Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections: Difference between revisions

Page extended-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
restore VIPS statement
Reverted to revision 754897778 by Scarpy (talk): Unacceptable source and READ THE EDIT NOTICE: Don't restore material that has been reverted uness there is consensus to do so. (TW)
Line 142: Line 142:


Independent presidential candidate and former CIA intelligence officer [[Evan McMullin]] said Republican leadership did not respond adequately during the 2016 election to their knowledge at the time about Russia's efforts to meddle in the process.<ref name=mcmullingop>{{citation|url=http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/evan-mcmullin-gop-russia-hacking-232625|work=[[Politico]]|accessdate=December 15, 2016|date=December 14, 2016|title=McMullin: GOP ignored Russian meddling in presidential election|first=Louis|last=Nelson}}</ref> McMullin said Republican politicians were aware the publicly revealed information about Russia's interference was likely simply the [[wikt:tip of the iceberg|tip of the iceberg]] relative to the actual threat.<ref name=mcmullingop /> McMullin said that with his experience having worked as an intelligence officer he was distressed by the CIA revelations.<ref name=mcmullingop /> He said Republicans had not acted on the issue sufficiently during the election because they placed importance of the Republican party over U.S. national concerns.<ref name=mcmullingop />
Independent presidential candidate and former CIA intelligence officer [[Evan McMullin]] said Republican leadership did not respond adequately during the 2016 election to their knowledge at the time about Russia's efforts to meddle in the process.<ref name=mcmullingop>{{citation|url=http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/evan-mcmullin-gop-russia-hacking-232625|work=[[Politico]]|accessdate=December 15, 2016|date=December 14, 2016|title=McMullin: GOP ignored Russian meddling in presidential election|first=Louis|last=Nelson}}</ref> McMullin said Republican politicians were aware the publicly revealed information about Russia's interference was likely simply the [[wikt:tip of the iceberg|tip of the iceberg]] relative to the actual threat.<ref name=mcmullingop /> McMullin said that with his experience having worked as an intelligence officer he was distressed by the CIA revelations.<ref name=mcmullingop /> He said Republicans had not acted on the issue sufficiently during the election because they placed importance of the Republican party over U.S. national concerns.<ref name=mcmullingop />

[[Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]] published a memo<ref name="VIPS_Dispute_Russia_Hacking_Claims">{{cite web
| url = https://consortiumnews.com/2016/12/12/us-intel-vets-dispute-russia-hacking-claims/
| dead-url = no
| title = US Intel Vets Dispute Russia Hacking Claims
| website = [[Robert Parry (journalist)|Consortiumnews]]
| language = English
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20161214172150/https://consortiumnews.com/2016/12/12/us-intel-vets-dispute-russia-hacking-claims/
| archive-date = 14 Dec 2016
| access-date = 14 Dec 2016
}}</ref> beginning

<blockquote>
A ''[[New York Times]]'' report on Monday alluding to “overwhelming circumstantial evidence” leading the CIA to believe that [[Russian President]] [[Vladimir Putin]] “deployed [[Security hacker|computer hackers]] with the goal of tipping the election to [[Donald J. Trump]]” is, sadly, evidence-free. This is no surprise, because harder evidence of a technical nature points to an inside [[Internet leak|leak]], not hacking – by Russians or anyone else.
</blockquote>

The memo was signed by [[William Binney (U.S. intelligence official)|William Binney]], [[Mike Gravel]], [[Larry C. Johnson|Larry Johnson]], [[Ray McGovern]], [[Elizabeth Murray (U.S. intelligence official)|Elizabeth Murray]] (''Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Middle East, CIA (ret.)''), and [[Kirk Wiebe (U.S. intelligence official)|Kirk Wiebe]] (''former Senior Analyst, SIGINT Automation Research Center, NSA (ret.)'')


===Electoral College===
===Electoral College===

Revision as of 03:13, 15 December 2016

Joint statement by Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence

The U.S. Intelligence Community first publicly affirmed in an October 2016 letter, its confidence Russia interfered in the 2016 US elections.[1] The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), representing seventeen intelligence agencies, in a joint letter with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), said Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.[1] On October 7, the DNI and DHS stated the intelligence community was confident Russia had directed Democratic National Committee (DNC) cyber-attacks and the release of its private documents.[1] The report stated these acts were conducted in an attempt to influence the results of the U.S. election in favor of Donald Trump.[2][3][4] Russia stated they were not involved.[5]

Senior U.S. officials and U.S. intelligence agencies stated they had high confidence[6] that Russia facilitated WikiLeaks obtaining hacked emails from the DNC and Clinton campaign chair John Podesta to influence the election and elect Trump.[7][8][9] A senior U.S. official said the conclusions were the consensus of multiple intelligence agencies.[10] This conclusion was based on circumstantial evidence gathered prior to the election, supported by many and doubted by some in the intelligence community.[11] U.S. officials stated the conclusion was, in part, based on the belief Russia hacked the Republican National Committee (RNC), and chose not to release the content. RNC officials stated they were not hacked, and a U.S. official stated efforts to hack RNC servers had failed.[12] A U.S. official said the FBI was uncertain as to motive, believing Russia was behind the attacks.[13][14][15]

On December 9, President Barack Obama ordered a report on foreign interventions in elections going back to 2008.[12][16][17] Republican Senators including Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain called for a bipartisan investigation.[18][19] President-elect Trump rejected the intelligence report,[20][21] and attacked the U.S. intelligence services in an official statement released by his transition team.[22][23] Wikileaks founder Julian Assange said Russia was not involved in the leaks.[5][24][25] On December 12, Senate Majority Leader Republican Mitch McConnell said he was confident in U.S. intelligence, and placed his support behind a bipartisan investigation.[26][27] McConnell announced that the Senate intelligence panel would conduct an investigation into Russia's involvement.[28]

Background

An aerial view of the Smolny Convent in Saint Petersburg
A Russian propaganda "troll farm" was traced back to Saint Petersburg.

