Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions
m →Super Bowl LVI: fix |
InedibleHulk (talk | contribs) →RD: Ivan Reitman: Putting it mildly. |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
*'''Support''': Even if I wasn't a recent editor, this feels like a slam dunk.--[[User:CreecregofLife|CreecregofLife]] ([[User talk:CreecregofLife|talk]]) 04:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC) |
*'''Support''': Even if I wasn't a recent editor, this feels like a slam dunk.--[[User:CreecregofLife|CreecregofLife]] ([[User talk:CreecregofLife|talk]]) 04:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
*'''Not Ready''' for the [[WP:CITE|usual reason]]. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 04:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC) |
*'''Not Ready''' for the [[WP:CITE|usual reason]]. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 04:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
*'''No Blurb''' [[Natural causes|for usual reason]]. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 04:30, 14 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== Super Bowl LVI==== |
==== Super Bowl LVI==== |
Revision as of 04:30, 14 February 2022
Welcome to In the news. Please read the guidelines. Admin instructions are here. |
In the news toolbox |
---|
This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.
This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.
view — page history — related changes — edit |
Glossary
All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality. Nomination steps
The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.
Headers
Voicing an opinion on an itemFormat your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated. Please do...
Please do not...
Suggesting updatesThere are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:
|
Archives
February 14
February 14, 2022
(Monday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
|
February 13
February 13, 2022
(Sunday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Health and environment
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Sports
|
RD: Ivan Reitman
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP
Credits:
- Nominated by TheJoebro64 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by TDKR Chicago 101 (talk · give credit) and CreecregofLife (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Director of many beloved '80s and '90s comedies, most notably Ghostbusters. JOEBRO64 03:50, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support: Even if I wasn't a recent editor, this feels like a slam dunk.--CreecregofLife (talk) 04:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Not Ready for the usual reason. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- No Blurb for usual reason. InedibleHulk (talk) 04:30, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Super Bowl LVI
Blurb: The Los Angeles Rams defeat the Cincinnati Bengals in Super Bowl LVI (MVP Cooper Kupp pictured). (Post)
Alternative blurb: The Los Angeles Rams defeat the Cincinnati Bengals in the Super Bowl (MVP Cooper Kupp pictured).
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by Muboshgu (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Bluerules (talk · give credit), Frank Anchor (talk · give credit), ViperSnake151 (talk · give credit), Donnowin1 (talk · give credit) and PCN02WPS (talk · give credit)
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
– Muboshgu (talk) 03:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Noting that we usually include the player of the game as the image once that is determined. --Masem (t) 03:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Not announced yet... waiting. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- It's Kupp. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Hydrology (talk) 03:45, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- one of the largest sporting events in the world. Definitely noteworthy. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 04:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Seems like we're inconsistent through the years on whether the blurb provides a Roman numeral lesson or not. For annual events, we typically don't repeat the year of the event.—Bagumba (talk) 04:29, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
2022 German presidential election
Blurb: Frank Walter Steinmeier is elected for a second term as President of Germany by the Bundesversammlung. (Post)
News source(s): CNBC, Politico
Credits:
- Nominated by Jonas1015119 (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: ITN/R jonas (talk) 23:32, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Chancellor's ITNR, not the President. —Cryptic 23:37, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose since not head of government. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 01:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support national-level election in a G7 state, even if not election directly made by voters. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 04:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
February 12
February 12, 2022
(Saturday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Sports
|
RD: Beryl Vertue
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian; Variety; The Independent
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Bloom6132 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by MerielGJones (talk · give credit) and Philip Cross (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Bloom6132 (talk) 01:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Solid article. Well referenced. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:43, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Frank Beckmann
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Detroit Free Press; The Detroit News; WXYZ-TV, WJR-AM
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Bloom6132 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Bloom6132 (talk) 22:56, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Solid article and well referenced. G2G. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posted --PFHLai (talk) 04:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
(Closed) 2021 FIFA Club World Cup Final
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: In association football, Chelsea defeats Palmeiras to win the 2021 FIFA Club World Cup. (Post)
News source(s): BBC Sports
Credits:
- Nominated by Kacamata (talk · give credit)
- Created by S.A. Julio (talk · give credit)
- Comment not ITNR Wikipedia:In_the_news/Recurring_items#Football_(association) --LaserLegs (talk) 20:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: The match summary is not there yet. --PFHLai (talk) 20:48, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wikipedia:In the news/Recurring items#Football (association), seems like we already have enough footy in a year. The last FIFA Club WC nom, also with an English club, was not posted.—Bagumba (talk) 09:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. This may sound like a big deal, but the reality is that the world pays little attention to this, and it has none of the prestige of its feeder competitions such as the Champions League or the Copa Libertadores. — Amakuru (talk) 09:53, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Adding oppose. There are already many football ITN items and this one is not receiving as much attention as the others. --Tone 10:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose, this tournament wouldn’t hold the significance that tournaments like the Champions League and the Copa Libertadores would hold so it’s better not to post. Hamza Ali Shah Talk 11:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support - The two finalists are from UEFA Champions League and Copa Libertadores which are listed in the ITNR. That makes this year Club World Cup Final a particularly significant event. STSC (talk) 12:53, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Glorified friendly. Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:29, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose The fact that the UK sports press were giving more attention to the week's regular season games than this, should suggest it isn't much more than a friendly with a FIFA bauble for the winners. Black Kite (talk) 13:53, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 18:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Hugo Torres Jiménez
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ABC News, Confidencial
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Innisfree987 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Major Sandinista figure, died in prison. Article is thoroughly referenced. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:38, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- More than long enough (900+ words), with enough footnotes (AGF'd non-English sources), and with no formatting issues, this wikibio is READY for RD. --PFHLai (talk) 00:03, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support No major issues. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:26, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support article looks great. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 10:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 11:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Rahul Bajaj
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NDTV
Credits:
- Nominated by Tube of Light (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Pachu Kannan (talk · give credit), Jkaharper (talk · give credit) and Ktin (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Indian industrialist; article is currently very short but fully cited. Tube·of·Light 14:02, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Weak Support Good citations, but as you said, the article is too short. Fakescientist8000 (talk) 15:14, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Weak Support per Fakescientist8000. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Article is now 437 words long thanks to the above mentioned updaters. Tube·of·Light 02:59, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posted --PFHLai (talk) 11:35, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
(Closed) Ongoing: Freedom Convoy 2022
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC, Le monde (fr), Al Jazeera
Credits:
- Nominated by 力 (talk · give credit)
- Oppose It is covered at least presently by the COVID ongoing. --Masem (t) 01:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Masem: I am open to an alternate proposal of replacing the COVID ongoing with this one. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 01:24, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- COVID remains a danger around the world affecting everyone. Replacing it makes no sense. --Masem (t) 01:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- I'm already at two reverts on this page to try to maintain decor, and can't manage the circus a straight removal proposal would be. I do note that Fire, the heat death of the universe, and falling turtles are dangers worldwide, but are not on the main page. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 02:56, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- COVID remains a danger around the world affecting everyone. Replacing it makes no sense. --Masem (t) 01:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Masem: I am open to an alternate proposal of replacing the COVID ongoing with this one. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 01:24, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think enough has changed for us to be able to find a consensus here, and, per Masem, this is basically covered in ongoing already. DarkSide830 (talk) 01:46, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose despite the news coverage, provincial at best. This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 01:49, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- To be fair, there are several other such convoys across the globe, but while there are others, they are all relatively small scale events of people with fringe views. --Masem (t) 01:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- To be fair to the so-called Lunatic Fringe, though, most everyone in Canada would have agreed (and still agree we would have once) that the government shouldn't do anything the protestors still agree it shouldn't do to us, up past SARS and only until not even two years ago. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:59, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- To be fair, there are several other such convoys across the globe, but while there are others, they are all relatively small scale events of people with fringe views. --Masem (t) 01:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Will you please understand that this is neither ITN-worthy nor Ongoing-worthy? It was very clear. Don't waste our time. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 01:53, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Heavy oppose - Third time, again? Consensus leans to a no-support, just give up. It's not impactful enough to be ITN-worthy. PenangLion (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Conceding that consensus can change, I am not a big fan of "the voting shall continue until the correct result is obtained." Very little has changed of a really material nature in this story. I supported the earlier nomination, but I think it's time to accept that absent some really dramatic development, consensus to post is unlikely to develop. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:48, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support. It continues to amaze me that ITN/C lives in some kind of an alternate relation from the rest of the world. The story has already had a major international impact, including on the auto production in the U.S., and spurring similar trucking protests in other countries, including in Europe. Nsk92 (talk) 07:04, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. I don't see why the Canadian protests are particularly notable compared those taking place in other countries around the world. I would be more open to (but would not necessarily support) an ongoing nomination for Protests over responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Chrisclear (talk) 07:36, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose we shouldn't be giving special treatment to this just because it's in North America. Many countries are having COVID vaccine related protests, so either post the general article about COVID protests, or nothing at all. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Credits:
