User talk:Strikerforce/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Re: Twinkle

  • If you're here to alert me to something that I did incorrectly using Twinkle, feel free to also trout me in good humor! I've only just begun to use it and am bound to make a mistake here and there until I get the hang of it! Strikerforce (talk) 01:35, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

`

DYK for B96 Pepsi SummerBash

Gatoclass (talk) 02:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

IkoniqueOS

Thanks for the further explanation on IkoniqueOS to this new editor. I noticed you added some supportive text for the prod to the talk page there. Did you want to add a {{Proposed deletion endorsed}} (or {{prod-2}}) to the main page as well? Might make it clearer for the closing admin.--RadioFan (talk) 18:15, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Done I may try to tackle it later today or tomorrow to see if I can help out the cause, but my initial Google search didn't look promising. Strikerforce (talk) 18:30, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Radiofan RfA

Hi, it may be a leftover in my browser cache but it looks as if you still need to update the time parser function :) --Kudpung (talk) 23:51, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

I see that, but I'm afraid my attempts to do so are blowing the template out of whack! Would you be willing to assist? This is my first nomination and I don't want to mess anything up. Strikerforce (talk) 23:56, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Not to worry, it looks as if someone has done it. I'll tell you what though if it's any consolation - when I transcluded my own RfA last week, it was one of the hairiest transcludes I ever did :) --Kudpung (talk) 00:07, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
I attempted it, but it appears that I didn't do something correctly, as it is showing up as "Pending closure" in the RfA report template on my user page?? Strikerforce (talk) 00:12, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

RfA

On my RfA, you stated "Oppose Regrettably so, but I just don't see the need for the candidate to have the tools, given their stated purpose for running". I have to say that I am quite confused by what you say, especially as all three of the areas that I stated that I intend to work in do use admin tools (AIV, RfPP, CSD). Although I currently make reports to those areas, and having been doing so for quite a while, without admin tools, it is the administrators who respond to those reports, and I've frequently noticed backlogs there. Could you please explain what you meant by your statement? --Slon02 (talk) 23:22, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Yes, in order to actually delete / protect pages, you'd need the mop, but I have concerns with some of your work in CSD, as referenced by a couple of other editors in the discussion. Strikerforce (talk) 23:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
I see. In that case, I'll direct you to the same CSD log that I showed other editors with the same concerns. Hopefully the 100% accuracy in it will persuade you, but if not, then I'll respect your right to oppose. --Slon02 (talk) 00:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, but I can not support at this time. Your attempt to come here to persuade me to change my mind is rather troubling, in my opinion. I view it as bad taste for a candidate to attempt conversation with a goal of changing the mind of editors who have offered oppose statements to their RfA on pages other than the RfA page itself. Strikerforce (talk) 07:40, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
The reason I do so is because all of these things have already been stated here, and I assumed that it is likely that some editors may have stopped paying attention to the discussion after the first day of their posting. --Slon02 (talk) 12:05, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I have to agree with Strikerforce. My own recent RfA was going very badly at one stage but I would never have considered attempting to sway opinion outside the RfA discussion itself. It does not bode well for discussions such as AfD etc, that you would be involved in as an admin. Kudpung (talk) 14:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)


Post close

Regarding this, please don;t worry too much about it. I was actually writing a comment without a !vote (but leaning keep) when it was closed. I tend to agree with many of the editors saying keep but it was understandable that you thought there was a chance it was not worthy of an article. Glad you got to say your piece and it sucks that some assumed the worst.Cptnono (talk) 07:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Well Done!

Excellent work welcoming people! Keep up the good efforts! A Very Manly Man (talk) 07:42, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! Strikerforce (talk) 07:44, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


Talkback

Hello, Strikerforce. You have new messages at Avicennasis's talk page.
Message added 16:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Also, thanks for offering to help the students in my absence. :) I appreciate it. Avicennasis @ 16:00, 9 Adar II 5771 / 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi! As Baba Shukla, it was deleted 11 Mar 2011. I don't think there's a CSD tag for that, tho. --Shirt58 (talk) 08:02, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I'd noticed that it had been previously deleted, which is why I deleted my original tag and changed rationale. But, you can't use the previously deleted material rationale for something that was speedy'd, which is something that I have trouble remembering until after the fact :) Thanks for the note! Strikerforce (talk) 08:03, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Oops, sorry for telling you stuff yolu already knew. It has always puzzled me why there doesn't seem to be any way of flagging that something has been speedied previously. Want to take it up at the Village Pump? Me neither. --Shirt58 (talk) 08:23, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Oh, no need to apologize. I didn't intend for it come across as being irritated or anything like that... my apologies if it did. Strikerforce (talk) 08:51, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
No problem at all. Just part of my inadvertant project to become the first user to be blocked for long-term sickly-sweet, over the top, hyper-civility. I send thank-you's to bots and sockpuppets, even. My full apologies if my comments have caused you any concerns whatsoever. (HMoG, I'm doing it again... ) --Shirt58 (talk) 09:21, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

G-WAN

I applaud your self-editing decision to remove the prod on G-WAN. While the snow is gathering on the AFD for the G-WAN (Web server), the article creater is already agitated enough, no need to make it worse. Good call on the sock puppet report as well.--RadioFan (talk) 14:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! We'll see what ends up happening at AfD. It looks like the sock report was declined, though. Strikerforce (talk) 00:52, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

RFC discussion of User:Bugapi

A request for comments has been filed concerning the conduct of Bugapi (talk · contribs). You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Bugapi. -- RadioFan (talk) 18:37, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Have endorsed the statement, as provided. I didn't see anything else for me to add, at this time. Strikerforce (talk) 18:50, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thanks for the quick attention. Hope I got it all, or at least the important points. Not sure what will come from this discussion but at least it gets it all down in one place.--RadioFan (talk) 18:53, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Wiselittleowl

I've detagged it because I don't think your reason complies with WP:NOTCSD, Criterion 1. Actually, I'm trying to find out what the heck db-reason IS there for. I think I've only ever got away with a couple of them, and I can't remember why... It only seems to work if you use a valid CSD reason, and there are tags for them already. Anyway, if this user starts holding loving conversations with a beloved, there could be further action available. As it stands, it's just a comment that doesn't even have a suspicion of an attack in it. Or spam. If it were in mainspace, it would go under context. On a userpage, we can't use that. Ah well.... Peridon (talk) 23:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

How does the current content not fail Wikipedia is not Facebook? Not trying to argue with you, just curious how you can justify removing the CSD. Strikerforce (talk) 23:36, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Please feel free to argue. I'm working from
"The following are not by themselves sufficient to justify speedy deletion.
1. Reasons based on Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Wikipedia is not: "a dictionary", "an indiscriminate collection of information", "a crystal ball", "a how-to list", etc."
And "Simple use as a personal web page is not in itself a speedy deletion criterion, although clear advertising and promotional use is." (From Wikipedia:User_pages#Deleting_others.27_user_pages. I used to enjoy battles with evangelists where I would counter their Bible quotes with my Bible quotes. There's probably scope for a similar game with Wikipedia policies. Your turn.... :) Peridon (talk) 23:52, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Counterargument, from What Wikipedia is not:
"Personal web pages. Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they may be used only to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account."
I ask you, good sir, what is the "information relevant..." in "Dylan Campbell is the love of Taylor Payne's life"? If you ask me, the two policies that we are using seem to counteract each other and send us in circles. LOL Strikerforce (talk) 00:03, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
I find the userpages policy confusing - "Generally, you should avoid substantial content on your user page that is unrelated to Wikipedia" and "usually one's user page has something about oneself". This is hardly substantial, and presumably the Owl is one or the other of the two lovebirds. Tag it again with 'per discussion on my talk page' in the summary, and see what someone else thinks. Whatever happens, we'll learn something. Previously, I would happily slap tags on to see what happened. Now, I'm having to learn to be more legalistic (without getting hidebound...). Peridon (talk) 00:24, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Nah, I won't tag it again. Big picture, it's not that big of a deal, you know? If I were wagering, I'd bet that the editor is probably young (under 13 or 14, most likely), in love for the first time, and wants the world to know about it. Pretty harmless. We were all that young once, right? I'll probably just leave a gentle note on their talk page about it and call it a night (especially since I'm about to head to a BBQ place to watch my beloved Illinois Fighting Illini play in the NCAA Tournament tonight... hopefully they don't choke, but I'm not holding my breath). Thanks for the discussion! :) Strikerforce (talk) 00:30, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Have a good time. Always willing to engage in an argument a discussion (except when I've got to be up at 4 in the morning... Peridon (talk) 00:36, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Incorrect External Link Notation in Mark Boerebach Article

Sorry for the misunderstanding, I think rather it being an external link, it can be added to the references, and noted as it coming from National Nine News, from memory, I think it aired on Wednesday 22nd October 2008. Thanks Whitewater111 (talk) 09:48, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Replying on user's talk page, in order to keep conversation in one place. Strikerforce (talk) 09:49, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Help request

I would appreciate it if an administrator or bureaucrat who may be online would review this edit[1] and advise me of any recourse that may be permissible. If necessary, I can be contacted off-Wiki via email. Strikerforce (talk) 06:28, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm not an admin or bureaucrat, but I think this is resolved as best it can be. Please raise it again if it becomes an issue. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 07:09, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Watseka wonder

i know that the forums are not considered as a reliable source but i mentioned it because of a reliable article(setevenson report) and his quotes were mentioned in it.--Navid1366 (talk) 06:51, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

This a stevensons report http://www.archive.org/stream/watsekawondersta00stev --Navid1366 (talk) 06:58, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Then source the report, not the forum. The forum is not a reliable source and can be removed from the article at any time. Strikerforce (talk) 07:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thanks please help me more in the future and please removed the deletion tagsNavid1366 (talk) 07:58, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
I will gladly assist you further! However, the deletion tag can not be removed. Once an article is nominated for deletion via the AfD process, the debate there must be allowed to run its course. Strikerforce (talk) 07:59, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
I added it as an inline citation and in addition to previous sources i added another one in common style--91.99.15.58 (talk) 09:46, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on List of number-one hits (WorldWide). I disagree with the speedy deletion of List of number-one hits (WorldWide)because This does not duplicate the individual country lists, or any other article, so this does not meet the CSD criteria. Questions such as "Is this necessary?" are ones for AfD, not speedy deletion.. You should therefore not retag List of number-one hits (WorldWide) for speedy deletion. You are, of course, free to tag the article with {{prod}} or nominate it at WP:AFD. Thryduulf (talk) 17:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Meh. No big deal. I may nom for deletion via AfD, at some point, but I also might not. I'll keep an eye on it and see how it develops. At the outset, however, it would seem that it duplicates existing lists. Strikerforce (talk) 18:04, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
I don't think it does duplicate existing lists, as this is a single worldwide list (or rather an index of such lists by year) rather than lists per country. Thryduulf (talk) 18:14, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
That could be the case, yes. I see someone has already nominated it for deletion, though. I wouldn't mind seeing what the original author was going to do with it.--Strikerforce (talk) 18:19, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

barn star

thats my pleasure because of your attention about my job in Wikipedia and this honor.thanksNavid1366 (talk) 23:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

I wish to ask your opinion of The Possessed (2009 film). As a two-sentence stub undergoing active editing, and without any tagging for concerns, it was nominated for deletion just three hours after creation.[2] Over the following few hours, the article has been expanded, sourced, and is looking far more suitbale for inclusion in Wikipedia.[3] Might you have advice for further improvement? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:26, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

I will look it over and offer an opinion.--Strikerforce (talk) 03:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

The Possessed (2009 film)

The main reason of the creation of this page was the the relation between this article and Watseka wonder. because a person which is interested in spiritual possession could access at least to visionary example of real incident.you know that most of the spiritual movies and stories are fake and in fact are worthless and also this article could help other people to get more knowledge about paranormal subjects specially for the people who can not spend their time for reading the Dr stevensons booklet.--Navid1366 (talk) 08:26, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

That's fine and honorable, but I still do not believe the film is notable. Sorry, but my commentary at the AfD discussion stands as is, unless someone can provide evidence to convince me otherwise. Strikerforce (talk) 08:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
I am not talking about notability, i'm talking about the relation between these two articles and also i have read the wikipedia policy about movie notability but again i could not understand why you mentioned that this article can not satisfy the wikipedia policies.--Navid1366 (talk) 08:38, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Block of Bugapi

I'm not sure what, if anything can be done, but I would also strongly recommend considering a block of the IP addresses that the user has been editing under for most of the past five days or so. They can be found listed here. Strikerforce (talk) 13:00, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

I'd also recommend extending this block to a permanent one. This is a single purpose account focused on promotion of a web server product that this editor is associated with. In addition to the edit waring, violation of the 3-revert rule, this editor has is bent on disrupting the AFD on the article in question and has taken recommending deletion of an article on a competing product here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherokee (Webserver). No less than 5 editors have tried, in vain, to give this editor the benefit of the doubt and direct them towards more positive contributions. More details are available here: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Bugapi--RadioFan (talk) 15:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Agreed there Radiofan - extended to permanent block since that kind of nonsense is beyond acceptable. The 2 day block was intentionally short to allow some input in the deletion discussion, and to (hopefully) prevent a myriad of IP's all over the place. I admit that i was actually close to an indef before, but seeing the addition to the other deletion discussion, i believe that WP:RBI is the only way to go here, as is for any future IP's or socks. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 15:27, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Am I ready for an RFA?

Evaluate me. Do you think I'm ready to be an administrator? I have the following things on my resume here:

  • Reverted hundreds of vandalizing edits
  • Marked many pages for speedy deletion
  • Warned hundreds of users
  • Resolved conflicts at Wikiquette alerts
  • 2200+ edits
  • Acts like an admin in some situations
  • Roughly 50 edits per day
  • Reverts BLP violations

If this is not appropriate, please tell me. My request for admin coaching, just to let you know, has not been answered.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:34, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

At the moment, I would say no. "2200+" edits in almost three years on Wikipedia is not going to be judged as having enough experience by most commentators at RfA. It would be a great service to others, in the way of being able to evaluate you better, if you would opt-in to the monthly edit counts, though. You may do that by following the instructions here[4]. The recent warning given to you in regard to refactoring the comments of other users on talk pages is a red flag, as well. While I didn't click on the diffs to see exactly what was done, my reaction was the same as most - if not all - others would have upon seeing that... "this person isn't ready yet". Strikerforce (talk) 07:27, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
That discussion occured a month ago, and I have ceased doing it after that. I've also opted in to monthly edit counts-much of my edits have been in the last 4 or 5 months.Jasper Deng (talk) 19:39, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
I realize that the discussion was a month ago. However, it would still be a problem. Commentators at RfA will look back through at least six months of contributions and interactions, if not more. Something of that nature being so recent would bring in a flood of oppose votes. Do you spend time participating in the RfA debates? I would suggest doing so for quite some time before you give serious thought to running for adminship yourself, so that you can get a feel for what other people look for and the kinds of things that get brought into the discussions. If you'd like an easy way to keep track of RfA, feel free to copy the code from my user page for the RfA table. Strikerforce (talk) 19:48, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Thx. Did not know it was an automatic template.Jasper Deng (talk) 22:45, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Polam Hall

I've done what I could here to help the author. Have I moved it past the A1 threshhold? :D Dru of Id (talk) 10:46, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Yes. As a school, it is generally notable. At the time of my tagging, there was no indication of what - exactly - it was. Strikerforce (talk) 10:48, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Well, I'd at heard of Ann Jellicoe and seen her in something, and everyone has to have gone to school somewhere, though her article says she went there, it isn't sourced, and everything online seems to mirror us, as I'm finding more and more... Cheers. Dru of Id (talk) 10:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I must admit I was fixin' for feud as an WP:A7 when the article was started, but it seems the article has now got legs, and is now no longer a CSD candidate. --Shirt58 (talk) 11:22, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Was it anything specifically that changed your mind? :D Dru of Id (talk) 11:35, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
The general expansion of the article, specifically the assertion of what the subject actually was, would have made my original tagging - made very early in the article's history - invalid. Strikerforce (talk) 12:39, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
What Strikerforce said! --Shirt58 (talk) 08:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Hey

Hey buddy. I think this accounts has been logged into on all computers in the lab in the Wilbur Cross building at UConn. because i saw it on 2 computers and obviously someone was vandalizing from a third. The others are in use so I can't check them but you might want to see what's going on here. Thanks. Uconnjoseph (talk) 17:29, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Mmmhmm. Your edit history[5] suggests otherwise. Are you attempting to tell me that multiple computers are logged in to this account, all in the twenty minutes or so since its first edit? Sorry, but I don't buy that. Please stop your disruptive editing or you may be blocked without further warning. Strikerforce (talk) 17:31, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
(User has been blocked.) Strikerforce (talk) 17:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Men in Frocks with footballs

I've changed your csd to a prod - it's too coherent for 'nonsense' in the csd definition. That tag ought to be renamed 'gibberish' or something better, IMO. This'll end up at AfD, probably. Peridon (talk) 16:32, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

I don't think you can speedy for made up - I've been knocked back for trying it before. That's why I converted to prod here. Peridon (talk) 16:35, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
It's all good. There should be a few more tags available, in my opinion, because I often come across stuff that doesn't have a tag already established, but obviously doesn't belong here. Strikerforce (talk) 16:37, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
The argument from the other side is always that other things aren't as clear-cut, and there's always good ol' Mr Prod. Peridon (talk) 16:56, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
PROD takes too long for things that are blatantly obvious. Any new tags would explicitly be for things that are obvious and could be declined just as any other rationale can be. I don't know... I may give it some more thought and write up a proposal, at some point. We'll see.--Strikerforce (talk) 17:06, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you reverting it. I was just about to. I got a bit confused on the different sides on Huggle. :P nding·start 17:49, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

No worries. :) Strikerforce (talk) 17:50, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Yawn

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frocker Peridon (talk) 22:39, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

That didn't take long, now did it? Delete. Strikerforce (talk) 22:44, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Just seen your name in the awarded list for reviewer. Have you got rollback? Peridon (talk) 23:11, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
I do, yes. Strikerforce (talk) 02:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

that's my image!

