User talk:CoffeeWithMarkets/archive

re:A Thank You Message

Great job on the article! It is well-researched and does a good job of staying neutral on a perhaps controversial subject. Let me know if there is anything I can do for you in the future :-) --Cerebellum (talk) 22:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CoffeeWithMarkets, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi CoffeeWithMarkets! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:21, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, CoffeeWithMarkets! Thank you for your contributions. I am Shaun9876 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! ♠♥♣Shaun9876♠♥♣ ^Talk 02:58, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew Klavan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page City Journal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Freedomnomics has been reverted.
Your edit here to Freedomnomics was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://johnrlott.blogspot.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:47, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks

Having red links on items may seem like its informal to some people but, redlinks are OK for subjects that are potentially notable. This encourages other users to create a page based on the subject so please stop removing them as you did from Happy Wheels
Cheers FourDimensionalHyperSphere FourDimensionalHyperSphere (talk) 11:32, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Notability (books)

Have you read the notability guidelines for books? I ask because the last two articles you created don't appear to meet them. Specifically, they don't show multiple significant reviews or other qualifying criteria. 2001:558:6045:A0:391F:B005:179D:8DD9 (talk) 06:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Both have multiple significant reviews. I just haven't added them yet.

Which doesn't answer the question, but now I know for certain that you're aware of the criteria. 76.102.49.177 (talk) 07:09, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a point to your remarks? You're confusing me. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not to sound mean, but I didn't see what you were saying. Anyways, I've expanded out both articles. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:34, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How Music Works

Sorry for any confusion. The impression I got from the book reviews I've seen is that Byrne didn't write about his time with Talking Heads. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:03, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries-- I've seen inconsistent comments about what's actually in the book from reviews myself. I believe that the non-linear narrative, mixing up his Talking Heads memoir content with analytic musings, made it difficult to review for sure. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:11, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

How Music Works (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Once in a Lifetime

Matthew Hollis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Edward Thomas

That Used to Be Us (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to War on

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Private Guns, Public Health, CoffeeWithMarkets!

Wikipedia editor Niado just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks good!

To reply, leave a comment on Niado's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Republican Party (United States), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Barone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alive II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Shout It Out Loud and Alive!

Back to Work: Why We Need Smart Government for a Strong Economy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Profits

The Assassins' Gate: America in Iraq (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Freedom

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Droughts

Hi, Thanks for your attention to Climate change in the United States. I reverted some of your work because (A) it only reported part of the summation from the abstract and (B) it improperly set up a contrast with a pre-existing unsourced statement, which is one form of WP:SYNTH. If you'd like to talk about it more, please start a thread on the article talk page so other eds can readily know about the conversation. Thanks, NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 07:57, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I responded on the related talk page.

Great, and please remember to sign your posts with ~~~~ even here on your own talk page. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 12:41, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can delete this

Shoot me an email. ben@thetransom.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.45.130.37 (talk) 03:57, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd prefer not to do that. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 13:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Respect BRD please

Hi, I gather you didn't agree with some of my reverts. Well fine, but that requires some talk page discussion. You should at least give me a chance to hang myself on the talk page before simply reloading what I reverted. That's the discuss part of WP:BRD. If you skip the discuss part, then you are edit warring, which may result in sanctions. I'll address the content of these edits on another day. For now I just wanted to register a complaint that you are skipping over the "discuss" part of BRD, and that looks like Edit-warring behavior, even if you haven't exceeded 3 reverts. Try harder? NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 04:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't edit war. I'm contributing to the site according to WP:BRD, and if you want to be constructive rather than blindly revert without more discussion (where discussion had already occurred), then you can.

If you're going to be a responsible editor, then you should a) not lie, b) not act like people don't know how the site works, and c) not get cute with people. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 13:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you practice WP:AGF, then you might conclude I was trying to WP:DONTBITE. You made two edits that left out key parts of info. That appears to be cherrypicking. You restored one without even attempting BRD. Instead you posed your D in the edit summary when you reverted my revert. Great, you know how the site works and that means you know that's the first salvo in an edit war. You need to do at least some D, where you could have asked "what criticisms for pete's sake" and then I could have answered that your own RS includes Gov Christie's claim that emissions were not being lowered and other people's claim that the reduction is not due to the program but due to the recession.

But you skipped the D part, and reverted my revert. That's an edit war. I don't know how to be more civil or polite in making this observation, though I'd be happy to advance to WP:THIRD or other forum to discuss whether you cherrypicked only part of the RS's info, or whether you launched the first salvo of an EW.

My only interest is to ensure NPOV additions of future RSs, without the cherrypicking. Does that seem like a reasonable goal to you?

NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 14:21, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS After I posted that I realized you had fixed one of the two cherries by adding the bit about drought severity/duration increasing as I asked. Thank you very much! NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 14:31, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I assumed good faith until you demonstrated that you believe I act in bad faith, and so I don't anymore (which is common sense, frankly). I'm mystified as to why you see me as this bogeymen acting in bad faith, but whatever. Anyways, I cherry-picked nothing, nor did I edit war. I merely reported the key points of the information in both cases on both articles. In your instance, you've chosen to behave tenaciously rather than constructively- ignoring my attempts at discussion and frank questions as to why you wanted to revert things.

At first it was mystifying to me why you'd merely revert and edit war rather than contribute more information to the article to give context if you felt that more context is needed (which I support). But then I looked at your history on the website, and, well, at least I know what I'm dealing with- this sort of thing is pretty common for climate change-related editors I guess. I still am left scratching my head as to why you'd rather blow a wet raspberry at me rather then actually adding the blasted context yourself, when you knew that it would be supported by me.

To be honest, I do feel a bit upset at your personal attacks, especially your condensing claim that you intentionally know is false that I'm new here and don't understand Wikipedia procedure, things that you said just to tweak me, given that I thought you could edit more substantively. I assure you that I don't care for your negative playground attitude. But if you want to edit those articles, then that's fine, of course, and you're welcome too as an established editor. I would like you to clean up your behavior, though.

At any rate, if you choose to blow another raspberry to me on this talk page, then I just won't respond. Good day. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:34, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a diff to support your claim that I accused you of acting in bad faith. If you want to take it to DR, I agree in advance to use the forum of your choice. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 14:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't any reason to go to dispute resolution in that you and I currently seem to have no actual disagreements about article context- the only thing at the moment is that I wish for you to stop making these silly comments on my talk page (and my talk page is not a regular article). CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"silly?" I'll likely continue to make comments about following our protocols, including the ones about getting along like WP:AGF. Take me to DR if you reach your limit. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 18:04, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Rahm Emanuel does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Hugh (talk) 16:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great work

Hi, I might revert you from time to time, but want to say thanks for your overall nice job improving these articles. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:35, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you!

Now I'm curious what you think of the horror movie images that I've recently uploaded also {emoticon withheld} CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:43, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Afraid I can't say, sorry. Only so much time in the day NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 02:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Powerman 5000, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New wave and Eddie Grant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Raven (2012 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical score (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

	WikiProject Forestry
	Thank you on behalf of WikiProject Forestry! We appreciate your contribution(s) and invite you to join us in further improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to forestry. Feel free to ask questions or make suggestions on the project's talk page.

Very nice graph on the List of countries by forest area article! Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 10:51, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sure, you're welcome! CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 21:25, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economic history of Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1800s (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Oregon Medicaid health experiment) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Oregon Medicaid health experiment, CoffeeWithMarkets!

Wikipedia editor Green Cardamom just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good work

To reply, leave a comment on Green Cardamom's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Healthcare.gov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Clearinghouse and Technologist

Domestic violence in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Shelters

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

David Freddoso (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Notre Dame

Domestic violence against men (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Shelters

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For dramatically improving Domestic violence against men. InverseHypercube (talk) 09:28, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Antisemitism in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Colonial, Programs and Hispanic Americans

Economic impacts of climate change (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Effects of climate change

Racism in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hispanic Americans

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Medical Quackery What makes you think you think that your unsourced pseudoscience is of encyclopedic merit? 24.159.209.131 (talk) 03:22, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nature Climate Change listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nature Climate Change. Since you had some involvement with the Nature Climate Change redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Randykitty (talk) 13:42, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Barack Obama religion conspiracy theories may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

article/ALeqM5g9Fu0WbCqTWm6kF5FRgE1KTl3fWQ|date=July 26, 2012|first=Massoud|last=Hayoun|publisher=[[AFP]}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:16, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Watchers: The Rise of America's Surveillance State, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Security Advisor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wedding Crashers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Fisher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thatcherism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Carlos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Domestic violence in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Palestinian territories may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

ruling the West Bank and recognized internationally as the official [[Palestinian Authority]] (see: [[Fatah-Hamas conflict]].<ref name=alarabiya0701>{{cite web |author=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:28, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heaven and Hell (Black Sabbath album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mob Rules (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Men's Rights Movement Article Probation

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, A Voice for Men, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is necessarily any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- Kyohyi (talk) 01:38, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tea Party movement, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anti-government and CPAC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bridget Powers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tiptoes (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tom Noonan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited VDARE, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin MacDonald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Biblical inerrancy

Hello, you may not have finished editing yet, but I have tagged your edit to this article as OR and better source needed. The stuff about the pope etc. is not in the source. Also, using a blog as a source is not reliable. There could be a place to argue that the bible is metaphorical rather than literally true, but we need better evidence for it. Myrvin (talk) 09:49, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

This edit is off the mark.

Track "Whatever Happened to Sin?" particularly attacks the growing acceptance of both abortion and homosexuality among Christians from a traditional theological perspective.

First, you missed the third verse where it discusses how American politicians use Christianity to get themselves elected and then they don't follow through on their faith. Second, it's not a "traditional" perspective, it's one Evangelical perspective. Third, it's not about growing acceptance at all, it simply offers an opposing view to those perspectives. Finally, it should really be referenced per WP:NPOV and WP:RS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:32, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and the grammar wasn't right either. Either remove "Track" or add the definite article before it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:33, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 5 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Meltdown (Steve Taylor album) page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 7 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Christian mortalism page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:41, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Soteriology

added a link pointing to Benevolent

Universal reconciliation

added a link pointing to 1800s

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wonderwall (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Covered. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of WP:ARBPIA

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

--Bbb23 (talk) 05:19, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 in the Palestinian territories, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stars (Collabro album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frozen (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Stalker (1979 film)

added links pointing to Epiphany and Guilt

Antisemitism in the United States

added a link pointing to Paul Harris

Halloween: Resurrection

added a link pointing to Michael Myers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Andrew Roberts (historian)

added a link pointing to Josephine

Rare Tracks (Jet album)

added a link pointing to Take It or Leave It

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited G. K.'s Weekly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scrapbook. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ghost Shark (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Taylor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Parahuman, Para-human, Parahumans listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirects Parahuman, Parahumans and Para-human. Since you had some involvement with these redirects, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. David Gerard (talk) 10:26, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Uptown Funk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Time. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raspberries juice

The article Raspberries juice has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

'Raspberries juice is not commonly mistaken for Raspberry Juice'

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nrwairport (talk) 05:57, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion/Stephen Marchionda

Greetings,

I'm glad this discussion is taking place as I've been wanting to update the information in this article. I am very much a newbie here, so please advise. I've added material to the page Articles for deletion/Stephen Marchionda and will add more references soon. Please check if you can and excuse me if not properly done..

Best wishes, Boxstrum (talk) 13:42, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Numeration

I am not sure if you know, but if you

Put a sentence leading with a hash sign (#) or Americans call it a "pound sign"
Continue like that on following lines
it will automatically number it for you
1. and you can even do subsections (but not very well).

Si Trew (talk) 10:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Close this matter soon"

I've noticed you make the remark on at least two separate AFDs recently:

Delete - and I recommend that this matter be closed soon.

Why the rush? The articles in question are likely to be deleted, but they are not inherently harmful. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Power pop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hanson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Somewhere (DJ Mog & Sarah Lynn song)

added a link pointing to Textile art

Sun and moon allegory

added a link pointing to Spiritual

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Heritage Foundation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hacking. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Para-llel computing

A tag has been placed on Para-llel computing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:36, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Byword (example) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Byword (example). Since you had some involvement with the Byword (example) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shitface listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shitface. Since you had some involvement with the Shitface redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)hilarious[reply]

Article

Hi, Could you please help me understand the reason for the speedy deletion criteria. It's my first article and i am still in the process of understanding the complete process. If you help me understand then i can go ahead and make the changes. thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rchnak (talk • contribs) 04:42, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I was trying to add Action Learning Question to the Action learning page. As a part of my school assignment i am suppose to add a new page or add to an existing page in Wikipedia. I have no intention of promoting any idea or person. I just thought to add more of explanation to the types of question technique used in action learning.

Rchnak (talk) 05:00, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend focusing on contributing to current pages by editing already existing sections, rather than making new pages. I also recommend looking through Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia. Then, perhaps look over at the website's main page for references to something that you find interesting. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:03, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thanks! Rchnak (talk) 05:54, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging of Pesa Twist

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Pesa Twist. I do not think that Pesa Twist fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because An article about a physical product is not eligible for an A7 Speedy. I request that you consider not re-tagging Pesa Twist for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk) 17:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There was a similar issue with Jocco's Mardi Gras Madness. DES ^(talk) 17:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gian Kumar

Hi CoffeeWithMarkets You just tag Gian Kumar page for speedy deletion. I request you to not to do that because I've added that page not to promote but I'm trying to introducing Author Gian Kumar to Wikipedia. I like his way of writing, his view points about life and God. According to me he is one best spiritual writers. First I've created page than I got message that there is lack of References. Now When I've added many References than page become promotional. I'm just not getting where is the problem. If I've added something offensive or in incorrect way than just let me know instead to delete the page.

