Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rockphed (talk | contribs) at 03:10, 10 June 2022 (→‎Kazakh constitutional referendum). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Typhoon Yagi over the South China Sea
Typhoon Yagi over the South China Sea

Glossary

  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Archives

June 10

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Sports


June 9

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology


Thailand legalises marihuana

Article: Cannabis in Thailand (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Thailand legalises the cultivation and possession of cannabis (Post)
News source(s): Al Jazeera, BBC News, ABC, The Independent, Fiji Times
Credits:

Article needs updating

Nominator's comments: Significant change in legislation for a country which still has the death penalty for some drug offences. Articles are not updated at the moment. Abcmaxx (talk) 22:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2022 Iranian food protests (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: No blurb specified (Post)
Article needs updating

Protests are huge, those are current events. 67.170.255.241 (talk) 01:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Wimepocey. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 13:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Aamir Liaquat Hussain

Article: Aamir Liaquat Hussain (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Dawn
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Controversial Pakistani politician, columnist and television host. Sherenk1 (talk) 09:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 8

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


(Posted) RD: Paula Rego

Article: Paula Rego (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Article appears to be well-cited, including lists of work/exhibitions. rawmustard (talk) 12:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Song Hae

Article: Song Hae (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [1]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Died June 8th, death announced today. He was S.Korea's oldest TV host. While the article is a stub, he is important enough to go on the main page. Haiiya (talk) (contribs) 03:19, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - the entire article has a grand total of two sentences of prose. Juxlos (talk) 03:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Juxlos. Also the nominator says While the article is a stub, he is important enough to go on the main page. This is wrong as RD nominations are always considered notable and are only judged on quality.  Hamza Ali Shah  Talk 06:53, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to update the article to reflec his notability?Waltzingmogumogupeach (talk) 10:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Berlin car ramming

Article: 2022 Berlin car ramming (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ On June 8, 2022, a person drove a Renault Clio into the Tauentzienstraße pedestrian zone in Berlin, killing one person and injuring about 30 people. (Post)
News source(s): [2], Spiegel (in German), DW
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Article is short atm but will most likely gain traction throughout the police investigation over the coming days. Haris920 (talk) 13:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC) 23:53, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose One dead, not quite enough to be unordinary, even if it was deliberate/politically motivated. A very tragic event but not of great importance outside of Berlin. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 13:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 7

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

  • Allison Fluke-Ekren pleads guilty in a federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, United States, of providing material support to ISIS by conspiring to conduct terrorist attacks on United States soil and by leading and training at least 100 female ISIS fighters. Fluke-Ekren also claimed in her plea deal to helping Ansar al-Sharia analyze documents stolen during the 2012 Benghazi attack. (CNN)

Politics and elections

Science and technology


RD: Erasmus Schöfer

Article: Erasmus Schöfer (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Verbrecherverlag and others
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: German author, main work a tetralogy of novels about resistance in Germany between 1968 and 1989, of which he had been part. No en article until now. As usually: much detail in German, if you have time to add. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2022 BJP Muhammad remarks controversy

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2022 BJP Muhammad remarks controversy (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ India ruling party's controversial comments made by two senior officials on Prophet Muhammad have led to condemnation in the Muslim world. (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: In the news. Will impact relations with GCC. Sherenk1 (talk) 04:52, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

June 6

Armed conflicts and attacks

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Orlando Jorge Mera

Article: Orlando Jorge Mera (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): TeleSur Le Monde
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 190.80.246.113 (talk) 21:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Bob Talamini

Article: Bob Talamini (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NFL
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Died May 30, death announced today. Article needs some work. The Kip (talk) 22:35, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Zeta Emilianidou

Article: Zeta Emilianidou (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ABC News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Incumbent Cyprus' minister of Labour. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 21:43, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Boris Johnson no confidence vote

