Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Klsyking (talk | contribs)
Line 2,595: Line 2,595:
<!-- Please add your suggestion to the TOP of this section (after this comment) using either the template provided or a level 4 header with the name of the new/expanded article. -->
<!-- Please add your suggestion to the TOP of this section (after this comment) using either the template provided or a level 4 header with the name of the new/expanded article. -->


{{subst:NewDYKnom | article=Everybody Was in the French Resistance...Now! | hook=... that "G.I.R.L.F.R.E.N (You Know I've Got A)" by '''[[Everybody Was in the French Resistance...Now!]]''' is a reply to [[Avril Lavigne]]'s song, "[[Girlfriend (Avril Lavigne Song)|Girlfriend]"]? | status=new | author=Bennydigital | nominator=Bennydigital }}

====Everybody Was in the French Resistance...Now!====
<!--
-->
{{*mp}}... that "G.I.R.L.F.R.E.N (You Know I've Got A)" by '''[[Everybody Was in the French Resistance...Now!]]''' is a reply to [[Avril Lavigne]]'s song, "[[Girlfriend (Avril Lavigne song)|Girlfriend]]"?
<!--
-->
<small>Created by [[User:Bennydigital|Bennydigital]] ([[User talk:Bennydigital|talk]]). Self nom at 14:31, 11 April 2011 (UTC)</small>
<!--
*{{DYKmake|Everybody Was in the French Resistance...Now!|Bennydigital}}
-->
:*<!--Make first comment here-->





Revision as of 14:32, 11 April 2011

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page.

Purge

Instructions

Using a DYK suggestion string (see below examples), list new suggestions in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the bottom. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged. Thanks for participating and please remember to check back for comments on your nomination. Every approved hook will appear on the main page.

DYK criteria

Official criteria: DYK rules and additional guidelines
Unofficial Guide: Learning DYK

How to list a new nomination

For a simplified version of these instructions, see User:Rjanag/Quick DYK.
For a step-by-step guide to filling out the
{{NewDYKnom}} template, see Template:NewDYKnomination/guide.

Please use one of the strings below to post your DYK nomination, using the "author" and "nominator" fields to identify the users who should receive credit for their contributions if the hook is featured on the main page.

  1. Nom without image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= }}
  2. Nom with image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= | image= | caption= }}
    To include more than one new or expanded article in a single hook: |article2= |article3= |article4= | (etc)
    To include more than one author: |author2= |author3= | (etc)
    To include alternate hooks: |ALT1= |ALT2= | (etc)
    To add a comment: |comment=
    To add the article you reviewed: |reviewed=

Do not wikilink the article title, or the author username field; the template will wikilink them automatically. Do wikilink the article title in the hook field, however.
Do not add a section heading if you are using the template; the template will add one for you.
Do not include a signature (~~~~) after the template.
Do not use non-free images in your hook suggestion.

An example of how to use the template is given below. Don't forget to fill out the rollover text, so people know what the image is of! Full details are at {{NewDYKnom}}:

{{subst:NewDYKnom
 | article      = Example
 | status       = new<!--(or)  expanded (or) BLP expanded-->
 | hook         = ... that this [[article]] is an  '''[[example]]''' ''(pictured)''?
 | author       = User1
 | nominator    = User2
 | image        = Example.png
 | rollover     = An example image
 | alttext      = Description of the image
 | comment      =
 | reviewed     = Article you reviewed
 | revieweddiff = diff link to the article review
}}
  • Note that you should only use one of the above templates for the original hook. If you want to suggest a second, alternative hook for the same article submission, just type it in manually. The above templates output useful code for each submission and if you employ them for alternative hooks, you will mess up the page formatting.
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name}}
  • If you have 5 or more self-nomination DYK credits, don't forget to review another editor's nomination, and link to the diff in your nomination.

How to review a nomination

Any editor who was not involved in writing/expanding or nominating an article may review it by checking to see that the article meets all the DYK criteria (long enough, new enough, no serious editorial or content issues) and the hook is cited. Editors may also alter the suggested hook to improve it, suggest new hooks, or even lend a hand and make edits to the article which the hook applies so that the hook is supported and accurate. For a more detailed discussion of the DYK rules and review process see the additional rules.

If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or note that there is an issue with the article or hook, please use the following symbols to point the issues out:

Symbol Code DYK Ready? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe DYK eligibility requires additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Please consider using {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the nominator's talk page, in case they do not notice that there is an issue.

Backlogged?

This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until an editor reviews it. Since editors are encouraged to review the oldest submissions first (so that those hooks don't grow stale), it may take several days until your submission is reviewed. In the meantime, please consider reviewing another submission (not your own) to help reduce the backlog (see instructions above).

Where is my hook?

If you can't find the hook you submitted to this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is in the queue for display on the main page. You can check whether your hook has been moved to the queue by reviewing the queue listings.

If your hook is not in the queue or already on the main page, it has probably been deleted. Deletion occurs if the hook is more than about eight days old and has unresolved issues for which any discussion has gone stale. If you think your hook has been unfairly deleted, you can query its deletion on the discussion page, but as a general rule deleted hooks will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Nominations

Older nominations

Articles created/expanded on March 27

Hollingworth Magniac

Created by Philg88 (talk). Self nom at 11:38, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed Myth of Skanderbeg
  • Article length and dates are OK. The hook is a bit too long, but that could be pretty easily fixed by a rewrite. The big problem is that I can't find a source for the hook fact. I do see a source for the assertion that Jardine Matheson is Fortune 500-listed, but I don't see a source for the part about recruiting William Jardine and James Matheson to the firm. All elements of the hook fact need to be supported in the article by inline citations. --Orlady (talk) 03:47, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1 ... that it was Hollingworth Magniac, not William Jardine and James Matheson, who in 1832 founded Jardine, Matheson and Company, a firm that would go on to become Asia's largest trading concern? ► Philg88 ◄ talk 06:46, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's a crisper hook, but I am continuing to have difficulty verifying both hooks. It's not clear from the article who founded Magniac & Co, which seems to be the legal predecessor of Jardine Matheson. I cannot determine whether you are saying that Hollingworth founded Magniac & Co, or whether he later formed a new partnership that became Jardine Matheson. (I note that the article Jardine Matheson Holdings does not give Hollingworth Magniac nearly as much credit as this article does.) Ref 4 does, however, indicate that the name was changed to Jardine Matheson in 1832. The article does not have very many inline citations, so I cannot determine where a lot of the information in the article comes from. It appears that much of the story is on the pages of the book "The Thistle and the Jade," which makes me think that some additional inline references to that book (ideally to specific pages) would help support the article and the hook. Please try adding inline citations so that there is a clearer indication of where all of the article content comes from... --Orlady (talk) 19:33, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, will do. Magniac's role has been played down by JM for obvious reasons, but without dear old Hollingworth the future partners would never have met. In a nutshell, Magniac & Co took both Jardine and Matheson into his existing company. After he retired and went back to England, the new partners changed the firm's name to JM. ► Philg88 ◄ talk 00:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a link in the article to the online version of A business in risk: Jardine Matheson and the Hong Kong trading industry which shows the evolution of the firms involved. Let me know if it's still an issue. Best, ► Philg88 ◄ talk 00:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's still a problem with referencing in the article. Here's my analysis of the sourcing:

  • Reference 1 (offline) supports Hollingworth's life dates and the names of his wife and parents.
  • Reference 2 (the "thistle and jade" book) supports information about his father, the fact that John Reid became Austria's Chinese Consul, the fact that Charles Magniac was killed on a trip to Europe (I added that ref), and the fact that Hollingworth wanted to leave Asia (I also added that ref).
  • Reference 3 documents information about the establishment of Magniac, Smith & Co. The article also cites it as the source for the statement that Hollingworth searched for a senior partner and settled on Jardine, but I can't find that in the book. (Only part of the book is online, but search indicates that Hollingworth is mentioned on only 3 pages. I can see page 27, where he is discussed, and page 39, where his name is in a footnote. I can only see a snippet of search results from the third page, which is the index page that indicates he is mentioned on page 27. Accordingly, I don't believe this fact is supported by this book.)
  • Reference 4 documents the date when Jardine joined Magniac and Co., and it documents the dates of company name changes, but it doesn't mention Hollingworth nor document the details of who invited Jardine to join Magniac and Co.
  • Reference 5 (offline) documents Jardine Matheson being the largest trading company in Asia. Reference 6 documents its being listed in the Fortune 500.
  • Reference 7 documents the memorial to Hollingworth and his wife and references 7 and 8 document his art collection.

I can't identify the source(s) for most of the article's details about Hollingworth, his business activities, his brother Daniel, and his relationship to Jardine and Matheson. It's not necessary for sources to be online, but they do need to be cited. --Orlady (talk) 16:17, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'm working on it ► Philg88 ◄ talk 02:42, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've reworded some of the text and added more references but the hook fact will have to be tweaked accordingly. So I propose:

ALT2 ...Hollingworth Magniac was in partnership with William Jardine and James Matheson before the pair changed the firm's name to Jardine Matheson and Company, which went on to become the largest trading company in Asia?
► Philg88 ◄ talk 01:39, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 28

Breast shaped hill

Twin hills on Mykonos that known to the locals as the Breasts of Aphrodite.

Created/expanded by Xufanc (talk). Nominated by AgadaUrbanit (talk) at 15:36, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ever heard the expression "Damn that hill is really getting on my tits?"♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:33, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Returned from preps because the article contains only ~1350 bytes of prose. I understand there is much bulleted information, but it is mostly unreferenced. Many of those hills have no wikipedia articles/images, and thus are not certainly breast shaped. Materialscientist (talk) 10:03, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I read "not certainly breast shaped" as "certainly not breast shaped", as if all breast-shaped hills would by now, of course, have their own articles on Wikipedia. - Dravecky (talk) 12:53, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Argh :) .. I meant we can't be sure they are (all) breast shaped. Materialscientist (talk) 03:25, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recycling in Canada

5x expanded by Kevlar67 (talk). Self nom at 20:43, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the hook should be more specific. There may be too many red links for topics that will never be pursued further. Billy Hathorn (talk) 14:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed with above user. Plus the citations need to have full ref templates, rather than bare URLS (there is a tag noting this already, I'm just drawing attention to it). Ruby2010 talk 22:27, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Billy Hathorn's concerns are unaddressed while Ruby2010's have been resolved. However, no one has notified expander/nominator Kevlar67 of these concerns, so I have just notified Kevlar67. OCNative (talk) 02:58, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 30

Jacques Cauvin

Created by Paul Bedson (talk). Self nom at 22:05, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hook verified, length and age OK - almost ready to go. There are, however, some large sections of text for which it would be good to have some references.Ivolocy (talk) 21:46, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article is not DYK-ready. There are five references, all used once each and three of which appear at the end of the one-line lede. Most of the article is unreferenced and there is an enormous list of published works by the subject. With such an output, a few highlights are sufficient. In order to be approved for DYK, there must be at least one reference per paragraph. The lede should be a rough description of the article and therefore generally does not contain references, which are instead used in the body of the article, where the real information is detailed.
Also, I think that hook could use some work. It's very long, doesn't seem quite grammatical — "considered the neolithic revolution to have moved into Anatolia" would be better, no? It's currently at 199 characters, which means it's already about maximum length.
You are encouraged to work on the article and add the necessary references. Marrante (talk) 07:57, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have referenced it better and shortened the hook and bibliography as suggested. Paul Bedson (talk) 01:42, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure what the standard is for biographies, but I think you should try and reduce the bibliography to his 10-15 most important works. And I would certainly drop all translations.--Zoeperkoe (talk) 02:48, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've reduced the article to books only. Which has totally ruined the page as a unique English reference tool for Cauvin's work. I guess there are powers out there that want the prehistory of the Lebanon to remain hidden (for now). Hopefully it's DYK-able now though. Paul Bedson (talk) 19:09, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Prompted by the comments here I've tracked down Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lists of works), which states that Complete lists of works, appropriately sourced to reliable scholarship (WP:V), are encouraged, particularly when such lists are not already freely available on the internet. If the list has a separate article, a simplified version should also be provided in the main article. Since the list of works for Cauvin was long, I would suggest that, subject to providing sources, a separate list may be appropriate in this case, rather than wholesale deletion. For example see List of scientific publications by Albert Einstein. Ivolocy (talk) 18:52, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My personal concern remains that I would like to see more of the text linked to references. The first main paragraph, for example, starts by taking about 1959 and ends in 1976, but has only one link to a reference for the entire paragraph. It may simply be that all of this paragraph is contained in this since reference; if so, then personally I would add links to this single reference after each major point, rather than just once at the end. If not, then links to the other sources would be appropriate. Ivolocy (talk) 19:06, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've linked more of the text to the 2 primary sources used. Hope that helps clear things up. Paul Bedsontalk 03:20, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 31

