Template talk:Did you know

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cerebellum (talk | contribs) at 12:59, 7 September 2009 (→‎Battle of Unsan: rewording hook). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:DYK-Backlog

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page.

Purge

Instructions

Using a DYK suggestion string (see below examples), list new suggestions in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged. Thanks for participating and please remember to check back for comments on your nomination.

DYK criteria

Official criteria: DYK rules and additional guidelines
Unofficial Guide: Learning DYK

How to list a new nomination

Please use one of the strings below to post your DYK nomination, using the "author" and "nominator" fields to identify the users who should receive credit for their contributions if the hook is featured on the main page.

  1. Nom without image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= }}
  2. Nom with image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= | image= | caption= }}
    To include more than one new or expanded article in a single hook: |article2= |article3= |article4= | (etc)
    To include more than one author: |author2= |author3= | (etc)
    To include alternate hooks: |ALT1= |ALT2= | (etc)
    To add a comment: |comment=
    To add the article you reviewed: |reviewed=

Do not wikilink the article title, or the author username field; the template will wikilink them automatically. Do wikilink the article title in the hook field, however.
Do not add a section heading if you are using the template; the template will add one for you.
Do not include a signature (~~~~) after the template.
Do not use non-free images in your hook suggestion.

An example of how to use the template is given below. Full details are at {{NewDYKnom}}:

{{subst:NewDYKnom
 | article       = Example
 | status        = new<!--(or) expanded-->
 | hook          = ... that this [[article]] is an '''[[example]]''' ''(pictured)''?
 | author        = User
 | nominator     =
 | image         = Example.png
 | rollover      = An example image
 | comment       =
}}
  • Note that you should only use one of the above templates for the original hook. If you want to suggest a second, alternative hook for the same article submission, just type it in manually. The above templates output useful code for each submission and if you employ them for alternative hooks, you will mess up the page formatting.
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|May 1}} Thanks, ~~~~

How to review a nomination

Any editor who was not involved in writing/expanding or nominating an article may review it by checking to see that the article meets all the DYK criteria (long enough, new enough, no serious editorial or content issues) and the hook is cited. Editors may also alter the suggested hook to improve it, or may suggest new hooks.

If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or note that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:

Symbol Code DYK Ready? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe DYK eligibility requires additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Please consider using {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the nominator's talk page, in case they do not notice that there is an issue.

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Where is my hook?

If you can't find the hook you submitted to this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is in the queue for display on the main page. You can check whether your hook has been moved to the queue by reviewing the queue listings.

If your hook is not in the queue or already on the main page, it has probably been deleted. Deletion occurs if the hook is more than about eight days old and has unresolved issues for which any discussion has gone stale. If you think your hook has been unfairly deleted, you can query its deletion on the discussion page, but as a general rule deleted hooks will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on September 7

SMS Weißenburg

5x expanded by Parsecboy (talk). Self nom at 12:34, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • 11,532 bytes 2,344 bytes = approx. 4.9x expansion. You're only 188 bytes of prose away, though, so I reckon you're capable of fixing this concern. --Dylan620 (contribs, logs)help us! 12:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charterhouse cave

Created by Dmvward (talk). Self nom at 11:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Petrotel Lukoil Refinery

Created by Mario1987 (talk). Self nom at 10:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • (checked using DYKcheck) Everything checks out. The article is classified as a stub, but I'll leave that to the discretion of another reviewer. --Dylan620 (contribs, logs)help us! 12:43, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Dancer

Created by Aboutmovies (talk). Self nom at 09:23, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Ryūkyū Shimpō

Created by LordAmeth (talk). Self nom at 09:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • That what they say about themselves. Any chance to have a third-party reference? Another problem is 1315 bytes of prose, whereas 1500b is a minimum. Materialscientist (talk) 09:42, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, well, I suspected the article might be a bit short. I did what I could with the sources I happened to have immediately available. As for the sourcing issue, I've cited a number of different sources; one is from an online encyclopedia which happens to be published/organized by the Ryukyu Shimpo Company. Nothing in the article is from the primary source directly - such as an "About Us" or "History" page on the newspaper's website. It's from an encyclopedia. LordAmeth (talk) 10:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've added a bit more, from a history of the prefecture by Shinzato Kenji et al. Hopefully that pushes it above 1500kb. Thanks again. LordAmeth (talk) 11:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It does. BTW, the japanese wiki page brings much more info (though unreferenced, as usual) Materialscientist (talk) 11:41, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tawang Monastery

Caroline Moore, SN 2008ha

  • Comment: double nom.

5x expanded by Materialscientist (talk). Self nom at 06:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Butt Hole Road

Butt Hole Road street sign

  • ... the residents of England's Butt Hole Road (pictured) raised 300 to have the name of the street changed to keep tourists away and end jokes about the street's name?

5x expanded by Dream out loud (talk). Self nom at 05:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

USS Emily

Created by pd THOR (talk). Self nom at 04:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Article is too short (only 387 characters), the minimum is 1500. Can you expand the article at all? Javért  |  Talk 05:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wholly my fault, I misremembered the DYK criteria from previously (thinking character count only mattered for those articles nominated due to expansion). No, I don't believe I can expand the article at this time; I've scoured the internet for all due sources, and it appears the only ones left available to me are offline at the New York State Library archives. Thanks for the notice, though! — pd_THOR | =/\= | 05:49, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on September 6

Battle of Unsan

Created by User:Cerebellum (talk). Self nom at 12:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[[Kore

Jimmy Melbourne

Created by Dan arndt (talk). Self nom at 09:27, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Whoa: "Australian - Australian - Australia" in one hook. Can we tweak that somehow and avoid the repetition? And what does "also" add to the hook? Was he also murdered elsewhere? Dahn (talk) 12:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kicks (song)

5x expanded by Gongshow (talk). Self nom at 07:01, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Expansion and date verified, offline hook refs accespted in good faith. --Bruce1eetalk 07:46, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No Letting Go

Created by 03md (talk). Self nom at 00:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • (checked with DYKcheck) Everything looks good. I made one minor wording correction in the first sentence of the article. Javért  |  Talk 05:49, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Virginia Shehee

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 23:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Dissertation Concerning the End for Which God Created the World

Created by Javert (talk). Self nom at 23:17, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lana Cantrell

Created by Metropolitan90 (talk). Self nom at 22:06, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hélène Deschamps Adams

  • ... that Hélène Deschamps Adams saved American parachutists from capture at drop zones and helped Jewish families escape to Spain during World War II, while after the war she wrote two books, was the subject of several TV documentaries on female spies, and served as the basis for video game character Manon Batiste?

Created by A Nobody (talk). Self nom at 21:06, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Do you think you could submit a shorter hook? At 268 characters, it runs well over the general limit. --Dylan620 (contribs, logs)help us! 21:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do you have any recommendation for how to tighten it? She achived so much (saved lives, authored two books, inspired a video game character who appeared in multiple notable games), I am not sure how to to best encapuslate it all. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 21:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not sure there's any requirement for or purpose of the hook to "encapsulate it all". Dahn (talk) 21:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • We could of course always eliminate those particular brackets from the proposed hook above, but because the article was merged it can't actually be deleted per the GFDL anyway, so at worst it would just be a redirect to an internal link to somewhere, but anyway, okay so what about: "... that French Resistance fighter and spy Hélène Deschamps Adams served as the basis for video game character Manon Batiste?" Regards, --A NobodyMy talk 21:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cherasco Synagogue

  • ... that the Baroque Cherasco Synagogue was built on a courtyard of that the sounds of Jewish worship would not offend Christian ears?

Created by User:Historicist (talk). Self nom 6 September 2009 (UTC)

  • There seems to be a word or words missing from the hook: "a courtyard of ... that". --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that the Baroque Cherasco Synagogue was built on a courtyard so that the sounds of Jewish worship would not reach Christian ears, and possibly endanger the Jewish community?Historicist (talk) 00:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • slight alt:... that the Cherasco Synagogue was built on a courtyard within a residential building so that the sounds of Jewish worship would not reach Christian ears, and endanger the Jewish community?--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • clarification, since "built on a courtyard" may suggest being out in the open: ... that the Cherasco Synagogue was built within a residential building, facing an internal courtyard so that the sounds of Jewish worship would not reach Christian ears and endanger the Jewish community?

--Rich Janis (talk) 07:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Forensics in antiquity

Created by Sandstein (talk). Self nom at 19:26, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Offline reference accepted AGF, this passes all the criteria. It's also an intriguing hook!—S Marshall Talk/Cont 11:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Josefin Crafoord

Created by Theleftorium (talk). Self nom at 19:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of outlying islands of Scotland

Created by Ben MacDui (talk). Self nom at 19:17, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Very fine new list; all criteria met. But - and that's a question to DYK regulars - the pirate hideout bit is cited to what seems to be a self-published source ([1]); is that adequate? If not, it could be dropped from the hook.  Sandstein  20:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • If it's self-published, it's to be dropped from the article, not just from the hook. Dahn (talk) 21:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • the above alt should suffice for the hook. I will look into the Mestag sourcing in more detail. Andrew Spratt (caithness.org) is a genuine historian, but this a pretty obscure and remote spot so it may not be easy to find an alternative - RCAHMS have zilch. Ben MacDui 08:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trabzonspor (women)

Created by CeeGee (talk). Self nom at 19:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The hook is ungrammatical: if I read it right, the comma has no place in there. I also removed the picture, which is fair use and therefore can only be used in the article itself. And lastly: I'm not sure "(women)" is a proper distinguishing title for such articles on women's football teams. Dahn (talk) 21:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Romanian counties by foreign trade

Created by Mario1987 (talk). Self nom at 18:52, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wait up. First of all, the hook looks awful with a string of bold lettering that reads very poorly. Secondly: Ilfov County may have been combined with Bucharest for the purpose of this particular statistic, but it does not actually include the capital - it merely borders it. This is therefore misleading. So is the very rationale it uses, since it seems to ascribe to Ilfov things that could only apply to Bucharest. I'm also perplexed about the "comparable country" column, which seems to be WP:OR (and particularly WP:SYNTH), and have to wonder about the use of the entire article - especially given that it would have to be updated periodically from top to bottom, since the numbers that are likely to fluctuate greatly. I would suggest another hook, only I find nothing that could be formulated into one, and, as stated, I feel the entire article may be pointless cruft. Dahn (talk) 21:06, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Concerning the comparative column: a) Wikipedia is not a source; b) WP:SYNTH; c) what is the ultimate purpose of the comparison? d) with two variables, what hope does the analogy have of still being valid, say, in six months? Dahn (talk) 10:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Removed the columns. And BTW what do these columns have in common with the hook? Mario1987 11:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, they do. An new article ideally has to abide by certain standards before it is linked on the main page. And thanks. Dahn (talk) 12:39, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian cruiser Bahia

  • ... that after being driven mad by heat, lack of food and prolonged exposure to the sun, some survivors of the Brazilian cruiser Bahia jumped off of their rafts, where they were eaten by sharks?

Created by The ed17 (talk). Self nom at 17:18, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I was asked to look over for grammar and sourcing problems. Everything looked clean, and everything checks out. Ottava Rima (talk) 18:50, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I figured I'd find this article at DYK, but I really thought you'd have gone for the "second fastest light cruiser in the world at the time of commissioning" hook </subtle hint for a possible alt hook> :) Parsecboy (talk) 01:20, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First Madagascar expedition

Created by PHG (talk). Self nom at 16:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson B. Davis

OR ... that former Louisiana State Senator Jackson B. Davis, a Navy veteran of Pearl Harbor, still practices law, at the age of 91, in Shreveport?

!-- --> Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 14:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Erm... a "Pearl Harbor survivor" is one who survived the appalling conditions of "a harbor on the island of Oʻahu, Hawaii, west of Honolulu". I suppose you mean "Pearl Harbor survivor", but I for one would prefer this to be stated more clearly than a hidden link - squeezing "Pearl Harbor attack" in the hook shouldn't be a problem. Dahn (talk) 20:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • My point, I believe, still stands for the updated hook: if he was a survivor/veteran/whatever of the Attack on Pearl Harbor, why point the reader to the vague article on the harbor itself? Dahn (talk) 10:53, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Allison

Created by Stone (talk). Self nom at 12:22, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peau d’Espagne

Created by Sandstein (talk). Self nom at 11:43, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Size and the rest check out. Use of a blog, but the source is cited to a non-blog in addition (the blog just provides free access to the same quote), so, it checks out. I would suggest a rewrite to the grammar of the hook and say "Havelock Ellis claimed that peau d’Espagne 'is of all...". Ottava Rima (talk) 18:56, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • By the way, if anyone was wondering - I got 1539 characters sans blockquote. So, it is at the bottom but it passes in size for as much as I am concerned. Ottava Rima (talk) 18:57, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I personally prefer the original hook, since I do not think that "claim" is appropriate for something so subjective as an opinion about how to describe a scent, but I'll leave this up to the promoting admin.  Sandstein  19:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You could always use "said" or some other variant. My concern was mostly to use the word "is" as a sort of buffer between the noun and "of". It is not a big deal either way. Ottava Rima (talk) 19:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There's apparently another source for the hook, but the blog "source" needs to go from the article, per WP:RS, WP:V, WP:ELNO etc. It doesn't matter and is in fact inconsistent to state that the blog is an an okay source because it cites another source - using the same rationale, we could start "citing" wikipedia articles and even talk pages. And, frankly, an untrusted source is untrusted even for plain facts, since there's no editorial policy binding them. The policies and guidelines are clear on this one. Dahn (talk) 20:45, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

20 ITK 40 VKT

  • ... that the gun, 20 ITK 40 VKT received a nickname Vekotin (gadget) from the manufacturers VKT?

Created by MFKI (talk). Nominated by Pmlinediter (talk) at 10:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Skaz

Created by Lampman (talk). Self nom at 09:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date, length, refs are fine, and the article is rather useful and deserves expansion (strangely, it does not exist on russian wiki), but. I believe the hook might be more interesting, as nobody knows "Overcoat" and and even Gogol' is not that famous. How about something like ALT1 ... that literary critic Boris Eikhenbaum considered skaz as a central element of Russian culture and literature? Materialscientist (talk) 10:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's fine with me; I had problems finding anything really captivating about this one. I removed the repetition of "Russian". Lampman (talk) 18:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    then Materialscientist (talk) 22:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Healey 1000/4

Created by Thruxton (talk). Self nom at 08:48, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ilyushin Il-22 (1947)

  • ... that the prototype of the Soviet Il-22 jet bomber made the first ever Soviet jet-assisted take-off on 7 February 1948 with a pair of SR-2 boosters?

Created by Sturmvogel 66 (talk). Self nom at 08:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oregon PHL/DEQ Laboratories

State of Oregon health and environmental laboratories

Created by Aboutmovies (talk). Self nom at 08:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roppongi Hills Mori Tower

Roppongi Hills Mori Tower

5x expanded by Torsodog (talk). Self nom at 06:38, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Good questions. I added the year and city. --TorsodogTalk 17:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cook Island, New South Wales

Created by Alex Douglas (talk). Self nom at 05:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date, length, refs Ok, but "an important" is too vague in the hook. Materialscientist (talk) 09:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Understood. I don't know what I can change "an important" to. How about either of the following:

Created by Alex Douglas (talk). Self nom at 10:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Alex Douglas (talk). Self nom at 10:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ALT2 is worse, ALT1 a bit better, but has no reference (ref. 2 doesn't say who discovered the island). It is pretty logical that Cook discovered Cook Island, but this also makes the hook uninteresting. I would urge seeking a better hook, and if not found, provide a ref. and go with ALT1. Materialscientist (talk) 10:27, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps ALT3 ... that in 1770, James Cook named two landmarks of the Cook Island, New South Wales, Australia, as Mount Warning and Point Danger because he nearly shipwrecked there? Ref. 2 covers that. Materialscientist (talk) 10:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pogopalooza

Created by Smartse (talk). Self nom at 02:56, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • That first hook is a bit crap:

HAWAII MR1

Created by Hardtofindaname (talk). Self nom at 04:03, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For those that don't know feet:
ALT 1... that the HAWAII MR1 mapping system was used to find the USS Yorktown, a shipwreck 17,000 feet (5,200 m) underwater?

  • USS Yorktown is an disambiguation page. Pls link to the page of the specific Yorktown, and italicise just the ship's name but not "USS". --74.13.126.87 (talk) 12:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've fixed the link so it goes to correct ship and is formatted correctly too. Mjroots (talk) 14:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whinfield Power Station

Created by Fintan264 (talk). Self nom at 23:18, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on September 5

William Chaloner

  • ... that William Chaloner an audacious swindler, charlatan, sham plotter, and 'agent provocateur' was convicted of counterfeiting coins by Isaac Newton, sent to Newgate prison and hung on the gallows at Tyburn.?

new article Autodidactyl (talk). Self nom at 10:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • alt1 ....that William Chaloner, a master swindler, turned 'King's evidence' when he was caught forging £100 Banknotes in 1695, received a reward of £200 from the Bank of England and kept all his counterfeiting profits. Autodidactyl (talk) 12:39, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Minnesota North Stars head coaches

5x expanded by SRE.K.A.L.24 (talk). Self nom at 22:20, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

William Sharman

Created by Sillyfolkboy (talk). Self nom at 12:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Cooke (officer of arms)

Funeral of Sir Philip Sidney, 1587

Created by PKM (talk). Self nom at 05:16, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Added image file - PKM (talk) 21:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Panamanian monkey species

Created by Rlendog (talk). Self nom at 01:29, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic Complaint-Letter Generator

Created by Cunard (talk). Self nom at 23:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Loy F. Weaver

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 22:45, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Murba Party

Created by Soman (talk). Self nom at 21:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Demetrius the Chronographer

Created by A ntv (talk). Self nom at 21:42, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Names in Marble

  • ... that the film based on the novel Names in Marble is the most successful film in Estonia regarding box office profits?

Created by Alarichus (talk). Self nom at 21:36, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date, length, fact and refs all check out. J Milburn (talk) 22:26, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Most successful film made in Estonia is doubtless intended, though that's not what the statement says.--Wetman (talk) 09:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hubert D. Humphreys

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 20:52, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nan Vernon

Created by A Nobody (talk). Self nom at 20:39, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana

Created by Tim1965 (talk). Self nom at 18:45, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • "What century" is quite clear in the article. But the hook would be too long to make clear that it's the 20th century. - Tim1965 (talk)

List of Students' Unions in the United Kingdom

Created by Francium12 (talk). Self nom at 18:29, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • 1289 characters of prose. The bulleted part doesn't count. Please expand to at least 1500. Shubinator (talk) 00:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done.  Francium12  15:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The source for the hook is quoting the president of St Andrews University. I'd be more comfortable with a third-party source. Shubinator (talk) 19:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Can't find a particularly "scholarly" source. [2] repeats the claim  Francium12  21:16, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of accidents and incidents involving the Vickers Viscount

Created by Mjroots (talk). Self nom at 18:08, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • 107 characters of prose. The bulleted part doesn't count. Please expand to at least 1500. Shubinator (talk) 00:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I "shot" the bullets, should be OK now. Mjroots (talk) 05:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Apologies for passing this. I wasnt aware that an article of some 71,007 bytes still needed 1500 characters of prose  Francium12  15:45, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is now 1500 characters of prose exactly in the intro. This user has beaten the system!  Francium12  15:48, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BSA Thunderbolt

Created by Thruxton (talk). Self nom at 16:30, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Carpenter (game show contestant)

Expanded by Kubek15 (talk). Self nom at 14:50, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • According to the article's history, it has not been edited since August 22, and the nominator's last contribution to it was made on April 10. LiteraryMaven (talkcontrib) 15:30, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • and the article has no references whatsoever. Materialscientist (talk) 04:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Siegfried Palm

  • ... that Siegfried Palm (1927–2005), a German cellist who inspired composers, (head of Hochschule für Musik Köln, Intendant of Deutsche Oper Berlin,) appeared (as a music teacher) in the 1982 German film Doktor Faustus....?
  • Comment: way too long, () indicating possible shortening, completely unbelievable, especially that no article existed for him so far, smile

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk), Michael Bednarek (talk). Self nom at 14:36, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • There are a lot of problems, but since this is your first DYK we'll give you time to work on them. First of all, the hook is far too long and detailed, and all the things in parentheses should be removed (particularly the dates; hooks generally do not list birth and death dates). The rule of thumb is not to cram as many facts as you can into a hook, because it makes it cluttered and uninteresting; rather, choose one interesting fact and attempt to bring it out as well as possible. Another possible problem is that the only source for this hook fact is an IMDB page, which may not be a reliable source (there is debate on this; some people say IMDB should be considered reliable for cast lists but not for other biographical information). Also, the hook is not formatted correctly; relevant terms need to be linked (most importantly, there needs to be a link to the article itself) and Siegfried's name needs to be bolded; see WP:DYK#The hook and Wikipedia:Did you know/Additional rules#Other additional rules for the hook for more information. The last problem with the hook is that it's not that interesting; all it's saying is that a famous cellist also appeared in a film. Is there anything more unique or eye-catching that he did? Finally, the last problem is that the hook has peacock terms, "inspired composers", which need to be removed.
  • That's it for problems with the hook. Now, for things that need to be fixed within the article itself. I don't read German, but based on the layout this article appears to be nearly a word-for-word translation, and only three references have been added, meaning the bulk of the article is completely unreferenced. I'm sure the The Independent obituary could be used as a source for some of this article. But the bottom line is that other Wikipedia articles are never considered reliable sources, including Wikipedia articles in other languages, so if you just copy it word-for-word from German there is no way of knowing that the information is correct. I'm not sure if this article can be passed unless it is completely rewritten and references are added. If you want an example/model, take a look at Suanmeitang, which I translated from Chinese Wikipedia (zh:酸梅汤) back in December and was then featured on DYK). rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 14:49, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article was accepted by my advisor who reads German, s. discussion. I'll work on improvements, but not this weekend. Forget the hook, my first one was better, Graham Waterhouse, Aug 22.--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:11, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just how does any of that address Rjanag's objections (which, btw, are sound). The ideas here are: a) that the article is poorly written and not up to the minimal standards (WP:V, WP:MOS, WP:RS etc.); b) that the hook and the alternative don't comply with the basic rules anyone should read before posting here (you'll find them linked at the very top of the page). Statements such as "The article was accepted by my adviser who reads German" are utterly irrelevant to any of that. Dahn (talk) 16:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The alternative hook is ok (I can clean up the punctuation), but Dahn is right about the article issues. Particularly, you should read the core guidelines Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Citing sources; just assuring us that your advisor OK'ed the article is not enough, the article needs to meet Wikipedia's standards, and more particularly it needs to meet DYK's standards. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 04:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikipedia relies on reliable outside sources for verifiability. Obviously, you cannot use wikipedia itself to source facts on wikipedia - find sources that mention those facts and cite them for what they say. Like Rjanag, I encourage you to spend some time reading the core guidelines, you'll find that it's all in there. Dahn (talk) 12:44, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valère Somé

Created by Soman (talk). Self nom at 13:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leonid Rogozov

Created by Serge925 (talk). Self nom at 11:20, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I rewrote the hook for better clarity. Length and reference confirmed. This is an interesting article! LargoLarry (talk) 16:16, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arsenal Park Transilvania

Created by Mario1987 (talk). Self nom at 11:20, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length checked. Foreign-language reference accepted in good faith. Ready for DYK. LargoLarry (talk) 19:35, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Intuitive perhaps, but where is the reference for it being the largest such site in Romania? Dahn (talk) 00:18, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • What the new ref says is: "Aici se va construi, pe o suprafaţă de circa 80 de hectare, primul şi cel mai mare complex turistic exclusivist din România." ("Here shall be built, on an 80 hectare surface, the first and largest complex for exclusive tourism [there may be a better translation for "exclusive tourism", but I decline competence] in Romania"). This is not the same as saying it is the "largest outdoor amusement park". Also, the one source mentioning this predates construction works (when the article lets know that construction is not yet complete) and it appears to be the only one so far making this specific claim. For this reason, the claim needs to be introduced with words such as "reportedly", "allegedly", "according to" - which I'm also unsure would validate inclusion of this fact in the hook. The rest checks out, though. How about replacing the one questionable part with a verifiable tidbit from the article? Dahn (talk) 11:20, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • And what should i add to the hook? Mario1987 14:16, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Effect of psychoactive drugs on animals

Webs built by the same spider before (left) and after taking caffeine. Image can be improvedWebs built by the same spider before (top) and after taking caffeine

  • Comment: Ugly hook, but my other versions fail to properly link the article. Image can be improved.

Created by Materialscientist (talk). Self nom at 11:13, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ALT ... that after ingesting caffeine, spiders fail to build a proper web (see picture)? Johnbod (talk) 20:30, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks! I can never find right phrasing at night. Materialscientist (talk) 23:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Since when do we use "(see picture)"? Dahn (talk) 01:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I have had accepted hooks with (see pictured) when it was more appropriate than (pictured). Here, (pictured) would refer to "a proper web" only, which the picture is not. Any better idea is welcome. Materialscientist (talk) 03:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    How about (results pictured) or (web samples pictured)? They're both more orthodox. Btw, the brackets now say (see picture), not (see pictured), but maybe there's something I'm missing. Dahn (talk) 11:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Length, date and hook ok. I agree that (see picture) is better; if you used (pictured) you would have to put it after "fail", which would seem awkward. I like the left-hand picture, anything you could do to improve it would be great. I put a comma after "caffeine". PS: please link to the English language version of Google Books, not the Japanese one. Lampman (talk) 04:02, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Burkinabé parliamentary election, 1992

Created by Soman (talk). Self nom at 09:28, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shirley Huffman

Created by Aboutmovies (talk). Self nom at 07:50, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified. Source for hook accepted in good faith. ceranthor 12:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fred McQueen

Created by Esemono (talk). Self nom at 07:51, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Actually sort of a play on words as the movie is about a cult but ALT 1 sounds good! -- Esemono (talk) 23:03, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis Gorski

5x expanded by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 07:27, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't have access to these particular NYT archives, so AGF on them. The article looks fine though. NW (Talk) 03:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cypraea tigris

5x expanded by Casliber (talk). Self nom at 04:34, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • comes to 1492 characters of prose; a tiny expansion, then we're there. I'd suggest amending the hook because it doesn't really scream "click me"; how about ... that specimens of tiger cowry have been found at Pompeii, where they were most likely used as ornaments? A slight improvement. Ironholds (talk) 06:30, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • both hooks acceptable, alternative preferred. Don't worry about the miscount; could happen to anyone. I did the same thing with Inns of Chancery a while back. Ironholds (talk) 16:45, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I just put "the" into the hook, that's usually how it is referred to, the tiger cowry. Thanks, Invertzoo (talk) 22:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charles L. Gilliland

5x expanded by Jwillbur (talk). Self nom at 03:32, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • offline reference accepted in good faith, everything else checks out. Ironholds (talk) 06:34, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ilyushin Il-40

  • ALT1:... that the first time that the prototype of the Soviet Il-40 ground-attack aircraft fired its guns in the air its pilot was temporarily blinded and both jet engines flamed out when they ingested the combustion gasses from the guns?

5x expanded by Sturmvogel 66 (talk). Self nom at 02:49, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please wikilink the qualifying article in the hook. Shubinator (talk) 02:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

League Championship Series Most Valuable Player Award

Created by Killervogel5 (talk). Self nom at 01:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The picture for the second hook, though I can't put it in the template, is File:Orlando Hernández.jpg. KV5 (TalkPhils) 01:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Original hook is good to go. Rlendog (talk) 19:42, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Harold H. Thompson (anarchist)

  • ... that after being sentenced to life imprisonment plus 50 years for murder and expropriation, anarchist Harold Thompson had his sentence lengthened by 31 years for attempting to murder three prison officers in a failed escape attempt?

Created by Skomorokh (talk). Self nom at 00:22, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • All the inline citations are to one source. Could you add more? Shubinator (talk) 02:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm a bit concerned the negative tone of the hook. Granted, the guy isn't living, but he died less than a year ago. Even for long dead people, combining murder, expropriation, anarchy, and life imprisonment is not flattering. Shubinator (talk) 18:57, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The anarchy and expropriation are positive connotations for the subject and his supporters, and I daresay they'd consider the others justified or an intolerable injustice to the subject. Check the sources.  Skomorokh  02:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Z. Morrow

Created by Acdixon (talk). Self nom at 14:15, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LeGarrette Blount

  • ... that LeGarrette Blount, a running back suspended one game into his second season of NCAA football, rushed for over 1,000 yards in one season, but under 1,000 for his two-season career?

5x expanded by Peteforsyth (talk). Self nom at 03:30, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not a fivefold expansion. Expansion started as far beck as August 19/20, when it reached 1,955 characters. It is now at 7,066, which gives ≈ 3.6 Lampman (talk) 04:28, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on September 4

George William Beatty

Created by Alansohn (talk). Self nom at 00:33, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Papineau-Labelle Wildlife Reserve

Created by P199 (talk). Self nom at 15:36, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date, size, cite, hook all verified. Image relevant and tagged as Creative Commons. --maclean (talk) 18:00, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ada Jack Carver Snell

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 01:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:OR

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 01:06, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maltman Barry

Created by Warofdreams (talk). Self nom at 20:22, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Edw. Malley Co.

Created by Needscurry (talk). Self nom at 18:31, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How the Scots Invented the Modern World

  • Comment: fact from 1st paragraph of "Publication" section referenced to an offline source but can be confirmed via publishers' webistes: US UK

Created by Maclean25 (talk). Self nom at 17:32, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scissor Sisters (convicted killers)

Created by GainLine (talk), expanded by User:Candlewicke (talk). Nominated by Candlewicke (talk) at 14:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Communications Workers of America v. Beck

Created by Tim1965 (talk). Self nom at 13:25, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond Words Publishing

Created by Aboutmovies (talk). Self nom at 07:14, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Snell (journalist)

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 03:07, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Very close wording. For example,
Article: Snell filed a number of stories for the Constitution, both while in military training in the United States and after having arrived with the World War II occupation forces in South Korea.
Source: Snell filed a number of stories to the Constitution both while in training in the United States and after arriving with the occupation forces in Korea.

"RewordedBilly Hathorn (talk) 00:11, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shubinator (talk) 16:39, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tasmanian Masked Owl

Created by Maias (talk). Self nom at 01:44, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dwór (manor house)

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 22:22, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length checked. Foreign-language reference accepted in good faith. ALT1 ready for DYK. LargoLarry (talk) 19:39, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The first hook seems stronger, imo. Asking why seems a tad unreasonable. Johnbod (talk) 20:33, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really see what the brackets add to the hook, and they look terribly irregular - particularly since a (pictured) is supposed to come right after that (and bracket on bracket outside of maths is an eyesore). If you want the native name, why not go for it? I could suggest: manor houses, dwór manor houses, dwór manors or the plural for dwór (which for some unfathomable reason, the article doesn't mention - dwóry?). Any of these would look better. Dahn (talk) 21:54, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ney v. Landmark Education Corporation and Werner Erhard

Created by Cirt (talk). Self nom at 21:50, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Keyes (gridiron football)

5x expanded by Bobbykeyes2 (talk), DoubleBlue (talk). Nominated by Giants27 (talk) at 21:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Voices Carry (song)

Created by Frcm1988 (talk). Self nom at 21:12, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Pape

5x expanded by PeeJay2K3 (talk). Self nom at 20:10, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative: ... that while playing for Clapton Orient, footballer Albert Pape scored against former club Manchester United during a match in February 1925? GiantSnowman 21:50, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No no, he was a Clapton Orient player on the morning of the game, but signed for Manchester United an hour before kick-off and scored against Orient in the match. I can see why that would have been confusing, though, and that's why I asked for help with the hook. It's not easy to fit something like this into 200 characters! – PeeJay 23:01, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, oh right - you're right, very confusing! GiantSnowman 19:38, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ALT: ... that Albert Pape scored a goal for Manchester United against Clapton Orient, despite only having been transferred from Orient to United earlier that day? (153 characters) Jmorrison230582 (talk) 06:15, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, that's much better! – PeeJay 07:38, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that wording is much better. GiantSnowman 19:38, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just as a minor change, I would like to suggest the following:
ALT: ... that Albert Pape scored a goal for Manchester United against Clapton Orient in 1925, despite only completing a transfer from Orient to United an hour before kick-off? – PeeJay 23:50, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confédération générale du travail du Burkina

Created by Soman (talk). Self nom at 19:42, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Counsellor at Law

5x expanded by LiteraryMaven (talk). Self nom at 17:48, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length verified and offline hook reference accepted in good faith. OK for DYK. LargoLarry (talk) 13:48, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Austin Davis

Created by Richard (talk). Self nom at 17:45, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The word "different" seems redundant. A redshirt freshman is someone whose year as a student doesn't count against their eligibility. So if he played and broke 15 records, I don't think he was a redshirt freshman. I think he broke the records after his redshirt freshman year. It sounds from the article like that was his first year as a starter? ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:24, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • He broke 15 school records in one year, which was his redshirt freshman year, which was first year as a starter. The records broken are single-game and single-season records. Richard (talk) 19:01, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see. So he "redshirted" in 2007 making him a redshirt freshman in 2008. Confusing, but I get it now. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:11, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can we get a wikilink of some sort for "redshirt", as personally I don't have a clue what it means.....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:44, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Montenegrin Air Force

Created by Eurocopter (talk). Self nom at 17:41, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, no prob. --Eurocopter (talk) 22:59, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yibir

  • ... that the Yibir are a Somali clan of itinerant magicians who give blessings to newborns and newly married couples?

5x expanded by Drmies (talk). Self nom at 16:38, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I tweaked the lead so as to magically eliminate the commas. Revert if you don't like it, but it's much much better this way. :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:28, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bhima Devi Temple Complex

Created/expanded by Nvvchar (talk). Self nom at 14:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The rest of us may have too much experience of on-site restorations of ruins, (Knossos?) to disbelieve in them.--Wetman (talk) 01:08, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sexuality in music videos

Created by Brandmeister (talk). Self nom at 14:07, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I tweaked the hook. What is "the" sexual variables? ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Variations, variants. Could be changed, the current wording is per reference. Brand[t] 08:28, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No doubt, and it is meaningless here and in the article without the context of that source (the lead para is a forest of dubious jargon too). Reread the source & see what they actually mean, which I suspect is something like "... that according to 1996 research into sexuality in music videos, hip-hop and R&B scored highest in an analysis of sexual content?" Johnbod (talk) 20:38, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that the image used in the article has a fair use rationale exclusively for a different article. You need to add a second rationale to be able to use it here. Lampman (talk) 12:41, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decltype

Created by Decltype (talk). Self nom at 13:59, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Magnolia x wieseneri

Created by Casliber (talk). Self nom at 13:32, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Needs a cite for the sentence with the hook, otherwise ok. I don't know which of the sources that support the hook, so I couldn't add it myself. decltype (talk) 14:02, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • clarified - commented out text notes first ref refs whole para anyway. Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:17, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Okay. Found it in online sources too, but don't know if they're considered reliable. decltype (talk) 14:27, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Martha Wollstein

Created by Lampman (talk). Self nom at 10:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Selection rule

5x expanded by Petergans (talk). Self nom at 07:23, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • This suggestion is not just an expansion. Previously the article was tagged as in need of expert attention. I have given it just that. The bulk of the present article, Section 2 is completely new. Petergans (talk) 07:23, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Nice rewriting, but the prose expansion is 8265/2484=3.3, i.e. too far from 5, and most of the article is unreferenced. Materialscientist (talk) 08:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can't do much about the prose style because of the high level of technical and mathematical content. In this context it is more important to be precise than eleoquent. Regarding references, we have been here before. The material is not recent and is covered in many books including that of Harris and Bertolucci, which covers it all in different places in the book, though I did not use all of thse when writing the article. Indeed, most of the material is covered in the other books which have been referenced in the article. How much detailed referencing is needed when expounding "standard" material in science? Petergans (talk) 16:42, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the "not just an expansion" issue, please see F2. Art LaPella (talk) 23:17, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have strong compassion on this nom, and do share the point that brevity (i.e. clarity) of the article often helps DYK more than number of bytes, but I do not feel like to make exceptions on 3.3x expansion. Referencing issue I understand too, but disagree - you know that "basic quantum mechanics", I know, but the reader may not trust that. Unspoken DYK rule is at least one ref should be in every non-trivial paragraph to cover it. Materialscientist (talk) 23:25, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have added page and other references so that almost all paragraphs have references. Wihout having done a word count, I believe that I have complied with the 5 times rule. Petergans (talk) 09:40, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prose expansion 8471/2484=3.4, the rest is Ok. I can't judge this nom. Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gwalia Gold Mine

Created by Calistemon (talk). Self nom at 00:29, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I prefer succinct hooks, but either way it's good to go. decltype (talk) 14:25, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on September 3

Dutch Golden Age painting

  • Comment: Hook in "Scenes of everyday life" section. Expansion size very kindly checked here

5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self nom at 00:14, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Geumsansa

Mireukjeon hall at Geumsansa

5x expanded by Steve46814 (talk). Nominated by Caspian blue (talk) at 10:38, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cowboy Casanova

Created by CarrieFan89 (talk). Nominated by TenPoundHammer (talk) at 15:58, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Faith Bible High School

  • Comment: Should be vague enough to get lots of clicks. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:07, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Aboutmovies (talk). Self nom at 06:07, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date, length, refs are all fine, but. The ref which supports the hook is offline and I failed to cross-check the fact on the internet. Materialscientist (talk) 09:50, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: We're not playing charades here. It needs to be clearly stated that the message contained a threat, even if that gives a few less clicks. Anything else is misleading. Lampman (talk) 10:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Where exactly in the rules does it say that? Quite the opposite, the rules say it should be "short [...] and likely to draw [the] readers", which the hook meets. Regards SoWhy 13:38, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you need a rule to tell you that hooks shouldn't be misleading, then I'm afraid I can't help you. Lampman (talk) 14:38, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
While hooks don't need to summarize the article or contain complete information, leaving out that the message was a threat seems a bit too tricky. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:43, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. There's also a strong likelihood that readers will assume that we are incompetent hook writers. In either case, not a good idea.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 07:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
IMO, the article facts should be as precise as possible, but the hook may be somewhat vague, but brief - hook is never sited itself and merely leads to information. The article should contain the hook, but not verbatim. Overly long, "precise" hooks just do not read and do not survive the review. I do respectfully disagree with Lampman on this and note that one should not enforce a policy which does not exist. That said, I would be glad to see the evidence for this hook and am uncomfortable to accept that one supporting reference (local newspaper) in good faith - everything is possible, even if that publication did exist, it might be in error, confusion, or else. Materialscientist (talk) 23:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would recommend that the hook have the word "threatening" added before the word "message", because it would be easy to guess anyway that the message was a threat rather than, say, a compliment or an invitation to a party, while using the phrase "a threatening message" would be a more natural way to refer to the incident than just using "a message" would be. One will still have to click through to find out what the nature of the threat was. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add what you want, but there is nothing wrong with the existing hook. As to the source, excuse me but what is the problem? Please read through this page and you might notice which is exactly for these situations, offline sources. Also note, The Oregonian is not a local newspaper, it is a regional, top 25 circulation in the US, multiple Pulitzer Prize winning newspaper that easily passes WP:RS. The local paper is the Hillsboro Argus. But if you would really like to check, search their archives using "Hillsboro police tracking online threat against boy" and the all dates option and you can get a free preview, or more if you have access via your local library. But let's not forget AGF and our existing processes already in place at DYK in the future. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:04, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I fail to see why you're resisting the addition of the key word "threatening" to the hook. If I read the hook as originally submitted, I would think "big deal" and move on. IMO, the fact a threat was involved adds to the intrigue and will prompt more clicks, which seems to be your chief concern. LargoLarry (talk) 14:32, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Resisting what? I started out with "Add what you want"! Most of the rest is about why we for some unknown reason decided to get rid of normal protocol and not accept the offline hook in good faith, and addressing an editor's implication that the source must not meet WP:RS (that would be the only reason for saying "am uncomfortable to accept that one supporting reference (local newspaper) in good faith"). But as to more intriguing, threats online happen fairly often and I have read where schools close down due to them before, thus not that intriguing to me if threat is mentioned in the hook. Whereas if I read a hook that says a school was closed because of an IM message, I'm probably going to click through to see what kind of message it was, if only to confirm it was some sort of threat. But, obviously you disagree, which we have room for. But we usually don't fail hooks because we think a different version might be more interesting, as "interestingness" is too subjective. Now, as to misleading, well most hooks would be to some extent. In order to not be misleading at all we would need to have something like "...school X closed down for one day after a student received a message on AOL IM on his home computer that said the author of the message was going to kill that student and that the student should not go to school." That's what happened, and anything less would to some extent be misleading. Do we also need to mention it was a death threat? Maybe we should also mention the threat was made to the student when the student was at home? Otherwise, as the hook was proposed: message via AOL IM received - check; school closed because of it - check. But leaving some info out is can be part of the point of the hooks we have on DYK. Some editors even encourage this. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:01, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Now you're being facetious. There's a vast difference between leaving out peripheral details and leaving out information that is essential to avoid a misunderstanding. The former is a practical necessity, the latter is a lie by omission. But if you agree to add "threat" then there shouldn't be a problem? I don't think it will be more intriguing that way, but neither do I believe in making the hook intriguing at the cost of veracity and reliability. I'd probably get a lot of clicks on "... that President Obama was born in Kenya?" See what I did there? I left out the word "not"! Lampman (talk) 04:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • And you are going with a straw man argument. So three cheers all around for logical fallacies! Should we try for some more? Or can you recognize that leaving out threat (an adjective describing the type of message) from my hook versus leaving out "not" in your hook is materially different? One is vague or misleading without the word, the other is just plain incorrect without the word. And at least with mine a RS source confirms it was a message; and in fact never in the article is it called a "threatening message", and threat or a version of that word only appears a single time in the same sentence as message, and they are separated by more than a dozen words. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Checked the newspaper archives on the fact of police following the threat, can't read the rest (that the school was closed), but accept AGF. Date, length Ok. Agree with Aboutmovies on "interestingness" and thus support the hook as it stands. Materialscientist (talk) 00:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I would be very careful about implicitly lying to our readers, and trying to increase the number of hits on one particular DYK at the cost of the credibility of the project. Furthermore, the creator has already agreed to change the hook. Lampman (talk) 04:55, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am very careful with lies, which this one is not. What the author said was said under pressure to have the nom accepted. However, I have no hard feelings there, if the consensus is for modify, I'm fine with that. Materialscientist (talk) 06:44, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If there turns out to be a consensus (not seeing one either way at the moment) for the modified hook, then I'm fine with that, but my preference is for the unmodified version. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Post Office (Peekskill, New York)

Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self nom at 04:14, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not liking the hook. What about: ... that the the Peekskill, New York, post office includes Palladian window Georgian arched windows (pictured) in its Colonial Revival design? The proposed hook seems to have too many conditions on the assertion of novelty (in New York, built before the New Deal, Colonial Revival). Adding a date might be good. I don't know what the built before the new deal part signifies? ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
During the Roosevelt administration, a lot more new post offices were built than had been built before, with a lot more architects involved, as part of the relief programs. I couldn't say "before the Depression" because it was built during the Depression. Perhaps I could add "relief programs" to the end of the hook? Daniel Case (talk) 05:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Appropriately reworded (and good catch! Thanks for adding the ref in the article!). Daniel Case (talk) 05:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Gillette

Created by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 03:34, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ockie Anderson

Created by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 01:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SMS Kurfürst Friedrich Wilhelm

SMS Kurfürst Friedrich Wilhelm

5x expanded by Parsecboy (talk). Self nom at 23:24, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Only a x3 expansion by my count, sorry. Gatoclass (talk) 10:50, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Are you sure you're checking the size right? Prose at pre-expansion was just over 1mb, and when you checked it at 10:50, the prose was about 8mb (to which another 4mb has been added since). That's significantly more than 5x expansion. Parsecboy (talk) 16:47, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article went from 811 to 10,049 characters, well over 5x expansion. References checked, no problems, ready for DYK. LiteraryMaven (talkcontrib) 18:24, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry, but that isn't the case. this is the pre-expansion version, and it's already over 5k in size - 2k by DYKcheck - and the current version is only about 6k of prose, which is only a x3 expansion. Gatoclass (talk) 18:29, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, it's been expanded further since I made the original comment, so it's now just over the x5 limit and therefore a pass. That was pretty quick work Parsecboy! Gatoclass (talk) 18:34, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why are you confirming something I already cleared for DYK? Had you checked my math instead of disputing it, you would have seen I was right to approve it. LiteraryMaven (talkcontrib) 18:42, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not that it matters at this point, but to clear up any confusion on my part in the future, why is the revision from Sept. 1 the "pre-expansion" version? Why isn't this revision, which was what the article stood at before I started working on the article on 3 Sept.? Parsecboy (talk) 00:33, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please see F2, which says "previously existing" not "pre-expansion". Art LaPella (talk) 06:13, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

9 part Tennyson hook

Illustration of Mariana by William Britten in 1901

  • Comment: 195 characters. Mariana was a history merge (see here for the timing). The rest are new articles. The hook can be found in the page on William Britten. There are images for each of the poems, but Shoemaker's Holiday has not had a chance to finish them (personal problems).

Created/expanded by Ottava Rima (talk), Juliancolton (talk), Shoemaker's Holiday (talk). Self nom at 23:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • There is no edit war nor would it affect DYK. Ottava Rima (talk) 13:53, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Should the name of the poems be italicized? ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:54, 4 September 2009 (UTC) My mistake. I'm not sure "illustrated many images" is great wording. But I guess it's okay. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In the articles? Or where? The above DYK doesn't have their actual name but a description of their imagery. I've discovered that it is more interesting to give a short summary than just list a title (as you can have quite a bit of fun with that). :) Ottava Rima (talk) 19:41, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dispute over Break, Break, Break is resolved, and the articles all look good. NW (Talk) 00:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sir John Pelly, 1st Baronet

Created by Rosiestep (talk). Self nom at 22:37, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Denial of the Temple in Jerusalem

Created by Historicist (talk). Selfnom <Historicist 3 September 2009 (UTC)

  • Unless I'm misreading both this article and Israeli–Palestinian history denial, it appears that "temple denial" is not necessarily a denial that the temples ever existed, but a denial that they were located in Jerusalem at the Temple Mount. As cited in this article, Arafat suggested that the temple was in Nablus. In "Israeli–Palestinian history denial" there are numerous cited quotes from people stating a belief that the temple wasn't in Jerusalem (and suggesting that it may have been elsewhere -- Jericho is mentioned in one case). The only claims that the temple never existed seem to come from a single television broadcast in 2004. Also, neither this article, nor any other that I can find, say that Jesus taught there, unless you consider Jesus and the money changers to be teaching. Thanks, cmadler (talk) 16:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The only Canonical Gospel source does not quite amount to "taught", though this was how the Middle Ages, & no doubt many modern Christians, interpret it: Luke 2:46+ "Now so it was that after three days they found Him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the teachers, both listening to them and asking them questions. 47 And all who heard Him were astonished at His understanding and answers". "disputed" would be the technical term, but the everyday meaning sounds too confrontational - "debated" maybe? Johnbod (talk) 20:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Presupposing the historical accuracy of the gospels amount to proselytising. Go with one of the Alts. Lampman (talk) 05:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ilyushin Il-20 (1948)

  • ALT1:... that the wing-mounted cannon of the Soviet Il-20 ground attack aircraft prototype were adjustable on the ground to fire either directly ahead or depressed at an angle of 23° to allow it to strafe targets on the ground while remaining in level flight?

5x expanded by Sturmvogel 66 (talk). Self nom at 21:25, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Carletonomys

  • ... that the rodent Carletonomys is known only from one incomplete upper jaw?

Created by Ucucha (talk). Self nom at 20:57, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • As it is a genus containing only one species (I forget the proper name!) it should be written about the genus and then say that it only contains one species. I've changed the text but I can't remember how the taxobox should be reorganised and I can't think of another genus with only one species. The second paragraph of the description doesn't have a reference but other than that once the species/genus formatting has been changed it is good to go. Smartse (talk) 03:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks for your comment. I don't know of any rule or policy to that effect, however, and I note that other monotypic oryzomyine genera (Sooretamys, Lundomys, Amphinectomys, Noronhomys, Mindomys, Pseudoryzomys, Oreoryzomys) are organized in the same way as in my original article. Furthermore, your version seems to suggest that other species will be discovered in the future, which it shouldn't do. I therefore reverted your change. Ucucha 12:26, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • I actually came here to nominate the article, so instead I will second the nomination. Ucucha's paragraph formatting is more commonplace. Andrewsarchus may be a good example since it too is a species only known from fossils (and with no common name). Thoughts on a more informative hook?
      • ALT1 ... that Carletonomys, a rodent related to modern rice rats, is known only from one incomplete upper jaw from over 1 million year old silt deposits in Argentina? --Aranae (talk) 13:34, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don Bell (radio broadcaster)

Created by Jasper33 (talk). Self nom at 14:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yaakov Bodo

  • ... that the "Moishe Ventilator" character, portrayed by acclaimed Israeli actor Yaakov Bodo, was enacted in a self titled theater show that ran over a thousand times and was eventually made into a film by the same name in 1966?



Alternative suggestion:

  • ... that Yaakov Bodo played the character "Moishe Ventilator" over 1000 times?

Created by Jaakobou (talk). Selfnom JaakobouChalk Talk 14:50, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    • Suggesting alternate hook. Durova310 16:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Israeli actor Yaakov Bodo invented a character called "Moishe Ventilator" whose successful run on stage led to a 1966 film titled after the character?

Created by Jaakobou (talk). Suggested nom text by Durova310 16:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coprinellus micaceus

5x expanded by Sasata (talk). Self nom at 05:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Maybe it's too picky, but I can't see the glistening particles in the small photo and the way the hook is phrased it makes it seem like that's what's pictured. ALT... that the mica cap mushroom (pictured) is topped with glistening particles that are remnants of a universal veil? ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:59, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not picky at all, I agree that's a better worded hook... thanks Sasata (talk) 19:43, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lateran Council of 649

Maximus the Confessor

  • Comment: Maximus is a featured article

Created by Savidan (talk). Self nom at 03:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daggernose shark

5x expanded by Yzx (talk). Self nom at 02:36, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date, length, expansion Ok. Can't very the hook ref., but accept in good faith. The problem is the article states "possibly" "in response to the environment", and thus I suggest deleting the latter part from the hook. Materialscientist (talk) 05:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The "timing of events" part seems weird and the hook also makes it sound like the shark is making a conscious choice. What about:... that the timing of the daggernose shark's (pictured) reproductive cycle adjusts by several months? It leaves us hanging a bit. But maybe that's okay for a hook. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:06, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Winton Train

The commemorative statue unveiled in Prague Main railway station on 1 September 2009 on the Wilton Train departure date

Created by MickMacNee (talk). Self nom at 02:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Is "one off" British for "once only"? I think so, but most Americans don't know that. Art LaPella (talk) 04:21, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Simplemente Amigos

Created by Jaespinoza (talk) 00:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC). Self nom at 00:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Like a very succesful charting song? Do I have to change the hook? Jaespinoza (talk) 01:12, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You could probably drop the word smash. It's a bit flowery. You could also try quotation marks if it's well sourced and that might help make it fly. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:15, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1: ... that the number-one song "Simplemente Amigos" written and performed by Mexican singer Ana Gabriel is considered her first hit? Jaespinoza (talk) 01:20, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2: ... that singer Myriam received a gold certification in México for an album that included a cover version of the number-one song "Simplemente Amigos"? Jaespinoza (talk) 01:20, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't understand how "Simplemente Amigos" could be Gabriel's first hit or even her first smash hit, unless I'm misreading both this article and "Ay Amor", which reports that "Ay Amor" spent 14 weeks at #1 a year before "Simplemente Amigos" spent 2 weeks in the top position. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The "fact" "Simplemente Amigos" is considered her first smash hit is referenced, but that doesn't mean the reference is right. It's not enough to provide a reference for a hook - the reference has to contain accurate information or it's useless. Metropolitan90 is correct. The numbers speak for themselves. "Ay Amor" was #1 for 14 weeks, while "Simplemente Amigos" - released two years later - was #1 for only 2 weeks. That hardly makes it her "first" smash hit. LargoLarry (talk) 14:51, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree completely with both of you. I wrote the hook based on the reference from Allmusic, which reads: "considered"... even when I know that is Gabriel's second number-one hit, specially since I did all the Hot Latin Tracks lists for every year and almost all the articles about the number-one singles. That is why I am presenting the ALT2, which is referenced and also includes the name of the article.
ALT2: ... that singer Myriam received a gold certification in México for an album that included a cover version of the number-one song "Simplemente Amigos"? Jaespinoza (talk) 20:24, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on September 2

Music of the Katamari Damacy series

  • Comment: Hook might be a bit wordy, its my first nom.

