Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Mattisse (talk | contribs)
Mattisse (talk | contribs)
Line 1,556: Line 1,556:
:::*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|18px]] Good! Size and date fine. I have to AGF on the Scottish(?) hook ref, however. <sup><small>[[User:Law|<font color="black">'''Law'''</font>]]</small></sup><sub><small> [[User talk:Law|<font color="black">shoot!</font>]]</small></sub> 02:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
:::*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|18px]] Good! Size and date fine. I have to AGF on the Scottish(?) hook ref, however. <sup><small>[[User:Law|<font color="black">'''Law'''</font>]]</small></sup><sub><small> [[User talk:Law|<font color="black">shoot!</font>]]</small></sub> 02:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
::::* Well, anyone with access to the ODNB can verify (see [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/25652 article]). Cheers, [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 02:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
::::* Well, anyone with access to the ODNB can verify (see [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/25652 article]). Cheers, [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 02:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
:::::* What percentage of Wikipedia's readers is that? &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


====[[Davis v. Beason]]====
====[[Davis v. Beason]]====

Revision as of 22:34, 22 March 2009

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
WP:ErrorsWP:Errors
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page.

Purge

Instructions

Using a DYK suggestion string (see below examples), list new suggestions in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged. Thanks for participating and please remember to check back for comments on your nomination.

DYK criteria

Official criteria: DYK rules and additional guidelines
Unofficial Guide: Learning DYK

Sample DYK suggestion strings

Please use one of the strings below to post your DYK nomination, using the "author" and "nominator" fields to identify the users who should receive credit for their contributions if the hook is featured on the main page.

  1. Nom without image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= }}
  2. Nom with image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= | image= | caption= }}
    To include more than one new or expanded article in a single hook: |article2= |article3= |article4= | (etc)
    To include more than one author: |author2= |author3= | (etc)
    To include alternate hooks: |ALT1= |ALT2= | (etc)
    To add a comment: |comment=
    To add the article you reviewed: |reviewed=

Do not wikilink the article title, or the author username field; the template will wikilink them automatically. Do wikilink the article title in the hook field, however.
Do not add a section heading if you are using the template; the template will add one for you.
Do not include a signature (~~~~) after the template.
Do not use non-free images in your hook suggestion.

An example of how to use the template is given below. Full details are at {{NewDYKnom}}:

{{subst:NewDYKnom
 | article       = Example
 | hook          = ... that this [[article]] is an '''[[example]]''' ''(pictured)''?
 | author        = User
 | nominator     =
 | image         = Example.png
 | rollover      = An example image
 | comment       =
}}
  • Note that you should only use one of the above templates for the original hook. If you want to suggest a second, alternative hook for the same article submission, just type it in manually. The above templates output useful code for each submission and if you employ them for alternative hooks, you will mess up the page formatting.
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|May 25}} Thanks, ~~~~

Symbols

If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:

Symbol Code DYK Ready? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe DYK eligibility requires additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Please consider using {{subst:DYKproblem}} on the user's talk page, in case they do not notice if there is an issue.

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Where is my hook?

If you can't find the hook you submitted to this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is in the queue for display on the main page. You can check whether your hook has been moved to the queue by reviewing the queue listings.

If your hook is not in the queue or already on the main page, it has probably been deleted. Deletion occurs if the hook is more than about eight days old and has unresolved issues for which any discussion has gone stale. If you think your hook has been unfairly deleted, you can query its deletion on the discussion page, but as a general rule deleted hooks will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on March 22

Joe Riley (artist)

Created by The Little Blue Frog (talk). Self nom at 20:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The original version made me wonder if the children were being animated and controlling imaginary franchises, so I suggest "children's animation franchises". Similarly for ALT1; is the artist children or is he animated? I suggest "children's animated film artist" or "children's animation film artist". Each of my suggestions get more Google hits than what they replace. Art LaPella (talk) 22:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Willard Stone

Created by Arxiloxos (talk). Self nom at 20:33, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: if the first suggestion is selected, there is a nice photo of Stone's sculpture "Lady of Spring" on the federal government's archival website for the Clinton White House.[1] I am not familiar enough with Wikipedia's photo policies to have an informed opinion about whether this photo may be used to illustrate the article and/or the DYK. Maybe someone more experienced would like to take a look? Thanks.--Arxiloxos (talk) 20:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Tills

Created by Tills (talk). Self nom at 19:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agaricus lilaceps

Created by ImperatorExercitus (talk). Self nom at 19:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bovista nigrescens

Created by ImperatorExercitus (talk). Self nom at 16:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

World Conference on Human Rights

Created by Wasted Time R (talk). Self nom at 15:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Source, length, and history verified. Awadewit (talk) 15:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Darkness over Daggerford

Created by Vantine84 (talk). Self nom at 13:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ruby Cycle Co Ltd

Created by Thruxton (talk). Self nom at 09:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Northman

Created by Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk). Self nom at 07:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and history are fine, but I can't find this fact in the article...I presume it's something having to do with the Woolf quotation, but I guess it went a bit over my head. Can you help clarify? rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 13:28, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm assuming it's ' "In this year Bamburgh was sacked and much booty was captured there, and after that the army came to the mouth of the Humber and did great damage there, both in Lindsey and in Northumbria. Then a very large English army was collected, and when they should have joined battle, the leaders Fræna, Godwine and Frythegyst, first started the flight" Woolf thought that both Northman and Waltheof were in the south for this reason.' :) Cheers. I'mperator 17:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is in the article, though I suppose you gotta add two and two to get it. The article says he has two historical appearances (cited), one of which is :
"A Norþman dux, "Ealdorman Northmann", witnessed a charter dating to 994 by King Æthelred II ("the Unready").[10] The charter is a grant of 10 hides at Fovant, Wiltshire, to the church of St Mary, Wilton"
  • Wilton is south of the Humber, i.e. in England outside Northumbria; the other is from Durham, i.e. north of the Humber, in Northumbria. Then the article talks about how the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle describes the plundering of Bamburgh the previous year; the chronological connection can be cited to Woolf. Does this clarify it? Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 20:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ambassador of Russia to Austria

5x expanded by Russavia (talk). Self nom at 05:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Note that the article previously was simply a list, with no prose.Russavia Dialogue 05:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Golos Truda

Created/expanded by Skomorokh (talk). Self nom at 04:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

George Murray (Royal Navy officer)

Created by Benea (talk). Self nom at 03:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Size, date, and image fine. AGF on offline hook source. Nice work, btw. Law shoot! 03:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great Northern, Piccadilly and Brompton Railway

Created by DavidCane (talk). Self nom at 01:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Cotoneaster salicifolius

Created by Hamamelis (talk). nom by Earthdirt (talk) 17:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 21

SS class blimp

  • ... that the first SS class blimp entered service on 18 March 1915; less than three weeks after work was started on the type?

Created by Red Sunset (talk). Self nom at 21:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Arthur W. Ryder

Created by Shreevatsa (talk). Self nom at 20:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ellie Kemper

Created by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self nom at 20:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mesangiospermae

Created by 128.171.106.252 (talk). Nominated by FingersOnRoids (talk) at 19:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Fourteen Hours

5x expanded by Stetsonharry (talk). Self nom at 18:09, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kasturi Ranga Iyengar

Created/expanded by Ravichandar84 (talk). Self nom at 17:40, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Li Jiang

  • ... that after the Tang Dynasty general Li Jiang died in a mutiny, his successor Wen Zao slaughtered the mutineers and offered their heads to Li Jiang as a sacrifice?

