Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ahmad Salama Mabruk: trying another ALT. if this doesn't work we may have to give up'
Line 2,449: Line 2,449:
:::*'''ALT2''': ... that all the [[Duchy of Courland and Semigallia|Dukes of Courland]] are buried in '''[[Jelgava Palace]]'''? <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 12:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
:::*'''ALT2''': ... that all the [[Duchy of Courland and Semigallia|Dukes of Courland]] are buried in '''[[Jelgava Palace]]'''? <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 12:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
::::*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|18px]] and verified. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 12:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
::::*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|18px]] and verified. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 12:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

===[[Big Nose George]]===
[[File:Bignosegeorgey.jpg|100px|right]]
<!--
-->
{{*mp}}... that after [[Wild West]] outlaw '''[[Big Nose George]]''' was hanged by a [[lynch mob]] he was made into a pair of shoes?
<!--
-->
<small>Created by [[User:Myosotis Scorpioides|Myosotis Scorpioides]] ([[User talk:Myosotis Scorpioides|talk]]). Self nom at 16:34, 13 March 2009 (UTC)</small>
*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|18px]] Date, length, reference checks. Great one! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 23:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

(Replacing this into regular DYK from April Fools DYK, as so off the wall anyway, it might do better in the regular DYK)


==Special occasion holding area==
==Special occasion holding area==

Revision as of 13:11, 23 March 2009

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page.

Purge

Instructions

Using a DYK suggestion string (see below examples), list new suggestions in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged. Thanks for participating and please remember to check back for comments on your nomination.

DYK criteria

Official criteria: DYK rules and additional guidelines
Unofficial Guide: Learning DYK

Sample DYK suggestion strings

Please use one of the strings below to post your DYK nomination, using the "author" and "nominator" fields to identify the users who should receive credit for their contributions if the hook is featured on the main page.

  1. Nom without image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= }}
  2. Nom with image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= | image= | caption= }}
    To include more than one new or expanded article in a single hook: |article2= |article3= |article4= | (etc)
    To include more than one author: |author2= |author3= | (etc)
    To include alternate hooks: |ALT1= |ALT2= | (etc)
    To add a comment: |comment=
    To add the article you reviewed: |reviewed=

Do not wikilink the article title, or the author username field; the template will wikilink them automatically. Do wikilink the article title in the hook field, however.
Do not add a section heading if you are using the template; the template will add one for you.
Do not include a signature (~~~~) after the template.
Do not use non-free images in your hook suggestion.

An example of how to use the template is given below. Full details are at {{NewDYKnom}}:

{{subst:NewDYKnom
 | article       = Example
 | hook          = ... that this [[article]] is an '''[[example]]''' ''(pictured)''?
 | author        = User
 | nominator     =
 | image         = Example.png
 | rollover      = An example image
 | comment       =
}}
  • Note that you should only use one of the above templates for the original hook. If you want to suggest a second, alternative hook for the same article submission, just type it in manually. The above templates output useful code for each submission and if you employ them for alternative hooks, you will mess up the page formatting.
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|October 17}} Thanks, ~~~~

Symbols

If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:

Symbol Code DYK Ready? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe DYK eligibility requires additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Please consider using {{subst:DYKproblem}} on the user's talk page, in case they do not notice if there is an issue.

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Where is my hook?

If you can't find the hook you submitted to this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is in the queue for display on the main page. You can check whether your hook has been moved to the queue by reviewing the queue listings.

If your hook is not in the queue or already on the main page, it has probably been deleted. Deletion occurs if the hook is more than about eight days old and has unresolved issues for which any discussion has gone stale. If you think your hook has been unfairly deleted, you can query its deletion on the discussion page, but as a general rule deleted hooks will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on March 23

5x expanded by Chanakal (talk). Self nom at 11:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Punkmorten (talk). Self nom at 10:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Created by Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk). Self nom at 08:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by Nvvchar (talk). Self nom at 07:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Created by Poeticbent (talk). Self nom at 07:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Double has been called a pioneer for bringing R&B to a dance-pop controlled music industry?

5x expanded by Moon-sunrise (talk). Self nom at 03:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is an interesting subject and definitely one that deserves more attention on WP, but unfortunately the article right now does not qualify for DYK; the prose portion has only been expanded threefold (from 800 characters to 2400 characters), and the requirement is fivefold. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 03:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 22

Created by Dravecky (talk), BlueMesa171 (talk). Self nom at 09:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by Howard the Duck (talk). Self nom at 04:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Yzx (talk). Self nom at 04:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the harefoot mushroom (pictured) lasts only a few hours before its gills dissolve into a black liquid?

Created/expanded by Sasata (talk). Self nom at 03:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, didn't know that was important. Have rerated as C-class. Sasata (talk) 05:46, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Leslie George Katz founded the Eakins Press, which printed a number of books by his wife Jane Mayhall, using funds from the sale of several Thomas Eakins paintings that Katz's father had secretly collected?

