User talk:Shwcz

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Shhhhwwww! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Petrb (talk) 20:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

DYK nomination of Philippines v. China

Hello! Your submission of Philippines v. China at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Philippines v. China

Gatoclass (talk) 10:24, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Old Tagalog

Hello! Your submission of Old Tagalog at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! czar ♔ 08:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of the Philippines (1946–65) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {
• date having been the day when in 1898, [[Emilio Aguinaldo]] declared independence from [[Spain]]). Later, Macapagal told author [[Stanley Karnow]] that the reason for the change was that American

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:43, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm OccultZone. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Six Californias, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 14:00, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Partition and secession in California with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 14:24, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Reversion of recent bold edits

I have reverted WP:BOLD edits you recently made to the (1521-1898) and (1898-1946) articles about the History of the Philippines. Please discuss at Talk:History of the Philippines (1898–1946)#Bold edits to two articles by user Shhhhwwww!!. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 06:06, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of St. Augustine Parish Church (Bay)

Hello! Your submission of St. Augustine Parish Church (Bay) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 19:31, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Please see new note on DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 23:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Renaming of Kendall Jenner article reverted

I've reverted your renaming of the article, which was done without prior discussion and is, in my opinion, controversial. A quick search of e.g. Google News reveals that her full name is still very widely used. If you want the article renamed, you should initiate a formal discussion as explained at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. Favonian (talk) 07:18, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

As a matter of fact, a similar renaming was discussed at Talk:Kendall Jenner#Requested move 21 March 2014 and soundly defeated. Favonian (talk) 07:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK for St. James the Apostle Parish Church (Paete)

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Disappearance of Sherlyn Cadapan and Karen Empeño

Hello! Your submission of Disappearance of Sherlyn Cadapan and Karen Empeño at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 05:30, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Cape Bojeador

Hello! Your submission of Cape Bojeador at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Poro Point

Hello! Your submission of Poro Point at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Muboshgu (talk) 17:19, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Nuestra Señora de los Angeles Parish Church (Santa Maria)

Hello! Your submission of Nuestra Señora de los Angeles Parish Church (Santa Maria) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 00:14, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Transfiguration of our Lord Parish Church (Cavinti)

Hello! Your submission of Transfiguration of our Lord Parish Church (Cavinti) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chris Troutman (talk) 02:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tropical Storm Fung-wong (2014) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• com/news/2014-09-18/philippines-shuts-capital-as-storm-causes-flood-cancels-flights] [[Bloomberg)]].</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:09, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

Thank you for the information you added to this article today. Unfortunately, it cannot go where you put it in section 13, because condemning a terrorist group is not the same as designating it as a terrorist organization. The designation of a country as a terrorist organization is a formal government ruling, and when a government does this it adds the name of the group to an official list. (You can see an example in the US citation in the information box.) I have moved your information an appropriate place in the Lead. --P123ct1 (talk) 12:58, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Edgardo Gomez

Hello! Your submission of Edgardo Gomez at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —innotata 02:50, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Gambling in Manila

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Edgardo Gomez

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:04, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Aserradora Mecanica de Tuason y Sampedro

Hello! Your submission of Aserradora Mecanica de Tuason y Sampedro at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

• Shhhhwwww!!, you still have not replied to this after over ten days. It is your responsibility, as nominator, to address issues with your DYK nominations as they come up, and I have yet to see you do so over very many nominations. If you wish to remain a nominator in good standing at DYK, you need to respond to messages like this one in a timely manner. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

• Regrettably, I have to close this nomination. It is disappointing that you still have not had the courtesy to respond. When you abandon a nomination like this, it is unfair to the reviewer and to the rest of us who work at DYK, whose time you have wasted. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:06, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for San Sebastian Parish Church (Lumban)

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Our Lady of Guadalupe Parish Church (Pagsanjan)

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:02, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of University of Santo Tomas Baybayin Documents

Hello! Your submission of University of Santo Tomas Baybayin Documents at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Lagrange613 16:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Poro Point

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Betty Go-Belmonte

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:04, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for San Bartolome Apostol Parish Church (Nagcarlan)

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Sampaloc Church

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:02, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Transfiguration of our Lord Parish Church (Cavinti)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:04, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Our Lady of Candelaria Parish Church (Silang)

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for University of Santo Tomas Baybayin Documents

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lichauco Heritage House

Hello! Your submission of Lichauco Heritage House at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 06:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Monsters Among Us

Hello! Your submission of Monsters Among Us at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Serten (talk) 21:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for St. Augustine Parish Church (Laguna)

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:05, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Disappearance of Sherlyn Cadapan and Karen Empeño at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 02:04, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Saint Paul the First Hermit Cathedral

