Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
RD: Ivan Reitman: Putting it mildly.
Line 32: Line 32:
*'''Support''': Even if I wasn't a recent editor, this feels like a slam dunk.--[[User:CreecregofLife|CreecregofLife]] ([[User talk:CreecregofLife|talk]]) 04:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
*'''Support''': Even if I wasn't a recent editor, this feels like a slam dunk.--[[User:CreecregofLife|CreecregofLife]] ([[User talk:CreecregofLife|talk]]) 04:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
*'''Not Ready''' for the [[WP:CITE|usual reason]]. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 04:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
*'''Not Ready''' for the [[WP:CITE|usual reason]]. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 04:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
*'''No Blurb''' [[Natural causes|for usual reason]]. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 04:30, 14 February 2022 (UTC)


==== Super Bowl LVI====
==== Super Bowl LVI====

Revision as of 04:30, 14 February 2022

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

James A. Robinson in 2018
James A. Robinson

Glossary

  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Archives

February 14

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime


February 13

Armed conflicts and attacks

Health and environment

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


RD: Ivan Reitman

Article: Ivan Reitman (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Director of many beloved '80s and '90s comedies, most notably GhostbustersJOEBRO64 03:50, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Super Bowl LVI

Proposed image
Article: Super Bowl LVI (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Los Angeles Rams defeat the Cincinnati Bengals in Super Bowl LVI (MVP Cooper Kupp pictured). (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The Los Angeles Rams defeat the Cincinnati Bengals in the Super Bowl (MVP Cooper Kupp pictured).
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 – Muboshgu (talk) 03:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 German presidential election

Proposed image
Article: 2022 German presidential election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Frank Walter Steinmeier is elected for a second term as President of Germany by the Bundesversammlung. (Post)
News source(s): CNBC, Politico
Credits:

Nominator's comments: ITN/R jonas (talk) 23:32, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 12

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


RD: Beryl Vertue

Article: Beryl Vertue (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian; Variety; The Independent
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 01:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Frank Beckmann

Article: Frank Beckmann (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Detroit Free Press; The Detroit News; WXYZ-TV, WJR-AM
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 22:56, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2021 FIFA Club World Cup Final

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2021 FIFA Club World Cup Final (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In association football, Chelsea defeats Palmeiras to win the 2021 FIFA Club World Cup. (Post)
News source(s): BBC Sports
Credits:
 Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 19:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Hugo Torres Jiménez

Article: Hugo Torres Jiménez (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ABC News, Confidencial
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Major Sandinista figure, died in prison. Article is thoroughly referenced. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:38, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Rahul Bajaj

Article: Rahul Bajaj (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NDTV
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indian industrialist; article is currently very short but fully cited. Tube·of·Light 14:02, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Ongoing: Freedom Convoy 2022

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Freedom Convoy 2022 (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC, Le monde (fr), Al Jazeera
Credits:
Nominator's comments: This was posted (and pulled) a few days ago. As some of the opposition was related to the specific blurb, I am re-nominating this as purely ongoing. Like the Ukraine story, there is no blurb that I support as nominator, but it is certainly "in the news" internationally now. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 01:03, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Credits:
Nominator's comments: "Ongoing" nomination. It's not clear to me how much of this being in the news is Western propaganda, but it is undeniably in the news. Unless there is an actual invasion, I don't see any blurb I would be willing to support, hence the nom is for ongoing. The article looks good enough. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 00:14, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
'Extremely strong oppose' = oppose. – Sca (talk) 14:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Likewise, 'Extremely strong support' = support. Fakescientist8000 (talk) 17:59, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
'Strong support' = support. – Sca (talk) 14:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Things have been heating up, especially within the past few weeks and days. Might as well. Redoct87 (talk) 03:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted. There's consensus that this is an ongoing high-priority international news topic that warrants posting, whether or not war breaks out. The "failed verification" tags have been addressed as of the posting. Sandstein 08:34, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-Posting Support -- things are getting extraordinarily tense. It definitely deserves to be posted. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 11:02, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support It's In The News, not In The Things That Will Happen. Headlines in at least English language media for multiple times past few weeks. Would be weird to not at least put it there. Juxlos (talk) 14:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting support – Continues to lead almost every prime RS site, with some offering multiple articles. Today's examples include AP, BBC. The looming question: What's Putin's game? – Sca (talk) 14:04, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • War is now imminent. See here: "Satellite imagery obtained by CNN shows that a large base at Yelnya, which held Russian tanks, artillery and other armor, has been largely emptied, with the equipment apparently being moved much closer to the frontier in recent days.