Created by Alansohn (talk). Self nom at 02:07, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Created by BusterD (talk). Self nom at 01:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Created by Killervogel5 (talk). Self nom at 23:57, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date of article verified. Minor quibble with hook: the article does not say that he won the award as catcher first, before winning four at second base. I don't think you should expect the reader to comb through the sources to see if this is true when it is not stated in the article. —Mattisse (Talk) 01:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Tim1965 (talk). Self nom at 23:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by The Little Blue Frog (talk). Self nom at 20:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The original version made me wonder if the children were being animated and controlling imaginary franchises, so I suggest "children's animation franchises". Similarly for ALT1; is the artist children or is he animated? I suggest "children's animated film artist" or "children's animation film artist". Each of my suggestions get more Google hits than what they replace. Art LaPella (talk) 22:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Arxiloxos (talk). Self nom at 20:33, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: if the first suggestion is selected, there is a nice photo of Stone's sculpture "Lady of Spring" on the federal government's archival website for the Clinton White House.[1] I am not familiar enough with Wikipedia's photo policies to have an informed opinion about whether this photo may be used to illustrate the article and/or the DYK. Maybe someone more experienced would like to take a look? Thanks.--Arxiloxos (talk) 20:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The image in question is free as it is "A work from a U.S. federal government source". Cheers. I'mperator 22:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Tills (talk). Self nom at 19:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by ImperatorExercitus (talk). Self nom at 19:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, the misunderstanding was on my part; I misread the paragraph. However, it states in the source that the fungus is located under the eucalyptus, which is interesting. Cheers. I'mperator 11:35, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Phylogenetic relationships between Bovista nigrescens and and species of Lycoperdaceae were established based on ITS and LSU sequence data from north European taxa?

Created by ImperatorExercitus (talk). Self nom at 16:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Wasted Time R (talk). Self nom at 15:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Vantine84 (talk). Self nom at 13:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Thruxton (talk). Self nom at 09:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk). Self nom at 07:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and history are fine, but I can't find this fact in the article...I presume it's something having to do with the Woolf quotation, but I guess it went a bit over my head. Can you help clarify? rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 13:28, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm assuming it's ' "In this year Bamburgh was sacked and much booty was captured there, and after that the army came to the mouth of the Humber and did great damage there, both in Lindsey and in Northumbria. Then a very large English army was collected, and when they should have joined battle, the leaders Fræna, Godwine and Frythegyst, first started the flight" Woolf thought that both Northman and Waltheof were in the south for this reason.' :) Cheers. I'mperator 17:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is in the article, though I suppose you gotta add two and two to get it. The article says he has two historical appearances (cited), one of which is :
"A Norþman dux, "Ealdorman Northmann", witnessed a charter dating to 994 by King Æthelred II ("the Unready").[10] The charter is a grant of 10 hides at Fovant, Wiltshire, to the church of St Mary, Wilton"
  • Wilton is south of the Humber, i.e. in England outside Northumbria; the other is from Durham, i.e. north of the Humber, in Northumbria. Then the article talks about how the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle describes the plundering of Bamburgh the previous year; the chronological connection can be cited to Woolf. Does this clarify it? Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 20:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • *Sigh* Rjanag, as the article says and as I explained above, he only occurs in two sources, one for Durham and one in the Wiltshire charter. ImperatorExercitus appears to have got this too, as any reviewer would if they took up the "crazY' idea of reading the article they are reviewing. As apparently this is the only way to save myself time, I added the hook to the article directly. Is this satisfactory? Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 01:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • So the hook is basically saying that, out of the 2 times this guy appears in the historical record, one was south of some river and the other wasn't? That's not very extraordinary. Can you suggest anything more interesting? (Note: Mattisse and I are trying to help you get your article through DYK, not trying to annoy you, so please try to work with us rather than getting frustrated.) rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 01:25, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Getting an article through DYK is not exactly a great prize. ;) It's more important to put a high-quality new article on the front page, with an interesting tit-bit. Rjanag, if you wanna be a guy controlling entries into DYK, that's fine, and I always extend the volunteers who do this a lot of patience; but if you're gonna distrust me on something you need to have actually read the article. No, the hook is interesting because northern Northumbria in the period isn't really a proper part of England, and such "ealdormen" almost never appear in the south; that this appearance came in the south the year after a Viking attack on his land is interesting for those with an interest in the area (though it may not be to you). Take my word for that or post a message on WikiProject Middle Ages. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 01:37, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • If it takes this much background knowledge in early English history to understand why a hook is interesting, then no, it's boring. Readers on the main page aren't going to "take your word for it" and they're not going to go investigate WikiProject Middle Ages, they're just not going to click. That is why I requested additional hooks; we always have to assume that the reader has no background knowledge in the topic we're writing a hook for.
  • As for your other comments.... I'm not trying to "control" hooks, I'm just volunteering here to help out. Since you are so quick to take offense, though, I will relieve you of my presence and let someone else deal with this nom. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 02:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In case Rjanag view that the current hook is "boring" is more general (and since he requested), here are some more:

--Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 02:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Russavia (talk). Self nom at 05:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source, length, and history verified. Awadewit (talk) 01:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by Skomorokh (talk). Self nom at 04:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Benea (talk). Self nom at 03:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by DavidCane (talk). Self nom at 01:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Hamamelis (talk). nom by Earthdirt (talk) 17:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 21

Created by nrswanson (talk). Self nom at 11:42, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that PC World magazine rated Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch: Make My Video, part of the Make My Video series, as one of the 10 worst video games of all time?

Created by Jinnai (talk). Nominated by MuZemike (talk) at 04:51, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self nom at 01:23, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Dravecky (talk). Self nom at 01:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Tim1965 (talk). Self nom at 23:41, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the first SS class blimp entered service on 18 March 1915; less than three weeks after work began on the design?

