Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Dravecky (talk | contribs)
→‎My Year Without Sex (film): rm failed as too short, no prose expansion in 7 days
Line 372: Line 372:
:::{{*mp}}... that a misspelling in '''''[[David Carradine is a Bounty Hunter Whos Robotic Arm Hates Your Crotch]]''''' was described as an attempt to reinvent the [[English language]]? That much is surely true... --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 20:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
:::{{*mp}}... that a misspelling in '''''[[David Carradine is a Bounty Hunter Whos Robotic Arm Hates Your Crotch]]''''' was described as an attempt to reinvent the [[English language]]? That much is surely true... --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 20:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
::::Proposal: {{*mp}}... that [[Fight Like Apes]] named one of their 2007 [[Extended play|EP]]s '''''[[David Carradine is a Bounty Hunter Whos Robotic Arm Hates Your Crotch]]'''''? (The DYK aspect of this article seems to me to be the bizarre title.) --[[User:Metropolitan90|Metropolitan90]] [[User talk:Metropolitan90|(talk)]] 04:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
::::Proposal: {{*mp}}... that [[Fight Like Apes]] named one of their 2007 [[Extended play|EP]]s '''''[[David Carradine is a Bounty Hunter Whos Robotic Arm Hates Your Crotch]]'''''? (The DYK aspect of this article seems to me to be the bizarre title.) --[[User:Metropolitan90|Metropolitan90]] [[User talk:Metropolitan90|(talk)]] 04:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|18px]] for Metro90s Alt hook - which I suggest should combine with another of candlewicke's DYK noms (long way down this page) for the band itself, thus becoming: that '''[[Fight Like Apes]]''' named one of their 2007 [[Extended play|EP]]s '''''[[David Carradine is a Bounty Hunter Whos Robotic Arm Hates Your Crotch]]'''''?


====Geary Eppley====
====Geary Eppley====

Revision as of 05:40, 15 June 2009

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page.

Purge

Instructions

Using a DYK suggestion string (see below examples), list new suggestions in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged. Thanks for participating and please remember to check back for comments on your nomination.

DYK criteria

Official criteria: DYK rules and additional guidelines
Unofficial Guide: Learning DYK

How to list a new nomination

Please use one of the strings below to post your DYK nomination, using the "author" and "nominator" fields to identify the users who should receive credit for their contributions if the hook is featured on the main page.

  1. Nom without image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= }}
  2. Nom with image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= | image= | caption= }}
    To include more than one new or expanded article in a single hook: |article2= |article3= |article4= | (etc)
    To include more than one author: |author2= |author3= | (etc)
    To include alternate hooks: |ALT1= |ALT2= | (etc)
    To add a comment: |comment=
    To add the article you reviewed: |reviewed=

Do not wikilink the article title, or the author username field; the template will wikilink them automatically. Do wikilink the article title in the hook field, however.
Do not add a section heading if you are using the template; the template will add one for you.
Do not include a signature (~~~~) after the template.
Do not use non-free images in your hook suggestion.

An example of how to use the template is given below. Full details are at {{NewDYKnom}}:

{{subst:NewDYKnom
 | article       = Example
 | status        = new<!--(or) expanded-->
 | hook          = ... that this [[article]] is an '''[[example]]''' ''(pictured)''?
 | author        = User
 | nominator     =
 | image         = Example.png
 | rollover      = An example image
 | comment       =
}}
  • Note that you should only use one of the above templates for the original hook. If you want to suggest a second, alternative hook for the same article submission, just type it in manually. The above templates output useful code for each submission and if you employ them for alternative hooks, you will mess up the page formatting.
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|August 24}} Thanks, ~~~~

How to review a nomination

Any editor who was not involved in writing/expanding or nominating an article may review it by checking to see that the article meets all the DYK criteria (long enough, new enough, no serious editorial or content issues) and the hook is cited. Editors may also alter the suggested hook to improve it, or may suggest new hooks.

If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or note that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:

Symbol Code DYK Ready? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe DYK eligibility requires additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Please consider using {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the nominator's talk page, in case they do not notice if there is an issue.

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Where is my hook?

If you can't find the hook you submitted to this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is in the queue for display on the main page. You can check whether your hook has been moved to the queue by reviewing the queue listings.

If your hook is not in the queue or already on the main page, it has probably been deleted. Deletion occurs if the hook is more than about eight days old and has unresolved issues for which any discussion has gone stale. If you think your hook has been unfairly deleted, you can query its deletion on the discussion page, but as a general rule deleted hooks will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on June 15

STSAT-2

Created by SriMesh (talk). Self nom at 04:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anaconda Road Massacre

5x expanded by Geraldk (talk). Self nom at 02:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


  • ... that actress Charlene McKenna was overjoyed when her full-frontal nude scene in television series Raw attracted few complaints?

(self-nom, created by --candlewicke 01:24, 15 June 2009 (UTC) )[reply]


Created by Mercurywoodrose (talk). Self nom at 01:44, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 14

Swellshark

  • ... that the swellshark (pictured) bends its body in a U-shape and sucks in water to double in size and avoid attacks from predators?

5x expanded by Giants27 (talk). Self nom at 00:18, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Privity in English law

... that it has been argued that privity in English law is simply an element of consideration? Ironholds (talk) 00:17, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jan and Anna Puchalski (plus) Grodno Ghetto

Jews in Grodno Ghetto, 1941

Created by Poeticbent (talk). Self nom at 00:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Camp Trousdale

5x expanded by Geraldk (talk). Self nom at 23:48, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Garfield School

Created by Wadester16 (talk). Self nom at 23:45, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DemiDec

Created by NuclearWarfare (talk). Self nom at 22:49, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dziwożona

Created by Malick78 (talk). Self nom at 22:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Wharton (Maryland)

5x expanded by Geraldk (talk). Self nom at 22:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Liz Swaine

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 21:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration Committee (English Wikipedia)

Created by MBisanz (talk). Self nom at 21:16, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Norwegian Nobel Committee

5x expanded by Punkmorten (talk). Self nom at 21:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Rise to Power (Monstrosity album)

Created by Cannibaloki (talk). Self nom at 18:37, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Deir Yassin massacre

5x expanded by SlimVirgin (talk). Self nom at 18:18, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It has been completely rewritten in the last three days, Hadashot. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 18:59, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For anyone else looking at this, this is the article on June 10, before I started editing, and this is the June 14 version. As you can see, almost everything has changed, apart from the background section. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 19:09, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please see F2. Art LaPella (talk) 19:19, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(ec)You'd be better off taking this to WP:GAN. DYK is mainly for content: newly created or greatly expanded articles, not for improved articles. An article that was already well-developed at 27,000 characters is not really a good DYK candidate. If you take this to GAN instead, I'm sure you can get a GA out of it, and maybe even an FA with a little bit of work. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Rjanag. What I'm going to do instead is submit a new article about the psychiatric hospital. It's the fact that an abandoned village that had this atrocity in it was turned into a mental health facility that I find so odd and interesting. I think it'd be a good DYK. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 20:28, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It certainly would be, and this sounds like a great topic for an article. Thanks, and happy writing! (And don't forget to submit this article for GAN, too; I think it deserves it!) rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 21:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rhodotus

Created by Sasata (talk). Self nom at 17:54, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Desert Strike: Return to the Gulf

Expanded (former redirect) by Bridies. Self nom.

Zana e malit

  • ... that in Albanian folklore the zana, mountain fairies revered for their beauty and courage, are said to have watched approvingly over Albanian protests against the 1878 Treaty of San Stefano?

Created by Flokarti (talk), Gonzonoir (talk). Self nom at 13:02, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Wicker

  • ... that despite having organized the first LGBT rights demonstration in the US, activist Randy Wicker denounced the Stonewall riots, saying that "throwing rocks through windows doesn't open doors"?

Created/expanded by Otto4711 (talk). Self nom at 11:53, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Józef Kalasanty Szaniawski

Created by Nihil novi (talk). Self nom at 11:14, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(self-nom, created by --candlewicke 09:08, 14 June 2009 (UTC) )[reply]

  • Gonzonoir is on the right track. The quote from the press release is a joke, not an attempt to 'reinvent the English language'. A new hook is needed, focusing on something other than this triviality. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 18:20, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Proposal:

Geary Eppley

Created by Strikehold (talk). Self nom at 07:43, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chhatarpur Temple

Created by Mehul trivedi (talk). Nominated by Ekabhishek (talk) at 06:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolas Jacques Pelletier

5x expanded by NuclearWarfare (talk). Self nom at 04:06, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The source checks out, the article, although not rated, does not seem to be a stub class (and has enough words of prose), and the fivefold expansion criteria is passed. Good job on the extension! Hurricane Angel Saki (talk) 06:14, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(self-nom, created by --candlewicke 02:49, 14 June 2009 (UTC) )[reply]

Little Red Schoolhouse (Brunswick, New York)

Created by Wadester16 (talk). Self nom at 01:59, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Hanrahan

Created by Alansohn (talk). Self nom at 01:50, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

United Kingdom Election Results

Created by Cirt (talk). Self nom at 00:55, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 13

Blood Ties (Homicide: Life on the Street)

Created by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self nom at 05:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Veeder

Created by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 01:37, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bluebirds Flying High

Created by 03md (talk). Self nom at 23:29, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John R. Conway

5x expanded by Biosci01 (talk). Self nom at 00:08, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Ernsting

Created by Gaia Octavia Agrippa (talk). Self nom at 20:55, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Despenser

Created by Ealdgyth (talk). Self nom at 18:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don Kelly (baseball)

5x expanded by Mackensen (talk). Self nom at 17:03, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dos Caras, Jr.

