User:Thingg/dashboard
CAVEAT: all the |show=
parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- 192.196.218.223 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 249 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user conducting large scale reverts, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- The user is making large scale reverts, reverting themselves. PhilKnight (talk) 14:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Purpleurple2001 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – This person clearly has an axe to grind with the medical profession w.r.t. this specific condition. However, no single edit has been a positive contribution to this article. Opinions don't build encylcopaedias. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have partially blocked the user. PhilKnight (talk) 13:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
---|---|
User requested | 6 |
Empty articles | 0 |
Nonsense pages | 0 |
Spam pages | 0 |
Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
Other candidates | 12 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
---|
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 5 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 52 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Kvrk20official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Clinton Yours (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 11:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- PalestineLives4EverFlores (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Mrskibidibiden (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 15:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Cobracoding (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Special:Permalink/1243607450. jlwoodwa (talk) 09:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- SkibidiSpiderman808 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) DISRUPTNAME. The sooner this ‘Skib’ whatever meme drops dead, the better… DISRUPTNAME case helped by their existing 2 warnings. MM (Give me info.) (Victories) 10:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Continued editwarring on infobox image, open discussion on talk page. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- If we full-protect it, it will mean that when that full protection expires all protection will end as it is not currently possible to layer two levels of protection. I can set a W-Ping to reset it, but this will likely mean there will be some period where the article is completely unprotected. Would you be OK with this possibiility? Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinate semi-protection: The page is already protected until 2122, which does not make any sense to protect a page for 100 years only for it to not be protected when that 100 years has passed. I think an Indefinate semi protection would be best. 142.114.181.79 (talk) 07:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: A user with a red nickname constantly deletes information from the source, adding information without a source Dushnilkin (talk) 07:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. High risk page. Protection requested as per WP:CT/IPA Wikibear47 (talk) 08:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nxcrypto Message 09:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Nxcrypto Message 09:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant addition of unsourced content by several IPs and unconfirmed users. CycloneYoris talk! 09:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. NumberjacksFan2024 (talk) 09:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA from User:Yawners' Cleaner et al., and please hide recent revisions from socks User:PowerMinersFan and User:Toa Mahri Kongu. Wikishovel (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And nonsense revision deleted. Johnuniq (talk) 10:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page receives vandalism only edits. Rarely receives legitimate contributions. DaHuzyBru (talk) 10:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – DreamRimmer (talk) 10:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent long term disruption. IP range may merit scrutiny. 2601:19E:4100:710:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 10:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and Disruptive edits By IP Address. Gunther : Talk 12:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: There is an ongoing issue with vandalism on Circassian-related articles, where an individual is consistently removing content related to religions other than Islam, despite the presence of reliable sources. This user is evading detection by using different IP addresses and has been banned on some occasions, but continues to disrupt the articles.
The vandalism is not only removing relevant information but also undermining the neutrality and accuracy of the articles. I request that the Circassian-related articles be protected to prevent further disruption and ensure the integrity of the content.
I believe this measure is necessary to maintain the quality and reliability of the articles and to prevent further disruption. Thank you for considering this request. Flux500 (talk) 12:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Long-term IP vandalism and removal of sourced content. Skitash (talk) 13:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 13:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism going on since late 2023. CaptainOlimar42 (talk) 14:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spike in vandalism from IP addresses and new accounts since 20:29, 7 September 2024. Panian513 14:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA readdition of long-winded unsourced POV commentary by several socks today alone. Wikishovel (talk) 14:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism JeanMercier90 (talk) 14:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: CTOPS Israel-Palestine. Borgenland (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consider long-term protection under arbitration enforcement for WP:ARBAP2. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New target of HoY Piermark. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: Create protection is no longer required because the page will be redirected to Royal Match. The company is not notable enough for its own article, but is best known for its creation of the game. This is the result of an AFC/R request. Original administrator has not been active since April, and a timely response is unlikely. Garsh (talk) 22:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Protected for over a decade. However, both of the page protectors are likely inactive. Consider downgrading protection level and set a time limit?102.106.191.176 (talk)
- Question: Agree the disruption that led to the AfD being protected has long since ceased. But curious why anyone would need to edit this closed AFD from 2011. The deleted article title (VIBES FM Hamburg) is not protected so is theoretically available for recreation if the subject has since become notable. -- Euryalus (talk) 06:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC) Euryalus (talk) 06:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: There's no reason to edit it, so why unprotect it? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Let me ask you this then: why won't you at least let EC users fix Linter Errors in case if they notice any?102.106.191.176 (talk) 07:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Does it have any? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Sumanuil It's clean from all lint* error types that we regularly fix and I don't see any reason to need to edit that page for lint reasons.
