Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Suntag (talk | contribs)
Articles created/expanded on November 6: Symbol confirmed.svg for George Sopkin
Line 175: Line 175:


*... that '''[[Odd Isaachsen Willoch]]''', an uncle of later [[Prime Minister of Norway|Norwegian Prime Minister]] [[Kåre Willoch]], commanded the ship [[HNoMS Eidsvold|HNoMS ''Eidsvold'']] which was sunk in 1940 during the [[Battles of Narvik]]? -- co-nomination by [[User:Manxruler|Manxruler]] and [[User:Punkmorten|Punkmorten]] ([[User talk:Punkmorten|talk]]) 13:48, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
*... that '''[[Odd Isaachsen Willoch]]''', an uncle of later [[Prime Minister of Norway|Norwegian Prime Minister]] [[Kåre Willoch]], commanded the ship [[HNoMS Eidsvold|HNoMS ''Eidsvold'']] which was sunk in 1940 during the [[Battles of Narvik]]? -- co-nomination by [[User:Manxruler|Manxruler]] and [[User:Punkmorten|Punkmorten]] ([[User talk:Punkmorten|talk]]) 13:48, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

*... that '''[[Rescue of Jews by Polish communities during the Holocaust|many Polish Jews were sheltered by Polish individuals, organizations and communities]]''' during the [[Holocaust in Nazi-occupied Poland]]? --article by [[User:Poeticbent]], [[User:Ecoleetage]] and myself, nom by <sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 17:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC)


===Articles created/expanded on November 5===
===Articles created/expanded on November 5===

Revision as of 17:49, 7 November 2008

Núria Llansà
Núria Llansà

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page.

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Instructions

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles whose main body text has been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a JavaScript extension like User:Dr pda/prosesize.js (instructions on the talk page), a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. For Mac users, Apple has a Word counter widget available for Mac OS X 10.4 or later. Note: The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • always cited in the article with an inline citation.
Please note that hooks are subject without notice to copyediting as they move to the main page. The nature of the DYK process makes it impractical to consult users over every such edit. In particular, hooks will be shortened if they are deemed too long: the 200-character limit is an outside limit not a recommended length. Also, watch the suggestions page to ensure that no issues have been raised about your hook, because if you do not respond to issues raised your hook may not be featured at all.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as [[Image:image name |right|100x100px| Description]] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Suggested sounds should have similar qualities to pictures, and should be formatted using the format {{DYK Listen|filename.ogg|Brief description}}
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]] and ~~~~
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|November 10}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • For more details see the previously Unwritten Rules.

Symbols

  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Next update


Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on November 7

  • The source statement "The arched base, constructed from rough-hewn limestone, is unique among Kentucky memorials. The zinc statue it supports is typical of stock soldier figures: wearing a uniform with slouch hat and holding a rifle down in front. The soldier also wears a bedroll and canteen."[1] does not seem to say why the arched base is unique. -- Suntag 15:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No qualifying article.97198 (talk) 11:47, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The BankWest Tower in Perth, Western Australia
The BankWest Tower in Perth, Western Australia