5x expanded by MPJ-DK (talk). Self nom at 14:51, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Please note I had to remove most of the content for copyright violation before rewriting the article. I expanded the text more than 5 times, not counting info boxes etc. check the difference between edits)

Siegfried class coast defense ship

Created by Parsecboy (talk). Self nom at 12:50, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Gold Glove Award winners at second base

Created by Killervogel5 (talk). Self nom at 12:09, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Irene–Olivia

Created by Hurricanehink (talk). Self nom at 04:54, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That hook is incorrect. Track maps from 1911 and 1876 clearly indicate that at least two earlier tropical cyclones moved from the Atlantic to the eastern Pacific. Changing to say that the tropical cyclone was the first actively tracked tropical cyclone to move from one basin to the other would solve the problem. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 06:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article does mention those other storms. Would it work if I said "the first known", "the first reported", any of those? I think "actively tracked" could be confusing. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 11:54, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I thought that the hook, as it currently is, might confuse readers into thinking that IO is the earliest known TC to change basins. I suggested the change to make it clear that IO was the first one to do so while being tracked in real time. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 18:32, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, good point, I went with your wording. I hope the layman understands it. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:39, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conspiracy Encyclopedia

Created by Cirt (talk). Self nom at 04:24, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of drugs illegal in the United Kingdom

Created by Anxietycello (talk). Self nom at 02:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 12

Mr. T
Mr. T
Mr. T plays Santa Claus with First Lady Nancy Reagan for Christmas at the White House, 1983
Mr. T plays Santa Claus with First Lady Nancy Reagan for Christmas at the White House, 1983

(self-nom, 5x expanded by --candlewicke 00:14, 13 June 2009 (UTC) )[reply]

ISO 898

Created by Wizard191 (talk). Self nom at 01:15, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Washington State Route 106

5x expanded by ComputerGuy (talk). Self nom at 00:03, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Feudal aid

  • ... that the custom of collecting a feudal aid from a vassal originated in the 11th century in France, in the County of Anjou?

Created by Ealdgyth (talk). Self nom at 21:35, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Santi Vincenzo e Anastasio a Trevi

Created by TodorBozhinov (talk). Self nom at 20:30, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ninigret Pond

Cool article MaenK.A.Talk 07:15, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of the palaces /new/ and Charles Cameron (architect) /exp./

Alt hooks

Eryngium racemosum

Created by IceCreamAntisocial (talk). Nominated by Punkmorten (talk) at 19:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Richie Williams (Canadian football)

Created by Geologik (talk). Self nom at 05:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hans Larsen Saakvitne

Created by Punkmorten (talk). Self nom at 17:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Le Maistre Chat, ou le Chat Botté (Puss in Boots)

  • Comment: This nomination is an upgrade of a previous nomination that failed due to a lack of inline citations and the reviewer's inability to find the hook in the article. The article and hook have been upgraded to comply with DYK criteria. The hook is found in the "Question of authorship" section and the caption to the accompanying image. Inline citations have been entered throughout the article.

Created by Kathyrncelestewright (talk). Self nom at 17:32, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The hook is not interesting to me. Aside from it, the article has some issues with the title, inline sourcing for some passages and others. I think the article could be merged into Puss in Boots (fairy tale), or the latter has to be renamed like "Puss in Boots (character)". Also could you show me "the previous and failed nomination for DYK"? When did it occur and who was the reviewer back then? (the accusatory tone is bothering) If the article was previously nominated, how could this be "the new article? --Caspian blue 08:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't have a huge problem with the hook, although it could be more interesting; I found the source and can accept it AGF. (Also, by the way, I don't think she meant to be "accusatory" when pointing out that Mattisse didn't find the hook; it probably just came out wrong.) But the serious problem is the one Caspian pointed out about Puss in Boots (fairy tale). Clearly the articles have slightly different focuses; the latter is about the story in general, whereas this one is more about the specific book that Perrault published. The question is whether they need to be separate articles or not—and if they do not need to be, whether this work could be considered a 5x expansion of what already existed. Even if they are kept separate, I think some more work needs to be done getting the two articles well coordinated; Puss in Boots (disambiguation) doesn't mention Puss in Boots (fairy tale), which it certainly needs to, and The Master Cat, or Puss in Boots could use more discussion (beyond just the "authorship" section) on how Perrault's story fits into the whole set of Puss in Boots stories; furthermore, both articles have sections that appear to overlap, such as "adaptations". I think some of these issues need to be cleared up before this can pass. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 12:30, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you both for your insights and consideration! I've reworked the hook slightly and ask your opinion. Caspian, the issues you mention have been rectified in the "Master Cat" article (thank you for solving the snarl with the title!) and I do agree with you that the two articles need some consideration. There is not much to merge into The Master Cat, or Puss in Boots from Puss in Boots (fairy tale) as much of the latter article is unsourced and has an OR tang, especially in the analysis section. I suggest a "Variants" or a "Cat as Helper" section in "The Master Cat" article examining the topic from well respected folklorists and retaining only the "adaptations" that are supremely notable such as Tchaikovsky's ballet and the Faerie Tale production. Perrault's Puss in Boots has inspired legion upon legion of "adaptations" over the centuries and it is impractical in my opinion to list every single one of them no matter how insignificant they are in the greater scheme of things in "The Master Cat" article without giving the topic "adaptations" undue weight. Alternatively, ALL adaptations could be listed in a stand alone article called "Puss in Boots adaptations". What do you think of my proposal? Caspain, I'm so sorry you preceive me as using "accusatory tone" with Matisse. Nothing of the sort was intended. I was simply stating a 'right to the point' fact. Kathyrncelestewright (talk) 22:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • That seems to me to be the best option: redirect Puss in Boots (fairy tale) to this new article, add a section or so summing up the general history of the fairy tale and how Perrault fits into that history, and then spin the list of adaptations out into a new article. I find the spinning-out solution to be an expedient hack when you have a large hunk of information that is relevant to an article but crappily written and not likely to ever be up to the same standard as the rest of your article (especially if you're planning on GAN or FAC); for example, I did pretty much the same thing with Chinese classifier and List of Chinese classifiers. It might feel a little bit like cheating, but whatever. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 22:26, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Black Procession

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 15:36, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Jane West-Eberhard

  • ... that the theoretical biologist Mary Jane West-Eberhard learnt more about science at high school from her English course on critical reading and writing that her biology class?

Created by LittleHow (talk). Self nom at 11:47, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ole Mørk Sandvik

Created by Punkmorten (talk). Self nom at 10:01, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Harrys Gym

Created by Decltype (talk). Self nom at 08:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Geastrum pectinatum

Created by Sasata (talk). Self nom at 06:29, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sugimoto-dera

  • ... that of the three precious statues of goddess Kannon enshrined in the ancient Sugimoto-dera temple in Kamakura, Japan, very probably none was made by the artist it is traditionally attributed to?

Created by Urashimataro (talk). Self nom at 06:11, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly (song)

Created by Zephyrnthesky (talk). Self nom at 05:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • How about simply stating that it is a song, not just a couple harmonica chords in the opening scene? Never realized there could be any words behind it. NVO (talk) 11:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • There aren't any lyrics per se, the source says that Montenegro does the sort of "hup-rup-hup" sounds himself. I just listened to it a moment ago and it sounds like there is a backing vocal sound, but I don't know who did that. It's opening notes are enough to convey the association with the film, so those get played more often. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 17:01, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
much better! ...
  • That kind of slipped my mind when I was creating the article last night, but I've since added the sentence from the book that says that (and referenced it as well). The book describes it as the "rep, rup, rep, rup, rep" sound between the choruses. I think that could work too. Sorry to sound wishy-washy, but the whole DYK thing is pretty new to me, I've only been involved in one (and somebody else nominated it for me because I was confused as to how it was done). Like I said above, I'm deferential. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 18:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rafael Carrión, Sr.

Cards Pond

Rommie Loudd

Created by Hirolovesswords (talk). Nominated by Royalbroil (talk) at 01:29, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ref, date and length fine ... some help on the raw ref format would be good. I did one ... Victuallers (talk) 16:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done a pretty rough job with WP:REFLINKS, but it's better than nothing. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:32, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 11

Washington Valley Park

Created by Ekem (talk). Self nom at 21:37, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Olympic medalists in badminton

Created by SRE.K.A.L.24 (talk). Self nom at 05:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Andrews (actress)

Created by Cryptic C62 (talk). Self nom at 16:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marion West Higgins

Created by Offenbach (talk). Self nom at 02:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gerta Keller

5x expanded by Alansohn (talk). Self nom at 01:30, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Haymes

Created by Korny O'Near (talk). Self nom at 00:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Korny O'Near (talk). Self nom at 00:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that makes sense - I added a modified version of your suggestion as a second option. Korny O'Near (talk) 16:45, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please add inline citations, especially for the hook fact. Shubinator (talk) 00:36, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article needs several maintenance items addressed before it can appear on the main page. Royalbroil 12:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that on May 31, 2009, the ROV Nereus reached an underwater depth of 10,902 metres (6.8 mi), becoming the world's deepest-diving vehicle?

Created/expanded by Mattisse (talk). Self nom at 21:55, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.

