Cox Communications: Difference between revisions
Dariuspomaha (talk | contribs) grammar/punctuation |
|||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
The cable industry spends millions of dollars annually on government relationships.[http://www.spinwatch.org/content/view/485/9/][http://www.publicintegrity.org/telecom/search/profile.aspx?id=M000018][http://www.nashvillecitypaper.com/index.cfm?news_id=56172][http://www.sdreader.com/php/cover.php?mode=article&showpg=1&id=20001005] Regularly this industry employs the spouses, sons and daughters of influential mayors, councilmen, commissioners, and other officials to assure its continued local monopoly and preferred market allocations, many of which have been questioned as unethical.[http://www.fppc.ca.gov/index.html?id=299] |
The cable industry spends millions of dollars annually on government relationships.[http://www.spinwatch.org/content/view/485/9/][http://www.publicintegrity.org/telecom/search/profile.aspx?id=M000018][http://www.nashvillecitypaper.com/index.cfm?news_id=56172][http://www.sdreader.com/php/cover.php?mode=article&showpg=1&id=20001005] Regularly this industry employs the spouses, sons and daughters of influential mayors, councilmen, commissioners, and other officials to assure its continued local monopoly and preferred market allocations, many of which have been questioned as unethical.[http://www.fppc.ca.gov/index.html?id=299] |
||
The monopoly on cable television has historically been enforced by local governments |
The monopoly on cable television has historically been enforced by local governments. Cox maintains thousands of such de facto monopolies. In order to provide service to individual homes, a cable provider must place its cable wiring along and across local streets or other rights-of-way. To do so, the provider must get permission from the local government(s) that own those streets via rights-of-way permits. |
||
Operational permission comes in the form of a document called a local franchise agreement. Most of local government(s) chose to grant permission to only one company, however, recently states have developed broader franchising laws to drive more investment and competition. Changes in the federal law in 1992 had forced local governments to grant permission to other companies to provide service, however the U.S. Government found in 2006 that only 2% of U.S. households had a competitive choice. In some cases Comcast, with municipal government approval, had entered into market allocation schemes. By agreeing to not compete head to head, consumers thus are perpetually locked into a single monopoly cable provider with annual price escalations reaching 93% in the past decade.[http://www.sfbg.com/39/26/news_comcast.html][http://www.law.com/jsp/law/LawArticleFriendly.jsp?id=1157557741772][http://rapidshare.com/files/35850727/Arvada_-Comcast_Market_Allocation_Agreement.pdf.html][http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.pdf] |
Operational permission comes in the form of a document called a local franchise agreement. Most of local government(s) chose to grant permission to only one company, however, recently states have developed broader franchising laws to drive more investment and competition. Changes in the federal law in 1992 had forced local governments to grant permission to other companies to provide service, however the U.S. Government found in 2006 that only 2% of U.S. households had a competitive choice. In some cases Comcast, with municipal government approval, had entered into market allocation schemes. By agreeing to not compete head to head, consumers thus are perpetually locked into a single monopoly cable provider with annual price escalations reaching 93% in the past decade.[http://www.sfbg.com/39/26/news_comcast.html][http://www.law.com/jsp/law/LawArticleFriendly.jsp?id=1157557741772][http://rapidshare.com/files/35850727/Arvada_-Comcast_Market_Allocation_Agreement.pdf.html][http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.pdf] |
Revision as of 22:38, 3 August 2007
File:Cox Communications Logo.PNG | |
Company type | Private |
---|---|
Industry | Telecommunications |
Founded | 1962 |
Headquarters | Atlanta, Georgia, USA |
Key people | Pat Esser, President James C. Kennedy, Chairman Barbara Cox Anthony and Anne Cox Chambers owners |
Products | Cable Television, Broadband Internet, VoIP |
Revenue | $7.054B (2005) [1] |
Not currently available | |
Number of employees | 22,350 (2004) |
Website | http://www.cox.com |
Cox Communications is a wholly-privately owned subsidiary of Cox Enterprises providing digital cable television and telecommunications services in the United States. It is the fourth-largest cable television provider in the United States, serving more than 6.7 million customers, including 2.7 million digital cable subscribers, 3.1 million Internet subscribers, and 1.7 million digital telephone subscribers[2]. Its animated spokesman is named Digital Max.
Cox Enterprises expanded into the cable television industry in 1962 by purchasing a number of cable systems in Lewistown, Lock Haven and Tyrone, Pennsylvania, followed by systems in California, Oregon and Washington. The subsidiary company, Cox Broadcasting Corporation (later to be renamed), was not officially formed until 1964, when it was established as a public company traded on the New York Stock Exchange.
In 2000 Cox Communications acquired Multimedia Cablevision with assets in Kansas, Oklahoma and North Carolina and Media General with assets in Fairfax County, Virginia.
On November 1, 2005, Cox announced the sale of all of its Texas, Missouri, Mississippi and North Carolina properties, as well as some systems in Arkansas, California, Louisiana and Oklahoma to Cebridge Communications. The sale closed in 2006 and those systems were transitioned by their new owner from Cox branding to Suddenlink Communications.
On May 14, 2007, Cox announced that they had sold their investment in Discovery Communications for the Travel Channel, related assets, and $1.3 billion.[3]
Other business units
- Cox Business Services
- Cox Media
- Travel Media, Inc.
Privatization
In 2004, Cox Enterprises announced its intention to purchase those shares of Cox Communications which they did not own. A $6.6 Billion tender offer was completed in December of that year, and Cox Communications has been a wholly owned subisidary since. This represents the second time Cox has been taken private by Cox Enterprises.
Consumer Issues
The cable industry spends millions of dollars annually on government relationships.[1][2][3][4] Regularly this industry employs the spouses, sons and daughters of influential mayors, councilmen, commissioners, and other officials to assure its continued local monopoly and preferred market allocations, many of which have been questioned as unethical.[5]
The monopoly on cable television has historically been enforced by local governments. Cox maintains thousands of such de facto monopolies. In order to provide service to individual homes, a cable provider must place its cable wiring along and across local streets or other rights-of-way. To do so, the provider must get permission from the local government(s) that own those streets via rights-of-way permits.
Operational permission comes in the form of a document called a local franchise agreement. Most of local government(s) chose to grant permission to only one company, however, recently states have developed broader franchising laws to drive more investment and competition. Changes in the federal law in 1992 had forced local governments to grant permission to other companies to provide service, however the U.S. Government found in 2006 that only 2% of U.S. households had a competitive choice. In some cases Comcast, with municipal government approval, had entered into market allocation schemes. By agreeing to not compete head to head, consumers thus are perpetually locked into a single monopoly cable provider with annual price escalations reaching 93% in the past decade.[6][7][8][9]
A recent third party survey of citizens found approximately 62% of the respondents were very dissatisfied (along with another 25% who were dissatisfied) with the cost of cable television service. A majority of the respondents were satisfied with the friendliness and courtesy of customer service personnel, however, approximately 30% of the respondents rated the cable company's performance as poor. With regard to open-ended comments, respondents felt that the cost of the cable service was too high, a need for cable competition existed and the desire for a basic cable package offering was desired. Although respondents cited these critical issues, the local monopoly structure preserves the status quo of poor customer service, limited product choices, no direct competition and uncontrollable annual cable TV price increases. Relief for consumers is being created by state level a multi jurisdictional franchise and service process that will spur investment and competition; thus driving economic development sought by state and local government leaders.[10]
However, Cox is seen by many as the leading cable company when it comes to customer service. Cox's advantage is that it uses one customer-care provider, with U.S.-based centers, like Sykes Inc.. Rather than pushing agents to hurry customers off the phone and causing multiple call-backs, Cox strives to handle issues in a single call and grades agents on how well they eliminate problems. To avoid confusion, field technicians tap into the same system used by call-center representatives. Cox has even started a "geek squad" to help customers with tech issues, whether they involve its gear or not.[11]
The industry strongly lobbies against federal "family tier" and "a la carte" bills that would give consumers the option to purchase individual channels rather than a broad tier of programming. These anti-consumer issues continue to garner attention from state governments, Congress and FCC Chairman Martin. [12]
Current systems
Arizona
Arkansas
Bentonville Also Services: Bella Vista, Bentonville, Cave Springs, Centerton, Gravette, Highlands, Hiwasse
Berryville Also Services: Beaver City, Berryville, Eureka Springs, Green Forest, Holiday Island
Fayetteville Also Services: Elkins, Farmington, Fayetteville, Goshen, Greenland, Lincoln, Prairie Grove, West Fork, Winslow
Fort Smith Also Services: Alma, Arkoma OK, Barling, Bonanza, Cameron OK, Cedarville, Central City, Chester, Dora, Dyer, Excelsior, Fort Smith, Greenwood, Hackett, Highway 71, Huntington, Jenny Lind, Kibler, Lake Alma, Midland, Mansfield, Lavaca, Mountainburg, Mulberry, Muldrow OK, Pocola OK, Rock Island, Roland OK, Rudy, Rye Hill, Sugarloaf area, White Bluff
Harrison Also Services: Bellefonte, Bergman, Dogpatch, Harrison, Valley Springs
Rogers
Siloam Springs Also Services: Colcord, Decatur, Gentry, Siloam Springs, Watts, West Siloam Springs
Springdale Also Services: Bethel Heights, Goshen, Elm Springs, Johnson, Lowell, Sonora, Springdale, Tontitown
Van Buren Also Services: Van Buren, See also Fort Smith
California
- Orange County
- Palos Verdes
- San Diego (Other companies such as Time Warner Cable operate here)
- Santa Barbara
Florida
- Central Florida (Gainesville and Ocala)
- Gulf Coast (Pensacola, Fort Walton Beach, Shalimar, Mary Esther, Crestview, Destin, Niceville, Freeport, Miramar Beach, Eglin Air Force Base, Hurlburt Field, and parts of Cantonment and Santa Rosa Beach)
Georgia
- Middle Georgia (Macon, Warner Robins and surrounding areas)
Idaho
- Sun Valley and surrounding areas
Kansas
Andover, Crawford Co., Great Bend, Lyons, Riley, Ark City, Derby, Halstead, Maize, Rose Hill, Arma, Dearing, Haysville, Manhattan, Salina, Auburn, Dodge City, Hesston, McPherson, Saline Co., El Dorado , Hoisington, Milford, Sedgwick, Bel Aire, Erie, Humboldt, Mulvane, So. Coffeyville, Benton, Finney County, Hutchinson, Newton, Sterling, Berryton, Ford County, Iola, Nickerson, Tecumseh, Burrton, Franklin, Jardine, Ogden, Topeka, Caney, Frontenac, Jefferson, Park City, Towanda, Cheney, Garden City, Junction City, Pittsburg, Tyro, Cherokee Co., Garden Plain, Kechi, Pottwawatomie, Valley Center, Cherryvale, Gas, Kingman, Pratt, Weir, Chicopee, Geary, Kinsley, Wichita, Coffeyville, Goddard, Larned, Winfield, Cunningham, Grandview Plza, Lindsborg, Yates Center
Louisiana
Nebraska
- Omaha and surrounding areas
Nevada
New England
- Rhode Island and parts of Connecticut
Ohio
- Cleveland (Broadview Heights, Brooklyn Heights, Fairview Park, Lakewood, Olmsted Falls, Olmsted Township, Parma, Parma Heights, Rocky River and Seven Hills)
Oklahoma
Virginia
External links
- Cox Communications' Official Website
- Digital Straight Talk
- Cox Communications help forums (registration required - free)
- List of TV programmes and online tools for subscribers
References
- ^ "Fortune 500 2006: Cox Communications". CNN/Fortune 500. Retrieved 2006-10-16.
- ^ "PointTopic: Cox Communications". PointTopic. Retrieved 2006-10-16.
- ^ "Press release announcing sale of the Travel Channel to Cox Communications".