Internet Research Agency

See also: Trolls from Olgino and Web brigades

Beginning in fall 2014, The New Yorker writer Adrian Chen performed a six-month investigation into Russian propaganda online by a group called the Internet Research Agency.[29] The New Yorker reported it was widely documented in Russian media that Evgeny Prigozhin, a close associate of Vladimir Putin, was behind the operation which hired hundreds of individuals to work in Saint Petersburg.[29]

The group was regarded as a "troll farm", a term used to refer to propaganda efforts controlling many accounts online with the aim of artificially providing a semblance of a grassroots organization.[29] Chen reported that Internet trolling was used by the Russian government as a tactic largely after observing the social media organization of the 2011 protests against Putin.[29] Chen interviewed Russian reporters and activists who said the end goal of propaganda by the Russian government was to sow discord and chaos online.[29]

Counter-Disinformation Team scrapped pre-election

The International Business Times reported the United States Department of State planned to use a unit formed with the intention of combating disinformation from the Russian government, and that it was disbanded in September 2015 after department heads missed the scope of propaganda before the 2016 U.S. election.[30] The unit had been in development for 8 months prior to being scrapped.[30]

Titled Counter-Disinformation Team, it would have been a reboot of the Active Measures Working Group set up by the Reagan Administration.[31][32] The Counter-Disinformation Team was set up under the Bureau of International Information Programs.[31][32] Work began on the Counter-Disinformation Team in 2014, with the intention to combat propaganda from Russian sources such as the "Russia Today" TV network RT.[31][32] A beta website was ready and staff were hired by the U.S. State Department for the unit prior to its cancellation.[31][32] U.S. Intelligence officials explained to former National Security Agency analyst and counterintelligence officer John R. Schindler that the Obama Administration decided to cancel the unit as they were afraid of antagonizing Russia.[31][32] A State Department representative told the International Business Times after being contacted regarding the closure of the unit, that the U.S. was disturbed by propaganda from Russia, and the strongest defense was sincere communication.[30]

U.S. Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy Richard Stengel was point person for the unit before it was canceled.[31][32] Stengel previously wrote about disinformation by RT.[33] After U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry called RT "a "propaganda bullhorn" for Moscow",[34] RT insisted the State Department give an "official response".[33][35] Stengel wrote that RT engaged in a "disinformation campaign".[33][35]

Russian trolls support for Trump

In December 2015 Adrian Chen noticed pro-Russia accounts suddenly became supportive of Trump.

Adrian Chen observed a pattern in December 2015 where pro-Russian accounts became supportive of 2016 U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump.[36] Andrew Weisburd and Foreign Policy Research Institute fellow and senior fellow at the Center for Cyber and Homeland Security at George Washington University, Clint Watts,[37] wrote for The Daily Beast in August 2016 that Russian propaganda fabricated articles were popularized by social media.[36] Weisburd and Watts documented how disinformation spread from Russia Today and Sputnik News, "the two biggest Russian state-controlled media organizations publishing in English", to pro-Russian accounts on Twitter.[36]

Citing research by Adrian Chen, Weisburd and Watts compared Russian tactics during the 2016 U.S. election to Soviet Union Cold War strategies.[36] They referenced the 1992 United States Information Agency report to the United States Congress, which warned about Russian propaganda called active measures.[36] Weisburd and Watts concluded social media made active measures easier.[36] Institute of International Relations Prague senior fellow and scholar on Russian intelligence, Mark Galeotti, agreed the Kremlin operations were a form of active measures.[38] The Guardian reported in November 2016 the most strident Internet promoters of Trump were paid Russian propagandists.[39] The paper estimated there were several thousand trolls involved.[39]

Weisburd and Watts collaborated with colleague J. M. Berger and published a follow-up to their Daily Beast article in online magazine War on the Rocks, titled: "Trolling for Trump: How Russia is Trying to Destroy Our Democracy".[37][40][41] They researched 7,000 pro-Trump social media accounts over a two-and-a-half year period.[40] Their research detailed Internet trolling techniques to denigrate critics of Russian activities in Syria, and to proliferate falsehoods about Clinton's health.[40] Watts said the propaganda targeted the alt-right movement, the right wing, and fascist groups.[37] BuzzFeed News reported Kremlin-financed trolls were open about spreading Russian disinformation.[42]

On November 24, 2016, The Washington Post reported the Foreign Policy Research Institute stated Russian propaganda exacerbated criticism of Clinton and support for Trump.[43][44][45] The strategy involved social media, paid Internet trolls, botnets, and websites in order to denigrate Clinton.[43][44][45] Watts stated Russia's goal was to damage trust in the U.S. government.[43] Conclusions by Watts and colleagues Andrew Weisburd and J.M. Berger were confirmed by research from the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University and by the RAND Corporation.[43]

Computer security company FireEye concluded Russia used social media as a weapon to influence the U.S. election.[46] FireEye Chairman David DeWalt said the 2016 operation was a new development in cyberwarfare by Russia.[46] FireEye CEO Kevin Mandia stated Russian cyberwarfare changed after fall 2014, from covert to overt tactics with decreased operational security.[46]

U.S. intelligence analysis

Director of National Intelligence, Homeland Security and CIA

Office of the Director of National Intelligence
United States Department of Homeland Security
Seals of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security

The U.S. Intelligence Community tasked resources debating why Putin chose summer 2016 to escalate active measures influencing U.S. politics.[47] Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper said after the 2011–13 Russian protests, Putin's confidence in his viability as a politician was damaged, and Putin responded with the propaganda operation.[47] Former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officer Patrick Skinner explained the goal was to spread uncertainty.[48]