Created by Nlu (talk). Self nom at 16:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dejan Vojnović, Jurica Grabušić, Slaven Krajačić

Created by Punkmorten (talk). Self nom at 10:08, 22 March 2009 (UTC). Also, User:GregorB helped expand the article Dejan Vojnović.[reply]

Maurice Macdonald Seymour

Created by SriMesh (talk). Self nom at 01:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Size, date, and hook ref all check out. Law shoot! 02:22, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The "Dr. M.D., C. M., D. P. H." is really unnecessary, if you ask me. Punkmorten (talk) 10:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Camp Gilwell

Created by SriMesh (talk). Self nom at 01:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Size, date, and hook ref fine. Law shoot! 02:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Folds

5x expanded by ChrisTheDude (talk). Self nom at 22:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length (5x expansion) and date varified. Book source for hook accepted on good faith. (Short article with one source.) —Mattisse (Talk) 23:10, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Real Change (history)

A vendor for Real Change

5x expanded by Rjanag (talk). Self nom at 22:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Nominating this using a new version of the template I'm working on, with a "history" link added; let me know if you find it useful or not. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 22:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length (5x expansion), date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry. I'm so used to looking at the (history) on my own that I didn't use your link. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: the image currently has a permission-missing tag because of concerns someone brought up at a related article's FAC, so the image will not be ok for us to use until either OTRS gets an e-mail or the editor withdraws his concerns (at which point the permission-missing tag would be removed). rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 23:23, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Scott of Branxholme and Buccleuch

Created by PKM (talk). Self nom at 21:34, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Book source for hook accepted on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:21, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Homeless Grapevine

A sign advertising the Homeless Grapevine

Created/expanded by Apoc2400 (talk). Nominated by Rjanag (talk) at 19:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • :* Length, date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 21:39, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Lover (2004 novel)

5x expanded by Collectonian (talk). Self nom at 18:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Unfortunately, none of the official publisher's sites have the actual publication dates, so I had to use bookseller sites. The Barnes and Noble link is used to reference both the US hardback and paperback releases. Fixed the sourcing issues on the hook *doh thought I had done that* -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK. Length, date and hook sources verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 16:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Bringing Home the Goods

Created by Nudve (talk). Self nom at 18:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Unfortunately, per DYK rules, the sourched hook is not in the article. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:47, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've added inline citations to the lead. Is it OK now? -- Nudve (talk) 05:42, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK. Length, date and hook sources verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 16:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1948 College Football All-America Team

  • ... that the 1948 All-America team was the first to include separate offensive and defensive teams, as one writer noted the "era of the iron man in football is rapidly passing"?

Created by cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 15:25, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and creation date verified, offline refs for quote and facts accepted in good faith. JamieS93 16:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Murri (condiment)

  • ... that murri is an Arabic condiment akin to soy sauce which is made from barley dough allowed to rot for 40 days?

Created by Tiamut (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 12:31, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is not 'ferment' the operative phenomenon?--Wetman (talk) 17:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
We-ell yeah, I guess, but it is in essence rotting. Either is cool by me :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alt Hook changed above; they are not the same thing at all - if murri rots it no doubt has to be thrown away, like other fermented foods. Johnbod (talk) 20:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frank E. Baker Motorcycles Ltd

Created by Thruxton (talk). Self nom at 08:59, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes Ian Chadwick is specifically a leading authority on Triumph motorcycles but also an important source for other makes of British motorcycles Thruxton (talk) 09:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Siward Barn

Created by Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk). Self nom at 08:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Offline book sources for hook accepted on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 15:48, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alberto Cavos

Created by [[User:User:NVO|User:NVO]] ([[User talk:User:NVO|talk]]). Self nom at 07:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bradbury Motor Cycles

Created/expanded by Thruxton (talk). Self nom at 06:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Done - it wasn't easy but I've found an original Bradbury advert if you have really good eyesight you should be able to verify the hook from this! Thruxton (talk) 09:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • That is the motorcycle company saying so. But is there not a neutral third-party source? Are there not comparative evaluations of motorcycles, the way PC World evaluates software, for example? It does not say who awarded the "gold medals". —Mattisse (Talk) 16:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism: A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas

Created/expanded by Skomorokh (talk). Self nom at 03:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. The closest I could find to the hook in the article is the following statement: ... leading post-anarchism theorist Saul Newman declared it to be symptomatic of a growing interest in anarchism and a revitalization of the anarchist tradition", and that it would "serve as an excellent introduction to the anti-authoritarian tradition, and an important resource for the scholar of anarchism". Is this close enough to the hook? —Mattisse (Talk) 16:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would feel more comfortable with a hook that was a little toned down:
  • alt ... that a post-anarchism theorist called the publication of volume one of the anthology Anarchism: A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas in 2006 a sign of a resurgent interest in anarchist philosophy?
  • Point taken, but it's a rather boring article, and that was the most interesting piece I could find. Is the original hook ok if we attribute the claim and use less bombastic language? Skomorokh 01:24, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Your modification of the hook is fine, and I have changed the symbol! —Mattisse (Talk) 16:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KVXX

Created by Dravecky (talk). Self nom at 00:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:43, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Asad Ali Khan

Created by Hekerui (talk). Self nom at 00:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:47, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Le Griffon

5x expanded by Wpwatchdog (talk). Self nom at 20:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length (5x expansion), date, and hook verified. However, please removed repeated external links to http://greatlakesexploration.org/ from the body of the article. There should be not external links in the body. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The external link is removed from the Shipwreck section. An article by the Great Lakes Exploration Group is used as a reference in the Construction section. Should this be removed? --Wpwatchdog (talk) 02:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Great! Thanks for removing them. —Mattisse (Talk) 16:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 20

Southern White-cheeked Gibbon

Created by Shimgray (talk). Self nom at 19:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Jane Park

Jane Park at the 2008 LPGA Championship

Created by Giants2008 (talk). Self nom at 23:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • alt ... that since joining the LPGA in 2007, golfer Jane Park (pictured) has earned almost $700,000 and recorded five top-10 finishes? (sourced statement taken from article) —Mattisse (Talk) 00:28, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are problems with this one, which are on me as the creator. The reference didn't cover what she's done in 2009, and I didn't think about it until I saw this here. I also didn't consider that one of her top-10s was as an amateur. Giants2008 (17-14) 17:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Canadian Chiefs of the Defence Staff

Created by Tartarus (talk). Self nom at 19:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • 711 characters of prose. The table doesn't count. Shubinator (talk) 19:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The hook is only mentioned in a footnote. Could you incorporate it into the main article (maybe the lead)? Also, I can't see a reference for the hook. Shubinator (talk) 22:47, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The reference says he was born in Romania, but does not say he was the first CDS to be born in another country. Shubinator (talk) 01:31, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for the prod, but that is not what this hook is about. TARTARUS talk 01:47, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • (unindent) I am sorry if that last comment sounded snippy, but my point was that if all of the other generals were born in canada and he was born in Romania, would that not mean that he was the only? TARTARUS talk 02:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, we're looking at Natynczyk, not de Chastelain; my bad. There's the same issue for Natynczyk though; the ref does establish that Natynczyk is not of British or French descent, but does not establish that the others are. So the all of the other generals were of British or French descent part needs a reference. Shubinator (talk) 03:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tengku Alam Shah

5X expanded by Mr Tan (talk). Self nom at 08:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length (5x expansion) and date verified. Book source for hook accepted on good faith. I am confused over the name. You are calling Alauddin Alam Shah Tengku Alam in the hook. Is that not confusing? —Mattisse (Talk) 17:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Alauddin" was the regnal name given to Tengku Alam during his proclamation as Sultan (which was ceremonial by nature), while his full name was given as "Alam Shah bin Ali Iskandar Shah", bin denotes "son of" in Islamic cultures. "Tengku" is a title for princes in the Malay world--you may take a look at Malay titles--Ive linked "Tengku" to the article's subheading for convenience sake, as this is a problem very commonly faced by many Western readers who are not familiar with Malay(sian) forms of address. For example, take a look at M'sia's 1st Prime Minister "Tunku Abdul Rahman"; Malaysians, and even the international press called "Abdul Rahman" together with the "Tunku" with it; perhaps try using Google books as a matter of quick check.
As for the matter of the naming confusions, most sources refer to the subject by "Tengku Alam" rather than "Alauddin Alam Shah", which was only a part of his regnal name given to the prince. You can use Google books to verify for the results between these two address modes, if you may be concerned. Mr Tan (talk) 17:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • My only concern is for the reader. I know I was confused, and had difficulty reading the article because the name confusion added to the complication of so many unfamiliar (to me) similar names in the article. The word "Tengku" seems like a name, rather than a title, and I briefly considered clicking on it when I finally realized it was a title, but that would have taken me far afield in an article where I was already confused! Why do you not rename the article, as it should be given the most common name by Wikipedia naming conventions? —Mattisse (Talk) 17:50, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Renamed it "Tengku Alam Shah". Im not too sure about these naming conventions whether a title that is commonly used to address a person according to his status is allowed (Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(common_names)), but nevertheless, I did it on consideration that Malaysia's first Prime Minister, was addressed by Tunku Abdul Rahman rather than "Abdul Rahman" (similar example would be Tengku Razaleigh, which I had raised). In the case of Tunku Abdul Rahman, the title "Tunku" is part of a common name used in the press, although it is not his given or actual name, but an honorific title--if you may do a google search, references to the Msia's 1st PM would almost always incorporate the title "Tunku". Thanks! Mr Tan (talk) 07:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You are right about usually titles are not in the name, but perhaps in this case an exception is warranted? —Mattisse (Talk) 16:40, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lausanne Hall

Front of Lausanne Hall

Created/expanded by Aboutmovies (talk). Self nom at 06:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Offline newspaper sources for hook accepted on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 17:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Male Restroom Etiquette

Created by Rfc1394 (talk), TKD (talk). Nominated by TKD (talk) at 05:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 17:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whisky Creek Cabin

Created by Orygun (talk). Self nom at 03:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 17:34, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ATV Today

Created by TheRetroGuy (talk). Nominated by HowardBerry (talk) at 01:41, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Article has no inline citations. —Mattisse (Talk) 02:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Several citations have now been added. Howie 21:21, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK. Length (5x expansion), date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 16:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Schapiro, Sascha Schapiro

Created by Skomorokh (talk). Self nom at 00:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Debbie Kruger

Created/expanded by Shaidar cuebiyar (talk). Self nom at 23:51, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Is the hook in the article, as I could not find it? —Mattisse (Talk) 00:42, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Salle

Created by Punkmorten (talk). Self nom at 20:47, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I found it as he won a medal at the 1992 UK Championships, "with entry limited to British Athletes" according to the page. After this point in time he is also listed as a non-foreigner in the AAA Championships, listed as a British competitors in the World Cup, at the British all-time list etc. Punkmorten (talk) 09:08, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT 1: ... that the English international long jumper Fred Salle also represented Cameroon for parts of his career? Punkmorten (talk) 10:18, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Verified. I guess it's technically "synthesis" to put two and two together like this, but I think it's simple and obvious enough that it shouldn't be a problem. Either hook is fine with me. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 13:38, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald Holmes

Created by Clithering (talk). Self nom at 20:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Having read the article, I cannot say whether the hook is verified. The part that seems to address the issues in the hook do not have a source. In any event, I do not think the hook is interesting or intriguing and that it is too obscure. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for your comment. The hook has been rephrased.--Clithering (talk) 06:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not that thrilled by either of these hooks. I would prefer to see a hook ab out something Holmes actually did rather than something that was going on anyway. There appears to be plenty of information in the article; do you think you could dig something up? rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 13:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've made another hook. Is it better this time? Thanks for comment. --Clithering (talk) 11:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hurdia

  • ... that the Cambrian predator Hurdia (pictured) was thought to be a number of separate organisms for 100 years, until its redescription this week?

Created by Nrkn (talk). Expanded by Spotty11222 (talk · contribs) and Smith609; nominated by Smith609 (talk) at 19:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Not sure what week "this week" is in hook. There seems to be an incomplete reference in the article —Mattisse (Talk) 19:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's the week containing today. I would have said 'today', but the hook probably won't go live for a couple of days, so 'this week' seemed more appropriate. '2009' lacks the immediacy of 'this week'. Perhaps 'This month' would be a suitable compromise? Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 00:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It may be next week that it runs as a DYK or even longer. It is unpredictable. Some run right away, but some wait a week or two. If you look at the queue, it goes back to March 12 hooks that are still considered eligible as of today—that is 12 days ago. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:23, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, then we should be safe with 'this month' - if, when this tag is chosen, it happens to be April, the selecting editor could replace 'this month' with 'last month'. Does that sound okay? Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 15:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • alt ... that the 500 million year old Cambrian predator Hurdia (pictured) was thought to be a number of separate organisms for 100 years, until 2009 when the complete animal was reconstructed? (sourced statement from article) —Mattisse (Talk) 20:16, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arno von Lenski

Created by HerkusMonte (talk). Self nom at 17:16, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I prefer the alt - it's more hooky. Law shoot! 20:22, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charnockite, St. Thomas Mount

Charnockite Rock at st. Thomas Mount.JPG

Created/expanded by Nvvchar (talk). Nominated by Ravichandar84 (talk) at 15:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

White Dog (book)

5x expanded by User:Collectonian (talk). Self nom at 15:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • alt ... that Romain Gary wrote his autobiographical novel White Dog in both French and English versions, both published in France and the United States, respectively, in 1970? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:17, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length (5x expansion) and date verified. Book sources for hook accepted on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 16:22, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Both are good alts, thanks :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 05:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (video game)

5x expanded by Vantine84 (talk). Self nom at 14:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length (5x expansion) and source for hook verified. However, there is a "merge" tag on the article. Also the hook is promotional. —Mattisse (Talk) 17:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is? Do you have any suggestions for making it non-promotional? It wasn't my intention to promote the game or the movie; I just wanted to point out that Hollywood people helped with a video game, which is uncommon. Also, the merge tag has been removed (and not by me). — Levi van Tine (tc) 07:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have any statements in the article that it is unusual for Hollywood people to be involved with a video game, and why that might be? —Mattisse (Talk) 00:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, unfortunately. — Levi van Tine (tc) 08:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Factions of Command & Conquer

5x expanded by Caissa's DeathAngel (talk). Nominated by Cabe6403 (talk) at 13:18, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. The hook statement is not sourced in the article (that I could see) plus it is not interesting nor intruiging. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:53, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT1: ... that in the original Command & Conquer series, out of the three main factions, the Scrin possess a significant aerial fleet which they use to invade and harvest the Earth's Tiberium deposits? -- Interesting and intruiging is subjective remember. Others may find something interesting that you don't -- Cabe6403 (TalkSign) 14:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • That hook is interesting/intriguing but I don't see all of the elements of the hook in the article. The reference in that section is good but it is difficult to match what it is saying to what is in the article. The paragraph on the Scrin is very complex. Is the article only describing the "original" series? The section on the Scrin does not mention "original" versus other versions. The article is hard for the general reader (me) to understand. —Mattisse (Talk) 16:55, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2000 PBA All-Filipino Cup

Created/expanded by User:Howard the Duck. Self nom at 12:50, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. I cannot find reference for the first hook. (Can you show it to me?) The second hook is referenced but the hook is 242 characters, a little over the 200 character maximum for the hook. —Mattisse (Talk) 14:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The first TRO was on citation #1, the second one is on citation #4. Basically the second was just an extension of the first. –Howard the Duck 14:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
*alt2 ... that the postponement of the 2000 PBA All-Filipino Cup series between Purefoods TJ Giants and Tanduay Rhum Masters was the first other than for a typhoon, earthquake or bomb threat? (181 characters) —Mattisse (Talk) 14:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • This text seems strikingly familiar and I know that I didn't read this article yesterday when it was created nor am I a Filipino basketball enthusiast who would have read this in the sports pages. This needs investigation and explanation before promotion. - Dravecky (talk) 11:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait, I think it was the 2004–05 PBA Philippine Cup article. The 1999 article was "posted" in overnight hours in our place so I wasn't able to see it, if it ever made it to the Main Page. –Howard the Duck 12:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Heart of Rock & Roll

