Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
4iamking (talk | contribs)
Line 105: Line 105:
*'''Support ALT 1''' Whether you like it or not, this was still technically an election. I don't see any of the "oppose" !votes giving a solid reason why we should not post. This is a story of global importance given China's standing on the world stage. - [[User:Presidentman|Presidentman]] [[User talk:Presidentman|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Presidentman|contribs]] ([[WP:TBACK|Talkback]]) 22:20, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
*'''Support ALT 1''' Whether you like it or not, this was still technically an election. I don't see any of the "oppose" !votes giving a solid reason why we should not post. This is a story of global importance given China's standing on the world stage. - [[User:Presidentman|Presidentman]] [[User talk:Presidentman|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Presidentman|contribs]] ([[WP:TBACK|Talkback]]) 22:20, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
*'''The National Congress article has not been updated with the actual outcomes''' [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 22:42, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
*'''The National Congress article has not been updated with the actual outcomes''' [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 22:42, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
* '''Comment''' – This user could support the original blub with one small refinement: Change "elected" to "erected." – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 23:41, 23 October 2022 (UTC)


== October 22 ==
== October 22 ==

Revision as of 23:41, 23 October 2022

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section - it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Ebrahim Raisi in 2023
Ebrahim Raisi

Glossary

  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually - a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Archives

October 23

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


RD: Leszek Engelking

Article: Leszek Engelking (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Leszek Engelking nie żyje. Był autorem m.in. przekładów T. S. Eliota i Kundery
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: died on October 22 and is on the 2022 article 4me689 (talk) 22:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Louis Gigante

Article: Louis Gigante (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: First reported today (October 23); died on October 19. —Bloom6132 (talk) 21:04, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Xi Jinping's third term

Proposed image
Articles: Xi Jinping (talk · history · tag) and 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Xi Jinping is elected for a 3rd term as the leader of China. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party elects Xi Jinping (pictured) to a third term as General Secretary.
Alternative blurb II: ​ The National Congress of the CCP chooses Xi Jinping (pictured) as General Secretary.
Alternative blurb III: Xi Jinping (pictured) retains power as General Secretary after the CCP National Congress
News source(s): CNN, WSJ, AP, AlJazeera
Credits:

Article needs updating

Nominator's comments: Conclusion of the 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party and selection of the 20th Poliburo Standing Committee. - Indefensible (talk) 04:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - it is a significant election result—with respect to succession norms—for the largest nation on the planet. Ayyydoc (talk) 04:38, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – it's significant given the prior stipulation of a two-term limit 675930s (talk) 05:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on blurb The blurb is misleading, Xi is not elected as the country's leader but instead the CCP's general secretary. Noting the state - party separation in China, President and general secretary are different positions, with the latter not having a term limit.Yxuibs (talk) 05:38, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Altblurb - New Altblurb looks good. Yxuibs (talk) 07:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Significant event. Altblurb and image added. Quantum XYZ (talk) 06:26, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Needs updates! The Congress article contains several statements such as "is expected" and little content on actual outcomes. --Tone 09:23, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - "Not an election" is not a reason for not at blurb this time because he broke all the previous rules of CCP for his own power this time. But I do think that the word "elects" should be changed because in no way he is really elected. Mahogany115 (Message) 12:19, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The blurb doesn't say he was elected by the people - it clearly mentions that he was chosen by the CCP Congress, which is what happened. This being (or not being) a rubberstamp body is another issue. Regards. Quantum XYZ (talk) 12:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support alt blurb, a significant event, particularly since a third term for the General Secretary represents a break with tradition. The original blurb is a no go: The terms "elected" and "leader" are too vague and easily misinterpreted. Nsk92 (talk) 12:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Oppose – From what I've seen, third term was expected all along. [1]. Significance/impact faint. – Sca (talk) 12:29, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    In my opinion, this is equivalent to being re-elected to the presidency of the US, which is significant. I don't think that the election being rigged is an argument here. Quantum XYZ (talk) 12:36, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Political theater by an entrenched party pol. -- Sca (talk) 12:46, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    They've gone from decades of power sharing amongst the elite to basically one man rule. That's a fairly significant shift. Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC
    They didn't 'go' to that at this pre-choreographed congress. In effect for some years. News value nil. -- Sca (talk) 13:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support alt-blurb - It's definitely a dictatorial stitch-up (and bolding the congress will also direct people to read about how Hu Jintao was treated), but this is the mechanism by which the world's most populous nation currently selects its leader, and the selection of Xi Jinping for a third term - which only Mao Zedong had previously had - is clearly significant and worthy of a headline. We report on democracies, we report on monarchies, we should clearly report on this. GenevieveDEon (talk) 13:26, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    What changes for the people of the world's most populous country as a result of this congress? -- Sca (talk) 13:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    We'd still post the win of an incumbent president in a national election, even if that doesn't change how the country's ruled. ITN is not a place to RGW. Masem (t) 13:55, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Agree with Masem. What changes for the people of America if Biden is re-elected in 2024? We'd still blurb it, so why not this? Quantum XYZ (talk) 13:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    You're ignoring that the U.S. president is elected in a genuine vote by the population. (But don't get me started on the #!$+*%¿ Electoral College.) -- Sca (talk) 14:04, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Again, we're not here to RGW. If there is significant political commentary about the fakeness of the election it should be covered on the target article, but ITN should not care about that. Masem (t) 14:06, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If?Sca (talk) 14:17, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not trying to 'right a great wrong.' Just trying to ignore it -- or to ignore meaningless political theater that isn't really even newsworthy. Yawn... -- Sca (talk) 14:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - significant political event in the world’s most populous country, rightly considered comparable to the re-election of a president in a democratic republic. Blurb needs to be carefully worded and wikilinked considering that the “leadership” of China is not explicitly associated with any one particular official title.
Who posted? – Sca (talk) 17:40, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, It is a significant event in the political arena. Alex-h (talk) 16:41, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support A third term for the leader of China for the first time since Mao is a significant development. Pawnkingthree (talk) 16:53, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Whether it fits our picture of a representative democracy in a land of milk and honey is immaterial. It's a willy-nilly silly old re-election, yes, but it is still a re-election of a world leader, and we need to grin and bear it rather than pooh-pooh the outcome. 🌈WaltCip-(talk) 17:12, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb + altlurb1 not really an election, more of a show, Xi calls all the shots and used the event to load the executive with yes men. Elections under duress with no checks and balances are not elections by definition. Therefore added altblurb2. Abcmaxx (talk) 17:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    How about "Xi Jinping stays in power in China." -- Sca (talk) 17:44, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    the definition of the word "election" doesn't stipulate anything about who the electorate can be; or under what conditions they can vote. This, that; and the other are all elections, and none is more so one than another. ✨  4 🧚‍♂am KING  21:04, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
we should be impartial and neutral, which means we shouldn't be whitewashing dictators and call their leadership processes exactly as they are, not use weasel words. "Election" is misleading to describe this and should be avoided. Abcmaxx (talk)
the word "Election" is not misleading, since it was an election; even if the outcome was never in doubt given what the electorate was. Saying "elected by the Chinese Communist Party national congress" isnt whitewashing anything, thats exactly what has happened; it wasnt the Chinese public that elected him. The onus is not on us to put our own definition to what an election is. To suggest Elections under duress with no checks and balances are not elections by definition. is adding your bias to what an election should be. That being said, to suggest that there are no checks and balances within the CCP and that this election was conducted under duress is also questionable.... Sure the electorate was going to be stacked with CCP loyalists, but I dont think they were under any duress to vote for Xi. ✨  4 🧚‍♂am KING  23:33, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ALT 1. Happy for "chooses" to be substituted for "elects" in that blurb. Significant as any top level election of the world's superpowers. Schwede66 18:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Altblurb it's probably the best worded in my opinion. 4me689 (talk) 22:31, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOTFORUM.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
  • Support Through Socialism with Chinese characteristics, China has eradicated poverty, homelessness and illiteracy. The capitalists are represented through the party to keep them from being compradors, and are kept in line, with Xi Jinping thought now nationalizing and controlling the private rapidly. The genius of Deng's theory is keeping the dictatorship of the workers while also using the benefits of global capitalism to build the revolution. America's fate was sealed when Deng inherited a broken China and built it into a superpower. LONG LIVE DENG XIAOPING THOUGHT! LONG LIVE CHINA! Buck3983 (talk) 19:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on significance. He leads the most populous country on earth; how is a term extension not newsworthy? Vanamonde (Talk) 19:46, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support anything but blurb nom as that doesn't mention the NCCCP (the thing that's in the news). Very exciting event: XJP secures his reign as Paramount leader, growing closer to Mao; protests in Beijing without any incidents; XJP gave a long monologue on Hu Jintao's leadership and immediately proceeded to purge him; etc etc. ~~ lol1VNIO⁠👻 (I made a mistake? talk to me) 19:59, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - an dictator continues to rule. No big news, but support on overall significance.BabbaQ (talk) 20:19, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per Vanamonde93. Jusdafax (talk) 20:39, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support notability and article(s') quality but Oppose the word "election" in blurb(s) as per my previous comments. Added altblurb3 further to previous comments. Abcmaxx (talk) 21:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support altblurb I don't know why you all want to complicate things so much, really. Besides, the quality of the two articles is good. _-_Alsor (talk) 22:19, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ALT 1 Whether you like it or not, this was still technically an election. I don't see any of the "oppose" !votes giving a solid reason why we should not post. This is a story of global importance given China's standing on the world stage. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:20, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The National Congress article has not been updated with the actual outcomes Stephen 22:42, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – This user could support the original blub with one small refinement: Change "elected" to "erected." – Sca (talk) 23:41, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 22

