Jump to content

Wikipedia:HighBeam/Prior applications

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:HighBeam

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dry Martini (talk | contribs) at 16:43, 2 April 2012 (→‎Applications: +me). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Wikipedia:Highbeam/Nav This page is designed to manage the applications process for editors who want access to a free, full-access, 1-year HighBeam Research account. HighBeam has indicated that they will defer to the community's judgment about which editors will qualify for a free account. Because they do not have a strict limit on the number of free accounts they are willing to give us (they've initially authorized 1000), there is unlikely to be a problem of too many editors trying to get too few accounts. The criteria and an explanation of the application process are listed below.

Requirements
  • You do not have free online access to HighBeam through your local library or university
  • You have your Wikipedia email enabled
  • You have an account that is a minimum of 1 year old
  • You have a minimum of 1000 edits to the encyclopedia
  • Ideally, you are active in content generation, research, and verification work.
Process
  • Promotion of the application process will begin on March 13, 2012
  • The free accounts will be widely advertised on Wikipedia community pages, content portals, wikiprojects, mailing lists, and available media (Signpost, Wikimedia Blog)
  • Applications will officially open on Monday April 2, 2012 at 10am Eastern Standard Time (EST) and remain open until Monday April 9 at 12pm EST.
  • Applications will not be given on a first-come first serve basis; in the unlikely event that there are more eligible editors than accounts, they will be assigned randomly
  • Account access codes will be emailed to all participants by Monday April 16 at 12pm EST
Expectations for use
  • All editors are encouraged to apply where they have a need for background reading, research, verification, or content writing
  • Editors should try out and use the HighBeam account during their free access period
  • Editors should always provide original citation information, in addition to linking a HighBeam article, per WP:V and WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT
  • Editors should not provide bare links to non-free HighBeam pages
  • Editors should note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
  • Your application suggests you've read this and will give it a fair shot :)

Example application

  1. [[User:Name]]. Active Wikimedia project(s). History of content, research, or verification work. Intentions for future research.
  2. User:Ocaasi. English Wikipedia. I write biographies about alternative medicine practitioners and Middle Eastern political activists. I intend to continue this work, specifically writing about Gabriel Cousens and the Egyptian presidential election, 2012. Ocaasi t | c 21:37, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Applications

Feel free to add your name below, but no applications will be considered until Monday, April 2, 2012 at 10am Eastern Standard Time (EST). If there is a shortage, applications will be given on a random basis to all who meet the basic qualifications. Please tell your wiki-friends, WikiProjects, and other fora you frequent about this opportunity.

  1. user:Hgrosser English Wikipedia. 2300+ edits since Nov. 2005. Created the articles San Patricio Church massacre and Pussy Riot (the first on any wiki). — Hgrosser (talk) 06:16, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. User:Vejvančický. English Wikipedia. 4 years of experience, cca 24,000 edits, content related work (content creation, verification, referencing, deletion (mainly CAT:CSD), deletion discussions), WP:ADMIN, WP:CREDO. The access could be very useful for my work. Thanks for considering this application. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 13:41, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:Orangemike Admin on English-language Wikipedia; 8 years experience, 81,000+ edits, content-related work (creation, expansion, verification, article rescue) where access to Highbeam would be useful. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:35, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. User:Gobonobo. English Wikipedia. ~4 years experience, 40,000 edits, content-related work (creation, expansion, referencing). Intend to work on 20th century biographies and the backlog at Category:BLP articles lacking sources. --Gobōnobo + c 16:48, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. User:Racconish. English, French and Italian Wikipedias. 3 years experience, 18,000+ edits, content-related work (creation, expansion, verification, article rescue) where access to Highbeam would be useful.— Racconish Tk 17:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. User:Pharaoh of the Wizards English Wikipedia . 5 Years experience ,38000 + edits ,content-related work (content creation,expansion, verification, referencing) access to Highbeam will be very useful.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. User:Prioryman English Wikipedia. Between this and a former account, 8 years' experience and about 60,000 edits, primarily in content creation (see my userpage for various FAs, GAs, DYKs and other articles I've written). Prioryman (talk) 20:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. User:Wehwalt English Wikipedia. 5 years experience, almost 70,000 edits. Over 60 FAs in various fields, especially history, politics, and numismatics. Plan to keep working in those areas. See my userpage, although I don't update it much.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. User:Nikthestoned, English Wikipedia. ~2 years experience, >17,000 edits almost all in content creation / expansion; over 70 well sourced articles created. Nikthestoned 12:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. User:Dravecky, English-language Wikipedia, nearly 5 years experience and over 74,000 edits, am an admin but spend most of my time in content creation, especially broadcasting, Alabama and Texas history, and other areas that would benefit strongly from access to Highbeam's resources. - Dravecky (talk) 13:26, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. User:Resolute, English Wikipedia, 7 years experience and 37,000 edits. Like Dravecky, I am a content admin, with 50 good and featured articles to my credit. I tend to focus on ice hockey and Canadian history topics. Resolute 14:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. User:Djsasso, English Wikipedia and Simple English Wikipedia, 7+ years of experience and 90,000 edits. -DJSasso (talk) 14:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. User:MikeLynch, English and Sanskrit language Wikipedia, admin in both. ~2 years of experience and over 20,000 global edits. Active in content creation in English as well as Indian language Wikimedia projects. Lynch7 14:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. User:Vibhijain, English Wikipedia, 1 year of experience. 8500 local edits and 20,000 global edits. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 14:48, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. User:The ed17, English Wikipedia, 4 years of experience, 39,000 edits, administrator. I've written 20 FAs, all focused around 20th century naval history. I'm really interested in the newspaper archives offered by Highbeam (see South American dreadnought race for how I'd use them). Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 15:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Aschmidt (talk) 15:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC) German Wikipedia since 2005, some 13,000 edits there, editing articles mainly on law, economics, media, current affairs, free software. The newspaper and journal archive would be a great help both for improving and for writing new articles on my subjects. Thanks for considering my application.--Aschmidt (talk) 15:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Liesel (talk) 15:59, 15 March 2012 (UTC) german wikipedia since 2005, over 22000 edits in articles, themes: railroad, motorsport, geography[reply]
  18. --Nicola54 (talk) 16:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC) German Wikipedia since 2004, some 57.000 edits, editing articles mainly on history of sports and cycling. The archive would help me to find out more about biographies of veteran sports people and historical sports events.[reply]
  19. Polarlys German Wikipedia, active since 2004, 49000 edits, 31000 in articles, topics: medicine, scientists/biographies, regularly had no access especially to newspaper archives for essential biographic information. Thank you for consideration. --Polarlys (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Emeritus German Wikipedia, 8000 edits since 2009, topics: Pacific history and politics, indigenous peoples. --Emeritus (talk) 16:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. DerHexer, editor since 2005; sysop on German and English Wikipedia, steward on Meta Wiki; 250'000 edits; 900'000 sysop actions; one featured and one good article (dozens written with main topic antiquity), three featured pictures (thousands uploaded); after having finished my Master thesis in summer 2012 I will not anylonger have access to journal archives.
  22. SlimVirgin, English Wikipedia, editor since November 2004; 120,000 edits, around 42 percent to articles, mainly focusing on content review and creation, including 10 featured articles and one GA. I write a lot of current affairs pieces, so access to a good news database would be very useful. SlimVirgin (talk) 17:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 17:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC) - editor and author since 2003 in the German WP, lots of edits, ~100 good article (‘lesenswert’) and ~50 featured (‘exzellent’) ones in the German WP -- Achim Raschka (talk) 17:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. NiTenIchiRyu, German and English Wikipedia editor since 2004, about 35,000 edits in the German and 1500 in the English Wikipedia, topics: history, biographies, art. --NiTen (talk) 17:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Ruud Koot, content creator on the English (and occasionally Dutch) Wikipedia since 2005. Working in particular on topics related to (the history of) science.
  26. Astynax, English Wikipedia, editor since 2006; 8,000 edits, approximately 74 percent to articles which include raising 10 to FA and 13 to GA status. I assist on various topics where the ability to provide citations from a news database would be helpful. • Astynax talk 17:29, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Denis Barthel (talk) 18:55, 15 March 2012 (UTC), German Wikipedia (sometimes en), active since 2003, ~51.000 edits de, ~57.000 edits global, ~50 good and featured articles, topics: protozoology, botany, music (experimental, doom metal), quality TV.[reply]
  28. Zero0000 (talk), Editor since 2003 (over 15,000 edits), administrator since 2004. Mainly I edit historical articles related to the Middle East, with the particular emphasis of improving the quality of sources. Zerotalk 19:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Marcus Cyron, Editor since 2005, Administrator en de:WP and Commons, more than 165.000 Edits in all WMDE projects (about 145.000 in de:WP; more than 15.000 on Commons; Author of more than 5.000 articles on de:WP, more than 30 are featured or good (mostly about the Classical world and Winter sports). And thanks again for showing, that only en:WP is important for the movement. Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Binksternet, editing English Wikipedia for 4.6 years, top 300 users by edit count, with 2 FA, 35 GA and 134 DYK articles under my belt. I work primarily on article content, and I often find that Highbeam is holding a source that would greatly assist my work. Binksternet (talk) 19:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. tsor: user and administrator in de:WP, first edit July 2003, more than 81.000 edits. --Tsor (talk) 20:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Elitre (talk · contribs · count) requesting an account for my activity on it.wiki. > 20,000 edits there (> 6700 in ns0) in 5 years, major contributor of a FA (1, 2, article stats), user of "Progetto Cococo" (local WikiProject Copyright Cleanup), sysop, OTRS agent. No access to reference works except for my Credo Account: I am going to notify the Italian community the same way I did for the Credo accounts, enabling some Italian fellow to get theirs. ----Elitre (talk) 20:14, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Freimut Bahlo, editor since July 2007, 55,963 edits, Author of more than 2.000 articles on de:WP, part of the community Project jazz. 1 informative list (‘informative Liste’), 1 good article (‘lesenswert’) and 1 featured (‘exzellent’) in the German WP--Freimut Bahlo (talk) 20:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Anmeldezeitpunkt: 16. Juli 2007[reply]
  34. Redlinux editor since 2006; sysop on German Wikipedia and mentoring (with the largest number of mentees in de-wiki) (i.e. Adopt a User in en-wiki); cause I'm living in a rural area, I don't have access to journal archives. Most of my qualified articles [1] are on medical topics. Redlinux···→ 21:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  35. valepert (talk · contribs · count) requesting an account for my activity on it.wiki. sysop with > 88,000 edits in 6 years, user of "Progetto Cococo" (italian equivalent for WikiProject Copyright Cleanup), I have a Credo account. --valepert (talk) 21:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Sannita. Admin on Italian Wikipedia since 2007, 6+ years experience and 47k+ edits. I currently work mostly on biographies (both BLPs and BDPs), and accessing to Highbeam would be definitely useful. I already have a Credo account, which I use also to help other users. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 21:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Toter Alter Mann − sysop on German Wikipedia, some 20k edits; mentor and active editor for three years now. Mainly biology, but also a lot of cleanup, research and verification in the social sciences. I am further participating at the German WP:REX (de:WP:BIBA). I have a Credo account which I mainly used for helping other people with their articles.--Toter Alter Mann (talk) 21:58, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Olei. German Wikipedia, active since 2005, ~24.000 edits de, ~40,000 edits global, topics: biology (insecta, lepidoptera) --Olei (talk) 22:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Muscari. German Wikipedia, active since 2007, ~38.000 edits de, topics: biology (botany, herpetology, entomology,...) --Muscari (talk) 22:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Asdalol. Editor since 2007 on It.wiki, more than 10.000 edits on ns0. Actually working on biographies, history of sports. I don't have access to a journal archive, the HighBeam account would be very useful. --Asdalol (talk) 22:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Nicolabel: sysop on Italian Wikipedia since 2011, user since 2005, ~12500 edits. Active mostly in cleanup/verification activities and geography, occasionally in other fields. I got a credo account in 2011. --Nicolabel (talk) 22:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. User:Etrusko25: Italian wikipedia, working mostly in ichthyology and fish biology. Etrusko25 (talk) 22:48, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. User:Vituzzu: sysop and bureaucrat on the Italian Wikipedia and steward ~63.000 edits global, my main interests are modern and contemporary history and information technology. --Vituzzu (talk) 23:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. User:Lucas: Italian Wikipedia. I am sysop on the Italian Wikipedia since 2006. I did more than 45.000 global edits. I am interested in psychology, communication, and modern history (expecially the biographies side). --Lucas (talk) 01:58, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Ansuman: English Wikipedia and Odia Wikipedia, Admin on Odia Wikipedia. 1+ year of experience and over 8500 global edits. Active in various Wikimedia Projects. -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 06:00, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Agathoclea en & de-wiki, 20k+ edits, admin here. As my time is currently limited due to work commitments please disregard if oversubscribed. Agathoclea (talk) 08:12, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  47. WiseWoman: German Wikipedia, active since 2004, 2000+ edits; English Wikipedia active since 2004, 470+ edits; Swedish Wikipedia since 2007, 27 edits. I do mostly cleanup, but when I create articles they tend to be about women who are missing in the Wikipedia. It is often hard to come by information on them, so additional resources much appreciated. --WiseWoman (talk) 08:16, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Martin Bahmann (talk) German Wikipedia, active since 2004, ~33.000 edits de, 11 good and 7 featured articles, topics (mainly) history, especially local/roman/german history, biographies, plants, botany and - the "fun part" for me as contributor - cat breeds & veterinary medicine. Martin Bahmann (talk) 08:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  49. User:Demostene119: Italian Wikipedia 6.000+ edits from 2006, Credo Account, main interest in mineralogy, paleontology and modern and contemporary history.Demostene119 (talk) 09:21, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  50. User:Emha: Active in German Wikipedia since 2004 (>9.000 edits) and on Commons, I write about persons and geographical topics and do Quality assurance, where it is useful to lookup details -- Emha (talk) 10:26, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  51. User:Bramfab: Italian wikipedia, since 2006 and sysop, editing (40.000+) mostly in earth science, evolutionary biology, history of science and Italian history. I'm quite active on verification of correctness of dubious citation in articles --Bramfab (talk) 11:41, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  52. User:ca$e: active in German Wikipedia since 2005, >39.000 edits, ArbCom, coordination of work in areas of philosophy, religious studies, among other areas in humanities and social sciences. Ca$e (talk) 12:38, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  53. --Belladonna2 (talk) 12:45, 16 March 2012 (UTC):German Wikipedia, editing 8000 edits since 2007, mostly in botanical sciences, gender sciences, genetically modified organism and ecology.--Belladonna2 (talk) 12:45, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC) Over 16000 edits English Wikipedia. Edit on philately, history, art, postal system. Hoping it will access local newspapers I usually can't view. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  55. theredmonkey: German Wikipedia editor since 2005; >4000 edits; editing and verification in social science --trm 15:51, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Secret account 15:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC) Member since 2005, over 35,000 edits in my former two accounts and this one, was a former administrator and I have several FAs to my credit. Highbeam will be extremely useful in my subject area, Baseball history, American football history and current hip hop articles. Secret account 15:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Andrea.gf Editor and former admin on italian wiki, active since 2005 with 7000+ edits, mainly content-related work (creation, expansion and verification) where access to Highbeam would be very useful. Andrea.gf (talk) 16:19, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Avraham. Active since late 2005. Wide area of edits (mathematics, religion, geopolitics, etc.). I often focus on updating and maintaining citations, so HighBeam access would be a fantastic resource. (Other info, FWIW: ENWP: Admin, crat, OS, CU; COM: Admin, OS; Meta: Admin, Steward) Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 17:46, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  59. InverseHypercube. Active on the English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons since late 2010, with 8000+ edits on Wikipedia. I edit a wide variety of articles, but tend to focus on science, computers, history, and current events. I do have access to many sources through the University of British Columbia, so please prioritize others before me. However, HighBeam does seem to have valuable sources that I can't access, so I would appreciate the opportunity to use it if there are spots available. InverseHypercube (talk) 20:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Ziko, see my page on meta. Ziko (talk) 22:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Wildtierreservat, de.wp editor since 2008, ~6000 edits, ~50 articles. This would be a great help for my articles on writers. --Wildtierreservat (talk) 23:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Kmhkmh. I'm primarily active in en.wp (6000+ edits) and de.wp (25000+ edits) for more than 5 years now, mostly in the fields of math, sciences, history, biography, geography, movies, literature, food & drink. Since I'm not affiliated with an university anymore, I lack any sort of free journal access, hence highbeam might prove extremely valuable for me when writing new articles or improving/proofreading existing ones.