Created by Red Sunset (talk). Self nom at 21:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length (5x expansion) and date verified. However, I do not see where the source given says that less than three weeks after work began on the design. Could you clarify for me? —Mattisse (Talk) 01:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Shreevatsa (talk). Self nom at 20:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self nom at 20:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by 128.171.106.252 (talk). Nominated by FingersOnRoids (talk) at 19:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ALT: That the clade mesangiosperms, representing one of four major clades of flowering plants, contains 99.95% of flowering plant species? Conveys more context, IMO. --Yerpo (talk) 07:28, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Stetsonharry (talk). Self nom at 18:09, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by Ravichandar84 (talk). Self nom at 17:40, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that after the Tang Dynasty general Li Jiang died in a mutiny, his successor Wen Zao slaughtered the mutineers and offered their heads to Li Jiang as a sacrifice?

Created by Nlu (talk). Self nom at 16:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Punkmorten (talk). Self nom at 10:08, 22 March 2009 (UTC). Also, User:GregorB helped expand the article Dejan Vojnović.[reply]

Created by SriMesh (talk). Self nom at 01:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by SriMesh (talk). Self nom at 01:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by ChrisTheDude (talk). Self nom at 22:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A vendor for Real Change

5x expanded by Rjanag (talk). Self nom at 22:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the image currently has a permission-missing tag because of concerns someone brought up at a related article's FAC, so the image will not be ok for us to use until either OTRS gets an e-mail or the editor withdraws his concerns (at which point the permission-missing tag would be removed). rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 23:23, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by PKM (talk). Self nom at 21:34, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A sign advertising the Homeless Grapevine

Created/expanded by Apoc2400 (talk). Nominated by Rjanag (talk) at 19:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Collectonian (talk). Self nom at 18:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Unfortunately, none of the official publisher's sites have the actual publication dates, so I had to use bookseller sites. The Barnes and Noble link is used to reference both the US hardback and paperback releases. Fixed the sourcing issues on the hook *doh thought I had done that* -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Nudve (talk). Self nom at 18:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added inline citations to the lead. Is it OK now? -- Nudve (talk) 05:42, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that the 1948 All-America team was the first to include separate offensive and defensive teams, as one writer noted the "era of the iron man in football is rapidly passing"?

Created by cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 15:25, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that murri is an Arabic condiment akin to soy sauce which is made from barley dough allowed to rot for 40 days?

Created by Tiamut (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 12:31, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is not 'ferment' the operative phenomenon?--Wetman (talk) 17:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
We-ell yeah, I guess, but it is in essence rotting. Either is cool by me :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alt Hook changed above; they are not the same thing at all - if murri rots it no doubt has to be thrown away, like other fermented foods. Johnbod (talk) 20:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Thruxton (talk). Self nom at 08:59, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk). Self nom at 08:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by [[User:User:NVO|User:NVO]] ([[User talk:User:NVO|talk]]). Self nom at 07:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by Thruxton (talk). Self nom at 06:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • That is the motorcycle company saying so. But is there not a neutral third-party source? Are there not comparative evaluations of motorcycles, the way PC World evaluates software, for example? It does not say who awarded the "gold medals". —Mattisse (Talk) 16:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by Skomorokh (talk). Self nom at 03:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. The closest I could find to the hook in the article is the following statement: ... leading post-anarchism theorist Saul Newman declared it to be symptomatic of a growing interest in anarchism and a revitalization of the anarchist tradition", and that it would "serve as an excellent introduction to the anti-authoritarian tradition, and an important resource for the scholar of anarchism". Is this close enough to the hook? —Mattisse (Talk) 16:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would feel more comfortable with a hook that was a little toned down:
  • alt ... that a post-anarchism theorist called the publication of volume one of the anthology Anarchism: A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas in 2006 a sign of a resurgent interest in anarchist philosophy?
  • Point taken, but it's a rather boring article, and that was the most interesting piece I could find. Is the original hook ok if we attribute the claim and use less bombastic language? Skomorokh 01:24, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Dravecky (talk). Self nom at 00:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Hekerui (talk). Self nom at 00:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Wpwatchdog (talk). Self nom at 20:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The external link is removed from the Shipwreck section. An article by the Great Lakes Exploration Group is used as a reference in the Construction section. Should this be removed? --Wpwatchdog (talk) 02:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 20

Created by Shimgray (talk). Self nom at 19:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Park at the 2008 LPGA Championship