- Nominated by 力 (talk · give credit)
- Support; has been extremely prominent in the news for an extended period of time, and even if there is no invasion will impact relations between Russia and the rest of the world for decades. However, the previous discussion should be closed before we open a new one. BilledMammal (talk) 00:21, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- No, that discussion need not be closed. An ITNC discussion from 3 weeks ago that has been archived for two weeks is implicitly closed as "no consensus". User:力 (powera, π, ν) 00:24, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- I strongly disagree with that; I also note that it has been listed at WP:RFCL for over two weeks. BilledMammal (talk) 01:48, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- I've removed your pointless close request. ITNC items that are more than a week old are archived. Archives are not edited further. Stephen 05:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- It is relatively common to close archived discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 12:05, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- I've removed your pointless close request. ITNC items that are more than a week old are archived. Archives are not edited further. Stephen 05:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- I strongly disagree with that; I also note that it has been listed at WP:RFCL for over two weeks. BilledMammal (talk) 01:48, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- No, that discussion need not be closed. An ITNC discussion from 3 weeks ago that has been archived for two weeks is implicitly closed as "no consensus". User:力 (powera, π, ν) 00:24, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Strong Neutral Nothing has changed since the last discussion. Some say war is imminent. Some think not. Audituri autem estis proelia et opiniones proeliorum videte ne turbemini oportet enim haec fieri sed nondum est finis.. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:37, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing seismic has changed since the previous discussion was closed. DarkSide830 (talk) 01:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- The former discussion was not closed. BilledMammal (talk) 01:48, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Closed is the wrong way of putting it, I guess, but no one has commented on it for ~2 weeks and there didn't seem to be any consensus. DarkSide830 (talk) 02:10, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- The former discussion was not closed. BilledMammal (talk) 01:48, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Extremely strong support - Most likely will turn into a world war CR-1-AB (talk) 02:01, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Extremely strong oppose - Most likely will just fade away over time as the international dick rattlers find another game to play. HiLo48 (talk) 03:53, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- 'Extremely strong oppose' = oppose. – Sca (talk) 14:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Likewise, 'Extremely strong support' = support. Fakescientist8000 (talk) 17:59, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- 'Extremely strong oppose' = oppose. – Sca (talk) 14:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Despite my involvement in the editing of this article, despite the fact that war is "imminent", I'm not going to support this issue as the critical crises of the incident has generally been over by now. Leaked documents from late January indicated that both sides (Russia and NATO) has not been serious in a military conflict. Given with the circumstances, unless a massive escalation occurs, I'm opposing this nomination. PenangLion (talk) 03:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Wait This clearly could be big, but right now its a lot of preparations for combat and political saber rattling without any actual open hostilities. But should something happen, I fully expect this to either have a story to blurb or drop into ongoing (pending article quality), this is clearly the type of story that would have the type of enduring world effects. --Masem (t) 05:17, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Why does an international crisis require actual military hostilities to be ITN worthy? Plenty of things have happened already, including UN Security Council meetings, major troop deployments by Russia around Ukraine, U.S. moving some extra troops to Europe, U.S. ordering all its citizens out of Ukraine, and so on. It's simply insane, I repeat, completely insane, that while all major news sources in all counties around the world are covering this crisis as a major story, ITN still pretends that nothing is happening. Nsk92 (talk) 07:11, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- ITN doesn't pretend things aren't happening by omitting them from Ongoing. Everything except the pandemic is excluded. What sets this real situation apart from every other widely-covered arc? InedibleHulk (talk) 19:38, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Why does an international crisis require actual military hostilities to be ITN worthy? Plenty of things have happened already, including UN Security Council meetings, major troop deployments by Russia around Ukraine, U.S. moving some extra troops to Europe, U.S. ordering all its citizens out of Ukraine, and so on. It's simply insane, I repeat, completely insane, that while all major news sources in all counties around the world are covering this crisis as a major story, ITN still pretends that nothing is happening. Nsk92 (talk) 07:11, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Strong support. It's not that it "could be big", it is already is a huge story and has been so for several months. That's exactly what ITN Ongoing is for. Nsk92 (talk) 06:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ad Orientem. Morgan695 (talk) 08:10, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support it's an ongoing event that has been in the news almost continuously for weeks, and has had troop deployments and UN discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support — Meets the criteria for ongoing events: newsworthy and updated. No need to wait; later "World War III" may become an ongoing event. STSC (talk) 10:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Strong support per Nsk Bumbubookworm (talk) 11:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Strong support per Joseph2302 -- HurricaneEdgar 12:00, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose This turned into a very bizarre game of successive allegations and denials about imminent invasion while nothing has really happened for four months. If we're really nearing an invasion as reported in the media, then let's wait for it to happen and post it then. I don't think we should add a warning about something which may never happen.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:26, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support, it meets the criteria for ongoing events: the article is newsworthy and updated. Concerning development. BastianMAT (talk) 13:34, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support It's been subject to ongoing discussion and constant media attention for weeks; its certainly a lot more widely commented on than many of the natural disasters and sporting events that get covered on ITN.--Llewee (talk) 14:06, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support I highly doubt there'll be an invasion, but it's been in the news for a long time. Banedon (talk) 14:25, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose - Nothing has changed since the last nom, and if the community did not see fit to post it at that time, there is no indication that consensus will have changed here.--WaltCip-(talk) 14:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Question Have we ever posted a similar political/diplomatic crisis before? Scaramouche33 (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support - not our place to interpret whether this is legitimate potential invasion or a political pissing match, nor to peer into our crystal ball to determine whether or not this will turn to war or have long-lasting geopolitical consequences. This is a global news story and has been for over a month. By simply placing this into ongoing, we can also avoid the need to state the highly fluid current situation on the ticker. - Floydian τ ¢ 15:35, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support No matter what the result is, this is most certainly a major story in the news, and will continue to be. -- Kicking222 (talk) 15:50, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support because the crisis in itself has had far-reaching implications for the security architecture of the world, already. That makes it a highly significant ongoing crisis regardless of whether the final outcome is an outright war or not. Yakikaki (talk) 16:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support It meets the criteria, and is certainly still reported by the news. The article itself actually looks good for an ongoing event. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:56, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support A prolonged crisis that has received plenty of attention from RS and world leaders, and is already notable regardless of whether an invasion is pending. Definitely among the most important stories of the year. Davey2116 (talk) 18:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Like last time, more anti-Russia hype anticipating future world war. We're not an allied outlet in this campaign. As of now, just another tense border situation. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:20, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- How is it anti-Russia or pro-NATO/Ukraine? - Floydian τ ¢ 19:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Lead says it "generated concerns over a potential invasion". Would you like to be cast as a potential invader? By media friendly to the coalition heavily arming and militarily reinforcing your unfriendly neighbour, under the auspices of "defense"? InedibleHulk (talk) 19:51, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Are there sources arguing that Ukraine is arming itself to launch an invasion of Russia? 93 (talk) 21:31, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- No, but there are plenty of sources saying Russia "could be" preparing to invade Ukraine in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, etc, and they never did. Banedon (talk) 23:42, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- There are also sources from those years saying Russia "could be" to blame for American democracy, "could be" behind Eurozone cyberattacks, "could be" punished for punitive polonium poisonings. Others, more sympathetic, see how Russia "could be" seeing the troop and missile battery buildup just outside its backyard as something it might want to think about claiming self-defence over. And the article is clear that it has. Ukraine isn't worth amassing about. But NATO is quite intimidating, even to cold hard Russians, deep down. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Are there sources arguing that Ukraine is arming itself to launch an invasion of Russia? 93 (talk) 21:31, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Lead says it "generated concerns over a potential invasion". Would you like to be cast as a potential invader? By media friendly to the coalition heavily arming and militarily reinforcing your unfriendly neighbour, under the auspices of "defense"? InedibleHulk (talk) 19:51, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- How is it anti-Russia or pro-NATO/Ukraine? - Floydian τ ¢ 19:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Constant, escalating, and prolonged developments about the impending possibility of war between two European countries 93 (talk) 19:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support, has been the top international story for a few days. It also doesn't matter if this amounts to nothing, it's in the news now, and can just be removed later if that's the case. Nixinova T C 19:49, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support per all above. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 20:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- There are three {Failed verification} tags in this wikiarticle. Can these problem tags be resolved, please? --PFHLai (talk) 21:01, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support once tags sorted. 82.32.8.87 (talk) 21:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Strong Support - Surprised this isn't up there already. The news is hardly talking about anything else, and it is certainly the world's current foremost political crisis across Europe and North America. Continues to be an ongoing standoff. BlackholeWA (talk) 02:40, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- 'Strong support' = support. – Sca (talk) 14:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Things have been heating up, especially within the past few weeks and days. Might as well. Redoct87 (talk) 03:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posted. There's consensus that this is an ongoing high-priority international news topic that warrants posting, whether or not war breaks out. The "failed verification" tags have been addressed as of the posting. Sandstein 08:34, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Post-Posting Support -- things are getting extraordinarily tense. It definitely deserves to be posted. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 11:02, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support It's In The News, not In The Things That Will Happen. Headlines in at least English language media for multiple times past few weeks. Would be weird to not at least put it there. Juxlos (talk) 14:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Post-posting support – Continues to lead almost every prime RS site, with some offering multiple articles. Today's examples include AP, BBC. The looming question: What's Putin's game? – Sca (talk) 14:04, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- War is now imminent. See here: "Satellite imagery obtained by CNN shows that a large base at Yelnya, which held Russian tanks, artillery and other armor, has been largely emptied, with the equipment apparently being moved much closer to the frontier in recent days.
Large amounts of weaponry were moved to the base late in 2021 before disappearing -- including some 700 tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and ballistic missile launchers. Social media videos since show some of that equipment on trains and roads much further south in the Bryansk region, which is close to Ukraine."
"Meanwhile, heightened activity in the Kursk and Belgorod Oblasts, which border northeastern Ukraine, has added to concerns. "We are seeing a massive influx of vehicles and personnel in Kursk," Konrad Muzyka, an expert in tracking military movements with Rochan Consulting, warned on Twitter." Count Iblis (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- OTOH, maybe it's just Товарищ Putin's idea of a publicity stunt on steroids. You know, the doping thing. – Sca (talk) 20:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
February 11
February 11, 2022
(Friday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
February 10
February 10, 2022
(Thursday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Health and environment
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Science and technology
|
RD: Mary Ellen Duncan
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Howard Community College Facebook
Credits:
- Updated by TJMSmith (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Academic administrator and teacher. TJMSmith (talk) 16:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose It's an oversized stub. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:03, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- It's beyond most WP:STUB measurements at 2507 bytes and 386 words of readable prose.—Bagumba (talk) 12:41, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: The death is currently referenced to a FB post. I hope this can be sourced to formal obituaries by Monday morning when college offices re-open after the weekend. More materials to expand this wikibio may be available from these obituaries. And I suspect Spencer may ask for section headers (which hopefully would make this start-class article look less like an "oversized stub"). --PFHLai (talk) 14:28, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Manuel Esquivel
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://caribbean.loopnews.com/content/former-belize-pm-sir-manuel-esquivel-has-died
Credits:
- Updated by Joofjoof (talk · give credit) and Jkaharper (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Prime Minister of Belize, 1984-1989 & 1993-1998. Almost 400 words of readable prose -- it would be nice if someone familiar with Belize can expand this wikibio, particularly on what he did while he was PM -- I don't think this wikibio should get on RD till this glaring gap in coverage is filled. Thanks. PFHLai (talk) 09:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Short but adequate. Referencing is sat. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:05, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support looks fine and ready. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posted. Nicely expanded and doubled in size by Joofjoof during the past day or so. --PFHLai (talk) 15:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Stefan Żywotko
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Polsatsport, TVP, Interia
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by NorthernFalcon (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Jkaharper (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Polish football manager who won two African Champions League titles. Article should be ready to go. NorthernFalcon (talk) 06:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- More than long enough (800+ words), with enough footnotes in expected spots, and with no formatting issues, this wikibio is READY for RD. AGF'd all non-English sources. --PFHLai (talk) 09:09, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Solid article and decently referenced. Marking as ready. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 01:40, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Olsen Filipaina
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New Zealand Herald; Reuters; ABC News (Australian Associated Press)
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Bloom6132 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Bloom6132 (talk) 22:25, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment His club affiliation from 1987 to 1990 is not given (same affiliation as in his 1990 championship?). When did he retire? Joofjoof (talk) 23:36, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Joofjoof: done – added sentence and ref re. 1987 retirement from Kiwis. —Bloom6132 (talk) 03:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
(Closed) Ongoing: 2022 Winter Olympics
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC, NYT
Credits:
- Nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Bjerrebæk (talk · give credit), De Boni 2007 (talk · give credit) and Sportsfan 1234 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
- Strong support there was consensus for this to be added to ongoing on 4 February, and the main thing that stopped it then was the made-up rule that it must apparently be posted as a blurb first. Much better to have this on ongoing rather than the poor quality article as a blurb (if it's orange-tagged, then it should be removed from the front page). Joseph2302 (talk) 12:04, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Heavy support - It is worthy in its own right. The consensus a few days ago favored heavily for approval. PenangLion (talk) 12:49, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – Posting the formal opening ceremony was purely a function of WP:ITN/R. – Sca (talk) 13:04, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- The Olympics was what Ongoing was established for; the only question is which Olympic article to use as the target. --Masem (t) 13:23, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Well, Chronological summary of the 2022 Winter Olympics has very little text, and the text in the lead is all in the wrong tense (future tense), and leads to a WP:EASTEREGG link if posted. All of which is why 2022 Winter Olympics is the better target in my opinion (and which is why that's the one listed in this nomination). Joseph2302 (talk) 13:28, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Strong support - It's the olympics after all CR-1-AB (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
February 9
February 9, 2022
(Wednesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Health and environment
Sports
|
(Posted) RD: Ian McDonald (musician)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News, Rolling Stone
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Ritchie333 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: He co wrote "21st Century Schizoid Man" and Epitaph; as Robert Fripp might say - what more reason does one need? Discography needs some sources and cleanup; I'm working on it now. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:14, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support
pending- I was going to nominate this when I heard the news, but looked at his article and was too daunted to take it on. Looks like it has seen significant improvement in those 12 hours. Only thing that jumps out at me is the mostly-unsourced discography (which I still think we should be able to use the album sleeve as a source... anybody can obtain it to verify themselves). And kudos for honing on the King Crimson works and not his later pop rock ;) - Floydian τ ¢ 15:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- The discography isn't unsourced (or, to be more accurate, unverifiable), it merely didn't have inline citations (AFAIK everything not with a direct inline cite was cited in the body anyway). However, I've popped some in. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- I was just heading off the inevitable ITN regulars perennial comment. Pending striked, good to go. - Floydian τ ¢ 17:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- The discography isn't unsourced (or, to be more accurate, unverifiable), it merely didn't have inline citations (AFAIK everything not with a direct inline cite was cited in the body anyway). However, I've popped some in. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 20:15, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Jim Angle
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Fort Worth Star-Telegram; Lubbock Avalanche-Journal; Fox News
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Bloom6132 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Bloom6132 (talk) 09:52, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Long enough (500+ words), with enough footnotes in expected spots, with no formatting concerns, this wikibio is READY for RD. --PFHLai (talk) 20:07, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Short but adequate and solidly referenced. Marking as ready. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 01:39, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Betty Davis
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:
- Nominated by Ritchie333 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Alexcalamaro (talk · give credit), Ghmyrtle (talk · give credit), 20chances (talk · give credit) and Spencer (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Godmother of soul, big influence on Prince. (And someone DID NOT write a song about her eyes) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Iconic. Strong article. Ljgua124 (talk) 22:31, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- There are a few {cn} tags that need to be addressed, and the "Unofficial releases" section has zero references. Please add more REFs. --PFHLai (talk) 23:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Added more refs so this should be good to go now. cc: PFHLai. SpencerT•C 08:00, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the new footnotes. Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 19:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Azita Raji
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): US Embassy in Sweden
Credits:
- Nominated by TDKR Chicago 101 (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Article updated and well sourced --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 03:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Short but adequate. Referencing is solid. No issues. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:18, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support: fully sourced; no problems are apparent. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support, Article has enough information. Alex-h (talk) 16:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posted Nice work. -- Kicking222 (talk) 19:23, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Jeremy Giambi
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [1][2]
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Muboshgu (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Jkaharper (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: News is just breaking, so better quality sources are coming. That was quick, here's ESPN – Muboshgu (talk) 00:04, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Short but minimally adequate and decently referenced. I am assuming there will be some article expansion given the news and likely attention. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:29, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support would like more on his playing career, but not a blocker to RD. Star Mississippi 02:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Star Mississippi, I will add more there. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- It's much better now. I could've sworn the article already had Derek Jeter's flip play, but it didn't until just now. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Agree, nicely done! Star Mississippi 14:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Article in good shape. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 05:23, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posted—Bagumba (talk) 00:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
February 8
February 8, 2022
(Tuesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Science and technology
Sports
|
RD: Robert Mulcahy
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ESPN
Credits:
- Nominated by Thriley (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Thriley (talk) 02:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. Right now a bit short at 257 words and would need rapid expansion to avoid timing out, as it seems this was announced on the 8th (should the nomination be moved to that date?) Innisfree987 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Innisfree987: yes, it should be listed under the 8th. I've moved it accordingly. —Bloom6132 (talk) 02:40, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you @Bloom6132, that’s good to know! Innisfree987 (talk) 02:41, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Innisfree987: yes, it should be listed under the 8th. I've moved it accordingly. —Bloom6132 (talk) 02:40, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
RD: Luc Montagnier
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Washington Post The New York Times
Credits:
- Nominated by Thriley (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Thibaut120094 (talk · give credit) and Sunshineisles2 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: French virologist. Discovery of Human Immunodeficiency Virus. I have not had a chance to look at the article yet. In good faith, someone familiar with the topic, please see if this should be a blurb. Thanks Ktin (talk) 17:59, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. Combining nominations. Retaining the nom for 2/8. Updating nominator to Thriley. Ktin (talk) 18:30, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Article needs some work. Seeing how Montagnier co-discovered HIV and was instrumental in linking HIV to AIDS, I can see how this could merit a blurb, but article needs to be fixed. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 18:41, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: There are at least 10 {cn} tags in this wikibio that need to be resolved before the nom can proceed. This wikibio is also oddly structured: The first section is about "History of the discovery of HIV", with no info on his earlier work on retroviruses before HIV, except stating that people at his lab at Pasteur Institute had "extensive experience with retroviruses". The second section on "Personal life and death" has 3 sentences, and has little on early education and nothing on how he got to Pasteur Institute and involved in the field of retroviruses. After a short list of Awards and Honors, a "Controversies" section then takes up the second half of the wikibio. It looks like much work is needed to get this wikibio balanced and referenced for use on ITN/RD. --PFHLai (talk) 13:12, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I am not too knowledgeable on medicine / medical research other than currently reading Jennifer Doudna's The Code Breaker book. Do we have anyone knowledgeable on this topic who can step in and help? Thanks. Ktin (talk) 18:25, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- I am tagging the only person who I have run into and might be knowledgeable on this topic, @Graham Beards:. Pardon the cold ping. Please see if you can help. Ktin (talk) 18:29, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- I met him once, briefly, in the late 1980s. Sadly, the article needs some work. A few of the {cn} tags can be sourced to Booss, John; August, Marilyn J (2013). To catch a virus. Washington, DC: ASM Press. pp. 313–314. ISBN 978-1-55581-507-3. but the topic remains controversial, and will need some careful (diplomatic) editing, because of the important role Robert Gallo played in the discovery of HIV and his not being recognised by the Nobel Committee. Montagnier's comments, made in his dotage, about the origins of the covid coronavirus should not be given such prominence in my view. I don't know what the policy is on selecting ITN articles. Are ones with such obvious issues acceptable? Graham Beards (talk) 19:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yup. These issues are not acceptable for the article to move to the homepage, unfortunately. The article needs to pass hygiene expectations (referencing, citations, reasonable comprehensiveness of coverage etc.) Usually, we do have editors who can help with some work on the article. But, this one seems a tad difficult. With that, this might have to go stale. RIP Montagnier. Ktin (talk) 04:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- I met him once, briefly, in the late 1980s. Sadly, the article needs some work. A few of the {cn} tags can be sourced to Booss, John; August, Marilyn J (2013). To catch a virus. Washington, DC: ASM Press. pp. 313–314. ISBN 978-1-55581-507-3. but the topic remains controversial, and will need some careful (diplomatic) editing, because of the important role Robert Gallo played in the discovery of HIV and his not being recognised by the Nobel Committee. Montagnier's comments, made in his dotage, about the origins of the covid coronavirus should not be given such prominence in my view. I don't know what the policy is on selecting ITN articles. Are ones with such obvious issues acceptable? Graham Beards (talk) 19:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- I am tagging the only person who I have run into and might be knowledgeable on this topic, @Graham Beards:. Pardon the cold ping. Please see if you can help. Ktin (talk) 18:29, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I am not too knowledgeable on medicine / medical research other than currently reading Jennifer Doudna's The Code Breaker book. Do we have anyone knowledgeable on this topic who can step in and help? Thanks. Ktin (talk) 18:25, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Gerald Williams
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CBS Sports
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Muboshgu (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: This is not ready, it needs considerable work. Ready now – Muboshgu (talk) 01:03, 10 February 2022 (UTC) – Muboshgu (talk) 20:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Decent article. Referencing is satisfactory. No issues. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support per improvements made since nomination. Star Mississippi 02:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Marked as ready. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:06, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 12:31, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Bamber Gascoigne
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Ritchie333 (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: University Challenge presenter for several decades. Some sources needed. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:44, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support The article is good to go as it stands. There's some interesting discussions on the talk page, which include input from the great man himself but these are no obstacle to sharing the latest sad news. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:07, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support. No conferring. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:10, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- "Give us some easy RDs, you big bottom-boil!" Vyvyan333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support, bonus for 10. Mjroots (talk) 11:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support sourcing looks fine (selected publications all have ISBN numbers, so are verifiable, everything else looks to have a source). Joseph2302 (talk) 11:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support (edit conflict) SN54129 13:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 12:34, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
(Pulled) Freedom Convoy 2022
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: A state of emergency has been declared following protests in Ottawa, Canada. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Four provinces scrap COVID-19 vaccination mandates in Canada as the Freedom Convoy 2022 inspires similar protests worldwide.