--Kmhkmh (talk) 01:44, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Riggr Mortis. Editor on en.wp since 2006 (with prior User:Outriggr). Would edit more in arts and literature with improved (any) access to resources. Riggr Mortis (talk) 04:13, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Ureinwohner German Wikipedia, active since 2004, ~66.000 edits, focus on creating and expanding footballer biographies (UK, Australia, Africa), the newspaper archive would be really useful --Ureinwohner (talk) 08:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Rsrikanth05, Have an account since 2005, though active editing started in late 2008. As of today, I've got 12k edits on English. I've worked on a GA (Transport in India, and a DYK (Coimbatore bypass). I regularly hunt for refs to add to articles where they aren't present, or are needed. I plan to work on various Transport related articles in the future, and having this would be a great asset. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:52, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Mirgolth French Wikipedia. Active since 2005 (>20K edits), I write marine zoology articles. I'm currently writing on Anemonefishes and I intend to continue with major fishes families (Scaridae, Labridae, Chaetonidae, Pomacanthidae...). I'm mostly using public papers anly and access to Copeia and other zoology publications would help a lot. Mirgolth (talk) 13:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Cymbella French Wikipedia (and sometimes also other languages). Active since 2007, ~23.000 edits, eclectic contributions, namely botany, history of botany, disambiguation, spelling corrections. - Cymbella (talk) 13:54, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  68. User:MIRROR, active since 2006 on fr.wiki. 8k+ edits there, 14k+ global. i work (or intend to) on biology (mainly entomology, evolution mecanisms, LUCA…), particle physics and biographies linked to those fields - MIRROR (talk) 13:57, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Veneziano Italian Wikipedia. Editor since 2007, sysop since 2008, >20.000 edits focused in medical, psychological and scientific areas. I'm, and I will be, active in content verification issues in medical/psychological areas. Veneziano (talk) 14:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  70. GabrielF primarily en-Wiki. Editor since December 2004 with 8,000+ edits. In addition to article writing, I also help provide PDFs of scholarly and other articles at the resource exchange. GabrielF (talk) 17:34, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Cullen328 I have 16,000+ edits on English Wikipedia since 2009. I started working on biographies of California mountaineers and artists, and have gone on to write, expand and reference articles on a wide variety of topics. I am also an Online Ambassador assisting college students working on Wikipedia assignments. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 17:52, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Dank - around 50k edits, lots of reviewed content, frequent reviewer at WP:FAC. - Dank (push to talk) 19:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Miss Manzana: Spanish Wikipedia. Around 18 000 edits, administrator. More than 70 GAs and 11 FAs, regular GA and FA reviewer. User since 2010. мιѕѕ мαηzαηα (let's talk) 19:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  74. WhisperToMe - 8 years of experience on the English Wikipedia, with a large number of edits, active in article and content writing - I would find such access very useful WhisperToMe (talk) 19:41, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Andreateletrabajo. 2 years and admin in es:WP. More than 30 000 edits in several WM Projects. 1 GA, 70 articles and GA revewer. I write about biology, technology and others, and as admin I do extensive job of reversions, copyvio deletions, add contents, add sources, etc. My uni don't has access to HighBeam, so I think it can be very usefull for me. --Andreateletrabajo (talk) 20:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Daniel B - 6 years of experience on the Hebrew Wikipedia. Around 40K edits. Administrator and CheckUser. Write about mathematics, 2 FA. Daniel B (talk) 20:07, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Diego Moya. About 8 years editing English Wikipedia, creating missing articles and referencing stuff mainly in Computer Science. I could use access to the Journal of End User Computing and related topics to improve the Human–computer interaction articles. Diego (talk) 20:11, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Oyoyoy. Approx. 3yrs editing on Hebrew & English Wikipedia and related projects. Hundreds of articles added to Hebrew Wikipedia. I would love to have access to this database. Oyoyoy (talk) 20:26, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  79. SPat talk 20:29, 17 March 2012 (UTC) ~3 years editing on en and mr wikipedia. Added ~20 new article.[reply]
  80. עדירל (talk) 20:30, 17 March 2012 (UTC) I am active on Hebrew Wikipedia, use free Hebrew newspapers very often and would like to supplement from other sources.[reply]
  81. ליאור • Lior (talk) - An active editor in Wikipedia since 2004, mostly contributing to the Hebrew Wikipedia. I focus on Beta Israeli heritage as well as scientific articles, both of which necessitate access to hardly-accessible articles and books. A HighBeam account might prove useful for these. Thanks, ליאור • Lior (talk) 20:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Kiefer.Wolfowitz: 25 thousand edits since 2005, mostly in mathematics, statistics, computer science, United States history (especially politics), English-language and Spanish-language literature, contemporary Sweden.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 20:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Mandarax. On English Wikipedia for 7 years, with over 200,000 edits. I include plentiful citations in the articles I write, and having this additional resource would be very useful. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 21:11, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Aircorn. Have been on the English Wikipedia for two years and have 11 000 edits. One of my main focuses is the GA process and having access to HighBeam will help me verify potentially "Good" articles. AIRcorn (talk) 23:28, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Aviados: A highly active editor in Hebrew Wikipedia for the past 4 years, with over 65K edits (most of which are in the main namespace). Administrator since 2009. Focus mainly in content writing, usually within the various fields of Jewish studies. Access to HighBeam would undoubtedly prove useful for my work. Aviados (talk) 23:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Simon Burchell: Been around since 2006, but not really active until 2008, with 29,000 edits. 4 FAs and a dozen or so GAs. I also sporadically spend time on the Spanish wikipedia. I'm constantly frustrated by paywalls, and any extra resource would be a great help. I'm particularly active in WikiProjects Mesoamerica and Guatemala with the addition of new material. I do a lot of article assessment on WikiProject Mythology, I also write up the odd British archaeological site. Simon Burchell (talk) 23:59, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Peteforsyth (talk · contribs) Active Wikipedia editor since 2006, primarily on topics relating to the U.S. state of Oregon. I do a good deal of new Wikipedia editor outreach and outreach to cultural institutions as well. Access to the Highbeam database would be tremendously useful -- I frequently run into Highbeam abstracts and am frustrated by the inability to access the full article. The donation is greatly appreciated!! -Pete (talk) 00:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Goodvac: English Wikipedia, active since late 2007, 10,000+ edits. Involved in content creation and at the resource exchange. Goodvac (talk) 00:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Brianboulton Active since September 2007, about 50,000 edits, 56 Featured Articles. Mainly music and opera, also literature, general biographies and polar exploration. Sometimes recent scholarly articles, newspaper reviews etc are hard to access, and this could be a considerable help. Brianboulton (talk) 00:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Smallman12q (talk · contribs): English wikipedia, active since 2009, ~10,000 edits. Involved in article creation and expansion. Smallman12q (talk) 01:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Peter.C (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia. I am a student and recently I have had no time to have to go bury through sources to go and find proper articles to help me develop emergency medicine articles. As a high school student I do not have access to many good sources for what I need. At the moment I have 5000+ edits. Peter.C • talk • contribs 01:10, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Cindamuse: Active on en.wp two+ years with over 20,000 edits. Involved in article creation, verification, referencing, and expansion. Access to HighBeam would be valuable in my work on Wikipedia. Thanks! Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 01:23, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  93. User:GorillaWarfare: Active on the English Wikipedia for over two years with almost 20,000 edits. I do a lot of maintenance work, but I find paid databases to be extremely useful when I do content work. I don't have access to HighBeam through my uni, so it would be quite nice! I don't work in any specific area, but I have two GAs, and am working on making one a FA. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Laser brain: English Wikipedia, active since 2008, 9,000+ edits. Active in Featured Article review process, and in article creation and expansion. --Laser brain (talk) 02:51, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Grapple X—active since October 2010 (~17 months), over 8,000 edits in this time. Active in content generation and improvement (60 GA-class articles, 1 FA, 1 FL at time of application). Would make use of newspaper archives mainly for the review history of film and television topics, though use of such a tool would probably light a fire under my ass to research more "important" topics as well. GRAPPLE X 02:55, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Wizardman - October since 2006 on English wikipedia, 100,000+ edits, several featured and good articles, Highbeam would be able to help me write more of them. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:18, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Carrite (talk) 03:42, 18 March 2012 (UTC) - I'm a content writer with about 30K edits and over 160 significant starts and can use the resource.[reply]
  98. Imzadi1979. Active in the U.S. Roads WikiProject on the English Wikipedia in addition to its sister projects with 10 FAs and 133 GAs in my almost 54,00 edits since October 2005. My intent is to continue to research the histories of various US highways and I could assist the rest of the project obtain articles. Imzadi 1979 → 04:22, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Johnbod, 10 FAs, 189 DYks & 99k edits on en:wp since 2006. Most on art & art history, so I would mostly be interested in journals like The Art Bulletin, which I'm delighted to see HighBeam carry. Johnbod (talk) 04:50, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Noleander 2 FAs; 4 GAs; 21,000 edits; 5+ years; primarily a content creator. --Noleander (talk) 04:58, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Carcharoth. 7+ years experience, c.60,000 edits (with c.15,000 article edits). Content-related work (creation, expansion, verification, article review processes) where access to Highbeam would be useful. Topics I have worked on and intend to work on in the future include the history of science, medicine and technology, and World War I. Carcharoth (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Orlady. American; editor in the English Wikipedia since 2004; active since 2006; currently administrator; well over 60,000 total edits. Most of my work is in creation and improvement of content in a diverse variety of topical areas, mostly related to current topics or the last couple of centuries -- roughly corresponding to the period covered by HighBeam archives. I don't have access to any university libraries and my access to paywall-protected Internet content is rather limited, but I am skilled at locating information on the free Internet. I have found archived articles from newspapers and magazines published in the last two centuries to be valuable resources for research, particularly in the subject areas of history, politics, biography, and business. Access to HighBeam resources would definitely increase the stature of the sources I use, as I would have less need to rely on articles from small-city local newspapers that happen to have been archived at Google Books. --Orlady (talk) 05:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Theleftorium - written 130+ GAs and 4 FAs, and made 30,000+ edits over the past 4 years. I'm an administrator but I mostly write articles. HighBeam would be very useful for me. Theleftorium (talk) 10:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Cwmhiraeth - I have been with the English Wikipedia since late 2010 and create articles on animals and plants. I often find myself frustrated by not being able to access articles from scientific journals. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:27, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Fæ - c.73,000 edits to the English Wikipedia over the last 2 years and 88,000+ globally with a further 21,000 by Faebot. I have been available as a direct contact on WP:REX for over a year (I would encourage more people to put their names there if they want to help with sourcing and verification) and regularly check things up for others using the British Library as I am the point of contact for the GLAM programme there (as well as other UK institutions). Oh, forgot to mention I'm an Admin on Wikipedia and an OTRS volunteer and sometimes checking sources is relevant for some issues that come in to Wikimedia by email. --Fæ (talk) 12:26, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  106. AshLin - I'm coordinator for WikiProject India. 22K edits, 4 GAS, 18 DYKs. I'm working on India-related articles on History, military history & biodiversity. My greatest need is quality refs in areas where Indo-Pak conflict issues arise. AshLin (talk) 13:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Moonriddengirl (talk) - Pushing five years on Wikipedia. 113,913 live and deleted edits combined. While I do create articles when I can (not often), I would primarily use the resource for copyright cleanup.
  108. Fang Aili talk - English Wikipedia since 2005, ~24K edits, I was one of the most active sysops for a time. I have done some content work, but these days I would mainly use the access to find sources for BLPs and other articles I ran into while doing cleanup. --Fang Aili talk 15:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Modernist – English Wikipedia since 2006, nearly 6 years, 72K+ edits, 9 FA, 3 GA, mostly content on the Visual arts and culture related articles. Modernist (talk) 15:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  110. FormerIP. 9,614 edits (plus one in just a second) and about 2,000 before that as an IP, over the last 4 years or so. I do regular content creation, particularly fixing unreferenced biographies (although there's less of that to do now) and preparing articles for WP:ITN, which can include adding a lot of background and fixing general problems as well as updating the news-y bit. On my to do list at the moment is improving some articles to do with linguistics and the Sex Pistols (as two separate topics, if you were wondering). FormerIP (talk) 15:56, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  111. User:Ceoil - En Wiki since 2006; 60k edits, 20 FAs and another 15 odd FAR saves. Mostly art history, but also lith and popular music. Spend a significant amount time each week tracking down sources, old books, journal articles etc. Ceoil (talk) 16:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Graham Colm– Coming up to 5 years with 14,967 edits and 4 FAs. I work mainly on virology articles and I'm a FAC delegate. Graham Colm (talk) 16:29, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Truthkeeper88 - En wikipedia with about 39,000 edits, 9 FAs and others in the works, mainly in the area of literature. I beg and borrow sources, and buy books, pay large library fines. Anything to help sources be more accessible would be welcome. Truthkeeper (talk) 16:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Yngvadottir Primarily en.wikipedia - created one page on de.wikipedia but the comments on my German were scathing so I have returned to just gnoming on other Wikipedias ... Editor since July 2, 2008, 8,000+ edits, by my own count I've created 100 pages and I also do a lot of page expansions (including attempting to save articles at AfD). I'm extremely eclectic, except that I am not qualified to do much that's scientific/technical. I don't have access to any online archives through my local library and have no academic library affiliation, so I could really use help seeing newspaper articles. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Factumquintus - Editor since 2004 and sysop since 2005 on German WP; mentor since 2009; ~24 500 edits de; ~32 000 edits global; topics: mostly biology -Factumquintus (talk) 18:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  116. User:Ermanon: Italian wikipedia, since 2006, editing (25000+) mostly in geography and administrative divisions. I'm active on edits verification and peer reviewing. --Ermanon (talk) 19:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  117. CheepnisAroma French wikipedia, with over 26,000 contributions. Very eclectic (history, geography, sciences, fixing links, disambiguation, spelling corrections). A HighBeam account would be more than useful for me. CheepnisAroma (talk) 19:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  118. User:Alpha Quadrant - Editor since 2010, 42,000 edits. I primarily work at Articles for Creation and I typically write articles on United States organizations related articles. Often times, articles in this area are behind paywalls. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 20:02, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  119. User:Cheveri - Editor at es.wiki, where I am also an administrator. I usually review GA, and have also written four of them from the begining.I spend an important part of my time here on countervandalism duties, in addition to some improvements for already existing articles. Registered since 2005 and about 15000 edits. Cheveri (talk) 20:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  120. User:Shakehandsman - Editor on English Wikipedia since 2006, 10,000+ edits, most of which involved content creation or trying to add refs to existing content. I work on BLPs, crime articles, sports, politics, quite a variety of subjects really and access to Highbeam would allow me to get more work done. I intend to continue editing my content generation and referencing work well into the future.--Shakehandsman (talk) 21:10, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  121. User:Bay Area Native - I've been editing for 5 years, focused on current news events, including articles relating to the San Francisco Bay Area as well as current LGBT issues and notable media figures. My watchlist is extensive, monitoring vandalism-vulnerable articles on sensitive topics. Access to HighBeam would greatly enhance my refinement on the articles in my watchlist. Bay Area Native (talk) 21:34, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  122. User:Yomangani - I meet the criteria; if the accounts are to be "given on a random basis to all who meet the basic qualifications" if over-subscribed, I don't see any need to provide a candidate statement. Yomanganitalk 23:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  123. User:Pequod76 - I've been editing for almost 5 years, mostly on the Wikipedia in Italian. I focused on and added referenced contents to linguistics, ancient history, music and literature related articles, with almost 50.000 edits on it.wiki (my record there). Access to HighBeam would be good for my referenced editing. --Pequod76 (talk-ita.esp.eng) 01:22, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  124. User:Milowent - Active on Wikipedia for 2.5 years, over 10,000 edits. Active on Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron, also work on sourcing BLPs and founded Wikipedia:Unreferenced BLP Rescue. Plan on continuing same work, I do not have free or other access to Highbeam; I have cited highbeam before when people have helped me get a copy of an article for sourcing something.--Milowent • hasspoken 01:24, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  125. User:Andreasmperu - Active at es.wiki since 2008 (around 59.000 edits), also with more than 1.000 edits at enwiki. Andreasm just talk to me 02:29, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  126. User:Fixertool - Active at es.wiki since 2006 (around 13750 edits), mainly focused in literature and history. --Fixertool (talk) 08:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Symposiarch (talk) 10:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC) mainly German Wikipedia, but also French + English WP, active since 2005, ~21,831 edits de, Total edits (including deleted): 8,778 @ fr, 2,671 @ en; no good and no featured articles, topics (mainly) history, especially local/german history, biographies, German wine, local plants, project Metz, african elections and politicians[reply]
  128. User:Ealdgyth. Active with medieval history, equine. 60,000+ edits, a number of FAs and GAs. Continuing work on improving coverage of medieval topics as well as horse subjects.