Created by Giants2008 (talk). Self nom at 23:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • There are problems with this one, which are on me as the creator. The reference didn't cover what she's done in 2009, and I didn't think about it until I saw this here. I also didn't consider that one of her top-10s was as an amateur. Giants2008 (17-14) 17:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Tartarus (talk). Self nom at 19:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • (unindent) I am sorry if that last comment sounded snippy, but my point was that if all of the other generals were born in canada and he was born in Romania, would that not mean that he was the only? TARTARUS talk 02:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, we're looking at Natynczyk, not de Chastelain; my bad. There's the same issue for Natynczyk though; the ref does establish that Natynczyk is not of British or French descent, but does not establish that the others are. So the all of the other generals were of British or French descent part needs a reference. Shubinator (talk) 03:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5X expanded by Mr Tan (talk). Self nom at 08:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Alauddin" was the regnal name given to Tengku Alam during his proclamation as Sultan (which was ceremonial by nature), while his full name was given as "Alam Shah bin Ali Iskandar Shah", bin denotes "son of" in Islamic cultures. "Tengku" is a title for princes in the Malay world--you may take a look at Malay titles--Ive linked "Tengku" to the article's subheading for convenience sake, as this is a problem very commonly faced by many Western readers who are not familiar with Malay(sian) forms of address. For example, take a look at M'sia's 1st Prime Minister "Tunku Abdul Rahman"; Malaysians, and even the international press called "Abdul Rahman" together with the "Tunku" with it; perhaps try using Google books as a matter of quick check.
As for the matter of the naming confusions, most sources refer to the subject by "Tengku Alam" rather than "Alauddin Alam Shah", which was only a part of his regnal name given to the prince. You can use Google books to verify for the results between these two address modes, if you may be concerned. Mr Tan (talk) 17:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • My only concern is for the reader. I know I was confused, and had difficulty reading the article because the name confusion added to the complication of so many unfamiliar (to me) similar names in the article. The word "Tengku" seems like a name, rather than a title, and I briefly considered clicking on it when I finally realized it was a title, but that would have taken me far afield in an article where I was already confused! Why do you not rename the article, as it should be given the most common name by Wikipedia naming conventions? —Mattisse (Talk) 17:50, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Renamed it "Tengku Alam Shah". Im not too sure about these naming conventions whether a title that is commonly used to address a person according to his status is allowed (Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(common_names)), but nevertheless, I did it on consideration that Malaysia's first Prime Minister, was addressed by Tunku Abdul Rahman rather than "Abdul Rahman" (similar example would be Tengku Razaleigh, which I had raised). In the case of Tunku Abdul Rahman, the title "Tunku" is part of a common name used in the press, although it is not his given or actual name, but an honorific title--if you may do a google search, references to the Msia's 1st PM would almost always incorporate the title "Tunku". Thanks! Mr Tan (talk) 07:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You are right about usually titles are not in the name, but perhaps in this case an exception is warranted? —Mattisse (Talk) 16:40, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Front of Lausanne Hall

Created/expanded by Aboutmovies (talk). Self nom at 06:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Rfc1394 (talk), TKD (talk). Nominated by TKD (talk) at 05:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Orygun (talk). Self nom at 03:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by TheRetroGuy (talk). Nominated by HowardBerry (talk) at 01:41, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Skomorokh (talk). Self nom at 00:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by Shaidar cuebiyar (talk). Self nom at 23:51, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Punkmorten (talk). Self nom at 20:47, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Clithering (talk). Self nom at 20:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Having read the article, I cannot say whether the hook is verified. The part that seems to address the issues in the hook do not have a source. In any event, I do not think the hook is interesting or intriguing and that it is too obscure. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that the Cambrian predator Hurdia (pictured) was thought to be a number of separate organisms for 100 years, until its redescription this week?

Created by Nrkn (talk). Expanded by Spotty11222 (talk · contribs) and Smith609; nominated by Smith609 (talk) at 19:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's the week containing today. I would have said 'today', but the hook probably won't go live for a couple of days, so 'this week' seemed more appropriate. '2009' lacks the immediacy of 'this week'. Perhaps 'This month' would be a suitable compromise? Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 00:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It may be next week that it runs as a DYK or even longer. It is unpredictable. Some run right away, but some wait a week or two. If you look at the queue, it goes back to March 12 hooks that are still considered eligible as of today—that is 12 days ago. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:23, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, then we should be safe with 'this month' - if, when this tag is chosen, it happens to be April, the selecting editor could replace 'this month' with 'last month'. Does that sound okay? Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 15:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by HerkusMonte (talk). Self nom at 17:16, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charnockite Rock at st. Thomas Mount.JPG

Created/expanded by Nvvchar (talk). Nominated by Ravichandar84 (talk) at 15:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by User:Collectonian (talk). Self nom at 15:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Both are good alts, thanks :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 05:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Vantine84 (talk). Self nom at 14:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is? Do you have any suggestions for making it non-promotional? It wasn't my intention to promote the game or the movie; I just wanted to point out that Hollywood people helped with a video game, which is uncommon. Also, the merge tag has been removed (and not by me). — Levi van Tine (tc) 07:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have any statements in the article that it is unusual for Hollywood people to be involved with a video game, and why that might be? —Mattisse (Talk) 00:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, unfortunately. — Levi van Tine (tc) 08:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Caissa's DeathAngel (talk). Nominated by Cabe6403 (talk) at 13:18, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • That hook is interesting/intriguing but I don't see all of the elements of the hook in the article. The reference in that section is good but it is difficult to match what it is saying to what is in the article. The paragraph on the Scrin is very complex. Is the article only describing the "original" series? The section on the Scrin does not mention "original" versus other versions. The article is hard for the general reader (me) to understand. —Mattisse (Talk) 16:55, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The factions article is clearly broken into sections using level 1 headings dealing with the various different series (the Tiberium series for example, where the Scrin section is located). The Scrin do not appear in other series' in the Command & Conquer world(s) and remember that paragraph is a summary of nearly 15 years of real life time developments of a a fictional species which the canon can take back thousands. I've tried to help clear it up in ALT2, it's probably not the best written it could be but it's late and can be cleared up if need be -- Cabe6403 (TalkSign) 01:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by User:Howard the Duck. Self nom at 12:50, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. I cannot find reference for the first hook. (Can you show it to me?) The second hook is referenced but the hook is 242 characters, a little over the 200 character maximum for the hook. —Mattisse (Talk) 14:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
*alt2 ... that the postponement of the 2000 PBA All-Filipino Cup series between Purefoods TJ Giants and Tanduay Rhum Masters was the first other than for a typhoon, earthquake or bomb threat? (181 characters) —Mattisse (Talk) 14:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • This text seems strikingly familiar and I know that I didn't read this article yesterday when it was created nor am I a Filipino basketball enthusiast who would have read this in the sports pages. This needs investigation and explanation before promotion. - Dravecky (talk) 11:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by CarpetCrawler (talk). Self nom at 09:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oooh, that one is very good! :) CarpetCrawler (talk) 16:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by sasata (talk). Self nom at 08:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Rlendog (talk). Self nom at 03:45, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Mosedschurte (talk). Nominated by Piotrus (talk) at 19:25, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 16:22, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 19