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Politics and elections

Sports


(Posted) RD: Pablo Eisenberg

Article: Pablo Eisenberg (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Washington Post
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: First reported today (October 22); died on October 18. —Bloom6132 (talk) 01:31, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Some awkward phrasing in the lead but not enough to worry about. Thryduulf (talk) 08:48, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 10:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Dietrich Mateschitz

Article: Dietrich Mateschitz (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Significant businessman and motorsports figure as well. The article for him is shorter than expected, but it seems to be pretty well sourced except for one piece of personal life that could reasonably be removed anyways as unsourced. TartarTorte 22:02, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. The Personal life section looks OK, but the Sports section needs significantly more sources. Thryduulf (talk) 23:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The article is definitely significant enough and well sourced enough to go in the RD section. --Chrill (talk) 10:27, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    There are currently six explicit CN tags. Thryduulf (talk) 11:03, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Article has multiple citation needed tags. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 16:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    No more CN tags remaining. --PFHLai (talk) 18:15, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, as said by Chrill above.Horcoff (talk) 19:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 20:43, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Josephine Melville

Article: Josephine Melville (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: tragic death in unusual circumstances. Article needs a lot of expansion but actually has potential as there are enough citations and sources. Only created today though but worth nominating to draw attention to it. Abcmaxx (talk) 21:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose – Stub. – Sca (talk) 22:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Needs a lot of expansion and the filmography needs sourcing. Thryduulf (talk) 23:57, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Come on, folks. Please don't be wet blankets too quickly! This stub is not even half a day old. Let it grow... Let it grow... --PFHLai (talk) 01:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Unsee growth. -- Sca (talk) 12:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Article is a stub. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 16:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Giorgia Meloni sworn as PM

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Giorgia Meloni (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Brothers of Italy leader Giorgia Meloni is sworn in as Prime Minister of Italy, becoming the first woman to hold the position. (Post)
News source(s): Washington Post
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: Currently in Portal:Current Events, we got Ulf Kristersson's ascension to Swedish PM. On the last discussion, somebody said that the portal will post results, but not government formation results; not sure Ulf Kristersson's premiership being listed is congruent with this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 675930s (talkcontribs) 04:55, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

October 21

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Politics and elections


(Posted) RD: Gus Stavros

Article: Gus Stavros (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Tampa Bay Times; University of South Florida
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: First reported today (October 21); died on October 18. —Bloom6132 (talk) 10:42, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Jim Bolla

Article: Jim Bolla (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Las Vegas Review-Journal
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 10:32, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Harry White (jockey)

Article: Harry White (jockey) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ABC News; The Age; Victoria Racing Club
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 10:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Peter Schjeldahl

Article: Peter Schjeldahl (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times; ARTnews
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 23:51, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Some more dates in the personal life section would be good if you can find them, but that's not enough to hold up posting. Thryduulf (talk) 00:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 06:10, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) October 2022 Conservative Party leadership election

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: October 2022 Conservative Party leadership election (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): [2], [3]
Credits:
Nominator's comments: this is a upcoming leadership election that will happened on 24–28 October 2022. 4me689 (talk) 17:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose Change of PM is ITN/R. We'll post that as a blurb and do not need to go full UKpedia with ITN. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:14, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose as per above; only the result needs posting. rawmustard (talk) 17:52, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - we're already pretty much set in for the resignation and new PM items, we don't need this as well. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:55, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Given that we blurbed Truss' resignation and will blurb her successor there is nothing to be gained from having this on ongoing. Thryduulf (talk) 18:22, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Support adding to ongoing. Major event in G7 country currently in deep government crisis. Kirill C1 (talk) 19:05, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose given that we will likly blurb her sucessor, it is unecessary. NW1223<Howl at meMy hunts> 19:42, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: May Blood, Baroness Blood

