Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 538: Line 538:
:ALT *... that '''[[Bridgeport Village (Oregon)|Bridgeport Village]]''', a shopping center in [[Washington County, Oregon]], was built on the site of a former rock [[quarry]]? [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies|talk]]) 00:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
:ALT *... that '''[[Bridgeport Village (Oregon)|Bridgeport Village]]''', a shopping center in [[Washington County, Oregon]], was built on the site of a former rock [[quarry]]? [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies|talk]]) 00:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
::[[Image:Symbol confirmed.svg|18px]] Expansion x5, date, and ALT hook's ref verified. Note that article creator, [[User:Philliporth|Philliporth]], should also be credited. --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 19:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
::[[Image:Symbol confirmed.svg|18px]] Expansion x5, date, and ALT hook's ref verified. Note that article creator, [[User:Philliporth|Philliporth]], should also be credited. --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 19:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

*... that the origin of '''[[Chicano literature]]''', the literature of Mexican-Americans in the USA, has been traced back as far as 1542 and the chronicle of [[Álvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca]]? --[[User:Jbmurray|jbmurray]] ([[User talk:Jbmurray|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jbmurray|contribs]]) 20:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


==Expiring noms==
==Expiring noms==

Revision as of 20:24, 20 September 2008

Cannonball in Milwaukee, 1966
Cannonball in Milwaukee, 1966

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page.

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Instructions

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles whose main body text has been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a JavaScript extension like User:Dr pda/prosesize.js (instructions on the talk page), a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. (The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.)
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • always cited in the article with an inline citation.
Please note that hooks are subject without notice to copyediting as they move to the main page. The nature of the DYK process makes it impractical to consult users over every such edit. In particular, hooks will be shortened if they are deemed too long: the 200-character limit is an outside limit not a recommended length. Also, watch the suggestions page to ensure that no issues have been raised about your hook, because if you do not respond to issues raised your hook may not be featured at all.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely-licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as [[Image:image name |right|100x100px| Description]] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Suggested sounds should have similar qualities to pictures, and should be formatted using the format {{DYK Listen|filename.ogg|Brief description}}
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]] and ~~~~
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|November 14}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • For more details see the previously Unwritten Rules.
  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Next update


Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on September 20

  • ...that small modelli of works of art were produced for patrons to approve (example pictured)?
wikified and shortened with tweaks by Victuallers (talk) 15:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not established or increased in size 5x within last five days; article is a list split off from main article. Kablammo (talk) 08:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All OK. Kablammo (talk) 09:04, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All OK. Kablammo (talk) 09:10, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on September 19



1950 characters. Created September 19. The medal count is confirmed via the Manchester Evening News and the Paralympic Medal Record. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 16:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
2298 characters. Created September 19. Times Online confirms the hook. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 16:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ineligible split. Most of the content of this new article, which is DDT (molecule), previously appeared (and remains) at DDT, an older article. Kablammo (talk) 12:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I didn't see that. --Bruce1eetalk 13:08, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
2220 characters (including 'intro'). Created August 17 as a redirect and expanded September 19. BBC confirms the hook. However, it would be nice to see the article formatted into sections if possible. I have taken into consideration that normally an intro would excluded in the character count, but even with this consideration it is still well over the minimum. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 16:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article is now sectioned. Mike H. Fierce! 17:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length ok. Suggest wikilinking mutiny and concubine in hook and in article. Ref 1 in article appears garbled. doncram (talk) 07:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date, hook's ref verified. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on September 18

