Jump to content

User:MelanieN/links

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
...from administrators 1
Requests for unblock 141
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 45
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 71
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 28
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 4
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 121
Requested RD1 redactions 22
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 2
Candidates for speedy deletion 19
Open sockpuppet investigations 128
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]


Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 0
Empty articles 1
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 4
Importance or significance not asserted 2
Possibly contested candidates 1
Other candidates 13
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 11 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – 22 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Let's lock this up before one of these guys gets blocked.... Let's force them to engage more on the talk page. Moxy🍁 22:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Things seem to have calmed down since last night (NA Eastern Time) and the opening of the DR/N thread. Daniel Case (talk) 19:26, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing with the continuous addition of unsourced claims into the article. Sricsi (talk) 07:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Same protection as base template. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 08:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Template protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: BLP violations by IPs and 1-day old accounts. Borgenland (talk) 09:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Lam312321321 block evasion again, an IP retreading the ground of previous sock User:Spicesareyummy before the previous year-long protection template had even been removed by the bot. Belbury (talk) 09:26, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Do you have any evidence to suggest I am a sockpuppet, despite never editing on here before? I'm shocked at how my edits got reverted. Please check my IP history and you'll see I'm not a sockpuppet. I am also not connected to User:Spicesareyummy... I'm dumbfounded 90.243.14.0 (talk) 09:35, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
I'm not gonna revert you Belbury, because I don't want to edit war, but you have reverted my edits, based on, your gut feelings, that I'm apparently User:Spicesareyummy. Have a read of: Wikipedia:Don't be quick to assume that someone is a sockpuppet 90.243.14.0 (talk) 09:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Declined This seems to be outside the scope of this noticeboard. Take it to AN/I or SPI. Daniel Case (talk) 20:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:30, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS under IPA. Daniel Case (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated uncited edits stating Nusantara is Indonesia's capital - the move has not been announced. Davidelit (Talk) 09:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:26, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: High level of including unsourced claims, and disrupting lead section Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 11:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GoodnightmushTalk 19:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Nationalist POV-pushing by Albanian IP [1] [2] in page with a history of protections [3]. Super Ψ Dro 12:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:30, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Abusive ip editor, warning issued, initial comment removed, but they have restored it. Sciencefish (talk) 13:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 77.77.218.0/23 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the page for three months, so other IPs can still edit it. Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism Stickhandler (talk) 13:26, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GoodnightmushTalk 19:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent IP block evasion (and harresment). Slatersteven (talk) 15:35, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent addition of unfounded material, as well as continued MOS violations by a sock-hopping, user-using editor (report coming). livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. Charlie (talk) 16:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 16:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 19:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vandalism over the past two weeks by socks of User:JustAnAveragePiglet. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 16:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism. JMHamo (talk) 17:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes, he's involved in a recent news event, but I don't see a lot of vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 19:19, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Re-requesting temporary semi-protection for persistent violations of the BLP policy, of which there have been a bunch since the last request was declined. --AntiDionysius (talk) 20:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:CT/AP. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 17:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

+1 Reason: vandalism Solanum's moon (talk) 17:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes, it's a current event in a contentious topic area. But I don't see the kind of disruption that I usually consider as justifying protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Floor exercise section subject to continuing vandalism due to recent CAS decision Mypurplelightsaber (talk) 17:50, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined Only 1 disruptive edit in the last week GoodnightmushTalk 19:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Ongoing vandalism due to recent CAS decision Mypurplelightsaber (talk) 17:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined Looks pretty quiet since last protection ended 3 days ago. GoodnightmushTalk 19:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Heavy unexplained removals by IP, 2 edits made by reg. user reverted. Recommending atleast one month of protection. Thewikizoomer (talk) 18:35, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was two days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 19:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Per WP:PIA, ongoing part of conflict Wiiformii (talk) 20:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Per WP:PIA, very recent Wiiformii (talk) 20:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Per WP:PIA Wiiformii (talk) 20:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption in August. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:34, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: Should redirect to Hashtag United F.C. as an alternative name for Spencer FC (Spencer Carmichael-Brown), also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spencer Owen was about a different person of the same name. Sahaib (talk) 09:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer needed because nobody has made major edits to the page in a while, and there has been a lack of vandalism. Wcamp9 (talk) 16:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

That's a sign the protection - which was levied after six prior time-limited protections - is working. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