Article: May Blood, Baroness Blood (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Belfast Telegraph
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: British politician, I've added a missing ref and trimmed some uncited stuf - Dumelow (talk) 12:25, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. A little light on details, but good enough. Thryduulf (talk) 13:38, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support It's fine. --Jayron32 14:45, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose does not look notable. 4me689 (talk) 17:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    If you don't think the subject is notable, then nominate the article at AfD. Per the instructions above, any person who has an individual article and who has recently died are notable enough to appear on RD. Thryduulf (talk) 18:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:IAR. 107.127.49.7 (talk) 19:03, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    In what way will ignoring this rule benefit the encyclopaedia? Thryduulf (talk) 19:25, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Besides the fact that notability is besides the point for RD, the subject is clearly and obviously notable via WP:NPOL. Curbon7 (talk) 22:28, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - clearly notable. Article looks good to me. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:06, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I fixed one cn tag, looks ok. Pawnkingthree (talk) 20:12, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Marking as ready. Thryduulf (talk) 20:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 22:01, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Aftermath of Italian General Election

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Giorgia Meloni (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Giorgia Meloni is designated Prime Minister of Italy by President Sergio Mattarella, becoming the first woman in the role. (Post)
News source(s): ABC The Australian Reuters
Credits:

Article updated
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

October 20

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime

Law and crime

Politics and elections


(Posted) RD: Bettye Crutcher

Article: Bettye Crutcher (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [4]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 – Muboshgu (talk) 15:59, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Lucy Simon

Article: Lucy Simon (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times; Associated Press; Variety
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 16:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Article is ready for RD. Quality is good, suitable but not necessarily outstanding. Cheers. WimePocy 17:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Reasonably comprehensive and fully sourced. Thryduulf (talk) 18:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 03:49, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indonesian liquid medicine ban

Article: Toxic cough syrup (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Indonesia bans all liquid medicines after the deaths of almost 100 children from toxic cough syrup. (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Article could use a little more detail but worth starting a debate on significance I think. A large number of deaths and a ban affecting the fourth-most populous country in the world feels pretty significant - Dumelow (talk) 06:55, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support – Major tragedy, great example of Wikipedia coverage. Not sure if the mass death or the material ban is the topic of this ITN, but the article looks fit for featuring. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 11:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I suspect the ban just covers oral, syrupy medicines rather than everything that comes in liquid form, such as vaccines and eye-drops. The Indonesian language article says "Larangan juga ditujukan kepada tenaga kesehatan untuk tidak tidak meresepkan obat-obatan berbentuk sirup." (The prohibition is also aimed at health workers not to not prescribe drugs in the form of syrup.) So perhaps we should use the word syrup rather than liquid. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:54, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as it's a tragic event with an immediate response. This is a very good example of what should be posted.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:10, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The target article contains only three lines of text in total about toxic cough syrup in Indonesia and only a single sentence about the ban. We need more information to post on the main page; as essentially the target article has functionally no additional information beyond what the blurb says. That's not acceptable. --Jayron32 19:16, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The target article contains very little information about this event, and expanding it much further in that article would add undue weight to the article on toxic cough syrup.4meter4 (talk) 21:37, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, It has enough information for ITN. Alex-h (talk) 16:46, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose the target article has very very little about this specific event. --Masem (t) 16:54, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Haitian crisis

Article: 2022 Haitian crisis (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The United Nations Security Council approves a travel ban and arms embargo in Haiti, amid an ongoing crisis of armed gang violence, economic inflation, acute hunger, cholera, and civil unrest. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Amid a socioeconomic and political crisis in Haiti, the United Nations Security Council approves a travel ban and arms embargo aimed at armed gangs in the country.
Alternative blurb II: ​ Amid a humanitarian crisis in Haiti of economic inflation, widespread hunger, and civil unrest, the United Nations Security Council approves a travel ban and arms embargo aimed at armed gangs in the country.
Alternative blurb III: ​ In response to armed gangs blockading Haiti's largest fuel depot, the United Nations Security Council approves sanctions on the country, amid a humanitarian crisis of economic inflation, widespread hunger, and civil unrest.
News source(s): Al Jazeera, Associated Press, CBS News, France24, Reuters, United Nations
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Unfortunately the page in question, 2018–2022 Haitian protests, needs work. I've updated it with some recent developments and citations, but there still seems to be some information missing, as well as prose that can be improved. Before I looked at it earlier today, the article mentioned both the president of Haiti up to 2021, and the current prime minister, but neglected to note that the current prime minister took office as a result of the president being assassinated. It might even be worth considering splitting this topic into more than one article (i.e. Mahsa Amini protests, 2021–2022 Iranian protests, 2019–2020 Iranian protests, etc.).

  • Oppose A protracted four year long event is not good for ongoing. There needs to be a well definition event to make appropriate for main page Masem (t) 18:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose but of course if there is a military intervention from the UNSC, that would almost certainly warrant posting. 🌈WaltCip-(talk) 20:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Article is orange-tagged for needing updates. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 01:18, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - per Masem, though if there is UN intervention, this should be posted. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 08:35, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I great appreciate the work you put in to bring this article much more up-to-date. As it stands right now, I don't think it's suitable for ITN per above, but if there were a high-quality article specifically about the blockade, that might've worked well within our system. Of course, actual international intervention will likely also make the topic qualify better, as long as the article remains up-to-date. Thank you for the nomination ^_^ ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:48, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Agree with Mable. -- Sca (talk) 13:42, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Masem, WaltCip, FAdesdae378, PrecariousWorlds, Maplestrip, and Sca: The United Nations has unanimously voted to impose sanctions on Haiti. I have split the information regarding the current state of the country into its own article, 2022 Haitian crisis. Forgive me for not knowing how to properly proceed here: should I update the above proposal to reflect these changes, or should this discussion be closed, and a new proposal be opened? —Matthew - (talk) 23:14, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @MatthewHoobin: You could change the target article to 2022 Haitian crisis. I’ll do it for you. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 04:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Blaylockjam10: Thank you. I've updated the blurbs as well to reflect the more recent information. —Matthew - (talk) 04:43, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Yeah this is the good stuff. Very nice work on this article; this would be a very good subject to feature on ITN. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 10:17, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – Per Masem, Walt. Complex, ongoing domestic turmoil. Murky. – Sca (talk) 11:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support AltI. Yes it is a domestic situation, but it's a pretty dire one that's drawing serious international attention. US and Mexico considering sending troops now. DarkSide830 (talk) 02:19, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    U.S. sent supplies, vehicles. [5] -- Sca (talk) 12:38, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Liz Truss resignation

