Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 111: Line 111:
* ... that one-third of '''[[Socio-economic problems of India|India's population]]''' (roughly equivalent to the entire population of the United States) lives below the poverty line? article by {{user|Gppande}} nomination by [[User:Parthian Scribe|Parthian Scribe]] 18:18, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
* ... that one-third of '''[[Socio-economic problems of India|India's population]]''' (roughly equivalent to the entire population of the United States) lives below the poverty line? article by {{user|Gppande}} nomination by [[User:Parthian Scribe|Parthian Scribe]] 18:18, 9 November 2008 (UTC)


*... that the 18 '''[[List of King of the Ring winners|winners of the King of the Ring]]''' have won in ten different [[U.S. states]]? article by {{user|SRX}}.--'''[[User:SRX|<font color="black">S</font></font>]]<sub>[[User talk:SRX|<font color="blue">R</font>]]</sub>[[User:SRX/Guestbook|<font color="black">X</font></font>]]''' 18:16, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
*... <s>that the 18 '''[[List of King of the Ring winners|winners of the King of the Ring]]''' have won in ten different [[U.S. states]]?</s> article by {{user|SRX}}.--'''[[User:SRX|<font color="black">S</font></font>]]<sub>[[User talk:SRX|<font color="blue">R</font>]]</sub>[[User:SRX/Guestbook|<font color="black">X</font></font>]]''' 18:16, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
**[[Image:Symbol question.svg|18px]] The article length and refs look ok, but this hook doesn't really say anything interesting, it's pretty much just saying what the article is. It also forces the reader to do a bunch of counting. Can you suggest a different hook? &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 19:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
**[[Image:Symbol question.svg|18px]] The article length and refs look ok, but this hook doesn't really say anything interesting, it's pretty much just saying what the article is. It also forces the reader to do a bunch of counting. Can you suggest a different hook? &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 19:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
***Alt:... that the there have been 18 '''[[List of King of the Ring winners|winners of the King of the Ring]]''' since its inception in 1985?--'''[[User:SRX|<font color="black">S</font></font>]]<sub>[[User talk:SRX|<font color="blue">R</font>]]</sub>[[User:SRX/Guestbook|<font color="black">X</font></font>]]''' 20:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
***Alt:... <s>that the there have been 18 '''[[List of King of the Ring winners|winners of the King of the Ring]]''' since its inception in 1985?</s>--'''[[User:SRX|<font color="black">S</font></font>]]<sub>[[User talk:SRX|<font color="blue">R</font>]]</sub>[[User:SRX/Guestbook|<font color="black">X</font></font>]]''' 20:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
****What about: ... that professional wrestler [[Bret Hart]] is the only person that has '''[[List of King of the Ring winners|won the King of the Ring tournament]]''' more than once? [[User:Nikki311|<font color="Teal">'''Nikki'''</font>]][[User Talk:Nikki311|<font color="Salmon">'''311'''</font>]] 20:58, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
****What about: ... that professional wrestler [[Bret Hart]] is the only person that has '''[[List of King of the Ring winners|won the King of the Ring tournament]]''' more than once? [[User:Nikki311|<font color="Teal">'''Nikki'''</font>]][[User Talk:Nikki311|<font color="Salmon">'''311'''</font>]] 20:58, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
*****[[Image:Symbol confirmed.svg|18px]] That's a hook I can get behind. (Well, it's not perfect, but good enough, and there's no point starting a huge discussion over it.) &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 03:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

* ... that at one time, the '''[[Sneath Glass Company]]''' produced almost 90 percent of the glassware used in consumer refrigerators in the United States? article by {{user|TwoScars}} nomination by [[User:Parthian Scribe|Parthian Scribe]] 18:08, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
* ... that at one time, the '''[[Sneath Glass Company]]''' produced almost 90 percent of the glassware used in consumer refrigerators in the United States? article by {{user|TwoScars}} nomination by [[User:Parthian Scribe|Parthian Scribe]] 18:08, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:Akula class submarine.JPG|80px|right|An Akula class submarine]]
[[Image:Akula class submarine.JPG|80px|right|An Akula class submarine]]

Revision as of 03:37, 10 November 2008

Farnese Artemis in the National Archaeological Museum, Naples
Farnese Artemis in the National Archaeological Museum, Naples

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page.