Hi CoffeeWithMarkets I'd deleted the speedy deletion tag. Also I've leave a message in Contest This Speedy Deletion. What I can do now? Guide me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rupika2303 (talk • contribs) 06:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe that the author is particularly notable in terms of Wikipedia guidelines, and I'd recommend looking at Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Your First Article for more information. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:38, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arnia language

Do you know if this is a recognised alternate spelling of "Arniya"? For context, this article came from a block-evading sockpuppet who was creating apparently unfounded articles about the "Arina" language last week. If they're just inventing new spellings in order to make articles which can tangentially say "also spelt Arina", we shouldn't keep it around as a redirect. --McGeddon (talk) 07:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From my searching (which wasn't in depth, just some Googling), I don't see it as a recognized alternate spelling but just as a typo, one that doesn't appear often but seems to pop up. While this probably does relate to the sockpuppet's weird obsession, from the point of view of the redirect itself I think it may be worth keeping around given how we have all kinds of similar redirects, such as (just off the top of my head) Mumbia going to Mumbai. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:01, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Sejarah Outbound

Hello CoffeeWithMarkets. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sejarah Outbound, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:14, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of North Sudan

Someone else already dealt with it, but man, I wish you'd checked the edit history and seen that it was previously a redirect instead of deletion-nominating an article, essentially just because someone vandalized it. Please be more careful in the future. Winter's Tulpa (talk) 10:17, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contested prod Rapid Compression Machine

Hi. I'm contesting speedy deletion of the portfolio strategy page. As I mentioned in my protest msg, It's akin to LEAN or Agile, and many school districts are employing it. I didn't see a page on school district management theory, but maybe I could make one of those and stick "portfolio strategy" in it? Charlotte-Mecklenburg has a page on this. DeKalb has something similar. Jordan 16:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I contested your prod of this article, because a quick google search [1] shows many scientific research articles using this device, including Argonne National Lab. shoy (reactions) 13:13, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am contesting the speedy deletion of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pop_Medley I have made some changes to add content. Please allow the page to stay. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weezer17 (talk • contribs) 06:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am contesting the speedy deletion of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pop_Medley_2 & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_Medley. I have added content, and would like the pages to stay. If there is something I need to do to keep these 3 pages around, please let me know. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weezer17 (talk • contribs) 06:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Action Hero. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, National Advertising Day, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Action Hero Shoot! 10:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Action Hero. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Pop Medley, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Action Hero Shoot! 14:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

From Hell letter

added a link pointing to Specter

Sao Hkun Hkio

added a link pointing to Burmese people

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pop Medley

Your deletion tag was probably removed, you must also check other page which are also unsourced created by the same user. Thanks. --Action Hero Shoot! 14:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Glucosio

Hello Coffee,

I have added the reference list and categories is this better?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glucosio

Thanks and any feedback you have is appreciated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkerensa (talk • contribs) 17:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dhaka University Cultural Society

We have sent press release to many media houses...but if it was not authentic, media house like banglanews24 or jaijaidin wouldn't publish the news.

Speedy deletion tags

Please be more patient when placing speedy deletion tags. You placed this tag five minutes after a new user had created an article and was working on it. If an article has been created and is in that same state after a few hours then I think a speedy tag is okay, but five minutes is far too short. Please be more patient. --Pine^✉ 03:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed article

Hi CoffeWithMarkets you proposed article i've strated because there are not enough references, but i've put the reference of the official website. I've request to you can you please guide me about referencing in wikipedia in simple language not technical terms because i'm making mistakes but not getting solution. hoping for positive response. Rupika2303 (talk) 08:42, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Rupika2303[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of O-ga

A tag has been placed on O-ga requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of USS Utah page

Just to let you know someone else added to the USS Utah page that you proposed for deletion. thank you tom991

Speedy deletion nomination of Saaar Protectorate

A tag has been placed on Saaar Protectorate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:55, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear CoffeeWithMarkets I see you had marked my page Uday Kumar Vaish, for speedy deletion i have seen all the promotional bits and got rid of them completely. It's no longer promotional, would request you to kindly judge it again and remove your tag if you agree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonprost (talk • contribs) 09:47, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

problems with Richard Gisser

Hi, I do not really see the issue with this article: It is (a) not an orphan as at least one other page points to it, there are (b) plenty of inline citations confirming its statements, and I even added a few more, and (c) when you note that it requires copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling I am personally hurt---please point out a single typo there! Please look into it one more time. I am quite sure that you’ll hear the “encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia”. --93.83.156.94 (talk) 06:55, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I had forgotten to sign on before --WernR (talk) 07:05, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion Ghost Motorcycles: I’m sorry but you are quite wrong in your assessment that this article is in any way promotional – Ghost is not a functioning business at this time and hasn’t been for many years – it is, as described, an iconic name from the past notable to the locale and to the biking industry (actually worldwide). The only reason was (is) is used in this text is because the original building and family still occupy the location. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.232.159.237 (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Argument from desire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mind-reading. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Be nice

This edit summary was not nice. Did you even read the rationale? There is consensus from an RfC to have only one article. The Kim Davis biography has survived two attempts at deletion by a large margin. This was nothing more than technical deletion. - Mr X 16:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When you and your clique are some of the most nasty and unreasonable editors that I've sever seen on this website, I find it rather startling that you could be this badly deluded and intellectually dishonest. I'm being nice. Far nicer than I'd like to be. Do you want me to not be nice? CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 16:34, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your attitude. Everyone else is following the processes for determining consensus for a content dispute. You seem to want everyone to acquiesce to you opinion, which is not how a collaborative project works. You can't override consensus by moving pages and ignoring the outcomes of two AfDs and multiple RfCs, no matter how strongly you feel about it. I'm sorry if that makes you want to lash out.- Mr X 17:00, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's rather sad that you're engaging in complete psychological projection, given that you've assumed bad faith and acted in a terrible manner to begin with, to now suddenly play victim and act as if I've been committing some great sin because how dare I take an act that you oppose. It's even sadder given that I'm following the processes for determining consensus for a content dispute. It's people like you that utterly refuse to comment on talk pages with reason, hashing things out, and instead you just have to have it your own way and override the consensus when, as the RFD plainly stated, there's a majority viewpoint for a "Kim Davis _____ controversy/controversies" page.

Look, you can spew whatever bile you want on talk pages and engage in whatever obsessive edit warring on pages if you like (I'm not going to step in further in terms of article names), but if you want to toss some eggs on the wall of my talk page then just know that your next comment here will be your last. Any more bad faith personal attacks I'll just remove. Don't worry, though, since you and your guys are so obsessive about getting the last word then you can say what you want and I won't post underneath. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:09, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Kim Davis (county clerk). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:39, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you actually read the context, you see that they're attacking, and I'm responding. You've got it backwards. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:40, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I read it. You have multiple comments that are direct personal attacks. Recommend you WP:DISENGAGE. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:42, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your revert, this is your final warning before an ANI. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:43, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly, you either haven't read the context, or you have and you're just here on some kind of a harassment or something. I'd like to point out that I have a rather long history of constructively editing Wikipedia, and when people like those other editors believe that I'm nothing more than some kind of subhuman because that anyone that dares to object to breaking procedure and breaking consensus must be stopped.

Why is it so hard for there to just A)Be an RFC on the move issue, B)The RFC to go on, and C)The RFC to be finished? That's what I've always wanted. Consensus. Procedure. Why can't that happen? CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:45, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Going to note that I reverted. Here's why:

A)Labeling the article as a "psuedo-biography" is 100% fair comment on an article's quality. There's literally zero reasons to view that as any kind of libel, slander, or anything of the sort. Multiple other editors have said the same thing.

B)Asking for details as to why someone voted in an RFC when they go something like Keep, Oppose, etc and aren't going in depth is 100% fair comment. It's not hounding in any way. It's not uncivil in any way. That's normal. That's how normal discussions are done. I can't believe that you guys are living in this Alice in Wonderland world where asking for details is the same as an attack. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:51, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The part I redacted, and you reverted, was calling other edits liars and "I'm not surprised that you want to keep pouring out viles of hate, foaming at the mouth, like you've done for days now, but it's getting tiresome". This is a personal attack. See WP:NPA. Your "pseudo-boigraphy" or request for details are not the issue here and were not redacted. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:53, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is factually incorrect. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:56, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:58, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is also, once again, factually incorrect. I am not moving pages. Nor am I engaging in attacks. Referring to an article as a "psuedo-biography", asking another user to clarify points in detail, and asking someone to revert their personal attacks upon me are not disruptive behaviors. Other users are making Wikipedia a battleground, and I would like them to stop. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 18:02, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Kim_Davis_(county_clerk), you may be blocked from editing. Additionally, please assume good faith and calm down a little. Your point can be made without being uncivil. Thanks. samtar ^(msg) 18:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks and general incivility are not 'legitimate talk page comments'. As well, I'd like to point out that I reverted, got re-reverted (if that's a word, I don't recall if it is), and decided instead to just reply. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 18:07, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied on the article's talk page too - I can't see any personal attacks CoffeeWithMarkets. Could you provide me with the diff of the attack? samtar ^(msg) 18:11, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Armorik video game

I was going to add all the relevant information about the game with the Visual Editor, as I found it much easier to use it than the coding source page. You just didn't gave me enough time to write them! :) The game was somewhat popular back in the 80s, and there's even a page on Moby Games. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daimyo2 (talk • contribs) 18:34, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, like I said in the talk page of that article for the game, I made a mistaken click tagging it for deletion rather than tagging it as a tag (that it needed category storing). Easy thing to accidentally do, but frustrating. It's alright. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 18:41, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rouvigny

Hi CoffeeWithMarkets

About your proposed deletion of my page Henri de Massue, 1st Marquis de Ruvigny:

I'm actually quite happy for that page to be deleted, as I'd spelt the name wrong, but I'm recreating it under Henri de Massue, 1st Marquis de Rouvigny and anticipate that you'll have the same problem with it there. I had thought that, as it was such an obscure part of Wikipedia, I could edit quietly there and get my article in a proper state - but if you disagree I'll remove to a draft space. I actually do have a lot more material to put in there. Thanks anyway, Le Sanglier des Ardennes (talk) 00:12, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Little Miss Nobody cold case

FYI... you created a redirect to itself. Bgwhite (talk) 06:25, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Localsaver.com

Localsaver.com is a coupons and deals website by Datasphere Technologies and they have more than 1.5 million visitors per month. So, I am contesting the deletion of the Localsaver.com wikipedia page. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Localsaver (talk • contribs) 20:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bad for You Baby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Otis Taylor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Image and Reality of the Israel–Palestine Conflict (Cover).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Image and Reality of the Israel–Palestine Conflict (Cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Masturbation redirects listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Masterbated and Masterbatory. Since you had some involvement with these redirects, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 20:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drug use in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electro. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another reason

"If you're reading this, then you might be wondering:"
Why you did a large number of edits at an article that I also edited? Just wondering who you were. Now I know. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 21:17, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drug use in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intoxication. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ella Fitzgerald and Louis Armstrong collaborations has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, CoffeeWithMarkets. Ella Fitzgerald and Louis Armstrong collaborations, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 19:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sailor (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Big Chill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Human–animal marriage, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Enlightenment and Magic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Lutz Röhrich) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Lutz Röhrich, CoffeeWithMarkets!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've added a normal link at bottom left to the dewiki article (you can do this by clicking "edit links") and two extra citations - hope this helps.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hotshot (stock character), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arrogance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ECLI for Art 23 1/15 and Art 23 2/15

He Coffee, I made a copy paste error and thus a wrong redirect. You caught it before I coudl breath and correct. I have been bold and re-established what I wanted. If you wish to go through with the deletion, go ahead though... L.tak (talk) 10:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Houlton High School

Hello CoffeeWithMarkets. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Houlton High School, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to schools. Thank you. Passengerpigeon (talk) 11:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Houlton High School

I'm sorry but any school is notable. It's not my opinion, it's Wikipedia policy. Xx236 (talk) 11:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kiliwi nwachukwu

Okay you put a BLP prod on Kiliwi nwachukwu, looking over it-it seems to be more of a db-hoax if anything. Wanted to point this out. Wgolf (talk) 20:10, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Admittedly I only skimmed a little bit of it before going to Google and seeing various real people seemingly by this name, this all in just a few seconds, upon more reading it does seem to be pretentious nonsense. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 20:18, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited First Serbian Volunteer Division (military force), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hague Conventions. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sir,Could you please take a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aravind_L._Iyer in my opinion it fails notability and should be considered for deletion.I request you to take a call though.(Rajeshbm (talk) 03:28, 29 May 2016 (UTC)).[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability in Knight's Cross Holder articles

Hi, since you participated in an AfD discussion that involved this topic, I'm letting you know that I started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Notability in Knight's Cross Holder Articles -- to see if the issue can be dealt on a systemic basis, rather than one off AfDs.

One of the suggestions I got was to see if an RfC may need to be formulated, so I'm seeking input into this potential RfC or other possible ways to address the notability concern in similar articles. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:42, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Saar Protectorate listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Saar Protectorate. Since you had some involvement with the The Saar Protectorate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 02:04, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Puppy cat

added a link pointing to Depression

Welcome to Holland

added a link pointing to Parenthood

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for all of your excellent contributions at RfD! - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 09:45, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

House of Lords redirect pages

Hi when you've got a minute could you have a look at this discussion and give me your opinion please. WP:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_October_26#Independents_in_House_of_Lords I'm trying to put an end to a totally futile dispute that has been lingering for a while now by being as accommodating as I can. If it seems reasonable to you I'll blank the problem pages for deletion. Thanks for your help. Domdeparis (talk) 07:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Carol Storck

Again, thank you for creating that article! My apologies for intruding with so many changes right away. That image of his bust wasn't available until now...I just transferred it from Romanian Wikipedia. WQUlrich (talk) 21:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you're welcome! He's an interesting figure, and I very much like the bust of him that we have in the article now! CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:28, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CoffeeWithMarkets. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitomi Tanaka (3rd nomination)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitomi Tanaka (3rd nomination). As you have participated in a previous AfD on this article, you may be interested in commenting on this third AfD. Thank you. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 00:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Tornillo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stub sorting Roosevelt Republican

Hello CoffeeWithMarkets,

I noticed you marked an article as a stub using the {{stub}} template. Did you know that there are thousands of stub types that you can use to clarify what type of stub the article is? Properly categorizing stubs is important to the Wikipedia community because it helps various WikiProjects to identify articles that need expansion.

If you have questions about stub sorting, don't hesitate to ask! There is a wealth of stub information on the stub sorting WikiProject, and hundreds of stub sorters. Thanks! -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 08:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC) (fixed link at 08:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Racial differences in crime listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Racial differences in crime. Since you had some involvement with the Racial differences in crime redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 05:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CoffeeWithMarkets. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please come and help...

Should MoS shortcut redirects be sorted to certain specific maintenance categories? An Rfc has been opened on this talk page to answer that question. Your sentiments would be appreciated! Paine Ellsworth ^put'r there 18:11, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

	Happy Holidays
	Wishing you a happy holiday season! Times flies and 2018 is around the corner. Thank you for your contributions. ~ K.e.coffman (talk) 23:43, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crime in Puerto Rico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illegal migration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 29#Disambiguation (audio)

I think my ping failed! Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:03, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. It happens. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 00:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Frederick A. Douglass High School) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Frederick A. Douglass High School, CoffeeWithMarkets!

Wikipedia editor AngusWOOF just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Created from RFD result. Passes notability.

To reply, leave a comment on AngusWOOF's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (LouderSound.com) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating LouderSound.com, CoffeeWithMarkets!

Wikipedia editor Polyamorph just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Would be better redirecting to the umbrella website, but since no article exists for that this is fine redirection for now

To reply, leave a comment on Polyamorph's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Polyamorph (talk) 20:16, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pietro Gaietto

The article Pietro Gaietto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPERSON, with a mention in a BBC article and a self-published book as the only references. I searched for other sources, but found little.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rock Me (Steppenwolf song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rock Me (Steppenwolf song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock Me (Steppenwolf song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kendall-K1 (talk) 17:44, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of World Federation of Scientists for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Federation of Scientists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Federation of Scientists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 01:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CoffeeWithMarkets. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CoffeeWithMarkets. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shitface listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shitface. Since you had some involvement with the Shitface redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 00:48, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

I was walking down memory land, never mind why, came across Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Paros (Greece) rape, and admired your calm objectivity. E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:49, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"The digimon" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The digimon. Since you had some involvement with the The digimon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:16, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Unleash the Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Love Not War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Double redirects

Hi there! I just wanted to give you a heads-up regarding a couple of redirects you recently created. I was reviewing them and noticed that you created them in a way that allows only one of them to function properly, and that leaves the rest as double or triple redirects, which are to be avoided per WP:2R. The two such instances I found were:

Scot (album) → Scot (rap album) → S.C.O.T → S.C.O.T.
Scott (Scott Walker album) → Scott (pop album) → Scott (album)

After taking a quick glance at your contributions, and seeing your involvement creating redirects and !voting at WP:RFD, I'm assuming these were just simple mistakes, and I simply wanted to make you aware of my changes. Thanks! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 05:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, yeah, I've been probably making quite a number of errors when doing late night / early morning edits due to odd sleep schedules. Thanks for the heads-up. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:56, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

After America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vision

The True Believer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to What Happened

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"The Dirty Boogie (album)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Dirty Boogie (album). Since you had some involvement with the The Dirty Boogie (album) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 15:03, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Stanley (professor) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Matthew Stanley (professor), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 04:03, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I'll work on it more when I get a chance. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi CoffeeWithMarkets, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 17:18, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you! CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bullet points

Why are you removing spaces after bullet marks * in other user's comments? Example: Special:Diff/950259046. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:51, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I realize that this isn't a valid answer, but I honestly have no idea why I've done that sometimes. It's rather goofy and weird, and I should stop. Sorry about that. In an non-defense, this appears to be a part of an OCD-ish tendency to like things to line up regardless of context, like me sometimes moving stuff around on counters in public businesses and other places I go into. Again, sorry about that. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 11:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

a suggestion

You called the redirect ((Vakhidov)) Sobit (Abdumukit) Valikhonovich "baffling", and agreed with the nominator it should be deleted.

I think the nominator should have done a web search, to find out whether or not that exact spelling was in use. I think that if they found it in use they should have concluded it should be retained, without regard to whether or not people found it "baffling".

Do you think it would be a good idea, if you are going to add opinions at RfD in the future, to do your own web search for redirect terms you find "baffling", to see whether those terms are in actual use, elsewhere? Geo Swan (talk) 13:14, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have done my research. The individual has been known as 'Vakhidov Sobit Abdumukit Valikhonovich' in terms of reporting based on the U.S. government's shifting about of his name. He has not been known as '((Vakhidov)) Sobit (Abdumukit) Valikhonovich'. We have redirects of different form (such as Trump, Donald for Donald Trump), and those are fine. We don't have things such as '((Trump)), Pres(ident) Don(a)ld'.

I think that it would be a good idea, in the future, for you to assume good faith and behave more reasonably rather than make empty personal attacks without you understanding the actual context. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 15:31, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But we do have a link from “((To Archive))” to your talk page archive.

1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Back when I was an undergrad, Gerald Weinberg, a writer on software engineering, wrote about the "egoless programming team" - teams that worked better, more efficiently, because everyone committed to remember they were fallible, and did not put their ego on the line, every time they stated an opinion. I really think this excellent advice is extremely appropriate here. [2]

WRT the research you did - it fell short. It is not a lapse from AGP, on my part, to point out that official documents, reprinted in over 1000 newspapers, reprinting the name you called "baffling". Even if the DoD moved on, and now only rarely uses their "baffling" use of ((Vakhidov)) Sobit (Abdumukit) Valikhonovich, its use was a completely policy compliant reason to retain the redirect.

WRT ((Trump)), Pres(ident) Don(a)ld, no, of course we wouldn't keep that redirect. No documents use that term. Official documents DID use ((Vakhidov)) Sobit (Abdumukit) Valikhonovich. Geo Swan (talk) 23:54, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- MrX 🖋 13:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jungian archetypes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Celtic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:43, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CoffeeWithMarkets

Thank you for creating Personal character.

User:Rosguill, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Heads up, while this is often a synonym for the target, I found several examples of the term "personal character" being used as an unrelated specialized term in AI research as well.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:32, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill:, thanks for letting me know. I'm not very familiar with AI research, and so this was news to me. Still, I think that "personal character" is generally a synonym for "moral character", and so maybe a note can be added to the top of that latter term's page? CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 20:37, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we have an article covering that topic right now so for now I think that the redirect can stand as is, for the reason you identified. I found the term used this way on Google Scholar, so it's possible that in the future such an article will exist. Just figured that I'd let you know in advance of anyone editing the redirect. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill:, I see. Thanks again for letting me know. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 20:43, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jungian archetypes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conundrum Press (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI...

...I think you may have recently accidentally edited while logged out. (I was going to email you the diffs, but I see you don't currently have email enabled.) Just giving you a heads up, in case it was you and you want the IP info suppressed by an oversighter. Steel1943 (talk) 15:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. It's no big deal and I'll let things be, but I do really appropriate messaging me here. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 16:50, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 10 Great Songs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 10 Great Songs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10 Great Songs (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Matthew Stanley (professor)

Hello, CoffeeWithMarkets. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Matthew Stanley (professor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Intel has been nominated for merging

Category:Works about Intel has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 05:37, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Another Word" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Another Word and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 14#Another Word until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Plantdrew (talk) 18:45, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Feldman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DRNC

Hi there! Regarding your reversion at Nancy_Pelosi: WP:DRNC suggests that while yes, my edit was limited in its citing of a secondary source, one should help to improve the article rather than reverting what can be easily fixed. I think you even agreed that the content of the edit belonged there, so why delete it entirely? The source I provided was plenty until someone would add the primary :) Horizons 1 (talk) 02:08, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

thanks for all your contributions! 🐦DrWho42👻 07:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 15:25, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Buffalo shooting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Motive.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ideal (ethics)

Ideal (ethics) CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:56, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Abundance (Book Cover).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Abundance (Book Cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creampie (sexual act)

Creampie (sexual act) CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 19:24, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pronouns

Hi, I just noticed that while on your user page you write that you prefer "they/them" pronouns, your settings seem to be "he/him" as can be seen when using Preferences>Gadgets>Navigation Popups. The setting is in Preferences below "Internationalisation" (without a heading). -- Random person no 362478479 (talk) 09:39, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see!

I believe that it was fixed before. I've checked it again, and I've re-fixed it again. Things happen.

Anyways, have a good day! CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 09:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:57, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your behavior at Talk:Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 2024 presidential campaign

Your frequent casting of aspersions and use of personal attacks on the talk page has to stop. Additionally, your violations of WP:BLP must also stop. If any of this behavior continues you will be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is LGBT chemicals conspiracy theory. Thank you. I am notifying you as although I did not name you, I did mention your actions as creator of the article. Nil Einne (talk) 14:10, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Glory (honor), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 18:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]