Jens Joneleit

head of Jens Joneleit at the microphone, receiving the Kulturpreis in Rodgau

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nom at 13:24, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have questions about length here. Over half of the "Professional Career" section is a long quote, and the "Operas" section reads like an annotated list, which is followed by a table. There is nothing about his life either, not even education. Seems incomplete.Thelmadatter (talk) 01:34, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gerd Kühr

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nom at 10:03, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. There are some grammatical issues which lead me to be unsure of what the hook is trying to say. Can it be better phrased as
ALT1: that the libretto to Gerd Kühr's opera Stallerhof was written by playwright Franz Xaver Kroetz? (I'm not sure what the deal is with the "taboo topic." What is the opera actually about?) Roscelese (talkcontribs) 19:20, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I formatted ALT1, but only to reject it. Many opera librettos were written by playwrights, that is not so special. But in this case, the playwright turned his own successful play into a libretto. I hope for suggestions to say so. Taboo: the ref, a review, says: "I chanced at Lucerne upon Stallerhof, based upon a dialect play that caused a furore in 1972 because of its stark and shocking treatment of taboo subject matter". I leave it to the reader to find out more, the review is quite explicit, but that is not the topic of the article about the composer, just meant to create curiosity. - In addition: there is a German Wikipedia article on the play, mentioning the opera. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:46, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • How about:
ALT2: that playwright Franz Xaver Kroetz turned his controversial play Stallerhof into an opera libretto for Gerd Kühr, which premiered at the Munich Biennale?
It just sounds weird to say "it's a taboo topic" without saying what the topic is, but it's slightly less awkwardly phrased this way. Roscelese (talkcontribs) 03:58, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree about the unspecified taboo subject. Creating curiosity is fine, as long as it's satisfied in the article (which it isn't (wasn't)). I looked into it, thinking I could clarify the sentence, but my German isn't up to it: the servant befriends the girl who may be mentally deficient (but can do the mental tests when her parents aren't watching). When a sexual relationship develops, the parents kill the servant's dog .. so where exactly is the taboo? Is the girl really mentally deficient? I couldn't work it out. An alternate hook might be to say that Kühr's first two operas were based on subjects highly controversial in his native Catholic Austria .. or some such. Here's the subject of his second opera:
The play "Death and the Devil" by Peter Turrini caused a violent controversial discussion in 1990 on the occasion of the first performance in Vienna's Burgtheater: the story of the pastor Bley, "the sin can no longer understand", is a critical examination of the Catholic Church, and the way that they deal with guilt and sin. Bley does finally - a modern "Passion Play" - and taking the role of Jesus Christ, dies a sacrificial death nailed to the cross. (sorry, Google translation, with interpolations/ guesses)
On the downside, it needs a bit of work to expand the work descriptions, on the upside we could probably get 5000+ accesses for that hook (if that's important to the Opera project) ... Scarabocchio (talk) 20:33, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
PS. ALT2 is fine. Scarabocchio (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Without need for google translate a click on ref 4 shows: "... Franz-Xaver Kroetz 's Stallerhof deals with stunted emotions in a dysfunctional, impoverished rural home. A small farmer is unable to relate to his wife, nor can either of them do so in any positive way to their 14 yr old mentally retarded daughter, Beppi. The central characters are Sepp (Johannes Kosters), a lonely and sexually frustrated seasonal worker, who rapes and befriends Beppi (Elisabeth Rolli), their developing mutual friendship showing the only tenderness on display. That illicit relationship is, of course, doomed. / The girl's pregnancy leads to Sepp's eviction from the household and to Beppi's father killing Sepp's dog (his only steady companion) as a warning in case he should show up again. Murder of the bastard baby, and even that of the erring girl herself, is considered. An abortion is prepared, but the mother finds the procedure too distasteful to complete and father muses that he had always wanted a son - -. There is a vein of fantasy alongside this sordid reality. / The final scene has Beppi's pregnancy going to term and delivery, with the child/mother calling for Mama, just as does the naughty child at the end of Ravel's L'enfant et les sortileges. ..." I think this should not be part of the article on the composer, but is easily accessible. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:53, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fred (baboon)

  • ... that Fred the baboon was captured and given a lethal injection after assaulting tourists, breaking into their cars and stealing food?

Created by Candlewicke (talk). Self nom at 11:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article refers to Fred as "the leader of a baboon gang". However, I checked through all of the available sources listed (The Times site seems to be unavailable), and, while some mention that Fred was an "alpha male", I didn't see any that specifically say that he was a gang leader. I don't think that's close enough for hook verification purposes, so, unless other sources emerge, I'd recommend abandoning the April 1 idea and going with the original hook. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 09:17, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • D'oh! The Times site is now coming through, and it uses the term "troop leader". That's good enough for me. I've added an inline citation immediately after that in the article, and I once again think that an April Fools' hook may be viable. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 20:26, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor Series (2000)

5x expanded by Richard "Wrestler" Lopez (talk). Nominated by GaryColemanFan (talk) at 15:16, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lumley Chapel

Part of a stone and brick chapel with a red tiled roof seen from an angle

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 09:22, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Date length and hook approved. Good to go.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:07, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Disorders of consciousness

Created by razorbelle (talk). Self nom at 20:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm sorry but you created this article in March 31st, and DYK articles are supposed to be 5 days or younger (or 5 days or less has been since the article was expanded) at the time of nomination. The article also doesn't fulfil the requirements concerning length (the prose falls just short of 1500 characters), and it's generally expected that the article is cited throughout (I got a suggestion to provide at least one ref tag per pargraph). For future reference, until you have successfully self-nominated 5 DYKs, i.e. are "new to DYK", you are exempt from the new rule that self-nominators should always review another DYK and provide the diff link for their review as proof that they did it. As long as you fall in the "new to DYK" users category, it'd be helpful if you made a comment to say you're new. Pitke (talk) 15:04, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 1

Authenticity in art

  • ... that a performer's authenticity in art may involve conforming to the composer's intention or ignoring it?

5x expanded by Aymatth2 (talk). Self nom at 00:37, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ruislip Manor

5x expanded by Harrison49 (talk). Self nom at 19:41, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hook o.k., but not yet a 5x expansion. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:37, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is up from 170 characters to 1622 when links, the infobox and references are removed. Harrison49 (talk) 14:39, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are right - it is 5x expanded. Something is wrong with the DYK check tool. It shows the version before expansion started as 148 characters, size now as 1612 characters, but says it has not been expanded 5x. This may be caused by old versions that contained garbage content, since removed, such as this version. Good to go. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:56, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Three Fishers

  • ... that in the late 1800s when Antoinette Sterling sang the English folk song "Three Fishers" she made the first verse "quite bright" so as not to give away the unhappy ending?

Created by MrFizyx (talk). Self nom at 16:02, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Harrellson

A man in his twenties with dark hair wearing a white warm-up jacket with the letters UK in blue on the left shoulder and a blue Nike "swoosh" on the right shoulder

Created by Acdixon (talk). Self nom at 17:35, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like my next door neighbour, only a foot taller...♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:45, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mollie's Nipple

Created by Mbz1 (talk). Self nom at 16:44, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fun and amusing! length and references check out. I added a "the" to the hook before USGS to make it flow better.--Kevmin § 17:05, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment How about linking the DYK article to the "Molly" or "nipples" (should this be spelled "Mollie"), rather than the somewhat counter-intuitive USGS? Something like "... that the US Geological Survey has named at least eight of Mollie's Nipples in Utah? Canada Hky (talk) 00:20, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The spelling differs from source to source, so I am not sure which one to use. About linking to Mollie's Nipple, well, yes, but IMO the hook will be more mysterious, if it is linked to nipples or is not linked to anything. I removed the link to nipples. It is even better without it. In any case I'll leave it to an admin, who is going to move the hook to prep area to decide which one to use. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:18, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My thinking was - if I see a link for the USGS - meh. Mollie's Nipples, on the other hand - I'm probably going to click on. With it buried in the USGS link, you don't notice it until you mouse over. Just a thought.  :) Canada Hky (talk) 03:54, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How about ALT2:... that Mollie has at least eight nipples marked by the US Geological Survey? OCNative (talk) 06:15, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I like it :-)--Mbz1 (talk) 23:00, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

STOP! This would be one of the most unencyclopedic suggestions I have seen for a long time. The article says Mollie's Nipple or Molly's Nipple is the name given to as many as seven peaks in Utah. It does NOT say/suggest that Mollie/Molly has at least eight nipples. The tacky inference is mind boggling, but much worse is the expectation that someone would totally savage the meaning of an article to produce such a childish DYK which has no relevance to the article. Sigh. Moriori (talk) 07:37, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will go with this suggestion to but I think that there is nothing wrong with the original hook, as is is accurate. I may have been better to link Molly as the article title, while leaving a link to the USGS, but it is verifiable that Mollie has at least seven nipples in Utah. --Kevmin § 03:53, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How about ALT4:... that Mollie has at least seven nipples marked by the US Geological Survey? OCNative (talk) 11:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

St Mary's Church, Fleet Marston

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 13:43, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Egyptian Halls

The Egyptian Halls frontage on Union Street.

Created by Yorkshiresky (talk). Self nom at 12:42, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Swakeleys House

View of the western side of Swakeleys House

Created by Harrison49 (talk). Self nom at 23:16, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Museum of Lebanese Prehistory

Created by Paul Bedson (talk). Self nom at 23:10, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The citation supporting the hook is from [[3]] Sfeir, Mia., Femme Magazine - Préhistoire VS Urbanisation, le témoignage d’Henri Fleisch - Issue 206 - P.70 Published June 1, 2010. - it could be translated into English - he surveyed with other Jesuits at the time, much of the Lebanese coastline and mountains and freezes thousands of images, his passion for what he called "stones". A term to describe small tools and remains belonging to the cavemen. For my surprise, there are nearly a million years, long before the Phoenicians, bipedal hominid just from Africa were halted in Lebanon. A selection from nearly 400 prehistoric sites discovered along the Lebanese coast and in the Bekaa Valley are demonstrated. Paul Bedson (talk) 03:17, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 2

Shoot to Kill (1990 TV drama)