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Instructions

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles whose main body text has been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a JavaScript extension like User:Dr pda/prosesize.js (instructions on the talk page), a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. For Mac users, Apple has a Word counter widget available for Mac OS X 10.4 or later. Note: The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • always cited in the article with an inline citation.
Please note that hooks are subject without notice to copyediting as they move to the main page. The nature of the DYK process makes it impractical to consult users over every such edit. In particular, hooks will be shortened if they are deemed too long: the 200-character limit is an outside limit not a recommended length. Also, watch the suggestions page to ensure that no issues have been raised about your hook, because if you do not respond to issues raised your hook may not be featured at all.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as [[Image:image name |right|100x100px| Description]] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Suggested sounds should have similar qualities to pictures, and should be formatted using the format {{DYK Listen|filename.ogg|Brief description}}
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]] and ~~~~
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|October 9}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • For more details see the previously Unwritten Rules.

Symbols

  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined. You may use {{DYKquestions}} to notify the nominator
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix. You may use {{DYKquestions}} to notify the nominator
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Next update


Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on November 10

Articles created/expanded on November 9

The Julia Butler Hansen Bridge as seen southbound from Cathlamet.
The Julia Butler Hansen Bridge as seen southbound from Cathlamet.
An Akula class submarine
An Akula class submarine
Rainfall map of Nora and Olaf (another cyclone)
Rainfall map of Nora and Olaf (another cyclone)
Length, date, hook's ref verified. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
236 character hook. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:15, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date verified. Offline hook reference accepted in good faith. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Psilocybe montana
Psilocybe montana
Length, date, hook's ref verified. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:21, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 8

- fine article Victuallers (talk) 17:56, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Length, hook, refs verified. Second hook is better (I did a minor copyedit of it, too).
Note: Reference for the above statement is India: A Global Studies Handbook by Fritz Blackwell. Reference number 1. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:23, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues An interesting new article (date and length verified) and an interesting hook. However, currently the sentence in the article which supports the fact given in the hook does not provide an in-line reference citation for that fact. You need to add such a citation to that sentence per DYK rules, see WP:DYK. Also, for the book references in the article please include additional publication details, such as publication years and the names of the publishers (and, if possible, ISBN numbers would be good too). Nsk92 (talk) 21:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am rather confused. ALL book references in the article have publisher name, date and ISBN number listed in the "References" section, and the hook does have an in-line citation, linking to the author, book, and page number on the book, in question. I will put the publisher name and ISBN into the in-line citation as well, but this seems a bit redundant. --MChew (talk) 03:42, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was looking just at the "Notes" section, where the books quoted were just listed by author name and book title. I see now that these books are also listed under "References" with full publication details. So on that point everything is fine. However, the issue of an inline citation still needs to be fixed. At the moment there is an in-line citation (to note no. 6) at the end of the following sentence: "The Japanese fleet was nominally independent, but carried out operations under the direction of the Royal Navy command on Malta, primarily in escort operations for transport and troopship convoys and in anti-submarine warfare operations". The problem is that this sentence does not mention the number of ships (eight destroyers) which is what the hook is about. You just need to add an in-line citation (even if it is a direct duplicate of citation no 6, with the same page number) in the preceding sentence:"This deployment began with Rear Admiral Kozo Sato arrived in Malta in mid-April 1917, with the cruiser Akashi as his flagship and eight Kaba-class destroyers". Then everything will be OK. Nsk92 (talk) 03:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, now everything looks good. Date and length of the article OK, length of the hook OK, the hook is supported by two references, one off-line and one online. Nsk92 (talk) 12:45, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay! --MChew (talk) 07:01, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 7

Image:GayKids omslag forside.jpg

- length and ref fine Victuallers (talk) 18:19, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Reminds me of "Whatcha gonna do with all that junk, All that junk inside that trunk?" In any event, it looks like some of the material for the new article came from here. Usually for DYK, the material should be new to article namespace. -- Suntag 03:35, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cool hook and article. Length and date good, offline hook accepted AGF. — BillC talk 02:17, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I just suggested a combined hook down at Paleoparasitology, see below. —Politizer talk/contribs 17:51, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Asher Roth, a hip hop musician from suburban Pennsylvania, raps about "pizza a dollar a slice"? - self nom by Boston (talk) 01:13, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Article is too short. (Granted, it was longer before I chopped most of it out, but I believe most of that chopping was necessary.) Also, article is currently tagged for having too many SPSs (again, the tag is my doing, but again I think it belongs there). Notify us if the article is expanded and refs improved within the next couple days. —Politizer talk/contribs 02:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • I removed the PSP tag because I removed the last of the SPS references. There's plenty of material from interviews that can be added to the article to meet length requirements, but I would like to know there are no points of contention to be addressed before I proceed. Thanks. - Boston (talk) 20:10, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • Maybe SPS was the wrong tag to go with. You have removed the sources from Roth's own website, true, but a lot of the sources given are still not reliable sources as they are from blogs or other places without reliable standards. Specifically, ref 2 is some kind of blog, ref 3 is some kind of something bad (I don't know if it's technically a blog or messageboard or what), ref 4 is some kind of blog, and ref 7 is an online video by some guys (maybe they are notable and maybe they aren't, I don't know; I left the ref in to give it the benefit of the doubt, but it still contributes to why the tag is there). I've replaced {{self-published}} in the article with {{primarysources}}; either way, the underlying message is still that there are problems with the sources being used.
        • On the bright side, after your recent edits the article is long enough again, just barely. But I still think the sources are a serious problem. —Politizer talk/contribs 20:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I removed a stray "and", so it's unquestionably <200 now :) ~ Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 18:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My reading of the article and the ref is that he was was the first to use the term in his book (with this pronunciation) ...not that he noted its usage... am I missing something? Victuallers (talk) 23:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How about: ... that Ernest Peixotto's 1916 work Our Hispanic Southwest was the first appearance of the ethnic slur "spic" in writing? howcheng {chat} 03:43, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 2nd hook fine - thx Victuallers (talk) 18:07, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thaddeus Fairbanks
Thaddeus Fairbanks
  • The source statement "The arched base, constructed from rough-hewn limestone, is unique among Kentucky memorials. The zinc statue it supports is typical of stock soldier figures: wearing a uniform with slouch hat and holding a rifle down in front. The soldier also wears a bedroll and canteen."[1] does not seem to say why the arched base is unique. -- Suntag 15:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is there any way to combine this hook with the hook for Confederate Memorial Gateway in Hickman below? There are a whole bunch of hooks here on Confederate memorials and I don't know if it's a good idea to have the same topic represented over and over for several updates in a row...if someone can find something in common between this article and that one below, I think it would be beneficial to combine them into one hook. —Politizer talk/contribs 06:54, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not being biased against your hooks, I'm just suggesting a way to get some hooks done faster and help clear up the backlog while keeping from having very similar things featured several times in a row. The reason I challenged your earlier hook wasn't because I'm biased against these (in fact, as I said, I think you did a good job writing that article), but just because I didn't think the topic of the hook was notable. If no one wants to combine them, fine, it was just a suggestion; there's no need to get all worried about unfair treatment. —Politizer talk/contribs 15:26, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No qualifying article.97198 (talk) 11:47, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The BankWest Tower in Perth, Western Australia
The BankWest Tower in Perth, Western Australia
  • 5X expansion (from 1,722 to 10,205) and November 7 date verified, hook verified from the article itself. Free use of image verified from the Image:Bankwest Tower.jpg image page. -- Suntag 19:05, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 6

Length, date and hook verified. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:24, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No qualifying article. Also, nom duplicated under "Articles created/expanded on November 7" above. -- Suntag 15:44, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The only thing in the article I could find about Cumbria is "Ranulf's accession may have involved him giving up many of his other lands, including much of his wife's Lincolnshire lands and his land in Cumbria, though direct evidence for this beyond convenient timing is lacking." -- Suntag 15:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is a whole section devoted to his rule of Cumbria before becoming earl of Chester. You are right though that, contrary to what many often say, there is little evidence that he had to give up rule of Cumbria for Chester (may have happened later). Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 17:28, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Grace Church
Grace Church
Sorry - thought the source mentioned something about it being the only remaining original building. (It's been in userspace for a couple of weeks.) Revised hook follows.
ALT1... that Grace Church (pictured) is one of few remaining structures from the once-thriving town of Ca Ira, Virginia? --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 18:12, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For ALT1, length, date, and hook verified. -- Suntag 18:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
for the image. The upload information says "Image taken by me for Wikipedia" however the camera metadata says "Copyright holder Copyright 1,1999", which was before Wikipedia came into existence. Image:NicholasMukomberanwa.jpg, which AlbertHerring uploaded is Public Domain tagged but the image upload notes have a copyright symbol and clearly say "All other uses require prior written permission." -- Suntag 18:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm willing to bet the camera metadata is a bug from the user's camera; likely the result of a date reset. 1, 1999 either means Jan. 1999 or something else weird, which would indicate the date was likely reset. The "copyright" is probably something else specific to that camera. I'd check other images that come from the Zoran Coach 1.0. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 19:12, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The press release[2] says "In the mid-1990s Valspar began an aggressive international expansion, which over the following ten years increased its overseas sales from 3 percent to more than 30 percent of overall sales." Also, the DYK hook should be source to a secondary source that is independent of the article's topics. -- Suntag 16:03, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you check further down (look at the first paragraph of "Key Acquisitions of Rompala Era"), it directly attributes their overseas expansion to Rompala. As to a secondary source... I'll try to check LexisNexis for additional corroboration. If nothing else I'll just write a new hook. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 18:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, I'm not entirely sure referenceforbusiness.com counts as a primary source; if you look at the bottom of the page, they do list their references (though, of course, there aren't any inline refs). —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 18:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Sorry, that's a further reading section- I misread. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 18:51, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Length and date verified. Sufficient reliable source material used (e.g., it's not all press releases). However, Rompala must have had help in the increase while he was in his decade-long tenure. How about ALT1 ... that overseas revenues rose from 3% in the mid-1990s to almost 30% during the ten years that Richard Rompala helped lead paint and coatings manufacturer Valspar? -- Suntag 17:12, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand that alt hook. Assuming you meant "helped lead paint and coatings manufacturer Valspar", it seems inconsistent with the objection that it's intended to satisfy. "Rompala must have had help in the increase ... " from his employees, so perhaps we shouldn't give Rompala all the credit. But "help[ed] lead paint and coatings manufacturer Valspar" says he had help leading the company, not help from employees. Actually, according to the article he was president, CEO and chairman, which made him undisputed leader. Art LaPella (talk) 22:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your assumption about "helped is correct (I changed it above). The ALT1 hook was meant to convey that the rise from 3% began while Rompala helped lead the company. Being the leader while a rise occurs allows for others to have had help in the increase. Rompala was elected president of Valspar May 1994 and he assumed the position of CEO on October 30, 1995. The rise from 3% began in the mid-1990s. If the mid-1990s began on or after the day that Rompala was the undisputed leader, then my ALT1 suggestion would be incorrect. -- Suntag 19:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lenght date, and reference verified. -- Suntag 15:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lenght date, and reference ("He was in St. Louis and there was no bike messengers there, but he was obsessed with this, so he wrote open source software for dispatching, which to this day is used by many different taxi cab companies.") verified. The facts that Dorsey wrote the taxi software at 14 and that the taxi software was Dorsey's inspiration for the twitter software would enhance the DYK hook. This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues for the image. The image source links to Creative Commons 2.0 license. However, if that is all Wikipedia needs to confirm free use (I am unsure of this and the Wikipedia image page is tagged with "Flickr review needed"), then good to go for the Main Page. -- Suntag 16:28, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks a bunch for your review. For the image, the FlickreviewR bot has passed it so yes its license is verified and fine. I found a new source for his version of the story. Dorsey had multiple inspirations apparently. But this is probably fair to say. Do you prefer this alt?
ALT1 ... that at age 14, Jack Dorsey (pictured) began the software that dispatches some taxicabs and that inspired him to create Twitter?
For ALT1 - Lenght date, and reference verified. Image Free use verified from Wikipedia image page and Flickr image link to cc. -- Suntag 16:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1 ... that the successful escape from the multi-ship mutiny at the Nore by Royal Navy Captain Charles Cunningham (pictured) in 1797 led to that mutiny's failure? -- Suntag 16:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done. :) Arcayne (cast a spell) 06:09, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nepenthes northiana
Nepenthes northiana
 Done. I might also suggest I slightly different hook:
  • For ALT HOOK - Ref verified (source says:"Recent research suggests that a million Poles were involved, but some estimates go as high as three million."). DYK date, length, and use of 1,500 characther standard accepted based on Ecoleetage's 14:32, 8 November 2008 above. -- Suntag 16:21, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 5

Obama delivering his acceptance speech
Obama delivering his acceptance speech
ALT1: ... that the day after Royal Rumble (1993), Ric Flair lost a loser leaves town match and did not wrestle for the WWF again until 2001? GaryColemanFan (talk) 16:51, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2: ... that at Royal Rumble (1993), Giant Gonzalez made his WWF debut by eliminating the Undertaker from the Royal Rumble match despite not being a participant? GaryColemanFan (talk) 16:51, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Charles Shorey House
Charles Shorey House
Added some links. --74.14.18.233 (talk) 14:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date, hook's ref verified. --Rosiestep (talk) 21:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date, and ref verified. — BillC talk 02:34, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whose nom is this? --74.14.18.233 (talk) 21:34, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it's MPorciusCato's. BobAmnertiopsisChatMe! 22:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does "Graduate" already mean people with a master's or doctor's degree? Are they rejecting applications for membership from people who got straight to a PhD program after undergraduate, skipping the master's? --74.14.18.233 (talk) 14:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In Finland, it is impossible to skip the master's. Foreign PhDs with such qualifications would be allowed, I think. On the other hand, it was possible until 2005 to skip the bachelor's degree. The study to master's degree without a bachelor took five years after high school graduation. (BTW, I edited this nomination a little.) --MPorciusCato (talk) 15:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date, hook's ref verified. --Rosiestep (talk) 21:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT: ... that a digital time capsule "A Message From Earth" was transmitted to the planet Gliese 581c and included a message by actress Gillian Anderson comprised of images of George W. Bush and Barack Obama? --Bruce1eetalk 14:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me :) Chamal talk 16:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
19th century telegraph pole
19th century telegraph pole
  • ... that Harrison Gray Dyar erected the first telegraph line (telegraph pole pictured) and dispatched the first message over it ever sent, being designated by the U.S. Supreme Court as the real inventor of the telegraph? new article, self nom by --Doug Coldwell talk 14:45, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've added a pic. How about this for an alternate hook:
ALT: ... that Harrison Gray Dyar erected the first telegraph line (telegraph pole pictured) and dispatched over it the first message ever sent, making him the real inventor of the telegraph? --Bruce1eetalk 14:51, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I like Bruce1ee's ALT better and with the pic, works for me. --Doug Coldwell talk 16:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date, hook's ref verified. --Rosiestep (talk) 21:16, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was unaware that the tables would not count towards the word count. There not, as of yet, any pages for individual seasons for Navy Midshipmen football so this is all there really is. I hope it is acceptable. Msr iaidoka (talk) 01:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This rewrite is incorrect. Originial hook is correct as it stands. See hidden text in refs Notes 8 and 9 at Kukkal. Marcus (talk) 16:01, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Added a link. --74.14.18.233 (talk) 14:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Verified. – RyanCross (talk) 05:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expiring noms

  • Currently a backlog of 86 hooks as of 03:54, 5 November 2008 (UTC) - Gatoclass (talk)
  • Backlog of 75 hooks as of 03:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC) - Gatoclass (talk)
  • Backlog of about 70 hooks as of 03:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC) - Gatoclass (talk)
  • Backlog of about 64 hooks as of 03:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC) - Gatoclass (talk)
  • Max backlog of 53 hooks as of 03:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC) - Gatoclass (talk)

Articles created/expanded on November 4

  • ... that the protagonists in the independent film Ninjas vs. Zombies fight back against the undead with an unexpected weapon -- the power of the Ninja? new article by Psphenom (talk · contribs), nom. by cbl62 (talk · contribs) Cbl62 (talk) 18:26, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • This hook reads like promotional material. I would suggest finding a different hook, but after looking at the article, there is almost nothing there that isn't either speculation (e.g., "Ninjas Vs. Zombies could easily make a true name for itself") or blatantly promotional (e.g., "What follows is, as the press kit describes it, 'a whirlwind of magic, swordplay, hand-to-hand combat, gunfire and simmering sarcasm'"). Not much that can be done to save this. —Politizer talk/contribs 19:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • And just in case that wasn't enough...after I removed the blatant plagiarism, the article length is down to about 800b. —Politizer talk/contribs 19:26, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • I understand your comments Politzer, but there is a tremendous fan base for zombie movies, and this article meets notability standards. I've beefed up the content, including sourced information from several horror film publications, and I think it now meets DYK standards. I'd propose the following as an Alternative hook:
    • ... that the independent zombie parody Ninjas vs. Zombies, shot in Northern Virginia, led one reviewer to ask, "There are ninjas, and there are zombies, what more do you need?" new article by Psphenom (talk · contribs) and cbl62 (talk · contribs), nom. by cbl62 (talk · contribs)
      • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues At a glance, most of the refs you've added seem to be from blog posts or similarly questionable sources. Also, the Reception section is mostly long quotes taken from other articles, with little actual summarizing and describing in our own words (ie, instead of "X, Y, and Z praised the film," it looks more like "X said '...', Y said '...', and Z said '...'"); if I count the article length without counting all the quoted material, I wouldn't be surprised if it's still too short.... Anyway, without even getting into policy issues of whether or not these refs are good, I will just point out that the text of one of the refs you cite is "Really, its ninjas vs freakin’ zombies; on Halloween! You WANT to see this, and you CAN find child care. The kids are sleeping at Midnight. Or, you CAN make that party - the first screening is done by 11:30. What? Do we need to send the zombie army to drag you there? HUH???!!! Breathe…breathe. What’s that, you say? NINJAS vs what?..." (which continues on for a while). I think it's pretty clear that that is not the stuff we want on Wikipedia. I will take another closer look at the article, but I doubt it's going to be able to pass. —Politizer talk/contribs 21:12, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • It sounds to me like you're not a fan of zombie movies :) ? Cbl62 (talk) 21:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
          • Wow, people today are really having a field day accusing me of IDONTLIKEIT. Anyway, Cbl62, I don't have any problem with zombie movies; I have a problem with badly written articles. Ok, wikibreak time. Cbl62, it's not that I dislike zombie movies, it's just that this article is not in shape to be featured on the front page. (Oh, and, just so there is something substantive to this message: I have cleaned up the article again and the length is around 1160b. Still too short, and most sources are either SPS or blog; I will be pointing out the questionable sources specifically in the article's talk page.)—Politizer talk/contribs 21:31, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • A further concern is that this article is about an upcoming film. Per DYK's Unwritten rule C2 we don't include articles that could be construed as an advertisement. That would exclude this article regardless of the sources, length, etc.Nrswanson (talk) 21:26, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • The release date is listed as 10/31/08, and the sources show it was shown publicly on that date in a theater in Va., so I'm not sure Art's unwritten rule applies. Look, I didn't write the article, but it seemed like a good one to me, an interesting eye-catching topic... just what I think we need on DYK. I realize a lot of folks don't care for low-budget horror flix, just as some (like me) think pro wrestling is crap. But we need to take care in not imposing our own personal view of what is legitimate content. Until yesterday, I hadn't posted anything here for a month -- in part because of what I perceive as too much drama and politics. I thought "Zombies vs. Ninjas" was a cool topic, and the theatrical trailer looks good to me, but I haven't seen it, have no stake in it, and if others conclude it's inappropriate, so be it. Cbl62 (talk) 21:36, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Well, the article and the first two refs given imply that the 10/31 showing was a sort of unofficial sneak peek ("Bootleg Premiere," whatever that means). IMDB has its release date as October 31, but we all know how IMDB is. The film's official website says "coming soon" or something like that at the bottom. —Politizer talk/contribs 21:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article has now been pretty well cleaned up. To avoid any suggestion that the hook is an advertisement for the film, I suggest the following further alt hook:
  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues That hook is not very informative, it's just taking one writer's satire and taking it out of context; if I were looking at that on the front page without having worked on the article, that hook would be pretty much meaningless. I'm looking around the article right now to see if there's any good hook material (I still think the article isn't good enough for main page, but if we must feature it then we should at least dig up a decent hook...). —Politizer talk/contribs 03:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date verified. Offline hook reference accepted in good faith. --Rosiestep (talk) 21:26, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bank of Spain
Thanks DeLarge. I've corrected the hook above to read 'only English rider', but the alternative hook would also be ok. See Below. Autodidactyl (talk) 19:22, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Haydn
Haydn
Pacific University Health Professions Campus
Pacific University Health Professions Campus
Length, date, hook's ref verified. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date verified. Offline hook reference accepted in good faith. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Harike Wetland (pictured) with the Harike Lake formed across the Sutlej River by a barrage built in 1953 has a concentration of migratory fauna of waterfowls with number of globally threatened species.--Nvvchar (talk) 11:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • barrage was dab'ed to barrage (tidal). Confirm that this is accurate. Alansohn (talk) 00:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Barrage is on the river and far away from the tidal zone, please. Hence, introducing (tidal) would not be proper.Thanks.--Nvvchar (talk) 01:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • If barrage (tidal) is misleading, then the disambiguation page barrage is more misleading, because it asks the reader to choose between the same barrage (tidal) article and several other meanings of "barrage" that aren't related to water at all. Could we change it to a synonym like "dam"? Also, "... of migratory fauna of waterfowls with number of ..." is confusing in English. Based on the second reference, I think it means "... of migratory waterfowl with a number of ..." Art LaPella (talk) 02:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
          • Barrage is a very common usage in India to define low height headworks on rivers. Since there is a confusion due to disambuation, headworks could replace the name barrage. On the second part, I agree with your suggestion.I have reworded the Hook as under.--Nvvchar (talk) 02:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
            • ... that Harike Wetland (pictured) with the Harike Lake formed across the Sutlej River by a headwork built in 1953 has a concentration of migratory waterfowl with a number of globally threatened species?--Nvvchar (talk) 02:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
              • "Headwork" is also unfamiliar to me as an American, and it's missing from unspecialized dictionaries. But I found barrage (engineering) redirects to sluice. So I suggest [[sluice|barrage]] or [[sluice|headwork]] (or just "sluice" or "sluice gate"). I also removed the "s" from "waterfowls", added "a" before "number", and changed the period to a question mark (we have a rule about question marks). Art LaPella (talk) 05:25, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
                  • Can we adopt the word "Headregulator" which would be more appropriate than a sluice. In case that is also not found in the unspecialised dictionary, adopting the word "Dam" could be a better alternative. Similar change has to be made on another article on the Kanjli Wetland posted by me here on 1st November. I am now also considering writing an article on Barrage to bridge the gap in the data base on the subject.--Nvvchar (talk) 07:45, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two ideas:

Article has been listed at AfD. Consider if kept. Daniel Case (talk) 21:47, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Moved from 31 October 2008 nom to 4 November 2008 nom to account for the 5 days at AfD. -- Suntag 20:39, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 3

  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Length and date verified. "chose to become a rabbi" verified. However, the source says

    "Rabbi Cotel told The Jewish Week in March that he was inspired, while in Europe to conduct performances of “Dreyfus,” by a German woman who told him that the retelling of the story of the maligned French army officer prompted her to take Hebrew lessons."

    That does not seem to support the DYK Hook idea that "she had returned to Judaism". -- Suntag 19:24, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The source from The New York Times covering the paragraph states that "After returning from Europe, he spotted the woman on the street. She greeted him in Hebrew and told him that she had been so inspired by his telling of the Dreyfus story that she had returned to Judaism, an identity she had forsaken since the Nazi onslaught." (see here). The source was explicitly added to reference the sentence in question. Thanks for the catch. Alansohn (talk) 20:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 2

  • ... that space rock band The Boxing Lesson's drummer was sent to prison for five years for "conspiracy to manufacture marijuana"? - or - ... that space rock band The Boxing Lesson uses a Moog synthesizer in place of a bass guitar? - article created November 2. Self-nom. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]
    • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues The fact in the first hook doesn't really tell us a whole lot about the band, and it's pretty derogatory towards the drummer (can you imagine any other case in which you would mention a living person on the front page of Wikipedia solely to point out that he was sent to prison for marijuana?) so I'm just going to strike it out for good; the second hook doesn't really say anything notable, unless you can establish (maybe somewhere in the article) why the use of the Moog synthesizer is notably different than what other bands do. —Politizer talk/contribs 05:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 1

  • The hook is referenced to "Massie", but it is not clear what Massie is. Also, the hook makes no connection between "Blackamoor" and the "massive Negroes". Also, some people might be offended by having "massive Negroes" on the Main Page without more context. Also, there is no context as to who is Jim Hercules in the hook other than he was a massive negro. -- Suntag 23:05, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also