Created by nrswanson (talk). Self nom at 08:07, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Created by Kung Fu Man (talk). Nominated by MuZemike (talk) at 05:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Nlu (talk). Self nom at 17:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Aboutmovies (talk). Self nom at 06:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crowds at the 41st CIBF

Created/expanded by T L Miles (talk), Dr B2 (talk). Nominated by T L Miles (talk) at 06:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Royalbroil (talk), Drdisque (talk). Self nom at 02:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sunfish Pond

Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 00:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the 16-volume series The London Stage by J. P. Wearing has been called "invaluable, thoroughly accurate" and "a proverbial mine of useful information"?

Created by Ssilvers (talk). Self nom at 21:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Grsz11 (talk). Self nom at 17:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by The Little Blue Frog (talk). Self nom at 01:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by The Little Blue Frog (talk). Self nom at 01:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • About "claims", it looked derogatory once phrased as a DYK: "DYK that the ABAJ claims it's read by half a million lawyers?" sounded to me like pointing only at their claiming it, as if that was somehow false or preposterous. But you gave me an idea, I'm updating it to "DYK that the ABAJ is +allegedly+ read...": the use of lawspeak should at least sound funny.
  • Could you please explain the "Offline sources for hook accepted on good faith"? All my sources are online and free, and each claim has a note.  The Little Blue Frog (ribbit) 16:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry. I see that they are online. The way you have the footnotes for the reference sources formatted, they look like offline sources. Usually websites are not formatted in the same way as offline sources. I just assumed they were either printed material or not accessible. —Mattisse (Talk) 18:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not sure that online sources are supposed to look different (beyond having a dim blue link): the output of the official {{cite web}} and {{cite book}} is the same, and I more or less mimic them by hand. (Of course I count as "online sources" even books or magazine articles when we can link to a free copy of their full text on Gutenberg or Google Book or NYTimes.com or such.)
  • Also, I don't put my main online sources directly in the notes but instead an author-date cite, so as to keep all my main sources (online or offline) grouped together in the sources section: one can often get an idea of the sourcing or coverage of an article by having a first look at the sources listed into its References/Sources/Bibliography section. I couldn't get that result if half my main sources were scattered into the blizzard of notes and cites.
  • Anyway, is there something I could do to improve the design of sources and cites, without changing my grouping the main sources in a single section?  The Little Blue Frog (ribbit) 21:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that George Hedges, a lawyer who represented Hollywood stars and studios, was part of an archaeological team that discovered the remains of the ancient frankincense trading city of Ubar?

5x expanded by Alansohn (talk). Self nom at 20:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ALT:... that most filmed copy of the CBS sitcom Mr. Adams and Eve was destroyed or lost in storage because of a contract dispute when the series was cancelled in 1958?

New artice by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 16:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ALT:... that the 1959–1961 CBS anthology series The DuPont Show with June Allyson featured guest stars Harpo Marx, Ginger Rogers, Bette Davis, and Ronald Reagan as well as multiple roles by hostess June Allyson?

New artice by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 11:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by Arsenikk (talk). Self nom at 17:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that when Dorothea Holt Redmond was hired in 1938 in the "heretofore exclusively male field" of film production design, male co-workers demanded that she work in a walled-off area separated from them?

5x expanded by Alansohn (talk). Self nom at 16:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Tim1965 (talk). Self nom at 15:48, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Not sure that the hook has correct date, as source article indicates the erruption was Thursday, that is, March 19, 2009. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:36, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Link to Smithsonian site[5] (cited in the article, and which is more accurate than mass media reports) says either March 16 or 17, but reported on March 17. AP article (dated March 19) cited at the bottom of the article says volcano "has been erupting for days". I went with the more reputable citation for eruption date (although you can flip a coin as to March 16 or March 17). - Tim1965 (talk) 00:29, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Fram (talk). Self nom at 15:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vika Line

    • ... that when the Vika Line opened in 1995, it was the first new street line of the Oslo Tramway since 1939?

5x expanded by Arsenikk (talk). Self nom at 14:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Esemono (talk). Self nom at 08:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date of article verified. However the hook is misleading. The source for the hook says

The CBC interview, part of a documentary that traced the actions of senior government officials that fateful day, revealed that the Prime Minister had essentially authorized U.S. fighter jets to shoot down a Korean airliner over Canada if it diverted from a planned emergency landing in Whitehorse.

While still over Alaska, the pilot of the Korean Airlines 747 had erroneously sent coded signals indicating the airliner had been hijacked. The pilot was ordered to land in Whitehorse, and was met by U.S. jet fighters while still over American territory.

NORAD command in Winnipeg agreed the airliner could enter Canadian airspace accompanied by the U.S. fighters, but insisted the decision to shoot it down must be the Canadian government's.