- * The one "issue" that you'll see listed there in the lint info, "night-mode-unaware-background-color", is more a tracking category than a lint error, and it is predominantly being left alone by the experienced delinting editors since we don't really agree with WMF for it's classification as lint, and since the issues are not well defined with a high rate of false flags. Until then, those issues are to be ignored. Zinnober9 (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: There's no reason to edit it, so why unprotect it? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I would like to request that... (date of death is updated to 30/11/2024) . Jamesington (talk) 23:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: For which one? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 02:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]
13 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC) |
17 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 13:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- SerChevalerie (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Been on Wikipedia for a few years now. Mainly created BLPs. Requesting for autopatrolled rights to reduce the backlog of new page patrollers. I declare that I've understood verifiability, notability and copyrights. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- On hold. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, the user's talk page history is back. This can now be evaluated normally. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Chaotic Enby (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Requesting autopatrolled for Chaotic Enby. Trusted user who already has NPP rights, articles are consistently well-written and well-sourced. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Jebiguess (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Created 407 articles, and only 2 were deleted—1 was soft deleted earlier in 2022, and the latest one was deleted per WP:A10, which is not a major issue. 99.5% or 405 of his articles are still live. I came across him while patrolling New Pages. I believe he is one of the users for whom this right was created. GrabUp - Talk 17:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed
[edit]- Arthur Vritra (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
my account has existed for 4 days and I have made 10 edits but my account is yet to be autoconfirmed. Arthur Vritra (talk) 17:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done – hi Arthur Vritra! The software is looking for exactly 96 hours, which you account has not yet attained. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 18:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]
- James Allison (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been editing since 2005 with over 15,000 edits without incident. I am requesting this permission so I am able to perform round robin moves when necessary. I am also open to assisting at WP:RM. James (talk/contribs) 21:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- @James Allison: I'm not seeing any problems, but you don't really have a lot of recent activity regarding moves. Do you expect to get much use out of this permission? Elli (talk | contribs) 19:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2RDD (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm 2RDD. With over a thousand edits and experience in maintaining article quality, I'm eager to help with page moves. I understand the importance of accurate titles and want to assist in keeping our namespace organized. I've reviewed the page move guidelines and am familiar with the process. Granting me Page Mover rights would allow me to efficiently rename pages, reducing the workload for administrators. Thanks for considering my request! 2RDD (talk) 10:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- CosmLearner (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! I have read Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes. I want to become a pending changes reviewer. ZeetBaralWiki 15:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose...has weak grasp of copyright/license, verifiability, and MOS. We're only a week-ish out from their block for contradicting citing sources and copy-pasting from AI. DMacks (talk) 18:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Jy Sandford (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I edit AusPol pages, and I'd like to be able to approve edits made to them :) No stress if I need more of a track record of edits - I totally understand. Jy Sandford (talk) 23:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 94 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 23:50, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Tvfunhouse (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- CosmLearner (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! I request for the permission - Rollback. ZeetBaralWiki 15:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 09:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Vasil3fonov (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello to anyone concerned.
I am requesting rollbacker rights, having done so before without the knowledge of having to warn users after undoing their edits, and I believe I now have a substantial track record of doing so ever since promising to fulfill that role. I now also have a good idea of how to use tools such as Twinkle effectively, which have greatly helped my work against vandalism.
Thanks for taking your time to read my request. Best regards, Vasil3fonov (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 17:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- You are still consistently failing to notify editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 09:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- The three sole examples of me not doing it from the past month and a half, which you are referring to, are the same single person, making the same changes over and over to player statistics tables through different IPs for the past 12+ months. I looked up different pages that match the categories of the ones I've undone, and the user has been warned multiple times, to no effect, making the same edit again and again. They then stop editing from that IP and start doing the same exact edits from a new one. They have been warned multiple times by multiple users for the exact same edit yet still repeatedly undo other users' work without any explanation when they are clearly in the wrong. Examples of this are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, etc., etc.; some of those edits were way over a year ago, and I am only referencing the ones that the user has been warned for (there are thousands of other such cases from tens, if not hundreds of different IPs) that they haven't been warned for by users who revert their edits. In this case, I have decided that reaching out to the user is futile and I believe that in such extreme examples, that should be an option. What is the point of a warning the user when it is clearly proven that they will keep doing it from new IPs and never read the original talk page anyway?
- I have not failed to warn a single other user for the time period since I had promised to do so, which I believe is the whole point of rollback rights in the first place. I strongly believe that this specific, and definitely irregular, case is not sufficient to justify the denial of the rights. However, this is just my point of view on the topic and if you really believe that I am in the wrong and that I should repeatedly (
and foolishly) warn the same user for the same thing that they will not stop doing, and expecting a different result, then maybe I do not really need rollback rights in the end if that is to be your final verdict. - Thanks, Vasil3fonov (talk) 11:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- You are still consistently failing to notify editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 09:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- OhHaiMark (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I believe I'm experienced enough to have this right. OhHaiMark (talk) 21:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 09:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2RDD (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi everyone, I'm 2RDD. I've been editing Wikipedia for a year now and have made over a thousand edits. I'm passionate about maintaining article quality and combating vandalism. I believe Rollbacker rights would help me make a bigger impact. I'm eager to take on this responsibility and contribute to our community's mission. Thanks for considering my request! Best, 2RDD (talk) 10:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 10:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- TheProEditor11 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hey, I would like to request for the rollback permission because I am engaged in rollback activities very much for some time. This permission would be very helpful and will make my Wiki activity very easier. Moreover, I am experienced enough with enough edits and edit time in Wikipedia. I have read everything about this tool and will abide by all the rules too.! Thanking you! TheProEditor11 (talk) 10:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC) TheProEditor11 (talk) 10:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links
DYK
[edit]Count of DYK Hooks | ||
Section | # of Hooks | # Verified |
---|---|---|
July 13 | 1 | 1 |
July 18 | 3 | 1 |
July 19 | 3 | |
July 23 | ||
July 25 | 2 | |
July 26 | 3 | |
July 27 | 2 | 1 |
July 28 | 5 | 1 |
July 29 | 2 | |
July 30 | 3 | |
August 1 | 3 | |
August 3 | 2 | |
August 4 | 1 | |
August 5 | 8 | 2 |
August 6 | 6 | 3 |
August 7 | 4 | 2 |
August 8 | 5 | 2 |
August 9 | 4 | 3 |
August 10 | 8 | 4 |
August 11 | 6 | 3 |
August 12 | 4 | 3 |
August 13 | 2 | 2 |
August 14 | 9 | 6 |
August 15 | 6 | 5 |
August 16 | 8 | 4 |
August 17 | 8 | 4 |
August 18 | 9 | 7 |
August 19 | 8 | 3 |
August 20 | 5 | 2 |
August 21 | 3 | 1 |
August 22 | 7 | 4 |
August 23 | 9 | 2 |
August 24 | 7 | 1 |
August 25 | 12 | 5 |
August 26 | 5 | 2 |
August 27 | 13 | 8 |
August 28 | 14 | 5 |
August 29 | 16 | 5 |
August 30 | 20 | 7 |
August 31 | 9 | 6 |
September 1 | 8 | 4 |
September 2 | 8 | 2 |
September 3 | 9 | 2 |
September 4 | 4 | 2 |
September 5 | 6 | 4 |
September 6 | 6 | 1 |
September 7 | 1 | 1 |
September 8 | 1 | 1 |
Total | 288 | 122 |
Last updated 15:03, 8 September 2024 UTC Current time is 15:35, 8 September 2024 UTC [refresh] |