Jump to content

User:Ruhrfisch/Resources

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
FACs needing feedback
viewedit
MLS Cup 2022 Review it now
Fountain Fire Review it now
1973 FA Charity Shield Review it now


Featured article removal candidates
Andrée's Arctic balloon expedition Review now
Helium Review now
Martin Keamy Review now
Pauline Fowler Review now
Battle of Red Cliffs Review now
Mariah Carey Review now
Pokémon Channel Review now
Concerto delle donne Review now
The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask Review now
Geography of Ireland Review now

Some things I find useful and have put here...

For the good of the order

[edit]
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 136
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 55
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 69
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 27
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 123
Requested RD1 redactions 34
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 7
Open sockpuppet investigations 152
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]


Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 1
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 0
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 1
Other candidates 7
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Indefinite extended protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR TylerBurden (talk) 15:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – persistent sockpuppetry by User:Desanimade. The mainspace title is already salted. C F A 💬 16:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:17, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent restoration of unsourced article, following an outcome of "redirect" at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toyota E transmission, probably anon block evasion by User:12DionneJ. Wikishovel (talk) 16:32, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky (talk) 17:03, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Steady trickle of IP/non-autoconfirmed edits removing reference to xenophobia despite discussion on the talk page, and this disambiguation page is quite unlikely to see substantial change anyways. Tollens (talk) 17:16, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Consistent edit-warring in the article. GnocchiFan (talk) 18:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like the IP stopped the disruptive removals upon being warned. Favonian (talk) 18:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Shortly after protection was over the page is again disrupted. Shadow4dark (talk) 18:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2a02:1406:64:baca::/64 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 18:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Waxworker (talk) 20:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – One very persistent IP editor keeps introducing unsourced and undue content to the lede. Now accompanied by snippy commentary. — GhostRiver 20:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP violations by IP editors. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism. el.ziade (talkallam) 20:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: Should redirect to Hashtag United F.C. as an alternative name for Spencer FC (Spencer Carmichael-Brown), also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spencer Owen was about a different person of the same name. Sahaib (talk) 09:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 2600:1700:6E0:D930:CCC1:6784:2BB3:D42F (talk) 17:47, 18 August 2024 (UTC) Article is outdated and needs revision. Conflicts with other article on EMDR

Not unprotected – You have already filed an edit request at the article talk page. That's where the matter will be discussed. Favonian (talk) 17:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


"Israeli military activities in the Gaza Strip remained unchanged following adoption of the resolution" needs a marker: citation needed. AmbroseVenture (talk) 18:42, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

"On 28 March, the IDF shot and killed two unarmed men in central Gaza, before burying them in sand with bulldozers.[397]" needs to be altered, the source gives two contradicting stories which CNN (the source) didn't clear up. In the article AJ argues without evidence the two videos they present are from the same people, the IDF tells those were two separate incidents. This has to be cleared up to remain factual. AmbroseVenture (talk) 18:44, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

I want to add an RFPPI request for 2018 Philadelphia Phillies season, with the reason; “socking and vandalism” 134.6.109.138 (talk) 18:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:15, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

2 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Wikipedia languages/core (request) 2024-07-27 11:23 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Template:Wikipedia languages (request) 2024-07-30 19:50 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
29 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox Chinese (request) 2024-06-07 08:07 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2024-06-20 06:11 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-06-20 07:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox Christian leader (request) 2024-06-28 12:36 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox language (request) 2024-06-30 06:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
Template:Infobox islands/length (request) 2024-07-10 14:57 Template-protected (log) Modified by Yaris678 on 2017-03-13: "For consistency with Template:Infobox islands. An increase of edit protection and decrease of move protection."
Module:Sports color/baseball (request) 2024-07-10 18:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikBot II on 2021-08-17: "High-risk template or module 30997 transclusions (more info)"
Template:Infobox person (request) 2024-07-19 00:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Module:Navbox (request) 2024-07-19 19:53 Template-protected (log) Modified by Ged UK on 2014-05-07: "lowering to template protection"
Template:Infobox road (request) 2024-07-26 06:18 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-18: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox islands (request) 2024-07-30 17:45 Template-protected (log) Modified by Yaris678 on 2017-03-13: "For consistency with Template:Infobox islands. No change to edit protection and decrease of move protection."
Module:College color/data (request) 2024-08-04 15:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Taxobox (request) 2024-08-05 06:25 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Tasks (request) 2024-08-05 18:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by HJ Mitchell on 2014-04-14: "drop to TE per request at RfPP"
Template:Country data Solomon Islands (request) 2024-08-06 05:37 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Country data Nova Scotia (request) 2024-08-06 06:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Country data New Brunswick (request) 2024-08-06 06:57 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Country data Manitoba (request) 2024-08-06 10:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Country data Romania (request) 2024-08-09 06:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Module:Football box (request) 2024-08-09 15:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2018-10-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Football box collapsible (request) 2024-08-09 15:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2018-10-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Taxonomy/Archaeplastida (request) 2024-08-12 23:51 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mifter on 2018-12-07: "Highly visible template"
Template:Contentious topics/page restriction talk notice base (request) 2024-08-13 06:09 Template-protected (log) Protected by Dreamy Jazz on 2023-01-15: "Highly visible template"
Template:Infobox comedian (request) 2024-08-15 10:25 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Infobox military person (request) 2024-08-15 10:27 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Infobox writer (request) 2024-08-15 10:28 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Module:Lang-zh (request) 2024-08-17 15:53 Template-protected (log) From Module:Zh: Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-05-03: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Country data Turks and Caicos Islands (request) 2024-08-18 05:22 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/header (request) 2024-08-18 18:15 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2014-09-02: "Highly visible template: Lowering to allow template editors"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]

For a third time, I'm applying for autopatrolled rights; my first request was denied in April 2023, and my second request was denied in June 2024. The reason for the first decline was that my previous articles were tagged for "notability." After that decline, I worked on bringing articles over from the Russian Wikipedia and had relatively few problems when other editors were reviewing them (I don't bring over everything from those respective pages, so I added a tag for expanding from Russian to let others know that information is still there). The reason for the second decline was that I moved one of my BLP articles back into the mainspace without changing the sourcing, and it was eventually deleted (that was a mistake on my part). Now, roughly two months later, I have had little to no problems with the other articles I have brought over. I respectfully request that I be granted the autopatrolled permission this time around, as I believe it will help lighten the NPP workload to some extent. Thanks in advance for your consideration. Losipov (talk) 20:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 20:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Gonna mark this as  Not done; you don't create so many articles that it's a burden on NPP and given the previous issues I'd rather they still get reviewed manually. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer Aszx5000 has messaged me twice that I should be autopatrolled. I don't care for my sake, since the process works fine for me, but I don't want to be a burden on the reviewers. Please either grant or deny this status based on whatever you think is best for the community. Thanks! Jordanroderick (talk) 23:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Would like to cut down on the backlog of pages that need to be reviewed while I create pages, especially as of recent where I've been working on creating pages for military battles, and Bahmani rulers. I definitely believe the pages I've created shows I am familiar with the guidelines of page notability, and especially quality. I've practiced with this being a new page patroller myself. Noorullah (talk) 00:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

I have created 25 new pages and would like to request the autopatrolled right. I have been a user since 2007, but have increased my writing on Wikipedia in the last 3 years. I create articles in generally non-controversial areas such as crystallography, symmetry and philately. GreatStellatedDodecahedron (talk) 13:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]


Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights: Assists in helping for typo correction. The proof of which can be seen from my contributions in Typo Team Moss-D Bunnypranav (talk) 15:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([2]). MusikBot talk 15:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
 Not done You now technically meet the header criteria, but you still don't really have enough experience IMO. I will be willing to grant once you've made a few hundred more edits, especially more substantive edits. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
I understand, but I would be grateful if you could give me a bit more information. Does typo fixing count as substantive edits? If no, then how is typo fixing a starting use for AWB.
Thanks in advance. Bunnypranav (talk) 06:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Typo fixing is fine as something to do with AWB, but I would not call it a "substantive" edit and it doesn't seem right to count it as a "non-automated edit" either (even if you truly did perform them without any kind of automation), and not doing so would put you clearly below the criteria. I interpreted the idea behind that requirement was more about what the edits did and less about the non-observable requirement of how they were done, and making 500 mostly typo-fixing edits in a month just doesn't establish the kind of track record I look for when granting advanced permissions. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback and explanation. Bunnypranav (talk) 15:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

I am currently engaged in editing biographies of recently elected United Kingdom MPs. Much of this involves adding relevant templates and categories, which I hope to streamline with the help of AWB. It will also assist in my more general gnomish work of syntax fixing across the project. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 11:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

I am interested in gaining access so that I can maintain GA related tasks as is detailed at WP:GA/MISMATCH#In a subcategory Category:GA-Class articles but not a good article NightWolf1223 <Howl at meMy hunts> 02:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 04:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

[edit]
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag.

Extended confirmed

[edit]
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]

Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma(talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Question, though I am not an administrator, I see that you have published accepted AFC submissions, even if they lack citations or are in need of some fixing. And some have orange banners on them. Why is this? — 48JCL 01:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
@48JCL: As they should. The standard at acceptance at AfC is that the article would probably survive an AfD. Nothing more. Declining a draft for surmountable problems like a lack of citations or pretty much anything covered by a cleanup banner is inappropriate. – Joe (talk) 08:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
I spot checked the 4 most recent accepts and they had lots of citations at time of acceptance. Feel free to link to the specific draft accepts you are concerned with. A complete lack of citations is a valid draftification reason and valid AFC decline reason, but I am not seeing that here. A major lack of citations such as entire paragraphs missing a citation (and also not supported by any WP:GENREFs) could be a valid decline reason (WP:V is policy after all). But it may also be reasonable to accept a draft that is mostly cited and just missing a couple citations, such as Draft:Norah Fulcher. –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Could anyone please review my request ? It is already couple of days. Xegma(talk) 18:10, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). MusikBot talk 20:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I see you found the IP at AfC who submits soundtrack articles (41 accepts of soundtracks it looks like). I'm glad to see you've started to accept drafts at AfC, instead of just declining (a ratio of 1 accepted to 348 declined at the time of the last application). I do still have concerns about your experience at AFD, given that, of your last 40 votes, all but 2 of them were pile on votes where the result had basically already been decided based on the number of votes for the conclusion you chose. You accepted one piece of criticism from me, your lack of accepts at AfC, but you do still appear to be pile on voting. Honestly, I'm not sold, but I'll leave it up to someone else whether they want to grant you a trial or not. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback. I understand your points, I've made lots of contributions recently, and I hope I will be granted a trial to demonstrate my willingness to contribute positively. Best, Waqar💬 07:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to say that I've been working so hard for the past couple of months. I've made so many contributions to AFCs, I've reviewed over 1,160 articles (accepts: 138, declines: 670, and the rest either rejected or speedily deleted) so far. I'm also actively patrolling the new page feed, adding maintenance tags, and tagging articles for speedy deletion like A3, A7, and G11. I've drafted more than 200 articles that either lacked reliable sources or needed additional sources. In the AFD discussions, I voted on more than 150 pages. Without considering the no consensus results, 98.6% of my AfD's were matches, and even though the votes were assumed to be piles on voting, most of my recent votes were very detailed and specific and weren't pointing towards anyone, but I will accept their valuable advice and try my best to make improvements at AFDs as well. Having said that, I believe that all those contributions exhibit my hard work and dedication. I hope I get a chance to at least prove myself by patrolling new pages, and I would be more than happy to help with the backlog. Thanks for your time and consideration. Waqar💬 18:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

I was given a trial for a few months and would like to renew my permissions. I have made good use of my permissions by fixing new pages and judiciously applying CSD whenever necessary. I am still active at NPP and will continue to make good use of my permissions upon renewal. Florificapis (talk) 22:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Joe Roe (expires 00:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 22:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

I'd like to help out with the backlog at NPP. My previous experience includes many nominations of drafts under G1, G2, and G3, and a couple instances of article ratings and XfD participation. Rusty 🐈 03:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

I would like to become a new page patrol to accelerate the page creation process, improve the quality of Wikipedia pages, and reduce the huge current backlog. I have a good understanding of what a qualified article would look like, and created around four articles like Organothallium Chemistry. I have also done various other editing, including merging Carbohydrate Chemistry into Carbohydrate. Pygos (talk) 06:35, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Two months ago I was given the new page reviewer right, and I want to continue with it. I trust I have made good contributions. Thanks in advance. Tajotep (talk) 10:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) This user's NPP rights expired on the 5th of August. Rusty 🐈 22:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

I believe I would be able to help reduce the catalogue of pages needing review. I would review them properly with an unbiased view point. Camillz (talk) 13:04, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 404 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 13:10, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
 Not done: you do not meet the minimum requirements for this permission and would benefit from getting experience with the deletion process first. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 02:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

I have created 85 pages including a GA. I am familiar with the p&g on notability and reliable sources. Would like to put my knowledge to use by reviewing pages and help out WikiProject Korea a bit more. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 05:05, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

My last request was denied due to vague votes in AfD. Since then, I have taken my time to learn more and not just rushed to re-request the rights. Then I had created 50 articles when the request was denied. Currently, I have over 714 articles with only 5 deleted. This shows that I have understanding of what GNG and what SIGCOV is. It will be a pleasure in helping reduce the backlog of new created pages. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 09:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights 79lives (talk) 15:48, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I am 79lives and I am willing to remove issues within the numerous articles sent in! I am able to search throughout articles on whether they have used citations or not and will align suitably to Wikipedia notability guidelines as well! Not only that but I am quite active on Wikipedia, so I will be able to try alleviate some of the backlog for the group here.

 Automated comment This user has 317 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 15:50, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only 317 mainspace edits, you don't meet the minimum requirements for granting. Please come back when you have the experience required for administrators to review your edits. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:59, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Per Joe Roe's post on WikiProject Linguistics, I would be willing to help out reviewing new linguistics articles. Botterweg14 (talk) 22:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

I requested this perm a while ago before I was adequately experienced, and it was recently suggested that I apply again. Since my first request I have participated a lot more at AfC and AfD, which I think has shown me aspects of notability/deletion/creation policies I had less of a grasp of then. I think it would be good to help given the backlog (particularly where it relates to events and literature where I believe myself to have the best grasp on notability criteria). I would like to help with the redirect backlog as well. Thanks! PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:20, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

I request that I have page reviewer rights to lower the backlog. I typically create articles in royalty and nobility and have made 16 successful articles specialised in royalty as well as I contribute a lot to them. I have 1,700 edits in the 9 months I have been on Wikipedia meaning I contribute daily. I do often look at the articles in page patrol and add tags when needed. I really hope that I can help reduce the backlog! Thanks in advance. Azarctic (talk) 01:37, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]


Reason for requesting page mover rights: I want to have my page mover rights extended, as I contribute to RM/TR. Was given 3mo trial and it will end on August 20. ToadetteEdit! 08:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by Robertsky (expires 00:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 08:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi again, Toadette. You were great during the 2024 CrowdStrike-related article title saga! I hope you become a Page Mover at the same time as me! Jruderman (talk) 06:48, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Given User talk:ToadetteEdit#Move review for Donald Trump fist pump photographs just today, as well as a past history of similar closes of deletion discussions at DRV, I am not convinced this should be granted. * Pppery * it has begun... 06:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
At the least, asking Toadette here what might or should have been done differently seems appropriate. Dekimasuよ! 06:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
I'm also concerned about User_talk:ToadetteEdit#RM_at_Talk:Ted_Wilson_(figure_skater), which is, at best, a communication failure (A good closer will transparently explain how the decision was reachedWP:NHC), and at worst a headcount to determine consensus (WP:NOTDEMOCRACY). DatGuyTalkContribs 13:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
@ToadetteEdit: would you please respond to the above concerns? Best, HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 15:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Good evening. It has been a while since the request was opened. I've resolved the concern about the Donald Trump photo RM by moving to the appropriate page. I also answered the concerned about the Ted Wilson page, so communication isn't an issue here. My consensus is often misunderstood by many, but this time, I will only focus on closing straightforward RMs and leave controversial ones until I improve my decision-making skills, in addition to answering RMTR requests. ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
I'm an active AfC reviewer, and I spend a lot of time patrolling new pages. I often draftify articles that are not sourced or need additional sources (over 250 articles so far). Having this right would be super useful and help reduce the number of R2 tags for admins in the backlog. I also have experience in WP:RM, and I'd like to request page mover rights for non-controversial tasks. Thank you, Waqar💬 16:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

I have been monitoring recent changes on pages for a while now AlexBobCharles (talk) 08:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello@AlexBobCharles. Most of your history looks good. Could you explain why you warned rather than explained after [4] this edit? Seems like a good faith error? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

I’ve been editing for a little while now, I’ve requested page protection and reverted edits which are not appropriate on various pages. I am pretty devoted to editing on Wikipedia and I have an extensive Watchlist so I think this permission would be useful. Adriazeri (talk) 22:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Adriazeri: I see you don't consistently warn vandals after you revert them. Happy to give you PCR if you commit to warning more consistently. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I do apologise about not consistently warning vandals, I can absolutely commit to warning more frequently. It might’ve been because I’ve only really started using Twinkle recently. Adriazeri (talk) 12:32, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 13:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

I've been monitoring the pages in Wikipedia for a long time. I try my best to review new changes, revert any vandalism and provide authenticity. This permission will help me review the pages more fluently. MSouvik01 (talk) 21:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello @MSouvik01. You don't seem to warn people consistently after reverting them. It's easy to do with WP:Twinkle. Could you commit to doing this? I also noticed that you rarely leave WP:edit summaries. It's good practice to let others know what your edit did! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Did all the requirements and patrolled the recent changes page for a rotating number of days. My account also meets all the requirements. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 09:38, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([5]). MusikBot talk 09:40, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

I've been creating and monitoring articles in Wikipedia for a long time and its time to a new step in this great community. TheFrenchKing (talk) 21:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi @TheFrenchKing: happy to assign PCR if you commit to WP:warning users every time you revert vandalism. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 11:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello @—Femke 🐦! I agree to follow the community guidelines on WP:warning to revert vandalism. TheFrenchKing (talk) 12:17, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 12:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]

I have been patrolling recent changes and combating vandalism for a little over a month. I've been primarily using Twinkle and I would like to request rollback privileges to use other tools such as Huggle. I understand the importance of leaving users a notice whenever their edits are reverted. Jiffles1 (talk) 22:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 09:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi there! Thanks for responding. I believe I left warning messages for the three reverts you cited (here, here, and here). In all three cases, I used Twinkle to generate the messages because, as you noted, the tool makes the process extremely easy. Admittedly, I was bit inconsistent in leaving warnings when I first started combating vandalism, but I have been quite diligent about it over the past couple of weeks. If I’m missing something or doing something wrong, please let me know and I’ll correct it going forward. Jiffles1 (talk) 11:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
My apologies, you are totally correct. I misread the edit summaries for those reverts. Appreciate the clarification,  Done -Fastily 09:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

I had this as admin, I would still find it useful. Naomi Amethyst 03:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done -Fastily 09:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

I have used Twinkle to revert vandalism mostly from the recent changes page for a while now and warn users afterwards. Twinkle is not sufficient for me on longer articles because of my sluggish internet connection. Reverts I make with Twinkle may take up to ten seconds, even with ethernet connected to my router. Rollback permissions would be greatly appreciated to make edits faster and save time. I can be trusted with rollback permissions as I have been actively reverting vandalism with a few breaks for school since July 2023, consistantly warning editors with the templates that Twinkle offers. I understand what is and what is not vandalism, and believe that I have what it takes to be trusted with the rollback tool. Thank you, ItsCheck (talk) 03:10, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done you've barely made any reverts since I declined your previous request. I've told you this before: please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. -Fastily 09:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I am familiar with helpful tools such as SWViewer and Twinkle and use them frequently, as well as the relevant guidelines for fighting vandalism. You can see from my contribution history that I always notify the users whose edits I am reverting. Greetings, MrBenjo (talk) 20:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I noticed you make a handful of edits, and then drop off for weeks/months at a time. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend at least a month consistently patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are always warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 08:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor

[edit]


    Admin statistics
    Action Count
    Edits 51389
    Edits+Deleted 53091
    Pages deleted 450
    Revisions deleted 50
    Pages restored 29
    Pages protected 97
    Pages unprotected 9
    Protections modified 11
    Users blocked 74
    Users reblocked 4
    Users unblocked 9
    User rights modified 3

    Tools

    [edit]

    Peer Review Reminders

    [edit]

    Partial transclusion trick for Peer Reviews

    [edit]

    <onlyinclude>

    <includeonly>:'''Note''': Because of its length, this peer review is not transcluded. It is still open and located at [[Wikipedia:Peer review/]].</includeonly></onlyinclude>

    Peer review is still open, just not transcluded to save space at [[WP:PR]]

    CBM's tool for largest PR requests.

    D M S conversion tool

    Editcountitis

    [edit]

    Edit summary usage


    Kate's Tool edit counter

    Soxred93's edit counter (also links to an articles created tool, among others)

    Interiot's "Wannabe Kate's edit counter

    Tool to look at contributions to any page by editor

    Another tool to look at contributions to any page by editor

    My email user link

    My contributions

    External link checker from FAC

    Dab checker

    Readability / word counter tool

    Check many times an article has been viewed

    Cheat sheet

    [edit]

    Stolen from Ben MacDui

    This is
    a table

    {{subst:unsigned|user name or IP} —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 1.2.3 (talkcontribs) date.

    Strike out or write it in small caps.

    Superscripts and subscripts: X2, H2O

    Invisible comments to editors (<!-- -->) only appear while editing the page.


    References

    [edit]

    State Parks and NRHP

    [edit]

    WikiProject:Pennsylvania State Parks headquarters

    State Park ECW listing on the NRHP

    Fermata PA wilds survey

    Elkman's NRHP Infobox generator

    Pennsylvania state legislature - search for bills

    Pennsylvania: A Guide to the Keystone State By Federal Writers' Project

    Lots of Penns Forest History

    National Park Service CCC camps

    Act 18 establishing the DCNR

    PennDot maps

    [edit]

    All PennDot maps in PDF


    {{cite map |scale = 1:65,000| publisher = Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Bureau of Planning and Research, Geographic Information Division | url= ftp://ftp.dot.state.pa.us/public/pdf/BPR_pdf_files/Maps/GHS/Roadnames/allegheny_GHSN.PDF | title= 2007 General Highway Map Allegheny County Pennsylvania | accessdate= 2007-07-27}} ''Note: shows Allegheny Islands State Park''


    {{cite news | author= Pennsylvania State Highway Department | url= ftp://ftp.dot.state.pa.us/public/pdf/BPR_PDF_FILES/Maps/Type_10_GHS_Historical_Scans/Union_1915.pdf | title= Map of the Public Roads in Union County, Pennsylvania | date = [[May 1]], [[1915]] | accessdate= 2007-03-29}}


    {{cite news | author= Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Bureau of Rail, Freight, Ports & Waterways, Center for Program Development and Management, Bureau of Planning and Research | url= ftp://ftp.dot.state.pa.us/public/pdf/BPR_pdf_files/MAPS/Statewide/parail.pdf | title= Pennsylvania Railroad Map, September 2006 | accessdate= 2006-03-07 }}

    PennPilot

    [edit]

    Historic aerial photo library, Pennsylvania Geological Survey

    Native American names

    [edit]

    <ref name ="donehoo"> {{cite book |last=Donehoo |first= Dr. George P. |title= A History of the Indian Villages and Place Names in Pennsylvania |origdate= 1928 |url= http://www.srbc.net/docs/IndianNamesDataChart.PDF|format= PDF|accessdate= 2007-03-09|edition= Second Reprint Edition |date= 1999|publisher= Wennawoods Publishing |location= [[Lewisburg, Pennsylvania]]|id= ISBN 1-889037-11-7|pages= 290|quote = ISBN refers to a 1999 reprint edition, URL is for the Susquehanna River Basin Commission's web page of Native American Place names, quoting and citing the book}}</ref>

    Susquehanna River Basin Commission's Native American Place names table

    Lenape Dictionary

    Counties and townships

    [edit]
    • ""Pennsylvania Local Government"" (PDF). Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Retrieved 2007-10-08.
    • "Chapter 8: County Subdivisions" (PDF). U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved 2007-11-27.
    • Chronicles of Central Pennsylvania by Frederic A. Godcharles

    Birds and Wildlife

    [edit]

    Geology

    [edit]

    Educational Series (ES)

    Maps

    Creeks

    [edit]

    Making Maps

    [edit]

    Here's how I make the maps - basically they are all from the Census factfinder web site here. I always use the 2000 census data and if I enter "Ohio", I get this. Next I go to the upper left corner under "Change", click there on "Boundaries and Features" and turn off all labels and all features except the state and county borders (boundaries). Then I get this. I copy the map (right click, or control and Print Screen) then paste that into MS Paint or Paint Dot Net and change the colors so they are consistent with the WikiProject Maps guidleines - I started with the Image:US Locator Blank.svg for its colors. I put a one pixel wide black line around the maps and save them in PNG format in Wikimedia Commons (I have an account there too).

    What I like about the maps is that they are US Government work and so public domain (and I release my modifications under the GFDL). You can zoom in a lot, add streets and water and township and city borders in. Some other examples I have made starting with these are here: Image:Larrys Creek Watershed Map.PNG (started from county and township borders and creeks in the census map), Image:Fort Wayne Indiana Metro Map.PNG (several counties, left the urban areas pink), and my most ambitious county map Image:Lancaster County, PA.PNG. Hope this helps, ask if you have questions.

    http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/painting.html