Created by Eastlaw (talk). Self nom at 21:47, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

267 character hook. Art LaPella (talk) 23:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose either of these would do, but I really was hoping to mention the human cannonball thing--it just makes the hook more interesting. Still, these would be fine. --Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 14:45, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maschaug Pond

The source checks out, the hook is short enough, and the page is not stub-class. I'll pass it, and well done! Hurricane Angel Saki (talk) 22:28, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Franco-Persian alliance

Created by PHG (talk). Self nom at 20:18, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Institutionalization (psychology)

  • Comment: Moved from userspace on 11 June 2009

Created by Rjanag (talk). Self nom at 19:21, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pennsylvania Route 963

Created by Mitchazenia (talk). Self nom at 18:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Waldmann disease

Created by Acebulf (talk). Self nom at 18:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pilot Rock (Jackson County, Oregon)

Created by Little Mountain 5 (talk). Self nom at 17:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nut Island effect

Created by Sswonk (talk). Self nom at 17:23, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Points of disagreement, 1) the quotes around the title are unnecessary, texts from the first 30 Google hits do not use them 2) The title describes a general situation but refers to what happened specifically in Boston/Quincy, not "such as in the situation" which is itself somewhat awkward. My revised hook follows. 3) The descriptions of the managers as "distracted" or possibly "preoccupied" and the workers as "isolated" are a requirement of application of the term and should not be removed from the hook.
ALT2: ... that the Nut Island effect refers to a human resources situation involving distracted managers and isolated employees that led to the massive pollution of Boston Harbor in the 1970s? Sswonk (talk) 23:23, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
General or specific situation: which is it? If it describes only the Boston incident, then first of all, it shouldn't be an article but should be a section of the article about that incident (or, if there isn't one, this article should be moved to Nut Island incident or whatever). If it can be used more generally, however, then it is more notable and there is nothing wrong with making a hook about its general use, rather than its specific application to Boston. To be honest, a hook that essentially says "this term was coined because of X incident and describes only that one incident" is not very exciting.
Anyway, based on my glance at the sources, it does seem to be that people have attempted to use the term more generally; both this and this talk about it in a more general manner, and suggest to me that a hook along the lines of ALT1 should be appropriate.
All that being said...how notable is this "effect"? Would it survive an AfD? To be honest, I'm not sure. First of all, the article itself says much more about the Nut Island incident than the supposedly general "nut island effect". Secondly, based on my glance at the sources, more of them are more like motivational talks ("Learn from what happened at Nut Island!") then real, scholarly references to some widely accepted "effect"—if anything, the article seems to be about this one Levy paper and how important it is, although to be honest I have seen much more influential papers in many fields. Finally, if it really is that important that we specify "distracted" managers, it sounds like a ridiculously narrowly-defined topic. (Along the lines of saying "the Rjanag effect is when Rjanag gets hungry and eats ice cream but only if he's wearing red socks.") I must say, I am on the verge of taking this to AfD, is there a good reason for me not to? rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 23:39, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I hope all we're stuck on here is the definition, and I'll attempt to avert your attention from any AfD action after I answer your first question. The term Nut Island effect is general, as in other broader economics effects, but it's name refers to the multiple-year systemic problems at the MDC Nut Island plant, which is interesting. A less obvious comparison would be the term Stockholm syndrome which describes a general psychological response but refers specifically to the incident at the bank in Stockholm in 1973. The paucity of coverage in Wikipedia on the entire Boston Harbor pollution situation and ongoing Boston Harbor Project mitigations is saddening and I am hoping to expand it in part by drawing attention to this human resources effect (Paul F. Levy's term). Its notability is evolving but it is found in these professional contexts, indicating professional use in government, healthcare and water resources management. Part of the referencing dilemma I ran into is that professional blogging is in a nascent state and I have found that citing blogs on Wikipedia is frowned upon. Levy is actually quite notable, having led the cleanup effort and now CEO of a major teaching hospital in the United States, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. He has a dual background having been a dean at Harvard Medical School and currently a trustee at MIT along with the government background. See [1], [2] and [3]. His blogging is considered a pioneer effort among high profile professionals, as stated in that third link. The effect he described is the subject of the article, which heavily refers to the history at MDC Nut Island. It is a new term, coined in this decade, which would be difficult to relate without the background information. Hope that helps, heh. Thanks for the questions, I enjoyed answering. Sswonk (talk) 00:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I can live with ALT3, it's actually quite good, with one caveat: in Levy's description of the effect, the isolation of the employees is a prerequisite, not a result (i.e., not "becomes"), though not "isolation" in the physical sense. This can be learned by a reader once they go to the article, but it would be nice if the hook could include something that indicates that. Here is a direct quote from the essay:

The Nut Island effect is a destructive organizational dynamic that pits a homogeneous, deeply committed team against its disengaged senior managers. Their conflict can be mapped as a negative feedback spiral that passes through five predictable stages. 1. Management, its attention riveted on high-visibility problems, assigns a vital, behind-the-scenes task to a team and gives that team a great deal of autonomy. Team members self-select for a strong work ethic and an aversion to the spot-light. They become adept at organizing and managing themselves, and the unit develops a proud and distinct identity.

The team is by its nature set apart from run-of-the-mill divisions of enterprises. I realize it is difficult to express that concept along with the distracted condition of management within 200 bytes. The situation is more common than one might think, for example senior marketing management/IT staff, hospital corporate directors/specialized nursing departments etc. As long as the managers are convinced the employees can solve all problems on their own and take their success for granted, the potential for the downward spiral exists. Sswonk (talk) 14:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Added thought: possibly modify "employees" with "autonomous"? Sswonk (talk) 14:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(out) I just checked the google scholar search results you gave and, to be honest, I'm not very impressed by them. Almost all the hits for the phrase "Nut Island effect" are just citing the title of Levy's article, not necessarily talking about the effect. In the first two pages of results, the only thing I found that said "Nut Island effect" in the context of talking about the actual effect, rather than the title of Levy's article, was this, with something along the lines of "Levy described something that has come to be known as the Nut Island effect". Right now I'm really at a loss for what to do. The quiet, dying inclusionist within me is telling me that it does no harm, and that as an "up-and-coming term" people might want to look it up and having articles like this is actually what makes Wikipedia special; but the deletionist in me is telling there just is not proof yet that it meets the notability guidelines. (That doesn't mean that it necessarily isn't notable...it just means that it hasn't proved its notability yet.) I would not be super-excited about deleting it because, if it's true as you said that it's notable within its field but just hard to find citations for, it would just be increasing systemic bias that already exists on Wikipedia (certain topics are very easy to get in, certain topics are very difficult). I guess I'll have to think some more; really what I want to see is more evidence that this term is used, a lot, in real life—not just for recounting the Boston incident, and not just for citing Levy's work, but used in its own right. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 15:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I added a provisional "Occurrences of the term" section on the article talk page. This section can be cleaned up a little and added to the main article. There is already a reference at the end of the main article to a story in The Walrus called "Living on Nut Island" about an Ontario Provincial Police Tactical and Rescue Unit that is titled and built around the term. The story was a 2007 Canadian National Magazine Award nominee. Sswonk (talk) 17:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to those examples, there is a 2002 HBS Press textbook [4], Harvard Business Review on Culture and Change, which is the source of a number of the Google hits since it includes the essay. As this book gains circulation (understanding the WP:CRYSTAL implications) the term likely will as well. In fact, it may be the indirect reason for any one of the examples given on the talk page. Sswonk (talk) 17:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hm. I still need to think about this more, but my strongest instinct right now is similar to what I said above: retitle the article to 'Nut Island incident' or something like that, make it an article mainly about the incident, and then include a section called "Impact" or "Legacy" or whatever to document the more recent incidents that have been compared to it, other appearances of the term "Nut Island effect", how Levy has used it as an example of corporate teamwork/etc., yada yada. That seems the best option right now, but I still need to think on it. I have considered taking it to AfD not so much to get it deleted as to get more opinions, but to be honest I'm a little wary of that...I think I'd just get a swarm of "Delete - neologism" and "Keep - notable" votes and little real input. This is a tough one... rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 20:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
While I appreciate the advice and the thoughtfulness you have applied, I'm afraid you're missing the point of the article. There is no one "incident", neither in the case of Boston Harbor nor in the cited examples of subsequent occurrences of the phrase. It looks as though the single 4-day release of raw sewage has dominated the story for you. That incident by itself may be a little notable but I can't see an entire article about it entitled "Nut Island incident". The Nut Island effect, and the article I created about it, defines a type of degradation over time in human resources communications. The man who directed the cleanup of Boston Harbor recognized the effect, which took several years to develop in the case of Nut Island. He knew the people, political atmosphere and physical conditions that fostered the breakdown in communications and process control that led to years of faulty management and large failures for days at a time of the plant to successfully treat sewage. The four-day release is but the exclamation point to the history of MDC's handling of sewage treatment, and Nut Island happens to be the treatment and dispersal point where it was brought to bear. Quincy's lawsuit, filed in 1982, was a complaint filed on the grounds of many months of Clean Water Act violations, not just the one four-day release which had occurred nearly seven years before.[5] Levy recognized that the factors in play at MDC exist in a wide array of business environments and that using the well-known Boston Harbor pollution story would draw attention to his discovery of the effect and dramatize it. The publication of his ideas raised the attention of other analysts, such as the ones so far quoted who have used the term to describe other real and generalized complex situations. The textbook mentioned was published in 2002 and is still published and sold worldwide. Your comments about AfD are insightful, and I think this DYK discussion has gone pretty far to establish more than just a "drive-by" look at the essay and general analytic term that is also the title. But again I stress the article is about the effect and the published piece, and both of those are about a slow-developing complex human resources problem, not a single incident. Sswonk (talk) 23:40, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think it might be time to get some other opinions in here; we seem to be hitting an impasse. I don't necessarily want to post a message at WT:DYK, though, since the problem here isn't an issue of whether or not it's DYK-eligible, it's just a more general issue of what the article should be. Do you know if there's a suitable, active WikiProject where we could ask for some outside opinions? rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 02:23, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I would rather withdraw the nomination than go down that path. Thank you for your valuable input. Sswonk (talk) 03:38, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pete Milne

Created by Dewelar (talk). Self nom at 15:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Great hook for an interesting article, but it only has 641 characters of prose, short of the required 1,500. It's always possible to add material about the rest of his career in the prose to expand it to meet the minimum. Let me know on my talk page if I can help. Alansohn (talk) 01:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for catching that. I forgot to discount the size of the infobox. I will fix it. -Dewelar (talk) 03:22, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've added about 2K of prose, detailing Milne's career in the minors and majors. That should address the issue above. -Dewelar (talk) 03:39, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the expansion you've made of the article and some sources I've added, the article meets the minimum size and the hook is properly sourced. Alansohn (talk) 02:02, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Capitulations of Santa Fe

Created by Brandmeister (talk). Self nom at 14:04, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coral Gardens and their Magic

Created by Gonzonoir (talk). Self nom at 13:41, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1985 Turkish embassy attack in Ottawa

Created by Chippolona (talk). Self nom at 09:57, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Check out the reference that I just added to the article. I think you will find a more interesting hook in there. Possibly a mention that by confronting them he stalled them and allowed the ambassador to escape? Jolly Ω Janner 19:38, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1998 Music City Bowl

5x expanded by JKBrooks85 (talk). Self nom at 04:58, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Freddy Awards

Created by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self nom at 03:22, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dasavathaaram

Created by World Cinema Writer (talk). Self nom at 03:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Politico's Guide to the History of British Political Parties

Created by Cirt (talk). Self nom at 02:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 10

Board and path showing part of the Dollis Valley Green Walk

Created by Grim23 (talk). Nominated by Simply south (talk) at 22:01, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alt... that the Dollis Valley Greenwalk, a local long distance footpath linking Barnet and the Hampstead Garden Suburb, is one of ten parks and open spaces in the London Borough of Barnet to receive a £400,000 grant to improve its quality and safety?

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum shooting

  • Comment: Reasoning for three authors: Historicist started the article. AlbertHerring added the images and has made the second highest amount of edits. I, AgnosticPreachersKid, am nominating the article and have made the highest amount of edits.

Created by Historicist (talk), AgnosticPreachersKid (talk), AlbertHerring (talk). Self nom at 13:57, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably better suited to In The News, no? —Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:05, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(EDIT CONFLICT) Why is this being proposed for DYK? It's an obvious candidate for ITN. Has the article been rejected from ITN? If it stays here, I recommend a rearrangement of the hook to make the link to the DYK article more prominent:
--Orlady (talk) 14:11, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Reply to AD and Orlady - Because the ITN crowd doesn't think it's newsworthy. It's probably too "American-centric" or some crap like that. APK lives in a very, very Mad World 14:24, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
p.s. I like Orlady's hook much better. APK lives in a very, very Mad World 14:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zach Bonner, Little Red Wagon Foundation

Created by Cunard (talk). Self nom at 19:22, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jacques Brotchi

Created by Fram (talk). Self nom at 13:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by A Nobody (talk) and SatuSuro (talk). Self nom at 12:13, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I guess this sounds much better. Tymek (talk) 18:42, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(joint-nom, expanded by Cargoking and --candlewicke 00:41, 11 June 2009 (UTC) )[reply]

(joint-nom, new article created by Cargoking and expanded by --candlewicke 00:41, 11 June 2009 (UTC) )[reply]

  • I'm sorry, but yet again I see a problem with the hook here. It comes out of nowhere and it's voiced as if anybody would know who Cathal Mac Coille is - no mention of his nationality and what he does for a living, which would explain the context. Paradoxically, it does explain who Larry King is, even though I'm sure more people are bound to know that (I'm not saying we shouldn't explain that, but that we should explain both). What's more: how exactly is it automatically relevant that he had breakfast with another broadcaster? I'm sure people do that all the time, and, prima facie, this goes into a level of the trivial that we expect from tabloids. On one hand, it looks like he's supposed to be well-known; on the other, it goes into parochial info (the "I'll never wash my hand" kind). Btw, there is something more intriguing in that info, once you follow the details: I checked the source (the article doesn't go into this kind of detail); note how it mentions the incident as supposedly indicative of RTÉ's liberal bias (before you ask: I find that comment stupid, but interesting). A mention of that objection would, I guess, make for a more interesting hook, provided it's also mentioned in the article. Dahn (talk) 10:56, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sigh (again), will it hinder anyone to click? The chances are that anyone who takes the smallest bit of notice of the hook will want to find out more anyway and will have to click to do that... the rest is just speculation on your behalf ("I'm sure" yet no source for anything close to people queueing up to breakfast with Larry King on Super Tuesday?), the hook is fact. --candlewicke 15:59, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would also appreciate if you informed me on my talk page of problems you have with my nominations. Especially if they've been approved already. I was just passing by and found that you'd made an objection to them all after approval. --candlewicke 16:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(joint-nom, new article created by Cargoking and expanded by --candlewicke 00:41, 11 June 2009 (UTC) )[reply]

United Methodist Hymnal

Created by TenPoundHammer (talk). Self nom at 22:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vidyalankar Institute of Technology

Created by Shravan.Iyer (talk). Self nom at 20:20, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Living for the Night

Created by TenPoundHammer (talk). Self nom at 19:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Size and date are fine, and the hook matches the source. The article meets notability because the song charted (couldn't resist). The only minor issue is that there was something added to the article stating that Strait wrote 4 songs for Ace in the Hole. But the following revision, adding the word "solo" should be fine though:

Booya (ship)

  • ... that almost 29 years after she went missing in Darwin Harbour during Cyclone Tracy, the Booya was discovered by accident in only 20 metres (66 ft) of water?

Created by Spy007au (talk). Self nom at 11:52, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date, reference (currently [4]) all OK. Hook tweaked by insertion of "almost". Mjroots (talk) 14:28, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Jayco, Inc

  • ... that Jayco, the largest privately held manufacturer of recreational vehicles (collapsible model pictured) in North America, has mostly Amish and Mennonite employees?

Created by Doug Coldwell (talk). Self nom at 11:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Amish (pictured)"?! How does the picture of an Amish man in Canada fit in with the hook? Does he even work for Jayco? I could see how the picture would fit in with a hook about a part of Amish dress codes that would be visible in the picture, but this... I mean, if you wrote a hook mentioning African Americans, would you add a random picture of a random African American man, for those of us who don't know what they might look like? Dahn (talk) 11:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Removed objectional picture of Amish man. Added instead a picture of one of their collapsible model campers.--Doug Coldwell talk 11:42, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Konrad Nielsen

Created by Punkmorten (talk). Self nom at 10:34, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Metcalfe House, Delhi

  • ... that in Christmas Eve party held in 1895 at the Metcalfe House, Delhi, unusual events of murder of an Englishman and a fire that ruined Metcalfe’s testimonials occurred; mystery shrouded both events?

Created by Nvvchar (talk). Self nom at 09:54, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

National Fresh Water Fishing Hall of Fame

Muskie sculpture at the National Fresh Water Fishing Hall of Fame

Created by Royalbroil (talk). Self nom at 04:40, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That would work, but I was thinking more along the lines of: ... (ALT2) that the National Fresh Water Fishing Hall of Fame is home to the world's largest muskie sculpture (pictured)?Juliancolton | Talk 16:49, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Need to disam muskie to muskellunge. – ukexpat (talk) 19:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent comments, everyone. It's a sculpture, as you have indicated. I prefer ALT2 because its clear and concise. Thanks for the help! Royalbroil 04:08, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2.5x expanded by Jeremy (talk). Nominated by Jeremy (talk) at 04:36, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You know, I've only started doing this as of late, and I may be wrong, but this doesn't look like it was five-fold expanded between Alison9's April 21st edit and the most recent edit. I'm leaving this to another editor to decide. Hurricane Angel Saki (talk) 22:56, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hurricane Angel Saki is correct. The article isn't "new" as described at WP:Did you know/Article. 8056/3360=2.4x, not 5x, so the article would need about twice as much prose to qualify, although there is still time to add more. Hurricane Angel Saki may want to read WP:Did you know/DYKcheck. Art LaPella (talk) 23:49, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know where the 5x came from, I just used the template for expansion. The article has more than doubled in size within the last week due to his death, so 2.4x would be correct. Does it have to be 5x to qualify? this is my first one. --Jeremy (blah blah) 02:36, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. The rules for the article are summarized at WP:Did you know/Article; for more details, click the links. Notice the phrase "... At least 80% of the article must be new (five days old or less) ... ". 80% new and five-fold expansion are mathematically equivalent. Art LaPella (talk) 19:19, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again (Yui song)

  • ... that Japanese pop rock singer Yui's "Again" has the highest opening week sales for a female act in 2009?

5x expanded by Moon-sunrise (talk). Self nom at 03:19, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollercoaster (Phineas and Ferb)

Created/expanded by SuperFlash101 (talk). Self nom at 02:25, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nothing technically wrote with it, but can we get a better source than the show itself? Also, other references need to be formatted correctly. Fairly interesting hook, though. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:12, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I can find the other source than the DVD extra easily, but what refs need formatting and how? The Flash {talk} 04:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Added the other source and formatted refs. The Flash {talk} 14:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. The Flash {talk} 17:02, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cite 11, if that's the one you're referencing, doesn't back up the hook. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 20:45, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fixing it. Though, question, why isn't the DVD clip of the pitch reliable enough on it's own? The Flash {talk} 23:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, unfortunately, other than the DVD showing of the clip itself, there's no known other source for the hook. Therefore, I'll give this ALT if this one's not okay: "... that it took 16 years for the pilot of Phineas and Ferb to be picked up?" It's the new ref 11. The Flash {talk} 00:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
16-year hook checks out. As for your question, secondary sources are preferred for hooks, and the DVD is a primary source. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 00:42, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, thanks for letting me know, I'll have to remember that for the future. Also, thanks! The Flash {talk} 01:06, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 9

Lucas Welfare Cost of Fluctuations

  • Comment: There are very few economics/science/math related DYKs as most of them are on People and Places. This is an attempt to redress that to some extent. I realize that the article is somewhat technical but with some concepts that's unavoidable.

Created/expanded by Radeksz (talk). Self nom at 08:04, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops, sorry about that.radek (talk) 22:27, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Annales laureshamenses

Created by Srnec (talk). Self nom at 04:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Shevlin

  • ... that four-time All-American football end and millionaire lumberman Tom Shevlin (pictured) died of pneumonia after contracting a cold while training the Yale football team?

5x expanded by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 01:30, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baron Vaea

5x expanded by Scanlan (talk). Self nom at 14:37, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Lovebugs (band)

  • ... that three albums by the Swiss band Lovebugs has been on the top of the Swiss charter list?

5x expanded by Highest Heights (talk). Self nom at 10:13, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well, i am pretty unsure how to do when adding sources. I translated the german article and added some more info. But the german wiki does not have any references. And if the references for all text is hitparade.ch (a swiss musicsite that i have come across as a possible source) and de.wp, schould i put the same sources after every sentence again and again and again? Could someone please help me? Highest Heights (talk) 22:43, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Debo Hacerlo

Created by Jaespinoza (talk) 02:35, 13 June 2009 (UTC). Self nom at 02:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fight Like Apes at Oxegen 2008

(self-nom, 5x expanded by --candlewicke 00:14, 13 June 2009 (UTC) )[reply]

Tomb of Hafez

The current pavilion over Hafez's tomb

  • ... that a shrine in Shiraz over the tomb (pictured) of the famed Persian poet Hafez was pulled down in 1899 by protesters, because it was being built by a Zoroastrian?
  • Comment: This is a former redirect, turned into an article on June 9. If you prefer another picture, there are several available, both in the article and at Commons:Category:Tomb of Hafez

Created by Maedin (talk). Self nom at 22:18, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

William F. Hyland

Created by Offenbach (talk). Self nom at 02:25, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Green Dam Youth Escort

Created by Wiki alf (talk). Self nom at 23:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I checked with a couple of English lecturers who believe the "a" is not required, should be ok as stands.--Alf melmac 03:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

La Dauphine

Created by Ekem (talk). Self nom at 19:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stannard Rock Light

  • ... that the Stannard Rock Light (pictured) known as the “Loneliest Place in the World” is the furthest lighthouse from land and in the top 10 engineering feats in the United States?

Created by Wpwatchdog (talk). Self nom at 18:26, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External cardinal

Created by CarlosPn (talk). Self nom at 11:53, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kohno Michisei

Self-Portrait, 1917, by Kohno Michisei

--> Created by AlbertHerring (talk). Self nom at 02:25, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

United States House Permanent Select Committee on Aging

Created by Wasted Time R (talk). Self nom at 00:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fun Little Movies

5x expanded by MichaelQSchmidt (talk). Self nom at 23:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mill Colonnade

Mill Colonnade

Created by Bobak (talk). Self nom at 23:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas S. Rodgers

Created by Jrt989 (talk). Self nom at 23:29, 9 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Chrysler SERV

5x expanded by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self nom at 23:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Camber thrust

  • ... that camber thrust contributes to the ability of bicycles and motorcycles to negotiate a turn with the same radius as automobiles but with a smaller steering angle?

Created by AndrewDressel (talk) Self nom at 20:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Geography of Michigan

  • ... ... that in Michigan, no one is more than 6 miles (9.7 km) from any lake?

Created by Permethius (talk). Self nom at 16:32, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is a pretty dull hook IMO, and I'd go so far as to say nearly everybody in the Northeast United States already knows this. Can you find a more interesting bit of info? Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 21:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ah no, this is fine. Think of those who are not from the US and may have heard of Michigan or know the three lakes but never connected the two. It certainly won't be obvious to every European or non-US readers from wherever... --candlewicke 21:58, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's still pretty boring. It essentially says that Michigan has lakes...well, big whoop, most states or provinces have lakes, and that's the sort of thing you'd expect to find in an article about geography. On a side note, the hook is not even well-written...first of all, "geography includes lakes" is not really normal English (geography is an abstract thing, it doesn't "include" physical things like rocks and lakes), and secondly the period after "great lakes" (which I have now removed) was wrong and suggested that there are only three great lakes. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 22:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I think you'll find there are many countries where one lake is a novelty... also is the DYK tag on the talk page a mistake? If not, DYK has already featured it today... --candlewicke 22:04, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's a mistake; the creator probably made the page by copy-pasting another article's talk page. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 22:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And, by the way, regardless of the novelty of the lakes, this is a boring hook fair and square. Let's pretend this was a bio instead. Lots of people have kids but, of course, lots also don't. Does that mean it would be interesting for me to write a hook saying " ... that Joe Schmo has 3 children?" Absolutely not. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 22:09, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also, what happened to Lake Erie? I thought the state of Michigan took pride in bordering four of the Great Lakes, not just three of them. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:20, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I was surprised it took as many observations of this proposed hook to point out the missing Great Lake. I have a few suggestions for alternate hooks:
  • ALT1... that in Michigan (map picured) no one is more than 85 miles (137 km) from one of the Great Lakes?
  • ALT2... that there over 11,000 inland lakes in Michigan?
Imzadi1979 (talk) 05:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • There, now those are much more interesting hooks (and possibly even better would be slight varation of ALT1, pointing out that no one is more than 6 miles from any lake). I'm not sure the source for ALT1 is reliable, unfortunately, but at least we're on the right track. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 12:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, if I change it to ALT2 would it make it? I've made the article into more sections, to make more easily accessible too.--Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ Hit Me!Sign Here! 13:20, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2 is sourced to the same website as ALT1. I will leave a message at the reliable sources noticeboard to see what they have to say. If they do say it's reliable, I would probably choose ALT1, which I think is more interesting than ALT2. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 13:24, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Same here, I would want ALT1 over 2 , much more interesting.--Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ Hit Me!Sign Here! 13:34, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ALT3: ... that in Michigan, no one is more than 6 miles (9.7 km) from any lake? rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 15:05, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ALT3 verified, length and history good, RS/N says the source is ok for DYK purposes. I personally would not use the map picture, but maps have been used before so the person promoting this hook to the queue may choose.
The article is not the best article DYK has ever seen and most of it is still not sourced with inline citations, but I am feeling generous for now and pass it; if you have any intentions to work on the article further, though, sourcing is a top priority. And please do not remove the {{refimprove}} tag again, or this article might not be promoted after all. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 15:05, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, moving ALT3 to the hook. --Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ Hit Me!Sign Here! 15:55, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The hook is now more interesting, but I'm really not comfortable putting an article with maintenance tags on the main page. –Juliancolton | Talk 16:52, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I won't be offended if you oppose promoting the article. In my short time here I have rejected lots of articles for having {{refimprove}} on them. It's always a somewhat controversial issue (some people believe DYKs shouldn't have to be "mini-GAs" and they should be promoted as long as the hook fact has a reference, regardless of the rest; other people believe the standards need to keep going up), but on this particular article I feel pretty ambivalent. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 19:33, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest that the hook be changed to "... more than 6 mile from a lake", rather than "... from any lake" which has a different, and in this case incorrect meaning (that every lake is within 6 miles of every point of the state). --TachyonJack (talk) 00:47, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pathophysiology of hypertension

Created by Madhero88 (talk). Self nom at 16:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Older nominations

Articles created/expanded on June 8

Hockley Valley Provincial Nature Reserve

Created by Óðinn (talk). Self nom at 22:48, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ritland crater

Created by Oceanh (talk). Self nom at 16:07, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of tombs of antipopes

Santa Maria in Trastevere

5x expanded by Savidan (talk). Self nom at 17:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wawffactor

Created by Cymru82 (talk). Self nom at 14:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro Espada, Jr., 2009 New York State Senate Leadership Crisis

5x expanded by Alansohn (talk). Self nom at 01:52, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cunt (video game)

  • ... that players in the Flash game Cunt take control of a penis that shoots semen at an enemy vagina?
  • Comment: I am not making this up.

Created by Someone another (talk). Nominated by MuZemike (talk) at 00:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Funny, yes, but I'm not sure if it's appropriate for the main page. Tamer things have been kept off in the past. I'm not personally taking a position, but i'm going to leave a note at WT:DYK all the same, just to see what others think. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 01:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Absolutely not, Chzz. There may not be a specific policy, but there is massive consensus against clearly no consensus for promoting it, and you are violating that by putting {{DYKtick}} here. Wikipedia works by consensus, not by blindly following policies. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 12:40, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The policies have been agreed through consensus - in this case, specifically, the WP:NOTCENSORED policy. If you think that a policy needs to change, or that additional constraints on the use of language are required, then we should discuss that in the appropriate places. I always abide by the consensus, and I don't believe that I have violated anything - on this page, it says, "Any editor who was not involved in writing/expanding or nominating an article may review it", etc. If you feel that I have acted inappropriately, then I would welcome elucidation.  Chzz  ►  18:36, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't edit your comment, I removed an incorrect verification tag. None of the substance of your comment was changed. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 19:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(ec) I actually do that a lot myself, as it avoids confusion when putting queues together.--Giants27 (t|c|r|s) 19:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The tag was certainly a part of the substance of my comment, and the assertion that it was incorrect is your opinion; I similarly consider that your 'delete' tag is incorrect - so should I remove that?  Chzz  ►  20:56, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, remove it, I don't care. It is inappropriate of you to put up a {{DYKtick}} tag when there are clearly so many people objecting to it, and you've been here long enough to know that. I'm tired of listening to this WikiLawyering and I'm done commenting here; there's not much for me to say anyway, I can just sit back and watch consensus do its thing. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 21:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Two wrongs do not make a right; therefore I will not remove it. I apologise for saying, 'should I remove that?' - it was inappropriate. I resent the accusation of Wikilawyering; I am a firm believer in the process of consensus and common sense overruling policy.  Chzz  ►  03:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I saw this mentioned elsewhere. Are any of the sources in the article reliable? They all look like blogs to me. Gimmetrow 11:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Damian Sims, Fred Reid (Canadian football)

5x expanded by Giants27 (talk). Self nom at 23:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Lawson (actress)

Created by David Straub (talk). Self nom at 18:46, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Electrolux addisoni

5x expanded by Smartse (talk). Self nom at 15:10, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tăng Tuyết Minh

Created by Kauffner (talk). Self nom at 12:28, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How about: ... that Vietnamese leader Ho Chi Minh was married to a Chinese woman named Tang Tuyet Minh? That doesn't really explain why she is significant, but it's brief and factual. Kauffner (talk) 10:18, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What's wrong with Ironholds' first suggestion, that her marriage to Ho was never acknowledged by the government? It's not cited in the article yet, but I'm sure that claim is in several of your sources, so it would be easy to cite (both in the introduction, and by adding a sentence in the final paragraph). rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 13:14, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 7

Fluxus 1

Created by Franciselliott (talk). Nominated by M.K (talk) at 08:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Elmendorph Inn

Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self nom at 04:42, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John W. Wescott

Created by Offenbach (talk). Self nom at 02:36, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valley Entertainment

  • I have often removed a presumably accidental space before the question mark according to I8, but "&nbsp;?" must have been deliberate. On my monitor, that combination removes the top of the "l" in "Evil", making it look like a dotless "i". Art LaPella (talk) 02:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Ekans (talk). Self nom at 20:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Novus Magnificat

Created by Ekans (talk). Self nom at 16:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heinz Award

Created by Sophus Bie (talk). Self nom at 07:52, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Village Diner

Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self nom at 01:37, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The woman who would be president

  • Most of the "personal life" section is single-sourced to a gossip column apparently interviewing the subject about pop culture likes and dislikes. It's almost pure trivia and, for one of Ireland's leading journalists, fairly insulting to include a sentence starting "Wilson has read several books". Also, the hook is not about her, just a quote about the subject of a book by a third person that she happened to be reading at that moment. Even if the trivia is not removed from the article (which it quite likely should be) surely there's something interesting about one of Ireland's leading journalists that is actually about her that can be said here. - Dravecky (talk) 05:20, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pauline Rita

5x expanded by Tim riley (talk), Ssilvers (talk). Self nom at 19:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Lenght and date ok. I see one of the article's claims are questioned in embedded cmts. Can this be resolved pls. Hook verified, though its a little underwhelming. Otherwise, the article is v good. Ceoil (talk) 21:23, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Many claims are backed by articles which have not been titled. Can you provide. Ceoil (talk) 21:26, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, I'm afraid those newspapers and journals did not title reviews in those days. Sometimes there would be a heading like "Theatres" or "At the Savoy", but Tim always puts complete information there when it's available, so there was no title. Feel free to alter the hook if you like a different aspect of the article. -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:51, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Church of St. Polyeuctus

5x expanded by Cplakidas (talk). Self nom at 17:46, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Strange (English politician)

Honewort

Created by SP-KP (talk). Self nom at 09:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Velocette MAC (WD)

Created by Thruxton (talk). Self nom at 08:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Some sentences are uncomfortably close to the source. For example,
Article: By 1941 a more specialised version, the 350cc MAF (which stood for 'Armed Forces') was developed by Phil Irving and supplied with a strengthened frame, front fork improvements, revised cam profiles and a lower bottom gear.
Source: By 1941 a more specialised machine, the 350cc MAF (Armed Forces) was supplied with a stronger frame, front fork refinements, revised cam profiles and a lower bottom gear. Shubinator (talk) 22:45, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Blavet

Created by PHG (talk). Self nom at 07:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coronation Park, Delhi

5x expanded by Nvvchar (talk). Self nom at 05:22, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • 1) This hook is quite a jumble, I could barely understand what it was trying to say. 2) What's so "quirky" about the fact that the king statue is opposite the obelisk? Maybe there's some historical irony there or something, but it's certainly not something I am aware of, and the hook doesn't provide any clues. 3) I presume "King George V" should be piped to George V of the United Kingdom? King George V is a disambiguation page. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 05:41, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Statue of King George V was earlier located under a canopy infront of India Gate during British rule and after India's independence it was removed, like many other statues of Britsh Monarchs and officials to this desolate park where the three Durbars had been held in the past. The quirky part is that the statue is located opposite to the Obelsik, which was erected at the very spot where King George V had held his Durbar in 1911. I would appreciate if you could reword the hook.Thank you.--Nvvchar (talk) 07:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK. I am suggesting the following three Alternate Hooks (but in the count, the characters of 'that' , 'Pictured' and also part of dismabguation word has been excluded). I hope all hooks are within limit of 200ch.--Nvvchar (talk) 05:48, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Alt 3 }--- that in the Durbar held in 1911 by King George V (pictured) at Coronation Park, Delhi, expenses sanctioned on celebrations and army parade amounted to 900000 pounds
It seems that all hooks have issues with punctuation, format and even grammar. The first alt, I'm guessing, should read: "... that the Durbar held by Emperor of India George V (pictured) at the Coronation Park was a premeditated decision to give importance to Delhi's past history?" (I tuned it a bit, squeezed in more necessary links, and fixed the subjective and peacocky assertion of "glorious history"). The second: "... that in the Durbar held in 1911 at Coronation Park, Delhi, Emperor of India George V (pictured) declared that the British Raj's capital would be shifted from Calcutta to Delhi?" (that's were the links should lead). The third: "... that in the Durbar held in 1911 by Emperor of India George V (pictured) at Coronation Park, Delhi, expenses sanctioned on celebrations and army parade amounted to 900,000 pounds?" And lastly: "... that Coronation Park, Delhi, which was the venue for the coronation of three British Emperors of India, has now become a resting place for the statues of British monarchs?" (corrected the messy punctuation). Though it would be simpler and better-looking to just say: "... that Delhi's Coronation Park, where three British Emperors of India were crowned, has become a resting place for the statues of British monarchs?" Dahn (talk) 20:48, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the suggestions. While the tweaked and bolded alternative hooks suggested by User:Dahn are fine with me, the last preferred suggested has an issue since only British Monarch (King George V) held the Durbar in 1911 while the previous two Durbars were presided by then Governor Generals of India. I hope User:Rjanag likes any one of the three suggested now.--Nvvchar (talk) 08:49, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • (out) References and expansion check out, but I am only verifying this conditionally for now: the article is still sorely in need of a copyedit, mainly to correct improper capitalization and awkward English. Please find an editor willing to do a full copyedit. I know normally we do not need to require DYKs to be "mini-GAs", but if the problems are serious enough I do like to require a full copyedit before promoting. Also, I should mention that the article is pretty disorganized and confusing (it took me 10 minutes of searching just to find explicit mention of what the Durbar was for and that it celebrated the shifting of the capital...also, there seem to be multiple Durbars that took place throughout history, and you don't distinguish well between them, so it's difficult to always know which one you're talking about); the History section seems to jump around the timeline, and in particular the first paragraph of it is more analysis than history. That is not a problem for DYK, but in the future I strongly recomment that you work on cleaning up the organization of the article and making it flow more coherently.
  • Because so many similar hooks have been proposed, and all have needed to be copyedited, I am going to choose right now which hook to use, and what form it should be in:
That final suggestion links "Delhi" twice (WP:OVERLINK). Might I suggest delinking the second, or dropping it altogether (i.e.: "from Calcutta -full stop")? Fixed. Dahn (talk) 15:19, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oops; I thought I had delinked the second, guess I missed it. I decided not to drop it because, when dropped, it's not quite clear where the capital was shifted to (you can assume Delhi, but you can't be sure). I couldn't think of any better rewording that avoids saying Delhi twice. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 15:21, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. And I should add that I fully agree with your comments on the article. Dahn (talk) 15:23, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 6

Five wits

  • ... that in Medieval times it was commonly believed that there were five "outward" wits (i.e. the five senses) as well as five "inward" wits?

5x expanded by Uncle G (talk). Nominated by ThaddeusB (talk) at 19:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saved from AfD and massively expanded by Uncle G. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Undulus asperatus

Created by Wikidemon (talk). Nominated by Runningonbrains (talk) at 20:27, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Papal selection before 1059

Created by Savidan (talk). Self nom at 15:43, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kája Saudek

Created by Vejvančický (talk). Self nom at 08:28, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Herman "Wimpy" Jones

Created/expanded by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 03:20, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Bass

5x expanded by Frank (talk). Nominated by Moonriddengirl (talk) at 00:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I discussed this with Moonriddengirl here and am therefore putting her as nominator for coming up with the original hook.  Frank  |  talk  00:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

L.D. Knox

  • ... that in 1979 L.D. Knox of Winnsboro, Louisiana, had his name legally changed to "None of the Above" Knox to dramatize the lack of voter choices on his state's ballot?

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 15:00, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

E.D. Gleason

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 14:47, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Makinti Napanangka

Created by Hamiltonstone (talk). Self nom at 12:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

St. Paul's (Zion's) Evangelical Lutheran Church

Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self nom at 05:55, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • First, the article says the word in question was "homogeneous". Second, the articles does not state that she was involved in "an on-air disagreement" of any sort, merely that during the time that she was hosting the show that an author questioned the accuracy of a newspaper over the spelling of "homogeneous" versus "homogenous". So the hook is wrong on several points and cannot possibly pass as written. Indeed, that whole section about the spelling incident might belong in the show's article but not her biography, as it is written and referenced. - Dravecky (talk) 05:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of festivals in Nepal

  • ... that during the Tihar festival in Nepal, cows are celebrated due to the Hindu belief that they are surrogate mothers to the human race by providing milk?

Created by Dr. Blofeld (talk). Self nom at 15:07, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • passes, but I worry that the hook doesn't really reflect the article itself. Can anyone more experienced than myself comment on whether this is normally appropriate? Ironholds (talk) 22:12, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Odd question. The article is about a diversity of festivals celebrated in Nepal. Each festival is different so I don't know what you mean about not reflecting the article. It is a fact from a festival which is covered in the article. Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:02, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's covered, but it isn't the subject. It would be like me writing a hook on Privity in English law for the article on English contract law - yes, it's covered in the article, but it isn't the subject. Ironholds (talk) 00:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ss. Michael and Gabriel Church, Satu Mare

Created by Mario1987 (talk). Self nom at 08:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the Cazania lui Varlaam link leads nowhere, it was created as a redirect to a locality for some mysterious purpose, and it should probably not be an article on its own. Also, book titles are rendered in italics. What's more, "one of the oldest books in the country" is an ambiguity or absurdity, and it is not itself a fact verified by the source. Romania hosts very old books, including a 9th century Codex Aureus. While it is not an autochtonous product, it is quite clearly much older than the Varlaam homily. Books have been written in what is now Romania (but, nb, not in Romanian) from the high middle ages (in Transylvania) and from the Renaissance period elsewhere, and print was adopted within a century of its invention - i.e. more than 100 years before Varlaam. Even books in Romanian (which is clearly not what the hook refers to) had been in print for several decades before Varlaaam's homily. The hook in this form is therefore unsustainable. What's more, while Varlaam's book is a valuable collector's item, its presence in a book collection is probably not interesting in itself.
Without doing the job of referencing this article (which, before I edited it, even failed to specify what denomination the church belongs to), I note that an alternative hook can be drawn from the fact that this was one of the churches restored into Greek-Catholic possession after they were assigned to the Orthodox Church. This is however only alluded to in the source used for the text, and, although factual, would require a second source stating the circumstances of this. It did receive coverage in the press (and extra exposure for being the location of street battles between the two communities), so this shouldn't be hard to pick up if someone is more interested.
And, btw, the church is not a mere church, it is a cathedral, and one may wish to change the title accordingly. Dahn (talk) 19:58, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also note the distinct and intuitive possibility that all those objects are no longer part of the cathedral collection: since they are Orthodox items and transferred during the period of Orthodox administration, it may be entirely possible that they have been moved out of the building after the Greek Catholics won it back in court. The article as is only uses one source (by all means an imperfect one - it is non-academic and rather generic, itself glossing over some essential issues); that source tells us about the objects, but it may be reliant on very old info. Dahn (talk) 19:53, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 5

Joseph Cheesman Thompson

Global Forum for Health Research

  • Comment: Been distracted by real life, just logging this one before the bell. I plan to whip 10/90 gap into shape as well so would be grateful if this could hang around for a couple of days. Ta! I'll also have a think about the wording of the hook - there's an interesting fact to properly tease out...

Created by Bigger digger (talk). Self nom at 22:05, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Is the converse also true? To me, "90% of medical research spending is applicable to diseases that constitute only 10% of existing health problems" is a bit more striking than saying it the other way around (which I had to think for a moment to wrap my head around). rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 22:09, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Human rights in Estonia

5x expanded by (primarily) users Offliner Peltimikko, Vecrumba and Martintg. Nominated by Piotrus (talk) at 10:24, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clancee Pearce

Created by The-Pope (talk). Self nom at 13:15, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

J. Frank Colbert

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 14:41, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

C.W. Thompson

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 14:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OR ... that Louisiana State Representative C.W. Thompson, who served from 1944 to 1951, was a former president of the Webster Parish School Board and the Louisiana School Boards Association?

Krystyna Dańko

Otwock 1942. Jews await transport to Treblinka

Created by Poeticbent (talk). Self nom at 03:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure what you mean. The length of the hook is well within guidelines at around 178 characters. And, the clandestine photograph of historic value is the only visual record in existence of Otwock deportations. It might not be colorful, but it conveys a message. --Poeticbent talk 18:10, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I find the picture moving, and I'd like to see it get the featured spot. Gatoclass (talk) 13:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't say the photo was bad, just that it's not very useful for a DYK hook. It's still fine to have in the article.
As for the hook, yes, now that I look at it it is under the 200-character absolute limit. I guess it just subjectively looked long to me—regardless of the character count, it is a somewhat complicated mouthful. It could probably be trimmed. `rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 20:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Length and history verified; foreign-language source taken on good faith. Hook shortened. Awadewit (talk) 02:08, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Juggernauts (song)

Created by 03md (talk). Self nom at 23:00, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • passes, but there was a previous article in that location that was blanked and turned into a redirect. Taking that into account would take this article out of the race, since it wouldn't pass the five-fold expansion requirement. Anyone more experienced know what we normally do in this sort of circumstance? Ironholds (talk) 22:53, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Mail Case

    • This looks basically OK, but the hook phrase "overreported its profit by around £1 million" seems to be an editor's interpretation of the information in the article which I could not quite tie to the text and refs. hamiltonstone (talk) 02:12, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Antonio Zea

Created by Mijotoba (talk). Self nom at 00:03, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 4

Diane Dietz

Created by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 21:04, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Newsjack

Created by ISD (talk). Self nom at 19:25, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The new source just has a list of episodes. The site does not seem reliable, and even says at the bottom We are just providing information, which we hope fans will find useful. We cannot vouch for the user experience provided by external sites. Also, some of the content in the article does not seem encyclopedic, like the "Submitting material" section: material for the "Your voice" section can be sent in as later at the Tuesday before the next broadcast at 17:00. (I'm talking about content here, not the lack of a copyedit, though that's apparent too.) Shubinator (talk) 00:36, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Jack Merridew (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 09:57, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The hook is somewhat awkwardly written and needs to be cleaned up. I would suggest just dropping the restaurant names and going with
Er, yeah, although I think the tag has merit I suspect a recipe with bacon is not going to feature in many parts of the world. I'll see what I can do. Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfD closed as keep. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 08:59, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roger and Out

Created by Lost Fugitive (talk). Self nom at 23:37, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article relies on one site, allmusic.com. Only one reference, the review, isn't a list of some sort. Also, there's only one reference for the prose of the article. While a lot of the information appears in the tables, some facts only appear in the lead and should be sourced. Shubinator (talk) 21:43, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aquí Estoy Yo

5x expanded by Jaespinoza (talk). Self nom at 22:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orthodoxy, Autocracy, and Nationality

quick source: page 133, second paragraph from the bottom

Golden Sun (series)

Created by Haha169 (talk). Self nom at 04:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 3

Allegations of antisemitism in the United Nations

Created by Jalapenos do exist (talk). Self nom at 21:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't think you're allowed to link the article with "claimed" the way you did. Perhaps an editor more experienced with DYK could point to the relevant guideline? — Jake Wartenberg 23:29, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Gatoclass: As recently manifested, you're clearly not neutral voice on Israel/Palestine articles. No offense. Please avoid opposing Jewish/Israel articles that are up for DYK nominations, especially on "POV" grounds. Leave it to other capable editors. Thanks,--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 15:10, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An article with a title like this is unlikely to have a neutral point of view. The subject could be covered more fairly in the article Israel, Palestinians, and the United Nations to avoid POV forking. Shubinator (talk) 15:25, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I was inclined to agree with Gatoclass and Shubinator, and have initiated a merge discussion on the relevant pages. hamiltonstone (talk) 05:21, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mack Supronowicz

Created by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 23:37, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, superlatives heaped upon a prospect are not unusual. How did he not bear that out? Daniel Case (talk) 16:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, he did turn out to be a terrific player (MVP of the Big Ten Conference in 1948) and has been inducted into the Univ. Mich. Hall of Honor. Pro basketball wasn't as desirable a career path in the 1940s as it later became, and college players from the 1940s typically aren't household names. That's why "Soup" Supronowicz deserves a little love by being featured on DYK. Cbl62 (talk) 00:26, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps we could list his achievements in the hook instead? I have no idea what "cage prospect" means. Awadewit (talk) 01:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sinéad O'Connor performing live in 2008
Sinéad O'Connor performing live in 2008
Neil Jordan met his dead father on an aeroplane
Neil Jordan met his dead father on an aeroplane
  • Do you mean the hooks themselves or is it just a matter of including the TV series. DYK is supposed to attract the reader's attention and leave them hungry for more... --candlewicke 02:49, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If we start linking generic stuff such as death and fixed-wing aircraft, we might as well link every word. "that Neil Jordan spoke of his stormy encounter with his dead father on an aeroplane on The Meaning of Life?"... But anyway, in this case I think the hook could be improved by somehow avoiding the "on... on..." structure and at least specifying who Neil Jordan is - profession and perhaps nationality. This hook reads like it was written for savvy Dubliners, and I'm a rather bland Bucharester. Dahn (talk) 02:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not a "savvy Dubliner" but again I apologise for my ignorance. Having previously thought Desperate Housewives was a well-known TV show internationally, I have to admit I thought the same of Jordan. But it isn't too much to add "director" (although those who are curious can click to find out who he is anyway) and the links can be decided/removed by those who post it if they find them to be too much. --candlewicke 15:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Huskies softball

Created by User:Mike Selinker. Self nom at 04:52, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Length, history and reference verified; but withholding passage until bare URLs are replaced with properly formatted references. Daniel Case (talk) 16:36, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done.--Mike Selinker (talk) 13:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tokyo Tokyo

  • Other issues include prose style, which I have tried to improve, a 'citation neeed' tag, and if non-notable non-referenced text were removed it would not be long enough. The hook is sound though... hamiltonstone (talk) 04:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's still pretty scanty, and I would be wary about promoting it in the current state. Much of the character count comes from long lists of dishes offered; the Dishes offered section is a lot wordier than it needs to be (for example, if the unnecessary "they come in the same packaging as their best-seller variants" were removed, it would be under 1500 characters). While the page technically is over 1500 characters, it looks short and feels short; 1500 characters is only a rough guideline anyway. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 23:32, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Wilhite

5x expanded by Giants27 (talk). Self nom at 02:12, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alt1... that after playing most of his senior season at nickel back, Jonathan Wilhite will return to playing that position in 2009? --Giants27 (t|c|r|s) 19:39, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, I like the first hook better. There are lots of people who don't know much about American football and don't know what a nickel back is. But if you say that a certain football player is a funny guy, at least that gives them something to latch onto in terms of wanting to read about his personality, whether or not they care what position he plays. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm with Metro90 - the hook hooked me, and I don't have an interest in sports entries in general and yup, I would have no idea what a nickel back is. The Alt hook is dull; the original has something... mind you, once i read the entry on the guy i thought "that was 60 seconds of my life I will never get back" :-) hamiltonstone (talk) 13:00, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 2

New Super Mario Bros. Wii

Created by RMThompson (talk). Nominated by MuZemike (talk) at 00:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The link for ref 4 is dead, and a large portion of the article is sourced to that ref. Also, do you have a more interesting hook? I think it's standard for console games to support multiplayer for 4. Shubinator (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Both those hooks sound somewhat like advertisements; the first ALT can be salvaged just by removing the "first" stuff. The second I think is without hope...also, it's not exactly accurate (I recall some of the games for original nintendo where you could play multiplayer in that weird sewer thing, and also Super Mario 3 had "multiplayer" turn-taking gameplay, so the distinction is more subtle than just being the first or not the first to have multiplayer). rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 23:33, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dana Delany viewed several thousand women race

  • She's that desperate, huh? Kidding aside, I don't think a hook placing her in the audience at an event involving at least 40,400 people makes for a good DYK. I mean, it could be used for just about anybody else in the attendance who happens to be notable (the article itself casually mentions four others, if I counted right). Is this really the only interesting fact from the article, or was this the only possible hook to come with a picture? Dahn (talk) 17:04, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nope, I just thought it would have a certain amount of international appeal as I believed (wrongly now it seems) that Desperate Housewives was a popular television show internationally and in the US where most of the readers are as well. I often discover these things at DYK, i.e. that certain people or items are not as popular as I thought or indeed are more popular on some occasions, I apologise for this being one of those unfortunate occasions. I thought it was quick, catchier, more DYK-like to include one rather than a list of minor Irish celebrities but if it is better to include a few then I have no problem with that at all. :) However, I don't see what is desperate at all about a notable woman (or any woman indeed) attending what is a major world event for women. --candlewicke 00:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just checked - I think those you were referring to were participants. Miss (or Mrs, perhaps? I suspect it doesn't matter anyway since she's not all that famous) Delany just stood on the sidelines watching... I never bothered to question why but there must be some attraction if she happened to be there on a Monday afternoon. --candlewicke 00:15, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, my bad about the participants vs. spectators bit. That said, I still think that her being a mere spectator, regardless of the notoriety, is not the best of hooks, but I'm really not imposing this view on anybody else. Per the passing mention in the source: "Dana Delany (51), who plays Katherine Mayfair in the US TV drama, was among the thousands of admiring spectators watching the hordes get ready yesterday for the 27th Flora Women's Mini-Marathon (emphasis mine)." (And, yes, I knew about the show, and you're right about it being well-known, including where I live.) "However, I don't see what is desperate at all about a notable woman (or any woman indeed) attending what is a major world event for women." - here I was just making a pun on the title of her show and how the hook sounds when read out loud, not a serious commentary about the event itself. Dahn (talk) 02:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the misunderstanding, I cannot find another verifiable and notable spectator though and thought it was more unusual for someone like her to simply watch when notable people seem to regularly participate. I also thought the theme fitted the overall ideals of DYK and would interest anyone reading. --candlewicke 10:22, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that this hook is not the best. Thousands of people watch marathons, especially one this size (edit: ok, so it's not a marathon, but still...even 10ks of this size have big audiences). Throwing in a random name of a woman who happened to be here seems, to me, just a step or two above needlessly talking about boobs just to get readers to click the hook—we want clicks, but not badly enough that we should whore ourself out. No offense meant to you as an editor, it's just that I don't like the hook proposal. This seems to be quite a major marathon race, there must be something else good to say about it. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 01:36, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1... that the Dublin Women's Mini Marathon is the largest women's mini marathon in the world? Awadewit (talk) 01:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Better, but I have some reservations. First of all, are you sure it's accurate? I can't access the Ireland.com source, but the Herald one only says it's the largest "event of its kind", not specifying what the criteria are for that. Also, is "mini marathon" a common term outside Europe? I've been running road races for six years in the US and I've never heard it, I had to look it up to see what it meant. I think "largest 10k" would be better, if that is accurate—again, we'd need to check the sources to see. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 01:47, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Association of Broadcasters of the Philippines

Created by TitanOne (talk). Self nom at 23:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've placed an alternative below which was sources through a major broadsheet news organization. Other sources exists but they are not in english. News articles are also available through the web. --TitanOne (talk) 00:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ALT: ... that the KBP advocates the 18 minutes of advertising per hour rule for Philippine TV stations?

The issue is that the article is largely sourced to the Association's own website. Can you find more of those news articles and bolster the citations a little? The problem is that the article currently largely states what the association says about itself. Awadewit (talk) 01:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tales of Monkey Island

Created by S@bre (talk). Self nom at 15:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 30

Malik Jackson

5x expanded by Giants27 (talk). Self nom at 20:40, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dull hook. Play football long enough and you will eventually recover a fumble; noting when it was doesn't make it any more interesting. If it was a game-winning touchdown, maybe. Daniel Case (talk) 16:12, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alt1 ... that Malik Jackson has played all defensive positions in his professional career? Not sure if that's better.--Giants27 (t|c|r|s) 18:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Five times expansion OK. Can't see a citation for the ALT hook. As a non-American, can I comment that this article is pretty much incomprehensible. That's life once one gets into technical things I guess. But to give a few examples: "two year starter"; "force fumbles"; "sacks and tackles for a loss"?? Even the word "sophomore" is not used at all in Australia or the UK (or perhaps other countries) and while I know it is to do with the year you are in at school, I have no idea which year. Not sure if there are any standards at WP for readability for these kinds of things, so I will leave it in the hands of other editors, but I also note a number of these terms are not wikilinked, so there isn't the opportunity to go elsewhere to find out what they mean. Cheers. hamiltonstone (talk) 23:47, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fixed all of the ones you mentioned on their first occurance or only occurance, and the alt hook in sourced in refs 3, 6 and 7 but only position by position.--Giants27 (t|c|r|s) 00:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks heaps - the links and rephrasing make it more comprehensible. Re the hook - I'd like other views on this, but since a reader (like me) wouldn't know what the defensive positions in this game are, even if i were to go one by one through the three refs to see he'd played these three positions, I wouldn't know that that was all the defensive positions. To work that out then is OR on my (the reader's) part. I just don't know whether this should be considered good enough, rather than finding a ref which says "he has played all defensive positions". Sorry if I'm being a pain. hamiltonstone (talk) 00:27, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • No problem I have to say if one person's not understanding it, probably a lot won't understand it, but I'm still of the belief that the original is the best option available.--Giants27 (t|c|r|s) 00:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This article is getting too old for DYK. --74.14.18.200 (talk) 19:32, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Article don't expire.--Giants27 (t|c) 20:24, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think 74.xxxxxx is just saying that we need to hurry along and take a definitive action on this article before it sits around much longer. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 20:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you can add a sentence in the article on defensive positions with a wikilink to American football#Defense? Also, please add a wikilink to American football somewhere in the hooks. Otherwise the article checks out. Shubinator (talk) 14:59, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alt2 ... that gridiron football player Malik Jackson has played at every defensive position in his professional career? Adds in the link for defensive positions and since he now plays canadian football I went with Gridiron football instead of American football.--Giants27 (t|c) 15:04, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(checked using User:Shubinator/DYKcheck) Alt2 good to go. Shubinator (talk) 15:11, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Special occasion holding area

Note: Articles nominated for a special occasion should be nominated within five days of creation or expansion as usual (with the exception of April Fools'). Also, articles should be nominated at least five days before the occasion to give reviewers time to check the nomination.

Articles created/expanded for the anniversary of the Stonewall riots (June 28)

List of pre-Stonewall LGBT actions in the United States

Created by Otto4711 (talk). Self nom at 19:48, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll accept the offline sources in good faith. The number of pre-Stonewall LGBT actions as described in the hook checks out (I could count 14), and the length looks good. I'll keep this tick up so someone can verify my check. I also think it should be held for June 28 as a double-feature. Hurricane Angel Saki (talk) 23:04, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See also