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Boris Johnson (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In the United Kindom, a no confidence vote is taken against Prime Minister Boris Johnson (pictured). (Post)
News source(s): NBC News, The Guardian, CNN, BBC
Credits:
 Cheers! Fakescientist8000 19:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wait Unless he's ousted, it shouldn't be posted, but until the outcome is known this is very premature. 4iamking (talk) 19:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ya think? -- Sca (talk) 19:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wait as 4iamking stated. Pretty sure if he is replaced that it would still be ITN/R, but otherwise this is just domestic politics. - Floydian τ ¢ 19:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fake is just getting it into the queue, I guess. -- Sca (talk) 19:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait per above. I don't know enough on UK politics to know what happens if the no confidence vote goes through - does that assure he is removed from office, or us it like US impeachment when one body may decide not to act on affirmed findings of anylother body. We want to post "the point of no return" ideally. --Masem (t) 19:32, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    He gets removed as the leader of the Conservative party, which is a defacto removal from office. Its up to the Conservative party then to nominate an (Interm) leader to replace him. It's an internal party matter though and not a vote of confidence in the House of Commons against the government. 4iamking (talk) 19:40, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    If he loses then he has to resign and there'll be a leadership election in the Conservative Party. He won't be ousted as PM right away but once that leadership election is finalised then he'll leave. Quite major as these hardly ever happen XxLuckyCxX (talk) 19:42, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - if there is a change in government, sure. Until then, no. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wait Not expecting the vote to be successful (as in there won't be a lack of confidence for Johnson) but worth waiting to see the result before we do anything else XxLuckyCxX (talk) 19:47, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The result was 211-148 in favour of Boris. The news media will be full of analysis and speculation about the implications now. The issue will remain In the News. Andrew🐉(talk) 20:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW - Results are out; Boris is in, Suggest SNOW close. 4iamking (talk) 20:01, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

June 5

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(Posted) RD: Christopher Pratt

Article: Christopher Pratt (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CBC News; CTV News (Canadian Press); The Globe and Mail
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 09:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Ken Kelly (artist)

Article: Ken Kelly (artist) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Rolling Stone
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Fantasy artist that did album covers and other film art. Article needs some significant sourcing Masem (t) 03:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

French Open

Proposed image
Article: 2022 French Open (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In tennis, Iga Świątek wins the Women's Singles and Rafael Nadal wins the Men's Singles at the French Open. (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times The New York Times
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 70.138.211.34 (talk) 23:53, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Owo church attack