Hey. U stole my image :) Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) (Shout!) 23:15, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

I borrowed your template. The image just happened to be there. GFDL at work! :) Strikerforce (talk) 02:26, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Artecombo

Hello Strikerforce, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Artecombo, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 01:01, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

It did no such thing when I tagged it. It won second prize at some competition... so? I still don't see how that passes muster. I also still stand by my assertion that it qualifies as G11, as well; "ArteCombo’s aim is to create bridges between music and other arts, as shown by the following examples" looks a lot like an advertising phrase rather than an encyclopedia entry, to me. I'm well aware of the criteria for speedy deletion, but thanks for the message. Strikerforce (talk) 02:23, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Ouch. Final line comes across awfully snarky. Not intended as such... I tag quite a few pages and have had a solid accuracy rate, to date. Everybody misses one every now and then, but that doesn't warrant a "you should review (read: educate yourself because you don't appear to know better) the criteria before you tag any further pages", in my opinion. I'm sure you were commenting in good faith, Logan, but it just rubbed me a bit sore. (Losing a wager on the Florida-Butler game tonight may also have me in a sour mood, as well... who knows..) Strikerforce (talk) 02:33, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

I have deproded Social competence

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Social competence, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Tideflat (talk) 19:06, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Lisa Hammond

You nominated this for deletion on the grounds that the article gave no indication of her notability and it was struck out before I had seen your tag. The article said that she is vice-chair of the Craft Potters Association. The CPA is the representative body for professional potters in the UK. If you doubt a subject's notability, but know nothing about the subject, it is common sense and courtesy to the editor who has created the article to do five minutes' research before recommending deletion. I am too busy to re-write the article now, and all I can say is that you should have read more carefully before placing this tag. Marshall46 (talk) 10:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

At the time of tagging, it did no such thing. Also, it would appear that my tag was correct, as the article was - in fact - deleted.Strikerforce (talk) 12:47, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Ian Gallagher

I've been trying to work with the other people on this issue but none of them are willing to come to any decision that isn't "no article there". If you have any suggestions on how to deal with three intractable people who blindly delete articles because they don't like them I'd be happy to hear about it because I can;t get past "no article here" and threats from any of them. Harley Hudson (talk) 17:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I would have to disagree with your assessment of the situation. You are edit warring, by the very definition of the phrase. Please see WP:3RR. --Strikerforce (talk) 17:33, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Whatever. Thanks for your insight, you really brought a lot to the table. Harley Hudson (talk) 17:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
You have accused three editors including myself of "threats", being unhelpful, ganging up on you etc.. we have offered to help but you said no, you only want it your way. You could create the article under a different name space. Like I said it needs more OOU information adding then. However an admin has now, kindly recreated the article under Ian Gallagher (Shameless). You have just talked to this editor in a very demeaning manner too.. so that is around 4 editors you have launched your insults onto.Rain the 1 BAM 17:46, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Re:Editor Review

I have done what you said. How am I doing now?--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 00:44, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

You're still heavy in the user talk space with over 60% of your edits thus far this month in that area. You've only made about 200 edits since your RfA, which is not really enough for me to offer a solid opinion. Reach out again when you get in the neighborhood of 2500 or so edits, which would be an additional 700 since your RfA. Strikerforce (talk) 00:48, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
My User talk page space editing is now only 41%--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 21:03, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Edit War on Matt Painter

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.--174.253.20.207 (talk) 17:03, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Ummm... no? It's a page with Pending Changes protection. Unless I am mistaken, this is not a situation where 3RR would apply. Strikerforce (talk) 17:12, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
3 reverts is 3 reverts. You don't get to pick and choose. I have reported you. --174.253.20.207 (talk) 17:16, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Well, that would be your right as an editor, I suppose. I'd be very surprised to see anything come of the report, but we'll see. Strikerforce (talk) 17:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
You are vandalizing Wikipedia. You will be blocked!--174.253.20.207 (talk) 17:22, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
As I said above, we'll see what action - if any - that an administrator decides to take. I'm curious, though, about one thing... you haven't made any other edits to the encyclopedia other than a report to AN/3 about me. What is your deal? Why are you so interested in interacting with me about a claim regarding a violation of policy that might not even be, in fact, a violation? Strikerforce (talk) 17:25, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Supreme Overlord of Knowledge, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Minimac (talk) 06:29, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Apparently you didn't read the edit summary that I used when I created the page, Minimac :-) 'Tis all good, though. Delete away! Strikerforce (talk) 06:36, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
CSD Removed per ApFaDa   «l| Promethean ™|l»  (talk) 06:35, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Userspace edit

Don't worry about the category that I removed for being red. I created it. The Wikipedians who use Chrome currently are you and me. Other than that, it's clear.--The Master of Mayhem 19:14, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Your comments on my page re Barry Bonds

You stated "Your edit summary on Barry BondsI do not appreciate the tone of your most recent edit summary on the Barry Bonds article. Per BLP, I was correct to undo your edit and request a citation. I was well aware, at the time of my edit, that the verdict had come in. All you had to do was provide that citation, which you could have done without adding the comment that you did. --StrikerforceTalk Review me! 21:58, 13 April 2011 (UTC)"

Your comments are out-of-line. You could have just as easily put a cite in, as you were apparently aware of the verdict. Failure to do so is conterproductive. Jvsett (talk) 23:33, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

I disagree with you. My edit was backed 100% by policy (one of the most strict policies that Wikipedia has). I made a simple request for a citation ("Citation, please", for anyone that may be reviewing this interaction at any future point). Your response of "See the news, please" comes across as snippy, disrespectful, and patronizing. For that reason, I left a comment on your talk page, simply pointing out that you may have been a bit uncivil (which, looking at a couple of other items on your talk page, appears to be a problem that you have had previously). In regard to the citation, I was aware of it, yes, thanks to my Twitter feed blowing up with "breaking news" comments about it, but I had yet to read an article about the verdict, myself. Thus, I did not have a citation readily available. In the interest of maintaining BLP compliance, I acted correctly. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 23:58, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
And I disagree with you. Regarding my comment "read the news," since you acknowledge you had full awareness of the fact Barry Bonds had been convicted, the proper edit would have been to add cite, not to remove an undisputed fact which simply was “He was convicted on April 13, 2011 on the obstruction of justice charge”. This is nothing controversial nor editorializing about this statement. Your reverting did not increase the utility of Wikipedia, nor comply with policy you cite. I note that another use added additional citation approximately one hour after my citation, which should have been done in your edit. Your inappropriate umbrage and continued posting on this matter is bewildering. You accuse me of being uncivil and personally attacked me on two different pages. I was neither uncivil nor attacked you. I did not make any disparaging remarks about you, which you continue to do. This is inappropriate. You continue inflame this situation for no apparent reason. Jvsett (talk) 01:56, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Per BLP, the burden is on the editor wishing to add or reinsert information to an article. Nothing about this is inappropriate. You were, in my opinion, uncivil in your edit summary. Step back and read it from my point of view... do you not see how it could be interpreted as a snippy, insulting comment? I very calmly stated my opinion that I did not appreciate the summary. You've chosen to escalate this into accusing me of being "inappropriate" and "bewildering" and "inflaming this situation for no apparent reason". StrikerforceTalk Review me! 05:26, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
My original edit was appropriate with the recent verdict. My revert and justification were also appropriate. You demanded citations in your revert; yet, you had actual knowledge of the truth of the conviction and with numerous citations available. These facts undermine the purpose of your revert. Your original revert and continued justification violates the WP:Common principle. As to the claims of inflaming, it was you who first stated that my tone is inappropriate on my talk page. This means you took time out of your busy schedule to reprimand me. When I responded, you then accused me of not following YOUR rules on my talk page, while simultaneously stating I am "a bit uncivil (which, looking at a couple of other items on your talk page, appears to be a problem that you have had previously)" on your own talk page. These three comments would be considered personal and direct attacks on my character. I believe this violates many Wikipedia rules. In any event, I disagree with these accusations. Now, I find a comment from 174.253.0.250 (talk) at 03:27, 14 April 2011 (UTC) (apparently out of Chicago, Illinois based on the location of the IP address) stating that I am "profane language deleted by SF." Based on your previous comments that you are monitoring my user talk page, you knew this comment had been posted. After this comment was posted, you then you accuse me of escalating the situation. This is simply untrue. At every stage highly prejudicial and loaded terms have been thrown against me. Please stop this harassment. Jvsett (talk) 06:40, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Harassment? Seriously? Do you really want to go there? I'll tell you what, if you think that I'm harassing you, then feel free to report me. In case you haven't figured it out yet, I'm more disappointed by the fact that you failed to recognize that my issue has been with your edit summary, not your edit, and the tone that the summary took. Are you aware of some of the reasons why Wikipedia's active contributor numbers are down over the past couple of years? As part of the new Wiki Guides program, I've been enlightened by some interesting information from User:Philippe that will be revealed in further detail in the coming weeks, but I will share this bit with you; snippy edit summaries - like the one that you provided - have a role in newcomers feeling bitten, on occasion, among other reasons. Civility is a problem here on Wikipedia, whether perceived or in reality. My point all along was that you could have used a more tone-neutral edit summary. In regard to the IP edit, I didn't see it until you pointed it out here. I have over 200 pages in my watchlist and since the conversation between us had migrated to my page rather than yours, I'd removed your talk page from my list. Are you trying to imply that I am the IP or simply that I, for some magical reason, had ignored the posted comment? StrikerforceTalk Review me! 06:55, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
You are right. Lack of civility on Wikipedia is an issue. Examples would probable include:
  • Reverting a good faith uncontentious edit when that the person reverting knows it is both verifiable and truthful.
My action was backed by BLP, as stated above. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 21:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Posting on another user’s page because a perceived slight.
Absolutely nothing wrong with this, considering that I did it in a calm manner that simply expressed my disappointment. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 21:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Making comments such as another user is “snippy, disrespectful, and patronizing,” along with being “uncivil”.
Please try putting yourself in my position and then try to tell me that you would not have felt the same way. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 21:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Creating and/or sanctioning (through an action or inaction) an atmosphere where another user is forced to endure profane language being posting about him or her on his or her user page. The use of profane language in that situation would be clear violation of WP:PA.
I have explained myself already. I had nothing to do with the profane post on your talk page, nor did I know anything about it until you brought it up on this page. Once our conversation had migrated here, I removed your talk page from my watchlist. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 21:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
All these would reasonably contribute to the problem of lack of civility on Wikipedia. All these actions could cause a person not to want to contribute to Wikipedia. As for the apparent graffiti, no, do I believe you posted it. This sentence doesn't make sense... at first read, it seems like you are saying that you don't believe that I posted it, but your next statement presents the appearance that you do believe that I did? StrikerforceTalk Review me! 21:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC) This is especially true in light of your warning to anonymous user in question, as seen here. I thank you for that; however, as you state “[t]his user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers.” As I have been around for about five years on Wikipedia, and do not believe Ihave not had this occur before, it is quite alarming it was posted in the middle of our discussion. I do not beleive it was just a random occurrence. Finally, I do apologize for posting the profane language in question on your user talk page; however, I believe an accurate quote is better than not providing one. Sincerely Jvsett (talk) 17:11, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
No apology is needed. You brought the comment here as a direct quote, not as a new comment. In the context of our conversation, it was necessary. Once I'd seen it and responded as needed, I removed it.StrikerforceTalk Review me! 21:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
I apologize. My sentence should have read, "I do not beleive you posted the grafitti". Sincerely Jvsett (talk) 21:31, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Acceptable blogs for Wikipedia use

Hey, Strikerforce. I just wanted to state that regarding this edit, I believe it falls into the category of reliable-source blogs, per Wikipedia:Verfiability#Newspaper and magazine blogs. It's not a newspaper blog source, but it is a news blog source. I'm sure we're both in agreement that a better source than zap2it.com can be found for that same information if it is notable, though. Flyer22 (talk) 09:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I'll agree with that. I'm still not convinced, though, that the "cover" shown on that website and the Twitter account associated with Lady Gaga is, in fact, the actual album cover. If the only source that we (and other websites) have is a TwitPic, that's pretty weak, in my opinion. As far as our article here on Wikipedia, I don't believe that we can use a TwitPic as an acceptable source. If we do it for this, that may set a dangerous precedent down the road. But, that's just my opinion as one editor, of course. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 09:10, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
No problem. I definitely understand your concerns. Flyer22 (talk) 15:07, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Oh, and regarding zap2it.com being a reliable source, I'm certainly not saying that all blogs reporting the news are reliable sources. I'm saying that it seems to fall in line with the professionalism aspect stated in the above link about using blogs on Wikipedia. I've seen zap2it.com used in plenty of articles, usually in regards to television (I even used it a couple of times for One Tree Hill (TV series) critical reception information months ago), and it's usually accepted as a reliable source. That makes me think that a blog coming from one of its writers reporting news is acceptable too. I'm not 100% on that. But, yeah, it's like you and I stated above. If this information is true/so notable, than a better source should be able to be found for it. Flyer22 (talk) 15:22, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

THANK YOU

I just wanted to say Thank you for clearing that up on my page. I really am glad you did that!

BiggKhrisco (talk) 09:38, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Regulate article

How is a direct interview with Warren G on the where the song was recorded considered an unreliable source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thadrd28 (talkcontribs) 02:05, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

YouTube fails RS. In this particular case, I don't necessarily disagree with you, but unfortunately, Wikipedia policies clearly state that YT should not be used as a source. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 04:10, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

My edits

Sorry about my vandalism the 1st thing was an accident and the whole urine poop thing was my STUPID 11 year old brother its ao andrewod here

Hmmm... quack? StrikerforceTalk Review me! 09:12, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Im serious i fixed the royal rumble anyway — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aoandrewod (talkcontribs) 11:22, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

copyright problem

Hi i read the Khalid Islambouli article and i found out it is incomplete and also unreliable. i have several pictures about this article but i have some problem about their copyrights.the pictures have been taken about over 30 years ago and all of them are in black and white the author and copyright permission of them is unknown but these pictures are unique and in low quality and also they have been spread through medias .could you help me how could i upload these pictures in wiki common and also how to put them in related articles.--Navid1366 (talk) 20:46, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Userspace edit

I have modified the Google Chrome category because chances are it will get merged.--The Master of Mayhem 12:08, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Erie Anime Experience

Hello Strikerforce. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Erie Anime Experience, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not an unambiguous copyright infringement, or there is other content to save. Thank you. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

As I have just said in reply to your comment at the AfD, the link on the page for the copyright source went to their blog which didn't have their text. The link you gave indeed is identical - so I have blanked out the copyright violation while OTRS/AfD are sorted out! Regards, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:31, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the Wiki humor

I don't think that the airport is owned by a train ;).

8-D --Dan Dassow (talk) 20:29, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

FYI

Hello Strikerforce. Thanks for the good editing that you do here at WikiP. Just to let you know that this edit [6] is incorrect. Just because an editor is going through the admin reconfirmation process does not mean that they have stopped being an admin. They still have all of their admin tools and they can perform normal admin functions. Only when an editor has be desysoped will they stop being an admin. I would add that you really should not edit another editors userpage at all. As opposed to articles userpages are considered exclusive to the user. If you have any question about something on a userpage you should a) ask the user about it or b) go to an appropriate noticeboard like AIV or WQA. I apologize if anything that I have said here has upset you as I was hoping to let you know how these things are handled. I hope that your move is (or has if it is finished) going well. Cheers and continued happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 20:36, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

You are wrong. Per his own statement, quoted on your talk page, he has relinquished his administrator tools pending the outcome of the reconfirmation RfA. As such, he can not act as an administrator and should not display the userbox, as it would be incorrect. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 20:39, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
(edit conflict)Well it looks like our edits have crossed. My apologies as HJ's statement shows that I wasn't thorough enough. On the other hand it is still not your place to edit his userpage You might ask HJM (he is very approachable as an editor) if he would remove the box and if he doesn't respond then ask another admin. Sorry again. MarnetteD | Talk 20:40, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Erie Anime Experience

I want to know why you deleted erie anime experience page, if you don't allow anime convention pages then delete them all not just the ones you dislike. Now I know why the trade school I went to said not to trust anything on this site. You say to keep it neutral, the page was wrote with facts, that can be found on the EAE site as well as animecons.com and many more. I should tell everyone that Wiki is to bias and only allows content that the Admins want/like and heck with everyone else. (Kenshinkyo (talk) 14:04, 7 May 2011 (UTC)).

Hi! Did you read my notice above? I am not an administrator and do not have the power to delete pages. Like any editor on Wikipedia (including yourself), I do have the power to nominate pages for a deletion discussion and to participate in those discussions. In the case of this specific article, I did not make the nomination for deletion, nor did I offer a vote in the discussion, although I did participate. The main issue that I had with the article, as you wrote it, was that it was a direct copy and paste from the event's official website, which is a copyright violation and not permitted on Wikipedia. Once OTRS permission was granted, I had no problem with the article, which is why I did not offer a vote in the AfD discussion. Please take your soapboxing elsewhere. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 00:01, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

I am sorry then, (Kenshinkyo (talk) 00:27, 8 May 2011 (UTC)).

The article Todd Schnitt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

blp with no sources since 2009

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Active Banana (bananaphone 06:21, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Farmer City, Illinois

Friendly advice: maybe you should read this. http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=33789 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.202.68 (talk) 04:23, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh joy. Perhaps the individual that wrote that post should read my UAA report again, rather than just jump to conclusions. Thanks for the heads up. I may respond, if I feel like it. --StrikerforceTalk Review me! 04:55, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Interesting to see that the post was written by someone who is blocked from Wikipedia. I wonder if there is a touch of bitterness there? LOL StrikerforceTalk Review me! 05:02, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Editor review

Hi. You might find this helpful. You can also leave a note on its talk page if you think it can be improved. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your help :) Muthamonster (talk) 08:12, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Btw how do I watch this page if that is possible? Muthamonster (talk) 08:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Tag?

I am confused as to WHY you placed the tag on my Talk Page considering the fact that I COMPLETELY removed ALL of the information from there. I NEVER leave ANY of the information on my talk page NO LONGER than a day if that long so I don't see how that would constitute as "Promotion for my non-notable album." Yes, I create the articles for these albums but thats just to ensure they are in the correct format for when I create them for approval when they release and possibly gain notoriety. I do not know where to go or what to do to dispute this "tag for speedily deletion" or whatever so I feel I am a rock in a hard place. I do however, appreciate your professionalism in this regard and I regret that it has had to come to this.

P.S., I have also realized that you are the SAME guy who was messin with me before and got proven wrong by User:STATicVerseatide. What are you trying to prove by these attacks?

BiggKhrisco (talk) 17:33, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

The proper place to work on an article prior to submission to AfC (assuming that's what you mean) is a draft page in your user space, rather than on your talk page. I am not attacking you and do not recall what you may be referring to by "you are the SAME guy who was messin with me before and got proven wrong by User:STATicVerseatide". Please provide diffs to remind me. Thanks. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 01:25, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Black Veil Brides

Hello,

I saw that there is some confusion as to my identity and the identity of user Jinxxed4Life (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Black_Veil_Brides) . What can I do to prove to you and the rest of the community that we are who we say we are? I am new to Wikipedia so I am not familiar with all of the in's and outs of this site but I truly am the bands management. You can check their official Facebook page facebook.com/blackveilbrides and see that they have Mercenary Management listed in the info section for management contact. You can email me directly at Dan@mercenarymanagement.com . Unlike the other people editing the page I have a source to prove all of the info I post/edit and I have proper credentials to ensure its coming from reliable sources (the band themselves). The user Jinxx4life is in fact the real Jinxx as well. Please advise.

Thanks, Dan — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeAwareX1 (talkcontribs) 03:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I'm fairly certain that the status of the article is not about what you or the band "approves" (as you've said in an edit summary), but what can be contributed and properly referenced by Wikipedia's users (see WP:OWN for the policy governing this). Jinxx4life, as a member of the band, should not edit any article related to himself, the band, any of its albums, or any of its singles, because that would be a violation of Wikipedia's policy on conflict of interest. Your role, as the band's manager, probably also falls under COI, but there may be a loophole that I do not know about right off the top of my head. It would probably be better to reach out to an administrator such as Gfoley4, HJ Mitchell, or any of the other folks listed here. I have left a talkback template on the talk pages of the two specific administrators that I mentioned, so one of them may drop by this page shortly. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 04:10, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
We're not trying to own the article or make any changes based on preference. The only changes I made were factual. The band being based out of Hollywood, Ca is a fact and is referenced in numerous interviews and articles. The band originating from Cincinnati, OH is just a rumor. None of the original members ever lived there at the time of playing in BVB. They were from cities spread all across OH (Cincinnati not being one of them). Furthermore the Never Give In EP never existed. It was completely made up, as is the studio that it was recorded in. It's Wikipedias policy that such things need to have a verifiable source. I saw nothing citing a source, because it was totally made up. We just want to provide factual info and dispel any rumors and bogus info on their page.
I'm new to Wiki so I dont know all of the in's and out's but I would be happy to provide any of the editors with proper information regarding the band so that everything in the article is 100% fact, and possibly even add in some more stuff that isn't in the article yet. Thanks for taking the time to address my concerns, I really appreciate it. BeAwareX1 (talk) 04:50, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. You say that "numerous interviews and articles" have said that the band is originally from Hollywood, California. So cite them (when the article is unlocked), provided they are reliable sources. The main thing that you need to watch out for when editing with a conflict of interest, is writing with a nuetral point-of-view. This is something I believe you can do!

P.S. I also think that Atama's comments are very helpful! GFOLEY FOUR— 17:42, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Hey guys can we please get that Never Give In EP and California DGK Studios removed from the Black Veil Brides discography? That EP never existed. If there is one floating around its a bootleg and not released by the band. Also they have never recorded at a place called California DGK Studios. I have no idea why that's getting thrown in there or where it came from. Any help would be great. Thank you :) BeAwareX1 (talk) 05:59, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with the fake EP. It was printed in the newest issue of Music Connection magazine that its not real and that they never recorded anything at the studio in question. Do I need to provide an online link for it as a source or can I just say it was the current issue? Let me know. Thanks again — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeAwareX1 (talkcontribs) 09:14, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
A link would be very helpful, since it would be a verifiable source. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 21:24, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
http://www.musicconnection.com/digital page 37 of the July issue with BVB on the cover. Also, is there a way we can get this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Never_Give_In either deleted or edited to show that its a fake/bootleg?
I have nominated it for deletion here. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 03:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

BiggKhrisco Sandbox

Thank you VERY much for informing me of the Sandbox thing. It really has helped me! I must admit, you have been a GREAT help in helping me learn new things about Wikipedia. Though at times, you can be pretty annoying, you are also very good at what you do for this site! Thanks again! Keep up the good work my friend! :) BiggKhrisco (talk) 03:08, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Nicki Minaj

I watched her interview with Ellen DeGeneres where Ellen stated that Nicki was 26, and she agreed. Plus, Bio.com states that she is 26. Cloverboy19 (talk) 02:51, 25 July 2011 (EST)

Bio.com, if I remember correctly, is essentially another Wiki. The interview can not be used because there is no way of citing it as a reference. The police report is still the most reliable source that we have. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 18:58, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Femininity

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Femininity. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 05:34, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 02:39, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tree shaping

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Tree shaping. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 18:38, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of films considered the worst. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 21:35, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Edit Warring Reminder

Nothing personal, but according to the guidelines on the Speedy page:

The criteria for speedy deletion specify the only cases in which administrators have broad consensus support to, at their discretion, bypass deletion discussion and immediately delete Wikipedia pages or media. They cover only the cases specified in the rules below.

...


If speedy deletion has been removed by an editor other than the page's creator who has indicated a plausible reason for the decline or removal, then the page should not be considered an obvious case and should not be re-tagged for the same type of speedy deletion. The page could be tagged under another applicable criterion, e.g., if it is later found that the page is a copyright violation.

Now, the rules on Speedy seem quite clear to me. If I give a plausible reason, which I believe I have, then you need to consider this a non-obvious case, and take it through the normal deletion process. If you need more clarification, please feel free to ask, but at this point, I am considering this to be edit warring, since the guidelines on this are quite clear. Thanks, and happy editing. -- Avanu (talk) 02:27, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Your reason is not plausible, per my edit summaries and the note that I just left on your page. I am also not edit warring, again as explained on your talk page. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 02:30, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of WKQX for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WKQX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WKQX until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 02:53, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of WKQX for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WKQX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WKQX(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 02:56, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

WKQX.

You nominated the article twice. I've tagged the second nomination for speedy speedy deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:01, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes, Twinkle, for some reason, is attempting to place the original nomination on WWWN, the destination article of the redirect. I attempted to undo that placement and put it back on the redirect, which created the second nomination. Any help that you might be able to lend in getting the nomination on the proper page would be much appreciated! StrikerforceTalk Review me! 03:03, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Do you have the proof of what happened to the WKQX letters? I'd be happy to put that information in the WWWN article until the WKQX article can be written. Meanwhile, I've been working hard to redirect the links to WWWN. Some I can't find. And there seem to be many more today.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 15:43, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
The WWWN-FM call letters were most recently associated with a small Watseka, IL radio station that isn't even operating currently. That little station just happens to be owned by Radioactive LLC. Radioactive LLC happens to be wholly owned by Randy Michaels. Randy Michaels also just so happens to be the CEO of Merlin Media LLC, who is the new operator of 101.1 FM in Chicago. At the start of this year, the Watseka radio station used the call letters of WMLF-FM, but Radioactive LLC requested they be changed to WWWN-FM last month, in anticipation of the WKQX-FM take over. The WKQX-FM call letters now belong to the small, dark station in Watseka.
http://chicagoradioandmedia.com/news/1792-1011-fm-changes-call-letters-to-wwwn-fm
http://www.radio-info.com/news/new-fcc-call-signs-list-shows-recent-changes-including-wkqx-going-to-watsek
-- Avanu (talk) 17:53, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
I know I can't use the second as a source, but I'll come up with something. Thanks.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:44, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WKQX. Since you had some involvement with the WKQX redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:03, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

  • I see what you were trying to do, but please don't blank redirects. I've filed it at WP:RFD, which is where redirects should go. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
You might want to fix up the introduction at the MfD, since it has TenPound's signature and short intro on it. I'd be happy to fix it to look like your comment if you like, it is just less easy to follow as it is now. -- Avanu (talk) 03:11, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Newz100logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Newz100logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Jim Tressel Edits

Hi StrikerForce..I believe (and I'm new to editing so bear with me)...you reverted a change to JT coaching record. What is listed is wrong as after vacating the wins of season 2010..JT's record is 94 wins not 82. With the 2010 season his wins total at OSU is 106. I was just correcting those values where necessary.

Thanks.

D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.250.1.171 (talk) 16:54, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Request for comment

May I request a comment (WP:RFC) at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (art). Marshallsumter (talk) 18:38, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:One Song to the Tune of Another. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 19:35, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Marry You

Hi there, can we use this source to say that "Marry You" is a single? Oz talk 07:40, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

In my opinion, no, because that is essentially a blog and blogs typically do not meet the guidelines of RS. But, start a talk page discussion on the Marry You article and let's get a consensus. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 13:50, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
I think its an airplay-only release. Its getting played on mainstream radio and urban radio in the United Kingdom. Oz talk 23:14, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
I can live with that, I suppose. But, I would say that the "song" infobox should be used, rather than the "single" one, until it can be shown by citing an RS that the song was intended to be a single. There are occasions when radio will play an album cut, for no real reason at all, without the label actually intending for it to be a single. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 08:40, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Digital Spy (which is a reliable source) says it was released on August 21. But it doesn't say how it was released though because iTunes, Amazon or 7 Digital don't have its single release. Oz talk 11:44, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dartmouth

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dartmouth. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 17:05, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Planned Parenthood

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Planned Parenthood. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 19:35, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Haven (TV series)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Haven (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 08:16, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pashtun people

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pashtun people. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 18:35, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of melodic death metal bands. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Theatre

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Theatre. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 08:26, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Suicide

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Suicide. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Haven (TV series)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Haven (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Color. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pan Am (TV series)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pan Am (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 29 October 2011 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT 04:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Strikerforce! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only. 
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:26, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Playboy Club

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Playboy Club. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes classic new website by going back several years that played on the radio from decades around the U.S.

Strikerforce can you buy or register a yes classic new website like http://www.yes.com called http://www.yesclassic.com by going back several years that played on the radio from all decades ago around the U.S. like NYC, LA, Chicago, Philly and others 'cause I don't like new playlist I like old playlist for example:

103.5 KTU from April 18, 1998 old mediabase playlist from YouTube

  • Soul II Soul - Back to Life
  • Amber - One More Night [Remix]
  • Donna Summer - Bad Girls
  • Coolio - Gangsta Paradise (feat. L.V.)
  • Ultra Nate - Free
  • Commercials
  • Toni Braxton - Un-break My Heart [Remix]
  • Madonna - Open Your Heart
  • Unknown Artist - Tenessee
  • Savage Garden - Truly, Madly, Deeply
  • and more... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.72.39.176 (talk) 19:29, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Girl gamer

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Girl gamer. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 13:17, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (music). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Verifiability. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Coat of arms of Spain

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Coat of arms of Spain. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Feedback Dashboard task force

Hi Strikerforce,

Since you were a part of the WikiGuides project, I thought I'd give you a heads-up about a new way you can help/mentor newbies on en.wiki: we've recently released a feature called the Feedback Dashboard, a queue that updates in real time with feedback and editing questions from new registered contributors who have attempted to make at least one edit. Steven Walling and I are putting together a task force for experienced Wikipedians who might be interested in monitoring the queue and responding to the feedback: details are here at Wikipedia:Feedback Dashboard. Please sign up if you're interested in helping out! Thanks, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 22:07, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hart of Dixie

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hart of Dixie. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pan Am (TV series)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pan Am (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 06:41, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:27 Club

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:27 Club. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Joint custody

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Joint custody. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:New Amsterdam (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:H.P. Lovecraft. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Crunkcore

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Crunkcore. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Photography. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Grammy Award for Best Contemporary Jazz Album. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Greg Pak

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Greg Pak. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:T.H.E. (The Hardest Ever). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:7 World Trade Center

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:7 World Trade Center. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pan Am (TV series)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pan Am (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:King of the Hill (soundtrack). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 03:16, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Wachowskis

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Wachowskis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ely, Cambridgeshire

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ely, Cambridgeshire. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Crunkcore

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Crunkcore. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Soap Operas. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Oscar Madison

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Oscar Madison. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Futurama (season 6)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Futurama (season 6). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fox News Channel

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fox News Channel. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:EJ DiMera

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:EJ DiMera. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jurassic Fight Club

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jurassic Fight Club. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Night of the Living Dead. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Game Shows. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Star Wars: The Old Republic. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Daemon (computing)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Daemon (computing). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Space Ghost

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Space Ghost. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of iCarly episodes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

A request for comments has been opened on administrator User:Fæ. You are being notified due to your prior participation in ANI, RfA, or RfC discussions regarding this user. Thank you, MadmanBot (talk) 19:39, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Metro Walk

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Metro Walk. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Merriweather Post Pavilion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tamil people

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Tamil people. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:7 World Trade Center

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:7 World Trade Center. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Route 66 (TV series)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Route 66 (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Format Of KJLH

User:San Diego Ca has kept reverting the format of KJLH to urban contemporary, and they're still not urban. Despite the rap tracks, they remain the only urban AC station in Los Angeles. Mediabase & Nielsen BDS still report the station on the urban AC panel, and KJLH is widely known as an urban AC. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Also, he kept changing the WQHT page, and WQHT is rhythmic contemporary as it is per Mediabase/Nielsen BDS reports, not urban contemporary. WWPR-FM is urban contemporary. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 06:41, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Frasier Crane

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Frasier Crane. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Intellectual property activism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lisa Dewey

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Lisa Dewey. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Drop C tuning

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Drop C tuning. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 22:16, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Blue (Bill Mack song)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Blue (Bill Mack song). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Berlin

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Berlin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:84th Academy Awards

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:84th Academy Awards. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Soap Operas. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Music of Canada. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Newcastle United F.C.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Newcastle United F.C.. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Category talk:Collecting

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:Collecting. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Big Bang Theory (disambiguation). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Secret in Their Eyes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Commentary (magazine)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Commentary (magazine). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 18:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

An admin called "Oleola" insulted me.

hi. i'm not threating anybody. but do your admins have the rights to insult people? I am just complaining about him/her.