Articles created/expanded on November 6

No qualifying article. Also, nom duplicated under "Articles created/expanded on November 7" above. -- Suntag 15:44, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The only thing in the article I could find about Cumbria is "Ranulf's accession may have involved him giving up many of his other lands, including much of his wife's Lincolnshire lands and his land in Cumbria, though direct evidence for this beyond convenient timing is lacking." -- Suntag 15:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is a whole section devoted to his rule of Cumbria before becoming earl of Chester. You are right though that, contrary to what many often say, there is little evidence that he had to give up rule of Cumbria for Chester (may have happened later). Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 17:28, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Grace Church
Grace Church
  • The press release[2] says "In the mid-1990s Valspar began an aggressive international expansion, which over the following ten years increased its overseas sales from 3 percent to more than 30 percent of overall sales." Also, the DYK hook should be source to a secondary source that is independent of the article's topics. -- Suntag 16:03, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lenght date, and reference verified. -- Suntag 15:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lenght date, and reference ("He was in St. Louis and there was no bike messengers there, but he was obsessed with this, so he wrote open source software for dispatching, which to this day is used by many different taxi cab companies.") verified. The facts that Dorsey wrote the taxi software at 14 and that the taxi software was Dorsey's inspiration for the twitter software would enhance the DYK hook. This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues for the image. The image source links to Creative Commons 2.0 license. However, if that is all Wikipedia needs to confirm free use (I am unsure of this and the Wikipedia image page is tagged with "Flickr review needed"), then good to go for the Main Page. -- Suntag 16:28, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1 ... that the successful escape from the multi-ship mutiny at the Nore by Royal Navy Captain Charles Cunningham (pictured) in 1797 lead to that mutiny's failure? -- Suntag 16:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done. :) Arcayne (cast a spell) 06:09, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nepenthes northiana
Nepenthes northiana

Articles created/expanded on November 5

Charles Shorey House
Charles Shorey House
Added some links. --74.14.18.233 (talk) 14:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whose nom is this? --74.14.18.233 (talk) 21:34, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it's MPorciusCato's. BobAmnertiopsisChatMe! 22:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does "Graduate" already mean people with a master's or doctor's degree? Are they rejecting applications for membership from people who got straight to a PhD program after undergraduate, skipping the master's? --74.14.18.233 (talk) 14:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In Finland, it is impossible to skip the master's. Foreign PhDs with such qualifications would be allowed, I think. On the other hand, it was possible until 2005 to skip the bachelor's degree. The study to master's degree without a bachelor took five years after high school graduation. (BTW, I edited this nomination a little.) --MPorciusCato (talk) 15:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT: ... that a digital time capsule "A Message From Earth" was transmitted to the planet Gliese 581c and included a message by actress Gillian Anderson comprising images of George W. Bush and Barack Obama? --Bruce1eetalk 14:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me :) Chamal talk 16:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
19th century telegraph pole
19th century telegraph pole
  • ... that Harrison Gray Dyar erected the first telegraph line (telegraph pole pictured) and dispatched the first message over it ever sent, being designated by the U.S. Supreme Court as the real inventor of the telegraph? new article, self nom by --Doug Coldwell talk 14:45, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've added a pic. How about this for an alternate hook:
ALT: ... that Harrison Gray Dyar erected the first telegraph line (telegraph pole pictured) and dispatched over it the first message ever sent, making him the real inventor of the telegraph? --Bruce1eetalk 14:51, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I like Bruce1ee's ALT better and with the pic, works for me. --Doug Coldwell talk 16:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Added a link. --74.14.18.233 (talk) 14:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Verified. – RyanCross (talk) 05:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 4

