User talk:Учхљёная

This account is a suspected sockpuppet of Diabedia (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

This is the User Talk Page for Учхљёная. If there are any issues to discuss that this user may have participated in, please begin a new section below and write your message and I will attempt to reply as soon as possible. Thank You!

User:Учхљёная ^{(talk,philosophy,edits)} 19:13, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 🇩🇱

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that 🇩🇱, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hitro talk 16:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the notification of this. I have removed the category link that I had formerly placed on this page, in that the article 🇩🇱 was created by accident. Thank you! User:Учхљёная ^{(talk,philosophy,edits)} 16:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect formatting

When you add categories to redirects, like 🇨🇳, please add a blank line between the #REDIRECT line and the category, per the examples at WP:RE/SG. Gorobay (talk) 17:17, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Leftist states has been nominated for discussion

Category:Leftist states, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:07, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding articles to this category. Some of these are clearly not states or proto-states, there's no clear criteria for the category, some of the actual states aren't leftist unless you mean everything left of the right. It seems to be largely based on your opinion. Doug Weller talk 15:11, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am deeply sorry for causing such confusion on Wikipedia, creating unnecessary trouble, and causing general trouble regarding categories. I will try harder to not violate these issues and I will take more time to learn the regulations and rules in place before. I agree that the category was created in haist and is more of an expression of an opinion than actual fact, my original intention was to create a category for Nations with a history of Leftist governments. I have stopped adding pages to this category. Thank you for notifying me. User:Учхљёная ^{(talk,philosophy,edits)} 02:17, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Дантэрскэ

Just out of curiosity, what is Danterian? - Toothswung (talk) 17:40, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a ConLang that I'm working on. Thank you for asking! User:Учхљёная ^{(talk,philosophy,edits)} 18:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I half suspected that. Good luck with it ;) - Toothswung (talk) 11:23, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Hello, Uchkhljionaya! Check out these great pages! (Uralic Phonetic Alphabet - International Phonetic Alphabet) They are very similar... From User:HotelFurbyFan1 (talk • contribs • d. contribs) at 17:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ninjago language

A tag has been placed on Ninjago language requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Cyrillization of German

Hi, I'm TonyBallioni. Учхљёная, thanks for creating Cyrillization of German!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add reliable sources so that our readers can verify the content.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

TonyBallioni (talk) 17:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Chemical nomenclature] into Cyrillization of Chemical nomenclature. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No original research

Wikipedia is not a place to publish your invented systems of Cyrillization or to add misinformation to existing linguistic articles. Wikipedia is a place to systematize information from authoritative sources. Please read Wikipedia:No original research. Burzuchius (talk) 13:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Burzuchius: Thank you for notifying me. However, I must acknowledge that many of the "invented systems of Cyrillization" were, in fact, created by an external source, albeit not a secondary source that I have found yet. User:Учхљёная ^{(talk,philosophy,edits)} 23:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:User text

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:User text, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Train2104 (t • c) 00:31, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Учхљёная. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sisters of letters

Please be very careful with what symbols you consider sisters of E and F. Georgia guy (talk) 22:30, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Georgia guy: Okay. Could you be more specific? I fixed the problem with E, which I miğt add, was an accident. However, I don't see any problem in F? User:Учхљёная ^{(talk,philosophy,edits)}. 23:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't realize that you had corrected those mistakes prior to me. I honestly don't know what I was thinking at the time, and I apologize for any confusion. User:Учхљёная ^{(talk,philosophy,edits)}. 23:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox grapheme

Hi Учхљёная, you may remember I once tried to remove some of the new letter infoboxes you added. While I appreciate the work you have evidently put into this, I'm afraid I still have some rather fundamental objections to the whole concept of these boxes. I've started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Writing systems to get some more input on them. Thanks, – Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:39, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That monkey-looking guy that everyone wears on their T-shirts listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect That monkey-looking guy that everyone wears on their T-shirts. Since you had some involvement with the That monkey-looking guy that everyone wears on their T-shirts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:33, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lkj;lkslkjfdslkjfdsalk;jfed;lkjfkjfdsa;lkjfdsa;lkjfdsa;dsalkjfdslkjfdsalkjfdalkj;fdsa;lkjfdsa;lkjfdsalkj;fdsalkjdfsalkjdfs;lkjfdsa;lkjfdsa;lkjfdsa;lkjfdsa;dsjfkdkds;kfjsdkfja;fdjksjfkdjflkdsjfkdjfkdsja;jdfakfaf

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lkj;lkslkjfdslkjfdsalk;jfed;lkjfkjfdsa;lkjfdsa;lkjfdsa;dsalkjfdslkjfdsalkjfdalkj;fdsa;lkjfdsa;lkjfdsalkj;fdsalkjdfsalkjdfs;lkjfdsa;lkjfdsa;lkjfdsa;lkjfdsa;dsjfkdkds;kfjsdkfja;fdjksjfkdjflkdsjfkdjfkdsja;jdfakfaf, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 08:13, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for creating nonsense pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:20, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Учхљёная (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The 2 redirects to Che Guevara were done on a dare (of which I would think that they would fall under Wikipedia:G10 rather than Wikipedia:Patent nonsense), other than that I have no rationale for the rest other than boredom. You don't have to unblock me, but I just thouğt that it would be suiting to let you or anyone else know that I didn't know that such behaviour was stricly against any rules; I certainly will exercise better restraint in the future and limit myself to only constructive* edits. (The definition of constructive is subjective).

Decline reason:

So you think your creations should have been deleted as attack pages, but you didn't know that such behaviour was strictly against any rules? Try again. Huon (talk) 17:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ԇлар listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ԇлар. Since you had some involvement with the Ԇлар redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ԇлаһар listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ԇлаһар. Since you had some involvement with the Ԇлаһар redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Еть listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Еть. Since you had some involvement with the Еть redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 21:57, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrics on Meniń Qazaqstanym

Hello, I've started a discussion on whether to include the lyrics and a large number of (unofficial) translations on the article on its talk page. SURJECTION _{·talk·contr·log·} 08:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anthem of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 14:35, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ScrapIronIV: If anything, it appears as if your edits are the most disruptive, especially to the progress of articles. I have explained my reasons multiple times during the revert-wars on Meniń Qazaqstanym and I believe that I am justified in doing so. As such, according to your reasons and with the pending approval of User:Surjection, a consensus will be reached on the aforementioned article. From my perspective, there is no viable reason to delete massive quantities of lyrics from articles, especially when they are A. Not placed by me, a "disruptive" editor, B. They are frequent and proven to be useful with rationales explained, and C. Useful, even by your own definition, before relocation to Wikisource. I will not take this to external help because this dispute is both petty and not worth the attention of such. It seems there is only one solution, and that is to keep the main lyrics in some form. -User:Учхљёная ^{(talk,philosophy,edits)}. 14:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 15:00, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3O

I've filed a request for third opinion over the dispute at Talk:Meniń Qazaqstanym#Recent restoration of lyrics. SURJECTION _{·talk·contr·log·} 17:29, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cyrillization of chemical nomenclature

The article Cyrillization of chemical nomenclature has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per talk page discussion, this appears to be a hoax as it is not supported by the real sources cited (and one of them appears to be made up)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Every morning (there's a halo...) 19:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Placing unrelated articles in communism categories

Hi, please refrain from placing unrelated articles in communism categories, as you have done with New Urbanist Memes for Transit-Oriented Teens, which clearly is not a "communist party". FDMS 4 20:32, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cyrillization of chemical nomenclature for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cyrillization of chemical nomenclature is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyrillization of chemical nomenclature until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CataracticPlanets (talk) 18:34, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Michigan

Your edits to the portal have not been well received.

The animated GIFs are quite distracting.
The blue flags don't show up well on a background of the same shade of blue. They look like small, distorted versions of the state coat of arms bouncing around, assuming you know what the state coat of arms looks like when it's miniaturized to that small size.
At that size, the flag and the seal aren't very legible, but they are below in the Symbols section. This would be an accessibility issue as well.
The edit also removed the box around the intro section.
If other portals are making such poor design choices, they should be changed, not this one.

You might not see the problem, but I've just outlined five reasons why your edit is a problem. Please do not revert without further discussion in keeping with the spirit of WP:BRD. Imzadi 1979 → 02:14, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Xhosa vowels

Do you have a reference for your interpretation of ‹o› and ‹u›? 4pq1injbok (talk) 22:45, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@4pq1injbok: No, not yet at least. As of yet, I suppose its just primary research from my interaction with and phonetic analysis of Xhosa speakers. I believe it also shows itself this way in several Xhosa songs, but I'm not sure. You may delete it if necessary. -User:Учхљёная ^{(talk,philosophy,edits)}. 23:20, 26 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks, I'll put it back as it was. 4pq1injbok (talk) 09:35, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Anthem of the Tajik Soviet Socialist Republic, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:26, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Anthem of the Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I initiated a discussion on the talk page days ago. Please join in the discussion rather than blindly revert to your preferred version as you've been doing on anthem related articles. Iryna Harpy (talk) 18:47, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tam, vdali, za rekoj

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Tam, vdali, za rekoj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CataracticPlanets (talk) 00:54, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Linguistics Facebook

Template:Linguistics Facebook has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nardog (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Your recent editing history at Himni i Flamurit shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 14:52, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at State Anthem of the Republic of Tatarstan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 15:12, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at State Anthem of the Republic of Karakalpakstan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 15:19, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Anthem of the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 15:24, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of lyrics?

Please join discussion at Talk:Anthem of the Tajik Soviet Socialist Republic#Discuss inclusion of lyrics.--Nø (talk) 14:51, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Anthem of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria

Song lyrics from 1992 are copyright, and we're not allowed to include them. Sorry, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:47, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at English alphabet, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 03:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on O Canada. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:49, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anthem lyrics

Please join the discussion at Talk:Anthem of the Tajik Soviet Socialist Republic#Discuss inclusion of lyrics, instead of consistently reverting reasoned edits on the multiple articles in question.--Nø (talk) 03:16, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nø: I did; you simply can't revert my edits using a "per talk" excuse without a consensus. -User:Учхљёная^{(talk,relevant directory,edits)}. 03:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC).[reply]

July 2018

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Qaumi Taranah, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:19, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enouğf, thanks for notifying me. -User:Учхљёная^{(talk,relevant directory,edits)}. 03:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Page moves

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, you may be blocked from editing. Please do NOT move pages against the naming policy; also, do NOT move pages where the new name is NOT a commonly used spelling. Your moves to Latin transcription/transliteration names is damaging to the project and results in the article being lost from search, among others. I have reverted your moves at Ghaznavids, ~~Khakassia~~, State Anthem of the Republic of Khakassia and State Anthem of Ingushetia while another editor has reverted your move at Ghalib. — kashmīrī ^TALK 22:31, 3 July 2018 (UTC) — kashmīrī ^TALK 22:31, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic User:Учхљёная. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Die Wacht am Rhein

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Die Wacht am Rhein. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:03, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Your recent editing history at Men – Tyva Men shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — kashmīrī ^TALK 11:58, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May I add to the above, to all involved: IF the dispute concerns inclusion of lyrics, please discuss at Talk:Anthem of the Tajik Soviet Socialist Republic#Discuss inclusion of lyrics.--Nø (talk) 15:30, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Die Wacht am Rhein. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel P. Bateman listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Samuel P. Bateman. Since you had some involvement with the Samuel P. Bateman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Imaginatorium (talk) 02:37, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that you originally created this page as a redirect to Cyrillization of Georgian, at the same time that you created that article. Neither of these has any references at all: can you explain this? How would we know that you were not just making this up? Imaginatorium (talk) 02:47, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Imaginatorium: I got the information off Omniglot, and Samuel P. Bateman was originally redirected to Sovietization, I believe, for the reason that they were also mentioned in their article on Hungarian Cyrillization during the Soviet period. I'm afraid I can't do much about that now tho, as I'm currently blocked. -User:Учхљёная^{(talk,relevant directory,edits)}. 02:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC).[reply]

(talk page stalker) That was it: [1]. But then, No such user was unable to conclude that such a researcher ever existed [2]. BTW, the block has already expired. — kashmīrī ^TALK 21:03, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Song articles with TOCcolors-class lyrics section has been nominated for discussion

Category:Song articles with TOCcolors-class lyrics section, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:35, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Odicide listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Odicide. Since you had some involvement with the Odicide redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Uanfala (talk) 16:15, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cyrillization of German for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cyrillization of German is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyrillization of German until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 23:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a webhosting service

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a free webhosting service. Wikipedia is not a place to post personal content, host personal websites, or do things that are not directly related to adding to or improving the encyclopedia, as you did at User:Учхљёная/Вчицзаря Testing site. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 04:19, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the IPA to the Anthem of Poland.

Thank you for IPA adding. But I guess you should add to Modern Official version which is sung actually today, not to Original Polish version.. And some IPAs are wrong, for example "prz- " is /pʂ/, not /pʐ/, and also "ł " is actually /w/. And IPA of "Bonaparte" and "Dąbrowski" are also wrong. --Propatriamori (talk) 07:55, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Your addition to Long Live our State has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Scr★pIron^IV 17:42, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Long Live our State shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
* Edit warring over a clear copyright violation; protected by the Berne convention until 50 years after the author's death. This is NOT a state work, NOT an anthem. A PROPOSED anthem. Article 1259 of Book IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation does not apply. Scr★pIron^IV 17:56, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Учхљёная reported by User:ScrapIronIV (Result: ). Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 18:03, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic "Ongoing disruption by Учхљёная". - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:35, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Onsetsumojy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Onsetsumojy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:35, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Escu-toid

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Escu-toid, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:40, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Your recent editing history at March of the Volunteers shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 03:25, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
904	National anthem (talk)	Add sources
34	Anthem of the Republic of Kazakhstan (talk)	Add sources
2,348	Maurya Empire (talk)	Add sources
38	Religion in national symbols (talk)	Add sources
4,065	The Star-Spangled Banner (talk)	Add sources
200	Syr Darya (talk)	Add sources
142	Vladimír Weiss (footballer, born 1989) (talk)	Cleanup
255	Kabardino-Balkaria (talk)	Cleanup
18	National Anthem of the Sakha Republic (talk)	Cleanup
115	Maamme (talk)	Expand
537	Internet censorship and surveillance by country (talk)	Expand
4,303	Languages of India (talk)	Expand
2,655	Chechnya (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
79	Patrioticheskaya Pesnya (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
6	Pavel Prokkonen (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
267	Khmer Rouge rule of Cambodia (talk)	Merge
2	Sunzha (talk)	Merge
294	Islam Karimov (talk)	Merge
13	Isle of Beauty, Isle of Splendour (talk)	Wikify
14	Sons and Daughters of Saint Lucia (talk)	Wikify
28	March On, Bahamaland (talk)	Wikify
3	Khieu Chum (talk)	Orphan
2	Prudence in Woman (talk)	Orphan
3	Charjou Abdirov (talk)	Orphan
113	Jai Jai Garavi Gujarat (talk)	Stub
20	Khalmg Tanghchin chastr (talk)	Stub
8	State Anthem of the Komi Republic (talk)	Stub
49	Salām-e Shāh (talk)	Stub
4	Turab Tula (talk)	Stub
12	As-Salam al-Malaki (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:37, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for disruptive editing, including restoration of copyright violations. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 19:00, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Учхљёная (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you look at my edit-history, I was in the process of revertinğ several disruptive edits by User:87.229.108.210 and currently doinğ some thinğs with Userboxes and Barnstars. It'd be greatly appreciated if someone could unblock me so that I may at least continue my work on the latter, as the incident at State Anthem of the Republic of Khakassia was isolated and only part of my action on the former. I would also like to note that User:94.237.48.222 & User:149.29.2.26 & User:Учхљёнэя are, in fact, not my sockpuppets and look like a typical example of framinğ (not sure if there's a rule against that), possibly on the part of User:Champion per his accusations at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Учхљёная and continu'ous edit-warrinğ against me. -User:Учхљёная^{(talk,relevant directory,edits)}. 18:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I looked at your edit history, and it only confirms to me that this is a valid block, which you don't address the reason for in your request- and also use it to criticize the behavior of another user. As you don't seem to understand that you did something wrong, and edit warred to preserve your improper edits, I am declining this request as there is little benefit to the project in unblocking you. 331dot (talk) 19:58, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For the record, I also opened an ANI topic, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Reverts and copyright violations by Учхљёная--Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: Yes, I noticed that, and thanks for notifyinğ me, but I can't defend myself and you seem to've left-out a bit of information. -User:Учхљёная^{(talk,relevant directory,edits)}. 18:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't mind my asking, why do you keep incorrectly writing "g" as "ğ"? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:07, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Boing! said Zebedee: Well, I don't see it as incorrect, but I use it to mark a silent "g" or "gh" in English, inspired by its usage in Turkish orthography. -User:Учхљёная^{(talk,relevant directory,edits)}. 19:09, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it's incorrect, as English does not use Turkish orthography (or any other written distinction for silent "g" or "gh" - and it's not silent anyway!) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:12, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Boing! said Zebedee: IDK, seems like its gonna be a somewhat good idea as far as spellinğ-reforms go. Anyway, I have somethinğ to-do IRL, so I'll probably see any messages after this one a bit later. -User:Учхљёная^{(talk,relevant directory,edits)}. 19:17, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The fact remains that you are writing English incorrectly as English does not have the letter "ğ", and the uncollaborative/stubborn attitude you seem to be exhibiting over this trivial error does not show you in a good light. Anyway, it's up to you - I won't be unlocking you, but maybe someone else will. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:26, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Boing! said Zebedee: Since English doesn't have a regulatory body like Académie française or Dansk Sprognævn, no use of it is categorically "incorrect". So as long as they're not doing it in the main namespace or what have you, let them be. Nardog (talk) 19:40, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't mean anyone can make up anything they want and it's correct. Of course Учхљёная can deliberately write whatever incorrect English they want - I'm just suggesting that it's not an example of collaborative editing that's going to help get them unblocked in a project where we speak English. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Boing! said Zebedee: Who said anythinğ about uncollaboration or stubbornness, I'm merely presentinğ my take on your question? -User:Учхљёная^{(talk,relevant directory,edits)}. 21:31, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies in advance for talkpage stalker-ish behaviour, but I was genuinely interested by this. Feel free to delete/ignore my comment, but if you'd like to expand on your thinking, I'd be interested to learn more about it.

Why are you picking on poor old 'g'? Particularly in words like 'anything' or 'presenting', the 'g' isn't silent - it combines with the preceding 'n' to form the grapheme 'ng', which corresponds (unusually unambiguously) to a distinctive phoneme in English.

I'd contend that we don't really have silent letters in English - rather, we have a hodge-podge of graphemes that correspond inconsistently to the phonemes in the language. For example, if you want to write the sound used in the personal pronoun 'I', you could use 'I' (I), 'ie' (die), 'eye' (eye), 'igh' (sigh), i-e' (like), 'y' (by), 'ye' (bye), 'uy' (buy) - there are probably more that I haven't thought of. None of the letters are silent - they just work in different ways in different words to represent the necessary sounds. I teach small people to read and write, and this irregularity is one of my constant bugbears. It would be great if we actually had a properly phonetic alphabet, but we don't. Individual letters do not correspond directly to sounds in English; there's no alternative but to learn all the different possible sounds that different combinations of letters can represent, and to familiarise yourself with which combination is used in which word. Girth Summit (talk) 23:31, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Ĳ aĉtûallỳ ¥iňk Учхљёная has gr@t idéå, and èvèpỳoňë čommèňting hérë √ould makë ūπ thär øwň ôr¥ōgra¶y hweň ¥ey reπly. - BilCat (talk) 08:29, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Учхљёная (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Again, the most recent edits were part of an effort to undo the edits of the now-blocked IP address. I will admit that I did thinğs wronğ, includinğ violatinğ copyriğt on multiple occasions, but for the most-part, I stopped that behavior until today because of the mentioned incident. I request unblock again so that, seeinğ as the issue with the IP has been mostly resolved, I may resume my efforts in the Wikipedia & User namespaces and to defend myself where issues arise elsewhere. -User:Учхљёная^{(talk,relevant directory,edits)}. 22:43, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you're going to continue trolling here by deliberately writing English incorrectly then you are not showing a collaborative attitude towards communication. Other admins might think this harsh of me, but they're welcome to review any new unblock request independent of my opinion. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:53, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Учхљёная (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is just gettinğ ridiculous; I've provided several valid reasons, I've explained what I plan to do after beinğ unblocked, and I don't think I present any real threat to the English Wikipedia with these reasons. There is no "correct" or "incorrect" English as long as it's mutually intelligible, and an attempted spellinğ-reform that certainly does not manifest in the main namespace is definitely no hindrance. Y'all're just gettinğ all trivial for this, and it's just nonsense. I mean, at least give me back Userspace riğts. -User:Учхљёная^{(talk,relevant directory,edits)}. 20:02, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't understand why this is a fight you want to pick in an unblock request - but as above, I don't believe that an unblock is appropriate at this time. You know exactly what Boing! said Zebedee is talking about, and you still want to lawyer / argue about it. Because of this, I have my doubts that you would be able to follow the project's rules if I were to unblock you. Please think carefully before making your next unblock request, and review the guide to appealing blocks - 3 failed requests is often the line where a blocked editor will lose access to edit their talkpage. SQL ^{Query me!} 21:16, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Interested?

@Учхљёная: I have created a new proposal for a WikiProject named WikiProject Anthems. It seems that you are very active to contribute to articles about anthems. Would you like joining my WikiProject? You could sign it here. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 07:44, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) @Jeromi Mikhael: Iň ĉase ÿoū haveň't ňoticed, ¥e user is ĉurreňtlý bloĉked. - BilCat (talk) 08:20, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Swarm ♠ 23:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See SPI for evidence. Swarm ♠ 23:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Учхљёная/Шаблон Testing site

User:Учхљёная/Шаблон Testing site, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Учхљёная/Шаблон Testing site and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Учхљёная/Шаблон Testing site during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:09, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cyrillization of Georgian

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Cyrillization of Georgian, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kirbanzo (talk) 03:56, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cishom

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Cishom, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It is an "attack page", (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 01:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Columbian union listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Columbian union. Since you had some involvement with the Columbian union redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:52, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who have been awarded the Michigan Barnstar has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wikipedians who have been awarded the Michigan Barnstar, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. VegaDark (talk) 01:47, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Redirect-Class Emoji flags has been nominated for renaming

Category:Redirect-Class Emoji flags has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"🇸🇺" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 🇸🇺. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 11#🇸🇺 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Gonnym (talk) 13:04, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

THANK YOU

SimonPL2000 (talk) 18:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cacaopera phonology

Hi Учхљёная! I was curious what your source is for the phonological inventory of Cacaopera that you posted. It seems similar to those of other Misumalpan languages, but disagrees with sources like Campbell (1975) and Richards (1989). —Firespeaker (talk) 16:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:User dle

Template:User dle has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. This nomination also includes {{User dle-5}}.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 15:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:User dle

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Template:User dle, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 16:20, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:User dle-5

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Template:User dle-5, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 16:20, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:National anthems of the Commonwealth of Unrecognized States has been nominated for deletion

Category:National anthems of the Commonwealth of Unrecognized States has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:15, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]