Jump to content

Economy of India: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot (talk | contribs)
m Reverting possible vandalism by 67.180.5.41 to older version. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot. (512771) (Bot)
Undid revision 262404525 by ClueBot (talk) clubot report doesn't work
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Economy of India infobox}}
{{Economy of India infobox}}
The '''economy of [[India]]''', measured in terms of [[purchasing power parity]] (PPP), is the world's [[List of countries by GDP (PPP)|fourth largest]] with a GDP of approximately [[US$]]3 trillion (2007).<ref>https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2001rank.html</ref><ref>http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2008/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?sy=2007&ey=2007&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=512%2C446%2C914%2C666%2C612%2C668%2C614%2C672%2C311%2C946%2C213%2C137%2C911%2C962%2C193%2C674%2C122%2C676%2C912%2C548%2C313%2C556%2C419%2C678%2C513%2C181%2C316%2C682%2C913%2C684%2C124%2C273%2C339%2C921%2C638%2C948%2C514%2C943%2C218%2C686%2C963%2C688%2C616%2C518%2C223%2C728%2C516%2C558%2C918%2C138%2C748%2C196%2C618%2C278%2C522%2C692%2C622%2C694%2C156%2C142%2C624%2C449%2C626%2C564%2C628%2C283%2C228%2C853%2C924%2C288%2C233%2C293%2C632%2C566%2C636%2C964%2C634%2C182%2C238%2C453%2C662%2C968%2C960%2C922%2C423%2C714%2C935%2C862%2C128%2C716%2C611%2C456%2C321%2C722%2C243%2C942%2C248%2C718%2C469%2C724%2C253%2C576%2C642%2C936%2C643%2C961%2C939%2C813%2C644%2C199%2C819%2C184%2C172%2C524%2C132%2C361%2C646%2C362%2C648%2C364%2C915%2C732%2C134%2C366%2C652%2C734%2C174%2C144%2C328%2C146%2C258%2C463%2C656%2C528%2C654%2C923%2C336%2C738%2C263%2C578%2C268%2C537%2C532%2C742%2C944%2C866%2C176%2C369%2C534%2C744%2C536%2C186%2C429%2C925%2C178%2C746%2C436%2C926%2C136%2C466%2C343%2C112%2C158%2C111%2C439%2C298%2C916%2C927%2C664%2C846%2C826%2C299%2C542%2C582%2C443%2C474%2C917%2C754%2C544%2C698%2C941&s=PPPGDP&grp=0&a=&pr.x=48&pr.y=17</ref><ref>http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GDP_PPP.pdf</ref> When measured in terms of [[exchange rate]], it has the world's [[List of countries by GDP (nominal)|twelfth largest]] economy with a GDP (nominal) of US$1.2 trillion (2007).<ref>http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601091&sid=aK2ccLqM2xhQ&refer=india"</ref> It recorded a GDP growth rate of 9.1% for the fiscal year 2007–2008, making it the world's second-fastest growing major economy.<ref name="gdp-growthrate">{{cite news | title=India Defies Turmoil With Growth of 8.8% | date= May 31, 2007 | publisher=MarketWatch | url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121213639165032371.html?mod=googlenews_wsj}}</ref> However, due to the current [[Late 2000s recession|global economic crisis]], India's economic growth is expected to slow down to 6.7% in 2009.<ref>http://www.rediff.com/money/2008/nov/10bcrisis-goldman-cuts-india-growth-forecast.htm</ref> Despite sustained [[economic development in India|economic development]] over the past decade, India continues to battle [[poverty in India|widespread poverty]].<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7556489.stm</ref> India's [[population of India|population]] of 1.2 billion, the world's [[List of countries by population|second largest]], has an estimated [[per capita]] income of US$3,963, measured by PPP, and US$941, measured in nominal terms, {{As of|2007|lc=on}}.


India's economy is diverse and consist of various activities including manufacturing, agriculture and services. Although most of the Indian workforce still earns its livelihood directly or indirectly through agriculture and manufacturing, high tech services are a growing sector and play an increasingly important role in India's economy. The advent of the digital age, and the large number of young and educated populace fluent in English, is gradually transforming India as an important 'back office' destination for global [[outsourcing]] of [[customer service]]s and technical support. India is a major exporter of highly-skilled workers in software and financial services, and [[software engineering]]. Other sectors like [[manufacturing]], [[telecommunication]], [[shipbuilding]], [[aviation]] , [[tourism]] and [[retailing]] are showing strong potentials with higher growth rates.
The [[economy of India]] has a [[Economic history of India|long history]]. It has followed a [[socialist]]-inspired policies for most of its independent history, which have included extensive public ownership, regulation, [[red tape]], and [[trade barrier]]s collectively known as [[License Raj]]. India developed at [[Hindu rate of growth|substantially slower pace]] than many other Asian countries and slipped in rankings.<ref name="oecd"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/50yrs/kapur.htm|title=Industry passing through phase of transition|publisher=The Tribune}}</ref> After sliding into near bankruptcy, India launched [[Economic liberalization in India|fundamental reforms in 1991]] and has progressed towards a market-based system.<ref name="oecd"/><ref>{{web cite|url=http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Why_believe_in_India_1663|title=Why believe in India|author=Ranjit V. Pandit|publisher=McKinsey|year=2005}}</ref>


India followed a [[socialist]]-inspired approach for most of its independent history, with strict government control over [[private sector]] participation, [[foreign trade]], and [[foreign direct investment]]. However, since the early 1990s, India has gradually opened up its markets through [[Economic reforms in India|economic reforms]] by reducing government controls on foreign trade and investment. The [[privatisation]] of publicly owned industries and the opening up of certain sectors to private and foreign interests has proceeded slowly amid political debate.
In the late 2000s, India's growth has reached 7.5%, which will double the average income in a decade.<ref name="oecd"/> [[McKinsey]] states that removing main obstacles "would free India’s economy to grow as fast as China’s, at 10 percent a year".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://business.indian-network.de/artikel/The%20McKinsey%20Quarterly-%20India-From%20emerging%20to%20surging.pdf|title=The McKinsey Quarterly: India—From emerging to surging|publisher=The McKinsey Quarterly|2001}}</ref> The [[World Bank]] suggests that the most important priorities are public sector reform, infrastructure, agricultural and rural development, removal of labor regulations, reforms in lagging states, and HIV/AIDS.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.worldbank.org.in/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/SOUTHASIAEXT/INDIAEXTN/0,,contentMDK:20195738~menuPK:295591~pagePK:141137~piPK:141127~theSitePK:295584,00.html|title=India Country Overview 2008|publisher=World Bank}}</ref> In India's federal system, states have large responsibilities in setting their policies. The annualized 1999-2008 growth rates for [[Gujarat]] (8.8%), [[Haryana]] (8.7%), or [[Delhi]] (7.4%) were significantly higher than for [[Bihar]] (5.1%), [[Uttar Pradesh]] (4.4%), or [[Madhya Pradesh]] (3.5%).<ref name="lakshmi"/> India is the [[List of countries by GDP (nominal)|twelfth-largest]] economy in the world and the [[List of countries by GDP (PPP)|fourth largest]] by purchasing power parity adjusted exchange rates (PPP). On per capita basis, it ranks [[List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita|128th]] in the world or [[List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita|118th]] by PPP.


India faces a fast-growing population and the challenge of reducing economic and social [[Economic inequality|inequality]]. [[Poverty]] remains a serious problem, although it has declined significantly since independence.
India has a rising middle class which affords consumer goods such as bicycles (around 40% of households<ref name="bicycles">{{cite web|url=http://www.bike-eu.com/news/1573/bicycle-ownership-in-india.html|title=Bicycle Ownership in India}}</ref>) and motorcycles (around 10% of households<ref name="bicycles"/>). Nevertheless, a large proportion of the population [[poverty in India|is poor]] as most people in India live on less than two purchasing power adjusted dollars a day. Half of children are underweight, nearly double that of Sub-Saharan Africa.<ref name="underweight"/> In terms of occupation, two-thirds of the Indian workforce earn their livelihood directly or indirectly through [[agriculture]] in rural villages. [[Green Revolution]] has improved yields significantly and India has not experienced famines since the early 1970s. As a proportion of GDP, towns and cities make over two thirds of the Indian economy. Service markets which now enjoy much lighter burden of regulation and other obstacles have been most successful, for instance, [[Communications in India|communications]] and world-famous [[Business process outsourcing in India|business process services]].<ref name="oecd">{{cite web|url=http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/52/39452196.pdf|title=Economic survey of India 2007: Policy Brief|publisher=[[OECD]]}}</ref><ref name = BMJ>{{cite journal |last=Mudur |first=Ganapati |year= 2004|month=June |title=Hospitals in India woo foreign patients |journal=[[British Medical Journal]] |volume=328 |issue= |pages=1338 |id= |doi= 10.1136/bmj.328.7452.1338 |pmid=15178611}}</ref> In terms of jobs, textiles are the largest sector after agriculture.

India's trade has risen from 6% of GDP in 1985 to 24% in 2006, which is still moderate.<ref name="oecd"/><ref name="Trade">{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2008/04/18/stories/2008041850551000.htm|title=Rise in Indian services exports less than global average: WTO|date=2008-04-18|accessdate=2008-11-16|author=G. Srinivasan|publisher=[[The Hindu Business Line]]}}</ref> India's share of world trade is around 1%, compared with 0.5% in 1991.<ref name="hobble"/> Textiles, jewellery, engineering goods and software are major export commodities while crude oil, machineries, fertilizers, and chemicals are major imports.


==History==
==History==
Line 32: Line 31:
The impact of the British rule on India's economy is a controversial topic. While leaders of the [[Indian independence movement]], and left-nationalist [[economic history|economic historians]] have blamed colonial rule for the dismal state of India's economy in its aftermath, right-wing historians have countered that India's economic performance was due to various sectors being in a state of growth and decline, resulting from changes brought about by colonialism and a world that was moving towards industrialization and [[economic integration]].<ref name="roy-1">{{cite book|author=Roy, Tirthankar|title=The Economic History of India|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2000|isbn=0-19-565154-5|page=304|chapter=10}}</ref>
The impact of the British rule on India's economy is a controversial topic. While leaders of the [[Indian independence movement]], and left-nationalist [[economic history|economic historians]] have blamed colonial rule for the dismal state of India's economy in its aftermath, right-wing historians have countered that India's economic performance was due to various sectors being in a state of growth and decline, resulting from changes brought about by colonialism and a world that was moving towards industrialization and [[economic integration]].<ref name="roy-1">{{cite book|author=Roy, Tirthankar|title=The Economic History of India|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2000|isbn=0-19-565154-5|page=304|chapter=10}}</ref>


===Independence to 1991===
===Independence to 1991===
[[File:Farming haryana.jpg|thumb|The [[green revolution in India|green revolution]] during the late [[1960s]] resulted in significant increase in agricultural production across India.<ref>http://countrystudies.us/india/104.htm</ref>]]

Indian [[economic policy]] after [[Indian independence movement|independence]] was influenced by the colonial experience (which was seen by Indian leaders as exploitative in nature) and by those leaders' exposure to [[Fabian socialism]]. Policy tended towards [[protectionist|protectionism]], with a strong emphasis on [[import substitution]], [[industrialization]], [[state intervention]] in labor and financial markets, a large public sector, business regulation, and [[central planning]].<ref name="kirit-1">{{cite paper | author=Kelegama, Saman and Parikh, Kirit|title=Political Economy of Growth and Reforms in South Asia|year=2000|version=Second Draft|url=http://www.eldis.org/static/DOC12473.htm}}</ref> [[Five-Year Plans of India]] resembled central planning in the [[Soviet Union]]. Steel, mining, machine tools, water, telecommunications, insurance, and electrical plants, among other industries, were effectively nationalized in the mid-1950s.<ref name="staley">{{cite web|url=http://www.reason.com/news/show/36682.html|title=The Rise and Fall of Indian Socialism: Why India embraced economic reform|author=Sam Staley|year=2006}}</ref> Elaborate licences, regulations and the accompanying [[red tape]], commonly referred to as [[Licence Raj]], were required to set up business in [[India]] between 1947 and 1990.<ref>[http://www.swaminomics.org/articles/20011125_streethawking.htm Street Hawking Promise Jobs in Future], [[The Times of India]], [[2001-11-25]]</ref>
Indian [[economic policy]] after [[Indian independence movement|independence]] was influenced by the colonial experience (which was seen by Indian leaders as exploitative in nature) and by those leaders' exposure to [[Fabian socialism]]. Policy tended towards [[protectionist|protectionism]], with a strong emphasis on [[import substitution]], [[industrialization]], [[state intervention]] in labor and financial markets, a large public sector, business regulation, and [[central planning]].<ref name="kirit-1">{{cite paper | author=Kelegama, Saman and Parikh, Kirit|title=Political Economy of Growth and Reforms in South Asia|year=2000|version=Second Draft|url=http://www.eldis.org/static/DOC12473.htm}}</ref> [[Jawaharlal Nehru]], the first [[prime minister of India|prime minister]], along with the statistician [[Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis]], carried on by [[Indira Gandhi]] formulated and oversaw economic policy. They expected favorable outcomes from this strategy, because it involved both public and private sectors and was based on direct and indirect state intervention, rather than the more extreme [[Economy of the Soviet Union|Soviet-style]] central command system.<ref name="Cameron-1">{{cite paper|author=Cameron, John and Ndhlovu, P Tidings|title=Cultural Influences on Economic Thought in India: Resistance to diffusion of neo-classical economics and the principles of Hinduism|year=2001|url=http://www.economicissues.org/archive/pdfs/5v6p2.PDF|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20060823161225/http://www.economicissues.org/archive/pdfs/5v6p2.PDF|archivedate=2006-08-23|format=PDF}}</ref> The policy of concentrating simultaneously on capital- and technology-intensive [[heavy industry]] and subsidizing manual, low-skill [[cottage industries]] was criticized by economist [[Milton Friedman]], who thought it would waste capital and labour, and retard the development of small manufacturers.<ref name="milton-1">{{cite web|title=Milton Friedman on the Nehru/Mahalanobis Plan|url=http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/Notes/fried_opinion.html| accessdate = 2005-07-16}}</ref>

[[Jawaharlal Nehru]], the first [[prime minister of India|prime minister]], along with the statistician [[Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis]], carried on by [[Indira Gandhi]] formulated and oversaw economic policy. They expected favorable outcomes from this strategy, because it involved both public and private sectors and was based on direct and indirect state intervention, rather than the more extreme [[Economy of the Soviet Union|Soviet-style]] central command system.<ref name="Cameron-1">{{cite paper|author=Cameron, John and Ndhlovu, P Tidings|title=Cultural Influences on Economic Thought in India: Resistance to diffusion of neo-classical economics and the principles of Hinduism|year=2001|url=http://www.economicissues.org/archive/pdfs/5v6p2.PDF|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20060823161225/http://www.economicissues.org/archive/pdfs/5v6p2.PDF|archivedate=2006-08-23|format=PDF}}</ref> The policy of concentrating simultaneously on capital- and technology-intensive [[heavy industry]] and subsidizing manual, low-skill [[cottage industries]] was criticized by economist [[Milton Friedman]], who thought it would waste capital and labour, and retard the development of small manufacturers.<ref name="milton-1">{{cite web|title=Milton Friedman on the Nehru/Mahalanobis Plan|url=http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/Notes/fried_opinion.html| accessdate = 2005-07-16}}</ref>


India's low average growth rate from 1947–80 was derisively referred to as the [[Hindu rate of growth]], because of the unfavourable comparison with growth rates in other Asian countries, especially the [[Four Asian Tigers|"East Asian Tigers"]].<ref name="williamson-1"/>
India's low average growth rate from 1947–80 was derisively referred to as the [[Hindu rate of growth]], because of the unfavourable comparison with growth rates in other Asian countries, especially the [[Four Asian Tigers|"East Asian Tigers"]].<ref name="williamson-1"/>

[[File:Annadatha.jpg|thumb|The global [[Green Revolution]] [[green revolution in India|arrived in India]] during the late [[1960s]], resulting in significant increase in agricultural production across India.<ref>http://countrystudies.us/india/104.htm</ref>]]
The [[Rockefeller Foundation]]'s research in [[hybrid seed|high-yielding varieties of seeds]], their introduction after 1965 and the increased use of [[fertilizers]] and [[irrigation]] are known collectively as the [[Green Revolution]], which provided the increase in production needed to make India self-sufficient in food grains, thus improving [[agriculture in India]]. [[Famine in India]], once accepted as inevitable, has not returned since the introduction of Green Revolution crops.


===After 1991===
===After 1991===
[[Image:Ind school of business.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Major improvements in educational standards across India has helped its economic rise. Shown here is the [[Indian School of Business]] at [[Hyderabad, India|Hyderabad]], ranked number 20 in global MBA rankings by the ''[[Financial Times]]'' of London in 2008<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.livemint.com/2008/01/29001824/Indian-School-of-Business-plac.html |title=Indian School of Business placed 20th in global Top 100 rankings - livemint |publisher=Livemint.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref>]]
{{main article|Economic liberalization in India}}

In the late 80s, the government led by [[Rajiv Gandhi]] eased restrictions on capacity expansion for incumbents, removed price controls and reduced corporate taxes. While this increased the rate of growth, it also led to high fiscal deficits and a worsening current account. The collapse of the [[Soviet Union]], which was India's major trading partner, and the [[Gulf War|first Gulf War]], which caused a spike in oil prices, caused a major balance-of-payments crisis for India, which found itself facing the prospect of defaulting on its loans.<ref name = "Ghosh"> {{cite paper
In the late 80s, the government led by [[Rajiv Gandhi]] eased restrictions on capacity expansion for incumbents, removed price controls and reduced corporate taxes. While this increased the rate of growth, it also led to high fiscal deficits and a worsening current account. The collapse of the [[Soviet Union]], which was India's major trading partner, and the [[Gulf War|first Gulf War]], which caused a spike in oil prices, caused a major balance-of-payments crisis for India, which found itself facing the prospect of defaulting on its loans.<ref name = "Ghosh"> {{cite paper
| last = Ghosh
| last = Ghosh
Line 53: Line 46:
| date= 2004-06-01
| date= 2004-06-01
| url =http://www.globaleconomicgovernance.org/docs/Ghosh%20-%20India.pdf
| url =http://www.globaleconomicgovernance.org/docs/Ghosh%20-%20India.pdf
| accessdate = 2007-10-02|format=PDF}}</ref> In response, Prime Minister [[Narasimha Rao]] along with his finance minister [[Manmohan Singh]] initiated the [[Economic reforms in India|economic liberalisation of 1991]]. The reforms did away with the [[Licence Raj]] (investment, industrial and import licensing) and ended many public monopolies, allowing automatic approval of [[foreign direct investment]] in many sectors.<ref name="arvind">{{cite paper | author=Panagariya, Arvind | title=India in the 1980s and 1990s: A Triumph of Reforms | year=2004 | url=http://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpit/0403005.html}}</ref> Since then, the overall direction of liberalisation has remained the same, irrespective of the ruling party, although no party has tried to take on powerful lobbies such as the [[trade unions]] and farmers, or contentious issues such as reforming labour laws and reducing agricultural subsidies.<ref name="Gandhi-1">{{cite news | title=That old Gandhi magic | date= November 27, 1997 | publisher=The Economist | url=http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=107076}}</ref> Since 1990 India has emerged as one of the wealthiest economies in the developing world; during this period, the economy has grown constantly, but with a few major setbacks. This has been accompanied by increases in life expectancy, literacy rates and food security.
| accessdate = 2007-10-02|format=PDF}}</ref> India asked for a $1.8 billion bailout loan from [[IMF]], which in return demanded reforms.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://harrisschool.uchicago.edu/News/press-releases/IPP%20Economic%20Reform%20in%20India.pdf|title=Economic reforms in India: Task force report|year=2006}}</ref>

In response, Prime Minister [[Narasimha Rao]] along with his finance minister [[Manmohan Singh]] initiated the [[Economic reforms in India|economic liberalisation of 1991]]. The reforms did away with the [[Licence Raj]] (investment, industrial and import licensing) and ended many public monopolies, allowing automatic approval of [[foreign direct investment]] in many sectors.<ref name="arvind">{{cite paper | author=Panagariya, Arvind | title=India in the 1980s and 1990s: A Triumph of Reforms | year=2004 | url=http://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpit/0403005.html}}</ref> Since then, the overall direction of liberalisation has remained the same, irrespective of the ruling party, although no party has tried to take on powerful lobbies such as the [[trade unions]] and farmers, or contentious issues such as reforming labour laws and reducing agricultural subsidies.<ref name="Gandhi-1">{{cite news | title=That old Gandhi magic | date= November 27, 1997 | publisher=The Economist | url=http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=107076}}</ref> Since 1990 India has emerged as one of the fastest-growing economies in the developing world; during this period, the economy has grown constantly, but with a few major setbacks. This has been accompanied by increases in life expectancy, literacy rates and food security.