  129. Antandrus (talk). Active in many fields (music history, energy, geography, geology, and a few others); have written over 630 articles from scratch; approximately 100,000 edits; eight years of history; admin for seven. I've bumped into HighBeam's paywall many times, particularly while writing articles on the petroleum industry.
  130. User:Patrickneil Seven years of editing, 15,000+ edits, with 3 FAs and more GAs, mostly history, international relations, and geography topics. With HighBeam, its mostly tracking down newspaper articles from 10+ years ago, that have otherwise disappeared from the web.-- Patrick, oѺ∞ 17:39, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  131. User:Taty2007 - Active at es.wiki since 2008 with approximately 25.921 edits. I am an admim at es.wiki and have contributed in several good and feature articles, as well as creating articles related to art and history. I constantly search information in books and newspaper articles that require subscription such as Oxford databases and Access World News. As an active member of Wikipedia I will continue using these research tools and resources. Taty2007 (talk) 18:10, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  132. User:Gary King – Content contributor. Haven't been as active lately as I used to be, but still working on a few articles off-wiki. Gary King (talk · scripts) 19:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  133. User:Ravpapa seven years or so, thousands of edits, mostly in the areas of classical music and the Middle East.--Ravpapa (talk) 19:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  134. User:Julius1990. User on de.wiki since 2005 with 33.000+ edits. So far 15 articles that are rated excellent or good articles. My topics are art history, sports, cinema, latin america, history. Julius1990 (talk) 19:49, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  135. User:JayJasper. Wikipedia editor for over 5 yrs., with more than 25,000 edits. Fields of interest and editing activity include current events, politics, US history, law, literature, sports, music, among others. Experience with creation, expansion, research and sourcing of content.--JayJasper (talk) 20:25, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  136. User:GuillaumeTell. Based in England. Active on English Wikipedia since December 2005, over 13,000 edits (it could be a lot more, but I'm always pressing the Show Preview button), member of WikiProject Opera and WikiProject Shakespeare. Also interested in a wide range of other subjects, especially architecture and local history. Some experience in Peer Reviews and FAC, c3000 articles on my Watchlist. --GuillaumeTell 22:51, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  137. User:SarahStierch Wikimedia Foundation Community Fellow, active in WP:Feminism, Visual Arts, Women's History. I'm the Wikipedian in Residence at the Smithsonian Institution going on one year. Feel free to visit my userpage to review my resume and bio! I often run into HighBeam articles, especially about women artists, and I'd love to help improve coverage about those artists and other women with HighBeam. Sarah (talk) 23:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  138. User:Buckshot06 English, French wikipedias. I focus on military subjects that are not well covered by Wikipedia's systemic bias - thus Africa, Asia especially. I would very much like access to a HighBeam account to improve coverage and sourcing. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:40, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Archeologo. User on Italian Wikipedia since 2006, 6+ years experience. I currently work mostly on archaeology and heritage pages, and accessing to Highbeam would be definitely useful. --Archeologo (talk) 02:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  140. User:Gadfium. Editor on English Wikipedia since 2004, admin since 2005, 90 thousand edits. Have created hundreds of articles, and frequently add references to other people's additions. I frequently find HighBeam a useful source of references, but am unable to read the full articles.-gadfium 03:37, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Moroboshi (talk · contribs · count). Editor on it.wikipedia for over 5 years, with over 15k edit on ns0. Im mainly active on game and game publisher articles, mainly with translation from en.wiki, but I like to expand the articles and to add source when they are missing.--Moroboshi (talk) 06:44, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  142. User:Tom Morris. Admin on en.wikipedia and en.wikinews. I've written a number of DYKs and helped fact-check articles and check up on references on mostly academic topics, primarily philosophy and a few other humanities topics. It'd be useful to have HighBeam access for a variety of sources related to medical history, current affairs, humanities and so on in order to help write new DYKs, and to improve existing articles on topics of interest. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:54, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  143. User:Graham87. I've an admin who has been editing Wikipedia for seven years. I primarily write content about music (both classical and popular) and, more recently, about the Australian Paralympic movement. Because I use a screen reader, I find it difficult to access Google Books and the Google News Archive, so having a free high-quality corpus of full texts would be especially useful to me. Graham87 12:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Qoan. Editor mainly on Spanish and Catalan wikipedia since 2006, I'm Patroller in ES-wiki. I've created hundreds of articles, mainly on Geography, History and Languages and I've contributed by increasing information and adding sources to thousands other articles on these fields. Access to high-quality reliable sources would be of inmeasurable value for me. Qoan (say it!) 13:56, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  145. User:Eclipsed - English Wikipedia. I contribute under a declared COI on various subjects. 6000+ edits, started in 2005. Intentions for improving articles. Eclipsed   (talk)   (COI Declaration)   13:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  146. User:Tchoř – active mainly on cs.wikipedia: 20 thousands edits since 2008. I believe I would use the access for verification, referencing and resolving content disputes.--Tchoř (talk) 16:11, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  147. User:Silver seren - English Wikipedia. I have a wide range of subjects I work on, 2 GAs, 42 DYKs, and 67 articles total, over 18,000 edits, and active since 2006. This will prove very useful in all of my source gathering for improving AfDs and writing articles in general. SilverserenC 16:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  148. User:John Broughton - English Wikipedia. I have more than 25,000 edits, active since August 2005. I'm the author of Wikipedia: The Missing Manual. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 17:27, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  149. User:We hope-Here 2+ years with 32,000+ edits. Editing a variety of topics, including bios and veterinary medicine. Was an avid user of Google News Archive for this until they abandoned the project and also cut the search capabilities of their database at the same time. We hope (talk) 17:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  150. User:Miyagawa - 3+ years, around 24,000 edits on the English language Wikipedia. 8 FLs, 39 GAs and 164 DYKs. Would be primarily looking to use the newspaper archives for content generation as I have access to some British newspaper archives through my library but it would be wonderful to have access to some of the American ones too. Miyagawa (talk) 18:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  151. User:ErrantX - ~2 years, 16,000 edits. My interests tend to be biographies, WW2 and current events, but I dabble all over. Archive access would provide a whole lot more source material for my article work :) --Errant (chat!) 19:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  152. User:Chrishmt0423 - English Wikipedia. 5+ years, 40,000+ edits. 51 FLs. I mainly edit NBA articles. Archive access would help to verify facts.—Chris!c/t 19:17, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Valfontis (talk) Admin on English Wikipedia. Over 6 years experience and over 60,000 edits. e-mail is enabled. I create content, and do expansion, verification, rescue and clean up. I don't have access to HighBeam through my local library. Access to HighBeam would help me in my work--the snippet views often tantalize with hints of a subject's notability, but usually can't be used as reliable sources without checking the full article. I believe strongly in providing full citations and will adhere to the usage suggestions. Thanks for the opportunity! Valfontis (talk) 19:39, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  154. 28bytes (talk): Admin on English Wikipedia; editing since 2006, 18,000 edits so far. I've created just under 100 articles so far, with plans for many more. 28bytes (talk) 19:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Mazbln (talk) - (Mainly) German Wikipedia, active since 2004, about 50,000 edits, admin. I would use the access for research in regard of the Balkan conflicts of the 90ies to verify articles and to solve edit wars. --Mazbln (talk) 19:55, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  156. User:Jrcla2. Over 5+ years as registered user, 91,000+ manual edits, 735 article creations, 97 DYK credits. I create new articles on historically and modern-day notable college basketball players. I frequently need archived articles to help beef up content but have trouble doing so, thus a HighBeam account would be tremendously helpful. Jrcla2 (talk) 20:01, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  157. User:The Rambling Man - Nearly 7 years here, 70,000+ edits, sysop, 'crat, featured list director, 50+ featured credits (FA + FL). This kind of freedom to access info would be invaluable on a daily basis. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:11, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  158. User:Dirtlawyer1. Over 41,000 manual edits to English Wikipedia in three years on Wikipedia. I work to improve college sports articles, including teams, athletes and coaches. Access to a HighBeam account would be extremely helpful for adding sourced footnotes for newspapers, magazines and other publications not availble through Google News Archive or not otherwise available online. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  159. User:Eagles247. English Wikipedia. Been an editor for almost three years with about 40,000 edits to mainly National Football League and college football-related articles. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:45, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  160. User:Lemonade51 English Wikipedia. Have made over 3k edits since 2005 as I contributed subtly for the first few years. Help out referencing football articles and from time to time television programmes. A Highbeam account would be highly beneficial in finding articles published by newspapers pre-1998 on the internet in order to beef up content and double check information. -- Lemonade51 (talk) 21:01, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  161. User:Colin. Over 6 years on English Wikipedia with 10k+ edits. I create, edit and review mainly medical articles. Also some people-lists for which newspaper sources are very useful. Colin°Talk 21:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  162. User:wtshymanski. English Wikipedia, and some photos and diagrams on Commons; about 29000 edits in article space since 2005. I have been adding references and expanding text in articles relating to electrical engineering and history of electrotechnology.