Created by CarpetCrawler (talk). Self nom at 09:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 11:45, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oooh, that one is very good! :) CarpetCrawler (talk) 16:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nidula

5x expanded by sasata (talk). Self nom at 08:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length (5x expansion) and date verified. Offline book source for hook accepted on good faith. Source for first hook is also online. —Mattisse (Talk) 12:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Source #10 (as of now) seems to be online. Law shoot! 12:13, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Sauer

Created by Rlendog (talk). Self nom at 03:45, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date, size and ref hook all check out. Law shoot! 10:12, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Bloc economies

Created by Mosedschurte (talk). Nominated by Piotrus (talk) at 19:25, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


French submarine Doris

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 16:22, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Book source for hook accepted on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 17:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 19

Quan Deyu

Created by Nlu (talk). Self nom at 17:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

George A. Steel

Created by Aboutmovies (talk). Self nom at 06:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Very interesting, got me to click! verified, image has proper license (PD-old). Royalbroil 15:30, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cairo International Book Fair

Crowds at the 41st CIBF

Created/expanded by T L Miles (talk), Dr B2 (talk). Nominated by T L Miles (talk) at 06:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 18:08, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I put the parentheses back inside the italics for (pictured). J7 isn't my favorite rule but it's standard. Art LaPella (talk) 18:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Drew Blickensderfer

Created by Royalbroil (talk), Drdisque (talk). Self nom at 02:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 18:18, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Illinois Centennial Monument

Sunfish Pond

Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 00:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for hook verified. (Most of the references in article contain little if any info on the monument.) —Mattisse (Talk) 18:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

J. P. Wearing

  • ... that the 16-volume series The London Stage by J. P. Wearing has been called "invaluable, thoroughly accurate" and "a proverbial mine of useful information"?

Created by Ssilvers (talk). Self nom at 21:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Subscription source for hook accepted on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Big East Conference football awards

5x expanded by Grsz11 (talk). Self nom at 17:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Annual Bulletin of the Comparative Law Bureau

Created by The Little Blue Frog (talk). Self nom at 01:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Book source for hook accepted on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 17:50, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Could you please explain that "Book source for hook accepted on good faith"? All my sources are online and free, and each claim has a note.  The Little Blue Frog (ribbit) 16:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It means that Mattisse didn't check the source itself but is trusting that the information is in there. It's nothing to worry about, the hook is verified. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 16:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

American Bar Association Journal

Created by The Little Blue Frog (talk). Self nom at 01:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Offline sources for hook accepted on good faith. Note that the journal "claims" it is read by half of the 1 million lawyers. —Mattisse (Talk) 18:40, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • About "claims", it looked derogatory once phrased as a DYK: "DYK that the ABAJ claims it's read by half a million lawyers?" sounded to me like pointing only at their claiming it, as if that was somehow false or preposterous. But you gave me an idea, I'm updating it to "DYK that the ABAJ is +allegedly+ read...": the use of lawspeak should at least sound funny.
  • Could you please explain the "Offline sources for hook accepted on good faith"? All my sources are online and free, and each claim has a note.  The Little Blue Frog (ribbit) 16:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry. I see that they are online. The way you have the footnotes for the reference sources formatted, they look like offline sources. Usually websites are not formatted in the same way as offline sources. I just assumed they were either printed material or not accessible. —Mattisse (Talk) 18:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not sure that online sources are supposed to look different (beyond having a dim blue link): the output of the official {{cite web}} and {{cite book}} is the same, and I more or less mimic them by hand. (Of course I count as "online sources" even books or magazine articles when we can link to a free copy of their full text on Gutenberg or Google Book or NYTimes.com or such.)
  • Also, I don't put my main online sources directly in the notes but instead an author-date cite, so as to keep all my main sources (online or offline) grouped together in the sources section: one can often get an idea of the sourcing or coverage of an article by having a first look at the sources listed into its References/Sources/Bibliography section. I couldn't get that result if half my main sources were scattered into the blizzard of notes and cites.
  • Anyway, is there something I could do to improve the design of sources and cites, without changing my grouping the main sources in a single section?  The Little Blue Frog (ribbit) 21:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

George Hedges

  • ... that George Hedges, a lawyer who represented Hollywood stars and studios, was part of an archaeological team that discovered the remains of the ancient frankincense trading city of Ubar?

5x expanded by Alansohn (talk). Self nom at 20:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ·Length, date and source for hook verified. (Hook is 200 characters.) —Mattisse (Talk) 22:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Adams and Eve

ALT:... that most filmed copy of the CBS sitcom Mr. Adams and Eve was destroyed or lost in storage because of a contract dispute when the series was cancelled in 1958?

New artice by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 16:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The DuPont Show with June Allyson

ALT:... that the 1959–1961 CBS anthology series The DuPont Show with June Allyson featured guest stars Harpo Marx, Ginger Rogers, Bette Davis, and Ronald Reagan as well as multiple roles by hostess June Allyson?

New artice by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 11:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Festning Tunnel, Rådhusplassen

Created/expanded by Arsenikk (talk). Self nom at 17:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date for both articles verified. Hook from online source in Norweigian taken on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:25, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothea Holt Redmond

  • ... that when Dorothea Holt Redmond was hired in 1938 in the "heretofore exclusively male field" of film production design, male co-workers demanded that she work in a walled-off area separated from them?

5x expanded by Alansohn (talk). Self nom at 16:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:29, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hunga Tonga

Created by Tim1965 (talk). Self nom at 15:48, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Not sure that the hook has correct date, as source article indicates the erruption was Thursday, that is, March 19, 2009. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:36, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Link to Smithsonian site[2] (cited in the article, and which is more accurate than mass media reports) says either March 16 or 17, but reported on March 17. AP article (dated March 19) cited at the bottom of the article says volcano "has been erupting for days". I went with the more reputable citation for eruption date (although you can flip a coin as to March 16 or March 17). - Tim1965 (talk) 00:29, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK. Accept this justification for date on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I clarified the date of eruption issue in a footnote, now, too, with sources. - Tim1965 (talk) 00:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Le Journal de Mickey

Created by Fram (talk). Self nom at 15:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:39, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vika Line

Vika Line

    • ... that when the Vika Line opened in 1995, it was the first new street line of the Oslo Tramway since 1939?

5x expanded by Arsenikk (talk). Self nom at 14:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length (5x expansion) and date verified. Offline sources in Norwegian accepted in good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 15:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Korean Air Lines Flight 85

Created by Esemono (talk). Self nom at 08:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Only 1471 characters when a minimun of 1500 characters is required. Can you expand it a little more? —Mattisse (Talk) 15:18, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK I've expanded the article. -- Esemono (talk) 00:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't know what you did, but now the article is only 1127 characters. Remember, anything in a list or a blockquote does not count. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Really no lists? Anyway I hope the most recent changes will bump up the character cound. -- Esemono (talk) 02:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Really no lists; see C1. But it's now 3399 characters counted our way. Art LaPella (talk) 03:13, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length and date of article verified. However the hook is misleading. The source for the hook says

The CBC interview, part of a documentary that traced the actions of senior government officials that fateful day, revealed that the Prime Minister had essentially authorized U.S. fighter jets to shoot down a Korean airliner over Canada if it diverted from a planned emergency landing in Whitehorse.

While still over Alaska, the pilot of the Korean Airlines 747 had erroneously sent coded signals indicating the airliner had been hijacked. The pilot was ordered to land in Whitehorse, and was met by U.S. jet fighters while still over American territory.

NORAD command in Winnipeg agreed the airliner could enter Canadian airspace accompanied by the U.S. fighters, but insisted the decision to shoot it down must be the Canadian government's.

There is a big if in the source. It does not say that the Canadian Prime Minister, Jean Chrétien, authorized that ... —Mattisse (Talk) 19:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but removing the entire phrase makes the hook meaningless. Did you mean Flight 85 "was authorized to be shot down ..."? Art LaPella (talk) 19:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sunfish Pond

Sunfish Pond

Created by Dmadeo (talk). Self nom at 07:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date, and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 11:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Henryk Rzewuski

Henryk Rzewuski

Self-nom by Nihil novi (talk) 06:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Offline sources for hook accepted on good faith. (It would be better if each sentence referring to hook had a citation, but will accept good faith of editor on this issue in this case.) —Mattisse (Talk) 11:23, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've provided an additional citation. Thanks for the suggestion. Nihil novi (talk) 07:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sarojini Varadappan

Created/expanded by Ravichandar84 (talk). Self nom at 05:09, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, Hook and Refs check out. dm (talk) 08:20, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Phillimore

Created by Benea (talk). Self nom at 02:16, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    • Date and length fine. AGF on offline sources. Both hooks are fine, however I find the ALT pretty funny. Law shoot! 07:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Tolman

Created by Chick Bowen (talk). Self nom at 01:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Size, date, and hook ref all check out. Law shoot! 01:37, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 18

Zombia

5x expanded by Guettarda (talk). Self nom at 05:24, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • That's what you get for working off of a downloaded copy. Updated ref. Guettarda (talk) 19:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Triumph

Mount Triumph from the southeast

Created by Themaeeandhisfriend (talk). Nominated by Wsiegmund (talk) at 17:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for alt hook verified. First hook is POV, that is, it is a subjective opinion. Also, I did not see a source for it. One of the sources said it was difficult to climb because it had multiple overhanging faces. You could add that to the article and to the hook. —Mattisse (Talk) 19:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I added another hook with source. However, the source for first hook is cited in the article. Beckey uses the words, "one of the outstanding sights" and "great local relief". I changed the wording a bit to make this more clear. Thank you. Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Genius (TV series)

5x expanded by ISD (talk). Self nom at 09:13, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length (5x expansion) and date verified. However, the hook is not sourced in the article. Also, none of the article you reference mentioned this particular "genius" idea, although others are mentioned. Maybe you could change the hook to an idea that has a reference source if you do not have one for this idea. —Mattisse (Talk) 19:39, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've added references and changed the article a bit so that it suits the hook more. ISD (talk) 19:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK. Length (5x expansion), date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

St. Augustine Gospels

Sunfish Pond

5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self nom at 15:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Size, date and image fine. AGF on offline hook. Would prefer an inline citation for latter half of the hook sentence. Law shoot! 20:33, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Added. Johnbod (talk) 04:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sultan Ali of Johor

  • ... that Sultan Ali of Johor signed a treaty on 10 March 1855 with the Temenggong which formally ceded his sovereignty claims over Johor?

5X expanded by Mr Tan (talk). Self nom at 06:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length (5x expansion) and date verified. Offline source for hook accepted in good faith. It would be good if you could wikilink, or otherwise explain, "Temenggong". —Mattisse (Talk) 00:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

V. Kanakasabhai

Created/expanded by Ravichandar84 (talk). Self nom at 04:33, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. That he was the first to attemp a systematic history is verified. However, that he was of Tamil ancestry is not. (Please show me where, if I am wrong.) —Mattisse (Talk) 00:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK. Length, date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:24, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kathleen Gough

Created/expanded by Ravichandar84 (talk). Self nom at 01:17, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Iced Earth discography

5x expanded by Cannibaloki (talk). Self nom at 21:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • - Is the hook meant to be sarcastic? Because fourteen years is a rather long time. FingersOnRoids♫ 21:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ehhh, no. Do you have any suggestions to improve? Cannibaloki 22:02, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • alt ... that heavy metal band Iced Earth reached the Billboard 200 chart for the first time, fourteen years after the release of their debut album? (Removed "only" as that word made the hook seem sarcastic.) —Mattisse (Talk) 22:53, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length (5x expansion) and date verified. German language sources for hook accepted on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:55, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I think Alt 2 puts it best. FingersOnRoids♫ 00:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Skip Young (actor)

ALT:... that Skip Young, who played humorous Wally Plumstead on ABC's The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet, was a Korean War Navy veteran interred at Riverside National Cemetery?

New artice by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 16:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Monster Kingdom: Jewel Summoner

Created by Vantine84 (talk). Self nom at 07:25, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Source for hook is not clearly verified. The source says, "The monster training system follows the PSP's internal clock, as a monster that you've trained in the morning shows the fruits of your labor at night." I do not understand from this that the player's monsters continual to be trained when the console is not in use. Does the source sentence have the same meaning as your hook? —Mattisse (Talk) 12:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, they mean the same thing. Players can upgrade monsters normally, or they can allow the game to do it automatically by letting the console sit, because the game's code follows the PSP's battery-operated clock to track changes to monsters. Reference #7 may make it more clear; the 1UP preview says "...the fusion system takes place in real world time, so often fusions will take six to 10 hours to complete, encouraging players to stop playing and come back the next day when the fusion is done. Luckily, changing the PSP system date to six or 10 hours later is a good workaround that we're sure many players will be using." This also suggests that because anyone can simply change a PSP's clock settings at any time, players can cheat the game by "moving time forward". — Levi van Tine (tc) 07:57, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Magnificent (U2 song)

  • ... that the U2 song "Magnificent" was originally titled "French Disco"?

Created by Y2kcrazyjoker (talk), MelicansMatkin (talk). Self nom at 05:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Source for hook is not verified. The reference given makes no mention of the song's original title. —Mattisse (Talk) 12:29, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Apologies; it looks like the wrong citation was used by accident. I've replaced it with the correct one. MelicansMatkin (talk) 15:20, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hook source verified, along with length and date. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:15, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scribner House (Cornwall, New York)

  • Length, date and hook ref verified. --Bruce1eetalk 05:12, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hai Ying Wu

Created by Tim1965 (talk). Self nom at 01:19, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Off line sources for hook accepted on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 12:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Osbjorn Bulax

Created by Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk). Self nom at 00:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm counting 1487 worth of readable prose. Law shoot! 01:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good! Size and date fine. I have to AGF on the Scottish(?) hook ref, however. Law shoot! 02:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • What percentage of Wikipedia's readers is that? —Mattisse (Talk) 22:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Davis v. Beason

Created by Tempshill (talk). Self nom at 22:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. I think the hook misrepresents the decision just a little, in that the court upheld a lower court ruling that an Idaho statute charging the defendant with a crime because he refused to take an oath as prescribed by an Idaho statute, that he would not commit polygamy or bigamy, did not violate his right to Free Exercise of his religion as a member of the Mormon Church. The Supreme court ruled this statute did not violate the defendant's First Amendment rights. Is your wording is good enough? —Mattisse (Talk) 13:15, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think the wording is accurate and correctly represents the decision. It could be a little more precise to say "... that it was acceptable for States or Territories to prohibit religious polygamists from voting...". Or is your problem with the phrase "religious polygamists"? Do you have a preferred wording? Tempshill (talk) 17:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was hung up on the "oath" part, that he refused to take an oath regarding his religious behavior, but the hook is probably ok. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:20, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tianyulong

  • ... that the discovery of feather-like structures on the primitive dinosaur Tianyulong (pictured) raises the possibility that ancestral dinosaurs were feathered?

Created by Crazyharp81602 (talk). Nominated by ArthurWeasley (talk) at 22:22, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Hook is not in article. Do feathers make an animal fuzzy? —Mattisse (Talk) 22:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The proto-feathers were filamentous hair-like structures so an animal covered with them will indeed look fuzzy. I can either modify the hook or write a sentence on fuzziness in the article, whichever you prefer. ArthurWeasley (talk) 23:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Modified the hook. ArthurWeasley (talk) 23:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You should clarify things in the article regardless. We can't expect an average reader to know what proto-feathers are and whether or not they were fuzzy. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 23:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done! The term "Fuzzy" is not very encyclopedic that's why it is not used in the article but it was used in the press release provided in the external link section. ArthurWeasley (talk) 23:56, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean "also feathered" in the hook? If you took the "also" out, I think it would improve the hook. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good point! Removed "also" in the hook. ArthurWeasley (talk) 03:24, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I took the liberty to add a picture. ArthurWeasley (talk) 05:29, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Batavier Line, SS Batavier II (1897), SS Batavier V (1902)

Created by Bellhalla (talk). Self nom at 21:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for hook verified for all three articles. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not sure we necessarily need to explain everything in the hook, but the ALT works for me if that's what others think. It is, however, over 200 characters… — Bellhalla (talk) 14:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Your ALT2 hook is 287 characters. The hook cannot be over 200 characters. Could you reword your ALT2? —Mattisse (Talk) 23:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT3 ... that the Batavier II and Batavier V, of the Dutch Batavier Line, were captured, released, and later sunk by four different submarines? How about that? dm (talk) 02:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, technically, they weren't released by submarines, but it's close enough. — Bellhalla (talk) 04:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

János Apáczai Csere

5x expanded by David Eppstein (talk). Self nom at 21:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length (5x expansion), date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:43, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Archer (D78)

5x expanded by Mjroots (talk). Self nom at 19:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length (5x expansion) date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 20:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Silver Slugger Award winners at first base

Created/expanded by Killervogel5 (talk). Self nom at 18:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Sources verified that both father and son were winners in that category. But I am not clear that the sources show that they were the "only" father-son combination. Could you point out where that is sourced, as I am missing it? —Mattisse (Talk) 20:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, I could link to each player's statistics at Baseball-Reference, which shows parentage, but that would be a very large amount of refs. I know that the List of second-generation Major League Baseball players verifies it, but it's a Wikipedia page. [3] and [4] are lists of players, and though they don't specifically state this fact, checking them against the Wikipedia list will show that no other set won the award as first basemen. I am not sure what exactly would be required here. KV5 (TalkPhils) 01:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • [5] will show that he and his father both won the award and in what year, but also doesn't say that they were the only pair at first base. KV5 (TalkPhils) 01:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • If these issues make this a problem, may I suggest...
Alt1: ... that father and son combination Cecil Fielder and Prince Fielder each won a Silver Slugger Award at first base? KV5 (TalkPhils) 01:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alt2: ... that both father and son, Cecil Fielder and Prince Fielder, each won a Silver Slugger Award at first base? (clearer grammar) —Mattisse (Talk) 23:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, I don't agree that this grammar is clearer. If an alt is to be used, I prefer 1 or 3. KV5 (TalkPhils) 12:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alt3: ... that the father and son combination Cecil Fielder and Prince Fielder each won a Silver Slugger Award at first base?

Crucibulum laeve

Created/expanded by Sasata (talk). Self nom at 17:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length (5x expansion) and date verified. Subscription web source accepted on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 17:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joel Hopkins

Created by 97198 (talk). Self nom at 13:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 17:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Stone

  • ... that Lucy Stone was pestered by rude comments from men and boys in the street during the year and a half she chose to wear fashion bloomers?

5x expanded by Binksternet (talk). Self nom at 12:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The prose has only been expanded 2.7x in the last 5 days. --Bruce1eetalk 13:09, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Washbrook

5x expanded by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 17:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and sources for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Brickell White

5x expanded by KudzuVine (talk). Self nom at 11:56, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length (5x expansion) and date verified. Hook is not stated clearly in article and it is difficult to verify without reading 10 PDF documents and compiling the info. Could the nominator please put the hook in the article and reference it? —Mattisse (Talk) 17:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I rethought this also, and decided to accept your hook references on good faith. Looking through the info, I can see that he indeed was a noted architect with many such buildings to his credit. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rethought this. I could rewrite because the South Carolina Encyclopedia (reference 1) lists everything but the Daniel Morgan Monument. It does not specifically say that Grace Church and Charleston High are in Charleston Historic District and does not say that any are NHL/NRHP. And it is not online. I will also think about an alternate hook, but have not yet thought of one.KudzuVine (talk) 21:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • This alt hook is referenced. Feel free to add another. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • This one really doesn't work because Market Hall is a Greek Revival (I am not an architect and you could fool me!) I changed the article to put in the Huguenot Church picture because it is said to be Gothic Revival. I would stick with the original hook. KudzuVine (talk) 19:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Slaven's Cabin

Created by JKBrooks85 (talk). Self nom at 02:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • This article currently isn't long enough for Did You Know. Please see C1 for details. Art LaPella (talk) 03:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry about that; keep forgetting the difference between the history in bytes and the character count. JKBrooks85 (talk) 03:12, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Knowlton

  • ... that Martin Knowlton conceived the Elderhostel concept, in which senior citizens take college-level courses in the summer, to overcome "the disturbing concept that people are all used up after age 65"?

Created by Alansohn (talk). Self nom at 00:23, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Paid access news article accepted on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Lau

  • ... that Jason Lau is a Wing Chun Kung Fu Grandmaster who was an instructor in Mitchell Werbell III's counter-terrorist training camp?

Created by User:Pecoc (talk). Self nom at 02:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have withdrawn the AfD. The article is still not ready for DYK yet, though, as it provides no context for the reader to know what it's talking about. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 14:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adolf Pilch

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 22:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 17

Stephanie Novacek

Created by nrswanson (talk). Self nom at 10:48, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Banksia lindleyana

Created/expanded by Hesperian (talk), casliber (talk). Self nom at 05:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Database Console Commands (Transact-SQL)

Created/expanded by Ravichandar84 (talk). Self nom at 17:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • 382 characters of prose. Most of it is a list of commands. Please expand. Shubinator (talk) 02:50, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's still essentially a list of commands, and now most of the sections have just one or two sentences. Shubinator (talk) 15:57, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History of the Oslo Tramway and T-bane, Homansbyen (station)

Created/expanded by Arsenikk (talk). Self nom at 14:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Both articles are verified as to length and date. However, I am having difficulty seeing the relationship between the two articles reflected in the article text of either one. Perhaps you could point it out to me. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Fowler

Created by ISD (talk). Self nom at 08:34, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:53, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sandomierz Voivodeship (1939)

  • Comment. This article is mostly based on Polish-language sources, as I have not found anything in English on this topic. Tymek (talk) 19:56, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Does it have to be referenced? All sources claim that Polish government was very determined to create this voivodeship. The only reason it was not created was the war, nothing else. Tymek (talk) 02:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Li Fan (Tang Dynasty)

Created by Nlu (talk). Self nom at 17:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: This is a new article that displaced a redirect.Nlu (talk) 17:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fountain of the Great Lakes

5x expanded by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 07:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Since you can't see the source, it would be impossible for you to know this interpretation is incorrect. The laws were changed due to the furor over a public painting, I believe.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I reworded it. Is that OK?
  • alt ... that Chicago's Fountain of the Great Lakes is composed of five female figures arranged so that water flows through them in the same pattern as it does through the five Great Lakes? (difference angle on the fountain) —Mattisse (Talk) 17:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length (5x expansion) and date verified. Offline book source for hook accepted on good faith. (Interesting article.) —Mattisse (Talk) 16:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Red Gap, British Columbia

Created by KenWalker (talk). Self nom at 06:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • for whatever it may be worth, I think the alt version is an improvment -KenWalker | Talk 05:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length and date verified. Book source offline for hook accepted on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 16:37, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Camperdown Cemetery

5x expanded by Amandajm (talk). Self nom, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Although the DYK checker says this article has not been expanded in the last 10 days, It has been expanded 5x starting March 14. However, the hook source http://www.myfidnet.com/ is not valid. Large parts of the article are not sourced. —Mattisse (Talk) 02:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The problem with the link has been repaired. This is now a quite a long article and not all the refs are in place. Requires time. It's currently going for a DYK, not an FA. Amandajm (talk) 05:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refs are important way below FA level as well... Punkmorten (talk) 08:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Response I'm getting there. being now a longish article, it takes time to write and reference. The time frame for completing and referencing is indefinite. Having considerably expanded it, the time frame for putting it up for DYK is considerably shorter. That is the point that I am making here. Amandajm (talk) 08:44, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have some refs somewhere or other on my bookshelf as well, but there is alot going on all over the 'pedia currently. Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:44, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The new link verifies the hook. —Mattisse (Talk) 16:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My Friend Flicka (TV series)

ALT... that the CBS western TV series My Friend Flicka produced only 39 episodes but aired for years on numerous networks in reruns?

5x expanded by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 17:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and first hook verified, although the site is a little strange as only some things are "verified" on it . Could not verify second hook. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chilkat weaving

  • ... that Tsimshian, Tlingit, and Haida tribes traditionally create ceremonial regalia with Chilkat weaving, a technique so complex that a single blanket might take a year to weave?

Created by Uyvsdi (talk). Self nom at 18:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Off line book source for hook accepted on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 19:05, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hook is 231 characters. —Mattisse (Talk) 19:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about the length. Do I resubmit it or do you just chose from either suggested, alternative hooks? Both seem quite good and concise. -Uyvsdi (talk) 20:33, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]
  • - Length, date, source, hook all check out. I agree, alt 1 is better for a more general audience. FingersOnRoids♫ 21:41, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BlogShares

Created by Gary King (talk). Self nom at 17:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Off line newspaper source for hook accepted on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 19:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Harvard Girl

Created by Rjanag (talk). Self nom at 16:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Verified article length and that article moved from user space on March 17. However, re Hook1 the reference does not say that Liu Yiting became a national superstar in China. http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/12/31/in_china_ivy_league_dreams_weigh_heavily_on_students/ Re Hook2, article says "The book also had an impact on admissions for Harvard. It made Harvard a household name in China, and books of this genre caused a significant increase in the number of Chinese applicants to top American universities.[1] In 1999, when Liu applied to Harvard, a total of 44 Chinese students applied there; in 2008, 484 did." Therefore, hook2 is not in article. Please show me if I am wrong. —Mattisse (Talk) 02:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The particular wording "national superstar" is on page 2 of the Boston Globe ref (so if you did a page search just on the first page, you wouldn't have found it). The other refs don't use that exact phrase, but all say pretty much the same thing. As for hook2, I was just considering it simple math; I figured "tenfold" is catchier and hookier than giving the exact numbers. If it's a problem, I can reword the article itself to say tenfold rather than repeating the exact numbers; either way is fine with me. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 02:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The way 'national superstar' is used in the article is not an assertion the reference is making. It is a quote from an apparent interview of a Liu-counterpart. Not sure if that helps. Law shoot! 04:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, but they're quoting a guy saying something that is widely known and accepted; it's not like he's trying to puff her up more or anything, he's just stating what is common knowledge over there. For more similar refs that are not quotes from people: "household name" (Harvard Crimson), "huge celebrity" (New York Times), "celebrity status" (Harvard Magazine). The claim this hook is making is not a controversial one, and I can easily switch out "national superstar" for one of these equivalent counterparts from a different source. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 05:15, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, if you read through the article, you can see that, while the exact phrase "national superstar" might be a quote from a person rather than from the article writer, the article itself is also making the same assertion, just in different words. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 05:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

USCGC Citrus (WLB-300)

Created/expanded by KudzuVine (talk). Self nom at 13:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Both hooks verified, I prefer the first. Gatoclass (talk) 23:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd suggest adding "ship" between smuggling and MV. JKBrooks85 (talk) 03:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I put "ship" in. KudzuVine (talk) 15:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Against All Odds (2005)

Created/expanded by Wrestlinglover (talk). Self nom at 04:07, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, doesn't bother me any. I forgot to be more out of universe.--WillC---(What the F*** have you done lately???!!) 20:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length, date and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 13:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Older nominations

Articles created/expanded on March 16

St Bernard's Hospital

St Bernard's Hospital

Created/expanded by Gibnews (talk). Nominated by Gibmetal77 (talk) at 22:42, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The picture provided for the nom is not in the article. This picture is in the article, clearly shows the hospital, and is much prettier in my opinion. Shubinator (talk) 23:10, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the comment. I chose the picture above as I was planning on changing it just after. Please feel free to change it if you so wish, either one is acceptable. Thanks, --Gibmetal 77talk 11:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length, date, and source for hook verified. —Mattisse (Talk) 19:59, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pei Ji (Late Tang)

Created by Nlu (talk). Self nom at 18:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Hook is questionable since it references a book Zizhi Tongjian "published in 1084, under the form of a chronicles". —Mattisse (Talk) 21:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Would this alt hook do?
  • The obscure phrase "reassessed the formula for cash-goods conversion" turns out to mean "reassessed the value of goods used to pay taxes", so I suggest substituting that phrase. Art LaPella (talk) 02:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, the article doesn't say "taxable goods". It says "Further, if the people were to submit the products of labor to satisfy their taxes, the conversion formulas into cash were still the ones set early in Emperor Dezong's reign, when those goods cost less in terms of monetary value; therefore, by the time that Pei was chancellor, the burdens of the people were inappropriately high." So it was a primitive barter economy where farmers were likely to pay tax in the form of rice (or whatever they had) because they had no money. The goods were payment for the tax; the goods weren't taxed themselves. Art LaPella (talk) 02:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'll propose another alternative myself:
  • Length and date verified. Source for hook accepted on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 20:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Amelia Van Buren

Created/expanded by JNW (talk). Nominated by Raul654 (talk) at 17:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Great new article by JNW.Raul654 (talk) 17:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length and history verified, offline ref accepted in good faith. I'd suggest the following hook:
  • ALT1 ... that the woman depicted in the painting Miss Amelia Van Buren (pictured) was one of artist Thomas Eakins' most gifted students? rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 18:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Shouldn't the title be in italics? Circeus (talk) 23:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hobo News, International Brotherhood Welfare Association

Cover of the Hobo News
  • ALT1:... that in the early 20th century there were two American newspapers called Hobo News?

Created by Apoc2400 (talk). Nominated by Rjanag (talk) at 13:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(takes care of the problem of no mention of the IBWA) —Mattisse (Talk) 21:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, I found it a bit weird, but I've just been using it as a convenient way to access what otherwise seems like a real journal article. I guess I could go looking for the actual article in a database somewhere, if something lights a fire under me. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 22:31, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article exists at least, see [6] and scroll down to Dodge, Chris. I don't think there is anything supported only by that reference in any case. --Apoc2400 (talk) 23:20, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ALT3:... that in the early 20th century there were two American newspapers called Hobo News, one published by the IBWA, a mutual aid society for migratory workers (cover pictured)? --Apoc2400 (talk) 13:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

St Philip's Church, Hove

Created by Hassocks5489 (talk). Self nom at 21:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Off line book source for hook accepted on good faith. --—Mattisse (Talk) 23:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Davy Crockett (TV series)

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 21:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Considered by whom? Not stated in the article either. Also some concern over the reliability of the sources used aside from the one used to support this fact. —97198 (talk) 12:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Correction made Billy Hathorn (talk) 15:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length and date verified. Book source for hook accepted on good faith. —Mattisse (Talk) 20:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (TV series)

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 21:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Article is too short - only 1351 characters. It must be at least 1500. —Mattisse (Talk) 19:38, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It may be 1500 now.Billy Hathorn (talk) 21:36, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. The hook source does not say this was Harpo Marx's final TV appearance, that I could find. —Mattisse (Talk) 20:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
* alt ... that the 1962 ABC sitcom Mr. Smith Goes to Washington featured a television appearance by the pantomime artist Harpo Marx?

Dante (TV series)

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 21:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Article is too short - only 1160 characters. It must be at least 1500. —Mattisse (Talk) 19:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to expand it to 1500 characters.Billy Hathorn (talk) 17:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • No inline citation for this fact, and the only things that could remotely be considered citations for it (although they're still too far away) are IMDB pages. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 18:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 15

Rodeo in the United States

Created by Buttermilk1950 (talk). Nominated by Una Smith (talk) at 14:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date and length check out. Hook is in the article, but is not specifically sourced. Also, the article recently received a {{POV}} tag from me and may not be suitable for the front page as it is unbalanced. ++Lar: t/c 19:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Footnote 54 is expository text clarifying why another event is not "first"... but as is our practice at DYK, cite to printed source including page number (noted as the same cite as before, just moved to a different location in the sentence) accepted. So, hook, length and source checked out. Article still has major POV issues, but it is technically not disqualified. ++Lar: t/c 23:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kadettangen

Created by Punkmorten (talk). Self nom at 21:17, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Of course the entire paragraph is covered by ref 2. I added another ref tag, though. Punkmorten (talk) 10:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Offline, Norwegian ref accepted in good faith, length and history good. The paragraph had three different footnotes throughout it so I wasn't totally sure which stuff (out of the stuff without a direct citation) came from which one. Better now, though. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 13:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alla (song)

5x expanded by Grk1011 (talk). Self nom at 00:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yu Di

  • ... that the Tang Dynasty chancellor lost his chancellorship in a scandal where he tried to use bribes to obtain a Jiedushi (military governor) position?

Created by Nlu (talk). Self nom at 02:12, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oops; missed his name accidentally. --Nlu (talk) 10:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length and date verified. Unfortunately, I could not find the hook in the article although there was discussion of bribes. Also, the hook in the article must have a reference directly after it, even if it means repeating a reference further down in the paragraph. —Mattisse (Talk) 17:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's the entire second paragraph of the section "After return to Chang'an" with the hook intending to summarize the entire paragraph. --Nlu (talk) 18:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barryville–Shohola Bridge

Created by Mitchazenia (talk). Self nom at 00:24, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. I could not verify the hook as there is no place in the article that says the first three spans were built by the same person. Also, why is that unusual? —Mattisse (Talk) 01:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Its spread through the "First Two Spans" and "The Third Span" as it lists Chauncey Thomas (d. 1882) having done the first three in one way or another. Also, does it always happen when the same person has to build and rebuild the same bridge three times?Mitch32(Go Syracuse) 09:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Many bridges have more than one span, so in those cases it would not be unusual. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:48, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • This bridge has had to be built five times once in 1854, once in 1859, once in 1866, once in 1941, and once in 2007. There's only one span, and its the same bridge.Mitch32(Go Syracuse) 09:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Would you be willing to clarify this in the hook? Perhaps using a less ambiguous word than "span" would help. —Mattisse (Talk) 17:05, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trinity Episcopal Church (Columbia, South Carolina)

Created by KudzuVine (talk). Self nom at 16:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I meant to include one similar to Alt 1, but forgot. Thank you. KudzuVine (talk) 21:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Length, reference and history verified for alt 1. Daniel Case (talk) 13:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reduced relative clause

Created by Rjanag (talk). Self nom at 16:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: The image wouldn't show up well at 100x100px (although it might still encourage people to click on it and get a better look). I'm assuming we probably won't be able to use it, but if anyone does think it would be ok to use, let me know so I can put in a request at WP:GL/I to have it vectorized.rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 16:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image notwithstanding, length and history verified and offline ref accepted IGF. Daniel Case (talk) 13:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Laugh-Out-Loud Cats

Laugh-Out-Loud Cats #736

Created/expanded by Ragesoss (talk). Self nom at 03:39, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Verified. The source might qualify as SPS, but I believe that is permissible in this case since it's about the comic's overt influences. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 03:59, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 14

Cyclone Joni (2009)

  • ... that the name Joni was retired, after its previous use?

Created by Jason Rees (talk). Self nom at 02:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me im not quite sure what the issue is as pages 28 -30 of that document does verify, that the name was used in and retired after the 1992-93 South Pacific Cyclone season. Also 1992 and 1993 PTS will not mention a Cyclone Joni as its not relevant to their articles, however it is relevant to the 1990–1995 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone seasons and has a section Also 1997-98 SPAC does not mention a Cyclone Joni as the name was not used in that year Jason Rees (talk) 21:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • For your new hook, you need to verify 1.) that the name "Joni" was retired after the 1992–93 South Pacific cyclone season, 2.) that nonetheless it remained on the naming lists, and 3.) that the reason it remained on the lists is unknown. Are there references in your article already? —Mattisse (Talk) 20:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thats all backed up by 2008's Tropical Cyclone Operational Plan which is linked to in the article - and yes their are references in my article :) Jason Rees (talk) 23:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The infomation is in the article Ed :} - it just may not be clear enough, which i will try and fix Jason Rees (talk) 19:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sloat's Dam and Mill Pond

I wasn't sure where I was lengthwise, so I left "Rockland County" out. I'll put it back in. I would have said "upper Ramapo River" but that would be technically incorrect since Village of Monroe Historic District uses a picture of another old dam much further upriver. Daniel Case (talk) 16:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 13

Ahmad Salama Mabruk

  • Length and date verified. Could not find hook in article; found pieces of each hook but not all of either hook. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The first one is out of order, but the second one is all there. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 04:37, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jelgava Palace

Mitava Palace
Mitava Palace

Created by Wikiolap (talk). Self nom at 04:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date and source for hook verified if this statement means there were 21 sacophagi: "The Duke Wilhelm’s wife Sophie who died in 1610 also had been buried in Kuldīga castle church was completed; there was a cellar beneath it for the Dukes’ sarcophagi. The cellar premise was about 9 m wide, with a free passage in the middle and covered by a barrel vault. In 1587, the Duke Gotthard was the first to be buried there; 24 members of the Kettler family were buried until 1737." —Mattisse (Talk) 00:24, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Your article says "Of a special historical interest, there is the burial vault of the Dukes of Curland in the south-east basement. It contains 30 buried members of Kettler family - 21 Sarcophagus and 9 wodden coffins. The burials were made from 1569 to 1791." Who are the Kettler family? Perhaps you could come up with a better hook? —Mattisse (Talk) 00:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    ... that a Latvian agricultural school occupies Mitava Palace where Louis XVIII of France lived for four years and where all the Dukes of Courland are buried? --Ghirla-трёп- 20:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Special occasion holding area

Articles created/expanded for April Fool's Day 2009 (April 1)

Please suggest hooks at Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know, not here. Royalbroil 14:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded for Orthodox Easter (April 19)

Anastasios Christodoulou

Created by Jack1956 (talk). Self nom at 11:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alt ... that Greek Cypriot academic Anastasios Christodoulou was named 'Anastasios' ('Resurrection') by his parents as he was born on Easter Day? Jack1956 (talk) 11:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • My mistake...I substantially expanded the article but forgot to change the rating. Now corrected. Jack1956 (talk) 22:41, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If we were going to use the 2nd hook might we save this article for Orthodox Easter 2009 (April 19)? --Boston (talk) 01:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Let's. That's the only way it would become interesting enough ... I'm sure he's not the only Anastasios in the world who got that name from being born on Easter. Daniel Case (talk) 15:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See also