Created by Jheald (talk). Self nom at 14:15, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Shouldn't that be "had disappeared" instead of "were disappeared"? -- Nczempin (talk) 14:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, it is in quotes, and that it how it was actually said per the original. I suppose it is a slight grammatic stretch to be using "disappeared" as an adjective, rather than part of a verb; but if anything to me that slight unorthodoxy in the use of language adds to the vividness of the quote, and thence also the hook. Jheald (talk) 15:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • The were that makes it wrong is not inside the quotes. How about something like "were said to be" (or use the active voice somehow) and then the quote? -- Nczempin (talk) 15:53, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        • The were is there in the original source.[5] If you like, we can move the opening quote mark back one word, though I think makes has more impact as it is. Jheald (talk) 16:03, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
          • Putting it inside at least makes it clear that the error is in the original, but the question is: Do you want to draw attention to the grammar or to the interesting fact? I would avoid using the direct quote and state the facts. -- Nczempin (talk) 16:25, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
            • I don't think it is an "error", as you put it. To me it's within the natural idiomatic flexibility that's accommodated in English, certainly as spoken and also as quoted. But this may be a case of different regional/national attitudes to grammatical flexibility. In my view, and it may be more of a UK-centred English view, a certain amount of the right kind of grammatical flexibility, when it naturally goes with the language, is allowable and even welcome if it allows an idea to be communicated more punchily and effectively. This kind of flexibility and license is even ultimately how languages evolve. I honestly don't have a problem with the use of "disappeared" as a quasi-adjective here, given its position in this particular sentence. Jheald (talk) 16:38, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
              • [edit conflict] "were dead, [were] disappeared, or [were] not allowed to talk", if not incorrect (if you allow the stretch that someone is disappeared; I would have no objection to someone using it in spoken English, but I wouldn't expect it in a reputable newspaper, journal or book.), it simply draws attention to itself, and I don't think that was your intention. I speak and write British English almost exclusively BTW (so that can't be it). -- Nczempin (talk) 16:54, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
              • In the end, you can phrase the hook in whatever way you like; I was just trying to help (and not formally reviewing it). I am leaving this page now for a while, for other reasons; if you want to continue, you can come to my talk page. I'm fine either way. -- Nczempin (talk) 17:51, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Axis power negotiations on the division of Asia during World War II

Created by Morgan Hauser (talk). Self nom at 03:38, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length checks out. Hook reference accepted in good faith from offline source (plus I remember the hook's fact from my own history courses in college). Date is verified as evening of April 2 while nomination was early morning of April 8, so this technically fails the five day rule by a few hours. However, Morgan Hauser has only had one DYK credit before, so we could slightly bend the five day rule on this one. Morgan Hauser also doesn't need to review another nomination due to his having only had one DYK credit. I took the liberty of adding wikilinks to World War II, Nazi Germany, Empire of Japan, and 70th meridian east. OCNative (talk) 08:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Garawarra State Conservation Area

Created by Poyt448 (talk), Casliber (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 12:48, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • date and length fine. As for the hook: I find it referenced only by the Latin names. If there is no other reference, please give the Latin names also in the article, and repeat the ref for all three plants. Or find more ref(s) or a different hook, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:51, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • All three species' common names are now referenced in their respective species articles with our national herbarium website. If you want to add the species names to the hook I am not too fussed but I don't think it is necessary. Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps I was not clear enough, I don't want to have species names in the hook. Ref 2 doesn't mention Sassafras, and how do I know that Ref 4 is for this specific park? Camp Gully is mentioned in the ref and in the picture captions but not in the article. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:46, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
thank you, that's easier for the less specialized reader,

German destroyer Z9 Wolfgang Zenker

Created by Sturmvogel 66 (talk). Self nom at 04:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hans Daniel Namuhuja

Created by Pgallert (talk). Self nom at 09:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • one source would be not a serious problem for me, but the date 1 April together with that makes me think. And why does it look like two sources? And what kind of source is New Era? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:39, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Gerda, this was not intended as April fool's joke. New Era (Namibia) is one of two English national daily newspapers. Close to the ruling party but as this article is not political I believe there is no problem. I wanted to put the quote into the article because the source does not verbatim say he was the first to publish in Oshindonga. I thought with the quote in the text one can make an own judgment to see I did not publish OR. But the quote only supports the first paragraph. That's why I put the same reference a second time, without the quote. If there is a more elegant way to do this, please let me know. There are blogs discussing him, and there are several sources in Oshiwambo such as this which I unfortunately cannot read. Hope this clarifies, cheers, Pgallert (talk) 13:29, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for explaining. My recommendation: make the quote part of the article and use the source we cannot read as a second ref. Is there a "print version" of the article, without the advertising? That also would look more reliable. Getting closer, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:12, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Implemented the quote and added the Oshiwambo text as external link. I don't really want to put it as reference to a particular claim as I do not understand this language at all. Will ask one of my students to translate at least the title. Regarding the print version: I do not see much advertising there, the print version leads to some weird JavaScript that does not work without a printer. Maybe it is acceptable like this? --Pgallert (talk) 12:17, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gulf Coast Lines

Created by Textorus (talk). Self nom at 07:32, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hook validated, but not very interesting, IMO. The magnitude of the increase in the price of land after the railroad arrives is much more interesting, but isn't directly relevant to the Gulf Coast Lines, per se.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with both your points; not much has been written about this railroad, probably because it was independent for only 8 years. So it's hard to think up a hook of interest to non-railfans, but making use of a related article I just created, how about this:
ALT1 . . . that in 1903, visionary "empire builder" Benjamin Franklin Yoakum began building the Gulf Coast Lines in southern Texas as a link in a projected transcontinental railroad system stretching from Chicago to Mexico?
Textorus (talk) 03:24, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

::Whups, I notice some other editor has already started crapping up this article I sweated over for two days and nights, adding unsourced claims and changing the meaning of sentences. Sigh. Oh well maybe I'll get it cleaned up before it appears on DYK. Or not. Who cares? It's Wikipedia! Textorus (talk) 04:02, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a much more interesting hook, but it needs better support in the Gulf Coast Lines article. And it may be too long.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:37, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added a direct quotation from an official MoPac history that should provide plenty of support. Also, my ALT1 hook is 32 words; the longest entry on main page DYK at this moment is 38 words. So will this do now? Textorus (talk) 05:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hooks are measured by number of characters, not number of words. Wikipedia:Did you know#The hook says hooks should be less than 200 characters. The suggested ALT1 hook is currently at 216 characters. OCNative (talk) 03:07, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Harry T. Bagley, George R. Bagley

Black and white portrait of a man from about 1910

Created by Aboutmovies (talk). Self nom at 06:01, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Lyttelton Times

portrait of an elderly man sitting in a chair

Created by Schwede66 (talk). Self nom at 20:36, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nice article, well illustrated, good hook. I've duplicated a ref and added it to the picture caption to give a more explicit sourcing for the hook. I prefer the original hook, not ALT 1 -- it's shorter, snappier. Good to go. Jheald (talk) 23:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Surrogate's Courthouse

Created by Station1 (talk). Self nom at 07:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Matthews

Created by OCNative (talk). Self nom at 22:57, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Laser Clay Shooting System

5x expanded by MuZemike (talk). Self nom at 22:39, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tasmanian Pygmy Possum

5x expanded by Anaxial (talk). Self nom at 21:09, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brevivulva

the only known Brevivulva electroma specimen

5x expanded by Kevmin (talk). Self nom at 20:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Lincoln Thornton Manuscript

Created by Drmies (talk). Self nom at 19:04, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Russian police reform

Created by Nanobear (talk). Self nom at 18:17, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monte do Gozo

A path on green grass on a rise with white clouds and blue sky behind and a modern-looking sculpture in the background with some people next to it

  • ... that Monte do Gozo (pictured), a hill in Spain, is most known for its view of a sight below, a view that is now largely obscured?

Created by Wasted Time R (talk). Self nom at 17:34, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Church of St Mary the Virgin, Fordwich

A shingled broach spire on a flint tower

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 17:24, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All checks out. Moonraker2 (talk) 18:49, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date and hook seem fine. A well written article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:03, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

George M. Willing

5x expanded by Allen3 (talk). Self nom at 15:17, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gyanvapi Mosque

Created by Lordofallhearts (talk). Nominated by Redtigerxyz (talk) at 13:53, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've got some doubts about the article's weighting – there is more about than original temple and its destruction than the current mosque, and the picture of the new temple is bigger than the picture of the mosque. The article still needs a good copyedit for MoS conformance, and the references formatting could be improved. But the article creation and length and hook length check out, and it's an interesting and important subject, so I guess it's a borderline okay. I've tweaked the hook for proper grammar. Wasted Time R (talk) 15:12, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hamburger Feuerkasse

  • ... that Hamburger Feuerkasse was the first official fire insurance company established in the world?

Created by Doug Coldwell (talk). Self nom at 13:18, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Orno

Withdrawn and moved to April Fool's DYK following suggestion by EdJohnson.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 14:15, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 3

Kommilitonen!

Created by GuillaumeTell (talk). Self nom at 15:39, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wildlife of Botswana

Kalahari in Botswana

Created/expanded by Nvvchar (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk). Self nom at 01:39, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Bennett Fenn

5x expanded by Canada Hky (talk). Self nom at 03:47, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Length, date and hook check outThelmadatter (talk) 14:57, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wheeler Opera House

A three-story orange stone building on a slightly curved street corner, lit by sun from the right. The windows at street level have awnings; those at the top are in rounded arches. The face of the building on the left has a small pointed top at the roof. At street level an awning on that face has "Wheeler Opera House" on it; the word "Bank" is carved into the stone on the corner face above an awning with "Bentley's" written on it.

Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self nom at 00:14, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So do I. I just modified the hook to reflect some improved sourcing I found. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. --Nvvchar. 09:57, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warner's Hotel, Lyttelton Times Building

b&w photo of inner city buildings

  • Reviewed: Harness racing in Finland ([15])
  • Comment: The Warner's Hotel article isn't quite finished yet (needs another section, infobox plus photos), but it meets DYK criteria by now and I'll have to get the nomination in, so that the Lyttelton Times Building article doesn't get too old. Update – the article is finished for the time being, but I haven't been able to get a modern photo of Warner's as yet, and it's located within the earthquake no go zone, so I can't take one myself.

Created by Schwede66 (talk). Self nom at 20:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Length, history and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 00:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Spirit Fruit Society

Created by Wikipelli (talk). Self nom at 13:48, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was saving that for the forthcoming article on the founder. :) Wikipelli Talk 21:16, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chamcook Lake

Chamcook Lake
  • ... that in 1886, 200,000 salmon and salmon trout fry (young trout) were deposited in the Chamcook Lake (Pictured) in New Brunswick?

Created by Dr. Blofeld (talk), Rosiestep (talk), Nvvchar (talk). Self nom at 09:45, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: Archaeological Museum of the American University of BeirutDr. Blofeld 10:06, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! Are you going to write the red linked articles sometime? Buggie111 (talk) 00:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully, yes in the near future.--Nvvchar. 23:20, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Central Organising Committee, Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) Party Unity, Mazdoor Kisan Sangram Samiti

Created by Soman (talk). Self nom at 02:08, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Length, age and reference for hook all check out. Just minor quibble: I don't see where the citation for the third sentence in the lede supports it, but the sentence isn't critical to any thing in the article (and this article is otherwise well sourced). -- Donald Albury 12:58, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Litt Laman Blanchard, The Town (newspaper)

5x expanded/created by Qrsdogg (talk). Self nom at 20:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • expansion/creation, date, length, sources fine. Consider to describe the writer a bit more in the hook for those who don't know him yet, I first thought he was a newspaper person. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:36, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wildlife of Cape Verde

Acacia tree

Created/expanded by Nvvchar (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk), Rosiestep (talk). Self nom at 13:09, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Massive expansion and date OK. But I'm concerned by the term "hot spot". I know hooks are supposed to be quizzical, but IMO this goes too far. The article does say what the hook says, but doesn't explain the term. By going to the reference, and searching, I discovered it means a biodiversity hotspot, (not a volcanic, or a temperature-determined, or any other sort of "hot spot"). May I suggest that, so far as DYK is concerned, it is linked to "biodiversity hotspot", and that the term is fully explained in the article. And a trifle; the image is not that of a "coral reef" --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 18:03, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for the review. I have removed the image from the main hook and also added the word "biodiversity hotspot", instead of only 'hotspot'. Similar change has been made in the article also. However, since I could not locate an img of the coral reef from Cape Verde, I am proposing an alt hook with an img of Acacia tree from the Cape Verde area.
Sorry, but I'm going to be pedantic again. I don't think it's three million tree species (are there that many?) but rather three million trees. Would you accept the following (also tightened a bit)?
for ALT 2. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 14:24, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Ward (prophet)

