angusmclellan|(Talk)]] 18:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
* [[List of English monarchs]] and [[List of British monarchs]]. Discussion see [[Talk:List of British monarchs]]. [[User:Angusmclellan|Angus McLellan]] [[User talk:Angusmclellan|(Talk)]] 18:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
* [[Outside Context Problem]] to [[Excession]]. [[Talk:Outside Context Problem#Merge_proposal|Discussion]]. The 1996 [[Iain M. Banks]] novel Excession is the origin of this neologism and, so far, the only referenced work on the article. Although Banks' idea may be applicable to cultural anthropology, there is as yet no sign that the term has acquired currency. The merge has been challenged, however, hence this discussion. 11:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
* [[Outside Context Problem]] to [[Excession]]. [[Talk:Outside Context Problem#Merge_proposal|Discussion]]. The 1996 [[Iain M. Banks]] novel Excession is the origin of this neologism and, so far, the only referenced work on the article. Although Banks' idea may be applicable to cultural anthropology, there is as yet no sign that the term has acquired currency. The merge has been challenged, however, hence this discussion. 11:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:24, 4 March 2008

This page is an incomplete list of proposed mergers. Anyone may list any article merger proposal here. This is optional, and it does not replace any of the other steps in the merger process. Please add the appropriate merger tag(s) to the articles before listing them here. See Category:Merge by month for all pages needing to be merged.

Guidelines

In general, this page should be used primarily to solicit outside feedback regarding mergers (particularly those of a controversial nature), or assistance with difficult or complicated mergers. Brief replies may be posted here, but lengthy discussions should be confined to the talk pages of the articles involved. After articles are merged (or a consensus that the articles should not be merged is reached), please remove them from the list below.

Current listings

Please list new proposals at the top of this month's section. Sign each listing or comment by typing: ~~~~

2008

March 2008

February 2008

(talk) 02:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

  • merge Paraceratherium and Indricotherium. In french the corresponding articles are already merged. Here the difficulty is that both articles in english complete each other. The reason for the proposed merge is that : larger more robust Indricotherium with larger incisors being probably the male, and the more gracile Paraceratherium the female. It make no sense to have to articles describing a single specie. It need just a reference that historically they seemed to be different species. 6 January 2008

2007

December 2007

Other CDPs could also be considered for mergers.Inwind (talk) 11:48, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note, the merge of content was done from the last "good" page - looks like it just needs an edit history merge. SkierRMH (talk) 02:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Comment Which notorious?--Lucy-marie (talk) 11:13, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Response Notorious (2009 film)....fixed the link--Bren202 03:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alice.S was recently blocked for creating an attack page against me. She apparently has not learned from her lesson as she followed me to this page to try to have it deleted. She is not a party to the discussion. Jose João (talk) 22:04, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Reasons for merger:
  1. This page should have been moved when the call sign of the radio station changed to KBWF.
  2. All pertinent information from article has already been incorporated into the KBWF article.
  3. Talk page is the only thing that really needs to be merged, but I have no idea how to go about it.
There are two other articles about previous incarnations of this frequency (KZQZ and KKHI), and I will deal with those separately. I will suggest KZQZ be deleted, but KKHI should stay, since it does have a pretty deep history, and can exist as an article of a defunct station.--Fightingirish 19:14, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Comment - Actually it's more complicated than that. Both unions are legally registered labor unions, so they are both legitimate. There was an edit conflict between two newish WP:COI editors, and it appears to be resolved with the untangling of the previously intermixed information.--Bookandcoffee 08:18, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Edit wars are continuing with these. I don't think this issue is resolved, and still believe the best way to resolve it is with a merger. Torc2 19:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

July 2007

Comment. If no merge is to occur here, I suggest moving the former to the more appropriate name Easy access. B.Wind (talk) 04:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there is a subsequent merge proposal combining Community of Interest with the more properly named Community of interest. B.Wind (talk) 04:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Target article is a series of lists that should be separated into three or four new list articles and has been tagged as such. B.Wind (talk) 04:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

SteveBaker 03:37, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

Further merge Female sexual arousal disorder into Sexual arousal disorder xCentaur | 20:17, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2007

2006

December 2006

November 2006

All that needs done would be to move the (dab) page to the main page and the main page to the (surname) page. I think the current situation works and should remain unless a problem arises. Otherwise it's a lot of links to fix for almost nothing. Quickmythril (talk) 04:38, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2006

Merger Proposals without consensus

Comment This appears to be a one-person crusade that has been opposed in each of the above cases by consensus. Suggest closing this collection. Of the listed characters, only James Heller would be considered "minor" in the series.B.Wind (talk) 04:54, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion closed with no consensus to merge. The disagreement rages on. B.Wind (talk) 06:04, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No consensus has been reached. B.Wind (talk) 08:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The consensus appears to be to keep them both. Bearian 20:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Having read Phonation, I think they should either be left seperate or phonation merged into voice organ, as the second includes the first. I'm no expert, though...Djbb2 19:37, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
List already exists List_of_Westfield_Group_shopping_centres_in_Australia Is merger rqd? The pages are quite large, notable or not, and merging them together would make the resultant page huge.xCentaur |  talk  12:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]