"Israeli military activities in the Gaza Strip remained unchanged following adoption of the resolution" needs a marker: citation needed. AmbroseVenture (talk) 18:42, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

"On 28 March, the IDF shot and killed two unarmed men in central Gaza, before burying them in sand with bulldozers.[397]" needs to be altered, the source gives two contradicting stories which CNN (the source) didn't clear up. In the article AJ argues without evidence the two videos they present are from the same people, the IDF tells those were two separate incidents. This has to be cleared up to remain factual. AmbroseVenture (talk) 18:44, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

5 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Wikipedia languages/core (request) 2024-07-27 11:23 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Template:Wikipedia languages (request) 2024-07-30 19:50 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Big Brother 26 (American season) (request) 2024-08-19 01:58 Fully protected, expires 2024-08-25 at 00:02:52 UTC (log) Modified by Star Mississippi on 2024-08-18: "Edit warring / content dispute"
Template:Replace (request) 2024-08-19 08:32 Fully protected (log) Modified by Xaosflux on 2022-02-23: "1MM+ uses"
2028 United States presidential election (request) 2024-08-19 20:20 Fully protected, expires 2024-11-06 at 00:22:10 UTC (log) Modified by JPxG on 2024-08-05: "tfw you are good at math"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
30 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox Chinese (request) 2024-06-07 08:07 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2024-06-20 06:11 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-06-20 07:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox Christian leader (request) 2024-06-28 12:36 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox language (request) 2024-06-30 06:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
Template:Infobox islands/length (request) 2024-07-10 14:57 Template-protected (log) Modified by Yaris678 on 2017-03-13: "For consistency with Template:Infobox islands. An increase of edit protection and decrease of move protection."
Module:Sports color/baseball (request) 2024-07-10 18:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikBot II on 2021-08-17: "High-risk template or module 30997 transclusions (more info)"
Template:Infobox person (request) 2024-07-19 00:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Module:Navbox (request) 2024-07-19 19:53 Template-protected (log) Modified by Ged UK on 2014-05-07: "lowering to template protection"
Template:Infobox road (request) 2024-07-26 06:18 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-18: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox islands (request) 2024-07-30 17:45 Template-protected (log) Modified by Yaris678 on 2017-03-13: "For consistency with Template:Infobox islands. No change to edit protection and decrease of move protection."
Module:College color/data (request) 2024-08-04 15:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Taxobox (request) 2024-08-05 06:25 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Tasks (request) 2024-08-05 18:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by HJ Mitchell on 2014-04-14: "drop to TE per request at RfPP"
Template:Country data Solomon Islands (request) 2024-08-06 05:37 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Country data Nova Scotia (request) 2024-08-06 06:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Country data New Brunswick (request) 2024-08-06 06:57 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Country data Manitoba (request) 2024-08-06 10:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Country data Romania (request) 2024-08-09 06:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Module:Football box (request) 2024-08-09 15:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2018-10-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Football box collapsible (request) 2024-08-09 15:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2018-10-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Taxonomy/Archaeplastida (request) 2024-08-12 23:51 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mifter on 2018-12-07: "Highly visible template"
Template:Contentious topics/page restriction talk notice base (request) 2024-08-13 06:09 Template-protected (log) Protected by Dreamy Jazz on 2023-01-15: "Highly visible template"
Template:Infobox comedian (request) 2024-08-15 10:25 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Infobox military person (request) 2024-08-15 10:27 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Infobox writer (request) 2024-08-15 10:28 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Module:Lang-zh (request) 2024-08-17 15:53 Template-protected (log) From Module:Zh: Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-05-03: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Country data Turks and Caicos Islands (request) 2024-08-18 05:22 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Requested move notice (request) 2024-08-19 12:57 Template-protected (log) From Template:Title notice: Modified by Ymblanter on 2020-04-24: "Highly visible template: request at WP:RFPP"
Template:WikiProject United States (request) 2024-08-19 15:25 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-17: "allow template editors to modify"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]