While the credit rating of India was hit by its nuclear tests in 1998, it has been raised to investment level in 2007 by S&P and Moody's.<ref>http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2003/02/10/stories/2003021000040900.htm</ref> In 2003, [[Goldman Sachs]] predicted that India's GDP in current prices will overtake France and Italy by 2020, Germany, UK and Russia by 2025 and Japan by 2035. By 2035, it was projected to be the third largest economy of the world, behind US and China.<ref name = GoldmanSach>{{cite web|last=Wilson|first=Dominic|coauthors=Purushothaman, Roopa|url=http://www2.goldmansachs.com/insight/research/reports/99.pdf|title=DreamingWith BRICs: The Path to 2050|publisher=[[Goldman Sachs]]|work=Global economics paper No. 99|date=2003-10-01|accessdate = 2007-10-04|format=PDF}}</ref><ref name="Indian economy 'to overtake UK'">{{cite web|first=Damian|last=Grammaticas |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/6294409.stm| title="Indian economy 'to overtake UK'"|publisher=BBC News|accessdate=2007-01-26}}</ref>
While the credit rating of India was hit by its nuclear tests in 1998, it has been raised to investment level in 2007 by S&P and Moody's.<ref>http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2003/02/10/stories/2003021000040900.htm</ref> In 2003, [[Goldman Sachs]] predicted that India's GDP in current prices will overtake France and Italy by 2020, Germany, UK and Russia by 2025 and Japan by 2035. By 2035, it was projected to be the third largest economy of the world, behind US and China.<ref name = GoldmanSach>{{cite web|last=Wilson|first=Dominic|coauthors=Purushothaman, Roopa|url=http://www2.goldmansachs.com/insight/research/reports/99.pdf|title=DreamingWith BRICs: The Path to 2050|publisher=[[Goldman Sachs]]|work=Global economics paper No. 99|date=2003-10-01|accessdate = 2007-10-04|format=PDF}}</ref><ref name="Indian economy 'to overtake UK'">{{cite web|first=Damian|last=Grammaticas |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/6294409.stm| title="Indian economy 'to overtake UK'"|publisher=BBC News|accessdate=2007-01-26}}</ref>
In the revised 2007 figures, based on increased and sustaining growth, more inflows into foreign direct investment, Goldman Sachs predicts that "from 2007 to 2020, India’s GDP per capita in US$ terms will quadruple", and that the Indian economy will surpass the [[United States]] (in US$) by 2043.<ref>[http://www.usindiafriendship.net/viewpoints1/Indias_Rising_Growth_Potential.pdf "India's Rising Growth Potential"]</ref>


==Government intervention==
In the revised 2007 figures, based on increased and sustaining growth, more inflows into foreign direct investment, Goldman Sachs predicts that "from 2007 to 2020, India’s GDP per capita in US$ terms will quadruple", and that the Indian economy will surpass the [[United States]] (in US$) by 2043.<ref>[http://www.usindiafriendship.net/viewpoints1/Indias_Rising_Growth_Potential.pdf "India's Rising Growth Potential"]</ref> Goldman Sachs has outlined 10 things that it needs to do in order to achieve its potential and grow 40 times by 2050. These are 1.improve governance 2.raise educational achievement 3.increase quality and quantity of universities 4.control inflation 5.introduce a credible fiscal policy 6.liberalize financial markets 7.increase trade with neighbours 8.increase agricultural productivity 9.improve infrastructure and 10.improve environmental quality.<ref>[http://specials.rediff.com/money/2008/jun/17slid01.htm The top 10 challenges for India], Rediff</ref>
===State planning and the mixed economy===
{{main|Five-Year Plans of India}}
[[Image:BSE.jpg|right|thumb|Asia's oldest stock exchange, the [[Bombay Stock Exchange]], is also Asia's fourth largest stock exchange in terms of market capitalization. The [[National Stock Exchange of India]] is Asia's fifth largest.<ref>http://www.world-exchanges.org/publications/EQU1108.pdf</ref> The government of India regulates stock exchanges across the country through Securities Contracts Act.]]
After independence, India opted for a centrally [[planned economy]] to try to achieve an effective and equitable allocation of national resources and balanced economic development. The process of formulation and direction of the [[Five-Year Plans of India|Five-Year Plans]] is carried out by the [[Planning Commission]], headed by the [[Prime Minister of India]] as its [[List of deputy chairpersons of the planning commission of India|chairperson]].<ref name="planning">{{cite web|title=History of the Planning Commission|url=http://planningcommission.nic.in/aboutus/history/about.htm| accessdate = 2005-07-22}}</ref>


India's [[mixed economy]] combines features of both capitalist market economy and the socialist planned economy, but has shifted more towards the former over the past decade. The public sector generally covers areas which are deemed too important or not profitable enough to leave to the market, including such services as the railways and postal system. Since independence, there have been phases of [[nationalizing]] such areas as banking. More recently, there have been phases of privatizing such sectors.<ref name="survey"/>
==Government==
{{main article|Government of India}}
{{see also|Taxation in India}}
[[Image:Private and public industry employment in India(2003).png|thumb|The number of people employed in non-agricultural occupations in the public and private sectors. Totals are rounded. Private sector data relates to non-agriculture establishments with 10 or more employees.<ref name="survey">{{cite web|title=Economic Survey 2004–2005|url=http://indiabudget.nic.in/es2004-05/esmain.htm| accessdate = 2006-07-15}}</ref>]]


===Public expenditure===
The current government has concluded that most spending fails to reach its intended recipients.<ref name="bajuraj"/> [[Lant Pritchett]] calls India's public sector "one of the world's top ten biggest problems - of the order of AIDS and climate change".<ref name="bajuraj">[http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10804248 India's civil service: Battling the babu raj] Mar 6th 2008 The [[Economist]]</ref>
[[Image:Private and public industry employment in India(2003).png|thumb|left|The number of people employed in non-agricultural occupations in the public and private sectors. Totals are rounded. Private sector data relates to non-agriculture establishments with 10 or more employees.<ref name="survey">{{cite web|title=Economic Survey 2004–2005|url=http://indiabudget.nic.in/es2004-05/esmain.htm| accessdate = 2006-07-15}}</ref>]]
India's [[public expenditure]] is classified as development expenditure, comprising central plan expenditure and central assistance and non-development expenditures; these categories can each be divided into [[Capital (economics)|capital]] expenditure and [[revenue]] expenditure. Central plan expenditure is allocated to development schemes outlined in the plans of the central government and public sector undertakings; central assistance refers to financial assistance and developmental loans given for plans of the state governments and [[union territories]]. Non-development capital expenditure comprises capital [[Military of India|defense]] expenditure, loans to public enterprises, states and union territories and foreign governments, while non-development revenue expenditure comprises revenue defence expenditure, administrative expenditure, [[subsidies]], [[debt]] relief to farmers, [[mail|postal]] [[deficit]], [[pension]]s, social and economic services (education, health, agriculture, science and technology), grants to states and union territories and foreign governments.<ref name="pubexpend">Public expenditure was classified as plan and non-plan expenditure in the 1987–1988 union budget. It is now referred to as development and non-development expenditure, but the definition remains the same. Development expenditure is a capital expenditure.</ref><ref name="Datt-18">{{cite book | author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. | title=Indian Economy | page = 943 | chapter = 55}}</ref><ref name="survey"/>


India's non-development revenue expenditure has increased nearly fivefold in 2003–04 since 1990–91 and more than tenfold since 1985–1986. Interest payments are the single largest item of expenditure and accounted for more than 40% of the total non development expenditure in the 2003–04 budget. Defence expenditure increased fourfold during the same period and has been increasing due to India's desire to project its military prowess beyond South Asia. In 2007, India's defence spending stood at US$26.5 billion.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23474033-23850,00.html |title=India's budget may backfire &#124; The Australian |publisher=Theaustralian.news.com.au |date=April 3, 2008 |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref> Administrative expenses are compounded by a large [[salary]] and [[pension]] bill, which rises periodically due to revisions in [[wage]]s, [[dearness allowance]] etc. [[subsidies]] on food, [[fertilizers]], education and [[petroleum]] and other merit and non-merit subsidies account are not only continuously rising, especially because of rising crude oil and food prices, but are also harder to rein in, because of political compulsions.<ref name="Datt-3">{{cite book|author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M.|title=Indian Economy|pages=943–945|chapter=55}}</ref><ref name="survey"/>
[[The Economist]]'s article about Indian civil service (2008) says that Indian central government employs around 3 million people and states another 7 million, including "vast armies of paper-shuffling peons"<ref name="bajuraj"/>. According to a government officer responsible for personnel, India has 80,000 "Category One" [[Indian Administrative Service]] (IAS) bureaucrats who make decisions.<ref name="bajuraj"/> Furthermore, the Economist writes that an elite of merely 5600 members "mostly runs India".<ref name="bajuraj"/> India is divided to 604 districts, size of small countries.<ref name="bajuraj"/> The Economist described how a district head officer spends 60% of his time dealing individual supplicants asking for things such as alms or firewood instead of larger issues.<ref name="bajuraj"/> Million dollar bureaucracies can be run without a single computer in the management.<ref name="bajuraj"/> At local level, administration can be worse. It is not unheard of that most state assembly seats are hold by convicted criminals.<ref>{{cite news
| title = Jo Johnson
| author = The criminalisation of Indian democracy
| publisher = [[Financial Times]]
| url = http://www.ft.com/cms/s/21d0f5f8-f8c1-11db-a940-000b5df10621.html
| date = [[May 2]] [[2007]]
| accessdate = 2007-05-12
}}</ref>
The Reserve Bank of India has warned that India's public-debt to GDP ratio is over 70 percent.<ref>[http://in.reuters.com/article/topNews/idINIndia-31225020080103 India is vulnerable to high public debt - RBI]. Reuters.</ref>


===Public receipts===
One study found out that 25% of public sector teachers and 40% of public sector medical workers could not be found at the workplace. Among teachers who were paid to teach, absence rates ranged from 15% in [[Maharashtra]] to 71% in [[Bihar]]. Only 1 in nearly 3000 public school head teachers had ever dismissed a teacher for repeated absence. Despite poorer absence rates, public sector teachers enjoy salaries at least five times higher than private sector teachers. India's absence rates are one of the worst in the world.<ref>[http://econ.ucsd.edu/~kamurali/teachers%20and%20medical%20worker%20incentives%20in%20india.pdf Teachers and Medical Worker Incentives in India by Karthik Muralidharan]</ref><ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/4051353.stm Combating India's truant teachers]. [[BBC]]</ref><ref name="KMuralidharan">[http://www.ncaer.org/downloads/lectures/popuppages/PressReleases/popuppages/PressReleases/7thNBER/KMuralidharan.pdf Private Schools in Rural India: Some Facts] (presentation) / [http://scripts.mit.edu/~varun_ag/readinggroup/images/d/dc/Public_and_Private_Schools_in_Rural_India.pdf Public and Private Schools in Rural India] (a paper). Karthik Muralidharan, Michael Kremer.</ref><ref>[http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/macarthur/inequality/papers/KremerTeacherAbsenceinIndia.pdf Teacher absence in India: A snapshot]</ref> A greater private sector role with means such as [[education vouchers]] has been proposed.<ref name="KMuralidharan"/>
[[Image:SBImumbai.jpg|thumb|Regional office of the [[State Bank of India]] (SBI), India's largest bank, in Mumbai. The government of India is the largest shareholder in SBI.]]
India has a three-tier tax structure, wherein the [[Constitution of India|constitution]] empowers the [[Government of India|union government]] to levy [[income tax]], tax on capital transactions ([[wealth tax]], [[inheritance tax]]), [[sales tax]], service tax, [[customs]] and [[excise]] duties and the [[States and territories of India|state governments]] to levy sales tax on intrastate sale of goods, tax on [[entertainment tax|entertainment]] and [[profession]]s, excise duties on manufacture of [[alcoholic beverage|alcohol]], [[stamp duty|stamp duties]] on transfer of property and collect land revenue (levy on land owned). The [[local governments]] are empowered by the state government to levy [[property tax]] and charge users for [[public utilities]] like [[water supply]], [[sewage]] etc.<ref name="jk">Service tax and expenditure tax are not levied in Jammu and Kashmir; Intra-state sale happens when goods or the [[Title (property)|title]] of goods move from one state to another.</ref><ref name="angela">{{cite paper | author=Bernardi, Luigi and Fraschini, Angela | title=Tax System And Tax Reforms In India | year=2005 | version=Working paper n. 51 | url=http://ideas.repec.org/p/uca/ucapdv/45.html}}</ref> More than half of the revenues of the union and state governments come from taxes, of which half come from [[Indirect taxes]]. More than a quarter of the union government's tax revenues is shared with the state governments.<ref name="sharing">Tax revenue was 88% of total union government revenue in 1950–51 and has come down to 73% in 2003–04, as a result of increase in non-tax revenue. Tax revenues were 70% of total state government revenues in 2002 to 2003. Indirect taxes were 84% of the union governments total tax revenue and have come down to 62% in 2003–04, mostly due to cuts in import duties and rationalisation. The states share in union government's tax revenue is 28.0% for the period 2000 to 2005 as per the recommendations of the eleventh finance commission. In addition, states that do not levy sales tax on [[sugar]], [[textile]]s and [[tobacco]], are entitled to 1.5% of the proceeds.{{cite book|author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M.|title=Indian Economy|publisher=S.Chand|year=2005|isbn=81-219-0298-3|pages=938, 942, 946}}</ref>

The tax reforms, initiated in 1991, have sought to rationalise the tax structure and increase compliance by taking steps in the following directions:
*Reducing the rates of individual and corporate income taxes, excises, customs and making it more progressive
*Reducing exemptions and concessions
*Simplification of laws and procedures
*Introduction of [[permanent account number]] (PAN) to track monetary transactions
*21 of the 29 states introduced [[value added tax]] (VAT) on April 1, 2005 to replace the complex and multiple sales tax system<ref name="angela"/><ref name="VAT">{{cite news|title=Indif_real_GDP_per_capitaa says 21 of 29 states to launch new tax|date=March 25, 2005|publisher=Daily Times|url=http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_25-3-2005_pg5_13}}</ref>

The non-tax revenues of the central government come from [[fiscal]] services, interest receipts, public sector dividends, etc., while the non-tax revenues of the States are grants from the central government, interest receipts, dividends and income from general, economic and social services.<ref name="Datt-3"/>

Inter-State share in the federal tax pool is decided by the recommendations of the [[Finance Commission]] to the President.

Total tax receipts of Centre & State amount to approximately 18% of national GDP. This compares to a figure of 37-45% in the OECD and explains why the country remains under-developed as evident inter-alia from the poor state of its infrastructure and social services compared to OECD countries. The limited resources of Government affect its ability to pay fair wages to public servants. This may well be the cause of endemic corruption at all levels of government.

===General budget===
The [[Finance minister of India]] presents the annual [[Union budget of India|union budget]] in the [[Parliament of India|Parliament]] on the last [[working day]] of February. The budget has to be passed by the [[Lok Sabha]] before it can come into effect on April 1, the start of India's [[fiscal year]]. The Union budget is preceded by an [[Economic survey of India|economic survey]] which outlines the broad direction of the budget and the economic performance of the country for the outgoing financial year. This economic survey involves all the various NGOs, women organizations, business people, old people associations etc.

India's union budget for [[Union budget of India (2005-06)|2005–06]], had an estimated outlay of Rs.5,14,344 crores ($118 billion). Earnings from taxes amount to Rs. 2,73,466 crore ($63b). India's [[fiscal deficit]] amounts to 4.5% or 1,39,231 crore ($32b).<ref name="UB2005-06">{{cite web|title=Union Budget & Economic Survey|url=http://indiabudget.nic.in/ub2006-07/ubmain.htm| accessdate = 2006-07-29}}</ref> The fiscal deficit is expected to be 3.8% of GDP, by March 2007.<ref name="def">{{cite web|title=Revenue surge boosts fiscal health|url=http://www.business-standard.com/common/storypage.php?autono=269424&leftnm=2&subLeft=0&chkFlg=}}</ref>

==Currency system==
{{main|Indian rupee}}
The rupee is the only [[legal tender]] accepted in India. The exchange rate as of November 18, 2008 is about 49.27 to a US dollar, <ref>{{cite web|url=http://in.finance.yahoo.com/currency/convert?amt=1&from=USD&to=INR&submit=Convert. |title=U.S. Dollar to Indian Rupee Exchange Rate - Yahoo! Finance India |publisher=In.finance.yahoo.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref> 64.01 to a Euro, and 80.45 to a UK pound. The Indian rupee is accepted as legal tender in the neighboring [[Nepal]] and [[Bhutan]], both of which peg their currency to that of the Indian rupee. The rupee is divided into 100 [[paisa|paise]]. The highest-denomination banknote is the 1,000 rupee note; the lowest-denomination coin in circulation is the 1 rupee coin (it earlier had 25 & 50 paise coins which have been discontinued by the Reserve Bank of India).<ref>[http://www.rbi.org.in/currency/coins.html RBI]</ref> There has been a recent fall in the value of the Rupee as a result of the global financial crisis of 2008, as foreign institutional investors sell large amounts of Indian stocks and invest in US treasury bonds.


==Natural resources==
==Natural resources==
{{seealso|Energy policy of India}}
{{seealso|Energy policy of India}}
[[Image:Workers Outside Coalmine.jpg|thumb|India has the world's 3rd largest coal reserves.<ref>http://www.business-standard.com/india/storypage.php?tp=on&autono=33438</ref> Shown here is a coal mine in [[Jowai]].]]
[[Image:Windfarm Kayathar India Tamil Nadu 2005-10-8.JPG|thumb|India has the [[Installed wind power capacity|world's fourth largest]] [[wind power]] industry, with an annual power capacity of 8,896 MW.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.business-standard.com/india/storypage.php?tp=on&autono=44562 |title=India to add 6,000 mw wind power by 2012; but below target |publisher=Business-standard.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref> Shown here is a [[wind farm]] in Kayathar, [[Tamil Nadu]].]]
India's total cultivable area is 1,269,219 km² (56.78% of total land area), which is decreasing due to constant pressure from an ever growing population and increased urbanisation.
India's total cultivable area is 1,269,219 km² (56.78% of total land area), which is decreasing due to constant pressure from an ever growing population and increased urbanisation.


India has a total water surface area of 314,400 km² and receives an average annual rainfall of 1,100 mm. [[Irrigation]] accounts for 92% of the water utilisation, and comprised 380 km² in 1974, and is expected to rise to 1,050 km² by 2025, with the balance accounted for by industrial and domestic consumers. India's inland water resources comprising rivers, canals, ponds and lakes and marine resources comprising the east and west coasts of the [[Indian ocean]] and other [[Headlands and bays|gulfs]] and [[bay]]s provide employment to nearly 6 million people in the [[fisheries]] sector. In 2008, India had the world's third largest fishing industry.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindu.com/2008/01/05/stories/2008010552830300.htm |title=The Hindu : Kerala / Kochi News : Diversify fishing methods, says Pawar |publisher=Hindu.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref>
India has a total water surface area of 314,400 km² and receives an average annual rainfall of 1,100 mm. [[Irrigation]] accounts for 92% of the water utilisation, and comprised 380 km² in 1974, and is expected to rise to 1,050 km² by 2025, with the balance accounted for by industrial and domestic consumers. [[Image:182619562 00d6f703b6 b.jpg|thumb|left|India has the world's 3rd largest coal reserves.<ref>http://www.business-standard.com/india/storypage.php?tp=on&autono=33438</ref> Shown here is a coal mine in [[Jharkhand]].]] India's inland water resources comprising rivers, canals, ponds and lakes and marine resources comprising the east and west coasts of the [[Indian ocean]] and other [[Headlands and bays|gulfs]] and [[bay]]s provide employment to nearly 6 million people in the [[fisheries]] sector. In 2008, India had the world's third largest fishing industry.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindu.com/2008/01/05/stories/2008010552830300.htm |title=The Hindu : Kerala / Kochi News : Diversify fishing methods, says Pawar |publisher=Hindu.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref>


India's major [[mineral]] resources include [[Coal]] (3rd-largest reserves in the world), [[Iron]] ore, [[Manganese]], [[Mica]], [[Bauxite]], [[Titanium]] ore, [[Chromite]], [[Natural gas]], [[Diamond]]s, [[Petroleum]], [[Limestone]] and [[Thorium]] (world's largest along [[Kerala]]'s shores). India's [[oil reserves]], found in [[Bombay High]] off the coast of [[Maharashtra]], [[Gujarat]], and in eastern [[Assam]] meet 25% of the country's demand.<ref name="Datt-1">{{cite book | author=Datt, Mihir Bhojani & Vivek Sundharam, K.P.M. | title=Indian Economy | pages =90,97,98,100 | chapter = 7}}</ref><ref name="CIA">{{cite web
India's major [[mineral]] resources include [[Coal]] (fourth-largest reserves in the world), [[Iron]] ore, [[Manganese]], [[Mica]], [[Bauxite]], [[Titanium]] ore, [[Chromite]], [[Natural gas]], [[Diamond]]s, [[Petroleum]], [[Limestone]] and [[Thorium]] (world's largest along [[Kerala]]'s shores). India's [[oil reserves]], found in [[Bombay High]] off the coast of [[Maharashtra]], [[Gujarat]], and in eastern [[Assam]] meet 25% of the country's demand.<ref name="Datt-1">{{cite book | author=Datt, Mihir Bhojani & Vivek Sundharam, K.P.M. | title=Indian Economy | pages =90,97,98,100 | chapter = 7}}</ref><ref name="CIA">{{cite web
| title =CIA - The World Factbook - India
| title =CIA - The World Factbook - India
| publisher =[https://www.cia.gov/ CIA]
| publisher =[https://www.cia.gov/ CIA]
Line 96: Line 107:
Rising energy demand concomitant with economic growth has created a perpetual state of energy crunch in India. India is poor in oil resources and is currently heavily dependent on coal and foreign oil imports for its energy needs. Though India is rich in [[Thorium]], but not in [[Uranium]], which it might get access to in light of the nuclear deal with US. India is rich in certain energy resources which promise significant future potential - clean / renewable energy resources like [[Solar power in India|solar]], [[Wind power in India|wind]], biofuels (jatropha, sugarcane).
Rising energy demand concomitant with economic growth has created a perpetual state of energy crunch in India. India is poor in oil resources and is currently heavily dependent on coal and foreign oil imports for its energy needs. Though India is rich in [[Thorium]], but not in [[Uranium]], which it might get access to in light of the nuclear deal with US. India is rich in certain energy resources which promise significant future potential - clean / renewable energy resources like [[Solar power in India|solar]], [[Wind power in India|wind]], biofuels (jatropha, sugarcane).