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Thunder (singer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [}Category:Filipino rappers]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:25, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Nuestra Señora de Candelaria Parish Church (Mabitac)

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Death of Jennifer Laude

Hello! Your submission of Death of Jennifer Laude at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

• Shhhhwwww!!, it has been a full week, and you have not yet addressed the issues raised in your DYK review. One week is a standard time on Wikipedia for a response. Your failure to respond to these requests on this and previous nominations has exhausted our willingness to extend the response time on your submissions. You have one more week to respond on the nomination page. If you do not, and have edited on Wikipedia in the interim, the nomination will be closed. I hope we hear from you before then. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:39, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of CNN Philippines

Hello! Your submission of CNN Philippines at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:09, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Philippines v. China

added a link pointing to Pedra Branca

Territorial disputes in the South China Sea

added a link pointing to Pedra Branca

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Monsters Among Us

Mike V • Talk 08:14, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hi there.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.--220 of ^Borg 09:24, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK for CNN Philippines

Harrias ^talk 00:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Megalopolis (city type)

added links pointing to Kediri and Ayuthaya

Mega Manila

added a link pointing to Megalopolis

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 2014 Ghent apartment siege for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Ghent apartment siege is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Ghent apartment siege until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 05:32, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Americans, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not radically change the scope of an article in its lead section without receiving consensus on he article's talk page first.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:44, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Illegal immigration ‎

I suggest that you need to justify your addition of the tag, by explaining it on the article talk page. If you look at the previous discussions on that page you will see that I share many of your apparent concerns over the article - but, so far, those opposing changes to the article or its title have successfully resisted changing it. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your controversial page move of the Illegal immigration and Illegal immigration to the United States articles

A move like the one you did of Illegal immigration should really not be done without a formal "Requested move" discussion. If you wish to start such a discussion, you can find instructions at WP:RM. —BarrelProof (talk) 03:41, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

And the same thing (perhaps obviously) goes for your move of the Illegal immigration to the United States article. —BarrelProof (talk) 03:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Heartbeat Song (Kelly Clarkson song)

Hello! Your submission of Heartbeat Song (Kelly Clarkson song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Final notice: this nomination, and Uma Thurman (song) below, will be marked as unsuccessful if you fail to respond in the next 12 hours. Your continuing failure to respond to any and all DYK notices is most unfortunate, and your apparent unwillingness to provide quid pro quo reviews as required means that making those nominations only serves to waste your time and ours. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:37, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Uma Thurman (song)

Hello! Your submission of Uma Thurman (song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Final notice: this nomination, and Heartbeat Song (Kelly Clarkson song) above, will be marked as unsuccessful if you fail to respond in the next 12 hours. Your continuing failure to respond to any and all DYK notices is most unfortunate, and your apparent unwillingness to provide quid pro quo reviews as required means that making those nominations only serves to waste your time and ours. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:37, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

STOP IT

MARWAN IS NOT HIS REAL NAME. HIS NAME IS ZULKIFLI ABDHIR. Breckham101 (talk) 16:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

I agree that a proposed move should have been discussed first using the formal Wikipedia:Requested moves process. Moving "Zulkifli Abdhir" to "Marwan (terrorist)" is obviously controversial, especially when the article covers a high-profile current event. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:04, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of best-selling music artists. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 09:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

That wasn't vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 10:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

@IndianBio:, I agree. Shhhhwwww!! even gave an edit summary. I agree with the revert, but giving a level-2 vandalism notice (when there is no level 1) for a good-faith edit is not best practices. Cheers everyone! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Kayla Mueller

Hello! Your submission of Kayla Mueller at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Shhhhwwww!!, this nomination doesn't even have a hook: there's nothing here at all! Please fix this, and also supply a quid pro quo review, which is required for all your nominations. Note that you have earlier nominations, also without QPQ reviews, that are on the verge of being closed as unsuccessful because you haven't done the reviews on them. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

And don't attribute your ideas to me. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:23, February 15, 2015 (UTC)

Final call for a QPQ review. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Current events

The IP who keeps reverting you has done this before (see their talk page and this unresolved ANI). I wanted to remind you to be careful not to edit war yourself, and to let you know what you're getting into.