For a third time, I'm applying for autopatrolled rights; my first request was denied in April 2023, and my second request was denied in June 2024. The reason for the first decline was that my previous articles were tagged for "notability." After that decline, I worked on bringing articles over from the Russian Wikipedia and had relatively few problems when other editors were reviewing them (I don't bring over everything from those respective pages, so I added a tag for expanding from Russian to let others know that information is still there). The reason for the second decline was that I moved one of my BLP articles back into the mainspace without changing the sourcing, and it was eventually deleted (that was a mistake on my part). Now, roughly two months later, I have had little to no problems with the other articles I have brought over. I respectfully request that I be granted the autopatrolled permission this time around, as I believe it will help lighten the NPP workload to some extent. Thanks in advance for your consideration. Losipov (talk) 20:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([4]). MusikBot talk 20:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Gonna mark this as  Not done; you don't create so many articles that it's a burden on NPP and given the previous issues I'd rather they still get reviewed manually. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer Aszx5000 has messaged me twice that I should be autopatrolled. I don't care for my sake, since the process works fine for me, but I don't want to be a burden on the reviewers. Please either grant or deny this status based on whatever you think is best for the community. Thanks! Jordanroderick (talk) 23:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Would like to cut down on the backlog of pages that need to be reviewed while I create pages, especially as of recent where I've been working on creating pages for military battles, and Bahmani rulers. I definitely believe the pages I've created shows I am familiar with the guidelines of page notability, and especially quality. I've practiced with this being a new page patroller myself. Noorullah (talk) 00:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

I have created 25 new pages and would like to request the autopatrolled right. I have been a user since 2007, but have increased my writing on Wikipedia in the last 3 years. I create articles in generally non-controversial areas such as crystallography, symmetry and philately. GreatStellatedDodecahedron (talk) 13:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]


Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights: Assists in helping for typo correction. The proof of which can be seen from my contributions in Typo Team Moss-D Bunnypranav (talk) 15:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([5]). MusikBot talk 15:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
 Not done You now technically meet the header criteria, but you still don't really have enough experience IMO. I will be willing to grant once you've made a few hundred more edits, especially more substantive edits. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
I understand, but I would be grateful if you could give me a bit more information. Does typo fixing count as substantive edits? If no, then how is typo fixing a starting use for AWB.
Thanks in advance. Bunnypranav (talk) 06:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Typo fixing is fine as something to do with AWB, but I would not call it a "substantive" edit and it doesn't seem right to count it as a "non-automated edit" either (even if you truly did perform them without any kind of automation), and not doing so would put you clearly below the criteria. I interpreted the idea behind that requirement was more about what the edits did and less about the non-observable requirement of how they were done, and making 500 mostly typo-fixing edits in a month just doesn't establish the kind of track record I look for when granting advanced permissions. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback and explanation. Bunnypranav (talk) 15:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

I am currently engaged in editing biographies of recently elected United Kingdom MPs. Much of this involves adding relevant templates and categories, which I hope to streamline with the help of AWB. It will also assist in my more general gnomish work of syntax fixing across the project. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 11:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

I am interested in gaining access so that I can maintain GA related tasks as is detailed at WP:GA/MISMATCH#In a subcategory Category:GA-Class articles but not a good article NightWolf1223 <Howl at meMy hunts> 02:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 04:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
I edit a lot of drafts and newly created articles. Whether it's fixing MOS issues or improving a draft, my workflow is quite slow. Looking to use AWB to remove the requirement of having several browser tools installed. My main interests of this program are the database scanner (for new page patrol edits pertaining to orphans), and the aforementioned efficiency that I am seeking. OnlyNanotalk 15:53, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

[edit]
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag.

Extended confirmed

[edit]
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]

Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma(talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Question, though I am not an administrator, I see that you have published accepted AFC submissions, even if they lack citations or are in need of some fixing. And some have orange banners on them. Why is this? — 48JCL 01:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
@48JCL: As they should. The standard at acceptance at AfC is that the article would probably survive an AfD. Nothing more. Declining a draft for surmountable problems like a lack of citations or pretty much anything covered by a cleanup banner is inappropriate. – Joe (talk) 08:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
I spot checked the 4 most recent accepts and they had lots of citations at time of acceptance. Feel free to link to the specific draft accepts you are concerned with. A complete lack of citations is a valid draftification reason and valid AFC decline reason, but I am not seeing that here. A major lack of citations such as entire paragraphs missing a citation (and also not supported by any WP:GENREFs) could be a valid decline reason (WP:V is policy after all). But it may also be reasonable to accept a draft that is mostly cited and just missing a couple citations, such as Draft:Norah Fulcher. –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Could anyone please review my request ? It is already couple of days. Xegma(talk) 18:10, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
@Xegma: I assume patrolling admins here have been waiting for you to address the concerns raised by 48JCL. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:53, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Novem is right, I also believe that entire paragraph missing a citation that is a problem, and the draft that mostly cited and just missing a couple citations that is ok to accept the draft. Thanks. Xegma(talk) 16:43, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([6]). MusikBot talk 20:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I see you found the IP at AfC who submits soundtrack articles (41 accepts of soundtracks it looks like). I'm glad to see you've started to accept drafts at AfC, instead of just declining (a ratio of 1 accepted to 348 declined at the time of the last application). I do still have concerns about your experience at AFD, given that, of your last 40 votes, all but 2 of them were pile on votes where the result had basically already been decided based on the number of votes for the conclusion you chose. You accepted one piece of criticism from me, your lack of accepts at AfC, but you do still appear to be pile on voting. Honestly, I'm not sold, but I'll leave it up to someone else whether they want to grant you a trial or not. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback. I understand your points, I've made lots of contributions recently, and I hope I will be granted a trial to demonstrate my willingness to contribute positively. Best, Waqar💬 07:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to say that I've been working so hard for the past couple of months. I've made so many contributions to AFCs, I've reviewed over 1,160 articles (accepts: 138, declines: 670, and the rest either rejected or speedily deleted) so far. I'm also actively patrolling the new page feed, adding maintenance tags, and tagging articles for speedy deletion like A3, A7, and G11. I've drafted more than 200 articles that either lacked reliable sources or needed additional sources. In the AFD discussions, I voted on more than 150 pages. Without considering the no consensus results, 98.6% of my AfD's were matches, and even though the votes were assumed to be piles on voting, most of my recent votes were very detailed and specific and weren't pointing towards anyone, but I will accept their valuable advice and try my best to make improvements at AFDs as well. Having said that, I believe that all those contributions exhibit my hard work and dedication. I hope I get a chance to at least prove myself by patrolling new pages, and I would be more than happy to help with the backlog. Thanks for your time and consideration. Waqar💬 18:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

I was given a trial for a few months and would like to renew my permissions. I have made good use of my permissions by fixing new pages and judiciously applying CSD whenever necessary. I am still active at NPP and will continue to make good use of my permissions upon renewal. Florificapis (talk) 22:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Joe Roe (expires 00:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 22:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

I'd like to help out with the backlog at NPP. My previous experience includes many nominations of drafts under G1, G2, and G3, and a couple instances of article ratings and XfD participation. Rusty 🐈 03:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

I would like to become a new page patrol to accelerate the page creation process, improve the quality of Wikipedia pages, and reduce the huge current backlog. I have a good understanding of what a qualified article would look like, and created around four articles like Organothallium Chemistry. I have also done various other editing, including merging Carbohydrate Chemistry into Carbohydrate. Pygos (talk) 06:35, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Two months ago I was given the new page reviewer right, and I want to continue with it. I trust I have made good contributions. Thanks in advance. Tajotep (talk) 10:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) This user's NPP rights expired on the 5th of August. Rusty 🐈 22:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 13:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

I have created 85 pages including a GA. I am familiar with the p&g on notability and reliable sources. Would like to put my knowledge to use by reviewing pages and help out WikiProject Korea a bit more. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 05:05, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done for a three month trial period. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

My last request was denied due to vague votes in AfD. Since then, I have taken my time to learn more and not just rushed to re-request the rights. Then I had created 50 articles when the request was denied. Currently, I have over 714 articles with only 5 deleted. This shows that I have understanding of what GNG and what SIGCOV is. It will be a pleasure in helping reduce the backlog of new created pages. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 09:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Per Joe Roe's post on WikiProject Linguistics, I would be willing to help out reviewing new linguistics articles. Botterweg14 (talk) 22:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 13:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

I requested this perm a while ago before I was adequately experienced, and it was recently suggested that I apply again. Since my first request I have participated a lot more at AfC and AfD, which I think has shown me aspects of notability/deletion/creation policies I had less of a grasp of then. I think it would be good to help given the backlog (particularly where it relates to events and literature where I believe myself to have the best grasp on notability criteria). I would like to help with the redirect backlog as well. Thanks! PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:20, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