In a joint statement on October 7, 2016, the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued a statement on Russian influence on the 2016 U.S. presidential election.[1] The statement read: "The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the U.S. election process."[1] The statement represented the conclusions of 17 intelligence organizations within the United States government and the United States Secretary of Homeland Security.[1]

Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper

By December 2, "multiple sources with knowledge of the investigation into Russia's hacking" told CNN that the U.S. Intelligence Community was "increasingly confident that Russian meddling in the U.S. election was intended to steer the election toward Trump, rather than simply to undermine or in other ways disrupt the political process."[49]

On December 9, the CIA told U.S. legislators the U.S. Intelligence Community concluded Russia conducted operations during the 2016 U.S. election to assist Donald Trump in winning the presidency.[50][51][52] Multiple U.S intelligence agencies concluded people with direct ties to the Kremlin gave WikiLeaks hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and additional sources such as John Podesta, campaign chairman for Hillary Clinton.[50] These intelligence organizations additionally concluded Russia hacked the Republican National Committee (RNC) as well as the DNC—and chose not to leak information obtained from the RNC.[12] A senior administration official told The New York Times: "We now have high confidence that they hacked the D.N.C. and the R.N.C., and conspicuously released no documents [from the R.N.C.]".[12]

The CIA said the foreign intelligence agents were Russian operatives previously known to the U.S.[50] Writing in The New York Times on December 9, David E. Sanger and Scott Shane described the ambiguity surrounding the information then publicly available: "It is also far from clear that Russia's original intent was to support Mr. Trump, and many intelligence officials—and former officials in Mrs. Clinton's campaign—believe that the primary motive of the Russians was to simply disrupt the campaign and undercut public confidence in the integrity of the vote."[12] The CIA told U.S. Senators it was "quite clear" that Russia's intentions were to help Trump.[51]

Intelligence revealed to NBC News by two senior federal employees after the election led intelligence officials to believe with "a high level of confidence" that Vladimir Putin himself dictated the covert operations plot to sway the election.[53][54] The two officials told NBC News Putin's motives started as a feud against Hillary Clinton, and grew more broadly into a desire to sew distrust of the U.S. around the globe.[53][54] The intelligence individuals told NBC News the covert operation would have had to have been approved by top officials in the Russian government, and said they believed this due to concluding Putin controlled absolute directives over government in Russia.[53][54]

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Seal of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

In June 2016, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) notified the Illinois Republican Party in June that some of its email accounts may have been hacked.[55]

On October 31, 2016, The New York Times stated that the FBI had been examining possible connections between Trump and Russia "for much of the summer," and was unable to find "any conclusive or direct link." Moreover, "even the hacking into Democratic emails, FBI and intelligence officials now believe, was aimed at disrupting the presidential election rather than electing Mr. Trump."[56]

An unnamed official disputed assertions the RNC servers were hacked, and stated that "attempts to penetrate the Republican committee's systems ... were not successful," citing "an FBI investigation into the matter."[12]

In a December 11, 2016 interview with George Stephanopoulos of ABC News R.N.C. director Reince Priebus stated: "We contacted the FBI months ago when the [alleged hacking of the Democratic National Committee] issue came about. They reviewed all of our systems. We have hacking-detection systems in place, and the conclusion was then, as it was again two days ago when we went back to the FBI to ask them about this, that the RNC was not hacked."[57]

During a House Intelligence Committee hearing, the FBI broke with the CIA on the reasons for the hacks, with the official responsible for the briefing stating that "there’s no question that [the Russians’] efforts went one way, but it’s not clear that they have a specific goal or mix of related goals".[58]

Government response

U.S. Senate

U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Republican Senator John McCain and Senate Minority Leader Democrat Chuck Schumer planned a bipartisan investigation.
McCain, Graham, Schumer, Reed Joint Statement on Reports That Russia Interfered with the 2016 Election

Members of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee traveled to Ukraine and Poland in 2016 and learned about Russian operations to influence their affairs.[59] U.S. Senator Angus King told the Portland Press Herald that tactics used by Russia during the 2016 U.S. election were analogous to those used against other countries.[59]

On November 30, 2016, King joined a letter in which seven members of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee asked President Obama to publicize more information from the intelligence community on Russia's role in the U.S. election.[59][60] In the letter to President Obama, the senators called upon the president to allow the declassification and release of "additional information concerning the Russian Government and the U.S. election."[49] In an interview with CNN, Senator King warned against ignoring the problem, saying: "I don't consider this a partisan issue. We can't just let it go and say that's history because they will keep doing it."[61]

Representatives in the U.S. Congress took action to monitor the National security of the United States by advancing legislation to monitor propaganda.[62][63] On November 30, 2016, legislators approved a measure within the National Defense Authorization Act to ask the U.S. State Department act against propaganda with an inter-agency panel.[62][63] The legislation authorized funding of $160 million over a two-year-period.[62] The initiative was developed through a bipartisan bill, the Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act, written by U.S. Senators Republican Rob Portman and Democrat Chris Murphy.[62] Portman urged more U.S. government action to counter propaganda.[62] Murphy said after the election it was apparent the U.S. needed additional tactics to fight Russian propaganda.[62] U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee member Ron Wyden said frustration over covert Russian propaganda was bipartisan.[62]

Republican U.S. Senators stated they planned to hold hearings and investigate Russian influence on the 2016 U.S. elections.[64] By doing so they went against the preference of incoming Republican President-elect Donald Trump, who downplayed any potential Russian meddling in the election.[64] U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain and U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr discussed plans for collaboration on investigations of Russian cyberwarfare during the election.[64] U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker planned a 2017 investigation.[64] Senator Lindsey Graham indicated he would conduct a sweeping investigation in the 115th Congress.[64]

