Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Nrswanson (talk | contribs)
Line 165: Line 165:
::::It is a double DYK, both the Natural Area and the Box Huckleberry articles are new. I prefer the original hook. [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]] '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 19:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
::::It is a double DYK, both the Natural Area and the Box Huckleberry articles are new. I prefer the original hook. [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]] '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 19:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
:::::How about ... that the '''[[Hoverter and Sholl Box Huckleberry Natural Area|smallest Natural Area in Pennsylvania]]''' protects a stand of '''[[box huckleberry]]''' ''(pictured)'', but another stand nearby is the oldest plant in the [[United States]]? I've just made the corresponding change to the article, to reflect what I understand to be the crux of Wetman's objection. (That is, the distinction between "natural areas" in general, and tracts of land designated as "Natural Areas" and protected by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.) [[User:Choess|Choess]] ([[User talk:Choess|talk]]) 19:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
:::::How about ... that the '''[[Hoverter and Sholl Box Huckleberry Natural Area|smallest Natural Area in Pennsylvania]]''' protects a stand of '''[[box huckleberry]]''' ''(pictured)'', but another stand nearby is the oldest plant in the [[United States]]? I've just made the corresponding change to the article, to reflect what I understand to be the crux of Wetman's objection. (That is, the distinction between "natural areas" in general, and tracts of land designated as "Natural Areas" and protected by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.) [[User:Choess|Choess]] ([[User talk:Choess|talk]]) 19:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

*... a '''[[Western Hartebeest]]''' can run at speeds of up to 80 kilometres per hour (50 mph), making it one of the fastest [[antelopes]]? (expanded 5+ fold by myself) [[User:Livitup|Livitup]] ([[User talk:Livitup|talk]]) 14:01, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
*... a '''[[Western Hartebeest]]''' can run at speeds of up to 80 kilometres per hour (50 mph), making it one of the fastest [[antelopes]]? (expanded 5+ fold by myself) [[User:Livitup|Livitup]] ([[User talk:Livitup|talk]]) 14:01, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
*... that the [[Creation Evidence Museum]] sponsors hunts for living [[pterodactyls]] in [[Papua New Guinea]]?
*: or, the more general, but less fun: ... that the [[Creation Evidence Museum]] displays alleged evidence for humans coexisting with [[dinosaurs]]? Self-nom. --[[User:GRuban|GRuban]] ([[User talk:GRuban|talk]]) 21:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


===Articles created/expanded on August 13===
===Articles created/expanded on August 13===

Revision as of 21:15, 15 August 2008

Dreamtime
Dreamtime

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page.

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Instructions

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles whose main body text has been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a JavaScript extension like User:Dr pda/prosesize.js (instructions on the talk page), a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. (The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.)
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • always cited in the article with an inline citation.
Please note that hooks are subject without notice to copyediting as they move to the main page. The nature of the DYK process makes it impractical to consult users over every such edit. In particular, hooks will be shortened if they are deemed too long: the 200-character limit is an outside limit not a recommended length. Also, watch the suggestions page to ensure that no issues have been raised about your hook, because if you do not respond to issues raised your hook may not be featured at all.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely-licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as [[Image:image name |right|100x100px| Description]] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]] and ~~~~
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|July 9}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • For more details see the previously Unwritten Rules.
  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

2024-07-09T00:00:00Z

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on August 15

File:S Donald Stookey with CorningWare.jpg
Length, date and hook verified. Nice work! :) -- RyRy (talk) 05:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Hook is too long. I counted 266 characters, should be 200 or less. Article length was 2,696 characters, which by my count you now have 13,610 so you meet the x5 requirement (2,696x5=13,480). Mitico (talk) 16:49, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on August 14

File:Tipwindmill.jpg
  • A bit difficult that, if you look on the map it is in Tiptree. The mill is commonly known as Tiptree Windmill and no doubt if you ask the residents of Tiptree they will say it is "their" mill. It actually stands in the parish of Tolleshunt Knights, hence the title of the article. Mjroots (talk) 07:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Link added to my reply showing that mill is commonly known as Tiptree windmill. Mjroots (talk) 20:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alt hook ... that Tiptree Windmill (pictured) has walls that are 4 feet (1.22 m) thick? Mjroots (talk) 19:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2: *... that Jimmy Jack returned to his hometown of Perth after an argument with his The Black Balloon co-writer? less words?? Victuallers (talk) 20:43, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mount Etna
Mount Etna
A bureaucratic pseudofact like smallest natural area in Pennsylvania seems easily avoidable.--Wetman (talk) 14:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT:"... Hoverter and Sholl Box Huckleberry Natural Area protects a specimen of box huckleberry over 1,000 years old?" - House of Scandal (talk) 17:45, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is a double DYK, both the Natural Area and the Box Huckleberry articles are new. I prefer the original hook. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 19:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How about ... that the smallest Natural Area in Pennsylvania protects a stand of box huckleberry (pictured), but another stand nearby is the oldest plant in the United States? I've just made the corresponding change to the article, to reflect what I understand to be the crux of Wetman's objection. (That is, the distinction between "natural areas" in general, and tracts of land designated as "Natural Areas" and protected by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.) Choess (talk) 19:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on August 13

You are correct, I moved this to August 13. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:35, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note, not quite a 5x expansion, but was an unnoticed copyvio. See Art LaPella's talk page.
or ... that American physician John Ziegler pioneered anabolic steroids but later said "... healthy athletes are putting themselves in the same category as drug addicts. It's a disgrace. Who plays sports for fun anymore?" Autodidactyl (talk) 12:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues The portion of the first hook that says "pioneered their use with U.S. weightlifting champion Bill March of the York Barbell club in 1959" is cited to a geocities website, which is not a reliable source. Thingg 15:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Hook needs an inline citation. The hook is mentioned in the lead, may I suggest also putting in the "Breeding" section. Good image.
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues The intro states "Proposed articles should not be marked as stubs", and Oyem's talk page states that it is a stub. Is it an outdated grade? If it can be upgraded or edited to do such, it would be ideal. Hurricane Angel Saki (talk) 03:23, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, sometimes people forget to remove the {{stub}} tag when nominating articles for DYK. In any case, this article is a little too short at 1299 characters of prose. Thingg 04:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Map of the Bulgarian communities in Romania
Map of the Bulgarian communities in Romania

Articles created/expanded on August 12

Alt hook: ... that mountaineer Ger McDonnell brought a hurley to the summit of Mount Everest in 2003?

— Cheers, JackLee talk 15:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC) (expanded article and nominated it).[reply]
An AMX-30E on display at the Museum of Armored Vehicles of El Goloso, in Spain
An AMX-30E on display at the Museum of Armored Vehicles of El Goloso, in Spain

*... that Will Dockery built Dockery Plantation (pictured) (home of such legendary bluesmen as Charlie Patton, Tommy Johnson, and Robert Johnson), thus being fundamental in the development of the Mississippi blues? (self nom) —Mattisse (Talk) 16:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing inadequate, in my view, per previous discussions for this DYK nominator. Discuss at/see Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Referencing style reprise. doncram (talk) 21:48, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to ignore above; user has proven to review anything I provide in bad faith.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 21:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unstriking. Please don't edit war, Bedford, and please don't strike my comments. doncram (talk) 01:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You are the one insisting on warring. You are not El Jefe of Wikipedia.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 01:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Restoring and REPEATING, please do not remove my This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues indication. doncram (talk) 03:26, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You know you have no right assessing anything I do here. As it was illegitimate, away it goes.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 07:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Referencing inadequate, in my view, per previous discussions for this DYK nominator. Discuss at/see Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Referencing style reprise. doncram (talk) 21:48, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to ignore above; user has proven to review anything I provide in bad faith.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 21:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unstriking. Please don't edit war, Bedford, and please don't strike my comments. doncram (talk) 01:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You are the one insisting on warring. You are not El Jefe of Wikipedia.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 01:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Restoring and REPEATING, please do not remove my This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues indication, which you removed here and above. doncram (talk) 03:26, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You know you have no right assessing anything I do here. As it was illegitimate, away it goes.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 07:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That would be an acceptable alt nom. I could have gone for five, or six, but there just isn't enough space for characters. :) Ottava Rima (talk) 01:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lengths, dates, and hooks verified. (*off topic*) I have to admit I laughed when I saw this edit summary to an addition of ~12000 bytes.... Thingg 03:43, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alt nom - ... that in addition to Boswell's famous Life (1791), major accounts of Samuel Johnson's life include the Anecdotes (1786), the rival Life (1787), An Essay (1792), and the Thraliana? self-nom, six part nom Ottava Rima (talk) 19:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
additional articles verified. Thingg 17:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alt nom - ... that in addition to Boswell's famous Life (1791), major accounts of Samuel Johnson's life include Biographical Sketch (1784), Anecdotes (1786), the rival Life (1787), Essay (1792), and Thraliana? self nom, seven parts, I forgot the original postmortem work on Johnson, whcihw as too important to leave out. Ottava Rima (talk) 00:34, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date and hook verified. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: While it passes all three criteria, in order to avoid fights over sentences ending with prepositional phrases, I recommend the following:
Note: Image:Ysgol Uwchradd Caergybi High School.jpg is released under CC-BY-SA; thus, it can be used on the main page. Mouse is back 18:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
good article but banal hook. Surely the heroic solo nest-building and rearing behaviour of the female is more interesting? Autodidactyl (talk) 17:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note, the stub contained 138 characters of prose but a list that accounted for 848 characters. I have based the 5x expansion on real prose, not the list. I hope my interpretation of the rules about this were correct. ~ AmeIiorate U T C @ 00:56, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. #Instructions says " ... articles whose main body text has been expanded fivefold ... " (emphasis added) Art LaPella (talk) 01:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... the disappearance of Ann Gotlib in broad daylight in 1983 was a key factor that lead to the creation of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children? selfnom --Rividian (talk) 00:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Since the reference article is pay/subscription only, here is the quote: "Meanwhile, child-welfare advocates say Ann's case has helped increase national awareness of missing and abducted children and has revolutionized how missing-child cases are handled across the country. The Gotlib case was "part of the reason that Congress realized that Americans needed help with missing children," said Charles Pickett, a senior case manager at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children." --Rividian (talk) 00:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
or this Alt Hook:
Alt Hook #3 with image:
Baldwin apple
Baldwin apple
  • Maybe for someone who works in the industry this is a no-brainer (about the apples), but it wasn't for me. Anyhow, why did you put the word traditional into scare-quotes... or did you mean something else? - Poeticbent talk 02:43, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on August 11

I read the section on unwritten rules. The article isn't expanded fivefold yet. I'll try and expand it tomorrow and post here when it's actually ready. Admiral Norton (talk) 21:52, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I expanded the article fivefold within last five days. I'll be going to sleep in a short while, so please save any non-urgent questions for tomorrow. Just a little request: could you please include this in the tomorrow 10 AM UTC update if it passes the requirements and gets selected? Admiral Norton (talk) 23:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Soviet stamp honoring the frigate Oryol
Soviet stamp honoring the frigate Oryol
André Raponda Walker in 1898
André Raponda Walker in 1898
Thanks for the compliment, but I'd have preferred a suggestion rather than a request. He was the son of a princess - (but the ref is in French). How about
I think you need to choose or make a suggestion, I'm finding your request a bit vague Victuallers (talk) 11:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The first article is fine (assuming good faith for the offline ref), but the ref for the statement in the second article mentions him receiving the David Bishop Medal of the American Opera Association of Chicago for his play, not the Bispham Memorial Medal Award. Thingg 02:00, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • "Bishop Medal" appears to be a typo, from all I can figure - the David Bispham Medal is the one the Association awarded. "David Bishop" "American Opera Association" turns up two sources - this one, and the Dutch Wikipedia entry, which appears to be a direct translation of this one. Consequently, I split the difference; I figured it was a safe assumption to make. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 04:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • I thought that may have been the case when I first saw it. Since I found no record of anyone named David Bishop who lived within 100 years prior the time the award was established (let alone someone who founded an opera award) after nearly 25 minutes of searching on three search engines and four reference websites, I think it's safe to assume that it was a typo. Articles verified. Thingg 05:09, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, the award is referred to by it's official name, Verdienstorden der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, in English (The Grand Cross of the Order of Merit, Federal Republic of Germany) in the first ref. Article verified. Thingg 01:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oops, being an American over the age of 12, I didn't catch that U-16 meant under-16 soccer players. We'll go with the following
Again, sounds like a quite ordinary thing. We all learn something from parents :) NVO (talk) 01:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it's too common for a soccer player's high-school coach to be his father, but I could be wrong. Either way, I don't really care, but I think the hook is fine. Thingg 00:51, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not thrilled with this hook. At any rate, the phrase "none other" should not be included. - House of Scandal (talk) 19:42, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Referencing inadequate, in my view, per previous discussions for this DYK nominator. Discuss at/see Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Referencing style reprise. doncram (talk) 21:48, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to ignore above; user has proven to review anything I provide in bad faith.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 21:59, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unstriking. Please don't edit war, Bedford, and please don't strike my comments. doncram (talk) 01:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You are the one insisting on warring, and you love striking people. You are not El Jefe of Wikipedia.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 01:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Restoring and REPEATING, please do not remove my This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues indication, here and twice above. doncram (talk) 03:26, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You know you have no right assessing anything I do here. As it was illegitimate, away it goes.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 07:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mba.jpg
Taste in High Life
Taste in High Life
Length, date and hook verified. Thanks to both of you for getting a milestone on the Main Page. :) PeterSymonds (talk) 01:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats on the milestone! The hook, however, goes into overtime. I suggest mentioning perhaps two of the three (Roger Connor, Hall of Fame, Polo Grounds) facts. Also...isn't this hook really about his brother rather than Joe himself?- House of Scandal (talk) 19:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Even better (I like to note that Kane switched sides during the war): "... the first three residents of the John Kane House (pictured) were a man nearly hanged for treason, a Patriot turned British Loyalist, and George Washington? Daniel Case (talk) 23:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds great. - House of Scandal (talk) 01:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on August 10

Arms of St Bees School
Arms of St Bees School
I checked the primary sources used by your sources (in the form available on the net). It appears that although the English wiki article renders all the graphic details of Tokarev's confession correctly (not mentioning the circumstances of its extraction), Tokarev did not say a word that (then) major Blokhin was the only shooter. On the contrary, Tokarev more than once used they: they killed. NVO (talk) 10:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here's Polish (original) and Russian text of Tokarev's interrogation: [3]. Proceed to middle of p.442.: <my own English version>:
Q. How did they, from the komendant's team, like your driver, shoot - did they shoot the <Walter guns> brought <by Blokhin in a suitcase>?
A. Yes, from <guns> the brought <by Blokhin>. Blokhin managed it himself. He issued the pistols, and took them back once the job was over. He collected <the guns> in person.
Q. Why did the drivers took part in the shootings if it was not their job?
A. <Tokarev makes a hardly comprehensible answer probably implying that they were forced to kill or be killed>.
so this I suppose negates the "single shooter" story.NVO (talk) 10:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll have to ask Bullzeye, because he wrote the article, but I understand it that of the 828,000 executions, tens of thousands were carried out by Blokhin himself, 6,000 of them during that 28-day period when he averaged one execution every three minutes for ten hours each night. Jennavecia (Talk) 15:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I checked the book. Page 324 of The Lesser Terror reads: "One Chekist who deserves a special mention is V.M. Blokhin, quite possibly the greatest executioner in history. ... the NKVD carried out 828,000 official executions... Blokhin, as head of the execution squads under Iagoda, Ezhov and Beriia must have been responsible for a good percentage of them. ... Blokhin was a hands-on executioner, taking part, for instance, in the shooting of the Polish POW officers from the Oshtakov camp who were killed in April 1940 in the headquarters of the NKVD in Kalinin." I don't have access to the text of Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar, but I'll ask Bullzeye when he's online again. That is the cited source for the "one execution every three minutes for ten hours a night for 28 days." Jennavecia (Talk) 16:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The source, in using must have been recognises it is conjecture on the part of the author, and isn't verification that he did carry out all of the executions which the hook claims that he did partake in. --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 19:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, he was a Soviet Major-General, not a Russian Major-General, and Soviet links to Soviet Russia instead of Soviet Union; why is that? --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 19:39, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The issue here is sources. Being that this was Stalinist era covert operations, undertaken without paperwork, Tokarev was the only direct witness to the Kalinin POW executions, and he gave his story under interrogation. Which means he gave it 97 times, each one slightly different but with the same major details. Several sources simply state that he killed them all. Tokarev himself says this at one point. The number of POWs killed also varies from 6,000 to 7,000. I'm open to suggestions as to a better hook, but in terms of overall article quality and verifiability, I encourage historical perspective. There's no doubt based sheerly on arithmetic and anecdote that Blokhin killed more people than any other executioner in recorded history; but unfortunately, there's no paperwork giving an exact number, either. This isn't Nazi Germany; there is no smoking gun, no Swansee Conference minutes, no neatly typed internal memos. There's also no additional extant sources that mention Vasili Blokhin aside from the ones I included in the article. I'll work on a new hook tonight. Also, props to User:NVO for the Polish self-translation. It was very helpful. Bullzeye (Ring for Service) 20:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Saying both 'among' and 'include' is redundant. Suggest the following, now with extra links:
Referencing inadequate, in my view, per previous discussions for this DYK nominator. Discuss at/see Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Referencing style reprise. doncram (talk) 21:48, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to ignore above; user has proven to review anything I provide in bad faith.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 21:59, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unstriking. Please don't edit war and please don't strike my comments. doncram (talk) 01:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You are the one insisting on warring, and you love striking people. You are not El Jefe of Wikipedia.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 01:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Restoring and REPEATING, please do not remove my This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues indication, here and three times above. doncram (talk) 03:26, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You know you have no right assessing anything I do here. As it was illegitimate, away it goes.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 07:04, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Although I don't particularly mind hooks which don't have the article name in them, we definitely need the word 'American' in there somewhere: until I read HoS's alt I assumed it meant a civil war in the Bahamas (and that's despite my knowing Bedford's interests - the Main Page audience won't be so lucky!) Olaf Davis | Talk 12:39, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Others please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this sentence is a no-no: "Despite these refutations Siborne's allegations often are repeated in Anglophone historiography of the battle (also the current version of the Battle of Waterloo in Wikipedia)." It's a Wikipedia:Self-reference that invites a Template:Contradict-other. I would think he should resolve the difference of opinion at the Battle of Waterloo page first, rather than ask readers to guess which contradicting page to believe. Art LaPella (talk) 01:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Carl Rungius astride a moose skull.
Carl Rungius astride a moose skull.
... the first career wildlife artist in North America if you don't count Mark Catesby or John James Audubon...--Wetman (talk) 05:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Those two are career naturalists, whose job happened to involve art. The hook is cited too. -Oreo Priest talk 13:25, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I expanded the article and brought it into the 21st century. Added 4 book references, 3 charts by reference, and USCG light list. Additional image to possibly be added later today. Thanks for the motivational push!KudzuVine (talk) 12:31, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
expanded article maybe long enough now.MYINchile 07:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article is now 2,012 charachters long. --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 17:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article refers to 2003 and 2006 sources on price. By now, mass, supermarket-sold brands (upscale but not exceptional) are already there. Can you update the price section and also quote the "runners up" prices (US market realities are not quite obvious in other markets).NVO (talk) 10:12, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'll try to follow your recommendations. The per bar price in the article is recent. The $90 a pound comes from sources a couple years old but I don't know that this chocolate has gotten any more recent press covereage. I don't feel these issues invalidate the hook but am open to the opinions of other editors. - House of Scandal (talk) 16:04, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*... that that the Brunei Royal Family has cars with unique and personalised license plates -- (selfnom, new article) Novelty (talk) 16:35, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Length, date and ref verified. Nice hook! Olaf Davis | Talk 11:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
nice article - reffed and length fine Victuallers (talk) 08:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues 214 character hook. "... that the Passer Angelfish undergoes large changes in coloration during its transition from juvenile to sexually mature, going from bright orange, yellow, and blue to a drab brownish-black color?" is 198 characters if you want to use that. Thingg 19:39, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A 1847 map of Lower Manhattan; the only railroad in Manhattan at that time was the New York and Harlem Railroad.
A 1847 map of Lower Manhattan; the only railroad in Manhattan at that time was the New York and Harlem Railroad.
He's the only ballplayer this ever happened to? Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Nope, this has happened hundreds of times in my calculations. Please do find a different hook that is rather interesting. Thanks, RyRy (talk) 05:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alt hook: ... that, in his first and only season as a starter, Steve Brye led the Minnesota Twins in doubles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LAAFan (talkcontribs)
Length, date and hook verified. This is much more interesting, but I would reword it to ALT: ... that Steve Brye, in his first and only season as an baseball outfielder, led the Minnesota Twins in doubles? Good job LAAFan! :-) Keep it up! -- RyRy (talk) 23:43, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
1896 Southeast Town Hall
1896 Southeast Town Hall
The ref does not support the "in honour of"; it either "takes it name from" or "is a play on". Also, I think it is better to use "RTÉ" rather than "Ireland", so I prefer House of Scandal's revision. ww2censor (talk) 17:04, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very well. I see your point. It is more RTÉ's than Ireland's. Is it likely to be included at all at this point though? There doesn't appear to be much time left? --Candlewicke Consortiums Limited 15:51, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Until the hooks of a given date go below the "expiring noms" article they are considered for promotion only in extremis, so your article still has time. It's not about anything in the USA, so that's a plus. - House of Scandal (talk) 19:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In extremis??? :O But do articles this far down get bothered about? Or are they generally taken from the top? --Candlewicke (Talk) 00:32, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
They're taken from the bottom. The article is still in the locker room. Articles below this are on the actual playing field. If you're anxious about whether it will get picked or not, it can't hurt to keep improving (not necessarily adding, but improving) until the clock runs out. - House of Scandal (talk) 01:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on August 9

Length and reference verified; copyedited hook (Also, it's better supported by note 1, not note 2, which appears to be the cited source. Daniel Case (talk) 23:46, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Hi there. Normally, I would approve it, but I do not like the way the article is referenced. They should be referenced properly generally be using {{citeweb}} templates. I'm not so sure if there is a citeweb-like template for book references though. If you could properly reference all, ahem, 24 references, I would most likely approve it. Thanks, RyRy (talk) 10:08, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is the {{cite book}} template. Admiral Norton (talk) 10:44, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, that's exactly what I'm looking for. :-) Thanks, RyRy (talk) 10:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh you meanies, making me do work:) Ok I'll have a go:) Sticky Parkin 12:31, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All refs fixed I think, User:Suntag has helped, the star.:) Sticky Parkin 22:32, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Much better. Length, date and hook verified. Congratulations! :) -- RyRy (talk) 21:36, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Not too sure about this one, I think it will probably need a thorough review. Gatoclass (talk) 06:01, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Had a read of the article, and I've put it up for AFD. Gatoclass (talk) 10:17, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Could there be a cite for the 20,000? It isn't footnoted in the lede, appears nowhere else in the article and I couldn't find it in any of the other cited sources. Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The 20,000 is sourced. It's in the fourth paragraph of the New York Time article, the article's main source. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 14:38, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Found it now. Length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 23:40, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and history verified; offline reference accepted on AGF grounds. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Siniolchu photographed by Vittorio Sella
Siniolchu photographed by Vittorio Sella
Length and history verified; offline ref accepted on good faith. Daniel Case (talk) 02:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mba.jpg
Length, date and hook verified. -- RyRy (talk) 09:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on August 8

  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Length verified. I'd like a second opinion on the hook's referencing which currently goes to a personal Fotopages site that, at first glance, gives me a Geocities vibe. I've never seen Fotopages used as a reliable source before so another opinion would be worthwhile. AgneCheese/Wine 21:06, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please elaborate? and take note that i have cited the {{facts}} and {{who?}}MYINchile 20:01, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Much much better. Great job. verified. Thingg 01:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Pretty lame hook if you ask me. Surely something a bit more interesting can be found? How about the fact that there's apparently a conflict between developers and conservationists? Gatoclass (talk) 05:48, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Latin specific name is Greek"? Which language? --74.13.127.161 (talk) 02:14, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, although scientific names are technically in Latin, many, many of them are formed on Greek roots. Circeus (talk) 02:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's so confusing. Can we just say its scientific name means "golder eyebrow"... --74.14.18.205 (talk) 22:36, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and history verified; offline ref on good faith. Fixed hook per discussion. Daniel Case (talk) 02:02, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Where is it confirmed in the article that "the area above its eyes is not very yellowish"? I can't see such a statement. Gatoclass (talk) 05:13, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you read the description of the fish's coloring it states that

"The longnose trevally is generally silver in colour, with the body and head greenish blue above, becoming silvery with yellow-green reflections below." The yellow portion of the fish is therefore not near the upper part of the eye.Nrswanson (talk) 05:27, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I think that's an unwarranted assumption. If the source does not specifically state that the fish doesn't have yellow around its eye, then we should not be presuming so in the hook. Gatoclass (talk) 05:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also