I request that I have page reviewer rights to lower the backlog. I typically create articles in royalty and nobility and have made 16 successful articles specialised in royalty as well as I contribute a lot to them. I have 1,700 edits in the 9 months I have been on Wikipedia meaning I contribute daily. I do often look at the articles in page patrol and add tags when needed. I really hope that I can help reduce the backlog! Thanks in advance. Azarctic (talk) 01:37, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]


Reason for requesting page mover rights: I want to have my page mover rights extended, as I contribute to RM/TR. Was given 3mo trial and it will end on August 20. ToadetteEdit! 08:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by Robertsky (expires 00:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 08:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi again, Toadette. You were great during the 2024 CrowdStrike-related article title saga! I hope you become a Page Mover at the same time as me! Jruderman (talk) 06:48, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Given User talk:ToadetteEdit#Move review for Donald Trump fist pump photographs just today, as well as a past history of similar closes of deletion discussions at DRV, I am not convinced this should be granted. * Pppery * it has begun... 06:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
At the least, asking Toadette here what might or should have been done differently seems appropriate. Dekimasuよ! 06:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
I'm also concerned about User_talk:ToadetteEdit#RM_at_Talk:Ted_Wilson_(figure_skater), which is, at best, a communication failure (A good closer will transparently explain how the decision was reachedWP:NHC), and at worst a headcount to determine consensus (WP:NOTDEMOCRACY). DatGuyTalkContribs 13:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
@ToadetteEdit: would you please respond to the above concerns? Best, HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 15:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Good evening. It has been a while since the request was opened. I've resolved the concern about the Donald Trump photo RM by moving to the appropriate page. I also answered the concerned about the Ted Wilson page, so communication isn't an issue here. My consensus is often misunderstood by many, but this time, I will only focus on closing straightforward RMs and leave controversial ones until I improve my decision-making skills, in addition to answering RMTR requests. ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
About "my consensus is often misunderstood by many", can you explain what you mean? Whose consensus is being determined in these discussions, and why might your intention be misunderstood frequently? Dekimasuよ! 03:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
As you can observe on my talk page and the latest archive. therre were people who disagree with my closure and associated consensus. There aren't any consensus from others and people see me as an editor new to closing discussions, and therefore sometimes others do not understand my consensus or confused of it. ToadetteEdit (talk) 05:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. However, this does not assuage my concerns. Consensus is formed among editors through the process of discussion, and a closure should reflect the consensus that is shown in the discussion. When other editors disagree with one of your closes, this indicates a feeling that your close did not reflect the balance of the result of the discussion, not an intent to discount your perspective because you are a newer closer. Consensus is not an aspect of the editor closing the discussion, so while you may mean "my reading of consensus", we do not normally refer to "my consensus" or "consensus from others" when marking the outcomes of discussions. Dekimasuよ! 06:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
I understood your statement. It's my sense of consensus and my implementation. At first, editors do not agree with the closure in the first place, so that was what I meant by "consensus misunderstood". ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
I'm an active AfC reviewer, and I spend a lot of time patrolling new pages. I often draftify articles that are not sourced or need additional sources (over 250 articles so far). Having this right would be super useful and help reduce the number of R2 tags for admins in the backlog. I also have experience in WP:RM, and I'd like to request page mover rights for non-controversial tasks. Thank you, Waqar💬 16:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

I have been monitoring recent changes on pages for a while now AlexBobCharles (talk) 08:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello@AlexBobCharles. Most of your history looks good. Could you explain why you warned rather than explained after [7] this edit? Seems like a good faith error? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello . I withdraw my request because i do not plan to be very active on WP. I warned them because they seemed to be the same IP who made the same change a few hours before and got reverted and they didn't make any response to my edit summary AlexBobCharles (talk) 07:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

I’ve been editing for a little while now, I’ve requested page protection and reverted edits which are not appropriate on various pages. I am pretty devoted to editing on Wikipedia and I have an extensive Watchlist so I think this permission would be useful. Adriazeri (talk) 22:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Adriazeri: I see you don't consistently warn vandals after you revert them. Happy to give you PCR if you commit to warning more consistently. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I do apologise about not consistently warning vandals, I can absolutely commit to warning more frequently. It might’ve been because I’ve only really started using Twinkle recently. Adriazeri (talk) 12:32, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 13:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

