Jump to content

Jawaharlal Nehru: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Exdg77 (talk | contribs)
Exdg77 (talk | contribs)
divide nationalism movement 1931-1935 into three parts and expand
Line 173: Line 173:
<blockquote>Of course these movements exercised tremendous pressure on the British Government and shook the government machinery. But the real importance, to my mind, lay in the effect they had on our own people, and especially the village masses.&nbsp;... Non-cooperation dragged them out of the mire and gave them self-respect and self-reliance.&nbsp;... They acted courageously and did not submit so easily to unjust oppression; their outlook widened and they began to think a little in terms of India as a whole.&nbsp;... It was a remarkable transformation and the Congress, under Gandhi's leadership, must have the credit for it.</blockquote>
<blockquote>Of course these movements exercised tremendous pressure on the British Government and shook the government machinery. But the real importance, to my mind, lay in the effect they had on our own people, and especially the village masses.&nbsp;... Non-cooperation dragged them out of the mire and gave them self-respect and self-reliance.&nbsp;... They acted courageously and did not submit so easily to unjust oppression; their outlook widened and they began to think a little in terms of India as a whole.&nbsp;... It was a remarkable transformation and the Congress, under Gandhi's leadership, must have the credit for it.</blockquote>


=== Nationalist movement: 1931–1935 ===
=== Nationalist movement: 1931–1932 ===
The first [[Round Table Conference]] organised by the British government to discuss India's political future began in London on 12 November 1930. The Congress did not attend, but Nehru and other prisoners were released on 26 January 1931 by orders of [[Lord Irwin]], the viceroy of India.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=171-173}} On the day of his release, Nehru was informed that his father, Motilal, was seriously ill.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=171-73}} The family travelled to Lucknow to seek treatment. However, Motilal's health declined and he died in Lucknow on 6 February 1931, with his son and wife present.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=171-73}} On 5 March 1931, Gandhi signed a [[Gandhi–Irwin Pact|pact]] with Lord Irwin. Gandhi obtained some political concessions and agreed to end the Civil Disobedience Movement. Nehru was disappointed with the terms.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Mukherjee|first=Rudrangshu|url=https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Jawaharlal_Nehru/T7mCDwAAQBAJ?hl|title=Jawaharlal Nehru|year=2018|publisher=OUP India|isbn=9780199096596|pages=65}}</ref> Political developments soon turned against the Congress. Lord Irwin left India to be succeeded by [[Lord Willingdon]] in April 1931.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=186-87}} Gandhi and Nehru met Lord Willingdon in [[Shimla]] before agreeing to participate in a second Round Table Conference. Nehru came away with the impression that the new viceroy shared his perception of the pact as a temporary truce.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=187}} In August 1931, a [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative]] dominated
The first [[Round Table Conference]] organised by the British government to discuss India's political future began in London on 12 November 1930. The Congress did not attend, but Nehru and other prisoners were released on 26 January 1931 by orders of [[Lord Irwin]], the viceroy of India.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=171-173}} On the day of his release, Nehru was informed that his father, Motilal, was seriously ill.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=171-73}} The family travelled to Lucknow to seek treatment. However, Motilal's health declined and he died in Lucknow on 6 February 1931, with his son and wife present.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=171-73}} On 5 March 1931, Gandhi signed a [[Gandhi–Irwin Pact|pact]] with Lord Irwin. Gandhi obtained some political concessions and agreed to end the Civil Disobedience Movement. Nehru was disappointed with the terms.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Mukherjee|first=Rudrangshu|url=https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Jawaharlal_Nehru/T7mCDwAAQBAJ?hl|title=Jawaharlal Nehru|year=2018|publisher=OUP India|isbn=9780199096596|pages=65}}</ref> Political developments soon turned against the Congress. Lord Irwin left India to be succeeded by [[Lord Willingdon]] in April 1931.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=186-87}} Gandhi and Nehru met Lord Willingdon in [[Shimla]] before agreeing to participate in a second Round Table Conference. Nehru came away with the impression that the new viceroy shared his perception of the pact as a temporary truce.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=187}} In August 1931, a [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative]] dominated
[[National Government (United Kingdom)|National]] coalition came into power in the United Kingdom.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=191-92}} Lord Willingdon moved to suppress the Congress, with the support of the new [[Secretary of State for India]].<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p167-171">{{Cite book|last=Gopal|first=Sarvepalli|url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13225|title=Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947|date=1976|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780198079828|language=en|page=167-171}}</ref>
[[National Government (United Kingdom)|National]] coalition came into power in the United Kingdom.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=191-92}} Lord Willingdon moved to suppress the Congress, with the support of the new [[Secretary of State for India]].<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p167-171">{{Cite book|last=Gopal|first=Sarvepalli|url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13225|title=Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947|date=1976|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780198079828|language=en|page=167-171}}</ref>
Line 180: Line 180:
Non-payment of rent was a possible solution, but this risked giving the government a justification to suppress the Congress.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p165-166">{{Cite book|last=Gopal|first=Sarvepalli|url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13225|title=Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947|date=1976|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780198079828|language=en|page=165-66}}</ref>{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=192-93}} Nehru brought the matter before British authorities.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p165-166">{{Cite book|last=Gopal|first=Sarvepalli|url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13225|title=Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947|date=1976|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780198079828|language=en|page=165-66}}</ref> The government made no concessions, and the Congress decided to recommend tenant farmers withhold rent.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p165-166"/> The government introduced ordinances to suppress the "no-rent" agitation. Nehru was served with orders prohibiting him from leaving Allahabad and engaging in political activities {{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=192-93}} On 26 December 1931, Nehru was arrested for violating the order as he prepared to leave for Bombay to meet a returning Gandhi. He was sentenced to two years imprisonment.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p167-171"/>{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=192-93}} The government accussed of Nehru of pursuing a "[[Leninite]] dictatorship".<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p167-171"/> Nehru's arrest was part of a larger measure against Indian nationalism. The Congress was once again declared illegal, and most leading Congress members were in jail by 10 January 1932. Gandhi himself was arrested under a 1827 Bombay ordinance revived by the government. Indian civil disobedience was renewed.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=171-73}}
Non-payment of rent was a possible solution, but this risked giving the government a justification to suppress the Congress.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p165-166">{{Cite book|last=Gopal|first=Sarvepalli|url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13225|title=Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947|date=1976|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780198079828|language=en|page=165-66}}</ref>{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=192-93}} Nehru brought the matter before British authorities.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p165-166">{{Cite book|last=Gopal|first=Sarvepalli|url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13225|title=Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947|date=1976|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780198079828|language=en|page=165-66}}</ref> The government made no concessions, and the Congress decided to recommend tenant farmers withhold rent.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p165-166"/> The government introduced ordinances to suppress the "no-rent" agitation. Nehru was served with orders prohibiting him from leaving Allahabad and engaging in political activities {{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=192-93}} On 26 December 1931, Nehru was arrested for violating the order as he prepared to leave for Bombay to meet a returning Gandhi. He was sentenced to two years imprisonment.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p167-171"/>{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=192-93}} The government accussed of Nehru of pursuing a "[[Leninite]] dictatorship".<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p167-171"/> Nehru's arrest was part of a larger measure against Indian nationalism. The Congress was once again declared illegal, and most leading Congress members were in jail by 10 January 1932. Gandhi himself was arrested under a 1827 Bombay ordinance revived by the government. Indian civil disobedience was renewed.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=171-73}}


=== Nationalist movement: 1933–1934 ===
On 30 August 1933, Nehru was released from prison. He travelled to [[Pune]] to meet Gandhi. By this point, Nehru and Gandhi were growing apart. Nehru was vexed by some of Gandhi's philosophy and methods, including his prioritisation of social movements over independence since the [[Communal Award]] of August 1932.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p176-77">{{Cite book|last=Gopal|first=Sarvepalli|url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13225|title=Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947|date=1976|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780198079828|language=en|page=176-77}}</ref> Nehru was also concerned by some of Gandhi's lieutenants that he considered [[reactionaries]].<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p176-77"/> A diary entry from 18 July 1933 states "I am getting more and more certain there can be no further political co-operation between Bapu and me. At least not of the kind that existed. We had better go our different ways".<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p176-77"/> It was thought that Nehru might break with Gandhi, but the duo reconciled in Pune. Both publicly affirmed their trust in, and loyalty to, each other.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p179-180">{{Cite book|last=Gopal|first=Sarvepalli|url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13225|title=Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947|date=1976|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780198079828|language=en|page=179-180}}</ref> Nehru resumed his nationalist activities, and the British government moved to detain him once again. On 22 December 1933, the [[Sir John Gilmour, 2nd Baronet|Home Secretary]] sent a memo to all local governments in India:
On 30 August 1933, Nehru was released from prison. He travelled to [[Pune]] to meet Gandhi. By this point, Nehru and Gandhi were growing apart. Nehru was vexed by Gandhi's anti-rational mysticism, and prioritisation of social movements over independence since the [[Communal Award]] of August 1932.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p176-77">{{Cite book|last=Gopal|first=Sarvepalli|url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13225|title=Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947|date=1976|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780198079828|language=en|page=176-77}}</ref> Nehru was also concerned by some of Gandhi's lieutenants that he considered [[reactionaries]].<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p176-77"/> A diary entry from 18 July 1933 states "I am getting more and more certain there can be no further political co-operation between Bapu and me. At least not of the kind that existed. We had better go our different ways".<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p176-77"/> It was thought that Nehru might break with Gandhi, but the duo reconciled in Pune. Both publicly affirmed their trust in, and loyalty to, each other.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p179-180">{{Cite book|last=Gopal|first=Sarvepalli|url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13225|title=Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947|date=1976|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780198079828|language=en|page=179-180}}</ref> Nehru resumed his nationalist activities, and the British government moved to detain him once again. On 22 December 1933, the [[Sir John Gilmour, 2nd Baronet|Home Secretary]] sent a memo to all local governments in India:


<blockquote> The Government of India regard him [Nehru] as by far the most dangerous element at large in India, and their view is that the time has come, in accordance with their general policy of taking steps at an early stage to prevent attempts to work up mass agitation, to take action against him.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p185-86">{{Cite book|last=Gopal|first=Sarvepalli|url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13225|title=Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947|date=1976|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780198079828|language=en|page=185-86}}</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote> The Government of India regard him [Nehru] as by far the most dangerous element at large in India, and their view is that the time has come, in accordance with their general policy of taking steps at an early stage to
prevent attempts to work up mass agitation, to take action against him.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p185-86">{{Cite book|last=Gopal|first=Sarvepalli|url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13225|title=Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947|date=1976|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780198079828|language=en|page=185-86}}</ref></blockquote>


Government propaganda described Nehru as "the high priest of Communism".<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p187-88">{{Cite book|last=Gopal|first=Sarvepalli|url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13225|title=Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947|date=1976|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780198079828|language=en|page=187-88}}
Various speeches made in late 1933 were examined as grounds for prosecution. Nehru's denunciation of the Raj at Calcutta in January 1934 gave the Bengal government the opportunity to change him with sedition. He was arrested on his return to Allahabad on 12 January and taken back to Calcutta. He was sentenced to two years imprisonment on 16 February.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p185-86"/> In August 1934, Nehru was released for eleven days to attend to his wife's ailing health. He was sent back to prison when her health improved.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=251}}
</ref> The authorities remained fearful of his potential to attract followers to a revolutionary agitation. Various speeches made in late 1933 were examined as grounds for prosecution. Nehru's denunciation of the Raj at Calcutta in January 1934 gave the Bengal government the opportunity to change him with sedition. He was arrested on his return to Allahabad on 12 January and taken back to Calcutta. He was sentenced to two years imprisonment on 16 February.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p185-86"/> In August 1934, Nehru was released for eleven days to attend to his wife's ailing health. He was sent back to prison when her health improved.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=251}} Nehru would end up spending most of the time between December 1931 and September 1935 in prison.<ref>Schöttli, J., 2012. ''Vision and Strategy in Indian Politics: Jawaharlal Nehru’s Policy Choices and the Designing of Political Institutions'', p. 52. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.</ref>

=== Nationalist movement: 1934 ===
On 7 April 1934, Gandhi officially called off the Civil Disobedience Movement.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=231}} The movement had been fading since Gandhi became preoccupied with social issues. Nehru was left bitterly disappointed by the decision. He wrote "...there is hardly any common ground between me and Bapu and the others who lead the Congress today. Our objectives are different, our ideals are different, and our methods are likely to be different".<ref name="B.N.Pandey">{{Cite book|last=Pandey|first=B. N.|url=https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Nehru/PO-wCwAAQBAJ?hl|title=Nehru|date=1976|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK|isbn=9781349007929|language=en|page=179}}</ref><ref name="R.Dube">{{Cite book|last=Dube|first=Rajendra Prasad|url=https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Jawaharlal_Nehru/zE7VJZoHbzYC?hl|title=Jawaharlal Nehru: A Study in Ideology and Social Change|date=1976|publisher=Mittal Publications|isbn=9788170990710|language=en|page=106}}</ref> Nehru adds that "...I felt with a stab of pain that the cords of allegiance that had bound me to him for many years had snapped."<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p186-87">{{Cite book|last=Gopal|first=Sarvepalli|url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13225|title=Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947|date=1976|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780198079828|language=en|page=186-87}}</ref> The end of the movement was followed by Gandhi's announcement on 17 September 1934 that he was retiring from Congress politics in order to focus on social issues.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Dalton|first=Dennis|url=https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Mahatma_Gandhi/KxUp1igCL_0C?hl|title=Mahatma Gandhi: Nonviolent Power in Action|date=2012|publisher=Columbia University Press|isbn=9780231159593|language=en|page=230}}</ref> In the interim, the Swaraj Party had been reformed in May 1934 as a group within the Congress, with the support of Gandhi. The Swarajists aimed to contest the [[1934 Indian general election]]{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=235-36}}<ref name="Ghose1988">{{Cite book|last=Ghose|first=Shankar|url=https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Mahatma_Gandhi/5l0BPnxN1h8C?hlhl|title=Mahatma Gandhi|date=1988|publisher=Allied Publishers Limited|isbn=9788170232056|language=en|page=226-27}}</ref></blockquote> However, it was soon decided that the Congress itself would enter the elections, rather than the Swaraj Party on its behalf. To this end, a Congress Parliamentary Board was formed.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Gandhi|first=Rajmohan|url=https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Gandhi/FauJL7LKXmkC?hl|title=Gandhi: The Man, His People, The Empire|date=2012|publisher=University of California Press|isbn=9780520255708|language=en|page=364}}</ref>

The end of civil disobedience and the embrace of constitutionalism was a bitter blow for Nehru. The business community had been pressuring the Congress to revert to constitutionalism. In April 1934, Gandhi wrote to [[G. D. Birla]] that "There will always be a party within the Congress wedded to the idea of council-entry. The reigns of the Congress should be in the hands of that group."<ref name="Ghose1988"/> The business community was determined to secure influence with the party and office holders. Nehru became unhappy at the anti-socialist orientation of the Congress leadership.<ref name="B.N.Pandey"/><ref name="R.Dube"/> He wrote:

<blockquote>The Congress had become a caucus where opportunism flourished and the Working Committee's resolution condemning socialism showed such astounding ignorance of even the elements of the subject that it was painful to read it and realize that it might be read outside India. It seemed that the overmastering desire of the Committee was somehow to assure various vested interests even at the risk of talking nonsense.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p187-88"/></blockquote>

Nehru questioned the sincerity of constitutionalism. He complained that there were constitutionalists who had avoided civil disobedience when politics was unsafe and now sought office.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Ghose|first=Shankar|url=https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Mahatma_Gandhi/5l0BPnxN1h8C?hlhl|title=Mahatma Gandhi|date=1988|publisher=Allied Publishers Limited|isbn=9788170232056|language=en|page=226-27}}</ref> Nehru was also greatly concerned at this time by the growth of [[Communal_violence#Asia|communalism]]. He was critical of religious organisations whom he saw as putting their sectarian interests above the national one of independence.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p182-83">{{Cite book|last=Gopal|first=Sarvepalli|url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13225|title=Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947|date=1976|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780198079828|language=en|page=182-83}}</ref> The competition for office would only widen communal tensions.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|pp=253}}

In response to events, socialists formed the [[Congress Socialist Party]] faction within the Congress in May 1934. The group included [[Jayaprakash Narayan]], [[Narendra Deo]], [[Rammanohar Lohia]], [[Minoo Masani]], [[Yusuf Meherally]], [[Asoka Mehta]], and [[Achyut Patwardhan]]. This group made no secret that they sought and drew inspiration from Nehru.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p187-88"/> Masani wrote to Nehru in prison:

<blockquote>...the group in its proposed form would carry out the purpose you have in mind... a programme that would be socialist in action and objective...The group would do socialist propaganda among rank and file with a view to converting the Congress to an acceptance of socialism.<ref name="Mathur">{{Cite book|last=Mathur|first=Sobhag|url=https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Spectrum_of_Nehru_s_thought/YPXStqxsowUC?hl|title=Spectrum of Nehru's thought|date=1994|publisher=Mittal Publ.|isbn=9788170994572|language=en|page=44}}</ref></blockquote>

Nehru replied that "I would welcome the formation of a socialist group in the Congress... I feel the time has come when the country should face the issues and come to grips with real economic problems which ultimately matter."<ref name="Mathur"/> However, Nehru declined to join the group.<ref name="Mathur"/> According to [[Sarvepalli Gopal]], Nehru actually considered their decision to form the group premature, and likely to distract from the national goal of independence.<ref name="Sarvepalli1976p187-88"/> Nevertheless, Nehru's position allowed him to become a bridge between the socialists and Gandhi.<ref name="Dutt1981">{{Cite book|last=Rabindra Chandra Dutt|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2WI31XdK8pkC&pg=PR9|title=Socialism of Jawaharlal Nehru|publisher=Abhinav Publications|year=1981|isbn=978-81-7017-128-7|page=178}}</ref>


=== Europe: 1935–1936 ===
=== Europe: 1935–1936 ===
Line 191: Line 209:
[[File:Jawaharlal Nehru at Karachi on return from Lausanne with Kamala Nehru’s ashes.jpg|thumb|Nehru in [[Karachi]] after returning from [[Lausanne]], [[Switzerland]] with the ashes of his wife [[Kamla Nehru]] in March 1936]]
[[File:Jawaharlal Nehru at Karachi on return from Lausanne with Kamala Nehru’s ashes.jpg|thumb|Nehru in [[Karachi]] after returning from [[Lausanne]], [[Switzerland]] with the ashes of his wife [[Kamla Nehru]] in March 1936]]


Kamala was very ill by 1935. In May, she travelled to Germany to seek further treatment, and was accompanied by her daughter Indira.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|pp=245–46}} Nehru was released from prison on compassionate grounds in September 1935, and travelled to [[Badenweiler]] to be with his family. While on a visit to England in the fall, Nehru learned that he was Congress president-elect starting in December 1936. He was torn over whether to remain with his family, or accept the presidency. On 31 January, Kamala was moved to a sanatorium near [[Lausanne]] to be closer to Indira, who was studying at Bex.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|pp=248}} On 28 February 1936, Kamala died, with Nehru by her side.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|pp=248}} In March 1936, Nehru returned to India, having accepted the presidency. He stopped in Rome on his way back, and was visited by an Italian official. Nehru learned that [[Mussolini]] wanted to meet him personally to convey condolences. He wrote to Mussolini, thanking him for his message of condolence, but stated that he could not accept his invitation.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|pp=248}}
Kamala was very ill by 1935. In May, she travelled to Germany to seek further treatment, and was accompanied by her daughter Indira.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|pp=245–46}} Nehru was released early from prison on compassionate grounds in September 1935, and travelled to [[Badenweiler]] to be with his family. While on a visit to England in the fall, Nehru learned that he was Congress president-elect starting in December 1936. He was torn over whether to remain with his family, or accept the presidency. On 31 January, Kamala was moved to a sanatorium near [[Lausanne]] to be closer to Indira, who was studying at Bex.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|pp=248}} On 28 February 1936, Kamala died, with Nehru by her side.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|pp=248}} In March 1936, Nehru returned to India, having accepted the presidency. He stopped in Rome on his way back, and was visited by an Italian official. Nehru learned that [[Mussolini]] wanted to meet him personally to convey condolences. He wrote to Mussolini, thanking him for his message of condolence, but stated that he could not accept his invitation.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|pp=248}}


While in Europe, Nehru travelled to England and France, and met with several intellectuals and politicians.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|pp=248}} He became very concerned with the possibility of another world war. At that time, he emphasised that, in the event of war, India's place was alongside the democracies, though he insisted India could only fight in support of Great Britain and France as a free country.<ref name="Hoiberg2000">{{Cite book|last=Hoiberg, Dale|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ISFBJarYX7YC&pg=PA108|title=Students' Britannica India|publisher=[[Popular Prakashan]]|year=2000|isbn=978-0-85229-760-5|pages=107-08}}</ref>
While in Europe, Nehru travelled to England and France, and met with several intellectuals and politicians.{{sfn|Moraes|2007|pp=248}} He became very concerned with the possibility of another world war. At that time, he emphasised that, in the event of war, India's place was alongside the democracies, though he insisted India could only fight in support of Great Britain and France as a free country.<ref name="Hoiberg2000">{{Cite book|last=Hoiberg, Dale|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ISFBJarYX7YC&pg=PA108|title=Students' Britannica India|publisher=[[Popular Prakashan]]|year=2000|isbn=978-0-85229-760-5|pages=107-08}}</ref>
Line 211: Line 229:
The 1937 elections brought the Congress party to power in a majority of the provinces, with increased popularity and power for Nehru. Since the Muslim League under Muhammad Ali Jinnah (who was to become the creator of Pakistan) had fared badly at the polls, Nehru declared that the only two parties that mattered in India were the British colonial authorities and the Congress. Jinnah's statements that the Muslim League was the third and "equal partner" within Indian politics were widely rejected.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_xA-AAAAMAAJ|title=Pakistan: From Community to Nation|author=Arshad Syed Karim|publisher=Saad Publications|year=1985}}</ref> Nehru had hoped to elevate [[Abul Kalam Azad|Maulana Azad]] as the preeminent leader of [[Islam in India|Indian Muslims]], but Gandhi, who continued to treat Jinnah as the voice of Indian Muslims, undermined him in this.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Ayoob|first1=Mohammed|date=25 May 2018|title=Remembering Maulana Azad|author-link=Mohammed Ayoob|newspaper=[[The Hindu]]|url=https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/remembering-azad/article23980998.ece}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=21 May 2019|title=Triumph of Nehruvianism – Part 2|newspaper=The Economic Times |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/blogs/courts-commerce-and-the-constitution/triumph-of-nehruvianism-part-2/|last1=Paul |first1=Santosh }}</ref>
The 1937 elections brought the Congress party to power in a majority of the provinces, with increased popularity and power for Nehru. Since the Muslim League under Muhammad Ali Jinnah (who was to become the creator of Pakistan) had fared badly at the polls, Nehru declared that the only two parties that mattered in India were the British colonial authorities and the Congress. Jinnah's statements that the Muslim League was the third and "equal partner" within Indian politics were widely rejected.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_xA-AAAAMAAJ|title=Pakistan: From Community to Nation|author=Arshad Syed Karim|publisher=Saad Publications|year=1985}}</ref> Nehru had hoped to elevate [[Abul Kalam Azad|Maulana Azad]] as the preeminent leader of [[Islam in India|Indian Muslims]], but Gandhi, who continued to treat Jinnah as the voice of Indian Muslims, undermined him in this.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Ayoob|first1=Mohammed|date=25 May 2018|title=Remembering Maulana Azad|author-link=Mohammed Ayoob|newspaper=[[The Hindu]]|url=https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/remembering-azad/article23980998.ece}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=21 May 2019|title=Triumph of Nehruvianism – Part 2|newspaper=The Economic Times |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/blogs/courts-commerce-and-the-constitution/triumph-of-nehruvianism-part-2/|last1=Paul |first1=Santosh }}</ref>


In the 1930s, under the leadership of [[Jayaprakash Narayan]], [[Narendra Deo]], and others, the [[Congress Socialist Party]] group was formed within the INC. Though Nehru never joined the group, he acted as a bridge between them and Gandhi.<ref name="Dutt1981">{{Cite book|last=Rabindra Chandra Dutt|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2WI31XdK8pkC&pg=PR9|title=Socialism of Jawaharlal Nehru|publisher=Abhinav Publications|year=1981|isbn=978-81-7017-128-7|page=178}}</ref> He had the support of left-wing Congressmen Maulana Azad and [[Subhas Chandra Bose]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/on-parakram-diwas-a-look-at-bose-s-indian-national-army-101611393163491.html|title=On Parakram Diwas, a look at Bose's Indian National Army|last1=Soni|first1=Mallika|date=23 January 2021|website=Hindustan Times}}</ref><ref name="auto6">{{Cite web|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/galleries/nation/2017/dec/05/indian-national-congress-presidents-over-the-ages-the-ones-who-changed-course-of-history-101085.html|title=Indian National Congress Presidents over the ages: The ones who changed course of history|date=5 December 2017|website=The New Indian Express}}</ref> The trio combined to oust [[Rajendra Prasad]] as the Congress president in 1936.<ref name="auto6" /> Nehru was elected in his place and held the presidency for two years (1936–37).{{sfn|Moraes|2007|pp=234–38}} His socialist colleagues Bose (1938–39) and Azad (1940–46) succeeded him. During Nehru's second term as general secretary of the Congress, he proposed certain resolutions concerning the [[foreign policy of India]].{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=129}} From then on, he was given ''[[carte blanche]]'' ("blank cheque") in framing the foreign policy of any future Indian nation.<ref>Sharma, Rinkal. 2016. "[https://www.academia.edu/33066114/Nehru_a_passionate_advocate_of_education_for_Indias_children_and_youth_believing_it_essential_for_Indias_future_progress Nehru: a passionate advocate of education for India's children and youth, believing it essential for India's future progress]." ''International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity'' 7(7):256–59.</ref> Nehru worked closely with Bose in developing international relations with other countries.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.news18.com/news/india/jawaharlal-nehru-birth-anniversary-pandit-nehru-and-his-freedom-struggle-2386021.html|title=Jawaharlal Nehru Birth Anniversary: Pandit Nehru and His Freedom Struggle|date=14 November 2019|website=[[News18]]}}</ref> Nehru was also given the responsibility of planning the economy of a future India and appointed the [[National Planning Commission of India|National Planning Commission]] in 1938 to help frame such policies.<ref>{{Cite web|title=3rd Five Year Plan (Chapter 1)|url=http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/fiveyr/3rd/3planch1.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120326094741/http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/fiveyr/3rd/3planch1.html|archive-date=26 March 2012|access-date=16 June 2012|publisher=Government of India}}</ref><ref name="auto7">{{Cite web|url=https://thewire.in/history/past-continuous-nehru-independence|title=Past Continuous: Those Who Think Nehru Was Power Hungry Should Review Events Leading to Independence|website=The Wire|first=Nilanjan|last=Mukhopadhyay|date=14 November 2018}}</ref>
Nehru formed a faction with Congressmen Maulana Azad and [[Subhas Chandra Bose]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/on-parakram-diwas-a-look-at-bose-s-indian-national-army-101611393163491.html|title=On Parakram Diwas, a look at Bose's Indian National Army|last1=Soni|first1=Mallika|date=23 January 2021|website=Hindustan Times}}</ref><ref name="auto6">{{Cite web|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/galleries/nation/2017/dec/05/indian-national-congress-presidents-over-the-ages-the-ones-who-changed-course-of-history-101085.html|title=Indian National Congress Presidents over the ages: The ones who changed course of history|date=5 December 2017|website=The New Indian Express}}</ref> The trio combined to oust [[Rajendra Prasad]] as the Congress president in 1936.<ref name="auto6" /> Nehru was elected in his place and held the presidency for two years (1936–37).{{sfn|Moraes|2007|pp=234–38}} His socialist colleagues Bose (1938–39) and Azad (1940–46) succeeded him. During Nehru's second term as general secretary of the Congress, he proposed certain resolutions concerning the [[foreign policy of India]].{{sfn|Moraes|2007|p=129}} From then on, he was given ''[[carte blanche]]'' ("blank cheque") in framing the foreign policy of any future Indian nation.<ref>Sharma, Rinkal. 2016. "[https://www.academia.edu/33066114/Nehru_a_passionate_advocate_of_education_for_Indias_children_and_youth_believing_it_essential_for_Indias_future_progress Nehru: a passionate advocate of education for India's children and youth, believing it essential for India's future progress]." ''International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity'' 7(7):256–59.</ref> Nehru worked closely with Bose in developing international relations with other countries.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.news18.com/news/india/jawaharlal-nehru-birth-anniversary-pandit-nehru-and-his-freedom-struggle-2386021.html|title=Jawaharlal Nehru Birth Anniversary: Pandit Nehru and His Freedom Struggle|date=14 November 2019|website=[[News18]]}}</ref> Nehru was also given the responsibility of planning the economy of a future India and appointed the [[National Planning Commission of India|National Planning Commission]] in 1938 to help frame such policies.<ref>{{Cite web|title=3rd Five Year Plan (Chapter 1)|url=http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/fiveyr/3rd/3planch1.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120326094741/http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/fiveyr/3rd/3planch1.html|archive-date=26 March 2012|access-date=16 June 2012|publisher=Government of India}}</ref><ref name="auto7">{{Cite web|url=https://thewire.in/history/past-continuous-nehru-independence|title=Past Continuous: Those Who Think Nehru Was Power Hungry Should Review Events Leading to Independence|website=The Wire|first=Nilanjan|last=Mukhopadhyay|date=14 November 2018}}</ref>


The [[All India States Peoples Conference]] (AISPC) was formed in 1927 and Nehru, who had supported the cause of the people of the princely states for many years, was made the organisation's president in 1939.<ref name="Bandyopādhyāẏa2004">{{Cite book|last=Śekhara Bandyopādhyāẏa|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-EpNz0U8VEQC|title=From Plassey to Partition: A History of Modern India|publisher=[[Orient Blackswan]]|year=2004|isbn=978-81-250-2596-2|page=410}}</ref> He opened up its ranks to membership from across the political spectrum. AISPC was to play an important role during the political integration of India, helping Indian leaders Vallabhbhai Patel and [[V. P. Menon]] (to whom Nehru had delegated integrating the princely states into India) negotiate with hundreds of princes.<ref>{{Harvnb|Lumby|1954|p=232}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Brown|1984|p=667}}</ref>
The [[All India States Peoples Conference]] (AISPC) was formed in 1927 and Nehru, who had supported the cause of the people of the princely states for many years, was made the organisation's president in 1939.<ref name="Bandyopādhyāẏa2004">{{Cite book|last=Śekhara Bandyopādhyāẏa|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-EpNz0U8VEQC|title=From Plassey to Partition: A History of Modern India|publisher=[[Orient Blackswan]]|year=2004|isbn=978-81-250-2596-2|page=410}}</ref> He opened up its ranks to membership from across the political spectrum. AISPC was to play an important role during the political integration of India, helping Indian leaders Vallabhbhai Patel and [[V. P. Menon]] (to whom Nehru had delegated integrating the princely states into India) negotiate with hundreds of princes.<ref>{{Harvnb|Lumby|1954|p=232}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Brown|1984|p=667}}</ref>

Revision as of 00:58, 2 June 2023

Jawaharlal Nehru
Nehru in 1947
1st Prime Minister of India
In office
15 August 1947 – 27 May 1964
MonarchGeorge VI (until 1950)
President
Governors General
DeputyVallabhbhai Patel (until 1950)
Preceded byPost established
Succeeded byLal Bahadur Shastri[a]
Minister of External Affairs
In office
2 September 1946 – 27 May 1964
Head of Interim Government of India
In office
2 September 1946 – 15 August 1947
Governors General
Member of Parliament, Lok Sabha
In office
17 April 1952 – 27 May 1964
Preceded byConstituency established
Succeeded byVijaya Lakshmi Pandit
ConstituencyPhulpur, Uttar Pradesh
Personal details
Born(1889-11-14)14 November 1889
Allahabad, North-Western Provinces, British India
Died27 May 1964(1964-05-27) (aged 74)
New Delhi, India
Resting placeShantivan
Political partyIndian National Congress
Spouse
(m. 1916; died 1936)
ChildrenIndira Gandhi
Parents
RelativesNehru–Gandhi family
Alma mater
AwardsBharat Ratna (1955)
Signature

Jawaharlal Nehru (/ˈnru/ or /ˈnɛru/;[1] Hindi: [ˈdʒəʋɑːɦəɾˈlɑːl ˈneːɦɾuː] ; juh-WAH-hurr-LAHL NE-hǝ-ROO; 14 November 1889 – 27 May 1964) was an Indian anti-colonial nationalist, secular humanist, social democrat,[2] and author who was a central figure in India during the middle third of the 20th century. Nehru was a principal leader of the Indian nationalist movement in the 1930s and 1940s. Upon India's independence in 1947, he became the first prime minister of India, serving for 16 years. Nehru promoted parliamentary democracy, secularism, and science and technology during the 1950s, powerfully influencing India's arc as a modern nation. In international affairs, he steered India clear of the two blocs of the Cold War. A well-regarded author, his books written in prison, such as Letters from a Father to His Daughter (1929), Glimpses of World History (1934), An Autobiography (1936), and The Discovery of India (1946), have been read around the world. The honorific Pandit has been commonly applied before his name.

The son of Motilal Nehru, a prominent lawyer and Indian nationalist, Jawaharlal Nehru was educated in England—at Harrow School and Trinity College, Cambridge, and trained in the law at the Inner Temple. He became a barrister, returned to India, enrolled at the Allahabad High Court and gradually began to take an interest in national politics, which eventually became a full-time occupation. He joined the Indian National Congress, rose to become the leader of a progressive faction during the 1920s, and eventually of the Congress, receiving the support of Mahatma Gandhi who was to designate Nehru as his political heir. As Congress president in 1929, Nehru called for complete independence from the British Raj. Nehru and the Congress dominated Indian politics during the 1930s. Nehru promoted the idea of the secular nation-state in the 1937 Indian provincial elections, allowing the Congress to sweep the elections, and form governments in several provinces. In September 1939, the Congress ministries resigned to protest Viceroy Lord Linlithgow's decision to join the war without consulting them. After the All India Congress Committee's Quit India Resolution of 8 August 1942, senior Congress leaders were imprisoned and for a time the organisation was suppressed. Nehru, who had reluctantly heeded Gandhi's call for immediate independence, and had desired instead to support the Allied war effort during World War II, came out of a lengthy prison term to a much-altered political landscape. The Muslim League, under Muhammad Ali Jinnah, had come to dominate Muslim politics in the interim. In the 1946 provincial elections, Congress won the elections, but the League won all the seats reserved for Muslims, which the British interpreted to be a clear mandate for Pakistan in some form. Nehru became the interim prime minister of India in September 1946, with the League joining his government with some hesitancy in October 1946.

Upon India's independence on 15 August 1947, Nehru gave a critically acclaimed speech, "Tryst with Destiny"; he was sworn in as the Dominion of India's prime minister and raised the Indian flag at the Red Fort in Delhi. On 26 January 1950, when India became a republic within the Commonwealth of Nations, Nehru became the Republic of India's first prime minister. He embarked on an ambitious program of economic, social, and political reforms. Nehru promoted a pluralistic multi-party democracy. In foreign affairs, he played a leading role in establishing the Non-Aligned Movement, a group of nations that did not seek membership in the two main ideological blocs of the Cold War.

Under Nehru's leadership, the Congress emerged as a catch-all party, dominating national and state-level politics and winning elections in 1951, 1957 and 1962. He died as a result of a stroke on 27 May 1964. His birthday is celebrated as Children's Day in India.

Early life and career (1889–1912)

Birth and family background

Anand Bhawan the Nehru family home in Allahabad

Jawaharlal Nehru was born on 14 November 1889 in Allahabad in British India. His father, Motilal Nehru (1861–1931), a self-made wealthy barrister who belonged to the Kashmiri Pandit community, served twice as president of the Indian National Congress, in 1919 and 1928.[3] His mother, Swarup Rani Thussu (1868–1938), who came from a well-known Kashmiri Brahmin family settled in Lahore,[4] was Motilal's second wife, his first having died in childbirth. Jawaharlal was the eldest of three children.[5] The elder of his two sisters, Vijaya Lakshmi, was the first woman to become president of the United Nations General Assembly.[6] His youngest sister, Krishna Hutheesing, became a noted writer and authored several books on her brother.[7][8]

Childhood

Photograph of Nehru and his parents
Jawaharlal with his parents Swarup Rani Nehru (left) and Motilal Nehru in the 1890s

Nehru described his childhood as a "sheltered and uneventful one". He grew up in an atmosphere of privilege in wealthy homes, including a palatial estate called the Anand Bhavan. His father had him educated at home by private governesses and tutors.[9] Influenced by the Irish theosophist Ferdinand T. Brooks' teaching,[10] Nehru became interested in science and theosophy.[11] A family friend, Annie Besant subsequently initiated him into the Theosophical Society at age thirteen. However, his interest in theosophy did not prove to be enduring, and he left the society shortly after Brooks departed as his tutor.[12] He wrote: "For nearly three years [Brooks] was with me and in many ways, he influenced me greatly".[11]

Nehru's theosophical interests induced him to study the Buddhist and Hindu scriptures.[13] According to B. R. Nanda, these scriptures were Nehru's "first introduction to the religious and cultural heritage of [India]....[They] provided Nehru the initial impulse for [his] long intellectual quest which culminated…in The Discovery of India."[13]

Youth

Photograph of Nehru dressed in a cadet uniform
A young Nehru dressed in a cadet's uniform at Harrow School in England

Nehru became a nationalist during his youth.[14] The Second Boer War and the Russo-Japanese War encouraged his nationalism. He wrote, "[The] Japanese victories [had] stirred up my enthusiasm. ... Nationalistic ideas filled my mind. ... I mused of Indian freedom and Asiatic freedom from the thraldom of Europe."[11] Later, in 1905, when he had begun his institutional schooling at Harrow, a leading school in England where he was nicknamed "Joe",[15] G. M. Trevelyan's Garibaldi books, which he had received as prizes for academic merit, influenced him greatly.[16] He viewed Garibaldi as a revolutionary hero. He wrote: "Visions of similar deeds in India came before, of [my] gallant fight for [Indian] freedom and in my mind, India and Italy got strangely mixed together."[11]

Graduation

Swarup Rani and Motilal Nehru in England with their children from l. to r. Krishna (b. November 1907), Vijaya Lakshmi (b. August 1900) and Jawaharlal

Nehru went to Trinity College, Cambridge, in October 1907 and graduated with an honours degree in natural science in 1910.[17] During this period, he studied politics, economics, history and literature with interest. The writings of Bernard Shaw, H. G. Wells, John Maynard Keynes, Bertrand Russell, Lowes Dickinson and Meredith Townsend moulded much of his political and economic thinking.[11]

After completing his degree in 1910, Nehru moved to London and studied law at the Inner Temple Inn.[18] During this time, he continued to study Fabian Society scholars including Beatrice Webb.[11] He was called to the Bar in 1912.[18][19]

Advocate practice

Photograph if Nehru in his barrister's attire
Jawaharlal Nehru, Barrister-at-Law

After returning to India in August 1912, Nehru enrolled as an advocate of the Allahabad High Court and tried to settle down as a barrister. But, unlike his father, he had very little interest in his profession and relished neither the practice of law nor the company of lawyers: "Decidedly the atmosphere was not intellectually stimulating and a sense of the utter insipidity of life grew upon me."[11] His involvement in nationalist politics was to gradually replace his legal practice.[11]

Nationalist movement (1912–1938)

Britain and return to India: 1912–1913

Nehru had developed an interest in Indian politics during his time in Britain as a student and a barrister.[20] Within months of his return to India in 1912, Nehru attended an annual session of the Indian National Congress in Patna.[21] Congress in 1912 was the party of moderates and elites,[21] and he was disconcerted by what he saw as "very much an English-knowing upper-class affair".[22] Nehru doubted the effectiveness of Congress but agreed to work for the party in support of the Indian civil rights movement led by Mahatma Gandhi in South Africa,[23] collecting funds for the movement in 1913.[21] Later, he campaigned against indentured labour and discriminations faced by Indians in the British colonies.[24]

World War I: 1914–1915

When World War I broke out, sympathy in India was divided. Although educated Indians "by and large took a vicarious pleasure" in seeing the British rulers humbled, the ruling nobility sided with the Allies. Nehru confessed he viewed the war with mixed feelings. As Frank Moraes writes, "[i]f [Nehru's] sympathy was with any country it was with France, whose culture he greatly admired".[25] During the war, Nehru volunteered for the St. John Ambulance and worked as one of the organisation's provincial secretaries in Allahabad.[21] He also spoke out against the censorship acts passed by the British government in India.[26]

Nehru emerged from the war years as a leader whose political views were considered radical. Although the political discourse at the time had been dominated by the moderate, Gopal Krishna Gokhale,[23] who said that it was "madness to think of independence,"[21] Nehru had spoken, "openly of the politics of non-cooperation, of the need of resigning from honorary positions under the government and of not continuing the futile politics of representation".[27] He ridiculed the Indian Civil Service for supporting British policies, and agreed with a saying that it was "neither Indian, nor civil, nor a service".[28] Motilal Nehru, a prominent moderate leader, acknowledged the limits of constitutional agitation but counselled his son that there was no other "practical alternative" to it. Nehru, however, was dissatisfied with the pace of the national movement. He became involved with aggressive nationalists leaders demanding Home Rule for Indians.[29]

The influence of moderates on Congress' politics waned after Gokhale died in 1915.[21] Anti-moderate leaders like Annie Besant and Bal Gangadhar Tilak took the opportunity to call for a national movement for Home Rule. However, in 1915, the proposal was rejected because of the reluctance of the moderates to commit to such a radical course of action.[30]

Home rule movement: 1916–1917

See captionKamala and Jawaharlal Nehru marriage ceremony
Nehru and Kamala Kaul at their wedding in Delhi, 1916
Family portrait of Nehru, his wife and daughter
Nehru in 1919 with wife Kamala and daughter Indira

Nehru married Kamala Kaul in 1916. Their only daughter Indira was born a year later in 1917. Kamala gave birth to a boy in November 1924, but he lived for only a week.[31]

A Home Rule League was founded in September 1916 under the leadership of Annie Besant to voice a demand for self-governance, and to obtain the status of a Dominion within the British Empire as enjoyed at the time by Australia, Canada, South Africa, New Zealand and Newfoundland. Tilak had already formed his own Home Rule League in April 1916.[21] Nehru joined both leagues, but worked primarily with Besant.[32] He became secretary of Besant's Home Rule League and remarked later that "[Besant] had a very powerful influence on me in my childhood  ... even later when I entered political life her influence continued."[32][33]

In June 1917, the British government arrested and interned Besant. The Congress and other Indian organisations threatened to launch protests if she was not freed. Subsequently, the British government was forced to release Besant and make significant concessions after a period of intense protest.[34]

Meeting Gandhi: 1916–1919

In December 1916, the Congress made the Lucknow Pact with the Muslim League to support Hindu-Muslim unity. The pact had been discussed earlier in the year at a meeting held at the Nehru residence in Allahabad, and an agreement was reached at the annual session held in Lucknow.[32] Nehru first met Gandhi during the session. He was drawn to Gandhi's political leadership of the Champaran Satyagraha in 1917, but his father, Motilal, was reluctant to support political activity in contrivance of the law. In March 1919, Motilal Nehru invited Gandhi to his home in Allahabad to discuss his son's potential involvement in satyagraha campaigns.[35] Unwilling to alienate the influential Motilal Nehru, Gandhi counseled the younger Nehru to avoid direct participation. Nehru subsequently focused his activities writing for The Leader, a newspaper controlled by his father. However, Motilal Nehru soon lost control of The Leader, and started The Independent as a replacement. Nehru began writing for the new paper, and was briefly the editor before handing over to Bipin Chandra Pal.[36]

The Jallianwala Bagh killings occurred in Amritsar in April 1919 under the command of British brigadier general Michael O'Dwyer. Motilal Nehru was appointed by the Congress to head a public inquiry, and the younger Nehru was sent to Amritsar to gather information. On his return journey to Delhi by train, Nehru found himself sharing a compartment with O'Dwyer and other British officers. In Nehru's account, O'Dwyer claimed that "...he had the whole town at his mercy and he had felt like reducing the rebellious city to a heap of ashes, but he took pity on it and refrained..I was greatly shocked to hear his conversation and to observe his callous manner."[37]

Following the massacre, both Motilal and Jawaharal Nehru were radicalised, and became closely involved with Gandhi's political agitations. The family soon gave up luxury and western dress for the khadi and austerity advocated by Gandhi.[38][39] Motilal Nehru was elected President at the annual session of the Congress held in Amritsar in December 1919.[40]

Non-co-operation: 1920–1923

Nehru's first major national engagement came at the onset of the Non-cooperation movement in September 1920.[41] He played an influential role in directing political activities in the United Provinces (now Uttar Pradesh) and organising the peasantry. Nehru was arrested for the first time on 6 December 1921, on charges of anti-governmental activities. He was released a few months later.[42] The movement was gaining popularity, but its progress was suddenly halted as a result of the Chauri Chaura incident. On 4 February 1922, the police fired upon a group of protesters. In retaliation, the demonstrators attacked and set fire to a police station, which killed all of its occupants. In response, Gandhi halted political activities on 12 February, believing that his followers were not yet sufficiently trained in his principles of non-violent resistance. Nehru, who was still in prison when Gandhi made this decision, was disappointed, but ultimately agreed with the principle. He wrote to a colleague, "You will be glad to learn that work is flourishing. We are laying sure foundations this time... Rest assured that there will be no relaxation, no lessening in our activities and above all there will be no false compromise with Government."[43]

A few months after the movement ended, the British government arrested Gandhi. On 12 May 1922, Nehru was also again arrested by the government on charges of anti-governmental activities. He delivered the following statement[44]:

India will be free; of that there is no doubt. ... Jail has indeed become a heaven for us, a holy place of pilgrimage since our saintly and beloved leader was sentenced. ... I marvel at my good fortune. To serve India in the battle of freedom is honour enough. To serve her under a leader like Mahatma Gandhi is doubly fortunate. But to suffer for the dear country!! What greater good fortune could befall an Indian, unless it be death for the cause or the full realisation of our glorious dream?

Some Congress leaders and other Indian nationalists disagreed with Gandhi's decisions. These dissidents, including Motilal Nehru, contributed to the formation of the Swaraj Party by early 1923.[45] The Swaraj Party participated in the 1923 Indian general election under the Government of India Act 1919, which offered limited self-government in a system known as "dyarchy".

Nationalist movement: 1923–1926

Nehru's became a national figure by the end of the Non-cooperation movement.[46] He was released from jail at the end of January 1923, with a provisional amnesty. He was subsequently elected General Secretary of the All India Congress Committee in September 1923, and President of the United Provinces Provincial Congress Committee in October 1923.[47] Although the Congress avoided the main legislative bodies, the party agreed to contest municipal elections. In April 1923, Nehru was elected chairman of the Allahabad Municipal Board as a Congress member. He was selected after the party's first candidate, Purushottam Das Tandon, stood down due to opposition from the city's Muslim councillors.[48] The committee embraced the Nehru's ideology which was above sectarian prejudices. It unanimously opposed a suggestion to ban slaughter of cattle.[49] Nehru introduced Muhammad Iqbal's Sare Jahan se Accha to the school curriculum.[50] The anniversary of Tilak's death (1 August) and the day of Gandhi's sentencing (18 March) were declared public holidays while Empire Day was omitted.[49] Nehru opposed attempts by the municipality to segregate sex workers.[51] Nehru declared that they "are only one party to the transaction...if they were obliged to live only in a remote corner of the city, I would think it is equally reasonable to reserve another part of Allahabad for the men who exploit women and because of whom prostitution flourishes".[52] During this period, he also put efforts to improve schooling, sanitation, water supply and roads.[53]

British India included many territories ruled by Indian rulers, but under British paramountcy, called the princely states. In September 1923, Nehru visited the state of Nabha to observe the popular agitation after the British authorities deposed the Sikh maharaja, Ripudaman Singh.[54][55] Nehru was arrested and charged with illegally entering Nabha for taking part in "a criminal conspiracy". He was sentenced to two-and-a-half-years imprisonment, but this sentence was eventually dropped. Nehru's experience in Nabha influenced his consideration of popular movements in the princely states. The nationalist movement had been confined to the territories under direct British rule. He hoped to make the movement of the people in the princely states a part of the nationalist movement for independence, and this eventually contributed to his election as President of the All India States Peoples Conference (AISPC) in 1939.[54][56]

At the Kakinada session of the Congress in 1923, the Hindustani Seva Dal was established under N. S. Hardikar. The goal was to provide a "disciplined corps" of volunteers for the Congress.[57] The Dal was opposed by some party leaders, who considered it a potential militia-like organisation and thus inconsistent with Gandhian ethos.[58] Nehru was not among the detractors and agreed to become President. By 1931, the organisation was accepted by other Congress leaders. It was renamed the Seva Dal and brought under the aegis of the Congress Working Committee to become the party's central volunteer organisation. Each member underwent training in various subjects, including Indian history and labour relations. The corps was highly successful during the Civil Disobedience Movement, and remained under official censure even after British authorities lifted the general ban on the Congress in 1934.[59]

Europe: 1926-1927

Nehru became frustrated with his role as chairman of a municipal body. He resigned after two years and denounced municipal politics, stating "The main interest of Government in municipal administration is that "politics" should be kept out. Any resolution of sympathy with the nationalist movement is frowned upon."[60] In November 1924, Nehru's wife, Kamala, gave birth to an infant son that did not survive. Her health declined, and she began to develop symptoms of tuberculosis. Unhappy with the lack of political progress, Nehru decided to travel to Europe to seek treatment for his wife. On 1 March 1926, the couple and their daughter, Indira, departed for Switzerland. The family remained overseas for the next twenty months. They initially lived in Geneva. As Kamala showed little signs of improvement, Nehru later moved her to a sanatorium at Montana, in Valais, near Bex. While based in Montana, the family travelled across Europe. Nehru became acquainted with Indian expatriates, and corresponded with European intellectuals and politicians.[61] He wrote for the Journal de Genève, and also for the press back in India.[62]

In February 1927, Nehru was invited to Brussels to represent the Congress at the newly formed League against Imperialism (LAI). He was made an executive council member.[63][64] Increasingly, Nehru saw the struggle for independence from British imperialism as a multinational effort by the various colonies and dominions of the Empire; some of his statements on this matter, however, were interpreted as complicity with the rise of Hitler and his espoused intentions. Faced with these allegations, Nehru responded:[65]

We have sympathy for the national movement of Arabs in Palestine because it is directed against British Imperialism. Our sympathies cannot be weakened by the fact that the national movement coincides with Hitler's interests.

The LAI was dominated by socialists and communists, but also included other nationalists.[66] The meeting had been financed by the government of Mexico and the Kuomintang of China.[66] Nehru's public speeches articulated his understanding of imperialism, which drew more deeply from Marxist thought than previously. Nehru also interacted closely with the Chinese delegation and drafted a joint declaration that stressed a common cause against the British Empire.[67] Nehru was soon joined by his father, Motilal, in Europe. Nehru accepted an invitation to visit Moscow on the 10th anniversary of the October Revolution. Motilal was less enthusiastic, but conceded and visited Moscow with his son and daughter-in-law for four days.[68] Nehru was impressed by Soviet architecture, as well as its economic development and ideological progress on class and gender.[68] Nehru would write a series of articles on the USSR in Indian papers, which were compiled in December 1928 under the title Soviet Russia: Some Random Sketches and Impressions.[69] In his book Towards Freedom, Nehru wrote that "the theory and philosophy of Marxism lightened up many a dark corner of my mind".[70] Nehru, however, remained sceptical of Soviet communism. In a secret report to the Congress back in India, Nehru indicated that the "Russians will try to utilize the League to further their owns ends", and "Personally I have the strongest objection to being led by the nose by the Russians or any-one else".[71] In 1930, the LAI condemned Gandhi's Delhi Statement. In response, Nehru instructed the Congress to break off correspondence with the LAI. He was expelled from membership in 1931.[72][73]

Nationalist movement: 1927–1928

Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi in 1929

Nehru returned to India in December 1927 and disembarked at Madras to attend the annual Congress party session.[74] He drafted a resolution that the Congress should aim for India's complete independence from the British Empire.[75] The resolution passed despite Gandhi's criticism, and was supported by a newer generation of Congress leaders who were more receptive to radical solutions.[76] Gandhi wrote to Nehru and disapproved of his association with radicals demanding complete independence.[77] Nehru replied that present strategies were proving ineffective and questioned Gandhi's leadership since the end of the Non-co-operation movement.[78] Over the next few months, Nehru and Gandhi would exchange terse letters about India's political future.[79]

In 1928, the Simon Commission arrived in India to discuss possible constitutional reforms for self-government. The Congress opposed the commission on the grounds that it did not include Indians. Nehru was opposed to continued aspirations for dominion status. In response to the Simon Commission, the All Parties Conference drafted the Nehru Report, named after Nehru's father, Motilal Nehru, who chaired the drafting committee. Published in August 1928, the report outlined proposals for an Indian constitution under dominion status. In response, Nehru helped form the "Independence for India League", a pressure group within the Congress.[80][81] In September 1928, Nehru wrote to a friend "that the Congress contains at least two if not more groups which have nothing in common between them and the sooner they break apart the better".[82] Nehru's group included Subhas Chandra Bose. However, Nehru's revolutionary spirit was tempered by his moderation. His father, who had rejoined the Congress and was the President in 1928, also cautioned him that "pure idealism divorced from realities has no place in politics".[83] In December 1928, Gandhi and Nehru finally compromised. Gandhi proposed a resolution that called for the British to grant Dominion status to India within two years. If the British failed to meet the deadline, the Congress would call upon all Indians to fight for complete independence. Nehru objected to the time given to the British—he pressed Gandhi to demand immediate actions from the British. Gandhi brokered a further compromise by reducing the time given from two years to one.[81]

Declaration of independence: 1929

Nehru, President-elect of the Lahore session of the Indian National Congress in 1929, with the outgoing President, his father Motilal

Despite their disagreements, Gandhi encouraged Nehru to seek the Congress Presidency. Nehru was initially reluctant, and believed that the office would limit his political activity.[84] However, Gandhi persisted and eventually Nehru accepted his support. The British rejected demands for Dominion status in 1929.[81] Nehru assumed the presidency of the Congress party during the Lahore session on 29 December 1929, and introduced the successful resolution calling for complete independence.[81][85] Nehru drafted the Indian Declaration of Independence, which stated:

We believe that it is the inalienable right of the Indian people, as of any other people, to have freedom and to enjoy the fruits of their toil and have the necessities of life, so that they may have full opportunities for growth. We believe also that if any government deprives a people of these rights and oppresses them the people have a further right to alter it or abolish it. The British government in India has not only deprived the Indian people of their freedom but has based itself on the exploitation of the masses, and has ruined India economically, politically, culturally, and spiritually. We believe, therefore, that India must sever the British connection and attain Purna Swaraj or complete independence.[86]

At midnight on New Year's Eve 1929, Nehru hoisted the tricolour flag of India upon the banks of the Ravi in Lahore.[87] A pledge of independence was read out, which included a readiness to withhold taxes. The massive gathering of the public attending the ceremony was asked if they agreed with it, and the majority of people were witnessed raising their hands in approval. 172 Indian members of central and provincial legislatures resigned in support of the resolution and in accordance with Indian public sentiment. The Congress asked the people of India to observe 26 January as Independence Day.[88] Congress volunteers, nationalists, and the public hoisted the flag of India publicly across India. Plans for mass civil disobedience were also underway.[89]

After the Lahore session of the Congress in 1929, Nehru gradually emerged as the paramount leader of the Indian independence movement. Gandhi stepped back into a more spiritual role. Although Gandhi did not explicitly designate Nehru as his political heir until 1942, as early as the mid-1930s, the country saw Nehru as the natural successor to Gandhi.[90] As President, Nehru drafted the policies of the Congress and a future Indian nation in 1929.[91] He declared the aims of the congress were freedom of religion; right to form associations; freedom of expression of thought; equality before the law for every individual without distinction of caste, colour, creed, or religion; protection of regional languages and cultures, safeguarding the interests of the peasants and labour; abolition of untouchability; introduction of the adult franchise; imposition of prohibition, nationalisation of industries; socialism; and the establishment of a secular India.[92] All these aims formed the core of the "Fundamental Rights and Economic Policy" resolution drafted by Nehru in 1929–1931 and were ratified in 1931 by the Congress party session at Karachi chaired by Vallabhbhai Patel.[93]

Salt March: 1930

In early 1930, the Congress began planning civil disobedience to pressure the British authorities.[94] While Gandhi was planning a course of action, Nehru led the Congress in celebrating India's first 'independence day' on 26 January 1930 and hoisted the newly adopted tricolor flag.[95] Soon afterwards, Gandhi offered an 'Eleven Points' ultimatum to the British government; if the government would accept these points, Gandhi would call off civil disobedience. One of the 'Eleven Points' included the abolition of the British salt tax. Nehru was not enthusiastic about the 'Eleven Points' ultimatum and considered the demands too modest.[94] The government rejected the offer and Gandhi pressed ahead with civil disobedience through a satyagraha aimed at the salt tax. Most of the Congress leaders were ambivalent. Nehru wrote that "We were bewildered and could not quite fit in a national struggle with common salt."[96] After the protest had gathered steam, Nehru and other leaders realised the power of salt as a symbol. Nehru remarked about the unprecedented popular response, "It seemed as though a spring had been suddenly released".[97]

On 12 March, Gandhi set out from his ashram at Sabarmati for the small sea side village of Dandi. Nehru met Gandhi at Jambusar, about halfway between Sabarmati and Dandi.[98] After returning to Allahabad, Nehru made a speech to the country's youth:

The pilgrim marches onward. The field of battle lies before you, the flag of India beckons you, and freedom herself awaits your coming. Do you hesitate now, you who were but yesterday so loudly on her side? Will you be mere lookers-on in this glorious struggle and see your best and bravest face the might of a great empire which has crushed your country and her children? Who lives if India dies? Who dies if India lives?[98]

Gandhi broke the colonial salt law at Dandi on 6 April. Nehru was arrested on 14 April 1930 while on a train from Allahabad to Raipur. Earlier, after addressing a huge meeting and leading a vast procession, he had ceremoniously manufactured some contraband salt. He was charged with breach of the salt law and sentenced to six months of imprisonment at Central Jail.[99][100] Nehru nominated Gandhi to succeed him as the Congress president during his absence in jail, but Gandhi declined, and Nehru nominated his father as his successor.[101] With Nehru's arrest, the civil disobedience acquired a new tempo, and arrests, firing on crowds and lathi charges grew to be ordinary occurrences.[102]

The breach of the Salt Act soon became just one activity, and civil resistance spread to other fields. This was facilitated by the promulgation of various ordinances by the Viceroy prohibiting a number of activities. As these ordinances and prohibitions grew, the opportunities for breaking them also grew, and civil resistance took the form of doing the very thing that the ordinance was intended to stop.[103]

The salt satyagraha ("pressure for reform through passive resistance") succeeded in attracting world attention. Indian, British, and world opinion increasingly recognised the legitimacy of the claims by the Congress party for independence. Nehru considered the salt satyagraha the high-water mark of his association with Gandhi,[104] and felt its lasting importance was in changing the attitudes of Indians:[105]

Of course these movements exercised tremendous pressure on the British Government and shook the government machinery. But the real importance, to my mind, lay in the effect they had on our own people, and especially the village masses. ... Non-cooperation dragged them out of the mire and gave them self-respect and self-reliance. ... They acted courageously and did not submit so easily to unjust oppression; their outlook widened and they began to think a little in terms of India as a whole. ... It was a remarkable transformation and the Congress, under Gandhi's leadership, must have the credit for it.

Nationalist movement: 1931–1932

The first Round Table Conference organised by the British government to discuss India's political future began in London on 12 November 1930. The Congress did not attend, but Nehru and other prisoners were released on 26 January 1931 by orders of Lord Irwin, the viceroy of India.[106] On the day of his release, Nehru was informed that his father, Motilal, was seriously ill.[107] The family travelled to Lucknow to seek treatment. However, Motilal's health declined and he died in Lucknow on 6 February 1931, with his son and wife present.[107] On 5 March 1931, Gandhi signed a pact with Lord Irwin. Gandhi obtained some political concessions and agreed to end the Civil Disobedience Movement. Nehru was disappointed with the terms.[108] Political developments soon turned against the Congress. Lord Irwin left India to be succeeded by Lord Willingdon in April 1931.[109] Gandhi and Nehru met Lord Willingdon in Shimla before agreeing to participate in a second Round Table Conference. Nehru came away with the impression that the new viceroy shared his perception of the pact as a temporary truce.[110] In August 1931, a Conservative dominated National coalition came into power in the United Kingdom.[111] Lord Willingdon moved to suppress the Congress, with the support of the new Secretary of State for India.[112]

While Gandhi was in London, Nehru was accused of organising a "no-rent" political campaign against the British Raj.[112][113] Peasant agitations were occurring in the United Provinces. Tenant farmers were behind on rent, and facing evictions. They turned to the Congress for advice. Non-payment of rent was a possible solution, but this risked giving the government a justification to suppress the Congress.[114][115] Nehru brought the matter before British authorities.[114] The government made no concessions, and the Congress decided to recommend tenant farmers withhold rent.[114] The government introduced ordinances to suppress the "no-rent" agitation. Nehru was served with orders prohibiting him from leaving Allahabad and engaging in political activities [115] On 26 December 1931, Nehru was arrested for violating the order as he prepared to leave for Bombay to meet a returning Gandhi. He was sentenced to two years imprisonment.[112][115] The government accussed of Nehru of pursuing a "Leninite dictatorship".[112] Nehru's arrest was part of a larger measure against Indian nationalism. The Congress was once again declared illegal, and most leading Congress members were in jail by 10 January 1932. Gandhi himself was arrested under a 1827 Bombay ordinance revived by the government. Indian civil disobedience was renewed.[107]

Nationalist movement: 1933–1934

On 30 August 1933, Nehru was released from prison. He travelled to Pune to meet Gandhi. By this point, Nehru and Gandhi were growing apart. Nehru was vexed by Gandhi's anti-rational mysticism, and prioritisation of social movements over independence since the Communal Award of August 1932.[116] Nehru was also concerned by some of Gandhi's lieutenants that he considered reactionaries.[116] A diary entry from 18 July 1933 states "I am getting more and more certain there can be no further political co-operation between Bapu and me. At least not of the kind that existed. We had better go our different ways".[116] It was thought that Nehru might break with Gandhi, but the duo reconciled in Pune. Both publicly affirmed their trust in, and loyalty to, each other.[117] Nehru resumed his nationalist activities, and the British government moved to detain him once again. On 22 December 1933, the Home Secretary sent a memo to all local governments in India:

The Government of India regard him [Nehru] as by far the most dangerous element at large in India, and their view is that the time has come, in accordance with their general policy of taking steps at an early stage to prevent attempts to work up mass agitation, to take action against him.[118]

Government propaganda described Nehru as "the high priest of Communism".[119] The authorities remained fearful of his potential to attract followers to a revolutionary agitation. Various speeches made in late 1933 were examined as grounds for prosecution. Nehru's denunciation of the Raj at Calcutta in January 1934 gave the Bengal government the opportunity to change him with sedition. He was arrested on his return to Allahabad on 12 January and taken back to Calcutta. He was sentenced to two years imprisonment on 16 February.[118] In August 1934, Nehru was released for eleven days to attend to his wife's ailing health. He was sent back to prison when her health improved.[120] Nehru would end up spending most of the time between December 1931 and September 1935 in prison.[121]

Nationalist movement: 1934

On 7 April 1934, Gandhi officially called off the Civil Disobedience Movement.[122] The movement had been fading since Gandhi became preoccupied with social issues. Nehru was left bitterly disappointed by the decision. He wrote "...there is hardly any common ground between me and Bapu and the others who lead the Congress today. Our objectives are different, our ideals are different, and our methods are likely to be different".[123][124] Nehru adds that "...I felt with a stab of pain that the cords of allegiance that had bound me to him for many years had snapped."[125] The end of the movement was followed by Gandhi's announcement on 17 September 1934 that he was retiring from Congress politics in order to focus on social issues.[126] In the interim, the Swaraj Party had been reformed in May 1934 as a group within the Congress, with the support of Gandhi. The Swarajists aimed to contest the 1934 Indian general election[127][128] However, it was soon decided that the Congress itself would enter the elections, rather than the Swaraj Party on its behalf. To this end, a Congress Parliamentary Board was formed.[129]

The end of civil disobedience and the embrace of constitutionalism was a bitter blow for Nehru. The business community had been pressuring the Congress to revert to constitutionalism. In April 1934, Gandhi wrote to G. D. Birla that "There will always be a party within the Congress wedded to the idea of council-entry. The reigns of the Congress should be in the hands of that group."[128] The business community was determined to secure influence with the party and office holders. Nehru became unhappy at the anti-socialist orientation of the Congress leadership.[123][124] He wrote:

The Congress had become a caucus where opportunism flourished and the Working Committee's resolution condemning socialism showed such astounding ignorance of even the elements of the subject that it was painful to read it and realize that it might be read outside India. It seemed that the overmastering desire of the Committee was somehow to assure various vested interests even at the risk of talking nonsense.[119]

Nehru questioned the sincerity of constitutionalism. He complained that there were constitutionalists who had avoided civil disobedience when politics was unsafe and now sought office.[130] Nehru was also greatly concerned at this time by the growth of communalism. He was critical of religious organisations whom he saw as putting their sectarian interests above the national one of independence.[131] The competition for office would only widen communal tensions.[132]

In response to events, socialists formed the Congress Socialist Party faction within the Congress in May 1934. The group included Jayaprakash Narayan, Narendra Deo, Rammanohar Lohia, Minoo Masani, Yusuf Meherally, Asoka Mehta, and Achyut Patwardhan. This group made no secret that they sought and drew inspiration from Nehru.[119] Masani wrote to Nehru in prison:

...the group in its proposed form would carry out the purpose you have in mind... a programme that would be socialist in action and objective...The group would do socialist propaganda among rank and file with a view to converting the Congress to an acceptance of socialism.[133]

Nehru replied that "I would welcome the formation of a socialist group in the Congress... I feel the time has come when the country should face the issues and come to grips with real economic problems which ultimately matter."[133] However, Nehru declined to join the group.[133] According to Sarvepalli Gopal, Nehru actually considered their decision to form the group premature, and likely to distract from the national goal of independence.[119] Nevertheless, Nehru's position allowed him to become a bridge between the socialists and Gandhi.[134]

Europe: 1935–1936

Nehru in England, with his daughter Indira
Nehru in Karachi after returning from Lausanne, Switzerland with the ashes of his wife Kamla Nehru in March 1936

Kamala was very ill by 1935. In May, she travelled to Germany to seek further treatment, and was accompanied by her daughter Indira.[135] Nehru was released early from prison on compassionate grounds in September 1935, and travelled to Badenweiler to be with his family. While on a visit to England in the fall, Nehru learned that he was Congress president-elect starting in December 1936. He was torn over whether to remain with his family, or accept the presidency. On 31 January, Kamala was moved to a sanatorium near Lausanne to be closer to Indira, who was studying at Bex.[136] On 28 February 1936, Kamala died, with Nehru by her side.[136] In March 1936, Nehru returned to India, having accepted the presidency. He stopped in Rome on his way back, and was visited by an Italian official. Nehru learned that Mussolini wanted to meet him personally to convey condolences. He wrote to Mussolini, thanking him for his message of condolence, but stated that he could not accept his invitation.[136]

While in Europe, Nehru travelled to England and France, and met with several intellectuals and politicians.[136] He became very concerned with the possibility of another world war. At that time, he emphasised that, in the event of war, India's place was alongside the democracies, though he insisted India could only fight in support of Great Britain and France as a free country.[137]

Nehru's trip to Europe happened to be a turning point in his political and economic mindset. It's the visit that stimulated his interest in Marxism and his socialist thought pattern.[138] Time later spent incarcerated enabled him to research Marxism more deeply. Appealed by its ideas but repelled by some of its tactics, he never could bring himself to buy Karl Marx's words as revealed gospel.[139] However, from that time on, the benchmark of his economic view remained Marxist, adapted, where necessary, to Indian circumstances. After returning to India, Nehru gave a speech to the Congress and referenced the Soviet Union as a model of economic development.[140]

Nationalist movement: 1936-1938

Nehru with Indian Nobel-prize-winning poet Rabindranath Tagore in 1936
Photograph of 1000s of people in a procession
Nehru in a procession at Peshawar, North-West Frontier Province, 14 October 1937
Nehru on a visit to Egypt in June 1938

Nehru returned to India in March 1936 as Congress president-elect. In the interim, the British parliament had passed the Government of India Act 1935 as a response to political agitation. During the party's annual session at Lucknow in December 1936, the Congress debated whether to contest 1937 provincial elections to be held under the act.[141][142] Nehru opposed participation and described the act as a "new charter of bondage" and a "machine with strong brakes but no engine".[143][144] He believed that the act was designed to weaken the Congress and obstruct Indian nationalism.[145] At the Lucknow session, Nehru warned:

It is always dangerous to assume responsibility without power. It will be far worse with this constitution hedged in with safeguards and reserved powers and mortgaged funds, where we have to follow the rules and regulations of our opponents’ making. Imperialism sometimes talks of co-operation, but the kind of co-operation it wants is usually known as surrender, and the ministers who accept office will have to do so at the price of surrender of much that they might have stood for in public.[145]

Other Congress leaders joined with Nehru in condemning act, but wished to contest the elections. They resolved to defer the question of office acceptance for a later date.[145] Nehru reluctantly agreed to lead the election campaign as President. While leading the campaign, Nehru was re-elected for another term as Congress President at the annual session held at Faizabad in December 1937.[146]

The 1937 elections brought the Congress party to power in a majority of the provinces, with increased popularity and power for Nehru. Since the Muslim League under Muhammad Ali Jinnah (who was to become the creator of Pakistan) had fared badly at the polls, Nehru declared that the only two parties that mattered in India were the British colonial authorities and the Congress. Jinnah's statements that the Muslim League was the third and "equal partner" within Indian politics were widely rejected.[147] Nehru had hoped to elevate Maulana Azad as the preeminent leader of Indian Muslims, but Gandhi, who continued to treat Jinnah as the voice of Indian Muslims, undermined him in this.[148][149]

Nehru formed a faction with Congressmen Maulana Azad and Subhas Chandra Bose.[150][151] The trio combined to oust Rajendra Prasad as the Congress president in 1936.[151] Nehru was elected in his place and held the presidency for two years (1936–37).[152] His socialist colleagues Bose (1938–39) and Azad (1940–46) succeeded him. During Nehru's second term as general secretary of the Congress, he proposed certain resolutions concerning the foreign policy of India.[153] From then on, he was given carte blanche ("blank cheque") in framing the foreign policy of any future Indian nation.[154] Nehru worked closely with Bose in developing international relations with other countries.[155] Nehru was also given the responsibility of planning the economy of a future India and appointed the National Planning Commission in 1938 to help frame such policies.[156][157]

The All India States Peoples Conference (AISPC) was formed in 1927 and Nehru, who had supported the cause of the people of the princely states for many years, was made the organisation's president in 1939.[158] He opened up its ranks to membership from across the political spectrum. AISPC was to play an important role during the political integration of India, helping Indian leaders Vallabhbhai Patel and V. P. Menon (to whom Nehru had delegated integrating the princely states into India) negotiate with hundreds of princes.[159][160]

Nationalist movement (1939–1947)

Gandhi, Nehru, and Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan at the Congress Working Committee meeting in Wardha in September 1939

When World War II began, Viceroy Linlithgow unilaterally declared India a belligerent on the side of Britain, without consulting the elected Indian representatives.[161] Nehru hurried back from a visit to China, announcing that, in a conflict between democracy and fascism, "our sympathies must inevitably be on the side of democracy, ... I should like India to play its full part and throw all her resources into the struggle for a new order".[162]

After much deliberation, the Congress under Nehru informed the government that it would co-operate with the British but on certain conditions. First, Britain must give an assurance of full independence for India after the war and allow the election of a constituent assembly to frame a new constitution; second, although the Indian armed forces would remain under the British Commander-in-chief, Indians must be included immediately in the central government and given a chance to share power and responsibility.[163] When Nehru presented Lord Linlithgow with these demands, he chose to reject them. A deadlock was reached: "The same old game is played again," Nehru wrote bitterly to Gandhi, "the background is the same, the various epithets are the same and the actors are the same and the results must be the same".[164][165]

On 23 October 1939, the Congress condemned the Viceroy's attitude and called upon the Congress ministries in the various provinces to resign in protest.[166] Before this crucial announcement, Nehru urged Jinnah and the Muslim League to join the protest, but Jinnah declined.[163][167]

As Nehru had firmly placed India on the path of democracy and freedom at a time when the world was under the threat of Fascism, he and Bose split in the late 1930s when the latter agreed to seek the help of Fascists in driving the British out of India.[168] At the same time, Nehru supported the Republicans who were fighting against Francisco Franco's forces in the Spanish Civil War.[169] Nehru and his aide V. K. Krishna Menon visited Spain and declared support for the Republicans. When Benito Mussolini, dictator of Italy, expressed his desire to meet, Nehru refused him.[170][171]

Civil disobedience, Lahore Resolution, August Offer: 1940

Nehru with the Seva Dal volunteer corps in Allahabad, 1940

In March 1940, Muhammad Ali Jinnah passed what came to be known as the Pakistan Resolution, declaring that, "Muslims are a nation according to any definition of a nation, and they must have their homelands, their territory and their State." This state was to be known as Pakistan, meaning 'Land of the Pure'.[172] Nehru angrily declared that "all the old problems ... pale into insignificance before the latest stand taken by the Muslim League leader in Lahore".[173] Linlithgow made Nehru an offer on 8 October 1940, which stated that Dominion status for India was the objective of the British government.[174] However, it referred neither to a date nor a method to accomplish this. Only Jinnah received something more precise: "The British would not contemplate transferring power to a Congress-dominated national government, the authority of which was denied by various elements in India's national life".[175]

In October 1940, Gandhi and Nehru, abandoning their original stand of supporting Britain, decided to launch a limited civil disobedience campaign in which leading advocates of Indian independence were selected to participate one by one. Nehru was arrested and sentenced to four years imprisonment.[42] On 15 January 1941, Gandhi stated:

Some say Jawaharlal and I were estranged. It will require much more than a difference of opinion to estrange us. We had differences from the time we became co-workers and yet I have said for some years and say so now that not Rajaji but Jawaharlal will be my successor.[176][177]

After spending a little more than a year in jail, Nehru was released, along with other Congress prisoners, three days before the bombing of Pearl Harbor in Hawaii.[178]

Japan attacks India, Cripps' mission, Quit India: 1942

Gandhi and Nehru during the drafting of Quit India Resolution in Bombay, August 1942,

When the Japanese carried their attack through Burma (now Myanmar) to the borders of India in the spring of 1942, the British government, faced with this new military threat, decided to make some overtures to India, as Nehru had originally desired.[179] Prime Minister Winston Churchill dispatched Sir Stafford Cripps, a member of the War Cabinet who was known to be politically close to Nehru and knew Jinnah, with proposals for a settlement of the constitutional problem.[180] As soon as he arrived, he discovered that India was more deeply divided than he had imagined. Nehru, eager for a compromise, was hopeful; Gandhi was not. Jinnah had continued opposing the Congress: "Pakistan is our only demand, and by God, we will have it," he declared in the Muslim League newspaper Dawn.[181] Cripps' mission failed as Gandhi would accept nothing less than independence. Relations between Nehru and Gandhi cooled over the latter's refusal to co-operate with Cripps, but the two later reconciled.[182]

In 1942, Gandhi called on the British to leave India; Nehru, though reluctant to embarrass the allied war effort, had no alternative but to join Gandhi. Following the Quit India resolution passed by the Congress party in Bombay on 8 August 1942, the entire Congress working committee, including Gandhi and Nehru, was arrested and imprisoned.[183] Most of the Congress working committee including Nehru, Abdul Kalam Azad, and Sardar Patel were incarcerated at the Ahmednagar Fort[184] until 15 June 1945.[185]

In prison 1943–1945

See caption
Nehru's room at Ahmednagar fort where he was incarcerated from 1942 to 1945, and where he wrote The Discovery of India

During the period when all the Congress leaders were in jail, the Muslim League under Jinnah grew in power.[186] In April 1943, the League captured the governments of Bengal and, a month later, that of the North-West Frontier Province. In none of these provinces had the League previously had a majority—only the arrest of Congress members made it possible. With all the Muslim-dominated provinces except Punjab under Jinnah's control, the concept of a separate Muslim State was turning into a reality.[187] However, by 1944, Jinnah's power and prestige were waning.[188]

A general sympathy towards the jailed Congress leaders was developing among Muslims, and much of the blame for the disastrous Bengal famine of 1943–44 during which two million died had been laid on the shoulders of the province's Muslim League government. The numbers at Jinnah's meetings, once counted in thousands, soon numbered only a few hundred. In despair, Jinnah left the political scene for a stay in Kashmir. His prestige was restored unwittingly by Gandhi, who had been released from prison on medical grounds in May 1944 and had met Jinnah in Bombay in September.[188] There, he offered the Muslim leader a plebiscite in the Muslim areas after the war to see whether they wanted to separate from the rest of India. Essentially, it was an acceptance of the principle of Pakistan—but not in so many words. Jinnah demanded that the exact words be used. Gandhi refused and the talks broke down. Jinnah, however, had greatly strengthened his own position and that of the League. The most influential member of the Congress had been seen to negotiate with him on equal terms.[189]

Cabinet mission, Interim government 1946–1947

Nehru and the Congress party members of his interim government after being sworn in by the Viceroy, Lord Wavell, 2 September 1946

Nehru and his colleagues were released prior to the arrival of the British 1946 Cabinet Mission to India to propose plans for the transfer of power.[190][157] The agreed plan in 1946 led to elections to the provincial assemblies. In turn, the members of the assemblies elected members of the Constituent Assembly. Congress won the majority of seats in the assembly and headed the interim government, with Nehru as the prime minister. The Muslim League joined the government later with Liaquat Ali Khan as the Finance member.[191][192]

Prime Minister of India (1947–1964)

See caption
Teen Murti Bhavan, Nehru's official residence as prime minister, is now a museum.

Nehru served as prime minister for 16 years, initially as the interim prime minister, then from 1947 as the prime minister of the Dominion of India and then from 1950 as the prime minister of the Republic of India.

Republicanism

In July 1946, Nehru pointedly observed that no princely state could prevail militarily against the army of independent India.[193] In January 1947, he said that independent India would not accept the divine right of kings.[194] In May 1947, he declared that any princely state which refused to join the Constituent Assembly would be treated as an enemy state.[195] Vallabhbhai Patel and V. P. Menon were more conciliatory towards the princes, and as the men charged with integrating the states, were successful in the task.[196] During the drafting of the Indian constitution, many Indian leaders (except Nehru) were in favour of allowing each princely state or covenanting state to be independent as a federal state along the lines suggested originally by the Government of India Act 1935. But as the drafting of the constitution progressed, and the idea of forming a republic took concrete shape, it was decided that all the princely states/covenanting states would merge with the Indian republic.[197]

In 1963, Nehru brought in legislation making it illegal to demand secession and introduced the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution which makes it necessary for those running for office to take an oath that says "I will uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India".[198][199]

Nehru's daughter, Indira Gandhi, as prime minister, derecognised all the rulers by presidential order in 1969, a decision struck down by the Supreme Court of India. Eventually, her government by the 26th amendment to the constitution was successful in derecognising these former rulers and ending the privy purse paid to them in 1971.[200]

Independence, Dominion of India: 1947–1950

See caption
Lord Mountbatten swears in Nehru as the first Prime Minister of independent India on 15 August 1947

The period before independence in early 1947 was impaired by outbreaks of communal violence and political disorder, and the opposition of the Muslim League led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, who were demanding a separate Muslim state of Pakistan.[201][202]

Independence

He took office as the prime minister of India on 15 August and delivered his inaugural address titled "Tryst with Destiny".

Long years ago we made a tryst with destiny, and now the time comes when we shall redeem our pledge, not wholly or in full measure, but very substantially. At the stroke of the midnight hour, when the world sleeps, India will awake to life and freedom. A moment comes, which comes but rarely in history when we step out from the old to the new when an age ends, and when the soul of a nation, long suppressed, finds utterance. It is fitting that at this solemn moment we take the pledge of dedication to the service of India and her people and to the still larger cause of humanity.[203]

Assassination of Mahatma Gandhi: 1948

Nehru visiting an Indian soldier recovering from injuries at the Brigade Headquarters Military Hospital in Srinagar, Kashmir

On 30 January 1948, Gandhi was shot while he was walking in the garden of Birla House on his way to address a prayer meeting. The assassin, Nathuram Godse, was a Hindu nationalist with links to the extremist Hindu Mahasabha party, who held Gandhi responsible for weakening India by insisting upon a payment to Pakistan.[204] Nehru addressed the nation by radio:

Friends and comrades, the light has gone out of our lives, and there is darkness everywhere, and I do not quite know what to tell you or how to say it. Our beloved leader, Bapu as we called him, the father of the nation, is no more. Perhaps I am wrong to say that; nevertheless, we will not see him again, as we have seen him for these many years, we will not run to him for advice or seek solace from him, and that is a terrible blow, not only for me but for millions and millions in this country.[205]

Yasmin Khan argued that Gandhi's death and funeral helped consolidate the authority of the new Indian state under Nehru and Patel. The Congress tightly controlled the epic public displays of grief over a two-week period—the funeral, mortuary rituals and distribution of the martyr's ashes with millions participating in different events.[206][207] The goal was to assert the power of the government, legitimise the Congress party's control and suppress all religious paramilitary groups. Nehru and Patel suppressed the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the Muslim National Guards, and the Khaksars, with some 200,000 arrests.[208] Gandhi's death and funeral linked the distant state with the Indian people and helped them to understand the need to suppress religious parties during the transition to independence for the Indian people.[209] In later years, there emerged a revisionist school of history which sought to blame Nehru for the partition of India, mostly referring to his highly centralised policies for an independent India in 1947, which Jinnah opposed in favour of a more decentralised India.[210][211]

Integration of states and Adoption of New Constitution: 1947–1950

See caption
Indira Gandhi, Nehru, Rajiv Gandhi and Sanjay Gandhi in June 1949

The British Indian Empire, which included present-day India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, was divided into two types of territories: the Provinces of British India, which were governed directly by British officials responsible to the Viceroy of India; and princely states, under the rule of local hereditary rulers who recognised British suzerainty in return for local autonomy, in most cases as established by a treaty.[212] Between 1947 and about 1950, the territories of the princely states were politically integrated into the Indian Union under Nehru and Sardar Patel. Most were merged into existing provinces; others were organised into new provinces, such as Rajputana, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Bharat, and Vindhya Pradesh, made up of multiple princely states; a few, including Mysore, Hyderabad, Bhopal and Bilaspur, became separate provinces.[213] The Government of India Act 1935 remained the constitutional law of India the pending adoption of a new Constitution.[214]

See caption
Nehru signing the Indian Constitution c.1950

The new Constitution of India, which came into force on 26 January 1950 (Republic Day), made India a sovereign democratic republic. The new republic was declared to be a "Union of States".[215]

Election of 1952

Nehru as the main campaigner of the Indian National Congress, 1951–52 elections

After the adoption of the constitution on 26 November 1949, the Constituent Assembly continued to act as the interim parliament until new elections. Nehru's interim cabinet consisted of 15 members from diverse communities and parties.[216] The first elections to Indian legislative bodies (National parliament and State assemblies ) under the new constitution of India were held in 1952.[217][218] Various members of the cabinet resigned from their posts and formed their own parties to contest the elections. During that period, the then Congress party president, Purushottam Das Tandon, also resigned from his post because of differences with Nehru and since Nehru's popularity was needed for winning elections. Nehru, while being the prime minister, was elected the president of Congress for 1951 and 1952.[219][220] In the election, despite numerous competing parties, the Congress party under Nehru's leadership won a large majority at both state and national levels.[221]

Prime Minister: 1952–1957

In December 1953, Nehru appointed the States Reorganisation Commission to prepare for the creation of states on linguistic lines. Headed by Justice Fazal Ali, the commission itself was also known as the Fazal Ali Commission.[222] Govind Ballabh Pant, who served as Nehru's home minister from December 1954, oversaw the commission's efforts.[223] The commission created a report in 1955 recommending the reorganisation of India's states.[224]

Under the Seventh Amendment, the existing distinction between Part A, Part B, Part C, and Part D states was abolished. The distinction between Part A and Part B states was removed, becoming known simply as states'.[225] A new type of entity, the union territory, replaced the classification as a Part C or Part D state. Nehru stressed commonality among Indians and promoted pan-Indianism, refusing to reorganise states on either religious or ethnic lines.[222]

Subsequent elections: 1957, 1962

In the 1957 elections, under Nehru’s leadership, the Indian National Congress easily won a second term in power, taking 371 of the 494 seats. They gained an extra seven seats (the size of the Lok Sabha had been increased by five) and their vote share increased from 45.0% to 47.8%. The INC won nearly five times more votes than the Communist Party, the second-largest party.[226]

In 1962, Nehru led the Congress to victory with a diminished majority. The numbers who voted for the Communist and socialist parties grew, although some right-wing groups like Bharatiya Jana Sangh also did well.[227]

1961 annexation of Goa

After years of failed negotiations, Nehru authorised the Indian Army to invade Portuguese-controlled Portuguese India (Goa) in 1961, and then he formally annexed it to India. It increased his popularity in India, but he was criticised by the communist opposition in India for the use of military force.[228]

Sino-Indian War of 1962

From 1959, in a process that accelerated in 1961, Nehru adopted the "Forward Policy" of setting up military outposts in disputed areas of the Sino-Indian border, including 43 outposts in territory not previously controlled by India.[229] China attacked some of these outposts, and the Sino-Indian War began, which India lost. The war ended with China announcing a unilateral ceasefire and with its forces withdrawing to 20 kilometres behind the line of actual control of 1959.[230]

The war exposed the unpreparedness of India's military, which could send only 14,000 troops to the war zone in opposition to the much larger Chinese Army, and Nehru was widely criticised for his government's insufficient attention to defence. In response, defence minister V. K. Krishna Menon resigned and Nehru sought US military aid.[231] Nehru's improved relations with the US under John F. Kennedy proved useful during the war, as in 1962, the president of Pakistan (then closely aligned with the Americans) Ayub Khan was made to guarantee his neutrality regarding India, threatened by "communist aggression from Red China".[232] India's relationship with the Soviet Union, criticised by right-wing groups supporting free-market policies, was also seemingly validated. Nehru would continue to maintain his commitment to the non-aligned movement, despite calls from some to settle down on one permanent ally.[233]

The aftermath of the war saw sweeping changes in the Indian military to prepare it for similar conflicts in the future and placed pressure on Nehru, who was seen as responsible for failing to anticipate the Chinese attack on India. Under American advice (by American envoy John Kenneth Galbraith who made and ran American policy on the war as all other top policymakers in the US were absorbed in the coincident Cuban Missile Crisis) Nehru refrained from using the Indian air force to beat back the Chinese advances. The CIA later revealed that, at that time, the Chinese had neither the fuel nor runways long enough to use their air force effectively in Tibet. Indians, in general, became highly sceptical of China and its military. Many Indians view the war as a betrayal of India's attempts at establishing a long-standing peace with China and started to question Nehru's usage of the term Hindi-Chini bhai-bhai (Indians and Chinese are brothers). The war also put an end to Nehru's earlier hopes that India and China would form a strong Asian Axis to counteract the increasing influence of the Cold War bloc superpowers.[234]

See caption
Map showing disputed territories of India

The unpreparedness of the army was blamed on Defence Minister Menon, who "resigned" from his government post to allow for someone who might modernise India's military further. India's policy of weaponisation using indigenous sources and self-sufficiency began in earnest under Nehru, completed by his daughter Indira Gandhi, who later led India to a crushing military victory over rival Pakistan in 1971. Toward the end of the war, India had increased her support for Tibetan refugees and revolutionaries, some of them having settled in India, as they were fighting the same common enemy in the region. Nehru ordered the raising of an elite Indian-trained "Tibetan Armed Force" composed of Tibetan refugees, which served with distinction in future wars against Pakistan in 1965 and 1971.[235]

During the conflict, Nehru wrote two urgent letters to US President John F. Kennedy, requesting 12 squadrons of fighter jets and a modern radar system. These jets were seen as necessary to increase Indian air strength so that air-to-air combat could be initiated safely from the Indian perspective (bombing troops was seen as unwise for fear of Chinese retaliatory action). Nehru also asked that these aircraft be manned by American pilots until Indian airmen were trained to replace them. The Kennedy Administration (which was involved in the Cuban Missile Crisis during most of the Sino-Indian War) rejected these requests, leading to a cooling of Indo-US relations. According to former Indian diplomat G Parthasarathy, "Only after we got nothing from the US did arms supplies from the Soviet Union to India commence".[236] According to Time magazine's 1962 editorial on the war, however, this may not have been the case. The editorial states,

When Washington finally turned its attention to India, it honoured the ambassador's pledge, loaded 60 US planes with $5,000,000 worth of automatic weapons, heavy mortars, and land mines. Twelve huge C-130 Hercules transports, complete with US crews and maintenance teams, took off for New Delhi to fly Indian troops and equipment to the battle zone. Britain weighed in with Bren and Sten guns and airlifted 150 tons of arms to India. Canada prepared to ship six transport planes. Australia opened Indian credits for $1,800,000 worth of munitions.[237]

Popularity

See caption
Nehru with Albert Einstein in Princeton, New Jersey, 1949
Nehru with Indonesian president Sukarno in Jakarta in 1950
Nehru playing with a tiger cub at his home in 1955

To date, Nehru is considered the most popular prime minister winning three consecutive elections with around 45% of the vote.[238] A Pathé News archive video reporting Nehru's death remarks "Neither on the political stage nor in moral stature was his leadership ever challenged".[239] In his book Verdicts on Nehru, Ramachandra Guha cited a contemporary account that described what Nehru's 1951–52 Indian general election campaign looked like:

Almost at every place, city, town, village or wayside halt, people had waited overnight to welcome the nation's leader. Schools and shops closed; milkmaids and cowherds had taken a holiday; the kisan and his helpmate took a temporary respite from their dawn-to-dusk programme of hard work in field and home. In Nehru's name, stocks of soda and lemonade sold out; even water became scarce . . . Special trains were run from out-of-the-way places to carry people to Nehru's meetings, enthusiasts travelling not only on footboards but also on top of carriages. Scores of people fainted in milling crowds.[240]

In the 1950s, Nehru was admired by world leaders such as British prime minister Winston Churchill, and US President Dwight D. Eisenhower. A letter from Eisenhower to Nehru, dated 27 November 1958, read:

Universally you are recognised as one of the most powerful influences for peace and conciliation in the world. I believe that because you are a world leader for peace in your individual capacity, as well as a representative of the largest neutral nation....[241]

In 1955, Churchill called Nehru, the light of Asia, and a greater light than Gautama Buddha.[242] Nehru is time and again described as a charismatic leader with a rare charm.[b]

Nehru as an able statesman has been noted for his openness toward criticism from the opposition.[248] Atal Bihari Vajpayee, a prominent leader of the then opposition party Jan Sangh and the 10th Prime Minister of India, once recalled that during a debate in the parliament he commented on Nehru that "Panditji, you have a dual personality. You show characteristics of both Churchill and Chamberlain." Vajpayee said Nehru appreciated his words. Vajpayee added that such kinds of criticisms were only possible in those times.[249] At that time, Nehru had predicted that Vajpayee would become Prime Minister of India one day.[250] Other admirers of Nehru from opposing parties included George Fernandes who joined the socialist movement subject to the precondition that Nehru would not be replaced.[251]

Vision and governing policies

Nehru with schoolchildren at the Durgapur Steel Plant
Nehru with schoolchildren at the Durgapur Steel Plant. Durgapur, Rourkela and Bhilai were three integrated steel plants set up under India's Second Five-Year Plan in the late 1950s.

According to Bhikhu Parekh, Nehru can be regarded as the founder of the modern Indian state. Parekh attributes this to the national philosophy Nehru formulated for India. For him, modernisation was the national philosophy, with seven goals: national unity, parliamentary democracy, industrialisation, socialism, development of the scientific temper, and non-alignment. In Parekh's opinion, the philosophy and the policies that resulted from this benefited a large section of society such as public sector workers, industrial houses, and middle and upper peasantry. However, it failed to benefit the urban and rural poor, the unemployed and the Hindu fundamentalists.[252]

After the exit of Subhash Chandra Bose from mainstream Indian politics,[253] the power struggle between the socialists and conservatives in the Congress party balanced out. However, the death of Vallabhbhai Patel in 1950 left Nehru as the sole remaining iconic national leader, and soon the situation became such that Nehru could implement many of his basic policies without hindrance.[254] Nehru's daughter, Indira Gandhi, was able to fulfil her father's dream through the 42nd amendment (1976) of the Indian constitution by which India officially became "socialist" and "secular", during the state of emergency she imposed.[255][256]

Economic policies

Photograph of Nehru and German chancellor Konrad Adenauer and Deutsche Bank chairman Hermann Josef Abs
Nehru meeting with Chancellor Konrad Adenauer and Deutsche Bank chairman Hermann Josef Abs during a state visit to West Germany in June 1956.
Nehru during the construction of the Bhakra Dam in the Punjab, 1953
Nehru at an antibiotics manufacturing facility, Poona, 1956

Nehru implemented policies based on import substitution industrialisation and advocated a mixed economy where the government-controlled public sector would co-exist with the private sector.[257] He believed the establishment of basic and heavy industry was fundamental to the development and modernisation of the Indian economy. The government, therefore, directed investment primarily into key public sector industries—steel, iron, coal, and power—promoting their development with subsidies and protectionist policies.[258]

The policy of non-alignment during the Cold War meant that Nehru received financial and technical support from both power blocs in building India's industrial base from scratch.[259] Steel mill complexes were built at Bokaro and Rourkela with assistance from the Soviet Union and West Germany. There was substantial industrial development.[259] The industry grew 7.0% annually between 1950 and 1965—almost trebling industrial output and making India the world's seventh-largest industrial country.[259] Nehru's critics, however, contended that India's import substitution industrialisation, which continued long after the Nehru era, weakened the international competitiveness of its manufacturing industries.[260] India's share of world trade fell from 1.4% in 1951–1960 to 0.5% between 1981 and 1990.[261] However, India's export performance is argued to have shown actual sustained improvement over the period. The volume of exports grew at an annual rate of 2.9% in 1951–1960 to 7.6% in 1971–1980.[262]

GDP and GNP grew 3.9 and 4.0% annually between 1950 and 1951 and 1964–1965.[263][264] It was a radical break from the British colonial period,[265] but the growth rates were considered anaemic at best compared to other industrial powers in Europe and East Asia.[261][266] India lagged behind the miracle economies (Japan, West Germany, France, and Italy).[267] State planning, controls, and regulations were argued to have impaired economic growth.[268] While India's economy grew faster than both the United Kingdom and the United States, low initial income and rapid population increase meant that growth was inadequate for any sort of catch-up with rich income nations.[266][267][269]

Agriculture policies

Under Nehru's leadership, the government attempted to develop India quickly by embarking on agrarian reform and rapid industrialisation.[270] A successful land reform was introduced that abolished giant landholdings, but efforts to redistribute land by placing limits on landownership failed. Attempts to introduce large-scale cooperative farming were frustrated by landowning rural elites, who formed the core of the powerful right-wing of the Congress and had considerable political support in opposing Nehru's efforts.[271] Agricultural production expanded until the early 1960s, as additional land was brought under cultivation and some irrigation projects began to have an effect. The establishment of agricultural universities, modelled after land-grant colleges in the United States, contributed to the development of the economy.[272] These universities worked with high-yielding varieties of wheat and rice, initially developed in Mexico and the Philippines, that in the 1960s began the Green Revolution, an effort to diversify and increase crop production. At the same time, a series of failed monsoons would cause serious food shortages, despite the steady progress and an increase in agricultural production.[273]

Social policies

Education

Nehru was a passionate advocate of education for India's children and youth, believing it essential for India's future progress. His government oversaw the establishment of many institutions of higher learning, including the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, the Indian Institutes of Technology, the Indian Institutes of Management and the National Institutes of Technology.[274] Nehru also outlined a commitment in his five-year plans to guarantee free and compulsory primary education to all of India's children. For this purpose, Nehru oversaw the creation of mass village enrolment programs and the construction of thousands of schools. Nehru also launched initiatives such as the provision of free milk and meals to children to fight malnutrition. Adult education centres and vocational and technical schools were also organised for adults, especially in the rural areas.[275]

Hindu code bills and marriage laws

Under Nehru, the Indian Parliament enacted many changes to Hindu law through the Hindu code bills to criminalise caste discrimination and increase the legal rights and social freedoms of women.[276][277] The Nehru administration saw such codification as necessary to unify the Hindu community, which ideally would be a first step towards unifying the nation.[278] They succeeded in passing four Hindu code bills in 1955–56: the Hindu Marriage Act, Hindu Succession Act, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, and Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act.[279] Those who practise Sikhism, Jainism, and Buddhism are categorised as Hindus under the jurisdiction of the Code Bill.[280]

Nehru specifically wrote Article 44 of the Indian constitution under the Directive Principles of State Policy which states: "The State shall endeavor to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India." The article has formed the basis of secularism in India.[281] However, Nehru has been criticised for the inconsistent application of the law. Most notably, he allowed Muslims to keep their personal law in matters relating to marriage and inheritance. In the small state of Goa, a civil code based on the old Portuguese Family Laws was allowed to continue, and Nehru prohibited Muslim personal law. This resulted from the annexation of Goa in 1961 by India, when Nehru promised the people that their laws would be left intact. This has led to accusations of selective secularism.[282][283]

While Nehru exempted Muslim law from legislation and they remained unreformed, he passed the Special Marriage Act in 1954.[284] The idea behind this act was to give everyone in India the ability to marry outside the personal law under a civil marriage. In many respects, the act was almost identical to the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, demonstrating how secularised the law regarding Hindus had become. The Special Marriage Act allowed Muslims to marry under it and keep the protections, generally beneficial to Muslim women, that could not be found in the personal law. Under the act, polygamy was illegal, and inheritance and succession would be governed by the Indian Succession Act, rather than the respective Muslim personal law. Divorce would be governed by secular law, and maintenance of a divorced wife would be along the lines set down in civil law.[285]

Reservations for socially-oppressed communities

A system of reservations in government services and educational institutions was created to eradicate the social inequalities and disadvantages faced by peoples of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Nehru convincingly succeeded in secularism and religious harmony, increasing the representation of minorities in government.[286]

Language policy

Nehru was part of a faction of the Congress party that saw the benefit of an unifying local language, namely, Hindi.[287][288] However, Nehru himself recognised that "English is undoubtedly today the nearest approach to an international language".[289] After an exhaustive and divisive debate with the non-Hindi speakers, Hindi was adopted as the official language of India in 1950, with English continuing as an associate official language for 15 years, after which Hindi would become the sole official language. Efforts by the Indian Government to make Hindi the sole official language after 1965 were unacceptable to many non-Hindi Indian states, which wanted the continued use of English. The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), a descendant of Dravidar Kazhagam, led the opposition to Hindi.[290] To allay their fears, Nehru enacted the Official Languages Act in 1963 to ensure the continuing use of English beyond 1965. The text of the Act did not satisfy the DMK and increased their scepticism that future administrations might not honour his assurances. The Congress Government headed by Indira Gandhi eventually amended the Official Languages Act in 1967 to guarantee the indefinite use of Hindi and English as official languages. This effectively ensured the current "virtual indefinite policy of bilingualism" of the Indian Republic.[291]

Foreign policy

Throughout his long tenure as the prime minister, Nehru also held the portfolio of External Affairs. Usually with the assistance of Krishna Menon, Nehru shaped the new nation's foreign policy. He dealt with five major issues:[292][293]

  • Partition of India and Relations with Pakistan: One of the major foreign policy issues that India faced after its independence in 1947 was the violent partition of the subcontinent and the emergence of Pakistan as a separate state. India and Pakistan had tense relations due to border disputes, which led to several wars between the two countries, including the first war in 1947–1948 and the second in 1965.[294]
  • Relations with China: Another major foreign policy challenge for India during this period was its relationship with China, a neighbour to the north. India recognised the People's Republic of China in 1950 and established diplomatic relations with it, but border disputes led to the Sino-Indian War of 1962.[295]
  • Non-alignment: India also pursued a policy of non-alignment during the Cold War. Nehru played a leading role in the Non-Aligned Movement, which consisted of developing countries that were not aligned with either the Western (pro-American) or Eastern (pro-Russian) blocs.[296] Nehru never gave up his grandiose dream of forging some sort of international coalition of non-colonial and the colonised powers. However the world was rapidly bifurcated by the emergence of the Cold War between the West, led by the United States and Britain, and the East, led by the Soviet Union. Nehru decided it was urgent to develop policies regarding the Cold War, as well as relations with Pakistan, Britain, and the Commonwealth. Other plans could wait. Nehru and the Congress looked on the Soviet Union with distrust, reassuring the West that there was not the least chance of India lining up with the Soviet Union in war or peace.[297] Nehru intensely disliked the Cold War—the more India got involved, he believed, the worse for his long-term objectives of economic and national development. He took the lead in the non-aligned movement.[298]
  • Kashmir Conflict: The issue of dividing the largely Muslim state of Kashmir was a major foreign policy challenge for Nehru. India and Pakistan both claimed the entire region and fought several wars over how it was divided. The United Nations tried but failed to find a solution. At the United Nations, the Soviets supported Pakistan on Kashmir and there was a move to demand arbitration or a plebiscite, but India steadfastly repudiated the notions. Nehru insisted that Indian troops would not be withdrawn from Kashmir.[299]
  • Economic Development: India also faced the challenge of promoting economic development and securing foreign aid and investment to achieve this goal. India sought aid from both Western and Eastern bloc countries, but it was often conditioned on political alignment or other considerations. Nehru wanted India to be self-sufficient.[300]

The Commonwealth

Photograph of Queen Elizabeth II with Nehru and other Commonwealth leaders
Queen Elizabeth II with Nehru and other Commonwealth leaders, taken at the 1960 Commonwealth Conference, Windsor Castle

After independence, Nehru wanted to maintain good relations with Britain and other British commonwealth countries. As prime minister of the Dominion of India, he signed the 1949 London Declaration, under which India agreed to remain within the Commonwealth of Nations after becoming a republic in January 1950, and to recognise the British monarch as a "symbol of the free association of its independent member nations and as such the Head of the Commonwealth".[301][302] The other nations of the Commonwealth recognised India's continuing membership of the association.[303]

Non-aligned movement

See caption
Nehru with Gamal Abdel Nasser and Josip Broz Tito in Belgrade, Yugoslavia, 1961

On the international scene, Nehru was an opponent of military action and military alliances. He was a strong supporter of the United Nations, except when it tried to resolve the Kashmir question. He pioneered the policy of non-alignment and co-founded the Non-Aligned Movement of nations professing neutrality between the rival blocs of nations led by the US and the USSR.[304] Recognising the People's Republic of China soon after its founding (while most of the Western bloc continued relations with Taiwan), Nehru argued for its inclusion in the United Nations and refused to brand the Chinese as the aggressors in their conflict with Korea.[305] He sought to establish warm and friendly relations with China in 1950 and hoped to act as an intermediary to bridge the gulf and tensions between the communist states and the Western bloc.[306]

Nehru was a key organiser of the Bandung Conference of April 1955, which brought 29 newly independent nations together from Asia and Africa, and was designed to galvanise the nonalignment movement under Nehru's leadership. He envisioned it as his key leadership opportunity on the world stage, where he would bring together emerging nations.[307] Instead, the Chinese representative, Zhou Enlai, downplayed revolutionary communism and acknowledged the right of all nations to choose their own economic and political systems, including even capitalism upstaged him. Nehru and his top foreign-policy aide, V.K. Krishna Menon, by contrast, gained an international reputation as rude and undiplomatic. Zhou said privately, "I have never met a more arrogant man than Mr. Nehru." A senior Indian foreign office official characterised Menon as "an outstanding world statesman but the world's worst diplomat," adding that he was often "overbearing, churlish and vindictive".[308]

Defence and nuclear policy

While averse to war, Nehru led the campaigns against Pakistan in Kashmir. He used military force to annex Hyderabad in 1948 and Goa in 1961. While laying the foundation stone of the National Defence Academy in 1949, he stated:

We, who for generations had talked about and attempted in everything a peaceful way and practised non-violence, should now be, in a sense, glorifying our army, navy and air force. It means a lot. Though it is odd, yet it simply reflects the oddness of life. Though life is logical, we have to face all contingencies, and unless we are prepared to face them, we will go under. There was no greater prince of peace and apostle of non-violence than Mahatma Gandhi...but yet, he said it was better to take the sword than to surrender, fail or run away. We cannot live carefree assuming that we are safe. Human nature is such. We cannot take the risks and risk our hard-won freedom. We have to be prepared with all modern defence methods and a well-equipped army, navy, and air force."[309][310]

Nehru entrusted Homi J. Bhabha, a nuclear physicist, with complete authority over all nuclear-related affairs and programs and answerable only to the prime minister.[311]

Many hailed Nehru for working to defuse global tensions and the threat of nuclear weapons after the Korean War (1950–1953).[312] He commissioned the first study of the effects of nuclear explosions on human health and campaigned ceaselessly for the abolition of what he called "these frightful engines of destruction". He also had pragmatic reasons for promoting de-nuclearization, fearing a nuclear arms race would lead to over-militarisation that would be unaffordable for developing countries such as his own.[313]

Defending Kashmir

Nehru inspecting the troops on a visit to the Srinagar Brigade Headquarters Military Hospital, April 1948

At Lord Mountbatten's urging, in 1948, Nehru had promised to hold a plebiscite in Kashmir under the auspices of the UN.[314] Kashmir was a disputed territory between India and Pakistan, the two have gone to war over it in 1947. However, as Pakistan failed to pull back troops in accordance with the UN resolution, and as Nehru grew increasingly wary of the UN, he declined to hold a plebiscite in 1953. His policies on Kashmir and the integration of the state into India were frequently defended before the United Nations by his aide, V. K. Krishna Menon, who earned a reputation in India for his passionate speeches.[315]

In 1953, Nehru orchestrated the ouster and arrest of Sheikh Abdullah, the prime minister of Kashmir, whom he had previously supported but was now suspected of harbouring separatist ambitions; Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad replaced him.[316][317]

Menon was instructed to deliver an unprecedented eight-hour speech defending India's stand on Kashmir in 1957; to date, the speech is the longest ever delivered in the United Nations Security Council, covering five hours of the 762nd meeting on 23 January, and two hours and forty-eight minutes on the 24th, reportedly concluding with Menon's collapse on the Security Council floor.[315] During the filibuster, Nehru moved swiftly and successfully to consolidate Indian power in Kashmir (then under great unrest). Menon's passionate defence of Indian sovereignty in Kashmir enlarged his base of support in India and led to the Indian press temporarily dubbing him the "Hero of Kashmir". Nehru was then at the peak of his popularity in India; the only (minor) criticism came from the far right.[318][319]

China

Photograph of Nehru with Mao Zedong
Nehru and Mao Zedong in Beijing, China, October 1954

In 1954, Nehru signed with China the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, known in India as the Panchsheel (from the Sanskrit words, panch: five, sheel: virtues), a set of principles to govern relations between the two states. Their first formal codification in treaty form was in an agreement between China and India in 1954, which recognised Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.[320] They were enunciated in the preamble to the "Agreement (with the exchange of notes) on Trade and Intercourse between Tibet Region of China and India", which was signed at Peking on 29 April 1954. Negotiations took place in Delhi from December 1953 to April 1954 between the Delegation of the People's Republic of China (PRC) Government and the Delegation of the Indian Government on the relations between the two countries regarding the disputed territories of Aksai Chin and South Tibet. By 1957, Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai had also persuaded Nehru to accept the Chinese position on Tibet, thus depriving Tibet of a possible ally, and of the possibility of receiving military aid from India.[321] The treaty was disregarded in the 1960s, but in the 1970s, the Five Principles again came to be seen as important in China–India relations, and more generally as norms of relations between states. They became widely recognised and accepted throughout the region during the premiership of Indira Gandhi and the three-year rule of the Janata Party (1977–1980).[322] Although the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence were the basis of the 1954 Sino-Indian border treaty, in later years, Nehru's foreign policy suffered from increasing Chinese assertiveness over border disputes and his decision to grant asylum to the 14th Dalai Lama.[323]

Dag Hammarskjöld, the second secretary-general of the United Nations, said that while Nehru was superior from a moral point of view, Zhou Enlai was more skilled in realpolitik.[324]

United States

See caption
Nehru receiving US President Dwight D. Eisenhower at Parliament House, 1959
Nehru with John F. Kennedy at the White House, 7 November 1961

In 1956, Nehru criticised the joint invasion of the Suez Canal by the British, French, and Israelis. His role, both as Indian prime minister and a leader of the Non-Aligned Movement, was significant; he tried to be even-handed between the two sides while vigorously denouncing Anthony Eden and co-sponsors of the invasion. Nehru had a powerful ally in the US President Dwight Eisenhower who, if relatively silent publicly, went to the extent of using America's clout at the International Monetary Fund to make Britain and France back down. During the Suez crisis, Nehru's right-hand man, Menon attempted to persuade a recalcitrant Gamal Nasser to compromise with the West and was instrumental in moving Western powers towards an awareness that Nasser might prove willing to compromise.[325]

Assassination attempts and security

There were four known assassination attempts on Nehru. The first attempt was made during partition in 1947 while he was visiting the North-West Frontier Province (now in Pakistan) in a car.[326] A second was by Baburao Laxman Kochale, a knife-wielding rickshaw-puller, near Nagpur in 1955.[c] The third attempt took place in Bombay in 1956,[331][332] and the fourth was a failed bombing attempt on train tracks in Maharashtra in 1961.[333] Despite threats to his life, Nehru despised having too much security around him and did not like to disrupt traffic because of his movements.[334]

Death

If any people choose to think of me then I should like them to say, "This was the man who with all his mind and heart loved India and the Indian people. And they in turn were indulgent to him and gave him of their love most abundantly and extravagantly."

– Jawaharlal Nehru, 1954.[335]

Nehru's health began declining steadily in 1962. In the spring of 1962, he was affected with a viral infection over which he spent most of April in bed.[336] In the next year, through 1963, he spent months recuperating in Kashmir. Some writers attribute this dramatic decline to his surprise and chagrin over the Sino-Indian War, which he perceived as a betrayal of trust.[337] Upon his return from Dehradun on 26 May 1964, he was feeling quite comfortable and went to bed at about 23:30 as usual. He had a restful night until about 06:30. Soon after he returned from the bathroom, Nehru complained of pain in the back. He spoke to the doctors who attended to him for a brief while, and almost immediately he collapsed. He remained unconscious until he died at 13:44.[338] His death was announced in the Lok Sabha at 14:00 local time on 27 May 1964; the cause of death was believed to be a heart attack.[339] Draped in the Indian national Tri-colour flag, the body of Jawaharlal Nehru was placed for public viewing. "Raghupati Raghava Rajaram" was chanted as the body was placed on the platform. On 28 May, Nehru was cremated in accordance with Hindu rites at the Shantivan on the banks of the Yamuna, witnessed by 1.5 million mourners who had flocked into the streets of Delhi and the cremation grounds.[340]

US President Lyndon B. Johnson remarked on his death:-

History has already recorded his monumental contribution to the molding of a strong and independent India. And yet, it is not just as a leader of India that he has served humanity. Perhaps more than any other world leader he has given expression to man's yearning for peace. This is the issue of our age. In his fearless pursuit of a world free from war he has served all humanity.[341]

Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev remarked:-

He was a passionate fighter for peace in the whole world and an ardent champion of the realization of the principles of peaceful coexistence of states; he was the inspirer of the policy of Non-Alignment promoted by the Indian Government. This reasonable policy won India respect and due to it, India is now occupying a worthy place in the international arena.[342]

Nehru's death left India with no clear political heir to his leadership. Lal Bahadur Shastri later succeeded Nehru as the prime minister.[343]

The death was announced to the Indian parliament in words similar to Nehru's own at the time of Gandhi's assassination: "The light is out."[344][345] India's future prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee famously delivered Nehru an acclaimed eulogy.[346] He hailed Nehru as Bharat Mata's "favourite prince" and likened him to the Hindu god Rama.[347]

Positions held

Year Description
1946–1950 Elected to Constituent Assembly of India
1952–1957 Elected to 1st Lok Sabha
1957–1962 Elected to 2nd Lok Sabha
1962–1964 Elected to 3rd Lok Sabha

Key cabinet members and associates

Nehru served as the prime minister for eighteen years, first as interim prime minister during 1946–1947 during the last year of the British Raj and then as prime minister of independent India from 15 August 1947 to 27 May 1964. Simultaneously he was Minister for External Affairs in charge of foreign affairs.

B. R. Ambedkar, the law minister in the interim cabinet, also chaired the Constitution Drafting Committee.[348]

Vallabhbhai Patel served as home minister in the interim government. He was instrumental in getting the Congress party working committee to vote for partition. He is also credited with integrating peacefully most of the princely states of India. Patel was a long-time comrade to Nehru but died in 1950, leaving Nehru as the unchallenged leader of India until his own death in 1964.[349]

Maulana Azad was the First Minister of Education in the Indian government Minister of Human Resource Development (until 25 September 1958, Ministry of Education). His contribution to establishing the education foundation in India is recognised by celebrating his birthday as National Education Day across India.[350][351]

Jagjivan Ram became the youngest minister in Nehru's Interim Government of India, a labour minister and also a member of the Constituent Assembly of India, where, as a member of the Dalit caste, he ensured that social justice was enshrined in the Constitution. He went on to serve as a minister with various portfolios during Nehru's tenure and in Shastri and Indira Gandhi governments.[352]

Morarji Desai was a nationalist with anti-corruption leanings but was socially conservative, pro-business, and in favour of free enterprise reforms, as opposed to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru's socialistic policies. After serving as chief minister of Bombay State, he joined Nehru's cabinet in 1956 as the finance minister of India. he held that position until 1963 when he along with other senior ministers in the Nehru cabinet resigned under the Kamaraj plan.The plan, as proposed by Madras Chief Minister K.Kamaraj, was to revert government ministers to party positions after a certain tenure and vice versa. With Nehru's age and health failing in the early 1960s, Desai was considered a possible contender for the position of Prime Minister.[353][354] Later Desai alleged that Nehru used the Kamaraj Plan to remove all possible contenders 'from the path of his daughter, Indira Gandhi.[355] Desai succeeded Indira Gandhi as the prime minister in 1977 when he was selected by the victorious Janata alliance as their parliamentary leader.[356]

Govind Ballabh Pant (1887–1961) was a key figure in the Indian independence movement and later a pivotal figure in the politics of Uttar Pradesh (UP) and in the Indian Government. Pant served in Nehru's cabinet as Union home minister from 1955 until his death in 1961.[357] As home minister, his chief achievement was the re-organisation of states along linguistic lines. He was also responsible for the establishment of Hindi as the official language of the central government and a few states.[358] During his tenure as the home minister, Pant was awarded the Bharat Ratna.[359]

C. D. Deshmukh was one of five members of the Planning Commission when it was constituted in 1950 by a cabinet resolution.[360][361] Deshmukh succeeded John Mathai as the Union Finance Minister in 1950 after Mathai resigned in protest over the transfer of certain powers to the Planning Commission.[362] As finance minister, Deshmukh remained a member of the Planning Commission.[363] Deshmukh's tenure—during which he delivered six budgets and an interim budget[364]—is noted for the effective management of the Indian economy and its steady growth which saw it recover from the impacts of the events of the 1940s.[365][366] During Deshmukh's tenure, the State Bank of India was formed in 1955 through the nationalisation and amalgamation of the Imperial Bank with several smaller banks.[367][368] He accomplished the nationalisation of insurance companies and the formation of the Life Insurance Corporation of India through the Life Insurance Corporation of India Act, 1956.[369][370] Deshmukh resigned over the Government's proposal to move a bill in Parliament bifurcating Bombay State into Gujarat and Maharashtra while designating the city of Bombay a Union territory.[371][372]

V. K. Krishna Menon (1896–1974) was a close associate of Nehru and has been described by some as the second most powerful man in India during Nehru's tenure as prime minister. Under Nehru, he served as India's high commissioner to the UK, UN ambassador, and Union minister of defence. He resigned after the debacle of the 1962 China War.[373][374][375]

In the years following independence, Nehru frequently turned to his daughter Indira Gandhi for managing his personal affairs.[376] Indira moved into Nehru's official residence to attend to him and became his constant companion in his travels across India and the world. She would virtually become Nehru's chief of staff.[377] Towards the end of the 1950s, Indira Gandhi served as the president of the Congress. In that capacity, she was instrumental in getting the Communist-led Kerala State Government dismissed in 1959.[378] Indira was elected as Congress party president in 1959, which aroused criticism for alleged nepotism, although Nehru had actually disapproved of her election, partly because he considered that it smacked of "dynasticism"; he said, indeed it was "wholly undemocratic and an undesirable thing", and refused her a position in his cabinet.[379] Indira herself was at loggerheads with her father over policy; most notably, she used his oft-stated personal deference to the Congress Working Committee to push through the dismissal of the Communist Party of India government in the state of Kerala, over his own objections.[379] Nehru began to be embarrassed by her ruthlessness and disregard for parliamentary tradition and was "hurt" by what he saw as an assertiveness with no purpose other than to stake out an identity independent of her father.[380]

Relationships

After Kamala's death in 1936, Nehru was rumoured to have had relationships with certain women from time to time. These included Shraddha Mata,[381] Padmaja Naidu[382][383] and Edwina Mountbatten.[384] Countess Mountbatten's daughter Lady Pamela Hicks acknowledged Nehru's platonic relationship with Lady Mountbatten.[385]

See caption
Prime Minister Nehru with Edwina Mountbatten in 1951

British historian Philip Ziegler, with access to the private letters and diaries, concludes the relationship:

was to endure until Edwina Mountbatten's death: intensely loving, romantic, trusting, generous, idealistic, even spiritual. If there was any physical element it can only have been of minor importance to either party. [India's Governor-General] Mountbatten's reaction was one of pleasure....He liked and admired Nehru, it was useful to him that the Prime Minister should find such attractions in the Governor-General's home, it was agreeable to find Edwina almost permanently in good temper: the advantages of the alliance were obvious.[386]

Nehru's sister, Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit told Pupul Jayakar, Indira Gandhi's friend and biographer, that Padmaja Naidu and Nehru lived together for many years.[387][388]

Religion and personal beliefs

Nehru distributes sweets among children at Nongpoh, Meghalaya

Described as a Hindu agnostic,[389][390] and styling himself as a "scientific humanist",[391] Nehru thought that religious taboos were preventing India from moving forward and adapting to modern conditions: "No country or people who are slaves to dogma and dogmatic mentality can progress, and unhappily our country and people have become extraordinarily dogmatic and little-minded."[392]

The spectacle of what is called religion, or at any rate organised religion, in India and elsewhere, has filled me with horror and I have frequently condemned it and wished to make a clean sweep of it. Almost always it seemed to stand for blind belief and reaction, dogma and bigotry, superstition, exploitation and the preservation of vested interests.

As a humanist, Nehru considered that his afterlife was not in some mystical heaven or reincarnation but in the practical achievements of a life lived fully with and for his fellow human beings: “…Nor am I greatly interested in life after death. I find the problems of this life sufficiently absorbing to fill my mind,” he wrote.[81] In his Last Will and Testament, he wrote: “I wish to declare with all earnestness that I do not want any religious ceremonies performed for me after my death. I do not believe in such ceremonies, and to submit to them, even as a matter of form, would be hypocrisy and an attempt to delude ourselves and others.”[81]

In his autobiography, he analysed Abrahamic and Indian religions[394][395] and their impact on India. He wanted to model India as a secular country; his secularist policies remain a subject of debate.[396][397]

Legacy

Nehru was a great man... Nehru gave to Indians an image of themselves that I don't think others might have succeeded in doing. – Sir Isaiah Berlin[398]
See Caption
Bust of Nehru at Aldwych, London
See Caption
Bust of Nehru at Peace Palace, The Hague

Jawaharlal Nehru, next to Mahatma Gandhi, is regarded as the most significant figure of the Indian independence movement that successfully ended British rule over the Indian subcontinent.[399][400][401][402]

As India's first Prime minister and external affairs minister, Nehru played a major role in shaping modern India's government and political culture along with the sound foreign policy.[403] He is praised for creating a system providing universal primary education,[404] reaching children in the farthest corners of rural India. Nehru's education policy is also credited for the development of world-class educational institutions like the All India Institute of Medical Sciences,[405] Indian Institutes of Technology,[406] and the Indian Institutes of Management.[407]

Following the independence, Nehru popularised the credo of 'unity in diversity' and implemented it as state policy. [408] This proved particularly important as post-Independence differences surfaced since British withdrawal from the subcontinent prompted regional leaders to no longer relate to one another as allies against a common adversary. While differences in culture and, especially, language threatened the unity of the new nation, Nehru established programs such as the National Book Trust and the National Literary Academy which promoted the translation of regional works of literatures between languages and organised the transfer of materials between regions. In pursuit of a single, unified India, Nehru warned, "Integrate or perish."[409]

Called an "architect of Modern India",[d] he is widely recognised as the greatest figure of modern India after Mahatma Gandhi.[419][420] On the occasion of his first death anniversary in 1965, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, Lal Bahadur Shastri and others described Nehru as the greatest figure of India after Gandhi.[421][422]

See caption
Nehru's study in Teen Murti Bhavan, which is now converted into a museum.

Writing in 2005, Ramachandra Guha wrote that while no other Indian prime minister was ever close to the challenges that Nehru dealt with and if Nehru had died in 1958 then he would be remembered as the greatest statesman of the 20th century.[423] However, in recent years, Nehru's reputation has seen re-emergence and he is credited for keeping India together contrary to predictions of many that the country was bound to fall apart.[424]

Commemoration

See caption
Nehru on a 1989 USSR commemorative stamp

In his lifetime, Jawaharlal Nehru enjoyed an iconic status in India and was generally admired across the world for his idealism and statesmanship.[403][425] Nehru's ideals and policies continue shaping the Congress Party's manifesto and core political philosophy.[426] His birthday, 14 November is celebrated in India as Bal Divas ("Children's Day") in recognition of his lifelong passion and work for the welfare, education and development of children and young people. Children across India remember him as Chacha Nehru ("Uncle Nehru").[426] Nehru remains a popular symbol of the Congress Party which frequently celebrates his memory. people often emulate his style of clothing, especially the Gandhi cap and the Nehru jacket.[427][428] Nehru's preference for the sherwani ensured it continues to be considered formal wear in North India today.[429]

Indian 5 rupees coin, commemorating the birth centenary of Nehru in 1989.

Many public institutions and memorials across India are dedicated to Nehru's memory. The Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi is among the most prestigious universities in India. The Jawaharlal Nehru Port near the city of Mumbai is a modern port and dock designed to handle a huge cargo and traffic load. Nehru's residence in Delhi is preserved as the Teen Murti House now has the Nehru Memorial Museum & Library, and one of five Nehru Planetariums that were set in Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore, Allahabad and Pune. The complex also houses the offices of the Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund, established in 1964 under the chairmanship of Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, then president of India. The foundation also gives away the prestigious Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fellowship, established in 1968.[430] The Nehru family homes at Anand Bhavan and Swaraj Bhavan are also preserved to commemorate Nehru and his family's legacy.[431] In 1997, Nehru was voted as the greatest Indian since independence in India Today's poll.[432] In 2012, he ranked number four in Outlook's poll of The Greatest Indian.[433]

In popular culture

There have been many documentaries about Nehru's life, and he has been portrayed in fictionalised films. The canonical performance is probably that of Roshan Seth, who played him three times: in Richard Attenborough's 1982 film Gandhi,[434] Shyam Benegal's 1988 television series Bharat Ek Khoj, based on Nehru's The Discovery of India,[435] and in a 2007 TV film entitled The Last Days of the Raj.[436] Benegal directed the 1984 documentary film, Nehru, covering his political career.[437] Indian film director Kiran Kumar made a film about Nehru titled Nehru: The Jewel of India in 1990 starring Partap Sharma in the titular role.[438] In Ketan Mehta's film Sardar, Benjamin Gilani portrayed Nehru.[439] Naunihal (lit.'Young man'), a 1967 Indian Hindi-language drama film by Raj Marbros, follows Raju, an orphan, who believes that Jawaharlal Nehru is his relative and sets out to meet him.[440]

Similarly, in the 1957 film Ab Dilli Dur Nahin (lit.'Now Delhi is not far away') by Amar Kumar, Rattan, a young boy, travels to Delhi and seeks to avert the death sentence of his wrongly convicted father by asking Prime Minister Nehru for help.[441] Another 1957 English language short documentary Our Prime Minister was produced, compiled and directed by Ezra Mir, who also directed Three weeks in the life of Prime Minister Nehru in 1962.[442][443][444] Girish Karnad's historical play, Tughlaq (1962) is an allegory about the Nehruvian era. It was staged by Ebrahim Alkazi with the National School of Drama Repertory at Purana Qila, Delhi in the 1970s and later at the Festival of India, London in 1982.[445][446]

Writings

Nehru was a prolific writer in English who wrote The Discovery of India, Glimpses of World History, An Autobiography (released in the United States as "Toward Freedom,") and Letters from a Father to His Daughter, all written in jail.[447] Letters comprised 30 letters written to his daughter Indira Priyadarshani Nehru (later Gandhi) who was then 10 years old and studying at a boarding school in Mussoorie. It attempted to instruct her about natural history and world civilisations.[448]

Nehru's books have been widely read.[449][450] An Autobiography, in particular, has been critically acclaimed. John Gunther, writing in Inside Asia, contrasted it with Gandhi's autobiography:

The Mahatma's placid story compares to Nehru's as a cornflower to an orchid, a rhyming couplet to a sonnet by MacLeish or Auden, a water pistol to a machine gun. Nehru's autobiography is subtle, complex, discriminating, infinitely cultivated, steeped in doubt, suffused with intellectual passion. Lord Halifax once said that no one could understand India without reading it; it is a kind of 'Education of Henry Adams,' written in superlative prose—hardly a dozen men alive write English as well as Nehru ...[451]

Michael Brecher, who considered Nehru to be an intellectual for whom ideas were important aspects of Indian nationalism, wrote in Political Leadership and Charisma: Nehru, Ben-Gurion, and Other 20th-Century Political Leaders:

Nehru's books were not scholarly, nor were they intended to be. He was not a trained historian, but his feel for the flow of events and his capacity to weave together a wide range of knowledge in a meaningful pattern give to his books qualities of a high order. In these works, he also revealed a sensitive literary style. ... Glimpses of World History is the most illuminating on Nehru as an intellectual. The first of the trilogy, Glimpses, was a series of thinly connected sketches of the story of mankind in the form of letters to his teenage daughter, Indira, later prime minister of India. ... Despite its polemical character in many sections and its shortcomings as an impartial history, Glimpses is a work of great artistic value, a worthy precursor of his noble and magnanimous Autobiography.[452]

Michael Crocker thought An Autobiography would have given Nehru literary fame had the political fame eluded him:

It is to his years in prison that we owe his three main books, ... Nehru's writings illustrate a cerebral life, and a power of self-discipline, altogether out of the ordinary. Words by the million bubbled up out of his fullness of mind and spirit. Had he never been prime minister of India he would have been famous as the author of the Autobiography and the autobiographical parts of The Discovery of India. An Autobiography, at least with some excisions here and there, is likely to be read for generations. ... There are, for instance, the characteristic touches of truism and anticlimax, strange in a man who could both think and, at his best, write so well ...[453]

Nehru's speech A Tryst With Destiny was rated by the British newspaper The Guardian to be among the great speeches of the 20th-century. Ian Jack wrote in his introduction to the speech:

Dressed in a golden silk jacket with a red rose in the buttonhole, Nehru rose to speak. His sentences were finely made and memorable – Nehru was a good writer; his Discovery of India stands well above the level reached by most politician-writers. ... The nobility of Nehru's words – their sheer sweep – provided the new India with a lodestone that was ambitious and humane. Post-colonialism began here as well as Indian democracy, which has since outlived many expectations of its death.[454]

Awards and honours

In 1948, Nehru was conferred an honorary doctorate by the University of Mysore.[455] He later received honorary doctorates from the University of Madras, Columbia University, and Keio University.[456][457]

In 1955, Nehru was awarded the Bharat Ratna, India's highest civilian honour.[458] President Rajendra Prasad awarded him the honour without taking advice from the Prime Minister as would be the normal constitutional procedure as Nehru himself was Prime Minister then.[459]

See also

References

Notes

Citations

  1. ^ "Nehru". Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary. 2020. Archived 5 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  2. ^
    • Ganguly, Sumit; Mukherji, Rahul (2011), India Since 1980, Cambridge University Press, p. 64, ISBN 978-1-139-49866-1, Nehru was a social democrat who believed that liberal political and economic institutions could deliver economic growth with redistribution. The 1950s witnessed greater state control over industrial activity and the birth of the industrial licensing system, which made it necessary for companies to seek the permission of the government before initiating business in permitted areas.
    • Schenk, Hans (2020), Housing India's Urban Poor 1800–1965: Colonial and Post-colonial Studies, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-00-019185-1, The idea that the state should actively and in a planned and 'rational' and 'modern' manner promote development originated abroad. Inspiration came to some extent from the Soviet Russian planned economic development, and for some, including Nehru, from the—at that time still a bit remote—concept of the West European and largely social-democrat idea of the 'Welfare' state.
    • Winiecki, Jan (2016), Shortcut or Piecemeal: Economic Development Strategies and Structural Change, Central European University Press, p. 41, ISBN 9789633860632, Nehru, a Fabian socialist, or social-democrat in modern parlance, either did not read Mill or disregarded the (minimal) institutional requirements outlined by that classical writer. In Nehru's view, it was the state that should direct the economy from the center, as well as decide about the allocation of scarce resources.
    • Chalam, K. S. (2017), Social Economy of Development in India, Sage, p. 325, ISBN 9789385985126, Social democrats advocate peaceful transition from capitalism to socialism. While Jawaharlal Nehru was considered as a social democrat, his colleague in the Constituent Assembly, B. R. Ambedkar, was emphatic about state socialism. It appears that the compromise between these two ideas has been reflected in the Directive Principles of State Policy. The principles of social democracy and/or democratic socialism can be interrogated in the context of the present situation in India.
  3. ^ Babu, D. Shyam (11 July 2019). "Nehru and the Kashmir quandary". The Hindu. Retrieved 15 November 2021.
  4. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 21.
  5. ^ Nanda 2007, p. 25.
  6. ^ Smith, Bonnie G. 2008.The Oxford Encyclopedia of Women in World History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-514890-9. pp. 406–07.
  7. ^ "Jawaharlal Nehru: Freedom struggle icon, maker of modern India". Hindustan Times. 2 December 2020. Retrieved 15 November 2021.
  8. ^ "Mrs. Krishna Hutheesing, an Author and a Sister of Nehru, Dies". The New York Times. 10 November 1967. Retrieved 2 July 2021.
  9. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 22.
  10. ^ Gokhale, Balkrishna Govind (1978). "Nehru and History". History and Theory. 17 (3): 311–322. doi:10.2307/2504742. JSTOR 2504742 – via JSTOR.
  11. ^ a b c d e f g h Misra, Om Prakash. 1995. Economic Thought of Gandhi and Nehru: A Comparative Analysis. M.D. Publications. ISBN 978-81-85880-71-6. pp. 49–65.
  12. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 23.
  13. ^ a b Nanda 2007, p. 65.
  14. ^ Bharathi, K. S. (1998). Encyclopaedia of eminent thinkers. Concept Publishing Company Pvt. Ltd. ISBN 978-81-7022-684-0.
  15. ^ Tharoor 2003, p. 11.
  16. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 36.
  17. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 43.
  18. ^ a b Sen, Zoë Keshap C. 1964. "Jawaharlal Nehru." Civilisations 14(1/2):25–39. JSTOR 41230788.
  19. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 47.
  20. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 37.
  21. ^ a b c d e f g Ghose 1993, p. 25.
  22. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 49.
  23. ^ a b Moraes 2007, p. 50.
  24. ^ In Jawaharlal Nehru's autobiography, An Autobiography (1936) p. 33.
  25. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 52.
  26. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 53.
  27. ^ Ghose 1993, p. 26.
  28. ^ Nehru, Jawaharlal Glimpses of world history: being further letters to his daughter (Lindsay Drummond Ltd., 1949), p. 94
  29. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 56.
  30. ^ Argov, Daniel (June 1964). The Ideological Differences between Moderates and Extremists in the Indian National Movement with Special Reference to Surendranath Banerjea and Lajpat Rai 1885–1919 (PDF) (PhD thesis). University of London School of Oriental and African Studies. p. 11.
  31. ^ "Nehru Gave Up Life Of Ease, Wealth". The Windsor Star. 27 May 1964. p. 24. Retrieved 19 January 2013.
  32. ^ a b c Moraes 2007, p. 55.
  33. ^ "Jawaharlal Nehru – a chronological account". Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund (JNMF). Archived from the original on 4 June 2012. Retrieved 23 June 2012.
  34. ^ Remya, K. (2017). War in City Scape Popular Responses in Kozhikode 1914 1918 (PhD thesis). University of Calicut, Department of History. hdl:10603/208789.
  35. ^ Nanda 2007, p. 160-61.
  36. ^ Nanda 2007, p. 187-89.
  37. ^ Ilahi, Shereen (2016), Imperial Violence and the Path to Independence, London: Bloomsbury Publishing, p. 83, ISBN 978-0-19-569343-0
  38. ^ Herman, Arthur (2010). Gandhi and Churchill: The Rivalry That Destroyed an Empire and Forged Our Age. Random House. p. 264. ISBN 978-1-4090-6363-6.
  39. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 64.
  40. ^ Nanda 2007, p. 174.
  41. ^ Krishnan, Madhuvanti S. (12 November 2015). "Man for All seasons". thehindu.
  42. ^ a b "Jawaharlal Nehru: Freedom struggle icon, maker of modern India". Hindustan Times. 2 December 2020.
  43. ^ Gopal, Sarvepalli (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 65. ISBN 9780198079828.
  44. ^ Wolpert, Stanley (1996). Nehru: A Tryst with Destiny. Oxford University Press. p. 56. ISBN 978-0195100730.
  45. ^ Pratiyogita Darpan Editorial Board. Indian National Movement & Constitutional Development. Pratiyogita Darpan Extra Issue Series, Volume 12. Upkar Prakashan. Retrieved 2 October 2018.
  46. ^ Nanda 2007, p. 246.
  47. ^ Norman, D., 1965. Nehru, the First Sixty Years: Presenting in His Own Words. p. 108. London: John Day Company.
  48. ^ Gopal, Sarvepalli (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 88. ISBN 9780198079828.
  49. ^ a b Gopal, Sarvepalli (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 92. ISBN 9780198079828.
  50. ^ Zachariah, Benjamin (2004). Nehru. Taylor & Francis. p. 53. ISBN 9781134577408.
  51. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 101.
  52. ^ Gopal, Sarvepalli (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 23. ISBN 9780198079828.
  53. ^ Mukherjee, R. (2015). Nehru and Bose: Parallel Lives. Penguin Books Limited. p. 44. ISBN 978-93-5118-849-0.
  54. ^ a b Nanda 2007.
  55. ^ Ramusack, Barbara N. “Incident at Nabha: Interaction between Indian States and British Indian Politics.” The Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 28, no. 3, 1969, pp. 563–77. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2943179. Accessed 28 May 2023.
  56. ^ Chowdhary, Rekha (2015). Jammu and Kashmir: Politics of identity and separatism. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-41405-6.
  57. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 100.
  58. ^ Zachariah, Benjamin (2004). Nehru. Taylor & Francis. p. 66. ISBN 9781134577408.
  59. ^ Pandey, Gyanendra (2002). The Ascendancy of the Congress in Uttar Pradesh: Class, Community and Nation in Northern India, 1920–1940. Routledge. p. 36-37. ISBN 978-1-317-41405-6.
  60. ^ Nehru, Jawarhalal (1941). Towards Freedom: The Autobiography of Jawarhalal Nehru. The John Day Company. p. 119.
  61. ^ Nanda 2007, p. 252-53.
  62. ^ Chakraborty, A. K., 1981. Jawaharlal Nehru's Writings: A Literary Estimate, p. 23. Minerva: The University of Calcultta.
  63. ^ Nanda 2007, p. 254-55.
  64. ^ Keenleyside, T. A. (1983). "The Indian Nationalist Movement and the League of Nations: Prologue to the United Nations". India Quarterly. 39 (3): 281–298. doi:10.1177/097492848303900303. JSTOR 45071841. S2CID 150520531.
  65. ^ Roland, Joan G. (1998). The Jewish Communities of India: Identity in a Colonial Era (Second ed.). Routledge. p. 193. ISBN 978-0-7658-0439-6.
  66. ^ a b Nanda 2007, p. 256.
  67. ^ Nanda 2007, p. 255.
  68. ^ a b Nanda 2007, p. 257-58.
  69. ^ McGarr, P. M., 2013. The Cold War in South Asia, Britain, the United States and the Indian Subcontinent, 1945–1965, p. 31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  70. ^ Smith, D. E., 1958. Nehru and Democracy: The Political Thought of an Asian Democrat, p. 22. Orient Longmans: the University of Michigan.
  71. ^ Akbar, M. J., 1988. Nehru: The Making of India, p. 193. Viking: The University of California.
  72. ^ Nanda 2007, p. 257.
  73. ^ Louro, Michele L.. “India and the League Against Imperialism: A Special “Blend” of Nationalism and Internationalism.” (2015).
  74. ^ Nanda 2007, p. 181.
  75. ^ Gopal, Sarvepalli (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 112. ISBN 9780198079828.
  76. ^ Leone, Fabio (2019). Prophet and Statesmen in Crafting Democracy in India: Political Leadership, Ideas, and Compromises. Lexington Books. p. 107. ISBN 9781498569378.
  77. ^ Guha, Ramchandra (2018). Gandhi: The Years That Changed the World. Penguin Allen Lane. p. 258. ISBN 978-0670083886.
  78. ^ Guha, Ramchandra (2018). Gandhi: The Years That Changed the World. Penguin Allen Lane. p. 259. ISBN 978-0670083886.
  79. ^ Mallik, Sangita., 2016. "Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharal Nehru", in E. Pföstl (ed.), Between Ethics and Politics: New Essays on Gandhi, p. 130-133. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis. ISBN: 9781134911004.
  80. ^ Dutt, R.C. (1981). Socialism of Jawaharlal Nehru. New Delhi: Shakti Malik, Abhinav Publications. pp. 54–55. ISBN 978-81-7017-128-7. Retrieved 8 September 2017.
  81. ^ a b c d e f Gandhi, Rajmohan (28 November 1991). "Patel: A Life". Navajivan Publishing House. p. 171 – via Internet Archive.
  82. ^ Gopal, Sarvepalli (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 121. ISBN 9780198079828.
  83. ^ Nanda 2007, p. 301.
  84. ^ Nanda 2007, p. 313.
  85. ^ "Purna Swaraj: The Demand for Full Independence 26 January 1930". indiaofthepast.org. Archived from the original on 8 November 2018. Retrieved 6 July 2015.
  86. ^ Office, Public Record. "Learning Curve British Empire". Public Record Office, The National Archives.
  87. ^ Khalid, Haroon (26 January 2018). "Republic Day story: On Ravi's banks, a pledge that shaped the course of modern India 88 years ago". Scroll.in. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  88. ^ "Explained: Why India celebrates January 26 as Republic Day". 30 January 2021.
  89. ^ Education, Pearson. SSC topic-wise Previous Years Solved Papers General Awareness. Pearson Education India. ISBN 978-93-5286-640-3.
  90. ^ Davar, Praveen (15 November 2018). "The greatest Indian after the Mahatma? Why Gandhi chose Nehru to lead India". Deccan Chronicle.
  91. ^ Maheshwari, Neerja (1997). Economic Policy of Jawaharlal Nehru. Deep & Deep. p. 41. ISBN 978-81-7100-850-6. Retrieved 9 November 2018.
  92. ^ Kochar, R. C. (1997). Congress and Socialism: Economic Programmes and Policies. Anamika Publishers & Distributors. p. 22. ISBN 978-81-86565-24-7.
  93. ^ Pandey, BN, ed. (2015). The Indian Nationalist Movement 1885–1947: Select Documents. Springer Publishing. p. 45. ISBN 978-1-349-86215-3.
  94. ^ a b Gopal, Sarvepalli (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 137-40. ISBN 9780198079828.
  95. ^ Nanda 2007, p. 327-328.
  96. ^ Nehru, Jawaharlal, 1982. An Autobiography, p. 210. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  97. ^ Gandhi, Gopalkrishna. "The Great Dandi March – eighty years after" Archived 17 July 2012 at the Wayback Machine, The Hindu, 5 April 2010
  98. ^ a b Moraes 2007, p. 166.
  99. ^ Khanal, Vinod (13 November 2014). "Mahatma Gandhi describes Nehru's arrest in 1930 as 'rest'". Times of India. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  100. ^ "Telegram Post No. 90, dated (and read) 14th April, 1930". Civil Disobedience Movement in the United Provinces. Arrest of Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru. New Delhi: United Provinces Government. 1930. p. 71. Retrieved 9 September 2022 – via National Archives of India. For breaking Salt Law Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru was arrested at Allahabad this morning.
  101. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 167.
  102. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 168.
  103. ^ Nehru, Jawaharlal, 1982. An Autobiography, p. 215. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  104. ^ Fisher, Margaret W. June 1967. "India's Jawaharlal Nehru." Asian Survey 7(6):363–73. doi:10.2307/2642611. JSTOR 2642611. p. 368.
  105. ^ Johnson, Richard L. 2005. Gandhi's Experiments With Truth: Essential Writings By And About Mahatma Gandhi. Lexington Books. ISBN 978-0-7391-1142-0. p. 37.
  106. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 171-173.
  107. ^ a b c Moraes 2007, p. 171-73.
  108. ^ Mukherjee, Rudrangshu (2018). Jawaharlal Nehru. OUP India. p. 65. ISBN 9780199096596.
  109. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 186-87.
  110. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 187.
  111. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 191-92.
  112. ^ a b c d Gopal, Sarvepalli (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 167-171. ISBN 9780198079828.
  113. ^ Cell, John W. (2002). Hailey: A Study in British Imperialism, 1872-1969. p. 195. ISBN 9780521521178.
  114. ^ a b c Gopal, Sarvepalli (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 165-66. ISBN 9780198079828.
  115. ^ a b c Moraes 2007, p. 192-93.
  116. ^ a b c Gopal, Sarvepalli (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 176-77. ISBN 9780198079828.
  117. ^ Gopal, Sarvepalli (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 179-180. ISBN 9780198079828.
  118. ^ a b Gopal, Sarvepalli (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 185-86. ISBN 9780198079828.
  119. ^ a b c d Gopal, Sarvepalli (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 187-88. ISBN 9780198079828.
  120. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 251.
  121. ^ Schöttli, J., 2012. Vision and Strategy in Indian Politics: Jawaharlal Nehru’s Policy Choices and the Designing of Political Institutions, p. 52. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.
  122. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 231.
  123. ^ a b Pandey, B. N. (1976). Nehru. Palgrave Macmillan UK. p. 179. ISBN 9781349007929.
  124. ^ a b Dube, Rajendra Prasad (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Study in Ideology and Social Change. Mittal Publications. p. 106. ISBN 9788170990710.
  125. ^ Gopal, Sarvepalli (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 186-87. ISBN 9780198079828.
  126. ^ Dalton, Dennis (2012). Mahatma Gandhi: Nonviolent Power in Action. Columbia University Press. p. 230. ISBN 9780231159593.
  127. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 235-36.
  128. ^ a b Ghose, Shankar (1988). Mahatma Gandhi. Allied Publishers Limited. p. 226-27. ISBN 9788170232056.
  129. ^ Gandhi, Rajmohan (2012). Gandhi: The Man, His People, The Empire. University of California Press. p. 364. ISBN 9780520255708.
  130. ^ Ghose, Shankar (1988). Mahatma Gandhi. Allied Publishers Limited. p. 226-27. ISBN 9788170232056.
  131. ^ Gopal, Sarvepalli (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 182-83. ISBN 9780198079828.
  132. ^ Moraes 2007, pp. 253.
  133. ^ a b c Mathur, Sobhag (1994). Spectrum of Nehru's thought. Mittal Publ. p. 44. ISBN 9788170994572.
  134. ^ Rabindra Chandra Dutt (1981). Socialism of Jawaharlal Nehru. Abhinav Publications. p. 178. ISBN 978-81-7017-128-7.
  135. ^ Moraes 2007, pp. 245–46.
  136. ^ a b c d Moraes 2007, pp. 248.
  137. ^ Hoiberg, Dale (2000). Students' Britannica India. Popular Prakashan. pp. 107–08. ISBN 978-0-85229-760-5.
  138. ^ Gopal, Sarvepalli (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 1 1889–1947. Oxford University Press. p. 198-204. ISBN 9780198079828.
  139. ^ Moraes 2007, pp. 16.
  140. ^ Metcalf, Barbara D.; Metcalf, Thomas R. (2006). A Concise History of Modern India. Cambridge University Press. p. 176. ISBN 978-1-139-45887-0.
  141. ^ B. R. Tomlinson (1976). The Indian National Congress and the Raj, 1929–1942: The Penultimate Phase. Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 57–60. ISBN 978-1-349-02873-3.
  142. ^ Pandey, Deepak (1978). "Congress-Muslim League Relations 1937–39: 'The Parting of the Ways'". Modern Asian Studies. 12 (4): 629–654. doi:10.1017/S0026749X00006351. JSTOR 312372. S2CID 143450107 – via JSTOR.
  143. ^ Gupta, R. L. (1976). Conflict and harmony: Indo-British relations; a new perspective. Trimurti Publications. p. 18.
  144. ^ Sethi, R. R. (1958). The last phase of British sovereignty in India (1919-1947): being the concluding chapters of the Cambridge history of India, vol. VI. and the Cambridge shorter history of India. S. Chand. p. 34.
  145. ^ a b c Moraes 2007, p. 254.
  146. ^ Mukherjee, Rudrangshu (2018). Jawaharlal Nehru. OUP India. p. 41. ISBN 9780199096596.
  147. ^ Arshad Syed Karim (1985). Pakistan: From Community to Nation. Saad Publications.
  148. ^ Ayoob, Mohammed (25 May 2018). "Remembering Maulana Azad". The Hindu.
  149. ^ Paul, Santosh (21 May 2019). "Triumph of Nehruvianism – Part 2". The Economic Times.
  150. ^ Soni, Mallika (23 January 2021). "On Parakram Diwas, a look at Bose's Indian National Army". Hindustan Times.
  151. ^ a b "Indian National Congress Presidents over the ages: The ones who changed course of history". The New Indian Express. 5 December 2017.
  152. ^ Moraes 2007, pp. 234–38.
  153. ^ Moraes 2007, p. 129.
  154. ^ Sharma, Rinkal. 2016. "Nehru: a passionate advocate of education for India's children and youth, believing it essential for India's future progress." International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity 7(7):256–59.
  155. ^ "Jawaharlal Nehru Birth Anniversary: Pandit Nehru and His Freedom Struggle". News18. 14 November 2019.
  156. ^ "3rd Five Year Plan (Chapter 1)". Government of India. Archived from the original on 26 March 2012. Retrieved 16 June 2012.
  157. ^ a b Mukhopadhyay, Nilanjan (14 November 2018). "Past Continuous: Those Who Think Nehru Was Power Hungry Should Review Events Leading to Independence". The Wire.
  158. ^ Śekhara Bandyopādhyāẏa (2004). From Plassey to Partition: A History of Modern India. Orient Blackswan. p. 410. ISBN 978-81-250-2596-2.
  159. ^ Lumby 1954, p. 232
  160. ^ Brown 1984, p. 667
  161. ^ Saraf, Nandini (2012). The Life and Times of Lokmanya Tilak. Ocean Books. p. 119. ISBN 978-81-84301-52-6.
  162. ^ Menon, Vapal Pangunni (8 December 2015). Transfer of Power in India. Princeton University Press. p. 60. ISBN 978-1-4008-7937-3.
  163. ^ a b Bandyopadhyay, Sekhara (2004). From Plassey to Partition: A History of Modern India. India: Orient Longman. p. 412. ISBN 978-81-250-2596-2.
  164. ^ Moraes, Frank R. "Jawaharlal Nehru". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 2 October 2018.
  165. ^ W. Sears, Stephen (1973). The Horizon History of the British Empire Volume 2. American Heritage Publishing Company. p. 465. ISBN 978-0-07-030354-6 – via Google Books.
  166. ^ Wolpert, Stanley (2001). Gandhi's Passion: The Life and Legacy of Mahatma Gandhi. Oxford University Press. pp. 192–193. ISBN 0-19-515634-X. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
  167. ^ Anderson, Ken. "Gandhi – The Great Soul". The British Empire: Fall of the Empire. Archived from the original on 23 July 2018. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
  168. ^ Mukherjee, Mridula (9 April 2015). "Unlike Nehru, Netaji believed that authoritarian rule was essential for achieving radical social goals". India Today. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  169. ^ Dasgupta, Shirsho (22 May 2016). "Eighty Years Later, A Homage to Catalonia: Indians and the Spanish Civil War". The Wire. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  170. ^ Nakazato, Nariaki (27 April 2016). Neonationalist Mythology in Postwar Japan: Pal's Dissenting Judgment at the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-4985-2836-8 – via Google Books.
  171. ^ Prasannan, R. (2 August 2020). "Birth of a nation". The Week. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  172. ^ Kermani, Secunder (18 August 2017). "How Jinnah's ideology shapes Pakistan's identity". BBC.
  173. ^ Chand, Attar (21 May 2010). India and Asia-Pacific Security Volume 2. Amar Prakashan. p. 223. ISBN 978-81-8542-031-8 – via Google Books.
  174. ^ Radhey Shyam Chaurasia (2002). History of Modern India, 1707 A. D. to 2000 A. Atlantic Publishers. pp. 281–283
  175. ^ Sears, Stephen W. (10 September 2014). The British Empire. New Word City. ISBN 978-1-61230-809-8 – via Google Books.
  176. ^ Science & culture, Volume 30. Indian Science News Association. 1964.
  177. ^ Aditit De (8 September 2009). Jawaharlal Nehruh – The Jewel of India. Puffin Books. ISBN 978-81-8475-866-5 – via Google Books.
  178. ^ Hoiberg, Dale (19 December 2018). Students' Britannica India. Popular Prakashan. ISBN 978-0-85229-760-5 – via Google Books.
  179. ^ Amy McKenna, ed. (20 December 2009). The 100 Most Influential World Leaders of All Time. The Rosen Publishing Group|pages=223, Inc. ISBN 978-1-61530-015-0 – via Google Books.
  180. ^ Hoiberg, Dale (19 December 2018). Students' Britannica India. Vol. 4. Popular Prakashan. pp. 108–109. ISBN 978-0-85229-760-5 – via Google Books.
  181. ^ Mansergh, Nicholas (21 August 2013). Survey of British Commonwealth Affairs: Problems of Wartime Cooperation and Post-War Change 1939–1952. Routledge. p. 145. ISBN 978-1-136-24289-2 – via Google Books.
  182. ^ "The National Archives – Homepage". nationalarchives.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 1 December 2021. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  183. ^ "1942 Quit India Movement". open.ac.uk.
  184. ^ Aamir R. Mufti (10 January 2009). Enlightenment in the Colony: The Jewish Question and the Crisis of Postcolonial Culture. Princeton University Press. pp. 129–131. ISBN 978-1-4008-2766-4.
  185. ^ Amy McKenna, ed. (20 December 2009). The 100 Most Influential World Leaders of All Time. The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc. p. 224. ISBN 978-1-61530-015-0 – via Google Books.
  186. ^ Kher, N. N. Civics & History. Pitambar Publishing. ISBN 978-81-209-1088-1 – via Google Books.
  187. ^ Sears, Stephen W. (10 September 2014). The British Empire. New Word City. ISBN 978-1-61230-809-8 – via Google Books.
  188. ^ a b B. N, Pandey (May 1969). Break Up of British India. Macmillan Education UK. p. 169. ISBN 978-1-349-15307-7 – via Google Books.
  189. ^ Sears, Stephen W. (10 September 2014). The British Empire. NewWord City. ISBN 978-1-61230-809-8.
  190. ^ Kasniyal, BD (13 November 2015). "Nehru's belongings still intact in Almora jail". Tribuneindia News Service.
  191. ^ Marathe, Om (3 September 2019). "Explained: When India's interim government was formed in 1946". The Indian Express.
  192. ^ V. Krishna Ananth. India Since Independence: Making Sense of Indian Politics. Pearson Education India. 2010. pp 28–30.
  193. ^ ">Menon, Shivshankar (20 April 2021). India and Asian Geopolitics: The Past, Present. Brookings Institution Press. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-670-09129-4.
  194. ^ Lumby, E. W. R. 1954. The Transfer of Power in India, 1945–1947. London: George Allen & Unwin. p. 228
  195. ^ Tiwari, Aaditya (30 October 2017). "Sardar Patel – Man who United India". pib.gov.in.
  196. ^ "How Vallabhbhai Patel, V P Menon and Mountbatten unified India". 31 October 2017.
  197. ^ Furber, Holden (1951). "The Unification of India, 1947–1951". Pacific Affairs. 24 (4): 352–371. doi:10.2307/2753451. JSTOR 2753451 – via JSTOR.
  198. ^ C. A. Chandraprema (1991). Sri Lanka, the Years of Terror: The J.V.P. Insurrection, 1987–1989. Lake House Bookshop. p. 81. ISBN 9789559029038. Nehru brought in legislation making illegal the demand for secession in 1963. Thereafter, the DMK dropped its demand for a "Dravida Nadu".
  199. ^ Jayantha Dhanapala, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (1999). Small Arms Control: Old Weapons, New Issues. Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 9780754620761. Although the campaign for secession has reached its apex in Kashmir , the first Indian state to agitate for separatism was Tamil Nadu. In 1963 , in response to the vociferous campaign for a Dravidastan, Premier Nehru introduced the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution, making it mandatory for those running for office to take an oath stating, "I will uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India".
  200. ^ "56 events that changed India: Dissolution of princely states in 1950". India Today. 18 August 2003. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  201. ^ Encyclopaedia Indica: Independent India and wars – I. Anmol Publications. 1996. ISBN 978-81-7041-859-7.
  202. ^ Encyclopaedia of Indian War of Independence, 1857–1947: Gandhi era : Jawahar Lal Nehru and Sardar Patel. Anmol Publications. 2009. ISBN 978-81-261-3745-9.
  203. ^ Nehru, Jawaharlal (30 April 2007). "A Tryst with Destiny". TheGuardian.com. Archived from the original on 24 May 2014. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  204. ^ Saha, Abhishek (15 August 2015). "The politics of an assassination: Who killed Gandhi and why?". Hindustan Times.
  205. ^ Janak Raj Jai (1996). 1947–1980. Regency Publications. pp. 45–47. ISBN 978-81-86030-23-3.
  206. ^ Ansari, Sarah; Gould, William (31 October 2019). "'Performing the State' in Post-1947 India and Pakistan". Boundaries of Belonging. Cambridge University Press. pp. 23–66. doi:10.1017/9781108164511.003. ISBN 978-1-107-19605-6. S2CID 211394653.
  207. ^ Khan, Yasmin. "Performing Peace: Gandhi's assassination as a critical moment in the consolidation of the Nehruvian state" (PDF). core.ac.uk.
  208. ^ Khan, Yasmin (2011). "Performing Peace: Gandhi's assassination as a critical moment in the consolidation of the Nehruvian state". Modern Asian Studies. 45 (1): 57–80. doi:10.1017/S0026749X10000223. S2CID 144894540. (subscription required)
  209. ^ Khan, Yasmin (12 January 2011). "Performing Peace: Gandhi's assassination as a critical moment in the consolidation of the Nehruvian state". Modern Asian Studies. 45 (1): 57–80. doi:10.1017/S0026749X10000223. S2CID 144894540 – via Cambridge University Press.
  210. ^ Thapar, Karan (17 August 2009). "Gandhi, Jinnah both failed: Jaswant". ibnlive.in.com. Archived from the original on 3 July 2014.
  211. ^ "After Advani, Jaswant turns Jinnah admirer". The Economic Times. India. 17 August 2009. Archived from the original on 20 October 2017. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  212. ^ Ghosh, Bishwanath (17 March 2016). "Maps are malleable. Even Bharat Mata's". The Hindu. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  213. ^ Roychowdhury, Adrija (17 August 2017). "Five states that refused to join India after Independence". The Indian Express. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  214. ^ S., Mohamed Imranullah (1 February 2016). "Time to recall efforts made to create the Constitution". The Hindu. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  215. ^ Sinha, Shakti; Roy, Himanshu (5 November 2018). Patel: Political Ideas and Policies. SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-93-5280-854-0.
  216. ^ Marathe, Om (3 September 2019). "Explained: When India's interim government was formed in 1946". The Indian Express. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  217. ^ Park, Richard Leonard (1952). "India's General Elections". Far Eastern Survey. 21 (1): 1–8. doi:10.2307/3024683. JSTOR 3024683 – via JSTOR.
  218. ^ "Indian and Foreign Review". Publications Division of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India. 1969.
  219. ^ Weiner, Myron (8 December 2015). Party Politics in India. Princeton University Press. pp. 78–79. ISBN 978-1-4008-7841-3.
  220. ^ Varshney, Ashutosh. 28 March 2015. "Faults and lines." The Indian Express. Retrieved on 16 June 2020.
  221. ^ Guha, Ramachandra (2002). "Democracy's Biggest Gamble: India's First Free Elections in 1952". World Policy Journal. 19 (1): 95–103. doi:10.1215/07402775-2002-2005. JSTOR 40209795 – via JSTOR.
  222. ^ a b Koshi, Luke (2 November 2016). "Explainer: The reorganization of states in India and why it happened". The News Minute. Retrieved 3 April 2019.
  223. ^ "Govind Ballabh Pant's Death Anniversary: Remembering the First Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh". News18. 7 March 2021. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  224. ^ "State of the Nation". The Indian Express. 11 May 2008. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  225. ^ Chaudhary, Suraj Surjit (15 March 2021). Critical Commentary on the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 and Allied Laws. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-93-90252-05-3.
  226. ^ "1957 India General (2nd Lok Sabha) Elections Results". www.elections.in. Retrieved 31 August 2020.
  227. ^ Chakravarty, Shubhodeep (6 March 2019). "INKredible India: The story of 1962 Lok Sabha election – All you need to know". Zee News.
  228. ^ Davar, Praveen (31 December 2017). "The liberation of Goa". The Hindu. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  229. ^ Noorani, A.G. (29 August 2003). "Perseverance in the peace process". Frontline. hinduonnet.com. Archived from the original on 26 March 2005. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  230. ^ Klintworth, G. (1987). China's India War: A Question of Confidence. Working paper (Australian National University. Strategic and Defence Studies Centre). Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-7315-0087-1. China declared a unilateral ceasefire and by December it had withdrawn its forces to positions 20 km behind the line of actual control that had existed in 1959
  231. ^ Michele L. Louro (2018). Comrades against Imperialism: Nehru, India, and Interwar Internationalism. Cambridge University Press. p. 195. ISBN 9781108419307. Menon resigned under India's military preparedness failed to prevent a Chinese invasion during the Sino-Indian war of 1962
  232. ^ "Asia: Ending the Suspense". Time. 17 September 1965. Archived from the original on 21 May 2013. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  233. ^ Lüthi, Lorenz M., ed. (14 July 2020). Alternative World Visions. Cambridge University Press. pp. 261–328. ISBN 978-1-108-41833-1.
  234. ^ "China's Decision for War with India in 1962 by John W. Garver" (PDF). 26 March 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 March 2009. Retrieved 14 August 2012.
  235. ^ Sehgal, Saransh (7 May 2014). "Tibetans-in-exile divided over right to vote in Indian elections". The Guardian.
  236. ^ "Jawaharlal Nehru pleaded for US help against China in 1962". Times of India. 16 November 2010. Archived from the original on 2 January 2016. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
  237. ^ "India: Never Again the Same". Time. 30 November 1962. Archived from the original on 1 June 2008. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
  238. ^ "After Nehru and Indira, Modi is only PM to come back to power with full majority". The Economic Times. 23 May 2019.
  239. ^ World Mourns Nehru (1964), archived from the original on 31 July 2021, retrieved 31 July 2021
  240. ^ Guha, Ramachandra (26 May 2013). Verdicts on Nehru. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-93-5118-757-8.
  241. ^ "Letter From President Eisenhower to Prime Minister Nehru". history.state.gov. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1958–1960, South and Southeast Asia, Volume XV – Office of the Historian. 27 November 1958. Retrieved 31 July 2021.
  242. ^ Nayantara Sahgal (2010). Jawaharlal Nehru: Civilizing a Savage World. Penguin Books India. p. 59. ISBN 978-0-670-08357-2.
  243. ^ Ian Hall, The Conversation. "Nehru, the architect of modern India, also helped discredit European imperialism". Scroll.in. Retrieved 15 November 2021.
  244. ^ "How the ANC could fade away – OPINION | Politicsweb". www.politicsweb.co.za. Retrieved 15 November 2021.
  245. ^ "UP Next: How Nehru, Swami Prabhu Dutt Brahmachari's ideas of India resonate in 2022 polls". Firstpost. 15 November 2021. Retrieved 15 November 2021.
  246. ^ "PM Modi is A 'Charismatic' Leader Like Jawaharlal Nehru, Rajiv Gandhi: Rajinikanth". outlookindia. Retrieved 15 November 2015.
  247. ^ Service, Tribune News. "A thousand lies can't dwarf the giant Nehru was". Tribuneindia News Service. Retrieved 15 November 2021.
  248. ^ Mehrotra, R.R. (1990). Nehru: Man Among Men. Mittal Publications. p. 125. ISBN 978-81-7099-196-0.
  249. ^ "When Atal Bihari Vajpayee Got Nehru's Portrait Restored In South Block". NDTV.com. 22 February 2019.
  250. ^ NP, Ullekh (2018). The Untold Vajpayee: Politician and Paradox. Penguin Random House India Private Limited. p. 45. ISBN 978-93-85990-81-6.
  251. ^ Singh, Ajay (8 October 2022). "Review: The Life and Times of George Fernandes is a tale of how youthful idealism gives way to compromises". The Indian Express.
  252. ^ Parekh, Bhiku (1991). "Nehru and the National Philosophy of India". Economic and Political Weekly. 26 (5–12 Jan 1991): 35–48. JSTOR 4397189.
  253. ^ Kaushik, Narendra (11 October 2016). "How Gandhi softened stance towards Bose". The Tribune. Retrieved 2 October 2018.
  254. ^ Tan Chung, ed. (1998). Across The Himalayan Gap. Gyan Publishing House. p. 506. ISBN 81-212-0585-9.
  255. ^ Gokhale, H. R. "THE Constitution (Amendment)". indiacode.nic.in. Archived from the original on 28 March 2015. Retrieved 18 May 2017.
  256. ^ Roychowdhury, Adrija (27 December 2017). "Secularism: Why Nehru dropped and Indira inserted the S-word in the Constitution". The Indian Express.
  257. ^ Ghose 1993, p. 243.
  258. ^ Kopstein 2005, p. 364.
  259. ^ a b c Walsh, Judith E. (2006). A Brief History of India. Infobase Publishing. p. 190. ISBN 978-1-4381-0825-4.
  260. ^ Yokokawa, Nobuharu; Jayati Ghosh; Bob Rowthorn (2013). Industrialization of China and India: Their Impacts on the World Economy. Routledge. p. 213. ISBN 978-1-134-09387-8.
  261. ^ a b Grabowski, Richard; Sharmistha Self; Michael P. Shields (2007). Economic Development: A Regional, Institutional, And Historical Approach. M.E. Sharpe. p. 161. ISBN 978-1-134-09387-8.
  262. ^ Shand, R. Richard Tregurtha; K. P. Kalirajan; Ulaganathan Sankar (2003). Economic Reform and the Liberalisation of the Indian Economy: Essays in Honour of Richard T. Shand; papers Presented at a Major Conference on Second Generation Reforms in Chennai from 8 – 10 December 1999. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 39. ISBN 978-1-78195-943-5.
  263. ^ Thakur, Anil Khumar; Debes Mukhopadhayay (2010). Economic Philosophy of Jawaharlal Nehru. Deep and Deep Publications. p. 14. ISBN 978-81-8450-272-5.
  264. ^ Chandra, Bipan; Aditya Mukherjee; Mridula Mukherjee (2008). India Since Independence. Penguin Books India. p. 449. ISBN 978-0-14-310409-4.
  265. ^ Kapila, Uma (2009). Indian Economic Developments Since 1947 (3Rd Ed.). Academic Foundation. p. 132. ISBN 978-81-7188-711-8.
  266. ^ a b Kapila, Uma (2009). Indian Economic Developments Sinc 1947 (3Rd Ed.). Academic Foundation. p. 66. ISBN 978-81-7188-711-8.
  267. ^ a b Giersch, Herbert; Karl-Heinz Paqué; Holger Schmieding (1994). The Fading Miracle: Four Decades of Market Economy in Germany. Cambridge University Press. p. 4. ISBN 978-0-521-35869-9.
  268. ^ Kopstein 2005, p. 366.
  269. ^ Parker, Randall E.; Robert M. Whaples (2013). The Routledge Handbook of Major Events in Economic History. Routledge. p. 306. ISBN 978-0-415-67703-5.
  270. ^ Brown, Judith M. (17 June 2014). Nehru. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-87476-8.
  271. ^ Ashutosh Varshney (18 September 1998). Democracy, Development, and the Countryside: Urban-Rural Struggles in India. Cambridge University Press. pp. 30–31. ISBN 978-0-521-64625-3.
  272. ^ India Today. New Horizons. 1963.
  273. ^ Farmer, B. H. (1993). An Introduction to South Asia. Routledge. p. 120. ISBN 978-0-415-05695-3.
  274. ^ "Children's Day 2021: Here's Why Jawaharlal Nehru's Birthday Celebrated as Bal Diwas". News18. 14 November 2021.
  275. ^ Lion M.G. Agrawal (2008). Freedom Fighters of India. Vol. 2. Isha Books. p. 132. ISBN 978-81-8205-470-7 – via Google Books.
  276. ^ Som, Reba (February 1994). "Jawaharlal Nehru and the Hindu Code: A Victory of Symbol over Substance?". Modern Asian Studies. 28 (1): 165–194. doi:10.1017/S0026749X00011732. JSTOR 312925. S2CID 145393171.
  277. ^ Basu, Srimati (2005). She Comes to Take Her Rights: Indian Women, Property, and Propriety. SUNY Press. p. 3. ISBN 978-81-86706-49-7. The Hindu Code Bill was visualised by Ambedkar and Nehru as the flagship of modernisation and a radical revision of Hindu law...it is widely regarded as dramatic benchmark legislation giving Hindu women equitable if not superior entitlements as legal subjects.
  278. ^ Williams, p. 107.
  279. ^ Williams, p. 106.
  280. ^ Uppal, N. (2021). Narcissus or Machiavelli?: Learning Leadership from Indian Prime Ministers. Taylor & Francis. p. 48. ISBN 978-1-000-41480-6.
  281. ^ Erckel, Sebastian (2011). India and the European Union – Two Models of Integration, GRIN Verlag, ISBN 978-3-656-01048-7, p. 128
  282. ^ Merchant, Minhaz (27 August 2020). "Nehru's noble intent of treating Muslims fairly put India on slippery slope of faux secularism". ThePrint. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  283. ^ Kulke, Hermann; Dietmar Rothermund (2004). A History of India. Routledge. p. 328. ISBN 978-0-415-32919-4. One subject that particularly interested Nehru was the reform of Hindu law, particularly with regard to the rights of Hindu women...
  284. ^ Purandare, Vaibhav (23 August 2017). "triple talaq: Uniform code: Nehru okayed principle, but didn't make it a directive". The Times of India. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  285. ^ Soman, Zakia; Niaz, Noorjehan (17 June 2016). "Why Triple Talaq Needs to Be Abolished". The Wire. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  286. ^ Singh, Ravi Ranjan & M. K. (14 August 2021). "Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru". K.K. Publications. p. 20 – via Google Books.
  287. ^ Gusain, Lakhan (2012). "The Effectiveness of Establishing Hindi as a National Language". Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. 13 (1): 43–50. JSTOR 43134213 – via JSTOR.
  288. ^ Rathi, Nandini (15 September 2017). "Hindi Diwas: Journey of Hindi from pre-Partition India to post-independence language politics". The Indian Express. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  289. ^ E. Annamalai (1979). "Language Movements Against Hindi as An Official Language". Language movements in India. Central Institute of Indian Languages.
  290. ^ Viswanathan, S. (6 December 2009). "Language issue again: The need for a clear-headed policy". The Hindu. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  291. ^ Ghosh, P.E.U (3 September 2012). Indian Government and Politics. PHI Learning. ISBN 978-81-203-4649-9.
  292. ^ David M. Malone et al. eds. The Oxford handbook of Indian foreign policy (2015) pp 92–103.
  293. ^ C.H. Heimsath, Surjit Mansingh, A diplomatic history of modern India (1971) online
  294. ^ Malone, e Oxford handbook of Indian foreign policy (2015) pp 370–83
  295. ^ Malone, The Oxford handbook of Indian foreign policy (2015) pp 356–369.
  296. ^ Itty Abraham, "From Bandung to NAM: Non-alignment and Indian foreign policy, 1947–65." Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 46.2 (2008): 195–219. online
  297. ^ Gopal Sarvepalli, Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography. 1947–1956. Volume Two (1979) 43–65.
  298. ^ Odd Arne Westad, The Cold War: A World History (2017) pp 423–448.
  299. ^ Subrata K. Mitra, "Nehru's policy towards Kashmir: Bringing politics back in again." Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 35.2 (1997): 55–74.
  300. ^ Geoffrey Tyson, "Foreign Investment in India", International Affairs 31.2 (1955): 174–181.
  301. ^ Sorensen, Clark W.; Baker, Donald (10 December 2013). The Journal of Korean Studies, Volume 18, Number 2 (Fall 2013). Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-4422-3336-2.
  302. ^ K. Srinivasan (7 November 2005). The Rise, Decline and Future of the British Commonwealth. Palgrave Macmillan UK. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-230-24843-4.
  303. ^ "London Declaration". 16 May 2019. Archived from the original on 4 July 2021. Retrieved 22 August 2021.
  304. ^ Haque, Affanul (20 May 2017). "Non-Aligned Movement: Jawaharlal Nehru – The architect of India's foreign policy". The Times of India.
  305. ^ Robert Sherrod (19 January 1963). "Nehru:The Great Awakening". The Saturday Evening Post. 236 (2): 60–67.
  306. ^ Shashi, Shyam Singh (1996). Encyclopaedia Indica: Great political personalities of Post Colonial Era-I. Anmol Publications. p. 81. ISBN 9788170418597.
  307. ^ Sarvepalli Gopal,"Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography" Vol.2, 2:232–35.
  308. ^ H. W. Brands, India and the United States (1990) pp 78, 85
  309. ^ Indian Express, 6 October 1949 at Pune at the time of lying of the foundation stone of National Defence Academy.
  310. ^ Mahatma Gandhi's relevant quotes, "My non-violence does not admit of running away from danger and leaving dear ones unprotected. Between violence and cowardly flight, I can only prefer violence to cowardice. Non-violence is the summit of bravery." "I do believe that, where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence." "I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honour than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonour." – All Men Are Brothers Life and Thoughts of Mahatma Gandhi as told in his own words. UNESCO. pp. 85–108.
  311. ^ Sublet, Carrie. "Dr. Homi Jehangir Bhabha". nuclearweaponarchive.org. Archived from the original on 7 August 2011. Retrieved 8 August 2011.
  312. ^ Bhatia, Vinod (1989). Jawaharlal Nehru, as Scholars of Socialist Countries See Him. Panchsheel Publishers. p. 131.
  313. ^ Dua, B. D.; James Manor (1994). Nehru to the Nineties: The Changing Office of Prime Minister in India. C. Hurst & Co. Publishers. pp. 141, 261. ISBN 978-1-85065-180-2.
  314. ^ Mihir Bose (2004). Raj, Secrets, Revolution: A Life of Subhas Chandra Bose. Grice Chapman Publishing. p. 291. ISBN 978-0-9545726-4-8.
  315. ^ a b "V.K. Krishna Menon, India Defense Minister, U.N. Aide, Dies". The New York Times. 6 October 1974.
  316. ^ Guha, Ramachandra (2 August 2008). "A fateful arrest". The Hindu. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  317. ^ Sankar Ghose (1993). Jawaharlal Nehru, a Biography. Allied Publishers. pp. 1888–190. ISBN 978-81-7023-369-5.
  318. ^ "A short history of long speeches". BBC News. 25 September 2009. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016.
  319. ^ Majid, Amir A. (2007). "Can Self Determination Solve the Kashmir Dispute?" (PDF). Romanian Journal of European Affairs. 7 (3): 38. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 March 2012.
  320. ^ Sankar Ghose (1993). Jawaharlal Nehru, a Biography. Allied Publishers. pp. 266–268. ISBN 978-81-7023-369-5.
  321. ^ Li, Jianglin; Wilf, Susan (2016). Tibet in agony : Lhasa 1959. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. pp. 40–41. ISBN 978-0-674-08889-4. OCLC 946579956.
  322. ^ The full text of this agreement (which entered into force on 3 June 1954): "Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations" (PDF). United Nations Treaty Series. New York: United Nations. 1958. pp. 57–81. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 March 2012. Retrieved 14 August 2012.
  323. ^ "Nehru's India". Mint. 23 May 2014. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  324. ^ Grantham, Alexander (2012). Via ports : from Hong Kong to Hong Kong (New ed.). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. p. 184. ISBN 978-988-8083-85-5.
  325. ^ Nayudu, Swapna Kona (8 November 2016). "India's moment in the Suez Canal crisis". Business Line. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  326. ^ Mathai (1978). Reminiscences of the Nehru Age.
  327. ^ "Assassination Attempt on Nehru Made in Car". Gettysburg Times. 22 March 1955. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
  328. ^ "Rickshaw Boy Arrested for Nehru Attack". Sarasota Herald Tribune. 14 March 1955. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
  329. ^ "Rickshaw Boy Arrested for Attempting to Kill Nehru". The Victoria Advocate. 14 March 1955. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
  330. ^ "Knife Wielder Jumps on Car of Indian Premier". The Telegraph. 12 March 1955. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
  331. ^ "Police Say Nehru's Assassination Plot is Thwarted". Altus Times-Democrat. 4 June 1956. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
  332. ^ "Bombay Police Thwart Attempt on Nehru's Life". Oxnard Press-Courier. 4 June 1956. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
  333. ^ "Bomb Explodes on Nehru's Route". Toledo Blade. 30 September 1961. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
  334. ^ Mathai, M.O. (1979). My Days with Nehru. Vikas Publishing House.
  335. ^ Roberts, Elizabeth Mauchline (2017) [1974], Gandhi, Nehru and Modern India, Routledge Library Editions:British in India, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-00-063959-9
  336. ^ Sarvepalli Gopal (2014). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography Volume 3 1956–1964. Random House. p. 293. ISBN 978-1-4735-2189-6.
  337. ^ Asia Society (1988). "Jawaharlal Nehru". In Embree, Ainslie T. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Asian History. Vol. 3. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. pp. 98–100. ISBN 978-0-684-18899-7.
  338. ^ Kanwar Raj. "The evening 58 years ago when I saw off Nehru on his last flight". Deccan Herald. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  339. ^ BBC ON THIS DAY | 27 | 1964: Light goes out in India as Nehru dies Archived 11 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine. BBC News. Retrieved 17 March 2011.
  340. ^ Brady, Thomas F. (29 May 1964). "1.5 Million View Rites for Nehrus; Procession Route Jammed as Indians and Foreigners Pay Last Respects". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2 August 2017. Retrieved 18 May 2017.
  341. ^ "Letter to the President of India on the Death of Prime Minister Nehru". The American Presidency Project. 27 May 1964. Retrieved 21 February 2023.
  342. ^ S.L. Shastry (1964). Contemporary Indian Literature. p. 14. Retrieved 21 February 2023.
  343. ^ "From the archive, 28 May 1964: The death of Mr Nehru, hero and architect of modern India". The Guardian. 28 May 2014. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
  344. ^ "A Man Who, with All His Mind and Heart, Loved India". Life Magazine. Time Inc. 5 June 1964. p. 32.
  345. ^ "India Mourning Nehru, 74, Dead of a Heart Attack; World Leaders Honor Him". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 22 March 2017. Retrieved 28 March 2017.
  346. ^ Pathak, Vikas (17 August 2018). "Atal Bihari Vajpayee, the orator: Speech that sounded like poetry". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 7 January 2022.
  347. ^ "Vajpayee on Nehru's death: Bharat Mata has lost her favourite prince". ThePrint. 16 August 2018. Retrieved 7 January 2022. In the Ramayana, Maharashi Valmiki has said of Lord Rama that he brought the impossible together. In Panditji's life, we see a glimpse of what the great poet said. He was a devotee of peace and yet the harbinger of revolution, he was a devotee of non-violence but advocated every weapon to defend freedom and honour.
  348. ^ "We ensured B R Ambedkar was chairman of drafting committee of Constitution: Congress". The Economic Times. 30 November 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
  349. ^ Jivanta Schoettli (2011). Vision and Strategy in Indian Politics: Jawaharlal Nehru's Policy Choices and the Designing of Political Institutions. Routledge. p. 88. ISBN 978-1-136-62787-3.
  350. ^ "International Urdu conference from Nov. 10". The Hindu. 7 November 2010. Archived from the original on 11 November 2010. Retrieved 13 April 2012.
  351. ^ Chawla, Muhammad (2016). "Maulana Azad and the Demand for Pakistan: A Reappraisal". Journal of the Pakistan Historical Society. 64 (3): 7–24.
  352. ^ Singh, Pradyuman (19 January 2021). Bihar General Knowledge Digest. Prabhat Prakashan. ISBN 978-93-5266-769-7.
  353. ^ Anwarul Haque Haqqi; Indian Political Science Association (1986). Indian Democracy at the Crossroads. Mittal Publications. p. 123. GGKEY:X2U27GYQ2L1.
  354. ^ Mahendra Prasad Singh (1981). Split in a Predominant Party: The Indian National Congress in 1969. Abhinav Publications. p. 50. ISBN 978-81-7017-140-9.
  355. ^ Da, S (2001). "The Nehru years in Indian politics" (PDF). Edinburgh Papers in South Asian Studies. 16: 24. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
  356. ^ G.G. Mirchandani (June 2003). 320 Million Judges. Abhinav Publications. pp. 177–178. ISBN 978-81-7017-061-7.
  357. ^ "Nation pays homage to Govind Ballabh Pant". The Times of India. 10 September 2006. Archived from the original on 1 July 2012.
  358. ^ "Govind Ballabh Pant Engineering College, Pauri Garhwal, Uttarakhand". Gbpec.net. Archived from the original on 25 December 2012. Retrieved 1 January 2013.
  359. ^ "Padma Awards Directory (1954–2007)" (PDF). Ministry of Home Affairs. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 April 2009. Retrieved 26 November 2010.
  360. ^ Jivanta Schoettli (2012). Vision and Strategy in Indian Politics: Jawaharlal Nehru's Policy Choices and the Designing of Political Institutions. Oxon: Routledge. p. 106. ISBN 978-1-136-62787-3.
  361. ^ S. A. Palekar (2012). Development Administration. New Delhi: PHI Learning. p. 74. ISBN 978-81-203-4582-9.
  362. ^ Malhotra, Inder (26 September 2014). "Once upon a plan". The Indian Express. Retrieved 11 July 2016.
  363. ^ "Reference Material 2010 Notes of the Functioning of Various DiviionsI" (PDF). Planning Commission of India. 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 December 2016. Retrieved 11 July 2016.
  364. ^ M M Sury (2003). "India: Central Government Budgets – 1947–48 to 2003–04". New Century Publications. Retrieved 20 July 2016.
  365. ^ "North Block Mavericks". Business Standard. 1 March 1997. Retrieved 11 July 2016.
  366. ^ D K Rangnekar (2012). The Politics of Poverty: Planning India's Development. New Delhi: SAGE Publications. p. 134. ISBN 978-81-321-0902-0.
  367. ^ "dated December 21, 1954: State Bank of India". The Hindu. 21 December 2004. Archived from the original on 21 December 2016. Retrieved 12 July 2016.
  368. ^ Thaur, B. S. (20 April 2003). "Tracing history of the SBI". The Tribune. Retrieved 12 July 2016.
  369. ^ Arvind Panagariya (2008). India: The Emerging Giant. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-989014-9.
  370. ^ P S Palande; R S Shah (2003). Insurance in India: Changing Policies and Emerging Opportunities. New Delhi: Response Books. p. 31. ISBN 978-0-7619-9747-4.
  371. ^ Ziaul Hasan Faruqi (1999). Dr. Zakir Hussain, Quest for Truth. Delhi: APH Publishing. p. 280. ISBN 978-81-7648-056-7.
  372. ^ Niranjan Rajadhyaksha (7 December 2012). "The anxiety that lingers". Mint. Retrieved 11 July 2016.
  373. ^ Palmer, Norman D. (12 January 2007). "The 1962 Election in North Bombay" (PDF). cs.nyu.edu. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 March 2012. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
  374. ^ Fuller, C. J. (30 December 1976). The Nayars today – Christopher John Fuller. ISBN 978-0-521-29091-3. Retrieved 11 July 2012 – via Google Books.
  375. ^ Michael Brecher, and Janice Gross Stein, eds., India and world politics: Krishna Menon's view of the world (Praeger Publishing, 1968).
  376. ^ Steinberg, Blema S. (2008). Women in power : the personalities and leadership styles of Indira Gandhi, Golda Meir, and Margaret Thatcher. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. p. 20. ISBN 978-0-7735-3356-1. Retrieved 2 December 2015.
  377. ^ Steinberg, Blema S. (2008). Women in power : the personalities and leadership styles of Indira Gandhi, Golda Meir, and Margaret Thatcher. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. p. 20. ISBN 978-0-7735-3356-1. Retrieved 2 December 2015.
  378. ^ Upadhyaya, Prakash Chandra (1989). "Review of Marxist State Governments in India, Politics, Economics and Society by T. J. Nossiter". Social Scientist. 17 (1/2 January – February 1989): 84–91. doi:10.2307/3520112. JSTOR 3520112.
  379. ^ a b Frank, Katherine (2002). Indira: The Life of Indira Nehru Gandhi. Houghton Mifflin Books. p. 250. ISBN 978-0-395-73097-3.
  380. ^ Marlay, Ross; Clark D. Neher (1999). Patriots and Tyrants: Ten Asian Leaders. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 368. ISBN 978-0-8476-8442-7. Archived from the original on 5 February 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
  381. ^ Reddy, Sheela (23 February 2004). "If I Weren't A Sanyasin, He Would Have Married Me". Outlook. Archived from the original on 8 August 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
  382. ^ Srinivasan, Rajeev. "The Rediff Interview / Stanley Wolpert 'I have tried to tell Nehru's story as honestly as possible'". Rediff.com. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 6 August 2015.
  383. ^ Wolpert, Stanley (1996). Nehru: A Tryst with Destiny. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-510073-0. Retrieved 6 August 2015.
  384. ^ "Nehru-Edwina were in deep love, says daughter". The Indian Express. 15 July 2007. Archived from the original on 13 August 2021. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
  385. ^ "Love, longing & politics!". The Times of India. 21 April 2010. Archived from the original on 11 August 2011. Retrieved 2 September 2012.
  386. ^ Philip Ziegler, Mountbatten (1985) p. 473.
  387. ^ Jayakar, Pupul (1995). Indira Gandhi, a biography (Rev. ed.). New Delhi, India: Penguin. pp. 90–92. ISBN 978-0-14-011462-1.
  388. ^ Bose, Mihir (2004). Raj, secrets, revolution : a life of Subhas Chandra Bose. Norwich: Grice Chapman. pp. 137, 160. ISBN 978-0-9545726-4-8.
  389. ^ Sarvepalii, Gopal. Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 3; Volumes 1956–1964. Oxford University Press. p. 17. Nehru was still an agnostic, but a Hindu agnostic.
  390. ^ "The death of Nehru: From the archive, 28 May 1964". TheGuardian.com. 28 May 2013.
  391. ^ Vohra, Ashok (27 May 2011). "Nehru's Scientific Humanism". Times of India. Retrieved 18 August 2017.
  392. ^ Sarvepalli Gopal (8 January 2015). Jawaharlal Nehru;a Biography Volume 1 1889–1947. Random House. ISBN 978-1-4735-2187-2.
  393. ^ Thursby, Gene R. (1975). Hindu-Muslim Relations in British India: A Study of Controversy, Conflict, and Communal Movements in Northern India 1923–1928. BRILL. p. 1. ISBN 978-90-04-04380-0.
  394. ^ A. A. Parvathy (1994). Secularism and Hindutva, a Discursive Study. Codewood Process & Printing. p. 42.
  395. ^ Mohammad Jamil Akhtar. Babri Masjid: a tale untold. Genuine Publications. p. 359.
  396. ^ Ram Puniyani (1999). Communal Threat to Secular Democracy. Kalpaz Publications. p. 113.
  397. ^ Sankar Ghose (1993). Jawaharlal Nehru, a Biography. Alied Publishers. p. 210.
  398. ^ Jahanbegloo, Ramin Conversations with Isaiah Berlin (London 2000), ISBN 978-1-84212-164-1 pp. 201–202
  399. ^ Gail Omvedt (1980). We Will Smash this Prison!.: Indian Women in Struggle. Women in the Third World series. Zed Press. p. 124. ISBN 978-0-905762-44-9. Jawaharlal Nehru was the most famous leader, next to Mahatma Gandhi, of the Indian independence movement
  400. ^ Wiatr, J.J. (2022). Political Leadership Between Democracy and Authoritarianism: Comparative and Historical Perspectives. Verlag Barbara Budrich. p. 71. ISBN 978-3-8474-1693-7. scholars underline the importance of demographic political culture and its roots in the decades of peaceful struggle for independence (Vidyarthi 1967). Next to Gandhi himself, it was Nehru who deserved credit for such development.
  401. ^ Patil, V.T. (1987). Studies on Nehru. Facet Books International. p. 117. ISBN 978-0-932377-14-2. Among the many giants of the freedom movement , next to Gandhi , Nehru was the tallest
  402. ^ Cannon, P.G.; Cannon, G.; Brine, K. (1995). Objects of Enquiry: The Life, Contributions, and Influences of Sir William Jones, 1746–1794. New York University Press. p. 158. ISBN 978-0-8147-1517-8. "In the generation that won independence for India and the one following it [...] Jawaharlal Nehru, the second most important Indian nationalist next to Gandhi
  403. ^ a b Madan, Karuna (13 November 2014). "The relevance of Jawaharlal Nehru". gulfnews.com. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
  404. ^ Pal, R. M. (September 1997). "Universal primary education first on the Prime Minster's agenda". pucl.org. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
  405. ^ "Introduction". AIIMS. Archived from the original on 25 June 2014.
  406. ^ "Institute History". Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur. Archived from the original on 13 August 2007. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
  407. ^ "Nehru, a 'Queer Mixture of East and West,' Led the Struggle for a, Modern India; Devoted His Life to Nation's Cause; Blended Skill in Politics With the Spiritualism of His Mentor, Gandhi". The New York Times. 28 May 1964.
  408. ^ Vertovec, Steven (2014). Routledge International Handbook of Diversity Studies. Routledge International Handbooks. Taylor & Francis. p. 140. ISBN 978-1-317-60069-5.
  409. ^ Harrison, Selig S. (July 1956). "The Challenge to Indian Nationalism". Foreign Affairs. 34 (2): 620–636. doi:10.2307/20031191. JSTOR 20031191.
  410. ^ "Architect of modern India". Frontline. 8 November 2018. Retrieved 4 December 2021.
  411. ^ "'Architect of modern India': Congress pays tributes to Jawaharlal Nehru on death anniversary". The New Indian Express. Retrieved 4 December 2021.
  412. ^ "Jawaharlal Nehru: Architect of modern India". Hindustan Times. 14 November 2019. Retrieved 4 December 2021.
  413. ^ Ian Hall, The Conversation. "Nehru, the architect of modern India, also helped discredit European imperialism". Scroll.in. Retrieved 4 December 2021.
  414. ^ Dixit, J. N. (14 November 2021). "From the archives: How Jawaharlal Nehru shaped India in the 20th century". India Today. Retrieved 4 December 2021.
  415. ^ "Editorial: Master's voice". www.telegraphindia.com. Retrieved 4 December 2021.
  416. ^ "Opinion: Nehruvian legacy is his idea of India". The Siasat Daily. 26 May 2021. Retrieved 4 December 2021.
  417. ^ Service, Tribune News. "A thousand lies can't dwarf the giant Nehru was". Tribuneindia News Service. Retrieved 4 December 2021.
  418. ^ "Nehru, the real architect of modern India". Deccan Chronicle. 16 November 2014. Retrieved 4 December 2021.
  419. ^ Subramanian, V.K. (2003). The Great Ones Vol. IV. Abhinav Publications. p. 161. ISBN 978-81-7017-472-1. He was the greatest figure after Gandhi in the history of modern India.
  420. ^ Inder Malhotra (2014). Indira Gandhi: A Personal and Political Biography. Hay House. p. 124. ISBN 978-93-84544-16-4. Jawaharlal Nehru, the greatest of all Indians after Gandhi and free India's first prime minister
  421. ^ Bhatia, V. (1989). Jawaharlal Nehru, as Scholars of Socialist Countries See Him. Panchsheel Publishers. p. 105. Jawaharlal Nehru was incomparably the greatest figure after Gandhi in our history – a man of dynamic force, intellectual power and profound vision.
  422. ^ Lok Rajya. Directorate-General of Information and Public Relations. 1965. p. 40. Nehru was the greatest man produced by the nation after Mahatma Gandhi and the torch he lit must remain burning forever.
  423. ^ Guha, Ramachandra (2005). "Verdicts on Nehru: Rise and Fall of a Reputation". Economic and Political Weekly. 40 (19): 1958–1962. eISSN 2349-8846. ISSN 0012-9976. JSTOR 4416605. Retrieved 21 February 2023.
  424. ^ Craig Jeffrey, John Harriss (2014). Keywords for Modern India. Oxford University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-19-966563-1. Retrieved 21 February 2023.
  425. ^ Kaur, Navtej (2008). "Nehru as a prophet of world peace". The Indian Journal of Political Science. 69 (1). Indian Political Science Association: 203–222. ISSN 0019-5510. JSTOR 41856405. He was generally praised and supported for his statesmanship. Nehru did a commendable job in promoting world peace. As a statesman, committed to world peace, he strive hard to promote international understanding and co-operation
  426. ^ a b Thakur, Harish (2010). Gandhi Nehru and Globalization. Concept Publishing. ISBN 978-81-8069-684-8.
  427. ^ "Remembering Jawaharlal Nehru". Deccan Chronicle. 29 May 2019.
  428. ^ "Modish Designs". outlookindia. 4 February 2022.
  429. ^ Lahiri, Tripti (20 January 2012). "A Profile of the Nehru Jacket". blogs.wsj.com. Archived from the original on 3 March 2015. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
  430. ^ "Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund". Archived from the original on 7 November 2015. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
  431. ^ "The relevance of Jawaharlal Nehru". gulfnews.com.
  432. ^ India Today, Volume 22. Thomson Living Media India Limited. 1997. p. 77. on the choice of the greatest Indian since 1947. Jawaharlal Nehru was the clear choice of 42 percent
  433. ^ Sengupta, Uttam (20 August 2012). "A Measure Of The Man". Outlook. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
  434. ^ Suman Bhuchar (2002). "Seth, Roshan". In Alison Donnell (ed.). Companion to Contemporary Black British Culture. Routledge. p. 276. ISBN 978-1-134-70025-7.
  435. ^ "What makes Shyam special..." The Hindu. 17 January 2003. Archived from the original on 27 June 2003. Retrieved 6 June 2013.
  436. ^ "Universal Studio Scraps Nehru-Edwina Film".
  437. ^ Sharma, Garima (7 March 2010). "Shyam Benegal on his film Nehru". The Times of India. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
  438. ^ Documentary Today. Films Division, Government of India. 2010. p. 7.
  439. ^ "Jawaharlal Nehru Biography – Childhood, Facts & Achievements of India's First Prime Minister". culturalindia.net. Archived from the original on 13 August 2017. Retrieved 25 August 2017.
  440. ^ "Naunihal". Shemaroo. YouTube. 22 February 2016. Archived from the original on 9 June 2021.
  441. ^ "Ab Dilli Dur Nahin (1957)". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
  442. ^ Ashish Rajadhyaksha; Paul Willemen (10 July 2014). "Mir, Ezra". Encyclopedia of Indian Cinema. Taylor & Francis. pp. 9–. ISBN 978-1-135-94325-7. Retrieved 17 August 2015.
  443. ^ Richard Meran Barsam (1992). Nonfiction Film: A Critical History. Indiana University Press. p. 271. ISBN 978-0-253-20706-7. Retrieved 26 February 2013.
  444. ^ "India, 1951–1960". Movie Movie. 2009–2012. Archived from the original on 13 January 2018. Retrieved 29 September 2022.
  445. ^ AWARDS: The multi-faceted playwright[usurped] Frontline, Vol. 16, No. 3, 30 January – 12 February 1999.
  446. ^ Sachindananda (2006). "Girish Karnad". Authors speak. Sahitya Akademi. p. 58. ISBN 978-81-260-1945-8.
  447. ^ "Children's Day: Popular Books On and By Jawaharlal Nehru". The Times of India. 13 November 2020.
  448. ^ Balakrishnan, Anima (4 August 2006). "Young World : From dad with love". The Hindu. Chennai, India. Archived from the original on 12 November 2009. Retrieved 31 October 2008.
  449. ^ Adam Roberts, Michael J. Willis, Rory McCarthy, Timothy Garton Ash (2016). Civil Resistance in the Arab Spring: Triumphs and Disasters. OUP Oxford. p. 44. ISBN 978-0-19-108833-9. Nehru's books were translated into Arabic and widely read{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  450. ^ Rana, A.P. (1994). Four Decades of Indo-U.S. Relations: A Commemorative Retrospective. Har-Anand Publications. p. 203. ISBN 978-81-241-0156-8. Nehru's books were widely read and reviewed.
  451. ^ Gunther, John (1942), Inside Asia, New York and London: Harper and Brothers, p. 429
  452. ^ Brecher, Michael (23 September 2016), Political Leadership and Charisma: Nehru, Ben-Gurion, and Other 20th-Century Political Leaders, Intellectual Odyssey I, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 80–81, ISBN 978-3-319-32627-6
  453. ^ Crocker, Walter (2008), Nehru: A Contemporary's Estimate, Penguin Random House India, ISBN 9788184002133
  454. ^ Jack, Ian (1 May 2007), Noble words, Great speeches of the 20th-century: Nehru, Guardian
  455. ^ Khan, Laiqh A. (18 October 2020). "Nehru's address at UoM convocation in 1948 remains untraceable". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
  456. ^ "Who We Are". globalcenters.columbia.edu. Retrieved 5 July 2021.
  457. ^ "Conferment of Honorary Degree of Doctor: Keio University". keio.ac.jp. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
  458. ^ "Padma Awards Directory (1954–2007)" (PDF). Ministry of Home affairs. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 April 2009. Retrieved 26 November 2010.
  459. ^ Prasad, Rajendra (1958). Speeches of President Rajendra Prasad 1952–1956. The Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, GOI. pp. 340–341.: "In doing so, for once, I may be said to be acting unconstitutionally, as I am taking this step on my own initiative and without any recommendation or advice from my Prime Minister ; but I know that my action will be endorsed most enthusiastically not only by my Cabinet and other Ministers but by the country as a whole."

Bibliography

Further reading

  • Alam, Zafar. "Nehru in the Eyes of His Critics: An Appraisal." International Journal of Science and Research 8#6 (2019) pp 1727–28. online
  • Bayly, C. A. "The Ends of Liberalism and the Political Thought of Nehru's India." Modern Intellectual History 12.3 (2015): 605–626.
  • Brecher, Michael. Nehru: A Political Biography (1959). London:Oxford University Press.
  • Das, Manmath Nath. The political philosophy of Jawaharlal Nehru (Taylor & Francis, 2022) online.
  • "Nehru, Jawaharlal." in Ainslie T. Embree, ed., Encyclopedia of Asian History. Vol. 3. Charles Scribner's Sons. New York. (1988): 98–100.
  • Fonseca, Rena. "Nehru and the Diplomacy of Nonalignment." The Diplomats, 1939–1979 (Princeton University Press, 2019) pp. 371–397. online
  • Frankel, Francine. When Nehru Looked East: Origins of India-US Suspicion and India-China Rivalry (Oxford University Press, 2019) online.
  • Ghose, Sankar (1993). Jawaharlal Nehru. Allied Publishers. ISBN 978-81-7023-369-5.
  • Gopal, Sarvapelli. "Nehru and minorities." Economic and Political Weekly (1988): 2463–2466. online
  • Gopal, Sarvepalli. "The Formative Ideology of Jawaharlal Nehru." Economic and Political Weekly (1976): 787–792 online.
  • Gopal, Sarvepalli. Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography Volume 1 1889–1947 (1975); Jawaharlal Nehru Vol.2 1947–1956 (1979); Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography Volume 3 1956–1964 (2014), a major scholarly biography; excerpt vol 1
  • Guha, Ramachandra. "Jawaharlal Nehru." in Makers of Modern Asia (Harvard University Press, 2014) pp. 117–146.
  • Heimsath, C.H. and Surjit Mansingh. A diplomatic history of modern India (1971) online
  • Kopstein, Jeffrey (2005). Comparative Politics: Interests, Identities, and Institutions in a Changing Global Order. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-44604-4.
  • Louro, Michele L. Comrades against imperialism: Nehru, India, and interwar internationalism (Cambridge UP, 2018).
  • Malone, David et al. eds. The Oxford Handbook of Indian Foreign Policy. (2015) excerpt; a comprehensive overview by over 50 leading experts.
  • Moraes, Frank (2007). Jawaharlal Nehru. Jaico Publishing House. ISBN 978-81-7992-695-6.
  • Nanda, Bal Ram (2007). The Nehrus: Motilal and Jawaharlal. OUP India. ISBN 9780199081387.
  • Nath, Sushmita. The Secular Imaginary: Gandhi, Nehru and the Idea(s) of India (Cambridge University Press, 2022) online.
  • Purushotham, Sunil. "World history in the atomic age: Past, present and future in the political thought of Jawaharlal Nehru." Modern Intellectual History 14.3 (2017): 837–867.
  • Raghavan, Srinath. War and peace in modern India (Springer, 2016); focus on Nehru's foreign policy
  • Raghavan, Srinath. The Most Dangerous Place: A History of the United States in South Asia. (Penguin Random House India, 2018); also published as Fierce Enigmas: A History of the United States in South Asia.(2018). online review
  • Sherman, Taylor C. "Not part of the plan? Women, state feminism and Indian socialism in the Nehru years." South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 44.2 (2021): 298–312. online
  • Stanislaw, Joseph and Daniel A. Yergin (1988). "Commanding Heights" (PDF). New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.
  • Tharoor, Shashi (2003). Nehru: The Invention of India. Penguin Group. ISBN 9780670092000.
  • Tyson, Geoffrey. Nehru: The Years of Power (1966). London: Pall Mall Press.
  • Westcott, Stephen P. "Mao, Nehru and the Sino-Indian border dispute: A poliheuristic analysis." India Quarterly 75.2 (2019): 155-171. online
  • Zachariah, Benjamin. Nehru (2004) excerpt

External links