There is a big if in the source. It does not say that the Canadian Prime Minister, Jean Chrétien, authorized that ... —Mattisse (Talk) 19:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but removing the entire phrase makes the hook meaningless. Did you mean Flight 85 "was authorized to be shot down ..."? Art LaPella (talk) 19:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sunfish Pond

Created by Dmadeo (talk). Self nom at 07:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Henryk Rzewuski

Self-nom by Nihil novi (talk) 06:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Offline sources for hook accepted on good faith. (It would be better if each sentence referring to hook had a citation, but will accept good faith of editor on this issue in this case.) —Mattisse (Talk) 11:23, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by Ravichandar84 (talk). Self nom at 05:09, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Benea (talk). Self nom at 02:16, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Chick Bowen (talk). Self nom at 01:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 18

  • ... that the Galápagos hotspot can be tracked as ridges on both the Cocos and Nazca tectonic plates with eight major periods of activity in the last 20 million years?

5x expanded by Wikigillie (talk). Self nom at 11:50, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Created by Punkmorten (talk), Oceanh (talk). Self nom at 01:07, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Guettarda (talk). Self nom at 05:24, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Triumph from the southeast

Created by Themaeeandhisfriend (talk). Nominated by Wsiegmund (talk) at 17:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for alt hook verified. First hook is POV, that is, it is a subjective opinion. Also, I did not see a source for it. One of the sources said it was difficult to climb because it had multiple overhanging faces. You could add that to the article and to the hook. —Mattisse (Talk) 19:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I added another hook with source. However, the source for first hook is cited in the article. Beckey uses the words, "one of the outstanding sights" and "great local relief". I changed the wording a bit to make this more clear. Thank you. Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sunfish Pond

5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self nom at 15:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added. Johnbod (talk) 04:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Sultan Ali of Johor signed a treaty on 10 March 1855 with the Temenggong which formally ceded his sovereignty claims over Johor?

5X expanded by Mr Tan (talk). Self nom at 06:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length (5x expansion) and date verified. Offline source for hook accepted in good faith. It would be good if you could wikilink, or otherwise explain, "Temenggong". —Mattisse (Talk) 00:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by Ravichandar84 (talk). Self nom at 04:33, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. That he was the first to attemp a systematic history is verified. However, that he was of Tamil ancestry is not. (Please show me where, if I am wrong.) —Mattisse (Talk) 00:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by Ravichandar84 (talk). Self nom at 01:17, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Cannibaloki (talk). Self nom at 21:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I think Alt 2 puts it best. FingersOnRoids♫ 00:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ALT:... that Skip Young, who played humorous Wally Plumstead on ABC's The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet, was a Korean War Navy veteran interred at Riverside National Cemetery?

New artice by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 16:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Vantine84 (talk). Self nom at 07:25, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Source for hook is not clearly verified. The source says, "The monster training system follows the PSP's internal clock, as a monster that you've trained in the morning shows the fruits of your labor at night." I do not understand from this that the player's monsters continual to be trained when the console is not in use. Does the source sentence have the same meaning as your hook? —Mattisse (Talk) 12:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, they mean the same thing. Players can upgrade monsters normally, or they can allow the game to do it automatically by letting the console sit, because the game's code follows the PSP's battery-operated clock to track changes to monsters. Reference #7 may make it more clear; the 1UP preview says "...the fusion system takes place in real world time, so often fusions will take six to 10 hours to complete, encouraging players to stop playing and come back the next day when the fusion is done. Luckily, changing the PSP system date to six or 10 hours later is a good workaround that we're sure many players will be using." This also suggests that because anyone can simply change a PSP's clock settings at any time, players can cheat the game by "moving time forward". — Levi van Tine (tc) 07:57, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that the U2 song "Magnificent" was originally titled "French Disco"?

Created by Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk), MelicansMatkin (talk). Self nom at 05:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Tim1965 (talk). Self nom at 01:19, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk). Self nom at 00:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Tempshill (talk). Self nom at 22:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. I think the hook misrepresents the decision just a little, in that the court upheld a lower court ruling that an Idaho statute charging the defendant with a crime because he refused to take an oath as prescribed by an Idaho statute, that he would not commit polygamy or bigamy, did not violate his right to Free Exercise of his religion as a member of the Mormon Church. The Supreme court ruled this statute did not violate the defendant's First Amendment rights. Is your wording is good enough? —Mattisse (Talk) 13:15, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think the wording is accurate and correctly represents the decision. It could be a little more precise to say "... that it was acceptable for States or Territories to prohibit religious polygamists from voting...". Or is your problem with the phrase "religious polygamists"? Do you have a preferred wording? Tempshill (talk) 17:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the discovery of feather-like structures on the primitive dinosaur Tianyulong (pictured) raises the possibility that ancestral dinosaurs were feathered?

Created by Crazyharp81602 (talk). Nominated by ArthurWeasley (talk) at 22:22, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The proto-feathers were filamentous hair-like structures so an animal covered with them will indeed look fuzzy. I can either modify the hook or write a sentence on fuzziness in the article, whichever you prefer. ArthurWeasley (talk) 23:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Modified the hook. ArthurWeasley (talk) 23:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You should clarify things in the article regardless. We can't expect an average reader to know what proto-feathers are and whether or not they were fuzzy. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 23:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done! The term "Fuzzy" is not very encyclopedic that's why it is not used in the article but it was used in the press release provided in the external link section. ArthurWeasley (talk) 23:56, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean "also feathered" in the hook? If you took the "also" out, I think it would improve the hook. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good point! Removed "also" in the hook. ArthurWeasley (talk) 03:24, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I took the liberty to add a picture. ArthurWeasley (talk) 05:29, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Bellhalla (talk). Self nom at 21:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Mjroots (talk). Self nom at 19:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by Killervogel5 (talk). Self nom at 18:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Sources verified that both father and son were winners in that category. But I am not clear that the sources show that they were the "only" father-son combination. Could you point out where that is sourced, as I am missing it? —Mattisse (Talk) 20:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, I could link to each player's statistics at Baseball-Reference, which shows parentage, but that would be a very large amount of refs. I know that the List of second-generation Major League Baseball players verifies it, but it's a Wikipedia page. [6] and [7] are lists of players, and though they don't specifically state this fact, checking them against the Wikipedia list will show that no other set won the award as first basemen. I am not sure what exactly would be required here. KV5 (TalkPhils) 01:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • If these issues make this a problem, may I suggest...
Alt1: ... that father and son combination Cecil Fielder and Prince Fielder each won a Silver Slugger Award at first base? KV5 (TalkPhils) 01:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alt2: ... that both father and son, Cecil Fielder and Prince Fielder, each won a Silver Slugger Award at first base? (clearer grammar) —Mattisse (Talk) 23:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, I don't agree that this grammar is clearer. If an alt is to be used, I prefer 1 or 3. KV5 (TalkPhils) 12:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alt3: ... that the father and son combination Cecil Fielder and Prince Fielder each won a Silver Slugger Award at first base?

Created/expanded by Sasata (talk). Self nom at 17:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by 97198 (talk). Self nom at 13:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Lucy Stone was pestered by rude comments from men and boys in the street during the year and a half she chose to wear fashion bloomers?

5x expanded by Binksternet (talk). Self nom at 12:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 17:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by KudzuVine (talk). Self nom at 11:56, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length (5x expansion) and date verified. Hook is not stated clearly in article and it is difficult to verify without reading 10 PDF documents and compiling the info. Could the nominator please put the hook in the article and reference it? —Mattisse (Talk) 17:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I rethought this also, and decided to accept your hook references on good faith. Looking through the info, I can see that he indeed was a noted architect with many such buildings to his credit. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rethought this. I could rewrite because the South Carolina Encyclopedia (reference 1) lists everything but the Daniel Morgan Monument. It does not specifically say that Grace Church and Charleston High are in Charleston Historic District and does not say that any are NHL/NRHP. And it is not online. I will also think about an alternate hook, but have not yet thought of one.KudzuVine (talk) 21:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • This one really doesn't work because Market Hall is a Greek Revival (I am not an architect and you could fool me!) I changed the article to put in the Huguenot Church picture because it is said to be Gothic Revival. I would stick with the original hook. KudzuVine (talk) 19:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by JKBrooks85 (talk). Self nom at 02:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Martin Knowlton conceived the Elderhostel concept, in which senior citizens take college-level courses in the summer, to overcome "the disturbing concept that people are all used up after age 65"?

Created by Alansohn (talk). Self nom at 00:23, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Jason Lau is a Wing Chun Kung Fu Grandmaster who was an instructor in Mitchell Werbell III's counter-terrorist training camp?

Created by User:Pecoc (talk). Self nom at 02:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 22:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Older nominations

Articles created/expanded on March 17

Created by nrswanson (talk). Self nom at 10:48, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by Hesperian (talk), casliber (talk). Self nom at 05:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by Ravichandar84 (talk). Self nom at 17:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by Arsenikk (talk). Self nom at 14:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Both articles are verified as to length and date. However, I am having difficulty seeing the relationship between the two articles reflected in the article text of either one. Perhaps you could point it out to me. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • 'Homansbyen' is mentioned and linked under the section "horsecar" (as one of the end stations). 'History of the Oslo Tramway and T-bane' is now linked as 'first' in the Homansbyen article. Arsenikk (talk) 00:13, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Does it have to be referenced? All sources claim that Polish government was very determined to create this voivodeship. The only reason it was not created was the war, nothing else. Tymek (talk) 02:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mattisse, thanks for the alternative hook. Hope it is good now. Tymek (talk) 02:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Nlu (talk). Self nom at 17:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 07:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I reworded it. Is that OK?

Created by KenWalker (talk). Self nom at 06:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ALT... that the CBS western TV series My Friend Flicka produced only 39 episodes but aired for years on numerous networks in reruns?

5x expanded by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 17:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Rjanag (talk). Self nom at 16:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The particular wording "national superstar" is on page 2 of the Boston Globe ref (so if you did a page search just on the first page, you wouldn't have found it). The other refs don't use that exact phrase, but all say pretty much the same thing. As for hook2, I was just considering it simple math; I figured "tenfold" is catchier and hookier than giving the exact numbers. If it's a problem, I can reword the article itself to say tenfold rather than repeating the exact numbers; either way is fine with me. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 02:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The way 'national superstar' is used in the article is not an assertion the reference is making. It is a quote from an apparent interview of a Liu-counterpart. Not sure if that helps. Law shoot! 04:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, but they're quoting a guy saying something that is widely known and accepted; it's not like he's trying to puff her up more or anything, he's just stating what is common knowledge over there. For more similar refs that are not quotes from people: "household name" (Harvard Crimson), "huge celebrity" (New York Times), "celebrity status" (Harvard Magazine). The claim this hook is making is not a controversial one, and I can easily switch out "national superstar" for one of these equivalent counterparts from a different source. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 05:15, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, if you read through the article, you can see that, while the exact phrase "national superstar" might be a quote from a person rather than from the article writer, the article itself is also making the same assertion, just in different words. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 05:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by KudzuVine (talk). Self nom at 13:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I put "ship" in. KudzuVine (talk) 15:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 16

Created by Guinea pig warrior (talk). Nominated by Hunter Kahn (talk) at 01:09, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Do the sources for this meet WP:RS? This appears to be a blog post, and this says that its "source" is South Park Studios, and just links to an index page[9]. Granted, these are probably uncontroversial claims that don't require as rigorous sourcing as other things might, but still, I want to at least check. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 01:20, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, the former might be a blog post, but it's a blog at MTV, which is obviously a legit company. I suppose you could make a case for the latter source, but there are other citations for the info in this DYK nom, like here, so I would think at least for the purposes of this nomination we'd be OK. — Hunter Kahn (contribs) 01:32, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cover of the Hobo News
  • ALT1:... that in the early 20th century there were two American newspapers called Hobo News?

Created by Apoc2400 (talk). Nominated by Rjanag (talk) at 13:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(takes care of the problem of no mention of the IBWA) —Mattisse (Talk) 21:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, I found it a bit weird, but I've just been using it as a convenient way to access what otherwise seems like a real journal article. I guess I could go looking for the actual article in a database somewhere, if something lights a fire under me. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 22:31, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ALT3:... that in the early 20th century there were two American newspapers called Hobo News, one published by the IBWA, a mutual aid society for migratory workers (cover pictured)? --Apoc2400 (talk) 13:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 15

Created by Buttermilk1950 (talk). Nominated by Una Smith (talk) at 14:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date and length check out. Hook is in the article, but is not specifically sourced. Also, the article recently received a {{POV}} tag from me and may not be suitable for the front page as it is unbalanced. ++Lar: t/c 19:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Footnote 54 is expository text clarifying why another event is not "first"... but as is our practice at DYK, cite to printed source including page number (noted as the same cite as before, just moved to a different location in the sentence) accepted. So, hook, length and source checked out. Article still has major POV issues, but it is technically not disqualified. ++Lar: t/c 23:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Grk1011 (talk). Self nom at 00:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Length, history and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 05:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Mitchazenia (talk). Self nom at 00:24, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. I could not verify the hook as there is no place in the article that says the first three spans were built by the same person. Also, why is that unusual? —Mattisse (Talk) 01:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Its spread through the "First Two Spans" and "The Third Span" as it lists Chauncey Thomas (d. 1882) having done the first three in one way or another. Also, does it always happen when the same person has to build and rebuild the same bridge three times?Mitch32(Go Syracuse) 09:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • This bridge has had to be built five times once in 1856, once in 1859, once in 1866, once in 1941, and once in 2007. There's only one span, and its the same bridge.Mitch32(Go Syracuse) 09:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I thought I already mentioned that?Mitch32(Go Syracuse) 23:30, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by KudzuVine (talk). Self nom at 16:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Length, reference and history verified for alt 1. Daniel Case (talk) 13:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Rjanag (talk). Self nom at 16:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: The image wouldn't show up well at 100x100px (although it might still encourage people to click on it and get a better look). I'm assuming we probably won't be able to use it, but if anyone does think it would be ok to use, let me know so I can put in a request at WP:GL/I to have it vectorized.rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 16:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image notwithstanding, length and history verified and offline ref accepted IGF. Daniel Case (talk) 13:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 14

  • ... that the name Joni was retired, after its previous use?

Created by Jason Rees (talk). Self nom at 02:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me im not quite sure what the issue is as pages 28 -30 of that document does verify, that the name was used in and retired after the 1992-93 South Pacific Cyclone season. Also 1992 and 1993 PTS will not mention a Cyclone Joni as its not relevant to their articles, however it is relevant to the 1990–1995 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone seasons and has a section Also 1997-98 SPAC does not mention a Cyclone Joni as the name was not used in that year Jason Rees (talk) 21:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • For your new hook, you need to verify 1.) that the name "Joni" was retired after the 1992–93 South Pacific cyclone season, 2.) that nonetheless it remained on the naming lists, and 3.) that the reason it remained on the lists is unknown. Are there references in your article already? —Mattisse (Talk) 20:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 13

The first one is out of order, but the second one is all there. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 04:37, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mitava Palace
Mitava Palace

Created by Wikiolap (talk). Self nom at 04:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date and source for hook verified if this statement means there were 21 sacophagi: "The Duke Wilhelm’s wife Sophie who died in 1610 also had been buried in Kuldīga castle church was completed; there was a cellar beneath it for the Dukes’ sarcophagi. The cellar premise was about 9 m wide, with a free passage in the middle and covered by a barrel vault. In 1587, the Duke Gotthard was the first to be buried there; 24 members of the Kettler family were buried until 1737." —Mattisse (Talk) 00:24, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Bignosegeorgey.jpg

Created by Myosotis Scorpioides (talk). Self nom at 16:34, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Replacing this into regular DYK from April Fools DYK, as so off the wall anyway, it might do better in the regular DYK)

Special occasion holding area

Articles created/expanded for April Fool's Day 2009 (April 1)

Please suggest hooks at Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know, not here. Royalbroil 14:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded for Orthodox Easter (April 19)

Created by Jack1956 (talk). Self nom at 11:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alt ... that Greek Cypriot academic Anastasios Christodoulou was named 'Anastasios' ('Resurrection') by his parents as he was born on Easter Day? Jack1956 (talk) 11:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If we were going to use the 2nd hook might we save this article for Orthodox Easter 2009 (April 19)? --Boston (talk) 01:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Let's. That's the only way it would become interesting enough ... I'm sure he's not the only Anastasios in the world who got that name from being born on Easter. Daniel Case (talk) 15:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See also