I've been monitoring the pages in Wikipedia for a long time. I try my best to review new changes, revert any vandalism and provide authenticity. This permission will help me review the pages more fluently. MSouvik01 (talk) 21:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello @MSouvik01. You don't seem to warn people consistently after reverting them. It's easy to do with WP:Twinkle. Could you commit to doing this? I also noticed that you rarely leave WP:edit summaries. It's good practice to let others know what your edit did! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Did all the requirements and patrolled the recent changes page for a rotating number of days. My account also meets all the requirements. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 09:38, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([8]). MusikBot talk 09:40, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

I've been creating and monitoring articles in Wikipedia for a long time and its time to a new step in this great community. TheFrenchKing (talk) 21:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi @TheFrenchKing: happy to assign PCR if you commit to WP:warning users every time you revert vandalism. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 11:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello @—Femke 🐦! I agree to follow the community guidelines on WP:warning to revert vandalism. TheFrenchKing (talk) 12:17, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 12:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]

I have been patrolling recent changes and combating vandalism for a little over a month. I've been primarily using Twinkle and I would like to request rollback privileges to use other tools such as Huggle. I understand the importance of leaving users a notice whenever their edits are reverted. Jiffles1 (talk) 22:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 09:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi there! Thanks for responding. I believe I left warning messages for the three reverts you cited (here, here, and here). In all three cases, I used Twinkle to generate the messages because, as you noted, the tool makes the process extremely easy. Admittedly, I was bit inconsistent in leaving warnings when I first started combating vandalism, but I have been quite diligent about it over the past couple of weeks. If I’m missing something or doing something wrong, please let me know and I’ll correct it going forward. Jiffles1 (talk) 11:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
My apologies, you are totally correct. I misread the edit summaries for those reverts. Appreciate the clarification,  Done -Fastily 09:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

I have used Twinkle to revert vandalism mostly from the recent changes page for a while now and warn users afterwards. Twinkle is not sufficient for me on longer articles because of my sluggish internet connection. Reverts I make with Twinkle may take up to ten seconds, even with ethernet connected to my router. Rollback permissions would be greatly appreciated to make edits faster and save time. I can be trusted with rollback permissions as I have been actively reverting vandalism with a few breaks for school since July 2023, consistantly warning editors with the templates that Twinkle offers. I understand what is and what is not vandalism, and believe that I have what it takes to be trusted with the rollback tool. Thank you, ItsCheck (talk) 03:10, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done you've barely made any reverts since I declined your previous request. I've told you this before: please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. -Fastily 09:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I am familiar with helpful tools such as SWViewer and Twinkle and use them frequently, as well as the relevant guidelines for fighting vandalism. You can see from my contribution history that I always notify the users whose edits I am reverting. Greetings, MrBenjo (talk) 20:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I noticed you make a handful of edits, and then drop off for weeks/months at a time. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend at least a month consistently patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are always warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 08:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor

[edit]


    Things I might need.

    [edit]

    Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English

    administrators' how-to guide

    administrators' reading list

    new admin school

    Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies

    Special:Block

    Wikipedia:Keyboard shortcuts

    Wikipedia:Protection policy

    Wikipedia:Requested moves

    Wikipedia:List of policies

    Wikipedia:Blocking IP addresses

    Wikipedia:IP block exemption

    Wikipedia:Committed identity

    Special:RecentChanges

    Wikipedia:Deletion_review

    Wikipedia:Twinkle/doc

    Wikipedia:Vandalism

    http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Vandalbot

    Wikipedia:Dispute resolution

    Wikipedia:Revision deletion

    Category:Wikipedia backlog

    "If you add the following single line to your javascript page at Special:MyPage/skin.js;

    importScript('User:Gracenotes/rollback.js'); "

    Wikipedia:New admin school/Granting and revoking rollback

    Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrator instructions

    Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/delete

    {{Subst:UsernameBlocked}}

    Wikipedia:How to fix cut-and-paste moves {{Persondata}} http://reftag.appspot.com

    {{subst:submit}} AfC

    My adminstats

    [edit]
    Admin statistics
    Action Count
    Edits 96223
    Edits+Deleted 98347
    Pages deleted 6336
    Revisions deleted 689
    Logs/Events deleted 1
    Pages restored 69
    Pages protected 5347
    Pages unprotected 53
    Protections modified 472
    Users blocked 243
    Users reblocked 18
    Users unblocked 2
    User rights modified 8
    Users created 1