Sorry for your trouble. Remember that WP is usually fun and collaborative and friendly! FourViolas (talk) 14:35, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the warning FourViolas. That person is getting on my nerves. It tried to ignore it before but... Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 14:40, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome! I recommend you read WP:MASTODON, and take a brief WP:WikiBreak until the adrenalin surge clears away. It's never a good idea to edit under the influence of psychoactive chemicals, especially the ones your own body produces. FourViolas (talk) 14:59, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Tom Cotton

Hello Shhhhwwww!!,

The source you cited discusses Cotton as a potential 2020 presidential candidate, not 2016. His six year Senate term ends in 2020, and the proposed legislation would allow him to run for re-election to the Senate simultaneous with a presidential run. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:28, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Malaysian, you may be blocked from editing. Wakanebe Wizard (talk) 05:39, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Murad Ebrahim. Wakanebe Wizard (talk) 05:57, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

dude it says you are retired - I will put to you a simple and well known scenerio - a doctor saves thousands of lives - then one day he says to himself "I dont like that guy," and then kills him - any amount of good works does not justify a free pass for the doctor - you have never been blocked from editing wiki before and yet in the last few days your behavior makes no sense - like adding WP:ADVOCACY material you have begun to do - no one is saying that the trial is irrelevant BUT, like all trials on the current events page we just need to hear about the most major steps and from here on those appear to be (if they happen) the conviction and sentencing--70.190.111.213 (talk) 03:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Legal threat

Please do not restore the legal threat which was removed by the editor who made it. This editor was asked to withdraw their legal threat at WP:ANI and did so as requested under policy. Thank you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Noah Galloway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Limb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Kayla Mueller

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Mary Jane Veloso) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mary Jane Veloso, Shhhhwwww!!!

Wikipedia editor Roches just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nominated for "Did you know?", the feature list of new articles.

To reply, leave a comment on Roches's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

I removed the text you struck out, thinking it was unnecessary. Then I decided to put it back so the DYK reviewer could see it as well as your proposal. The original suggestions I made are still struck out and your proposed text is ALT2, like it was when you added it the first time. (When I erased the struck out text, I changed your text from ALT2 to the first entry.) Roches (talk) 15:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Mary Jane Veloso, what a sad sad case. It breaks my heart that an innocent that was taken advantage of will be executed. I was considering creating this myself but you did it before me. Hope and pray that god has mercy for her and her family. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 02:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Noah Galloway

Harrias ^talk 17:08, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Rodrigo Gularte

Hello! Your submission of Rodrigo Gularte at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:38, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

It has been well over two weeks without a response. The nomination will likely close soon if you do not provide a quid pro quo review. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Film article page moves

Hi. Film articles are at their English title per WP:NCF and WP:UE. I think you would be best to go via WP:RM#CM if you wish to move other similar pages ("Use this process if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested"). Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Marco Archer Moreira

Hello! Your submission of Marco Archer Moreira at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:42, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Because you habitually nominate articles for DYK while failing to provide QPQ reviews, this nomination will be closed within 48 hours unless a QPQ is provided by then. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:42, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hardhome

Hello! Your submission of Hardhome at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 06:29, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Medical sourcing, edit-warring

Hi, please review WP:MEDRS for Wikipedia's sourcing guidelines regarding medical content. Also please stop trying to get content into an article by reverting, several other editors have brought up concerns regarding your proposed content, please gain consensus on the Talk page instead of reverting it in. Zad68 14:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mother's Mercy

Hello! Your submission of Mother's Mercy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 12:15, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Hardhome

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Mother's Mercy

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:20, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/The Dance of Dragons at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 00:56, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 5 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Tagalogs page, your edit caused an ISBN error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

PhilWiki Community User Group

May we invite you to join the Community. Please sign up if you would like to be part of this new User Group. Thank you. --Filipinayzd (talk) 03:29, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Dance of Dragons

Hello! Your submission of The Dance of Dragons at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:37, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

New issues were raised a few days after your response. Please return if you wish to continue pursuing this nomination. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Warning

People are getting fed-up with your disruptive page-move nonsense. Just a heads-up, so you aren't surprised if you get blocked. — kwami (talk) 03:03, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

@Kwamikagami: like moving a page, then moving it right back again? Like they did to Iwa Moto about 80 minutes ago? 220 of ^Borg 09:29, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

And again!
Shhhhwwww!! what is the point of moving the page again then moving it back again? To provide edit summaries that you should have provided the first time?