On December 11, 2016, top-ranking bipartisan members of the U.S. Senate issued a joint statement together on December 11, 2016 responding to the intelligence assessments Russia influenced the election.[65][66][67] The two Republican signers were Senators Graham and McCain, both members of the Armed Services Committee; the two Democratic signers were incoming Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, and Senator Jack Reed, the ranking member of the Armed Services Committee.[65][66][67][68] The statement by the four said Russian interference in the election "should alarm every American" and that: "This cannot become a partisan issue. The stakes are too high for our country. We are committed to working in this bipartisan manner".[68]

In a response to Trump's disregard for the U.S. intelligence assessments on Russia, Republican Senator John McCain said: "The facts are there."[69] Senator McCain called for a special select committee of the U.S. Senate to investigate Russian meddling in the election.[70] Republican Senator and Senate Intelligence Committee member James Lankford agreed looking into Russian influence on the elections should be cooperative between parties, and tweeted: "Cybersecurity investigation of Russian interference can't be partisan."[71] Republican Senator Susan Collins said a bipartisan investigation should be forward looking towards improving proactive cyber defence.[72]

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, the outgoing leader of the Senate Democratic Caucus, said that the FBI had covered up information about Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election in a bid to swing the election in Trump's favor. Reid stated that FBI Director James Comey "has let the country down for partisan purposes," called Comey the "new J. Edgar Hoover," and called for Comey's resignation.[73] Reid asserted the FBI organized a "coverup" for the Russian hack to tip the election in Trump's favor.[74]

On December 12, Senate Majority Leader Republican Mitch McConnell disagreed with Trump and stated "I have the highest confidence in the intelligence community, and especially the Central Intelligence Agency."[26] McConnell added that investigation of Russia's actions "should not be a partisan issue" and said that it "defies belief" that some members of the Republican Party would not want such an investigation.[27] McConnell announced that the Senate intelligence panel would conduct an investigation into Russia's involvement.[28]

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Congressman Adam Schiff, Ranking Member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, commented on Putin's aims, and said U.S. intelligence agencies were concerned with Russian propaganda.[47] Speaking about disinformation that appeared in Hungary, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, and Poland, Schiff said there was an increase of the same behavior in the U.S.[47] Schiff concluded Russian propaganda operations would continue against the U.S. after the election.[47] He put forth a recommendation for a combined House and Senate investigation similar to the Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities before and after the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.[75]

The U.S. House Intelligence Committee chairman Congressman Devin Nunes stated that "There is no clear evidence — even now" that Russia acted to help Trump. Nunes stated "There’s a lot of innuendo, lots of circumstantial evidence, that’s it."[76]

Paul Ryan, the Republican Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, said through a spokeswoman that "foreign intervention in our elections is unacceptable".[77] Ryan said an investigation should be conducted by Congressman Nunes, and stated: "any intervention by Russia is especially problematic because, under President Putin, Russia has been an aggressor that consistently undermines American interests."[78]

Obama Administration

President Obama ordered the United States Intelligence Community to investigate Russian attempts to influence the election and report back by January 2017.[79]

On December 9, 2016, President Obama ordered the United States Intelligence Community to conduct an investigation into Russia's attempts to influence the 2016 U.S. election and provide a report before he leaves office on January 20, 2017.[79][80][81] Lisa Monaco, U.S. Homeland Security Advisor and chief counterterrorism advisor to the president, announced the study, and said the intrusion of a foreign nation into a U.S. national election was an unprecedented event that would necessitate further investigation by subsequent administrations in the executive branch.[79] The intelligence analysis will take into account data from the last three presidential elections in the U.S.[80] Evidence showed malicious cyberwarfare during the 2008 and 2016 U.S. elections.[80]

A senior administration official told CNN that "We already know very clearly that Russia was behind this malicious activity in an attempt to interfere in our election," and that this was based on multiple sources.[82] The official said that the Intelligence Community review ordered by President Obama was intended to be a forward-looking lessons learned report, and not a retrospective report on the 2016 election: "This report is not going to look at the result of 2016 and examine if voters were swayed. This is solely about lessons learned about foreign actors interfering, how they did it, what their techniques and procedures were and how the U.S. government can mitigate future attempts."[82] Various administration officials said that "a range of possible responses" were under consideration, including sanctions or a covert cyber response against Russia.[82]

On December 12, 2016, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest was critical of Trump's rejection of the idea that Russia used cyber-attacks to influence the election.[83] Earnest noted:

The president-elect has said one thing on Twitter, the 17 intelligence agencies of the United States came forward two months ago to put forward their unanimous assessment about Russia's malicious cyber activity. I'll let you and the American people judge who is in a better position to defend their argument.[83]


Commentary and reactions

Donald Trump

Trump's transition team dismissed the CIA conclusions

In September 2016, during the first presidential debate, Donald Trump said he did not think that "anybody knows it was Russia that broke into the DNC."[84] During the second debate, Trump said, "Maybe there is no hacking. But they always blame Russia."[85] After the election, Trump's transition team dismissed the CIA's conclusions, remarking: "These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction."[12] Reacting to the Washington Post's reporting, Trump said, "I think it's ridiculous. I think it's just another excuse. I don't believe it." Trump also said he thinks that the story was being pushed out by Democrats because of the results of the election.[86]

Intelligence community

Current members

The CIA assessment, and Trump's dismissal of it, created an immediate and unprecedented rupture between the president-elect and the intelligence community.[87][88][89] On December 11, 2016, U.S. intelligence officials responded to the first time to Trump's denunciation of its findings in a written statement that read: "It's concerning that intelligence on Russian actions related to the U.S. election is being dismissed out of hand as false or politically partisan. The inclination to ignore such intelligence and impugn the integrity of U.S. intelligence officials is contrary to all that is sacred to national-security professionals who work day and night to protect this country."[87]

On the same day, The Guardian reported that members of the intelligence community feared reprisals from Donald Trump once he takes office, in response to the reports that have been issued. Serving officers pointed to Trump's attempts to identify civil servants in the Department of Energy "who have attended climate change conferences" as a parallel example. Other serving officers stated that retaliation by Trump was a near certainty. [90]

Former members

Former CIA director Michael Morell said: "A foreign government messing around in our elections is, I think, an existential threat to our way of life. To me, and this is to me not an overstatement, this is the political equivalent of 9/11."[91] In a Washington Post op-ed, former NSA director and CIA director Michael V. Hayden wrote that Trump's attack on the Intelligence Community's findings diminished the chances that the incoming administration would use intelligence "to create the basis, and set the boundaries, for rational policy choices."[92]

Former CIA spokesman George E. Little condemned Trump for dismissing the CIA assessment, saying that the president-elect's "unprecedented" response was "nothing short of shameful" and "disrupts one of the bedrocks of our strength: the application of foreign intelligence, often collected at great peril by the men and women of the CIA, to the development of policies that keep us safe."[93] Another former CIA spokesman, Bill Harlow, said that the dispute between Trump and the CIA was a "really ugly situation" and that it was "unprecedented to have a president so frontally assault" the intelligence community.[88]

Independent presidential candidate and former CIA intelligence officer Evan McMullin said Republican leadership did not respond adequately during the 2016 election to their knowledge at the time about Russia's efforts to meddle in the process.[94] McMullin said Republican politicians were aware the publicly revealed information about Russia's interference was likely simply the tip of the iceberg relative to the actual threat.[94] McMullin said that with his experience having worked as an intelligence officer he was distressed by the CIA revelations.[94] He said Republicans had not acted on the issue sufficiently during the election because they placed importance of the Republican party over U.S. national concerns.[94]

Electoral College

On December 10, ten electors (in an open letter headed by Christine Pelosi to the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper) demanded an intelligence briefing on investigations into foreign intervention in the presidential election.[95][96]

Experts and scholars

Former U.S. Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul said Russian interference in the election was "disturbing".[97]

Former U.S. ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul, director of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University, writing in the Washington Post, called the known facts about Russian interference in the election "disturbing" and called for a full investigation to determine the facts that are still uncertain.[97] McFaul said that the investigation announced by President Obama was "a good start ... but it is not enough," writing: "First, a serious investigation will take longer than one month; second, the authors of such a report must be bipartisan; third, the scope of such an inquiry must include other forms of interference beyond hacking; and fourth, the actions (and maybe non-actions) of the executive branch during the 2016 campaign must be part of the study."[97] McFaul called for a "bipartisan investigation, staffed in part by academics and experts, so that we know better what happened and therefore can make important policy changes before the 2020 elections."[97]

Historian Robert S. McElvaine wrote that there should be "supreme outrage" over the CIA's conclusion of Russian interference and that "the stealing of an election through actions by a hostile foreign power is both the greatest scandal in American history and precisely the sort of evil that the Framers of the United States Constitution sought to block through the Electoral College."[98] McElvaine referred to Federalist No. 68 in calling upon the Electoral College to adopt a "compromise Government of National Unity."[98]

Russian government

Vladimir Putin representative Dmitry Peskov said Russia did not interfere in the U.S. election.[5]

The Russian government said it had no involvement.[5] In a statement given to Reuters in Moscow, Dmitry Peskov representative for Russian president Vladimir Putin said: "I completely rule out a possibility that the [Russian] government or the government bodies have been involved in this."[5]

Julian Assange

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said Russia had no involvement in the DNC email leaks.[24][25]

Republican National Committee

The RNC has said there was no intrusion into its servers, while acknowledging that the email accounts of individual Republicans (including Colin Powell) were breached. Over 200 emails from Colin Powell were posted on the website DC Leaks.[12][99]

Chief of staff-designate for Trump and outgoing RNC Chairman Reince Priebus appeared on Meet the Press on December 11, 2016, and discounted the CIA conclusions. When asked by Chuck Todd whether "Russia was trying to muddy up and get involved in the election in 2016," Priebus responded "There's been no conclusive or specific report to say otherwise"—a statement rated "False" by the fact-checking website Politifact.com, who noted it "flies in the face of plain words from two of the highest ranking intelligence and security officials."[1] Priebus relayed the FBI investigated and found RNC servers had not been hacked.[57]

Media

Glenn Greenwald wrote in a piece for The Intercept: "an important part of this story, quite clearly, is inter-agency feuding between ... the CIA and the FBI."[100] He criticized the news media for using "conflicting anonymous leaks" to report the CIA's conclusions from its investigation.[100]

The New York Times columnist Paul Krugman called the 2016 presidential election "tainted" and stated that Trump had been "installed with the help of and remarkably deferential to a hostile foreign power."[101] Krugman criticized FBI Director Comey's handling of the matter, writing that "grotesquely inappropriate, partisan behavior on the part of domestic law enforcement" had affected the election outcome.[101]

Fox News performed a poll in December 2016 which found the greater proportion of individuals surveyed believed Russian interference did not sway the outcome of the presidential election.[102] 59 percent thought Russian interference did not have a perceptible impact, and 32 percent of those surveyed said Russia's actions assisted Trump.[102] 67 percent maintained confidence in the performance of the CIA.[102]