Created by Shadygrove2007 (talk). Self nom at 09:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hospital Tobar García

Created by Rosiestep (talk), Nvvchar (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk). Self nom at 02:43, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre silk

Bizarre silk, France, c. 1715

Created by PKM (talk). Self nom at 00:42, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Codex Sangallensis 1395

Text of John 16:30-17:8

Created by Leszek Jańczuk (talk). Self nom at 23:07, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Jenny Silver

Jenny Silver in 2010

--BabbaQ (talk) 17:42, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed:Hurricane Hiki.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:45, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ädelfors folkhögskola

expanded 5x by --BabbaQ (talk) 13:09, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    • I'm not so sure. Teaching people with special needs is teaching people with difficulties or disabilities, so the hook is saying the same thing twice. How about

Alt 1

I will support the original hook. A folkhögskola is not a per say special needs school.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:19, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article is an unsuccessful translation from Swedish to English. Extensive copy-editing for grammar and context is needed.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 13:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixes made.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Craig F. Stowers

Created by OCNative (talk). Self nom at 02:16, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet War Memorial (Vienna)

Soviet War Memorial (Vienna)

Created/expanded by Leidseplein (talk). Self nom at 05:42, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

inline citation immediately after the hook fact is needed. MisterBee1966 (talk) 11:48, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, a cite there has been added.Leidseplein (talk) 13:14, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
looks good MisterBee1966 (talk) 14:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zenith Productions

Created by Jheald (talk) 19:31, 3 April 2011 (UTC). Self nom at 19:30, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Okay, I've added some more refs. The corporate business side should now be pretty comprehensively referenced. As for the various tv series, the ultimate verifiability there is from the end credits of the various works. But they can also all be confirmed through the IMDB and the BFI links given at the end of the article -- each film or series I have cited is attributed to Zenith on both databases. Jheald (talk) 00:14, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Jympson

Created by Gran2 (talk). Self nom at 09:16, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 4

Long Island serial killer

--BabbaQ (talk) 14:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sources given do not mention that first victim was found in 2007.
So removed the unsourced.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:38, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pneumatic Institution

Created by Nczempin (talk). Self nom at 08:23, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed: None, first ever DYK.
What's with all the Easter egg links? The one I find most questionable is the "a president": a president of what? if this aims to get clicks because readers may think it's a "president of the US" or something, then it doesn't really seem okay. Banks' wasn't a political office, as the hook seems to suggest - he was President of the Royal Society. Dahn (talk) 15:03, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
They were all done on purpose, to make the reader curious about what's behind them. I seem to recall having seen several DYKs like that (the only ones usually that drew my attention), so I wasn't aware that they violate some guideline. Please point me to the place that says that this style is discouraged. The hook doesn't suggest a political office; a PRS is a president. -- Nczempin (talk) 15:13, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And to quote from the DYK guidelines: When you write the DYK item (or "hook") please make it "hooky", that is, short, punchy, catchy, and likely to draw the readers in to wanting to read the article. An interesting hook is more likely to draw in a variety of readers. -- Nczempin (talk) 15:18, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In case you didn't realize, Lady Spencer was also a deliberate mislead. -- Nczempin (talk) 15:22, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Punchy, yes. Catchy, yes. But misleading? We only use this kind of hook on April 1. Are you sure you're not referring to those April Fool hooks as your precedent? Dahn (talk) 20:15, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
None of the hook's claims are wrong; they are factually accurate. Perhaps hallucinogenic drugs is not entirely accurate, I am not an expert in these things. Recreational drugs or party drugs would perhaps be more precise, and backed up by sources. I am only misleading people who think the only presidents in the world are US government ones, and perhaps the fewer people who equate Lady Spencer with Diana, and I am not doing it in a malicious way. Actually inhaled is an obvious reference (and quite harmless; honni soit qui mal y pense to connect that to the other president), just as it is an unassailable fact, and a surprising and perhaps important piece of medical history, that in its beginnings, some researchers actually tried some of the subjects of their study. I still haven't found the part of the guidelines that says that DYKs cannot be a humorous, even outside April Fools (the probability that I have seen only those is extremely low, probably less than 1/365). So unless you point me to it, can we please continue with the regular day-to-day work here now? If you have an alternate proposal for the hook, let's hear it. -- Nczempin (talk) 20:40, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT 1: ... that inventor James Watt tried to convince the Royal Society to support an establishment where nitrous oxide was administered for free, and that another inventor actually inhaled?
I'm sure several things can be worked out that are also interesting without ambivalence (the article is interesting!); the alt is just one option derived from your original hook. Regards, Dahn (talk) 08:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Did_you_know/Additional_rules#Rules_of_thumb_for_preparing_updates: J7: Consider picking at least one funny or quirky hook if there is one available and putting it in the last (bottom) slot of the update. Just as serious news programs end on an upbeat note to bring viewers back next time, ending on an upbeat or quirky note rounds an update off nicely and encourages readers to come back next time for more. Personally, I'd like to see more quirky or funny hooks, including (non-malicious) misdirects. -- Nczempin (talk) 09:18, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I see that is a rule of thumb for reviewers, not for writing hooks. In my opinion, it is rather inapplicable. But in any case, I think the nuance here is that the hook itself needs to be about something fun, not that it be about something serious made to look funny. (Actually, your article is already fun and quirky without misleading people.) Dahn (talk) 12:16, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Funny and quirky hook is a direct quote, I don't see where it says what the article needs to be about. If it is a rule of thumb for reviewers, how will they ever come across them if no-one is ever supposed to write them? You are also contradicting yourself if you need the subject of the article to be fun and or quirky (which you just said it is). You think the rule is inapplicable, but don't let us know why. You seem to strongly believe that the hook is inappropriate, but offer no guidelines, only your opinion. It fine for you to offer your opinion, but please respect that others may have a different one, and that your opinion is not grounds enough to reject the hook. Can we finally close this discussion and let someone decide whether the hook fulfils the DYK criteria? -- Nczempin (talk) 13:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Again: there is nothing in "funny and quirky" that would imply misleading. A funny hook is generally about a verifiable but funny fact, not about something serious being worded in a funny way. I don't see how I'm infringing on anyone's opinion: I offered the alt hook, didn't I? but I do believe (and other reviewers have generally agreed with me, which is why I made note of it) that it's a slippery slope to start selling out the quality of the information presented for a number of clicks that is increased artificially, with charades. As for guidelines, you need go no further than the paragraph you cited above: "Shorter hooks are preferred to longer ones, as long as they don't misstate the article content." Dahn (talk) 14:45, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As I've stated repeatedly, the hook is not misstating the article content. It is all correct and all sourced. It is only misleading for people who prejudge the words used to mean something very specific, when they can also mean something different. Realizing this mistake, many people will laugh at themselves for their prejudice having been exposed. It seems to be pointless to argue with you (you even managed to ignore the fact that you contradicted yourself), you have made up your mind. You have provided an alternative. I have stated my disagreement. So now let's just get on with the DYK process. Offer one of the official review results such as "too short", "unsourced" etc., with the right template, or bring some new evidence to the table, or please just let it go. -- Nczempin (talk) 15:14, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just get WP:CONS to change the guidelines to be clearer about this topic (and April fools', etc.), and next time a discussion like this won't have to take place. -- Nczempin (talk) 15:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your review of the above exchange is quite correct, and indeed it's a good idea to wait for further input. But what you present as me contradicting myself is factually wrong: your quote is from a guideline that does not addresses how hooks are written, but how written hooks are picked; the guidelines also note that the hook should not be written in such as to "misstate the article content". Incidentally, I'm not spending this time "arguing" with you - I'm stating my points for others to take note of the objections, and evaluate them as they see fit. Also note that I refrained from actually reviewing the hook, precisely because I don't want to make your nomination dependent on my comments. Though, obviously, I do wish something along the lines of alt 1 would be picked instead of the punchline "people will laugh at themselves" hook. Dahn (talk) 15:59, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
the hook itself needs to be about something fun, not that it be about something serious made to look funny. therefore the hook is inadequate (regardless of the part you said before this quote), because the article is serious, and the hook makes it look funny. (Actually, your article is already fun and quirky without misleading people.) Wait, now, I thought the article was serious? "People will laugh" is not a punchline, it's just an illustration that "misleading" can very well (and it certainly is the intention here) be funny/quirky, which you strongly denied. -- Nczempin (talk) 16:21, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The first quote addressed the belief that we need to tweak hooks beyond what they say, for comedic effect. The second says that your article is about something that is interesting, maybe even funny, in any case fun, without the tweaks. I don't suggest that misleading can't be funny and quirky, just that funny and quirky in DYK should preferably not be misleading - it could also mean that, but it shouldn't mean that for practical purposes. We can lawyer about the meanings over and over again, but I think it would be better to point out where this alleged "people will laugh" directive has been already applied on DYK, other than in April Fool's hooks. Best, Dahn (talk) 17:08, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What belief that we need to? Why is my explanation suddenly a "directive"?? Straw man much? You are entitled to your opinion that the hook is inappropriate. Anything beyond that is not constructive. If you want to reject the hook based on DYK guidelines & consensus, go ahead. I will stop watching this page now, this discussion is distracting far too much from regular DYK business; if someone has an "official" message stating something that needs to change to comply with DYK policies, it would be nice (but of course not strictly necessary) for them to notify either me on my talk page or other contributors on the article's page. -- Nczempin (talk) 17:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe I'm wrong when I say that it is misleading when someone designs the hook wanting people to click a link in the belief that it means thing A and then "laughing at themselves" when realizing that it means B. Maybe I have been mislead into thinking that misleading means something else, not "designed to deceive or mislead either deliberately or inadvertently". It's not like wikipedia is actually striving for credibility, we just want the hits. In any case, I too am done commenting on this hook - if my counter-suggestion is worth anything, pick it up instead of the Easter egg hook. Dahn (talk) 19:59, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Primrose

Created by Daemonic Kangaroo (talk). Self nom at 18:17, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Symbolist movement in Romania

Ink drawing of a woman with long hair and some animal features

Created by Dahn (talk). Self nom at 07:59, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! It took me a while to get it out of the sandbox, but I hope it helps with completing the image of Romanian culture in the good old days. Dahn (talk) 15:47, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tell al-Fakhar

  • ... that, according to the excavator, the more than 3000 year old "Green Palace" of Tell al-Fakhar in Iraq was pillaged and burned with the defenders still inside?

Created by Zoeperkoe (talk). Self nom at 00:23, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arts on the Line

Alewife Station

Created by Found5dollar (talk). Self nom at 23:33, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT 1 ... that the MBTA's Arts on the Line program, was the United States' first arts in transit program? --Found5dollar (talk) 23:33, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confluence (sculpture)

Created by Missvain (talk). Self nom at 22:13, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Looks good to me, but propose to mention the poem with an article and a good title:
ALT1:... that the sculpture Confluence by Robert Stackhouse and Carol Merrit was inspired by Langston Hughes' poem "The Negro Speaks of Rivers"? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:26, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • That sounds good too. I wasn't so sure how much I could manipulate the words - my source cites that "some" of the writing on the sculpture was inspired by Hughes' poem. I'm quite happy with the revamp though. Missvain (talk) 13:11, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Law of Æthelberht

Parchment leaf with early 12th-century writing

Created/expanded by Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk). Self nom at 21:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pinal de Amoles

Scene from the 2011 Huapango dance competition

5x expanded by Thelmadatter (talk). Self nom at 20:52, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Given that this is Pitke's first DYK review, I thought I'd have a look, too. AGF for foreign language hook fact source. I have not attempted to understand the merge history and what should be counted as the prose size before expansion began, but it certainly is a very comprehensive article now, and Thelmadatter is an old hand here, so I assume good faith on that front, too. Schwede66 19:02, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jones v Kaney

Created by Bencherlite (talk). Self nom at 20:26, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, it was nominated six days after creation, but since it was expanded five fold within five days of nomination, it can slide. Hook checks out.Thelmadatter (talk) 20:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, DYK goes by the date that the article was moved to mainspace, not the date of creation of the draft in userspace, so there's no "technically" about this one! BencherliteTalk 09:14, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

West Washington Street Bridge (Muncie, Indiana)

Created by Lbowman1 (talk). Nominated by Guerillero (talk) at 19:23, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Along with hundreds of other places; we really shouldn't put this on the Main Page until we can find a more interesting hook. I'm up way past my bedtime, so I can't really help now, but you could try finding something unusual and adding it from the underused National Register nomination form that's currently citation #2. Nyttend (talk) 06:05, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks! Unfortunately, this also has citation problems: no page numbers are ever provided for the nomination form citations, and we need page numbers for verifiability. Nyttend (talk) 04:32, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--Guerillero | My Talk | Review Me 01:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Soybean Car

Created by Doug Coldwell (talk). Self nom at 18:49, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Problem is that the article itself states that the frame was of tubular steel, so it wasnt all plastic. I suggest ALT1, that the first car to use plastic panels in its construction was the Soybean Car built in 1941? Otherwise, it checks out.Thelmadatter (talk) 21:01, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Appreciate your suggestion, however I have no reference that says the first car to use plastic panels in its construction. However, I do have a reference that says: The first plastic car was manufactured by the Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, Mi, USA, in August 1941. It is in the lede and is considered an excellent reference source = Anzovin, Steven, "Famous First Facts" 2000, H. W. Wilson Company, ISBN 0-8242-0958-3. I would prefer to use my original hook, unless you have a reference for your suggestion.--Doug Coldwell talk 21:13, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My Alt 1 suggested above should satisfy the requirements. Have references for that.--Doug Coldwell talk 21:39, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I dont know. Is "bodied" a word? How about ALT2 ... that according to the book "Famous First Facts," the Soybean Car was the first plastic car built by Ford?Thelmadatter (talk) 20:22, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Bodied" is a word. The reference I am referring to is online and reads: "the car was the 1941 Ford prototype car bodied entirely in plastic, designed by Lowell Overly." I believe your Alt would give the impression that perhaps there were other plastic cars, but the first one built by Ford is what Famous First Facts is talking about. The reference source Famous First Facts is talking about the first plastic car ever built worldwide.--Doug Coldwell talk 20:39, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the text of Famous First Facts I have uploaded to Flickr.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/22738816@N07/5593526938/
--Doug Coldwell talk 21:33, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thelmadatter: Here is a suggestion. Since apparently you approve the article otherwise, it appears it is just a matter of semantics on the wording of the hook. Line up your Alts, number them, and just let the DYK administrator select which one he would like amongst the Alts (yours and mine) for the actual DYK. Would you give it a tick under those conditions?--Doug Coldwell talk 12:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

for ALT 1b AGF for offline source.Thelmadatter (talk) 14:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

St John the Baptist's Church, Mongewell: St Mary's Church, Newnham Murren

A small flint church with red tiled roofs and a bellcote at the far end

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 18:14, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


List of ICC Cricket World Cup finals

Created by Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 12:02, 4 April 2011 (UTC). Self nom at 11:55, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Coiner

Created by OCNative (talk). Self nom at 06:16, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Elite 88 Award

Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 05:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it does. Missvain (talk) 22:08, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bench Around the Lake

Created by Missvain (talk). Self nom at 05:40, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good job, very nicely written and sourced, with a great pic. Textorus (talk) 07:19, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nikolai Ryzhkov

Expanded by --TIAYN (talk) 15:35, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Looking at the history, I believe this article's expansion started on March 28, not April 4, as it is nominated here. That puts it out of the five day window for eligibility. Please correct me if I have misunderstood something here. Canada Hky (talk) 03:56, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've reviewed the Charles Coiner article. --TIAYN (talk) 15:39, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't the whole point when it ended, and not when it started? --TIAYN (talk) 04:56, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, from the DYK Official Rules: "Former redirects, stubs, or other short articles in which the prose portion has been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are also acceptable as "new" articles. The content with which the article has been expanded must be new content, not text copied from other articles." Canada Hky (talk) 13:45, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valentin Pavlov

Created/expanded by --TIAYN (talk) 15:35, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Hospital Tobar García --TIAYN (talk) 15:40, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Major expansion of article by nom April 3-4. Everything looks properly referenced. Article headshot (which wasn't submitted) is non-free so don't put that on the front page. The issue I have here is the use of the titles Premier and Prime Minister in the hook and the lead of the article. Are they equivalents? The use of the phrase "Prime Minister of the Soviet Union, literally the Premier of the Soviet Union" doesn't get that across clearly. If they are the same thing, my opinion is that we should just go with Premier of the Soviet Union since that's what the WP article is called. If there's a difference, it needs to be spelled out. Gamaliel (talk) 22:15, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The office was renamed Prime Minister on 14 January 1991 when Pavlov was head of government. His predecessor was Chairman of the Council of Ministers, a post commonly referred to as Premier, and his successor Ivan Silayev was Premier through the office of Chairman of the Interstate Economic Committee (IEC). I like the use of Prime Minister in the article but if you don't like it's inclusion in the DYK sentence it's fine. --TIAYN (talk) 04:53, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clearing that up. In the DYK hook we should use Prime Minister since that was Pavlov's title. I see you've edited the lead to Valentin Pavlov to eliminate the confusion I had, thanks. Gamaliel (talk) 06:59, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A thought: would you be opposed to a slightly shorter hook like "that Valentin Pavlov, the Prime Minister of the Soviet Union, was involved in the 1991 Soviet coup d'état attempt against Mikhail Gorbachev? Gamaliel (talk) 07:00, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're one is good, maybe even better, then my one; my only wish is to get this article to the main page, if you see a problem with the hook please fix it. In short; I approve of your change! :) --TIAYN (talk) 13:07, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Silayev

Expanded by --TIAYN (talk) 15:35, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Warren Matthews --TIAYN (talk) 20:38, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 5

A Night of Neglect

  • ... when trying to clear a Björk song for an upcoming episode, the creators of Glee initially could not reach her as she apparently did not have a telephone number?

5x expanded by Yvesnimmo (talk). Self nom at 05:27, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ferris Jennings

Created by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 04:34, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date are fine, but the hook is a bit long at 180 characters. I don't think it needs to say that he was 140 pounds. But the real problem is that the source says it was the only touchdown from scrimmage, and that there were two touchdowns scored that year. StAnselm (talk) 13:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • One of the off-line newspaper sources did say that Jennings' score was the sole touchdown, but it turns out to be incorrect. Jennings' score was the first of two touchdowns scored by Michigan in 1934. I had included the weight, because 140 pounds is extraordinarily small for a QB, and he was often called "Little" Ferris Jennings. But in light of your points, I suggest the following alt hook:

Heinz-Otto Schultze

A smiling man with a black uniform and peaked cap.

5x expanded by MisterBee1966 (talk). Self nom at 12:53, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Miami Showband

Created by Ghmyrtle (talk). Nominated by Jeanne boleyn (talk) at 07:29, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Locher

Maj. Robert Lodge and Maj. Roger Locher in the cockpit of their F-4D

ALT1
Reviewed Health in Ghana here. — btphelps (talk) (contribs) 05:39, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Rescue of Bat 21 Bravo

Created by Btphelps (talk). Self nom at 22:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Colin Campbell Cooper [29]btphelps (talk) (contribs) 23:05, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

George Thomson (physician)

Created by Shadygrove2007 (talk). Self nom at 10:42, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date, length and hook all check out. I added a period to the end of one of the paragraphs. Other than that, a solid article and intriguing hook – though consider maybe "just when the city needed them most" for the conclusion. Either way great.—Biosketch (talk) 11:38, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maud Gage Baum

  • ... that Maud Gage Baum forced her husband to eat stale doughnuts because he did not confer with her prior to buying many of them?

Created by Cunard (talk). Self nom at 07:29, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

William F. Yardley

Created by Bms4880 (talk). Nominated by Orlady (talk) at 02:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date, length, and hook look good. I'd be happier if we knew for sure if he was the first African American to argue before the TN Supreme Court. Is that an issue for DYK? (first time DYK reviewer so if someone wants to backstop me.. :) ) Wikipelli Talk 15:40, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • As you probably know from checking the source, the cited source is not definite. I don't think anyone knows for sure. This source identifies another African American, John Sinclair Lewis, as "reportedly" being the first admitted to practice before the state supreme court, and yet another (Thomas Frank Cassels) as "apparently the first African-American lawyer admitted to practice before the state Supreme Court in West Tennessee," but it has no details on whether they actually argued before the state supreme court. --Orlady (talk) 16:12, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a note, being admitted to practice before a state's highest court means you are admitted to practice, or have passed the bar in that state. It is not the same with arguing a case in front of that court. So if the source says that Yardley was the first, and the other two were just admitted to practice there and probably never argued a case before it. If you need me to look at it further, drop me a note.--Wehwalt (talk) 17:18, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Health in Ghana

5x expanded by Sadads (talk), Als242 (talk). Self nom at 01:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Some of the content for this article was copied from other articles, but a vast majority of it was written today for the expansion of this article, and the subsequent need to expand the related articles. Also, this is well over 10x expansion, so I don't think that should be an issue, Sadads (talk) 01:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article review:Panama Creature
The size checks out and the article is generally well-written and sourced. However, the specific fact cited in the hook about maternal mortality is not supported by a reference. — btphelps (talk) (contribs) 05:24, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The other author updated that stat, I am thinking we should modify the hook, how about "... that in Ghanian women's health, breast cancer is the leading malignacy and HIV/AIDS affects 140,000 women?", 92.14.184.150 (talk) 20:54, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
effects->affects. -- Nczempin (talk) 10:16, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed above, and that was me on the ip previously, Sadads (talk) 21:00, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Panama Creature

Created by J Milburn (talk). Self nom at 22:54, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me, new article, sources, and length check out, Sadads (talk) 03:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amicable Society for a Perpetual Assurance Office

Reviewed Arts on the Line (diff) --Doug Coldwell talk 22:50, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Doug Coldwell (talk). Self nom at 22:22, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

E.E. Aiken

Created by Gamaliel (talk). Self nom at 22:19, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I got 1517 with the tool. I'll see what I can do about expanding it a bit. Gamaliel (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think it may be long enough now. Gamaliel (talk) 04:27, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jardín del Arte Sullivan

Created by Thelmadatter (talk). Self nom at 20:17, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Harness racing in Finland

Coldblood horses in racing harness approaching the finish line.

Created by Pitke (talk). Self nom at 17:45, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to DYK. That's a solid effort with your first nomination. You'll find that there are quite a few rules, but once you get your head around things, you'll find that with work of your quality, you'll fly through the process. Here are a few tips and pointers:
  • You could consider using Template:NewDYKnomination/guide for nominating the next article. That will help you getting the formatting right (the target article should be in bold, for example (have fixed that), it steps you through the process of adding pictures to your nomination, and it gives some pointers regarding what to say when you've moved articles from your user space).
  • A DYK requirement is that every paragraph (with the exception of the lead) should have at least one reference, so you will have to add a few more.
  • *groaaaaannnnnn* source for "Finnhorse is the only coldblood breed raced in Finland" or "coldblood races in Finland, unless otherwise specified, are open to coldblood breeds other than the Finnhorse"? Impossible! I've complained about this at the talk page of Finnhorse: the breed is the fastest coldblood breed but just try and find a source that bothers with saying "Finnhorses are fast". Cut it. Pitke (talk) 18:59, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bare URLs are not accepted. I suggest you use the citation templates that you get with your editor tool bar (click on the cite link and then use the drop down box 'Templates'; replace the bare URLs using this tool). If you need a hand with this, contact me on my talk page.
  • There needs to be a reference immediately after the hook fact in the article (none there at present).
  • Other than that, the article is new and long enough.
Good work! Those issues above will be easy to fix. Schwede66 18:40, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Offline and foreign language source accepted in good faith. Schwede66 21:00, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cornish fairings

Cornish fairings

  • ... that traditionally Cornish fairings (pictured) were sold at fairs for young men to give to their sweethearts?