Article: Owo church attack (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: At least 50 people die in a mass shooting and bomb attack at a Roman Catholic church in Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In Nigeria, at least 50 people die in an attack at a Catholic church in Owo, Ondo State.
Alternative blurb II: ​ In Nigeria, at least 50 people die in an attack at a Catholic church in Owo, Ondo State.
Alternative blurb III: ​ At least 50 people die in an attack at a Nigerian Catholic church in Owo, Ondo State.
News source(s): Agence France-Presse, Reuters, The Guardian, Al-Jazeera, ABC News, VOA, BBC, AP
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Article needs expansion before posting, however please bear in mind this is very recent and new at the time of this nomination, more information is likely to be added soon. Abcmaxx (talk) 17:08, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Rockstone, but the death toll is still unclear so I would caution from explicitly saying that at least 50 died. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 20:10, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: Could "mass shooting and bomb attack" be changed to something simpler such as "attack" or "massacre"? Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 20:11, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Shortened it to "attack". -- RockstoneSend me a message! 21:26, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They have recovered 50 bodies very early on so that's how we know know its at least 50; it's the only confirmed number so far.Abcmaxx (talk) 23:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tentative/weak support so far. This BBC piece makes this event sound like it does not stand out against the broader backdrop of recent violence there, but it does not have the death toll. The unconfirmed 50+ strikes me as significant. It is hard to tell at this point whether this attack is part of some broader conflict, and which one. Insurgency in Southeastern Nigeria has casualties just over 100 people on one side of that conflict, so if it's that one, this would be a significant escalation.Chaser (talk) 20:17, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Its death toll makes it stand out, as does the fact that it happened in SW Nigeria, outside the usual areas which insurgents target. The Boko Haram insurgency is primarily in the NE, the Nigerian bandit conflict in the NW & the insurgency in Southeastern Nigeria in the SE. Jim Michael 2 (talk) 10:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done - EugεnS¡m¡on 06:19, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on notability, and somewhat prefer Alt Blurb II. Nsk92 (talk) 12:09, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose. I support on significance, but I have concerns about the article content. Currently the article notes that no group has taken responsibility, but then uses weasely language to say that "many locals accused" members of an ethnic group and members of a semi-nomadic tribe of "complicity". The sentence in question is sourced to a reliable source that does support the content, but I don't like that we are using wiki-voice to basically cast aspersions on entire tribes and ethnic groups without evidence. If this gets fixed, my !vote changes to support. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 15:53, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that of many such tragedies in that part of the world; mainly that no-one knows anything for sure and the only way of finding anything out is ask the locals, word of mouth, and then relate that as a possibility. Ultimately this was part of an ongoing ethno-religious conflict, so that is why fingers are pointed at certain groups, because those are the most likely sources of the violence.Abcmaxx (talk) 17:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@User:ONUnicorn amended it as per your comments. Abcmaxx (talk) 17:43, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What's the problem with saying that locals accused Fulani herders of responsibility? There's an entire ongoing conflict in Nigeria between farmers and Fulani herders. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 18:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think the issue was according to the poster that it wasn't entirely clear who was accusing whom and in what context, and as a result sounded unencyclopaedic, but I've fixed this now.Abcmaxx (talk) 01:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Terrible tragedy. Any of the blurbs could be fine but I’d go with the initial blurb. -TenorTwelve (talk) 21:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -- marked as Ready. The article seems to be in an acceptable state for ITN. Rest in Peace all the victims. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 02:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support good to go. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 10:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Wait – Thin. Sans 'Background' and 'Aftermath,' narrative is 275 words (out of 590 total). Two unnamed 'reverends' quoted. General significance seems negligible. – Sca (talk) 12:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Significance is clear, while Nigeria has ongoing violence, this was primarily in the north. An attack of this type in the south was unheard of. And while the two reverend are unnamed, I assume its because only their position matters, like when a spokesman for the Vatican gives a statement... its not who the spokesman is but what they say. --Masem (t) 13:14, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Quoting unnamed (and unofficial) sources volubly in a fairly short article isn't kosher by journalism standards, and I would think also not acceptable in encyclopedic writing. -- Sca (talk) 14:36, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Our BLP rules tend towards omission of names of non public people. While the names can be found in the given sources, the names are the least important thing than being a reverend at the church that survived the attack. This seems to be a really odd complaint.--Masem (t) 14:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    General significance seems negligible
    What? This was one of the worst terrorist attacks in West African history, and one that is likely to hold a significant effect on the 2023 Nigerian presidential election. No idea why events like the Charlie Hebdo shooting (which killed 12 people and started a similar uproar in France) were sent to the ITN without too much issue but a massacre in Nigeria that killed at least four times more people is considered "negligible." Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 13:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree that this attack stands out from the others, but if I had to guess, mostly because massacres in Nigeria are a relatively frequent occurrence, kinda like mass shootings in the USA. 4iamking (talk) 14:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The situation remains murky. Per AP, the attackers haven't been identified and their whereabouts is unknown. Speculation alludes to Boko, but this is merely a guess based on previous history. Given the circumstances, Wait would seem more appropriate than posting at this pt. (Changing my vote.) -- Sca (talk) 14:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Boko Haram is unlikely, if anything, it's probably part of the herder-farmer conflict in the country (which for the most part involves herder attacks and massacres on farmers) than the Boko Haram insurgency. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 22:54, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sca: I've nominated a few Africa-based articles (by chance rather than anything else) and the same issue always gets highlighted over and over again and the response is nearly always the same; we may never know anything more than we know now, there is overall little chance of any meaningful investigation. That is just the sad truth, that there is a chance that not only the perpetrators will evade the authorities but also we may never know the true motive and background of them. This doesn't make the event any less notable though. Abcmaxx (talk) 00:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – Why are no URL links for the following sources (listed above) not provided? Agence France-Presse, Reuters, The Guardian, Al-Jazeera, ABC News, VOA, BBC. – Sca (talk) 14:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    All those are referenced and linked in the article. Suspect the nom did not know to bring links forward. Masem (t) 14:56, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted. SpencerT•C 00:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting comment – This DW report on their English newscast Tues. appeared to reflect some uncertainty about the death toll. Puzzling. (Just an observation.) – Sca (talk) 13:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Purely FWIW, German Wiki's ITN blurb says, "In Nigeria, several dozen people have died in an attack on a church" (In Nigeria sind bei einem Anschlag auf eine Kirche mehrere Dutzend Menschen ums Leben gekommen). Their article cites 18 sources, all in English. Puzzling. – Sca (talk) 13:38, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kazakh constitutional referendum

Article: 2022 Kazakh constitutional referendum (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Kazakhstan votes in overhauling its constitution after facing deadliest unrest in history. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Kazakhstan holds a constitutional referendum in changing 56 amendments to constitution following the January 2022 unrest.
Alternative blurb II: Kazakhstan votes for 56 amendments to its constitution, following the January 2022 unrest.
Alternative blurb III: ​ Khazakstan passes constitutional referendum reducing the power of the president, following the violent civil unrest in January 2022.
Alternative blurb IV: ​ Voters in Kazakhstan pass a constitutional referendum to change 56 amendments to constitution, following the January 2022 unrest.
News source(s): France 24, Kazinform, News.com.au. France24 (outcome), Guardian
Credits:

 ShadZ01 (talk) 05:56, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wait - Needs at least the preliminary results. 4iamking (talk) 17:00, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support after exit poll as per previous comments. Article very detailed and referenced already. Infobox needs expansion though I think? Abcmaxx (talk) 23:54, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support altblurb3 - Major news media is now reporting overwhelming victory for supporters of the amendment, so I think we can now move ahead given that there's no ambiguity regarding the outcome. Therefore I've added altblurb3. Melmann 11:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support altblurb4 Above, but blurb 3 seems not quite well-worded enough. The Kip (talk) 14:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Ready now, added a more condensed version in ALT2.4iamking (talk) 14:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I feel like mentioning either the referendum or “voters” is necessary; otherwise, one could be led to believe this was a governmental/parliamentary action, not a democratic one. The Kip (talk) 14:59, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I think having "(insert country) votes", would imply some sort of direct democracy. Regardless, any country upending their constitution to this extent is extremely noteworthy, the procedure in doing so is almost a secondary detail. 4iamking (talk) 16:47, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait. On notability this item certainly deserves posting, but the article needs to be updated further to actually say that the referendum approved the constitutional amendments, and there need to be several solid WP:RS cited that explicitly say that. For the moment preliminary results say that there was a 68.4% voter turnout, and that 77.2% of the participating voters voted yes. However, Article 91 of the Constitution of Kazakhstan requires that, in order for a referendum approve a constitutional amendment, at least 50% of eligible voters take part (this requirement has apparently been met, so that the referendum is considered "valid"), and that at least 50% of the participating voters vote for the amendment in at least two thirds of "regions, cities of republican significance and the capital."[5] The news sources I have seen don't say anything about this latter requirement having been met (although it probably has been met). Nsk92 (talk) 00:18, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Unless im missing something, no regional breakdown was included in the preliminary results that were released by the electoral commission, other than alluding to the fact that it passed with 77.18%. It's not ideal but I think the margin that high it's hard to image the regional requirements not being met. Without proper results I get that it's speculative in nature (as improbably as the other outcome is), but it could be several days to weeks until we get that. 4iamking (talk) 00:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think it is necessary to wait for the final official results before posting. However, I feel we do need to wait until some WP:RS clearly say that the constitutional amendments were approved by the referendum. The figure of 77.18% of the participating voters voting in favor is insufficient in this regard since we don't know how it was distributed geographically between the regions. Nsk92 (talk) 12:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The electoral comission officially states that the referendum met the majority threshold in all 17 regions, so any concerns of it potentially not meeting the regional requirement can now be dismissed. In addition the constitutional amendments come into force as of today (June 8). 4iamking (talk) 01:14, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – The Guardian headlines its results story with "Kazakhs vote to strip founding figure Nazarbayev of privileges," saying 77% voted in favor. I'm not clear on the significance of this referendum. – Sca (talk) 13:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The article is plenty long enough, seems to be well constructed, and didn't have any obvious [citation needed] tags. I think it meets the notability requirement as well. Rockphed (talk) 03:10, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Bangladesh fire

Article: 2022 Sitakunda fire (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least 49 people are killed and over 400 wounded by an explosion and fire at a storage depot in Sitakunda, Chittagong District, Bangladesh. (Post)
News source(s): NDTV, BBC, Reuters, DW, AP
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: A huge fire in an container yard in Bangladesh with at least 40 deaths with hundreds more injured. Casualties may rise with time. Debjyoti Gorai (talk) 11:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 4

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


Article: Bajram Begaj (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Bajram Begaj (pictured) is elected President of Albania by the parliament after 4th round of voting. (Post)
News source(s): albaniandailynews
Credits:

 Andrei (talk) 10:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Tentative support, though the article says he was elected on June 4, so this nomination should be placed there. --Tone 12:57, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • So moved. --13:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Oppose on quality paragraph on early life is unsourced, and most of the rest of the Biography section just reads like a CV. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It's not ITNR, as the office of President of Albania is ceremonial, not executive, so generally, such nominatios aren't usually very successful (Mattarella's re-election is a bad precedent). In any case, I think the main article should be the presidential election, the quality of which is far from acceptable. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 13:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Tony Pajaczkowski

Article: Tony Pajaczkowski (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Montreal Gazette
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:16, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 3

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports


(Posted) RD: Dorothy E. Smith

Article: Dorothy E. Smith (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Family Memorial Twitter <Additional WP:RS sources should be sought before posting.>
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Canadian sociologist. Article looks good at prelim glance. Ktin (talk) 19:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Sophie Freud

Article: Sophie Freud (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): New York Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Austrian American psychologist, educator, social scientist, and author. Died of pancreatic cancer. TJMSmith (talk) 13:17, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Larry Hillman

Article: Larry Hillman (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CBC News (Canadian Press); National Post
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 07:56, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Ann Turner Cook

Article: Ann Turner Cook (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYTimes
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: The original Gerber Baby. --PFHLai (talk) 16:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents:

  1. ^ (2day.kh.ua) (in Ukrainian)