• See Wikipedia:Redirect#How to make a redirect. 220 of ^Borg 09:47, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, my bad. Next time. Thanks for the advice. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 09:49, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kayla Mueller

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kayla Mueller you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 00:01, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kayla Mueller

The article Kayla Mueller you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kayla Mueller for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 04:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kayla Mueller

The article Kayla Mueller you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Kayla Mueller for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 14:41, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Republic of Ireland

Please don't start Requested moves without prior discussion on topics with which you have no previous involvement, as you did at Talk:Republic of Ireland. The question of article names has been very divisive in the past. There was an arbitration case, Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Ireland article names, and a major poll at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration/Poll on Ireland article names that showed a clear consensus among the community in general to keep the current names. The naming convention is stated and explained in the Manual of Style for Ireland-related articles at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Ireland-related articles#Use of Ireland and Republic of Ireland. You would have seen all that if you had just read the heading at the top of the Talk:Republic of Ireland page before jumping in with both feet. Scolaire (talk) 07:54, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Burma

Thank you. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Like a Virgin (song)#Requested move 4 August 2015

I recently started a move request. --George Ho (talk) 05:34, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

"Middle Ages"

Hi. I noticed with some alarm that you've been introducing the term "Middle Ages" to Philippine History articles a lot. I feel very strongly that the use of the term is problematic, potentially obscuring important nuances of early Philippine history. May I invite your participation in the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Tambayan_Philippines#Massive_move_of_article_names:_History_of_the_Philippines_.2F_.22Middle_Ages.22 please? Thank you. - Alternativity (talk) 00:44, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Moved requested move

I have moved your move request from Talk:Palestine (disambiguation) to Talk:Palestine because the disambiguation move is largely a technical move. The discussion concerns the name of the article primarily. Rob984 (talk) 23:36, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

I reverted it. Apparently it's not as simply as copying and pasting because of the bot. Rob984 (talk) 23:47, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Establishment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Philippines. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. See Talk:Philippines#Establishment. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Philippine independence. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. See this revert. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:44, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

murder has been moved to sept 1 where it belongs - please work on it there

• In the Philippines over the murder of an indigenous Lumad family and the rape of an indigenous Manobo girl by soldiers and militiamen of the Philippine Army.--68.231.26.111 (talk) 04:40, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

again the protests mean nothing they fail notablity but the murders are a story go to sept 1 and tell it--68.231.26.111 (talk) 04:44, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

fair warning i have brought this edit war of not notable material to the following admin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wtmitchell#https:.2F.2Fen.wikipedia.org.2Fw.2Findex.php.3Ftitle.3DPortal:Current_events.2F2015_September_10.26action.3Dhistory --68.231.26.111 (talk) 05:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

This is the only warning you will receive about ownership of articles. The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I have been contacted by another user asking for help re your recent edits at Portal:Current_events/2015_September_10 and other Portal:Current_events articles. A look at your editing history persuades me that you are again (still?) editing WP articles as if you owned them, making changes in a high-handed manner without providing edit summaries, and edit warring. This behavior is disruptive. Please cease this behavior. Provide appropriate edit summaries for your changes and discuss reverted changes on the relevant article article talk pages instead of edit-warring. Continuation of this behavior will result in blocks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 07:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Page moves

If you continue to engage in undiscussed and controbersial page moves (Héctor Herrera, amongst others), then you will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. GiantSnowman 09:25, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of political parties in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive Alliance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

ANI notice

Please see WP:ANI for a discussion relative to your recent moves and move requests. Calidum 23:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

I removed your edit to Umpqua Community College Shooting

You recently added information to the description of this shooting event, claiming it was aimed at Christians. I see why you think this is correct. He did, after all, ask about religion. However, this does not seem to be correct given the information we have. If you can find a reliable source from the last week or so claiming this, I will have no issue with it. I normally wouldn't let you know, but since you had the most recent edit, I figured you should know. Again, I have no doubt that this was in good faith. Early signs did point to your description. If you would like to add this information, it probably shouldn't go in the early description until it is more apparent that it is the reason for it. Please don't take this message the wrong way. I'm not calling you out on vandalizing or anything, just please back up your sources. Thanks.Padsquad2010 (talk) 15:22, 10 October 2015 (UTC) Padsquad2010 (talk) 15:22, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of North Borneo, Philippines

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as North Borneo, Philippines, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ Muffin Wizard ^;) 00:56, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Katie^talk 04:53, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miriam Defensor Santiago presidential campaign, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pablo Garcia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jamalul Kiram III. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ~ Muffin Wizard ^;) 08:32, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Jamalul Kiram III, you may be blocked from editing. ~ Muffin Wizard ^;) 10:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia as you did at February 25, you may be blocked from editing. Quis separabit? 07:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Good Article renominations

Shhhhwwww!, I was frankly surprised to see that you had renominated both the Mary Jane Veloso and Philippines v. China articles to be Good Articles. As I noted back when you had retired in September and I removed the nominations as abandoned, both articles did not meet the good article criteria at the time, not the least of which were their inadequate lead sections (see WP:LEAD for what is expected).

