Jump to content

Don't be evil: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Undid revision 743438741 by MarnetteD (talk)
Line 5: Line 5:


==Avoiding conflicts of interest==
==Avoiding conflicts of interest==
In their 2004 founders' letter<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000119312504142742/ds1a.htm#toc59330_1 |publisher=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission|SEC]] | location = USA |title= Letter from the founders, "an owner's manual" for Google's shareholders |date=14 August 2004}}</ref> prior to their [[initial public offering]], [[Larry Page]] and [[Sergey Brin]] explained that their "Don't be evil" culture prohibited [[conflicts of interest]], and required [[objectivity (journalism)|objectivity]] and an absence of [[bias]]:
In their 2004 founders' letter<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000119312504142742/ds1a.htm#toc59330_1 |publisher=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission|SEC]] | location = USA |title= Letter from the founders, "an owner's manual" for Google's shareholders |date=14 August 2004}}</ref> prior to their [[initial public offering]], [[Larry Page]] and [[Sergey Brin]] argued that their "Don't be evil" culture prohibited [[conflicts of interest]], and required [[objectivity (journalism)|objectivity]] and an absence of [[bias]]:


{{quotation|Google users trust our systems to help them with important decisions: medical, financial and many others. Our search results are the best we know how to produce. They are unbiased and objective, and we do not accept payment for them or for inclusion or more frequent updating. We also display advertising, which we work hard to make relevant, and we label it clearly. This is similar to a well-run newspaper, where the advertisements are clear and the articles are not influenced by the advertisers’ payments. We believe it is important for everyone to have access to the best information and research, not only to the information people pay for you to see.}}
{{quotation|Google users trust our systems to help them with important decisions: medical, financial and many others. Our search results are the best we know how to produce. They are unbiased and objective, and we do not accept payment for them or for inclusion or more frequent updating. We also display advertising, which we work hard to make relevant, and we label it clearly. This is similar to a well-run newspaper, where the advertisements are clear and the articles are not influenced by the advertisers’ payments. We believe it is important for everyone to have access to the best information and research, not only to the information people pay for you to see.}}


[[Chris Hoofnagle]], director of [[University of California, Berkeley|University of California]], [[Berkeley Law]]'s information privacy programs, has stated<ref>{{cite journal |volume=14 |number=4–6 |date=April 2009 |journal=First Monday |first=Chris |last=Hoofnagle | url= http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2326/2156 |title=Beyond Google and evil: How policy makers, journalist and consumers should talk differently about Google and privacy }}</ref> that Google's original intention expressed by the "don't be evil" motto is linked to the company's separation of search results from advertising. However, he argues that clearly separating search results from sponsored links is required by law, thus, Google's practice is now mainstream and no longer remarkable or good. According to Hoofnagle, Google should abandon the motto because:
[[Chris Hoofnagle]], director of [[University of California, Berkeley|University of California]], [[Berkeley Law]]'s information privacy programs, has stated that Google's original intention expressed by the "don't be evil" motto is linked to the company's separation of search results from advertising.<ref>{{cite journal |volume=14 |number=4–6 |date=April 2009 |journal=First Monday |first=Chris |last=Hoofnagle | url= http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2326/2156 |title=Beyond Google and evil: How policy makers, journalist and consumers should talk differently about Google and privacy }}</ref> However, he argues that clearly separating search results from sponsored links is required by law, thus, Google's practice is now mainstream and no longer remarkable or good. According to Hoofnagle, Google should abandon the motto because:


{{quotation|The evil talk is not only an [[Albatross (metaphor)|albatross]] for Google, it obscures the substantial consumer benefits from Google’s advertising model. Because we have forgotten the original context of Google’s evil representations, the company should remind the public of the company’s contribution to a revolution in search advertising, and highlight some overlooked benefits of their model.}}
{{quotation|The evil talk is not only an [[Albatross (metaphor)|albatross]] for Google, it obscures the substantial consumer benefits from Google’s advertising model. Because we have forgotten the original context of Google’s evil representations, the company should remind the public of the company’s contribution to a revolution in search advertising, and highlight some overlooked benefits of their model.}}

Revision as of 18:01, 9 October 2016

"Don't be evil" is the corporate motto of Google.[1] It was first suggested either by Google employee Paul Buchheit at a meeting about corporate values that took place in early 2000[2] or in 2001[3] or, according to another account, by Google Engineer Amit Patel in 1999.[4] Buchheit, the creator of Gmail, said he "wanted something that, once you put it in there, would be hard to take out", adding that the slogan was "also a bit of a jab at a lot of the other companies, especially our competitors, who at the time, in our opinion, were kind of exploiting the users to some extent."[2] While the official corporate philosophy of Google[5] does not contain the words "Don't be evil", they were included in the prospectus (on Form S-1) of Google's 2004 IPO (a letter from Google's founders, later called the "'Don't Be Evil' manifesto"): "Don’t be evil. We believe strongly that in the long term, we will be better served — as shareholders and in all other ways — by a company that does good things for the world even if we forgo some short term gains."[6] The motto is sometimes incorrectly stated as Do no evil.[3][7] Following Google's corporate restructuring under the conglomerate Alphabet Inc. in October 2015, the motto was replaced in the Alphabet corporate code of conduct by the phrase "Do the right thing"; however, the Google code of conduct still contains the phrase "Don't be evil".

Avoiding conflicts of interest

In their 2004 founders' letter[8] prior to their initial public offering, Larry Page and Sergey Brin argued that their "Don't be evil" culture prohibited conflicts of interest, and required objectivity and an absence of bias:

Google users trust our systems to help them with important decisions: medical, financial and many others. Our search results are the best we know how to produce. They are unbiased and objective, and we do not accept payment for them or for inclusion or more frequent updating. We also display advertising, which we work hard to make relevant, and we label it clearly. This is similar to a well-run newspaper, where the advertisements are clear and the articles are not influenced by the advertisers’ payments. We believe it is important for everyone to have access to the best information and research, not only to the information people pay for you to see.

Chris Hoofnagle, director of University of California, Berkeley Law's information privacy programs, has stated that Google's original intention expressed by the "don't be evil" motto is linked to the company's separation of search results from advertising.[9] However, he argues that clearly separating search results from sponsored links is required by law, thus, Google's practice is now mainstream and no longer remarkable or good. According to Hoofnagle, Google should abandon the motto because:

The evil talk is not only an albatross for Google, it obscures the substantial consumer benefits from Google’s advertising model. Because we have forgotten the original context of Google’s evil representations, the company should remind the public of the company’s contribution to a revolution in search advertising, and highlight some overlooked benefits of their model.

The End of "Don't Be Evil"

In an NPR interview, Eric Schmidt revealed doubts he had when Larry Page and Sergey Brin recommended the motto as a guiding principle for Google.[10] Others raised similar questions about the actual definition of what Google considered "evil".[11][12] Google's 2012 announcement to "begin tracking users universally across all its services" (via "Google Plus" accounts) resulted in public backlash on the motto, like "Google's Broken Promise: The End of "Don't Be Evil" on Gizmodo.[13][14][15]

And while the motto was still cited in the Google Investor Relations Preface to the Code of Conduct, which stated:

“Don’t be evil.” Googlers generally apply those words to how we serve our users. But “Don’t be evil” is much more than that...

The Google Code of Conduct is one of the ways we put “Don’t be evil” into practice...[16]

The Commercial Appeal objected "critics say Google's recent moves belie search giant's motto".[17] Indeed, criticism of Google still frequently spins the motto in a negative way, such as InfoWorld's 2014 article "Google? Evil? You have no idea".[18][19][20][21] Major social networks even co-developed a "Don't be evil" browser bookmarklet (specifically to expose alleged SERP manipulation promoting Google-owned content over that of others).[22] On the user-facing, aforementioned 'What We Believe' page, Google appeared to replace the original motto altogether (a carefully reworded version stood as of 10 April 2015, "You can make money without doing evil",[5] which varied significantly from the absolute imperative of DON'T be evil).

Following Google's corporate restructuring under the conglomerate Alphabet Inc. in October 2015, the slogan was replaced in the Alphabet corporate code of conduct by the phrase "Do the right thing",[23][24] however to this day, the Google code of conduct still contains the phrase "Don't be evil".[25]

"I think that you do evil"

On 16 May 2013 Margaret Hodge MP, the chair of the United Kingdom Public Accounts Committee accused Google of being "calculated and unethical" over its use of highly contrived and artificial distinctions to avoid paying billions of pounds in Corporation tax owed by its UK operations.[26] The company was accused by the committee, which represents the interests of all UK taxpayers, of being "evil" for not paying its "fair amount of tax". She told Matt Brittin, head of Google UK "I think that you do evil".[27] In 2015, the UK Government introduced a new law intended to penalise Google and other large multinational corporations' artificial tax avoidance.[28]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Google Code of Conduct". Google. 11 April 2012. Retrieved 9 April 2016..
  2. ^ a b "Paul Buchheit on Gmail, AdSense and More". Blogoscoped. 25 January 2007. Retrieved 4 April 2013. (quoting from: Jessica Livingston, Founders at Work, ISBN 978-1590597149)
  3. ^ a b Gleick, James, How Google Dominates Us, The New York Review of Books
  4. ^ "Don't Be Evil or don't lose value?". The Sydney Morning Herald. AU. 15 April 2008.
  5. ^ a b "Ten things we know to be true". Google Company. Google. Retrieved 25 November 2011.
  6. ^ Ovide, Shira (23 June 2011). "What Would 2004 Google Say About Antitrust Probe?". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 2 October 2015. Retrieved 2 October 2015. Our goal is to develop services that significantly improve the lives of as many people as possible. In pursuing this goal, we may do things that we believe have a positive impact on the world, even if the near term financial returns are not obvious..."Don't be evil. We believe strongly that in the long term, we will be better served—as shareholders and in all other ways—by a company that does good things for the world even if we forgo some short term gains. This is an important aspect of our culture and is broadly shared within the company... {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  7. ^ ndouglas (9 February 2006), "Don't be evil. Fact-check the company motto", Valleywag, Gawker
  8. ^ "Letter from the founders, "an owner's manual" for Google's shareholders". USA: SEC. 14 August 2004.
  9. ^ Hoofnagle, Chris (April 2009). "Beyond Google and evil: How policy makers, journalist and consumers should talk differently about Google and privacy". First Monday. 14 (4–6).
  10. ^ "Google's Eric Schmidt: "Don't Be Evil" was Stupid". USA: DailyTech LLC. 14 May 2013.
  11. ^ "What Google really means by "Don't be evil"". USA: Quartz. 21 October 2014.
  12. ^ "What Is 'Evil' to Google?". USA: The Atlantic Monthly Group. 15 October 2013.
  13. ^ "Google's Broken Promise: The End of "Don't Be Evil"". USA: Gizmodo. 24 January 2012.
  14. ^ "Google Kills Reader, Force-Feeds Us Google+: Don't Be Evil?". USA: IBT Media. 14 March 2013.
  15. ^ "The Plus in Google Plus? It's Mostly for Google". USA: The New York Times. 14 February 2014.
  16. ^ "Google Code of Conduct". Google. 11 April 2012. Retrieved 9 April 2016.
  17. ^ "Turning 'evil': Critics say Google's recent moves belie search giant's motto". The Commercial Appeal. Journal Media Group. Retrieved 21 May 2015.
  18. ^ "Google? Evil? You have no idea". USA: InfoWorld, Inc. 13 March 2014.
  19. ^ "Why Google Is Evil". USA: The Huffington Post. 7 October 2013.
  20. ^ "Steve Jobs: "Google's Don't Be Evil Mantra is Bullshit"". USA: Wired. 30 January 2010.
  21. ^ "Does 'Don't be evil' still apply to Google?". CNBC News. CNBC. Retrieved 21 May 2015.
  22. ^ "Facebook, Myspace and Twitter chide Google with 'Don't be evil' add-on". Australia: The Guardian. 24 January 2012.
  23. ^ "Alphabet Code of Conduct". Alphabet. 2 October 2015. Retrieved 9 April 2016.
  24. ^ Lawler, Richard (2 October 2015). "Alphabet replaces Google's 'Don't be evil' with 'Do the right thing". Engadget. AOL. Retrieved 7 October 2015.
  25. ^ "Google Code of Conduct". Google. 11 April 2012. Retrieved 9 April 2016.
  26. ^ Simon Bowers. "MP on Google tax avoidance scheme: 'I think that you do evil'". the Guardian.
  27. ^ "Margaret Hodge labels Google tax record 'evil'". BBC News.
  28. ^ "Budget 2015: 'Google Tax' introduction confirmed". BBC News.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Don%27t_be_evil&oldid=743444880"