News source(s): NPR, NY Times, BBC, NBC, Guardian, AP
Credits:
- Nominated by Ainty Painty (talk · give credit)
- Comment blurb seems slightly misleading; only the city of Ottawa has declared a state of emergency, and that was declared by its local mayor; Canada itself has made no such declaration. I also don't think that a state of emergency is itself newsworthy; we usually post the event that caused the state of emergency, not the state of emergency itself. NorthernFalcon (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- I've moved the country name to the end of the blurb. --PFHLai (talk) 08:19, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oposse Local news. We will talk about it if it happens at the national level, but I don't think it will come to this end. It was already said at the time that the issue of demonstrations against the COVID-19 measures were already included in Ongoing. Suggest WP:SNOW. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 09:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose this was WP:SNOW closed on 1 February, and don't see that it's become massively more important since then. Impact is limited to one state in one country. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I thought the agreed consensus for the previous nomination of this event was clearly opposed to posting the blurb? PenangLion (talk) 10:25, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support - The declaration of the state of emergency pushes this over the threshold for posting. Mjroots (talk) 11:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Article is in good shape, and story is a current top story on major international news organizations. Checks all of the boxes. --Jayron32 11:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support international news, and keeping with the Trudeau family tradition of overreacting to minor domestic issues. --LaserLegs (talk) 12:35, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- This is the mayor's reaction, Trudeau simply vanished. InedibleHulk (talk) 16:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Parochial story, already closed once, and additionally I don't see the point in publicising the activities of a number of tinfoil-hatted muppets having a tantrum. Black Kite (talk) 12:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support international news and it has became noteworthy, article is in good shape too. BastianMAT (talk) 13:09, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Black Kite. Until they cross a line of actually harming others (eg as in Jan 6), it seems wise not to give them the attention they want. --Masem (t) 13:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support - It doesn't matter if we personally think the protests are stupid; if they're newsworthy, they're newsworthy. We ought to take them at face value. --WaltCip-(talk) 13:18, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose – Per Alsoriano, Joseph, Kite, Masem. Much ado about not much. Lacks general significance. – Sca (talk) 13:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support I was skeptical of the last nom on this topic. However, since then the protests have escalated significantly as has the global news coverage. Also, protests are not currently being covered in the main Covid article we have linked in ongoing. The capital city of a major industrial country has been effectively paralyzed by mass protests. IMO this has reached the point where it warrants a blurb at ITN. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:13, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose unless the protest results in casualties or Trudeau's resignation. There are many unvaccinated people in the world who complain about the vaccine requirements, so there's nothing special which sets this protest apart from the others.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment With some of the protestors now blocking the Ambassador Bridge (among previous border blockades in the prairies, but Detroit–Windsor is the busiest crossing by far), this is going beyond the scope of the downtown Ottawa core. I could definitely see this as Ongoing should these events continue as they are. rawmustard (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Update At least the Windsor side is reopened, but the Detroit side is still closed. rawmustard (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Per WaltClip. This is not a local news story - it has been national news in Canada, sparked international headlines, and the situation has evolved significantly since last nomination. The range of the protests have expanded to shutting down/restricting access (depending on the point in time) to two international border crossings, Ambassador Bridge and Sweetgrass–Coutts Border Crossing, and the GoFundMe aspect has drawn international headlines - particularly with US politicians diving into the situation. My own feelings about how useless the COVID-19 ongoing as-is, aside - this has evolved far beyond some people waving signs around in Ottawa. Reframe and rewrite the blurb to focus on more notable events if necessary, but the state of emergency in the capital of a G7 country (as repeatedly stated by the media) is just scratching the surface of this situation - do not oppose this simply because of the wording of the blurb. Canadianerk (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Request Suggesting promotion is contingent on hurting or killing people is stupid and reckless, akin to double-dog daring; stick to level of coverage, please. InedibleHulk (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- I have to agree. We have posted far less consequential protests in the past in S. Korea, Romania and France. Why the sudden raising of the bar here? -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- If you're asking me, you're asking a tinfoil-hatted muppet, but I think the global COVID restrictions have made us all a more domestically violent people, if even only in thoughts and words. InedibleHulk (talk) 16:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Coverage in the media is insufficient for posting a blurb for a protest related to the pandemic when it’s been posted to the main page for almost two years. Also, it’s very strange to argue that we’re raising the bar when we’ve already rejected multiple other similar events with even wider coverage at some point simply because the pandemic appears on the main page. However, it was a huge mistake that the box on the pandemic was removed from the top of the ITN section because we could’ve easily added a link to Protests over responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in order to accommodate this and other similar events. Of course, there are exceptions if a protest turns violent or results in a government change, but then the consequences make a strong argument for posting, not the protest itself.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed. Let's put the box back up. GreatCaesarsGhost 18:07, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- I assumed we were talking about the minimum casualties bar (seemingly set at two by your vote). I agree these are COVID-related complications. But I could see an exception made if enough people agree the inflated coverage, big honking trucks and Canadian content set this dissimilar event apart. Ignoring other cases works for recent deaths. Why not everything? I'll support the box. Just not bloodshed. InedibleHulk (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- I deliberately mentioned "casualties" and "Trudeau's resignation" to hint at the exception and keep this alive. I could've easily dismissed it by arguing that COVID-19 pandemic in ongoing is enough but decided to give it a chance in case something happens compared to other similar protests.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:43, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- I think I appreciate your efforts at flexibility. All I intended by listing three other differences was that physical violence and federal politics aren't the only ways for activists to be noticed. Cheers! InedibleHulk (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- I deliberately mentioned "casualties" and "Trudeau's resignation" to hint at the exception and keep this alive. I could've easily dismissed it by arguing that COVID-19 pandemic in ongoing is enough but decided to give it a chance in case something happens compared to other similar protests.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:43, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Coverage in the media is insufficient for posting a blurb for a protest related to the pandemic when it’s been posted to the main page for almost two years. Also, it’s very strange to argue that we’re raising the bar when we’ve already rejected multiple other similar events with even wider coverage at some point simply because the pandemic appears on the main page. However, it was a huge mistake that the box on the pandemic was removed from the top of the ITN section because we could’ve easily added a link to Protests over responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in order to accommodate this and other similar events. Of course, there are exceptions if a protest turns violent or results in a government change, but then the consequences make a strong argument for posting, not the protest itself.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- If you're asking me, you're asking a tinfoil-hatted muppet, but I think the global COVID restrictions have made us all a more domestically violent people, if even only in thoughts and words. InedibleHulk (talk) 16:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- I have to agree. We have posted far less consequential protests in the past in S. Korea, Romania and France. Why the sudden raising of the bar here? -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Canadianerk, though the blurb should have some mention of what the protests are in reaction to. Morgan695 (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support. Declaration of emergency in a G7 capital because police can't clear out thousands of protestors occupying the downtown core for over a week. Protests have now also spread to multiple international crossings with the US. Blurb needs to mention cause of protests as mentioned above. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 18:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support per discussion. An extended prominent and newsworthy protest. Randy Kryn (talk) 18:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posting As noted, this is a top story as it is not "just" a protest, but an extended civil unrest that has disrupted the capital of a G7 nation. It is being covered around the world. Arguments of "the nomination was SNOWED last week" and "it's local" don't hold weight. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Post-Posting Comment Not pushing for a...pull, I guess, but I feel this was sorta railroaded. As much as the fact that this is "extended", "disruptive", and in "the capital of a G7 nation, I fail to see how that alone makes it deserving of posting. Many of the protests we post involve mass arrests or firing on protesters. As far as I can see no one has been killed, and all of 14 people in a protest of potentially tens of hundreds have been arrested. The idea that this specific event will fuel others is speculative, and it certainly isn't the first noted protest recently, much less since the start of the pandemic. As for the claims that other protests globally or even domestically were caused by this, that is speculation. I would, at the very least, lean Neutral on this and more likely oppose than support such a posting unless there was serious fallout (either solidly more arrests, shooting, or resignation of key officials within the Federal Government of Canada). Just my two cents, but I think this needs to be said in regards to posts like this going forward (because we know this won't be the last nomination of this type). DarkSide830 (talk) 20:58, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- DarkSide830, I posted it because (a) it's in the news, (b) it has substantial RS coverage, (c) it has a high quality article, and (d) the opposition is not convincing. There is no WP:MINIMUMDEATH requirement for posting, nor does it need to be connected to any past or future events which would be WP:CRYSTAL assumptions anyway. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:07, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- I get it, it's just simply a matter of myself not being as convinced as others about some of these criteria. That I why I chose not to vote, I simply figured that I could at least add a little something worthwhile to the debate. DarkSide830 (talk) 02:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- DarkSide830, I posted it because (a) it's in the news, (b) it has substantial RS coverage, (c) it has a high quality article, and (d) the opposition is not convincing. There is no WP:MINIMUMDEATH requirement for posting, nor does it need to be connected to any past or future events which would be WP:CRYSTAL assumptions anyway. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:07, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Pull, nothing actually happening, embarrassing, clearly did not have consensus. Abductive (reasoning) 21:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Abductive, as I said, most of those opposing votes have no weight. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- So, if I proposed posting 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis. and then everybody said, "but nothing's happening", they have no weight because they all said the same thing? Just embarrassing. Abductive (reasoning) 21:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- So now people agreeing with each other has no weight? I thought that was the definition of trying to acheive a consensus... but yet again, another North American article is given favourable treatment.... Joseph2302 (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- So, if I proposed posting 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis. and then everybody said, "but nothing's happening", they have no weight because they all said the same thing? Just embarrassing. Abductive (reasoning) 21:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Abductive, as I said, most of those opposing votes have no weight. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Post-posting concern. The blurb is vague. Is it referring to Mayor Jim Watson's declaration of a state of emergency in the city? There has also been discussion of Premier Doug Ford declaring a provincial state of emergency. It would be good to clarify who is doing the declaring. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 21:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Pull. Not a significant event; while coverage has been broad, it is a localized protest that has had no real impact outside of inconveniencing the city it is being held in. I also don't believe that consensus was reasonably assessed - per Wikipedia:In the news#Significance it is
highly subjective whether an event is considered significant enough
, and given that I don't believe the closer presented sufficient reason to decide thatmost of those opposing votes have no weight
. BilledMammal (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2022 (UTC) - Pull per above. Not of sufficient significance, and it doesn't look like there is consensus for it. Slightly confused as to why Oppose votes have been deemed to have "no weight". It's just a subjective decision like most others. — Amakuru (talk) 23:34, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Amakuru, WP:ITSLOCAL and "it was SNOWED a week ago" have no weight – Muboshgu (talk) 00:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Muboshgu: WP:ITSLOCAL doesn't appear to apply here; it's an argument to avoid in deletion discussions, as locality doesn't affect notability, but it can affect significance when we are considering an article inclusion ITN. As for the sole argument that referenced the previous WP:SNOW discussion, their position was not that this should be rejected because it "SNOWED a week ago", but because they do not believe there has been any change in significance since then, which is an appropriate argument and should not be given no weight. BilledMammal (talk) 01:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- BilledMammal, when I say ITSLOCAL, I'm referring to what it says above. #Please do not...
oppose an item because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. This applies to a high percentage of the content we post and is unproductive.
And, WP:CCC, so relying on a close from last week has no relevance either. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- BilledMammal, when I say ITSLOCAL, I'm referring to what it says above. #Please do not...
- @Muboshgu: WP:ITSLOCAL doesn't appear to apply here; it's an argument to avoid in deletion discussions, as locality doesn't affect notability, but it can affect significance when we are considering an article inclusion ITN. As for the sole argument that referenced the previous WP:SNOW discussion, their position was not that this should be rejected because it "SNOWED a week ago", but because they do not believe there has been any change in significance since then, which is an appropriate argument and should not be given no weight. BilledMammal (talk) 01:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Amakuru, WP:ITSLOCAL and "it was SNOWED a week ago" have no weight – Muboshgu (talk) 00:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Pull Not significant per above. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 00:16, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Pull delibrately ignoring one set of people is not objective. Not enough evidence has been given of a significant impact of this to gain an actual consensus for posting (if you actually ibjectively look for a consensus rather than declaring half the votes as apparently invalid). Joseph2302 (talk) 00:21, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- You've already opposed, so you're effectively !voting twice. Pawnkingthree (talk) 00:50, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Nope, complaining about the method of how something is posted is different from supporting/opposing the nomination in the first place. They are completely different, stop trying to use bureaucracy to annoy. Joseph2302 (talk) 04:32, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- You'll notice that none of the other editors who used a bolded "Pull" had previously expressed an opinion on the nom. Pawnkingthree (talk) 10:00, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Nope, complaining about the method of how something is posted is different from supporting/opposing the nomination in the first place. They are completely different, stop trying to use bureaucracy to annoy. Joseph2302 (talk) 04:32, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- I did not deliberately ignore a set of people, I deliberately ignored votes that have no policy basis, which is how consensus is formed. It's not a vote count. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- You've already opposed, so you're effectively !voting twice. Pawnkingthree (talk) 00:50, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Major protests generating international headlines and influencing anti-public health sentiments in other parts of the world. [3] Clearly no longer just a local story. Pawnkingthree (talk) 00:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Local news arguments and last week's situation should be discounted (not all Opposes). One is not true and the other is irrelevant. Significance is explained in various article sections. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:48, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Although I obviously see articles biased to my location local to this protest, it has seen numerous articles about it in numerous international news sources within the current 24-hour cycle, such as Al Jazeera, The Guardian, The Daily Mail, Washington Post, Times of India, New York Times... I could go on. However, I think that it may be worth discussing adding Protests over responses to the COVID-19 pandemic to ongoing if there is such a divide over singling out the Canadian one. - Floydian τ ¢ 01:04, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Using the DM should automatically disqualify this, but even then, this is a COVID story, and thus covered under the COVID ongoing, it does not need any more special attention as much as any other COVID story presented over the past 2-some years. --Masem (t) 01:18, 9 February 2022 (UTC)x
- Mangeshkar's death was a COVID story, too, no DQ. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Of course it wasn't. It was about her contribution to Bollywood and Indie's entertainment industry and the recognition of it in her death. And in this case, at least myself and others are acknowledging if this turned violent or caused a major political shift like Trudeau's resignation, that would make it a blurb as that goes beyond a simple COVID story. But right now its typical - beyond the fact its not in the US and in a major city center - of demonstrations that have gone on for the last two years rejecting mask and vaccine mandates from COVID. --Masem (t) 01:31, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- The first two paragraphs are all about her mild symptoms and aggressive treatment. That's a fact. Why this protest matters (or could matter) more is a matter of opinion. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:43, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Of course it wasn't. It was about her contribution to Bollywood and Indie's entertainment industry and the recognition of it in her death. And in this case, at least myself and others are acknowledging if this turned violent or caused a major political shift like Trudeau's resignation, that would make it a blurb as that goes beyond a simple COVID story. But right now its typical - beyond the fact its not in the US and in a major city center - of demonstrations that have gone on for the last two years rejecting mask and vaccine mandates from COVID. --Masem (t) 01:31, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Mangeshkar's death was a COVID story, too, no DQ. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Also to remind editors: we don't care how much coverage a story gets (as we are not a news ticker) only that it is in the news to quality for posting. There are lots of stories that get widespread international coverage on the day-to-day that do not make sense for ITN to cover as the topic likes encyclopedic significance (but can be covered at the Current Events portal). --Masem (t) 01:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- How does one determine the significance of a story without looking at how much coverage it is getting? Just use our own personal biases? Pawnkingthree (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- We consider 1) what's already in the box such as ongoing stories and 2) consider what are enduring stories that likely have long-term encyclopedic impact rather thhan news impact. That requires using news as sopurces but not necessarily the same weight that news gives the topics. And we also should work to eliminate systematic bias resulting from the majority of news sources heavily covering Western events. --Masem (t) 01:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- How does one determine the significance of a story without looking at how much coverage it is getting? Just use our own personal biases? Pawnkingthree (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Using the DM should automatically disqualify this, but even then, this is a COVID story, and thus covered under the COVID ongoing, it does not need any more special attention as much as any other COVID story presented over the past 2-some years. --Masem (t) 01:18, 9 February 2022 (UTC)x
- Good for people deciding to post this. I recommend once this drops out of the blurb timeframe, the Protests over responses to the COVID-19 pandemic should be considered to be added to ongoing. 188.27.42.181 (talk) 01:21, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose for now. Until it inspires something of meaningful historical note. Also, as a minor note: the state of emergency was declared on February 6, not the 8th. So, this nomination is under the incorrect date, as I understand it? I don't know if that matters anymore now that it's already on the front page right now. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 01:54, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Is the liberation of France meaningful or minor? InedibleHulk (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- The point above is that protests related to covid, unless they turn violent or create direct political results, are effective covered by the covid ongoing. I would agree that if world wide protests grew to a size similar to the BLM protests of 2020, then there might be something more, but these collectively still aren't very big and haven't changed politics yet. --Masem (t) 19:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- You're projecting things. Parasol's major point was only about waiting till it inspired something of meaningful historical note, which I believe The New York Times suggests this potential French revolution already is, by virtue of fitness to print in America. If you don't want to answer my question and only interrupt, that's fine, I'll assume you chose "minor". InedibleHulk (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Then you are talking about speculation about something major happening from this, which ITN also does not use as a metric. Even if major RSes suggest it is a major effect, we are still looking for something more significant and quantifiable. --Masem (t) 19:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- No, I already told you what we (not you) were talking about. Meaningful historical note. If you can't pay attention, don't play along, and don't invent other people's positions (opponents or proponents). InedibleHulk (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Then you are talking about speculation about something major happening from this, which ITN also does not use as a metric. Even if major RSes suggest it is a major effect, we are still looking for something more significant and quantifiable. --Masem (t) 19:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- You're projecting things. Parasol's major point was only about waiting till it inspired something of meaningful historical note, which I believe The New York Times suggests this potential French revolution already is, by virtue of fitness to print in America. If you don't want to answer my question and only interrupt, that's fine, I'll assume you chose "minor". InedibleHulk (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- The point above is that protests related to covid, unless they turn violent or create direct political results, are effective covered by the covid ongoing. I would agree that if world wide protests grew to a size similar to the BLM protests of 2020, then there might be something more, but these collectively still aren't very big and haven't changed politics yet. --Masem (t) 19:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Is the liberation of France meaningful or minor? InedibleHulk (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- @InedibleHulk: For me? I do not believe it of meaningful historical note yet. The NYT article also points out similar protests in Paris over the summer. One confirmed copy-cat in a city that has a history of protests against restrictions doesn't move my position at the moment. I may change my mind by the time the Paris protests officially commune on Friday, depends. These other mentioned calls to action in the article are promising candidates for changing my oppose here. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 01:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for elaborating on that. InedibleHulk (talk) 02:51, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- @InedibleHulk: For me? I do not believe it of meaningful historical note yet. The NYT article also points out similar protests in Paris over the summer. One confirmed copy-cat in a city that has a history of protests against restrictions doesn't move my position at the moment. I may change my mind by the time the Paris protests officially commune on Friday, depends. These other mentioned calls to action in the article are promising candidates for changing my oppose here. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 01:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I will make one last comment here. I saw support votes with good rationale and opposing votes that dismissed this as "local" and "parochial", or by not meeting a certain threshold of casualties and PM resignations. If another admin wants to pull this, they can. I will not as I think there is still a consensus in favor, though it is weaker now than it was when I posted it. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:20, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Pull -- This should not have been posted, there was not consensus at the time of posting. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 03:00, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment It is clear that there is and was no consensus to post this, with the consensus only being seen by giving no weight to certain !votes despite no policy or guideline based reason to do so. However, the posting admin is unwilling to withdraw this and that raises the question of where to take this next; the normal location would be WP:AN, but that process is too long for ITN. BilledMammal (talk) 04:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- You were thinking of taking this to AN because I made a decision that you don't like that I've explained here and on my talk page to you? I stand by my view of the consensus when I posted it and Stephen's decision to pull. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:12, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- To assess the close, per Wikipedia:Closing discussions#Challenging other closures, not to assess you as an editor or admin. However, that is now unneeded, due to Stephen's decision to pull. BilledMammal (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- You were thinking of taking this to AN because I made a decision that you don't like that I've explained here and on my talk page to you? I stand by my view of the consensus when I posted it and Stephen's decision to pull. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:12, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Pulled, the tide has turned on consensus for this story. Stephen 04:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Post-pulling comment – Significance trumps coverage. – Sca (talk) 13:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Significance can only be determined by coverage; there is no other source of evidence. I can only know about things by reading them. --Jayron32 13:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- No, ITN only requires a minimum bar of coverage for inclusion, the rest of it becomes a matter of discussion and consensus of where the topic fits into our goal as an encyclopedia, to cover topics from across the globe and from all areas of interest, and to avoid systematic biases that come from 24/7 news coverage of politics, entertainment, and sports that primarily favor the Western world. Using "Significance being proportion to coverage" is the road to ITN being a news ticker. Of course, the more coverage something has, the better quality article I expect to see. And we still have Current Events portal linked into the box for all other major news stories. --Masem (t) 13:30, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Please stop inventing things I never said, and then contradicting the thing I never said, and then pretending like that somehow contradicts me. I would have hoped you were better than that. What I said was that I need to read sources to learn about the significance of things. The coverage of an event is where I learn about its significance. To ignore the source material (coverage) seems counter to Wikipedia's core ethos. I don't matter. My opinion doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is what I can demonstrate by evidence in reliable source material. --Jayron32 15:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- No, ITN only requires a minimum bar of coverage for inclusion, the rest of it becomes a matter of discussion and consensus of where the topic fits into our goal as an encyclopedia, to cover topics from across the globe and from all areas of interest, and to avoid systematic biases that come from 24/7 news coverage of politics, entertainment, and sports that primarily favor the Western world. Using "Significance being proportion to coverage" is the road to ITN being a news ticker. Of course, the more coverage something has, the better quality article I expect to see. And we still have Current Events portal linked into the box for all other major news stories. --Masem (t) 13:30, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Significance can only be determined by coverage; there is no other source of evidence. I can only know about things by reading them. --Jayron32 13:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Further the affiant sayeth naught. 'Cuz it's all been said before. Bonne journée, mes amis. – Sca (talk) 14:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- It is amazing how stark the differences of schools of thought are between Jayron32 and Masem, and how they alternately dominate the discourse surrounding ITN nominations, depending both on local consensus and the presence of participants. I'm reminded of the stark dichotomies of Plato vs Aristotle. WaltCip-(talk) 15:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Further the affiant sayeth naught. 'Cuz it's all been said before. Bonne journée, mes amis. – Sca (talk) 14:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Re-post - Canada is not a Third World country; the state of emergency due to civil unrest is very significant by any standard. STSC (talk) 15:59, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't hear anyone suggest that Canada was a third-world country. As far as I recall, this (3,700-word) discussion was about a contrived truck traffic jam in Canada and its perceived significance elsewhere. – Sca (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Unless we're planning to post every time any city declares a state of emergency, posting this based on the state of emergency is a WP:BIAS in my opinion. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- My point is that Ottawa (being the capital of Canada) declaring a state of emergency due to civil unrest (not due to a storm or flood, etc.) is a significant event in a developed country like Canada. STSC (talk) 19:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Unless we're planning to post every time any city declares a state of emergency, posting this based on the state of emergency is a WP:BIAS in my opinion. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Sca: "Significance trumps coverage." could you please link to the relevant policy which cites that criteria? Thanks. --LaserLegs (talk) 00:40, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't hear anyone suggest that Canada was a third-world country. As far as I recall, this (3,700-word) discussion was about a contrived truck traffic jam in Canada and its perceived significance elsewhere. – Sca (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep pulled. Are we supposed to post every little thing that happens in every city in every country, just because a state of emergency has been declared? I don't think so. This is essentially a traffic jam in Ottawa, and unless they overthrow the entire government of Canada, this has no significant impact on any country. Fakescientist8000 (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support re-posting - This is the powder keg issue of the year for Canada with reverberations large and small. I understand there was some deliberate look-away by the media at the beginning but even international sources now cover this extensively.CoatCheck (talk) 19:04, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep pulled Just because a state of emergency has been declared in one city does not mean that this event is significant enough to post on ITN. If there was actual rioting with large scale damage to property or people, I would reconsider. Chaosquo (talk) 19:35, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- You seem to be judging this very complex story solely on the proposed blurb, not even the pulled one. I ask you click the link and reconsider after reading at least some of everything else beside the (unprecedented) state of emergency. Not mandatory, though! InedibleHulk (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- The event is also globally significant because of the vaccination issues involved. It really concerns all other countries and I think they would be observing closely such impacts of implementing the vaccination policies during this pandemic. STSC (talk) 20:06, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- This has been true throughout the pandemic, though. All sorts of momentous things have occurred which under normal circumstances, as isolated events, would merit posting but which become ongoing and widespread in these highly unusual times. This is why we have the sticky ongoing link to COVID-19 (and earlier, the special box, which I opposed removing) and we don't keep posting individual stories. — Amakuru (talk) 22:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- 4,300 words. – Sca (talk) 20:32, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- This has been true throughout the pandemic, though. All sorts of momentous things have occurred which under normal circumstances, as isolated events, would merit posting but which become ongoing and widespread in these highly unusual times. This is why we have the sticky ongoing link to COVID-19 (and earlier, the special box, which I opposed removing) and we don't keep posting individual stories. — Amakuru (talk) 22:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- The event is also globally significant because of the vaccination issues involved. It really concerns all other countries and I think they would be observing closely such impacts of implementing the vaccination policies during this pandemic. STSC (talk) 20:06, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – The AP, in an update filed around 19:50, reported that Alberta, Saskatchewan, Quebec and Prince Edward Island have announced plans to roll back some or all Covid precautions – Sca (talk) 20:49, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Comments above were made when there was only one proposed blurb. The altblurb was added on 9 February 2022 at 23:55 UTC, with diff Chrisclear (talk) 04:28, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Re-post the posting admin was correct in their assertion that opposed based on "not internationally significant" are invalid as we have specific guidance against that consideration. The posting admin was also correct in dismissing opposes based solely that the previous nomination had been closed (laughably in just four hours by someone who was later involved in opposing this nom). If WP:CONSENSUS is not just a !vote count, then there was conensus to post at the time it was done. Conseqeuntially pull !votes contesting that the original consensus was invalid are themselves invalid and thus there is still strong consensus to post this item. --LaserLegs (talk) 00:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Re-post with copycat protests in New Zealand, France, and Australia ([4]), this is worth posting. Banedon (talk) 02:22, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose both proposed blurbs The first blurb specifically mentions a state of emergency in Ottawa. However the States of emergency in Canada article shows that various parts of Canada have entered a state of emergency quite frequently, with 2015 being the most recent year when this did not take place. It's a quasi-routine action taken by the executive branch of government. If anything is to be posted, then it should be the reason for the state of emergency, not the state of emergency itself.
- The second blurb mentions that the Canadian protests are inspiring similar protests worldwide.
This claim is highly dubious. The non-Canadian protests are barely mentioned in the Freedom Convoy 2022 article, and the sources provided allude to causation, when it's merely spurious correlation.While there may be some truth to this claim, similar protests have been taking place for months in other countries. I don't see why the Canadian protests are particularly notable compared those taking place in other countries around the world. I would be more open to a nomination for Protests over responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Chrisclear (talk) 05:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)- I think the six sources currently crammed in the middle paragraph of "Other protests" vouch for inspiration, if not causation, often using forms of that word (in various languages). Pedestrian protests are old hat. Canada got the convoy ball rolling, at least in this era. And disaster emergencies are normal. But protest emergencies are new. InedibleHulk (talk) 04:50, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing out those six sources, four of which I overlooked previously. However I'm struggling to see why a "convoy protest" is more notable than a pedestrian protest. Chrisclear (talk) 05:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Trucks are larger, louder and harder to move than people. Truckers are also somewhat notorious for their ability to take a seat and withstand boredom for the long haul. All fine attributes for real extended persuasion, in my eyes. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:15, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing out those six sources, four of which I overlooked previously. However I'm struggling to see why a "convoy protest" is more notable than a pedestrian protest. Chrisclear (talk) 05:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- As a comment, the alt blurb (relating the dropping of mandates) is improper correlation with causation. While news sources reported the dropping of mandates and mention the convoy in the same article, I've not seen any specific statement that specifically states the mandates were being dropped due to the convoy. There's a possiblility that may be the case, but we can't jump that leap of logic. So it is is bad synthesis for us to even approach that. --Masem (t) 05:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- I said "as", suggesting only correlation, nothing like "because". InedibleHulk (talk) 05:18, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Which is leading to synthesis given the lack of space for context, it creates the impression to the reader "B happened because of A". --Masem (t) 05:22, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- I don't understand what you mean by space for context. If you can add it, go ahead. We can't be held responsible for people who read too fast or replace the written conjunctions in their heads, though, that's on them. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Is
As the Freedom Convoy 2022 inspires similar protests worldwide, four provinces scrap COVID-19 vaccination mandates in Canada
any clearer, with a comma between A and B? InedibleHulk (talk) 06:25, 10 February 2022 (UTC)- Yes, however then I (and maybe other editors too?) would question the notability/significance of a sub-national government deciding to end vaccination mandates. Chrisclear (talk) 06:36, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- They're four governments, each with a separate monarchy, equal to the federal government's under the Crown. Canada is hard to explain sometimes. I give up for now. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:46, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, however then I (and maybe other editors too?) would question the notability/significance of a sub-national government deciding to end vaccination mandates. Chrisclear (talk) 06:36, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Which is leading to synthesis given the lack of space for context, it creates the impression to the reader "B happened because of A". --Masem (t) 05:22, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- I said "as", suggesting only correlation, nothing like "because". InedibleHulk (talk) 05:18, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose second blurb because it implies the provinces dropped the vaccine mandates due to the protests, when it is readily evident to anyone who does any research that the vaccine mandates were on course for being dropped anyways. I don't like the first blurb either simply because of its emphasis on the "state of emergency". There are many municipal states of emergency in Canada every year (e.g. Toronto declares one every time a bad snowstorm hits); the previously linked article States of emergency in Canada only bothers listing provincial ones because municipal emergencies are not newsworthy, as this one is. I am not opposed to a blurb about the protests that sticks to the facts, for example: "Anti-vaccine mandate protests in Ottawa, Canada, inspire other protests across the country which shut down major highways and international border crossings." However, I'd like to point out that these protests are not dissimilar from the 2020 Canadian pipeline and railway protests, which did not get posted to ITN. NorthernFalcon (talk) 06:32, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
February 7
February 7, 2022
(Monday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Health and environment
Politics and elections
|
(Posted) RD: Bruce Owen
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CTV News; Barrie Advance; BarrieToday.com
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Bloom6132 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Thechristiancontender (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Bloom6132 (talk) 21:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Short but adequate and well referenced. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:32, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 22:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Abhijatabhivamsa
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC Burmese, Eleven Media
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Htanaungg (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Htanaungg (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Short but adequate. Referencing appears solid though I don't read Burmese and therefore can't make any judgments on the quality of the sources. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 23:18, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Jerome Chazen
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): WWD
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Star Mississippi (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: one of the founders of Liz Claiborne, former chair Star Mississippi 18:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Not Ready Article is little more than oversized stub. And frankly, I'm not sure the subject even passes WP:BASIC. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I've taken it as far as I think I can given sourcing so no issue if someone wants to remove the nomination. Step beyond my tech abilities Star Mississippi 21:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support unless someone wants to take it to AfD. It's just long enough to not be a stub. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:33, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose article is barely more than a stub, and says almost nothing about his life- there's 3 sentences on his company. The fact there's more on his philanthropy (which is basically just advertising for him) is not acceptable for a complete, NPOV biographical article. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- not the creator, although I did most of the updates. My guess is that because much of his tenure at Liz Claiborne was pre internet, there isn't much in the way of online sourcing. What I can find about his life beyond philanthropy isn't worth adding to the article, and wouldn't particularly help with balance. Star Mississippi 22:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Star Mississippi, there is plenty of pre-Internet coverage. Newspapers.com is a great resource you can get access to from the Wikipedia Library. Here's a source that I clipped for you. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you! Waiting to be re-whitelisted for the library (username blocked on Indonesian Wikipedia) and when I am will go through and flesh out what I can. I do think he's notable regardless of whether he's ITN eligible so there will be time even if I miss this window Star Mississippi 23:26, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Star Mississippi, there is plenty of pre-Internet coverage. Newspapers.com is a great resource you can get access to from the Wikipedia Library. Here's a source that I clipped for you. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- not the creator, although I did most of the updates. My guess is that because much of his tenure at Liz Claiborne was pre internet, there isn't much in the way of online sourcing. What I can find about his life beyond philanthropy isn't worth adding to the article, and wouldn't particularly help with balance. Star Mississippi 22:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I have updated it with some background on his bio from the WWD piece. I believe stub issues are resolved Star Mississippi 15:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 23:34, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) Cyclone Batsirai
Blurb: Cyclone Batsirai sweeps through Madagascar (Post)
Alternative blurb: Cyclone Batsirai makes landfall in Madagascar, displacing at least 45,000 people and leading to at least 20 deaths.
News source(s): BBC; NPR; ABC, Guardian, AlJazeera, DW
Credits:
- Nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk · give credit)
- Created by HurricaneEdgar (talk · give credit)
- Updated by StopBoi (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Nominator's comments: The BBC says "whole villages swept away" which sounds dramatic. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support biggest cyclone of the year so far, coverage of the high impact in major news sources many days after the main impacts occurred. Article is well sourced and lots of information too. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment could we fix up the blurb a bit? I don't mind adding it to ITN, but I would not support having one as plain as that on there. Fakescientist8000 (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- I'm more interested in the choice of picture, which is worth 1000 words. Here's some alternative views which also show Madagascar.
-
Actual and projected track
-
Water vapour map of the cyclone
-
Animated satellite images
- Y'all know the drill; what are the casualties and damage? Until we know the impact of this storm, wait.--WaltCip-(talk) 14:23, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Currently over 20 deaths. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, that would (sadly) be enough. WaltCip-(talk) 15:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- As of 15:30, BBC, Guardian, AlJazeera, DW and our Madagascar article said "at least 10." ReliefWeb, a UN organization, said "at least 20." – Sca (talk) 15:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Currently over 20 deaths. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Fairly noteworthy as far a Madagascar cyclones go. I think impact is solid enough even with the discrepancy over deaths (which, if desired to be added to the blurb, could always be appended later from "at least 10" to a more precise number). The blurb does need to be adjusted regardless though, but this event should be posted. DarkSide830 (talk) 16:46, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Article is in good shape, submitted an altblurb which matches the usual format we use; the main blurb contains next to no useful information about the storm and uses unencyclopedic language. --Jayron32 16:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Wait – Until at least some major RS news sites corroborate UN agency ReliefWeb's report of 20+ fatalities. – Sca (talk) 17:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 22:52, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Post-posting comment – Thanks. Going with the 10+ RS toll is prudent for now. It can always be revised. – Sca (talk) 23:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Post-posting comment To posters and editors - we have sourcing for 20+ deaths. Some examples: Washington Post, Al Jazeera, ABC News,The Times UK Canadianerk (talk) 01:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Post-posting comment RS say 20+ death in Madagascar Al jazzeera Washington Post HurricaneEdgar 02:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Post-posting oppose for now The blurb is incorrect, as the impact of the cyclone extends to more countries, not only Madagascar. That 45,000 people have been forced to be displaced I don't think is the most relevant thing and 20 deaths I don't think meets the minimum standard of deaths to be published on the Main Page. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 11:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
growing distracting --Jayron32 20:09, 8 February 2022 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
- FYI, AlJazeera attributes 20+ toll to unnamed "officials" – officials of what it doesn't say. – Sca (talk) 13:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Reuters say death toll in Madagascar 29 death need update in main page 'Everything is gone': Madagascans face destitution in cyclone's wake HurricaneEdgar 02:19, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
References
Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com]
rather than using <ref></ref>
tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.
For the times when <ref></ref>
tags are being used, here are their contents: