User:Relyimah/Dashboard
Menu: User Page | Talk Page (+) | Sandbox | Reference | Subpages | Contributions (alt) | Dashboard
This page is optimised for Mozilla Firefox and a screen resolution of 1280x1024 (minimum: 1024x768)
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- Mandirarow (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1174 (LTA 1174, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2409:40d4:101d:42e9:a7:19e5:44c6:63a3 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 178.167.188.67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Only contribution is vandalizing a page (I reverted)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Specialhumangojoissigma (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Vandalism-only account. Xexerss (talk) 03:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2409:40D4:101D:42E9:A7:19E5:44C6:63A3 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On CreateSpace: Spam account, recently blocked as user:2409:4085:D1C:159F:995E:C619:21C9:6098. MrBenjo (talk) 08:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yoon Hanbyul (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Persistent removal of content without explanation, since August 2024. Has been warned by several editors, at least four times in the editor's talk page.[1][2][3][4] No communication from the editor and just blanked the talk page. Hotwiki (talk) 09:07, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 8 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 1 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 3 |
| Other candidates | 11 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 3 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 12 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Ausernamea (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Gary4rfc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- WikiProCreate (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – The username suggests that this user might be involved in paid editing. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Their behaviour and argument feels very much like paid editing. They are far too concerned about their reputation. It's certainly nothing to do with the software ProCreate, this is a paid writer. Secretlondon (talk) 15:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- TheOWNMag (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Userpage states that it represents a magazine. R0paire-wiki (talk) 01:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ingageinstitute (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See [5]. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 01:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Softsalnoor1744 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:Softsalnoor1744. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Godgiftent (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See user page. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:51, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- BSalem Investment LLC (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Shellwood (talk) 08:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ukhrul Times (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Shellwood (talk) 08:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Reward Flight Finder Ltd (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (rewardflightfinder.com). Annh07 (talk) 08:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another IP edit, another round of blatant vandalism (changing the BLP's direct quotation to mean the opposite + changing a location). This under-watched article does not seem to inspire good editing, and I wonder whether it should be semi-protected for a very long time (i.e., long enough for someone to grow up). The last round was three months. WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated disruptive editing and removal of tags from IPs and socks. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism due to continuous edits denying the fact they are forgeries in contravention of RS. Makeandtoss (talk) 08:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 08:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I would like to request that... (Please consider reversing the recent revision made by the User:Gokul BM. The change in range was made without supporting sources, which has affected the accuracy of the ranking.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_South_Indian_films&diff=1246147282&oldid=1246147073&variant=en https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_South_Indian_films&diff=1246147073&oldid=1246002411&variant=en) . W170924 (talk) 19:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done. I don't see any supporting sources given for any of those numbers in the entire table, so there is no reason to believe that the previous version was more correct than the current version. If you have an issue with a recent edit, then discuss it with that editor. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Anachronist Also, I don’t understand what you meant by 'I don’t see any supporting sources given for any of those numbers in the entire table,' as the Highest-grossing films table is properly sourced except for the entries manipulated by this user. Am I wrong? Did I miss anything? W170924 (talk) 20:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Anachronist Pardon me, but to be specific, the ranges changed as follows:
Varisu: ₹290–293 to ₹290–310
Kabali: ₹284–305 to ₹284–499
Beast: ₹227–240 to ₹217–300
Mersal: ₹220 to ₹200–260
Note that before the change, the figures were supported by the references provided in the corresponding ref fields. The new ranges, however, contradict the references because the user did not provide any sources to back their claim. Why is there no consideration of this discrepancy?W170924 (talk) 20:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Did you contact the user who made that edit, as I suggested? ~Anachronist (talk) 23:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Anachronist I dropped a note on the user's talk page, and from the other threads, it’s pretty obvious this person is a serial vandal. The funny part? A vandal can freely run around editing Wikipedia, but if you want to call them out, you’ve got to perform an Olympic-level gymnastics routine. And don’t get me started on the edit count—it gives the impression they’re some kind of Wikipedia veteran! Sure, Wikipedia might slap them with a short ban, but their edit count stays shiny and impressive, like they’ve been building the place brick by brick. W170924 (talk) 03:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- The contributions of that user doesn't look like a vandal-only account to me, but more like attempts to get information up-to-date without updating the sources. In any case, the edits have been reverted and I left a short warning on the user's talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Anachronist I dropped a note on the user's talk page, and from the other threads, it’s pretty obvious this person is a serial vandal. The funny part? A vandal can freely run around editing Wikipedia, but if you want to call them out, you’ve got to perform an Olympic-level gymnastics routine. And don’t get me started on the edit count—it gives the impression they’re some kind of Wikipedia veteran! Sure, Wikipedia might slap them with a short ban, but their edit count stays shiny and impressive, like they’ve been building the place brick by brick. W170924 (talk) 03:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 08:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
เห็ดแชมเปญ(เห็ดถ้วยชมพู) Zeuzcloud8 (talk) 06:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined. This is not an edit request, that article doesn't exist, and this is the English Wikipedia. Article titles must be in English. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]
| 18 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 14:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC) |
| 12 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
RFP= Requests for permissions
Account creator
[edit]- Tiggerjay (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Returning from a wiki-break, former ACC. Happy to help with the backlog. TiggerJay (talk) 07:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Autopatrolled
[edit]- SerChevalerie (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Been on Wikipedia for a few years now. Mainly created BLPs. Requesting for autopatrolled rights to reduce the backlog of new page patrollers. I declare that I've understood verifiability, notability and copyrights. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
On hold. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, the user's talk page history is back. This can now be evaluated normally. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see any problems with your creations but as the rate is relatively low (last 25 takes us back to 2018), there will be minimal benefit to NPP in autopatrolling them.
Not done for now, but thank you for thinking of the backlog. – Joe (talk) 09:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. SerChevalerie (talk) 10:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Jebiguess (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Created 407 articles, and only 2 were deleted—1 was soft deleted earlier in 2022, and the latest one was deleted per WP:A10, which is not a major issue. 99.5% or 405 of his articles are still live. I came across him while patrolling New Pages. I believe he is one of the users for whom this right was created. GrabUp - Talk 17:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Roastedbeanz1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Has created 380 articles, of which only 4 have been deleted. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 00:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Done A decent chunk of page creations are disambiguation pages but there are enough article creations to grant this. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 00:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Intruder007 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to introduce an exceptional editor and author with a amazing track record in editing and article creation. Created 182 articles, none of which have been deleted, with the majority focusing on BLPs. Nice editor, and it’s clear that he is one of the editors for whom this user right was created. GrabUp - Talk 17:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]
- 98Tigerius (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reapplying to have this user rights as I was denied by admin Elli on my first one because of my edit warring block. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for page mover declined in the past 90 days ([6]). — MusikBot talk 17:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- S-Aura (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I am requesting for Page Mover rights on Wikipedia. I have been an active contributor and have made significant contributions.
I believe in my experience and understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Tvfunhouse (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Aliy Dawut (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- HypeBoy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([7]). — MusikBot talk 23:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Mischellemougly (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have 16 months experience in editing Wikipedia. I wish to contribute whole lot of my time for betterment of Wikipedia and reduce the backlog in all possible ways that I can. As an initial step towards it, I am applying for granting this user right, so I can use it to improve pages in Wikipedia. Thank You! Mischellemougly (talk) 09:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- ClaudineChionh (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been cleaning up vandalism mostly with the help of Twinkle. I was granted temporary rollback rights in 2021 but then life got busy and I didn't seek an extension. I now have more time to dedicate to counter-vandalism efforts again. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 13:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- MP1999 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello there, I'm requesting for permissions because I know it will save a lot of time my time to undo problematic edits. I have read the guidelines for how and when to use rollback so yes am ready. Cheers
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([8]). — MusikBot talk 16:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done for the exact same reason I declined your previous request -Fastily 19:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily But I Did Exactly what you said in the previous request. MP1999 ❯❯❯ Talk 17:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- No, you didn't. Re-read my previous decline. -Fastily 20:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Tesleemah (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello!
I have been guiding new users against Vandalism for a while now and this is done mostly offline.however,recently my passion for more onwiki contribution grew and I signed up as a host on Wikipedia Teahouse where I have been guiding new editors, I will like to request the right to roll back edit in order to do more of onwiki tasks and ease the work of admins. Tesleemah (talk) 19:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 19:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Cooldudeseven7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to have rollback because vandalism on wikipedia is always high and it is important to have people looking out for potential vandals, and lower this. I will not give mercy unless it is a good faith edit and will make sure to always warn users, as I am doing right now with the help of Ultraviolet. Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 14:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 69 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 14:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. Sorry, but you do not meet the minimum requirements for the perm, which include 200 mainspace edits. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- It says I have 400 edits? Not 69? What is a mainspace edit difference from a normal edit?? Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 17:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- A mainspace edit is (bit of oversimplication) an edit to an actual, live Wikipedia article, as opposed to a user's talk page, this page (in the Wikipedia) namespace, or something else. See WP:MAINSPACE. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 17:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- It says I have 400 edits? Not 69? What is a mainspace edit difference from a normal edit?? Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 17:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- XCBRO172 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I have over 800 edits, most of which are on the main space. I am aware I have a somewhat lousy history with giving proper edit summaries, as i didn't fill out revision summaries, but I have tried to rectify it. I was also involved in a dispute which might have been classified as an edit war back in April. Other then that I have a clean slate. Thanks for considering. Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 18:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 20:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links