Jump to content

User talk:Dxism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dxism (talk | contribs) at 22:35, 26 March 2010 (→‎Nope). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

First i would like to say there is an innocent man under conviction on wikipedia. He is Dragoon8. Because of the actions of AbeARules aka AbeAAgain it is under the impression that Dragoon8 was a vandal. He is not a vandal and he mistakedly trusted AbeAAgain so now he is blocked. I will stop at nothing until Dragoon8's name has been cleared. User:Dragoon8 On another note, if you're here to pay tribute to "The Snowman" just write it down.


Dxism
Dxism
Dxism
Dxism
Dxism
My ethics My editing My style My moves
"It is amazing how complete is the delusion that beauty is goodness." Leo Nikolaevich Tolstoy Wrestling/ any sports Either stand strong or back down. Pedigree, Tornado DDT, then Sweet chin music.
"It fascinates me that there is a variety of feeling about what I do. I'm not a premeditative photographer. I see a picture and I make it. If I had a chance, I'd be out shooting all the time. You don't have to go looking for pictures. The material is generous. You go out and the pictures are staring at you." Lee Friedlander Movies(any kind) If you don't change nothing changes. FU into Five knuckle-shuffle then RKO three times.

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Diff. Rjd0060 23:29, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response

You cannot create an article about "your own religion", it wouldn't be in any other encyclopedia, so it wont be in here, the issue is not up for debate. I would suggest that you read up on what wikipedia is not. Also, I never deleted it, I only put it up for deletion, and I am not an american. Can I also remind you that you do not 'own' any article on Wikipedia, as Wikipedia is a wiki, anyone can access, and edit them. Hencetalk 09:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, - This will tell you What Wikipedia is not, This talks about Ownership of articles. That should do it, but if you would like more reading material, feel free to post another message on my talk page. Hencetalk 15:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am not certain of what you mean, you could read This, but I am not sure if that is going to help you. If you need anything else, I will try my hardest to assist. Regards, Hencetalk 20:56, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Collaboration of the Week

The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for November 11 - November 17 is World Wrestling Entertainment. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, November 18.
Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week!Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!

From the Editor

Welcome to the inaugural edition of the WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter! I hope this will be a good source of news to those people interested in what's happening around our pro wrestlimg community. I plan to release it every Sunday.

This newsletter will just be a way to get the community announcements to people who don't have the time to check the mesageboards, as well that to those just curious about the news. The newsleter will consist of a project news section (to do with what's happening on Wikipedia), and a current events section (relating to news in the "real world"). The newslette will also contain the Collaboration of the Week announcement.

That's all. If you have any feedback or suggestions, please post them at this talk page.

~ The Chronic

Contributors to this Issue: Gavyn SykesLAXNahallac SilverwindsThe ChronicThe Hybrid

Delivered: 18:11, 11 November 2007 (UTC) by MiszaBot

Regarding your edit to Wikipedia:Today's featured article

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo 20:34, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: Your attempt at inserting a message with this edit to this non-existent userpage, of which I deleted, was vandalism. -- Gogo Dodo 21:45, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Vivek Prinja

A tag has been placed on Vivek Prinja, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ridernyc (talk) 18:47, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cheers, CP 18:48, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Abraham Assed, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Razorflame (talk) 19:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Abraham Assed, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Finngall talk 21:35, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Rated RKO Discussion Page, you will be blocked from editing. KTC (talk) 07:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked. - Philippe | Talk 22:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Cedric Hardy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Oxymoron83 22:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock| your text here}} below. - Philippe | Talk 23:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dxism (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

"hey sorry i wasn't trying to vandalize i was showing my frineds the wonders and possibilities of wikipedia. They were not really sure how it worked so i was showing them you can create articles and add more info in old ones. SO once again im sorry if what i wrote was inappropiate"

Decline reason:

I agree with Philippe, you were given plenty of warnings and were clearly deliberately vandalising. — Yamla (talk) 23:10, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were given multiple warnings by multiple people. I am not, at this point, inclined to unblock you. However, I will leave your unblock request active so that another admin may review it. I encourage you to take the time to read our vandalism and notability policies. - Philippe | Talk 23:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa need more clarity

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dxism (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

"Notice how it was under names of people? and the multiple reasons were because i didnt realize that was "hardcore" vandalism. i thought screwing up articles was the stuff you guys would get mad about and i didnt notice you guys minded i was just given three notices at the same time then i was blocked."

Decline reason:

Not knowing doesn't justify vandalism. Regardless, now you know. Please refrain from vandalizing in the future. You are welcome to contribute constructively when your block expires. --Kinu t/c 23:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dxism (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

"hey wth it says im blocked because some guy had an inappropiate name. So im asking why am i blocked? can you make a shorter block that expires earlier. I have a suspicion that my friend made the Randyorton username and hes new to wiki so ill talk to him but im asking for a shorter block. write me back thanks."

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.