My talk page is not the proper forum for this. Please take it to the proper noticeboard. Also, as I pointed out, the user that you appear to have an issue with is not an administrator. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 02:24, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
I do not know where the proper forum for this. may you orient me? where can i complain him/her?
Regarding [7], we both know there can be no good outcome of that thread, and I can handle it better without interference from the people who will be commenting there. I can close it as resolved instead if you want, but... Prodego talk 02:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Works for me. I was merely curious to why the thread was deleted with nothing more than a "snip" as the edit summary. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 02:32, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
I do tend to use that from time to time. Roughly equivalent to the summary 'improve Wikipedia'. Prodego talk 02:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Self-reference

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Self-reference. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Stella Parton discography. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of ethnic groups by population. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pisco Sour

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pisco Sour. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tea (meal)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Tea (meal). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 23:16, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:UC Davis pepper-spray incident. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 11:16, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Frank Zappa

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Frank Zappa. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

BVB Timeline

Regarding our edits on Black Veil Brides would it not be better to erase the text & leave the timeline? The timeline provides a visual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatemooverthere (talkcontribs) 01:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Prequel

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Prequel. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Frank Zappa discography. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 00:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on File talk:System of a down.jpg. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Greasy Love Songs

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Greasy Love Songs. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Derek (TV pilot episode). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of April Fool's Day jokes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rami Bar-Niv

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rami Bar-Niv. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bloop

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bloop. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pink slime

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pink slime. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic fiction. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:One Direction

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:One Direction. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Major houses in A Song of Ice and Fire. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Adam Yauch

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Adam Yauch. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 19:00, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:So You Think You Can Dance. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

someone responded to your contribution to the discussion on stand alone articles AdabowtheSecond (talk) 21:04, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Murasaki Shikibu

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Murasaki Shikibu. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:SCE Studio Liverpool

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:SCE Studio Liverpool. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts/MMA notability. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rugby league

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rugby league. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Suicide of Tyler Clementi. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Playing God (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Portal/Images/Furry. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Shooting of Trayvon Martin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of writers from peoples indigenous to the Americas. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:University of Western Ontario. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 13:16, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cigarette holder

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cigarette holder. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Beatles

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Beatles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pokémon

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pokémon. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of gothic rock bands. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 20:33, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tavi Gevinson

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Tavi Gevinson. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Uno (card game)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Uno (card game). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Beatles

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Beatles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants (character). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 04:00, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Playtime Is Over (mixtape). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Lamia (Dungeons & Dragons). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mabel Simmons

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mabel Simmons. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Wait Your Turn

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Wait Your Turn. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:This is PiL

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:This is PiL. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Wait Your Turn

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Wait Your Turn. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 06:16, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Disney XD

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Disney XD. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 18:53, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Legend of Korra

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Legend of Korra. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:St. Jimmy

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:St. Jimmy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Frasier Crane

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Frasier Crane. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Legend of Korra

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Legend of Korra. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 08:16, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Phallus

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Phallus. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Three Cheers for Sweet Revenge. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Square Enix. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 12:16, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Read All About It (song). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic fiction. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:American Vision

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:American Vision. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Polite request

Hi there. Sorry to bother you. I put a rfc for [Celtic F.C. Supporters]] on the rfc board but no response yet, so if you have time I wondered if you could look at it? Thanks 220.255.1.35 (talk) 10:25, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of castles in Belgium. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Maximum Ride

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Maximum Ride. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lilith Sternin

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Lilith Sternin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Long War Journal

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Long War Journal. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow

In this issue:

  • Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
  • Research: The most recent DR data
  • Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
  • Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
  • DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
  • Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
  • Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:32, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Taylor Swift discography. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fox News Channel

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fox News Channel. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donnie Darko

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Donnie Darko. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 19:20, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Formula One. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Steeler Nation

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Steeler Nation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:1960 in film

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:1960 in film. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Censorship in Islamic societies. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Disco Demolition Night

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Disco Demolition Night. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hetalia: Axis Powers

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hetalia: Axis Powers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/The Beatles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Human penis

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Human penis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of songs recorded by Hannah Montana. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Urination

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Urination. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Record charts. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ray of Light

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ray of Light. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Marvel Studios

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Marvel Studios. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Twister (game)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Twister (game). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nick Drake

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nick Drake. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User: Bull-Doser (disruptive editor) regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Farine (talk) 20:47, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

I have contributed thoughts to the discussion. Thank you for making me aware of it. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 03:17, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Shawshank Redemption. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Haibun

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Haibun. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Vulva

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Vulva. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dick Grayson

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dick Grayson. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

WFAN-FM

I have completed the history merge for WFAN-FM as requested. Please ensure that the version of the article that you want is showing, and if it isn't, please restore the desired revision. Also, if I got the titles backwards (though I suspect I did it right), a page move to the other title should work without additional assistance. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:11, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Minus a few minor housekeeping changes, it appears to be correct. I am headed to bed for the night. If someone hasn't beat me to it, I'll make the changes that I've seen that need to be made at some point later today. Thanks for your help! StrikerforceTalk Review me! 06:58, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2012/13 United States network television schedule. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Request for help

{{admin help}} I am not sure how to do this, but here is something that will need to be done, once the call letter swap is official - KBWX, currently assigned to the 100.3 frequency in St Louis, flipped formats today. However, it is actually a format swap and a flip, in one combined move, as KMJM, currently assigned to 104.9 in the market, picked up a Rhythmic Top 40 format. The Classic Rock format that WAS on 100.3 is now gone. From what I understand, it is Clear Channel's intention to swap the call letters, i.e., KMJM stays with the "Majic" brand and moves to 100.3, with KBWX going up the dial to 104.9 to be paired with the "Wild" brand that is now on 104.9. My question is, how do we maintain a continuity of each article's history? As it stands right now, the two articles are correct in listing the current formats, but if we are truly trying to maintain the integrity of the articles with their current formats...? (Was anyone able to follow that and understand what I'm getting at, because I think I just confused myself!) StrikerforceTalk Review me! 01:44, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

That was incredibly confusing, but you sound like you know what you're talking about. I'm sure if you edit the articles the way you see fit, and add reliable third party references to all the changes you have made, then that should be fine. -- Patchy1 02:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Whew! I'd like to think I'm a reasonably bright individual and I read that 4 times and still don't entirely grasp it. As Patchy said, it sounds like you know what you're doing, so as long as you reference it, I can't imagine anyone having any problem with it. As for the question, I am not sure I entirely understand what you're asking...so the two stations flipped formats and call letters. Are the articles correct as of this flip/swap? Go Phightins! 03:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
As of this moment, the KMJM call letters are still on 104.9, but the Urban AC format that was on that signal is now on 100.3, which is KBWX. From what I understand, Clear Channel intends to swap the call letters between the two frequencies, making 104.9 KBWX and 100.3 KMJM. How do we make that change with the article titles, without copying the contents of both articles into Word or something similar, deleting both articles, and creating them again with the previous material in the proper place (i.e., the material from KMJM on the 104.9 frequency is created in a new KMJM article with the 100.3 frequency and vice versa)? It almost feels like we need to say a prayer or two that Clear Channel applies for new call letters for 104.9! StrikerforceTalk Review me! 17:00, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
The articles will need to be moved correctly, copying and pasting content is not allowed. So when is the change happening? Can you provide some references here so I can familiarize myself, also can you link both articles concerned to here as well. -- Patchy1 01:02, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Articles are KMJM and KBWX. Not sure when the call letter swap is going to happen - or IF they're going to happen, for sure, yet. My only knowledge is that Clear Channel would like to keep the KMJM call letters associated with the "Majic" brand name that just moved from 104.9 (KMJM) to 100.3 (KBWX). StrikerforceTalk Review me! 02:49, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
So by the looks of the changes made to the articles and this reference, the change occurred on the 7th of November.
ADMIN HELP: The aforementioned articles need their titles/content swapped to reflect recent changes. -- Patchy1 05:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 Done I've swapped the pages. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:20, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Excellent, is this as it should be now Strikerforce? -- Patchy1 06:30, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Power Rangers Megaforce. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:James Earl Jones

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:James Earl Jones. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 22:22, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Abbey Road Sessions (Kylie Minogue album). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Penis

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Penis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Littlest Pet Shop (video game). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:New York Knicks

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:New York Knicks. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Derek McCulloch

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Derek McCulloch. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of unrecognized higher education accreditation organizations. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:In My City

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:In My City. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 03:39, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Astroturfing

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Astroturfing. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Santa Clause

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Santa Clause. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Black people

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Black people. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Call of Duty characters. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Trouble (Leona Lewis song). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Forbes Fictional 15

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Forbes Fictional 15. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 08:16, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Feminism

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Feminism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 20:16, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Killers

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Killers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 08:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sonezaki Shinjū (1978 film). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hypnotico

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hypnotico. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 09:16, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Marvel Studios

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Marvel Studios. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 21:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sanjuro

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sanjuro. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 09:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox musical artist. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 21:39, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 10:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Twin Peaks

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Twin Peaks. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kyuss

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kyuss. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Muppets

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Muppets. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 23:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Disney XD (Europe)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Disney XD (Europe). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Big Bang Theory

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Big Bang Theory. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Transformers: Prime characters. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pi Kappa Alpha

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pi Kappa Alpha. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:History of video game consoles (eighth generation). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 03:17, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Category talk:French novels

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:French novels. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:AllRovi movie

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:AllRovi movie. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cinema of Andhra Pradesh. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ys (series)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ys (series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Joseph Kony

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Joseph Kony. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mario Kart

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mario Kart. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Chris Claremont

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Chris Claremont. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Harlem Shake (song)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Harlem Shake (song). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John Kerry military service controversy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:Traditional knowledge. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lindsay Lohan

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Lindsay Lohan. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cheers

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cheers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Frasier episodes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Who Framed Roger Rabbit. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Flight of the Conchords episodes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lisa Lavie

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Lisa Lavie. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Malayalam cinema

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Malayalam cinema. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bill Biggart

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bill Biggart. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Watchmen

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Watchmen. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 15:16, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Final Fantasy VII: Advent Children. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:TLC (group)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:TLC (group). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 08:19, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Paramount Pictures

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Paramount Pictures. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2012 Packers–Seahawks officiating controversy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Arrow (TV series)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Arrow (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 09:16, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Valley of Fear

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Valley of Fear. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Charlize Theron

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Charlize Theron. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:G5 (universities)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:G5 (universities). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Contemporary art

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Contemporary art. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 17:21, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Album article style guide. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 12:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Iron Man 3

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Iron Man 3. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Discord (My Little Pony). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 04:16, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:United Bates of America. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.2A02:EC80:101:0:0:0:2:8 (talk) 00:45, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dragon Ball

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dragon Ball. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 10:29, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Iron Man 3

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Iron Man 3. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of sopranos in non-classical music. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Doctor Who

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Doctor Who. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Film Sack

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Film Sack. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 12:16, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Virtual Console games for Nintendo 3DS (North America). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Terra Nova (TV series)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Terra Nova (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kiss Kiss Bang Bang

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cheers (season 1)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cheers (season 1). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ristar

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ristar. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Terra Nova (TV series)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Terra Nova (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Standard AHL convention is to give each team its own separate page (as you can see with the Springfield Indians and Worcester IceCats having their own pages); I am in the process of creating a NEW one for the Comets; please leave the Rivermen's one alone to reflect its own history. Thank you. Tom Danson (talk) 18:54, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

How about being a little more polite with your request, please? "Please leave the Rivermen's alone" is a bit rough around the edges. You could have said that in another way that didn't come across so rudely, sir. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 19:00, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
I said "please" and "thank you," didn't I? If that's not polite, I don't know what is. Tom Danson (talk) 19:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bad Girls Club

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bad Girls Club. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Street Angel (1937 film). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Edwin Jarvis

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Edwin Jarvis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:House of Cards (U.S. TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Major League Baseball franchise postseason droughts. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Methylene blue

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Methylene blue. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Dakota

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Dakota. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Fabula Nova Crystallis Final Fantasy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Terra Nova (TV series)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Terra Nova (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:RetroArch

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:RetroArch. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 06:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The NeverEnding Story (film). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Batman Begins

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Batman Begins. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of magic museums

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of magic museums. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:SkyDrive

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:SkyDrive. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Kim Possible characters. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Direct-to-video

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Direct-to-video. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kim Possible (character). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pricasso

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pricasso. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Zeitgeist: The Movie

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Zeitgeist: The Movie. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Twisted Whiskers Show. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Skyfall

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Skyfall. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ice Age (Magic: The Gathering). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Flickr

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Flickr. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mariah Carey

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mariah Carey. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Shooting of Trayvon Martin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nicki Minaj discography. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello Strikerforce. I hope everything is okay with you.

I'm writing to let you know that Bull-Doser was socking today with the account User:DroleDesHits. I'm also letting you know that I will be completely retiring (I was already on semi-retired mode) and that I will exercise my right to vanish. I've started a new career and as long as my account exist, I will always have a tendancy to use it when I'm actually trying to actually stay away from Wikipedia (due to time constraints and lack of interest).

I know that you are very busy these days. But from times to times, if you can, would you mind checking radio station articles just to see there isn't any socking activity going on in them if you know what I mean. If I were you, would start by checking the CKMF-FM and CKOI-FM since these seems to be Bull-Doser favorite articles.

In any case, I wish you well in whatever endeavors you are currently pursuing. Take care. Farine (talk) 16:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

I am sorry to see you go. I will try to keep an eye on the pages that B-D was known to frequent, but I'm afraid that my RL responsibilities just don't lend much time to being able to edit Wikipedia these days. Best of luck to you in your endeavors. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 06:17, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Simpson family

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Simpson family. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Jem episodes

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Jem episodes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 04:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Glo Friends

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Glo Friends. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 16:16, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Christina Aguilera

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Christina Aguilera. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Jem episodes

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Jem episodes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.Legobot (talk) 01:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Raging Bull

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Raging Bull. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.Legobot (talk) 00:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mars and Venus (Botticelli). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.Legobot (talk) 00:02, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

RfC to consider

Might you consider offering an opinion on a content dispute between two editors involving the removal of parts of an article on a group of characters in a fictional novel? The discussion is here: Talk:Druids_(Shannara)#BRD_on_recent_large_addition_of_text. Thanks for considering. N2e (talk) 02:23, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Prometheus (2012 film)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Prometheus (2012 film). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 10 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gone with the Wind (film). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:Political television series. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Psychedelic rock

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Psychedelic rock. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Brooklyn Bridge

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Brooklyn Bridge. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jimi Hendrix

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jimi Hendrix. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:A Beautiful Mind (film). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Comedian

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Comedian. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of A Song of Ice and Fire characters. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WPFM NEW LOGO.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WPFM NEW LOGO.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Unapologetic

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Unapologetic. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of former child actors from the United States. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment

Hello,

You can help determine consensus by commenting at the RfC at Talk:Ta-Nehisi Coates#RfC:_Discipline_issues_in_high_school. Your input would be appreciated. Thank you. Useitorloseit (talk) 20:01, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day

Happy First Edit Day, Strikerforce, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 14:15, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Captain Marvel (DC Comics). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:What I've Been Looking For. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hi-5 (Australian band)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hi-5 (Australian band). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nymphomaniac (film)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nymphomaniac (film). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gamergate controversy

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gamergate controversy. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lindy West

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Lindy West. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Control (Garbage song)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Control (Garbage song). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nothing but Love

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nothing but Love. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

RfC United States same-sex marriage map

I opened up an RfC for the U.S. same-sex marriage map due to the complicated situation of Kansas: RfC: How should we color Kansas? Prcc27 (talk) 21:08, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Square Enix. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fever (Kylie Minogue album). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Phineas and Ferb (season 4). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:PATH (Toronto)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:PATH (Toronto). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2014 Jerusalem synagogue massacre. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Guardians of the Galaxy (film). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Chupacabra (The Walking Dead). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:A Boy Was Born

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:A Boy Was Born. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Post-Standard

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Post-Standard. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Spectre (2015 film)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Spectre (2015 film). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Tenchi Muyo! characters. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Guardians of the Galaxy (film). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Orson Scott Card

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Orson Scott Card. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jimi Hendrix

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jimi Hendrix. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Breitbart (website)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Breitbart (website). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Big 12 stadiums navbox, etc.

Hey, Strikerforce. I see that you have restored the navbox to the Cotton Bowl article, and added the Cotton Bowl link to the navbox. The fact that the stadium was not linked in the navbox was the primary reason I deleted the navbox from the Cotton Bowl article. That having been said, I question whether it is appropriate to add the Cotton Bowl link to the navbox when all of the other venues are home field stadiums. If you start adding neutral site stadiums, you might as well add the stadiums for all of the Big 12 tie-in bowl games, but I don't think that's what was intended nor do I think that is the accepted WP:CFB standard. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 14:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

I've added the Cotton Bowl stadium to the navbox. The Cotton Bowl stadium has been the host of the Red River Rivalry game for many years and is a designated "home" stadium for either Texas or Oklahoma each season. I think that the difference between it and the conference bowl game tie-in host stadiums is that CBS is consistent every season and hosts the same teams, where a bowl game tie-in host stadium would host - more than likely - a different team each season. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 15:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of YouTube personalities. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dabangg

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dabangg. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Steve Scalise

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Steve Scalise. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Public Ivy

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Public Ivy. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Weeknd

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Weeknd. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

I'm horrible at Wiki talk but usually when stations apply for a call sign change and in which case Emmis did so yesterday 1/29 they can start using the new call sign as soon as they reserve them. chances are by Monday the FCC Database will have them in place as KNOU. Radio geek in me thinks they are making new ID's for Monday @BeamRadio

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bloody Saturday (photograph). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Doctor

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Doctor. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Alejandro González Iñárritu. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Azure

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Azure. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Version 2.0

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Version 2.0. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Dark Side of the Moon. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Version 2.0

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Version 2.0. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rosamund Pike

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rosamund Pike. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Version 2.0

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Version 2.0. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2002 Venezuelan coup d'état attempt. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Robot Chicken episodes. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Roy Moore

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Roy Moore. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Please join the discussion on Talk:Glengarry Glen Ross (film)

Hello! I am soliciting comments for an RfC that is currently open on the "Glengarry Glen Ross (film)" page. There is disagreement about where the film was set (New York vs. Chicago).

One of the issues is whether it is original research to cite to elements in the film itself (including props, dialogue, and a statement in the end credits that it was "filmed on location in New York City") to establish setting.

Response so far in the RfC has been mixed. Comments welcome! Xanthis (talk) 13:22, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:A Voice for Men

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:A Voice for Men. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Paranormal activity

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Paranormal activity. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (architecture). Legobot (talk) 00:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zeitgeist (film series). Legobot (talk) 00:06, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Yes (band)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Yes (band). Legobot (talk) 00:03, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zeitgeist (film series). Legobot (talk) 00:05, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:James Joyce

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:James Joyce. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Trivia sections. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Christian metal artists. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television). Legobot (talk) 00:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Finally (CeCe Peniston song). Legobot (talk) 00:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox comedian. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Murder, She Wrote episodes. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Nobel laureates in Literature. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight). Legobot (talk) 00:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bad Girls Club

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bad Girls Club. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:SEMA

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:SEMA. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:UNFD

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:UNFD. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fire Emblem Fates

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fire Emblem Fates. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sailor Moon

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sailor Moon. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cyrano de Bergerac

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cyrano de Bergerac. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Dark Side of the Moon. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Heavy metal music

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Heavy metal music. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Captain America: Civil War. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Category talk:Al Hirt songs

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Category talk:Al Hirt songs. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Heavy metal music

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Heavy metal music. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of best-selling girl groups. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Star Wars: The Force Awakens. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sugar Mama (song)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sugar Mama (song). Legobot (talk) 00:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Exposing to the right

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Exposing to the right. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Media franchise

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Media franchise. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Unfinished Business (2015 film). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Second Stage Turbine Blade. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Campus sexual assault

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Campus sexual assault. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Need help

We need more neutral opinions here. Please help! Thanx! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:36, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Red Hot (song)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Red Hot (song). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mary Katharine Ham

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mary Katharine Ham. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Debbie Does Dallas

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Debbie Does Dallas. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Debbie Does Dallas

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Debbie Does Dallas. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton email controversy. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Maxinquaye

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Maxinquaye. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Proscenium

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Proscenium. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Adeaze

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Adeaze. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Man Who Sold the World (album). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Real Robot

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Real Robot. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gamergate controversy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gamergate controversy. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Brick (song)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brick (song). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sicario (2015 film)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sicario (2015 film). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Al Jazeera America

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Al Jazeera America. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Need help

We need more neutral opinions here. I've followed instructions here and at Wikipedia:Feedback request service and to used the user lists there. I've sent a message for neutral input to everyone active recently and available for 10 per month or more on the lists in the Language and linguistics, Media, the arts, and architecture, Society-sports-culture, Unsorted and All-RFCs lists, none of whom have interacted with me before, that I can remember. Have done my best to act in good faith to try to get more neutral opinions. Please help! Thanx! SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:38, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gary Cooper

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gary Cooper. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton email controversy. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Captain Marvel (DC Comics). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Natalie Portman

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Natalie Portman. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Axis: Bold as Love

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Axis: Bold as Love. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Giving You the Best That I Got (album). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:War & Peace (2016 TV series). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Father Ted

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Father Ted. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Led Zeppelin

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Led Zeppelin. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:B96SummerBashLogo-2007.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:B96SummerBashLogo-2007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:B96SummerBashLogo-2009.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:B96SummerBashLogo-2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SummerBash2011Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SummerBash2011Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kesuke Miyagi

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kesuke Miyagi. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Photography. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Dark Side of the Moon. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Axis: Bold as Love

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Axis: Bold as Love. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Red (Taylor Swift album). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Strikerforce,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Strikerforce. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:JonTron

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:JonTron. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Post-progressive

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Post-progressive. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Death of Alan Kurdi

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Death of Alan Kurdi. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Chuck Berry

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Chuck Berry. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ernest Hemingway

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ernest Hemingway. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Roman Reigns

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Roman Reigns. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:On the Corner

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:On the Corner. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Album-oriented rock

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Album-oriented rock. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Too Much Too Soon (album). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fabergé egg

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fabergé egg. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Generation Snowflake

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Generation Snowflake. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Crowne Plaza Hotel Billings. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Carol Burnett

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carol Burnett. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mariah Carey albums discography. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nothing Was the Same

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nothing Was the Same. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2017

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Poland

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Poland. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musicians. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox television channel. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ernie Wilkins

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ernie Wilkins. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Great British Bake Off. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Winged unicorn

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Winged unicorn. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Philosopher's Stone (album). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:University of Notre Dame. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of films based on actual events. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Magic (Justin Timberlake song) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Magic (Justin Timberlake song). Since you had some involvement with the Magic (Justin Timberlake song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:27, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Family Guy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Family Guy. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sony Yay

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sony Yay. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Gifted (TV series)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Gifted (TV series). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Thomas Rhett

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Thomas Rhett. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lady Bird (film)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lady Bird (film). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of 2010s one-hit wonders in the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Philosopher's Stone (album). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Strikerforce. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:More Life

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:More Life. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Only Connect

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Only Connect. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Game of Thrones

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Game of Thrones. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Trace Adkins

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trace Adkins. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Arrowverse

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Arrowverse. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:White House press corps. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Black Mirror episodes. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Record charts. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Satanic Temple

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Satanic Temple. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sridevi

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sridevi. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Raw Power

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Raw Power. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ariana Grande discography. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Daily Mail

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Daily Mail. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Doctor Who

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Doctor Who. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Star Wars: The Last Jedi. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Quinn Shephard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Quinn Shephard. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jessica Chastain

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jessica Chastain. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Equestrian statue of Frederick the Great. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Aromanticism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Aromanticism. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

KSLZ's program info

Hey Strikerforce. I reverted your edit on KSLZ because WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE is exactly what is preventing a program schedule, or more precisely, it's WP:NOTDIR, point 4 which states: "Directories, directory entries, electronic program guide, or a resource for conducting business. For example, an article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, format clocks, etc., although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant program lists and schedules may be acceptable. Likewise an article on a business should not contain a list of all the company's patent filings. Furthermore, the Talk pages associated with an article are for talking about the article, not for conducting the business of the topic of the article." That's what it says, which seems pretty straight-forward to me. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.Stereorock (talk) 18:41, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

It's been so long since I've used a talk page that I've forgotten how to indent... but, okay, I see what I missed in skimming through the policy earlier. All good. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 19:03, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

No worries! The indent is a colon, so I hope that helps! Have a Happy Friday the 13th!Stereorock (talk) 19:04, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Vevo

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vevo. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Trap music

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trap music. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Channel NewsAsia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Channel NewsAsia. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fauxcest

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fauxcest. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Invasion of Privacy (album). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Ingraham Angle

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Ingraham Angle. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (music). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tom Dixon (industrial designer). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Raw Power

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Raw Power. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Record charts. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Scottrade Center

Totally agree, doesn't become effective until July 1. I added info on the page just to let people know that it's not official until July 1.

Roberto221 (talk) 20:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Enterprise Center picture

You are correct about abbreviations about states and countries but it is AP style writing and that is the PROPER way to write in that form. That's my reasoning. I will leave it alone but I just wanted you to my reasoning behind to change it. Caleb Woods (talk) 15:19, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

You probably don't want to get into a debate with me about AP style. I've been in the media longer than you've been alive. StrikerforceTalk 15:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Like I said, I'll leave it alone. I won't get into a debate because it would make no sense to debate about that. I just wanted you to know my reasoning. Caleb Woods (talk) 15:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pointless

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pointless. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

You're probably not aware but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. The article about the person you added to May 22 did not have any reliable source that I could add to this page to back up your addition (see WP:IMDBREF) so this change has been reverted. Please do not restore it without providing a direct reliable source. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 16:20, 23 May 2018 (UTC) editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 16:20, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Toddst1, no, I wasn't aware, my apologies. As a quick glance at my contribution history might tell you, it's been quite some time since I've edited on a regular basis. There are more than a few things that have evolved. LOL StrikerforceTalk 18:31, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Nextdoor

Hi,

If you do undertake a rewrite of Nextdoor, just wanted to be sure you saw the proposed draft at User:BC1278/sandbox/Nextdoor There is a terribly long discussion, now tabled, of it here: Talk:Nextdoor#Request_for_Review. As I disclose, I have a COI.

I've really tried hard to get a consensus around the Racial Profiling section, and that discussion is sill open: Talk:Nextdoor#Proposed_new_language_for_"Racial_profiling"_section. There's a long version and two short versions and a lot of back and forth. There's a live RfC for the short version: Talk:Nextdoor#RfC_Consensus_Attempt

In my opinion, other than that, everything else should be straightforward. I have a Word document with all the sources that I cite in one doc. I'd be glad to email that.

Best,

Ed BC1278 (talk) 05:16, 24 May 2018 (UTC)BC1278

Please comment on Talk:Yale School of Drama

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Yale School of Drama. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Star Wars: The Last Jedi. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:07, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fall in Line

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fall in Line. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Springfield Sliders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Cox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

(Note to self - Link has been corrected.) StrikerforceTalk 14:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Carrie Underwood

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carrie Underwood. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

(Note to self - Responded.) StrikerforceTalk 14:08, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Hannibal Hoots

Hi, I'm confused by your edit summary on Hannibal Hoots. How is it that you were able to tag the page for speedy deletion, but not able to overwrite the redirect with a new article? When you press 'Publish changes' after entering the new article content, what happens? What error message do you get? — Smjg (talk) 16:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Using Firefox, when I attempt to edit the page (doing so from the current redirect page), it opens the Hannibal Cavemen page - which is to where the redirect points - rather than that of the Hannibal Hoots. StrikerforceTalk 18:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Actually, hold that thought, as it's letting me edit the redirect page, as we speak. I've cleared my cache since last attempting to do it, so maybe that had something to do with it? StrikerforceTalk 18:27, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:08, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rey (Star Wars)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rey (Star Wars). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

(Note to Self) Responded. StrikerforceTalk 13:57, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Amazing China

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Amazing China. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:CapeCatfishLogo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:CapeCatfishLogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:56, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

(Note to self) Responded. StrikerforceTalk 13:56, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Springfield Sliders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Association (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

(Adjusted to point to proper article.) StrikerforceTalk 14:17, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Help

I need an administrator to contact me off-Wikipedia, please, to discuss a privacy matter. StrikerforceTalk 14:56, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

I am changing your "helpme" tag to "adminhelp", so that only administrators try to respond to it. The king of the sun (talk) 15:42, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, @The king of the sun:. The request has been fulfilled.StrikerforceTalk 16:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Is Genesis History?

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Is Genesis History?. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Declining to participate in this one, as I try to avoid the topic of religion. StrikerforceTalk 15:15, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Deepika Padukone

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Deepika Padukone. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Prior to your close, I had already merged everything I could reliably source. I'm assuming this meets the intent of the merge decision and plan to just complete the job by redirecting. Do you have any objection to that? -- RoySmith (talk) 15:37, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

@RoySmith: No objections. StrikerforceTalk 15:40, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Also, @RoySmith:, I noticed that you're an admin. I may be interested in becoming an admin, in the future, working mostly in XfD and other cleanup areas. I've only just added the XfD Closer tool to start working with closures. If you'd be so inclined to keep an eye on my work using it and give any feedback that you may have, I'm always willing to listen. StrikerforceTalk 15:44, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
We're always looking for more admins. I'll be happy to keep an eye on your work. XfD closes are an art. I'm not saying this was a bad close or anything, but I always like to look at all the arguments and think if there's something that makes more sense than a straight nose count, and is likely to be agreeable to everybody. In this case, I think mentioning in the close that it looks like everything mergeable had already been merged so nothing left to do would have been a better close. But, hey, I'm kind of biased :-) -- RoySmith (talk) 16:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Quantico (season 3)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Quantico (season 3). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of one-hit wonders in the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

KBEZ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to KVOO
KHTT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to KVOO
KXBL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to KVOO

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:WUPV

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:WUPV. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BS 7925-1

I am concerned your good faith relisting of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BS 7925-1 did not apply due diligence and was disruptive. I have left a comment about it there. It is hard to see it going to a delete and the effect of the weeks delay is simply to keep the redirect version on a to-do list. While I don't think the nominator should have brought it to AfD I have little doubt he was acting in good faith. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk)

I respectfully disagree, @Djm-leighpark:, and have explained my rationale on the discussion page. StrikerforceTalk 13:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sapna Babul Ka...Bidaai. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Notable alumni lists on secondary schools

Hi, Strikerforce. For many years now, school article guidelines have actually discouraged prose alumni sections. They get way too crufty way too fast. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 01:30, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

My apologies, @John from Idegon: for not knowing that. I assumed the same criteria would apply to such an article as it does to other trivial list type material in, say, radio station articles. Now I know! StrikerforceTalk 14:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:XXXTentacion

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:XXXTentacion. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sierra Hull

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sierra Hull. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Submission at Articles for creation: Jin (singer) (July 6)

Hello! Thank you for reviewing my article so quickly! I would like to address your following grounds/concerns so it may be accepted! Here are my thoughts and changes.

1) There have been two previous deletions of pages by this name. I have concerns that they may have been similar in content to this proposed article and we're beating the proverbial dead horse here.

I did have a quick thought to why 'Jin (singer)' didn't exist! Really, I don't think I'm trying to work on a truly lost cause.

After you mentioned such, I looked into the deletion log of the page, and into the meaning of the "G 13" and 'abandoned draft' reason given, and I found that it was automatically deleted due to no contribution in six months(according to the G13 guidelines). Mainly, I wanted to point out that I've noticed that there isn't a discussion (or clear reason, besides abandonment) for its deletion (or at least one I haven't found), and I'd like to bring up how 'similar content' pages would be deleted, or how concern would arise for their existence. In my eyes, 'speedy deletion' equates to 'generally shouldn't exist.' If I had recreated, very similarly a page that was deleted for a reason via deletion discussion, it would be speedily deleted (or denied, in this case). I'm not sure how to properly quote this from the Wiki criteria, but it states under this (Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G4):

 "This applies to sufficiently identical copies, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion. It excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies, and content that has been moved to user space or converted to a draft for explicit improvement (but not simply to circumvent Wikipedia's deletion policy)."

By quoting/italicizing this, I imply that the page I created should be allowed chances to exist, disregarding your first concern. This is acknowledging the fact that those two deleted versions of the article very well existed before this new one-- similar titles that surely must have had content on the same person-- may have been discontinued due to some reason that I did not know when creating this article. My best guess is probably notability issues, unreliable sources from blogs, really biased writing, etc). Anyways, I am trying to create, at least, the best possible version (better than whatever those were) that can get by and is better! Those old versions may have definitely been the very dead horses, but I would like to mention I have no idea of their content. I feel that it is unfair for a younger version to carry the problems of the non-existent older when I'm not exactly sure of what they are, if my submission has them, and the realization that they were made back in 2017 as far as I can assume.

If this is still a concern to you and it needs to be proven that I did not outright copy those currently non-existent articles-- meaning that this new submission shouldn't exist and should be deleted-- I was thinking about reaching out to the user who last deleted it in the first place. I'd rather not bother them, but I'll take the responsibility of messaging the June 5th, 2018 editor, to see if I can somehow obtain(the deleted things the way he describes how to get it) it if it's required, but truthfully I feel that it is not. I have never viewed that deleted page, and I used articles V (singer),RM (rapper),Suga (rapper), and J-Hope as the basis and general standard for this submission.

Finally,
 2) To the extent of his notability other than as a member of BTS, he -may- qualify due to his songwriting credits. Unfortunately, for the purposes of this review, the citation within the article that speaks to those credits is not in English.

Which songwriting source you are referring to? At first I thought you meant this because you said credit(s). If it is this (I added the ID number, to which I will explain, probably unnecessarily) :

"he has 5 songs accredited to his name by the Korea Music Copyright Association. [4] "Songs credited to JIN". komca.or.kr. Writers & Publishers ID: 10005243. Retrieved July 5, 2018."

In order to search an artist's credits on 'https://www.komca.or.kr/foreign2/eng/S01.jsp' (this is a website in english) you may type in the artist's name in the "Writers and Publishers" bar. This is a direct copy of the way RM (rapper) is credited for his 80+ songs on his Wikipedia article. (combining his producing names RAP MONSTER and more recently RM, you get over 80 songs.)

I added his ID, because typing "JIN" is too broad of a name and brings up over 9,000 results. Rather, you type in his personal ID, 10005243 to bring up his BTS songwriting credits.

Now if you are referring to his credit on the song "Awake," I didn't notice before, but you're right evidently. It appeared that I linked it to the Gaon Music Chart, which is not in English. I forgot to cite my source from Billboard for it. I added it, reworded a bit, and I hope that fixes it.

To address the second part:
 As this is the English language Wikipedia, it is helpful for as many references as possible to be in English, in order to be easily verified, both for accuracy and reliability.

Yes, it may be extremely helpful for articles in the English Wikipedia to mainly be in English! I thought of this and thought I should find much more in English (which I slightly struggled to do for older news, trying to avoid sites like Soompi), but I continued writing. Considering that the right Korean sites are perfectly considered reliable sources to use and cite, even if they're written in Korean. (mainly pertaining to this list that I followed: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Korea/Reliable_sources#UR). I also used the other existing BTS member profiles as reference, and a lot of them used Korean articles just fine, that were clearly accepted by people managing the page. I tried to pay close attention to tagging the language as 'Korean' to the necessary citations. Acknowledging your comment though, I made sure to note that the majority of the article has English citations (in some cases, along with Korean citations for the same subject), so I hope it is acceptable now!

[ As a completely personal note, I did not find it hard to Google translate the title, easily decipher what the pictures were of, ((BTS) Jin and V (singer) as cover photos for the OST article, the Wings album cover, with "Awake" next to it (yet all the other text in Korean), the word MC in almost all the articles about BTS Jin hosting, etc...)), and sometimes translate the text to search for other articles like it while I was looking for citations. ]

To summarize the pages changes: I have made a few edits to the article, adding a couple more citations in English to go along with citations only written in Korean, and added a new heading of new information (hopefully with the goal of improving his notability, with individual appearances on Korean TV and variety shows, just as the other documented BTS members have listed in their pages, most prominently, like BTS V. Along with the new information, I added a bit to his education. Finally, I went through and corrected a few citations that are in Korean, but are not stated that they are in Korean.

Thank you for your time, apologies for this lengthy response. I hope I am doing this right! This is my first time writing an article, and I did as much research as possible on creating one. Is it okay for me to resubmit? p.s.i even asked in the live chat if it was considered acceptable to talk with your reviewer haha. --idkSam (talk) 09:02, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

@IdkSam:, to be honest, I read this over the weekend on mobile and didn't have time to respond then, sorry. It looks like you've done a good job justifying the article enough for me to approve it via AfC, so go ahead and resubmit, if you haven't yet. Now, I can't guarantee that somebody might not tag it for deletion, challenging his notability, but I'm at least willing to let it get through AfC based on what you've presented. Good luck! StrikerforceTalk 13:43, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Ah, I'm glad to hear! Thank you! I will resubmit it now. --idkSam (talk) 14:00, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Ed Schultz

On 7 July 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ed Schultz, for which you helped to improve references to ready for posting. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. StrikerforceTalk 14:55, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2018 in heavy metal music. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Closing RDs as stale

Hi, an RD nomination only becomes stale when the subject's death date is before the oldest entry on the template, ie the one furthest to the right. Lord Carrington died on the 9th, so anything more recent than that is ok.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 17:34, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

@Pawnkingthree:, I apologize. I wasn't aware that there was a specific guideline (although, since we have guidelines for just about everything else, perhaps I should have been aware, eh?) to follow. I was looking at it as the subjects having passed away seven or more days ago would make it "stale" to most readers. StrikerforceTalk 18:21, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Don't worry, it's not something that you would necessarily know until you'd been around ITN for a while. No RD can stay on the template for longer than seven days, but sometimes noms can get overlooked so we try and get them up if they are of sufficient quality, even if it's just for a few hours sometimes.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 19:05, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Everything Is Love

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Everything Is Love. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

 Done StrikerforceTalk 20:04, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of most-viewed YouTube videos. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

 Done StrikerforceTalk 20:12, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:William Madison Wall

Thanks for the comment, I cleaned out the end notes and moved that information into relevant footnotes. What happens next? Bluesauerkraut (talk) 20:08, 17 July 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluesauerkraut (talkcontribs) 20:04, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, @Bluesauerkraut:! I have reviewed your changes and declined the submission for the reasons noted in my commentary on the draft article. StrikerforceTalk 20:09, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks again, I understand what you are saying and will look for more sources. However, I think perhaps your judgment of find a grave in the RS context is a bit undeserved. While you are correct that the site may be easy to join and edit (to add information to, e.g.), the site itself documents (usually with a photo) grave stones that are rather hard to edit or change. Those grave stones document the relevant information such as a marriage or birth/death date. Bluesauerkraut (talk) 20:16, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
With all due respect, as a member of Find a Grave, myself, I would disagree with you. I think there are better sources out there for what you're trying to accomplish, @Bluesauerkraut:. StrikerforceTalk 20:20, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

HELP

Hi thanks for your advice on the article. I am new at creating articles. Can you please help wikify it and add needed references. Maybe copy edit it. It's not my article, anyone can edit it and make it better. I will ask other editors to help me expand it if you won't JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 15:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Deletiionist

I will keep creating articles until most of them are accepted. You can reject all of my articles. I disagree with your assessment and I am taking this to the article rescue squad — Preceding unsigned comment added by JC7V7DC5768 (talkcontribs) 16:57, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry that you feel that way, @JC7V7DC5768:. Unfortunately, the article in question is a biography of a living person and is subject to very specific requirements as to proper references and sources. I do not feel that the article meets those standards, which is why I have declined your submission. You are free to add references to the section to which I made note in my commentary along with my declining of the article and resubmit for review. Also, as this is not your Talk page, please do not remove comments. I have bot settings that archive material at specific intervals. StrikerforceTalk 17:03, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Read

Please don't be so bitey. Like newbies know about your 'bot' settings for you talk page. UGH. JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 17:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Again, I'm sorry that you feel that way. It is generally accepted practice for users not to remove material from the Talk pages of other users. StrikerforceTalk 17:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
I would also suggest that an edit summary along the lines of "can't talk to children" is not appropriate or civil. StrikerforceTalk 17:09, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for the summary. I won't be uncivil again. I was upset my article was declined. It's not easy for someone to get their submission rejected. I am sure 95 percent of Wikipedians have been uncivil a few times. JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 17:22, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Request on 19:21:17, 17 July 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by BensChopper


Hello,

Thanks for reviewing my Article, I understand you have declined it. Please can you explain in simplest form as to why a page about an Irish Actress cannot be published?

Many Thanks

BensChopper (talk) 19:21, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, @BensChopper:! In simplest terms, you don't have any reliable sources that establish the subject's notability under general guidelines or notability as it specifically pertains to entertainers. Facebook, IMDB, and Instagram are not acceptable sources and The Daily Mail isn't always considered acceptable. Wikipedia itself may also not be used a source. Thus, I declined for a failure to establish notability. StrikerforceTalk 19:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Many Thanks @Strikerforce:. If I was to Remove the sources, would that be ok? Many Thanks
You would still need to provide sources that meet RS in order for the article to be accepted. StrikerforceTalk 21:19, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Ok Thanks @Strikerforce:, I don’t really know what I can do from here onwards really. I’ve put all the information I know. Personally, I know that the sources are trustworthy as I follow the person so I know exactly what goes on. Perhaps you could assist me with helping to improve it to allow it to be created? Many Thanks
You will need to find sources that meet the guidelines set forth here. Social media accounts are typically not accepted as reliable sources because they are self-published by the subject or another party on their behalf. Use Google to find non-trivial mentions of Ms McDonnell that establish her notability. Right now, I simply don't see where she is notable for her own article. StrikerforceTalk 13:44, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi again @Strikerforce:, Please have a look at the following article, it has less information and one reference. If I was to remove the references that are not suitable (e.g. Instagram, IMDB), this would be in the same position as the article, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexa_Davies. I’m hoping this would be ok? Many Thanks
I'm not prepared to comment without seeing the changes. You're asking me to give a thumbs up or down essentially based upon the existence of something else. StrikerforceTalk 16:51, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi @Strikerforce:, No worries. I have never wanted to start an argument with you, I just fee this is a worthy article. I have made some changes and resubmitted, let me know what you think. Many Thanks.
I wasn't implying that you were trying to argue. I was just saying that I couldn't answer your question without seeing the changes to which you were referring. I'll go take a look! StrikerforceTalk 13:46, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Quantico (season 3)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Quantico (season 3). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

 Not done Am not familiar enough with the subject to feel comfortable commenting. StrikerforceTalk 13:46, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Adrian Cronauer

On 20 July 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Adrian Cronauer, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. StrikerforceTalk 14:59, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Domestic violence

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Domestic violence. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

On 20 July 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Table Rock Lake duck boat accident, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Pawnkingthree (talk) 20:20, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

The first article that I created to make the Main Page! Awesome! StrikerforceTalk 13:44, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

I had already told the author on their user talk page that I think the article is OK and they should re-submit, but that, since I had done so much of the work in improving the draft, that we should wait for another reviewer. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:36, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Okay, I'll go back and take another look. StrikerforceTalk 16:38, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

OSKAR

Hey Strikeforce, I didn't create the article for OSKAR (2018), I only moved it to the current title (it was previously titled wrong so I moved it to a correctly formatted title). Can you place the tag on the article creator's userpage?? Thank you and have a great day. JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 17:12, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Actually I understand why you did it. You can delete the redirects if you want. Thank you for notifying me. Have a great day. JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 17:14, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
The notification is an automatic function of Twinkle, sorry. I know you didn't create the original page, but it notified you because you created the redirect. All good. StrikerforceTalk 17:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of housing cooperatives in Canada. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Santorum

I'm talking about Campaign for the neologism "santorum", with a subject which is one of the most vile BLP violations I've ever seen here, and Wikipedia's dignifying is a low point for this so-called encyclopedia. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 21:28, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of box office records set by Deadpool. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Real Steel

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Real Steel. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Irving, Texas parking garage collapse

Hello, Strikerforce,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Irving, Texas parking garage collapse should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irving, Texas parking garage collapse .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Natureium (talk) 19:05, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I came across this new article you created. This article does not fulfill notability criteria. The edit summary at creation was "Creating stub article - may end up being non-notable, but have started this article for use in the event that the incident results in fatalities or is otherwise notable". There's no reason to create an article ASAP before there are any facts. At this point the best options are for you to add a {{Db-g7}} tag, or I can nominate it at AfD. Natureium (talk) 18:57, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello! I'm not willing to G7 the article, at this time, as it is a current event with information still unfolding. StrikerforceTalk 19:02, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Ok. I'll nominate it and people can discuss. Natureium (talk) 19:05, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
It's an event that is never going to be notable, voluntarily tagging it for deletion would be helpful and appreciated. It'll be AfD and a week before we can clean up this little accident you've had today otherwise. Nick (talk) 19:07, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
You have a crystal ball, Nick? Give it 24 hours. As I stated on the AfD, I will be happy to reconsider, if it turns out to be nothing more than a run of the mill failure in the structure's construction and nothing significant comes from it. StrikerforceTalk 19:13, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Just borrowing your crystal ball... Nick (talk) 19:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Pinging @Natureium:, @Chrissymad:, @Nick: - As Chrissy brought up in the recent AfD, "...an experienced user...", I'll expand to say "...an experienced user..." that hasn't really strayed into the arena of writing about news events. Most of what I've done in the past has been about static subjects (structures, radio stations, people, etc). I should have checked more into the guidelines for current event articles before getting into that area. I'll stay away from that area until I'm a bit more familiar. StrikerforceTalk 19:49, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

The basic principles of notability are the same regardless of subject. We don't create articles because the topic might become notable in the future. Natureium (talk) 20:27, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
True. My IRL background in reporting news, however, can get me in trouble, because I look at stories and see how they're newsworthy in that moment first and am used to writing immediately with verifiable information on-hand. In the case of this specific story, I'd have been all over that, as a reporter, but that's not always a good thing for WP. Live and learn. StrikerforceTalk 20:30, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Sig cleanup

Please update the HTML in your signature. Using deprecated tags like <font> triggers the WP:LINT filters; every time you sign, you are adding invalid HTML that we're eventually going to have to replace as move the pure HTML 5. Your sig looks awful to anyone who is using using user CSS to detect and clean up invalid HTML.

You can fix this in seconds in the Preferences menu by replacing:

  • [[User:Strikerforce|<font color="3333cc">'''Striker'''</font><font color="330099">'''force'''</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Strikerforce|<font color="3333cc">Talk</font>]] </sup>

with

  • [[User:Strikerforce|<span style="color:#3333cc;">'''Striker'''</span><span style="color:#330099;">'''force'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Strikerforce|<span style="color:#3333cc;">Talk</span>]]</sup>

Thank you in advance for helping Wikipedia modernize!  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  14:50, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Interesting. Thanks! I've made the change. StrikerforceTalk 15:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fountain (Duchamp)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fountain (Duchamp). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

AFC declines

Just as a note, when declining a draft at AFC, please use the "canned" summaries - if something fails NFILM, use the film decline reason. custom should only be used if it's an unacceptable draft that doesn't meet any of the "standard" decline reasons. The comments on a decline can be used to further explain the rationale behind the decline and/or offer suggestions as to improvement. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 17:40, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Okay, I will do that. Sometimes it just seems that the "canned" summaries may not completely make sense to a user that may be inexperienced and a less wordy summary, perhaps simpler, in some cases, would be be more useful. StrikerforceTalk 13:52, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Regards page Bhanwar Singh Vaish.

please see the article again and you will find why this aricle is necessary and not to be deleted I hope you will reply soon Bhanwar singh vaish (talk) 02:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

@Bhanwar singh vaish: Your rationale for contesting the speedy deletion isn't valid. You've created an autobiography and have not shown why you are notable under Wikipedia guidelines. StrikerforceTalk 15:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
sir let me tell you one thing that I am the only youngest Wikipedia member that's why my page is very notable as I am only 15 years of age and I have joined Wikipedia on the age of 14 years that's why I am saying that kindly give your feedback to my talk page thank you Bhanwar singh vaish (talk) 15:53, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
@Bhanwar singh vaish: Please keep comments about the same subject under the original heading for that subject. Unfortunately, your rationale is not valid under Wikipedia's guidelines. It should also be noted that you may be subject to being blocked if you continue to remove maintenance tags (such as CSD, PROD, or AfD notifications) from the article. StrikerforceTalk 15:57, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
PS page has been salted by Amakuru. Informing Slatersteven and Ravensfire about salting since they too called for it to be salted. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Redneck Fishing Tournament at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:03, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Strikerforce. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right may be revoked by an administrator. Swarm 12:41, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Now That's What I Call Music

Hi there and welcome to New Page Patrol. I noticed you marked as patrolled Now That's What I Call Music! 59 (UK series). Most NPP have felt that individual entries in this series were not notable and restored redirects. If you feel differently there's an AfD about several others in the series that's currently ongoing (and I plan to use as a NPP precedent for these either way it turns out) and which you might want to participate in. Also if you're going to patrol from the oldest side of NPP I have made a flowchart which you might find helpful. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:37, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

That is an interesting discussion, Barkeep49. Skimming through the first couple of comments, I can't say that I disagree with them. I'll probably chime in on the discussion. Thank you for the flowchart, I will definitely take a look! StrikerforceTalk 16:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm PKT. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Now That's What I Call Music! 62 (UK series), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

PKT(alk) 18:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

@PKT: No worries. I was considering reverting myself on those reviews, per the commentary provided elsewhere by a friendly barkeeper, anyways. StrikerforceTalk 18:10, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Regards page CardLife

Hi Strikerforce, I have added some new content to the CardLife page in relation to your feedback. The CardLife Page now features information about its creators Freejam Games. I've also added a new Reception category which shows that CardLife has had over 5 million views from prominent YouTube channels with a big following like PaulSoaresJnr (1.5 million subscribers), GrayStillPlays (663k subscribers) and others. I believe this will be enough for you to be satisfied that CardLife is notable enough to be featured on Wikipedia, but I'll leave that to you to decide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gribb85 (talkcontribs) 14:36, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, but the information about the creators of the game and the YouTube mentions don't change my current opinion of the article. The game still has not met notability guidelines. StrikerforceTalk 14:39, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

First edit suggestion

Hi Strikerforce, I made my first contribution via talk page of Polar Plunges. I was hoping to see if you could look at it and see if you could give me any pointers? Or better yet, if it looks good? I would really appreciate it! Polar Plunge - Illinois MRYork (talk) 19:02, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

As this is not an article relating to your employer, go ahead and be bold and make the edit. If something isn't quite right, someone will come along and fix it. StrikerforceTalk 19:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I appreciate the encouragement! As you can imagine I feel like I am walking on glass-shard ridden egg shells within the past week. MRYork (talk) 19:22, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

A beer for you!

You are a great person! MRYork (talk) 19:42, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oscar Wilde Memorial Sculpture. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

I Need Your Input On Accessing This Ref

Greetings, i need your input on accessing this reference, whether its reliable or not http://theglobeonline.news/entertainment/mic-diggy-apologies-to-slap-d-on-znbc-radio-4s-hip-hop-eardrum/ Regards Vicmullar (talk) 08:58, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

I'm not familiar with this particular source. A quick glance at a few pages on its website would suggest that it may be reliable, but I'm not prepared to state definitively one way or the other without further review. My suggestion would be to cite it as you were considering and see how the community reacts. StrikerforceTalk 14:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Ok the article was deleted How do i cite ? Am not an admin. @Barkeep49 said An initial look suggests the Globe Online could be RS and also @ansh thinks its probably reliable too. 41.77.149.190 (talk) 07:49, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I'm not sure that I'm following what you're asking me - the process of citing this source would be the same as any other. Are you not sure how to do citations, in general, or is there something about this specific source that is causing you some grief? Happy to help, once I'm certain what you're asking! StrikerforceTalk 14:12, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
i meant should i recreate the article then cite? since its deleted. Vicmullar (talk) 16:19, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Since the article has been deleted, yes, you would need to recreate it with the additional reference. As I recall, however, the deletion was due to the lack of notability of the subject. I'd have to see the new article to pass any sort of judgement as to whether the same result (deletion) wouldn't come from recreating. StrikerforceTalk 16:22, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Here http://theglobeonline.news/entertainment/mic-diggy-apologies-to-slap-d-on-znbc-radio-4s-hip-hop-eardrum/ it covers WP:MUSICBIO criteria 11 Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network. (and also MUSICBIO criteria 2, though there's no currently accepted chart for Zambia) as Barkeep49 would put it Vicmullar (talk) 16:31, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Please be aware that the various criteria all come with the stipulation that the subject may be notable if... Again, I'd have to see the recreated article to be able to pass any form of judgement. StrikerforceTalk 16:35, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Strikerforce Sure i'll let you know soon as am done, if you don't mind, i could use your help tiding it up (making it more appealing). Vicmullar (talk) 16:41, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

StrikerforceTalk

it gets deleted every 2 seconds without allowing me to state there is a new refernce. What do i do ? Vicmullar (talk) 19:23, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Are you familiar with your user Sandbox? If you're not well versed enough, please feel free to work on your new article here. Do not submit the page for consideration, etc. Work on the proposed new edit and I'll be happy to take a look at it, once you've finished. StrikerforceTalk 19:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
i did, you can check it out and let me know what you think Vicmullar (talk) 19:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
You still have problems with reliable sources. A majority of the sources that you've used in the most recent version still do not qualify as reliable sources. StrikerforceTalk 21:11, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Strikerforce

Alternatively i was considering creating a stub for now and expanding it as i find more sources, can that work? i was thinking of making a summary and possibly incorporating everything into 2 paragraphs, e.g for example, i refereed Cassper nyovest as the highest selling south african hip hop act in the article <ref>http://sahiphopmag.co.za/2018/02/top-5-best-selling-sa-hip-hop-artists-time/</ref>
Mic Diggy intro and signing with CD RUN france <ref>https://www.daily-mail.co.zm/mic-diggy-signs-cd-run/</ref>
His Slap Dee fued begin and end and his music playing across the country and hoping the no.4 spot i.e <ref>http://theglobeonline.news/entertainment/mic-diggy-apologies-to-slap-d-on-znbc-radio-4s-hip-hop-eardrum/</ref> <ref>https://www.zambianobserver.com/artist-slap-dee-shows-his-childishness-after-unleashing-insults-on-his-fans/</ref>

I removed other references there, check 102.144.76.226 (talk) 03:49, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

A stub is still going to be subject to the same challenges regarding reliable sources, especially as a biography of a living person. StrikerforceTalk 13:44, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
I Was stressed out that day, i will improve it on saturday. PS i noticed i was not the only one there. Lets talk over the weekend. Cheers 41.77.149.190 (talk) 07:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Aretha Franklin

On 16 August 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Aretha Franklin, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. StrikerforceTalk 18:00, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Page Edits

Hey Strikerforce, thanks for your help. It is much appreciated, will be sure to make the changes again with providing an edit summary + declaration of paid editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aushim123 (talkcontribs) 20:15, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Request on 06:29:55, 17 August 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by 109.98.165.185


After you've declined this draft, now Alex4ff contribuitor re-submitted for second time and awaiting review.

109.98.165.185 (talk) 06:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

I have declined for a second time for the reasons noted in my decline message shown in the the comments of the article. StrikerforceTalk 13:51, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you so much for helping me with my draft. I would really appreciate it if you paraphrased the information because I can't think of any good words to use in order to paraphrase the information. But by the way thanks for helping me out.--Anonymous1941 (talk) 18:18, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Yeah! Woo!

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Yeah! Woo!. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Redneck Fishing Tournament

On 19 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Redneck Fishing Tournament, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Redneck Fishing Tournament has seen thousands of Asian carp caught by its participants without the use of fishing poles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Redneck Fishing Tournament. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Redneck Fishing Tournament), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Mentorship

Hello Strikerforce. I think I need some mentorship from you to correct my occasional impulsiveness (in tagging articles, and very rarely in patrolling RC). I also have a low CSD and PROD log and would like tips on how to have a strong log for both (in particular in A7 and for spam tagging). You can review my daily or weekly edits starting ASAP and tell me if I am improving or not so I don't get delusional and think I am improving when I am not. I do try to wikify and fix up unreviewed new articles that are lacking (ie adding categories or references to the articles if they have no categories or if they are unreferenced or poorly referenced). I also will move an article that has no content into draft space (if after discussing it with the user they give me the green light). I've tried to steer some new editors in the right direction (using links to Wikipedia help pages mostly).

My AFD log is about in the low to mid 90s. I try to balance keep and delete so I am picky when I choose which AFD to vote in. I had an issue with an IP who took me to AIV. I have been a lot more respectful and nicer to IPs and new users since then (even to vandals). I stupidly reverted Chrissymad after she reverted me on a windmill article (but I self reverted with a stupid edit summary). Instead of communicating with Chrissy, I tried to fix the issue on the article's talk page.

I recently tried to touch up and nominate a few articles for GA review (AppleTV, XBox360) so I can at least play some role in adding more GAs to the site in areas I am interested in (video games/tech). Anyway so please help me. JC7V-constructive zone 19:02, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

I need to give this a bit of thought before I am able to give you a definite answer, JC7V7DC5768. I may not be the best available option for you, with regard to a "mentorship", as there are still plenty of areas of Wikipedia that I, myself, am still learning. StrikerforceTalk 20:32, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Ok fair enough. If you decide to mentor me, let me know. Thank you. JC7V-constructive zone 20:53, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hip hop music

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hip hop music. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia Articles Deletion Request

My Wikipedia Page, Kuasha Jakhon is considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. But I couldn't understand why my page is issued by delete. It's totally my work, there is no copywrite. Please notify me, where is my fault. But request you to, not delete my page.Ronita Bhattacharya (talk) 07:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ronita Bhattacharya: I've nominated the article for deletion on the basis that I believe it is a non-notable movie. As a discussion has already begun at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuasha Jakhon, I am not able to take any action other than to let the discussion at AfD play out. StrikerforceTalk 13:46, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

User Talk Page - Clean up

Curious what would be the best method to clean up my talk page? I was dinged previously for blanking, so would archiving be more advisable? If so, what would be the best approach? MRYork (talk) 19:07, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

@MRYork: If you're agreeable, I can put coding on your talk page that will archive on a regular basis, as my page does. StrikerforceTalk 19:13, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
That would be much appreciated! Don't want to piss off the admins again. As you know I'm skating on thin ice! Ha! MRYork (talk) 19:14, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
@MRYork: You're good to go, sir. StrikerforceTalk 19:28, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
You are the best! Thank you very much! MRYork (talk) 19:29, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

12:39, 22 August 2018‎ edit of Talk:Disappearance of Mollie Tibbetts

Next time you move an unsigned comment to what you feel is its proper place in the thread, please make sure you don't move other comments along with it. My comment is now out of context, but now embedded amid too many others to move. Thank you. --Sephiroth9611 (talk) 00:34, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Sephiroth9611 I'm sorry, but I'm not seeing how moving the unsigned and misplaced IP comment into the proper position (by time) in the discussion changed anything about your comment's context? It is still in the same position that it was previously, as the IP comment that I moved was placed after your comment, as it rightfully should have been, based on time stamp. StrikerforceTalk 17:54, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Regardless of where the IP comment belonged, I did not reply directly to your 16:22, 22 August 2018 comment. Mine was in reply to the original post by Mr_Xaero at the top, hence why it was not indented all the way under yours. Hope that clarifies it. --Sephiroth9611 (talk) 23:53, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gatestone Institute

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gatestone Institute. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Consensus takes time, sometimes

RfCs often run longer than four days. A week's usually the minimum, and at whichever time the whole thing should be closed together and a winner declared. I get that you started it, but once anyone responded, it became Wikipedia's. Didn't mean to insult you with the Q-word, just seemed like you wanted out, formally or otherwise. Nothing wrong with that. InedibleHulk (talk) 15:37, August 27, 2018 (UTC)

InedibleHulk No offense taken. I just want to see a resolution and I think my original proposal is clearly not one that is viable, based on the comments that have been offered in the discussion thus far. I was just trying to move things along and steer folks toward consideration of the other two proposals that, at this point, are probably more appropriate. StrikerforceTalk 16:05, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Understood. And I was just trying to avoid silencing the minority who believe it's right regardless of popularity. As a reminder, that includes you until (or unless) you strike out your initial support. InedibleHulk (talk) 10:17, August 28, 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Disappearance of Mollie Tibbetts

Hello! Your submission of Disappearance of Mollie Tibbetts at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 01:31, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Yoninah I have addressed. Happy to consider any additional suggestions! StrikerforceTalk 16:07, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 18:10, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello! I hate to bother you about this again, but I made sure to wait. So, it's been a while, and I'd like to know what you're waiting for on Jin's draft! I would resubmit, but it's still under your review I think! I noticed that the Jin (singer) redirect was misunderstood and not deleted. When I saw, I didn't bother reaching out because I'm still unexperienced here and unsure of where to do that. I believe they deleted because it "didn't make sense of why" apparently? So what I'm asking, is there a chance you can go for getting the redirect removed again? Maybe this time you could link my draft possibly! No rush, I would just like to remind, since nothing is happening at the moment. Or is there anything I or you can think to do in order to get it published? (Like manually removing the redirect automatically, or I suppose that's not allowed...)

Additionally, the random talk text should be removed before publishing...!

Thank you for your time! - idkSam (talk) 21:17, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

IdkSam I have declined the submission for the reason's noted on the draft itself. StrikerforceTalk 14:35, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Strikerforce Oh! What changed overtime? I thought that I outlined why a re-do of his draft for better information is okay, despite the latest, but old, deletion of simply abandonment of the draft. I also talked about his notability (except that was automatically deleted already). Additionally, individual member profiles would not work on a group as big as BTS (band). It's not usual for information about members, besides birthdays and age, to be on an article meant for the band as a whole. I suggest, possibly we can submit again through "Kim Seok-jin", in this way we recognize him as a notable person rather than a band member?
Disregarding that though, can you give me a pointer on what stands out to you as him being unnotable, despite my sources? I promise that I did research on his notability. Jin follows the general guidelines as I read them, but yes I am still unexperienced. I will explain what I know.
Wikipedia:Notability (people), Basic criteria:
• People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
I cited multiple sources of this, such as the main (English) articles dedicated to him, by Billboard, and excerpts from the Rolling Stone, which can be found in the draft. Recognition of his song cover(s) by Grammy (and Billboard). Individual songs, hosting, award nominations, and shows of his covered by Korean news (obviously, for events held in Korea) and occasionally, Billboard mentioned his songs. I'm sure there are reliable sources for every single fact. (Off topic: Along with the release of a new solo track of his, there are even more articles to be added, describing his singing and solos as Jin.)
Additionally, Wikipedia:Notability, General notability guideline:
• "Sources" should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability. There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected. Sources do not have to be available online or written in English.
A great deal of articles are not in English, but this is allowed by Wikipedia guidelines apparently, so it should not be a problem. Although this is an obstacle for people checking out the original articles, it is still true if you bother to do a quick Google translate.
There's more... but to keep it short, again, I compare Jin's article to that of V (singer), as they are from the same group with similiar, if not a little more, achievments. I used his success as a basis to the mere possibility of Jin's article being published, so I'm confused on why this didn't work out.
You are right, if you are thinking that it's in my personal interest to see him in the Wiki. However, I'm not going to be ignorant about this, so I do want to know myself if he truly deserves it. I did research and compared articles of his level (the minimal level I have written to) here, and I do not see a reason as to why he shouln't be considered as a person with info attached to him, covered genuinely by American and (obviously, rightfully majorly) Korean media. Jin is by no means not famous, (or not searched) for one thing. It's common fact that his group account, shared with his members, full of pictures of himself, are the most followed Korean account on Twitter, and most mentioned across countless SNS. They are widely known as the Billboard Top Social musical artists for two years in a row. They are indeed popular, and I believe Jin contributes to that. Wikipedia:Notability states:
"Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines explained below."
I apologize for being lengthy again! I guess it's due to the inexperience, I want to make sure I cover as much as possible. Thank you for your time, again. Here's to this being over with! - idkSam (talk) 07:20, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:How to write a plot summary. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Notice

Strongly disagree with the nomination, @Jytdog:, and have made my commentary at AfD. Thank you for the notification, though, it is appreciated. StrikerforceTalk 13:46, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
You're welcome. :) Jytdog (talk) 13:47, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Guardians of the Galaxy (film). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Request on 04:53:35, 4 September 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Alex4ff


Hi there! It's third time when editor Alex4ff resubmitted 29 August and awaiting review. Thanks!

109.102.105.180 (talk) 04:53, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

It appears that another reviewer has already taken action on this request. StrikerforceTalk 13:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ant-Man and the Wasp

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ant-Man and the Wasp. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Burt Reynolds

On 7 September 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Burt Reynolds, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. StrikerforceTalk 14:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BBC Radio 1

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:BBC Radio 1. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Mac Miller

On 8 September 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Mac Miller, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:32, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Here (Alicia Keys album). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

 Done StrikerforceTalk 19:33, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

New email

Hello, Strikerforce. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
@MRYork:, I haven't checked that account in ages and have forgotten the password. I have just changed the email account associated with my Wikipedia account. Please resend your email and it will get to the updated account. Thanks. StrikerforceTalk 19:32, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
@Strikerforce: Will do! MRYork (talk) 19:34, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Swimming (Mac Miller album). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 11 September 2018 (UTC)  Done StrikerforceTalk 19:38, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Killing of Mollie Tibbetts

On 16 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Killing of Mollie Tibbetts, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a record reward was raised by the local Crime Stoppers in the month-long search for missing University of Iowa student Mollie Tibbetts, who was found dead in a cornfield? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Killing of Mollie Tibbetts), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kind of Blue

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kind of Blue. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

??

User:Iamheentity/Nayeem can you tell the reason why u moved the page it has enough sources about his criminal actvity and criminal charge and it is from well known news sites and papers like times of india and deccan chronicle the hindu Iamheentity (talk) 14:53, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

In my opinion, the article - as it existed at the time of the move - did not pass BLPCRIME. It also has significant errors in structure. You're more than welcome to move it back into the Main, but - without better sourcing and establishment of notability - it's going to be vulnerable to an AfD nomination. StrikerforceTalk 15:45, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
I dont understand why you are telling that he is not having notability about his criminal activity the reference i provided in the artical are good.i agree with errors and structure. Please help me in improving it please Iamheentity (talk) 17:04, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Or is there any way that i can ask other editors to help me in improving the artical Iamheentity (talk) 17:06, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
I am not that familiar with publications in India, so I'm the wrong person to ask about whether or not you're using reliable sources in the article. However, when I looked at a handful of your sources, I was left with questions as to whether or not they were reliable due to a lack - as far as I'm able to see - of editorial oversight. "Times of India" is known to be a reliable source, but I have some doubts about the other sources. I also am not convinced that the article's subject passes the standard for notability for those accused of crimes. StrikerforceTalk 17:21, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
To the best that I am able to tell, the article's subject was accused of crimes, but never actually convicted. Thus, in my opinion, you've got a notability problem. StrikerforceTalk 17:22, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018

Hello Strikerforce, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.

Project news
As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.
Other
Moving to Draft and Page Mover
  • Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
  • If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
  • Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
  • The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
  • The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing

  • Twinkle provides a lot of the same functionality as the page curation tools, and some reviewers prefer to use the Twinkle tools for some/all tasks. It can be activated simply in the gadgets section of 'preferences'. There are also a lot of options available at the Twinkle preferences panel after you install the gadget.
  • In terms of other gadgets for NPR, HotCat is worth turning on. It allows you to easily add, remove, and change categories on a page, with name suggestions.
  • MoreMenu also adds a bunch of very useful links for diagnosing and fixing page issues.
  • User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js(info): Installing scripts doesn't have to be complicated. Go to your common.js and copy importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' ); into an empty line, now you can install all other scripts with the click of a button from the script page! (Note you need to be at the ".js" page for the script for the install button to appear, not the information page)
  • User:TheJosh/Scripts/NewPagePatrol.js(info): Creates a scrolling new pages list at the left side of the page. You can change the number of pages shown by adding the following to the next line on your common.js page (immediately after the line importing this script): npp_num_pages=20; (Recommended 20, but you can use any number from 1 to 50).
  • User:Primefac/revdel.js(info): Is requesting revdel complicated and time consuming? This script helps simplify the process. Just have the Copyvio source URL and go to the history page and collect your diff IDs and you can drop them into the script Popups and it will create a revdel request for you.
  • User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js(info): Creates a "Page Curation" link to Special:NewPagesFeed up near your sandbox link.
  • User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/deletionFinder.js: Creates links next to the title of each page which show up if it has been previously deleted or nominated for deletion.
  • User:Evad37/rater.js(info): A fantastic tool for adding WikiProject templates to article talk pages. If you add: rater_autostartNamespaces = 0; to the next line on your common.js, the prompt will pop up automatically if a page has no Wikiproject templates on the talk page (note: this can be a bit annoying if you review redirects or dab pages commonly).

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

JB and Halie

Huh check they are married now Furry ninja (talk) 14:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

@Furry ninja: You did not provide a reliable source for that information in your edit. Thus, per BLP, the edit had to be reverted. StrikerforceTalk 15:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Quiet storm

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Quiet storm. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

 Done StrikerforceTalk 14:13, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

What does this mean?

Can you be more specific? [8] Toddst1 (talk) 21:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

@Toddst1: Sure. My comment was to clarify that the specific edit for which you'd reported the user was not vandalism and was in error. When I reviewed the history of edits by that user, I noticed a couple instances of disputed editing between the two of you. Digging deeper into the edits that you had reverted, they didn't - in my opinion - rise to the level of vandalism. They were edits that needed to be cited, yes, but good faith was there. Hence, "disputed edits". StrikerforceTalk 14:05, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Although, now having read the user's talk page after being blocked, their comments about the matter do give me cause for concern. I still would not have reported for that specific edit, however, despite the fact that they were wrong - the 1969 AFL and NFL seasons, according to Pro-Football-Reference, only had a total of three MNF games between the two leagues. StrikerforceTalk 14:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Yeah. "Disputed edits." That's it. Good job. Toddst1 (talk) 14:38, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Dave Barrett (journalist)

On 21 September 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Dave Barrett (journalist), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. StrikerforceTalk 14:40, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

User talk:Strikerforce (section)

Please dont edit my user page.I strictly warn you if you commit this mistake in future,then i need to take action which will be very hard for you.please act decently in web media.you are assigned for responsible post.and act with tact.seriously if you want to edit likethis again restart your PRIMARY prep classes' .--Manavatha (talk) 07:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

I'd hope that's not any sort of legal threat, Manavatha. StrikerforceMobile (talk) 11:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alan Walker discography. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:22, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Resized file has been uploaded.  Done StrikerforceTalk 17:38, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

User talk:Strikerforce (section)

if you want to do troll expreiments go and do in your personal socialaccounts -YOUR boss is giving payamount for doing your job and wiki has given you opportunity as a member.Be fair to your pay and opportunity.stop editing my user page bcoz its personal account its NOT article--Manavatha (talk) 07:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Threats are usually not well received by the community, Manavatha. I've not done anything wrong under WP policy. StrikerforceMobile (talk) 11:15, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Well, you have - you've seriously misunderstood WP:UP#CMT and edit warred on his talk page and just plain harassed him, editing his user page. Toddst1 (talk) 23:30, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
@Toddst1: From UP#CMT, A number of important matters may not be removed by the user—they are part of the wider community's processes: ... * Miscellany for deletion tags (while the discussion is in progress). which applies to the images that the notice I left on the user's TP. I have not edit warred and don't appreciate the implication. As to the images themselves on the UP, he is not the copyright holder, per the information provided - as of my removal of them from the UP. Therefore, as a possible copy vio, removal is not improper. StrikerforceTalk 14:56, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
There is a difference between a MFD tag and a courtesy notice that the tag was applied to a file. In this case, you are insisting that the courtesy notice must remain, which is not in line with UP#CMT.
As far as the "possible copy vio," you have no indication that it is a vio. If the file is on-wiki, then it can be used. If it's a copyvio, then it shouldn't be on-wiki - and there's a discussion underway about that. Toddst1 (talk) 17:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, it's not clear at all how you came up with a total of over 58,000 hits for the hook for Killing of Mollie Tibbetts. The hook only appeared on September 16, and received 6,584 hits on that day. I relisted it at the DYKSTATS page. Best, Yoninah (talk) 21:27, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Buddy Williams (country musician). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Help - Need an admin to email me

I have a question for an administrator that I would prefer to keep to email only, at the present time. Thanks! StrikerforceTalk 15:04, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

@Strikerforce: My suggestion to you is to find your favorite friendly admin, maybe even one who has done a recent edit, and go that way. I have, however, changed your template to the admin specific ping. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:20, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, @Strikerforce. Please email me via Special:EmailUser/AGK and we can take your query from there. AGK [•] 21:07, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dark wave

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dark wave. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

File:EnterpriseCenterSTL-Rendering.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EnterpriseCenterSTL-Rendering.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  06:02, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Trin-i-tee 5:7

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trin-i-tee 5:7. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EnterpriseCenterSTL-Rendering.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EnterpriseCenterSTL-Rendering.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Boy (album)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Boy (album). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Humans episodes. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:George Soros

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Soros. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Are you sure you want this deleted? It's transcluded on many talk pages, so deleting it will cause the messages to be lost. Doesn't seem like too big of a problem, since as far as I can tell you only used it in 2011 or so, but just double checking. ansh666 20:16, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

I would assume that most of the places that I used that back in the day are on pages for users that are either no longer active or that have long since archived those posts. I'm okay with it being deleted... or being kept... either way is fine. I was just doing some cleanup of my watchlist and noticed it. StrikerforceTalk 20:38, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blonde (Frank Ocean album). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Strikerforce, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Backlog

As of 21 October 2018, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.

Community Wishlist Proposal
Project updates
  • ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
  • There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.
New scripts

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sci-Hub

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sci-Hub. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Nayeem

You edited Nayeem (gangster), would you mind checking latest discussion on the Talk page please. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:03, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, but that's very much a "thanks, but no thanks" situation, for me. StrikerforceTalk 17:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Longo (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProgrammingGeek was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ProgrammingGeek talktome 23:05, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Strikerforce! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ProgrammingGeek talktome 23:05, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
This should have been left on the TP of the author, not mine. StrikerforceTalk 14:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Elliot Soto listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Elliot Soto. Since you had some involvement with the Elliot Soto redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Spanneraol (talk) 17:43, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

 Done StrikerforceTalk 16:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

reply to your essay(((((Archiving vs Blanking etc etc

Answer to your essay

  • Reply to previous editor i dont want mention your name .But please understand archive is a collection.

So the messages are stored when it is necessary or else it has to be erased. need not set up anything for me.https://5.imimg.com/data5/RW/MW/MY-54813185/natraj-rubber-eraser-500x500.jpg if you want u can use it................please dont come back to my talk page again and again. - unsigned comment left by Manavatha

I have posted on your page exactly twice - to notify you of files subject to deletion (a required action when making such a nomination) and to make the above-referenced archiving suggestion. Please don't try to exaggerate the situation into some perceived "stalking" incident. StrikerforceTalk 17:32, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Strikerforce,

Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
  • Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.
If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.
We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.
With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Strikerforce. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Stephen Hillenburg

On 27 November 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Stephen Hillenburg, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 19:03, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks a lot for keeping a close eye on Ryan Day. Vjmlhds (and a few others) are apparently having a hard time being patient and waiting until after the Rose Bowl to make those changes. It would be great if you could also watch Ohio State Buckeyes football and Urban Meyer for similar changes by impatient editors. 2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43 (talk) 18:36, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Don't mention it! I'll keep an eye on the other articles, as well. StrikerforceTalk 18:40, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
I notice that the program's page was just (literally, within the last couple of minutes) protected, so that should cut down on the repeated changes a bit. Coach Meyer's page is autoconfirm protected, so that's going to be a matter of policing, as changing it to semi-protected would actually be a step backward. StrikerforceTalk 18:42, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! It's nice having great, long-time editors like you to help protect the integrity of articles whose topics are in the midst of getting a lot of media coverage. 2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43 (talk) 18:50, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Malcolm Kendrick as a source

Kendrick's personal blog is being used a source. See George D. Lundberg, a user keeps trying to add his blog. Skeptic from Britain (talk) 13:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

@Skeptic from Britain: Sorry, I'm not typically active on weekends, so I'm just getting caught up. I've watchlisted the article.StrikerforceTalk 14:58, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Another writer similar to Malcolm Kendrick and Uffe Ravnskov - Andreas Eenfeldt, I submitted for deletion. Skeptic from Britain (talk) 20:18, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

) I would appreciate clarification on the deletion of the Malcolm Kendrick page. I would like clarification on what WOULD satisfy the editors of the notability of Dr Kendrick? Is it peer reviewed papers? Newspaper or other media coverage of him? Number of books published and sold? OR what? I would genuinely appreciate this being clarified. I also note Skeptic from Britain now wants to delete another bio - that of Uffe Ravsnskov - who like Kendrick is a member of THINCS - a loose assocation of doctors, scientists and others who question the conventional position on cholesterol. This is two members "targeted" by Skeptic. Why? I am not a frequent contributor or editor but that in itself should not disqualify my edits or contributions - we cannot all be experts or knowledgeable about everything!Boddisatva 10:07, 12 December 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RPainter (talkcontribs)

Have a look at what constitutes a reliable source WP:RS. If there were peer-reviewed papers discussing his work or that mention him I would have voted to keep the article and so would others but there are none. Mainstream science does not take his ideas seriously, this would probably explain why no medicine journals reviewed his book in detail. In a few years there might be reliable secondary sources, but for now per policy his article has been deleted. Skeptic from Britain (talk) 14:56, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018

Hello Strikerforce,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top 100 reviewers.

Less good news, and an appeal for some help

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.


Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.


Training video

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Pirate hamster (talk) 05:33, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

@Pirate hamster: I have thoughts about your report, but as I am currently dealing with an off-Wiki crisis, it will be several days before I am able to offer them. Thanks for the notification, however. StrikerforceMobile (talk) 23:13, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
My response may be found here. StrikerforceTalk 16:15, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Hey, I appreciate your help on some of the articles I edited and your advice. You are a good editor. Unfortunately regarding the Malcolm Kendrick thing I was doxxed by some of his associates such as Tom Naughton, Jimmy Moore etc and these people including Kendrick have posted my real life name etc on various social media platforms and low-carb websites. Jimmy Wales spoke to some of these people via twitter but they ended up insulting him. They are not to be reasoned with! I will leave them to their irrational conspiracy theories. I will be leaving Wikipedia. I have requested a courtesy blanking of my username. MatthewManchester1994 (talk) 00:01, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Removing of unsuitable content

You suggested to another administrator who had redacted and revision-deleted content from a page that he might do some more on the same page. I have removed what I think must have been what you had in mind, but feel welcome to let me know if there is anything else I have missed, by email if necessary. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:57, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

@JamesBWatson: It looks like you got it. Thanks! StrikerforceTalk 14:57, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve DuPage Pistol Shrimp

Hello, Strikerforce,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating DuPage Pistol Shrimp! I edit here too, under the username Willsome429 and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add more references to the page. Multiple independent sources are needed to make a good Wikipedia page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 16:23, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

@Willsome429: I appreciate what you're trying to do, but please don't template the regulars. I'm aware of the issues with this article. It was created within minutes of the press conference announcing the team and the only source available at the time was the one within the article when you tagged it. I will look for more sources. StrikerforceTalk 17:08, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Penny Marshall

On 20 December 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Penny Marshall, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:10, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WPFMFM Logo 2013.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WPFMFM Logo 2013.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Strikerforce. You have new messages at RPainter's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

. PLease read comment on my talk page to you. Boddisatva 15:04, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

 Done StrikerforceTalk 21:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Keith Urban

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Keith Urban. Legobot (talk) 04:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17

Hello Strikerforce,

News
Discussions of interest
  • Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
  • {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
  • A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
  • There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
Reminders
  • NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
NPP Tools Report
  • Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
  • copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
  • The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.


Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Electronic Arts games. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Muse (disambiguation)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Muse (disambiguation). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Motion picture content rating system. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Harry Potter influences and analogues. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Carnage (comics)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carnage (comics). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bohemian Rhapsody (film). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of most-subscribed YouTube channels. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Thank U, Next

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Thank U, Next. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bobby soxer (music)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bobby soxer (music). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Monty Python's Flying Circus episodes. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Athens News

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Athens News. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Princess Zelda

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Princess Zelda. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Monopoly (song)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monopoly (song). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jimi Hendrix posthumous discography. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of box office records set by It. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Graham Linehan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Graham Linehan. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The New York Times

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The New York Times. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.18

Hello Strikerforce,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

  • Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
  • Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News
Discussions of interest

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250


Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bond 25

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bond 25. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Herndon Monument Climb - Thank you!

Thank you so much for fixing the hidden-table error from my edits to the Herndon Monument Climb times! I could not for the life of me figure out what I had done wrong to make it hidden (was it a missing carriage return? thought I tried that, but . . . ), and I hoped someone would swoop in and fix it for me/the community. And you did. Just wanted to be sure you know I appreciate it immensely. ~/Nefertari-Ta-Sherit 00:38, 21 May 2019 (UTC) P.S. Hi, fellow Herndon enthusiast!

Please comment on Talk:Postmodern art

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Postmodern art. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Game of Thrones title sequence. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:TERF

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:TERF. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Axios (website)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Axios (website). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Wall Street Journal. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jimmy Dore

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jimmy Dore. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Marriage

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Marriage. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Silente

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Silente. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of most visited museums. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Call You Mine

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Call You Mine. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019

Hello Strikerforce,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.


Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Television licensing in the United Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sharyl Attkisson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sharyl Attkisson. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kodomo no Jikan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kodomo no Jikan. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:T. Rex (band)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:T. Rex (band). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:NYC Pride March

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:NYC Pride March. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Andy Ngo

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Andy Ngo. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Elon Musk

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elon Musk. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michael Jackson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Michael Jackson. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lil Nas X

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lil Nas X. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

St. Louis Blues Medical Team

Strikerforce, the reason I added the “Medical Team” section to the page is due to the tremendous importance of the medical team to the St Louis Blues. How do you suggest we add this recognition without it looking “spammy” or “promotional”. Other big sports teams such as FC Barcelona and Liverpool F.C. have “Personnel” and “Coaching and medical staff” sections in which they mention the medical team. Doc2129 (talk) 21:10, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Other stuff exists is not a valid reason to include spam. I would say that the same removal of such content would be in order for the teams that you've linked. StrikerforceTalk 15:57, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Wikipedia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Wikipedia. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Panic! at the Disco

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Panic! at the Disco. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rachel Campos-Duffy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rachel Campos-Duffy. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rainbow Honor Walk

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rainbow Honor Walk. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Zendaya

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zendaya. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Re: WZPL

Frankly, I would challenge you to tell me just who would be better suited to offer input on WSMJ/WIKS/WZPL. Someone like myself with first hand knowledge of the events that shaped the history of the radio station - dating back as early as my father's employment there in 1963. Or someone, like the poster I attempted to correct, offering blatantly incorrect information making obvious the contributors zero personal history with the radio station. You can have your incorrect information if my personal history is considered a detriment. As for "scolding," I stand by my use of that word. As for making any further attempt to correct an inaccuracy on wikipedia, consider the lesson learned. I'll not attempt to do so again. No wonder many consider wikipedia to be the joke that I'm finding it is.

98.29.44.145 (talk) 16:09, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

@98.29.44.145: You're missing the point. I agree - someone with experience at the radio station would be in a great position to offer input. I have found myself in the same situation previously, in the same industry. But, that's not what standing Wikipedia policy says. While IAR would seem to be a logical item to apply to the situation, you'll find that other editors often don't see it that way and we get in hot water over the issue. StrikerforceTalk 16:24, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stanley Kubrick

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stanley Kubrick. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mindhunter (TV series)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mindhunter (TV series). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:IHeartRadio Canada

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:IHeartRadio Canada. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of music considered the worst. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Red (Taylor Swift album). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2019 in film

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2019 in film. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019

Hello Strikerforce,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
  • Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.
Not English
  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Korn

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Korn. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Desmond Napoles

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Desmond Napoles. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Super Audio CD

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Super Audio CD. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Propaganda

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Propaganda. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Siouxsie Sioux

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Siouxsie Sioux. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Idles (band)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Idles (band). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

I am just a humble categoriser and dont know much about internet radio. Is there a seperate website for each country? For each station? I dont really understand what is meant by "all-in-one iHeartRadio service featuring thousands of live radio stations". If you know more than I do your advice on how to categorise this would be helpful. Rathfelder (talk) 20:34, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

iHeartRadio hosts stations, terrestrial and online-only alike, from several countries. That's why I did not feel it was proper to remove the generalized category and replace it with "American", as it's not just an American company. If you wanted to add the American category, leaving the generalized category as well, I'd find that acceptable. StrikerforceTalk 20:44, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Veridia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Veridia. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox film

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox film. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cultural impact of the Beatles. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bell Media Radio

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bell Media Radio. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:How It's Done

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:How It's Done. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter November 2019

Hello Strikerforce,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 813 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools
  • It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
  • It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes
  • Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
  • Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.


To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Darkseid

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Darkseid. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Coddling of the American Mind. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tucker Carlson Tonight

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tucker Carlson Tonight. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2019 Hong Kong protests. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Jennifer Aniston performances. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Arrowverse

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Arrowverse. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Top Gear (1977 TV series). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Beyoncé discography

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Beyoncé discography. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter December 2019

A graph showing the number of articles in the page curation feed from 12/21/18 - 12/20/19

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days
Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 Rosguill (talk) 47,395 Patrol Page Curation
2 Onel5969 (talk) 41,883 Patrol Page Curation
3 JTtheOG (talk) 11,493 Patrol Page Curation
4 Arthistorian1977 (talk) 5,562 Patrol Page Curation
5 DannyS712 (talk) 4,866 Patrol Page Curation
6 CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 3,995 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 3,812 Patrol Page Curation
8 Boleyn (talk) 3,655 Patrol Page Curation
9 Ymblanter (talk) 3,553 Patrol Page Curation
10 Cwmhiraeth (talk) 3,522 Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

RfC notice

Based on your participation in an earlier discussion, you are invited to comment at WNGH-TV#RfC about TV and radio station style variances. Thanks. – Reidgreg (talk) 19:08, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Hello Strikerforce,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources
Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WKMX NEW LOGO.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WKMX NEW LOGO.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WIAD The Drive Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WIAD The Drive Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020

Hello Strikerforce,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources
  • A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
  • Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
  • A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
  • Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WKMX NEW LOGO.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WKMX NEW LOGO.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lichess on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cracker (term) on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DuPage Pistrol Shrimp Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DuPage Pistrol Shrimp Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Draft talk:Scott Dadich on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cavetown (musician) on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello Strikerforce,

A chart of the 2020 New Page Patrol Queue

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Willie York for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Willie York is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willie York (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lettlerhellocontribs 04:08, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Douglas Murray (author) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Michael J. Fox on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:59, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:English people on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:BBC (disambiguation) on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Gaudeamus igitur on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hardcore (punk rock and heavy metal subgenre) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of emergency telephone numbers on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of nicknames used by Donald Trump on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Christopher Wren on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CapeCatfishLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CapeCatfishLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Discovery One on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Philadelphia 76ers on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CumulusMediaLogoNEW.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CumulusMediaLogoNEW.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 13:37, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:The New York Times on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello Strikerforce,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.


To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bauhaus (band) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:The Sopranos on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Category names on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
  • On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 01:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Donald Trump on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Steele dossier on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Oxford High School shooting on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Goofy on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pegasus (spyware) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of online encyclopedias on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:College and university rankings on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Freshpet on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Charlie Moore (basketball) on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Halo (TV series) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello Strikerforce,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 813 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 861 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Goth subculture on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello Strikerforce,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 14845 articles, as of 18:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Notes
  1. ^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
  2. ^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics/American politics on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022

New Page Review queue August 2022

Hello Strikerforce,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination
MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.
Open letter to the WMF
The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.
TIP - Reviewing by subject
Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.
New reviewers
The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.
Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Disappearance of Lauren Spierer on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP message

Hi Strikerforce,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

Hi Strikerforce! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

  1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
  2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
  3. Paste {{Frs user|Strikerforce|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
  4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:02, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Article patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
  • There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol needs your help!

New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello Strikerforce,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter

Hello Strikerforce,

New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello Strikerforce:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2400 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Strikerforce! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MusikBot II talk 17:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)