Jump to content

User talk:Elan Morin Tedronai/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

User name "change"

Please go to WP:USURP to request a user name change. Simply moving your user and talk pages to a new user space is not the correct way to do this. The Mad Hatter account would need to be usurped as it was created, although never used, in July of 2006. --Onorem♠Dil 13:14, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

  1. REDIRECT User talk:Mad Hatter

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Iron Maiden. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 14:11, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for explaining your changes. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 14:15, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Iron Maiden

Do it or do not revert me. However, I don't think my edits need to be discussed anywhere. I am bold and that's what I am. Either acknowledge my edits, either do not. But my stance is clear and this article needs a lot, a lot, a lot of work.

Mad Hatter (talk) 14:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

The article looks much, much better for what I did. Look at it and tell me I am wrong. If people are unhappy - then let's discuss. But reversion is bad, bad habit and I never do it. So, man, I am pledging for loyalty and acknowledgement in the name of the future developping. I don't think I need permission or anything else in order to explain and justify an edit. I am an established and seasoned editor, not some fellow with yellow around my mouth. I know what I am doing and I consider it right. That's why I don't think I need any kind of permission. If you are not happy - then I am open to discussion. But if you come and decide to revert, just for the sake of it with such beaurocratic reasons as "We have to discuss" - I don't think so.

Regards:

14:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Right... just because you consider it to be correct doesn't make it so. You're making major changes that really need to be discussed first on the IM talk page. Please also be aware of WP:3RR. If you continue to rv myself and other editors you will be blocked for breaking the 3 revert rule. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. ScarianCall me Pat 15:54, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Additional note - Here you can propose your major changes. ScarianCall me Pat 15:59, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ScarianCall me Pat 09:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elan Morin Tedronai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Scarian is taking personal jab against me. He is abusing his power in order to silence my opinion and is persistently reverting me on the Iron Maiden page, because of relative inexperience and relative incompetence. It is remarkable that person of his standing - an administrator - has fallen to such petty ways of resolving issues. He didn't discussed anything about Iron Maiden, just kept reverting and then suddenly when I expressed disappointment in his way of resolving issues, he decided to block me up, saying it is a personal attack. While I wasn't happy, I had no intention to attack Scarian or to cause my blocking. My version of Iron Maiden can be found on the history page, I regard it as a better and I was continuosly hindered by Scarian adn other editors. I am appealing to administrators because of Scarian's inability to see the truth and his remarkable disrespect toward my standing as an established and capable editor

Decline reason:

Block seems appropriate. Insistence on talk page discussion rather than edit warring is the norm for Wikipedia, and personal attacks are highly discouraged (calling someone inexperienced and incompetent in an unblock request is hardly likely to win a reprieve) - however one week is somewhat excessive given generally clean block log, am reducing to 48 hours. Orderinchaos 11:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to unblock request admin - See here for evidence of personal attacks. Myself and others were referred to as "blockheads" and I was called a "silly revertor [sic]". As for the discussion of the Iron Maiden dispute, I asked the said user to discuss it here. I also made a section on the IM article talk page for the said user to discuss it here. ScarianCall me Pat 10:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Granted, I called you blockhead, and I still think you are blockhead, because of your lack of common sense, lack of tactfulness and lack of respect and understanding toward my edits and toward my stance as Wikipedia editor. You acted like a total jerk, your behaved as if I am a rookie and I don't know what I am doing, you behaved like a insulted lady and not as a man and resorted to blocking me, because you had nothing to say about the issue. You still can't say much about it and I am still flattered that people like you are administrators.
Regards: Mad Hatter (talk) 10:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Re:Iron Maiden

[1] - Please take heed of this and discuss on the article's talk page so we can gain consensus. Thanks for your understanding, friend. ScarianCall me Pat 11:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

I was incorrect in reverting you on Blur (band). Thanks for undoing my edit. Just one thing; the paragraph starting "At the end of their 2003 tour..." could do with some Wikifying and some sourcing. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 10:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Usurpation

With regards to this, if you are renamed, you will be issued a one-second block to link back to the Painbearer blocklog due to recent and important blocks. Is this acceptable? seresin ( ¡? ) 21:01, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Imoen

An article that you have been involved in editing, Imoen, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imoen. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Gavin Collins (talk) 08:41, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Airbag.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Airbag.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Jonathan Lunn, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/l/jonathan-lunn/. As a copyright violation, Jonathan Lunn appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Jonathan Lunn has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Jonathan Lunn and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Jonathan Lunn with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Jonathan Lunn.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Thomas Blomberg (talk) 23:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Привет!

Привет! Как си? Щастлив съм, че има българи и музиканти на wiki. BTW български ми е много лошо. Разбирам български, но трудно пиша. SSJ 5 (talk) 01:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Bob Dylan

Mad Hatter, your radical re-write of the post 2000 section of the Bob Dylan article has done a valuable job in reduced an article that was threatening to become over-long and unwieldy. However, I disagree with your putting some recent Dylan events into a new section called ‘Tributes and legacy’. For example, it makes no sense to include Dylan’s exhibition of his art in Germany last year, and the accompanying catalogue, in ‘Tributes and legacy’ since clearly this was an important new development in Dylan’s career, in the same way the publication of Vol. One of Dylan’s autobiography was an important development. Also, you have lost some information I thought was valuable, which I intend to restore. To do a radical re-write of a WP:FA may be WP: bold but sometimes it is wise to discuss your ideas on Talk page. Mick gold (talk) 09:46, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Rock music WikiProject

I'd like to invite you to join the newly-formed Rock music WikiProject. There's alot of Rock-related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help us get this project off the ground and a few Rock music pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks! --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 19:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Paranoid Android

Hi there! User:Giggy, User:Papa November, User:WesleyDodds, and I have been working on the "Paranoid Android" article and intend on getting it promoted to FA status in the near future. As you are a frequent editor to the Radiohead article, any additions you may have to contribute to the article would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 02:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Historical novelists of whodunnits

Category:Historical novelists of whodunnits, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 12:14, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Space opera

The reason the "list" article is a redirect, is that it is entirely original research. the main article has a list already, so this would be redundant, and as no-one can be bothered to find more sources, it seems unlikely that the list would ever be large enough to need a seperate page. The alternative is the drawn out process of AfD of this content fork, which would almost certainly say merge. If you want a longer list of examples, why not find sources and expand the one we have?Yobmod (talk) 15:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Civility

Please read Wikipedia's policy on civility and see if you would like to remove or strike some comments from this post. -- The Red Pen of Doom 20:52, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Talk:Imaginationland Episode I, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. this is absolutely inappropriate. You claim to be "experienced enough to deal with such situations", then act like it. -- Scorpion0422 21:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

In relation to the above, this post demonstrates unacceptable behavior. Please remain civil. Thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:35, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
"Who will be so selfish and arrogant to list his contributions on his personal page. I let my edits speak for themselves" is an uncivil comment, and has no place on Wikipedia. We're trying to build an encyclopedia, not to prove other editors wrong, not to attack other editors, and not to demonstrate why we are better than other editors. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:41, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
You're not criticizing, you're being uncivil. You don't have to regard yourself as wrong, but if you continue what is clearly being uncivil, you will be blocked from editing. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:52, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Okay then

So I start a merge discussion (which goes along with wikipedia policy) because I believe one really good page is better than four duplicates, (ie. Who Shot Mr. Burns?) and that makes me a bad user? It seems that you are taking things very personally and have resorted to attacking me, my conduct and (rather bizarely) my userpage. -- Scorpion0422 21:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

[2] Actually, I gave you the standard WP:NPA warning. Perhaps I started off a little too strong, but I figured that you deserved a strong warning since you have been here longer than me. -- Scorpion0422 21:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Editors are free to remove comments off their own talk page whenever they want. See WP:TALK. And if you don't believe that you're not being insulting, disrespectful, or uncivil with your comments, then I can say little more than recommend that you don't interact with other users. If you still want to, then give WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA a good, hard look. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 22:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

To be perfectly frank, your comments are disgusting and hateful. When is is ever constructive to call someone "ignorant", "plan stupid", "self-centered", "inexperienced", or "extremely childish"? You claimed Scorpion was not a "great editor". Who the hell are you to judge that? Your so-called "criticism" is nothing more than petty insults. You speak your mind, and when you do, we call you out on violating one of Wikipedia's tenets: that editors are civil to one another. That you believe WP:NPOV applies to editors just illustrates your lack of comprehension of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. In any case, I'm done here. Again, if you want to continue editing, then reexamine your interactions with other users, and think how you can change your behavior. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 23:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Imagionationland movie.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Imagionationland movie.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I am curious as to why you made your formatting edit on the Blink-182 page. Any specific reason? ŁittleÄlien¹8² (talk\contribs) 00:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

You really should discuss changes like this. You already made this edit in the past, so it would be hove of you to discuss this issue on the on the talk page before doing it again. Happy editing. — ŁittleÄlien¹8² (talk\contribs) 21:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
When are you going to start using the articles talk page? This is third time you've made this edit, and both times in the past they were reverted. Please start discussing things that have been reverted (multiple) times in the past. —ŁittleÄlien¹8² 17:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Why did you remove this text here and then make this edit? This seems contradictory. Either leave up the tag that says "main studio albums only" or remove the tag and allow the non-studio albums to be added. —ŁittleÄlien¹8² 18:46, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Wow, no discussion, edit summary, or explanation. Just a revert. I'm fine with either format, but at least add an explanation somewhere (anywhere), so future editors understand the rationale for your edits. —ŁittleÄlien¹8² 19:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Radiohead

Hi there, I can see that things are becoming a bit heated over there. Thanks for discussing the matter on the talk page. However, I must ask you not to revert the page again today however, to avoid violating the three revert rule. If you revert the page again, you may be blocked from editing and I really would prefer to avoid that. I have given a similar warning to the IP editor so let's try to sort this out through discussion and allow a third party to make any further reversions. Thanks, Papa November (talk) 13:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi, just wanted to say good job on the songwriting section of the radiohead page. It reads alot better now. Good stuff --A Chain Of Flowers (talk) 23:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Take That - Gary and Robbie

Hello,

I will be replacing my comments very shortly with referenced links. This was not a matter of opinion. It merely stated the fact that Robbie outdid Gary in popularity and stardom. The documentary answers all you're concerns. Gary pretty much conceded defeat in the film and i do not believe that I did anything to challenge otherwise. If anything, it was Gary's comments I've reflected on. I will however remove the "Crap songwriter" from the paragraph as i understand why some may be upset by it.

Swearing and abusing at other users is not an acceptable means of retracing comments. This will only lead to a repetition of comments being added again and again and eventually reporting such behaviour regardless of previous posts and work.

Regards,

Toon —Preceding unsigned comment added by ToonIsALoon (talk • contribs) 11:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Blur

Hi. I've reverted a few of your edits on the Blur article. The "height of fame" section header was rather inappropriate, because Blur arguably became more famous worldwide with the American-sounding Blur. Also, by adding "Backing vocals" to all of the musicians in the second sentence of the lead, you make it long and ungainly. Best to just list the main instruments they are primarily identified with; by keeping it short and sweet, we make for a more engaging lead. Remember that we are targeting the articles towards a reader who doesn't know anything about Blur. As for the 2004–2009 section, I believe a whole section needs to be devoted to how Blur have done nothing in that time. Also note WP:RECENT, which means that more recent information shouldn't be given undue coverage compared to older stuff. indopug (talk) 16:20, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Radiohead talk page

It's not recommended that you edit other editors' talk page posts, even if they are agreeing with you. Let them declare support for your edits themselves. WesleyDodds (talk) 04:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Please don't reformat other users' comments - it's considered bad etiquette. The guidelines are pretty clear on this. Papa November (talk) 16:02, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Alanis Morissette Awards and Nominations

Hello!

I noticed that you created the List of awards and nominations received by Alanis Morissette article, and I just wanted to let you know that I completely reorganized it for you. I still need help on citing sources on the awards. Is it possible if you could help by adding some more references to the article? I haven't referenced any articles before, so I'm kind of clueless when it comes to that kind of stuff...

Have a great new year!

WereWolf (talk) 02:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

I have nominated Radiohead for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

hey

Could you please learn some English before contributing? if not, i believe the bulgarian wikipedia needs some help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.123.223.178 (talk) 01:40, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


And your poems are, frankly, shit. 71.170.30.225 (talk) 22:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

- otherwise, your edits look like vandalism, especially when removing content with no reason. Stephenb (Talk) 18:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Alphabetization and collation

I am inviting you to comment, in your capacity as a librarian, at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Alphabetization and collation. -- Wavelength (talk) 19:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Dom Brown

Why have you listed Dom Brown as an official member of Duran Duran, when he clearly is not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.9.184.26 (talk) 02:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Dominic Brown / Duran Duran

You might be interested in this discussion. Cheers. – IbLeo (talk) 20:59, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

The Spinning Top

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Spinning Top, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.nme.com/news/43439. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:31, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I've restored Dylan external links that I think are consistent with WP:EL policy: those links that give important news & info on Dylan's touring schedule, recording sessions and which IMHO seriously expand our understanding of Dylan's work. On Dylan Talk page I've asked other editors what they think [[3]]. best wishes Mick gold (talk) 08:11, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Bob Dylan and WP:EL part two

You've deleted the External Links again on Bob Dylan and I've restored them again. This has been discussed on the Talk Page. See [[4]] which I referred to in my last posting. I & Allreet believe what we have is consistent with WP:EL policy, particularly No. 3 of the following:

=== What should be linked ===
  1. Wikipedia articles about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to the subject's official site, if any.
  2. An article about a book, a musical score, or some other media should link to a site hosting a copy of the work if none of the "Links normally to be avoided" criteria apply.
  3. Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons.

If there is disagreement among editors, you have to try to reach consensus, not simply delete every time. Read WP:EL policy and then please discuss. Mick gold (talk) 13:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Adventures (band)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article New Adventures (band), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mr_pand [talk | contributions] 09:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Verve

This is not an album, it's an EP. Check the rules:

a CD single has around 10–28 minutes of music, an EP has up to 36 minutes, and an album generally has 30–80 minutes.

Verve is, give or take, 30 minutes long - whilst that could just fit in the album category, it's most comfortable in the EP category. And it only has five tracks - every other Verve album has at least ten. Lastly, Ashcroft himself referred to A Storm in Heaven as their first album (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfgyGszPZuE, 6:09).

Kohran (talk) 09:50, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Liam at concert.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.chartattack.com/Gallery/20050620-oasis.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Liam at concert.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Liam at concert.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:47, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jazz Mellor

An editor has nominated the Jazz Mellor article for deletion. If you have any thoughts on this matter then please add your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jazz Mellor.

Thank-you Unknown Unknowns (talk) 12:23, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Kinks nominated as featured article

The Kinks has been nominated as a featured article and your name came up in Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Kinks/archive1 so I thought I'd give you a heads-up. Eubulides (talk) 07:45, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of New Adventures (band)

A tag has been placed on New Adventures (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hoponpop69 (talk) 15:56, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Adventures (band)

The article New Adventures (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unnotable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hoponpop69 (talk) 17:03, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Green Day

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the article which you can see at Talk:Green Day/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Edit conflict on The Kinks

Hi Mad Hatter. It appears you had an edit conflict when doing some work on the Kinks article, as your last edit wiped out all my work. I am going to need to undo your last edit to restore my work. I will try to then redo what you had done, though you will need to check it as it's not quite clear to read because of the edit conflict. Regards SilkTork *YES! 12:05, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mad Hatter! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Joe Alaskey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Bob Henrit - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Stephen Dando-Collins - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Anthony A. Goodman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Ross Leckie - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Kate Sedley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Candace Robb - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Alys Clare - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:00, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

The Kinks

Mad Hatter, we don't know each other but it saddens me to see you edit warring over the article you have put so much into. I urge you to take these matters up with other editors on the article talk page, just as has already been suggested more than once. If you were to continue as you are currently doing, I feel that would begin to seriously undermine your established position as a significant and respected contributor to the article. I hope you don't find this comment intrusive. Please, reflect on this, and try to start to work these things out on the talk page instead. I believe you can rectify the situation if you do this now, before matters deteriorate any further. Again, sorry if this is an intrusion; you may know more about the whole situation than I do. Anyway, I hope this helps somehow. PL290 (talk) 11:08, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Thought you'd be interested in this

User Carmaker1, showed up out of nowhere at my talk page couple of days ago blaming me and you for removing a whole chunk of information from the article of Backstreet Boys, see this here. Then he went on inserting unsourced release-date into the article of Backstreet Boys, meantime removing highly reliable sources and replacing them with Google search like sites, see this for example. Now he's all over the place accusing me and you being the same person, see this. If this editor keeps on throwing accusations of this kind we should report him. Thought, you should be aware of what's he's up to.--Harout72 (talk) 16:42, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks man, I appreciate it, I'll keep you posted if Carmaker1 has anything else to add to his earlier accusations.--Harout72 (talk) 21:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Glad to know you two aren't the same person then. However, I will report you, User: Mad Hatter, for your own poor conduct. Harout72 hasn't used the level of language you have in referring to me. As for you Harout72, verifiability does not include ease of access. In fact, those are news archives and unfortunately you must not possess anywhere near the amount of wealth I do to purchase any article for research. I'm glad you corrected one of the dates(August 12, 1997), but the Canadian date is still incorrect as the album was number one in October 1996. I provided to you information before that your judgment on Billboard Magazine's charts was flawed. I will continue to look for the accurate source containing the September 1996 release date. It is clearly obvious that there is a gang mentality that shouldn't be welcome on such a site.Carmaker1 (talk) 03:47, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Elan Morin Tedronai. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

E-mail

Your e-mail that you have provided for wikipedia, do you still have that e-mail? Because you don't seem to have received my e-mail. If no longer have one, let me know of another e-mail address where I can send you e-mail, I don't want to leave messages here out in the open. Leave your e-mail address here, I will delete it later.--Harout72 (talk) 16:29, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Jojhutton (talk) 01:51, 12 March 2010 (UTC) Its at WP:ANI#Apparent unrepentant User encouraging incivility in a Newbie

May 2010

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Batman in film, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.-5- (talk) 18:06, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

"how old are you? jeez...."

Things like that^ don't go in edit summaries. Please be polite. ×××BrightBlackHeaven(talk)××× 09:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

WQA notice

Hello, Elan Morin Tedronai. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Netalarmtalk 23:02, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Please remember to use civil language when leaving edit summaries, particularly not attacking other editors. Doing so will create a more enjoyable environment for you and other editors. I understand there have been several threads at ANI and WQA regarding your behavior, so I would appreciate it if you could stay with reasonable edit summaries. If you need help with anything, feel free to message me. Netalarmtalk 21:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Chavdar-me.JPG

Hi, all images hosted on Wikipedia need some kind of license, even those used only in userspace. Please add a free license to the image. Regards Hekerui (talk) 22:07, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

I nominated the image for deletion. Hekerui (talk) 19:44, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

System of a Down

Please do not remove content as you did with System of a Down article without previous discussion on the Talk. 1,2. Now the article is has full protection so that can't be restored right now. If the article is too long, maybe the solution is split it. See Wikipedia:Article size, WP:SPLIT --Neo139 (talk) 23:27, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ross Leckie

The article Ross Leckie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Assistant professor [5]

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gigs (talk) 04:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Main page appearance

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on March 25, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 25, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director, Raul654 (talk · contribs). If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 05:09, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Members of Radiohead

Radiohead are an English alternative rock band from Abingdon, Oxfordshire, formed in 1985. The band consists of Thom Yorke (vocals, guitars, piano), Jonny Greenwood (guitars, keyboards, other instruments), Ed O'Brien (guitars, backing vocals), Colin Greenwood (bass, synthesizers) and Phil Selway (drums, percussion). Radiohead released their first single, "Creep", in 1992. The song was initially unsuccessful, but it became a worldwide hit several months after the release of their debut album, Pablo Honey (1993). Radiohead's third album, OK Computer (1997), propelled them to greater international fame. Featuring an expansive sound and themes of modern alienation, OK Computer is often acclaimed as a landmark record of the 1990s. Radiohead's work has appeared in a large number of listener polls and critics' lists. While the band's earlier albums were influential on British rock and pop music, musicians in a wide variety of genres have been influenced by their later work. The New York Times described Radiohead as "the world's biggest art band." (more...)

Reply: OK

Thanks for the understanding. =) Oh & If you do wanna help, then maybe you can tidy up the Emmure article for me? I've been wanting to see that page shine and just got done with some work on it, but perhaps since you're so good at the stuff that goes on on here that I thought maybe you can help too. -- GunMetal Angel 05:16, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Please don't edit the Nickelback page if you don't know anything

The title says it all don't edit it the Nickelback page. Thank You for your occupation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickelbackrules1518 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Really?

Stop the immaturities. Thanks, Theleftorium (talk) 12:35, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Meagain.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Meagain.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:17, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Chavdar-me.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chavdar-me.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:20, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Drumming me.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Drumming me.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:20, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Imagionationland movie.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Imagionationland movie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:21, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Kodak 8 046.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kodak 8 046.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 3 Doors Down. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Calabe1992 (talk) 18:58, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:AngelsandAirwaves2011pg(1).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AngelsandAirwaves2011pg(1).jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please remove the tag.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. We hope (talk) 16:56, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AngelsandAirwaves2011pg(1).jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AngelsandAirwaves2011pg(1).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:56, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of M K Hume

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on M K Hume requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 21:28, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Finger Eleven discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Velvet Revolver

Replied and moved your post on my talk page to the article talk page. HrZ (talk) 12:08, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

"Per se" image usage on Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds article

What Wiki image usage policy are you referring to in your removal of the images from the Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds article? As far as I can tell, the images are not "staggering" or "bloating" anything, nor are they redundant, but rather are illustrating members and performances in the same manner as any of the GAs on musical groups that I've read. If anything, I could see wanting to trim out one or two, but not all. Colinclarksmith (talk) 20:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Nickelback

Thought I'd repost this here in case you didn't see it on the discussion page:

Any particular reason why you keep removing some of these sourced quotes without explanation? Most notably, you keep removing a part where it says they had 4 songs done in February, and that a member of the band claiming that "Here and Now" would be "more organic sounding" and sound like "All the Right Reasons". I see no reason to remove that, it's sourced and important info regarding the new album. Even if there was some sort of problem, you should be explaining why... Sergecross73 msg me 03:00, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

So, to be clear, your approach this situation, was to never respond, and then try removing it again, 6 months later, without any discussion or edit summary? Sergecross73 msg me 14:47, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

RE: Nickelback

Yes, I've actually noticed what you're saying, and that's what leads me to be all the more confused. You've edited for a long time, and are part of a music-related Wikiproject. So you obviously know removing sourced information w/o discussion or edit summary is frowned upon. (Through your talk page, I see you were accused of doing similar actions at Velvet Revolver as well.)

But I won't lecture your further. I'm sorry that you've got a lot going on, and I wish you well as well. Best of luck with all you've got going on. Sergecross73 msg me 20:55, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

RE: Velvet Revolver

I don't think any editor likes to see their edits removed so no need to apologise on that front sir. I put a lot of work getting that article up to some sort of decent standard (this being what is what like before) using articles like Pearl Jam and Soundgarden as examples, and while I don't own it or decide what is included or removed, I felt you were a little bit vague in your reasons for removing content, which is why I reverted and asked for a discussion. You say "very unprofessional" and "crappy fan page" and you may very well be right, but how am I to know if you don't explain why?

You feel strongly about what should and should not be in the article, but really it doesn't benefit article if one person is getting their way (me included) which is the whole reason to discuss first. So, I won't revert the recent changes you made but discuss what you want to change, though really you should have discussed them first (WP:STATUSQUO). The splitting of formation is well done, starting at Randy Castillo's funeral works well. Not a fan of the "Origins and past careers" heading but the only suggestion I have is "Early years" which may or may not work. A large amount of the content in "Search of new singer and hiatus" could be re-written to flow with the rest of the article rather than "In an interview with" every few sentences. Still don't believe that there should be a whole section with solo careers. I think it could still be trimmed (my fault for there being that much info in the first place) and inserted into the new singer and hiatus section. I personally don't see how it hampers the article and I've seen very similar sections, or mentions of other solo projects, on articles of a higher standard (The Beatles, Sex Pistols, Silverchair, The Smashing Pumpkins). I'm assuming these kind of sections inclusion is dependant on who is editing and down to personal opinion.

In regards to the removing of content previously, there is no policy or guideline that I am aware of (maybe you do) that states what length an article should be. Sometimes an article needs to be big just to give the subject adequate coverage. If there is any content that you disagree with, ask me about it and I'll tell you my reasons for adding in the first place. You might agree or disagree but at least then we can move on from there. Hope I made some sense in this response, happy editing sir. HrZ (talk) 14:35, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

I really think those changes work well. A large majority of the content you removed was mainly IP contributions, those who felt every interview, rumour and mention of the band's future should be included, so I am quite happy to see it go with some of it re-worded into the article. I'll give the changes a proper look when I have a little more time, but no cause for complaint on this end! Are you happy with the changes? I know you made them, but just incase there is any other issues you feel should be delt with in the article =) HrZ (talk) 11:29, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
It is a small bit of info so a subsection works better. I removed the "-present" part of the heading. It is my understanding that, if it is the current year then there is no need for it, until the following year that is! HrZ (talk) 13:58, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Historical novel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hornblower and Patrick O'Brien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Matt Cameron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Backspacer (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Harvard fellowship

Hi Mad Hatter. I saw your comment on Facebook about this position, and I wanted to encourage you to apply if you haven't already. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 18:36, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!

You are welcome! --Tito Dutta Message 01:46, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of James L. Nelson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James L. Nelson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James L. Nelson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. West Eddy (talk) 01:53, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Dostoyevsky peer review

hello,

I found your name here and I invite you to join this peer review. Any help appreciated! Regards.--GoPTCN 12:40, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anthony A. Goodman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anthony A. Goodman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dismas|(talk) 03:06, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Хиподил - Аа, Бб, Вв, Гг, Зз... (2003) и книга „Благордарение“

Имаш ли албум „Аа, Бб, Вв, Гг, ЗЗ“ от Хиподил (с обложки)? FokkerTISM 11:00, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited The Bravery discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Gore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Blur (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyde Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Opinion

Could you opine on this this matter. Regards AdabowtheSecond (talk) 18:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

backstreet boys

dont you think the backstreet boys article seems a bit inflated since your a darkwinkist and edited on the article cud you cut out the unnecessary info a bit 106.213.11.158 (talk) 11:00, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

LP

HI mr. distinguished editor. (not mocking, your page explains itself). i think sticking to time line way is better than this way. coz this revision doesn't explain clearly the gap between the 2nd album and 3rd one. so i don't know !!!! --hosam007 (talk) 18:57, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

i think if we return it back like it was would be good, and for time line i think it's a basic thing to make especially in the bands articles coz while reading the article you need to know what happened through it's history in the right order, like any other rock band (coldplay, green day, etc). it's a main article and i hope you fix it. thank you, peace --hosam007 (talk) 19:16, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen Deas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Starsailor (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Warchild (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikiproject advice

As a member of the literature project here on Wikipedia, could you lend some advice regarding technical literature? I recently created a page for Quad charts, a common tool used in busines-to-business marketing and bidding on contracts by technical firms. I'm not sure where it would belong in terms of projects since it's technical "literature," so to speak. MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:47, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Avenged Sevenfold may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Travis (band), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fran Healy and Neil Primrose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Where You Stand album cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Where You Stand album cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:24, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Massive Deletion of OK Go

Hi. Thanks for looking at the OK Go page. I don't want to revert your mass deletion without reaching out, but it looks like you deleted almost a third of the page, with only the note "had to cut some things. need more tidying." Would you be willing to revert your change and then bring the discussion to the article's talk page so they can be discussed? I believe that there is a particularly compelling case that OK Go is as much a multi-media artistic enterprise as it is a band, and that their albums are less important to their history and output then their videos are. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorisdanglehoff (talk • contribs) 20:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liam Gallagher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Be Here Now (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, Mad Hatter. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Council#OK_Go.
You can remove this notice at any time.

Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (converse) @ 19:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Bulgarian help needed

Hello Mad Hatter, I'm contacting you because we need some Bulgarian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on bg.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Bulgarian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 20:24, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Changes to Alter Bridge lead

Just seen your edits, I'm wondering if there was a mistake made? A ton of info was added to lead that had kind of messed it up and doesn't seem to need to be included there. HrZ (talk) 15:05, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm Jmeeter. An edit that you recently made to Angels & Airwaves seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! teratogen (talk) 03:38, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

This user helped promote Blink-182 to good article status.

Well done. SilkTork ✔Tea time 10:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Courteeners discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Edit summary needed

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Frze > talk 08:33, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Use Preview button

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Kaiser Chiefs , it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. --Frze > talk 08:33, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 26 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manes (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern Discomfort (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 11 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited As I Lay Dying discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages As I Lay Dying and American Tragedy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you made a change to an article, As I Lay Dying (band), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. STATic message me! 16:42, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Reply

Sir, I advise you to stop removing information without consulting other users. Those are featured articles that you are editing. Please, try to talk with other users before making any significant change in the articles. That goes againts the spirit of this wiki. Alright? Do not make unilateral changes. This here is a collaborative project. Right? All the best for you too.

  • MOS:IMAGES: "Images are an important part of any article's presentation. Effort should therefore be made to improve quality and choice of images or captions in articles rather than favoring their removal". ;) Coltsfan (talk) 23:01, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


First, your "appeal to experience" is meaningless. I could simply say that even the most experience editors make mistakes, but since apparently you claim to be infallible, it will probably fall on deaf ears. But, like I said before, the WP:STYLE says it very clear and it would be nice if check it out. "Efforts should therefore be made to improve quality and choice of images or captions in articles rather than favoring their removal". Images are indeed an important part of any article's presentation. Before removing all of them, you might want to check the opinion of other users, because, last I checked, there are probably other users besides you. If you are really as experienced as you claim to be, you know very well that that friendly coexistence is important. And in the spirit of collaboration, making radical changes in featured articles because you think it's what "the article needs", maybe it's not a good idea. If you talk to other editors in the article's talk page, and they all agree that these changes are necessary, then I would gladly abide by the consensus, because it would be a decision made by the comunity of editors. Other than that, it's just your opinion. And your opinion is, by definition, yours. Other people may disagree with your point of view. It happens. Until a consensus is achieved, status quo of the page must be respected. I meant no offense, but that's the way it was always done. Look at other featured articles. They all have images that help to illustrate the article. You still don't agree? Then do the civilized thing and start a helpful discussion at the article's talk page and let's see what other wikipedians say. Ok? Bye. Coltsfan (talk) 18:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Joe Walsh

Hi, Mad Hatter, I understand that you are one of Wikipedia's best editors, and I would highly appreciate it if you could help make Joe Walsh's page a good article. Many thanks Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 07:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your permission request

Hi, regarding your request and reply at Wikipedia:Request for permissions/Confirmed:

See the main page Wikipedia:Request for permissions. It describes the permissions and tools that can be granted to you. You will need to justify why you need each specific permission you request (for example, if you aren't involved in the account request process, you don't need 'account creator' permission, and if you mostly edit articles but don't create new ones, you don't need 'autopatrolled' permission).

Common permissions assigned to users are 'reviewer' and 'rollbacker'. I can grant you 'reviewer' privilege right now, based on your experience. This means, if you see a pending-change-protected edit in your watch list, you have the right to review and accept or reject that change. Not many articles are pending-change protected, mostly contentious biographies of living persons that attract a lot of anonymous vandalism. An article that is pending-change protected won't display the changes made by anonymous users until the change is approved by a reviewer.

Your user rights log is visible here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&action=view&type=rights&page=User:Mad_Hatter

At this time, I'm uncomfortable granting you rollback rights (it's mostly for people who focus on spam and vandal fighting) until you demonstrate more experience communicating with the community. You have very few edits to talk pages. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:37, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Good Charlotte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Campbell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Margaret George, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ulysses. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Thrice may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • which also features current/former members of [[Blink-182]], [[Nine Inch Nails]] and [Hazen Street]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:25, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Re:Space Opera

Here's the article: List of space opera media

But I would recommend removing Star Trek from the list since it's not Space Opera but Space Frontier or Space Western.69.165.246.181 (talk) 23:56, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

  • I would recommend creating a section in the space opera article called "List of space opera media" and pasting the contents of the article into that section. I'd also recommend you move those lists below into the "List of space opera media" section as it looks cluttered in the article. My two cents.69.165.246.181 (talk) 02:35, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Military science fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve White. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Historical fiction, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hornblower and Alan Savage. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Historical fiction
added links pointing to Antiquity, Hornblower, Captain Blood and Patrick O'Brien

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Space opera/Military science fiction and their lists

If people don't want to merge then it's not a big issue. Maybe you should discuss on talkpage or best ye just provide a link to the list on the space opera article. Regards.--Taeyebaar (talk) 20:16, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

In regards to the edits on the Star Trek page, I think that further discussion would be best regarding the catergorizations: Space Opera/ Space Western/ Military science fiction/ et al. Cryomantic (talk) 13:21, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Just to let you know...

...I shifted Starcraft from space opera to military science fiction because that's where it belongs. TC--Taeyebaar (talk) 01:21, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Historical fiction

You are doing a good job and I'll try to do what I can to help. Rwood128 (talk) 17:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Re subheadings there's no problem. Basically I don't like lists, especially when they lack any details, like dates, etc. For this topic the list could become vast -- see my comment on the Talk page.

I don't understand your comment re italics, because it is standard practise to italicise the titles of novels, plays, etc. Rwood128 (talk) 19:43, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Frontier (subgenre)

Please see if you can help improve that article. Thanks in advance--Taeyebaar (talk) 02:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Charlatans (UK band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portishead. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:36, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Happy Christmas

Thanks for the kind comment. I always enjoy editing more when there are other editors helping! Happy Christmas and all the best for 2015, Rwood128 (talk) 11:45, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Phish article removal of POV tag

You removed the POV tag without correcting the issues or addressing them on the talk page. 97.85.173.38 (talk) 06:40, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Historical fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ursus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Question

I noticed that you had listed Battlestar Galactica amongst the list of Space Opera media. Do you think we should specify the genre of that franchise as Space Opera? I've checked online for sources and it does show BSG as a space opera subgenre. Do you think we should open a discussion on the talk pages and discuss a change? Will you be available for discussions?--Taeyebaar (talk) 20:41, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Are you sure about that? If I'm not mistaken I did change it to military sci-fi and it got reverted. I also think BSG does not fit the definition of military science fiction, but rather space opera. Wait before de-listing. Check the definitions and online sources before making this move. Let me know what you find. Thanks--Taeyebaar (talk) 06:37, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 7 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

The Wikipedia Library

Call for Volunteers

Did you know that Wikipedia has its own library? The Wikipedia Library is seeking volunteers from those in galleries, libraries, archives and museums.

Sign up to help here :)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome

Seeing that you are a good and co-operative contributor. But a word of advice. Don't put Wikipedia above your real-life priorities. Make sure you're real life needs are fulfilled before devoting time and energy to Wikipedia. Best regards.--Taeyebaar (talk) 21:45, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Discussion

Hi Mad Hatter, since you contributed to pages regarding sci-fi genres, can you please have a look at this discussion when you can?--Taeyebaar (talk) 18:24, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

From my understanding cyberpunk is a subgenre of science fiction; wheras dystopian fiction is more about an alternative society, but commonly overlaps with cyberpunk and even social science fiction. You're feedback would be welcome.--Taeyebaar (talk) 18:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Elan Morin Tedronai. You have new messages at Old Time Music Fan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Robin Hobb bibliography

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Robin Hobb bibliography, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://www.sffchronicles.com/threads/4311/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 20 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Eric Flint bibliography
added a link pointing to American
S.M. Stirling bibliography
added a link pointing to American
Timothy Zahn bibliography
added a link pointing to American

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Simon R. Green bibliography

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Simon R. Green bibliography, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://audiobooks.3xforum.ro/post/1075/1/Simon_R_Green/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Michael F. Flynn bibliography
added a link pointing to American
Peter F. Hamilton bibliography
added a link pointing to British

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Discussion about recent revert on Alter Bridge

I am contacting you as a result of a revert that you made of my recent edit to Alter Bridge. I have started a discussion on Talk:Alter Bridge#Inclusion of Creed Navbox that I invite you to join if you wish to stand by that revert. Thanks and happy editing! — DLManiac (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Donachie

The article David Donachie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not only is there simply not much here currently, my searches found nothing better than some trivial mentions at Books and browsers. There may be some more hidden and archived coverage but I'm simply not seeing anything for the benefit of the doubt especially considering there's more than enough to suggest deleting now with no obvious signs of notabiltiy.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 06:08, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Daniel Baldwin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Santa Monica]].<ref>http://www.glitteratigossip.com/glitterati/2006/04/daniel_baldwin_.html] {{dead link|date=December 2015}}</ref> Authorities subsequently declined to press charges.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of works by Tamora Pierce
added a link pointing to American
Roger Zelazny bibliography
added a link pointing to American

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

This is complete list of works by...

I see you've created several pages starting "This is complete list of works by". Other than the issue of grammar ("This is a complete list of works by"), you need to consider the durability of your claim. The list may be complete at the time you write it, but will it be complete when it's being read? I'd advise against claiming it's complete unless the author is dead. Regards, Bazj (talk) 10:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of The Dreamers characters
added a link pointing to The Dreamers
Patricia A. McKillip bibliography
added a link pointing to American

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Could you add to my page?

I created a page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mythological_or_fantastic_beings_in_contemporary_fiction , but it needs more contributions. If you'd wander by and add any series you can remember enough of, I'd appreciate it. Tamtrible (talk) 21:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Gregory Benford

I reverted your edit at Gregory Benford, where you deleted a large section of sourced information without leaving an edit summary. Then I looked at your edit history and saw you were an experienced editor, so I tried to figure out what you were up to. I noticed you had created a separate article, Gregory Benford bibliography, for the large section of text you had removed. Could you please make it your New Year's resolution to leave edit summaries to assist other editors? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:50, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Stross bibliography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Merchants' War. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Improvement on articles of subgenres

Hi Mad Hatter. If you're still working on improving articles on science fiction subgenres (such as adding most recognizable TV shows, etc). see what you can do to improve biopunk, comedy science fiction and high-fantasy. Those articles could use some additional citations and later maybe you can add TV shows and movies to give better examples. I did all I can to improve those and will be preoccupied for some time. I've done enough editing for now and will return at a later time. If you wish you can improve them slowly. Take your time.--Taeyebaar (talk) 22:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Historical fiction

Portal:Historical fiction, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Historical fiction and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Historical fiction during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 07:05, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of comic science fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Borderlands. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to High fantasy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

February 2016

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Simon R. Green does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! - theWOLFchild 05:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the response MH, I hope you are well. I will see what I can do to fix those pages. I request in the meantime you add TV shows and movies to Maritime science fiction. I recommend adding Sea Quest and Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea as TV shows. As movies I recommend adding movie adaptations of 20, 000 Leagues Under the Sea. Take care and let me know if you require any assistance. I will help you when I am more available.--Taeyebaar (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Mad Hatter. I posted on the article talk page. Go ahead and add it, I've told him to leave it until you're finished adding them. If you add any mistakes, I'll edit the list as I did on space opera and military science fiction. I will review your lists when I return later. Best regards.--Taeyebaar (talk) 00:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Spy-Fi

Hi MH, are you still working on subgenre articles? We have a list of examples on Spy-Fi many of them sourced, but the format could be improved to the way you put them in table form. Review the article and see what improvements you make. If you make any mistakes in your list, I'll correct them. How are you doing for High fantasy? Do you still need help there? Let me know and take your time.--Taeyebaar (talk) 01:27, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Mad Hatter, sorry for the late reply. I checked out High fantasy today and did some small improvements to the article including editing the lists you created. Well done. It looks good now. Keep up your good work on other science fiction and fantasy subgenres and let me know if you need any help.--Taeyebaar (talk) 20:52, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited High fantasy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Warhammer Fantasy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

I fixed the link for you, so you don't have to worry about it anymore.--Taeyebaar (talk) 00:54, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Sad news

Dear Mad Hatter, yesterday one of our cats died of old age and sickness. Please pray for her deliverance. We are going through emotional sadness.

I hope my edits were helpful to you. I will be preoccupied with preparing my resume and others things. Please notify me if you need help on articles related to subgenres and I will help when I can drop by. Take good care of yorself.--Taeyebaar (talk) 19:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Targets

Thanks Mad Hatter for your condolences. These pets become like your family after living with you. It's like loosing a family member. We can only wish for the best.

Yes there are many genre and subgenre articles that need serious correcting. I'm going make some serious improvements to them as well. I'm also going to edit the improvements you've made on spy-fi.

Our current target should be biopunk, Space Western, Comedy science fiction, social science fiction and cyberpunk. Some of these might already have significant lists. I will recommend more as we go along. I will also update other science fiction pages in the process. Why don't you start with the ones I mentioned and then I'll follow. After that we can go after more pages for improvement. Take care.--Taeyebaar (talk) 23:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

And can you please vote on the Spy-fi article entry for keep or delete? Thanks.--Taeyebaar (talk) 21:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Split undone

I have undone your split of Jennifer Roberson, because the split is not justified under WP:SPLIT on either the basis of size or content. —swpbT 19:52, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Anne McCaffrey

You have just removed nearly 13k of content from the article without an edit summary. I have restored. If you are intending to make massive (constructive) changes, you must use edit summaries, and I suggest an explanatory section on the talk page before you start. --Mirokado (talk) 19:56, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Jim Butcher bibliography) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Jim Butcher bibliography, Mad Hatter!

Wikipedia editor Erick Shepherd just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Spectacular work!

To reply, leave a comment on Erick Shepherd's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

I have undone this split as well, for the same reason as above. Please do not split articles without a good reason, and discuss potentially-controversial splits before carrying them out. In these cases, starting a discussion would have prevented you from making a mistake. —swpbT 20:01, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
My apologies: There wasn't any indication that the article was a split when I was doing the new page curation, and I neglected to check the edit history on the parent page Jim Butcher. I mistakenly believed the new article was original work. --Erick Shepherd (talk) 20:16, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
"Rogue editor?" Get over yourself, immediately. What started off looking like an innocent mistake can very quickly go down a bad road for your editing rights, if your behavior doesn't fix itself. —swpbT 20:06, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Make whatever justifications you want. If you do not start bringing your splits to the article talk pages immediately, you will find yourself blocked, very quickly. You are not special, you do not get to ignore the guidelines. I don't care how long you've been doing it, it stops now. You will not split one more bibliography without a consensus established on the article's talk page, you will not attack one more editor for fixing your mess, and you will not canvas. I will be watching closely, and I am not alone. —swpbT 20:14, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop changing "works by" to "bibilography by"

What the title says. I have already corrected this in Anne McCaffrey with the detailed edit summary: "grammar: this list was not written by AIM, it is a list compiled by our editors based on other sources, so the previous phrase was OK". Now you have made the same change to Template:Brandon Sanderson, which I have also corrected. Please correct any other articles affected by this change. --Mirokado (talk) 18:18, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Spy-Fi

Hi Mad Hatter. Thanks for letting me know. I will check it. Yes it's very insulting when hard working editors get discredited for their work. I have experienced very similar disrespect, including my work on Spy-Fi! I was even accused of making personal attacks there! But like I said, I'm gonna check it.--Taeyebaar (talk) 23:45, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

I opened a discussion on the talk page of the article supporting my consensus to split. I invited other editors there to leave their comments. Hopefully this problem will be resolved soon.--Taeyebaar (talk) 00:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

WARNING

You know what I don't see on Talk:Marion Zimmer Bradley? A discussion, started by you, about whether the page should be split. You've been told, by multiple people, to get consensus for these splits, and I'm done playing. Since you're choosing to do things the hard way, know that I will be using every tool available -- WP:AIV, WP:ANI, arbitration, whatever it takes -- to make you stop ignoring the rules. —swpbT 18:23, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

I know what you mean dude. Wikipedia editing is a thanksless job.....:-}--Taeyebaar (talk) 00:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

PS since opposing editor has not responded to the split suggestion, I think it's OK. If he wants to revert, you can explain there was already a proposal on the talk page but nobody responded, so split is OK.--Taeyebaar (talk) 00:23, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

To editor Taeyebaar: What do you mean "there was already a proposal on the talk page" and "opposing editor has not responded"? Have you looked at Talk:Marion_Zimmer_Bradley#Split at all??? That proposal appeared after I warned MadHatter, and I immediately responded to it, so you are 100% wrong on both facts. Get your basic facts straight before you jump to defending the indefensible. Do you really think that following the rules is so hard that Mad Hatter should be excused from doing so? —swpbT 12:59, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

ANI notification

To editor Mad Hatter: Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —swpbT 14:59, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

RE: Splits

Mad Hatter, I'm not a sysop so I can't block or unblock you. I don't know if you saw this or not, but I actually oppose the topic ban that was suggested on you. However, if I may suggest, ease off the "being bold" for a bit, some people have a tendency to be too bold and it tends to upset the rest of the community. Just ease up, ask first and follow consensus, even if you don't agree. KoshVorlon 19:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Spy-Fi category deletion

Please check proposal to delete and vote there. I will take care of the spy-fi media list split now.--Taeyebaar (talk) 15:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

I've done the split. Anyone who opposes it will have to gain consensus on the discussion I started long before I re-did the split. The category has already been deleted. Yeah editing Wikipedia is one thankless job.--Taeyebaar (talk) 16:04, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

To editor Taeyebaar: You know, or you certainly should know, that that isn't how things work around here. Policy is clear that the version before the controversial change - meaning the split - stands. I intend to undo many more of Mad Hatter's unjustified splits; you can try to generate a real consensus to redo any of them you want. But another split from you without a proper consensus will be taken as an act of vandalism. —swpbT 17:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Lawrence Watt-Evans

Mad Hatter, I was going to the Wikipedia help desk looking for help to upload two images I have in mind. I'll ask the people at the help desk to upload this image.

The split on the articles seems like a good move. I saw some of the ANI report he posted against you and another editor mentioned you did the right thing by splitting and helped clear up a mess. I will keep working on the spy-fi split but it will take some time.--Taeyebaar (talk) 21:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

I posted on the help desk to help upload these images.--Taeyebaar (talk) 22:17, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Further warning

I have warned you about Wikipedia:Canvassing, like this. This is 100% unacceptable. Read the policy—every word. If Taeyebaar wants to follow a page, he can add it to his watchlist like everyone else. Do this again, and you'll have a new ANI to defend yourself at. —swpbT 19:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Anne McCaffrey shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This is the third time that you have removed over 8k of content from this article without any discussion. You have each time been reverted, by two different editors. Irrespective of the timescale this is edit warring. If you continue to do this after this warning, your actions will be deliberately disruptive. I will use rollback to restore the content and will request a topic ban or block without any further warning. --Mirokado (talk) 22:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Required notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —swpbT 14:27, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Splitting controversy

Mad Hatter, I too dislike articles with long lists. I haven't the time to check through the past history of the case against you, but do you give sufficient advanced warning of an intended split? This should prevent this kind of situation developing. Also, even if someone is a "rogue editor", as you claim, don't say so – sorry to sound like your mother! Rwood128 (talk) 19:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nancy Kress bibliography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crucible (novel). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Subgenre articles

Hello Mad Hatter, are you still up for filling up the science fiction and fantasy subgenre pages with me? I'm just trying to upload an image for Space Western so it looks complete and we can fill it up. We can start by adding list of novellas, films and TV series on pages that don't have them. But for Maritime science fiction, I don't think we can add anything there since that article is too small. We should start a separate one List of maritime science fiction media and list it there.

I also had the idea to create List of hard science fiction media and list of soft science fiction media but let's do that much later. Right now let's focus on science fiction subgenres, then we can move on to fantasy subgenres, then we can do hard and soft science fiction pages in the ned.

You start and I'll follow later.--Taeyebaar (talk) 19:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Re: Template

Hi Mad Hatter, I'm not sure how to merge these templates. I will look into it when i have more time. When we start filling up the list of examples the Space Western article, we can add Lost in Space to the list as i have added a source for it. Let me know hat else I can help you with--Taeyebaar (talk) 18:57, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Soon I will start editing Space Western and then form there we can add to it and continue with other subgenres. Just give me some time before I can start editing it.--User talk:Taeyebaar (talk) 23:13, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

List of maritime science fiction media

As I explained before since we can't add all the lists on the maritime science fiction article because it's too small to, I started the list. See what you can do to improve it. It needs a lot of work.--Taeyebar 21:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Archived

Hi Mad Hatter. I have added archiving for your talk page. Seeing that it's too being, it's going to be tough communicating with you. Your talk page is too full, so I hope you don't mind me archiving some of it. Thanks.--Taeyebar 00:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

List of maritime science fiction media

Check the list, somebody seems to have filled it and it looks good. Just needs some more citations. Do you still think we should fit the boxes in the maritime science fiction article? I'm asking because the article is currently too small to fit any box list and so the separate list is there.

We can use this goodreads list to cite on the list http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/17615.Oceanic_marine_science_fiction--Taeyebar 04:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft

Hi Mad Hatter it's here Draft:List of maritime science fiction works. Contribute anytime you wish. Instead of putting tables on that stub subgenre I opted for putting a list. Anytime you want you can contribute.--Taeyebar 23:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Unfortunately Mad Hatter, as in the case of maritime science fiction, some subgenre articles are too small to have tables on them and so we need to create separate lists. See what you can do to find sources for maritime science fiction and list of examples. We may need to create a separate list of Space Western works. We can use List of Space Opera media as an example.--Taeyebar 23:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

And thanks.--Taeyebar 23:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mad Hatter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

High fantasy

Sorry for the late reply. It seems somebody removed the examples table from the article.--Taeyebar 22:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Goo Goo Dolls

Happy Holidays! Why the destruction in the members timeline? with best wishes from VINCENZO1492 08:10, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

High fantasy

[6] yeah it seems the selected examples were removed. Do you want to replace them and discuss it or skip it? --Taeyebar 11:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.


Take the survey now!


You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 22 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF). About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Maritime science fiction and Draft:List of maritime science fiction works

Hello mad hatter. The drafts have been restored. If you wish to add any list of examples boxes, the article is too short for that. You are welcomed to Draft:List of maritime science fiction works. See also if we can find additional reliable sources so we can publish the drafts in a few months. Both the article and the list are short on sources. Thanks a lot.--Taeyebar 00:19, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mad Hatter. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Scott Stapp

I realize it's tough to get all the fact in when sources are few and far between, but we do know that Scott played guitar for the band during the 2002 Olympic concert in Salt Lake City. I'm assuming he would have done similar on those same songs in other concerts. Do you think there is a way we can mention that, just so we can show the fullest extent of each band members contributions? JesusFreak78 (talk) 19:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of M. K. Hume for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M. K. Hume is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. K. Hume (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doug Weller talk 14:15, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Copying content from one page to another

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.

  • It looks like you merged some content from Science fiction Western to Space Western without attribution. This needs to be attributed somewhere, typically either in an edit summary, talk page notification, or both (see WP:SMERGE). For what it's worth, I think science fiction Western is redundant, but it looks like you tried doing this before in 2014. Since that was contested, it'd probably be best to get consensus in a merge discussion. Also, unrelatedly, I removed the list of examples you merged in. We already have a well-sourced list of prominent examples that have influenced the genre. We don't need an mostly unsourced list of even more examples. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:40, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mad Hatter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

February 2019

Information icon Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tremonti (band), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:05, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Queensrÿche into Geoff Tate. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Tsoncho Rodev moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tsoncho Rodev, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 20:53, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Stoyan Zagorchinov, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:41, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tsoncho Rodev (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:02, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mad Hatter! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:02, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Dimitar Mantov moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dimitar Mantov, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:53, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Userbox

It is a good userbox. I'm not an expert on making them myself (just having way too many on my page), I've only made two, and they were mostly pretty close to ones I found with just text changes! Sigurd Dragon Slayer (talk) 05:33, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Tsoncho Rodev

Hello, Mad Hatter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Tsoncho Rodev.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:26, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Dimitar Mantov

Hello, Mad Hatter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Dimitar Mantov.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:30, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of List of comic science fiction for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of comic science fiction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of comic science fiction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:04, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

List of the Kinks band members (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ian Gibbons
The Kinks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Gosling

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Kinks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Gosling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:26, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of the Kinks band members (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bobby Graham
The Kinks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Gosling

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of works by Mike Resnick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Tsoncho Rodev moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tsoncho Rodev, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 12:13, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:25Halberds.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:25Halberds.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 22:46, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Dimitar Mantov moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dimitar Mantov, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 23:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Unsourced birth dates

Please don't add unsourced birth dates in BLPs, as you did in this edit. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:53, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Matthew Harffy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Matthew Harffy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 10:39, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Matthew Harffy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Matthew Harffy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.matthewharffy.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DGG ( talk ) 20:50, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

AC/DC

You will need to discuss the changes you want to make on the AC/DC members' page. The early members were not session musicians, who on earth ever said they were? Slade was never described as a touring member. Why all the deletions? You have explained nothing in your edit summaries. Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

The link you provided does not in any way support your edits. Discuss please. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
How does that justify the edit to the members' page? Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

FNM RHCP feud section

I think the section should still be in the article, since it's been listed by several sources as one of the greatest feuds in rock history. I think it could still remain in the article if some of the more tangential stuff is removed. --I call the big one bitey (talk) 15:29, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

  • I have to agree with Mad Hatter that there's no need for it. I think that while it's certainly worth mentioning that there was hostility between RHCP and FNM, along with a few examples, I've long felt that dedicating an entire five paragraph section to said feud is a bit much. The same goes for the mention in the Mr. Bungle article which stretches out to seven paragraphs. I say this as a HUGE fan of both FNM and Mr. Bungle who DESPISES RHCP. It just seems entirely unnecessary. NJZombie (talk) 21:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks for backing me @NJZombie:! The only way is by removing these sections and I am bold and I sludged 20k from Mr. Bungle! Go on! Revert them! I won't stop you! Fanboyish tip-of-a-targo! Go on, revert it! This is just ridiculous! There might be some mention, but this is just Instagramic and every-second-news like about a bicker on Ultimate Guitar on the old-KISS-gentlemen that I don't listen to and don't love as people and musicians enough to pay attention to! Can't you see it?! People are telling you, stop being so selfish and keep it for your own fan-transition! Is it clear? Sheesh. The Mad Hatter (talk)
    • I DO think there's enough of a significance to the "feud" between RHCP and both of the bands to at least mention it as they were often compared to each other and there was obviously some heat but outside of just mentioningthat and giving a few of the major examples, it doesn't seem encyclopedic at all. RHCP were admittedly the much more commercially successful band and other than mentioning that FNM was considered a similar band, there is no mention of them, or Mr. Bungle, feuding with RHCP on the RHCP article because it's a blip on their radar. Once again, this coming from someone who HATES RHCP and loves FNM and Bungle. It's just no encyclopedia-worthy. Not to that length at least. NJZombie (talk) 22:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • OK, go both (@NJZombie: and @I call the big one bitey:) look at Mr. Bungle and Faith No More. It's I think the most synthesized version. Both acts admit respect to each other. Media and TV personalities pumped it up. I admit, I was rash, but this is the best but to be improved I think. Go and see. Let's improve it from there. We can keep the cited Internet resources and the summarize of the so-called conflict. Other is pure speculation and Internet bullshit. Regards: The Mad Hatter (talk)

Article: List of Works by Fred Saberhagen--asterisks?

There is a warning notice on List of works by Fred Saberhagen: "This list asterisks without ever defining what they indicate." I see that you started this article (thank you!) and that you included the asterisks on the very first version of the article. Could you please edit the article to explain the significance of the asterisks on about 70 of the entries? If you do not recall what they mean, please remove the asterisks. Thank so much for helping clear this up! Femme du Pays (talk) 23:29, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Phish

Hi, could you please explain some of your edits to the Phish article? That page is a Good article and some of the edits you made were substantial and made without any edit reason or talk page discussion. This includes the removal of an entire section about the band's disbandment, moving around the dates of section headings, removing former members of the group, removing citations, and adding information to the lede that was better off in the text of the article. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 17:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi MadHatter, I get the idea of adding content from the now redirected Music of Phish page, but a lot of that information is either unsourced or redundant to stuff that's on the main Phish page anyway, and thus its including on the main page was avoided on purpose. None of the content on that page was really worth saving, particularly on a page that is now GA status. I agree with pointing the redirect at the section you did, as that section has most of the same stuff except it's sourced. As for Template:Phish, I am unsure about your removal of the LivePhish series articles from there. All of those albums have pages, and most of them charted, satisfying WP:NALBUMS. I think they should be there, just as Template:Grateful Dead lists all of the comparable Dick's Picks series. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 02:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Fixed your talk page archiving

Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. I've moved /Archive 40 to /Archive 1, and I've added {{Archives}} so that the archive is linked. --rchard2scout (talk) 09:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm XRENEGADEx. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User_talk:GloriaJFM that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. xRENEGADEx (talk | contribs) 07:26, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Westlands Map.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Westlands Map.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 23:37, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Aiel Waste and Shara.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aiel Waste and Shara.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 23:38, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Map of Seanchan.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Map of Seanchan.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 23:38, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

File:The Land of Madmen.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Land of Madmen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 23:38, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Sign your posts

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. You are currently signing without the default timestamp, this confuses various processes which rely on that. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 14:06, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Map of Osten Ard.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Map of Osten Ard.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Space Western, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:11, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Space Western, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:08, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

It looks like I've already warned you before about adding unsourced examples to this very article, and I've warned you about unsourced additions to biographies. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:22, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

ANI notification

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:38, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Continuous unsourced personal opinion editing

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 22:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Just in case you missed it, you will be blocked from editing the next time you add unsourced categories and content to articles as you did with this edit. Nothing in the article supports that category, just as with the many articles you've been adding it to. To add a category it must be sourced in the article, which they are not. At this point your edits are incredibly disruptive. You are editing in good faith, but you continue to add unsourced content, and dubious sources. You're a very long term editor, you know this. Canterbury Tail talk 14:13, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Marking edits as minor

Information icon Hi Elan Morin Tedronai! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Template:Science fiction that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. CapnZapp (talk) 12:18, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of works by Robert Jordan into Robert Jordan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:06, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:17, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

See this copy-paste from Space Western after multiple requests to follow copyright policy and repeated cut-and-paste moves. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:26, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elan Morin Tedronai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Really. I'm very sorry, but I didn't know that the copyright policy is so harsh and so dis-merciful. Wikipedia is my life. I never wanted to do harm. Space Western, Military science fiction and space opera: yes, I copied several paragraphs from one to the other, because I thought it'd be OK, since the information generally is the same. I also want to mend amends with @NinjaRobotPirate: and be friends with the administrator team. Please don't block me for life. It's like a death sentence. Wikipedia is, was and will be my life. I made a translation for Bulgarian information company also covering Kazach Wikipedia and all Cyrilic languages Wikipedias and really: it's death sentence to me. If I remain blocked as I am suffering from paltry epilepsy, I don't know how I'll cope in this life. I hope that I'd be excused from my violation and I'll try not to repeat the same mistakes again. Administrators could look at the articles and probably see judgment in my work. I hope in the future to continue my work on Wiki, since as I said: Wiki is my life, I'm also on Bulgarian Wikipedia and it's like cutting my brain for Hannibal's dinner. Kidding, but it's unbelievably harsh sentence for me. I hope to mend amends with NinjaRobotPirate. I hope to work with the people here collaboratively and not to make the same mistakes again. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk) 16:24, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Then, yeah: it's a death sentence for me. I tend to clear my talk pages. I'm epileptic, I forgot. I also find the comment by Schazjmd as an absolute dagger in heart, since the context of those warnings is totally out of shape; those respective articles of Geoff Tate, Queensryche and those three epic space genres has totally evolved and reevaluated in the other context that Wikipedia and its articles are always moving. This is like a total sword in my aching heart. I didn't expect it from a non-involved user to do this to me. I am deeply hurt and I can only say that Wikipedia is always evolving and articles are always moving like a true darwikinist can say. Really: it's killing me deeply if the permanent ban from NinjaRobotePirate, with whom I believe I've collaborated somewhere successfully before - remains, because I hope to continue doing this work until cardinally at the end of the year as I've worked for 20 years, with 3 years in computer clubs before getting a favourite Forsaken nickname of my own. I plead the other administrators to review my work, before really blocking me for life - just like that for true offenses, yes, but in the context of the good faith and many years of contributing. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)
I forget. I'm epileptic. I forgot I was warned. Truthfully, not to pinpoint to edits, but as far as I can remember, I moved some information from Queensryche to Geoff Tate or/and vice-versa and I was warned. Probably on point, but both articles were a mess back there. I was thanked later by a friendly contributor. As far as I can remember. All the stuff concerning Tate and Queensryche were totally messed up and I really had to move a lot of the stuff concerning him to his own proper article, while working and trying to clean Tate's article. I never delete or "exclusionize" just like that without trying to put the articles on shape as I have done recently on Poison. Administrators can check me out, I was even thanked and braved as contributor by @Binksternet: who said my exclusionist approach trimmed it down and I did a very god job! But yeah: I moved some of the material between Quuensryche and Geoff Tate back then! It was this when I stopped working on it! Close to its current state?! Which is not perfect always! Before that the article was crap like that! But 3 years ago?! I forgot for this tiny argument, but the development of the articles is worthy! I'm epileptic! Really! Sorry! Now's warning? Oh, I love so much "military space opera frontier" and "science fictional space warfare" genre that I wrote most of the material on the articles by myself with trying to find good references, including the examples. Since the 3 sub-genres totally overlap with one another, yeah: I totally wrote and copied here-and-there and probably I'm guilty more of recent, but 2018 and 2019 incidents, it's me: I clean my Talk pages. Or tended to do it even before. But I clean them in the start or end of like 50 messages or somewhere there. I totally forgot I was warned, but I work for the best and in good faith. Sorry. I didn't know it's so strict, after 3-warning to get a ban for life. I'm epileptic, as stated on my personal baby page. I plead to other administrators: I've been working for 20 years and met and talked even with Jimbo Wales; please don't block me! I'm sure I can amend myself and continue to work for the future. It'll be a dagger in my soul to cut me from this wonderful resource! Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)
I have to cite the resource like (copied from [[<page name>]]), I believe, even if it's forms entire another article or was from that article, but it belongs in its place. I believe so. I have to cite the resources in the edit summary, I think. I admit I haven't paid attention. But: please don't block me for life. It's deep wound in my everyday life. Since losing my job in 2018, I concentrated on this, but my health in 2020, while suffering two or three prolonged illnesses from COVID-19 and coupled with an epileptic seizure after my birthday. I totally agree to the instructions of Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. I should've put a (Copied content from [[<page name>]]; see that page's history for attribution)? Yes? That's all I can say. Block me for life you want, but that's written in the rules. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

Decline reason:

I'm really sorry to say this, but based on your statements, it sounds like we can't be sure you'd comply with WP:COPYRIGHT if we unblocked you. That places the entire project in jeopardy, so I can't risk lifting the block. I want to be clear, this is nothing personal. If you can more strongly convince us that you can reliably comply with WP:COPYRIGHT, you are welcome to make a new unblock request. For example, if your health improves. Alternatively, if you agree to refrain from any copy-and-paste, even when doing so would be okay by copyright. There may be other alternatives that would lead to us confidently unblocking you, too. I want to be clear, my decline isn't meant to be the end of the line for you here. I'd love to see you back and editing, I just can't currently see how we can do that. I hope what you take from this is either "Hey, I think Yamla is wrong and here's why" or alternatively, "Hey, I think Yamla may be right, but here's how we can work around their concerns". Yamla (talk) 11:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elan Morin Tedronai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please, don't block me for life. I'll comply fully with the WP:COPYRIGHT. Please don't hurt me like that. I agree wholeheartedly to refrain from cut-and-paste moves. Please, don't shatter my hopes. I hope to be able to contribute further. I've been blocked for already 2 weeks. Isn't it enough sentence? Please don't turn it for permanent. I'll never jeopardize the editing and I'll never make vandalism on pages. I think you're right, but such a verdict is incredibly hard and dark on me. I agree to follow the copyright and to refrain from cut-and-paste moves. Please, don't block me for life. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

Decline reason:

I would stress that you are not "blocked for life"; the block will be removed when the concerns that led to it have been adequately addressed. I greatly regret to say I don't think this request does that. Like Yamla I think it is very possible for the block to be lifted, but not right now. I think that your health which should be your first priority may need to improve some or you will otherwise need to show us how you will not let your health concerns interfere with your participation here. 331dot (talk) 09:45, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elan Morin Tedronai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well, if I continue to be blocked, I don't know how these concerns that led to it will be addressed. Really. I don't know how else I can contribute. I'm blocked indefinitely, which is incredibly hurtful. My health truly is my priority. I have addressed it in my profile page, that I'm epileptic since childhood and I have episodic seizures, but I've been able to contribute for years and I've been doing it since 2001, when I was unsigned User in computer club culture till 2004, when I signed back there in September 2004, I think when I was 18. I have been doing it successfully I believe in some ways, and in others I've made mistakes and I admit them if someone backfires because all edits stand and the evolution of the articles is there; Wikipedia has grown with me as a User and I was part of it. I am honored to be part of it. I've made mistakes. I admit it. But with a permanent ban I don't know how I can redeem myself. That's it. It's last request and I'll probably remain blocked, because I'm getting disheartened and greatly disappointed with each request denied, nearly a month being blocked each and every way. How I am supposed to redeem myself in editing Wikipedia, when I'm blocked for life? Oh, it's not for life, but not "right now"? Then when? Such a protracting and disappointing way to end to my editing and even to belittle my contributions through pointing out only my mistakes. Even probably take it on personal? I don't know. @Rwood128:? @Sadads:? I hope these guys and Users will come to the talk page? We worked on Historical fiction back in 2015? Alex Stinson? They're blocking me for life for COPYRIGHT issues on which I admit my guilt, but it's a harsh verdict to end my participation. You can see my contributions. Alex, can you say some good words for me? If you manage to see the ping? I'm librarian and I have myriad of degrees even in historical fiction and space opera. I've been contributing here since its beginning as an international source. I am honored to be part of the project. It's incredibly hurtful of the heart and soul to be blocked for life. I hope to redeem myself and the block to be lifted eventually. Whenever it is. "Not right now". Then when? Oh, it's minor edit. I know I'm hypocritical and disregarding, but this standing ban is really hurtful; it's still my talk page and my space and it's the only space I can edit; but how I can redeem myself, when I'm blocked majorly from Wikipedia for life only editing my talk page? Sorry to be rebellious, but I hope the ban will be lifted. I'll not make new requests. After this request probably gets denied, I won't make new requests and it's even hurtful since I cannot edit and blank-out my User Page. I want to. But I'cant. I'm banned for life only editing my talk page making heartfelt requests and getting denied "for the moment". I'll delete the contents here, after I'm denied request and I'll ask one of these guys to blank my User Page. It's hypocrisy. I broke in tears! I'm banned for life, Alex, Woody! Jesus! I can't believe it! Regards:Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:24, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Elan Morin Tedronai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok. I understand why I have been blocked for copyright violation for which I'm sorry and I believe I've learnt from my past mistakes. It's been almost 2 months and I sincerely wholeheartedly hope that it's enough. I've learnt my lesson. I sincerely appeal to the reviewing administrator to unblock me, because I hope that my "punishment" is enough. As an established editor and pending changes reviewer, I'll never cause damage or disruption and I always try to make the best contributions accordingly with an edit summary, because I admit that I've never taken it seriously thus far, but will try to implement it in my future edits. Please! Don't block me for life! Wikipedia and Fandom Wikia were and still are part of my life! I hope to continue do it in the upcoming years for sure!

Regards:Elan Morin Tedronai (talk) 15:58, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Accept reason:

(Non-administrator comment) You were warned three times previously about how to properly copy within Wikipedia (3 Jun 201826 Feb 2019, 17 Jun 2021). It's unlikely that you'll be unblocked unless you can show that you have read and understand the relevant policies by explaining what you should have done to properly copy from one Wikipedia article to another, and how you plan to change your behavior in the future. Schazjmd (talk) 16:34, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) C'mon, it's not that hard: how do you properly copy content from one article to another on Wikipedia? Do you agree to follow those instructions in the future? Schazjmd (talk) 17:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Why do you rarely use edit summaries? I understand you may be struggling but it is also very concerning that you were given a warning on June 17 and then you did the exact thing you were warned not to do 10 days later. I guess I am looking for some insight into why this happened and how we can trust you to change your behavior going forward. Please respond to these points under this post and not in the unblock request as that is getting hard to follow. Sasquatch t|c 22:13, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

I forget it's that important. Listen, I stated it on my User Page: since the seizure I hold scattering in my brain. My vocabulary is damaged and I forget such simple things on Wikipedia and never really while making my contributions paid that much attention to it. I admit I've made mistake this way, but never really paid much attention and I don't know even when it's proper to say: "75% of edits do have edit summaries! Good job!" I never paid attention these 20 years in working and I hope to continue working, although this time I'll be more proactive in this and will give good citations and will contribute with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia saying it's copied from another article. But, I forget it's that important. Is it really that demanding? I was never aware of this. Really. I'm sorry. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

Elan, you keep focusing on the effect of this block upon you that you are not paying attention to the words of the admins who turned down your block requests. You need to assure them that you understand Wikipedia's copyright guidelines. So, don't just state that you won't do anything wrong, you have to demonstrate, through explanation, that you understand copyright and how it works on Wikipedia. If necessary, explain it in the most simple and direct words. Admins reviewing your block request just want to be able to see that mistakes that have happened in the past won't happen again and that's your responsibility to demonstrate that you actually do understand copyright guidelines, not by stating that you do but by explaining them in your own words. When you can do that, you might have more success getting unblocked. Liz Read! Talk! 02:03, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Copyright problem icon Your edit to The Wheel of Time has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. eviolite (talk) 18:49, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Apologies, I had not noticed that the Fandom page was licensed under CC-BY-SA, but you still must attribute to avoid plagiarism. eviolite (talk) 18:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
@Eviolite: OK, sorry! I'll attribute every time! I thought it was enough in the edit summary! I'll attribute every time! Sorry! Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

Blocked

As you have continued to violate WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE after being unblocked, I have reluctantly blocked you again indefinitely. For those following along, the two violations I saw were here, copying content without attribution, and here, inappropriately using a copyrighted image without specifying a fair-use exemption (indeed, no fair-use exemption would likely be acceptable there). --Yamla (talk) 20:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

@Yamla:: Oh, please, Yamla! I didn't know it was so serious! I didn't know the policy fully about the pictures. I think a contributor put an attribution on The Wheel of Time. I put on the summary. I thought it was enough. I didn't know that on I couldn't put images or multiply them on other articles. Really. Please don't block me for life. I am all doing in good faith. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

This does nothing to convince me we could unblock you now and be sure you wouldn't continue to violate WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE. You've been warned over and over again. You knew your violations placed the entire project in jeopardy. You assured us you had learnt and would never again cause problems. So, we unblocked you and you basically immediately resumed your violations. Now, you need to somehow convince a reviewing admin that this time is different. This time, when you say you fully understand our policies, you really do. The bar will be much higher this time. I sincerely hope you can be unblocked, but I no longer have any faith in your ability to abide by WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE. Any admin is free to lift the block if they are sufficiently convinced. --Yamla (talk) 21:18, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elan Morin Tedronai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please don't block me again for life. I thought it was enough of attribution in the Edit summary that I was criticized so much for. I also thought that using pictures on multiple articles was also good. Always. But now, never. I'll be more careful in the future but at least I expanded The Wheel of Time with good additional info. In fact through the Fandom could be supported articles like Draft:Midkemia and Draft:Kelewan. It was just an example and person put an attribution but it was honest mistake. I would put myself, but he was quicker than me. Please don't block me for this. It was honest mistake, but all was in good faith. I still think that the Space Western would be good with the examples, albeit without the photo of Han Solo. But don't block me for that. If I make a mistake, warn me, but don't block me again for life. I haven't made meaningful harm in any way. Say so and it won't happen again. I admit that I made mistake. Please don't block me for life. It happens too fast and my block is very merciless. I will never use other sources without attribution and will never use photos from other articles. Please don't block me so fast for life. I think I learnt from my mistakes. There are always ways I can contribute in the future. Please don't shut me out so fast. I never meant harm in my edits. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Opened Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Elan Morin Tedronai. MER-C 11:12, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
@MER-C: Oh, mate, there's no way I can defend myself to that. So swiftly and quickly I was reblocked that I can only capitalize on the need sometimes to copy information from one article to another or to move chunks from one to another. I can't find other explanation for the perceived jeopardy other than that I needed to move parts of articles into discographies and bibliographies in order to make them work. I'd never jeopardize otherwise or with vandalism Wikipedia. It's just how I had to handle the processes back then to create separate discographies and bibliographies of established musicians and writers Probably, I always knew I had to put attribution from one article to another, but many times I forgot. For which I'm to blame of course, but there's no other way to defend myself, practically. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elan Morin Tedronai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please, lift out my account block and entitle me again to editing. I'll always cite resources for copyright reasons and will abide by Fair Use laws, and I won't make the same mistakes again. I understand why I was blocked, but in no way I will cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia and I have proven that I make useful contributions generally. I think, there are ways I can contribute further. Please unblock me, Reverend Admins. Regards:Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

Decline reason:

Hi Elan Morin Tedronai, as this was unsuccessfully attempted before, there is sadly currently no way for you to prove this other than perhaps editing other Wikipedias and asking for reconsideration at least 6 months after today. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@ToBeFree: Oh, that's extremely harsh verdict. Then it's the most probable final verdict, since I will probably never, ever edit Wikipedia in my life after almost 17 thousand edits and in my view undeniable contributions during 20 years of service. But, OK. It's very hard and hurtful to hear that there's no way I can prove myself useful after 20 years doing my job and misreading or more most likely misinterpreting the rules. OK. I will likely never ever edit Wikipedia if I can't do it and I am denied requests and shut the door each and every way. Cardinally it's so. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk) 22:22, 8 November 2021

Elan Morin Tedronai, that's not really what I said. I have attempted to provide an open door back here by pointing to the list of other Wikipedia languages and specifying a number of months after which asking again is feasible. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
@ToBeFree: No, man! You are great keyboardist and fine young lad, probably younger than me! But a block now, when I was merely asked to just make a polite careful unblock request, and to just deny me now and to postpone me for next year is likely a block forever! This disheartens me and discourages me from likely make another request, ever in my life! In Wheel of Time, yes, I added info from the Fandom, but look how big t grew?! Or historical fiction, space opera, military science fiction, list of space opera media and list of historical fiction by time period where I worked so hard and made so many compromises in the sake of the information and the evolution of the Portal! It's extremely disheartening, discouraging and deniable to shut me down and to even minimize my contributions! Alas, I didn't want it to end like this! I didn't expect to be treated so harshly by administrators! I'm extremely hurt that I'm thrown out and ousted of English Wikipedia when I think my contributions to the Portal are undeniable and when I think and I want and I fucking desire to edit and can to prove to contribute as I've always done these 20 years, but I can't and will never can! It's unbelievably hurtful that I can no longer click "Edit" and make the fucking musician, librarian best of me as always have done! Regards:Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)
  1. ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Elan_Morin_Tedronai/Archive_1&oldid=1239332104"