See also

Footnotes

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g Greenberg, Jon (December 11, 2016), "Reince Priebus falsely claims no conclusive report whether Russia tried to influence election", Politifact.com, retrieved December 12, 2016
  2. ^ Nakashima, Ellen. "U.S. government officially accuses Russia of hacking campaign to interfere with elections". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 7, 2016.
  3. ^ Ackerman, Spencer; Thielman, Sam. "US officially accuses Russia of hacking DNC and interfering with election". The Guardian. Retrieved October 7, 2016.
  4. ^ CNN, Evan Perez and Theodore Schleifer. "US accuses Russia of trying to interfere with 2016 election". CNN. Retrieved October 7, 2016. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  5. ^ a b c d e Moscow denies Russian involvement in U.S. DNC hacking, Reuters (June 14, 2016).
  6. ^ "Spy Agency Consensus Grows That Russia Hacked D.N.C." New York Times. Retrieved July 26, 2016.
  7. ^ Entous, Adam; Nakashima, Ellen; Miller, Greg, "Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House", The Washington Post
  8. ^ Ellen Nakashima, Is there a Russian master plan to install Trump in the White House? Some intelligence officials are skeptical, New York Times (July 27, 2016).
  9. ^ David E. Sanger & Scott Shane, Russian Hackers Acted to Aid Trump in Election, U.S. Says, New York Times (December 9, 2016).
  10. ^ Mary Louise Kelly (December 10, 2016), CIA Concludes Russian Interference Aimed To Elect Trump, NPR
  11. ^ Mazzetti, Mark; Lichblau, Eric (December 11, 2016). "C.I.A. Judgment on Russia Built on Swell of Evidence". New York Times. Retrieved December 12, 2016.
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h Sanger, David E.; Shane, Scott (December 9, 2016). "Russian Hackers Acted to Aid Trump in Election, U.S. Says". The New York Times. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
  13. ^ Natasha Bertrand, 'We're drawing very different conclusions': The FBI and the CIA can't agree on the motives of Russian hacks, Business Insider (December 12, 2016): "The FBI, however — while agreeing that the hacking campaign originated in Russia — has been reluctant to align itself with the CIA and assign a motive to the cyberattacks."
  14. ^ India Ashok, FBI and CIA give contrasting explanations to lawmakers on Russia's motives in 2016 election hacks, International Business Times (December 12, 2016).
  15. ^ Ellen Nakashima & Adam Entous (December 10, 2016), "FBI and CIA give differing accounts to lawmakers on Russia's motives in 2016 hacks", The Washington Post, retrieved December 12, 2016
  16. ^ Washington, Spencer Ackerman David Smith in (December 9, 2016). "Barack Obama orders 'full review' of possible Russian hacking in U.S. election". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
  17. ^ CNN, Tal Kopan, Kevin Liptak and Jim Sciutto. "Obama orders review of Russian election-related hacking". CNN. Retrieved December 10, 2016. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  18. ^ Seung Min Kim and Burgess Everett (December 11, 2016), "Trump vs. Congress on Russian hacking", Politico
  19. ^ Levine, Sam (December 10, 2016). "Chuck Schumer Calls For Investigation Into Russian Interference In The Election". The Huffington Post. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
  20. ^ Eric Bradner, Trump on Russian hacking: 'I don't believe it', CNN (December 11, 2016).
  21. ^ Nicholas Fando, Trump Links C.I.A. Reports on Russia to Democrats’ Shame Over Election, New York Times (December 11, 2016).
  22. ^ Sanger, David E. (December 10, 2016). "Trump, Mocking Claim That Russia Hacked Election, at Odds with G.O.P." The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
  23. ^ "Team Trump Mocks Suggestion of Russian Meddling in Election". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
  24. ^ a b "WikiLeaks' Assange denies Russia behind Podesta hack". Politico. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
  25. ^ a b Alex Johnson, WikiLeaks' Julian Assange: 'No Proof' Hacked DNC Emails Came From Russia, NBC News (July 25, 2016).
  26. ^ a b "McConnell, Differing With Trump, Says He Has 'Highest Confidence' In Intel Agencies". Retrieved December 12, 2016.
  27. ^ a b Rhodan, Maya. "Sen. Mitch McConnell: "The Russians are not our friends."". Retrieved December 12, 2016.
  28. ^ a b O'Keefe, Ed; Kane, Paul (December 12, 2016). "McConnell announces Senate probe of suspected Russian election interference: 'The Russians are not our friends'". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 12, 2016.
  29. ^ a b c d e Chen, Adrian (July 27, 2016), "The Real Paranoia-Inducing Purpose of Russian Hacks", The New Yorker, retrieved November 26, 2016
  30. ^ a b c Porter, Tom (November 28, 2016), "How US and EU failings allowed Kremlin propaganda and fake news to spread through the West", International Business Times, retrieved November 29, 2016
  31. ^ a b c d e f Schindler, John R. (November 5, 2015), "Obama Fails to Fight Putin's Propaganda Machine", New York Observer, retrieved November 28, 2016
  32. ^ a b c d e f Schindler, John R. (November 26, 2016), "The Kremlin Didn't Sink Hillary—Obama Did", New York Observer, retrieved November 28, 2016
  33. ^ a b c LoGiurato, Brett (April 29, 2014), "Russia's Propaganda Channel Just Got A Journalism Lesson From The US State Department", Business Insider, retrieved November 29, 2016
  34. ^ LoGiurato, Brett (April 25, 2014), "RT Is Very Upset With John Kerry For Blasting Them As Putin's 'Propaganda Bullhorn'", Business Insider, retrieved November 29, 2016
  35. ^ a b Stengel, Richard (April 29, 2014), "Russia Today's Disinformation Campaign", Dipnote, United States Department of State, retrieved November 28, 2016
  36. ^ a b c d e f Weisburd, Andrew; Watts, Clint (August 6, 2016), "Trolls for Trump - How Russia Dominates Your Twitter Feed to Promote Lies (And, Trump, Too)", The Daily Beast, retrieved November 24, 2016{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  37. ^ a b c Dougherty, Jill (December 2, 2016), The reality behind Russia's fake news, CNN, retrieved December 2, 2016
  38. ^ Ali Watkins and Sheera Frenkel (November 30, 2016), "Intel Officials Believe Russia Spreads Fake News", BuzzFeed News, retrieved December 1, 2016
  39. ^ a b Benedictus, Leo (November 6, 2016), "Invasion of the troll armies: from Russian Trump supporters to Turkish state stooges", The Guardian, retrieved December 2, 2016
  40. ^ a b c "U.S. officials defend integrity of vote, despite hacking fears", WITN-TV, November 26, 2016, retrieved December 2, 2016
  41. ^ Andrew Weisburd, Clint Watts and JM Berger (November 6, 2016), "Trolling for Trump: How Russia is Trying to Destroy Our Democracy", War on the Rocks, retrieved December 6, 2016
  42. ^ Frenkel, Sheera (November 4, 2016), "US Officials Are More Worried About The Media Being Hacked Than The Ballot Box", BuzzFeed News, retrieved December 2, 2016
  43. ^ a b c d Timberg, Craig (November 24, 2016), "Russian propaganda effort helped spread 'fake news' during election, experts say", The Washington Post, retrieved November 25, 2016
  44. ^ a b "Russian propaganda effort likely behind flood of fake news that preceded election", PBS NewsHour, Associated Press, November 25, 2016, retrieved November 26, 2016
  45. ^ a b "Russian propaganda campaign reportedly spread 'fake news' during US election", Nine News, Agence France-Presse, November 26, 2016, retrieved November 26, 2016
  46. ^ a b c Strohm, Chris (December 1, 2016), "Russia Weaponized Social Media in U.S. Election, FireEye Says", Bloomberg News, retrieved December 1, 2016
  47. ^ a b c d e "Vladimir Putin Wins the Election No Matter Who The Next President Is", The Daily Beast, November 4, 2016, retrieved December 2, 2016
  48. ^ Schatz, Bryan, "The Kremlin Would Be Proud of Trump's Propaganda Playbook", Mother Jones, retrieved December 2, 2016
  49. ^ a b Jim Sciutto & Manu Raju, Democrats want Russian hacking intelligence declassified, CNN (December 2, 2016).
  50. ^ a b c Adam Entous, Ellen Nakashima and Greg Miller (December 9, 2016), "Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House", The Washington Post, retrieved December 10, 2016
  51. ^ a b Chris Sanchez and Bryan Logan (December 9, 2016), "The CIA says it has evidence that Russia tried to help Trump win the US election", Business Insider, retrieved December 10, 2016
  52. ^ Sommerfeldt, Chris (December 9, 2016), "Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the White House: report", New York Daily News, retrieved December 10, 2016
  53. ^ a b c William M. Arkin, Ken Dilanian and Cynthia McFadden (December 14, 2016), "U.S. Officials: Putin Personally Involved in U.S. Election Hack", NBC News, retrieved December 14, 2016
  54. ^ a b c Lawler, David (December 15, 2016), "Vladimir Putin 'personally directed Russian hack of US election'", The Daily Telegraph, retrieved December 15, 2016
  55. ^ Pearson, Rick. "FBI told state GOP in June its emails had been hacked". chicagotribune.com.
  56. ^ a b Rossoll, Nicki (December 11, 2016). "Reince Priebus: 'RNC Was Not Hacked'". ABC News. Retrieved December 12, 2016.
  57. ^ Seipel, Brooke (December 11, 2016). "US intelligence split on motive for Russian election interference". Retrieved December 12, 2016.
  58. ^ a b c Miller, Kevin (December 1, 2016), "Angus King: Russian involvement in U.S. election 'an arrow aimed at the heart of democracy'", Portland Press Herald, retrieved December 2, 2016
  59. ^ Staff report (November 30, 2016), "Angus King among senators asking president to declassify information about Russia and election", Portland Press Herald, retrieved December 2, 2016
  60. ^ Jim Sciutto and Manu Raju (December 3, 2016), Democrats want Russian hacking intelligence declassified, CNN, retrieved December 3, 2016
  61. ^ a b c d e f g Timberg, Craig (November 30, 2016), "Effort to combat foreign propaganda advances in Congress", The Washington Post, retrieved December 1, 2016
  62. ^ a b Porter, Tom (December 1, 2016), "US House of representatives backs proposal to counter global Russian subversion", International Business Times UK edition, retrieved December 1, 2016
  63. ^ a b c d e Demirjian, Karoun (December 8, 2016), "Republicans ready to launch wide-ranging probe of Russia, despite Trump's stance", Chicago Tribune, The Washington Post, retrieved December 10, 2016
  64. ^ a b Senate Republicans join Democrats in calling for probe of Russian electioneering hacks, CBS News, December 11, 2016, retrieved December 11, 2016 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |agency= ignored (help)
  65. ^ a b Peralta, Eyder (December 11, 2016), "As Trump Dismisses CIA, Congress Looks To Confront Russian Cyberattacks", National Public Radio, retrieved December 11, 2016
  66. ^ a b John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Chuck Schumer, Jack Reed (December 11, 2016), McCain, Graham, Schumer, Reed Joint Statement on Reports That Russia Interfered with the 2016 Election, United States Senate Committee on Armed Services, retrieved December 11, 2016{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  67. ^ a b Seung Min Kim & Burgess Everett, Trump vs. Congress on Russian hacking, Politico (December 11, 2016).
  68. ^ McCain to Trump on Russian hacking: 'The facts are there' - CBS, December 11, 2016, retrieved December 11, 2016 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |agency= ignored (help)
  69. ^ Meyer, Theodoric (December 11, 2016), "McCain wants select committee to investigate Russian hacking", Politico {{citation}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  70. ^ Brown, Greg (December 11, 2016), "Lankford joins in call for bipartisan investigation into Russian election interference", KOKI-TV, retrieved December 11, 2016
  71. ^ Elise Viebeck and Karoun Demirjian (December 11, 2016), "Key GOP senators join call for bipartisan Russia election probe, even as their leaders remain mum", The Washington Post, retrieved December 12, 2016
  72. ^ David Smith, FBI covered up Russian influence on Trump's election win, Harry Reid claims, The Guardian (December 10, 2016).
  73. ^ Smith, David (December 10, 2016). "FBI covered up Russian influence on Trump's election win, Harry Reid claims". Retrieved December 12, 2016 – via The Guardian.
  74. ^ Harris, Shane (December 11, 2016), "Donald Trump Fuels Rift With CIA Over Russian Hack", The Wall Street Journal, retrieved December 12, 2016
  75. ^ Nakashima, Ellen; Entous, Adam (December 10, 2016). "FBI and CIA give differing accounts to lawmakers on Russia's motives in 2016 hacks". Washington Post. Retrieved December 11, 2016.
  76. ^ Rachael Bade, Ryan stops short of call for Russia probe, Politico (December 12, 2016).
  77. ^ Steinhauer, Jennifer (December 12, 2016), "McConnell and Ryan Back Russia Inquiries, Raising Potential Clash With Trump", The New York Times, retrieved December 12, 2016
  78. ^ a b c Sanger, David E. (December 9, 2016), "Obama Orders Intelligence Report on Russian Election Hacking", The New York Times, retrieved December 10, 2016
  79. ^ a b c Elizabeth Weise and Gregory Korte (December 9, 2016), "Obama orders review of foreign attempts to hack U.S. election", USA Today, retrieved December 10, 2016
  80. ^ Josh Gerstein, Jennifer Scholtes, Eric Geller and Martin Matishak (December 9, 2016), "Obama orders 'deep dive' of election-related hacking", Politico, retrieved December 10, 2016{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  81. ^ a b c Elise Labott, Official: Probe 'solely about lessons learned' on foreign hacking, CNN (December 10, 2016).
  82. ^ a b Griffiths, Brent (December 12, 2016), "White House rails against Trump for not accepting evidence of Russia hacking", Politico, retrieved December 13, 2016
  83. ^ Pramuk, Jacob (September 26, 2016). "Trump: DNC hacker could have been 400 pounds and sitting in bed". CNBC. Retrieved December 14, 2016.
  84. ^ Fox-Brewster, Thomas (October 10, 2016). "Clinton Claims Putin's Hackers Are Punting For Trump". Forbes. Retrieved December 14, 2016.
  85. ^ Flores, Reena (December 11, 2016). "Donald Trump weighs in on Russia hacking election, CIA intelligence". CBS News. Retrieved December 13, 2016.
  86. ^ a b Shane Harris, Donald Trump Fuels Rift With CIA Over Russian Hack, Wall Street Journal (December 11, 2016).
  87. ^ a b Brian Ross, James Gordon Meek, Mike Levine & Justin Fishel, Trump Engages CIA in War of Words Over Russian Election Hacking, ABC News (December 12, 2016).
  88. ^ John Cassidy, Trump Isolates Himself With C.I.A. Attack, The New Yorker (December 12, 2016).
  89. ^ Ackerman, Spencer (December 11, 2016), "Intelligence figures fear Trump reprisals over assessment of Russia election role", The Guardian, retrieved December 11, 2016
  90. ^ "Former acting CIA Director Michael Morell: Russian meddling in US election 'is the political equivalent of 9/11'". Politico. December 13, 2016.
  91. ^ Michael V. Hayden, Trump is already antagonizing the intelligence community, and that’s a problem, Washington Post (December 12, 2016).
  92. ^ Rebecca Savransky, Former CIA spokesman: Trump's disrespect for intelligence community is 'shameful', The Hill (December 12, 2016).
  93. ^ a b c d Nelson, Louis (December 14, 2016), "McMullin: GOP ignored Russian meddling in presidential election", Politico, retrieved December 15, 2016
  94. ^ Cheney, Kyle (December 12, 2016). "Electors demand intelligence briefing before Electoral College vote".
  95. ^ Pelosi, Christine. "Bipartisan Electors Ask James Clapper: Release Facts on Outside Interference in U.S. Election".
  96. ^ a b c d Michael McFaul, Let’s get the facts right on foreign involvement in our elections, Washington Post (December 10, 2016).
  97. ^ a b Robert S. McElvaine, Save America through a Compromise of 2016, Huffington Post (December 10, 2016).
  98. ^ cf. Tau, Byron (September 14, 2016). "Colin Powell Blasts Donald Trump, Criticizes Hillary Clinton in Leaked Messages". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved December 11, 2016.
  99. ^ a b Greenwald, Glenn. "Anonymous Leaks to the WashPost About the CIA's Russia Beliefs Are No Substitute for Evidence". The Intercept. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
  100. ^ a b Paul Krugman, The Tainted Election, New York Times (December 12, 2016).
  101. ^ a b c Blanton, Dana (December 14, 2016), "Fox News Poll: Majority says Russian hacking made no difference in 2016 election", Fox News, retrieved December 14, 2016

Further reading

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Russian interference in 2016 United States elections.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections&oldid=754898691"