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Articles: Liz Truss (talk · history · tag) and October 2022 United Kingdom government crisis (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Amid a government crisis, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Liz Truss (pictured) announces her resignation, becoming the shortest-serving prime minister in British history. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Liz Truss (pictured) resigns after six weeks in office.
Alternative blurb II: ​ The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Liz Truss (pictured) announces her forthcoming resignation after six weeks in office,
Alternative blurb III: After [only?] six weeks in office, UK Prime Minister Liz Truss (pictured) announces her forthcoming resignation.
News source(s): BBC News, AP, Guardian, DW, France 24, AlJazeera, [6]
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: She has handed her resignation to the king, making this the relevant moment (we posted Boris Johnson's resignation at the equivalent time). She will remain in office during the October 2022 Conservative Party leadership election (UK) Smurrayinchester 12:43, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Just as I was writing my 'Oppose' vote for the other nomination, this gets announced.
This is huge news, a massive leadership crisis in a major power. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 12:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support seems good to me. - 125.59.140.165 (talk) 12:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This nomination and the one immediately below should be merged as they are basically the same story. Never mind, I see the government crisis one is an Ongoing nom. But I think a blurb would be preferable. Pawnkingthree (talk) 12:49, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, with preference to alt 1 as simpler. — Ixtal ( T / C ) Non nobis solum. 12:51, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support and add Truss' image like we did with Johnson (if I remember correctly). Quantum XYZ (talk) 12:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Isn't it the norm for every other country in the world to post when the new PM comes in? —Cryptic 12:55, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    In this case though we have the "short-serving ever" angle. On the other hand, there should be a replacement within the week so it may be worth waiting.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:02, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Prime Minister should be capitalised Oscar666kta420swag (talk) 12:56, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Only before her name. -- Sca (talk) 13:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support with preference to main blurb. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support once successor is appointed Alt1. Huge news coming out of the UK. Cheers. WimePocy 13:02, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support main blurb (edit conflict) Kpddg (talk) 13:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Making him shortest-serving prime minister in British history. HurricaneEdgar 13:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
HurricaneEdgar, "her". — Nythar (💬-🎃) 13:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but prefer alt 1 as shorter and less pointed. Ceoil (talk) 13:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support With Image replacing Swedish Prime Minister. Frzzl (talk) 13:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Notable. Nythar (💬-🎃) 13:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for congruence I still think that resignations of heads of government or state (except abdications of monarchs) shouldn't be included in Main Page until a new successor is appointed. But since Johnson's resignation was posted, it's not common sense to do the opposite this time. _-_Alsor (talk) 13:05, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Massively covered. No. 1 news story today. Favor Alt3. – Sca (talk) 13:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Massive News coming out of the UK. I have a preference for Blurb 1. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 13:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - major story and historic significance given how short tenure is BeaujolaisFortune (talk) 13:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I object to the "Ready" tag. This nomination is half an hour old and we should wait for more opinions. Rushed postings have been controversial in the past.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    But this has lots of precedent, no? I say the sooner the better for events like these 2A00:23C8:B03:9F01:D12B:34D:4EDD:24C0 (talk) 13:19, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Alt1 Tetizeraz - (talk page) 13:18, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I knew it! I was first! I believe mentioning October 2022 United Kingdom government crisis in the blurb is preferable because this is no ordinary resignation and what caused her resignation directly. And may well cause the next one in a few weeks time. Abcmaxx (talk) 13:19, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Nice. Davey2116 (talk) 13:20, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ready ready ready, post post post.--🌈WaltCip-(talk) 13:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support The Daily Star's lettuce wins This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 13:23, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support original blurb The Kip (talk) 13:24, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Back in July, almost everyone was clamoring to get Johnson's resignation posted as soon as possible. Then, 2 weeks later, Mario Draghi resigned which was nominated for ITN. Suddenly, people were less enthusiastic, garnering comments such as: "UK Prime Ministers tend to resign less often than Italian ones", "Our standard practice is to post the change, not the resignation", "Wait until replacement is announced", and "Johnson is a bit of a different process. The UK government itself is stable". Draghi's resignation stayed open and was never posted. Now, not even 2 months later, another UK prime minister resigned and ITNC again can't wait to get it posted. Seems a bit strange to me. YD407OTZ (talk) 13:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Because it's true that UK PMs resign far less often than Italian ones, and the UK government is traditionally far more stable. Draghi is the 11th Italian PM since 2000, with Meloni set to become the 12th, and only one (Berlusconi in both terms) having lasted longer than 2ish years in office; in contrast, Truss is #6 for the UK in that same stretch, and her successor will be the seventh, with only Brown and Truss having lasted less than three years in office. Truss' resignation is likewise especially notable considering she's the shortest-serving British PM ever, by a wide margin.
    In short, it's simply the truth that Italy tends to cycle through PMs far more often than the UK, making it a less notable occurrence. I do think Draghi's should've been posted, however. The Kip (talk) 14:24, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Global media has an anglosphere bias. It naturally has an effect when determining what is "in the news". Comment by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 16:16, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The current blurb and altblurb are misleading at best, and possibly just plainly incorrect. Liz Truss is the Prime Minister and will remain so until a new leader is appointed. Chrisclear (talk) 13:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    German Wiki's blurb says she announces her intention to – or that she will – resign. (Liz Truss hat ihren Rücktritt als Premierministerin des Vereinigten Königreichs angekündigt. (My emph.) -- Sca (talk) 13:38, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per YD407OTZ. We cannot continue to treat the UK as a special case if we care about avoiding bias. GreatCaesarsGhost 13:39, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Coverage, significance. -- Sca (talk) 13:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, because of bias. That's the point. GreatCaesarsGhost 13:52, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Nobody was opposing based on coverage or significance when Draghi's resignation was nominated. All the Waits were simply procedural, because of some "standard practice" not to post resignations. Yet this practice does not seem so standard when nominations from the Anglosphere are considered. I don't even oppose this nomination (I'm neutral on it), but we can't pretend to care about unwritten rules for some nominations, and then start talking about "exceptions" for others. YD407OTZ (talk) 13:56, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I will only say that this blurb has the additional hook of her tenure being the shortest ever for UK prime ministers. 331dot (talk) 13:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    If she's been to the king, she has effectively resigned and will be replaced. -- Sca (talk) 14:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted. Picture in the works. First blurb seems to have agreement. The blurb is correct because she has announced her resignation, not carried it out. 331dot (talk) 13:40, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note The link to October 2022 United Kingdom government crisis takes to a redirect to Premiership of Liz Truss. Does this need changing? ISD (talk) 13:55, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    That bold redirect by an editor does not appear to have consensus; it will probably be reverted.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 14:05, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note What has been posted has two factual errors. She has not yet resigned as prime minister, just as leader of the Conservative Party. They will now select their new leader, who will become PM in due course. And secondly, it is not certain that she will be the shortest ever, that depends on when the new leader is finally selected. -- DeFacto (talk). 14:33, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Perhaps we're jumping the gun slightly, but it's expected the process of choosing a new leader will take about a week at most, at which point this blurb will almost certainly still be up. She's also going to be the shortest-serving PM unless it somehow drags out by another two and a half months, which is highly unlikely. The Kip (talk) 14:38, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    "announces her resignation" is accurate. – Rhain (he/him) 14:49, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    What DeFacto is saying is that she has technically announced her resignation only as Leader of the Conservative Party, not Prime Minister. I don't think the distinction matters, myself. Pawnkingthree (talk) 14:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I love the haste you guys do for UK-related articles. It's a spectacle. Howard the Duck (talk) 14:35, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Don't you know? This is Wiki-UK. But in all seriousness, this is the problem with the Westminster System -- nothing stopping them from having 10 prime ministers a year if they can't form a government. --RockstoneSend me a message! 19:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Howard the Duck I invite you to nominate other articles from underrepresented areas that are equivalent to this. We can only consider what is nominated. Rightly or wrongly, some countries get more coverage than others in worldwide English-speaking media. 331dot (talk) 20:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The becoming the shortest-serving prime minister in British history bit should be excised per WP:CRYSTAL. She is still PM. --LukeSurl t c 14:36, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    She's got 74 days to go until she wouldn't hold that title, so while it's perhaps a little WP:CRYSTAL, it's also highly, highly unlikely it doesn't prove to be true. The Kip (talk) 14:39, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    In agreement with the 1922 committee, the leadership contest will be quickly held within a week and she will step down at its completion. It is with this in mind that she is being reported a the shortest-serving prime minister. Comment by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 17:40, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting support - although I do think we could have taken a little longer to discuss this before posting. That was hasty, but I don't think it should be pulled. I also think the posted blurb is the right one - Truss' shortness of tenure is absolutely a key part of the story, and we're being told her replacement will definitely be in place by next Friday at the latest, by which time she will still have served less than half the time in office that George Canning, the previous record-holder, did. When that successor is announced, then we should pull this blurb and replace it with the new one. No point having both stories up at once when it's the same underlying event. ETA: I posted this in the wrong place, not realising I wasn't logged in. My apologies, but I now can't post it from my account without linking that publicly to my IP. 2A00:23C6:9E09:1D01:D977:F97F:391C:5506 (talk) 15:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting commentAmid a government crisis, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Liz Truss (pictured) announces her resignation, becoming the shortest-serving prime minister in British history.
— "Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Liz Truss" seems quite unwieldy. Suggest change to "United Kingdom Prime Minister Liz Truss," or even "UK Prime Minister Liz Truss, with "Prime Minister" linked to Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. (Every reader of English Wiki who's even halfway literate knows UK stands for United Kingdom.)
Also, since "Prime Minister" has already been mentioned, suggest replace second "Prime Minister" with the widely used abbreviation "PM." – Sca (talk) 15:39, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is called a false title, and is deprecated in British English. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:01, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This may be an unpopular position in much of the Anglosphere, but personally I think headlines benefit from the correct use of articles, prepositions, and so on. GenevieveDEon (talk) 15:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support This would definitely be a good article to post, I was planning on waiting until the new successor is announced, and then merge the articles, but this seems like it could be news by itself. Editor 5426387 (talk) 00:07, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt1 4me689 (talk) 13:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – Current blurb – Amid a government crisis in the United Kingdom, Prime Minister Liz Truss (pictured) announces her resignation – reads much better. – Sca (talk) 13:39, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree with this suggestion. And also, I think it would be best to add the "shortest-serving prime minister in British history" bit after the leadership contest is done. Vida0007 (talk) 20:45, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This has made front page headlines internationally. All of the blurbs seem fine to me, and I have no strong preference about which one should be featured.4meter4 (talk) 21:33, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) UK political meltdown

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: October 2022 United Kingdom government crisis (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Usually I would be against posting something so UK centric and probably the first to oppose similar nominations. But it's decending into fisticuffs, something that would be unimaginable in a place famous for its restraint just a few months ago. The new PM is about to be ousted after barely starting, half the top minister already resigned. The currency is tanking. Scotland is pushing for independence. Nearly every labour union is on strike or planning one. It's in the news every day, not just in the UK. To the unconvinced here is an interview with Tory Charles Walker absolutely tearing into his own: BBC News. It's a political meltdown of epic proportions that I believe is worth nominating. Abcmaxx (talk) 11:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Wait until there's actually action to any of the 'major events' that the nominator has proposed is happening. Scotland is pushing towards independence? All talk until a referendum. Currency tanking? Worldwide event. EVERY labor union proposing a strike? We'll see. We have nothing but talk, speculation, rumors, and a politician mad at his own. ITN is not "UK Rumor Hour", it never has, and never will be. Cheers. WimePocy 11:56, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose What we can't think of is that any government crisis has to be on Main Page. It's usual in every country in the world, and the Italianization of British politics forces us to see this more often. WimePocy is right. Speculation, individual resignations, miscellaneous messes and magnanimous statements mean nothing. _-_Alsor (talk) 12:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Italianization of British politics is a great descriptor! Abcmaxx (talk) 12:12, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The political crisis is very real though, as are the resignations and implications of a dysfunctional government for its inhabitants. I mean the Conservative Party is literally descending into violence amongst each other (The Guardian), (BBC News), (The Independent). Abcmaxx (talk) 12:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This is the type of day-to-day politics that WP should be staying far away from until the dust settles (summarizing after all is said and done), and in terms of ITN, the only thing we care about is if there's a another revolving door PM. --Masem (t) 12:24, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and Wait - If Truss ends up resigning, or if an election is called, then this can be posted. But as of the moment, this is just a particularily bad episode in UK politics, not ITN-worthy yet.
I would keep an eye on what's happening in the UK though. As you said, there are lots of events that could be very notable in the future, like Scottish and Northern Irish secessionist movements, economic crisis, etc. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 12:35, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This aged well. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 13:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Truss is now expected to resign per Guardian's liveblog, and that would be blurbworthy in itself once a successor is chosen. rawmustard (talk) 12:38, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • NOW this can be a blurb, she just announced she's resgining. [7]. --Masem (t) 12:39, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Truss has resigned, and we'll have a new PM in a week. This is completely unprecedented in British politics. Thryduulf (talk) 12:40, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - We can post the resignation of Truss as we did with Johnson, but a government crisis should not be posted to ongoing per above. Quantum XYZ (talk) 12:52, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Snow close See you all above. _-_Alsor (talk) 13:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Better as a blurb now Truss has gone. -- Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

October 19

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime

Politics and elections


(Posted) RD: Joanna Simon (mezzo-soprano)

Article: Joanna Simon (mezzo-soprano) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Deadline
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 4meter4 (talk) 18:06, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. B class article, everything looks good. Thryduulf (talk) 18:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, did some copy-editing. Thank you 4meter4, I was afraid I had to do another one when I read that she died. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:52, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Marking as ready. Thryduulf (talk) 20:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 21:56, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Dave Herman (American football)

Article: Dave Herman (American football) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): New York Jets
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 11:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak support. It's fine and sourced, but it's almost all stats in prose form. Thryduulf (talk) 13:33, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    360 words of text. -- Sca (talk) 13:45, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    That's why I said in prose form. Thryduulf (talk) 14:42, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support it's fine. --Jayron32 14:44, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 21:50, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Jay Owen Light

Article: Jay Owen Light (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Harvard Business School
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: First reported today (October 19); died on October 15. —Bloom6132 (talk) 09:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Charley Trippi

Article: Charley Trippi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [8]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 – Muboshgu (talk) 22:26, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Ongoing removal: Mahsa Amini protests