Length and date are fine, offline source accepted on good faith – Ikara talk → 20:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The coat of arms of the city of Paris
The coat of arms of the city of Paris
Offline hook and print only sources accepted on good faith. --Poeticbent talk 16:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
USS West Grama (ID-3794) underway in 1919
USS West Grama (ID-3794) underway in 1919
Date and size OK, print reference accepted on good faith. Kablammo (talk) 14:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Children of the Warsaw Ghetto
Children of the Warsaw Ghetto
This article is new, large enough, and covers a worthy subject. It however needs an inline cite (even to a foreign language source, which would be accepted in good faith). Perhaps both spouses should be mentioned in the hook. Kablammo (talk) 01:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps this alternative:
Kablammo (talk) 02:10, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I like that alternate hook. Inline citations already added. --Poeticbent talk 02:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As above, Polish inline cite added; accepted in good faith. Kablammo (talk) 06:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and date verified. Off-line sources accepted in good faith.Cbl62 (talk) 06:20, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Date, length and reference verified. Cbl62 (talk) 14:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2... that in preparation for his character in Hindi espionage thriller film Mukhbiir, actor Sameer Dattani spent a night in prison? Mspraveen (talk) 15:54, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT3... that Indian film director Mani Shankar claimed to have a "pre-release profit" for Hindi film Mukhbiir due to intelligent budgeting? Mspraveen (talk) 15:54, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
List of fatal World Rally Championship accidents = 2115. Alex Fiorio = 3376. Lars-Erik Torph = 2979. Ref cited in Alex Fiorio (Chicago Sun-Times) checks out. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 15:29, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
1795 characters. Hook is cited and the ref confirms that it is cheaper. However, neither the article or the reference assert that it is "easier", only cheaper, so if "and cheaply" is removed from the hook it's good to go. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 15:18, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I wondered about that, but thought it was self-evident (one process gives the whole of Europe!). Nevertheless, have added fact to article with suitable reference. Changed "easily" to "simply" to mimic wording in that reference (see final paragraph of second page). GDallimore (Talk) 15:40, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I know this article is older then 5 days, but seeing its a good quality article single-handedly created as a first contribution by a new user, i hope that this can be overlooked (With the excuse that the article has a few initial NPOV issues that were solved yesterday and that the article had been orphaned for most of its lifetime). Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 14:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. The article must have been created or expanded in the last 5 days. If an exception was made here, then an exception would have to made every time. The alternative option is to expand it five times, or to get it up to WP:GA status and nom it there. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 15:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
3332 characters of main-article prose (quotes ignored). Hook is cited and ref checks out. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 14:21, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
3347 characters. Hook is cited and both refs check out. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 14:25, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The first revision you link has 7302 characters (once the lists etc. are trimmed out). The second revision has 22840 = 3.13x expansion. I think you've counted the intro in the expansion? Furthermore, the article had 22575 characters until you cleaned it up (unwritten rule A3 applies). Sorry, but no DYK here, try over here though ;) ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 14:49, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, sorry. I thought that I could get away with it, but I guess we have some very cunning DYK users around here... Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 01:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Expanded from 1254 - 15779 characters = 12x expansion. Unfortunately, I don't happen to have a 1994 edition of the The Roanoke Times handy, so offline ref accepted in good faith. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 15:00, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your hook needs to reference a newly created/expanded article. --Bruce1eetalk 12:35, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and "newness" are fine, but the source does not characterize the importance of the highway, it was actually the bridge that washed out, and it was 6x, not "more than" 6x, per the source. Kablammo (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All good. Kablammo (talk) 19:44, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on September 17

Alfred Rosenheim
Alfred Rosenheim
Length, date verified. Hook's ref not available online but accepted IAW WP:AGF. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The One Fathom Bank Lighthouses
The One Fathom Bank Lighthouses
Length, date, hook's ref verif. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speaker iconI Want to Go Back to Michigan

Length, date and reference verified. Nice hook and the sound element would be a cool feature for the Main Page. It would be good to introduce the kids (and the grown-ups) to one of the best-selling songs from the early days of sound recording. If the sound element is used, should we add (listen here) or some such verbiage after the song title? Cbl62 (talk) 06:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you like make any changes you think are appropriate; I copied the format used by Shoemaker's Holiday in his recent music DYK. Seems like a pleasant change of pace. Best, DurovaCharge! 23:34, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date and ref. verified. Nice hook! Olaf Davis | Talk 16:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Kamio Mitsuomi
Kamio Mitsuomi
The FA Cup trophy awarded from 1896–1910
The FA Cup trophy awarded from 1896–1910
Suggest "first major title" instead of "first major honour". --74.13.131.192 (talk) 15:44, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In football circles, "the title" refers to the league championship. I considered putting "trophy", but was put off by "trophy" already being used to refer to the picture. Oldelpaso (talk) 16:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and date OK and this fact is referenced (but no others). Do try and add to this, but OK. Victuallers (talk) 15:12, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- fine, but shorten the hook, suggest ... that Louis Réard chose a nude dancer to model the first bikini in 1946? (They can read the article to find out the precise date, that there were ones in Roman times etc.) Victuallers (talk) 15:20, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bikini was "officially introduced" on July 5, 1946. So the date is important. AdjustShift (talk) 13:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A note that this is fictional seems essential.--Wetman (talk) 15:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ooo good point. Added! Also, the "chronicled in..." part...does that sound really awkward? If it does, what should be done with it? Cheers, -talk- the_ed17 -contribs- 18:11, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
it might be me (again?) but my reading says he was severe and thats how he got the job but he lost his job because "he found himself unable to comply with the king's wish to enforce the royal prerogative of dispensation". Maybe I missed a bit. Victuallers (talk) 14:26, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yup; he went along with the king's speedy lets-prosecute-popish-plot-members-severely-regardless-of-common-law (we're talking executing a key witness in another case just because he was found to be involved in the "plot") but eventually found himself unable to eke out such a brand of justice. The royal prerogative of dispensation would be "here are the common laws that are meant to apply to everyone, but for situation X i'm going to waive some of them and slap on a quicky death sentence". Ironholds 20:33, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just realised I didn't explain that very well in terms of how it relates to the hook. As a reward for accepting the severe prosecution on the London corporation case he was made CJOTCOCP; as a result of later feeling he was unable to eke out such justice per the prerogative, he was removed. Ironholds 21:30, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All checks out, but consider using "century-old" vice "100-year old". Kablammo (talk) 01:11, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
done.RlevseTalk
Verified. Ecoleetage strikes again! :) Nice work, RyRy (talk) 03:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Verified. -- RyRy (talk) 02:30, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Verified. -- RyRy (talk) 02:32, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Still unfinished ? or was it unfinished at the time?--74.13.131.192 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date and hook verified. -- RyRy (talk) 02:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date and hook verified. -- RyRy (talk) 02:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and date verified. Assuming good faith that the given reference has the information for this hook nomination in it, as you need to be a subscriber (or something like that) to have full access to the page. Thanks, RyRy (talk) 05:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date and hook verified. Nice to see you back here in DYK. :-) -- RyRy (talk) 02:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date and hook verified. Thanks for fixing the broken reference I noticed before. -- RyRy (talk) 03:37, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on September 16

Cumberland Market
Cumberland Market
Ayam
Ayam
Length, date, hook's ref verified. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All OK. I put the honor in quotes as some may be unfamiliar with the term. Kablammo (talk) 08:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
3277 characters. Confirmed move from from sandbox to mainspace on September 16. Ref #15 (The Huffington Post confirms the hook). Hook is 168 characters. Good to go. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 11:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Original was 252 characters, expansion is 2575 characters = 10x expansion, expansion began September 16. Reference number 12 (Irish Independent) confirms the hook. Good to go, except does 'curtain' really need to be wikilinked? No big deal though. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 11:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
shōjō
shōjō
File:Gesner fossil illustration 1551.jpg
ALT: ... that systems scientist Béla H. Bánáthy conceived of the idea where conference attendees all contribute papers in advance to every other participant, and the conference time is spent in in-depth, extended, non-hierarchical conversations about the conference papers? -- btphelps (talk) 20:36, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
here's another go:
Tsangpo River
Tsangpo River
Thanks for the nomination. Just in case this article should indeed still make it to the DYK section (no idea how exactly this works :) probably it's over already?), could we either add an "after [negotiating an 8-foot waterfall]" or leave out the waterfall completely... or does that spoil the hook? Gordon flipped at the bottom of the fall, but he only died (in hydraulics in the middle of the river) because he did not manage to roll up after his boat had been flushed out of the immediate area of the fall. As the video on the internet evokes the false impression that he died at the bottom of the fall, I'd rather have a crystal clear hook... --Ibn Battuta (talk) 19:22, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Date, length and reference verified.Cbl62 (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest "cantopop star Andy Lau" for notability. Or non-Asians would be wondering what's so special here. --76.64.77.35 (talk) 00:26, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
He's more than a pop star though isn't he, particularly known for his acting? Maybe entertainer? I'll put in actor as its a better hook (personally i'd only heard of him due to Infernal Affairs). Basement12 (T.C) 02:52, 17 September 2008 (UTC) Actually there is space for both Basement12 (T.C) 02:56, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oregon Civic Justice Center
Oregon Civic Justice Center