You should have at least improved the lead sections to meet the criteria before renominating the articles—I notice that this was an issue with your previous GAN, Talk:Kayla Mueller/GA1. However, since you have, you should be aware that both nominations will require significant work on your part to improve the articles if you wish them to be listed, so if you don't have the time (as you didn't with Kayla Mueller), you should probably withdraw them.

One thing: these are renominations—the old nominations were closed—not reinstatements of old nominations, so I have given them a timestamp that reflects your edits earlier today. Best of luck this time if you choose to pursue these nominations. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:30, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited APEC Philippines 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swimming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chokoleit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chokoleit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 21:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jejomar Binay, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 07:39, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Opinion polling in the Philippine Senate election, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Niel Tupas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rodrigo Gularte

The article Rodrigo Gularte you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rodrigo Gularte for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Notecardforfree -- Notecardforfree (talk) 22:21, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Miriam Defensor Santiago

I undid your move of the page, adding a hyphen to her name. Her own website, as well as several others cited in the article, do not include the hyphen. A previous move (to add the hyphen) was undone in 2006 for essentially these same reasons. If you think the hyphen should be there, please take it up on the article Talk page, and explain why (particularly in light of the disagreement among the sources). Thanks! JohnInDC (talk) 18:33, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

I now see that you have had issues in the past with disruptive moves - see this ANI thread, including blocks - and so would add to the foregoing that in any case when you think a move is appropriate, you should first take it to the article Talk page. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 18:56, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Filipino Americans

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Filipino Americans you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of E.M.Gregory -- E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of David v. Poe

Hello! Your submission of David v. Poe at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 08:25, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Catholic Church by country. Elizium23 (talk) 04:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm NebY. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Christianity by country has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NebY (talk) 07:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Protestantism by country. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NebY (talk) 07:39, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Christianity in Asia, you may be blocked from editing. NebY (talk) 07:40, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Grace Poe

Let's discuss. Here are my thoughts. [add'l info added]

"Why is she disqualified" is not extraneous, it's basic. The text of the actual decision apparently hasn't been seen except by "a highly reliable source" who said "the rulings of the en banc are 'nuanced.' News reports based on that, not "best evidence."

Poe has one more avenue to seek redress, the SC, which can't be done until the decision is actually released, à la "it ain't over until the paperwork is done."

The "world" has no idea what's been going on. Don't know about either of Poe's appeals nor what's been in previous news reports. In the US, the natural born citizen issue has impacted two recent presidential candidates, Barrack Obama & Ted Cruz, so at least here (me-Columbia Md.) it's relevant.

Should know more about the Philippines and other nations in East Asia. You do; I'll keep learning.

Please share your thoughts. Thanks. RaqiwasSushi (talk) 15:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Will re-edit at 19:30 UTC if no response RaqiwasSushi (talk) 16:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Re-edited. Please do not revert. If think it should change, let's talk RaqiwasSushi (talk) 19:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

You've been reported

Editing based on "personal image preference" is uncalled for. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

January 2016

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Karylle , but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:08, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Filipino Americans

The article Filipino Americans you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Filipino Americans for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of E.M.Gregory -- E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for David v. Poe

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

2016

As per WP:RY anniversaries are specifically excluded from Recent Year articles. If you continue to edit war over this you can expect the appropriate reaction. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 04:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Cut and paste move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Template:Partido ng Demokratikong Reporma-Lapiang Manggagawa/meta/color/meta/color/meta/color a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Template:Partido ng Demokratikong Reporma-Lapiang Manggagawa/meta/color. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, that was WP:Broken.

February 2016

Hello, I'm Mcmatter. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mar Roxas have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Retirement

Greetings! I hope that, like me, you're enjoying your retirement (playful grin).

If you're getting a bit bored, you might want to comment at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Opinion_polling_in_the_Philippine_presidential_election,_2016&oldid=705421580#Ten_green_bottles on how many bottles are left hanging on the wall... BushelCandle (talk) 11:48, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick and informative answer over at the article's talk page - you were spot on.

Reading through this talk page of yours there seems to be a lot of negativity. I have a feeling that a lot of people don't understand some of your great edits (like I didn't until you explained it to me). Maybe putting a bit more in the edit summary might help?

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

The text written there will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. BushelCandle (talk) 21:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Portal:Current events

I reverted your entry at Portal:Current events. No one involved in the robbery claimed to be part of Black Lives Matter. Please refrain from adding bogus information to the Current Events portal. Kaldari (talk) 19:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

About your recent edit

Hello, I'm XCONZ. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person as you did at TG Guingona, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! —Preceding undated comment added 20:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Philippine House of Representatives elections, 2016 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Carlos Zarate

Richard J. Gordon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Statesman

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)