Created by PresN (talk). Self nom at 20:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • No offense, but why does this article even exist? Information about the soundtracks should have been included in the individual articles for each game. This entire article seems redundant to me. LargoLarry (talk) 14:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Really. You think (size based on when this article is completed) that Katamari Damacy should spend more paragraphs talking about the music than the gameplay and story sections combined? The idea is to go into more detail than would be feasible in the parent article. --PresN 17:19, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

American Christian Television System, Vision Interfaith Satellite Network

Both are new, self nom by DantheCowMan at 20:05, 4 September 2009 (UTC). Other possibilities include:[reply]
  • Given Hallmark broadcasts little if any religious programming these days, I think ALT2 is the most interesting hook. Length checked and offline reference accepted in good faith (no pun intended). ALT2 OK for DYK. LargoLarry (talk) 15:10, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CRS Racing

Scott Jenkins driving for CR Scuderia in the 2008 British Formula Renault Championship

  • ... that British auto racing team CR Scuderia won races in all three series it participated in during 2008 as well as two championships?
  • Comment: The image included here is not in the article but is better cropped. If an article image is preferred then this image will work as well.

Created by The359 (talk). Self nom at 09:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bart Macomber

5x expanded by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 05:23, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • if the greatest upset of all time part is in quotes, I don't think you need the "what was regarded as" part. Or, if you leave the was regarded as, I don't think you need the quotes. But maybe others have a different opinion. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:17, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think you're right. I'm OK with striking "what was regarded as." Cbl62 (talk) 04:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dayak Unity Party

Created by Soman (talk). Self nom at 16:19, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Oberbauer

Created by TodorBozhinov (talk). Self nom at 14:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • It would be relevant if the museum wasn't a future museum and if an article existed. However, we can afford no red links. TodorBozhinov 00:20, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pope Constantine

5x expanded by Savidan (talk). Self nom at 00:18, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date, expansion Ok. Can't access refs, but cross-checked the fact here. The only request is to change 1260 to 1250 in the hook (1967-711=1256). Materialscientist (talk) 05:36, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Mitchell Association

5x expanded by Bearian (talk). Nominated by Bearian (talk) at 22:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Currently only 2338/941 = 2.5x expansion, please keep going. orangefreak33 03:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I shall try! Bearian (talk) 17:53, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've given up, as I can't find any more useful information. If it doesn't make it, I can live with it. Bearian (talk) 18:15, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Don't give up yet. I just removed bullets from the list at Components and buildings section[3], so then the article is now at 5384 byetes which is fivefold. Now, give me some sweet cookies for helping you. =) --Caspian blue 18:39, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wacław Olszak

  • Comment: It would be nice to DYK it on 11 September, on the 70th anniversary of his death

Created by Darwinek (talk). Self nom at 21:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charles of Lorraine-Commercy

Charles of Lorraine-Commercy

Created by Alarichus (talk). Self nom at 21:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Short, but there's 3k of text - enough. Shimgray | talk | 21:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • But what's in the hook? That he was an adviser? That's way bland. Dahn (talk) 22:29, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Behind Closed Doors (1958 TV series)

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 21:02, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Prophetic" looks like editorializing, and, after all, it's not like they foresaw the Vietcong victory - they imagined it. Right? Dahn (talk) 22:33, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length and age check out but the hook is referenced to IMDB, which is not considered reliable. Should be easy enough to find an alternate source to date LBJ's unveiling the buildup, though. "Prescient" might be a better word choice than "prophetic". I am rather concerned that even though DYKcheck is counting the episode content as readable prose that it's really an episode list that just isn't in list format. I don't know if that would be considered gaming the system or if it has any effect on the article's eligibility. Just as an aside, the sourcing overall is quite weak. I suggest beefing up the article with some of these sources before it hits the front page. Otto4711 (talk) 07:00, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Made an adjustment with a new source.Billy Hathorn (talk) 20:35, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
New source OK, but I'd like a second opinion on the episode list issue. Otto4711 (talk) 22:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very close wording. For example,
Article: The plot also concerns the conversion of a local military base into a Nike Hercules missile site. A citizens’ group in Illinois objects to the placement of nuclear missiles near their town ...
Source: Plot concerns the conversion of a local military base into a Nike Hercules missile site. A group of citizens living in "Whitfield, Illinois" objects to the placement of nuclear missiles near their small town.
Shubinator (talk) 16:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wording is close, agreed, but there are only so many ways you can summarize a plot, because it is what it is. LiteraryMaven (talkcontrib) 22:02, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Griffiths (footballer)

Created by ChrisTheDude (talk). Self nom at 20:49, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Article length and references meet criteria. --Jimbo[online] 23:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neonatal incubator

Infant in an incubator

  • ... that an incubator (pictured) may be used to maintain environmental conditions suitable for a newborn baby, and is often used in preterm births?

Created by Mikael Häggström (talk). Self nom at 20:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Entirely too short at only 678 characters. The functions section is bulleted, and therefore is not being counted. It would be better also if the link was not piped. orangefreak33 03:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

National People's Party (Indonesia)

Created by Soman (talk). Self nom at 20:32, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Egawa Hidetatsu

Created by PHG (talk). Self nom at 20:30, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Murba Women's Union

Created by Soman (talk). Self nom at 20:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Page has been moved, I updated the nom. --Soman (talk) 14:31, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Dunnett

Created by Qwfp (talk). Self nom at 17:53, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chamchuri Square

Chamchuri Square

Created/expanded by Paul 012 (talk). Self nom at 17:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Niels Ebbesen Hansen

Created by Hauganm (talk). Nominated by Pmlinediter (talk) at 17:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We're go for the alternate hook. Javért  |  Talk 05:39, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trilulilu

Created by Mario1987 (talk). Self nom at 15:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's impressive by Romanian standards. Mario1987 19:49, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • BTW not 2.2 million hits but unique visitors. Hits amount to around 67 million. Mario1987 19:54, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas H. Hoatson House

Created by Andrew Jameson (talk). Self nom at 11:47, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Belgaum Fort

Created/expanded by Nvvchar (talk). Self nom at 11:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • hook needs some tweaking for grammar and structure - I'd say just simplify it into "... that Mahatma Gandhi was imprisoned in the Belgaum Fort during India's struggle for independence? In addition the fact that he was imprisoned has no inline citation, which means this hook can't be listed. Ironholds (talk) 12:31, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the review. I have rearranged the references. This reference links to the Hook.[4]. I hope it meets the requirement. The hook suggested by you is fine with me and is given below as Alt.--Nvvchar (talk) 14:29, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • both hooks now pass - I think the second one flows better and I prefer that; obviously I'm a tad biased. Ironholds (talk) 17:43, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks.--Nvvchar (talk) 05:08, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alma, Palestine

5x expanded by Himalayan Explorer (talk). Self nom at 11:11, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I know Arabic has a different alphabet, but the hook says "'Alma", and the article says "Alma" 7 times and "'Alma" 3 times. Should we be consistent, with or without the apostrophe? Art LaPella (talk) 04:21, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think officially it is 'Alma. Alma if it is consistent should be fine.. Himalayan 19:13, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vladislav Titov

  • ... that after losing both his hands, Vladislav Titov wrote several books holding a pen by his teeth?

Created by Materialscientist (talk). Self nom at 07:20, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article has serious language issues, and needs a thorough copyedit before it can go on the Main Page. Lampman (talk) 09:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you. I have fixed some obvious blunders and would appreciate an advice of yours and others on this point. Whereas I accept a copyedit is required there, I do doubt this issue deserves this assessment tag. Materialscientist (talk) 11:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Though technically good language is not mentioned in the DYK requirements, it is up to the discretion of reviewers to turn down an article that is substandard. I'd be happy for another reviewer to give a second opinion though, alternatively do a copyedit. Lampman (talk) 14:25, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Elrington

Created by Lampman (talk). Self nom at 04:18, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date of creation, and hook verified. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 21:44, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Older nominations

Articles created/expanded on September 1

Gerda Ring

Created by Oceanh (talk). Self nom at 00:44, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Asylum Seekers (film)

  • ... that as a publicity stunt, the makers of the film Asylum Seekers arranged for a couple to be married on the red carpet immediately before the film's premiere at the CineVegas film festival?

5x expanded by Big Bird (talk). Self nom at 20:10, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This article is currently debated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asylum Seekers (film). It is highly unlikely to be deleted at this point (this was the version nominated for deletion) and the debate expires on September 8. Since the expansion began on September 1, I'm nominating the article now so that it falls within the five day period from its expansion because nominating it after the AfD debate closing will be too late. Of course, should it be promoted to DYK, it will have to be after the AfD debate is closed. Big Bird (talkcontribs) 20:20, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Collins discography

5x expanded by Mister sparky (talk). Nominated by Cannibaloki (talk) at 20:06, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and expansion verified. Technically, the expansion appears to have begun on Aug. 31 in Wikitime, but that should not be an issue. However, most of the hook is not actually stated in the text of the article. That the album is the highest selling release can be gleaned from the list itself, and the fact that it received a diamond award is mentioned, but not the fact that diamond represents 10 million sales. In theory this can be easily resolved by just stating the information from the hook in the article and incorporating the inline citations to support them. A source for the diamond=10M sales should be easy to find, and in theory the best selling album portion can receive the same inline citation as the RIAA reference within the list. But the link to the relevant fact in the list does not take me to a list of the Phil Collins songs by award, it just takes me to the RIAA cite and I could not figure out where the relevant information is located. So that needs to be fixed. Rlendog (talk) 20:02, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pap Dean

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 01:32, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Close wording. For example,
Article: ... he enrolled in the Landon School of Cartooning in Chicago, Illinois, and was mentored by C. H. Landon, at the time one of the best political cartoonists in the United States.
Source: ... he enrolled in the Landon School of Cartooning, headquartered in Chicago, and was mentored by C. H. Landon, who was recognized at that time as being the best political cartoonist in the United States.
Shubinator (talk) 16:51, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I reworded the section on C.H. Landon.Billy Hathorn (talk) 00:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse L. Boucher

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 01:42, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Union security agreement

5x expanded by Tim1965 (talk). Self nom at 01:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ridge A

  • ... that Ridge A in Antarctica has been identified as the coldest, driest, calmest place on Earth?

Created by Twp (talk). Nominated by Bender235 (talk) at 00:25, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article length is 714 bytes (should be at least 1500). You need much much better references and numbers to justify "the coldest, driest, calmest place on Earth" (see, e.g. Vostok Station with its -89 °C and Atacama Desert - hard to imagine a dryer place than the latter). As to the calmest, you need to explain how it is defined. Materialscientist (talk) 01:27, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A place does not have to be a sand desert to be dry. Also, Ridge A has an average temperature of -70 °C, while Vostok Station has about -65 °C (-89 °C was the record low). The source for that other claims is that study. BTW: "calm" means "most free of light pollution". --bender235 (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I know, but have no access to that article and thus may not accept or judge such claims. Dry does not mean desert, but that desert has exceptionally low precipitation values, and you need to come with numbers (for all claims) to beat that. As to calm, I think your definition contradicts to what most people understand by that word. Don't take me wrong, I would love to see you're right, but not with this evidence. Materialscientist (talk) 23:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
See the article "The coldest, driest place in the world" from the Brisbane Times which explicitly supports the claim of Ridge A for coldest and driest place in the world. Alansohn (talk) 02:20, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Clucas

Created by Jimbo online (talk). Self nom at 23:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Will this Brit be offended? It's football, not soccer! --74.14.21.211 (talk) 01:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I used soccer as that's what it's referred to in across the pond in the U.S. --Jimbo[online] 12:51, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Two things: the article says he studied "sports development qualification" which isn't the same as sport science. Also, I would take out the everything in the hook after the comma. Mm40 (talk) 15:30, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky Lady II

Created by Alansohn (talk). Self nom at 21:25, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • While ALT1 is entirely accurate, LeMay's remark is a bit more hookish. Alansohn (talk) 01:29, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pavel Argeyev

Created by LGF1992UK (talk). Self nom at 20:02, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Actually, that's better cos it matches with the names to the two Fronts. LGF1992UK (talk) 08:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • You need find an alternative source to support the facts that sourced by Russian wikipedia, Regards--Chanaka L (talk) 02:24, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • All sorted with the reference from the Russian Wikipedia, a book of biographies of aviators who recieved the Order of St. George in World War I, which seems reputable. LGF1992UK (talk) 22:07, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Failure of Capitalism

Created by Bearian (talk). Self nom at 17:16, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • This checks out in terms of date, length and references. I've approved it accordingly but I have my concerns about the hook, which is a little too long, and is grammatically unclear (about whether it's Posner or Bush who's moved away from advocacy of free-market capitalism). I would recommend rephrasing the hook.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 17:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done. Is that better, or should it be shorter? Bearian (talk) 17:49, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Great suggestion: I would go along with that one, thanks. Bearian (talk) 22:20, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flickinger Center for Performing Arts

Flickinger Center for Performing Arts

Created by Uncia (talk). Self nom at 14:52, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Source offline but seems to be reliable. Reworded the hook a bit to make it more understandable. Pmlineditor  Talk 18:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Headway

5x expanded by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self nom at 12:07, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I appears that the hook fact is not directly cited inline. Could you please do so, or point out to me where it is? Thanks! The V-Man (Said · Done) 14:08, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Anderson covers it in detail. It is reffed as #9, in the para that claims that hook. Maury Markowitz (talk) 21:19, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The citation should be right after the claim. And you should know this by now; we've asked you several times with various noms to add sufficient inline citations. Again, add more inline citations. Shubinator (talk) 03:23, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ferdinand Richard, En Avant

5x expanded by Bruce1ee (talk). Self nom at 09:53, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for that. ALT1 does read better, although it's not quite correct – he only sings on seven of the eight songs. --Bruce1eetalk 15:22, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dark shyshark, puffadder shyshark, brown shyshark, Natal shyshark, Haploblepharus

5x expanded by Yzx (talk). Self nom at 06:47, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The hook is not clear on its face that these are different types of shyshark. Suggest ".. that the dark, puffadder, brown, and Natal breeds species of shysharks (puffadder shyshark pictured), native to South Africa, are so named because they curl into a ring when threatened and "shyly" cover their eyes with their tails?" Otto4711 (talk) 16:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Species" would be the correct term, not "breed". Otherwise I've no objections. -- Yzx (talk) 17:42, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length, date and age check out on all articles. Brown shyshark and Haploblepharus need an inline citation directly after the fact. Otto4711 (talk) 18:49, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I improved the grammar and removed "of" repetition. -- Yzx (talk) 05:54, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on August 31

Doodle Jump

Created/expanded by Secret Saturdays (talk), Wikisergiowiki (talk), Freaky Face Films (talk). Self nom at 17:24, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • 1374 characters of prose. Please expand to at least 1500. Also, please add more inline citations. (I've removed the icon since non-free images are not allowed on the Main Page.) Shubinator (talk) 03:29, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Russian annexation of Eastern Galicia, 1914-1915

Created by Faustian (talk). Nominated by Piotrus (talk) at 20:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Helicopter Interdiction Tactical Squadron

Created by New Hampshirite (talk). Self nom at 15:44, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • You need to work the article into the hook somehow. You also need to find an interesting fact from the article that is directly supported by an inline reference. Lampman (talk) 16:02, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Changed it to be more specific and to work the article into the hook. The little-known and interesting fact is HITRON's existence and it's purpose. The citations apply to the entire paragraphs as will be seen if you look at the page cited. New Hampshirite (talk) 02:44, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's fine, but if you read the rules, you'll see that "The hook fact must have an inline citation right after it since the fact is an extraordinary claim; citing the hook fact at the end of the paragraph is not acceptable." Lampman (talk) 03:44, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Raonaid Murray

Created by User:GainLine (talk), expanded to requirements by Candlewicke (talk). Nominated by Candlewicke (talk) at 02:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not with this hook: (i) "one suspect is said to resemble" - too vague for a fact. Said by whom? (RS ?) (ii) the hook does read as Gallagher might be involved (iii) refs said his hair style resembled that of Gallagher, not he resembled. Materialscientist (talk) 05:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everett Strupper

Everett Strupper

5x expanded by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 06:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't think this fact is particularly remarkable or interesting. Many hearing-impaired people do that. If he used this to his advantage in a football game, then you have a hook. --74.14.21.211 (talk) 10:50, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I disagree. I've written and read extensively about American football, and I'm not aware of any other deaf person who has risen to this level of accomplishment (College Football Hall of Fame) in the sport. Bear in mind that he played in the 1910s. At the time, his deafness was a major issue, and his coach John Heisman wrote a lengthy article about the efforts they undertook to help Strupper overcome the impairment. Cbl62 (talk) 00:11, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The loss of hearing doesn't affect one's ability to catch/throw/run with the ball. If no one has written about it, maybe it's not relevant? Furthermore, just by reading the hook, no one would know if Strupper lost his hearing before or after his football career. (Hall-of-Famers are usually old people, and old people losing their hearing and than learning lip-reading is common.) Using lip-reading to overcome deafness, accomplished by many hearing-impaired people, is not the same as using lip-reading to overcome the difficulties related to playing a team sport that requires hearing what other people on the field are saying. Please put more "football-ness" into the hook. --74.13.126.87 (talk) 20:41, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Storm Wendy (1999)

Tropical Storm Wendy at peak intensity approaching China

  • ... that this Tropical Storm Wendy of 1999 (pictured) was monitored by three agencies in the West Pacific, of which all reported Wendy having a different peak intensity?

Created by Anhamirak (talk). Self nom at 16:30, 31 August 2009 (UTC) This is the basic DYK hook, I can't think of how to write it better. --Anhamirak 16:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The problem is that is wasnt monitored by just 3 warning agencys (JMA, JTWC, PAGASA.) The HKO, CWB, CMA, would off monitored it aswell. so it has to be a unless you can find a better hook. Jason Rees (talk) 16:44, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT 1 ... that even though Tropical Storm Wendy of 1999 was officially a tropical storm for only 12 hours, it killed 133 people? (The official agency for the West Pacific is the JMA) --Anhamirak 18:06, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think this fact is particularly remarkable or interesting. Many Category 4 and Category 5 cyclones kill no-one, and many short-lived tropical storms kill thousand. The strength and duration of a tropical cyclone may have very little to do with its effects. –Juliancolton | Talk 18:18, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Guptakashi

Shiva

Created by Nvvchar (talk), Redtigerxyz (talk). Self nom at 14:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Constanţa South Container Terminal

Created by Mario1987 (talk). Self nom at 14:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sourcing problems where citations do not properly match information with the source that provides the information. The two sources used as references for the 1,500,000 TEU figure claim values of 1,300,000 and 1,380,935 TEUs respectfully. The article does link to other references with the 1,500,000 figure (the terminal is apparently undergoing planned expansion) but those footnotes are linked to other sections within the article. --Allen3 talk 22:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • 1,500,000 represents the terminals nominal traffic capacity, the 1,300,000 and 1,380,935 figures represent the traffic that the terminal had in 2007 and 2008. Mario1987 07:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on August 30

Oslo Airport, Fornebu

5x expanded by Arsenikk (talk). Self nom at 21:33, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, I'm missing two points: what is unusual or remarkable in this hook? Why runways are struck through in the infobox of the article? Materialscientist (talk) 04:29, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is it usual procedure for airliners on scheduled routes to make detours to unfinished, unopened airports? I guess the runways are struck through because they no longer exist, don't know if that's the way to do it or not. Manxruler (talk) 21:11, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    No it is not, but. The article states in this regard "The plane had flown a scheduled route to Kjeller, and the captain had taken the plane onward to Fornebu to try out the new airport." (?!?) which does need clarification and reference(s). I also do not believe striking out is a proper way to cancel anything in a mainframe article. Materialscientist (talk) 00:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree. We'll have to wait for the creator to respond to the issues in question. Manxruler (talk) 13:16, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • If someone has a good idea how to rephrase this, feel free. The hook is referenced at the bottom of the paragraph and is from a book about the history of the airport. I am sorry, but this makes perfect sense to me, so I am not quite sure how to be more specific. According to the source, the pilot just decided to take a trip to the new airport to test it out, long before it was finished—back then aviation was a bit wilder business. As for the striking out, that was not me; I have seen it in other articles as well, but I have never come across it in the MOS. Arsenikk (talk) 23:24, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't understand whether the pilot flew (nearly) alone or it was a part of improvised passenger flight. If second then it is remarkable, if first then the hook sounds like "the first car to park at White House was a brown Ford". Then I would search for another hook in the article rather than rewrite this one. Materialscientist (talk) 01:50, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think I understand your point, and to follow your metaphor: it was like eight months before the parking lot at the White House opened, some random brown Ford owner decided to try out the parking lot to see if it worked... But I can see if I can find some other hook. Arsenikk (talk) 20:53, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, then maybe something like ALT1 ... that the first plane landed at Oslo Airport, Fornebu nine months before it was officially opened? ("was officially" added only to avoid confusion on what had opened) Materialscientist (talk) 23:19, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on August 29

Speleonectes atlantida

Created by ZooFari (talk). Self nom at 01:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The reference doesn't support "the only crustacean known to be poisonous", but rather says "Aside from members of the Remipedia group, no other venomous crustaceans are known", suggesting that this particular one belongs to the only known family of poisonous crustaceans, rather than this exact species being the only one. ArakunemTalk 18:30, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Misread. I listed an alt above, but probably won't be as unique as the other false positive. The phrase in brackets just indicates it would be fine without it. ZooFari 22:50, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Internationales Maritimes Museum Hamburg

  • Comment: Mostly based on German sources.

5x expanded by Sebastian scha. (talk). Self nom at 23:31, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: With the one and only English source.

View of a former warehouse, now museum, in Hamburg, Germany, in 2009

  • Comment If you insist on translating the name into English for the hooks, please note that's it "maritime", not "maritim". Dahn (talk) 10:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don't insist about this. changed it anyway because it's translated. If you choose to use the German name, that's okay for me. Sebastian scha. (talk) 11:15, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jiabiangou

  • ... that 2500 out of 3000 prisoners at the Chinese Jiabiangou labor camp died within three years, mostly from starvation?

Created by Addyson Smith (talk). Self nom at 14:37, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Need better refs. We can't use several recently published reviews of one recently published book as the source for such an article about a labour camp without any further supporting refs. The book in question is not even used as the ref. Instead, we have the webpage of a book retailer selling the book. At best, the 4 refs in the article right now can only be used to support the fact that the book has such contents, but they cannot validate the contents of the book. --74.13.125.201 (talk) 15:14, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Only the translation of the book is recent, the Chinese version has been out for many years - long enough to expose any fraud. What we have are secondary sources: reviews by some of the most reliable newspapers in the world (NY Times, Washington Post) of survivor stories written down in an acclaimed book (still counts as a primary source in my opinion). The cited description of the events at Jiabianguo by the book's translator is even closer to the events. The fact that the book is reviewed in the NY Times adds to its credibility and is consistent with Wikipedia's policy to usually rely on material from secondary sources. Addyson Smith (talk) 18:37, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have any other independent refs unrelated to this one book? News articles about the closing of the camp and about the investigations, perhaps? --74.13.130.88 (talk) 10:41, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • As of now the article cites 2 books "Woman from Shanghai" and "The Tragedy at Jiabiangou" about Jiabianguo, both based on independent sets of survivor interviews and the book "New ghosts, old ghosts: prisons and labor reform camps in China" that also mentions the camp and a statement on the death toll by a survivor (90%, the other sources that the article follows are closer to 80%) in a footnote. News articles from the period are unlikely to exist, since this happened China in the early 1960's. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Addyson Smith (talkcontribs) 12:27, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the new refs. --74.13.126.87 (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on August 28

Mela shikar

Created by Xeteli (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 12:48, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • "unreliable sources and plagiarism"? See NW's misplaced comments one section below. --74.14.21.211 (talk) 01:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I found major issues here, including unreliable sources (Facebook) and plagiarism. Several paragraphs are written in the matter of a newspaper report, and look to be copyright violations. No go unless these are fixed. NW (Talk) 18:11, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • As the first poster said all refs were offline unless facebook is some sort of code for a book not sure what you're talking about. I haven't contributed to the content of this article but if all the sources are offline how are you able to prove they're plagiarized? -- Esemono (talk) 01:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
NW put his comments for another DYKnom one section too low. --74.14.21.211 (talk) 00:48, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the above comments were originally placed in the section below accidentally. NW (Talk) 19:59, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be a fixable problem. But I don't have access to the off-line sources, so I can't do the fixing. I've left a note on the author's usertalkpage. Hopefully, (s)he can fix the text accordingly. --PFHLai (talk) 20:21, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I’m a newcomer to Wikipedia, hence inexperienced. I however created the article Mela shikar with the sources I had. Now it’s being nominated for DYK by PFHLai. If some tweaking of the text can make it eligible for the main page, I would like to request you veterans to help me. What I have are the references and the external link. - Xeteli (talk) 11:20, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ask NW which sentences appeared too similar to the source. Just re-write them without using the same sentence structure as in the source. --74.13.126.87 (talk) 12:55, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Letchworth Corset Riot

Created by Jspearmint (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 12:06, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: All refs currently in this article are off-line. I can't find alternate sources about this riot by googling. This is a totally AGF nom. But, can someone familiar with the history of Letchworth / Hertfordshire / early 20th century England confirm this, please? Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 20:26, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Think this guy might be a hoaxster? It's certainly a possibility. His other article, Garden City (album) seems even more unlikely. The fact that he has only made about 20 edits but created two articles which conform perfectly to MOS is another red flag, as is the fact that every live link he has left that I have clicked on comes up blank. Gatoclass (talk) 16:27, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subject is proving extremely resistant to independent confirmation. In addition to a simple search engine test I have performed news archive searches through both Google News and The Times (closest big city newspaper) and have been unable to find any mention of this event while using search terms such as "Letchworth corset" "Letchworth riot" and "corset riot". A search for an online presence by the museum listed as the source of several of the article's photographs only turned up information dealing with the Second World War.[5] As for the referenced offline sources, most are local interest books providing no online access. Exceptions are the Valerie Steele book which is available through Google Books via limited preview (referenced pages are however unavailable online) and Charles Purdom book which is available via snippet view. A search through the Steele book for the words "Letchworth" and "riot" both failed to generate any matches.[6] The Purdom book also failed to match these terms along with "Wilbury Road" (a name in the sentence for which this book is used as a source).[7] --Allen3 talk 18:31, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pedantry alert - FYI, Allen3 - The Times is a national newspaper, not a 'big city newspaper' (only Americans call it the London Times - to us Brits its just 'The Times'). 81.159.89.82 (talk) 16:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: In the absence of hard evidence of wrongdoing, I want to AGF. But I'd rather err on the side of caution. I'll have no problem letting this nom sit here on T:TDYK and eventually scroll off due to old age. I don't want to see iffy materials sneak onto MainPage. --PFHLai (talk) 20:10, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But it would be great if someone familiar with the history of Letchworth can look into this article. Thanks in advance. --PFHLai (talk) 05:50, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As this is clearly outside the personal expertise of the dozen or so regulars that patrol this page, I have dropped a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject England asking for more localized knowledge. --Allen3 talk 10:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is the burden of the nomiator and/or article writer to justify. And if they can't, I suggest we send both this and Garden City over to AFD and see if the heat of that fire causes anything to develop.--Wehwalt (talk) 12:29, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing is verifiable in either article. AGF is not a suicide pact. I am labeling both articles as hoaxes and submitting them to AfD. Let God sort them out. If this is a hoax, and I think it is, it is going to take time and effort to take out the text inserted to support the hoax in other articles.--Wehwalt (talk) 12:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've nommed it for deletion, currently it is three for deletion to nil. I've also indef blocked Jspearmint on discovering a third hoax, Sebastian Openshaw. Jspearmint has twice requested unblocks, insisting that he is "Super Cool", an allegation dismissed as "Lies" by the most recent admin to review it. Quite a Sunday morning! I don't think we need concern ourselves any further with this nom.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bara (genre)

Created by SykoSilver (talk). Nominated by Malkinann (talk) at 00:14, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Would fixing the orange tag be enough? The additional rules for DYK seem to indicate that only the orange tags are problematic? --Malkinann (talk) 12:36, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • In general all section tags should be addressed. Expansion tags also fall under D6; the article should appear to be complete and not some sort of work in progress. Shubinator (talk) 15:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Disasters of War

  • ... that the final etching in Francisco Goya's series The Disasters of War shows a female figure, possibly intended as a personification of Spain, besieged by a mob of baying animals?

Created by Ceoil (talk) and Johnbod (talk). Self nom at 20:09, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article says it might be a personification of Spain, or Truth, or the Constitution of 1812. So this hook is a little problematic. The image of the plate isn't all that good either. Perhaps you could submit a hook about a different plate? Gatoclass (talk) 16:05, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You are right; the article developed after I nomed. I need to sleep now; alt hook to follow. Thanks for the look. Ceoil (talk) 02:57, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT1:... that Francisco Goya's series of etchings The Disasters of War was not published until 35 years after his death, when there would no longer be a risk of political repercussions?
(Image has been switched) Ceoil (talk) 11:43, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ref problem - 35 years is in refs but not in ref 5 the one inline. Also I can find no ref for the reason for the delay. One ref even says that they can see no reason as it wasn't anti-French but anti-war?

U.S. Post Office (Nyack, New York)

Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self nom at 05:42, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The first is better, as classicising post-World War I post offices are commonplace.--Wetman (talk) 17:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's actually more accurate (although I think the first hook is more eye-catching). Daniel Case (talk) 22:07, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The renaming doesn't seem successful as this article is not titled with the new name ... in fact I can't find out what the new name is in the article in a quick read. Surely this should be obvious? Victuallers (talk) 11:36, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Special occasion holding area

Note: Articles nominated for a special occasion should be nominated within five days of creation or expansion as usual (with the exception of April Fools'). Also, articles should be nominated at least five days before the occasion to give reviewers time to check the nomination.

Articles created/expanded for September 11

Peekskill Presbyterian Church

Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self nom at 06:10, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The church's bell has not been replaced since (at least) its formal incorporation in 1826. The church began meeting in 1799, shortly before Washington's death and had a bell then. It seems, according to the centenary history cited in the NRHP nom, that it probably was tolled at Washington's death. Call it informed speculation ... I qualified it because I can't claim it as a black-and-white fact, and neither does the church's website. Daniel Case (talk) 05:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"It is possible..." That's what your ref says on its page 5. Do we know what happened to the bell between 1799 and 1826? --74.13.126.87 (talk) 12:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded for September 23

Roswell and Elizabeth Garst Farmstead Historic District

Created by Doncram (talk). Self nom at 08:27, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is preliminary, not yet meeting DYK standards in the article, but it will get there soon. doncram (talk) 08:27, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I7 says "No redlinks in the hook." Art LaPella (talk) 04:21, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Added a link to Heterosis#Hybrid_corn. Otto4711 (talk) 10:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Pls don't make Iowa seem like an agricultural produce grown at a farm. It should be "a farm in Iowa, USA".--74.13.126.87 (talk) 20:47, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any problem with "an Iowa farm"; this kind of wording is used all the time, and is shortier and punchier (which is important for a DYK hook). rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 14:29, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See also