Articles created/expanded on September 15

Don't understand the referencing ... Victuallers (talk) 10:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What do you don't understand?-RavichandarMy coffee shop 11:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the URL of the sources. I guess now you might be able to understand. :-) -RavichandarMy coffee shop 11:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ref = 2nd try. Ref 1 looks like a link but it goes nowhere. ref 2 talks sbout priests but no mention of Dalits ... Victuallers (talk) 12:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref 1: Castes and Tribes of Southern India Vol 7 by Edgar Thurston, Pg 304: The Valluvans are summed up by Mr. H. A. Stuart as being "the priests of the Paraiyans and Pallans.
  • Ref 2: [1]: (The Valluvars appear in colonial ethnographies as an untouchable priestly sub-caste of the Parayars)
Did you bother to check out the link I've provided? Paraiyars and Pallars are Dalit communities, of course.-RavichandarMy coffee shop 13:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay.. I've added another reference now. [2].Here, it is clearly mentioned:"The author of the work was Thiruvalluvar or Thiruvalluva Nayanar. He came from the caste, Valluvans, who are the priests of the Paraiyans and Pallans". Is it agreeable now???
If you have problems with the usage of the word Dalit, you could use this ALT hook:

ALT... that the Valluvars are the hereditary priests of the Pallars and Paraiyars of the Indian state of Tamil Nadu? -RavichandarMy coffee shop 19:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- thx - obviously us checkers have no idea about Davits. The last alt hook is fine (and the others could be accepted but only in good faith.) Victuallers (talk) 19:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Date, size good; print cite accepted on good faith. Kablammo (talk) 07:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


As the hook's ref is unavailable online, it's unclear who the "some" may be. Also was wondering if the article could include section headers to break up the 6 paragraphs? --Rosiestep (talk) 15:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is a lot of WP:FOOTNOTE formatting problems in the article. References should be after the ending punctuation, not before it like it is on basically every single reference in the article. -- RyRy (talk) 03:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - Footnotes have been fixed. --Superflewis (talk) 08:00, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can tell, neither the article nor the reference say it was the first such entity. Have I missed it? The Economist bit is there, but not much of a hook on its own. Olaf Davis | Talk 16:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Olaf, my apologies! It was in the book and I didn't realize missing from the other sources.(Convenience link to the paragraph in google books--it's the second or third sentence[3]). I'll add that page reference to the article as well. Thanks for your vigilance reviewing! --JayHenry (talk) 19:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I'm afraid the article has an edit history going back to June 1 2008 and hasn't been expanded five-fold in recent days. --Candlewicke (Talk) 21:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think this fellow's appearance in the edit history has led to some confusion. :( --Candlewicke (Talk) 16:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues 219 character hook. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:54, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Date, length and reference verified. Cbl62 (talk) 15:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is the "by humans" necessary? (I hope it would not be confusing . . . ) Kablammo (talk) 12:06, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is it supported that they are the only domestic turkeys able to reproduce without artificial insemination? That would have to be stated explicitly in a source. Boston (talk) 15:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article says "... the birds are so heavy that they are completely incapable of reproducing without artificial insemination ..."; is the hook supposed to say "... are the only domestic turkeys unable to reproduce ..."? ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 01:37, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is I don't see anything excluding the possibility of a domestic turkey which is neither a heritage turkey nor the mass market type that needs insemination. Boston (talk) 14:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ameliorate: the article is referring to commercial turkeys being too heavy to mate, not heritage birds. Read more closely. Boston: the possibility is excluded by the fact that all domestic turkeys which aren't heritage turkeys have been bred so large that they are anatomically incapable of the act of coitus. This is explicitly stated in several of the sources used in the article. It's rather widely known in poultry circles, but it's just often surprising to consumers that 90% of the turkeys in the world are created through artificial insemination by industrial agriculture, and that those birds are not able to mate naturally. Steven Walling (talk) 20:36, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date and reference verified.Cbl62 (talk) 15:19, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Date verified. Length, 16,310 characters, verified (article would benefit from further sections/subsections/shorter paragraphs). Hook's foreign language citation is accepted IAW WP:AGF. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
July 1, 1908 edition of Shōjo Sekai
July 1, 1908 edition of Shōjo Sekai
- sorry. We need 1500 chars of real text (ie ignoring lists and refs) ... you still have about 24 hours... this a great start... but size is important. Victuallers (talk) 10:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT *... that Bridgeport Village, a shopping center in Washington County, Oregon, was built on the site of a former rock quarry? Aboutmovies (talk) 00:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Expansion x5, date, and ALT hook's ref verified. Note that article creator, Philliporth, should also be credited. --Rosiestep (talk) 19:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on September 14

This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Prose is currently only 1293 characters. The article also lacks inline citation immediately after the given hook. – Ikara talk → 21:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Minor conundrum here as it is clearly not Magnus's longship that is pictured. Maybe "a longship (pictured)" although this still implies it is an 11th century vessel. Not sure of the protocols here. Please adjust as appropriate (inc. removing image if necessary). Ben MacDui 18:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How about the following, which hopefully clears up Ben's point and also gives an even 'hookier' bit of the story:
Length, date and ref. are all fine, too - though feel free to double-check the ref. for my alt! Olaf Davis | Talk 16:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Date and prose length are fine; print references accepted on good faith. The first half of hook is not sourced in text but is sourced in the list of major works appearing below the body of the article. Kablammo (talk) 20:16, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cochran House
Cochran House
ALT: * ... that Gustav Stickley's The Craftsman magazine called Elmer Grey a pioneer "in the development of the new American architecture" based upon the design of Cochran House (pictured)? new article, self nom. Cbl62 (talk) 03:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's a bit late for me to propose an alt hook, but I think this one may be better. Cbl62 (talk) 03:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Date and prose length are fine; print reference accepted on good faith. Kablammo (talk) 08:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whoever does the update should choose whichever when they think is catchier on this. I'm not sure.Cbl62 (talk) 15:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think most American sports fans know this, but granted we have a global audience. Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Prose is only 1188 characters. —97198 (talk) 06:45, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Still too small; I count 1184 characters. Kablammo (talk) 20:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues 239 character hook. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:56, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alternative 1: *... that Sir Edgar Speyer funded the Promenade Concerts from 1902 to 1914, but he was accused of trading with the enemy during the First World War and lost his British citizenship?
Alternative 2: *... that financier Sir Edgar Speyer was the last person to be struck off the list of Privy Council members after he was accused of trading with the enemy during the First World War?
Both are 181 characters.--DavidCane (talk) 12:19, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
One character more (I changed "of" to "off"). Art LaPella (talk) 21:07, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article appears to neither have been created in the past five days nor expanded five-fold. --Candlewicke (Talk) 16:00, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was created on the 14th. If you look at its history, you'll see that the article was previously on the user's sandbox. Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 01:51, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here we go again. Art LaPella (talk) 05:30, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I don't understand. This article was never deleted (I think), and is a completely new article. The user had been working on it on his sandbox and moved it to the mainspace on the 14th; I read on the unofficial rules for DYK that this is okay. Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 05:43, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, moving from his sandbox to the mainspace is OK. The problem is mine, not yours. If this is what the future will be like, then I need to learn how to identify a move from a sandbox without taking the author's word for it, here and in the edit summary. Someone else here can probably explain that for me. Art LaPella (talk) 21:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, ok, lol. Although, it would be nice if someone approved the fact... Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 05:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have now been able to verify the sandbox move. I leave approvals to others, and have just added that fact to my user page. Art LaPella (talk) 15:57, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues The hook has no reference. The fact is mentioned in the intro and the author has used the MOS guideline not to cite references in the intro, but the fact doesn't seem to appear anywhere else in the article. It mentions that Gene Hackman played the role before (in #Michael Rosenbaum) but makes no mention of another time when the role was played. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 17:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why repeat a mistake? --74.13.131.192 (talk) 16:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well it would be good to do it well this time. Is there a possible hook about the subject himself? Victuallers (talk) 16:55, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Then how about this:
2686 characters. Created September 14. Hook confirmed. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Created September 14. 2644 characters. Ref #2 confirms the hook. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 17:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Huian maiden statue
Huian maiden statue
There was no inline cite for the hook, but it is in the text, and the external links do make reference to this quote. However, it says that the Hui'an women are "jokingly" referred to in this manner. A clarification may be appropriate as follows:
ALT: * ... that Hui'an maidens (statue pictured) have been jokingly referred to as having "feudal heads, thrifty jackets, democratic bellies, and wasteful trousers"? Cbl62 (talk) 15:35, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues 1627 characters. Created September 14. As Cbl said above the ref wasn't cited but an external link in the article pointed to a page that mentioned it. I have cited that page as a reference in the article so I will have to leave it up to someone else to confirm this hook. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 17:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and history verified; Chinese-language ref accepted AGF. Daniel Case (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
not entirely uncontroversial, I suppose, but his claims have been held true by the United Nations. The article is extensively sourced in this respect. Punkmorten (talk) 11:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, reference and history verified. Rewording to make clear this was the UN's call. Daniel Case (talk) 16:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Could we cite this inline somehow? Daniel Case (talk) 16:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Length and hook's ref verified; note that the article was actually created 01:06, September 15, 2008. Good to go. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Tagged with {{singlesource}}. Daniel Case (talk) 13:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hook and reference verified. A collection of offline reading just added. Main source is a scientific study supported by an impressive bibliography. --Poeticbent talk 20:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on September 13

Sorry, but this is not a 5x expansion as the prose on July 22nd was approximately 2865 characters, and is now at approximately 3737. --Rosiestep (talk) 17:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and history verified; offline ref accepted AGF. Daniel Case (talk) 13:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alt-nom: ... that F. R. Leavis founded Scrutiny: A Quarterly Review, a widely-read literary magazine, in 1932 and remained its principal editor until the final issue in 1953? new article: User:Jayvdb, nom: AdjustShift (talk) 16:46, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
1851 characters. Ref #3 (The Weekly Standard) confirms the first hook, however it is 203 characters. The second hook is supported by an offline reference. Personally I like the first hook better (although it needs slight condensing). It is good to go anyway. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 16:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Per my comment above, a condensed hook; ALT: ... that although only printing 1500 copies per issue at its height, the journal Scrutiny helped its editor, F. R. Leavis, secure his status as an influential 20th century literary critic? ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 16:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article has already featured on the Main Page's In the news section which seems to contradict Unwritten rule D1. --Candlewicke (Talk) 16:14, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Victuallers (talk) 15:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Commentary: Anyone who has played one game in Major League Baseball can have an article, BUT why should we feature an article on the Main Page about a guy who played in 24 games (and only 30 innings) in his entire career and only won 2? I know we want to encourage new articles, but this is stretching it. In my opinion, a baseball player should have to be truly notable in at least SOME way beyond just playing a few games in the big leagues to be featured in DYK. Cbl62 (talk) 19:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Basically the same thing I was about to say... so I won't repeat it. In the other hand, the hook isn't very interesting, so I wouldn't have verified it anyway. I've seen a baseball DYK about a player who only played at one game in his entire career, which would be Larry Gowell. Though, the hook nominated was very interesting and notable (the ball he hit was accepted into the Hall of Fame since it was the last one before the DH rule), so it was accepted as a result, no matter how many games he played. It's really the hook that matters. This one isn't very interesting. Unless you can find a much more interesting hook for him, we'll accept it. Thanks, RyRy (talk) 19:56, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with RyRy that there needs to be something interesting about the hook. A player being picked up in March during spring training and then released at the end of March without making the club is simply not unusual, interesting, remarkable, or noteworthy.Cbl62 (talk) 20:03, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I too agree. I have not much regard for baseball and that certainly wouldn't draw me in. --Candlewicke (Talk) 19:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And the worst part of this is that we've had similar hooks before: "... that X was signed by SOME MAJOR-LEAGUE TEAM only to be released Y days later." I mean, major-league duh! How many baseball players, let alone pro athletes as a whole, has that happened to?

Perhaps we should start some sort of "Hook suggestions to avoid" subpage. Daniel Case (talk) 13:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The time is only out by two minutes and that would be probably be overlooked normally (really, 2 minutes isn't a big deal). However, the sources severely flaunt WP:NONENG and the only English source that actually mentions "Songpa sandaenori" does not go into any detail about where it originated from. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 16:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, according to WP:V, non-English sources are okay for references. I don't understand your object to the nomination.--Caspian blue (talk) 16:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My objection is that there are numerous issues with this nom; the time of nomination, the formatting (no sections), it only just makes the minimum, that most of the refs aren't in English and that no English ref confirms the hook all weigh against it. WP:NONENG is a shortcut to a section in WP:V. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 16:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And the article is tagged as a stub. ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 16:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I forgot to add <ref name="Andong Songpa">, so the hook is perfectly referenced with WP:English citation and you obviously only checked the hook and did not read the attached ENGLISH sources. Well, you're not the admins who judge the nomination and per your somewhat "clever" request for DYK nom to be featured on the top[5], I don't think I have to listen to your lecturing. I have contributed to DYK for a while, so I know what requirements should be presented. You can remove the stub, so I consider your objection is very absurd. Why do you think that {{subst:DYKtickAGF}} exists? --Caspian blue (talk) 17:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You left out the ref and when I raised the objection you attack me? I openly admitted why I was asking BorgQueen to switch my nom out, I had just got and uploaded the photo when she moved it across and I wanted it to at least have a chance - but I don't know what that has to do with anything here. I checked each English source - the one you have now added doesn't mention anything about a Songpa sandaenori - but rather a Songpa Sandae which I shall AGF is the same thing. I still don't like the lack of formatting and the referencing but if you are going to resort to incivility and personal attacks rather than taking on board reasonable objections and fixing the article then so be it. . ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 18:14, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're the one who has commented from bad faith and attacks me with the implausible reasons, and the article has a stub template which is utterly absurd. If I did not use English sources at all, I could've be tolerate of your accusation that I taunt the Wikipedia policy, but that is even false one. The example of your conduct is why I consider your intervention and interpretation of WP:English are unwarranted. I consider the request is somewhat tactful as opposed to your own thought. Everybody want to their nom to be on the top of the main page. I have not added any new references, so you did not obviously check the attached sources. Please be honest.--Caspian blue (talk) 18:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest: "complete year" -> "full season" --74.13.131.192 (talk) 16:13, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, reference and history verified. Article categorized and hook reworded for flow. Daniel Case (talk) 13:34, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


See also