5x expanded by Worm That Turned (talk). Self nom at 12:09, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel J. Kremer

Created by OCNative (talk). Self nom at 09:15, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date, and sources check out fine. My preference is for ALT1, although they're all pretty good. I'm not sure if we should use the word "accidentally" in the hook though. Qrsdogg (talk) 20:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald Singson

Created by Howard the Duck (talk). Self nom at 07:56, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problems from what I can see. Interesting hook! Deyyaz [ Talk | Contribs ] 23:47, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Archaeological Museum of the American University of Beirut

Archaeological Museum of the American University of Beirut

Created by Paul Bedson (talk). Self nom at 23.59, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Verified, but can you please convert the bullet list into prose?♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:05, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sands of Beirut

Created by Paul Bedson (talk). Self nom at 23.59, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Leslie Bethell

Created by Deyyaz (talk). Self nom at 23:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Current nominations

Articles created/expanded on April 6

Ash-sha'ab yurid isqat an-nizam

Created by Soman (talk). Self nom at 03:25, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Thomson (painter)

Portrait of Henry Thomson RA by Sir Martin Archer Shee PRA (detail)

Created by Moonraker2 (talk). Self nom at 11:47, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Direct lobbying

  • ... that the total amount spent on lobbying in the United States in 2010 was $3.49 billion?

Created by Chlopeck (talk), Vert3x (talk), Crawf279 (talk). Nominated by Bejinhan (talk) at 05:42, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Janbirdi al-Ghazali

Created by Al Ameer son (talk). Self nom at 05:28, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth J. Feinler

Woman with microphone

Created by W163 (talk). Nominated by W Nowicki (talk) at 21:04, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neither (that I know of). Just retired I think. Not sure if your point is if the article should be used by her common name? She used "Elizabeth" in formal documents so I would say keep it. However, the hook could probably be refined to be less ambiguous (using past tense). At least add a comma after 1989. How about:

ALT1 ... that Elizabeth J. Feinler (pictured), better known as "Jake", ran the Network Information Center of the Internet until 1989?

W Nowicki (talk) 17:25, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ernst Cadman Colwell

Created by Leszek Jańczuk (talk). Self nom at 18:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-François-Auguste Moulin

5x expanded by SteveStrummer (talk). Self nom at 05:10, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charles W. Cansler, Austin-East High School

Created by Bms4880 (talk), Orlady (talk). Nominated by Orlady (talk) at 03:34, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewed nom for Hollingworth Magniac (diff=[35]) --Orlady (talk) 03:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

Peñamiller

5x expanded by Thelmadatter (talk). Self nom at 15:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed Daytona Cubs from March 24

Hotel Plaza Grande

Created by Dr. Blofeld (talk), Dream Focus (talk). Self nom at 12:33, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Allison H. Eid

Created by OCNative (talk). Self nom at 06:06, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Inglis (c. 1731–1791)

Three-quarter length portrait of a man in a black hat, facing right, wearing a blue jacket with gold buttons and epaulettes.

Created by Benea (talk). Self nom at 21:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Fixed, but Crimmin's assessment holds true - 'a capable and competent officer without being inspired or presented with fortunate opportunities'. You might try
  • ... that Captain Charles Inglis (pictured) has been described as "a capable and competent officer without being inspired or presented with fortunate opportunities"?
This is where personal opinion comes in. I find this a far duller alternative than the original and alt. Could you confirm the article and hooks pass please? Benea (talk) 10:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3rd Arizona Territorial Legislature

Created by Allen3 (talk). Self nom at 19:22, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 European Under-18 Rugby Union Championship

Created by Calistemon (talk). Self nom at 17:31, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Old Church of St Mary the Virgin, Preston Candover

A small structure with a white painted wall and a tiled roof

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 16:29, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Lyceum Theatre (Crewe)

A red-brick gabled building on the right, with a flat-roofed grey block to the left

  • ... that the Lyceum Theatre (pictured) in Crewe, Cheshire, was opened in 1887, destroyed by fire in 1910, and rebuilt on the same site in 1911?

5x expanded by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 14:49, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Peter Marshall (police commissioner)

Created by XLerate (talk). Self nom at 12:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Racist music

Created by Jnast1 (talk). Self nom at 06:55, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neanaperiallus

Neanaperiallus in amber

5x expanded by Kevmin (talk). Self nom at 05:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go. Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:01, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indianapolis Art Center

Created by Missvain (talk). Self nom at 04:19, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Allah Made Me Funny

Created by Mbz1 (talk). Self nom at 04:14, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Aharish

  • ... that in 2007 Lucy Aharish became the first Arab to present the news on mainstream Israeli television?

Created by Biosketch (talk). Self nom at 11:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go. Jaespinoza (talk) 17:56, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monticello Association

5x expanded by Parkwells (talk). Self nom at 16:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did some copy editing work and added many cites, but most of the expansion took place before April 1, and I forgot to nominate it then, because of working on associated articles, mostly Thomas Jefferson.Parkwells (talk) 14:01, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Measuring rod, Tablet of Shamash

5x expanded by Paul Bedson (talk). Self nom at 12:56, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Child sexual abuse in New York City religious institutions

Created by Swliv (talk). Self nom at 05:19, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length of article OK, however hook is too long (306 characters instead of ~200) and rather convoluted, plus article title is not bolded. Article history says nothing except: "correcting title of recent new article; edited from prev. article". What was the title of the recent new article and where is its edit history? When was it created? --GuillaumeTell 16:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The previous page & its history was deleted by an admin (per an author's G7 request), as shown here. Shearonink (talk) 17:25, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The length may be fine but In my opinion, that's not a really appropriate topic to use. I know Wikipedia is not censored but there was an issue with something similar in the past that stopped a Big Jock Knew DYK hook being promoted. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 16:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To start I have to say thanks for all the good attention. This is not an easy one, I know.

Second, a shorter (195 char.) and I think better variant:

Swliv (talk) 01:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Third, the background on the creation. It's only circumstantial, but I'll start by noting that the current article was created April 9, yet this self-nomination is under the 6th. That's because I started the nomination of the original article (all mine, no edits on it, started on the 6th, 27 page views on the 7th); then I realized that my typo, in effect, in the title was a real blemish; so I proceeded to create the new page (and, yes, with a good deal more editing of my original work, but nothing fundamental) and then empty out the old page, as I understood to be the appropriate way to (as happened) have an admin. eliminate it. (I didn't want it hanging around, think that's understandable.) Then I came back to the self-nom. but forgot to move it to the 9th. (And have worried about that a little, in the interim.) Anyway, the change in the title was simply that I'd left a "the" in in front of "New York City":
Child sexual abuse in the New York City religious institutions. Obviously blemished, I think. More substantively, to trace my approach to the article just a little: The NY mag. article I read maybe two weeks ago. Then a primary subject of that article, interviewed in South Carolina and all, B. Oliva, pled guilty in Massachusetts. I only stumbled on the guilty plea because the page views of Christ The King Regional High School spiked. Once I saw that, I felt I had to try to pull together what I'd learned (feeling I was sort of playing catch up, by then, but having to do it anyway). I have to say at the moment I can't recall how the second case -- E. Lorch, still before the Mass. courts -- came to my view. If anyone's interested, I'll trace my path. (The coincidences between the two, which the DYK uses, were pretty striking to me, once I had found the latter one and worked it up.)
Fourth, I'll say I've been following some of the widespread Wiki work on the general subject of child sexual abuse, and contributing from time to time, for quite a while. I could go into my history here in more detail if anyone wants, but for now I'll just go to the "censorship" comment above. I appreciate but haven't explored the references given. I may explore them and will respond if I do. Meanwhile, I'd say that I think Wikipedia has done a pretty good job on this general, difficult area and, on the other hand, there's much more that can and I hope will be done. I did marvel at the three "category bars" (I don't know what they're called; "hide"/ "show" at the bottom) which I imported into my article from probably Philadelphia. So much there. So much more that could be. I do think my current NYC contribution, also I'm sure not perfect, is nonetheless worthy of Wikipedia and, hence, of consideration for DYK. I'll leave it at that. Thanks again. Swliv (talk) 01:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 7

White Ware

Created by Paul Bedson (talk). Nominated by Paul Bedson at 04:55, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jacques Cambry

Portrait of Jacques Cambry, 1749-1807

Created/expanded by Dr. Blofeld (talk) and Drmies (talk). Nominated by Drmies at 21:11, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Combretum glutinosum and Wildlife of the Gambia

5x expanded by Nvvchar (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk). Nominated by Dr. Blofeld (talk) at 10:07, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Deutsch

Created by Tim1965 (talk). Self nom at 03:49, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bernd Redmann, Jörg Duda, Bassoon Quintet

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nom at 11:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Killer Kowalski Memorial Show

Ox Baker speaking about Kowalski during the opening ceremony of the Killer Kowalski Memorial Show

Created by 72.74.219.7 (talk). Nominated by 72.74.219.7 (talk) at 10:32, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


George W. Milias

Created by OCNative (talk). Self nom at 08:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leslie Whetter

A man wearing thick woollen clothing.

Created by Apterygial (talk). Self nom at 08:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Commercial Telegraphers Union of America

Created by Tjepsen (talk). Nominated by E2eamon (talk) at 23:44, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dickshooter

Created by Mbz1 (talk). Self nom at 22:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date OK, Hook fact supported by the reference. Mjroots (talk) 13:32, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article is an absolute mess, and I object to it being promoted in its current form. Here's some history. Dickshooter is a U6 Census code location in a remote Idaho wilderness area, and I can find no record of it having any population. The only coverage of the place is its occasional inclusion on a list of funny place names. Presumably in order to meet the 1500 byte requirement for DYK, and due to the paucity of information that is actually about Dickshooter, the article's creator created multiple subsections summarizing the positive attributes of OTHER tourist destinations in Idaho. Most of these OTHER destinations discussed in the article are not even geographically close to Dickshooter -- three to four hours drive. These sections have no relevance to an article about Dickshooter (except possibly to add bulk to meet the 1500 byte requirement). I spent over an hour last night fixing it. I removed the flowery, Chamber of Commerce, tour guide style language. I also omitted the completely irrelevant sections discussing OTHER Idaho destinations at geographically remote distances from Dickshooter. Mbz then reverted all of my work in a wholesale manner. I re-made my changes with a note to please not undo my improvements in a wholesale manner. Mbz then made a note at the article's Talk page, and three minutes later another user User:ברוקולי again reverted all of my changes in a wholesale manner. Wikipedia is supposed to be about creating quality articles, not adding irrelevant fluff to an article so that it becomes long enough to get a DYK reward. Unless this article is substantially revised so that it legitimately meets the DYK requirements without the fluff and irrelevant discussion of distant sites OTHER THAN Dickshooter, it should not be promoted. Cbl62 (talk) 17:00, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion does not belong here. There's an article talk page to discuss content issues.--Mbz1 (talk) 18:48, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In light of the more cooperative edits this afternoon, including striking sections on the unrelated locales, I am withdrawing my objection to promotion of the article. Cbl62 (talk) 22:06, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As the article is right now, it is only ~ 700 characters, well short of the required 1500. Canada Hky (talk) 23:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • It is fixed now.Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:40, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    The information about unrelated locales was just re-added. Its possible there just might not be enough material to hit the criteria, funny name or not. Canada Hky (talk) 03:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Note that the name and scope of the article have been changed since it was first created. It was originally an article about the community of Dickshooter, Idaho. It is now about how the name "Dickshooter" has been given to several places in Owyhee County, Idaho. Qrsdogg (talk) 04:46, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Are there any similar articles about a collection of features, none of which seem particularly notable on their own? If they are all notable, I'd say they should all have their own articles, and a dab page. If Dick Shooter is notable, I'd say the material about what was named after him could all be included on one page. As it is - this just seems like a lot of dedication to something for the sake of a funny name, and I don't think that's a great thing to feature. Canada Hky (talk) 15:02, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, I think what you're saying is that this is inadmissible to DYK due to WP:SYNTH? I think the sources for each location note that they were named after Mr. Shooter, and the current title works as well as "Places Named After Dick Shooter" would. Whether this is the greatest article or not, I think it technically meets all of the DYK criteria now. Qrsdogg (talk) 15:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)comment edited at 18:09[reply]
    Well, "Dick Shooter" doesn't seem to be notable. A list of non-notable places named after him seems questionable as to whether it merits a Wikipedia entry. The fact that each place on its own does not have enough material on it to get 1500 characters isn't really a mark in its favour. I'm not questioning whether it is the greatest article, I'm questioning whether this listing of places is encyclopedic. Canada Hky (talk) 23:53, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Dick Shooter is not notable, the places named after him are, if for nothing else then at least for an unusual name, but Dickchooter creek listed in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and Dickshooter ridge mentioned in the Act adopted by US congress.
    This discussion does not belong here. Notability is not one of DYK criteria. There are afd to discuss notability of the articles.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Cochrane, 8th Earl of Dundonald

Created by Benea (talk). Self nom at 20:24, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gare de la Bastille

Gare de la Bastille, Paris in the early C20th

5x expanded by Mjroots (talk). Self nom at 19:53, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hoko River Formation

Fossil crab from the Hoko River Formation

Created by Kevmin (talk). Self nom at 19:24, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


HMS Plover (M26)

Created by Sturmvogel 66 (talk). Self nom at 16:29, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All Saints Church, Waldershare

An elaborate marble monument with statues of mourners and putti

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 16:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Railway accidents in Vietnam

A mountain pass by the sea

Created by Dragfyre (talk). Self nom at 14:46, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: Pistol River
Note: Created earlier in user space, moved to article space on Apr 7.
  • I like this well-referenced article, but am not happy about the hooks. The original hook is not explicitly stated in the article, and has to be deduced, so, as it stands, it is not OK. The source for ALT1 states "The conductor noted that usually, an accident occurs every day", which is not what the article or the hook says. If the article were to be amended to say what the source says, and the hook to reflect that, it would be OK. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 16:16, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK—I've stated the original hook in the "List of notable accidents" section, and referenced it properly. As for the ALT1 hook, I disagree that the source differs from the article and the hook. Toyoda's report refers to the conductor, but in the article, this is quoted as ...researcher A. Maria Toyoda noted "There are numerous safety issues with level crossings, residences right up against the tracks, and other areas of activity that are dangerously close ... People will cross the tracks at great risk, dodging in front of the train. ...usually, an accident occurs every day. In other words, the article says she noted that an accident occurs every day, which is correct, although to be precise, she noted it in her report because the conductor noted it to her first. So in essence, she noted that the conductor noted it. I didn't cite the conductor in this way because I felt it would detract from the readability; besides which, he wasn't directly quoted. Anyway, having said that, and still disagreeing (and preferring the original hook anyway), if you think ALT1 is worth using and still needs further precision, I'd accept to make further changes. --dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 17:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, let's work on the original hook. Maybe the problem is the word "deadliest". According to the list, accidents in the pass killed c100 and 11 people; others killed 14 and 13. So how about:

Museum label

  • ... that the oldest known museum labels (sample pictured) are from circa 1900 BCE describing 2000 BCE objects?

Created by Doug Coldwell (talk). Self nom at 13:22, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Piper's Opera House

Piper's Opera House, Virginia City, Nevada

Created by Maile66 (talk). Self nom at 09:30, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gloria (Gloria Trevi album)

Created by Jaespinoza (talk) 08:24, 7 April 2011 (UTC). Self nom at 08:24, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: Lucy Aharish. Jaespinoza (talk) 17:57, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Above and Below

Created by Missvain (talk). Self nom at 04:45, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rehabilitation Policy

  • ... that rehabilitation policies are those that intend to reform criminal offenders rather than punish them or segregate them from the greater community?

Created by BrickWallBartholomew (talk). Self nom at 17:09, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • This article is far too old for DYK. User:BrickWallBartholomew was created in February. At the end of February, this article had 4792 characters of prose. As of today, it has 8085. That is only a 1.7x expansion. There are also numerous issues with NPOV and the essay-like tone, but I will not address those here, as the age of the article alone already causes this article to fail DYK. OCNative (talk) 23:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lev Voronin

Created by TIAYN (talk) 19:00, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date and length good. The article says he was Chairman of the Council of Ministers, not that he was Premier of the Soviet Union. They may very well be the same thing, for all I know, but the article should use the same terminology as the hook, or vice versa. I would check the ref and change it myself, but the ref is in Russian.
I've reworded it. --TIAYN (talk) 15:15, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 8

{{subst:NewDYKnom | article=Everybody Was in the French Resistance...Now! | hook=... that "G.I.R.L.F.R.E.N (You Know I've Got A)" by Everybody Was in the French Resistance...Now! is a reply to Avril Lavigne's song, "[[Girlfriend (Avril Lavigne Song)|Girlfriend]"]? | status=new | author=Bennydigital | nominator=Bennydigital }}


Created by Touchless (talk), Cddwumich (talk). Nominated by Klsyking (talk) at 14:21, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Landysh

Created by Silverchemist (talk). Self nom at 23:04, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abraham Bolden

Created by Harley Hudson (talk). Self nom at 18:54, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Radix natalensis

A drawing of a lymnaeid shell

Created by Snek01 (talk). Self nom at 17:49, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: Acropyga acutiventris and Xenococcus annandalei. [47].
ALT1: that Radix natalensis (shell pictured) is a widespread freshwater snail in Africa transferring fluke Fasciola gigantica?

Choose a hook of your choice. --Snek01 (talk) 17:51, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT2 ... that Radix natalensis (shell pictured), a freshwater snail found in Africa, is a major intermediate host of liver flukes that cause fasciolosis?
ALT2 is not precise. It is a major vector in Africa for Fasciola gigantica only. Fasciola hepatica is transferred mainly by Galba truncatula and Pseudosuccinea columella in Africa. --Snek01 (talk) 10:07, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Fort Center

  • ... that Fort Center is an archaeological site where maize may have been cultivated centuries before it appeared anywhere else in Florida?
ALT1 ... that the Fort Center site came to the attention of archaeologists after a carved wooden bird (pictured) was found in a pond?

Created by Donald Albury (talk). Self nom at 01:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zugspitze

5x expanded by Bermicourt (talk). Self nom at 15:49, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Redmond Spokesman

Created by Orygun (talk). Self nom at 18:22, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Michoacán Market, Mexico City

Created by Thelmadatter (talk). Self nom at 14:44, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed John Bennett FennThelmadatter (talk) 14:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Air India One

Created by Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते. Self nom at 10:22, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

David Schuman, C.C. Bridgewater

Created by OCNative (talk). Self nom at 08:49, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sture Murders

  • ... that two people owed their survival of the Sture Murders to an ambiguous order issued by a mad king?

Created by Skäpperöd (talk). Self nom at 07:21, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All checks out. Moonraker2 (talk) 11:33, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Open Your Eyes (Yes song)

Created by 28bytes (talk). Self nom at 03:48, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Landa de Matamoros

5x expanded by Thelmadatter (talk). Self nom at 01:29, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reinhold von Werner

5x expanded by Parsecboy (talk). Self nom at 20:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Myrtis

Created by Brandmeister (talk). Self nom at 19:29, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Labour

  • ... that Blue Labour is a socially conservative trend in the British Labour Party that argues for Flag, Faith and Family?

5x expanded by Riversider2008 (talk). Self nom at 15:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A good article overall, but you'll have to use the cite web template. Even so, this article is good to go. --TIAYN (talk) 19:52, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

4th Arizona Territorial Legislature‎

  • Reviewed: George W. Milias ([51])
  • Comment: "Permanent" is quoted because the article's offline sources use the quotes and because Arizona's capital was moved to two other locations during the 25 years immediately following the session.

Created by Allen3 (talk). Self nom at 13:49, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- article size and creation date check out, dead-tree source accepted per AGF, should be ready to go. Nice work. Parsecboy (talk) 20:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vladimir Velichko

Created by TIAYN (talk) 19:51, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Article length, timeliness of submission, hook length all check out. Offline cite AFG. Article is OK for DYK. (I removed the unnecessary second "against" in the hook.) - Tim1965 (talk) 03:44, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Climate of the Falkland Islands

Created by Chipmunkdavis (talk). Self nom at 02:21, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Myrtis Chipmunkdavis (talk) 02:34, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 9

Created by Msrasnw (talk). Nominated by Msrasnw (Msrasnw) at 11:57, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Groupe Bogolan Kasobané

Created by Rosiestep (talk). Self nom at 04:49, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perkiomen Bridge

  • ... that angry residents burned down a toll booth on the west end of Perkiomen Bridge in 1867, and another on the east end in 1872?

Created by Smallbones (talk). Self nom at 01:56, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Landysh. Smallbones (talk) 03:06, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Foresight Nanotech Institute Feynman Prize

5x expanded by Antony-22 (talk). Self nom at 19:02, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Spirit Fruit Society

Note: This is mostly a list article, the prose portion was expanded from ~300 bytes to ~1650 bytes.

Antoine Germain Labarraque

  • ... that chemist Antoine Labarraque helped to banish nasty niffs from the streets and buildings of 19th century Paris?

Created by Shadygrove2007 (talk). Self nom at 13:42, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2012 United States federal budget

5x expanded by Antony-22 (talk). Self nom at 01:50, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Kommilitonen!

Sounding Point

Created by J04n (talk). Self nom at 00:39, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Linn-Gust

Linn-Gust in photo

  • ... that author Michelle Linn-Gust (pictured) released her first book Do They Have Bad Days in Heaven? Surviving the Suicide Loss of a Sibling which was about her experiences from her sister's suicide?

--BabbaQ (talk) 23:29, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carlton Hotel, Christchurch

Photo of a two storey building with earthquake damage.

Created by Schwede66 (talk). Self nom at 21:10, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Bruiser Brody Memorial Cup

Created by 72.74.224.37 (talk). Self nom at 19:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a miniute, The original hook is 35 characters over the limit. I think it probibly is the best one so it would be great if the characters could be cut down to be eligable. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 10:40, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dagens man

Carolina Gynning is the host of Dagens man

self nom --BabbaQ (talk) 19:43, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed:Bhikshatana.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:53, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • While it looks like it's a "dejtingprogram" in Swedish, I changed the English in the hook from "datingshow" to "dating show". But if that's some new compound word that I haven't heard of, or if it's somehow desired stylistically, go ahead and change it back. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 23:26, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Twenty-five Year Award

The John Hancock Tower with the Charles river int he foreground

5x expanded by Found5dollar (talk). Self nom at 17:09, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed: I have a ton of reviews from this April fools, but if I find an article to review here i will.


Reipas

  • ... that the record-setting Finnhorse trotter Reipas was originally a thin, weak foal of unknown parentage?

Created by Pitke (talk). Self nom at 15:05, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cathy Cochran

Created by OCNative (talk). Self nom at 08:21, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bhikshatana

Stone sculpture of a nude, four-armed man with a deer, dwarf and woman

Created by Redtigerxyz (talk). Self nom at 11:12, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't that be "slipped off at the sight of the Hindu god Shiva"? Richerman (talk) 00:54, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Courtney Vandersloot

Picture of Courtney Vandersloot

Created by Dale Arnett (talk). Self nom at 07:56, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Mote Park (cricket ground)

Created by The C of E (talk). Self nom at 07:07, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Date Length and ref verified. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 10:35, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dwight B. Heard

  • ... that Dwight B. Heard is credited with the expansion of Arizona's cotton industry after becoming president of the Arizona Cotton Association?

Created by Buggie111 (talk). Self nom at 00:25, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

reference says he is credited with making industry more competitive not that he is credited with its expansion. Richerman (talk) 01:21, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Economy growth does not equal expansion? What do you suggest? Buggie111 (talk) 01:26, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, have I missed something about economy growth in the source? If not I would just say he's credited with making industry more competitive internationally. Richerman (talk) 01:40, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, the source. Yes, I see your point. How 'bout this? Buggie111 (talk) 02:15, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Dwight B. Heard is credited with making Arizona's cotton industry more competitive after becoming president of the Arizona Cotton Association?
OK, change the line in article to that too and it's good to go Richerman (talk) 09:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You Debt Your Life

5x expanded by User:89119e (talk). Self nom at 06:24, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rushbearing

  • that the ancient custom of rushbearing (pictured) has died out in most of Britain but is still celebrated in parts of the northwest of England?

5x expanded by Richerman (talk). Self nom at 01:13, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seven Wonders of Colombia

created by Alwhorl (talk). Self nom at 20:02, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 10

Acropyga acutiventris and Xenococcus annandalei

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nom at 09:36, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ATL1: ... that the queen ant of the Acropyga acutiventris carry a mealybug Xenococcus annandalei in her jaws on her nuptial flight?

Samantha McClymont

Created by WWGB (talk). Self nom at 02:15, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]



Ethiopian eunuch

The baptism of the eunuch by Rembrandt

Created by StAnselm (talk). Self nom at 23:37, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Adam Eckfeldt

Created by Wehwalt (talk). Self nom at 22:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

St Mary Magdalene's Church, Tortington

Three-quarter view of a grey flint and stone church in a churchyard with many gravestones. A prominent arched entrance and a white turret on the roof are visible at the far end.

Created by Hassocks5489 (talk). Self nom at 22:05, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Walter Gilbert (cricketer)

Created by Sarastro1 (talk). Self nom at 21:25, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Date, length, ref all checked, though subscription ref accepted in good faith, everything in order, well done.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:07, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Scotland national football team hat-tricks

5x expanded by Miyagawa (talk). Self nom at 18:35, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Bit of an unusual one as the DYK check tool is saying that it isn't a 5x expansion although my calculator is saying it is. Previous count was 344, and current expansion places it at 1780 characters. 344x5=1720, so not sure why the addon is saying no. :( Miyagawa (talk) 18:38, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I get the same numbers with the DYK check and it seems OK to me. Hook checks out and refs all good. Is it necessary to say "sets of hat-tricks" or would "hat-tricks" be enough? --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:15, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for review, have amended hook. Miyagawa (talk) 21:59, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jefferson nickel

Created by Wehwalt (talk). Self nom at 17:10, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: Church of St John the Baptist, Upper Eldon--Wehwalt (talk) 17:10, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Church of St John the Baptist, Upper Eldon

A simple flint church with a red tiled roof

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 13:45, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


North Piddle

Created by Mbz1 (talk). Nominated by Canuckle (talk) at 08:17, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date, length, ref OK. But the ref does not say it was "one of England's strongest earthquakes"; this has to be deduced from the link, which is not OK for DYK. The ref says what the article says: it "exceeded in violence any previous instance of seismic energy here within the present century". Would you like to re-word the hook?--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 13:35, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Would "one of 19th-Century England's" be appropriate? Canuckle (talk) 03:53, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's correct, but it's still not what the source actually says. As the earthquake occurred in 1896, and it was the strongest of the century to date, it probably was the strongest in the century. But again that is deduction. Can you make anything of its occurrence in 1896 and the extract I quoted above? Or, to keep it simple, just leave out the bit about its being the strongest and confine the hook to the the date and the witness's experiences and speculations.--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 08:31, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Supernatural (Des'ree album)

  • ... that Supernatural, a 1998 album by British singer Des'ree, sold 50,000 copies in the United States, although her 1994 album I Ain't Movin' sold over a million copies?

Created by Adabow (talk). Self nom at 05:07, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Shubra Khit

  • ... that the detonation of the Mamluk's flagship's magazine at the Battle of Shubra Khit sent both the Mamluk flotilla and ground forces in full retreat?

Created by Buggie111 (talk). Self nom at 00:40, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • How could I have missed that? Darn. I'm fine with having mine deleted and the other continue on, it's got nearly the exact same info. Guess I shouldn't wait years when making articles in my userspace! Buggie111 (talk) 21:35, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse defense

5x expanded by Cryptic C62 (talk). Self nom at 05:02, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gandrung

A Gandrung dancer with traditional costume, a fan and a shawl in a dance movement.

created by Awewe (talk). Self nom at 20:02, 10 April 2011 (UTC+8)

Articles created/expanded on April 11

Felicia D. Henderson

Created by Ruby2010 comment! 06:05, 11 April 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Special occasion holding area

Do not nominate new articles for a special time in this section. Instead, please nominate them in the candidate entries section above under the date the article was created or the expansion began, and indicate your request for a specially-timed appearance on the Main Page.
Note: Articles nominated for a special occasion should be nominated within five days of creation or expansion as usual. Also, articles should be nominated at least five days before the occasion to give reviewers time to check the nomination, but no more than six weeks before the occasion. April Fools' Day is an exception to these requirements - see Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know.

April 15

(Anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic)

Colin Campbell Cooper

Painting depicting the Carpathia and rescue boats carrying Titanic survivors, with icebergs in the background

  • ... that American artist Colin Campbell Cooper assisted in the rescue of the survivors of the Titanic, and during the rescue created several paintings (example pictured) which document the events?
  • Reviewed: Fred (baboon) ([58])
  • Comment: DYKcheck fails here. Please check expansion manually.

5x expanded by Mandarax (talk). Self nom at 18:55, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article was 8,401 bytes on 2/14, now 21,287, only 2.5x expansion. Otherwise quality and refs are good. — btphelps (talk) (contribs) 22:58, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Then it's good to go. — btphelps (talk) (contribs) 23:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 16

Epitaphium

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nom at 13:38, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • All DYK criteria met. Moved into special holding area. But how about a small expansion to:

April 17, Palm Sunday

Himmelskönig, sei willkommen, BWV 182

interior of the court chapel with several balconies, facing the altar, the organ high up

Created/expanded by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nom at 22:03, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 22 (Good Friday)

Jesus at Herod's Court

Jesus at Herod's Court

Created by History2007 (talk). Nominated by LiteralKa (talk) at 17:08, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • And the Bible passage next to it doesn't count as a citation? LiteralKa (talk) 02:10, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment: I hope for someone to go over the prose and improve "... in which Jesus appears before Herod Antipas in Jerusalem, prior to the Crucifixion of Jesus", for example. - "The scene" (in the hook) reads like theater, I would not present that on Good Friday when believers remember facts. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have found a source that says that only Luke talked about it. I also second the motion that it should be held to be used on Good Friday. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 19:59, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How's that as an improved hook? The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 20:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with ALT1 is that multiple Bible commentaries mention the story and thus make the hook technically untrue. I would suggest
"Appears" is different from "mentioned". LiteralKa (talk) 02:10, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

to Alt2. Seems good to me, I think that it is only right that we have at least 1 Christian based DYK on the main page on Good Friday. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 20:13, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that happened so fast. I did not know you guys where DYKing this. I only started writing it earlier today & had not checked it. Anyway, I added a more WP:RS source for the suggested hook. As for text improvements, go for it - I wrote it really quickly, so I will leave it to you guys to make it DYK presentable. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 20:13, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • This seems also a bit too fast to me. I would have left it in the suggestion section for more people to watch. The prose still says "Jesus appears ... before the crucifixion of Jesus" (... "before his crucifixion", if at all). For the source: can you get something more reliable then bible study or offline? For the hook: let's assume readers around the globe who don't know what "the Luke" is. Suggestion:
ALT3:... that of the Four Evangelists, only Luke reported the episode of Jesus at Herod's Court (pictured)?
Wha does "more reliable than offline" mean? I think you should AGF it, but if you still want to check, there you go. Also this and this. And I think ALT2 works fine, mentioning the Evangelists opens Gospel authorship questions, a Pandora's box that is best left closed on a DYK line on Good Friday. History2007 (talk) 23:04, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am not reviewing this, just commenting. Clarifying: "more reliable than bible study" meant one thing, an online source preferable to an offline one another, English is not my first language. If the additional sources are good, insert them in the article, not here, please. - Personally, I know the hook fact from reading the Bible. But Wikipedia needs a source. - I remember a good article on a Christian fact, Circumcision of Christ, if you want a feeling for what can be done in the field. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:10, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually there are three WP:RS references for that fact in the article, as well as the Bible study ref. It is generally hard to find a scholarly book online, unless it is G-books, and those links are not usually used in articles. And above all else, this is a non-controversial fact in that no one has ever written that it appears in two Gospels, because they could not point to the 2nd Gospel. So the three book refs are well within WP:V territory, and that fact is really well referenced by general standards in Wikipedia. History2007 (talk) 09:40, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Halloween

Rhacophorus vampyrus

  • ... that the tadpole of the Vampire flying frog Rhacophorus vampyrus has two fang-like hooks in its mouth?

Created by Newone (talk), Ka Faraq Gatri (talk). Nominated by Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) at 14:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment If the article meets DYK criteria, suggest moving it to Special Occasions section and keeping for Halloween. The authors of the paper on which this article is substantially based have stated that they intend to publish a separate paper on the tadpoles of this species so the move would also allow time for any material from this paper (assuming it is published in time) to be incorporated. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 16:56, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's confirmed. I agree that this should be kept for Halloween, especially as "A detailed description of the new tadpole will be published separately." which might be available by October. It's certainly an early start for the Halloween collection, does anyone think it is a problem to save it until then? SmartSE (talk) 23:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
SUPPORT waiting till Halloween, esp. if we can get a good, free picture of the scary tadpoles. --PFHLai (talk) 04:06, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've moved this as there were no objections. If someone wants to make a subpage for it, like we have for April Fools' nominations then feel free. SmartSE (talk) 12:46, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Halloween is just under 10 months away. I can't help thinking that if every vaguely ghoulish or spooky article is saved up that long, it will create a massive backlog (and a precedent for other days). After all, there are only 3-4 sessions of 6 or 7 hooks available for any particular day. Bob talk 22:26, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have a raised eyebrow over this. Essentially were promoting an article to DYK, which in over half a year will appear on the main page. Would not this article be substatiannnly different from the one reviewed giving that theres 7+ months between creation and DYK appearance? Ottawa4ever (talk) 15:14, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good points. This article could be significantly different from the one reviewed by 31st October depending on whether or not the group concerned have published their second paper on the species (one which focuses specifically on the unusual tadpoles) by then. As it stands the article was written from all the extant scientific literature on the species (a single paper) and a smattering of popular press coverage (who probably won't ever revisit the species, unless a big deal is made out of the second paper). It is possible someone will re-write the article from the current sources, however, most articles on obscure species (of which this is one) don't have very high edit levels. For comparison, a large number of articles on other species in the same genus were created by Polbot and haven't been significantly altered since their creation in 2007. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 16:14, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your input. Ive opened a larger discussion here; Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Rhacophorus_vampyrus. Its not just that the article may be different, but also that dyk is in the spirit of new articles or recently expanded ones. As such (I feel) queing an article for 10 months is misleading our readers since it is a violation of both leading principles of dyk. Ottawa4ever (talk) 10:29, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See also