Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Articles created/expanded on November 3: comments on past precedent and other project stances
Line 249: Line 249:
:::(Outdent) "common sense and good taste"...hmmm. How does refusing to run an article which meets the DYK criteria on that basis ''not'' just censorship. We don't need to be prudish. As far as the ads complaint, I guess I don't see it. Let's pretend that I wrote a new article on a normal book scheduled for publication this week. If the article I wrote met NPOV/WP:N/ADVERT, would DYK decide to not run it on the potential that main page exposure would constitute "advertising"? And honestly, it's an unwritten rule. I understand that DYK is a volunteer effort that has to take many applications and produce vetted content. But it would be a shame to see this hook in particular pushed aside for the reasons presented here. If we are ''honestly'' talking about restricting content on the main page on the basis that the article covers a subject that wouldn't be shown in a grade school, we have to reorient ourselves, '''fast'''. [[User:Protonk|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk|talk]]) 00:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
:::(Outdent) "common sense and good taste"...hmmm. How does refusing to run an article which meets the DYK criteria on that basis ''not'' just censorship. We don't need to be prudish. As far as the ads complaint, I guess I don't see it. Let's pretend that I wrote a new article on a normal book scheduled for publication this week. If the article I wrote met NPOV/WP:N/ADVERT, would DYK decide to not run it on the potential that main page exposure would constitute "advertising"? And honestly, it's an unwritten rule. I understand that DYK is a volunteer effort that has to take many applications and produce vetted content. But it would be a shame to see this hook in particular pushed aside for the reasons presented here. If we are ''honestly'' talking about restricting content on the main page on the basis that the article covers a subject that wouldn't be shown in a grade school, we have to reorient ourselves, '''fast'''. [[User:Protonk|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk|talk]]) 00:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
:::: It's not only grade school, you know. Potentially objectionable/offensive materials should be avoided on MainPage. If you want to call it censorship, so be it. Just trying to be sensible and stay out of trouble. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 06:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
:::: It's not only grade school, you know. Potentially objectionable/offensive materials should be avoided on MainPage. If you want to call it censorship, so be it. Just trying to be sensible and stay out of trouble. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 06:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
:::::I'd concur with [[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] on this, just going off past precedent. Not too long ago there was a rather serious issue over the appearance of a DYK nom on the main page that was judged by some to be of questionable taste. That eventually resulted in [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo]] getting involved, a desysopping and a lot of bad feeling. And the subject there was a lot milder than a porn film. The mainpage has always been sensitive and rightly so. Over at the Featured Article side of things there are some FAs that are I believe defacto banned from a mainpage appearance on grounds of taste. (e.g. [[1987 (What the Fuck Is Going On?)]] and [[Jenna Jameson]]). There have also been concerns raised after commercial subjects like [[Ernest Emerson]] and [[Elderly Instruments]] were placed on the mainpage. I'm not making any judgements on the rightness or wrongness of these stances, but this is a highly controversial topic that is perhaps best pursued somewhere centralised and open if you want to challenge this stance and get a generalised statement of how the mainpage can be used, rather than fighting over individual noms as they come up. [[User:Benea|Benea]] ([[User talk:Benea|talk]]) 11:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)


*... that [[William Shockley]] of [[transistor]] fame also worked on [[solar cell]]s, and produced one of its most fundamental theoretical works, the '''[[Shockley-Queisser limit]]'''? [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) 22:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
*... that [[William Shockley]] of [[transistor]] fame also worked on [[solar cell]]s, and produced one of its most fundamental theoretical works, the '''[[Shockley-Queisser limit]]'''? [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) 22:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:46, 6 November 2008

Jenny Hurn
Jenny Hurn

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page.

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Instructions

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles whose main body text has been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a JavaScript extension like User:Dr pda/prosesize.js (instructions on the talk page), a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. For Mac users, Apple has a Word counter widget available for Mac OS X 10.4 or later. Note: The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • always cited in the article with an inline citation.
Please note that hooks are subject without notice to copyediting as they move to the main page. The nature of the DYK process makes it impractical to consult users over every such edit. In particular, hooks will be shortened if they are deemed too long: the 200-character limit is an outside limit not a recommended length. Also, watch the suggestions page to ensure that no issues have been raised about your hook, because if you do not respond to issues raised your hook may not be featured at all.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as [[Image:image name |right|100x100px| Description]] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Suggested sounds should have similar qualities to pictures, and should be formatted using the format {{DYK Listen|filename.ogg|Brief description}}
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]] and ~~~~
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|July 23}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • For more details see the previously Unwritten Rules.

Symbols

  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Next update

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on November 6

Nepenthes northiana
Nepenthes northiana

Articles created/expanded on November 5

Charles Shorey House
Charles Shorey House
Bank of Spain.
Whose nom is this? --74.14.18.233 (talk) 21:34, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it's MPorciusCato's. BobAmnertiopsisChatMe! 22:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 4

Pacific University Health Professions Campus
Pacific University Health Professions Campus
Length, date, hook's ref verified. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date verified. Offline hook reference accepted in good faith. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It might be a challenge to get a map that looks good at the usual pic size of 100x100px. Cropping may help. --PFHLai (talk) 15:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Harike Wetland (pictured) with the Harike Lake formed across the Sutlej River by a barrage built in 1953 has a concentration of migratory fauna of waterfowls with number of globally threatened species.--Nvvchar (talk) 11:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • barrage was dab'ed to barrage (tidal). Confirm that this is accurate. Alansohn (talk) 00:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Barrage is on the river and far away from the tidal zone, please. Hence, introducing (tidal) would not be proper.Thanks.--Nvvchar (talk) 01:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • If barrage (tidal) is misleading, then the disambiguation page barrage is more misleading, because it asks the reader to choose between the same barrage (tidal) article and several other meanings of "barrage" that aren't related to water at all. Could we change it to a synonym like "dam"? Also, "... of migratory fauna of waterfowls with number of ..." is confusing in English. Based on the second reference, I think it means "... of migratory waterfowl with a number of ..." Art LaPella (talk) 02:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
          • Barrage is a very common usage in India to define low height headworks on rivers. Since there is a confusion due to disambuation, headworks could replace the name barrage. On the second part, I agree with your suggestion.I have reworded the Hook as under.--Nvvchar (talk) 02:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
            • ... that Harike Wetland (pictured) with the Harike Lake formed across the Sutlej River by a headwork built in 1953 has a concentration of migratory waterfowl with a number of globally threatened species?--Nvvchar (talk) 02:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
              • "Headwork" is also unfamiliar to me as an American, and it's missing from unspecialized dictionaries. But I found barrage (engineering) redirects to sluice. So I suggest [[sluice|barrage]] or [[sluice|headwork]] (or just "sluice" or "sluice gate"). I also removed the "s" from "waterfowls", added "a" before "number", and changed the period to a question mark (we have a rule about question marks). Art LaPella (talk) 05:25, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
                  • Can we adopt the word "Headregulator" which would be more appropriate than a sluice. In case that is also not found in the unspecialised dictionary, adopting the word "Dam" could be a better alternative. Similar change has to be made on another article on the Kanjli Wetland posted by me here on 1st November. I am now also considering writing an article on Barrage to bridge the gap in the data base on the subject.--Nvvchar (talk) 07:45, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

<alt> ... that horror novelist Anne Rice has cited Dracula's Daughter (1936) as an inspiration for her own homoerotic vampire fiction?

self-nom, article expanded over the last couple of days. Otto4711 (talk) 02:27, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
new article self-nom by Anameofmyveryown (talk) 02:16, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me. —Nightstallion 08:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Gets a tick of approval from me too doktorb wordsdeeds 20:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent work very concise and great links and sources. Approve!! 03:06, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on November 3

Papillifera bidens
Papillifera bidens
Probably not perfectly suitable material for Wikipedia's Main Page.--Wetman (talk) 01:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOTCENSORED is better applied to the inclusion/exclusion of materials in the encyclopedia. For Main Page, to some extent "the face of the project", we really should exercise a bit more discretion, IMO. Also, getting such a DYK entry on Main Page soon after this video is released may appear to be "free frontpage advertising". I'd avoid this nom. --PFHLai (talk) 15:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Added the word "free" later. --18:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's be a crying shame if we wimped out of putting this expanded article on the main page because we are squeamish. Material in DYK, ITM or TFA is not advertising. WP:NOTCENSORED absolutely relates to those parts of the project. No reason to reject this nom. 65.30.180.47 (talk) 18:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"because we are squeamish"? How about common sense and good taste? I have no problem having this article in the encyclopedia, per WP:NOTCENSORED. Those who search for the article can read it. But I don't suggest featuring porn-related materials on MainPage, where no one is looking for porn. When we have a long backlog of noms to pick for DYK, I'd pick something else. --PFHLai (talk) 18:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd also invoke Unwritten rule C2: "No ads." This goes for any hooks about films, books, software, etc. that are *recently* released to the market. This DVD is scheduled for release *this week*. --PFHLai (talk) 19:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly endorse this view. If this video company needs a title like this to sell its goods then that isn't a reason for wikipedia to do the same. I'm proud we are not censored ... we don't have to prove it on our front page, but I'd be happy to do so if this article had any valuable contribution, but frankly I don't think it has. Victuallers (talk) 15:20, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(Outdent) "common sense and good taste"...hmmm. How does refusing to run an article which meets the DYK criteria on that basis not just censorship. We don't need to be prudish. As far as the ads complaint, I guess I don't see it. Let's pretend that I wrote a new article on a normal book scheduled for publication this week. If the article I wrote met NPOV/WP:N/ADVERT, would DYK decide to not run it on the potential that main page exposure would constitute "advertising"? And honestly, it's an unwritten rule. I understand that DYK is a volunteer effort that has to take many applications and produce vetted content. But it would be a shame to see this hook in particular pushed aside for the reasons presented here. If we are honestly talking about restricting content on the main page on the basis that the article covers a subject that wouldn't be shown in a grade school, we have to reorient ourselves, fast. Protonk (talk) 00:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's not only grade school, you know. Potentially objectionable/offensive materials should be avoided on MainPage. If you want to call it censorship, so be it. Just trying to be sensible and stay out of trouble. --PFHLai (talk) 06:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd concur with PFHLai on this, just going off past precedent. Not too long ago there was a rather serious issue over the appearance of a DYK nom on the main page that was judged by some to be of questionable taste. That eventually resulted in Jimbo getting involved, a desysopping and a lot of bad feeling. And the subject there was a lot milder than a porn film. The mainpage has always been sensitive and rightly so. Over at the Featured Article side of things there are some FAs that are I believe defacto banned from a mainpage appearance on grounds of taste. (e.g. 1987 (What the Fuck Is Going On?) and Jenna Jameson). There have also been concerns raised after commercial subjects like Ernest Emerson and Elderly Instruments were placed on the mainpage. I'm not making any judgements on the rightness or wrongness of these stances, but this is a highly controversial topic that is perhaps best pursued somewhere centralised and open if you want to challenge this stance and get a generalised statement of how the mainpage can be used, rather than fighting over individual noms as they come up. Benea (talk) 11:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Creation date and length verified. Article has a decent amount of references (in general). Do you have a more interesting fact? Usually we try to draw out something unusual or interesting, not state what something is. For instance, you have sourced that:
Ha! I was just coming back here to add that. I can't find another gun that is named after it's designers. There's an idea! Cheers DigitalNinja 16:04, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering if featuring an image of a gun on Main Page would draw complaints? I am aware of the "if we can feature tanks and warships, we can feature guns, too" logic, but AFAIK gun is a particularly sensitive topic in English-speaking countries. --BorgQueen (talk) 06:17, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As a person in the British Isles I'd say we are happy to see them as as an academic subject (even though we don't encourage people to have/own or use them). Seems like a good first article (I even like the 1st hook) Victuallers (talk) 15:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As an U.S. resident who doesn't like guns, I don't have a problem with a gun on the main page and I would expect that most Americans wouldn't have a problem with it. Royalbroil 05:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
L. Frank Baum
L. Frank Baum

Articles created/expanded on November 2

Norton 16H
Norton 16H
Bert Bolle's Barometer
Bert Bolle's Barometer
"The Ghost of a Flea", c.1819-20, by William Blake
"The Ghost of a Flea", c.1819-20, by William Blake
A bit simplistic? Ceoil sláinte 21:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but to the point. :) One of my literary focuses is on the "insanity" of poets, or how poetic inspiration causes them to appear insane to their culture. This image caused the same reaction of Christopher Smart's Song to David, which is funny because of their opposite takes. Ottava Rima (talk) 22:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I thightened it. Ceoil sláinte 05:08, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds fun! Johnbod (talk) 00:52, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jacob Earl Fickel firing first gun shots from airplane, 1910
Jacob Earl Fickel firing first gun shots from airplane, 1910
Confederate Memorial Gates in Mayfield
Confederate Memorial Gates in Mayfield
Tithe Barn, Pilton
Tithe Barn, Pilton
Replica of the Star of the South in Reich der Kristalle museum, Munich
Replica of the Star of the South in Reich der Kristalle museum, Munich
Verifed. – RyanCross (talk) 09:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Verified. – RyanCross (talk) 09:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Enterprise
The Enterprise
Hopefully, Maria gets her own article created soon and we can have a double-DYK hook. --PFHLai (talk) 17:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 1

Noonday Globe snail, Patera clarki nantahala
Noonday Globe snail, Patera clarki nantahala
Ariel W/NG 350
Ariel W/NG 350
Detail of The Family of Sir Thomas More by Rowland Lockey, after Hans Holbein the Younger, 1592
Detail of The Family of Sir Thomas More by Rowland Lockey, after Hans Holbein the Younger, 1592
That works. Ottava Rima (talk) 13:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"America" = United States or the Americas? Pls disambiguate. --74.13.129.187 (talk) 19:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to United States, as the reference shows. --Doug Coldwell talk 23:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
typo for "patriarchal"; changed. Johnbod (talk) 01:49, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Golubenko holds Russian citizenship, most sport associations don't allow foreign citizens to represent the flag of the country they happen to reside in (if she really wants to represent Estonia, she is eligible to take out Estonian citizenship if she wishes). An alternative hook could be:
grammatically, "to popularize licuados, the Latin American drink" works better - if you don't speak Spanish just imagine the word "smoothie" in place of "licuado" to get a sense of the flow. Wikidemon (talk) 18:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expiring noms

  • Currently a backlog of 86 hooks as of 03:54, 5 November 2008 (UTC) - Gatoclass (talk)
  • Backlog of 75 hooks as of 03:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC) - Gatoclass (talk)

Articles created/expanded on October 31

or ... that Daniel Mangeas, the voice of the Tour de France, commentates on 200 events a year but tries never to speak between races, to preserve his voice? Article created by User talk:Les woodland. Nom by Autodidactyl (talk) 11:09, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've commented out the pic because it's not showing as a 100x100 thumbnail, at least not in my browser... Hassocks5489 (tickets please!)


  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Length and date verified. However, neither of the references you cited say that this is the first anime film to be nominated for the Annie Award for Best Animated Home Entertainment Production. Cunard (talk) 05:29, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I much prefer "best known" to "most well known" jnestorius(talk) 13:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Either way, such a hook is rather WP:PEACOCK/POV-ish. --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:04, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Length and date verified. The first part of the reference is cited in the article, but I don't see much about the political parties expanding the institution. Could you add that into the article? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It was there all along, but should be clearer now. Punkmorten (talk) 09:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is some overlap here with phasmophobia, which featured on DYK earlier today. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 19:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is no overlap. Laudak (talk) 01:36, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues There should not be overlap, but the distinction between fear of ghosts and phasmophobia has not been addressed in the article; I had to add a dablink as a quick fix to try to explain the difference between the two. In any case, the article as it currently stands is not fit to be linked to from the main page, there are major cleanup and content problems that I can't fix in just a couple days; furthermore, the hook itself is POV and has a weasel word. —Politizer talk/contribs 22:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Verified. I've added "(pictured)" for you. – RyanCross (talk) 09:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on October 30