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



Article: Mahsa Amini protests (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item removal (Post)
Nominator's comments: I'm not really sure if this meets the criteria for ongoing - not much substantial edits in the last few days and the timeline section is totally empty, linking to a separate article for which the updates are only until the protests on 17 October. Quantum XYZ (talk) 13:16, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose removal It's October 19, and the most recent substantive updates are only 2 days ago. There's at least 2 items from 17 October: Updated death figures from Iran Human Rights, and EU Sanctions issued. WP:ONGOING has some general rules of thumb for the Ongoing section, and generally "too old" is only if it is older than the oldest blurb; the oldest blurb is definitely older than 2 days old, so this is still being regularly updated by our standards for "regular". --Jayron32 13:26, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose removal from ongoing at this time, per Jayron32. Way too early for the removal. Nsk92 (talk) 13:34, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose removal - per Jayron32. Having the oldest blurb be the "cutoff" point for an ongoing item seems like a good rule of thumb PrecariousWorlds (talk) 13:40, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose removal It is still in the news, way too early for removal. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 14:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose removal - no point in removing this right now. Still an ongoing situation.BabbaQ (talk) 15:01, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

October 18

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


(Posted) RD: Ken Kortas

Article: Ken Kortas (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Sentinel-News (Legacy.com)
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: First reported today (October 18); died on October 15. —Bloom6132 (talk) 13:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Article is of sufficient quality for ITN. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. No problems with the article. Marking ready. Thryduulf (talk) 17:53, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • PostedBagumba (talk) 15:17, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Harvey Wollman

Article: Harvey Wollman (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [9]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 – Muboshgu (talk) 04:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Robert Gordon (singer)

Article: Robert Gordon (singer) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Variety
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American rockabilly singer. Thriley (talk) 03:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose too much uncited material. Thryduulf (talk) 11:32, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. It's currently not ready, but I started working on citing the material and/or removing content that can't be sourced. I should hopefully be able to get it into good shape in the next 12 hours.4meter4 (talk) 00:13, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note the article has been moved from Robert Gordon (musician) to Robert Gordon (singer). It presently has an orange tag for unsourced material. Thryduulf (talk) 18:21, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Article is orange-tagged for citations. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 18:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Valery Rubakov

Article: Valery Rubakov (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Euro Weekly News
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Russian physicist. I added a few details on his death - Dumelow (talk) 13:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • That he mentored multiple others appears to be sourced to the Russian Wikipedia rather than a reliable source, it'll be read for RD. More information about his personal life and death would be good if there is anything in reliable sources, if not the sections should be combined. Thryduulf (talk) 11:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Thryduulf, good spot. I've removed the mentoring bit and combined the last two sections. Will look to see if I can add anything from current reporting - Dumelow (talk) 12:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I've fixed the referencing for the Hamburg Prize, it's all good now I think. Thryduulf (talk) 17:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 03:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Ole Ellefsæter

Article: Ole Ellefsæter (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): snl.no
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Norwegian lumberjack, Olympic champion in 50 km cross-country skiing, national champion in 3000 m steeplechase, and singer. Oceanh (talk) 11:39, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Each of the sections are quite short, but what's there is sufficient and well sourced. Thryduulf (talk) 11:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 03:19, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Charlie Smithgall

Article: Charlie Smithgall (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Lancaster Patriot
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former mayor of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Dumelow (talk) 10:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose – No article. Snow. – Sca (talk) 12:16, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Come on. It was an obvious clerical error. The article exists and is so easy to find. So easy to fix the error, too. --PFHLai (talk) 12:43, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      Be old. Cheers. WimePocy 12:00, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • support – Referenced and good.BabbaQ (talk) 14:45, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have to ask the question - is a mayor of a town of 58,000 people notable per WP:NPOL? Black Kite (talk) 22:31, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Well obviously not via WP:NPOL, it would be via WP:GNG; still not sure notability is met. For our purposes, there are a few spots in need of citations. Curbon7 (talk) 01:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The subject is most interesting as a cannon collector and expert -- top of that field, it seems. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:24, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I've just added three CN tags, but it's fine for RD once those are resolved. If you dispute the notability of the subject then nominate the article at AfD. Thryduulf (talk) 11:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks Thryduulf, someone had added these sentences since nomination. I've cited them - Dumelow (talk) 12:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Support, all cited and now ready for posting. Thryduulf (talk) 17:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • PostedBagumba (talk) 00:42, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Horst Metz

Article: Horst Metz (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Freie Presse
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: German politician, served as minister of finance in Saxony. The article looks good to me. Would profit from a more formal infobox regarding his position, and perhaps recent updates, but as his political career was over more than 10 years ago, those might be minor. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Charles Duncan Jr.

Article: Charles Duncan Jr. (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [10]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 – Muboshgu (talk) 23:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 17

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Sports


(Posted) RD: Michael Ponti

Article: Michael Ponti (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): FAZ - Gramophone
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Virtuoso pianist who made the first recordings of some 50 unknown Romantic piano concertos, - article was there but shortish. There could still be more. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Article is in good shape with no significant gaps in coverage obvious. Thryduulf (talk) 11:20, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, Article is fine, Alex-h (talk) 16:52, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 03:16, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Younoussi Touré

Article: Younoussi Touré (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Benin Web
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former Malian prime minister. I've added a ref for previously uncited info - Dumelow (talk) 10:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Carmen Callil

Article: Carmen Callil (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian; The Daily Telegraph; The Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 20:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Australian publisher, founded Virago Press, died of leukemia. InedibleHulk (talk) 07:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 12:37, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Booker prize

Proposed image
Articles: Shehan Karunatilaka (talk · history · tag) and The Seven Moons of Maali Almeida (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Sri Lankan Shehan Karunatilaka wins the Booker Prize for The Seven Moons of Maali Almeida. (Post)
News source(s): CNN
Credits:

Article updated
One or both nominated events are listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: The book article is fine, but Shehan's needs a lot of sourcing work Masem (t) 12:40, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Do we typically only bold the book?[11] In The Seven Moons of Maali Almeida, would be good to have an extra sentence or two on why it won, and not just a direct quote from "judges" before the prize was awarded. On a minor point, page suffers from WP:CITEKILL, esp. the lead.—Bagumba (talk) 13:05, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Given that for the International Booker prize, per itnr, we are to bold the work, the author, and the translator, I'd think for the regular booker we'd want the author and work. Masem (t) 15:27, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now I think the author's article needs to be beefed up a bit more. Also, correct the spelling to "Sri Lankan" in the blurb e.b. (talk) 14:12, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now - No need to state what others stated above.BabbaQ (talk) 14:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Roberto Rojas

Article: Roberto Rojas (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Página Siete
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Krisgabwoosh (talk) 10:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - Referenced and looks ready.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support looks good. thoroughly cited, well organized article. e.b. (talk) 14:16, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Ulf Kristersson becomes PM

Proposed image
Articles: Ulf Kristersson (talk · history · tag) and Tidö Agreement (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Ulf Kristersson (pictured) is elected Prime Minister of Sweden, heading a government backed by the far right. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Ulf Kristersson (pictured) is elected Prime Minister of Sweden, heading a government of the centre-right bloc.
Alternative blurb II: Ulf Kristersson (pictured) is elected Prime Minister of Sweden after the Tidö Agreement to form a government is passed in the Riksdag.
Alternative blurb III: Ulf Kristersson (pictured) is elected Prime Minister of Sweden.
Alternative blurb IV: Ulf Kristersson (pictured) is elected Prime Minister of Sweden by a coalition of three political parties.
News source(s): BBC, POLITICO, AP, Guardian, DW
Credits:

Article updated
One or both nominated events are listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Change in head of government of Sweden, per WP:ITNR. The far-right aspect mentioned in the blurb is what most major media focus on in reporting his election.  Sandstein 21:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - New Prime minister. Article is updated. The far right aspect is also interesting.BabbaQ (talk) 23:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality This news item is about the head of government being chosen and about the new government being formed as much as the person. However the Tidö Agreement has large parts uncited, is in an awkward format, and there is an ongoing merger proposal. The Ulf Kristersson only very briefly mentions him becoming prime minister, and given the seniority of the role I would expect much more especially as to how he came to be chosen. Article also very short and lacking detail about his political beliefs. Also "Leader of the Moderate Party" surely still counts as part of his biography; which is very much slanted towards party political career. He has also published numerous books and this part of his life is completely missing. Key elements of his businessman career are also missing. Abcmaxx (talk) 23:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Also far right is bias and wrong. See the agreement Page and voting areas. Economically Left (except maybe competitive corporate tax) and urban blue as opposed to globally rural right/conservative. 37.252.80.175 (talk) 00:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To avoid any bias in WP's reporting, it should be said that the new PM is leading a "centre-right bloc". --Masem (t) 02:17, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Stephen: Please do not edit blurbs to which others have responded; I've undone this because it violates WP:TPO. If needed you can propose an alternate blurb (I have no real preference one way or the other). Note that Tidö Agreement is not the nominated article. Sandstein 07:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Tidö Agreement is very much central to new PM bring chosen, as is the creation of the Kristersson Cabinet. And SD is very much a far-right party, just the other day they had to discipline their own MP for publicly making insulting comments about Anne Frank. It is one of the few major parties still in existence that was openly neo-nazi. We should not be diluting their position just because they are part of a new government. Even as a coalition there is not much "centre" about it, they are pretty deeply entrenched on that wing in many aspects, even if you discount the SD. Abcmaxx (talk) 08:33, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sandstein:, you may not have noticed but this isn’t a talk page. You don’t own the blurb, it’s the encyclopaedia that anyone can edit. Two editors have opined that the bloc is not far right, nor is that term used in the article. Stephen 09:20, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@StephenThis is a talk page in the sense that we are talking on it. And a basic tenet of Wikipedia etiquette is to not alter proposals that others have replied to because it makes it impossible to determine what, if any, proposal has consensus. Please add an alternate blurb if you wish to propose one. Sandstein 10:24, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would very much want to wait for the Kristersson Cabinet article to be further expanded and improved. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:43, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment while the Sweden Democrats are widely agreed to be such a party, the blurb calling this a "government backed by the far right" WITHOUT naming any of the three centre-right parties IN the government is undue and borders on clickbait Unknown Temptation (talk) 10:29, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree, if anything not mentioning it would be biased. The SD is the biggest of the four, and without their backing they would not be in power. It's the first time anyone agreed to work with such an extremist party in Sweden. Abcmaxx (talk) 10:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They are not extremist Haris920 (talk) 06:45, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support alternative blurb - New government of a major power in Northern Europe. I would prefer the alt blurb as it is more neutral. The Tidö Agreement page could use a little expansion though. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 12:36, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose "centre-right" label per previous comments. They are a right-wing coalition. Abcmaxx (talk) 13:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support alternative blurb Per PrecariousWorlds. Twistedaxe (talk) 13:12, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support and proposed AltIII given that the election is the big story here and it serves to avoid any debate over who did or didn't support him (point being is he's the PM and that's the major impact here). DarkSide830 (talk) 13:35, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Looks adequate, more than 1,500 words. However, the "center-right" label does seem somewhat dubious, and Tidö Agreement means nothing to most readers of English Wiki. Hence, favor Alt4. – Sca (talk) 13:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Alt II The coalition is a complex deal between several parties and so trying to pin an exact L-R label on it is too controversial and synthetic. The Alt II blurb is best because it highlights the article which has the details of the 60+ page Tidö Agreement. It's ITN's purpose to help readers find such non-obvious article titles; not to engage in political POV. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I appreciate Masem's steadfast and consistent commitment to WP:NPOV and objectivity throughout Wikipedia. That said, I have to support either Alt 2 or Alt 4. Just avoid the political bent altogether. We can see the politics aspectr for ourselves just by reading the article; hell, anyone can surmise it just from reading the news for the last 2 years.--🌈WaltCip-(talk) 17:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – What's the holdup? – Sca (talk) 19:33, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Limited number of admins here. Curbon7 (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 20:45, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nigerian flooding

Article: 2022 Nigeria floods (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Floods kill hundreds in Nigeria. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Floods in Nigeria result in more than 600 deaths and the displacement of more than a million people.
Alternative blurb II: ​ The rising death toll of floods in Nigeria, which has displaced more than a million people in recent months, exceeds 600.
News source(s): BBC; CNN, AlJazeera
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: There's lots of flooding around the world including Chad; Crete; Philippines;Pakistan; &c. The latest Nigerian floods seem to be the worst with hundreds of deaths which seems to dwarf the flash flood in Venezuela which we are currently blurbing. As cyclones and flooding are so common, I reckon we need an ongoing entry of some sort like a link to Weather of 2022... Andrew🐉(talk) 10:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Article is not quite up to par for ITN, but I will certainly support this when it is. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 11:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Multiple different flooding events over a year, the latest being stale. The individual ones should have been posted if they had significant numbers. The 1,300-some number in the infobox is not supported by the text as well. Masem (t) 12:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Deaths are ongoing, so I'm not sure what date you are using to call this stale. The oldest blurb in the box is 12 days old; hundreds have died in that time. Article quality makes this nomination a non-starter, though. GreatCaesarsGhost 14:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Both BBC and CNN give over 600 deaths but that is over several months of flooding, not a single event. Flooding happens annually, this year's there being the worst, but there's also similar tolls in other regions like India, China, and where they annually see high death numbers from that. Masem (t) 23:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Gotcha; I had not read the linked articles. I've been tracking this with family and friends there, and the very recent active flooding is like nothing they've ever seen. But the reporting even by the best local RSs is about as scattershot as this article [12]. GreatCaesarsGhost 11:46, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality Not much more than a stub at the moment. The Kip (talk) 18:14, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Article is a string of single sentences about death statistics in a few random Nigerian localities. If you want this posted, expand the article into a proper encyclopedia article on the topic. --Jayron32 18:16, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support in principle but the article is not where it needs to be to go on the front page This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 18:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Nothing more than a stub. Far too little informaton provided in the article at the moment. Expand it further and I'll support. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 15:24, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – Seems a blurb-worthy topic. AlJazeera, BBC say 600+ fatalities, 1.3 million "displaced." – Sca (talk) 13:10, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    But still a mini-stub. -- Sca (talk) 19:35, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please expand the prose (only 997 characters now). --PFHLai (talk) 04:57, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Getting stale, and still only 155 words of text. Ain't gonna fly. – Sca (talk) 13:50, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Made a pass at fleshing out the article. Should be closer to meeting quality standards now. gobonobo + c 14:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks for the expansion to 700+ words of prose. --PFHLai (talk) 14:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Maplestrip, Masem, GreatCaesarsGhost, The Kip, Jayron32, Dora the Axe-plorer, Orbitalbuzzsaw, and Sca: Time for a re-review, please. --PFHLai (talk) 14:56, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • I am still concerned that there is no real singular event, just that the rest of the world took notice, and the blurb needs to better reflect that. 600 people didn't die recently and suddenly, but over the last several months. --Masem (t) 15:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        • The flooding has been ongoing since at least August, but saw a surge in September following the release of water from the Lagdo Dam. It seems that global news organizations took notice about a week ago. Another, not-so-singular, yet ongoing event is that 1.4 million people have been displaced from their homes. Would this be more appropriate as ongoing? Floods are expected to continue through November. gobonobo + c 15:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
          • Better, but still a bit thin for such a big disaster. I'm neutral on posting this version. -- Sca (talk) 18:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
            A more succinct version of Alt2 needed. -- Sca (talk) 18:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ongoing or blurb. Article is looking quite nice. Still a bit short for such a major event, but I would be happy to see this on ITN. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 12:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 16

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(Posted) RD: Rollie Seltz

Article: Rollie Seltz (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): St. Paul Pioneer Press (Legacy.com)
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: First reported today (October 16); died on October 13. —Bloom6132 (talk) 04:38, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Comprehensive and well referenced. Thryduulf (talk) 11:19, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Article is of sufficient quality for ITN. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 02:56, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 French protests

Article: 2022 French protests (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Credits:

Nominator's comments: The protests following the oil and energy walkouts seem to become intense over the past days. Mhhossein talk 12:05, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose compared to the level of violence and deaths in the Iranian protests, this is a calm revolt, though has potential to be significant. --Masem (t) 12:11, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Since no foreign hands are trying to shape the demonstrations and no one tries to 10000 X the incidents by conducting 'influence operations'.[13][14]. --Mhhossein talk 12:22, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
uh? _-_Alsor (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose protests with no foreseeable significance. Another one farther from the ones that have been included in Main Page. _-_Alsor (talk) 16:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Still more protests are occurring and/or scheduled across the Europe. Maybe we go with the broader article. --Mhhossein talk 11:56, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Josef Somr

Article: Josef Somr (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Radio Prague; Brno Daily (Czech News Agency)
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 10:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Referenced. Looks good and ready.BabbaQ (talk) 14:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Lodewijk van den Berg

Article: Lodewijk van den Berg (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NOS (Dutch)
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Dutch-American astronaut, chemical engineer. - Indefensible (talk) 00:12, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support – article is well-referenced and meets minimum depth of coverage for ITN. —Bloom6132 (talk) 01:33, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – ditto. The article is in good shape. Hektor (talk) 07:16, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - referenced and ready.BabbaQ (talk) 07:44, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted. Thryduulf (talk) 11:07, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Benjamin Civiletti

Article: Benjamin Civiletti (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NY Times
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: U.S. Attorney General under Jimmy Carter – Muboshgu (talk) 17:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support – article is well-referenced and meets minimum depth of coverage for ITN. —Bloom6132 (talk) 18:08, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted. Anarchyte (talk) 13:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Dilip Mahalanabis

Article: Dilip Mahalanabis (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Indian Express]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indian medical doctor. Article is yellow-tagged and needs some work before it can be ready for homepage. I am currently out on some off-wiki work. Will update on my return. If someone else has some time -- please feel free to get to it before me. Ktin (talk) 15:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Satya Mohan Joshi

Article: Satya Mohan Joshi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Kathmandu Post
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Known for his research on the history and culture of Nepal बडा काजी (talk) 13:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose one citation needed in the biography (I've just tagged it) and the entire notable works section is unreferenced. Thryduulf (talk) 14:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Thryduulf:, please take a look. I have added references to cite the biography and notable works section. Thanks--Biplab Anand (Talk) 01:44, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Biplab Anand: All works listed in notable works should have a ref or ISBN. SpencerT•C 03:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Spencer: done now.--Biplab Anand (Talk) 04:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Manoj Singh Mandavi

Article: Manoj Singh Mandavi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Hindu
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indian politician. I've added his death to the article - Dumelow (talk) 08:09, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support reasonably comprehensive and well referenced. Thryduulf (talk) 09:12, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 00:32, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP, CNN, FT, BBC, Reuters, AlJazeera
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Major Chinese political event started today. - Indefensible (talk) 06:56, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Major political event in one of the biggest global powers. This congress in particular may be one of the most consequential in Chinese history. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 11:44, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question - Is there any precedent on this matter? Did we, for example, post the last congress? Or was it nominated and rejected, or not nominated at all? Quantum XYZ (talk) 12:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, we posted the results of the 2017 congress (here). Alexcalamaro (talk) 12:10, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • In that case my !vote would be weak support. I won't usually support an ongoing nomination, only preferring to blurb the results, but this one is more notable per PrecariousWorlds. Quantum XYZ (talk) 12:20, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    "No significant changes to the political or economic system are expected," says AP. -- Sca (talk) 14:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – Since China is a single-party autocracy run by Xi Jinping, it seems unlikely that news of general significance will emerge from this pre-planned proceeding. – Sca (talk) 12:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Based on the last time we posted this, it was due to a leadership change after the Congress was in session. So we can wait for any actual events, and oppose the ongoing. --Masem (t) 14:14, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Sca. DarkSide830 (talk) 16:50, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose If there's news, nominate it as a blurb. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:54, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose good faith nom, per Sca. It's Stalinist theater. If something significant actually comes from it, that can be handled as an ordinary nom. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:54, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose posting as ongoing per Sca, but if something significant will be decided on the congress, it can be posted as blurb. Guess I've lost a lot of social rating points now~ a!rado (CT) 18:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose posting as ongoing, as it is just a meeting, but support posting any significant outcomes as their own headline. For my part, this would include the renewal of Xi's premiership for a third term, as he would be the first Chinese Communist leader since Mao to receive a third term. GenevieveDEon (talk) 22:16, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) RD: Muhammad Uzair Shams

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Muhammad Uzair Shams (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [15] [16] [17]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
 Ainty Painty (talk) 04:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Article appears to have severe notability problems (it was just created today), as it is only sourced to a bio on a publishers' website it appears. --Masem (t) 04:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I agree with Masem, and have orange tagged it as needing independent sources. Thryduulf (talk) 09:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
  • Post-closure comment the article has been moved to Draft space (here). Alexcalamaro (talk) 17:42, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: