User talk:Sm8900

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user is American
This user has autoconfirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
This editor is a Master Editor and is entitled to display the Master Editor Ribbon.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user uses Twinkle to fight vandalism.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 78.28.44.31 (talk) at 06:15, 31 August 2021 (→‎Category:Upcoming_massively_multiplayer_online_role-playing_games is now at CfD: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Skip to top
Skip to bottom

    from {{start tab}}
    User pageTalk pageIndex
    links
    ArticlesProjects, tasksAwardsUser boxesNavboxes




    {{short description}}

    Welcome to my talk page. Please feel free to drop by any time, just to say hello if you want. thanks!!

    intro section

    Links to various items:

    toc

    TOC



    user pages

    List of subpages

    Thank you and Happy New Year

    Thank you Sir..!

    Domitian II

    to do search: {{Special:PrefixIndex?prefix=User%3Asm8900&namespace=0}} to display a list: {{List subpages|sm8900|user}}

    proposals: Talk:History of transport, Talk:History of technology

    all subpages of this page generated by: {{subpages}} or {{List subpages|sm8900|user}}

    Pages with the prefix 'sm8900' in the 'user' and 'user talk' namespaces:

    user:
    sm8900
    user talk:
    sm8900

    Happy New Year Sm8900!

    Happy New Year!
    Hello Sm8900:
    Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, ★Trekker (talk) 20:05, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



    Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.


    Hey, thanks, *Treker!!! Appreciate it. Happy New Year!! --Sm8900 (talk) 01:34, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Private social services moved to draftspace

    An article you recently created, Private social services, is a nonsubstantial essy, sourced only by articles talking about a small range of examples. We need references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements . I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 23:12, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Re:Item

    No problem...and thanks!!! :) Jhenderson 777 14:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    history project

    In response to your petition, I'd be glad to help out on the contemporary history project. I'll also take a look at the other page you asked about.Michael E Nolan (talk) 19:47, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Michael E Nolan:, hi. that's really terrific. I see some good things ahead that we can get done here. looking forward to further efforts. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 19:48, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    test reply. ---Sm8900 (talk) 🚀 19:22, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Help me!

    {{help me}}

    Hi. I'm just curious, why is the category Category:Top-importance Batman articles shown as empty? Does anyone know why? the article Batman at least should clearly be showing up there. right?

    and actually, it looks like all of the sub-categories of Category:Batman articles by importance are empty! any ideas on this? thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 23:39, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Please don't use the {{help me}} template in two places to ask the same question. You've identified the correct template to investigate at Talk:Batman#question re Category:Top-importance Batman articles. I'll look into it later if nobody else has gotten to it before then. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 00:59, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Comics articles importance ratings

    Hi, I reverted your changes to some Batman-related articles. You placed them all in "Top" importance, which may be their importance within the Batman universe (though even their some are debatable), but which is not their actual importance for the Comics project in general (which is what your edits actually achieved). Articles like Alfred Pennyworth or Batman's utility belt are very far removed from being Top importance for the Comics project. The intention is to keep "Top" for about 50 articles only: at the moment, there are 56 ones listed at Category:Top-importance Comics articles, of which only a handful can really be debated (I'll reassess Hobbes (Calvin and Hobbes) and take a look at some others). Batman is correctly one of them, but subtopics of the Batman universe should not be in this category. Fram (talk) 15:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi @Fram:. thanks so much for your courteous and helpful note here. no problem at all. i'll take a look at that, and think about if there are any other options. meanwhile, I also wrote to you on your talk page. nice to be in touch. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 15:31, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    My user page

    I've never paid any attention to user pages; I suppose it is useful not only for learning more about a particular editor but also in judging their competence and credibility. I honestly don't remember when I started editing Wikipedia, although a year ago sounds right. As for my date of birth, it is October 26, 1952, and I live in Mexico (although I'm a U.S. citizen, which largely explains my interest in U.S. history and politics). I guess you can see from this that I am giving you permission to set up my user page. Michael E Nolan (talk) 17:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Michael E Nolan:, okay, that's terrific. consider it done. I am really enjoying our mutual efforts, and look forward to many more items and projects in the weeks and months ahead. I'll be glad to get started on this.
    feel free to let me know any time, of course, if there's anything I've done that you want changed, corrected, revised, removed, or improved-upon, etc etc etc. it is your user page, so naturally you are in full control of course. I'll enjoy working on it though. always nice to try my hand at a new item. or to dabble in a new area. I appreciate your note, and all your help. feel free to be in touch any time, as always. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 17:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    RE question re your ideas on editors and various items

    Hello. I don't work much on userboxes lately. Here is what I have done so far:

    Feel free to use them, or to copy them to your own pages for further editing. I don't claim ownership, and I don't need any credit. People can use the userboxes from your own pages and subpages after you edit and adapt them to your own needs. -- Timeshifter (talk) 19:56, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Some advice for WikiProject History

    Hi Sm8900, great to see your interest in WP History. I have been involved in a small revival for something similar for WP:ANAT and want to leave some short advice for you:

    ideas re WikiProject
    1. Honestly, a dormant project doesn't have many active editors. So I wouldn't waste time creating infrastructure (eg. for A class reviews, task forces, role designations, statements of behaviour etc.) because there will only be a couple of active editors and that kind of stuff wastes a lot of time and in my experience drains energy and certainly doesn't result in any new editors.
    2. If you're active, do whatever makes you passionate about that area - wikignoming, organisation, or article editing. Editors (myself included) are drawn to activity and it will usually generate more active editing
    3. For automated tasks, use a bot, eg. if you plan to go through your volunteer list (or article list, or whatever), think clearly about what you want to do, and see if a bot owner can do it. Saves a lot of time. I'll give an example:
      • Go through all editors on your volunteers list
      • Separate our all editors without activity in the last year, move these to an 'old volunteers list'
      • To old volunteers, deliver a message notifying that you've like to get the project active but moved them to an old list because they're not
      • To active volunteers, deliver a message notifying that you'd like to get the project active again and welcome collaboration
    4. Consider using a mass message to notify editors of important project events or when disseminating a newsletter
    5. Wikiprojects are great places to discuss things that affect your sets of articles - such as groups of images, navboxes, templates, layout, sources etc. Keep in mind to expect strong and contradictory opinions.

    I hope that helps. So to summarise

    1. A WP consists of active members who want to contribute to that area
    2. Editors want to contribute to the area, so administrative stuff (1) wastes your time and (2) doesn't get active editors and (3) won't achieve your end goal of improving articles
    3. The point of the activity is to improve articles, so make sure you keep that as your focus
    4. Rome wasn't build in a day, and the most important element is consistent involvement over time or a small amount of activity over time in the area, rather than single momentous decisions

    Hope that helps. That is just my two cents from being involved in a similar process over at WikiProject Anatomy and our process of trial and error --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:14, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi. I didn’t delete it. Sorry, I simply moved it to the correct section. It is still there . Sorry for being less than clear about this. Thanks.Sm8900 (talk) 14:52, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I think your suggestion above is pretty good. I will try to do that. Thanks. Sm8900 (talk) 14:54, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Re WP Council

    You posted, then deleted, the following on my talk page:

    hi., thanks for clicking “thanks “! However, if you have a chance, I could also use some written support. If you get a chance, could you please write a reply there. It can be short; just one or two sentences would be totally great if you want. I appreciate it. Thanks!! Sm8900 (talk) 14:18, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

    Over the past few days, I have made several suggestions on how you could proceed. Once again, I think it would be useful if you created a new talk page (possibly in your own user space) where you could list what you think are the project's current shortcomings and how you think these could be overcome. When it is ready, you could then invite comment. Further discussion on the project's current talk page does not seem to be productive.--Ipigott (talk) 14:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    hi ipigott. I didn’t delete that comment; I simply moved it to the correct section. It is still there . Sorry for being less than clear about this. Thanks.
    I think your suggestion above is pretty good. I will try to do that. Thanks. Sm8900 (talk) 14:54, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    OK. Thanks for the explanation. I started to reply to it but then found it was no longer there and went back to history to find it again. Anyway, I'm glad to see you are going to follow up on my suggestion. I still think one of the important areas to work on is assessment. As you have probably noticed, there are already several types of assessment report including by changes (recently updated here but not yet incorporated), by page watchers, by Category:Defunct WikiProjects, Inactive WikiProjects and Semi-active WikiProjects and, interestingly, those featured on Signpost. What is not measured is the number of article talk pages tagged by WikiProject over time (e.g. over the past month or by year). This could be a useful way of finding out which WikiProjects are considered interesting by those creating new articles but I don't know if it would be easy to implement. Once you have developed your new talk page, I would be happy to contribute.--Ipigott (talk) 08:11, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    link to pages

    strategy pages

    Soft redirect to:meta:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/2019 Community Conversations/Survey
    This page is a soft redirect.

    question re sections

    how do I add a button to provide the option to hide or collapse a section of an article? thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 17:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I think that would be contrary to the manual of style. On mobile view, the sections are automatically collapsed. What's your broader objective? — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 18:00, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jmcgnh: well, I meant, to provide a way to collapse a section on a page, i.e. on WikiProject, or a talk page, or a maintenance page. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 18:05, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh, for something like that, you'd probably use {{collapse}}. {{collapse top}} or, where you want to indicate that a discussion is over and done with, {{Hidden archive top}}. Just avoid doing that in article space.
    There are plenty of options for including the section header text, having it expanded by default, etc. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 18:21, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Strategy

    Hi! Today, I was about to let you know that the discussions have been launched. I'm glad to find out that you needed no pings. :) SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 23:36, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    lol! thanks, SGrabarczuk (WMF)! I appreciate the thought. as you see, yup, I'm already there. I appreciate your note. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 02:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    What are the standards for inclusion in year links?

    Eg 1961 in poetry which has some people's names with red links. Thanks. A ping would be appreciated if you reply. Doug Weller talk 13:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Doug Weller: thanks for your note. well, as far as notability in year articles, I think, the standards for that are no different than the standards for WP:Notability in general. If you want my own feelings on that, the simplest answer is that I am absolutely an inclusionist. absolutely. that is why I like working on current year articles. if a fact is out there, let's grab it!!! snag that puppy before it goes by!!! put it in a timeline article, where the fact collerctors at Wikipedia can add it to their collection, put it under glass, and enjoy it for years to come!! <ahem> lol!! . well, that's my own personal outlook on this. so who are some of these poets who have red links? were they published? were they notable? was their work published, either in books, or else perhaps in major publications? Please feel free to let me know. if so, let's get them in!! I'd be happy to work with you on this. let me know.
    by the way, it is a pleasure to hear from you on this. I am currently in the midst of a major reworking and revamping of Wikipedia:WikiProject History. but after that, I hope to move on slowly to revamping other WikiProjects over the course of time. I am mainly thinking about history-related WikiProjects, since I am the lead coordinator at WikiProject history, which i consider the umbrella group for other history-related projects. but I am willing to look at entirely different subject areas, for other WikiProjects. so we can see how that goes, over time.
    actually, you came along just at the right time. would you like to help me at WikiProject History? I could really use your input. Actually, you can be my co-pilot there if you want. the position for that is wide open!! would you like to come over there? please feel free to let me know. I would welcome your input. thanks!!! --Sm8900 (talk) 14:08, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, I must have been thinking of something else, perhaps deaths, where the criteria is inclusion in other projects. Although I'm interested in history (and definitely archaeology), I have a watchlist of almost 20,000 and am a Checkuser and Oversighter, and of course an Admin, and really don't have time to do anything else. I'm days behind in filing an SPI! Doug Weller talk 14:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    okay no problem, Doug Weller!! but if that's the case, feel free to stop by Wikipedia:WikiProject History if you get a chance, and to give the place a three-minute once-over, and then let me know anything that I'm doing right, wrong, or should do differently. and then after that, you can vanish like the wind!! if you want. anyway, your input is always welcome, and appreciated. Please feel free to write any time. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 14:32, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree with the concept of inclusion, particularly in years projects. I would even go a step further, and I would like to see a revision of the policy regarding "notable deaths" because it tends to exclude non-Anglos and runs contrary to the priority of "diversity." Most contributors to English-Wikipedia are either North Americans or British, so articles about events or people tend to come from these areas. When writing about people or things that happened twenty or more years ago, it is probably best to simply add the information without creating red links. Unless you intend to write the articles yourself, they probably won't get written. Michael E Nolan (talk) 15:54, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    On another but related subject, I have also questioned the standards on inclusion or exclusion of events. Yesterday I posted on 2020 about a strong earthquake on (7.1Mw ) in the Caribbean that was felt in six countries but fortunately caused no significant damage. Someone suggested that such events should not be reported if there are not at least 1,000 deaths. I'm open to adhering to standards, but where are they published? Michael E Nolan (talk) 15:54, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    thanks for your reply @Michael E Nolan:! I appreciate your great points above. as far as notability for earthquakes, they fall in the category of natural events, not manamde disasters. therefore, as such the standard of notability depends on the intensity or magnitude of such an event, not any measure of the impact of humans or society. on that basis, that earthquake is definitely notable, and is definitely suitable for inclusion. I am glad you wrote to add your comments here. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 16:09, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    WikiProject History

    Hi Sm8900! I just wanted to thank you for personally reaching out to me about WikiProject history. I will be more than happy to help get the project active again. I am currently in a class at Rice University that requires us to work on a Wikipedia article and I will be expanding on my first work - History of Democracy in Mexico. I will also post on the talk page for the project soon. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do as I would very much like to help. Best, Claudia Paine22 (talk) 17:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi Claudia Paine22. thanks so much for your reply. okay, yes, let's absolutely get started. to begin with, what are some of your areas of interest? any answer at all is totally fine. and yes, please do comment on the project talk page, whenever you wish. the sooner that we can get you over there, the sooner we can get things moving. you may be able to have more of an impact on the overall direction of Wikipedia than you might have initially thought! I bet you're glad that you happened onto this! anyway, we are very glad that we have you here. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 18:38, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    actually, based upon your answer above, I would already like to start a task force for History of Mexico, or History of Central America , and place you on it. Also, I would like to place you on the task force for Political History, which already exists. would that be okay? thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 18:39, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    nav box cfdw

    2018 sports-related lists

    I have proposed renaming for a hierarchy that you started. Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_February_2#2018_sports-related_lists. – Fayenatic London 17:21, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    news items

    Message section

    Hi. as you can see below, I have several templates in this section. Below are the template names for each of these. I would like the first group of two templates to be shown side by side, and the second group, ie bugle, signpost and admin newsletter to be shown on the next row, side by side. is there any way to do so? I appreciate it. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 20:55, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    See Help:Table. I would suggest to put them in one table row. Gryllida (talk) 01:19, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Gryllida, thanks for your reply, but I tried that. actually, that worked! thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 05:12, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Excellent. I'm glad to help.
    May I ask you if you are interested in current news? If so, what topics? Gryllida (talk) 05:56, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi Gryllida. well, do you mean Wikipedia news, or world and national news? either way , the answer yes. my main focus for world news is politics and history. I have initiated a few timeline articles and other articles to keep track of current events in those areas. is that what you were asking about? please feel free to let me know. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 14:21, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    newsletters table
    Header text Header text Header text


    template names

    TEMPLATE NAMES:

    Templates

    There are a couple of different approaches you might take. For someone who is not familiar with coding, using the ordinary columnization templates might be better for a DIY solution. The more technical approach would involve setting up <div> directives with something like width=33% parameters (this is how userboxes and Wikipedia Adventure badges work). I'm not prepared to do this for you, so I'm going to leave the request open in case someone else happens along who is willing. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 23:51, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Footer section

    this is for footer items.

    {{PartofHelpContents}}

    Draft: UK in political history

    Wow! I really like it, especially the idea of division by PMs. The external links section also looks good. One suggested change: Instead of "Brexit" include a section on "Trade." Brexit is a thing of the past, and it deserves mention, but there are bound to be many other important trade issues in the coming decade. There's probably little to add to "Brexit" at this point. Michael E Nolan (talk) 15:40, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Michael E Nolan: thanks!!! glad you like it. well, now it brings up a little problem that we now have to iron out, i.e. namely and especially since you and I are the cutting-edge task force that came up with these in the first place!! basically, it doesn't make a lot of sense to have these for the UK, and nothing similar for the US; since the articles of this type have now become a success with the UK editor crew. we should try the same thing for the colonies over here on our side of the pond!!
    ok, so dividing things by premiership worked great for the UK articles. everyone seems to have taken to that pretty well. the problem here is, our Chief Executive change over here much less frequently. so dividing up by Presidential Administration wouldn't really work. but I don't want to divide it up by year either; then we are simply another ordinary timeline article. so therefore, I would like to divide these articles approximately by Congressional session ; in other words, 2008 to 2010, 2010 to 2012, 2012 to 2014, etc etc. doing so will capture the real political cycle for American politics, just as premiership capture the real political cycle of the UK. by the way, yes I know the new Congress takes office in January of the new year following the election, so yes, we may reflect that in our time-based sections as well.
    so anyway, how does that all sound? the drafts are getting set up now. i am still adding the section breaks for the basic structure. you can feel free to let me know any comments. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 16:19, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree with all of this. I don't see any problem with the fact that the election is in November but Congress begins its sessions in January. I do hope you and I aren't the only editors who contribute to these pages. Michael E Nolan (talk) 17:20, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Michael E Nolan okay, glad to hear that. that's good to know.
    re your other point, that's a good point and a good question; however, no, you and I are certainly not the only editors who edit these articles. the two decade overviews that are currently in article main space, namely 2010s in political history, 2010s in United Kingdom political history, are very much active, energized, and embraced by the Wikipedia community.
    My point is that we in our task force for contemporary history have basically invented and pioneered all of these. it's highly gratifying that you are adding content at the article for Draft:2020s in UK political history. I'm planning to move that to main space within the next few weeks. i am sure it will be readily accepted as well, based on the current positive response to the other decade overviews.
    my point is that the decade overviews for the USA will need a little prior attention before we move them out of drafts. they certainly do not need to be fully or even largely complete before doing so. I simply meant as long as we have the basic structure set out, with a few basic content details included, we can move this out to the larger community. so that's why I wanted to check with you, on what you think of the basic article structure by section and by era. I'm glad you like it. All of your input is very helpful. i appreciate it. feel free to send any other comments, ideas, etc., if you wish. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 17:30, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    2021 in the United States moved to draftspace

    An article you recently created, 2021 in the United States, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:29, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Update on new drafts for current events

    Your assumptions about my general interests are on target: decades in political history, U.S. politics, but not much interest in U.K. politics. I find myself quite busy--I recently made a page for 2020 in Nigeria. I decided it would be impossible to make a 2020 page for every country that is missing, so I made 2020 in West Africa. With every new entry, it seems there's almost always another page or two to update. I've also written several things for 2020s. Michael E Nolan (talk) 05:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Michael E Nolan:okay, that sounds terrific. that's actually a very good thing. the US decade articles may be where I may really need your help. you can feel free to take a look at them any time, or to edit them any time.
    the 2010s article for UK seems to be doing fine, so I anticipate that our British colleagues will be happy to get started and to help out on the article for 2020s as well. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 05:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    items

    hi. I need your help. could you please dratft a notice for WP:The great UK Destubathon that you are leading? I am looking for editor events and group projects that I could post to post at my new community forum, if that's okay. could you please let me know if that sounds okay to you? I really appreciate it. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) testing welcome messages


    okay, but may I also point out, our category systems happens to include these categories, as well:

    .

    Welcome aboard matey!

    CaptainEek lectures new crewmembers on the importance of not going overboard

    Ahoy! Welcome aboard the SS Wikipedia, it do be yer captain speaking! You are hereby commissioned into CaptainEek's crew as a deckhand. If ye be crafty and good at catching sources, it won't be long before you graduate with a captainship of yer own.

    But in all seriousness, you asked for adoption, and I can provide. This will be a bit unusual, as you have around longer than I, and made more edits, but I will help in any way I can. My adoptions are generally free form, and serve as me providing advice and watching over my adoptees. You are always welcome at my talk page, and I will endeavor to reply as quick as possible. If you have a certain project, area, or problem you'd like help with, I can tailor a course of training for you. Smooth sailing, CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 02:00, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    that's terrific. that sounds great!! aye aye, Cap'n!!! all hands will muster to the foredeck at eight bells, to make a clean sweep fore and aft, set the maindeck to rights, the hoist sail and aweigh anchor, as it's off to the bounding main!!! avast me hearties!!!! 'tis to glory we steer!!!! --Sm8900 (talk) 03:05, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Sm8900, Howdy hello! Hows the editing life treating you? This is half serious, half test of a new version of Enterprisey's ReplyLink gadget. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 10:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks

    Just a quick note to say 'thank you' for taking on board the suggestion to pare down all your user sub-pages. It's really appreciated - and you went a lot further than I expected. Remember, if you ever feel you've made a mistake in deleting something, an administrator will be able to restore most types of content for you on request. (I actually think I ought to do the same with all my own subpages, now!) No need to reply back, especially as a quick 'thank' against an editor's contribution can often be a quick way to acknowledge something without creating more back and forth messaging. Cheers, Nick Moyes (talk) 18:05, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    About !voting

    Information icon Thank you for your comments, which you added in discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 January 25. Please note that, on Wikipedia, consensus is determined by discussion, not voting, and it is the quality of the arguments that counts, not the number of people supporting a position. If your comments concerned a deletion discussion, please consider reading Wikipedia's deletion policy for a brief overview of the deletion process. We hope that you decide to stay and contribute even more. Thank you! —⁠andrybak (talk) 21:33, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    phew!! thank you, Andrybak. it is nice to hear an actual invitation to participate around here. you have no idea how much I needed that. your timing is impeccable!! I appreciate your message, and all that you do here for the encyclopedia. thanks so much. see you!! --Sm8900 (talk) 21:39, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Because you try

    Keep up the enthusiasm!
    Thanks for caring about making Wikipedia better. Schazjmd (talk) 01:53, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    well, I'll be. it's a miracle!! thanks, Schazjmd!!! it sure is nice to be appreciated. you made me smile, for once.I sure needed that, right now!!! thanks!!!! --Sm8900 (talk) 02:18, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    +1, your efforts are appreciated (and not just recently but also for the last 14 years). I think the problem boiled down to trying to do too many things at once (multiple new initiatives instead of just focusing on one), but it seems like you have that all sorted now and I hope this experience doesn’t discourage you from continuing to volunteer here. Levivich (lulz) 02:23, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    wow, thanks Levivich. that is very nice of you to say. I really appreciate it. it is nice to see someone give me some positive vibes here. I really needed that. I really appreciate your note. thanks!!! --Sm8900 (talk) 02:34, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Sm8900, I second Levivich and Schazjmd's comments. I thought the WikiProject town hall was an interesting idea, but perhaps should've been incubated in your userspace at first. I'm stopping by for the same reason as Levivich and after noticing that you requested deletion of User:Sm8900/Wikipedia service award thumbnails/Master Editor Level Four after the recent MfD I closed closed as userfy to your userspace. I guess it didn't need walking anymore? ;-) Doug Mehus T·C 22:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Dmehus thanks so much! that means a lot to me. thanks. believe me, I appreciate the positive sentiment and the encouragement of messages like yours. that sounds fine. I will keep that in mind. re the Master Editor Level Four, I guess it was better off in the wild!! lol!!! --Sm8900 (talk) 00:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Proposal at the Village Pump to streamline the welcome template

     You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Proposal to streamline the welcome template. This may be of interest to you as a member of the Wikipedia Help Project. Sdkb (talk) 04:57, 27 February 2020 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]

    The Signpost: 1 March 2020

    Michael Hirsh foreign policy

    Here´s the citation you requested. [1] I have added it. Michael E Nolan (talk) 00:09, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    thanks! --Sm8900 (talk) 23:04, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    References

    1. ^ Why the Liberal International Order Will Endure Into the Next Decade By Michael Hirsh, Foreign Policy, 27 Dec 2019, retrieved 2 March 2020

    TOC

    --Moxy 🍁 23:09, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    thanks, Moxy! wow, talk about a wealth of information. this is very helpful. thanks!!! --Sm8900 (talk) 02:38, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    A few concerns

    Hello friend, got your message on my talk page, a great thanks for your appreciation. I’ve left you a few messages on my talk page as replies. Please check Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 05:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank You :)

    Thank you Sm8900 for stopping by, leaving a positive comment, and dropping off that handy welcome box. All the best. History DMZ (talk) 01:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @History DMZ:, no problem!! glad to help and to be in touch. feel free to drop by any time. thanks. see you!! --Sm8900 (talk) 14:57, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    2020 in Syria

    Hi. With respect to your creation of 2020 in Syria, could you take a look at Talk:Timeline_of_the_Syrian_Civil_War#Proposed_merge_with_2011_in_Syria,_2012_in_Syria,_2013_in_Syria,_2014_in_Syria,_and_2015_in_Syria?

    Would you be willing to:

    1-Merge the “Events” section of "2020 in Syria" into Timeline of the Syrian Civil War (January–April 2020) and replace it with the sentence “For events related to the Civil War, see Timeline of the Syrian Civil War (January–April 2020)”?

    2-Create 2019 in Syria (which is missing) along the lines of 2018 in Syria? Thanks. Tradediatalk 23:08, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi @Tradedia:. the first item #1 sounds fine. re item #2, I don't really have much that I would need to0 add to a timeline for 2019 right now. if anyone wishes to create it, I could visit it to see if i want to add data there. is that okay? I'm glad you came by to comment. please feel free to write back. thanks for your helpful info. cheers! --Sm8900 (talk) 14:59, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok, i did item #2 and will let you do item #1 ;) Tradediatalk 03:48, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The Bugle: Issue CLXVII, March 2020

    Full front page of The Bugle
    Your Military History Newsletter

    The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
    If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    "Conceptual species roles"

    Hi, I see you're populating this (new) category. Only thing is, what is it? A thing like a Keystone species is clearly a people-centric category, something that we consider important. But Predation/Predator? That's one end of an unquestionably real relationship, predators eat prey, basta. If you're prey, predators are about the realest thing imaginable. So, why "conceptual"? And I see that the category has Keystone species and Umbrella species as twin "main articles" - this isn't right. There should be just one main article embodying the definition of the category, but (having brought Keystone species to Good Article), they plainly don't, either of 'em.

    So, what we need is an unambiguous definition of what this category is about, in text on its Commons page; and a single article which is all about the subject. If there isn't one, the suspicion must be that the concept is ill-founded, i.e. that the category covers some ill-assorted bedfellows. Or what? Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:06, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    hm, okay, those questions make sense. firstly, I'm very glad to meet you, Chiswick Chap. you raise some very good and valid questions. and it is always good to meet a fellow Wikipedian who is devoted to the project in a meaningful way. so, thanks, welcome, and cheers!!
    in regards to your excellent questions, you are correct; "umbrella species," on the one hand is obviously a conceptual role, being defined solely on a relational basis, ie upon the relation and impact of the species upon its environment, habitat, and neighboring species,
    while "predator" is not a relational definition at all; it exists based upon the actual behavior of the species itself, on an empirical basis, not based upon some overall impact that that species has on its environment, or any long-term trends, patterns or effects that would become evident only over the long term; rather it is based purely upon the simply empircal behavior of the species itself, in regards to its own biological survival, not to any larger trends or factors.
    however, I would submit to you, that "predator" in fact could be encompassed as being under the categorical umbrella of "conceptual species role" as well. my reason for this is simple. the categorization by zoologists of an animal as a "predator" is not based upon any taxonomic or zoological classifications whatsoever; in other words, since the label "predator" clearly includes multiple species and genuses. from cellular organisms, to largfe mamamls, to reptiles, birds, etc etc, it too is a conceptual species role.
    • I agree with you that there are actually two types of "conceptual roles" within the umbrella of "conceptual species roles" overall;
      • one type of conceptual role, eg: "umbrella species" pertains to the animal's overall impact upon its environment, and only animals that actually have a significant impact; the majority of species would not be deemed to have any such overall impact, and only some species would ever be grouped under any such label.
      • while the other type of conceptual role eg: "predator" is based solely on the animal's own behavior, i.e. its own essential characteristics and behavior, and not any such larger impact at all.
    • However, again, i would submit that both types of conceptual roles fall under this category's umbrella; mainly because they are both "conceptual" labels, i.e. arbitrary labels which do not correspond with any actual taxonomic categories.
    does that sounds reasonable? sorry if my answer got a bit repetitious or recursive in places. I'm very pleased to be able to have this dialogue with you, and to think this through. my own answer above was partially simply my own discursive way to think through the important points that you have raised above.
    please do feel free to write back to let me know your thoughts on the points above. I am totally open to your comments and thoughts on this. I will be glad to propose some refinements, improvements, or elucidations to be made on the page of the category, based on any suggestions, questions, or comments that you may express.
    It's great to hear from you. thanks for your note. Cheers!!! --Sm8900 (talk) 16:24, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the considered and detailed reply. However I see we're being overtaken by events, as Fram has brought this to CfD, see the next thread below. We'd better speak over there, but of course you can use any of your own thoughts, as briefly as possible, in that discussion. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:29, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Chiswick Chap:, okay, thanks so much for your reply. I'd be very interested to discuss this further with you. by the way, please help me out, was there anything I omitted to do, or that i did improperly, in how I created this category? If so, then I apologize. I have set up categories in the past, and simply populated them to get them off the ground. I was never informed that following this set of initial steps as a process was disruptive. if it was, then I apologize. could you please let me know if there are any steps that i should have done differently, or handled differently? I'd be very glad to hear any feedback or input that you might like to offer. I appreciate your help. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 17:20, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    If you're asking about the minutiae of Wikiprocedure, then I'm probably not the best person as I steer clear of such things as far as possible. On the practical side, the first thing in creating a category is to consider if it will be robust, i.e. will it be easy to use, obvious in meaning, clearly defined, unambiguous, and if need be readily defensible on talk page or (in the last analysis) at CfD. The best categories are those that everyone in a field is familiar with - nobody will dispute "Protein" or "Gene". All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:30, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    items

    link to pump tabs

    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(idea_lab)&oldid=947638990

    The Signpost: 29 March 2020

    Research Question

    Do you use any browser extensions or organizing software to aid in wikipedia article writing? T3g5JZ50GLq (talk) 23:07, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @T3g5JZ50GLq:. hi! actually, I do not use those to aid in article-writing. I appreciate you taking the time to write. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 23:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Invitation to WikiProject Current Events.

    Hello Sm8900. I was reading your post on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Current events's talk page about wanting to revive the project. Well I managed to revive the project. If you would like to, come join it. Elijahandskip (talk) 21:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    A cupcake for you!

    I'm also belatedly returning the favor with a snack to accompany that drink. History DMZ (talk)+(ping) 20:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The Signpost: 26 April 2020

    Special Barnstar

    The Special Barnstar
    I'm teaching my niece to edit, and she made her first edits last night. I went to her talk page this morning (to say congratulations) and discovered the message you left. Thank you for showing her straight off that Wikipedia can be warm and welcoming. JSFarman (talk) 14:17, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @JSFarman:, thanks so much!!! no problem, I am glad if my greeting made Wikipedia a little more inviting for a new editor. and your barnstar above is very nice, and much appreciated. please feel free to be in touch any time. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 03:24, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Started a Wikiproject on Science Policy

    Hi Sm8900, I just wanted to let you know that the Wikiproject for Science Policy has been officially created! Thanks for showing your interest in the Science Policy Wikiproject proposal page. It's still a little bare, but with your assistance, I believe that we can make it real nice. I started it based off of the template suggested in the Wikiproject, so any edits are always welcome. I could use help with developing our first goals as well, so any suggestions are welcome! Lightning1115 (talk) 03:23, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Lightning1115:, that's terrific!! I will be glad to help in any way. I am the Lead Coordinator at WP:History WikiProject. we are actually just getting re-activated ourselves. but I will be glad to help out in any way. please feel free to be in touch any time. thanks!! -Sm8900 (talk) 03:26, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Just a heads up

    I know back in March you wanted to revive the Current Events WikiProject. Well it reactivated in April. Just letting participates listed before it reactivated know it is an active WikiProject again. Elijahandskip (talk) 16:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Elijahandskip: Hi. that's really terrific to know. I will keep an eye on that WikiProject. I appreciate the note. thanks!!! --Sm8900 (talk) 16:08, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Checking in

    Howdy hello! How goes things on the high seas? I just wanted to check in and get a report of what articles you've been working on lately, what you'd like to be working on, and if you need any help. I know I was a bit busy as of late, so trying to do the rounds and see how folks are getting on :) CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 23:55, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi CaptainEek! thanks so much for your nice note. it is good to hear from you. things are fine here. I appreciate you asking. but for now, all is well, so steady as she goes. I hope things are well with you. congrats on the adminship!!! thanks for dropping by. see you!! --Sm8900 (talk) 00:44, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I have sent you a note about a page you started

    Hello, Sm8900

    Thank you for creating 2021 in United States politics and government.

    User:Sam-2727, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

    Much of the page was copied from the 2021 page. Remember to change the text of page when copying the layout.

    To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sam-2727}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

    (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

    Sam-2727 (talk) 23:56, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    A brownie for you!

    Thanks for your nice welcome to me with a cup of tea have a brownie from meFaster than fairies (talk) 20:24, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Faster than fairies:, you're welcome! thanks for your nice note. happy editing! --Sm8900 (talk) 22:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    laptop

    I need help with my dell inspiron it keep asking for HDD password can u plz send me a software if u have Nhlakanipho bingo (talk) 15:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    hi. Sorry, but I am not familiar with that. I suggest that you visit wp:teahouse, and ask them to help with your question. Thanks. —Sm8900 (talk) 15:31, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Deletion discussions

    Howdy hello pal! Hope all is treating you well. I was recently pinged at an AfD you were involved in, as you likely saw. I appreciate your mature action to amend your comments. Kingsif is right, you should only vote once in AfD's, and other notes should be labelled "Comments". But you should also limit the number of comments you add, I try not to add more than two to any discussion unless I feel someone has made a major error. Responding to a plurality of comments can be seen as bludgeoning, and usually only rehashes previous arguments. It is often better to say your piece, and then move on, then to sink more time into it. Hope that helps, CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi Captain Eek! yes, your advice is well said, and very welcome and appreciated here. I agree with all of your points above. I think that Kingsif was well within their rights to say that. In the end, it was actually only two superfluous comments that needed to be removed, but I agree wholly that I was better off doing so. I'm glad to have your comments. I'm glad to still be your adoptee. thanks! --Sm8900 (talk) 18:13, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    July 2020 at Women in Red

    Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173


    Online events:


    Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

    Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

    Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

    --Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

    The Signpost: 28 June 2020

    WikiPrairie Dogs

    Hi! You can keep an eye on who's a wikiprairie dog here. Geekpotato24 (talk) 23:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The Bugle: Issue CLXXI, July 2020

    Full front page of The Bugle
    Your Military History Newsletter

    The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
    If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:James M. Buchanan on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    August 2020 at Women in Red

    Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175


    Online events:


    Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

    Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

    Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

    --Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

    Category:Military aides by country has been nominated for deletion

    Category:Military aides by country has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 07:18, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The Signpost: 2 August 2020

    Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:Israel on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kamala Harris on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Sun Aug 16: Great American Wiknic NYC & Beyond

    August 16, 3pm: Great American Wiknic

    You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our annual summer Great American Wiknic, this year being held virtually.

    We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

    Featuring artist-Wikimedian Sara Clugage's "Picnics: An Outside History" for a cultural exploration of picnicking, knowledge and society during the national panel in the first part. We encourage you to call in for the second part from a local park or natural site and share it on the video stream, as well as sharing your favorite picnic grub or other special foods with us.

    Is there a project you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? A Wiki* skill you'd like to learn? Let us know by adding it to the agenda. The Wiknic is taking the place of "WikiWednesday" this month, so we will also include salon and knowledge-sharing workshop aspects.

    3:00 pm - 4:00 pm online via YouTube (watch our national panel's livestream, and participate by text chat)
    4:00 pm - 5:00 pm online via Zoom (participate by videoconference with NYC community)

    We especially encourage folks to share your parks and foods on screen, and add your 3-minute lightning talks to our roster for the Zoom portion, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues!

    (You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

    --Wikimedia New York City Team 22:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

    Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Namespace on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:33, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    September Women in Red edithons

    Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177


    Online events:


    Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

    Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

    Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

    --Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

    The Signpost: 30 August 2020

    Back Again

    Thank you for the nice gesture and invitation cool person.... :-))) Existance Leesaaisath 19:55, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    September 6, 2-4pm E.S.T: NYC COVID-19 Multilingual Wikipedia Edit-a-thon - ONLINE

    You are invited to join the Sure We Can community for our NYC COVID-19 Multilingual Wikipedia Edit-a-thon - ONLINE - this Sunday, Sept 6th, 2020. The edit-a-thon is part of Sure We Can's work with NYC Health + Hospitals to stop the spread of Covid-19. We plan to work on translating the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City article into other languages; as well as, brainstorm ideas about how we could use wikipedia to slow the spread of Covid-19. Please join us, all skill levels welcome!

    Is there an idea you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? Have an idea how we can use wikipedia to slow the spread of Covid-19? Please, let us know by adding it to the agenda.

    2:00pm - 4:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms available)

    --Wil540 art (talk) 20:16, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:Slate industry in Wales on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The Bugle: Issue Issue CLXXIII, September 2020

    Full front page of The Bugle
    Your Military History Newsletter

    The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
    If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

    G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kamala Harris on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:32, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The Signpost: 27 September 2020

    The Signpost: 27 September 2020

    Category:3d gameplay wargames has been nominated for deletion

    Category:3d gameplay wargames has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 03:19, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Alert from WikiProject Current Events

    Hello. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Current events format is currently being updated. However, one new change is a section for "Current discussions". The Portal:Current events has debates all the time to determine if things are notable for the portal (international news) or if they are better suited for a place like 2020 in the United States. In the past, small 'edit wars' have taken place between editors over topics. This new section on the WikiProject is a new place where editors can discuss between each other and have an easy access to 'outside opinion' from other participates. Members in the Current Event WikiProject are welcome to invite other editors that have disagreements to start the discussion on the WikiProject. (Unlike RFC's, discussions about topics would be about 1 week or whenever the topic is no longer relevant from the WikiProject).

    Thank you for reading and thank you for participating in the Current Event WikiProject! (Current Event WikiProject Coordinator) Elijahandskip (talk) 19:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Discussion about First Lady and Second Gentleman-designate titles in infoboxes of Jill Biden and Doug Emhoff

    Please join a discussion here regarding whether the terms "First Lady of the United States Designate" and "Second Gentleman of the United States Designate" should be in the infoboxes of Jill Biden and Doug Emhoff, spouses of the president-elect and vice president-elect, respectively. We need to come to a consensus. Thank you for your participation. cookie monster (2020) 755 21:26, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Welcome with cookies template you asked for on HiLo48's talk page

    Hi Sm8900! I noticed you've been searching for the welcome template HiLo48 used to welcome some users. After scouring the WP:Welcoming committee/Welcome templates page, I've finally found it. Here it is: {{Welcome-personal}}. Thanks. Silikonz (💬🖋) 06:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    well hello there @Silikonz:!! thanks very much for the help. I was wondering about that one! I will add that to my list. it is nice to meet you! by the way, what areas or topics do you like to edit in? thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 15:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    hmmm... annnd it's gone! lol! according to that template's page , apparently it will be merged with the basic cookie template! oh well. still good to see this. thanks! --Sm8900 (talk) 15:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Awww... That template was great. As of now (05:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)) it's already gone. Hopefully, welcoming in Twinkle with the plate of cookies works (or does it try to subst that same template onto talk pages? Maybe it's still possible to retrieve the template content from history.) Silikonz (💬🖋) 05:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh yes, your earlier question - I didn't see that just then - I'll answer that here! I usually edit in computer-related pages. I've started using a Mac recently, and so sometimes add content in Apple-related pages. When I'm not doing that, I usually revert whatever vandalism I can see. Or other things I can't recall. (Yes, I'm a recent changes patroller.) Sorry if this sounds a bit vague, but that's all I can say. ;) Silikonz (💬🖋) 05:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

    Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Introducing reference errors

    Hello, your latest edits on Comparison of user features of messaging platforms introduced about 16 broken references. Wakari07 (talk) 18:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Whereby moved to draftspace

    An article you recently created, Whereby, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 08:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Disambiguation link notification for December 16

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comparison of user features of messaging platforms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kune.

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    look up articles

    look up entry: Clair Patterson --Sm8900 (talk) 00:55, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

    Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

    Hello Sm8900, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
    Happy editing,

    History DMZ (talk)+(ping) 02:18, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

    Thank you and Happy New Year

    Thank you..! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahulpatelfan (talkcontribs) 07:09, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Happy New Year Sm8900!

    Happy New Year!
    Hello Sm8900:
    Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Rahulpatelfan (talk) 07:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



    Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

    test edit

    test edit, --Sm8900 (talk) 03:42, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    WikiProject Current Events Discussion (New proposal to admins)

    You are invited to a new proposal that will affect the WikiProject Current events. The discussion is about adding a way to track how many times an article is listed at Portal:Current events. You can see the proposal here. Elijahandskip (talk) 15:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    File permission problem with File:Martha Layne Collins photo.jpg

    Thanks for uploading File:Martha Layne Collins photo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

    If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

    • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
    • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

    If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

    If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

    If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

    This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Help on Wikiproject Climate change project

    Hi,

    any chance you want to help out on increasing coverage and info on this ? Carbon sink upscaling additional info on carbon sink upscaling (missing info) --Genetics4good (talk) 16:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of American liberals on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Category:Contemporary history of the United States has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 18:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    "Games.com" listed at Redirects for discussion

    A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Games.com. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 14#Games.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    February 17, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
    Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

    You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

    We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

    This month will include a discussion of Black WikiHistory Month in February, plans for WikiWomen's History Month in March, and of course the great work that is being done in these topical areas throughout the year. We will also have a relevant demonstration of the Wikipedia:Did you know process. If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or responding to this message.

    7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

    (You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

    --Wikimedia New York City Team 01:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

    "New immune cell (2020)" listed at Redirects for discussion

    A discussion is taking place to address the redirect New immune cell (2020). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 18#New immune cell (2020) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    An article you recently created, Wikipedia measures and proposals, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:51, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:Republican Party (United States) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment, and at Talk:Uyghurs on a "History and geography" request for comment, and at Talk:Joe Biden on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment, and at Talk:Israel and the apartheid analogy on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    The Bugle: Issue CLXXIX, March 2021

    Full front page of The Bugle
    Your Military History Newsletter

    The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
    If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    A tag has been placed on Category:Comparison of messaging software requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

    If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:20, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    April editathons from Women in Red

    Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196


    Online events:


    Other ways to participate:

    Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

    --Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

    The Signpost: 28 March 2021

    Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

    Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Modest flowers

    Thank you for what you said on Yoninah's talk! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Disambiguation link notification for April 8

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States Navy SEALs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Guam.

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Information icon Hello, Sm8900. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2020 in Mideast politics and government, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

    If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

    If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Precious

    exploration of North America

    Thank you for quality articles around the U.S. in history and culture, such as Exploration of North America, History of the United States Government and 2020s in United States political history, for coordinating project history and helping at the technical village pump, for a bot and scripts, for missing, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

    You are recipient no. 2572 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:56, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    wow. that's really terrific and much appreciated, @Gerda Arendt:. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 15:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    April 21, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC with Environmental focus
    Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

    You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

    We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

    As this WikiWednesday is just the day before Earth Day, we will have an environmental focus.

    If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.

    7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

    (You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

    --Wikimedia New York City Team 00:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

    The Bugle: Issue CLXXX, April 2021

    Full front page of The Bugle
    Your Military History Newsletter

    The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
    If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


    The category "Leaders who took power by coup" should be added to Joe Bidens page.

    Hello, I need help

    Two guys are bothering me with this article: Death of Benito Mussolini. I added important details with their respective sources and those two not only revert arbitrarily but I go out on duty as if I were the bad guy. Please help me because I already inadvertently violated the rule of the three reverts. Thanks.--EnzoGorlomi90 (talk) 17:18, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    PS: Thank you for your kind welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EnzoGorlomi90 (talkcontribs) 17:19, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    I don't know why you are posting this on another user's talk page, but I don't see that they are involved in this issue. The correct place would be Talk:Death of Benito Mussolini, and I see you discussing it there. You have been given correct advice - sourcing is important. Even with sourcing, how edits are worded are important. If it looks like the editor is inserting their point of view, even with sourcing, the edits are likely to be removed. I think we need to close this talk thread on this user's page. If you still want to discuss this, please post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. That project is expert at military history. They can help you understand what is, and is not, acceptable and reliable sourcing on military history articles. — Maile (talk) 18:19, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    The Signpost: 25 April 2021

    Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:Moldavia on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    May 2021 at Women in Red

    Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198


    Online events:


    See also:


    Other ways to participate:

    Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

    --Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

    Hello, Sm8900. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2020 in Mideast politics and government".

    In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

    Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:24, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Past categories?

    ( from: Category:Past Wikipedia meetups in 2010s talk page Almost all the pages in the Category:Wikipedia meetups by year are about events in the past, and soon the others will be. Does it follow that all its subcategories ought to be renamed? It seems an unnecessary complication. Better, I think, to rename the "Past" categories, for simplicity and consistency with the annual and other timely categories used in almost all parts of the encyclopedia. Jim.henderson (talk) 12:53, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    @Jim.henderson:, that is an excellent point. I have adopted your proposal completely. thanks!! ---Sm8900 (talk) 🌍 03:35, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Concern regarding Draft:Whereby

    Information icon Hello, Sm8900. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Whereby, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

    If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

    If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Martha Layne Collins photo, 1986.jpg listed for discussion

    A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Martha Layne Collins photo, 1986.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 12:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Notice about a new WikiProject Proposal

    This is a friendly notice about a proposal to have yearly based WikiProjects. You can find the proposal by clicking here. Elijahandskip (talk) 19:05, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    May 19, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
    Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

    You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

    We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

    If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.

    7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

    (You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

    --Wikimedia New York City Team 03:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC) thanks! ---Sm8900 (talk) 🌍 22:38, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Request for peer review help

    Hi Sm8900. I hope you are doing well and staying safe during these times! Apologize to bother and posting a random request. I have just started to work on a stub (Fontainea Venosa)and had added some sections. I am trying my best to get the article to B class hopefully. Knowing your expertise, I would love if you can help me to review and left a comment on what I can do to improve my edits. I hope that this is okay, but no pressure if you are busy. That is completely fine and understandable :) Hope to hear from you soon. The article is Fontainea Venosa

    Thank you so much :) Sparklingkull (talk) 04:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    @Sparklingkull:, thanks so much for your terrific note! However, sorry, but my own editing knowledge does not really include any articles on botany or other science topics. i highly recommend that you either seek input at a wikiproject for that area, or else perhaps generally at an article review page. sorry that I can't help more. i appreciate your note. thanks!---Sm8900 (talk) 🌍 14:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sm8900: Hi Sm8900! Not a problem! Will do :) Thank you so much for your reply!

    The Bugle: Issue CLXXXI, May 2021

    Full front page of The Bugle
    Your Military History Newsletter

    The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
    If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    June 2021 at Women in Red

    Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201


    Online events:


    Other ways to participate:

    Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

    --Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

    thanks! ---Sm8900 (talk) 🌍 14:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

    You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

    A tag has been placed on YouTube Movies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

    If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 『Woona』Dear Celestia... 13:05, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:Donald Trump on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Your draft article, Draft:Whereby

    Hello, Sm8900. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Whereby".

    In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

    If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 10:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    June 16, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
    Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

    You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

    We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

    If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.

    7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

    (You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

    --Wikimedia New York City Team 16:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

    July 2021 at Women in Red

    Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205


    Online events:


    Other ways to participate:

    Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

    --Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

    Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:Snake oil on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Information icon Hello, Sm8900. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Timeline of the 2019–2020 Persian Gulf crisis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

    If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

    If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    GOCE June 2021 newsletter

    Guild of Copy Editors June 2021 Newsletter

    Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, our first newsletter of 2021, which is a brief update of Guild activities since December 2020. To unsubscribe, follow the link at the bottom of this box.

    Current events

    Election time: Voting in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 16 June and will conclude at the end of the month. GOCE coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Have your say and show support here.

    June Blitz: Our June copy-editing blitz is underway and will conclude on 26 June.

    Drive and blitz reports

    January Drive: 28 editors completed 324 copy edits totalling 714,902 words. At the end of the drive, the backlog had reached a record low of 52 articles. (full results)

    February Blitz: 15 editors completed 48 copy edits totalling 142,788 words. (full results)

    March Drive: 29 editors completed 215 copy edits totalling 407,736 words. (full results)

    April Blitz: 12 editors completed 23 copy edits totalling 56,574 words. (full results)

    May Drive: 29 editors completed 356 copy edits totalling 479,013 words. (full results)

    Other news

    Progress report: as of 26 June, GOCE participants had completed 343 Requests since 1 January. The backlog has fluctuated but remained in control, with a low of 52 tagged articles at the end of January and a high of 620 articles in mid-June.

    Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Tenryuu and Twofingered Typist, and from member Reidgreg.

    To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

    Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 12:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]

    Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:Greater Germanic Reich on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    The Bugle: Issue CLXXXII, June 2021

    Full front page of The Bugle
    Your Military History Newsletter

    The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
    If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:07, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    The Signpost: 27 June 2021

    "Master Editor Level Four" listed at Redirects for discussion

    A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Master Editor Level Four. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 29#Master Editor Level Four until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Gonnym (talk) 22:45, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    "Senior Editor Level Three" listed at Redirects for discussion

    A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Senior Editor Level Three. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 29#Senior Editor Level Three until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Gonnym (talk) 22:45, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    "Master Editor Level Four Service Award" listed at Redirects for discussion

    A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Master Editor Level Four Service Award. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 29#Master Editor Level Four Service Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Gonnym (talk) 22:45, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:Christopher Wren on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:Arameans on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:32, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    July 14, 7pm: Virtual Coney Island Meetup + NYC monthly collaboration
    Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

    You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly online gathering (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

    Instead of our usual "WikiWednesday" Salon, we'll focus on the WikiProject NYC monthly collaboration and this month's subject of Coney Island.

    And rather than Zoom, we'll meet on a proximity chat virtual Coney Island beach and share over topical articles and collaborations.

    We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

    7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via WikiConey on Gather

    (You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

    --Wikimedia New York City Team 14:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

    Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

    Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

    For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

    I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

    Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

    Thanks so much,

    Sarah Sanbar

    Sarabnas I'm researching Wikipedia Questions? 21:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    August Editathons with Women in Red

    Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207


    Online events:


    See also:


    Other ways to participate:

    Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

    --Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

    The Signpost: 25 July 2021

    The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIII, July 2021

    Full front page of The Bugle
    Your Military History Newsletter

    The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
    If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Concern regarding Draft:Channel 12 news

    Information icon Hello, Sm8900. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Channel 12 news, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

    If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

    If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Information icon Hello, Sm8900. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wikipedia measures and proposals, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

    If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

    If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    August 14, 12-5pm: Wikimania Wiknic NYC
    Wikimania 2021
    Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

    You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for a planned socially-distanced Wiknic ("the picnic anyone can edit") in Brooklyn's Prospect Park to coincide with the virtual Wikimania 2021.

    For this occasion, and to allow more space as desired, we have individually packed lunches provided by the chapter, and attendees are encouraged to RSVP at Eventbrite and give sandwich/entree orders.

    12:00pm - 5:00 pm in a shaded grove in front of the Picnic House
    (Prospect Park, Brooklyn)
    Long Meadow of Prospect Park

    (You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

    --Wikimedia New York City Team 18:49, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

    A tag has been placed on Category:Upcoming massively multiplayer online role-playing games indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

    If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:55, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    August 25, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
    Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

    You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

    We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

    If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.

    7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

    (You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

    --Wikimedia New York City Team 14:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

    WikiProject Twenty-Tens Decade Started

    Hello! This is a message to let you know that WikiProject Twenty-Tens decade has started. A few months ago, a WikiProject proposal was made and you supported the WikiProject. Feel free to join the new WikiProject if you want! Elijahandskip (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    September 2021 at Women in Red

    Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208


    Online events:


    See also:


    Other ways to participate:

    Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

    --Rosiestep (talk) 22:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

    well, look who's here! thanks for the message, @Rosiestep:!!! ---Sm8900 (talk) 🌍 01:40, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIV, August 2021

    Full front page of The Bugle
    Your Military History Newsletter

    The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
    If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:49, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, I came across your article 2021 in technology and computing in the new pages feed. Are you currently working on this article? If so, you might want to add the under construction tag at the top to let other page patrollers know that you're working on it. I was considering adding it myself but did not want to disrupt anything you were working on. Waddles 🗩 🖉 01:46, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    @WaddlesJP13: thanks for the note!! you are totally welcome to edit this entry any time, as much as you wish. please proceed any time. thanks!! ---Sm8900 (talk) 🌍 02:38, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

    You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

    Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Channel 12 news, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

    Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 07:03, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    The Signpost: 29 August 2021

    See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 29#Category:Upcoming massively multiplayer online role-playing games. 78.28.44.31 (talk) 06:15, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]