I think in this case primary sources might be all right because no original research is involved. "Primary sources are considered reliable for basic statements of fact", in this case the date when the Hershey Company released three flavors of Snack Barz. --Jh12 (talk) 01:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues I think there might be a questionmark over the notability of these products though. Gatoclass (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There are articles on every other Hershey's product, so why not this one? Why wouldn't a specially-named product produced by one of the world's largest chocolate manufacturers be notable? Can I at least have another opinion?Intothewoods29 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Snack Barz may be a more appropriate name for the article since "There are three varieties, Hershey's Snack Barz, Reese's Snack Barz, and S'mores Snack Barz. ".[1] The DYK rules say that articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators. Usually, that happens when primary sources are used rather than secondary sources. As for material to expand the article, see Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL and some of [2][3][4][5][6]. -- Suntag 16:16, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Eduard Spelterini
Eduard Spelterini
"balloonist" is surely much the commonest, & to be preferred? Johnbod (talk) 02:13, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to "balloonist", though any other term is also fine with me. Thanks for notifying me, Art!  Sandstein  06:31, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Old postcard from Ceranów, Poland
Old postcard from Ceranów, Poland
I presume Satchel Paige should not be bold jnestorius(talk) 16:22, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I hope Satchel Paige can be expanded 5 times soon. Or it won't qualify--74.13.128.225 (talk) 19:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC) Unbolded. Expansion is unlikely for the already long article. --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This conflict is still ongoing. Suggest mentioning "so far" or sth to that effect in the hook. Also suggest checking the news for updates before posting the "57" figure on the main page. Pls also expand the intro. It's rather short. --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ōe Taku
Ōe Taku
ALT2: ... that Akkamma Cherian (pictured), an Indian freedom fighter, was popularly known as the Jhansi Rani of Travancore? -- new article self-nom by -- Tinu Cherian - 11:22, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT3: ... that Akkamma Cherian , an Indian freedom fighter , dared firing orders of the police to lead a rally inorder to revoke a ban on State congress party?-- new article self-nom by -- Tinu Cherian - 06:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT4: ... that Akkamma Cherian 's , an Indian freedom fighter , courageous words , “I am the leader; shoot me first before you kill others” , forced the police authorities to withdraw firing orders on the protest rally? -- new article self-nom by -- Tinu Cherian - 06:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An inspiration for any of this author's books? --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Only 845 bytes/162 words of readable prose. Hook is not mentioned in the article. — BillC talk 09:04, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Which citation verifies this hook? --Rosiestep (talk) 03:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC)][reply]
Both the first (Gray, p80) Electrical Influence Machines: "Cavallo, in 1795... described an influence machine", and the second (de Queiroz) Influence machines: "A similar [electric charge] adding device was Cavallo's multiplier (1795)". — BillC talk 08:31, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on October 29

This fact will work better as a DYK hook if Viswanathan Kakkan is a famous guy with a wikibio (Go turn the redlink blue!), or if the two political parties are high-profile rivals. So many politicians have siblings in the same business, you know. --74.13.129.207 (talk) 15:13, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't a question of siblings being in politics. But it is a rarity for a Dalit politician (that too in Tamil Nadu where the anti-Hindutva sentiments are high amongst Dalits) to contest the elections as a candidate of the NDA. And though I'm not sure if Viswanathan Kakkan, himself, would satisfy notability criteria, it would come as a surprise to many that the brother of a former Minister and prominent Dalit leader is associated with the Sangh Parivar and has contested the elections as a candidate of the NDA.-RavichandarMy coffee shop 03:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, Indian National Congress and Janata Party are rivals today. But the rivalry did not exist during the lifetime of P.Kakkan as he died 27 years back. In fact, the Congress party had no serious opponents at that time. But there has not been any high-profile Dalit leader or relative of any high-profile Dalit leader from Tamil Nadu associated with the BJP or its allies. Almost all big names from the Dalit communities in Tamil Nadu as Iyothee Thass, Rettamalai Srinivasan, Thirumavalavan and Krishnasamy had been opponents of the Sangh Parivar and its ideology.-RavichandarMy coffee shop 03:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Anon has put forth his points and I have made my replies. Considering that Mr. Anon has been absent for quite sometime someone here must take some decision-RavichandarMy coffee shop 04:19, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm back. The hook is passable per DYK rules. I ain't rejecting the nom, but I just wonder why this fact is interesting. I don't know anything about Tamil Nadu politics. And I'm scratching my head... is it supposed to be funny? ironic? interesting by relations to something famous? I don't know.... --74.14.18.233 (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2008 (UTC) You might want a hook about his stamp, or the reservoirs if they are notable enough to get an article in Wikipedia. Either would be more interesting than a non-famous sibling. --74.14.18.233 (talk) 21:54, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dalits are all generally against Hindu conservatives. And Viswanathan Kakkan, who is a brother of a prominent Dalit leader, P. Kakkan, has fought the elections as a member of the Janata Party, which is part of a Hindu conservative coalition. Though Kakkan did not openly support any conservative Hindu organizations as long as he was alive, it is, indeed, news that his brother does. Am I clear enough now?-RavichandarMy coffee shop 10:00, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is it possible to modify the hook so that these facts you have given can be included? I think it will be better, since that will make it clearer what it says. The refs, date, length are fine. We can pass it as it is, if the selector thinks the current version is good enough. Chamal talk 11:48, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't understand. What facts? I was only explaining to Mr. Anon, the significance of the fact included in the hook I've specified.-RavichandarMy coffee shop 12:52, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I meant that if this information is added in some way, it would be clearer for someone who doesn't know anything about Tamil Nadu politics. Anyway as I said there's nothing wrong with the hook as it is, and if you think there's no need to change it, fine by me. So, with date, length, ref verified. Chamal talk 14:20, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bertie Ahern
Bertie Ahern
After is better, or this will appear to be free advertising. --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In relation to the free advertising comment I hardly think it would be appropriate given the plans that are afoot to throw Barack Obama and John McCain onto the Main Page on November 4. There would seem to be inconsistencies if a former world leader cannot feature on the same day as a documentary on him airs. --➨Candlewicke  :) Sign/Talk 19:50, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter if the show is about a former world leader or a fictional fungus in the future. Just don't put hook on the Main Page when (or just before) the show is broadcast. We shouldn't help Mint advertise their show. --74.14.18.233 (talk) 21:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Need to establish in the hook that this is a notable film, or this sounds like another low-budget film failure. Also need to clarify the currency.
Good point about the notable vs low-budget failure criteria. What do you mean by needing to "clarify the currency"? SWik78 (talkcontribs) 15:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Clarifying the currency means specifying whether it's U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars, Liberian dollars, or whichever. —97198 (talk) 06:08, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Understood, clarified accordingly. SWik78 (talkcontribs) 13:34, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest mentioning in the hook who Cromwell was, at least for the uninitiated. --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't. The uninitiated might not recognize the Britishisms "barrister" and "QC" either, and at least Cromwell is linked. "Lord Protector" wouldn't help the uninitiated at all, and "17th-century British ruler" is a lot of words for the Main Page. Art LaPella (talk) 21:33, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How about–
"17th-century British ruler" is not a lot of words. --74.14.18.233 (talk) 21:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is "intro" a formal word to be used on Wikipedia's front page? --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not nearly long enough. Gatoclass (talk) 09:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on October 28

This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Article and hook are referenced to a personal website. Can you find a WP:RS? Should be relatively easy for straightforward claims. Length and date checked. — BillC talk 08:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also