--Wtshymanski (talk) 21:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  163. User:César German Wikipedia. Nearly 70000 edits there in almost seven years. Hundreds of articles – mainly about people in film and television history, several German DYK credits, six good articles (however all from 2005/06). --César (talk) 21:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  164. User:Little Mountain 5. Over four years and 19,000 edits on the English Wikipedia, with quite a bit of content creation and expansion, verification, and referencing. I mainly work on Oregon and river related articles. I also have a Credo account. Thanks! LittleMountain5 22:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Er Cicero: Italian Wikipedia. >14.000 global edits since September 2008, working mostly in Ancient Rome and occasionally in other fields. I got a credo account in 2011. Er Cicero (talk) 22:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  166. User:Cassianto - I have been an active editor on the English Wikipedia for two and a half years and have nearly 4,000 edits. I mainly edit biographies on those who were prominent within the English music hall and Edwardian theatre era, for which I have contributed on both GA's and FA's. -- Cassianto (talk) 22:54, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  167. User:JuneGloom07. I have been an editor on the English Wikipedia for five years, and have accumulated nearly 26,000 edits. I mainly edit articles on soap operas and fictional characters, though I do venture into film articles and BLPs. I have contributed to a number of DYK's, GA's and FL's. - JuneGloom Talk 23:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  168. User:Rikster2. Wikipedia editor since 2006. I work mostly on historical and current event articles about basketball and particularly college basketball. Very active editor for WP:College Basketball Rikster2 (talk) 00:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Ian Rose. Wikipedia editor since 2005; 29,000 edits; 30 Featured Articles; FAC Delegate and Military History Wikiproject Coordinator. As writer, work mainly in military biographies but edits and reviews range across arts, technology and general history. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 00:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Aushulz I have an account from 3 years and 7 months. I have 79107 contributions in Wikimedia projects, mainly it.wikipedia (62232), it.wiktionary (7318), commons (5697), en.wikipedia (2141) and it.wikibooks (1065). My fields of interest are science and technology, expecially chemistry, physics and engineering. I wrote new articles and I have modified old ones, adding contents, references, bibliography, and so on. I think can be very useful for my wikipedian activity have access to HighBeam search engine. --Aushulz (talk) 01:34, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  171. EncMstr has been editing enwiki for 6 year 7 months 5 days and 34,000+ edits. I frequently search for citations for existing content, as well as expanded content. Often I find content which is not supported and remove it if it seems like it cannot be found, or tag it if I think someone with other sources could find a citation. This looks like an amazing resource for such work, especially to help minimize our FUTON bias. —EncMstr (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Paulmcdonald Approximately 5 years editing experience, 25,000+ edits. I look for citations on college football articles and articles about the state of Kansas.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:43, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  173. User:Arxiloxos English Wikipedia, 3-1/2 years, 12,000 edits. I spend a lot of time looking for sources for both new and existing articles in a variety of areas, so full access to HighBeam would be very valuable. --Arxiloxos (talk) 04:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  174. User:Omgosh30. English Wikipedia for 2 years. I have made extensive improvements to Italian football articles, but access to HighBeam would provide me with the means to add further value to my work.  Omg †  osh  11:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  175. User:Paul MacDermott. English Wikipedia. 4 years experience, 41000 edits, content related work (creation, expansion, referencing). Topics include current events, media and biographies for which HighBeam access would be extremely useful. Paul MacDermott (talk) 12:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  176. User:Number 57. English Wikipedia, six years experience, c. 57,000 edits. My main area of work is election and referendum articles, and have now probably started around 2,000 articles on them. Having access to the Political Science journals on Highbeam would be a particularly useful source of information (Google searches for the relevant info relating to certain elections have often led me to Highbeam snippets, but without full access). Number 57 13:14, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  177. User:Waldir. Mainly active in English Wikipedia, but also in several other Wikimedia projects. Editor for over 7 years now, with 14,000 edits. Administrator. Heavily focused in content work (creation, expansion, referencing), in topics I come across due to my academic work or random interest. --Waldir talk 14:01, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  178. User:MSGrabia (de). German Wikipedia, 1,500+ edits (articles only) since 2005 in film and television. Articles, cleanup and helping others (including being an adopter in de.). I would use the access to research critical reception of movies. Find me at MSGrabia (de) (talk).
  179. User:Acdixon. English Wikipedia and Commons. Editor since September 2006, admin since February 2011. 17,000+ edits. Have contributed to numerous pieces of recognized content (FAs, GAs, DYKs, etc), mostly related to the state of Kentucky. Would like to have access to sources on more recent politicians, especially governors, in my quixotic pursuit of a Governors of Kentucky featured topic. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 14:19, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  180. User:Ktlynch Active since 2007 under a different account, this one since 2009, mostly English but also French. 10 GAs, in literature, film and general interest. Divide time between article writing and reviewing. Access to scholarly material would be very useful. --Ktlynch (talk) 14:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  181. de:Benutzerin:Liesbeth Lass for my account de:Benutzerin:Liesbeth (SUL was not possible any more). In de active since 2008, 11 000 edits. I was advised to aply after unsucessfully trying to verify de:William Pearson (Bariton) but found http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-4727890.html. I often work on biografies, obituaries would be helpfull. --Liesbeth Lass (talk) 15:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  182. User:Cmadler Active since 2005, 11,500 edits on English Wikipedia (plus a few thousand more on other projects, particularly Commons and English Wikisource). This access would be mostly useful for work on sports history articles (particularly college football and college basketball) as well as articles related to Michigan and Kentucky. cmadler (talk) 15:32, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  183. User:JoJan English, Dutch, French, German Wikipedia + Commons . 8 years experience , a total of more than 86,000 edits, content-related work, especially relating to Gastropoda (content creation, expansion, verification, referencing) access to Highbeam will be very useful to read more than the abstracts and look beyond the paywall of scientific journals. JoJan (talk) 16:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  184. User:Invertzoo, Active since 2007, primarily on the English Wikipdia, over 63,000 edits, 6 GAs,content-related work, especially relating to the Gastropoda and also more recently the Bivalvia. My work includes content creation, expansion, verification, and referencing. Access to Highbeam would be extremely useful, allowing me to read more than just the abstracts of papers, and to see beyond the paywall of scientific journals. Invertzoo (talk) 17:58, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  185. User:Shellnut, I am a former marine biologist and a new editor active since October 2011, on the English Wikipdia, over 2,800 edits in just 5 months, primarily related to the taxonomy of Gastropoda and the Bivalvia. My work includes content creation, expansion, verification, and referencing. Access to Highbeam would be extremely useful, allowing me to read more than just the abstracts of papers, and to see beyond the paywall of scientific journals which I no longer have access to in my career. Shellnut (talk) 18:41, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  186. User:Toohool, editor since 2006, ~2k edits. Active in developing articles on casinos and the gaming industry. Toohool (talk) 22:21, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  187. User:Trident13, based Wales, UK, 78,000+ edits, active 5years 11months. Active within WikiProject Wales, Motorcycles and Railways, and I am also active in writing numerous Biographies across numerous sectors, including business, actors, news readers and sports (in excess of 250). I am particularly interested in how access to HighBeam could improve the quality of biographocal articles. With media paywalls now becoming more prevelant, and often many key points of verification of fact and background reliant on old newspapers and magazine articles, and yet with many publications continually reducing the time of storage of old articles, I believe that this trial could be invaluable in improving biographical article quality. Rgds, - Trident13 (talk) 22:22, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  188. User:Edison Over 41,000 live edits over past 7 years on English Wikipedia. Admin since September 2007. Email is authenticated. A High Beam account would be useful when I am finding references to improve articles up for deletion, in answering questions at the Reference Desk, and in creating new articles based on threads at the Reference Desk, as well as in my new article patrol activities, where I often add the needed references. I've created 26 articles (including 3 "Did You Know" articles), in addition to redirects and disambiguation pages. Edison (talk) 23:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  189. User:Malleus Fatuorum. I've been on the English Wikipedia for about five years now, and in that time made more than 126,000 edits. According to this I'm number 11 in the number of FAs I've contributed substantially to, and according to this I'm in the top 200 of Wikimedians in terms of edits. Access to the journal articles offered by Highbeam would make a significant difference to the range and type of articles I could contribute to. Malleus Fatuorum 01:59, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  190. User:DeFaultRyan. Active contributor to highway and college sports articles. I've done a lot of digging to come up with historical information about highways, but frequently run into dead-ends that might be unresolvable without a lengthy trip to a transportation office. Access to a research account such as Highbeam's could greatly streamline the process of verifying historical transport information when free sources don't exist. DeFaultRyan 02:19, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  191. User:VonTasha. French wikipedia. + 55K edits on fr.wiki; + 60K edits globally, in more than 6 years. Active in Botanic/Zoology project. I'd like to be able to read scientific publications beyond the abstract. VonTasha (talk) 04:48, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  192. User:Sylenius. French Wikipedia, 17k edits since 2006. Contributor in computer science (computer vision, image processing) and classical music/jazz and main contributor of several featured articles. I lost access to paid scientific publications/journals since out of academia and unikely to get another access anytime soon. Sylenius (talk) 08:34, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  193. User:Viriditas. User on English Wikipedia. Seven years, +107K edits with 44% in article space. Actively involved in verification and content creation. The only reason I'm requesting this is because I've tried to read and cite dozens of HighBeam articles within the last year, but I didn't have access. Viriditas (talk) 08:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  194. User:Cplakidas. Active on English Wikipedia, secondarily Greek and German ones, since 2005. Over 65,000 edits, of which 70% in article space, 3 FAs, over 50 GAs. Active in Byzantine, modern Greek, Ottoman, Arab and Persian history. Especially eager for journal access.Constantine ✍ 09:02, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  195. User:MathsPoetry. French Wikipedia, 15k edits since 2009. To be honest, most of them are orthographe corrections. Contributor in computer science, maths, and a bit of everything. Occasional edits on English, German, and Italian Wikipedia. MathsPoetry (talk) 10:40, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  196. User:Mike Coppolano French Wikipedia. Contributor in American literature. Mike Coppolano (talk) 11:53, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  197. User:Deuxtroy on French-language- Wikipedia; since 2006, via IP or user nickname, 3,000 edits under registered account, content-related work (creation, expansion, verification, article referencing and rescue) mainly (but non only) in economical fields. Could be useful when french references are not avalaible.
  198. User:Alexander Doria. French Wikipedia user with 9k edits since 2006. My contributions ranges mostly on classical music, greek philosophy (several featured articles), and politics. I refer frequently to online scientific articles, which I try to present in several projects (like this one). Alexander Doria (talk) 11:51, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Cherubino (talk) user since 2004 and administrator since 2009 in de:WP, mainly interessted in history, 20.000 edits. --
  200. User:Ling.Nut3 see User:Ling.Nut & User:Ling.Nut2. User over five years, five FA articles, (Total edits including deleted: 36,045), recently returned to working on endangered languages but pop in from time to time to help out at WP:FAC etc. Ling.Nut3 (talk) 12:08, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  201. ClemRutterUser over eight years, nudging 12K edits on English WP, and 16K on Commons. Working on content on eighteenth century industry and cleaning up articles that lack references or logic!
  202. Agamitsudo, +30k edits on wp.fr since end of 2010. Interested in a HighBeam account to reference articles on wp.en. --Agamitsudo (talk) 13:15, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  203. DeejayK, English Wikipedia, over 10k edits since 2006. Active primarily with NFL Project — DeeJayK (talk) 14:28, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Tom Reedy. Shakespeare and Early Modern lit and history, 4 1/2 years, 8,500+ edits. 47% content, 32% article talk, 10% WP/WP talk. Knowledgeable on WP policy, no blocks or topic bans. Every now and then I chime in on WP dispute board discussions or lend a disinterested hand to a contentious page. Tom Reedy (talk) 15:51, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  205. User:Parrot of Doom. Count me in. I've written or made a significant contribution toward 27 featured articles and 26 good articles, mostly on historical subjects. I can always use more source material. Parrot of Doom 18:48, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  206. User:Spinningspark. Strong content provider with a string of FAs and GAs to my name. Technology article bias often needs non-free content. Also intermittent sessions of article reviewing requires access for verification. SpinningSpark 20:34, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  207. User:MistyMorn. Eligible and would be grateful for the opportunity to access sources for content editing in fields such as classical music, literature, health research, etc. (no longer have free Highbeam access from work). —MistyMorn (talk) 23:04, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  208. User:Spanglej Around 12k edits (80% on article content) over three years on English Wikipedia, mostly on articles concerning contemporary poets, referencing uncited articles, developing biographical and critical sections. Span (talk) 23:41, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Salsero35 French Wikipedia. Contributor in science. Salsero35 (talk) 23:48, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  210. User:Jklamo 5k edits on enwiki, 5k on cswiki. HighBeam access may be very useful mainly for my work on renewable energy and economy topics. --Jklamo (talk) 00:41, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  211. User:Orygun. English Wikipedia editor since Nov 07. Write article on wide range of history topics including places, events, and biographies; Oregon geography entries; and military-related subjects. Have contributed ~5K edits including 135 substantial articles.--Orygun (talk) 02:34, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  212. User:Bridies. I do content creation in -especially older- video game articles, where perhaps the only sources are old print magazines. I've used a HighBeam free trial in creating FAs and GAs and so would love full access. I've several years experience and several thousand edits. bridies (talk) 05:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  213. User:AroundTheGlobe - 9k+ edits on en.wiki (since 2006), 300+ images uploaded to Commons. 1 GA, 2 FL and 20 DYK contributions - I am hoping to contribute more FA/GA articles on Hinduism/Cricket/Aviation if I get more references. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 05:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  214. User:DoriSmith. Wikipedian since 2005 with nearly 12K edits. I've wished I had this access numerous times as I've added references to articles, and I know it would really come in handy. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 05:21, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  215. User:Ruigeroeland. Wikipedian since April 2006 with 118,965 edits on English wikipedia and 1000s of uploads on commons. I am mainly working on creating and improving Lepidoptera articles. I would like an account to be able to access the biology related journals they have available. Ruigeroeland (talk) 11:31, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  216. Lenka64. Czech Wikipedia, active since 2005, about 10,000 edits. Access could be useful for biografical references and cs-wikiquote.--Lenka64 (talk) 11:50, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  217. Canadian Paul 50k+ edits on the English Wikipedia across a wide variety of topics. Lost access to these kinds of resources after my master's and would love to have it again to help improve articles to GA status and beyond. Canadian Paul 15:08, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  218. Beyond My Ken here since 2005, close to 100k edits in total (see here), about 100 articles created, lots of gnomish work including improving refs Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:33, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  219. Alan Liefting. Been on English Wikipedia for eight years. Over 94,000 edits. I create and update environment and New Zealand related articles. See [2] for list of new articles (sort of). Am often frustrated with a lack of access to Highbeam pages. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 19:46, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  220. User:Bigturtle. c389 articles started, and 10,290 edits credited, since December 2005. Likes looking at other people's citations to see if they work or not, and coming up with better ones if possible (sometimes). Specializes: As little as possible, but look for articles about the geography of northern Michigan and the history of Antarctica. Bigturtle (talk) 05:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  221. User:Bagumba. English Wikipedia. I have edited since 2008 with over 9,000 edits and 39 pages created. I am active in WikiProject National Basketball Association and WikiProject Baseball, and HighBeam access would aid in gathering sources beyond free online content for expansion and verification of existing articles and for creation of new articles. It's frustrating sometimes seeing relevant search results on Google but not having access to the paid content, especially older newspaper articles.—Bagumba (talk) 06:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  222. User:Melirius. Russian Wikipedia. 7000+ edits since 2005. The project about FRINGE theories in Russian Wikipedia permanently needs reliable sources. --Melirius (talk) 13:45, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  223. User:Shirt58. Works in en.wp.org mainly in the areas of literature, Australian history, invertebrate zoology, fine arts, classical and popular music, the various codes of football, biographies, cricket, law, and... pretty much everything else. 20 000 or so edits, 200 or so articles started, and references added to tidy many other articles. A lot of things I work on are behind pay-walls that would otherwise be accessible via HighBeam.--Shirt58 (talk) 14:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  224. User:Fetchcomms, enwp, six GAs, 29 DYKs, to-do list. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 17:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  225. Im interested in getting an highbeam account so i can continue my research into Tropical cyclones here on the EN WP.Jason Rees (talk) 18:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  226. User:Demiurge1000. English Wikiepdia editor since June 2010, with over 11,000 edits. I regularly need access to paywalled (or similar) articles to expand or verify items in historical or BLP topics. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:26, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  227. User:Teemeah. Hungarian Wikipedia and English Wikipedia. registered 7 years ago, have over 70 000 edits and 24 featured articles in huwiki, active patroller there, which envolves finding sources for unsourced/poorly sourced articles. Currently taking part in huwiki cleanup project that also involves research of good sources for unsourced articles. 小龙 (Timish) # xiǎolóng de xìnxiāng 21:06, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  228. User:Crazypaco. primarily English WIkipedia. 18,000+ edits and over 100 created articles since November 2006. Active in Wikiprojects for National Register of Historic Places, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, Universities, College Football, College Basketball, and the University of Pittsburgh. I engage in content-related work (creation, expansion, verification, article rescue) and citation additions to articles where access to Highbeam would be useful. CrazyPaco (talk) 00:03, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  229. User:Gede. I'm mainly active on French Wikipedia (where I'm a sysop), with more than 20 000 edits. I write articles in social sciences, where I often use academic references that are covered by Highbeam. --Gede (talk) 09:18, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  230. User:Cunard. English Wikipedia. Three Wikipedia:Good articles and 37 Wikipedia:Did you know articles. I have frequently come across subscription-needed Highbeam articles that could have aided me in my research. Cunard (talk) 10:51, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  231. User:RotT, about 12k+ edits, 2.5 years of editing, about 150 articles including 1 FA. User:RotT 11:58, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
  232. User:Patriarca12. Over 6,800 manual edits to English Wikipedia articles in five+ years on Wikipedia. Have worked to get numerous articles to both GA and FL in addition to 50+ DYKs. Access to a HighBeam account would be extremely helpful to help in the search for reliable sources not available through Google News Archive or other free internet sources. Patriarca12 (talk) 17:26, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  233. FT2. Editor since 2004, 13,000+ manual edits, over 120 authored articles including 4 or 5 GAs and some DYKs, hundreds of articles significantly edited. Constantly involved in the kinds of article work that requires access to media sources - old biographies and historical matters, checking articles are comprehensive, and verifying and determining what facts are supported by sources. Researching these often end up at old newspaper archive pages, often only visible on Highbeam or other restricted viewing, so access would be extremely beneficial. Examples: 1940s dancer Rose Marie Magrill, Diana's butler Paul Burrell, 1940s history of the synchrotron, the murder of Stephen Lawrence and the history of English murder law, the development of DDR4 SDRAM memory, the background and service history of BP's Deepwater Horizon, significant legal cases such as Berghuis v. Thompkins and Hepting vs. AT&T (more). Access would help and will be well used, suggested guidelines will be followed if granted :) FT2 (Talk | email) 02:01, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  234. Racso. Spanish Wikipedia. Sysop, bureaucrat. Bot operator. OTRS volunteer. About 14k edits. About 123 articles created. About 10 good articles redacted. Would use HighBeam access as an extra help when researching for developing articles (I think it could even encourage me to write about new topics). --Racso (talk) 02:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  235. User:Rich Farmbrough en: Wikipeida mainly. Admin and botmeister. >>10k edits Highbeam would be a useful resource for referencing. Rich Farmbrough, 06:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]
  236. User:Jezhotwells. en: Wikipedia; some contributions to es: Wikipedia; over 55,000 edits; 3.5 years editing; Bristol, Theatre; Rivers; Spain. Regular GA reviewer (just under 600 reviews), contributor to FAC, 19 GAs, 2 FAs; original content creator for Bristol, Spain; Rivers, theatre and other associated subjects. Have library access to LexisNexis but Highbeam covers different newspapers and journals. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:54, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  237. User:Arnodino. French Wikipedia ([3]). First contributor on dinosaur project. Contributions since 2007. In search for scientific publications. Arnodino (talk) 18:00, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  238. User:Mwarf. French Wikipedia ([4]). Contributing since 2006. I'm interested in many topics (politics, history, music, computer science…). While searching for reliable sources to improve articles in these domains using search engines, I have come across HighBeam several times. An account would be very helpful to me in such cases. Mwarf (talk) 18:26, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  239. User:Delfort. +40.000 edits on it.wikipedia since 2006. HighBeam Research would very be useful to my work on verification and referencing biographies of sports people, historical sports events and history of sports. --Delfort (talk) 17:07, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  240. User:France3470. English Wikipedia. Editor since 2007; highly active since 2010. Have made 10,00+ edits primarily to mainspace; contributed 1 GA, and 5 DYKs as well as created 40+ others. I frequently expand and add citations to articles and can see HighBeam being very useful for this.France3470 (talk) 17:19, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  241. User:Meowy. English Wikipedia, for 6 years (since April 2006) and with over 7300 edits: 40% being content generation and 40% being content discussion. The majority of these were on articles related to the Near East and Caucasus regions. I would be especially interested in using HighBeam to access specialist journal content related to the art, architecture and history of the Near East / Middle East / Caucasus, in particular the medieval period. This would be used for both content writing and verification. Meowy 20:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  242. User:Wikisilki. Spanish Wikipedia. Around 30 000 edits since July 2008. I use to create or expand articles or biographies on art, literature and history issues, do sometimes reviews of GA and FA. I also have a Credo account. Thanks! wikisilki 01:02, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  243. User:Kafka Liz. Registered user since 2007; over 8,000 edits in that time, with a focus on visual arts and history. 4 FAs to date, and could really use better access to sources. Kafka Liz (talk) 01:57, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  244. Christian Stroppel German Wikipedia. Registerd since Jul 2007; 1,261 edits; 44.01% being content generation an 13.80% being content discussion. I studied psychology and want to read original studies.--Christian Stroppel (talk) 08:43, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  245. Ecemaml Spanish Wikipedia and Commons. Admin in both project. Almost 90,000 edits in the Spanish Wikipedia and significant contributions to, at least, five featured articles. --Ecemaml (talk) 09:22, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  246. User:Josh Parris. Active on en, increasingly active on simple. 70 en articles created, and I'm finding myself doing a lot of citation work recently. Planning on doing a lot more citations in BLPs I've created or become entangled with. Josh Parris 11:10, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  247. User:Coemgenus, active on English Wikipedia with about 26,000 edits in 7 years, including 10 FAs and 2 FLs. I mostly work in history and biography. --Coemgenus (talk) 11:57, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  248. User:Livitup Over 5k edits since 2005. I enjoy expanding stubs and wiki-gnoming, including {{refimprov}}ing, when possible. Very active with CSD, PROD, and AfD, where having access to high-quality sources would be a real benefit in getting things right. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 05:19, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  249. User:AndyTheGrump Eclectic editor on e.Wikipedia. 12,000+ edits, active since August 2010. I've often found myself wishing for a facility like this, and expect to make good use of it verifying sources, improving articles, and (when I finally think of a subject that hasn't already been written about) maybe even writing new ones. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:41, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  250. User:Neatnik. 1,000+ edits on frwiki, 80% in the article namespace. Active since 2011. Mostly focused on music (artists biographies, record labels, etc). I'm creating/expanding and/or adding refs to those articles. I intend to continue and think an account would help. Presently I can't access Randy Newman's Playboy interview from 1987, for instance ([5]), or this article on Kranky Records ([6]), etc. Neatnik (talk) 08:18, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  251. User:Graeme Bartlett. Active since 2005 on en Wikipedia with over 40,000 edits. Created several hundred articles, and also frequently rescue from CSD by adding references. I will continue to write new content and rescue inadequately referenced material. HighBeam will greatly improve non-recent references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  252. User:Antemister usually active in the German WP (about 9000 contribs), contributing to contemporary history and politics, expecially in the afro.asian region, a topic where access to such news media is really helpful--Antemister (talk) 07:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  253. User:Epipelagic English Wikipedia with 44,000 edits over 6 years, 64 DYKs, contributing mainly to marine life --Epipelagic (talk) 13:30, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  254. user:Viswaprabha Most @ Malayalam & Sanskrit Wikipedia and Wiktionary Since 2005. ViswaPrabha വിശ്വപ്രഭ (talk) 14:45, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  255. Dry Martini, 4500+ edits on it.wikipedia (active since April 2009), active in RC patrolling and welcoming new users. I would use the account to check information during patrolling, to get references for new articles (I also do that, yes ;-) ) and to retrieve references for the Reference recovery project on it.wiki. --Dry Martini (talk) 16:43, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:HighBeam/Prior_applications&oldid=485185700"