Large amounts of weaponry were moved to the base late in 2021 before disappearing -- including some 700 tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and ballistic missile launchers. Social media videos since show some of that equipment on trains and roads much further south in the Bryansk region, which is close to Ukraine."

"Meanwhile, heightened activity in the Kursk and Belgorod Oblasts, which border northeastern Ukraine, has added to concerns. "We are seeing a massive influx of vehicles and personnel in Kursk," Konrad Muzyka, an expert in tracking military movements with Rochan Consulting, warned on Twitter." Count Iblis (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OTOH, maybe it's just Товарищ Putin's idea of a publicity stunt on steroids. You know, the doping thing. – Sca (talk) 20:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

February 11

Armed conflicts and attacks

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


February 10

Armed conflicts and attacks

Health and environment

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology


RD: Mary Ellen Duncan

Article: Mary Ellen Duncan (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Howard Community College Facebook
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Academic administrator and teacher. TJMSmith (talk) 16:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Manuel Esquivel

Article: Manuel Esquivel (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://caribbean.loopnews.com/content/former-belize-pm-sir-manuel-esquivel-has-died
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Prime Minister of Belize, 1984-1989 & 1993-1998. Almost 400 words of readable prose -- it would be nice if someone familiar with Belize can expand this wikibio, particularly on what he did while he was PM -- I don't think this wikibio should get on RD till this glaring gap in coverage is filled. Thanks. PFHLai (talk) 09:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Stefan Żywotko

Article: Stefan Żywotko (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Polsatsport, TVP, Interia
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Polish football manager who won two African Champions League titles. Article should be ready to go. NorthernFalcon (talk) 06:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Olsen Filipaina

Article: Olsen Filipaina (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New Zealand Herald; Reuters; ABC News (Australian Associated Press)
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 22:25, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Ongoing: 2022 Winter Olympics

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2022 Winter Olympics (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC, NYT
Credits:
Article updated
Nominator's comments: The current blurb is about the opening ceremony which is no longer in the news. And that article has had orange banner tags for over a day now and so is lacking in quality. Coverage has now moved on to the numerous events, stars and scandals such as the latest Russian drug mystery. We should reflect this change in emphasis by running the ongoing entry instead. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:00, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

February 9

Armed conflicts and attacks

Health and environment

Sports


(Posted) RD: Ian McDonald (musician)

Article: Ian McDonald (musician) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News, Rolling Stone
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: He co wrote "21st Century Schizoid Man" and Epitaph; as Robert Fripp might say - what more reason does one need? Discography needs some sources and cleanup; I'm working on it now. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:14, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support pending - I was going to nominate this when I heard the news, but looked at his article and was too daunted to take it on. Looks like it has seen significant improvement in those 12 hours. Only thing that jumps out at me is the mostly-unsourced discography (which I still think we should be able to use the album sleeve as a source... anybody can obtain it to verify themselves). And kudos for honing on the King Crimson works and not his later pop rock ;) - Floydian τ ¢ 15:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discography isn't unsourced (or, to be more accurate, unverifiable), it merely didn't have inline citations (AFAIK everything not with a direct inline cite was cited in the body anyway). However, I've popped some in. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was just heading off the inevitable ITN regulars perennial comment. Pending striked, good to go. - Floydian τ ¢ 17:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Jim Angle

Article: Jim Angle (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Fort Worth Star-Telegram; Lubbock Avalanche-Journal; Fox News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 09:52, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Betty Davis

Article: Betty Davis (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Godmother of soul, big influence on Prince. (And someone DID NOT write a song about her eyes) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Azita Raji

Article: Azita Raji (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): US Embassy in Sweden
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Article updated and well sourced --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 03:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Jeremy Giambi

Article: Jeremy Giambi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [1][2]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: News is just breaking, so better quality sources are coming. That was quick, here's ESPN – Muboshgu (talk) 00:04, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 8

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Science and technology

Sports


RD: Robert Mulcahy

Article: Robert Mulcahy (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ESPN
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Thriley (talk) 02:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Luc Montagnier