Bank of Spain
Haydn
Haydn
Pacific University Health Professions Campus
Pacific University Health Professions Campus
Length, date, hook's ref verified. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date verified. Offline hook reference accepted in good faith. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It might be a challenge to get a map that looks good at the usual pic size of 100x100px. Cropping may help. --PFHLai (talk) 15:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Harike Wetland (pictured) with the Harike Lake formed across the Sutlej River by a barrage built in 1953 has a concentration of migratory fauna of waterfowls with number of globally threatened species.--Nvvchar (talk) 11:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • barrage was dab'ed to barrage (tidal). Confirm that this is accurate. Alansohn (talk) 00:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Barrage is on the river and far away from the tidal zone, please. Hence, introducing (tidal) would not be proper.Thanks.--Nvvchar (talk) 01:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • If barrage (tidal) is misleading, then the disambiguation page barrage is more misleading, because it asks the reader to choose between the same barrage (tidal) article and several other meanings of "barrage" that aren't related to water at all. Could we change it to a synonym like "dam"? Also, "... of migratory fauna of waterfowls with number of ..." is confusing in English. Based on the second reference, I think it means "... of migratory waterfowl with a number of ..." Art LaPella (talk) 02:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
          • Barrage is a very common usage in India to define low height headworks on rivers. Since there is a confusion due to disambuation, headworks could replace the name barrage. On the second part, I agree with your suggestion.I have reworded the Hook as under.--Nvvchar (talk) 02:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
            • ... that Harike Wetland (pictured) with the Harike Lake formed across the Sutlej River by a headwork built in 1953 has a concentration of migratory waterfowl with a number of globally threatened species?--Nvvchar (talk) 02:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
              • "Headwork" is also unfamiliar to me as an American, and it's missing from unspecialized dictionaries. But I found barrage (engineering) redirects to sluice. So I suggest [[sluice|barrage]] or [[sluice|headwork]] (or just "sluice" or "sluice gate"). I also removed the "s" from "waterfowls", added "a" before "number", and changed the period to a question mark (we have a rule about question marks). Art LaPella (talk) 05:25, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
                  • Can we adopt the word "Headregulator" which would be more appropriate than a sluice. In case that is also not found in the unspecialised dictionary, adopting the word "Dam" could be a better alternative. Similar change has to be made on another article on the Kanjli Wetland posted by me here on 1st November. I am now also considering writing an article on Barrage to bridge the gap in the data base on the subject.--Nvvchar (talk) 07:45, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

<alt> ... that horror novelist Anne Rice has cited Dracula's Daughter (1936) as an inspiration for her own homoerotic vampire fiction?

self-nom, article expanded over the last couple of days. Otto4711 (talk) 02:27, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
new article self-nom by Anameofmyveryown (talk) 02:16, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me. —Nightstallion 08:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Gets a tick of approval from me too doktorb wordsdeeds 20:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent work very concise and great links and sources. Approve!! 03:06, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on November 3

Papillifera bidens
Papillifera bidens
Length, date, hook's ref verified. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date verified. Offline hook reference accepted in good faith. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Probably not perfectly suitable material for Wikipedia's Main Page.--Wetman (talk) 01:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOTCENSORED is better applied to the inclusion/exclusion of materials in the encyclopedia. For Main Page, to some extent "the face of the project", we really should exercise a bit more discretion, IMO. Also, getting such a DYK entry on Main Page soon after this video is released may appear to be "free frontpage advertising". I'd avoid this nom. --PFHLai (talk) 15:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Added the word "free" later. --18:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's be a crying shame if we wimped out of putting this expanded article on the main page because we are squeamish. Material in DYK, ITM or TFA is not advertising. WP:NOTCENSORED absolutely relates to those parts of the project. No reason to reject this nom. 65.30.180.47 (talk) 18:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"because we are squeamish"? How about common sense and good taste? I have no problem having this article in the encyclopedia, per WP:NOTCENSORED. Those who search for the article can read it. But I don't suggest featuring porn-related materials on MainPage, where no one is looking for porn. When we have a long backlog of noms to pick for DYK, I'd pick something else. --PFHLai (talk) 18:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd also invoke Unwritten rule C2: "No ads." This goes for any hooks about films, books, software, etc. that are *recently* released to the market. This DVD is scheduled for release *this week*. --PFHLai (talk) 19:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly endorse this view. If this video company needs a title like this to sell its goods then that isn't a reason for wikipedia to do the same. I'm proud we are not censored ... we don't have to prove it on our front page, but I'd be happy to do so if this article had any valuable contribution, but frankly I don't think it has. Victuallers (talk) 15:20, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(Outdent) "common sense and good taste"...hmmm. How does refusing to run an article which meets the DYK criteria on that basis not just censorship. We don't need to be prudish. As far as the ads complaint, I guess I don't see it. Let's pretend that I wrote a new article on a normal book scheduled for publication this week. If the article I wrote met NPOV/WP:N/ADVERT, would DYK decide to not run it on the potential that main page exposure would constitute "advertising"? And honestly, it's an unwritten rule. I understand that DYK is a volunteer effort that has to take many applications and produce vetted content. But it would be a shame to see this hook in particular pushed aside for the reasons presented here. If we are honestly talking about restricting content on the main page on the basis that the article covers a subject that wouldn't be shown in a grade school, we have to reorient ourselves, fast. Protonk (talk) 00:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's not only grade school, you know. Potentially objectionable/offensive materials should be avoided on MainPage. If you want to call it censorship, so be it. Just trying to be sensible and stay out of trouble. --PFHLai (talk) 06:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd concur with PFHLai on this, just going off past precedent. Not too long ago there was a rather serious issue over the appearance of a DYK nom on the main page that was judged by some to be of questionable taste. That eventually resulted in Jimbo getting involved, a desysopping and a lot of bad feeling. And the subject there was a lot milder than a porn film. The mainpage has always been sensitive and rightly so. Over at the Featured Article side of things there are some FAs that are I believe defacto banned from a mainpage appearance on grounds of taste. (e.g. 1987 (What the Fuck Is Going On?) and Jenna Jameson). There have also been concerns raised after commercial subjects like Ernest Emerson and Elderly Instruments were placed on the mainpage. I'm not making any judgements on the rightness or wrongness of these stances, but this is a highly controversial topic that is perhaps best pursued somewhere centralised and open if you want to challenge this stance and get a generalised statement of how the mainpage can be used, rather than fighting over individual noms as they come up. Benea (talk) 11:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what I'm supposed to think. We are keeping non-pornographic material off the main page because it links to an article that isn't pornographic and all of it isn't censorship. And to top it off we are patting ourselves on the back for our discerning 'taste'. I accept the advice that this should be pursued generally rather than specifically--that's fair. But I guess I really fail to see the problem. Nothing about this hook is objectionable. The article could be considered objectionable for some people, but caveat lector. In my opinion we have a big hill to climb to say "we can substitute our judgment for that of the readers" and we haven't gone over that hump yet. Alluding to some vague, external controversy is not the way to do so. Likewise pointing out other specific times when WP:TFA fell down on the job isn't compelling to me. So while I ponder raising this question somewhat more generally I can ask you guys to ponder why objections to this article are stiffened. Why has this moved from "Probably not perfectly suitable material for Wikipedia's Main Page" to "How about common sense and good taste? I have no problem having this article in the encyclopedia, per WP:NOTCENSORED. Those who search for the article can read it. But I don't suggest featuring porn-related materials on MainPage, where no one is looking for porn."? Protonk (talk) 01:08, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date verified. Offline hook reference accepted in good faith. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date verified. Offline hook reference accepted in good faith. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article eligibility and hook length verified; offline source for hook fact accepted in good faith. --Orlady (talk) 05:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Creation date and length verified. Article has a decent amount of references (in general). Do you have a more interesting fact? Usually we try to draw out something unusual or interesting, not state what something is. For instance, you have sourced that:
Ha! I was just coming back here to add that. I can't find another gun that is named after it's designers. There's an idea! Cheers DigitalNinja 16:04, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering if featuring an image of a gun on Main Page would draw complaints? I am aware of the "if we can feature tanks and warships, we can feature guns, too" logic, but AFAIK gun is a particularly sensitive topic in English-speaking countries. --BorgQueen (talk) 06:17, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As a person in the British Isles I'd say we are happy to see them as as an academic subject (even though we don't encourage people to have/own or use them). Seems like a good first article (I even like the 1st hook) Victuallers (talk) 15:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As an U.S. resident who doesn't like guns, I don't have a problem with a gun on the main page and I would expect that most Americans wouldn't have a problem with it. Royalbroil 05:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I personally don't think anyone would have a problem regarding the academia of firearms. In the contrary, as an avid gun collector and stanch supporter of 2nd amendment rights, I think learing about firearms is both fascinating and overall a wise decision. The more you know about anything dangerous, the less dangerous such object becomes. DigitalNinja 15:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, 97198! (Can I call you "9"?) I put my siggie in after I spotted your ID of me. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
L. Frank Baum
L. Frank Baum

Articles created/expanded on November 2

Norton 16H
Norton 16H
Bert Bolle's Barometer
Bert Bolle's Barometer
"The Ghost of a Flea", c.1819-20, by William Blake
"The Ghost of a Flea", c.1819-20, by William Blake
A bit simplistic? Ceoil sláinte 21:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but to the point. :) One of my literary focuses is on the "insanity" of poets, or how poetic inspiration causes them to appear insane to their culture. This image caused the same reaction of Christopher Smart's Song to David, which is funny because of their opposite takes. Ottava Rima (talk) 22:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I thightened it. Ceoil sláinte 05:08, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds fun! Johnbod (talk) 00:52, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jacob Earl Fickel firing first gun shots from airplane, 1910
Jacob Earl Fickel firing first gun shots from airplane, 1910
Confederate Memorial Gates in Mayfield
Confederate Memorial Gates in Mayfield
Tithe Barn, Pilton
Tithe Barn, Pilton
Replica of the Star of the South in Reich der Kristalle museum, Munich
Replica of the Star of the South in Reich der Kristalle museum, Munich
Verifed. – RyanCross (talk) 09:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Enterprise
The Enterprise
Hopefully, Maria gets her own article created soon and we can have a double-DYK hook. --PFHLai (talk) 17:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expiring noms

  • Currently a backlog of 86 hooks as of 03:54, 5 November 2008 (UTC) - Gatoclass (talk)
  • Backlog of 75 hooks as of 03:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC) - Gatoclass (talk)
  • Backlog of about 70 hooks as of 03:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC) - Gatoclass (talk)

Articles created/expanded on November 1

Magoja
Magoja
Although I did this yesterday, I just wanted to make sure that I have in fact written the lead for the article. JonCatalán(Talk) 17:00, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Noonday Globe snail, Patera clarki nantahala
Noonday Globe snail, Patera clarki nantahala
And the author suddenly retired from Wikipedia. --74.14.18.233 (talk) 17:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"America" = United States or the Americas? Pls disambiguate. --74.13.129.187 (talk) 19:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to United States, as the reference shows. --Doug Coldwell talk 23:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(alt:) ... that Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres' Jupiter and Thetis (pictured) was painted in 1811 primarily to meet the artist's obligations to the French Academy in Rome? —Politizer talk/contribs 03:39, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Prefer Politizer's alt version. Ceoil sláinte 03:44, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The is now supported by the refs given in the article. Nonetheless, since we had to remove "financial obligations" (see User talk:Ceoil#DYK clarification needed for Jupiter and Thetis (Ingres)), it's not kind of unclear what the hook is even talking about. I will leave it up to other editors to decide whether or not it's worth putting up...as it stands now, the hook is factually accurate and technically meets DYK requirements, but might not be considered very "interesting" because of its vagueness. —Politizer talk/contribs 15:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Golubenko holds Russian citizenship, most sport associations don't allow foreign citizens to represent the flag of the country they happen to reside in (if she really wants to represent Estonia, she is eligible to take out Estonian citizenship if she wishes). An alternative hook could be:
Suggest "would rather play under" --> "played under". Unless we know her state of mind and opinions on this issue. Don't want the hook to sound like she is upset with Russia. Is there enough room to mention "living all her life in Estonia", too? --74.14.18.233 (talk) 17:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
grammatically, "to popularize licuados, the Latin American drink" works better - if you don't speak Spanish just imagine the word "smoothie" in place of "licuado" to get a sense of the flow. Wikidemon (talk) 18:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on October 31

Length, date verified. Offline hook reference accepted in good faith. --Rosiestep (talk) 17:36, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date verified. Offline hook reference accepted in good faith. --Rosiestep (talk) 17:30, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Length and date verified. However, neither of the references you cited say that this is the first anime film to be nominated for the Annie Award for Best Animated Home Entertainment Production. Cunard (talk) 05:29, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Length and date verified. The first part of the reference is cited in the article, but I don't see much about the political parties expanding the institution. Could you add that into the article? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It was there all along, but should be clearer now. Punkmorten (talk) 09:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is some overlap here with phasmophobia, which featured on DYK earlier today. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 19:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is no overlap. Laudak (talk) 01:36, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues There should not be overlap, but the distinction between fear of ghosts and phasmophobia has not been addressed in the article; I had to add a dablink as a quick fix to try to explain the difference between the two. In any case, the article as it currently stands is not fit to be linked to from the main page, there are major cleanup and content problems that I can't fix in just a couple days; furthermore, the hook itself is POV and has a weasel word. —Politizer talk/contribs 22:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on October 30

I think in this case primary sources might be all right because no original research is involved. "Primary sources are considered reliable for basic statements of fact", in this case the date when the Hershey Company released three flavors of Snack Barz. --Jh12 (talk) 01:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues I think there might be a questionmark over the notability of these products though. Gatoclass (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There are articles on every other Hershey's product, so why not this one? Why wouldn't a specially-named product produced by one of the world's largest chocolate manufacturers be notable? Can I at least have another opinion?Intothewoods29 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Snack Barz may be a more appropriate name for the article since "There are three varieties, Hershey's Snack Barz, Reese's Snack Barz, and S'mores Snack Barz. ".[4] The DYK rules say that articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators. Usually, that happens when primary sources are used rather than secondary sources. As for material to expand the article, see Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL and some of [5][6][7][8][9]. -- Suntag 16:16, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would be shocked if the topic was found to be non-notable in an AFD discussion. I count just under 1700 characters. It needs a history merge for the cut and paste job from Hersey's Snack Bar, so I listed it at WP:HISTMERGE. Royalbroil 17:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Date and 5x expansion length verified. Do we have an unwritten rule for "Is it okay for an article to use the essay to source most of the article including the DYK fact?" Royalbroil 14:14, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Verified, but I probably won't be the one to add it to the next update. Royalbroil 17:08, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I presume Satchel Paige should not be bold jnestorius(talk) 16:22, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I hope Satchel Paige can be expanded 5 times soon. Or it won't qualify--74.13.128.225 (talk) 19:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC) Unbolded. Expansion is unlikely for the already long article. --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article could use some cleanup/copyedit. Two sections of bulleted items should be prose and naming one section "Fact" is not too good. There are some pretty bad tone issues "he spoiled the story", "playing his typical solid defense" plus various typos/misspellings. Royalbroil 05:04, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This conflict is still ongoing. Suggest mentioning "so far" or sth to that effect in the hook. Also suggest checking the news for updates before posting the "57" figure on the main page. Pls also expand the intro. It's rather short. --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Too short. The rule states: contain more than 1,500 characters in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables) --BorgQueen (talk) 09:31, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ōe Taku
Ōe Taku
Only 845 bytes/162 words of readable prose. Hook is not mentioned in the article. — BillC talk 09:04, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on October 29

I don't see how there's nothing in the article that indicates notability. It satasifies at least WP:BK's criteria number 3 for having a movie adaptation (it only needs to satasify one of the criteria, so it should be fine), it also did win a literary award (number 2), albeit not really major outside of light novel standards. -- クラウド668 16:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BK refers to a notable movie, not just any movie. What evidence is there that the movie made from this book was in any way notable? As for the award, it was made by the same company that published the book. Gatoclass (talk) 02:39, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, you're right about the movie part, that was my mistake. The book however, was first submitted to the publisher as a draft, and is only published after it won the award, so I am wondering if that would make it pass. -- クラウド668 03:08, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


See also