==Physical infrastructure==
==Infrastructure==
[[Image:India roadway map.svg|thumb|A map of the network of [[NHAI|National Highways]] in India]]
[[Image:India roadway map.svg|thumb|A map of the network of [[NHAI|National Highways]] in India]]
Development of infrastructure was completely in the hands of the public sector and was plagued by corruption, bureaucratic inefficiencies, urban-bias and an inability to scale investment.<ref name="infra">{{cite book|author=Sankaran, S|title=Indian Economy: Problems, Policies and Development|publisher=Margham Publications|year=1994|id=ISBN}}</ref> India's low spending on power, construction, transportation, telecommunications and [[real estate]], at $31 billion or 6% of GDP in 2002 had prevented India from sustaining higher growth rates. This has prompted the government to partially open up infrastructure to the private sector allowing foreign investment<ref name="cnn-infra">{{cite web | title=Infrastructure the missing link | url=http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/09/03/india.eye.infra/ | accessdate = 2005-08-14}}</ref><ref name="asiatradehub-infra">{{cite web | title=Infrastructure in India: Requirements and favorable climate for foreign investment | url=http://www.asiatradehub.com/india/intro.asp | accessdate = 2005-08-14}}</ref><ref name="survey"/> which has helped in a sustained growth rate of close to 9% for the past six quarters.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ayAK98NMbmCA&refer=home|title=India's Economic Growth Unexpectedly Quickens to 9.2%|publisher=Bloomberg}}</ref>
Development of infrastructure was completely in the hands of the public sector and was plagued by corruption, bureaucratic inefficiencies, urban-bias and an inability to scale investment.<ref name="infra">{{cite book|author=Sankaran, S|title=Indian Economy: Problems, Policies and Development|publisher=Margham Publications|year=1994|id=ISBN}}</ref> India's low spending on power, construction, transportation, telecommunications and [[real estate]], at $31 billion or 6% of GDP in 2002 had prevented India from sustaining higher growth rates. This had prompted the government to partially open up infrastructure to the private sector allowing foreign investment<ref name="cnn-infra">{{cite web | title=Infrastructure the missing link | url=http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/09/03/india.eye.infra/ | accessdate = 2005-08-14}}</ref><ref name="asiatradehub-infra">{{cite web | title=Infrastructure in India: Requirements and favorable climate for foreign investment | url=http://www.asiatradehub.com/india/intro.asp | accessdate = 2005-08-14}}</ref><ref name="survey"/> which has helped in a sustained growth rate of close to 9% for the past six quarters.<ref>[http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ayAK98NMbmCA&refer=home India's Economic Growth Unexpectedly Quickens to 9.2%]</ref> India holds [[List of countries by road network size|second position]] in the world in roadways' construction, more than twice that of China.<ref name="Road">{{cite web | title=Infrastructure Rankings | url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2085rank.html}}</ref>
As of 2005 the electricity production was at 661.6 billion kWh with oil production standing at 785,000 bbl/day.

India's prime import partners are: China 8.7%, US 6%, Germany 4.6%, Singapore 4.6%, Australia 4% as of 2006 [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/print/in.html CIA FactBook]
Some 600 million Indians have no mains electricity at all.<ref name="creaking"/> While 80 percent of Indian villages have at least an electricity line, just 44 percent of rural households have access to electricity.<ref name="powertheft"/> According to a sample of 97,882 households in 2002, electricity was the main source of lighting for 53% of rural households compared to 36% in 1993.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mospi.nic.in/nss_58round_press_note_6june05.htm|title=Housing condition in India: Household amenities and other characteristics (July - September 2002)|publisher=Government of India}}</ref> Some half of the electricity is stolen, compared with 3% in China. The stolen electricity amounts to 1.5% of GDP.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4802248.stm|title=India struggles with power theft|publisher=[[BBC]]}}</ref><ref name="powertheft">{{cite web|url=http://rru.worldbank.org/documents/publicpolicyjournal/272bhatia_Gulati.pdf|title=Reforming the Power Sector: Controlling Electricity Theft and Improving Revenue|publisher=The World Bank}}</ref> Almost all of the electricity in India is produced by the public sector. Power outages are common.<ref name="creaking"/> Many buy their own power generators to ensure electricity supply. As of 2005 the electricity production was at 661.6 billion kWh with oil production standing at 785,000 bbl/day. In 2007, electricity demand exceeded supply by 15%.<ref name="creaking"/> [[Multi Commodity Exchange]] has tried to get a permit to offer electricity future markets.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/news/mcx-move-to-launch-electricity-future-faces-legal-hurdle/401592/|title=MCX move to launch electricity future faces legal hurdle|publisher=[[The Financial Express]]}}</ref>
As of January 15, 2007, there were 2.10 million broadband lines in India.<ref>http://www.trai.gov.in/trai/upload/PressReleases/419/pr15jan07no6.pdf</ref> Low tele-density is the major hurdle for slow pickup in broadband services. Over 76% of the broadband lines were via DSL and the rest via cable modems.

[[Indian Road Network]] is developing. Trucking goods from [[Gurgaon]] to the port in [[Mumbai]] can take up to 10 days.<ref name="hobble"/> Taxes and bribes are common between state borders; Transparency International estimates that truckers pay annually $5 billion in bribes.<ref>[http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_12/b4026010.htm India: Where Shipping Is Shaky]. [[BusinessWeek]]</ref><ref name="hobble"/> India has [[List of countries by road network size|the world's second largest road network]].<ref name="Road">{{cite web | title=Infrastructure Rankings | url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2085rank.html}}</ref> Although India has only 1% of the world's vehicles, India has 8 per cent of the world's vehicle fatalities.<ref>[http://www.reuters.com/article/inDepthNews/idUSBOM33255720080827 High road accident toll a drain on Indian economy]. Reuters.</ref><ref>[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/driving/news/article3168303.ece Corners cut on cost – and safety with the Tata Nano]. The Times.</ref>

Container traffic is growing at 15% a year.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.theage.com.au/news/business/ageing-indian-infrastructure-causes-congestion/2005/09/21/1126982123165.html|title=Ageing Indian infrastructure causes congestion|publisher=[[The Age]]|year=2005}}</ref> Some 60% of India’s container traffic is handled by the [[Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust]] in [[Mumbai]]. It has just 9 berths compared to 40 in [[Singapore]]'s main port. It takes an average of 21 days to clear import cargo in India compared to just 3 in Singapore.<ref name="creaking">{{cite web|url=http://www.economist.com/specialreports/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12749787|title=A special report on India: Creaking, groaning: Infrastructure is India’s biggest handicap|date=11 December 2008|publisher=The Economist}}</ref> China had 30 times more container traffic in 2004.<ref name="dpreview"/>

In 2007, an article by Businessweek reported that India's cell-phone market is the fast growing in the world and companies adding some 6 million new customers a month.<ref name="hobble"/> Very few Indians use Internet. As of January 15, 2007, there were 2.10 million broadband lines in India.<ref>http://www.trai.gov.in/trai/upload/PressReleases/419/pr15jan07no6.pdf</ref>
The entire India has only 25,000 tourist-class hotel rooms, compared with more than 140,000 in Las Vegas alone. Hotel companies see opportunities for big investments.<ref name="hobble">[http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_12/b4026001.htm The Trouble With India: Crumbling roads, jammed airports, and power blackouts could hobble growth] from [[BusinessWeek]] March 19, 2007</ref>

In some places, no major irrigation works have been done since the British era despite opportunities to boost agricultural productivity. Some 700 million Indians do not have access to a proper toilet.<ref name="creaking"/> Only 13% of sewage is treated according to one estimate, leaving rivers and other water resources under severe strain.<ref name="creaking"/> Most cities supply water only a few hours a day and none provides 24h water. A World Bank report says it is an institutional problem in water agencies, or "how the agency is embedded in the relationships between politics and the citizens who are the consumers."<ref name="dpreview"/>

{{see also|Transport in India}}
{{see also|Indian Road Network}}
{{see also|Ports in India}}
{{see also|States of India by installed power capacity}}
{{see also|States of India by installed power capacity}}
{{see also|Water supply and sanitation in India}}
{{see also|Water supply and sanitation in India}}


==Financial institutions==
==Currency and finance==
{{see also|Indian rupee|Banking in India|Insurance in India}}

[[Image:Mumbai Downtown.jpg|thumb|[[Cuffe Parade]], [[Mumbai]] is an important business district in India, home to the World Trade Center as well as other important financial institutions.]]

The [[Indian rupee]] is the only [[legal tender]] accepted in India. The exchange rate as of November 18, 2008 is about 49.27 to a US dollar, <ref>{{cite web|url=http://in.finance.yahoo.com/currency/convert?amt=1&from=USD&to=INR&submit=Convert. |title=U.S. Dollar to Indian Rupee Exchange Rate - Yahoo! Finance India |publisher=In.finance.yahoo.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref> 64.01 to a Euro, and 80.45 to a UK pound. The Indian rupee is accepted as legal tender in the neighboring [[Nepal]] and [[Bhutan]], both of which peg their currency to that of the Indian rupee. The rupee is divided into 100 [[paisa|paise]]. The highest-denomination banknote is the 1,000 rupee note; the lowest-denomination coin in circulation is the 1 rupee coin (it earlier had 25 & 50 paise coins which have been discontinued by the Reserve Bank of India).<ref>[http://www.rbi.org.in/currency/coins.html RBI]</ref> There has been a recent fall in the value of the Rupee as a result of the global financial crisis of 2008, as foreign institutional investors sell large amounts of Indian stocks and invest in US treasury bonds.


[[Image:Mumbai Downtown.jpg|thumb|left|[[Cuffe Parade]], [[Mumbai]] is an important business district in India, home to the World Trade Center as well as other important financial institutions.]]
India inherited several institutions, such as the [[Indian Civil Service|civil services]], Reserve Bank of India, railways, etc., from its [[British raj|British]] rulers. [[Mumbai]] serves as the nation's commercial capital, with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), [[Bombay Stock Exchange]] (BSE) and the [[National Stock Exchange of India|National Stock Exchange]] (NSE) located here. The headquarters of many financial institutions are also located in the city.
India inherited several institutions, such as the [[Indian Civil Service|civil services]], Reserve Bank of India, railways, etc., from its [[British raj|British]] rulers. [[Mumbai]] serves as the nation's commercial capital, with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), [[Bombay Stock Exchange]] (BSE) and the [[National Stock Exchange of India|National Stock Exchange]] (NSE) located here. The headquarters of many financial institutions are also located in the city.


Line 130: Line 125:
==Sectors==
==Sectors==
===Agriculture===
===Agriculture===
{{main|Agriculture in India|Forestry in India|Animal husbandry in India|Fishing in India}}
{{main|Agriculture in India}}
[[Image:FarmersIndia.jpg|thumb|Farmers work inside a rice field in [[Andhra Pradesh]]. India is the second largest producer of rice in the world<ref>http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/worldbiz/archives/2008/03/29/2003407560</ref> and Andhra Pradesh is the 3rd largest rice producing state in India.<ref>http://www.rice-trade.com/production-rice-india.html</ref>]]
[[Image:Composition of indias agricultural output in 2003-04.png|thumb|left|Composition of India's total production (million tonnes) of foodgrains and commercial crops, in 2003–04.]]
[[Image:Composition of indias agricultural output in 2003-04.png|thumb|Composition of India's total production (million tonnes) of foodgrains and commercial crops, in 2003–04.]]

India [[List of countries by GDP sector composition|ranks second]] worldwide in farm output. [[Agriculture]] and allied sectors like [[forestry]], [[logging]] and [[fishing]] accounted for 16.6% of the GDP in 2007, employed 60% of the total workforce<ref name="CIA"/> and despite a steady decline of its share in the GDP, is still the largest economic sector and plays a significant role in the overall socio-economic development of India. [[Yield]]s per unit area of all crops have grown since 1950, due to the special emphasis placed on agriculture in the five-year plans and steady improvements in [[irrigation]], technology, application of modern agricultural practices and provision of agricultural credit and subsidies since [[Green revolution in India]]. However, international comparisons reveal that the average yield in India is generally 30% to 50% of the highest average yield in the world.<ref name="Datt-5">{{cite book | author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. | title=Indian Economy | pages = 485–491 | chapter = 28}}</ref>
India [[List of countries by GDP sector composition|ranks second]] worldwide in farm output. [[Agriculture]] and allied sectors like [[forestry]], [[logging]] and [[fishing]] accounted for 16.6% of the GDP in 2007, employed 60% of the total workforce<ref name="CIA"/> and despite a steady decline of its share in the GDP, is still the largest economic sector and plays a significant role in the overall socio-economic development of India. [[Yield]]s per unit area of all crops have grown since 1950, due to the special emphasis placed on agriculture in the five-year plans and steady improvements in [[irrigation]], technology, application of modern agricultural practices and provision of agricultural credit and subsidies since [[Green revolution in India]]. However, international comparisons reveal that the average yield in India is generally 30% to 50% of the highest average yield in the world.<ref name="Datt-5">{{cite book | author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. | title=Indian Economy | pages = 485–491 | chapter = 28}}</ref>

[[File:Farm workers Bihar.JPG|thumb|Farmers in [[Bihar]].]]
[[File:Fishing In Orissa.JPG|thumb|Fishing in [[Orissa]].]]
The World Bank credits the Green Revolution for helping to increase grain production in the 1970s. Since 1990s, rural sectors have grown slowly. The World Bank identifies following main problems:<ref name="agriculturepriorities">{{cite web|url=http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/SOUTHASIAEXT/EXTSAREGTOPAGRI/0,,contentMDK:20273764~menuPK:548214~pagePK:34004173~piPK:34003707~theSitePK:452766,00.html|title=India: Priorities for Agriculture and Rural Development|publisher=[[World Bank]]}}</ref>
* India's large [[agricultural subsidies]] are hampering productivity-enhancing investment.
* Overregulation of agriculture has increased costs, price risks and uncertainty.
* Government interventions in labor, land, and credit markets'''.
* Inadequate infrastructure and services.

In water and irrigation management, the World Bank identifies:<ref name="agriculturepriorities"/>
* Inefficient, unsustainable and inequitable allocation of water.
* Deteriorating [[irrigation]] infrastructure.


The low productivity in India is a result of the following factors:
The low productivity in India is a result of the following factors:
Line 153: Line 136:
* Irrigation facilities are inadequate, as revealed by the fact that only 52.6% of the land was irrigated in 2003–04,<ref name="agri">{{cite paper | author=Multiple authors | title=Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2004 | year=2004 | url=http://dacnet.nic.in/eands/4.6(a)All%20lndia%20Area,%20Production%20and%20Yield%20of%20Rice.xls}}</ref> which result in farmers still being dependent on rainfall, specifically the [[Monsoon]] season. A good monsoon results in a robust growth for the economy as a whole, while a poor monsoon leads to a sluggish growth.<ref name="schand-ind.eco-3">{{cite book|author=Sankaran, S|title=Indian Economy: Problems, Policies and Development|pages=492–493|chapter=28}}</ref> Farm credit is regulated by [[NABARD]], which is the statutory apex agent for rural development in the subcontinent.
* Irrigation facilities are inadequate, as revealed by the fact that only 52.6% of the land was irrigated in 2003–04,<ref name="agri">{{cite paper | author=Multiple authors | title=Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2004 | year=2004 | url=http://dacnet.nic.in/eands/4.6(a)All%20lndia%20Area,%20Production%20and%20Yield%20of%20Rice.xls}}</ref> which result in farmers still being dependent on rainfall, specifically the [[Monsoon]] season. A good monsoon results in a robust growth for the economy as a whole, while a poor monsoon leads to a sluggish growth.<ref name="schand-ind.eco-3">{{cite book|author=Sankaran, S|title=Indian Economy: Problems, Policies and Development|pages=492–493|chapter=28}}</ref> Farm credit is regulated by [[NABARD]], which is the statutory apex agent for rural development in the subcontinent.


India has many farm insurance companies that insure wheat, fruit, rice and rubber farmers in the event of natural disasters or catastrophic crop failure, under the supervision of the [[Ministry of Agriculture]]. One notable company that provides all of these insurance policies is [[agriculture insurance company of india]] and it alone insures almost 20 million farmers.
India does have multiple farm insurance companies that insure wheat, fruit, rice and rubber farmers in the event of natural disasters or catastrophic crop failure. One notible company that provides all of these insurance policies is [[agriculture insurance company of india]] and it alone insures almost 20 million farmers. India has more than 500 farm insurance companies of various size that operate under the supervision of the [[Ministry of Agriculture]].

===Industry===
===Industry===
[[Image:Nano.jpg|thumb|India has one of the world's fastest growing [[automobile industry|automobile industries]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.reifenpresse.de/CDML007/en/gast/detail.php?tk=&t=unt&RecID=7767&wert1=19843&wert2= |title=Tyres & Accessories |publisher=Reifenpresse.de |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2682810.cms |title=The small car dream-merchants- Tata's People's Car-Specials-The Economic Times |publisher=Economictimes.indiatimes.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref> and is hope to be global leader of auto industry.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.quamnet.com/newscolumnistcontent.action?articleId=924056 |title=Quamnet.com stock news |publisher=Quamnet.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref> Shown here is [[Tata Motors]]' [[Tata Nano|Nano]], world's least expensive car in production.<ref name="forbes.com">{{Cite web|url=http://www.forbes.com/home/free_forbes/2007/0416/070.html|title=The Next People's Car|accessdate=2008-01-21|work=forbes.com}}</ref>]]
[[File:Printing by hand.jpg|thumb|Printing by hand. Textile manufacturing is the second largest source for employment after agriculture.<ref name="citi">{{cite web|url=http://www.citiindia.com/indian_overview.asp?pgname=Overview|title=Industry Overview - Indian Overview}}</ref>]]
[[Image:Malls in India.jpg|180px|thumb|By 2028, India is expected to have the fifth-largest consumer economy in the world due to sustained growth among all sectors of Indian economy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Tracking_the_growth_of_Indias_middle_class_2032_abstract |title=Tracking the growth of India’s middle class - The McKinsey Quarterly - India's middle class - Economic Studies - Country Reports |publisher=Mckinseyquarterly.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref> Shown here is a mall in Malad, Maharashtra.]]

Industry accounts for 27.6% of the GDP and employ 17% of the total workforce.<ref name="CIA"/> However, about one-third of the industrial labour force is engaged in simple [[Cottage industry|household manufacturing]] only.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2001/Census_data_finder/B_Series/Industrial_Category_of_worker.htm |title=Census Reference Tables B-Series Economic Tables |publisher=Censusindia.gov.in |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref> In absolute terms, India [[List of countries by GDP sector composition|is fourteenth]] in the world in factory output.
India [[List of countries by GDP sector composition|is fourteenth]] in the world in factory output. They together account for 27.6% of the GDP and employ 17% of the total workforce.<ref name="CIA"/> However, about one-third of the industrial labour force is engaged in simple [[Cottage industry|household manufacturing]] only.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2001/Census_data_finder/B_Series/Industrial_Category_of_worker.htm |title=Census Reference Tables B-Series Economic Tables |publisher=Censusindia.gov.in |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref>

Economic reforms brought foreign competition, led to privatisation of certain public sector industries, opened up sectors hitherto reserved for the public sector and led to an expansion in the production of fast-moving [[Final goods|consumer goods]].<ref name="theecon-india-economic-structure">{{cite news | title=Economic structure| date= October 6, 2003 | publisher=The Economist | url=http://www.economist.com/countries/India/profile.cfm?folder=Profile%2DEconomic%20Structure}}</ref>
India's labor regulations, which are heavy even by developing country standards, hamper the large-scale creation of formal industrial jobs.<ref name="oecd">{{cite web|url=http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/52/39452196.pdf|title=Economic survey of India 2007: Policy Brief|publisher=[[OECD]]}}</ref><ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4103554.stm Why India needs labour law reform]. [[BBC]]</ref><ref name="elephant">{{cite web|url=http://www.economist.com/specialreports/displayStory.cfm?story_id=12749735|title=A special report on India: An elephant, not a tiger|date=11 December 2008|publisher=[[The Economist]]}}</ref>

Economic reforms brought foreign competition, led to privatisation of certain public sector industries, opened up sectors hitherto reserved for the public sector and led to an expansion in the production of fast-moving [[Final goods|consumer goods]].<ref name="theecon-india-economic-structure">{{cite news | title=Economic structure| date= October 6, 2003 | publisher=The Economist | url=http://www.economist.com/countries/India/profile.cfm?folder=Profile%2DEconomic%20Structure}}</ref> Post-liberalisation, the Indian private sector, which was usually run by oligopolies of old family firms and required political connections to prosper was faced with foreign competition, including the threat of cheaper Chinese imports. It has since handled the change by squeezing costs, revamping management, focusing on designing new products and relying on low labour costs and technology.<ref name="compete">{{cite news | title=Indian manufacturers learn to compete | date=February 12, 2004 | publisher=The Economist | url=http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=S%27%298%3C%2FPQ%3B%21%21P%214%0A}}</ref>

[[Textile]] manufacturing is the second largest source for employment after agriculture and accounts for 26% of manufacturing output.<ref name="citi"/> [[Tata Motors]]' Famous industrial products include [[Tata Nano|Nano]], which claims to be the world's least expensive car.<ref name="forbes.com">{{Cite web|url=http://www.forbes.com/home/free_forbes/2007/0416/070.html|title=The Next People's Car|accessdate=2008-01-21|work=forbes.com}}</ref> [[Tirupur]] has gained universal recognition as the leading source of hosiery, knitted garments, casual wear and sportswear.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/2007/06/11/stories/2007061110090500.htm|title=Helping Tirupur emerge as a leader in knitwear exports in India - Tiruppur|publisher=The Hindu}}</ref> [[Dharavi]] in Mumbai has gained fame as a dense industrial hub.

===Services===

India [[List of countries by GDP sector composition|is fifteenth]] in services output. It provides employment to 23% of work force, and it is growing fast, growth rate 7.5% in 1991–2000 up from 4.5% in 1951–80. It has the largest share in the GDP, accounting for 55% in 2007 up from 15% in 1950.<ref name="CIA"/>

Business services ([[information technology]], [[information technology enabled services]], [[business process outsourcing]]) are among the fastest growing sectors contributing to one third of the total output of services in 2000. The growth in the IT sector is attributed to increased specialization, and an availability of a large pool of low cost, but highly skilled, educated and fluent English-speaking workers, on the [[Supply and demand|supply side]], matched on the demand side by an increased demand from foreign consumers interested in India's service exports, or those looking to [[Outsourcing|outsource]] their operations. [[Indian IT industry|India's IT industry]], despite contributing significantly to its [[balance of payments]], accounted for only about 1% of the total GDP or 1/50th of the total services in 2001<ref name="Revolution">{{cite paper|author=Gordon, Jim and Gupta, Poonam|title=Understanding India's Services Revolution|year=2003|version=November 12, 2003|url=http://www.imf.org/external/np/apd/seminars/2003/newdelhi/gordon.pdf|format=PDF}}</ref>
However the contribution of IT to GDP increased to 4.8 % in 2005-06 and is projected to increase to 7% of GDP in 2008<ref name="Share of IT">{{cite news | title=Share of IT, ITeS in India''s GDP to go up to 7 per cent by 2008| date=20 December 2006 | publisher=domain-b.com | url=http://www.domain-b.com/infotech/itnews/2006/20061220_per_cent.html}}</ref><ref name="Indian IT">{{cite news | title=The Coming Death Of Indian Outsourcing | date=2008-02-29<!--, 6:00 AM -->| publisher=Forbes| url=http://www.forbes.com/home/enterprisetech/2008/02/29/mitra-india-outsourcing-tech-enter-cx_sm_0229outsource.html}}</ref>

[[File:Dabbawala1.jpg|thumb|[[Dabbawala]] delivery services.]]
Most Indian shopping takes place in open markets and millions of independent grocery shops called kirana. Organized retail such supermarkets accounts for just 4% of the market as of 2008.<ref name="chainstores">{{cite web|url=http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?story_id=11465586|title=Retailing in India Unshackling the chain stores|year=2008|publisher=[[The Economist]]}}</ref> Regulations prevent most foreign investment in retailing. Moreover, over thirty regulations such as "signboard licences" and "anti-hoarding measures" may have to be complied before a store can open doors. There are taxes for moving goods to states, from states, and even within states.<ref name="chainstores"/>

{{see also|Business process outsourcing in India}}

===Banking and finance===
{{main|Banking in India|Insurance in India}}
The Indian [[money market]] is classified into: the organised sector (comprising private, public and foreign owned [[commercial bank]]s and [[cooperative]] banks, together known as ''scheduled banks''); and the unorganised sector (comprising individual or family owned indigenous bankers or [[Moneylending|money lenders]] and [[non-banking financial company|non-banking financial companies]] (NBFCs)). The unorganised sector and [[microcredit]] are still preferred over traditional banks in rural and sub-urban areas, especially for non-productive purposes, like ceremonies and short duration loans.<ref name="Datt-6">{{cite book | author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. | title=Indian Economy | pages = 847–850 | chapter = 50}}</ref>

Prime Minister [[Indira Gandhi]] [[nationalisation|nationalised]] 14 banks in 1969, followed by six others in 1980, and made it mandatory for banks to provide 40% of their net credit to priority sectors like agriculture, small-scale industry, retail trade, small businesses, etc. to ensure that the banks fulfill their social and developmental goals. Since then, the number of bank branches has increased from 10,120 in 1969 to 98,910 in 2003 and the population covered by a branch decreased from 63,800 to 15,000 during the same period. The total [[Bank deposit|deposits]] increased 32.6 times between 1971 to 1991 compared to 7 times between 1951 to 1971. Despite an increase of rural branches, from 1,860 or 22% of the total number of branches in 1969 to 32,270 or 48%, only 32,270 out of 5 [[lakh]] (500,000) villages are covered by a scheduled bank.<ref name="Datt-7">{{cite book|author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M.|title=Indian Economy|pages=850–851|chapter=50}}</ref><ref name="ghosh">{{cite web|author=Ghosh, Jayati|title=Bank Nationalisation: The Record|work=Macroscan|url=http://www.macroscan.com/cur/jul05/cur210705Bank_Nationalisation.htm| accessdate = 2005-08-05}}</ref>

Since liberalisation, the government has approved significant banking reforms. While some of these relate to nationalised banks (like encouraging mergers, reducing government interference and increasing profitability and competitiveness), other reforms have opened up the banking and insurance sectors to private and foreign players.<ref name="Datt-8">{{cite book|author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M.|title=Indian Economy|pages=865–867|chapter=50}}</ref><ref name="CIA"/>


Post-liberalisation, the Indian private sector, which was usually run by oligopolies of old family firms and required political connections to prosper was faced with foreign competition, including the threat of cheaper Chinese imports. It has since handled the change by squeezing costs, revamping management, focusing on designing new products and relying on low labour costs and technology.<ref name="compete">{{cite news | title=Indian manufacturers learn to compete | date=February 12, 2004 | publisher=The Economist | url=http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=S%27%298%3C%2FPQ%3B%21%21P%214%0A}}</ref>
===Companies===


34 Indian companies have been listed in the [[Forbes Global 2000]] ranking for 2008.<ref name="fg2-2007">{{cite web | title=Forbes Global 2000 (Ger-Ind) | url=http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/18/biz_2000global08_The-Global-2000-India_10Rank.html| accessdate=March | accessyear=2008 }}</ref> The 10 leading companies are:
34 Indian companies have been listed in the [[Forbes Global 2000]] ranking for 2008.<ref name="fg2-2007">{{cite web | title=Forbes Global 2000 (Ger-Ind) | url=http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/18/biz_2000global08_The-Global-2000-India_10Rank.html| accessdate=March | accessyear=2008 }}</ref> The 10 leading companies are:
Line 193: Line 151:
!World Rank !! Company !! class="unsortable"|Logo !! Industry !! Revenue <br /> (billion $) !! Profits <br /> (billion $) !! Assets <br /> (billion $) !! Market Value <br /> (billion $)
!World Rank !! Company !! class="unsortable"|Logo !! Industry !! Revenue <br /> (billion $) !! Profits <br /> (billion $) !! Assets <br /> (billion $) !! Market Value <br /> (billion $)
|-align="right"
|-align="right"
|193 || align="left" | [[Reliance Industries]] || align="left" | [[Image:Ril logo.jpg|35px]] || align="left" | Oil & Gas, Petrochemicals || 26.07|| 2.79 || 30.67 || 89.29
|193 || align="left" | [[Reliance Industries]] || align="left" | [[Image:Ril logo.jpg|35px]] || align="left" | Oil & Gas Operations || 26.07|| 2.79 || 30.67 || 89.29
|-align="right"
|-align="right"
|198 || align="left" | [[Oil and Natural Gas Corporation]] || align="left" | [[Image:ONGC Logo.jpg|35px]] || align="left" | Oil & Gas Operations || 18.90 || 4.11 || 33.79 || 54.11
|198 || align="left" | [[Oil and Natural Gas Corporation]] || align="left" | [[Image:ONGC Logo.jpg|35px]] || align="left" | Oil & Gas Operations || 18.90 || 4.11 || 33.79 || 54.11
Line 211: Line 169:
|826 || align="left" | [[Bharti Airtel]] || align="left" | [[Image:Airtel-logo.png|60px]] || align="left" | Telecommunications Services || 4.26 || 0.94 || 6.61 || 39.16
|826 || align="left" | [[Bharti Airtel]] || align="left" | [[Image:Airtel-logo.png|60px]] || align="left" | Telecommunications Services || 4.26 || 0.94 || 6.61 || 39.16
|-align="right"
|-align="right"
|846 || align="left" | [[Reliance Communications]] || align="left" | [[Image:Relcomm.png|120px]] || align="left" | Telecommunications Services|| 3.13 || 0.65 || 13.08 || 29.63
|846 || align="left" | [[Reliance Communications]] || align="left" | [[Image:Relcomm.gif|120px]] || align="left" | Telecommunications Services|| 3.13 || 0.65 || 13.08 || 29.63
|}
|}


===Services===
==Socio-economic characteristics==
[[Image:BangaloreInfosys.jpg|thumb|[[Infosys]] headquarters in [[Bangalore]], one of the largest software companies in India.]]
{{main|Socio-economic issues in India}}
India [[List of countries by GDP sector composition|is fifteenth]] in services output. It provides employment to 23% of work force, and it is growing fast, growth rate 7.5% in 1991–2000 up from 4.5% in 1951–80. It has the largest share in the GDP, accounting for 55% in 2007 up from 15% in 1950.<ref name="CIA"/> Business services ([[information technology]], [[information technology enabled services]], [[business process outsourcing]]) are among the fastest growing sectors contributing to one third of the total output of services in 2000. The growth in the IT sector is attributed to increased specialization, and an availability of a large pool of low cost, but highly skilled, educated and fluent English-speaking workers, on the [[Supply and demand|supply side]], matched on the demand side by an increased demand from foreign consumers interested in India's service exports, or those looking to [[Outsourcing|outsource]] their operations. [[Indian IT industry|India's IT industry]], despite contributing significantly to its [[balance of payments]], accounted for only about 1% of the total GDP or 1/50th of the total services in 2001<ref name="Revolution">{{cite paper|author=Gordon, Jim and Gupta, Poonam|title=Understanding India's Services Revolution|year=2003|version=November 12, 2003|url=http://www.imf.org/external/np/apd/seminars/2003/newdelhi/gordon.pdf|format=PDF}}</ref>
However the contribution of IT to GDP increased to 4.8 % in 2005-06 and is projected to increase to 7% of GDP in 2008<ref name="Share of IT">{{cite news | title=Share of IT, ITeS in India''s GDP to go up to 7 per cent by 2008| date=20 December 2006 | publisher=domain-b.com | url=http://www.domain-b.com/infotech/itnews/2006/20061220_per_cent.html}}</ref><ref name="Indian IT">{{cite news | title=The Coming Death Of Indian Outsourcing | date=2008-02-29<!--, 6:00 AM -->| publisher=Forbes| url=http://www.forbes.com/home/enterprisetech/2008/02/29/mitra-india-outsourcing-tech-enter-cx_sm_0229outsource.html}}</ref>


===Income and consumption===
===Banking and finance===
{{see|Poverty in India}}
{{main|Banking in India}}
[[Image:Scheduled banking structure in India.png|thumb|Structure of the organised banking sector in India. Number of banks are in brackets.<ref name="oldbanks">Old private banks are private banks existing prior to opening up of the banking sector.</ref>]]
[[Image:BPL Data GOI .png|thumb|250px|Percentage of population living under the poverty line of $1 (PPP) a day, currently 356.35 rupees a month in rural areas (around $7.4 a month).]]
The Indian [[money market]] is classified into: the organised sector (comprising private, public and foreign owned [[commercial bank]]s and [[cooperative]] banks, together known as ''scheduled banks''); and the unorganised sector (comprising individual or family owned indigenous bankers or [[Moneylending|money lenders]] and [[non-banking financial company|non-banking financial companies]] (NBFCs)). The unorganised sector and [[microcredit]] are still preferred over traditional banks in rural and sub-urban areas, especially for non-productive purposes, like ceremonies and short duration loans.<ref name="Datt-6">{{cite book | author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. | title=Indian Economy | pages = 847–850 | chapter = 50}}</ref>


Prime Minister [[Indira Gandhi]] [[nationalisation|nationalised]] 14 banks in 1969, followed by six others in 1980, and made it mandatory for banks to provide 40% of their net credit to priority sectors like agriculture, small-scale industry, retail trade, small businesses, etc. to ensure that the banks fulfill their social and developmental goals. Since then, the number of bank branches has increased from 10,120 in 1969 to 98,910 in 2003 and the population covered by a branch decreased from 63,800 to 15,000 during the same period. The total [[Bank deposit|deposits]] increased 32.6 times between 1971 to 1991 compared to 7 times between 1951 to 1971. Despite an increase of rural branches, from 1,860 or 22% of the total number of branches in 1969 to 32,270 or 48%, only 32,270 out of 5 [[lakh]] (500,000) villages are covered by a scheduled bank.<ref name="Datt-7">{{cite book|author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M.|title=Indian Economy|pages=850–851|chapter=50}}</ref><ref name="ghosh">{{cite web|author=Ghosh, Jayati|title=Bank Nationalisation: The Record|work=Macroscan|url=http://www.macroscan.com/cur/jul05/cur210705Bank_Nationalisation.htm| accessdate = 2005-08-05}}</ref>
As of 2005, 85.7% of the population lives on less than $2.50 (PPP) a day, down from 92.5% in 1981. This compares with 80.5% in [[Sub-Saharan Africa]].<ref name="WorldBankPoverty"/> 75.6% of the population lives on less than $2 a day (PPP), which is around 20 rupees or $0.5 a day in nominal terms. It was down from 86.6% and compares with 73.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/One-third_of_worlds_poor_in_India/articleshow/3409374.cms |title=One-third of world's poor in India: Survey-India-The Times of India |publisher=Timesofindia.indiatimes.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/2008/08/28/stories/2008082856061300.htm |title=The Hindu : National : World Bank&#8217;s new poverty norms find larger number of poor in India |publisher=Thehindu.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Editorials/Define_poverty_anew/articleshow/3423435.cms |title=Define poverty anew- Opinion-The Economic Times |publisher=Economictimes.indiatimes.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7583719.stm |title=BBC NEWS &#124; Business &#124; World poverty 'more widespread' |publisher=News.bbc.co.uk |author=Steve Schifferes |date=27 August 2008<!-- 09:40 UK -->|accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref><ref name="WorldBankPoverty">{{cite web|url=http://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&piPK=64165421&theSitePK=469372&menuPK=64166093&entityID=000158349_20080826113239|title=The developing world is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty|publisher=World Bank|year=2008}}</ref> A 24.3% of the population earned less than $1 (PPP, around $0.25 in nominal terms) a day in 2005, down from 42.1% in 1981.<ref name="WorldBankPoverty"/><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/india/storypage.php?autono=332669|title=India has fewer poor people: World Bank|publisher=Business Standard}}</ref> 41.6% of its population is living below the new international poverty line of $1.25 (PPP) per day, down from 59.8% in 1981.<ref name="WorldBankPoverty"/> The World Bank further estimates that a third of the global poor now reside in India.


Since liberalisation, the government has approved significant banking reforms. While some of these relate to nationalised banks (like encouraging mergers, reducing government interference and increasing profitability and competitiveness), other reforms have opened up the banking and insurance sectors to private and foreign players.<ref name="Datt-8">{{cite book|author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M.|title=Indian Economy|pages=865–867|chapter=50}}</ref><ref name="CIA"/>
Today, more people afford to a [[bicycle]] than ever before. Some 40% of Indian households owns a bicycle, with ownership rates ranging from around 30% to 70% at state level.<ref name="bicycles">{{cite web|url=http://www.bike-eu.com/news/1573/bicycle-ownership-in-india.html|title=Bicycle Ownership in India}}</ref> Housing is still very modest. According to Times of India, "a majority of Indians have per capita space equivalent to or less than a 10 feet x 10 feet room for their living, sleeping, cooking, washing and toilet needs." and "one in every three urban Indians lives in homes too cramped to exceed even the minimum requirements of a prison cell in the US."<ref name="housing">{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/33_of_Indians_live_in_less_space_than_US_prisoners/articleshow/3753189.cms|title=33% of Indians live in less space than US prisoners|publisher=Times of India|year=2008}}</ref> The average is 103 sq ft per person in rural areas and 117 sq ft per person in urban areas.<ref name="housing"/>

==Socio-economic characteristics==
{{main|Socio-economic issues in India}}
===Poverty===
[[Image:BPL Data GOI .png|thumb|250px|Percentage of population living under the poverty line]]
{{main|Poverty in India}}
Large numbers of India's people live in abject poverty. 14.3% of the population earned less than $1 a day in 2005 down from 33.3% in 1990.<ref>[http://www.business-standard.com/india/storypage.php?autono=332669
India has fewer poor people: World Bank]</ref> According to the new World Bank's estimates on poverty based on 2005 data, India has 256 million people, 21.6% of its population, down from 60% in 1981 living below the new international poverty line of $1.25 (PPP) per day. The World Bank further estimates that 13% of the global poor now reside in India. Moreover, India also has 228 million people, or 20.6% of the population living below $2 a day, compared to 72.2% for Sub-Saharan Africa.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/One-third_of_worlds_poor_in_India/articleshow/3409374.cms |title=One-third of world's poor in India: Survey-India-The Times of India |publisher=Timesofindia.indiatimes.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/2008/08/28/stories/2008082856061300.htm |title=The Hindu : National : World Bank&#8217;s new poverty norms find larger number of poor in India |publisher=Thehindu.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Editorials/Define_poverty_anew/articleshow/3423435.cms |title=Define poverty anew- Opinion-The Economic Times |publisher=Economictimes.indiatimes.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7583719.stm |title=BBC NEWS &#124; Business &#124; World poverty 'more widespread' |publisher=News.bbc.co.uk |author=Steve Schifferes |date=27 August 2008<!-- 09:40 UK -->|accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref>


[[Poverty in India]] is some of the starkest in the world. Around half of Indian children are malnourished. The proportion of underweight children is nearly double that of Sub-Saharan Africa.<ref name="underweight">{{cite web|url=http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/SOUTHASIAEXT/0,,contentMDK:20916955~pagePK:146736~piPK:146830~theSitePK:223547,00.html|title=India: Undernourished Children: A Call for Reform and Action|publisher=World Bank}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.medindia.net/news/Malnutrition-Among-Indian-Children-Worse-Than-in-Sub-Saharan-Africa-30955-1.htm|title=Malnutrition Among Indian Children Worse Than in Sub-Saharan Africa|publisher=Medindia}}</ref> However, India has not had [[Famine in India|famines]] since the [[Green Revolution]] in the early 1970s. While poverty in India has reduced significantly, official figures estimate that 27.5%<ref> This figure is extremely sensitive to the surveying methodology used. The Uniform Recall Period (URP) gives 27.5%. The Mixed Recall Period (MRP) gives a figure of 21.8% </ref> of Indians still lived below the national poverty line of $1 (PPP, around 10 rupees in nominal terms) a day in 2004-2005.<ref name="PlanningComm">Planning commission of India. Poverty estimates for 2004-2005 [http://www.planningcommission.gov.in/news/prmar07.pdf]</ref> A 2007 report by the state-run National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector (NCEUS) found that 65% of Indians, or 750 million people, lived on less than 20 rupees per day<ref>[http://nceus.gov.in/Condition_of_workers_sep_2007.pdf NCEUS Report]</ref> with most working in "informal labour sector with no job or social security, living in abject poverty."<ref name="Reuters-1">{{cite news | title=Nearly 80 Percent of India Lives On Half Dollar A Day | date= August 10, 2007 | publisher=Reuters | url=http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSDEL218894|accessdate=2007-08-15}}</ref>
[[Wealth distribution]] in India is improving since the liberalization and with the end of the socialist rule termed as the license raj.<ref>[http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/publications/india_consumer_market/slideshow/main.asp Income classes:India's income distribution widens]</ref> While poverty in India has reduced significantly, official figures estimate that 27.5%<ref> This figure is extremely sensitive to the surveying methodology used. The Uniform Recall Period (URP) gives 27.5%. The Mixed Recall Period (MRP) gives a figure of 21.8% </ref> of Indians still lived below the national poverty line in 2004-2005.<ref name="PlanningComm">Planning commission of India. Poverty estimates for 2004-2005 [http://www.planningcommission.gov.in/news/prmar07.pdf]</ref> A 2007 report by the state-run National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector (NCEUS) found that 65% of Indians, or 750 million people, lived on less than 20 rupees per day<ref>[http://nceus.gov.in/Condition_of_workers_sep_2007.pdf NCEUS Report]</ref> with most working in "informal labour sector with no job or social security, living in abject poverty."<ref name="Reuters-1">{{cite news | title=Nearly 80 Percent of India Lives On Half Dollar A Day | date= August 10, 2007 | publisher=Reuters | url=http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSDEL218894|accessdate=2007-08-15}}</ref>


Since the early 1950s, successive governments have implemented various schemes, under [[Planned economy|planning]], to alleviate poverty, that have met with partial success. All these programmes have relied upon the strategies of the ''Food for work'' programme and ''National Rural Employment Programme'' of the 1980s, which attempted to use the unemployed to generate productive assets and build rural infrastructure.<ref name="survey"/> In August 2005, the [[Parliament of India|Indian parliament]] passed the ''Rural Employment Guarantee Bill'', the largest programme of this type in terms of cost and coverage, which promises 100 days of minimum wage employment to every rural household in 200 of [[Districts of India|India's 600 districts]]. {{inote|ani-REGB|REGB}} The question of whether economic reforms have reduced poverty or not has fuelled debates without generating any clear cut answers and has also put political pressure on further economic reforms, especially those involving the downsizing of labour and cutting agricultural subsidies.<ref name="Datt-9">{{cite book|author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M.|title=Indian Economy|pages=367,369,370|chapter=22}}</ref><ref name="jgsy">{{cite web|title=Jawahar gram samriddhi yojana|url=http://rural.nic.in/jgsyg.htm| accessdate = 2005-07-09}}</ref>
Since the early 1950s, successive governments have implemented various schemes, under [[Planned economy|planning]], to alleviate poverty, that have met with partial success. All these programmes have relied upon the strategies of the ''Food for work'' programme and ''National Rural Employment Programme'' of the 1980s, which attempted to use the unemployed to generate productive assets and build rural infrastructure.<ref name="survey"/> In August 2005, the [[Parliament of India|Indian parliament]] passed the ''Rural Employment Guarantee Bill'', the largest programme of this type in terms of cost and coverage, which promises 100 days of minimum wage employment to every rural household in 200 of [[Districts of India|India's 600 districts]]. {{inote|ani-REGB|REGB}} The question of whether economic reforms have reduced poverty or not has fuelled debates without generating any clear cut answers and has also put political pressure on further economic reforms, especially those involving the downsizing of labour and cutting agricultural subsidies.<ref name="Datt-9">{{cite book|author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M.|title=Indian Economy|pages=367,369,370|chapter=22}}</ref><ref name="jgsy">{{cite web|title=Jawahar gram samriddhi yojana|url=http://rural.nic.in/jgsyg.htm| accessdate = 2005-07-09}}</ref>

McKinsey has made an [http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/publications/india_consumer_market/slideshow/main.asp animation of the income distribution].

===Education and employment===
Around two thirds of Indian children can not read a simple story.<ref name="dpreview">{{cite web|url=http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/SOUTHASIAEXT/0,,contentMDK:20980493~pagePK:146736~piPK:146830~theSitePK:223547,00.html|title=Development Policy Review|publisher=World Bank}}</ref> Around two thirds can not calculate a simple division.<ref name="dpreview"/>

Agricultural and allied sectors accounted for about 57% of the total workforce in 1999–2000, down from 60% in 1993–94. While agriculture has faced stagnation in growth, services have seen a steady growth. Of the total workforce, 8% is in the organised sector, two-thirds of which are in the public sector. The NSSO survey estimated that in 1999–2000, 106 million, nearly 10% of the population were unemployed and the overall unemployment rate was 7.32%, with rural areas doing marginally better (7.21%) than urban areas (7.65%). India's labor force is growing by 2.5% every year, but employment is growing only at 2.3% a year.<ref name="unemployment">[http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/pdf/Archive/Soc/soc.culture.pakistan/2008-09/msg00054.pdf Growing Unemployment Problem in India]</ref>

Unemployment in India is characterized by chronic [[underemployment]] or [[Unemployment types#Hidden unemployment|disguised unemployment]]. Government schemes that target eradication of both poverty and unemployment (which in recent decades has sent millions of poor and unskilled people into urban areas in search of livelihoods) attempt to solve the problem, by providing financial assistance for setting up businesses, skill honing, setting up public sector enterprises, reservations in governments, etc. The decreased role of the public sector after liberalization has further underlined the need for focusing on better education and has also put political pressure on further reforms.<ref name="Datt-11">{{cite book | author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M.|title=Indian Economy | pages = 403–405 | chapter = 24}}</ref><ref name="survey"/>

In 2006, [[remittances]] from Indian migrants overseas made up $27 billion or about 3% of India's GDP.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nrirealtynews.com/stories/oct07/remittances-from-indians-abroad-push-india-to-top.php|title=Remittances from Indians abroad push India to the top|year=2007}}</ref>


===Corruption===
===Corruption===
Line 245: Line 203:


The [[Right to Information Act]] (2005) and equivalent acts in the states, that require government officials to furnish information requested by citizens or face punitive action, computerisation of services and various central and state government acts that established vigilance commissions have considerably reduced corruption or at least have opened up avenues to redress grievances.<ref name="2005-TI-study">{{Cite web|url=http://www.cmsindia.org/cms/events/corruption.pdf|format=PDF| title= India Corruption Study 2005| author= Transparency International India| publisher = Centre for Media Studies|accessdate = 2008-03-14}}</ref> The 2007 report by Transparency International ranks India at 72nd place and states that significant improvements were made by India in reducing corruption.<ref name="transparency1"> {{Cite web|url=http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2007| title= 2007 Corruption Perceptions Index reinforces link between poverty and corruption|publisher=Transparency International|accessdate=2008-03-15}}</ref><ref name = "transparency2">{{Cite web|url=http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2006/cpi_2006__1/cpi_table| title =CPI Table | publisher= [[Transparency International]]| accessdate= 2008-03-15}}</ref>
The [[Right to Information Act]] (2005) and equivalent acts in the states, that require government officials to furnish information requested by citizens or face punitive action, computerisation of services and various central and state government acts that established vigilance commissions have considerably reduced corruption or at least have opened up avenues to redress grievances.<ref name="2005-TI-study">{{Cite web|url=http://www.cmsindia.org/cms/events/corruption.pdf|format=PDF| title= India Corruption Study 2005| author= Transparency International India| publisher = Centre for Media Studies|accessdate = 2008-03-14}}</ref> The 2007 report by Transparency International ranks India at 72nd place and states that significant improvements were made by India in reducing corruption.<ref name="transparency1"> {{Cite web|url=http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2007| title= 2007 Corruption Perceptions Index reinforces link between poverty and corruption|publisher=Transparency International|accessdate=2008-03-15}}</ref><ref name = "transparency2">{{Cite web|url=http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2006/cpi_2006__1/cpi_table| title =CPI Table | publisher= [[Transparency International]]| accessdate= 2008-03-15}}</ref>

===Occupations and unemployment===
[[Image:Jodhpurplant.jpg|thumb|Industrial plant in a rural area near [[Jodhpur]], Rajasthan. Industrial growth in India has provided increase employment opportunities across India.]]
Agricultural and allied sectors accounted for about 57% of the total workforce in 1999–2000, down from 60% in 1993–94. While agriculture has faced stagnation in growth, services have seen a steady growth. Of the total workforce, 8% is in the organised sector, two-thirds of which are in the public sector. The NSSO survey estimated that in 1999–2000, 106 million, nearly 10% of the population were unemployed and the overall unemployment rate was 7.32%, with rural areas doing marginally better (7.21%) than urban areas (7.65%).

Unemployment in India is characterized by chronic [[underemployment]] or [[Unemployment types#Hidden unemployment|disguised unemployment]]. Government schemes that target eradication of both poverty and unemployment (which in recent decades has sent millions of poor and unskilled people into urban areas in search of livelihoods) attempt to solve the problem, by providing financial assistance for setting up businesses, skill honing, setting up public sector enterprises, reservations in governments, etc. The decreased role of the public sector after liberalization has further underlined the need for focusing on better education and has also put political pressure on further reforms.<ref name="Datt-11">{{cite book | author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M.|title=Indian Economy | pages = 403–405 | chapter = 24}}</ref><ref name="survey"/>

[[Image:Kochi India slums.jpg|thumb|left|200px|Slums next to high-rise commercial buildings in Kaloor, Kochi. Hundreds of people, mostly comprising migrant labourers who come to the city seeking job prospects, reside in such shabby areas.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/nolpda/ukfs_news/hi/newsid_6677000/6677645.stm |title=BBC News Online &#124; Business &#124; Winners and losers as India booms |publisher=News.bbc.co.uk |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref>]]


===Regional imbalance===
===Regional imbalance===
{{main|List of regions of India}}
[[File:NH11India20080212-04.jpg|thumb|Rural life in [[Rajasthan]].]]
{{see also|States of India by size of economy|List of regions of India}}
One of the critical problems facing India's economy is the sharp and growing regional variations among India's different states and territories in terms of per capita income, poverty, availability of infrastructure and socio-economic development.<ref name="Datt-13">{{cite book | author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. | title=Indian Economy | pages = 471–472 | chapter = 27}}</ref>
One of the critical problems facing India's economy is the sharp and growing regional variations among India's different states and territories in terms of per capita income, poverty, availability of infrastructure and socio-economic development.<ref name="Datt-13">{{cite book | author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. | title=Indian Economy | pages = 471–472 | chapter = 27}}</ref>

Between 1999 and 2008, the annualized growth rates for [[Gujarat]] (8.8%), [[Haryana]] (8.7%), or [[Delhi]] (7.4%) were much higher than for [[Bihar]] (5.1%), [[Uttar Pradesh]] (4.4%), or [[Madhya Pradesh]] (3.5%).<ref name="lakshmi">{{cite web|url=http://www.economist.com/surveys/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12749719&fsrc=rss|title=A special report on India: Ruled by Lakshmi|date=11 December 2008|publisher=The Economist}}</ref>

Poverty rates in rural [[Orissa]] (43%) and rural [[Bihar]] (40%) are worse than in the world's poorest countries such as [[Malawi]].<ref name="dpreview"/> On the other hand, rural [[Haryana]] (5.7%) and rural [[Punjab]] (2.4%) compare well with middle-income countries.<ref name="dpreview"/>


The five-year plans have attempted to reduce regional disparities by encouraging industrial development in the interior regions, but industries still tend to concentrate around urban areas and port cities<ref name="bharadwaj-1">{{cite book | author=Bharadwaj, Krishna | year=1991 | chapter = Regional differentiation in India | editor=Sathyamurthy, T.V. (ed.) | title = Industry & agriculture in India since independence | pages=189–199 | publisher=Oxford University Press | isbn=0-19-564394-1}}</ref> After liberalization, the more advanced states are better placed to benefit from them, with infrastructure like well developed ports, urbanisation and an educated and skilled workforce which attract manufacturing and service sectors. The union and state governments of backward regions are trying to reduce the disparities by offering tax holidays, cheap land, etc., and focusing more on sectors like tourism, which although being geographically and historically determined, can become a source of growth and is faster to develop than other sectors.<ref name="understanding-2">{{cite paper | author=Sachs, D. Jeffrey; Bajpai, Nirupam and Ramiah, Ananthi | title=Understanding Regional Economic Growth in India | year=2002 | version=Working paper 88 | url=http://www2.cid.harvard.edu/cidwp/088.pdf | archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20070701042205/http://www2.cid.harvard.edu/cidwp/088.pdf | archivedate=2007-07-01|format=PDF}}</ref><ref name="planning-2">{{cite web | author=Kurian, N.J. | title=Regional disparities in india | work= | url=http://planningcommission.nic.in/reports/sereport/ser/vision2025/regdsprty.doc | accessdate = 2005-08-06}}</ref>
The five-year plans have attempted to reduce regional disparities by encouraging industrial development in the interior regions, but industries still tend to concentrate around urban areas and port cities<ref name="bharadwaj-1">{{cite book | author=Bharadwaj, Krishna | year=1991 | chapter = Regional differentiation in India | editor=Sathyamurthy, T.V. (ed.) | title = Industry & agriculture in India since independence | pages=189–199 | publisher=Oxford University Press | isbn=0-19-564394-1}}</ref> After liberalization, the more advanced states are better placed to benefit from them, with infrastructure like well developed ports, urbanisation and an educated and skilled workforce which attract manufacturing and service sectors. The union and state governments of backward regions are trying to reduce the disparities by offering tax holidays, cheap land, etc., and focusing more on sectors like tourism, which although being geographically and historically determined, can become a source of growth and is faster to develop than other sectors.<ref name="understanding-2">{{cite paper | author=Sachs, D. Jeffrey; Bajpai, Nirupam and Ramiah, Ananthi | title=Understanding Regional Economic Growth in India | year=2002 | version=Working paper 88 | url=http://www2.cid.harvard.edu/cidwp/088.pdf | archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20070701042205/http://www2.cid.harvard.edu/cidwp/088.pdf | archivedate=2007-07-01|format=PDF}}</ref><ref name="planning-2">{{cite web | author=Kurian, N.J. | title=Regional disparities in india | work= | url=http://planningcommission.nic.in/reports/sereport/ser/vision2025/regdsprty.doc | accessdate = 2005-08-06}}</ref>
{{see also|States of India by size of economy}}

{{see also|Standard of living in India#Regional imbalance}}
===Environment and health===
[[File:Ganges river at Varanasi 2008.jpeg|thumb|left|Millions depend on the polluted [[Ganges river]].]]
{{see also|Famine in India|Environment in India|Water supply and sanitation in India|HIV/AIDS in India}}
On Yale and Columbia's [[Environmental Performance Index]], India's score is 21/100 on sanitation, compared with 67/100 for the region and 48/100 for the country income group.<ref name="putrid"/>

About 1.2 billion people in developing nations lack clean, safe water because most household and industrial wastes are dumped directly into rivers and lakes without treatment. This contributes to the rapid increase in waterborne diseases in humans.<ref>Gleick PH. 1993. Water in Crisis. New York: Oxford University Press.</ref> Out of India's 3119 towns and cities, just 209 have partial treatment facilities, and only 8 have full wastewater treatment facilities (WHO 1992).<ref>Russell Hopfenberg and David Pimentel [http://www.oilcrash.com/articles/populatn.htm HUMAN POPULATION NUMBERS AS A FUNCTION OF FOOD SUPPLY] oilcrash.com Retrieved on- February 2008</ref> 114 cities dump untreated [[sewage]] and partially cremated bodies directly into the Ganges River.<ref>National Geographic Society. 1995. Water: A Story of Hope. Washington (DC): National Geographic Society</ref> Downstream, the untreated water is used for drinking, bathing, and washing. This situation is typical of many rivers in India as well as other developing countries. NewsWeek describes Delhi's sacred [[Yamuna River]] as "a putrid ribbon of black sludge" where fecal bacteria is 10,000 over safety limits despite a 15-year program to address the problem.<ref name="putrid">[http://www.newsweek.com/id/143694 SPECIAL REPORT: Putrid Rivers Of Sludge: Delhi's bureaucrats bicker over cholera and the role of city drains and state sewers.] [[NewsWeek]] on July 7-14, 2008 issue</ref> [[Cholera]] epidemics are not unknown.<ref name="putrid"/> Open [[defecation]] is widespread even in urban areas of India.<ref name="pt">[http://www.boloji.com/wfs5/wfs739.htm The Politics of Toilets], ''Boloji''</ref><ref name="ng">[http://www7.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0705/feature3/text3.html Mumbai Slum: Dharavi], ''[[National Geographic]]'', May 2007</ref>

Indoor air pollution from burning wood, coal and animal dung is widespread.<ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-1790711,prtpage-1.cms 'Indoor' air pollution is the biggest killer]. [[The Times of India]]</ref> 70% of rural households in India lack ventilation. Particulate concentrations in houses are reported to range from 8,300 to 15,000 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, greatly exceeding the 75 μg/m<sup>3</sup> maximum standard for indoor particulate matter in the United States.<ref>Christiani DC. 1993. Urban and trans-boundary air pollution: Human health consequences. Pages 13-30 in Chivian E, McCally M, Hu H, Haines A, eds. Critical Condition: Human Health and the Environment. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.</ref>

Changes in ecosystem biological diversity, evolution of parasites, and invasion by exotic species all frequently result in disease outbreaks such as [[cholera]] which emerged in 1992 in India. The frequency of [[AIDS]]/[[HIV]] is increasing. In 1996, about 46,000 Indians out of 2.8 million (1.6 % of the population) tested were found to be infected with HIV.<ref name="hivaids">Burns JF. 1996. Denial and taboo blind India to the horror of its AIDS scourge. New York Times, 22 September: A1.</ref>

Even in the rich regions, health care is poor. World Bank reports that "a detailed survey of the knowledge of medical practitioners
for treating five common conditions in Delhi found that the typical quality doctor in a public primary health center has a more than 50-50 chance of recommending a harmful treatment". The competence rating of India's doctors is below [[Tanzania]]'s.<ref name="dpreview"/>


== External trade and investment ==
== External trade and investment ==
Line 289: Line 238:
|}
|}


[[Image:ImageMundraGUjarat.jpg|thumb|Increasing foreign trade has resulted in rapid expansion of India's shipping industry. Shown here is the newly constructed [[Mundra Port]] in [[Gujarat]].]]
[[International trade]] as a proportion of GDP reached 24% by 2006, up from 6% in 1985 and still relatively moderate.<ref name="oecd"/><ref name="Trade">{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2008/04/18/stories/2008041850551000.htm|title=Rise in Indian services exports less than global average: WTO|date=2008-04-18|accessdate=2008-11-16|author=G. Srinivasan|publisher=[[The Hindu Business Line]]}}</ref>

India currently accounts for 1.2% of World trade as of 2006 according to the WTO.<ref>[http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp195_e.htm India's Trade policy review by the wto]</ref> Until the liberalisation of 1991, India was largely and intentionally isolated from the world markets, to protect its fledging economy and to achieve self-reliance. Foreign trade was subject to import tariffs, export taxes and quantitative restrictions, while [[foreign direct investment]] was restricted by upper-limit equity participation, restrictions on technology transfer, export obligations and government approvals; these approvals were needed for nearly 60% of new FDI in the industrial sector. The restrictions ensured that FDI averaged only around $200M annually between 1985 and 1991; a large percentage of the capital flows consisted of foreign aid, commercial borrowing and deposits of [[non-resident Indian and Person of Indian Origin|non-resident Indian]]s.<ref name="tn-srinivasan">{{cite paper | author=Srinivasan, T.N. | title=Economic Reforms and Global Integration | year=2002 | version=January 17, 2002 | url=http://www.econ.yale.edu/%7Esrinivas/ec_reforms.pdf|format=PDF}}</ref>
India currently accounts for 1.2% of World trade as of 2006 according to the WTO.<ref>[http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp195_e.htm India's Trade policy review by the wto]</ref> Until the liberalisation of 1991, India was largely and intentionally isolated from the world markets, to protect its fledging economy and to achieve self-reliance. Foreign trade was subject to import tariffs, export taxes and quantitative restrictions, while [[foreign direct investment]] was restricted by upper-limit equity participation, restrictions on technology transfer, export obligations and government approvals; these approvals were needed for nearly 60% of new FDI in the industrial sector. The restrictions ensured that FDI averaged only around $200M annually between 1985 and 1991; a large percentage of the capital flows consisted of foreign aid, commercial borrowing and deposits of [[non-resident Indian and Person of Indian Origin|non-resident Indian]]s.<ref name="tn-srinivasan">{{cite paper | author=Srinivasan, T.N. | title=Economic Reforms and Global Integration | year=2002 | version=January 17, 2002 | url=http://www.econ.yale.edu/%7Esrinivas/ec_reforms.pdf|format=PDF}}</ref>
[[Image:2006Indian exports.PNG|thumb|left|Indian exports in 2006]]


India's exports were stagnant for the first 15 years after independence, due to the predominance of tea, jute and [[cotton]] manufactures, demand for which was generally [[Elasticity (economics)|inelastic]]. Imports in the same period consisted predominantly of machinery, equipment and raw materials, due to nascent industrialisation. Since liberalisation, the value of India's international trade has become more broad-based and has risen to Rs. 63,080,109 [[crore]]s in 2003–04 from Rs.1,250 crores in 1950–51.{{Fact|date=June 2007}} India's major trading partners are China, the US, the UAE, the UK, Japan and the EU.<ref name="Datt-14">{{cite book | author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. | title=Indian Economy | pages = 767,772–76 | chapter = 46}}</ref> The exports during April 2007 were $12.31 billion up by 16% and import were $17.68 billion with an increase of 18.06% over the previous year.<ref>[http://commerce.nic.in/tradestats/indiatrade_press.asp INDIA’S FOREIGN TRADE: APRIL-DECEMBER, 2007]</ref>
India's exports were stagnant for the first 15 years after independence, due to the predominance of tea, jute and [[cotton]] manufactures, demand for which was generally [[Elasticity (economics)|inelastic]]. Imports in the same period consisted predominantly of machinery, equipment and raw materials, due to nascent industrialisation. Since liberalisation, the value of India's international trade has become more broad-based and has risen to Rs. 63,080,109 [[crore]]s in 2003–04 from Rs.1,250 crores in 1950–51.{{Fact|date=June 2007}} India's major trading partners are China, the US, the UAE, the UK, Japan and the EU.<ref name="Datt-14">{{cite book | author=Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. | title=Indian Economy | pages = 767,772–76 | chapter = 46}}</ref> The exports during April 2007 were $12.31 billion up by 16% and import were $17.68 billion with an increase of 18.06% over the previous year.<ref>[http://commerce.nic.in/tradestats/indiatrade_press.asp INDIA’S FOREIGN TRADE: APRIL-DECEMBER, 2007]</ref>


[[Image:2006Indian exports.PNG|thumb|Indian exports in 2006]]
India is a founding-member of [[General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade]] (GATT) since 1947 and its successor, the [[World Trade Organization]]. While participating actively in its general council meetings, India has been crucial in voicing the concerns of the [[Developing country|developing world]]. For instance, India has continued its opposition to the inclusion of such matters as labour and environment issues and other ''[[Non-tariff barriers to trade|non-tariff barriers]]'' into the WTO policies.<ref name="wto">{{cite web | title=India & the World Trade Organization | url=http://www.indianembassy.org/policy/WTO/overview.html | accessdate = 2005-07-09}}</ref>
India is a founding-member of [[General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade]] (GATT) since 1947 and its successor, the [[World Trade Organization]]. While participating actively in its general council meetings, India has been crucial in voicing the concerns of the [[Developing country|developing world]]. For instance, India has continued its opposition to the inclusion of such matters as labour and environment issues and other ''[[Non-tariff barriers to trade|non-tariff barriers]]'' into the WTO policies.<ref name="wto">{{cite web | title=India & the World Trade Organization | url=http://www.indianembassy.org/policy/WTO/overview.html | accessdate = 2005-07-09}}</ref>

Although individual leaders have proposed new policies, India is still hostile to [[international trade]]. India was proud of the [[Doha Development Round]] failure.<ref name="neighbourhood">{{cite web|url=http://www.economist.com/specialreports/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12749743|title=A special report on India: India elsewhere: An awkward neighbour in a troublesome neighbourhood|year=2008|publisher=[[The Economist]]}}</ref>


=== Balance of payments ===
=== Balance of payments ===
Since independence, India's [[balance of payments]] on its [[current account]] has been negative. Since liberalisation in the 1990s (precipitated by a balance of payment crisis), India's exports have been consistently rising, covering 80.3% of its imports in 2002–03, up from 66.2% in 1990–91. Although India is still a net importer, since 1996–97, its overall balance of payments (i.e., including the [[capital account]] balance), has been positive, largely on account of increased foreign direct investment and deposits from [[non-resident Indian and Person of Indian Origin|non-resident Indian]]s; until this time, the overall balance was only occasionally positive on account of external assistance and commercial borrowings. As a result, India's foreign currency reserves stood at $285 billion in 2008, which could be used in infrastructural development of the country if used effectively.
Since independence, India's [[balance of payments]] on its [[current account]] has been negative. Since liberalisation in the 1990s (precipitated by a balance of payment crisis), India's exports have been consistently rising, covering 80.3% of its imports in 2002–03, up from 66.2% in 1990–91. Although India is still a net importer, since 1996–97, its overall balance of payments (i.e., including the [[capital account]] balance), has been positive, largely on account of increased foreign direct investment and deposits from [[non-resident Indian and Person of Indian Origin|non-resident Indian]]s; until this time, the overall balance was only occasionally positive on account of external assistance and commercial borrowings. As a result, India's foreign currency reserves stood at $285 billion in 2008, which could be used in infrastructural development of the country if used effectively.


[[Image:Jnpt.jpg|thumb|India is a net importer: Per the CIA factbook in 2007, imports were $224bn and exports $140bn. Shown here is the cargo of a container ship being unloaded at the [[Jawaharlal Nehru Port]], [[Navi Mumbai]]]]
India's reliance on external assistance and commercial borrowings has decreased since 1991–92, and since 2002–03, it has gradually been repaying these debts. Declining interest rates and reduced borrowings decreased India's debt service ratio to 4.5% in 2007.<ref>[http://www.indiainfoline.com/news/innernews.asp?storyId=55091&lmn=1 India`s external debt rises to US$190.5bn]</ref> {{inote|rbi-handbook-aug2004|rbi}}
India's reliance on external assistance and commercial borrowings has decreased since 1991–92, and since 2002–03, it has gradually been repaying these debts. Declining interest rates and reduced borrowings decreased India's debt service ratio to 4.5% in 2007.<ref>[http://www.indiainfoline.com/news/innernews.asp?storyId=55091&lmn=1 India`s external debt rises to US$190.5bn]</ref> {{inote|rbi-handbook-aug2004|rbi}}
In India, [[External Commercial Borrowing]]s (ECBs) are being permitted by the Government for providing an additional source of funds to Indian corporates. The [[Ministry of Finance]] monitors and regulates these borrowings (ECBs) through ECB policy guidelines.<ref>[http://www.banknetindia.com/banking/ecb.htm External Commercial Borrowings]</ref>
In India, [[External Commercial Borrowing]]s (ECBs) are being permitted by the Government for providing an additional source of funds to Indian corporates. The [[Ministry of Finance]] monitors and regulates these borrowings (ECBs) through ECB policy guidelines.<ref>[http://www.banknetindia.com/banking/ecb.htm External Commercial Borrowings]</ref>


===Foreign direct investment in India===
===Investment===
[[Foreign direct investment]] in India has reached 2% of GDP, compared with 0.1% in 1990, and Indian investment in other countries rose sharply in 2006.<ref name="oecd"/>

As the fourth-largest economy in the world in PPP terms, India is a preferred destination for [[foreign direct investment]]s (FDI);<ref name="financialexpress1">{{cite web|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/news/India-2nd-best-country-for-biz-investment-Survey/343344/ |title=India 2nd best country for biz investment: Survey - The Financial Express |publisher=Financialexpress.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref> India has strengths in information technology and other significant areas such as auto components, chemicals, apparels, pharmaceuticals, and jewellery. Despite a surge in foreign investments, rigid FDI policies resulted in a significant hindrance. However, due to some positive economic reforms aimed at deregulating the economy and stimulating foreign investment, India has positioned itself as one of the front-runners of the rapidly growing Asia Pacific Region.<ref name="financialexpress1"/> India has a large pool of skilled managerial and technical expertise. The size of the middle-class population stands at 50 million and represents a growing consumer market.<ref>[http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/mginews/bigspenders.asp Next Big Spenders: India's Middle Class] </ref>
As the fourth-largest economy in the world in PPP terms, India is a preferred destination for [[foreign direct investment]]s (FDI);<ref name="financialexpress1">{{cite web|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/news/India-2nd-best-country-for-biz-investment-Survey/343344/ |title=India 2nd best country for biz investment: Survey - The Financial Express |publisher=Financialexpress.com |date= |accessdate=2008-11-03}}</ref> India has strengths in information technology and other significant areas such as auto components, chemicals, apparels, pharmaceuticals, and jewellery. Despite a surge in foreign investments, rigid FDI policies resulted in a significant hindrance. However, due to some positive economic reforms aimed at deregulating the economy and stimulating foreign investment, India has positioned itself as one of the front-runners of the rapidly growing Asia Pacific Region.<ref name="financialexpress1"/> India has a large pool of skilled managerial and technical expertise. The size of the middle-class population stands at 50 million and represents a growing consumer market.<ref>[http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/mginews/bigspenders.asp Next Big Spenders: India's Middle Class] </ref>


India's recently liberalized FDI policy (2005) allows up to a 100% FDI stake in ventures. Industrial policy reforms have substantially reduced industrial licensing requirements, removed restrictions on expansion and facilitated easy access to foreign technology and foreign direct investment FDI. The upward moving growth curve of the real-estate sector owes some credit to a booming economy and liberalized FDI regime. In March 2005, the government amended the rules to allow 100 per cent FDI in the construction business.<ref>[http://www.hindu.com/2005/02/25/stories/2005022506990100.htm The Hinduonline] </ref> This automatic route has been permitted in townships, housing, built-up infrastructure and construction development projects including housing, commercial premises, hotels, resorts, hospitals, educational institutions, recreational facilities, and city- and regional-level infrastructure.
India's recently liberalized FDI policy (2005) allows up to a 100% FDI stake in ventures. Industrial policy reforms have substantially reduced industrial licensing requirements, removed restrictions on expansion and facilitated easy access to foreign technology and foreign direct investment FDI. The upward moving growth curve of the real-estate sector owes some credit to a booming economy and liberalized FDI regime. In March 2005, the government amended the rules to allow 100 per cent FDI in the construction business.<ref>[http://www.hindu.com/2005/02/25/stories/2005022506990100.htm The Hinduonline] </ref> This automatic route has been permitted in townships, housing, built-up infrastructure and construction development projects including housing, commercial premises, hotels, resorts, hospitals, educational institutions, recreational facilities, and city- and regional-level infrastructure.


A number of changes were approved on the FDI policy to remove the caps in most sectors. Fields which require relaxation in FDI restrictions include civil aviation, construction development, industrial parks, petroleum and natural gas, commodity exchanges, credit-information services and mining. But this still leaves an unfinished agenda of permitting greater foreign investment in politically sensitive areas such as insurance and retailing. FDI inflows into India reached a record US$19.5bn in fiscal year 2006/07 (April-March), according to the government's Secretariat for Industrial Assistance. This was more than double the total of US$7.8bn in the previous fiscal year. The FDI inflow for 2007-08 has been reported as $24bn<ref>[http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=54c00804-3161-4609-ad33-b5307f3c1b2e&ParentID=6d35884a-76ac-433c-af16-ccc72908c3e5&MatchID1=4689&TeamID1=4&TeamID2=1&MatchType1=1&SeriesID1=1182&PrimaryID=4689&Headline=India+attracts+%24+25+billion+FDI+in+2007-08 Hindustan Times ''India attracts $ 25 billion FDI in 2007-08'']</ref> and for 2008-09, it is expected to be above $35 billion.<ref>[http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Economy/FDI_to_exceed_USD_35_bn_in_08-09/articleshow/3373887.cms Economic Times ''FDI inflows to exceed USD 35 billion target in 2008-09'']</ref> A critical factor in determining India's continued economic growth and realizing the potential to be an economic superpower is going to depend on how the government can create incentives for FDI flow across a large number of sectors in India.<ref>{{cite book|title=Indian Economic Superpower: Fiction or Future?|author=Jayashankar M. Swaminathan|publisher=World Scientific Publishing|year=2008}}</ref>
A number of changes were approved on the FDI policy to remove the caps in most sectors. Fields which require relaxation in FDI restrictions include civil aviation, construction development, industrial parks, petroleum and natural gas, commodity exchanges, credit-information services and mining. But this still leaves an unfinished agenda of permitting greater foreign investment in politically sensitive areas such as insurance and retailing. FDI inflows into India reached a record US$19.5bn in fiscal year 2006/07 (April-March), according to the government's Secretariat for Industrial Assistance. This was more than double the total of US$7.8bn in the previous fiscal year. The FDI inflow for 2007-08 has been reported as $24bn<ref>[http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=54c00804-3161-4609-ad33-b5307f3c1b2e&ParentID=6d35884a-76ac-433c-af16-ccc72908c3e5&MatchID1=4689&TeamID1=4&TeamID2=1&MatchType1=1&SeriesID1=1182&PrimaryID=4689&Headline=India+attracts+%24+25+billion+FDI+in+2007-08 Hindustan Times ''India attracts $ 25 billion FDI in 2007-08'']</ref> and for 2008-09, it is expected to be above $35 billion.<ref>[http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Economy/FDI_to_exceed_USD_35_bn_in_08-09/articleshow/3373887.cms Economic Times ''FDI inflows to exceed USD 35 billion target in 2008-09'']</ref> A critical factor in determining India's continued economic growth and realizing the potential to be an economic superpower is going to depend on how the government can create incentives for FDI flow across a large number of sectors in India.<ref>[Indian Economic Superpower: Fiction or Future? edited by Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, World Scientific Publishing, 2008]</ref>


== See also ==
== See also ==
Line 322: Line 267:
* [[Energy policy of India|Energy policy]]
* [[Energy policy of India|Energy policy]]
* [[List of co-operative banks in India]]
* [[List of co-operative banks in India]]
* [[Indian Construction Industry]]


==Notes==
==Notes==
Line 414: Line 358:


{{Link FA|mr}}
{{Link FA|mr}}

[[de:Wirtschaft Indiens]]
[[de:Wirtschaft Indiens]]
[[dv:އިންޑިޔާގެ އިޤްތިޞާދު]]
[[dv:އިންޑިޔާގެ އިޤްތިޞާދު]]

Revision as of 23:15, 6 January 2009

Template:Economy of India infobox The economy of India, measured in terms of purchasing power parity (PPP), is the world's fourth largest with a GDP of approximately US$3 trillion (2007).[1][2][3] When measured in terms of exchange rate, it has the world's twelfth largest economy with a GDP (nominal) of US$1.2 trillion (2007).[4] It recorded a GDP growth rate of 9.1% for the fiscal year 2007–2008, making it the world's second-fastest growing major economy.[5] However, due to the current global economic crisis, India's economic growth is expected to slow down to 6.7% in 2009.[6] Despite sustained economic development over the past decade, India continues to battle widespread poverty.[7] India's population of 1.2 billion, the world's second largest, has an estimated per capita income of US$3,963, measured by PPP, and US$941, measured in nominal terms, as of 2007.

India's economy is diverse and consist of various activities including manufacturing, agriculture and services. Although most of the Indian workforce still earns its livelihood directly or indirectly through agriculture and manufacturing, high tech services are a growing sector and play an increasingly important role in India's economy. The advent of the digital age, and the large number of young and educated populace fluent in English, is gradually transforming India as an important 'back office' destination for global outsourcing of customer services and technical support. India is a major exporter of highly-skilled workers in software and financial services, and software engineering. Other sectors like manufacturing, telecommunication, shipbuilding, aviation , tourism and retailing are showing strong potentials with higher growth rates.

India followed a socialist-inspired approach for most of its independent history, with strict government control over private sector participation, foreign trade, and foreign direct investment. However, since the early 1990s, India has gradually opened up its markets through economic reforms by reducing government controls on foreign trade and investment. The privatisation of publicly owned industries and the opening up of certain sectors to private and foreign interests has proceeded slowly amid political debate.

India faces a fast-growing population and the challenge of reducing economic and social inequality. Poverty remains a serious problem, although it has declined significantly since independence.

History

India's economic history can be broadly divided into three eras, beginning with the pre-colonial period lasting up to the 17th century. The advent of British colonisation started the colonial period in the 17th century, which ended with independence in 1947. The third period stretches from independence in 1947 until now.

Pre-colonial

The citizens of the Indus Valley civilisation, a permanent and predominantly urban settlement that flourished between 2800 BC and 1800 BC, practiced agriculture, domesticated animals, used uniform weights and measures, made tools and weapons, and traded with other cities. Evidence of well planned streets, a drainage system and water supply reveals their knowledge of urban planning, which included the world's first urban sanitation systems and the existence of a form of municipal government.[8]

Silver coin minted during the reign of the Gupta king Kumara Gupta I (AD 414–55)

The 1872 census revealed that 99.3% of the population of the region constituting present-day India resided in villages,[9] whose economies were largely isolated and self-sustaining, with agriculture the predominant occupation. This satisfied the food requirements of the village and provided raw materials for hand-based industries, such as textiles, food processing and crafts. Although many kingdoms and rulers issued coins, barter was prevalent. Villages paid a portion of their agricultural produce as revenue to the rulers, while its craftsmen received a part of the crops at harvest time for their services.[10]

Religion, especially Hinduism, and the caste and the joint family systems, played an influential role in shaping economic activities.[11] The caste system functioned much like medieval European guilds, ensuring the division of labour, providing for the training of apprentices and, in some cases, allowing manufacturers to achieve narrow specialization. For instance, in certain regions, producing each variety of cloth was the speciality of a particular sub-caste.

Estimates of the per capita income of India (1857–1900) as per 1948–49 prices.[12]

Textiles such as muslin, Calicos, shawls, and agricultural products such as pepper, cinnamon, opium and indigo were exported to Europe, the Middle East and South East Asia in return for gold and silver.[13]

Assessment of India's pre-colonial economy is mostly qualitative, owing to the lack of quantitative information. One estimate puts the revenue of Akbar's Mughal Empire in 1600 at £17.5 million, in contrast with the total revenue of Great Britain in 1800, which totalled £16 million.[14] India, by the time of the arrival of the British, was a largely traditional agrarian economy with a dominant subsistence sector dependent on primitive technology. It existed alongside a competitively developed network of commerce, manufacturing and credit. After the fall of the Mughals, India was administered by Maratha Empire. The Maratha Empire's budget in 1740s, at its peak, was Rs. 100 million. After the loss at Panipat, the Maratha Empire disintegrated into confederate states of Gwalior, Baroda, Indore, Jhansi, Nagpur, Pune and Kolhapur. Gwalior state had a budget of Rs. 30M. However, at this time, British East India company entered the Indian political theatre. Until 1857, when India was firmly under the British crown, the country remained in a state of political instability due to internecine wars and conflicts.[15]

Colonial

An aerial view of Calcutta Port taken in 1945. Calcutta, which was the economic hub of British India, saw increased industrial activity during World War II.

Company rule in India brought a major change in the taxation environment from revenue taxes to property taxes resulting in mass impoverishment and destitution of the great majority of farmers, resulting in numerous famines.[16] The economic policies of the British Raj effectively destroyed India's large handicrafts industry and caused a massive drain of India's resources.[17][18] An estimate by Cambridge University historian Angus Maddison reveals that India's share of the world income fell from 22.6% in 1700, comparable to Europe's share of 23.3%, to a low of 3.8% in 1952.[19] It also created an institutional environment that, on paper, guaranteed property rights among the colonizers, encouraged free trade, and created a single currency with fixed exchange rates, standardized weights and measures, capital markets, a well developed system of railways and telegraphs, a civil service that aimed to be free from political interference, and a common-law, adversarial legal system.[20] India's colonisation by the British coincided with major changes in the world economy—industrialisation, and significant growth in production and trade. However, at the end of colonial rule, India inherited an economy that was one of the poorest in the developing world,[21] with industrial development stalled, agriculture unable to feed a rapidly growing population, one of the world's lowest life expectancies, and low rates of literacy.

The impact of the British rule on India's economy is a controversial topic. While leaders of the Indian independence movement, and left-nationalist economic historians have blamed colonial rule for the dismal state of India's economy in its aftermath, right-wing historians have countered that India's economic performance was due to various sectors being in a state of growth and decline, resulting from changes brought about by colonialism and a world that was moving towards industrialization and economic integration.[22]

Independence to 1991

File:Farming haryana.jpg
The green revolution during the late 1960s resulted in significant increase in agricultural production across India.[23]

Indian economic policy after independence was influenced by the colonial experience (which was seen by Indian leaders as exploitative in nature) and by those leaders' exposure to Fabian socialism. Policy tended towards protectionism, with a strong emphasis on import substitution, industrialization, state intervention in labor and financial markets, a large public sector, business regulation, and central planning.[24] Jawaharlal Nehru, the first prime minister, along with the statistician Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis, carried on by Indira Gandhi formulated and oversaw economic policy. They expected favorable outcomes from this strategy, because it involved both public and private sectors and was based on direct and indirect state intervention, rather than the more extreme Soviet-style central command system.[25] The policy of concentrating simultaneously on capital- and technology-intensive heavy industry and subsidizing manual, low-skill cottage industries was criticized by economist Milton Friedman, who thought it would waste capital and labour, and retard the development of small manufacturers.[26]

India's low average growth rate from 1947–80 was derisively referred to as the Hindu rate of growth, because of the unfavourable comparison with growth rates in other Asian countries, especially the "East Asian Tigers".[20]

After 1991

Major improvements in educational standards across India has helped its economic rise. Shown here is the Indian School of Business at Hyderabad, ranked number 20 in global MBA rankings by the Financial Times of London in 2008[27]

In the late 80s, the government led by Rajiv Gandhi eased restrictions on capacity expansion for incumbents, removed price controls and reduced corporate taxes. While this increased the rate of growth, it also led to high fiscal deficits and a worsening current account. The collapse of the Soviet Union, which was India's major trading partner, and the first Gulf War, which caused a spike in oil prices, caused a major balance-of-payments crisis for India, which found itself facing the prospect of defaulting on its loans.[28] In response, Prime Minister Narasimha Rao along with his finance minister Manmohan Singh initiated the economic liberalisation of 1991. The reforms did away with the Licence Raj (investment, industrial and import licensing) and ended many public monopolies, allowing automatic approval of foreign direct investment in many sectors.[29] Since then, the overall direction of liberalisation has remained the same, irrespective of the ruling party, although no party has tried to take on powerful lobbies such as the trade unions and farmers, or contentious issues such as reforming labour laws and reducing agricultural subsidies.[30] Since 1990 India has emerged as one of the wealthiest economies in the developing world; during this period, the economy has grown constantly, but with a few major setbacks. This has been accompanied by increases in life expectancy, literacy rates and food security.

While the credit rating of India was hit by its nuclear tests in 1998, it has been raised to investment level in 2007 by S&P and Moody's.[31] In 2003, Goldman Sachs predicted that India's GDP in current prices will overtake France and Italy by 2020, Germany, UK and Russia by 2025 and Japan by 2035. By 2035, it was projected to be the third largest economy of the world, behind US and China.[32][33] In the revised 2007 figures, based on increased and sustaining growth, more inflows into foreign direct investment, Goldman Sachs predicts that "from 2007 to 2020, India’s GDP per capita in US$ terms will quadruple", and that the Indian economy will surpass the United States (in US$) by 2043.[34]

Government intervention

State planning and the mixed economy

Asia's oldest stock exchange, the Bombay Stock Exchange, is also Asia's fourth largest stock exchange in terms of market capitalization. The National Stock Exchange of India is Asia's fifth largest.[35] The government of India regulates stock exchanges across the country through Securities Contracts Act.

After independence, India opted for a centrally planned economy to try to achieve an effective and equitable allocation of national resources and balanced economic development. The process of formulation and direction of the Five-Year Plans is carried out by the Planning Commission, headed by the Prime Minister of India as its chairperson.[36]

India's mixed economy combines features of both capitalist market economy and the socialist planned economy, but has shifted more towards the former over the past decade. The public sector generally covers areas which are deemed too important or not profitable enough to leave to the market, including such services as the railways and postal system. Since independence, there have been phases of nationalizing such areas as banking. More recently, there have been phases of privatizing such sectors.[37]

Public expenditure

The number of people employed in non-agricultural occupations in the public and private sectors. Totals are rounded. Private sector data relates to non-agriculture establishments with 10 or more employees.[37]

India's public expenditure is classified as development expenditure, comprising central plan expenditure and central assistance and non-development expenditures; these categories can each be divided into capital expenditure and revenue expenditure. Central plan expenditure is allocated to development schemes outlined in the plans of the central government and public sector undertakings; central assistance refers to financial assistance and developmental loans given for plans of the state governments and union territories. Non-development capital expenditure comprises capital defense expenditure, loans to public enterprises, states and union territories and foreign governments, while non-development revenue expenditure comprises revenue defence expenditure, administrative expenditure, subsidies, debt relief to farmers, postal deficit, pensions, social and economic services (education, health, agriculture, science and technology), grants to states and union territories and foreign governments.[38][39][37]

India's non-development revenue expenditure has increased nearly fivefold in 2003–04 since 1990–91 and more than tenfold since 1985–1986. Interest payments are the single largest item of expenditure and accounted for more than 40% of the total non development expenditure in the 2003–04 budget. Defence expenditure increased fourfold during the same period and has been increasing due to India's desire to project its military prowess beyond South Asia. In 2007, India's defence spending stood at US$26.5 billion.[40] Administrative expenses are compounded by a large salary and pension bill, which rises periodically due to revisions in wages, dearness allowance etc. subsidies on food, fertilizers, education and petroleum and other merit and non-merit subsidies account are not only continuously rising, especially because of rising crude oil and food prices, but are also harder to rein in, because of political compulsions.[41][37]

Public receipts

Regional office of the State Bank of India (SBI), India's largest bank, in Mumbai. The government of India is the largest shareholder in SBI.

India has a three-tier tax structure, wherein the constitution empowers the union government to levy income tax, tax on capital transactions (wealth tax, inheritance tax), sales tax, service tax, customs and excise duties and the state governments to levy sales tax on intrastate sale of goods, tax on entertainment and professions, excise duties on manufacture of alcohol, stamp duties on transfer of property and collect land revenue (levy on land owned). The local governments are empowered by the state government to levy property tax and charge users for public utilities like water supply, sewage etc.[42][43] More than half of the revenues of the union and state governments come from taxes, of which half come from Indirect taxes. More than a quarter of the union government's tax revenues is shared with the state governments.[44]

The tax reforms, initiated in 1991, have sought to rationalise the tax structure and increase compliance by taking steps in the following directions:

  • Reducing the rates of individual and corporate income taxes, excises, customs and making it more progressive
  • Reducing exemptions and concessions
  • Simplification of laws and procedures
  • Introduction of permanent account number (PAN) to track monetary transactions
  • 21 of the 29 states introduced value added tax (VAT) on April 1, 2005 to replace the complex and multiple sales tax system[43][45]

The non-tax revenues of the central government come from fiscal services, interest receipts, public sector dividends, etc., while the non-tax revenues of the States are grants from the central government, interest receipts, dividends and income from general, economic and social services.[41]

Inter-State share in the federal tax pool is decided by the recommendations of the Finance Commission to the President.

Total tax receipts of Centre & State amount to approximately 18% of national GDP. This compares to a figure of 37-45% in the OECD and explains why the country remains under-developed as evident inter-alia from the poor state of its infrastructure and social services compared to OECD countries. The limited resources of Government affect its ability to pay fair wages to public servants. This may well be the cause of endemic corruption at all levels of government.

General budget

The Finance minister of India presents the annual union budget in the Parliament on the last working day of February. The budget has to be passed by the Lok Sabha before it can come into effect on April 1, the start of India's fiscal year. The Union budget is preceded by an economic survey which outlines the broad direction of the budget and the economic performance of the country for the outgoing financial year. This economic survey involves all the various NGOs, women organizations, business people, old people associations etc.

India's union budget for 2005–06, had an estimated outlay of Rs.5,14,344 crores ($118 billion). Earnings from taxes amount to Rs. 2,73,466 crore ($63b). India's fiscal deficit amounts to 4.5% or 1,39,231 crore ($32b).[46] The fiscal deficit is expected to be 3.8% of GDP, by March 2007.[47]

Currency system

The rupee is the only legal tender accepted in India. The exchange rate as of November 18, 2008 is about 49.27 to a US dollar, [48] 64.01 to a Euro, and 80.45 to a UK pound. The Indian rupee is accepted as legal tender in the neighboring Nepal and Bhutan, both of which peg their currency to that of the Indian rupee. The rupee is divided into 100 paise. The highest-denomination banknote is the 1,000 rupee note; the lowest-denomination coin in circulation is the 1 rupee coin (it earlier had 25 & 50 paise coins which have been discontinued by the Reserve Bank of India).[49] There has been a recent fall in the value of the Rupee as a result of the global financial crisis of 2008, as foreign institutional investors sell large amounts of Indian stocks and invest in US treasury bonds.

Natural resources

India has the world's fourth largest wind power industry, with an annual power capacity of 8,896 MW.[50] Shown here is a wind farm in Kayathar, Tamil Nadu.

India's total cultivable area is 1,269,219 km² (56.78% of total land area), which is decreasing due to constant pressure from an ever growing population and increased urbanisation.

India has a total water surface area of 314,400 km² and receives an average annual rainfall of 1,100 mm. Irrigation accounts for 92% of the water utilisation, and comprised 380 km² in 1974, and is expected to rise to 1,050 km² by 2025, with the balance accounted for by industrial and domestic consumers.

India has the world's 3rd largest coal reserves.[51] Shown here is a coal mine in Jharkhand.

India's inland water resources comprising rivers, canals, ponds and lakes and marine resources comprising the east and west coasts of the Indian ocean and other gulfs and bays provide employment to nearly 6 million people in the fisheries sector. In 2008, India had the world's third largest fishing industry.[52]

India's major mineral resources include Coal (fourth-largest reserves in the world), Iron ore, Manganese, Mica, Bauxite, Titanium ore, Chromite, Natural gas, Diamonds, Petroleum, Limestone and Thorium (world's largest along Kerala's shores). India's oil reserves, found in Bombay High off the coast of Maharashtra, Gujarat, and in eastern Assam meet 25% of the country's demand.[53][54]

Rising energy demand concomitant with economic growth has created a perpetual state of energy crunch in India. India is poor in oil resources and is currently heavily dependent on coal and foreign oil imports for its energy needs. Though India is rich in Thorium, but not in Uranium, which it might get access to in light of the nuclear deal with US. India is rich in certain energy resources which promise significant future potential - clean / renewable energy resources like solar, wind, biofuels (jatropha, sugarcane).

Physical infrastructure

A map of the network of National Highways in India

Development of infrastructure was completely in the hands of the public sector and was plagued by corruption, bureaucratic inefficiencies, urban-bias and an inability to scale investment.[55] India's low spending on power, construction, transportation, telecommunications and real estate, at $31 billion or 6% of GDP in 2002 had prevented India from sustaining higher growth rates. This had prompted the government to partially open up infrastructure to the private sector allowing foreign investment[56][57][37] which has helped in a sustained growth rate of close to 9% for the past six quarters.[58] India holds second position in the world in roadways' construction, more than twice that of China.[59] As of 2005 the electricity production was at 661.6 billion kWh with oil production standing at 785,000 bbl/day. India's prime import partners are: China 8.7%, US 6%, Germany 4.6%, Singapore 4.6%, Australia 4% as of 2006 CIA FactBook As of January 15, 2007, there were 2.10 million broadband lines in India.[60] Low tele-density is the major hurdle for slow pickup in broadband services. Over 76% of the broadband lines were via DSL and the rest via cable modems.

Financial institutions

Cuffe Parade, Mumbai is an important business district in India, home to the World Trade Center as well as other important financial institutions.

India inherited several institutions, such as the civil services, Reserve Bank of India, railways, etc., from its British rulers. Mumbai serves as the nation's commercial capital, with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and the National Stock Exchange (NSE) located here. The headquarters of many financial institutions are also located in the city.

The RBI, the country's central bank was established on April 1, 1935. It serves as the nation's monetary authority, regulator and supervisor of the financial system, manager of exchange control and as an issuer of currency. The RBI is governed by a central board, headed by a governor who is appointed by the Central government of India. The BSE Sensex or the BSE Sensitive Index is a value-weighted index composed of 30 companies with April 1979 as the base year (100). These companies have the largest and most actively traded stocks and are representative of various sectors, on the Exchange. They account for around one-fifth of the market capitalisation of the BSE. The Sensex is generally regarded as the most popular and precise barometer of the Indian stock markets. Incorporated in 1992, the National Stock Exchange is one of the largest and most advanced stock markets in India. The NSE is the world's third largest stock exchange in terms of transactions. There are a total of 23 stock exchanges in India, but the BSE and NSE comprise 83% of the volumes.[61] The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), established in 1992, regulates the stock markets and other securities markets of the country.

Sectors

Agriculture

File:FarmersIndia.jpg
Farmers work inside a rice field in Andhra Pradesh. India is the second largest producer of rice in the world[62] and Andhra Pradesh is the 3rd largest rice producing state in India.[63]
Composition of India's total production (million tonnes) of foodgrains and commercial crops, in 2003–04.

India ranks second worldwide in farm output. Agriculture and allied sectors like forestry, logging and fishing accounted for 16.6% of the GDP in 2007, employed 60% of the total workforce[54] and despite a steady decline of its share in the GDP, is still the largest economic sector and plays a significant role in the overall socio-economic development of India. Yields per unit area of all crops have grown since 1950, due to the special emphasis placed on agriculture in the five-year plans and steady improvements in irrigation, technology, application of modern agricultural practices and provision of agricultural credit and subsidies since Green revolution in India. However, international comparisons reveal that the average yield in India is generally 30% to 50% of the highest average yield in the world.[64]

The low productivity in India is a result of the following factors:

  • Illiteracy, general socio-economic backwardness, slow progress in implementing land reforms and inadequate or inefficient finance and marketing services for farm produce.
  • The average size of land holdings is very small (less than 20,000 m²) and is subject to fragmentation, due to land ceiling acts and in some cases, family disputes. Such small holdings are often over-manned, resulting in disguised unemployment and low productivity of labour.
  • Adoption of modern agricultural practices and use of technology is inadequate, hampered by ignorance of such practices, high costs and impracticality in the case of small land holdings.
  • Irrigation facilities are inadequate, as revealed by the fact that only 52.6% of the land was irrigated in 2003–04,[65] which result in farmers still being dependent on rainfall, specifically the Monsoon season. A good monsoon results in a robust growth for the economy as a whole, while a poor monsoon leads to a sluggish growth.[66] Farm credit is regulated by NABARD, which is the statutory apex agent for rural development in the subcontinent.

India does have multiple farm insurance companies that insure wheat, fruit, rice and rubber farmers in the event of natural disasters or catastrophic crop failure. One notible company that provides all of these insurance policies is agriculture insurance company of india and it alone insures almost 20 million farmers. India has more than 500 farm insurance companies of various size that operate under the supervision of the Ministry of Agriculture.

Industry

India has one of the world's fastest growing automobile industries[67][68] and is hope to be global leader of auto industry.[69] Shown here is Tata Motors' Nano, world's least expensive car in production.[70]
File:Malls in India.jpg
By 2028, India is expected to have the fifth-largest consumer economy in the world due to sustained growth among all sectors of Indian economy.[71] Shown here is a mall in Malad, Maharashtra.

India is fourteenth in the world in factory output. They together account for 27.6% of the GDP and employ 17% of the total workforce.[54] However, about one-third of the industrial labour force is engaged in simple household manufacturing only.[72]

Economic reforms brought foreign competition, led to privatisation of certain public sector industries, opened up sectors hitherto reserved for the public sector and led to an expansion in the production of fast-moving consumer goods.[73]

Post-liberalisation, the Indian private sector, which was usually run by oligopolies of old family firms and required political connections to prosper was faced with foreign competition, including the threat of cheaper Chinese imports. It has since handled the change by squeezing costs, revamping management, focusing on designing new products and relying on low labour costs and technology.[74]

34 Indian companies have been listed in the Forbes Global 2000 ranking for 2008.[75] The 10 leading companies are:

World Rank Company Logo Industry Revenue
(billion $)
Profits
(billion $)
Assets
(billion $)
Market Value
(billion $)
193 Reliance Industries File:Ril logo.jpg Oil & Gas Operations 26.07 2.79 30.67 89.29
198 Oil and Natural Gas Corporation File:ONGC Logo.jpg Oil & Gas Operations 18.90 4.11 33.79 54.11
219 State Bank of India Banking 15.77 1.47 188.56 33.29
303 Indian Oil Corporation File:Iocl logo.jpg Oil & Gas Operations 42.68 1.82 25.39 16.36
374 ICICI Bank File:Icicibank.png Banking 9.84 0.64 91.07 29.85
411 NTPC File:NTPC logo.png Utilities 7.84 1.60 20.34 41.57
647 Steel Authority of India Limited File:Saillogo.JPG Materials 7.88 1.45 8.05 26.37
738 Tata Steel File:In 01.jpg Materials 5.83 0.97 11.48 14.63
826 Bharti Airtel File:Airtel-logo.png Telecommunications Services 4.26 0.94 6.61 39.16
846 Reliance Communications File:Relcomm.gif Telecommunications Services 3.13 0.65 13.08 29.63

Services

Infosys headquarters in Bangalore, one of the largest software companies in India.

India is fifteenth in services output. It provides employment to 23% of work force, and it is growing fast, growth rate 7.5% in 1991–2000 up from 4.5% in 1951–80. It has the largest share in the GDP, accounting for 55% in 2007 up from 15% in 1950.[54] Business services (information technology, information technology enabled services, business process outsourcing) are among the fastest growing sectors contributing to one third of the total output of services in 2000. The growth in the IT sector is attributed to increased specialization, and an availability of a large pool of low cost, but highly skilled, educated and fluent English-speaking workers, on the supply side, matched on the demand side by an increased demand from foreign consumers interested in India's service exports, or those looking to outsource their operations. India's IT industry, despite contributing significantly to its balance of payments, accounted for only about 1% of the total GDP or 1/50th of the total services in 2001[76] However the contribution of IT to GDP increased to 4.8 % in 2005-06 and is projected to increase to 7% of GDP in 2008[77][78]

Banking and finance

Structure of the organised banking sector in India. Number of banks are in brackets.[79]

The Indian money market is classified into: the organised sector (comprising private, public and foreign owned commercial banks and cooperative banks, together known as scheduled banks); and the unorganised sector (comprising individual or family owned indigenous bankers or money lenders and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs)). The unorganised sector and microcredit are still preferred over traditional banks in rural and sub-urban areas, especially for non-productive purposes, like ceremonies and short duration loans.[80]

Prime Minister Indira Gandhi nationalised 14 banks in 1969, followed by six others in 1980, and made it mandatory for banks to provide 40% of their net credit to priority sectors like agriculture, small-scale industry, retail trade, small businesses, etc. to ensure that the banks fulfill their social and developmental goals. Since then, the number of bank branches has increased from 10,120 in 1969 to 98,910 in 2003 and the population covered by a branch decreased from 63,800 to 15,000 during the same period. The total deposits increased 32.6 times between 1971 to 1991 compared to 7 times between 1951 to 1971. Despite an increase of rural branches, from 1,860 or 22% of the total number of branches in 1969 to 32,270 or 48%, only 32,270 out of 5 lakh (500,000) villages are covered by a scheduled bank.[81][82]

Since liberalisation, the government has approved significant banking reforms. While some of these relate to nationalised banks (like encouraging mergers, reducing government interference and increasing profitability and competitiveness), other reforms have opened up the banking and insurance sectors to private and foreign players.[83][54]

Socio-economic characteristics

Poverty

File:BPL Data GOI .png
Percentage of population living under the poverty line

Large numbers of India's people live in abject poverty. 14.3% of the population earned less than $1 a day in 2005 down from 33.3% in 1990.[84] According to the new World Bank's estimates on poverty based on 2005 data, India has 256 million people, 21.6% of its population, down from 60% in 1981 living below the new international poverty line of $1.25 (PPP) per day. The World Bank further estimates that 13% of the global poor now reside in India. Moreover, India also has 228 million people, or 20.6% of the population living below $2 a day, compared to 72.2% for Sub-Saharan Africa.[85][86][87][88]

Wealth distribution in India is improving since the liberalization and with the end of the socialist rule termed as the license raj.[89] While poverty in India has reduced significantly, official figures estimate that 27.5%[90] of Indians still lived below the national poverty line in 2004-2005.[91] A 2007 report by the state-run National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector (NCEUS) found that 65% of Indians, or 750 million people, lived on less than 20 rupees per day[92] with most working in "informal labour sector with no job or social security, living in abject poverty."[93]

Since the early 1950s, successive governments have implemented various schemes, under planning, to alleviate poverty, that have met with partial success. All these programmes have relied upon the strategies of the Food for work programme and National Rural Employment Programme of the 1980s, which attempted to use the unemployed to generate productive assets and build rural infrastructure.[37] In August 2005, the Indian parliament passed the Rural Employment Guarantee Bill, the largest programme of this type in terms of cost and coverage, which promises 100 days of minimum wage employment to every rural household in 200 of India's 600 districts. Template:Inote The question of whether economic reforms have reduced poverty or not has fuelled debates without generating any clear cut answers and has also put political pressure on further economic reforms, especially those involving the downsizing of labour and cutting agricultural subsidies.[94][95]

Corruption

Corruption has been one of the pervasive problems affecting India. The economic reforms of 1991 reduced the red tape, bureaucracy and the Licence Raj that had strangled private enterprise and was blamed for the corruption and inefficiencies. Yet, a 2005 study by Transparency International (TI) India found that more than half of those surveyed had firsthand experience of paying bribe or peddling influence to get a job done in a public office.[96]

The Right to Information Act (2005) and equivalent acts in the states, that require government officials to furnish information requested by citizens or face punitive action, computerisation of services and various central and state government acts that established vigilance commissions have considerably reduced corruption or at least have opened up avenues to redress grievances.[96] The 2007 report by Transparency International ranks India at 72nd place and states that significant improvements were made by India in reducing corruption.[97][98]

Occupations and unemployment

Industrial plant in a rural area near Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Industrial growth in India has provided increase employment opportunities across India.

Agricultural and allied sectors accounted for about 57% of the total workforce in 1999–2000, down from 60% in 1993–94. While agriculture has faced stagnation in growth, services have seen a steady growth. Of the total workforce, 8% is in the organised sector, two-thirds of which are in the public sector. The NSSO survey estimated that in 1999–2000, 106 million, nearly 10% of the population were unemployed and the overall unemployment rate was 7.32%, with rural areas doing marginally better (7.21%) than urban areas (7.65%).

Unemployment in India is characterized by chronic underemployment or disguised unemployment. Government schemes that target eradication of both poverty and unemployment (which in recent decades has sent millions of poor and unskilled people into urban areas in search of livelihoods) attempt to solve the problem, by providing financial assistance for setting up businesses, skill honing, setting up public sector enterprises, reservations in governments, etc. The decreased role of the public sector after liberalization has further underlined the need for focusing on better education and has also put political pressure on further reforms.[99][37]

Slums next to high-rise commercial buildings in Kaloor, Kochi. Hundreds of people, mostly comprising migrant labourers who come to the city seeking job prospects, reside in such shabby areas.[100]

Regional imbalance

One of the critical problems facing India's economy is the sharp and growing regional variations among India's different states and territories in terms of per capita income, poverty, availability of infrastructure and socio-economic development.[101]

The five-year plans have attempted to reduce regional disparities by encouraging industrial development in the interior regions, but industries still tend to concentrate around urban areas and port cities[102] After liberalization, the more advanced states are better placed to benefit from them, with infrastructure like well developed ports, urbanisation and an educated and skilled workforce which attract manufacturing and service sectors. The union and state governments of backward regions are trying to reduce the disparities by offering tax holidays, cheap land, etc., and focusing more on sectors like tourism, which although being geographically and historically determined, can become a source of growth and is faster to develop than other sectors.[103][104]

External trade and investment

Global trade relations

Share of top five investing countries in FDI inflows. (2000–2007)[105]
Rank Country Inflows
(Million USD)
Inflows (%)
1  Mauritius 85,178 44.24%[106]
2  United States 18,040 9.37%
3  United Kingdom 15,363 7.98%
4  Netherlands 11,177 5.81%
5  Singapore 9,742 5.06%
File:ImageMundraGUjarat.jpg
Increasing foreign trade has resulted in rapid expansion of India's shipping industry. Shown here is the newly constructed Mundra Port in Gujarat.

India currently accounts for 1.2% of World trade as of 2006 according to the WTO.[107] Until the liberalisation of 1991, India was largely and intentionally isolated from the world markets, to protect its fledging economy and to achieve self-reliance. Foreign trade was subject to import tariffs, export taxes and quantitative restrictions, while foreign direct investment was restricted by upper-limit equity participation, restrictions on technology transfer, export obligations and government approvals; these approvals were needed for nearly 60% of new FDI in the industrial sector. The restrictions ensured that FDI averaged only around $200M annually between 1985 and 1991; a large percentage of the capital flows consisted of foreign aid, commercial borrowing and deposits of non-resident Indians.[108]

Indian exports in 2006

India's exports were stagnant for the first 15 years after independence, due to the predominance of tea, jute and cotton manufactures, demand for which was generally inelastic. Imports in the same period consisted predominantly of machinery, equipment and raw materials, due to nascent industrialisation. Since liberalisation, the value of India's international trade has become more broad-based and has risen to Rs. 63,080,109 crores in 2003–04 from Rs.1,250 crores in 1950–51.[citation needed] India's major trading partners are China, the US, the UAE, the UK, Japan and the EU.[109] The exports during April 2007 were $12.31 billion up by 16% and import were $17.68 billion with an increase of 18.06% over the previous year.[110]

India is a founding-member of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) since 1947 and its successor, the World Trade Organization. While participating actively in its general council meetings, India has been crucial in voicing the concerns of the developing world. For instance, India has continued its opposition to the inclusion of such matters as labour and environment issues and other non-tariff barriers into the WTO policies.[111]

Balance of payments

Since independence, India's balance of payments on its current account has been negative. Since liberalisation in the 1990s (precipitated by a balance of payment crisis), India's exports have been consistently rising, covering 80.3% of its imports in 2002–03, up from 66.2% in 1990–91. Although India is still a net importer, since 1996–97, its overall balance of payments (i.e., including the capital account balance), has been positive, largely on account of increased foreign direct investment and deposits from non-resident Indians; until this time, the overall balance was only occasionally positive on account of external assistance and commercial borrowings. As a result, India's foreign currency reserves stood at $285 billion in 2008, which could be used in infrastructural development of the country if used effectively.

India is a net importer: Per the CIA factbook in 2007, imports were $224bn and exports $140bn. Shown here is the cargo of a container ship being unloaded at the Jawaharlal Nehru Port, Navi Mumbai

India's reliance on external assistance and commercial borrowings has decreased since 1991–92, and since 2002–03, it has gradually been repaying these debts. Declining interest rates and reduced borrowings decreased India's debt service ratio to 4.5% in 2007.[112] Template:Inote In India, External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs) are being permitted by the Government for providing an additional source of funds to Indian corporates. The Ministry of Finance monitors and regulates these borrowings (ECBs) through ECB policy guidelines.[113]

Foreign direct investment in India

As the fourth-largest economy in the world in PPP terms, India is a preferred destination for foreign direct investments (FDI);[114] India has strengths in information technology and other significant areas such as auto components, chemicals, apparels, pharmaceuticals, and jewellery. Despite a surge in foreign investments, rigid FDI policies resulted in a significant hindrance. However, due to some positive economic reforms aimed at deregulating the economy and stimulating foreign investment, India has positioned itself as one of the front-runners of the rapidly growing Asia Pacific Region.[114] India has a large pool of skilled managerial and technical expertise. The size of the middle-class population stands at 50 million and represents a growing consumer market.[115]

India's recently liberalized FDI policy (2005) allows up to a 100% FDI stake in ventures. Industrial policy reforms have substantially reduced industrial licensing requirements, removed restrictions on expansion and facilitated easy access to foreign technology and foreign direct investment FDI. The upward moving growth curve of the real-estate sector owes some credit to a booming economy and liberalized FDI regime. In March 2005, the government amended the rules to allow 100 per cent FDI in the construction business.[116] This automatic route has been permitted in townships, housing, built-up infrastructure and construction development projects including housing, commercial premises, hotels, resorts, hospitals, educational institutions, recreational facilities, and city- and regional-level infrastructure.

A number of changes were approved on the FDI policy to remove the caps in most sectors. Fields which require relaxation in FDI restrictions include civil aviation, construction development, industrial parks, petroleum and natural gas, commodity exchanges, credit-information services and mining. But this still leaves an unfinished agenda of permitting greater foreign investment in politically sensitive areas such as insurance and retailing. FDI inflows into India reached a record US$19.5bn in fiscal year 2006/07 (April-March), according to the government's Secretariat for Industrial Assistance. This was more than double the total of US$7.8bn in the previous fiscal year. The FDI inflow for 2007-08 has been reported as $24bn[117] and for 2008-09, it is expected to be above $35 billion.[118] A critical factor in determining India's continued economic growth and realizing the potential to be an economic superpower is going to depend on how the government can create incentives for FDI flow across a large number of sectors in India.[119]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2001rank.html
  2. ^ http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2008/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?sy=2007&ey=2007&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=512%2C446%2C914%2C666%2C612%2C668%2C614%2C672%2C311%2C946%2C213%2C137%2C911%2C962%2C193%2C674%2C122%2C676%2C912%2C548%2C313%2C556%2C419%2C678%2C513%2C181%2C316%2C682%2C913%2C684%2C124%2C273%2C339%2C921%2C638%2C948%2C514%2C943%2C218%2C686%2C963%2C688%2C616%2C518%2C223%2C728%2C516%2C558%2C918%2C138%2C748%2C196%2C618%2C278%2C522%2C692%2C622%2C694%2C156%2C142%2C624%2C449%2C626%2C564%2C628%2C283%2C228%2C853%2C924%2C288%2C233%2C293%2C632%2C566%2C636%2C964%2C634%2C182%2C238%2C453%2C662%2C968%2C960%2C922%2C423%2C714%2C935%2C862%2C128%2C716%2C611%2C456%2C321%2C722%2C243%2C942%2C248%2C718%2C469%2C724%2C253%2C576%2C642%2C936%2C643%2C961%2C939%2C813%2C644%2C199%2C819%2C184%2C172%2C524%2C132%2C361%2C646%2C362%2C648%2C364%2C915%2C732%2C134%2C366%2C652%2C734%2C174%2C144%2C328%2C146%2C258%2C463%2C656%2C528%2C654%2C923%2C336%2C738%2C263%2C578%2C268%2C537%2C532%2C742%2C944%2C866%2C176%2C369%2C534%2C744%2C536%2C186%2C429%2C925%2C178%2C746%2C436%2C926%2C136%2C466%2C343%2C112%2C158%2C111%2C439%2C298%2C916%2C927%2C664%2C846%2C826%2C299%2C542%2C582%2C443%2C474%2C917%2C754%2C544%2C698%2C941&s=PPPGDP&grp=0&a=&pr.x=48&pr.y=17
  3. ^ http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GDP_PPP.pdf
  4. ^ http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601091&sid=aK2ccLqM2xhQ&refer=india"
  5. ^ "India Defies Turmoil With Growth of 8.8%". MarketWatch. May 31, 2007.
  6. ^ http://www.rediff.com/money/2008/nov/10bcrisis-goldman-cuts-india-growth-forecast.htm
  7. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7556489.stm
  8. ^ Nehru, Jawaharlal (1946). Discovery of India. Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-303103-1.
  9. ^ Kumar, Dharma (Ed.) (1982). The Cambridge Economic History of India (Volume 2) c. 1757 - c. 1970. Penguin Books. p. 519.
  10. ^ Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. (2005). "2". Indian Economy. S.Chand. pp. 15–16. ISBN 81-219-0298-3.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. ^ Sankaran, S (1994). "3". Indian Economy: Problems, Policies and Development. Margham Publications. p. 50. ISBN.
  12. ^ Kumar, Dharma (Ed.). "4". The Cambridge Economic History of India (Volume 2). p. 422.
  13. ^ Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. "2". Indian Economy. p. 16.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. ^ "Economy of Mughal Empire". Bombay Times. Times of India. 2004-08-17.
  15. ^ Kumar, Dharma (Ed.). "1". The Cambridge Economic History of India (Volume 2). pp. 32–35.
  16. ^ http://www.unu.edu/unupress/unupbooks/80815e/80815E0k.htm
  17. ^ http://books.google.com/books?id=XdEpABrFW8QC&pg=PA20&dq=british+india+handicrafts+raj&client=firefox-a#PPA21,M1
  18. ^ http://books.google.com/books?id=rMoOAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA186&dq=british+india+economy&lr=&client=firefox-a
  19. ^ "Of Oxford, economics, empire, and freedom". The Hindu. October 2, 2005.
  20. ^ a b Williamson, John and Zagha, Roberto (2002). "From the Hindu Rate of Growth to the Hindu Rate of Reform" (PDF). Working Paper No. 144. Center for research on economic development and policy reform. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  21. ^ Roy, Tirthankar (2000). "1". The Economic History of India. Oxford University Press. p. 1. ISBN 0-19-565154-5.
  22. ^ Roy, Tirthankar (2000). "10". The Economic History of India. Oxford University Press. p. 304. ISBN 0-19-565154-5.
  23. ^ http://countrystudies.us/india/104.htm
  24. ^ Kelegama, Saman and Parikh, Kirit (2000). "Political Economy of Growth and Reforms in South Asia". Second Draft. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  25. ^ Cameron, John and Ndhlovu, P Tidings (2001). "Cultural Influences on Economic Thought in India: Resistance to diffusion of neo-classical economics and the principles of Hinduism" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-08-23. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  26. ^ "Milton Friedman on the Nehru/Mahalanobis Plan". Retrieved 2005-07-16.
  27. ^ "Indian School of Business placed 20th in global Top 100 rankings - livemint". Livemint.com. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  28. ^ Ghosh, Arunabha (2004-06-01). "India's pathway trough economic crisis" (PDF). Global Economic Governance Programme GEG Working Paper 2004/06. Retrieved 2007-10-02. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  29. ^ Panagariya, Arvind (2004). "India in the 1980s and 1990s: A Triumph of Reforms". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  30. ^ "That old Gandhi magic". The Economist. November 27, 1997.
  31. ^ http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2003/02/10/stories/2003021000040900.htm
  32. ^ Wilson, Dominic (2003-10-01). "DreamingWith BRICs: The Path to 2050" (PDF). Global economics paper No. 99. Goldman Sachs. Retrieved 2007-10-04. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  33. ^ Grammaticas, Damian. ""Indian economy 'to overtake UK'"". BBC News. Retrieved 2007-01-26.
  34. ^ "India's Rising Growth Potential"
  35. ^ http://www.world-exchanges.org/publications/EQU1108.pdf
  36. ^ "History of the Planning Commission". Retrieved 2005-07-22.
  37. ^ a b c d e f g "Economic Survey 2004–2005". Retrieved 2006-07-15.
  38. ^ Public expenditure was classified as plan and non-plan expenditure in the 1987–1988 union budget. It is now referred to as development and non-development expenditure, but the definition remains the same. Development expenditure is a capital expenditure.
  39. ^ Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. "55". Indian Economy. p. 943.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  40. ^ "India's budget may backfire | The Australian". Theaustralian.news.com.au. April 3, 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  41. ^ a b Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. "55". Indian Economy. pp. 943–945.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  42. ^ Service tax and expenditure tax are not levied in Jammu and Kashmir; Intra-state sale happens when goods or the title of goods move from one state to another.
  43. ^ a b Bernardi, Luigi and Fraschini, Angela (2005). "Tax System And Tax Reforms In India". Working paper n. 51. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  44. ^ Tax revenue was 88% of total union government revenue in 1950–51 and has come down to 73% in 2003–04, as a result of increase in non-tax revenue. Tax revenues were 70% of total state government revenues in 2002 to 2003. Indirect taxes were 84% of the union governments total tax revenue and have come down to 62% in 2003–04, mostly due to cuts in import duties and rationalisation. The states share in union government's tax revenue is 28.0% for the period 2000 to 2005 as per the recommendations of the eleventh finance commission. In addition, states that do not levy sales tax on sugar, textiles and tobacco, are entitled to 1.5% of the proceeds.Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. (2005). Indian Economy. S.Chand. pp. 938, 942, 946. ISBN 81-219-0298-3.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  45. ^ "Indif_real_GDP_per_capitaa says 21 of 29 states to launch new tax". Daily Times. March 25, 2005.
  46. ^ "Union Budget & Economic Survey". Retrieved 2006-07-29.
  47. ^ "Revenue surge boosts fiscal health".
  48. ^ "U.S. Dollar to Indian Rupee Exchange Rate - Yahoo! Finance India". In.finance.yahoo.com. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  49. ^ RBI
  50. ^ "India to add 6,000 mw wind power by 2012; but below target". Business-standard.com. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  51. ^ http://www.business-standard.com/india/storypage.php?tp=on&autono=33438
  52. ^ "The Hindu : Kerala / Kochi News : Diversify fishing methods, says Pawar". Hindu.com. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  53. ^ Datt, Mihir Bhojani & Vivek Sundharam, K.P.M. "7". Indian Economy. pp. 90, 97, 98, 100.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  54. ^ a b c d e "CIA - The World Factbook - India". CIA. 2007-09-20. Retrieved 2007-10-02. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  55. ^ Sankaran, S (1994). Indian Economy: Problems, Policies and Development. Margham Publications. ISBN.
  56. ^ "Infrastructure the missing link". Retrieved 2005-08-14.
  57. ^ "Infrastructure in India: Requirements and favorable climate for foreign investment". Retrieved 2005-08-14.
  58. ^ India's Economic Growth Unexpectedly Quickens to 9.2%
  59. ^ "Infrastructure Rankings".
  60. ^ http://www.trai.gov.in/trai/upload/PressReleases/419/pr15jan07no6.pdf
  61. ^ "Regional stock exchanges—Bulldozed by the Big Two". Retrieved 2005-08-10.
  62. ^ http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/worldbiz/archives/2008/03/29/2003407560
  63. ^ http://www.rice-trade.com/production-rice-india.html
  64. ^ Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. "28". Indian Economy. pp. 485–491.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  65. ^ Multiple authors (2004). "Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2004". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  66. ^ Sankaran, S. "28". Indian Economy: Problems, Policies and Development. pp. 492–493.
  67. ^ "Tyres & Accessories". Reifenpresse.de. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  68. ^ "The small car dream-merchants- Tata's People's Car-Specials-The Economic Times". Economictimes.indiatimes.com. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  69. ^ "Quamnet.com stock news". Quamnet.com. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  70. ^ "The Next People's Car". forbes.com. Retrieved 2008-01-21.
  71. ^ "Tracking the growth of India's middle class - The McKinsey Quarterly - India's middle class - Economic Studies - Country Reports". Mckinseyquarterly.com. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  72. ^ "Census Reference Tables B-Series Economic Tables". Censusindia.gov.in. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  73. ^ "Economic structure". The Economist. October 6, 2003.
  74. ^ "Indian manufacturers learn to compete". The Economist. February 12, 2004.
  75. ^ "Forbes Global 2000 (Ger-Ind)". Retrieved March. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)
  76. ^ Gordon, Jim and Gupta, Poonam (2003). "Understanding India's Services Revolution" (PDF). November 12, 2003. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  77. ^ "Share of IT, ITeS in Indias GDP to go up to 7 per cent by 2008". domain-b.com. 20 December 2006.
  78. ^ "The Coming Death Of Indian Outsourcing". Forbes. 2008-02-29.
  79. ^ Old private banks are private banks existing prior to opening up of the banking sector.
  80. ^ Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. "50". Indian Economy. pp. 847–850.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  81. ^ Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. "50". Indian Economy. pp. 850–851.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  82. ^ Ghosh, Jayati. "Bank Nationalisation: The Record". Macroscan. Retrieved 2005-08-05.
  83. ^ Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. "50". Indian Economy. pp. 865–867.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  84. ^ [http://www.business-standard.com/india/storypage.php?autono=332669 India has fewer poor people: World Bank]
  85. ^ "One-third of world's poor in India: Survey-India-The Times of India". Timesofindia.indiatimes.com. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  86. ^ "The Hindu : National : World Bank’s new poverty norms find larger number of poor in India". Thehindu.com. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  87. ^ "Define poverty anew- Opinion-The Economic Times". Economictimes.indiatimes.com. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  88. ^ Steve Schifferes (27 August 2008). "BBC NEWS | Business | World poverty 'more widespread'". News.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  89. ^ Income classes:India's income distribution widens
  90. ^ This figure is extremely sensitive to the surveying methodology used. The Uniform Recall Period (URP) gives 27.5%. The Mixed Recall Period (MRP) gives a figure of 21.8%
  91. ^ Planning commission of India. Poverty estimates for 2004-2005 [1]
  92. ^ NCEUS Report
  93. ^ "Nearly 80 Percent of India Lives On Half Dollar A Day". Reuters. August 10, 2007. Retrieved 2007-08-15.
  94. ^ Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. "22". Indian Economy. pp. 367, 369, 370.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  95. ^ "Jawahar gram samriddhi yojana". Retrieved 2005-07-09.
  96. ^ a b Transparency International India. "India Corruption Study 2005" (PDF). Centre for Media Studies. Retrieved 2008-03-14.
  97. ^ "2007 Corruption Perceptions Index reinforces link between poverty and corruption". Transparency International. Retrieved 2008-03-15.
  98. ^ "CPI Table". Transparency International. Retrieved 2008-03-15.
  99. ^ Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. "24". Indian Economy. pp. 403–405.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  100. ^ "BBC News Online | Business | Winners and losers as India booms". News.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  101. ^ Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. "27". Indian Economy. pp. 471–472.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  102. ^ Bharadwaj, Krishna (1991). "Regional differentiation in India". In Sathyamurthy, T.V. (ed.) (ed.). Industry & agriculture in India since independence. Oxford University Press. pp. 189–199. ISBN 0-19-564394-1. {{cite book}}: |editor= has generic name (help)
  103. ^ Sachs, D. Jeffrey; Bajpai, Nirupam and Ramiah, Ananthi (2002). "Understanding Regional Economic Growth in India" (PDF). Working paper 88. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-07-01. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  104. ^ Kurian, N.J. "Regional disparities in india". Retrieved 2005-08-06.
  105. ^ "FDI in India Statistics". Retrieved 2008-02-12.
  106. ^ Much of India's FDI is routed through Mauritius, because both countries have an agreement to avoid double taxation. "India to sign free trade agreement with Mauritius". Retrieved 2005-08-15.
  107. ^ India's Trade policy review by the wto
  108. ^ Srinivasan, T.N. (2002). "Economic Reforms and Global Integration" (PDF). January 17, 2002. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  109. ^ Datt, Ruddar & Sundharam, K.P.M. "46". Indian Economy. pp. 767, 772–76.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  110. ^ INDIA’S FOREIGN TRADE: APRIL-DECEMBER, 2007
  111. ^ "India & the World Trade Organization". Retrieved 2005-07-09.
  112. ^ India`s external debt rises to US$190.5bn
  113. ^ External Commercial Borrowings
  114. ^ a b "India 2nd best country for biz investment: Survey - The Financial Express". Financialexpress.com. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  115. ^ Next Big Spenders: India's Middle Class
  116. ^ The Hinduonline
  117. ^ Hindustan Times India attracts $ 25 billion FDI in 2007-08
  118. ^ Economic Times FDI inflows to exceed USD 35 billion target in 2008-09
  119. ^ [Indian Economic Superpower: Fiction or Future? edited by Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, World Scientific Publishing, 2008]

References

Books
  • Nehru, Jawaharlal (1946). Discovery of India. Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-303103-1.
  • Kumar, Dharma (Ed.) (1982). The Cambridge Economic History of India (Volume 2) c. 1757 - c. 1970. Penguin Books.
  • Sankaran, S (1994). Indian Economy: Problems, Policies and Development. Margham Publications. ISBN.
  • Roy, Tirthankar (2000). The Economic History of India. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-565154-5.
  • Bharadwaj, Krishna (1991). "Regional differentiation in India". In Sathyamurthy, T.V. (ed.) (ed.). Industry & agriculture in India since independence. Oxford University Press. pp. 189–199. ISBN 0-19-564394-1. {{cite book}}: |editor= has generic name (help)
Papers
Government publications
News
Articles
Government of India websites
Reports and statistics

Template:Link FA