Article: Luc Montagnier (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Washington Post The New York Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: French virologist. Discovery of Human Immunodeficiency Virus. I have not had a chance to look at the article yet. In good faith, someone familiar with the topic, please see if this should be a blurb. Thanks Ktin (talk) 17:59, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. Combining nominations. Retaining the nom for 2/8. Updating nominator to Thriley. Ktin (talk) 18:30, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Article needs some work. Seeing how Montagnier co-discovered HIV and was instrumental in linking HIV to AIDS, I can see how this could merit a blurb, but article needs to be fixed. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 18:41, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: There are at least 10 {cn} tags in this wikibio that need to be resolved before the nom can proceed. This wikibio is also oddly structured: The first section is about "History of the discovery of HIV", with no info on his earlier work on retroviruses before HIV, except stating that people at his lab at Pasteur Institute had "extensive experience with retroviruses". The second section on "Personal life and death" has 3 sentences, and has little on early education and nothing on how he got to Pasteur Institute and involved in the field of retroviruses. After a short list of Awards and Honors, a "Controversies" section then takes up the second half of the wikibio. It looks like much work is needed to get this wikibio balanced and referenced for use on ITN/RD. --PFHLai (talk) 13:12, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Unfortunately, I am not too knowledgeable on medicine / medical research other than currently reading Jennifer Doudna's The Code Breaker book. Do we have anyone knowledgeable on this topic who can step in and help? Thanks. Ktin (talk) 18:25, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I am tagging the only person who I have run into and might be knowledgeable on this topic, @Graham Beards:. Pardon the cold ping. Please see if you can help. Ktin (talk) 18:29, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I met him once, briefly, in the late 1980s. Sadly, the article needs some work. A few of the {cn} tags can be sourced to Booss, John; August, Marilyn J (2013). To catch a virus. Washington, DC: ASM Press. pp. 313–314. ISBN 978-1-55581-507-3. but the topic remains controversial, and will need some careful (diplomatic) editing, because of the important role Robert Gallo played in the discovery of HIV and his not being recognised by the Nobel Committee. Montagnier's comments, made in his dotage, about the origins of the covid coronavirus should not be given such prominence in my view. I don't know what the policy is on selecting ITN articles. Are ones with such obvious issues acceptable? Graham Beards (talk) 19:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Yup. These issues are not acceptable for the article to move to the homepage, unfortunately. The article needs to pass hygiene expectations (referencing, citations, reasonable comprehensiveness of coverage etc.) Usually, we do have editors who can help with some work on the article. But, this one seems a tad difficult. With that, this might have to go stale. RIP Montagnier. Ktin (talk) 04:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Gerald Williams

Article: Gerald Williams (baseball) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CBS Sports
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: This is not ready, it needs considerable work. Ready now – Muboshgu (talk) 01:03, 10 February 2022 (UTC) – Muboshgu (talk) 20:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Bamber Gascoigne

Article: Bamber Gascoigne (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: University Challenge presenter for several decades. Some sources needed. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:44, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Give us some easy RDs, you big bottom-boil!" Vyvyan333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Pulled) Freedom Convoy 2022

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Freedom Convoy 2022 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A state of emergency has been declared following protests in Ottawa, Canada. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Four provinces scrap COVID-19 vaccination mandates in Canada as the Freedom Convoy 2022 inspires similar protests worldwide.
News source(s): NPR, NY Times, BBC, NBC, Guardian, AP
Credits:
 Ainty Painty (talk) 07:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Per WaltClip. This is not a local news story - it has been national news in Canada, sparked international headlines, and the situation has evolved significantly since last nomination. The range of the protests have expanded to shutting down/restricting access (depending on the point in time) to two international border crossings, Ambassador Bridge and Sweetgrass–Coutts Border Crossing, and the GoFundMe aspect has drawn international headlines - particularly with US politicians diving into the situation. My own feelings about how useless the COVID-19 ongoing as-is, aside - this has evolved far beyond some people waving signs around in Ottawa. Reframe and rewrite the blurb to focus on more notable events if necessary, but the state of emergency in the capital of a G7 country (as repeatedly stated by the media) is just scratching the surface of this situation - do not oppose this simply because of the wording of the blurb. Canadianerk (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Request Suggesting promotion is contingent on hurting or killing people is stupid and reckless, akin to double-dog daring; stick to level of coverage, please. InedibleHulk (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have to agree. We have posted far less consequential protests in the past in S. Korea, Romania and France. Why the sudden raising of the bar here? -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you're asking me, you're asking a tinfoil-hatted muppet, but I think the global COVID restrictions have made us all a more domestically violent people, if even only in thoughts and words. InedibleHulk (talk) 16:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Coverage in the media is insufficient for posting a blurb for a protest related to the pandemic when it’s been posted to the main page for almost two years. Also, it’s very strange to argue that we’re raising the bar when we’ve already rejected multiple other similar events with even wider coverage at some point simply because the pandemic appears on the main page. However, it was a huge mistake that the box on the pandemic was removed from the top of the ITN section because we could’ve easily added a link to Protests over responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in order to accommodate this and other similar events. Of course, there are exceptions if a protest turns violent or results in a government change, but then the consequences make a strong argument for posting, not the protest itself.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Let's put the box back up. GreatCaesarsGhost 18:07, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I assumed we were talking about the minimum casualties bar (seemingly set at two by your vote). I agree these are COVID-related complications. But I could see an exception made if enough people agree the inflated coverage, big honking trucks and Canadian content set this dissimilar event apart. Ignoring other cases works for recent deaths. Why not everything? I'll support the box. Just not bloodshed. InedibleHulk (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I deliberately mentioned "casualties" and "Trudeau's resignation" to hint at the exception and keep this alive. I could've easily dismissed it by arguing that COVID-19 pandemic in ongoing is enough but decided to give it a chance in case something happens compared to other similar protests.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:43, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think I appreciate your efforts at flexibility. All I intended by listing three other differences was that physical violence and federal politics aren't the only ways for activists to be noticed. Cheers! InedibleHulk (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per Canadianerk, though the blurb should have some mention of what the protests are in reaction to. Morgan695 (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Declaration of emergency in a G7 capital because police can't clear out thousands of protestors occupying the downtown core for over a week. Protests have now also spread to multiple international crossings with the US. Blurb needs to mention cause of protests as mentioned above. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 18:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per discussion. An extended prominent and newsworthy protest. Randy Kryn (talk) 18:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posting As noted, this is a top story as it is not "just" a protest, but an extended civil unrest that has disrupted the capital of a G7 nation. It is being covered around the world. Arguments of "the nomination was SNOWED last week" and "it's local" don't hold weight. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-Posting Comment Not pushing for a...pull, I guess, but I feel this was sorta railroaded. As much as the fact that this is "extended", "disruptive", and in "the capital of a G7 nation, I fail to see how that alone makes it deserving of posting. Many of the protests we post involve mass arrests or firing on protesters. As far as I can see no one has been killed, and all of 14 people in a protest of potentially tens of hundreds have been arrested. The idea that this specific event will fuel others is speculative, and it certainly isn't the first noted protest recently, much less since the start of the pandemic. As for the claims that other protests globally or even domestically were caused by this, that is speculation. I would, at the very least, lean Neutral on this and more likely oppose than support such a posting unless there was serious fallout (either solidly more arrests, shooting, or resignation of key officials within the Federal Government of Canada). Just my two cents, but I think this needs to be said in regards to posts like this going forward (because we know this won't be the last nomination of this type). DarkSide830 (talk) 20:58, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    DarkSide830, I posted it because (a) it's in the news, (b) it has substantial RS coverage, (c) it has a high quality article, and (d) the opposition is not convincing. There is no WP:MINIMUMDEATH requirement for posting, nor does it need to be connected to any past or future events which would be WP:CRYSTAL assumptions anyway. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:07, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I get it, it's just simply a matter of myself not being as convinced as others about some of these criteria. That I why I chose not to vote, I simply figured that I could at least add a little something worthwhile to the debate. DarkSide830 (talk) 02:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pull, nothing actually happening, embarrassing, clearly did not have consensus. Abductive (reasoning) 21:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Abductive, as I said, most of those opposing votes have no weight. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    So, if I proposed posting 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis. and then everybody said, "but nothing's happening", they have no weight because they all said the same thing? Just embarrassing. Abductive (reasoning) 21:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    So now people agreeing with each other has no weight? I thought that was the definition of trying to acheive a consensus... but yet again, another North American article is given favourable treatment.... Joseph2302 (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting concern. The blurb is vague. Is it referring to Mayor Jim Watson's declaration of a state of emergency in the city? There has also been discussion of Premier Doug Ford declaring a provincial state of emergency. It would be good to clarify who is doing the declaring. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 21:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pull. Not a significant event; while coverage has been broad, it is a localized protest that has had no real impact outside of inconveniencing the city it is being held in. I also don't believe that consensus was reasonably assessed - per Wikipedia:In the news#Significance it is highly subjective whether an event is considered significant enough, and given that I don't believe the closer presented sufficient reason to decide that most of those opposing votes have no weight. BilledMammal (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pull per above. Not of sufficient significance, and it doesn't look like there is consensus for it. Slightly confused as to why Oppose votes have been deemed to have "no weight". It's just a subjective decision like most others.  — Amakuru (talk) 23:34, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Amakuru, WP:ITSLOCAL and "it was SNOWED a week ago" have no weight – Muboshgu (talk) 00:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Muboshgu: WP:ITSLOCAL doesn't appear to apply here; it's an argument to avoid in deletion discussions, as locality doesn't affect notability, but it can affect significance when we are considering an article inclusion ITN. As for the sole argument that referenced the previous WP:SNOW discussion, their position was not that this should be rejected because it "SNOWED a week ago", but because they do not believe there has been any change in significance since then, which is an appropriate argument and should not be given no weight. BilledMammal (talk) 01:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    BilledMammal, when I say ITSLOCAL, I'm referring to what it says above. #Please do not... oppose an item because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. This applies to a high percentage of the content we post and is unproductive. And, WP:CCC, so relying on a close from last week has no relevance either. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    See this. BilledMammal (talk) 02:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pull Not significant per above. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 00:16, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pull delibrately ignoring one set of people is not objective. Not enough evidence has been given of a significant impact of this to gain an actual consensus for posting (if you actually ibjectively look for a consensus rather than declaring half the votes as apparently invalid). Joseph2302 (talk) 00:21, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    You've already opposed, so you're effectively !voting twice. Pawnkingthree (talk) 00:50, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Nope, complaining about the method of how something is posted is different from supporting/opposing the nomination in the first place. They are completely different, stop trying to use bureaucracy to annoy. Joseph2302 (talk) 04:32, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    You'll notice that none of the other editors who used a bolded "Pull" had previously expressed an opinion on the nom. Pawnkingthree (talk) 10:00, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I did not deliberately ignore a set of people, I deliberately ignored votes that have no policy basis, which is how consensus is formed. It's not a vote count. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Major protests generating international headlines and influencing anti-public health sentiments in other parts of the world. [3] Clearly no longer just a local story. Pawnkingthree (talk) 00:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Local news arguments and last week's situation should be discounted (not all Opposes). One is not true and the other is irrelevant. Significance is explained in various article sections. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:48, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Although I obviously see articles biased to my location local to this protest, it has seen numerous articles about it in numerous international news sources within the current 24-hour cycle, such as Al Jazeera, The Guardian, The Daily Mail, Washington Post, Times of India, New York Times... I could go on. However, I think that it may be worth discussing adding Protests over responses to the COVID-19 pandemic to ongoing if there is such a divide over singling out the Canadian one. - Floydian τ ¢ 01:04, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Using the DM should automatically disqualify this, but even then, this is a COVID story, and thus covered under the COVID ongoing, it does not need any more special attention as much as any other COVID story presented over the past 2-some years. --Masem (t) 01:18, 9 February 2022 (UTC)x[reply]
      • Mangeshkar's death was a COVID story, too, no DQ. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        • Of course it wasn't. It was about her contribution to Bollywood and Indie's entertainment industry and the recognition of it in her death. And in this case, at least myself and others are acknowledging if this turned violent or caused a major political shift like Trudeau's resignation, that would make it a blurb as that goes beyond a simple COVID story. But right now its typical - beyond the fact its not in the US and in a major city center - of demonstrations that have gone on for the last two years rejecting mask and vaccine mandates from COVID. --Masem (t) 01:31, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Also to remind editors: we don't care how much coverage a story gets (as we are not a news ticker) only that it is in the news to quality for posting. There are lots of stories that get widespread international coverage on the day-to-day that do not make sense for ITN to cover as the topic likes encyclopedic significance (but can be covered at the Current Events portal). --Masem (t) 01:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • How does one determine the significance of a story without looking at how much coverage it is getting? Just use our own personal biases? Pawnkingthree (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        • We consider 1) what's already in the box such as ongoing stories and 2) consider what are enduring stories that likely have long-term encyclopedic impact rather thhan news impact. That requires using news as sopurces but not necessarily the same weight that news gives the topics. And we also should work to eliminate systematic bias resulting from the majority of news sources heavily covering Western events. --Masem (t) 01:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good for people deciding to post this. I recommend once this drops out of the blurb timeframe, the Protests over responses to the COVID-19 pandemic should be considered to be added to ongoing. 188.27.42.181 (talk) 01:21, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for now. Until it inspires something of meaningful historical note. Also, as a minor note: the state of emergency was declared on February 6, not the 8th. So, this nomination is under the incorrect date, as I understand it? I don't know if that matters anymore now that it's already on the front page right now. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 01:54, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Is the liberation of France meaningful or minor? InedibleHulk (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The point above is that protests related to covid, unless they turn violent or create direct political results, are effective covered by the covid ongoing. I would agree that if world wide protests grew to a size similar to the BLM protests of 2020, then there might be something more, but these collectively still aren't very big and haven't changed politics yet. --Masem (t) 19:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    You're projecting things. Parasol's major point was only about waiting till it inspired something of meaningful historical note, which I believe The New York Times suggests this potential French revolution already is, by virtue of fitness to print in America. If you don't want to answer my question and only interrupt, that's fine, I'll assume you chose "minor". InedibleHulk (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Then you are talking about speculation about something major happening from this, which ITN also does not use as a metric. Even if major RSes suggest it is a major effect, we are still looking for something more significant and quantifiable. --Masem (t) 19:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    No, I already told you what we (not you) were talking about. Meaningful historical note. If you can't pay attention, don't play along, and don't invent other people's positions (opponents or proponents). InedibleHulk (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: For me? I do not believe it of meaningful historical note yet. The NYT article also points out similar protests in Paris over the summer. One confirmed copy-cat in a city that has a history of protests against restrictions doesn't move my position at the moment. I may change my mind by the time the Paris protests officially commune on Friday, depends. These other mentioned calls to action in the article are promising candidates for changing my oppose here. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 01:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for elaborating on that. InedibleHulk (talk) 02:51, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I will make one last comment here. I saw support votes with good rationale and opposing votes that dismissed this as "local" and "parochial", or by not meeting a certain threshold of casualties and PM resignations. If another admin wants to pull this, they can. I will not as I think there is still a consensus in favor, though it is weaker now than it was when I posted it. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:20, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pull -- This should not have been posted, there was not consensus at the time of posting. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 03:00, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It is clear that there is and was no consensus to post this, with the consensus only being seen by giving no weight to certain !votes despite no policy or guideline based reason to do so. However, the posting admin is unwilling to withdraw this and that raises the question of where to take this next; the normal location would be WP:AN, but that process is too long for ITN. BilledMammal (talk) 04:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pulled, the tide has turned on consensus for this story. Stephen 04:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-pulling comment – Significance trumps coverage. – Sca (talk) 13:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Significance can only be determined by coverage; there is no other source of evidence. I can only know about things by reading them. --Jayron32 13:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    No, ITN only requires a minimum bar of coverage for inclusion, the rest of it becomes a matter of discussion and consensus of where the topic fits into our goal as an encyclopedia, to cover topics from across the globe and from all areas of interest, and to avoid systematic biases that come from 24/7 news coverage of politics, entertainment, and sports that primarily favor the Western world. Using "Significance being proportion to coverage" is the road to ITN being a news ticker. Of course, the more coverage something has, the better quality article I expect to see. And we still have Current Events portal linked into the box for all other major news stories. --Masem (t) 13:30, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Please stop inventing things I never said, and then contradicting the thing I never said, and then pretending like that somehow contradicts me. I would have hoped you were better than that. What I said was that I need to read sources to learn about the significance of things. The coverage of an event is where I learn about its significance. To ignore the source material (coverage) seems counter to Wikipedia's core ethos. I don't matter. My opinion doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is what I can demonstrate by evidence in reliable source material. --Jayron32 15:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Further the affiant sayeth naught. 'Cuz it's all been said before. Bonne journée, mes amis.Sca (talk) 14:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is amazing how stark the differences of schools of thought are between Jayron32 and Masem, and how they alternately dominate the discourse surrounding ITN nominations, depending both on local consensus and the presence of participants. I'm reminded of the stark dichotomies of Plato vs Aristotle. WaltCip-(talk) 15:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't hear anyone suggest that Canada was a third-world country. As far as I recall, this (3,700-word) discussion was about a contrived truck traffic jam in Canada and its perceived significance elsewhere. – Sca (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unless we're planning to post every time any city declares a state of emergency, posting this based on the state of emergency is a WP:BIAS in my opinion. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My point is that Ottawa (being the capital of Canada) declaring a state of emergency due to civil unrest (not due to a storm or flood, etc.) is a significant event in a developed country like Canada. STSC (talk) 19:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sca: "Significance trumps coverage." could you please link to the relevant policy which cites that criteria? Thanks. --LaserLegs (talk) 00:40, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep pulled. Are we supposed to post every little thing that happens in every city in every country, just because a state of emergency has been declared? I don't think so. This is essentially a traffic jam in Ottawa, and unless they overthrow the entire government of Canada, this has no significant impact on any country. Fakescientist8000 (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support re-posting - This is the powder keg issue of the year for Canada with reverberations large and small. I understand there was some deliberate look-away by the media at the beginning but even international sources now cover this extensively.CoatCheck (talk) 19:04, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep pulled Just because a state of emergency has been declared in one city does not mean that this event is significant enough to post on ITN. If there was actual rioting with large scale damage to property or people, I would reconsider. Chaosquo (talk) 19:35, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    You seem to be judging this very complex story solely on the proposed blurb, not even the pulled one. I ask you click the link and reconsider after reading at least some of everything else beside the (unprecedented) state of emergency. Not mandatory, though! InedibleHulk (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The event is also globally significant because of the vaccination issues involved. It really concerns all other countries and I think they would be observing closely such impacts of implementing the vaccination policies during this pandemic. STSC (talk) 20:06, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This has been true throughout the pandemic, though. All sorts of momentous things have occurred which under normal circumstances, as isolated events, would merit posting but which become ongoing and widespread in these highly unusual times. This is why we have the sticky ongoing link to COVID-19 (and earlier, the special box, which I opposed removing) and we don't keep posting individual stories.  — Amakuru (talk) 22:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
4,300 words. – Sca (talk) 20:32, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – The AP, in an update filed around 19:50, reported that Alberta, Saskatchewan, Quebec and Prince Edward Island have announced plans to roll back some or all Covid precautions – Sca (talk) 20:49, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Ontario doesn't care! InedibleHulk (talk) 21:03, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    WOW! WaltCip-(talk) 21:03, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Comments above were made when there was only one proposed blurb. The altblurb was added on 9 February 2022‎ at 23:55 UTC, with diff Chrisclear (talk) 04:28, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Re-post the posting admin was correct in their assertion that opposed based on "not internationally significant" are invalid as we have specific guidance against that consideration. The posting admin was also correct in dismissing opposes based solely that the previous nomination had been closed (laughably in just four hours by someone who was later involved in opposing this nom). If WP:CONSENSUS is not just a !vote count, then there was conensus to post at the time it was done. Conseqeuntially pull !votes contesting that the original consensus was invalid are themselves invalid and thus there is still strong consensus to post this item. --LaserLegs (talk) 00:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Re-post with copycat protests in New Zealand, France, and Australia ([4]), this is worth posting. Banedon (talk) 02:22, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose both proposed blurbs The first blurb specifically mentions a state of emergency in Ottawa. However the States of emergency in Canada article shows that various parts of Canada have entered a state of emergency quite frequently, with 2015 being the most recent year when this did not take place. It's a quasi-routine action taken by the executive branch of government. If anything is to be posted, then it should be the reason for the state of emergency, not the state of emergency itself.
  • The second blurb mentions that the Canadian protests are inspiring similar protests worldwide. This claim is highly dubious. The non-Canadian protests are barely mentioned in the Freedom Convoy 2022 article, and the sources provided allude to causation, when it's merely spurious correlation. While there may be some truth to this claim, similar protests have been taking place for months in other countries. I don't see why the Canadian protests are particularly notable compared those taking place in other countries around the world. I would be more open to a nomination for Protests over responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Chrisclear (talk) 05:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I think the six sources currently crammed in the middle paragraph of "Other protests" vouch for inspiration, if not causation, often using forms of that word (in various languages). Pedestrian protests are old hat. Canada got the convoy ball rolling, at least in this era. And disaster emergencies are normal. But protest emergencies are new. InedibleHulk (talk) 04:50, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for pointing out those six sources, four of which I overlooked previously. However I'm struggling to see why a "convoy protest" is more notable than a pedestrian protest. Chrisclear (talk) 05:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Trucks are larger, louder and harder to move than people. Truckers are also somewhat notorious for their ability to take a seat and withstand boredom for the long haul. All fine attributes for real extended persuasion, in my eyes. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:15, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • As a comment, the alt blurb (relating the dropping of mandates) is improper correlation with causation. While news sources reported the dropping of mandates and mention the convoy in the same article, I've not seen any specific statement that specifically states the mandates were being dropped due to the convoy. There's a possiblility that may be the case, but we can't jump that leap of logic. So it is is bad synthesis for us to even approach that. --Masem (t) 05:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I said "as", suggesting only correlation, nothing like "because". InedibleHulk (talk) 05:18, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Which is leading to synthesis given the lack of space for context, it creates the impression to the reader "B happened because of A". --Masem (t) 05:22, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't understand what you mean by space for context. If you can add it, go ahead. We can't be held responsible for people who read too fast or replace the written conjunctions in their heads, though, that's on them. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Is As the Freedom Convoy 2022 inspires similar protests worldwide, four provinces scrap COVID-19 vaccination mandates in Canada any clearer, with a comma between A and B? InedibleHulk (talk) 06:25, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, however then I (and maybe other editors too?) would question the notability/significance of a sub-national government deciding to end vaccination mandates. Chrisclear (talk) 06:36, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    They're four governments, each with a separate monarchy, equal to the federal government's under the Crown. Canada is hard to explain sometimes. I give up for now. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:46, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose second blurb because it implies the provinces dropped the vaccine mandates due to the protests, when it is readily evident to anyone who does any research that the vaccine mandates were on course for being dropped anyways. I don't like the first blurb either simply because of its emphasis on the "state of emergency". There are many municipal states of emergency in Canada every year (e.g. Toronto declares one every time a bad snowstorm hits); the previously linked article States of emergency in Canada only bothers listing provincial ones because municipal emergencies are not newsworthy, as this one is. I am not opposed to a blurb about the protests that sticks to the facts, for example: "Anti-vaccine mandate protests in Ottawa, Canada, inspire other protests across the country which shut down major highways and international border crossings." However, I'd like to point out that these protests are not dissimilar from the 2020 Canadian pipeline and railway protests, which did not get posted to ITN. NorthernFalcon (talk) 06:32, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

February 7

Armed conflicts and attacks

Health and environment

Politics and elections


(Posted) RD: Bruce Owen

Article: Bruce Owen (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CTV News; Barrie Advance; BarrieToday.com
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 21:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Abhijatabhivamsa

Article: Abhijatabhivamsa (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC Burmese, Eleven Media
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Htanaungg (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Jerome Chazen

Article: Jerome Chazen (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): WWD
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: one of the founders of Liz Claiborne, former chair Star Mississippi 18:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Cyclone Batsirai

Proposed image
Article: Cyclone Batsirai (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Cyclone Batsirai sweeps through Madagascar (Post)
Alternative blurb: Cyclone Batsirai makes landfall in Madagascar, displacing at least 45,000 people and leading to at least 20 deaths.
News source(s): BBC; NPR; ABC, Guardian, AlJazeera, DW
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: The BBC says "whole villages swept away" which sounds dramatic. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm more interested in the choice of picture, which is worth 1000 words. Here's some alternative views which also show Madagascar.
Andrew🐉(talk) 13:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As of 15:30, BBC, Guardian, AlJazeera, DW and our Madagascar article said "at least 10." ReliefWeb, a UN organization, said "at least 20." – Sca (talk) 15:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
growing distracting --Jayron32 20:09, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
  • It should be noted that we post lots of blurbs about events where no one dies. There is no requirement that a certain number of people die before it becomes main page worthy. The Winter Olympics, for example, was posted, and I'm not aware of any deaths there. If you wish there to be such a standard, please start a discussion somewhere and establish consensus for your new standard. --Jayron32 11:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think I need to clarify that I was referring to natural disasters and attacks on people… _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 12:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Where would you put that number and why? WaltCip-(talk) 13:19, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    There are no standard number of deaths for "natural disasters and attacks on people". I did not qualify the types of articles in my response because I wanted to be as inclusive as possible. There are no standard number of deaths at all on any kind of article, which would include "natural disasters and attacks on people". If you wish to establish such a standard, start a discussion and get a consensus for it. Otherwise, there's no valid, policy-based reason to object to a standard you made up that doesn't exist. --Jayron32 15:19, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • For God's sake...you are long time users in Candidates, are you really surprised by what I am saying? In all nominations related to disasters, their viability has been questioned depending on the number of deaths and damages they cause. And it doesn't matter if this is written as a standard or not. Considering the inclusion of, for example, an earthquake that only results in the death of one or two people, rips away the sense of notability/ITN worthy of MP. I will not open a debate on something that is always under debate in every nomination of this type. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 15:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    You have stated there is a "minimum standard" that this nomination does not meet. You did not specify where that minimum standard is, thereby making your argument 100% conjecture. WaltCip-(talk) 16:16, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    As WaltCip says, can you show me the place where I can read about this minimum standard you keep alluding to? I'd like to apply it fairly myself, but first I would need to read about it so I know what it is. --Jayron32 16:25, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can show you where I say that these "standards" are not written: a few lines above. Even in Law, there are things that are done as a "standard" even if they are not written. By custom, as a result of consensus. And this is the case: nominations related to disasters tend to prosper or not depending on the number of fatalities they cause. You can look it up for yourselves in the previous nominations that have taken place, in many of them you have even participated in the debate. I can't be any clearer than that. This debate is ridiculous. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, AlJazeera attributes 20+ toll to unnamed "officials" – officials of what it doesn't say. – Sca (talk) 13:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: