Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 3,674: Line 3,674:




====Daphne Oseña-Paez====
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
[[File:Daphne Oseña-Paez .jpg|100x100px|Filipina TV host Daphne Oseña-Paez|alt=Filipina TV host Daphne Oseña-Paez half shot wearing a white blouse.]]
</div><!--
-->
{{*mp}}... that Filipina TV host '''[[Daphne Oseña-Paez]]''' got her big break by waiting for a network executive in the [[ABS-CBN]] parking lot to show him a TV program that she filmed, shot, and edited herself?
<!--
-->
<small>Created by [[User:Noraft|Noraft]] ([[User talk:Noraft|talk]]). Self nom at 03:24, 4 June 2011 (UTC)</small>
<!--
*{{DYKmake|Daphne Oseña-Paez|Noraft}}
-->
:*<!--Make first comment here-->



{{-}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line.-->
ALT: ... that Filipina TV host '''[[Daphne Oseña-Paez]]''' was discovered after showing a program that she filmed, shot, and edited herself to a a network executive in the [[ABS-CBN]] parking lot?
Please note this article was moved from <big>[[User:Noraft|<font color="green">ɳorɑfʈ</font>]]</big><small><sup>[[User talk:Noraft| Talk!]]</sup></small>'s userspace on 6/4/11
====Chris Smith (footballer born 1981)====
====Chris Smith (footballer born 1981)====
<!--
<!--

Revision as of 03:24, 4 June 2011

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page.

Purge

Instructions

Using a DYK suggestion string (see below examples), list new suggestions in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the bottom. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged. Thanks for participating and please remember to check back for comments on your nomination. Every approved hook will appear on the main page.

DYK criteria

Official criteria: DYK rules and additional guidelines
Unofficial Guide: Learning DYK

How to list a new nomination

For a simplified version of these instructions, see User:Rjanag/Quick DYK.
For a step-by-step guide to filling out the
{{NewDYKnom}} template, see Template:NewDYKnomination/guide.

Please use one of the strings below to post your DYK nomination, using the "author" and "nominator" fields to identify the users who should receive credit for their contributions if the hook is featured on the main page.

  1. Nom without image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= }}
  2. Nom with image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= | image= | caption= }}
    To include more than one new or expanded article in a single hook: |article2= |article3= |article4= | (etc)
    To include more than one author: |author2= |author3= | (etc)
    To include alternate hooks: |ALT1= |ALT2= | (etc)
    To add a comment: |comment=
    To add the article you reviewed: |reviewed=

Do not wikilink the article title, or the author username field; the template will wikilink them automatically. Do wikilink the article title in the hook field, however.
Do not add a section heading if you are using the template; the template will add one for you.
Do not include a signature (~~~~) after the template.
Do not use non-free images in your hook suggestion.

An example of how to use the template is given below. Don't forget to fill out the rollover text, so people know what the image is of! Full details are at {{NewDYKnom}}:

{{subst:NewDYKnom
 | article      = Example
 | status       = new<!--(or)  expanded (or) BLP expanded-->
 | hook         = ... that this [[article]] is an  '''[[example]]''' ''(pictured)''?
 | author       = User1
 | nominator    = User2
 | image        = Example.png
 | rollover     = An example image
 | alttext      = Description of the image
 | comment      =
 | reviewed     = Article you reviewed
 | revieweddiff = diff link to the article review
}}
  • Note that you should only use one of the above templates for the original hook. If you want to suggest a second, alternative hook for the same article submission, just type it in manually. The above templates output useful code for each submission and if you employ them for alternative hooks, you will mess up the page formatting.
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name}}
  • If you have 5 or more self-nomination DYK credits, don't forget to review another editor's nomination, and link to the diff in your nomination.

How to review a nomination

Any editor who was not involved in writing/expanding or nominating an article may review it by checking to see that the article meets all the DYK criteria (long enough, new enough, no serious editorial or content issues) and the hook is cited. Editors may also alter the suggested hook to improve it, suggest new hooks, or even lend a hand and make edits to the article which the hook applies so that the hook is supported and accurate. For a more detailed discussion of the DYK rules and review process see the additional rules.

If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or note that there is an issue with the article or hook, please use the following symbols to point the issues out:

Symbol Code DYK Ready? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe DYK eligibility requires additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Please consider using {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the nominator's talk page, in case they do not notice that there is an issue.

Backlogged?

This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until an editor reviews it. Since editors are encouraged to review the oldest submissions first (so that those hooks don't grow stale), it may take several days until your submission is reviewed. In the meantime, please consider reviewing another submission (not your own) to help reduce the backlog (see instructions above).

Where is my hook?

If you can't find the hook you submitted to this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is in the queue for display on the main page. You can check whether your hook has been moved to the queue by reviewing the queue listings.

If your hook is not in the queue or already on the main page, it has probably been deleted. Deletion occurs if the hook is more than about eight days old and has unresolved issues for which any discussion has gone stale. If you think your hook has been unfairly deleted, you can query its deletion on the discussion page, but as a general rule deleted hooks will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Nominations

Older nominations

Articles created/expanded on May 21

Franciscan monastery of Saint Luke, Jajce

Created by TheSilverArrow (talk). Self nom at 11:07, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Query, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 23:30, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
HOOK: "Bosian ... Bosnia", redundant wording, and overlinked. ALT1: ... that the skeleton of the last Bosnian king, Stephen Tomašević, lies in the Franciscan monastery of Saint Luke, Jajce? Tony (talk) 13:48, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I can confirm that the article is long enough, but several paragraphs are unreferenced - this is a DYK requirement that needs to be attended to. Schwede66 10:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's hard to find references for all parts this article, but i found some and added them. TheSilverArrow 12:32, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I speak Croatian and I can confirm that references check out. Timbouctou (talk) 10:57, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
refs 7,8,9 are not formatted properly. This needs fixed and should be the last thing. BarkingMoon (talk) 22:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 22

Perp walk

5x expanded by Daniel Case (talk). Self nom at 18:29, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At least in relation to the first suggestion, I have deep BLP style reservations about applying the word perpetrator (even in abbreviated form) to somebody whose case has not even reached the courts. Does innocent until proven guilty not apply to Wiki? Kevin McE (talk) 20:06, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The term is used so often that I don't think most people make the connection to the full meaning of "perpetrator" anymore. BLP says nothing (yet) about maintaining the presumption of innocence of people accused of crimes, not in the least because it is not a universal practice (yet). Not that it wouldn't be a bad idea to so amend BLP, but in the present circumstance that doesn't apply. Daniel Case (talk) 19:27, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure BLP would restrict us from calling someone a perpetrator of a crime, when no RS would dare doing so for fear of libel and/or contempt proceedings. Perhaps we could get around it by using a phrase like "so-called perp walk". Kevin McE (talk) 21:28, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, RSes all over the U.S. use it all the time, including in discussing the one mentioned. Nor, for all the concern expressed over the potentially prejudicial effect on the presumption of innocence, have I found any evidence of any attempt to actually research this. If it's good enough for the New York Times, it's good enough for us. I'll go with putting it in quotes, perhaps, but even that goes against standard usage in the American media. Daniel Case (talk) 01:25, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Perp walk" is surely semantically independent of "perpetrator" at this stage, no? Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 01:29, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Essentially what I was saying in so many words. Daniel Case (talk) 05:29, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The perp walk term is used in reference to Strauss-Kahn by Reuters, the Washington Post, the New York Times, the New Yorker, MSNBC, Fox News, and CNN. The term was also used in reference to Strauss-Kahn in an Associated Press article that ran in the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, CBS News, ABC News, and NPR. Some of these stories discuss the clash in American vs. French and European reactions to the perp walk, as it is quite common in the U.S. but very rare in France and Europe. I think these stories may explain Daniel and Kevin's reactions to this hook, as Daniel is American and Kevin is British. OCNative (talk) 10:41, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously a vast difference here between the US and non-US perception of how common this term is: I had never heard of it before reading this hook (and incidentally, I'm more Irish than British, but anyway...). I would still be happier with a one step removed treatment of the term, by putting it in inverted commas or preceding it with so called, but I'll make that a suggestion rather than an objection. Kevin McE (talk) 14:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I was going off your respective user pages. I saw that you had mentioned Irish roots, but everything else looked British. Sorry about my mix-up on that. OCNative (talk) 08:18, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be inclined to accept ALT1 + the first suggestion. Myself being from the United Kingdom, I do not pick up any implication that he is guilty (despite the barely visible etymology of the phrase). Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 18:18, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deacon, I know you said you'd "be inclined to accept ALT1," but it seems that you are describing the original DSK hook. Could you clarify whether you were referring to the Dominique Strauss-Kahn hook or the Judd Hirsch hook? OCNative (talk) 08:22, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, sorry for being confusing; I have altered my statement for clarity. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 14:56, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"perp walk" needs to be less opaque if this is to attract the readers; it just doesn't make enough sense at the moment (especially to non-Americans) if you don't know the term. I have a problem with possible POV ... why should the press not wait 15 hours? What is so bad about that? Tony (talk) 13:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Isn't the idea to get people to click on the link to learn more? I've clicked on quite a few, both here and on the Main Page.
  • Fifteen hours is a rather long time to wait for any media event. Perhaps the hook should clarify that they waited 15 hours at the scene, i.e., without going back to their hotels or offices. But, I sort of thought that was implicit. Daniel Case (talk) 22:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • "At the scene", yes, that's looking better. Even "journalists were forced to wait 15 hours at the scene ...". On clicking on links ... I do believe the primary aim is to get visitors to click to the DYK article first, not to be diverted to another to work out what on earth it means. (They will either pass over it, or click to "perp" and never come back. Neither do we want. Get them to the DYK article by somehow explaining "perp"? Don't much like the parentheses, either. I do hope perp walks are always with the agreement of the person charged. There seems to be something perverted about the whole notion. What about this?

    ALT2:... that actor Judd Hirsch's son promoted an upcoming appearance by his band during a "perp" walk (a "perpetrator's" walk in public for the media) on drug charges that were later dropped? Tony (talk) 07:16, 2 June 2011 (UTC) Hmmm ... on revisiting ALT2, I'm not sure I like it. Long and clunky. Tony (talk) 14:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • "They will either pass over it, or click to "perp" and never come back. Neither do we want. Get them to the DYK article by somehow explaining "perp"? Don't much like the parentheses, either." Hmm? I don't understand this. The two terms are not separate; clicking on the boldface will get the reader to the article we want them to read. As for your second comment, well ... just read the article. Daniel Case (talk) 16:21, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 24

Carlisle House, Soho, Teresa Cornelys

Created by Yngvadottir (talk). Self nom at 16:05, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Teresa Cornelys was just created on May 29 and will change a bit, especially after I get hold of the book on her that I was forced to order online. But these 2 articles belong together, so dual nomination at the last minute for the Carlisle House one. (And I will review an article as soon as I can.) Yngvadottir (talk) 16:09, 30 May 2011 (UTC) Got the book, revised Teresa Cornelys, hope someone can now review the two articles. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have now reviewed Trisakti shootings: diff. Yngvadottir (talk) 03:46, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Overlinked, and ALT1 loses track in "another" ... the reader will think "another what? The original is better, with the whole point at the opening. But please unlink "London". ALT2 ... that there were once two Carlisle Houses in Soho Square, London, one of which was the site of Mrs. Cornelys' sensational entertainments, and the other of London's premier arms and riding school? Tony (talk) 14:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for looking at it! I'm not sure whether you are saying the articles are overlinked or just the first hook? If the articles . . . I'm not sure how much readers will know about the 18th-century context, such as the fact the King's Theatre still exists but has changed name, and I think it's nice that we have articles on several London streets so that those not familiar with London can look them up if they're so inclined, or if "Haymarket," for instance, doesn't seem like a street name. The only difference I see between the first hook and ALT2 (other than the use of the gizmo for the apostrophe) is that London has been unlinked - and I thought about not linking that but a lot of readers are going to think New York when they see "Soho" and I've been bopped before for not making "obvious" links in DYK hooks. So I think it needs that context. I like the first hook a little better, too, but since we have an article on the fencing and riding school man, I thought that might suck in readers with different interests from me. (I had also considered making a hook about the Catholic chapel/church connection but couldn't see an interesting way to convey it in under 200 words. Both houses were used for Catholic chapels at different times and Mrs Cornelys' notorious establishment made way for St. Patrick's; various authors have remarked on the irony, or justice, of that.) I don't think either hook is unclear with respect to there being 2 Carlisle Houses, but perhaps you're right that people are going to miss the indefinite article in ALT1. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The hook, not the article. Can we save space with the numeral? ... that in Soho Square in 18th-century London, Domenico Angelo's fencing and riding school was in a Carlisle House and Madame Cornelys' masquerades and illegal operas in another house of the same name?

Is that what "another" means? It's just over the limit now, at 202 ch. Tony (talk) 07:32, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. I guess I see why London might not need to be linked in the hook, so long as it's mentioned, but I think Soho Square needs to be. (As I say, I've been corrected before for assuming people can glean enough context from these very brief hooks.) "another" after "a Carlisle House" still seems clear to me, and "another house of the same name" is awfully long and also it seems to me gives the false impression the link on Carlisle House is only about one of them. I'm not sure whether 18th-century with a numeral is allowed in hooks; I know it's deprecated in articles. If it is allowed . . . how about:
I make that 199 characters in a count by hand. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:26, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Isn't "Soho Square" linked in both DYK articles, prominently? I'd say get the readers to both of those articles first; then let them choose further links. The worst would be if they go to Soho Square first: will they ever end up at Carlisle House or Madam Cornelys then? Tony (talk) 10:11, 3 June 2011 (UTC) Century numerals: I think they're obligatory in articles, not deprecated. Tony (talk) 10:12, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well the thing is, the underlying interesting fact is that both houses were on Soho Square and both were known by the same name. Since Mrs. Cornelys' was pulled down and the other survived until the Blitz, they've become confused - some sources don't realise there were two of them. And - as you'll see if you look at the pretty poor Carlisle House DAB page - there was another Carlisle House in London. I'll eventually write it up if no one else gets to it first, but so far I believe it was in Lambeth. So people do need to be told Soho Square or I'll be being misleading. And not just Soho or I'll be understating the oddness. I'd pipe the 2 houses to the 2 sections of the article, but I believe that violates the guidelines. - And I'm personally happy enough for them to click on Soho Square instead of the target articles, I'm not being paid by the hit. On having too many links in hooks: as I've said, I've been corrected on this before and reminded that Did You Know is seen by readers who have no idea of the context. When I proposed John Stanley Coombe Beard at DYK, I thought West Wickham was sufficient localisation and people could click on that if they didn't know where it was - but London got added, with the link. So it seems to be the dominant interpretation of the guideline on giving enough info in the hook for context, and that plus the existence of Soho in Manhattan is why I put in London this time - Soho's confusing in a way that West Wickham isn't. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lagos Colony, Walter Egerton

Created by Aymatth2 (talk). Self nom at 19:53, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Everything checks out, but I think it would be better if the hook was related to Lagos, not British Guiana. Something about his push for rail over river transport perhaps? The-Pope (talk) 12:52, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose this hook is more suitable to both articles. Aymatth2 (talk) 21:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Could pacification patrols have a wikilink to a relevant article? It's not a term that I'm familiar with - but is used in the source - maybe put it in quotes or italics? Also adding the word "annual" prior to pacification might also give a better context. The-Pope (talk) 12:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT2: ... that Walter Egerton, last Governor of Lagos Colony, found that annual "pacification patrols" in southeast Nigeria usually achieved submission without using force?
Good points - see ALT2 for the changes. I don't think "pacification patrol" is a technical term that should have an article, although a Google books search does show it being used in other contexts to mean an armed patrol through hostile territory aimed at discouraging resistance. Aymatth2 (talk) 17:20, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Context isn't quite clear enough in any of the three attempts. The context for 1 and 2 was that such patrols had traditionally used brutal force? If so, that needs to be said. Tony (talk) 07:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't follow. See here for the source, towards the foot of the page. Egerton initiated the policy of sending out annual pacification patrols. He found that the threat of force was "usually" sufficient to eliminate any threat of resistance to the colonial administration, which could then move in and take over. Presumably, although not stated by the source, force was used occasionally. What would you suggest for the hook? How about ALT3 below: Aymatth2 (talk) 13:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT3: ... that Walter Egerton, last Governor of Lagos Colony, initiated annual "pacification patrols" in southeast Nigeria which usually achieved submission without using force?
Interest level of ALT3 just passes. I tweaked the article. Do consider accessing the quick, easy and non-controversial dash script – for breaks and year ranges. Just paste: importScript("User:GregU/dashes.js"); into your vector.js file or monobook.js file. Expect the button at the same tab as the move-page. Instructions for script acquisition in general are here. Tony (talk) 10:28, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aodh Méith

Created by Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk). Self nom at 00:47, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A request for clarification: is this a return of hostages as part of negotiations, hostages as a surety of the safety of Aodh Méith, or what? Kevin McE (talk) 14:18, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The latter. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 18:05, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In that case ALT1 ... that Aodh Méith, Ó Néill chief and king of Tír Eoghain, refused to meet John, King of England because the latter was unwilling to give hostages as surety that he would be safe? Kevin McE (talk) 20:26, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Don't think the top suggestion should be confusing ("give", not "return"), but your ALT1 would work too minus that he would be safe which sounds a tad clumsy. It makes sense without it, or even with as surety for his safety.Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 20:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I like the for his safety: reads better than my proposal Kevin McE (talk) 11:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ambrosio José Gonzales

Colonel Ambrosio José Gonzales

  • ... that Colonel Ambrosio José Gonzales (pictured), a Confederate soldier, once fought for the US annexation of Cuba?

This article was once a "stub" and I, Tony the Marine (talk) 15:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC), have expanded it to what it is now, a full article.[reply]

  • Expansion of the article falls short of 5x. According to DYKcheck, the previous version was 1742 characters (255 words) of prose, and current one is 6456 characters (1042 words). Thus, it's currently at 3.7x. Is it possible to add more? --Orlady (talk) 03:21, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello Orlady, I'm not too familiar with the expansion character thing. The thing is that when I happened upon the "stub" on May 24th, it looked like this "Stub" and after I tackled it, I ended up with the current version which is this. To tell you the truth I don't think that I have more to add to the article. Tony the Marine (talk) 06:03, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • In an attempt to further expand the article I have created and added a section called "Father of notable journalists". I hope this helps because to tell you the truth I do not know what else I can do. Thank you and take care. Tony the Marine (talk) 18:45, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The qualification for DYK is that an article be new or be a 5x expansion (measured in prose) over the previous version. In this case, the original article was fairly long, although it did not do justice to its subject. Not all of the expansion is counted as prose, since the expansion includes a long blockquote (which isn't counted by the tools). The "Journalists" section is a good addition. I've poked into the sources for the article, and I believe that ample content exists to take this to a full 5x expansion. The 2003 biographical book about Gonzeles has extensive information that could be used to flesh out the article (however, I found the book "hard going" to read). Additionally, there is a large amount of primary-source material (not generally appropriate for Wikipedia, but potentially helpful nonetheless) at http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/gonzales.htm . With a little tweaking, I think this will qualify for DYK. --Orlady (talk) 04:22, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think it needs to be withdrawn. It just needs a little more expansion work. It's an interesting article for DYK. --Orlady (talk) 14:41, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I've spent some time with the article, and it's now at 5x by my reckoning. (DYKcheck doesn't agree, but that seems to be based on a slightly longer version that included some random vandalism and existed for only one minute.) I suggest an alternate hook:
  • FWIW, I think the article qualifies and the hook is fine. However, having done some article expansion, I don't consider myself qualified to approve it. Sooner or later someone else will review it. Hooks don't get removed from this page merely for being old... --Orlady (talk) 23:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
TBH I'd have IAR passed the original as the nom seems to be a DYK newbie, and the article expansion is good work that deserves the "15mins fame" on the main page :) but right now the article passes all criteria. And both alts stand up to referencing. My only comment is that for those not acquaintented with the factions in the US civil war etc. it may bit be clear how these two items in his life appear contradictory: suggest tweaking the wording to show this situation. Otherwise; good to go. --Errant (chat!) 00:29, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tema Harbour

Created by Crosstemplejay (talk). Self nom at 18:14, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checked. Ready! I would write Tema Harbour with both words capitalized. -IceCreamAntisocial (talk) 06:57, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tema Harbour, or The Tema Harbour? The latter looks odd, and only occurs in one of the 5 websites cited. Hook changed: objection withdrawn Kevin McE (talk) 19:58, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please clean up the overlinking in the article. --PFHLai (talk) 19:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)Delinked. Thanks for cleaning up the overlinking. --PFHLai (talk) 22:48, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I ran the dash script on it (takes five seconds). Please see the edit summary for where/how to acquire this useful device. The article has horrors such as "An old fishing villages". Please scrutinise. HOOK: No "The". Add spice to the hook?
ALT1 ... that Tema Harbour in Ghana is Africa's largest man-made harbour, on a site that was a fishing village only 34 years ago?

If that's to your liking,

. Tony (talk) 16:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
All concerns raised have been addressed.  CrossTempleJay  → talk 20:20, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT2 ...Tema Harbour in Ghana was named after the Torman fishing village and is Africa's largest man-made harbour?

Islanding

  • ... that in spite of real-world tests concluding that the risk is "virtually zero", islanding conditions are still used by utility companies to refuse connection of new distributed generation systems?

5x expanded by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self nom at 17:28, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed Bird Watching, below
It's used in #8. I'm not sure I know what you mean by the author=, I've never used that. Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:15, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry as in: {{ref |author=}}. -danjel (talk to me) 00:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I haven't used that either. Can you make a sample edit in the page so I can see how to do it? Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I really can't... The problem is that I can't identify what "Bower & Ropp" is, because you haven't given me any other information to find those citations besides the author names. You need to, at least, provide the year of publication, the title, and publisher.
Above, I was assuming that Verhoeven, Bower & Ropp, etc. were the authors of some of the other references that you've already provided, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Take a look at WP:REFERENCES#Examples and Template:Cite and fill in some detail so that the references are verifiable. -danjel (talk to me) 02:35, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bird Watching (magazine)

Created by Pigsonthewing (talk). Self nom at 16:56, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very boring hook. Tony (talk) 12:28, 2 June 2011 (UTC) Article: overlinked (UK, subscription, magazine ... why dilute the link to "birdwatchers"? Spell out ABC. Run the dash script on this, please. (Very handy to install – does within-sentence interruptors and year ranges). Is the article long enough to qualify? Tony (talk) 14:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, only 715 chars of readable prose. Eisfbnore talk 14:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paperbark Flycatcher

Created by Maias (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 12:18, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The grinding scissors noise might be notable in discussion of the Restless Flycatcher, but has absolutely nothing to do with the Paperbark Flycatcher. Humans never walk around with their backsides in the air like the closely related chimpanzee, but we don't use that fact as the main piece of data to share about our species. Kevin McE (talk) 20:09, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The issue was that they were considered the same species until 1999 and look very similar. I just realised the former point is not conveyed and hence the significance is lost. I am ruminating on how to make it more interesting. I just thought the "scissors-grinding" thing was funny....Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:07, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Casliber. I'm afraid I agree with Kevin McE - "scissors-grinding" is a feature of Restless Flycatcher and has nothing to do with the Paperbark Flycatcher. Sorry. --Philcha (talk) 12:35, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's why I suggested the alternate below - more interesting than it sounds as it is highly unusual for a species to be split like this in a first world country. Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:47, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1

  • ... that the Paperbark Flycatcher was only classified as a species distinct from the similar-looking Restless Flycatcher in 1999?
  • "rictal bristles"—I love it. Rushing to my dictionary (no link for rictal?). " There is no overlap in size between the species."—not quite sure what it means. Please go easy on the clause connector ", with ... -ing" (, with nana almost never using, etc). So what kind of vocalisation does nana use? The hook is a bit forced, isn't it? ... saying that the subject doesn't do something Tony (talk) 14:20, 2 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 25

WithdrawnSocial Democrats, USA

The 21 demands of the Polish labor union, Solidarity
SDUSA member Tom Kahn, testifying on behalf of the AFL-CIO to the US Congress, recommended that U.S. aid require the Communist regime to meet the 21 demands of Solidarity (pictured).
  • Reviewed: Åbo bloodbath (Copy-editing and picture)
  • Reviewed: Jens Bache-Wiig ([4])
  • Comment: This might also count as a sourced BLP two-fold expansion (?), since last week the main source was a fringe left-wing website (whose material is echoed by fringe rightwing sites like JewWatch and David Duke's). I have saved what I could, and provided secondary references from quality journals, some academic to assertions. The DYK tool won't reflect the overhaul of content (the bit count is not at 5-fold expansion.

5x expanded by Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk). Self nom at 12:45, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2x expanded and sourced (BLP) (re: CARL GERSHMAN, and mistakes about Ben Wattenberg and Elliot Abrams) by Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk). Self nom at 12:45, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Length of article
As noted above, the DYK check tool will not show the five fold expansion. Look at its state on the 25th and compare now. The 5x expansion is obvious. (The old article had mostly lists and notes, not prose.) I just added a big chunk from a revised article on Penn Kemble, the revision happening today. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:14, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(QUOTATION, now with link to 25 May DYK check.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:23, 31 May 2011 (UTC))[reply]
The DYK check for 25 May showed the following "1690 characters (259 words) "readable prose size" (which is more than 5-fold expansion, I add now 08:31, 31 May 2011 (UTC)). The present DYK check shows "12492 characters (1890 words) "readable prose size".  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 23:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is almost there, but not quite. This May 25 version is 3526 characters, while the current version is 12492 characters, giving 3.54x. You can still make 5x, but it will take some work. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:41, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Re-check the DYK statistics I cited. I added a link to help.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:50, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand why you chose this time on 25 May, when I gave you the statistics from that day, roughly half the stats you quote.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:23, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
According to A5: "Fivefold expansion is calculated from the previously existing article, no matter how bad it was (copyvios are an exception), no matter whether you kept any of it and no matter if it was up for deletion. This may be a bad surprise, but we don't have enough time and volunteers to reach consensus on the quality of each previous article. Twofold expansion for newly-sourced BLPs similarly means from the version prior to the expansion and addition of sources." In other words, the stuff you removed between the edit I chose and the one you chose is still counted. It is not calculated after the pruning, but including what was pruned. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:51, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I do not see how this could be called a BLP. It seems to be an organization. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:53, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is classified as BLP-o (for "other"), because it has significant BLP content: see its talk-page assessment for details regarding the BLP project.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:23, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Now "19618 characters (2982 words) "readable prose size"! tiredly,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 14:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The organization is mainly known through the activity of its members, and it is a fascinating story, particularly for lumpen leftists and weirder-than-usual conspiracy theorists. Carl Gershman, Norman Hill, and others are alive. (Penn Kemble died in c. 2005 and Kahn around 1996.)  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:14, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The DYK check for 25 May showed the following "1690 characters (259 words) "readable prose size", (08:31, 31 May 2011 (UTC)) obviously more than a 5-fold expansion, I note now. The present DYK check shows "12492 characters (1890 words) "readable prose size".  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 23:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article is about the organization, and not its members. While it may legally be a "corporate person", by general definitions (i.e. "A single human being; an individual") it is not. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:41, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
From the top of the article's talk page: "... Biographies of living persons policies do not apply directly to the subject of this article ...". I am interpreting that to mean that BLP x2 expansion would not be allowed. We can defer to another editor though, if you wish. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

:::Agreed about the subject of the article, but BLP policies apply to the living persons mentioned, as noted above.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 09:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In that case I defer the question of whether or not BLP X2 applies to another editor who is more experienced with DYK. It appears we have no clear policies on this issue, so we will need a consensus. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:08, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I expanded the article again, so now it meets the 5-fold expansion criterion, by your previous benchmark. Thanks for your encouragement/push! Best regards,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 14:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but due to the size of the article around 29 October 2010, it is still reading as a (nearly) 2x expansion. The number of characters 10386 in October 2010 vs. 19618 now. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:23, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is unfair to penalize editors for having to deal with unsourced, poorly written junk text. I am thus counting the expansion as taking place after the removal of text here, and this suggests to me that it meets the criteria (grew from 4k prose to 23k). There is a problem with the DYK system, in which expansions are much more difficult. I think that this article meets the criteria - removal of text was justified, and the article was 5x+ expanded from the verifiable state to where it is now. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 16:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you that the article has been improved greatly (nice to see a GA nom coming up) with the changes by Kiefer. If the other editors don't mind, I will accept using this version as the benchmark and ignore A5. However, there is still much work to be done. That version is 6082 chars, while the current is 19926 chars, giving 3.2x expansion. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's nice that finally an editor invokes WP:Ignore all rules on my side! Turnabout is fair play, after all.
:-)
Crisco1492's benchmark is a reasonable and fair-minded suggestion. I had already removed a lot of BLP violations and NPOV/OR violations from the article previous to your suggested benchmark-version.
However, you may wish to reconsider the BLP violations of the benchmark you propose. In particular, Ben Wattenberg was NOT a member of SDUSA, contrary to the assertion of this version. (I believe that it would be difficult to establish that Radosh was a member of SDUSA by secondary reliable sources, although reference to primary sources could be found, I believe.)

The article was poorly sourced with the most independent references to a nonreliable (fringe left-wing) website (formerly in the SW USA and now archived at IPS). Many of the other references were broken weblinks supporting OR.
A lesser concern is that the large section at the end on a Pennsylvania group trying to revive SDUSA, which has one independent reliable source: Their convention had 25 people, roughly 1/3 the size of my Cub Scout pack! I trimmed this section because of notability, and documentation problems. Less charitable editors may have worried about COI issues ....
Honestly, my concern has been to redress the unfairness in the earlier WP versions of the SDUSA article.
I was surprised to be able to tell part of the story of the AFL-CIO's aid to solidarity, which I was surprised to find documented in the Shervis reference. This story should be told, because it is good for us, far better than my 13 previous DYKs put together.
Sincerely,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 10:58, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The strides the article has taken are remarkable. However, don't celebrate just yet. You still need perhaps 10,000 chars to pass 5x using the benchmark we have. 6,082 * 5 = 30,410 Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good so far. I would feel better if we had more of a consensus though. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:18, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Length of hook
Hook: it's too long, at 239 ch. But great focus of interest! Trying to think of how to shorten. AFL-CIO is also gobbledygook to 99% of readers. Bumpety-bump with the commas; and why not just a central link to funnel the readers? I've manhandled it down to 201 ch. Keen to hear whether people think it's better.

ALT1 ... that Social Democrats, USA helped the AFL-CIO to donate $300,000 to the Polish labor-union Solidarity in 1979–81, despite Secretary of State Muskie's warnings this might provoke a Soviet invasion? Tony (talk) 15:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the effort! I copy-edited. It is very important to avoid stating the SDUSA did anything directly, because Kahn insisted that his actions were approved by the AFL-CIO executive officers or council. (Stating that the AFL-CIO donated money is a white lie, because it purchased equipment worth nearly that amount.)  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:36, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Biographies

Why is the majority of the content in this article simply biographies of its members? Those should be in the respective biography articles. OCNative (talk) 09:50, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Procedurally, I believe that your comment reflects a flag and not a possible veto. Posting the possible veto requires that you notify me.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 11:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'm usually pretty good about notifying people. Something must have distracted me when I was editing. You have my apologies on that. OCNative (talk) 10:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi OCNative! As stated in the article, SDUSA was an organization that sponsored conferences, passed resolutions, issued pamphlets, and had a newsletter---which makes it barely notable. However, it is notable as being the renamed Socialist Party of Debs and Thomas, and because its history tells the history of (many but not all) Socialist contributions to the civil rights movement along with the labor movement and US foreign policy---and this is notable indeed. If you read the biographical sections, you can see the decades of interaction among the prominent members. This interaction and socialist tradition is not captured in the biographies of the members.
That said, I just added Feldman, which is too long. I shall condense that section next week.
It would be possible to write a topical essay, for example, on SDUSA positions as reflecting the (dominant) labor-movement perspective in defending teachers' tenure, due process, and seniority rules against the demands of "Black Power" militants in the early 70s---this would help people understand the reference to nuclear war being caused by Albert Shanker getting control of nuclear missiles in Woody Allen's Sleeper. I lack the resources to do such an article, and my guess is that such an article would be OR. The coverage of journal articles necessitates, imho, that the story of SDUSA and its members be told largely by biography. However, if you look at articles discussing SDUSA, such as cited in the article, you will find that they mostly discuss the activities of its leaders, and only rarely SDUSA-organizational activities. Thus, WP's article's coverage of biographies reflects the reliable sources.
The article strives to be accurate and based on reliable sources, such as national journals (some academic). Please do a Google search for SDUSA and you will find that many of the hits are sites like "David Duke. com" or "Jew Watch.org". There are also conspiracy theorists of the (lumpen-)left that charge that SDUSA was a group of Trostkyists/neoconservatives/Jews that have been running foreign policy. The allegation is that this group of people behaved like a conspiracy, masterminded by Max Schachtman (notwithstanding the latter's death).
Sincerely,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 11:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am not challenging the accuracy of the article at all. It's certainly well-cited (although there are a few paragraphs that need citations). The problem is the biographies are off-topic; they're in the wrong article. The article needs to be about the organization and not the activities of people who were also members. The portions of the biographies that are included must directly relate to the SDUSA organization.
If this is an effort to describe the history of socialism in the United States, then History of the socialist movement in the United States would be the appropriate article for this content.
There is already a long article on socialism in the USA. The SDUSA could be considered a subsection, spin-off, refugee from that abomination of NPOV, BLP, and RELIABLE violations. Such spin-off articles are sanctioned by WP policies on article length. Your other suggestions are similarly irrelevant and lacking any policy backing: Your background in writing articles on Republican lawyers may not be the best preparation for understanding the SDUSA article.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 11:14, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If this is an effort to describe socialist contributions to the labor movement, then Labor history of the United States would be the appropriate article for this content.
If this is an effort to describe socialist contributions to U.S. foreign policy, then History of U.S. foreign policy would be the appropriate article for this content.
Otherwise, the paragraphs of biography in the SDUSA article should be moved to the biographies of the members, as they are perfectly encyclopedic paragraphs, but they're just in the wrong article. This would be like having several paragraphs about the lives of Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan added to the Presidents of the United States article. OCNative (talk) 10:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OCNative, you have not responded to what I wrote.
There are primary documents, available on line, that state that SDUSA turned itself into a pro-Solidarity organization in the early 1980s. Those are not cited, because or reliability/secondary policies. I would be happy to cite the on-line statement by the Pennsylvania social democrat Andrew Hacker if you don't object.
As I wrote above, I am following the published literature. Just look for SDUSA OR "Social Democrats, USA" OR "Social Democrats USA" on Google Scholar, and you will find nearly all discussions relate to the members/leaders' actions, not their newsletter or conferences. (C.f., the discussions by Aldon Morris of "movement halfway houses" or by Maurice Isserman on small-organizations' influence on the new left.)
You seem not to have read the biographical sections, because you don't acknowledge the interconnections among the biographies, only some of which are documented. Look at Bayard Rustin's appearance in many biographies, for example. (Rustin's relationship with Kahn is not discussed here on WP, but occurs in biographies of Rustin.)  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 10:53, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Some of these bio paragraphs strike me as clearly worth including here, like Hook and Kemble. But the Feldman one puzzles me; it's not clear from the article text (to my tired eyes, anyway), what role the SDUSA played in any of these events of her career. Failing that, her inclusion does make it feel more like "List of SDUSA members" than an article about the party (though your point above that it's traditionally described by its highest profile members is well taken). There's also a citation problem here; I believe DYK rules require at least one citation per paragraph, which the first three 'graphs of the Feldman section violate. Sorry to throw another roadblock up for what's generally such a quality expansion. Khazar (talk) 12:07, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(EC) Thanks, Khazar, for the notice and query. I'll look at Feldman's section, which I trimmed substantially today.
Briefly, let me give you a direct answer. Feldman and Shanker's UFT faced the first conflict between reverse discrimination/affirmative action and union seniority rules, which gives them both national significance of continuing interest: Shanker's personality ensured that the conflict would be sharp, as noted by Woody Allen! I have had not the time to link the discussion to SDUSA, but just look at the papers associated with Rustin, Hill, Shanker, etc. as well as the statements about the importance of due process and seniority in SDUSA statements! Sincerely,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 12:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As I've state before, I am not sure if we can count this as a 2x BLP + references. However, as noted by Khazar, there are still some paragraphs in need of citation, so (for a little while) it could not pass 2x + references. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article is at 5x expansion, by the benchmark Crisco 1492 gave before. I'll fix the footnote detail. Would you two, Crisco and Khazar, please address the question raised by Orange County Native?
I do not know enough about the topic to give a good suggestion. Although Kiefer is correct insofar as SDUSA is its own entity, OC raises a good point; the people mentioned in the article may have been active in American Socialism outside of SDUSA. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the article states that these people used to be associated with the Socialist Party, before it changed its name to SDUSA. There is an article on the Socialist Party, to which this article refers, as appropriate. What is the point?  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:44, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If I'm understanding right what you mean by answering OC's question, I do basically agree with him/her. Feldman is clearly notable in her own right, but the sections on her and Hill don't appear to even mention membership in SDUSA as currently written, much less this membership being a driving force for their other accomplishments detailed here. I don't really follow what you mean by looking at papers about Rustin to see how seniority worked which will explain to me how Feldman fits in here, but it does sound rather tangential. So I don't know how easily this can be filled in, or if it can be, but I do agree that it should be fixed. Other bios on here seem ok to me, though, such as the ones I mentioned above. Let me know if I can help. Cheers, Khazar (talk) 13:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Look again at Feldman, which I have trimmed (following through my announced editing plan), which mentions her organizing a SDUSA conference in 1999. Hill's relationship is similarly easy to establish. These are minor points, which can be raised in the article page, as usual: Maybe you guys have confused DYK for Featured Article review?  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
New material?

I hate to introduce yet another new issue into this, but clicking back through Feldman, Hill, and Randolph's main articles, it's pretty clear that the text on them in this one has been copied over from those. While not a problem for Wikipedia purposes generally, it is a problem for a DYK nom per WP:DYK: "Former redirects, stubs, or other articles in which the prose portion has been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are also acceptable as "new" articles. The content with which the article has been expanded must be new content, not text copied from other articles." Since this article is having length issues already, it's hard to see how it's going to "make" without the copied content being counted, unless I'm misunderstanding what's the expanded part here. It looks like a major rehaul will be needed. Khazar (talk) 13:15, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In all cases the text has been edited and improved. Please see the BLP violations of the old article on Penn Kemble and then compare my revision, for example. This editing was disclosed many times, many days ago.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:55, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article does not have length issues, unless Crisco 1492 has disavowed Crisco's benchmark of the article length. You should review the discussion above. 13:57, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the order to re-review the discussion. While I'm doing that, perhaps you might re-review your article? The original text of these four sentences from the main Feldman article:
While in graduate school, Feldman worked as a fourth grade teacher at Public School 34 on the New York City's Lower East Side. She immediately joined the AFT (which had only one other member at the school). When New York City teachers won collective bargaining rights in 1960, she organized the entire school staff within a year. During this time, Feldman became an associate of Albert Shanker, then an organizer for the United Federation of Teachers.
Here's your "edited and improved" version:
While in graduate school, Feldman worked as a fourth-grade teacher at Public School 34 on the New York City's Lower East Side. She immediately joined the American Federation of Teachers, which had only one other member at the school. When New York City teachers won collective bargaining rights in 1960, she organized the entire school staff within a year.[44] During this time, Feldman became an associate of Albert Shanker, then an organizer for the United Federation of Teachers.
Other equally clear examples abound. It's not a problem for Wikipedia generally, but DYK requires all-new content toward its word count. I feel like the cut-and-paste approach here is also why text on Feldman stuck out to OC and myself as not well-integrated into this article; we still don't have a single RS putting her in the SDUSA in either her main article or here, just cut-and-pasted material about her life generally. I'm up for being overruled by other editors, but considering that Crisco's already lowered the bar for you (which I was game for), I'd oppose giving this nomination an exemption on a second policy. Perhaps it'd be a better fit for GA nom; despite the issues with the bios section, I think it's still an impressive expansion. Khazar (talk) 14:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The old article was severely violating BLP. Crisco did no lower the bar, but suggested (seeking consensus with me and another editor) that a reasonable benchmark would be what day he specified. You are free disagree with his judgment, but do not mischaracterize his statement.
As I wrote, your time would be better spent helping than writing new paragraphs in opposition. I would appreciate your making one contribution to one paragraph in the article, the way many of do when editing DYK nominations. (See the acknowledgments for my help to other editors this week.)
I have edited and reduced the Feldman text. Feel free to reduce it further, if you wish to help.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 14:38, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, there is no point continuing to discuss anything with you if you will not find a reference to SDUSA and Feldman, who was the President of the AFT, by doing a Google search.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 14:40, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your apparent hostility and demands that I do your research for you aren't productive. I'm currently putting together a separate DYK nom in another tab and frankly don't feel like immediately dropping that to clean up your cut-and-pasting and lack of sourcing. I simply wanted to point out the problem to you and other editors, and after you flatly denied it, I thought I'd better pull a quote to show what I was talking about. We can waste more time with me pulling those if you like, but I think we can agree now that significant chunks of this article are in fact cut-and-pastes from other articles, which disqualifies it for DYK failing a major rewrite of those parts; it's also problematic in that you haven't even tied large chunks of the article into the article topic, but demand that other editors to do it for you. At this point, I'll gladly leave this one to others who perhaps have more time and patience to bring your nomination "up to code", if anybody's game. (Heck, I'll even give them a barnstar for it). I think it's a worthy article and I do hope it gets there, if not here, at the Good Article noms. Best of luck with it. Khazar (talk) 15:05, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Apparent hostility", no, but minor irritation/annoyance (with the universe) yes. The hook shall run with Tom Kahn in a week, but I shan't expend more time here, with trying to improve "SDUSA" to a DYK this week: I have read the very interesting Swedish anthology Surving Failures which includes interesting essays by Serge Christophe Kolm on "A general theory of socialist failure" and Alec Nove on "Socialist failures: East and West", etc.! :-)
However, I appreciate your and others' good-faith comments, which I shall remember and use to improve the article. Sincerely,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Åbo bloodbath

Created by Skäpperöd (talk). Self nom at 10:03, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The context is missing from the hook, so readers are likely to glaze over and go to the next DYK, or worse, another section on the main page. This is also a critical problem in the lead of the article, which is very unsatisfactory. Are we in Finland? Lithuania? England? And do I take it from the hook that it happened in the 20th century? Great premise for the hook, though, twice spared. Can you make both hook and article work? Tony (talk) 14:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I second Tony's concerns. We should not assume that everyone knows what we are talking about. There are British, American, Canadian, Australian, and plenty of non-native speakers of English who read Wikipedia; not everyone will have the same reference pool. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the context would be that important if the hook was more interesting... Hack (talk) 14:56, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It wouldn't take much.
Duke Karl Insulting the Corpse of Klas Fleming by Albert Edelfelt (1878)
After the Åbo bloodbath, the corpse of an executed nobleman was defiled, according to folklore that inspired this Edelfelt painting pictured).
would be much clearer and still be a good hook, I think. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:01, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK with ALT1, I have also expanded the lead per the suggestions above. Thank you, Skäpperöd (talk) 17:35, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I copy-edited ALT1. WP's article states that they received reprieves, which would allow their later execution. I linked to the appropriate articles on Finnish and Swedish history and on clemency/reprieves. I added the picture from the article. (Feel free to ask me for help on Swedish DYKs.)  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 12:05, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, I am not comfortable with all aspects of the new ALT1. In particular, "both Finland and Sweden" is irritating, since
  • Finland was, at that time, still an integral part of Sweden and not a separate entity (furthermore the 16th cty Finland was not, geographically speaking, the Finland of today, but rather the Turku region);
The reader following the link from "Finland" would find all of that information in the article on Finnish history in the Swedish Imperial era. I don't understand your objection.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 07:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • also, the picture should not be linked since the hook makes no reference of the depicted incident and the scene is so detailed that you do not see what it depicts at 100px. The caption added to the picture here is also false, since Fleming (the dead noble) was not executed—to decapitate him is what Charles, according to legend, would have done if he was still alive, but he had died before.
Agreed.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 07:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For reference, the alternative hook proposal I consented to above was edited, and before that it read
ALT1 (old) "... that two condemned Swedish prisoners spared in the Åbo bloodbath also survived the subsequent Linköping bloodbath?"
If the old ALT1 is being rejected, I am open to new proposals. I had meanwhile created an article about Arvid Stålarm the Younger, who was one of the prisoners spared, and I have also nominated this for DYK and it already passed, see Template_talk:Did_you_know#Arvid Stålarm the Younger. Probably, the two could nevertheless be combined into one hook? Skäpperöd (talk) 07:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Alt1b "... that two condemned Swedish prisoners spared in the 1599 Åbo Bloodbath also survived the 1600 Linköping Bloodbath?"
I capitalized "Bloodbath" reflecting the articles' capitalization. I dabbed Swedish, linking to the WP article on that era's Swedish history. I replaced "subsequent" by 1600 and added 1599.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 07:41, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fine with me. Skäpperöd (talk) 14:08, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nickel Ashmeade

5x expanded by Sillyfolkboy (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 09:34, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • meet record is, I believe, an Americanism: it would be an athletics meeting on my side of the Atlantic. I wonder whether those involved in the sport on both sides of the Atlantic might be able to acknowledge something like event record as a version neutral compromise. Kevin McE (talk) 19:03, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have no problem with the switch from "set a meet record" to "set an event record" in this hook, but is it really necessary? The words "meet record" were taken directly from the ref., which is an IAAF website, so this is probably "international" English. Furthermore, the hook is about an event that took place in Puerto Rico, an accomplishment by someone who makes his home in Florida. So using American English seems appropriate. Anyway, I'll be happy either way. --PFHLai (talk) 21:16, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WP:ENGVAR suggests finding phrasings that are common to all versions of English over and above conforming to local language customs. Kevin McE (talk) 14:46, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mind changing that part, but I don't think it is necessary. Everyone understands what that means. --PFHLai (talk) 19:11, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Meet record"—jargon in athletics throughout the anglosphere, not just the US. The problem is that it's jargon.

Hook: boring, I'm afraid. What is the focus of interest, the irony, the punch? Is it that a Jamaican (a black guy, I guess) beat someone? Probably not, but some readers may take that as the point. It's not even clear from the article. Could one take this line:

"... that Jamaican sprinter Nickel Ashmeade has had a meteoric rise over the past four years, and beat a former Olympic and World champion in the 100 m and set a meet record at the Ponce Grand Prix in May 2011?"

But now it's 209 ch. You could shorten the Ponce bit and remove 2011. Tony (talk) 14:49, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing I would remove would be the POV/PEACOCK-ish "has had a meteoric rise over the past four years". Boring? I find it exciting when a record is set. If you are looking for a boring hook to fix, try #Argentina at the 1972 Summer Paralympics, South Africa at the 1972 Summer Paralympics, Australia at the 1972 Summer Paralympics below. --PFHLai (talk) 19:11, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Saxon (horse)

  • ... that the offspring of the stallion Saxon were the subject of teasing from his owner's brother, resulting in a challenge race that his horse won by four lengths?

Created by Ealdgyth (talk). Nominated by Qrsdogg (talk) at 00:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I read that a few times without being any the wiser about whether "his horse" meant the horse belonging to the owner or the owner's brother. Perhaps ... that when his owner's brother criticised the offspring of the stallion Saxon, Saxon's daughter won the resulting challenge race by four lengths? I know the same word appears either side of a comma, but it is unambiguous. The margin of victory is fairly meaningless if we don't know the distance of the race (or even the tactics of the jockeys: was one horse or the other easing up at the end if the result was already clear?) Kevin McE (talk) 06:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marjan Bojadziev

Created by Dr. Blofeld (talk). Self nom at 09:33, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hans Vogt (composer)

5x expanded by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nom at 05:45, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Date, length, hook looks all good to go. Connormah (talk) 23:56, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Now there is a stub article on the opera itself, therefore
ALT1:... that the opera Die Stadt hinter dem Strom, composed by Hans Vogt (born 100 years ago) based on Hermann Kasack's novel, was first staged at the Internationale Maifestspiele Wiesbaden in 1955?

HD 154672 b, HD 154672

  • ... that, if extrasolar planet HD 154672 b has water in its atmosphere, the water probably changes from a liquid to a gas regularly as the planet makes its orbit?

5x expanded by Starstriker7 (talk). Self nom at 19:32, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: Assembly of French Citizens Abroad --Starstriker7(Talk) 19:44, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Could I add a second article as well?
ALT1: ... that, , if extrasolar planet HD 154672 b has water in its atmosphere, the water probably changes from a liquid to a gas regularly as the planet makes its orbit around its host star? --Starstriker7(Talk) 22:51, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We are told that the "equilibrium temperature of the planet varies between 300 K and 600 K" (27 to 327 C so ostensibly either side of boiling point of water as we know it), but if I remember my O level physics, boiling point depends of temperature and pressure: without data about atmospheric pressure on the planet, the temperature range means nothing in terms of volatility of putative liquids. Kevin McE (talk) 23:08, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Kevin McE if this is original research. However, if cited that should be fine. Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:09, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Love the hook; agree with Crisco. Tony (talk) 13:28, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The hook is taken from a part of the discovery paper on page 6. --Starstriker7(Talk) 15:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Where's the diff? I only see one. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:45, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, my apologies...The diff is here. I reviewed Brandon Crawford. --Starstriker7(Talk) 23:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good to go. Cheers! Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:54, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Returned from preps because of a very awkward WP:CRYSTAL formulation. It is not appropriate to speculate on existence of water (which implies life) only to indicate the temperature fluctuations. You probably wanted to say the same as in "that because of the elongated orbit the maximum surface temperature of the extrasolar planet HD 205739 b is thought to vary by about 100 °C?", but that hook was in the next prep, and featuring them in a row would be a bad taste. Materialscientist (talk) 03:12, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is inappropriate for us to speculate. From the source linked above: "If water is present in

the atmosphere of HD 154672b, it could transition between gaseous and liquid phases along the planet’s orbit," on page six. It is not definite, but it is also not original research. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on degree of speculation, its author and purpose. That hyperbolic speculation is launched there merely to illustrate the predicted variation of surface temperature (weak claim). However, existence of water implies existence of life (strong claim, WP:REDFLAG) and can't be accepted as is, IMO. Note that this speculation is only mentioned in passing in the Discussion of the article. Putting it forward as a DYK hook would be WP:UNDUE. Materialscientist (talk) 07:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I guess we could do a standard temperature variation hook, but it would lose a lot of the interest factor. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 26

The Bubble (Parks and Recreation)

5x expanded by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self nom at 18:59, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • My reaction is "so what?", unless you can insert something that makes it interesting, unusual, punchy. Tony (talk) 07:50, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • I had trouble coming up with anything particular sexy for this DYK. I thought the Gould one could be of interest since Gould himself has a fanbase separate from the show itself. I will see if I can come up with something better. In the meantime, however, the Gould one is accurate and checks out, right? — Hunter Kahn 16:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edward H. Harte

Created by 4meter4 (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 10:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Doubled ref im question, suggest
ALT1:... that the American newspaper executive, journalist, philanthropist, and conservationist Edward H. Harte established in 2000 the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at the TAMU-CC with a 46 million dollar endowment? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:15, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interest level of hook is low. Surely there's something more catchy in the article. Who is going to know what "TAMU-CC" is (looks like a copyright-free licence). You don't want people to divert to that link-target; they'll never come back. Isn't it enough, here, to say just "Texax A&M University"? Could you shorten to "US" and ""? Brevity is good. Tony (talk) 08:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2:... that the American newspaper executive, journalist, philanthropist, and conservationist Edward H. Harte established at the Texax A&M University the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies which helped after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:15, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's way too long, I'm afraid. The 200-ch. limit is treated strictly, is it? Also, it goes into blue-carpet mode. What does it mean by "helped after"? Use "US" to save ch., and remove at least two of the professional words at the opening? Just keep the most important—they'll find out more in the article. Also, "established at the A the B is a bit awkward. Do we have to mention both institutions in full? ... that the US newspaper executive Edward H. Harte established a research institute at the Texax A&M University dedicated to ????? after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill? Tony (talk) 15:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please explain blue-carpet? English isn't my first language. Back then to a modified ALT1, although $s seem less catchy to me than oil spill (I didn't name the institution, nor the Bach cantatas). I dropped the philanthropist for shortening, what do you think? If it's still too long we might drop conservationist also, because the hook shows him as one. Please correct the figure, I'm not at all familiar with that.
ALT3:... that the American newspaper executive, journalist, and conservationist Edward H. Harte established in 2000 the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at the Texax A&M University with a US$46M endowment? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's 209 ch. You don't need journalist, do you? And US can go from $ ... clearly not Hong Kong dollars. Try
ALT4:... that in 2000 the American newspaper executive and conservationist Edward H. Harte established the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at the Texas A&M University with a $46M endowment? Tony (talk) 07:50, 2 June 2011 (UTC) PS I fixed the x typo. Tony (talk) 07:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, helpful! (I misunderstood "US" in your comment above.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • US is now the preferred way of the peak Chicago Manual of Style (16th ed., major announcement). You can use the dots if you want, but it will take up more space. Are you saying you endorse ALT4? If so, I'll tick it (since that seems to be important at DYK). Tony (talk) 10:01, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT4 is suggested (not sure what endorse means). But may be we should say U.S. American, America is so much greater than the US part. However, people seem to say America if they mean the US, right? Thanks for cleaning up the article which is not mine! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:13, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warqenah Eshate

Created by Llywrch (talk). Self nom at 06:09, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I felt that the hook was as short as I could make it without risking lack of comprehension; if the hook can be rewritten to make it snappier, I'd appreciate the help. Otherwise, I don't know what to make of this comment: does that mean the hook otherwise would pass -- or fail? (I would think that a real-life example of the literary theme of recognition, which is as old as Homer's Odyssey & the myth of Oedipus & has been evoked more recently in the movie Sommersby, for example, would be interesting. But if my judgment is wrong here, I will happily move on.) -- llywrch (talk) 20:18, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Llywrch, I'm trying to help, and you must have been offended to have left a complaint on my talk-page. Perhaps I was a little blunt, unintentionally. Please let's work on this hook and get it running. Tony (talk) 09:55, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Animation Council of the Philippines, Inc. and Animahenasyon

Created/expanded by AnakngAraw (talk). Self nom at 02:54, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to mention that above is a double nom. - AnakngAraw (talk) 23:26, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lacks the context to make it interesting as a stand-alone. ACPI needs to be spelled out (maybe then you can remove the last three words of the hook?). "annual animation" is a jingle (an an). Not sure the focus of interest is there, anyway. Is it the only one in SEAsia, or a significant one in the world? Tony (talk) 09:58, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT 1: ... that the Animation Council of the Philippines, Inc. is the sponsor of the yearly animation festival in the Philippines? - AnakngAraw (talk) 22:18, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT 2: ... that the Animation Council of the Philippines, Inc. sponsors the yearly festival that features the works of Filipino animators? - AnakngAraw (talk) 22:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Palestine Railways H class

Palestine Railways H class

Created by Motacilla (talk). Self nom at 01:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good point - sorry! I've now revised the wording (see above). Is this better?
I forgot to use the template that includes an image. The article has a photo; how can I add it to the nomination retrospectively? The photo will not be very clear when reduced to tDYK humbnail size but it should be recognisable as an old steam train at an old station. Also the sepia colour of the print would emphasise the sense of age. Motacilla (talk) 11:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Added the photo. Just see how I laid it down above. Bolded the topic in your modified/tweaked hook. - AnakngAraw (talk) 23:22, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! This should help me to remember to use the correct nomination template in future! Motacilla (talk) 18:53, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I do like this hook but as a general rule, shorter and clearer is better. Perhaps "... that the last standard gauge steam locomotive in use in Israel was a Palestine Railways H class 4-6-0 (pictured) originally built for the British army's Palestine Military Railway?" would work? Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 08:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • (e.c.) Origianl too long (248 ch.); photo useless at that size. Please unlink "British Army". Cluttered, and I don't quite get the point of the hook. Ed's is 187 ch and much better. Tony (talk) 16:07, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nadira Isayeva

  • ALT1... that the prosecution of Russian journalist Nadira Isayeva was built primarily on psychological and linguistic examinations?
Reviewed:Volkswagen Chattanooga Assembly Plant

Created by Khazar (talk). Self nom at 06:32, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Tweaked ALT1 just now, but I prefer the original hook in any case. Khazar (talk) 04:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Bay Secondary College

  • ... that a number of highly gifted primary school (elementary school) aged students attend Rose Bay Secondary College for a day a week across a school term to undertake advanced studies in a number of areas?

5x expanded by Danjel (talk). Self nom at 13:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • With thanks to User:Kudpung for copyediting the final draft.
  • DYK Check seems to be inaccurately reporting the expansion (at least here). So, to make sure... The previous edit was: Prose size (text only): 1263 characters (204 words); the new version is: Prose size (text only): 8978 characters (1448 words). -danjel (talk to me) 13:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewed Islanding [[7]] and Charles Edward Keyser [[8]]. -danjel (talk to me) 14:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 27

Total Recall (2012 film)

Created by Rusted AutoParts (talk). Nominated by Jhenderson777 (talk) at 00:40, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Simplify that: ALT1:

WASP-13b

5x expanded by Starstriker7 (talk). Self nom at 02:24, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: Argentina at the 1972 Summer Paralympics, South Africa at the 1972 Summer Paralympics, Australia at the 1972 Summer Paralympics --Starstriker7(Talk) 02:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: a core can't have non-existent mass. The claim is that there may be no core. — kwami (talk) 10:15, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In which case the centre of the planet is a vacuum: was this really in a scientific publication of some repute? Kevin McE (talk) 12:14, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, they mean there is no differentiated rocky or metallic core, as we think there is in Jupiter. That is, just (liquified) gas all the way down, like a star, with no denser material at the center. Or not much of a core at the center. — kwami (talk) 19:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1:... that extrasolar planet WASP-13b's low mass is most likely attributed to a core of very low mass, or to the total lack of a core? --Starstriker7(Talk) 15:18, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
low overall mass is attributed to ...? Tony (talk) 11:30, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We don't need to discuss the relative possibility of attribution: is probably due to or is attributed to. As soon as we read a scientist's opinion, we know for a fact that it is attributed to (by one person at least). Kevin McE (talk) 12:29, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Phonon noise

Created by Teply (talk). Self nom at 01:32, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Argentina at the 1972 Summer Paralympics, South Africa at the 1972 Summer Paralympics, Australia at the 1972 Summer Paralympics

Created by Doh5678 (talk). Self nom at 00:57, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Argentina: Newness, length, and referencing check out. An article has been reviewed. My only note is that Argentina's portion of the hook, where it sent a delegation, is not directly cited anywhere in the article.
South Africa: Same issue as with Argentina.
Australia: Same issue as with both Argentina and South Africa. Once the beginning portion of each article, where it states that they did indeed send delegations, is directly cited, these three should be good to go. --Starstriker7(Talk) 02:33, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
All three are covered by the source in the second sentence saying how many athletes were in the delegation (and for that matter any of the source in the articles which show results for athletes at the Games). Unless you're worried about the word delegation itsel;f in which case you'd be lucky to find a source and perhaps "team" or "athletes" would be a more appropriate choice - Basement12 (T.C) 12:48, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected hook from "sent a team" to "sent teams", the three teams were separate - Basement12 (T.C) 22:02, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm struggling to find the focus of interest. So what if three countries sent teams to this paralympics event? Is there possibly an interest factor in that all three are in the Southern Hemisphere? Or that it was the first time for any of them? Tony (talk) 11:33, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Adjusted hook accordingly. Doh5678 Talk 18:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I was unsure about the hook to begin with but as I wanted it to go forward stood back but I have to admit that I'm not sure it's at all interesting. Even adding the southern hemisphere bit what about Peru at the 1972 Summer Paralympics, New Zealand at the 1972 Summer Paralympics, Rhodesia at the 1972 Summer Paralympics and Kenya at the 1972 Summer Paralympics? Personally I'd suggest different hooks for each article as the way forward. Sorry to throw a spanner in the works - Basement12 (T.C) 19:20, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If I did what you suggest I should do, would I have to 5x expand the article or would something else happen? Doh5678 Talk 23:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

George Tyler Wood

5x expanded by Allen3 (talk). Self nom at 09:44, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please refrain from such personal attacks. I know perfectly well that multiple sentences, even a whole paragraph can be supported with one cite. However, the ref should also be cited immediatly after the hook sentence whilst the article is on the Main Page. You can of course remove it when the DYK is over. Cheers. --Eisfbnore talk 19:25, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Shouldn't it be Senator Wood rather than Governor Wood? He resigned as Senator to command the unit. He didn't become Governor until after his military service (granted immediately after, but still after). OCNative (talk) 13:51, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with OCN: there was no Governor GT Wood before the Mexican-American war. Suggest ... that George Tyler Wood, later Governor of Texas, resigned his seat on the Texas Senate at the beginning of the Mexican-American War to command a military unit? Kevin McE (talk) 21:16, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with this change is that members of legislatures (i.e. one of many resigning) resigning during a time of war to join the military is a fairly common occurrence, and thus generates a rather mundane hook fact in comparison to the resignation of a chief executive. As reviewers appear unwilling to use initial hook then I would suggest ALT2: ... that the campaign of George Tyler Wood for Governor of Texas was aided by Isaac Van Zandt dying from yellow fever? --Allen3 talk 21:37, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We could still catch the spirit of the original hook (and spice it up a little), with this ALT:
ALT3:... that George Tyler Wood resigned from the Texas Senate at the beginning of the Mexican-American War to command a military unit but was elected Governor of Texas at the end of that same war? OCNative (talk) 09:02, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please see User:Rjanag/DYK mantra for an explanation as to why run on suggestions like ALT3 make bad hooks. --Allen3 talk 11:14, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wildlife of Tanzania

Grey Crowned Crane national Bird of Tanzania
Purple African Violet

5x expanded by Nvvchar (talk), Rosiestep (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk). Self nom at 08:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT 1 hook seems poorly substantiated: the external source that it seems based on is the commercial site of a travel company, and its comment about where the Crowned Crane can be seen is "can be seen in the Ngorongoro Crater as well as other game viewing locations. " That is a long way short of claiming that it is "found in all game-viewing locations". Kevin McE (talk) 20:26, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Since the hook is referenced to a commercial site and is also overstated, I have removed this reference. I suggest the following alternative hook instead. I have added one more reliable reference in the article to support the reworded text also
ALT 3: ... that the conservation status of Grey Crowned Cranes (pictured), found in wetland-grassland habitats of Eastern and Southern Africa, including Tanzania, is listed as vulnerable?
Includes commas and removes extraneous 'the'. Mephtalk 01:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Kamara

Reviewed:2011 Manhattan terrorism plot

Created by Khazar (talk). Self nom at 06:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go. Jaespinoza (talk) 06:53, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vivienne Osborne

Created by MichaelQSchmidt (talk). Self nom at 04:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Short by 467 characters of prose, according to DYKCheck. Mephtalk 04:48, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Now at 1537.[12] Thanks for the good eyes. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:50, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)Recheck the hook for close paraphrasing. Mephtalk 06:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article re-organized for flow and close paraphrasing addressed. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:37, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ready. Mephtalk 08:18, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From Dust

5x expanded by Mephistophelian (talk). Self nom at 02:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nom reviewed #Vivienne Osborne, and helped create a better hook. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 08:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to improve the hook further, before it goes live. If anyone else has any additional feedback, I'd be grateful. Thank you. Mephtalk 04:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. As it waits to cycle, you'll have plenty of time. :) Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest cutting the "with Ubisoft as its publisher"--less interesting info that dilutes the punch of the rest. Very nice hook on the whole, though. Khazar (talk) 07:05, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is the alt. version an improvement? Mephtalk 08:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Suggested alt. First was 2005 visit, then was research, then was game. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:05, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Let's go with ALT2. Mephtalk 19:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There were several trips; 1999 appears to be the inspirational one. Mephtalk 06:41, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 28

2010 in women's ice hockey

Created by Maple_Leaf (Maple_Leaf). Self nom, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

2011 in women's ice hockey

  • ... that in 2011 in women's ice hockey, Hilary Knight scored the game-winning goal as the United States defeated Canada in a 3-2 overtime in the gold-medal game at the IIHF World Women’s Championships?

Created by Maple_Leaf (Maple_Leaf). Self nom, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Wildlife of Djibouti

Khat

5x expanded by Nvvchar (talk), Tibetan Prayer (talk), Rosiestep (talk). Nominated by Rosiestep (talk) at 03:18, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems odd to describe something that causes coronary vasoconstriction, myocardial infarction, depression, paranoia, anxiety, irritation, sleeping difficulties, impotence, gastrointestinal tract problems, and oral cancer as a medicinal plant. It is a psychotropic social drug. Kevin McE (talk) 11:42, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I never heard of khat before reading 2 pages about it last night in an online book. I used the phrase medicinal plant as the hook's references comes from the book entitled: Handbook of African medicinal plants. I'll offer up an alt, removing "medicinal plant", but note that I also have no objection to sticking with Nvv's original hook, which I was unaware of when I nom'ed the article last night. ALT1: ... that khat (pictured), endemic to Djibouti, is chewed by 90% of the men and one of its effects is a state of euphoria? --Rosiestep (talk) 13:27, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The 90% bit is the focus of interest: extraordinary. Hook is overlinked; at least unlink the dictionary word "euphoria". I've tweaked it. ALT2: ... that khat (pictured), which induces a state of euphoria and is endemic to Djibouti, is chewed by 90% of the men? Tony (talk) 13:41, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
previous review

Euphorbia godana, a unique plant found in Djibouti

  • ... that in the wildlife of Djibouti (pictured a forest plant), in the harsh terrain, forests account for less than one percent of the total land area of the country?

Created/expanded by Nvvchar (talk), Tibetan Prayer (talk), Rosiestep (talk). Self nom at 08:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Ben Auerbach

Created by Jrcla2 (talk). Self nom at 00:37, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not sure whether the principal sources meet Wikipedia's reliability standards, but setting that aside for now, I note these other issues: The relevant source cited in the article say that it was the 1940–41 season (not 1939–40) that ended 18–1 and without postseason play, and also says Auerbach was caption "in 1941" (the NYU Athletics page says "in 1940", but from other date formatting there, it seems clear that they mean the 1940–41 season). SJ Morg (talk) 08:44, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another point I forgot to mention above: The only source the article gives for dates of birth and death is a link that, at least on my browser, only goes to a blank-fields version of the SSDI page, and if I then manually enter Benjamin Auerbach's name, I get 8 results, at least two of which have birth dates that could plausibly be someone who played basketball in college in 1939. Do you have another source for the dates of birth and death (or at least one of those)? SJ Morg (talk) 09:44, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • You were right about him being a captain in his senior year of 1940–41, so that part is erroneous. However, it is correct that they went 18–1 in 1939–40 when he was a junior. I'm not sure what you read that would indicate otherwise (?). I've removed "captain" from the hook.
  • The reason I know his birth and death dates from SSDI is two-fold: historical context, and age when graduated. Back in the early days of college basketball, players did not travel all over the country to play for teams except for only the biggest of the big (i.e., in the 1930s and 1940s, a California native would not have gone anywhere but California or Nevada to play college basketball unless it was the University of Kentucky, for instance). A school like NYU especially did not draw talent from the state of Ohio, which would eliminate the one quasi-feasible option. Hence, the New York-born Auerbach is the one who played at NYU. The other reason is if it were the Auerbach who was born on October 31, 1917, that would make him very close to age 24 when he graduated in 1941. That's extremely old to be graduating college (and once again, it wasn't uncommon for students to graduate younger back then, such as 20 years old). The likelihood that (a) he was raised in Ohio but played for NYU, and (b) he was almost 24 when he graduated, made it pretty simple to use the other DOB/DOD option. Jrcla2 (talk) 12:33, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • My confusion over which season was the one mentioned in the hook resulted from my misreading the jewsinsports text, which refers to each season by only a single year, causing me to think that "1940" meant the 1940–41 season. Looking at it again, I see that "1940" there meant 1939–40, so the hook is OK.
    However, regarding the birth and death dates: Sorry, but your process and explanation simply are not good enough for Wikipedia. You haven't identified any source that explicitly states that this Ben Auerbach was born on the specific date you gave or died on the specific date you gave. If you had a source for one date or the other, then you could use SSDI for the other one, but you have neither. It doesn't matter how logical your reasoning is, you are still making some assumptions to reach the conclusion that the specific set of dates you found in SSDI refer to this Benjamin Auerbach. As it is, the article has no source for either date, and even your main source (the jewsinsports page) says "unknown" for both of these dates (not even a year for either). Those dates need to be removed entirely from the article until and unless someone finds an actual source for them. You might consider putting a note on the article's talk page giving those dates and your theory as to why you believe they probably refer to the specific Ben Auerbach being written about here, as a possible aid to someone who might be interested in researching it. (BTW, I tried some Googling myself, as well as a search of a newspaper obit database that I can access through my library, to see if I could find something, and found nothing useful.)
    Beyond that, I still have serious misgivings about the suitability of your other sources. Except for the NYU Athletics page, which gives just two sentences on the subject, all of your other citations are from two blogs, and blogs are not generally considered reliable sources for Wikipedia (with certain exceptions). I hope the other DYKs you've been credited with (according to your user page) used better sources. I'd welcome input from another editor on this, since I am a novice at reviewing DYK nominations, but if the dates issue is dealt with, I would consider approving it under rule D13. SJ Morg (talk) 07:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This just occurred to me: How do you even know he's dead? He could still be alive, in his 90s, and in that case he wouldn't be in the SSDI at all. For all we know, this article could be a BLP, which would raise the bar even higher. SJ Morg (talk) 11:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the DOB/DOD and put it on the talk page like you recommended. I'm fine with the removal. However, this player clearly passes WP:NBASKETBALL and also notability thresholds for college athletes. He won a major award (as determined by its inclusion on {{College Basketball Awards}}), not to mention he played professionally in a league that preceded the NBA. JewsInSports has been used as a reference in other DYKs, so I'm not sure why it's suddenly not appropos. I appreciate your thoroughness in the review, however, so I'm hoping that we can meet halfway with this DOB/DOD removal. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:49, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, but for the record: I never questioned his notability. And, regarding sources: What other editors (reviewing past DYKs) felt about whether jewsinsports.org is a good enough source is irrelevant; there are plenty of contributors to WP whose standards are too low. I took a look at that site (before my first review) after noting that your citation only cites "jewinsports.org" as the source, which I consider too vague a citation description under Wikipedia policy (even a citation of The New York Times would require more info. than that, such as the author's name and date of publication or post), and it did not help. Nothing under its Home page or FAQ page identifies whose site it is. The "credits" page lists "directors", but doesn't say what they are directors of. Is jewinsports an organization of some sort, or is it just a website? The site itself does not say! (which raises credibility and reliability concerns).
    If it were a website so well known that there was an article about it on WP, then more detail in how the citation identifies the source would not necessarily be needed, but that is not the case here. So, I'm left wondering: Who edits that website? Do they practice good journalism, checking of facts, objectivity, etc.? I am not saying or even implying that they don't. The site may very well have a good reputation for that, but I have no idea, so it's reasonable to question whether it meets WP:RS. I'd be much less concerned if it were being used only as a supplementary source for your article, but it is virtually your only source. You don't have any newspaper, magazine or book references for the subject? In cases like this (1940 athlete), I concede it takes a lot more work to locate info. from sources that practice journalism professionally (and have a good reputation), but that is nevertheless what you should be trying to do, in my opinion. Anyway, I don't have enough experience reviewing DYK noms to know whether this area of concern is generally considered sufficient reason to reject a DYK nom on its own, and since you dealt with my other concerns well, I am willing to meet you halfway. The nom meets all other requirements, regarding article length, newness, hook length, placement of inline citations for facts cited in hook. SJ Morg (talk) 10:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Algerine (horse)

  • ... that the American Thoroughbred racehorse Algerine won the 1876 Belmont Stakes without winning another race beforehand?

Created by Froggerlaura (talk). Self nom at 14:59, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: Meanest Genie -Froggerlaura (talk)

Forrest McClendon

Created by Scanlan (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 06:23, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Among the Truthers

Created by Qrsdogg (talk). Self nom at 23:46, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go, nice to see some book articles.Tibetan Prayer 10:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hook is overlinked: don't you want them to click through to the bolded article? Won't they access the other links there? "more farfetched, paranoid conspiracies are gaining adherents in the United States"—ambiguous (greater numbers of, or more intensely far-fetched ..."?); needs to be fixed in the article. Perhaps a more exciting hook would be this, since readers love a bit of conflict:

ALT1 ... that Among the Truthers argues there is growing popularity in the US for far-fetched, paranoid conspiracies, though some reviewers have raised issues about the book's focus and political claims? [198 ch] Tony (talk) 16:09, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the input. You're right, that sentence was ambiguous, I've reworded it a bit. I have no problems with using your suggested ALT1, although I do prefer "U.S." rather than "US". Qrsdogg (talk) 02:28, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Lodger (opera)

Created by GuillaumeTell (talk). Self nom at 10:46, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hm, looks as if I must have included the roles table in the count. I'll see if I can pad it out a bit more, though sources, whether on- or off-line are difficult to find. --GuillaumeTell 15:02, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Gilbert Cooper, Miravan

a painting of a man revulsed at the sight of a tomb broken open to reveal a skeleton

Created by Victuallers (talk). Self nom at 10:33, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lengths, dates and hook refs all good. Not sure the image looks fantastic at that size but i'll leave it for the admin adding to the queue to decide if the hook goes forward with or without it - Basement12 (T.C) 00:17, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think Joseph Wright of Derby should be unpiped. I've seen his work many times in museums, and I've never seen his name without the "of Derby". Also, is "revulsed" a word? Maybe "Miravan being revulsed" should be replaced with "Miravan's revulsion". MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 01:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As reviewer I can confirm than revulsed is indeed a word, but I can see the desire for a more common phrasing. I can also confirm that I know naff all about art so I'll duck out of the piping conversation - Basement12 (T.C) 01:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
tweaked those suggestions Victuallers (talk) 15:25, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heliopithecus

Created by Regstuff (talk). Self nom at 05:57, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No. 1 Long Range Flight RAAF

5x expanded by Nick-D (talk). Self nom at 01:11, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

5x expansion (192 words to 1276) and other requirements check out. Wasted Time R (talk) 20:57, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Al-Saqr

Created by Khazar (talk). Self nom at 00:07, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Connell Fort

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 23:39, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT:=... that in 1933, John L. Fort, a son of Mayor Connell Fort of Minden, Louisiana, shot to death Brisco Nation, a city council member who had quarreled with the mayor?
Reviewed Troy Yocum

Troy Yocum

Created by TParis (talk). Self nom at 21:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the article and changed the first name references to last names. Location of high school needed. There is not that much on him, he being only 31. The hook refers to a Guiness record, but what record? I think the article needs more work. Billy Hathorn (talk) 23:51, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've addressed the high school and Guinness record issues. Please use appropriate templates next time instead of adding comments into the prose of articles.--v/r - TP 00:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Billy Hathorn (talk) 14:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Salem

Reviewed: Hamill (film)

Created by Khazar (talk). Self nom at 19:11, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hamill (film)

Created by Erik (talk). Self nom at 15:33, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Length and date check out, and an interesting and well-reffed hook. I'll have to remember this one for my Netflix queue. Khazar (talk) 19:20, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ilocos Sur's 1st legislative district special election, 2011

Created by Howard the Duck (talk). Self nom at 14:09, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kafka's Soup

  • ... that recipes from the literary pastiche Kafka's Soup were used as audition pieces by a theatre company in the West country?

Created by User:Ka Faraq Gatri (talk). Self nom at 13:53, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Could someone with a good knowledge of French just check the three French articles cited just to make sure I haven't misinterpreted them. I think it's OK but I'd like to be sure.
  • ALT1... that a live performance of the French translation of Kafka's Soup included a sung recipe for onion tart? Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 14:23, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hermanus van Wyk

A black-and-white photography from 1872. Four middle-aged men sit behind a small folding table in front of a cottage. A book is prominently placed in the middle of the table.

Created by Pgallert (talk). Self nom at 13:46, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I put in the required sentence and changed a number of other things but I feel I should admit that this is not explicitly backed up by the source. Protection treaties did not involve any land sales and no money was exchanged in any of them. Implicitly the second hook part is supported, as the Pound Sterling price and the invalidation of the deal are meticulously documented, as well as that the land has been theirs ever since. If you feel this is too close to WP:OR I will try to find a source on how those deals were generally conducted--to find a reference for something that did not happen is always difficult. --Pgallert (talk) 11:02, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leipzig University Library

Description of the image

Created by Leszek Jańczuk (talk). Nominated by Leszek Jańczuk (talk) at 11:23, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of common English usage misconceptions

  • ... that many sentences in "first-rate writing" begin with conjunctions such as "and" or "but"?

Created by Airborne84 (talk). Self nom at 19:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this is my first try at a DYK nom. Perhaps these will work? Or perhaps the bolded wikilink should read: "common English usage misconception"?
Seems ok to me as previously mentioned above. The topic is now bolded in article. - AnakngAraw (talk) 23:05, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I like the previous alts 1 and 2, so numbered the latest hook versions as 3 and 4 respectively. - AnakngAraw (talk) 23:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In ALT 3, it is not a misconception that professional publications use double spacing: it is a misconception that such publications must or always use double spacing. By the same token, the word some would need to be inserted before professionally in ALT1 Kevin McE (talk) 14:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • First hook is ambiguous: "tsk tsk, look what those first-rate writers do? ALT1 same problem. ALT2 is OK, but a bit hackneyed. ALT3 "with ... with". ALT4 "that ... that" (remove the first). Tony (talk) 15:48, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't want to overwrite the text above, so I'll repost the modified versions below; that way the earlier versions are visible above. I deleted ALT 3 as it was redundant and added ALT 4.

Created by Airborne84 (talk). Self nom at 19:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For ALT 1, I tried to stay true to the misconception as related by the author at Type Desk. --Airborne84 (talk) 17:57, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT 5 ... that a preposition is something that a sentence can end with?
ALT 6 ... that it is not necessarily wrong to, in written English, split an infinitive? Kevin McE (talk) 13:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lol. Well done! --Airborne84 (talk) 16:13, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, vote ALT6 for humor value. Khazar (talk) 03:59, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT 7 ... that, in written English, it is not necessarily wrong to split an infinitive? - AnakngAraw (talk) 00:10, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe ALT 7 is a better version of ALT 6? - AnakngAraw (talk) 00:10, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's a better version. ALT 6 is more "in your face" and more people may see the humor, but is a bit halting. The split in ALT 7 is more subtle and will be recognized by fewer people, but the prose flows smoother (IMHO). --Airborne84 (talk) 05:16, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Of my two suggestions, I prefer ALT5: couldn't find a natural sounding way of splitting the infinitive. Maybe the subtlety eludes me: in what way is ALT 7 an example of splitting the infinitive? Kevin McE (talk) 12:23, 1 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]
My mistake. It's not a split infinitive. I just like the wording.

Any of the hooks above seem fine, but the ones with the most interest seem to be those about the prepositions and the split infinitives. --Airborne84 (talk) 01:22, 2 June 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Omar Belhouchet

  • ... that in 1993, the car of Algerian journalist Omar Belhouchet was machine-gunned while he was driving his children to school?
Reviewed:Argentina at the 1964 Summer Paralympics

Created by Khazar (talk). Self nom at 06:02, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Modeste Mutinga

Reviewed: Luis Durango

Created by Khazar (talk). Self nom at 04:32, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:10, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Durango

An African-American male wearing a black baseball helmet with a red jersey, displaying two eyes on the front. He is also holding two bats in his hand, one red and the another black.

2x expanded and sourced (BLP) by Giants27 (talk). Self nom at 03:49, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know this shouldn't be next in line, but I can't resist the baseball ones. Date, length, hook ref all good to go. Very nice expansion, and good hook. Kudos! Khazar (talk) 04:40, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Splendid image. Perhaps this should be a lead hook. - AnakngAraw (talk) 10:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ignorant question from someone who knows nothing about baseball: how far is it between the home plate and second base? Apterygial talk 10:14, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
90 feet. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, but my point is that this should be in the hook, because it's essentially meaningless to someone who doesn't follow baseball. Apterygial talk 11:30, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, I disagree. Those who want to learn more about the rules of American baseball can click on the link for first base; trying to add them in here would make the hook pretty clunky. In any case, I think it's pretty clear this is a "good" time, or it wouldn't be on a list like this. Cheers, Khazar (talk) 16:03, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1: ... that in 2006, San Diego Padres outfielder Luis Durango (pictured) was timed running the 90 feet (27 m) from home plate to first base in 3.4 seconds? Apterygial talk 11:14, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the fastest time recorded, then we should say so: if not, it needs some context for the reader to make some sense of it. I cycled around a circuit of local villages in 61minutes 37 seconds yesterday: is that remarkable? Kevin McE (talk) 12:37, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe it;s the fastest ever, but it is still very impressive and interesting, in my mind.Giants27(T|C) 18:53, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

La Esmeralda Dam

Created/self-nom--NortyNort (Holla) 07:03, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

R v Baillie

Date, length good to go; well-referenced and researched piece from the look of it; offline hook source accepted IGF. Nice piece. Khazar (talk) 05:24, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Qatar at the 2010 Asian Para Games

Created by Bill william compton (talk). Self nom at 04:58, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whichever blurb is preferred, the the before Qatar is redundant: only ALT1, even after that, is grammatically sound, and then the preposition should be to rather than in. Article looks very much like a translation, or the output of a non-native English speaker: I've had a bit of a go at improving the English in it, but others might want a look.
Yes, I'm not a native English speaker, so sometimes make such grammatical errors, sorry for that; also this article was made in hurry, because I just have too much on my plate at the moment. Is there any other problem? — Bill william comptonTalk 13:08, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 29

Michael McFaul

2x expanded and sourced (BLP) by OCNative (talk). Self nom at 12:12, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Kromer

Created by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 01:03, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wardah Hafidz

Created by Khazar (talk), Crisco 1492 (talk). Nominated by Crisco 1492 (talk) at 09:59, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Imitation of Christ

5 x expanded by History2007 (talk). Self nom at 5:41, June 1 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed (other article reviewed by nominator): Gita Dhyanam just below. History2007 (talk) 12:43, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Length and date are both fine, great expansion there. The hook is ok, but it is slightly overlinked and rather basic. Suggest ALT1... that while Saint Francis of Assisi advocated a path of poverty as the Imitation of Christ, Thomas à Kempis presented a path based on a focus on the interior life? Qrsdogg (talk) 18:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually to be correct the alt would need to differentiate on outward preaching not poverty. Like Francis, Kempis was no Donald Trump look alike, but Kempis did not advocate active preaching, while Francis did. So that may be a little bit too complicated to explain in a DYK-telegram. And the reason I did not bring Kempis into the hook was that his book is so well known, and the idea of Imitation pre-dated him - that was why I started on the expansion path a few days ago, just to clarify that the ideal pre-dated Kempis. History2007 (talk) 20:18, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As ALT2 we could try:
... that the ideal of the Imitation of Christ goes back to the earliest days of Christianity?
That may be easier to say in one sentence, and not controversial. And it will also echo the message of the article that "the ideal of imitation existed long before the 14th century" and the Devotio Moderna movement, etc.History2007 (talk) 20:32, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2 works, although it isn't too surprising. Tough to find something real interesting yet accurate here. Qrsdogg (talk) 14:28, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, let us go with ALT2. But on a topic as ancient as this, if it is surprising, then there will be 17 people with 37 different angles on it. And once it is controversial, then the debates about the accuracy of the statement start. But in my experience many people associate the idea with Kempis (because his book has over 1,000 editions and is so widely read) and are unaware of the history of the topic before him. That was the reason for writing the page in the first place. Anyway, time to move on. Thanks for your input. History2007 (talk) 20:41, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gita Dhyanam

The setting of the Bhagavad Gita: Krishna and Arjuna at Kurukshetra, 18–19th century painting

Created by Presearch (talk). Self nom at 19:41, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed (other article reviewed by nominator): Ministry of Tourism (Ghana) (DIFF)
How does the pic tie to the hook? It's not clear at all.BarkingMoon (talk) 00:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The image is a representation of the scene in which the Bhagavad Gita was delivered (according to tradition). The charioteer is Krishna (who spoke the Gita) and the passenger is Arjuna, to whom it was spoken. For those familiar with the Gita (a minority in Europe/USA, but probably most in India), this would be a scene recognizable as the setting of the Gita. It's recognizable as such in the article, but I confess I have doubts that it's large enough here to be readily visible as a chariot (other opinions?). Of course, even if its details aren't clear, the image may still convey to most viewers a sense of South-Asian tradition, which is appropriate to the topic. Feel free to use the hook without the image, if that seems preferable. -- Presearch (talk) 04:28, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Dallimore

  • Reviewed: Claiming exemption, this only my 2nd DYK nomination.

Created by Bagumba (talk). Self nom at 09:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are assuming that the reader will know which sport this jargon belongs to. There are vast swathes of the world in which knowledge of baseball (and I only know that that is the sport in question because I can see the link destinations) is near zero. Kevin McE (talk) 12:19, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interestingly you don't apply this to non-U.S. sport related ones. Can a English-speaking Chinese understand the hook at Robert Ramsay (cricketer), George Nash (cricketer)? –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 16:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That English speaking Chinese person will know that cricket is being discussed, because it says that professional cricketer George Nash ...: there was no such clue in this hook initially. Thanks to Baguma, there is now. Kevin McE (talk) 12:39, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Updated and specified "baseball" in "Major League Baseball":
ALT1 ... that after playing nine seasons in the minor leagues and being labelled a journeyman, Brian Dallimore made his Major League Baseball debut as a 30-year-old and hit a grand slam for his first major league hit? —Bagumba (talk) 18:26, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Weir (loyalist)

Created by Jeanne boleyn (talk). Self nom at 07:30, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Length and date check out. Assuming good faith on the offline source. Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:02, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Papyrus 49

Description of the image

5x expanded by Leszek Jańczuk (talk). Self nom at 00:26, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aland is an autonomous region of Finland, and is unlikely to have an authoritative viewpoint on biblical manuscripts. according to German theologian Kurt Aland, Papyrus 49 is one of three....
In ALT 1, the article only suggests that it is probable according to one scholar that the two documents have the same scribe: that is not an absolute assertion of fact. Kevin McE (talk) 12:32, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I should expand this article. Hatch, Welles and other palaeographers also believed that scribe was the same. Thanks. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 23:57, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have added more details to the article. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 19:41, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Codex Vindobonensis 751

Created by Drmies (talk). Self nom at 20:42, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Church of the Holy Archangels Michael and Gabriel, Church of Saint Paraskevi, Nesebar

Apse view of a richly decorated yet partially preserved medieval Orthodox church

5x expanded by TodorBozhinov (talk). Self nom at 20:05, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Angel Delgadillo

Created by Ktr101 (talk). Self nom at 19:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Enlil and Ninlil

Drawing of Enlil and Ninlil taken from a mural decoration of Susa. Lord Enlil (with hooves and horns of the Bull God) and the Lady Ninlil. Second half of the 2nd millenium BC, Louvre, Paris. Baked bricks, height 54 inches.

Created by Paul Bedson (talk). Self nom at 17:42, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for reviewing! I have improved the source "Miguel Ángel Borrás; Centre de Cultura Contemporània de Barcelona (2000). Joan Goodnick Westenholz, The Foundation Myths of Mesopotamian Cities, Divine Planners and Human Builder in La fundación de la ciudad: mitos y ritos en el mundo antiguo. Edicions UPC. pp. 48–. ISBN 9788483013878. Retrieved 29 May 2011." so it is clearer that Joan Westenholz discusses this in an English chapter of a Spanish book. Paul Bedsontalk 21:55, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Earthstopper

a man digging in the dark

Created/expanded by Victuallers (talk). Self-nominated at 15:45, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

reviewed Carex hirta Victuallers (talk) 14:27, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Debate between Winter and Summer

Winter and Summer
A Summer scene
A Winter scene

Created by Paul Bedson (talk). Self nom at 15:09, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hook's ok; article is not. "it's" ... please. Ellipsis points are three dots, not six, spaced left and right. The images seem to be trivial. Isn't there a better image of ancient Sumeria or an artefact from there? Tried Commons? Tony (talk) 15:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've fixed the Ellipsis and "it's". The images reflect Summer and Winter, the subject of the myth. I agree Summer alone appears trivial for the context of DYK?, so I've added winter as well (if Blofeld is going to have 2 images with his Wildlife of Tanzania, I feel I can too). This fits in with the Debate series where two images represent the disputants, I think they look great in series this way and these particular two conjure images of Winter and Summer pretty well, which I feel is appropriate in an ancient short story where natural phenomena are so personified, why shouldn't they be imaged? The stock Sumerian tablet or cuneiform images are certainly not as colourful. There is another good "summer winter" single image if you search commons although this doesn't fit with the other debates in the series, I guess it could be used if space is a premium. Paul Bedsontalk 16:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've added the combo image as an alternative if needed along with specifying how one or both should be related in text. Hopefully this will help with review (hint hint) Paul Bedsontalk 00:12, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nueva Cádiz

Created by Bender235 (talk). Self nom at 12:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Expanded. Enough? --bender235 (talk) 09:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, it roughly needs 241 more characters to be eligible for DYK. Date is okay. Diego Grez (talk) 01:01, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carra Castle, Antrim

5x expanded by Dr. Blofeld (talk), Rosiestep (talk). Self nom at 10:54, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Miguel GonzálezTibetan Prayer 10:56, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Miguel González

A man dressed in red standing looking to the right.

Created by Diego Grez (talk). Self nom at 00:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks satisfactory.Tibetan Prayer 10:55, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's a very underwhelming hook: how many thousands of candidates for minor parties fail to get elected in local elections twice? Kevin McE (talk) 14:34, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt the Party for Democracy is a minor party, but well... I think I'll expand this a bit more later, and I'll suggest another hook. Diego Grez (talk) 20:58, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

61st FIFA Congress

Created by Gareth E Kegg (talk). Self nom at 23:19, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The source is good, thanks, but by the time that this gets approved for DYK, it's all going to be old news, since the vote is supposed to take place on Wednesday. Can we come up with a hook that's not time-sensitive? --Elonka 00:45, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"... that the opening ceremony of the 61st FIFA Congress featured Grace Jones, a Hammered dulcimer player, ballet and a juggler?" Hope you like it :) The page got 1.3k views today! In the news candidate? Gareth E Kegg (talk) 23:48, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Recommend we wait until the Congress is over, and then pick one of the notable events from within it? It'll probably be a couple weeks before this shows up on the mainpage, so we can pick a good retrospect hook. BTW, length and date of article both check out, it's just the hook we need to decide on. --Elonka 18:23, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beauty (dog)

Created by Miyagawa (talk). Self nom at 21:51, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Juliusz Karol Kunitzer

  • ... that Polish-German "cotton king" Juliusz Karol Kunitzer died in the second assassination attempt on his life?

Created by Piotrus (talk), HerkusMonte (talk), MyMoloboaccount (talk). Self nom at 21:48, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed #16th (Parachute) Field Ambulance)
All checks out, except that "second assassination attempt" isn't cited. What we have is that he was assassinated and that there had been at least one previous attempt: for all we know it could have been the tenth attempt. I think it's just a matter of rewriting the hook, unless a citation for "second" can be added. Moonraker (talk) 19:47, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
All sources note that the 1893 attempt was the first, but I cannot find a crystal clear claim the 1905 was the second. How about the alt below? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:58, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
All checks out for Alt1. Moonraker (talk) 08:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"On his life" is a bit redundant and clunky. Perhaps reduce to "... that Polish-German "cotton king" Juliusz Karol Kunitzer survived a 1893 assassination attempt, but died during that of 1905?" Nice hook either way, though. Khazar (talk) 05:37, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dizzy Nutter

5x expanded by Albacore (talk). Self nom at 21:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Fourth DYK, don't need to give a review. Albacore (talk) 21:30, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • While the article technically meets requirements (>5x expansion in the last 5 days, >1500B, and so forth), there is further information that could be added just from Baseball-Reference. Have you tried a Google News or Google Books search in that time period for more information? You'll also need to correct the links in the reference section (either all linked to the Wikipedia page on Baseball-Reference or none). — KV5Talk21:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

16th (Parachute) Field Ambulance


Self nom Jim Sweeney (talk) 18:56, 29 May 2011 (UTC) [reply]

reviewed Ballylough 29 May entry. Jim Sweeney (talk) 19:04, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT: ... that on 20 November 1943 a wounded Airborne Forces Surgeon from the 16th (Parachute) Field Ambulance carried out over 150 operations?
Our readers assume that bolded items appearing in the DYK section might be re-worded for "catchiness" Jim Sweeney (talk) 23:32, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If required I prefer ALT 3

William Thompson (journalist)

  • ... that newspaper editor Col. William Thompson won his 1871 shootout with a rival newspaper editor despite sustaining severe gunshot wounds, including a bullet lodged behind his eye, and a beating from a cane?

Created by Jorgenev (talk). Self nom at 18:52, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The hook originally had "Col. William Thompson". This should be either "Col. William Thompson" or "Col. William Thompson". I've made it the former, but if you prefer the latter, go ahead and change it. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 04:17, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Finn Wischmann

  • ... that Norwegian botanist Finn Wischmann wrote more than 45,000 herbarium sheets and 21,000 checklists, recording more than half a million plant discoveries?

Created by Eisfbnore (talk). Self nom at 18:44, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Irlo Bronson, Sr.

Portrait of a smiling middle-aged man dressed in a suit and tie

Created by Connormah (talk). Self nom at 18:30, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I assume he is notable for something other than being an (real) estate agent: should the blurb not indicate grounds for notability? Kevin McE (talk) 20:48, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Bronson served in both houses of the Florida Legislature and he is notable for that. Thank you-RFD (talk) 12:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In that case ALT1 ... that Irlo Bronson (pictured), who served in both houses of the Florida Legislature, conducted the sale of the land that is present-day Walt Disney World? Otherwise it looks as though we are simply identifying an estate agent. Kevin McE (talk) 15:02, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Epsilon II Archaeological Site

5x expanded by Nyttend (talk). Self nom at 15:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ballylough

5x expanded by Tibetan Prayer (talk). Self nom at 13:54, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

date and x 5 expansion ok Jim Sweeney (talk) 19:01, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arvid Stålarm the Younger

Created by Skäpperöd (talk). Self nom at 13:53, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merkantilt biografisk leksikon

Created by Eisfbnore (talk). Self nom at 12:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Commitment: Love, Sex, Marriage, and My Family

Created by Cirt (talk). Self nom at 08:37, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I reviewed At the Pershing: But Not for Me. -- Cirt (talk) 08:40, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At the Pershing: But Not for Me

5x expanded by Lexein (talk). Self nom at 08:33, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Bahrain

A woman in Bahrain wearing traditional wedding dress

Created/expanded by AnakngAraw (talk). Self nom at 07:15, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1 better, I think, but needs to be clarified. I don't supposes it's the first such univ. for women in the whole Arab world, is it? Possibly on the Arabian peninsula? I'm trying to find the biggest honest claim that can be phrased in.

So there are public universities for women? And there are domestic (non-international) universities there for women?

Ref 1, to justify a fairly sweeping statement, is this. Is it reliable? I'm a bit nervous about it; who's the publisher? Doesn't seem to be up-front about it. Is it for tourists? Tony (talk) 14:53, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish response to The Forty Days of Musa Dagh

Created by Mbz1 (talk) and by Invertzoo (talk). Self nom at 06:10, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article is poorly written, and is stitched together in such a way as to overmphasize the book's impact ("it played a role in organizing the Jewish resistance to the Nazis." No, not really) as well as to decontextualize it by focusing on Jewish and only Jewish interest in the book. There is a reasonably well-organized section of the article on the book itself The Forty Days of Musa Dagh called "Resonance among Jews." This appears to be forked from that article and I suggest a redirect to that section. The "Jewish response" article also is confused in its focus. The "Impact in Eretz Yisrael" section, for instance, says one contingency plan drawn up by Jews against a possible German invasion of mandatory Palestine was called the "Musa Dagh" plan. But that's not a response to the book -- that's a "response" to the actual heroic Armenian action at the actual seige at Musa Dagh, the event that inspired the Austrian-Jewish author Franz Werfel to write The Forty Days of Musa Dagh in the first place.Westbankfainting (talk) 16:14, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The user engages in the original research and trying to re-write the history.
It is also quite ridiculous to complain that the article named Jewish response to The Forty Days of Musa Dagh focusing on Jewish and only Jewish interest in the book. I would not mind if the user is to write an article for example about Anti-Semites response to The Forty Days of Musa Dagh, but the article I wrote is about Jewish response to The Forty Days of Musa Dagh, and it is well sourced by reliable, scholarly, academic sources.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:31, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You misunderstand me. I have no doubt that a book written by an Austrian Jew in 1933 (during the rise of the third reich) about a heroic seige endured by an outnumbered and outgunned people facing genocide made an impression on a jewish audience. It was an inspirational tale with relevance for its time. What underpinned it as a useful metaphor was the reality of events at Musa Dagh. It was both the book, and the thing in itself. Furthermore, there were many other metaphors of resistance popular in the Jewish ghettos of Nazi occupied Europe. To write a separate, stitched together article on "Jewish reactions" to the book seriously overstates its importance both for Jewish resistance under Nazi rule (which you'll notice makes no mention of the book or the actual events at Musa Dagh, reflecting the fact that the book is a footnote in the tale of Jewish resistance) and for 20th Century Zionism, which takes most of its metaphors of resistance and truimph from the Bible and Jewish history, rather than Armenian history. The real point here is that a discussion of the book and its impact is best placed in the context of the article on The Forty Days of Musa Dagh. It's an interesting bit of cultural history. But doing it this way is seriously misleading to the reader (basically because it's way out of proportion; had the book never been written, Jewish resistance such as it was would have been the same). By the way, I got involved here becaus I fixed an article now called 1983 West Bank fainting epidemic (it was a mess) and you're not involved with that article at all. I'm now keeping an eye on this page as a result.Westbankfainting (talk) 17:23, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, potential reviewers should be aware that the above user was just blocked for WP:HOUNDing Mbz, so this nomination is still in need of review. I worked on this article a bit just now, so it probably shouldn't be me. Khazar (talk) 04:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For clarity's sake I have struck (but not removed) the comments from the blocked user. OCNative (talk) 04:22, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid I think the article could do with some work. In the section #Impact on resistance forces and victims of the Holocaust, I believe there is too much emphasis on where Musa Dagh "pops up" and little on the overall impact as suggested by a source that takes a wider view. Also, I don't think "and victims of the Holocaust" is as clear as it needs to be. There are lots of sources from ghettos, which isn't even close. We're talking "oppressed Jewish people" (in this case), but the term "holocaust" refers to acts of genocide rather than anti-Semitism in general. There may be an issue where the term refers to solely Jews, as well. I think the section needs rewriting to bring it more into line with other articles, particularly on the structure (too many direct quotations) and unclear narrative – there is no overall discussion. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 21:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the suggestion. This article is not about the Holocaust, and not about ghettos, and not about an impact. This article is about a particular book The Forty Days of Musa Dagh and about how this book affected (and in some situations changed) the lives of the Jews during Second World War. IMO this is a fascinating, and in some way a finished story. Just think about this: A Jewish poet writes a novel about Armenian Genocide, and then some time after the novel was published, reading this novel helps Jews who became the victims of even worse genocide on their own.
About the structure of the article. I have used quite a few sources, but the main source is this one. The structure of the article is very close to the structure of this source. Yes, I did include lots of quotations, but this is an unusual article about a special situation. It is based on the testimonies of the people who read the book in ghettos many of whom perished there. They are talking about their feelings towards the book, and I decided it is better to let them speak for themselves. Maybe it was the last book they read. --Mbz1 (talk) 22:15, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, the header wording issue raised by Grandiose has now been fixed. I agree that the number of direct quotes might be re-examined here, but I'm not sure it's a significant enough problem to reject the DYK nom. This one still seems to need an official review if anybody's interested. Cheers, Khazar (talk) 06:47, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gerhard Schönbacher

Created by EdgeNavidad (talk). Self nom at 10:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date and length check out, but from the article it is not clear that Schönbacher finished last on purpose in 1979. The article only says that Philippe Tesnière rode slow on purpose, and that only after his drop-out Schönbacher finished last. The one statement that could be construed as Schönbacher being slow on purpose is that he stopped and kissed the road just before the finish line of the final stage - but that would be too much a stretch, since by then he already held the last position, and nothing would have changed if he had not kissed the road. Skäpperöd (talk) 13:43, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, the 'on purpose' part is my interpretation, and currently not in the article. Him kissing the road costed him less than 10 seconds, so it is not important for the result. Suggested alternative:
ALT1: ... that after cyclist Gerhard Schönbacher received much publicity for finishing last in the 1979 Tour de France, the rules were changed to avoid riders finishing last on purpose, but Schönbacher again finished last in the 1980 Tour de France?
I think something can be removed, but I'm not sure what.--EdgeNavidad (Talk · Contribs) 18:07, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Aucoin

Created by GorillaWarfare (talk). Self nom at 22:10, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Length, hook and refs checks out. Possible alt hook: ... that Peter Aucoin's article "Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums" has been cited over 500 times? yorkshiresky (talk) 09:38, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Current nominations

Articles created/expanded on May 30

WASP-44, WASP-44b

Created by Starstriker7 (talk). Self nom at 06:22, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WASP-44 was created on 1 June 2011. --Starstriker7(Talk) 06:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Slovenia international footballers

  • Reviewed: Dennis Marks [22]
  • Comment: Article created on May 30, expanded lead over 1,500 characters on June 2.

Created by Timbouctou (talk). Self nom at 17:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • A noun is missing at the end of the hook; also, most-capped would be unclear to a layman.
  • The original hook ends with a noun already. An "international" is a common term used for players who represent their countries in association football. But if you think it might confuse lay people I'm fine with dropping it. I'm OK with ALT1. Timbouctou (talk) 10:40, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Goal counts are quantitative, not qualitative: highest scorer, not best scorer. Kevin McE (talk) 12:40, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's usually "top scorer". Timbouctou (talk) 15:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WASP-24b, WASP-24

Created by Starstriker7 (talk). Self nom at 04:44, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note WASP-24b was created on June 1. --Starstriker7(Talk) 04:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewed: Dekade diff and Jurang Pemisah diff --Starstriker7(Talk) 04:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Puerto Banús

Dalí's Rhinoceros sculpture 3,600 kilograms

5x expanded by Nvvchar (talk). Nominated by Tibetan Prayer (talk) at 10:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Fil and Filippa: Story of Child Life in the Philippines.Tibetan Prayer 10:21, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The length (5x expansion) and the date are good to go. The image also appears fine, so is the hook pertaining to the statue being made by Dali and its location in Puerto Banús. The only issue is the statue's weight, which is not cited. FruitMonkey (talk) 18:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
New cite added now covers all aspects of the hook. Good to go. FruitMonkey (talk) 08:06, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Fry (rugby player)

  • ... that Stephen Fry captained the South Africa national rugby team against the British Lions?

Created by FruitMonkey (talk). Self nom at 22:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If it seeks to mislead, it has no place in an encyclopaedia. Kevin McE (talk) 12:36, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The DYK entries for April Fools' day are usually of this type (superficially baffling and even slightly misleading but actually perfectly correct). As far as I have seen, there is no major disagreement about that. If you want to contest this practice, WT:DYK would be the right place to do so. --Hegvald (talk) 14:16, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion around the Main Page for a few days either side of April 1 every year is full of objections to this practice. Kevin McE (talk) 15:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You may well be right (I hadn't noticed), but apparently a majority thinks the practice is fine, or it wouldn't persist. Either way, it is not a discussion for this page. --Hegvald (talk) 15:40, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As an American, I've never heard of the comedian or the rugby player, so this hook boils down to "some guy captained the South Africa national rugby team against the British Lions?" so how about this alt hook:

That flies fine by me. Does that mean we need a re-review? FruitMonkey (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer Alt2. I linked South Africa national rugby union team and Great Britain national rugby league team and dashed "jazz-pianist".
 Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong British Lions, I have corrected to British and Irish Lions. FruitMonkey (talk) 15:42, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tagalog pocketbooks

Created/expanded by AnakngAraw (talk). Self nom at 21:54, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I Am Playr

Created by Miyagawa (talk). Self nom at 21:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Polish Teachers' Union

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 21:22, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Judith Trim

Created by Pigsonthewing (talk). Self nom at 21:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chuck Ricci

Created by Killervogel5 (talk). Self nom at 21:14, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Dizzy Nutter. — KV5Talk21:14, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Baby Don't Go

  • ... that the duet aspect of Sonny & Cher's first recorded hit single, "Baby Don't Go", was not originally planned but established the pair's unusual harmonic style?

5x expanded by Wasted Time R (talk). Self nom at 21:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed No. 1 Long Range Flight RAAF

National Youth Employment Program

Created by Crosstemplejay (talk). Self nom at 20:49, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Volkswagen Westmoreland Assembly Plant [[23]]

Frédéric Alfred d'Erlanger

Created by HotFXMan (talk), Jenks24 (talk), Fetchcomms (talk). Nominated by Jenks24 (talk) at 20:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • References check out, length okay. Does recreated article refer to a move from user space or was this entry previously deleted? Recommend taking out the word friend, as it is not mentioned the two were friends in the article. Froggerlaura (talk) 19:40, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for reviewing. I agree friend can be taken out. I saw it mentioned that they were friends when I was searching for references, but now I can't find anything to verify it. Oh well, it's not very important in any case. Recreated (I assume your talking about HotFXMan's edit summary when he created the article) refers to the fact that the article had been deleted per A7 a few hours beforehand. I assume that HotFXMan had created the article not long before the deletion (but I'm not an admin, so I don't know for sure). See User talk:Philippe (WMF)#Frederic Alfred d'Erlanger for slightly more detail. Jenks24 (talk) 14:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mabla Mountains

Djibouti Francolin

Created by Rosiestep (talk). Self nom at 19:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hotel Florida (Madrid)

Created by Tibetan Prayer (talk). Self nom at 17:55, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ministry of Youth and Sports (Ghana)

  • ... that one reason for establishing the National Sports College of the Ministry of Youth and Sports of Ghana was because Ghanaian sportsmen were under performing in international competitions?

Created by Crosstemplejay (talk). Self nom at 17:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Volkswagen Westmoreland Assembly Plant [[24]]

Mitch McDeere

Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 15:04, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go. Jaespinoza (talk) 17:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Massively overlinked. The whole point is to get people to go to the DYK article, from which they can link to all of these other targets. It's almost all blue. Tony (talk) 09:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(alt)... that Mitch McDeere is a fictional character played by Tom Cruise in Sydney Pollack's 1993 film adaptation of John Grisham's The Firm (1991 novel), which was ordered as a 2011–12 NBC television series?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(alt2)... that Mitch McDeere is a fictional character played by Tom Cruise in Sydney Pollack's 1993 film adaptation of John Grisham's The Firm (1991 novel), which was ordered as a 2011–12 NBC television series? --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(alt3)... that Mitch McDeere, Tom Cruise's character in Sydney Pollack's 1993 $270 million-grossing film adaptation of John Grisham's The Firm that sold 7 million copies, will reappear in a television series? --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Volkswagen Westmoreland Assembly Plant

  • ... that when workers staged a 1978 wildcat strike for higher wages at Volkswagen's new Westmoreland Assembly Plant that built the Rabbit model, the picketers shouted "No Money, No Bunny"?

Created by 842U (talk). Self nom at 14:51, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hook, length, date all check out. Good to go. -- CrossTempleJay  → talk 17:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jurang Pemisah, Senyawa, Sabda Alam, Konser Tur 2001, Dekade

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 14:10, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews to follow. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:10, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reviews:
  1. Louis Theroux: Miami Mega Jail (diff)
  2. Lake Assal (diff)
  3. Social Democrats, USA (diff)
  4. Erich Lackner (diff)
  5. Sissy's Magical Ponycorn Adventure (diff)
Cheers! Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:43, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Newness and length check out for Jurang Pemisah. A review has been done. I'm afraid Indonesian isn't a language I know, but it looks like the hook is cited to a book, so accept it in good faith. --Starstriker7(Talk) 15:33, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For Sabda Alam, newness and length check out; there are a few errors that I'll copyedit out in a sec. There's no mention of the studio executives being locked out. If you can't find a source, perhaps you could find one that had him collaborating with the son of the president? --Starstriker7(Talk) 15:39, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, never mind...I found it. --Starstriker7(Talk) 15:45, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think I'll save collaborated with Sukarno's son for Puspa Indah, which was nearly all Guruh and Chrisye. Thanks for the idea though. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Cool stuff. Can't wait to see it on the Main Page! --Starstriker7(Talk) 00:57, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It'll be a while though. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
On Konser Tur 2001, newness, length check out. A review's done. The hook's equivalent in the article should be directly cited. In any case, I'll accept the ref in good faith. --Starstriker7(Talk) 15:55, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:46, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
All set. --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For Dekade, hook, length, newness, and review check out. I'll accept the offline reference in good faith. This portion of the hook pops less than the others do. Can something that calls the attention more be found?
--Starstriker7(Talk) 16:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How about went double platinum on his birthday? Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's more like it. --Starstriker7(Talk) 00:57, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Newness, length, and hook check out for Senyawa. A review is done. I'll accept the Indonesian ref in good faith. --Starstriker7(Talk) 16:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on all of this; I'm happy to see that Chrisye is getting attention on Wikipedia. Although I don't understand them, I've heard many of his songs. --Starstriker7(Talk) 16:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1 "... that during his career, Chrisye released albums that sold like "chicken shit", were recorded with studio executives locked out, raised controversy for being "against Asian mores", went double platinum on his birthday, and had to be recalled to replace the cover design?" Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hook length is 275 chars with spaces, but I think C3 applies. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rose City Transit, Blue Bus lines (Oregon)

Created by SJ Morg (talk). Self nom at 12:52, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment from article's author: These articles are written in American English. Please do not delete "service" or change "transit" to "transport", as the latter (and the version without "service") is British English, whereas these new articles are both entirely about U.S. subjects. In the copies of the hook that would be archived permanently (after their main page appearance) on the articles' own talk pages (and on other pages), it would forever look out of place to see a British English wording when the subjects are American. A piped link, [[Public transport|transit service]], makes the most sense to me; alternatively, piping it as [[Public transport|public transit]] service would be acceptable, but is redundant to American eyes, because in American English the word "public" is implied/inferred with "transit" (which has a much narrower meaning than "transportation"). In any event, the visible portion should not include "transport", which is not used as a noun (only as a verb) in American English. Eventually, someone will write a separate article about transit (a major subject!) for Wikipedia, but for the time being the much broader "public transport" article is the closest thing to it on the site.
I recommend showing quotation marks around "Blue Bus" (through piping), because it was most commonly written that way, as it was a nickname, not a formal name. I left the quotation marks out of the title only because Wikipedia's article naming conventions appear to recommend doing so in most cases, and I did include them in the bold text in the article's lead section. SJ Morg (talk) 13:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It Gets Better: Coming Out, Overcoming Bullying, and Creating a Life Worth Living

Created by Cirt (talk). Self nom at 05:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

David Lucas (composer)

Created by Elonka (talk). Self nom at 03:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The infamy of cowbells will mean absolutely nothing to a very large proportion of readership. Kevin McE (talk) 14:42, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
, date, length and hook check out. I'd agree, the cowbell reference is obscure and essentially unverifiable hyperbole, since the ref isn't transparent. Suggest trimming that from the hook. Alt1: that David Lucas, who produced and sang backup on Blue Öyster Cult's "Don't Fear the Reaper" also wrote AT&T's "Reach out and touch someone" jingle?. 842U (talk) 15:02, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No objection to the new hook. --Elonka 00:50, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow-crowned Bishop

Black bird with yellow head and back perched on a stem

5x expanded by BarkingMoon (talk · contribs) and Casliber (talk · contribs). Self nom at 02:32, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Everything checks out, I actually like the hook. ;) And, by the way, beautiful picture! :) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 05:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Cirt, someone suggested another hook on a talk page: ALT1 "... that when some that when the male Yellow-crowned Bishop (pictured) is ready to mate, that their heads and backs turn a distinctive yellow in color?" Whomever moves to a prep set can choose. BarkingMoon (talk) 10:32, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't find the bend over info in the article (which I lightly c-ed). "Stems" is clearer from the alt text caption, but not so clear as a stand-alone. I like ALT1 too (note unintended word repetition), but perhaps: ALT2 "... that when the male Yellow-crowned Bishop (pictured) is ready to mate, his head and back turn a brilliant yellow color?" Tony (talk) 14:46, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I like ALT 2 also. @Tony - bent stem sentence is in the behavior section. BarkingMoon (talk) 16:24, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The bird does not bend over stems, it bends stems over. I believe we have a policy against using personal pronouns for wild animals, so it rather than he Kevin McE (talk) 12:47, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That was already fixed in the article.BarkingMoon (talk) 11:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Berwick Rangers F.C. 1-0 Rangers F.C.

Created by Yorkshiresky (talk). Self nom at 09:22, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Reindeer in South Georgia

Created by Maias (talk). Self nom at 01:32, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest splitting the link, so that South Georgia stands distinct. This will emphasise that it refers to the place called South Georgia, and not the southern part of a Caucasian republic, or of any sub-national entity. Kevin McE (talk) 13:16, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Meanest Genie

  • ... that Maggot Pie, a children's book by Michael Lawrence, was renamed the Meanest Genie in 2009?

Created by Rcsprinter123 (talk). Self nom at 12:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article was created on 9 December 2008 and was last edited by the nominator on 4 May 2011, which was not a 5x expansion. Article also contains only one reference to a personal blog. Fails DYK and may also fail notability for inclusion on Wikipedia. Froggerlaura (talk) 16:18, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Err.. Which article? I created The Meanest Genie yesterday. Rcsprinter (talk) 17:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This hook contains only the link for the author Michael Lawrence and I assumed it was for that page.

Did you want it to be:

As it stands the article will need at least one reputable third-party reference for the hook to make DYK. Also the article consists almost entirely of plot information. Is there any information on worldwide sales, critical reviews or public response to flesh out the article and make the book notable? Froggerlaura (talk) 17:26, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I wanted it to be that. I'll try and find some sources. Rcsprinter (talk) 18:19, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Right, I added a source to the page from Yahoo! Answers, I've read the book myself, and found some reviews on Amazon here. Rcsprinter (talk) 18:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yahoo Answers and Amazon.com are not reliable sources. Better sources would be the book's publishing company or reviews in major newspapers or magazines (peer reviewed sources), but this book has not received much press. The author page is also supported just by a blog. But these are issues for Wikipedia:Notability. Froggerlaura (talk) 19:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So, what should I do? Try and find some reasonable citations? Where would I start? Rcsprinter (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I looked through various local newspapers in the UK and US major media and found no references to the book or author. I don't think there is enough out there to support the book having its own wikipedia page because most of the links are to booksellers and there are no editorial reviews. Right now DYK fails, but you can wait for a second opinion from another editor or continue searching (I cannot access many UK sources). Froggerlaura (talk) 21:50, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's a no go at this point. Froggerlaura (talk) 20:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hatoon al-Fassi

Created by Boud (talk). Self nom at 21:13, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date, length, and hook are all fine. My preference is for ALT1, the idea of a professor banned from teaching is quite interesting. I think it's fine to have Dr. Qrsdogg (talk) 00:40, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 31

Ruins of Banteay Kdei temple complex
Ruins of Banteay Kdei temple complex

Banteay Kdei

  • ... that the Archaeological excavation carried out by the Sophia Mission of Japan at the Banteay Kdei (pictured) in Cambodia revealed relics of 274 Buddhist statues made in sandstone, in 2001?

5x expanded by Nvvchar (talk), Tibetan Prayer (talk). Self nom at 07:11, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Peter Dawson (politician)

  • ... that Peter Dawson served as Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Alberta for 26 years, the longest in the history of the province?

5x expanded by Connormah (talk). Self nom at 00:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ready. Nice expansion. -IceCreamAntisocial (talk) 18:02, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Franc Fernandez

Created by Noted Seven (talk). Self nom at 14:05, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wer mich liebet, der wird mein Wort halten, BWV 59

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nom at 12:52, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Minden Cemetery

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 02:57, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Earthling (Fringe)
Length ok, ref seems ok, hook cited, well-written. - AnakngAraw (talk) 00:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Earthling (Fringe)

  • ... that visual effects supervisor Jay Worth found inspiration for the "Ash Man" storyline in the Fringe episode "Earthling" from holding his grandmother-in-law's hands at her funeral?

Created by Ruby2010 comment! 02:31, 1 June 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Three are no note references for the second paragraph and the section "Plot." Perhaps these were mistakenly omitted. Billy Hathorn (talk) 03:16, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Television plots do not require citations (it's assumed the episode in question is the source). And which second paragraph? If you're referring to the lead, it does not require citations either (as it is just a summary of the referenced article below). Ruby2010 comment! 00:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Villa Gesell

5x expanded by Cambalachero (talk). Self nom at 02:24, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Date, length check out, Google translator assures me your hook is legit. The only remaining issue I see is that DYK requires at least one citation per paragraph, which your 2-5 paragraphs appear to lack. Can you fill these in, even if it means just repeating fn2 (which I assume those are)? Khazar (talk) 06:11, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done Cambalachero (talk) 12:59, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Good to go. Khazar (talk) 14:32, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Earthquake sensitive

Created by Ceranthor (talk). Self nom at 23:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Machine of Death

  • ... that after the science fiction anthology Machine of Death reached #1 on the Amazon.com bestseller list instead of his own book, Fox News commentator Glenn Beck denounced it as part of a liberal "culture of death"?

Created by Gamaliel (talk). Self nom at 23:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bojana Radulović

5x expanded by Thehoboclown (talk). Nominated by Oceanh (talk) at 21:18, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Milton J. Durham

A man in his fifties, facing left, with receding hair and bushy eyebrows. He is wearing a white shirt and black jacket.

5x expanded by Acdixon (talk). Self nom at 20:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK check positive. Picture is PD. Ready to go, though I would suggest this as a hook instead: ... that an elderly Milton J. Durham (pictured), former U.S. Representative and First Comptroller of the Treasury, bloodied the face of a writer for the Lexington Leader over a news report? Gamaliel (talk) 23:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No problem with that hook, but note that the proper title is "First Comptroller of the Treasury". (There was actually a "Second Comptroller of the Treasury" at the time.) Durham was not the first to be Comptroller of the Treasury. In fact, he was the last "First Comptroller of the Treasury". hehe. They changed the name after his term, I think. I'd also suggest linking "First Comptroller of the Treasury" to Comptroller of the Treasury, as it isn't a well-known office like U.S. Representative (even though I think that could be linked, too.) Acdixon (talk contribs count) 13:48, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So that's why you included First in the wikilink in the Durham article! Thanks for clearing that up. (It's explicit in the Comptroller of the Treasury article, but I never followed the link.) I've tweaked my suggested hook above to make this clear and wikilinked it per your suggestion. Gamaliel (talk) 14:49, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Jackson Dickison

Article created by Tony the Marine (talk) 19:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC). Self nom 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria, Association of National Accountants of Nigeria

Created by Aymatth2 (talk). Self nom at 18:40, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Allen Forward

New article by FruitMonkey (talk). Self nom at 18:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed Puerto Banús.
  • Very hooky - brilliant :). New (created 31 May), long enough (about 2900 or so characters of prose), funny. However, it is difficult to find where the fact in the hook is cited with an inline citation in the body of the article. The lead states that he was a "forward who favoured the position of flanker" but it is not obvious to me in which reference i should look to check the claimed fact. I cannot find anywhere in the body of the article where his role as a forward is stated at all, let alone sourced with an inline citation. This needs an inline citation, preferably in the main body (since otherwise it is not easy to justify it in the lead) so that the reader can easily check the claim. Boud (talk) 20:16, 31 May 2011 (UTC) (clarification: i meant that the hook (not the article) is funny. New and long enough are for the article.) Boud (talk) 21:17, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    It's a picky one to split. Rugby union positions are split between backs and forwards. The backs are your lighter, faster scorers and your forwards are the more aggresive blockers and hitters. In the early days players were either backs or forwards, but as the game modernised the positions were split into their differing roles. Flankers are a subgroup of forwards. FruitMonkey (talk) 22:22, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • But also if we accept him as a flanker, we therefore accept him as a forward. In the same way we accept a bassist as a musician. One is a subset of the other. It does not need to be quoted. FruitMonkey (talk) 22:33, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • Right, there is now a direct quote to him being a forward made by a journalist. But it is offline, hope it's good enough. FruitMonkey (talk) 07:48, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        • Flankers are less widely known than bassists, and while it is obvious that a double bass is used for making music, it is not so obvious that a flanker is "forward" as opposed to "middle", "side" or "back". i see you added one source in the body (the direct quote of a journalist's statement). In principle good faith can be used to accept an offline reference, but i've done some work on Allen Forward, rugby union positions and flanker (rugby union) and there is in fact the necessary info in the sources - all the epsnscrum refs that i checked list him as "F", and the only reasonable interpretation is that F means flanker. This just required a bit of work inlining the citations. :)
        • Possible remaining concerns:
          1. The flanker (rugby union) article is rather weak on references and has an unresolved tag. However, this is not the article proposed for DYK - the information that a flanker is considered part of the forward section has one reference, and that source - a South African sports body - seems reliable enough to me for the claim that a flanker is considered to be part of the forward section. IMHO the tag should remain, but that's not a DYK issue, in any case.
          2. Allen Forward now has a non-free photo (with a justification). As long as the photo is not proposed for DYK, this is not violating the rules, taken literally. Do we have to avoid a DYK that links to an article with a non-free image?
        • i'm a novice at reviewing DYK proposals, so i'll leave these two concerns for other people to discuss. The article is now: new, long enough and the hook fact is inline cited; and the hook is hooky. IMHO the proposal is acceptable. Other people will read this discussion and comment if they're worried about either of these two points. Boud (talk) 09:01, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We should let the reader know the sport or context in which A Forward was a forward: ... that rugby player A. Forward was a forward? Kevin McE (talk) 13:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. The fact that the sport wasn't mentioned is partly what makes it so hooky. I've been noticing an unfortunate trend on DYK reviews where those who do the reviewing are trying to make everything so damn literal. The entire point of DYK is to make a quick sentence or phrase so catchy that it entices the reader to click the bolded link to find out more. If people know right away that "A. Forward" is a rugby player, there will be far less interest. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:23, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Jrcla2. Adding rugby just makes it less interesting. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I thought the point of an encyclopaedia was to be informative, not intriguing. Kevin McE (talk) 15:05, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're correct; the point of an encyclopaedia is to be informative. But DYK is not the encyclopaedia, it's a sign beckoning people to the encyclopaedia. By that token, being intriguing is clearly more important than being informative (although the original hook is sufficiently informative to be neither obscure nor misleading). I wholeheartedly agree with Jrcla2. Indeed, I don't think I've ever seen a better hook. Congratulations, FruitMonkey. Ericoides (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I do not see how the absence of rugby in the hook makes it unclear to the point of not being informative. Most native speakers would probably realize (after a pause) that a forward is in a sport, be it football, rugby, or whatnot. I would agree with you 100% if rugby was not in the article, but the hook has slightly different rules. We need a balance of interest and information to write a good DYK hook, and being overly precise can work against us. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:18, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Straight from Wikipedia:Did you know#The hook: "When you write the DYK item (or "hook") please make it "hooky", that is, short, punchy, catchy, and likely to draw the readers in to wanting to read the article. An interesting hook is more likely to draw in a variety of readers. Shorter hooks are preferred to longer ones, as long as they don't misstate the article content.". The proposed hook meets all of the criteria. We don't need to be so robotic about Wikipedia 100% of the time (beep boop must make everything humorless and boring beep boop) Jrcla2 (talk) 15:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. Taken to its logical extremes, we'd have something like "... that Welsh rugby player Allen Forward played as a forward for Pontypool." Although it is much more informative, it is much less hooky. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:42, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To wit, an article I created (Al Szolack) received over 9,000 hits in a 24-hour period because the hook was short, intriguing, but still factually correct: "... that Al Szolack lost all 245 professional basketball games he ever played in?" Incidentally, this article is in the DYK Hall of Fame, all because its principles were the same as A. Forward's proposed hook. Jrcla2 (talk) 14:23, 3 June 2011 (UTC) [reply]

And that hook is absolutely fine, because it tells the reader exactly what the article is about. The proposal here does not: Don't falsely assume that everyone worldwide knows what country or sport you're talking about (C2). Kevin McE (talk) 16:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I question whether the sport is important to understanding the hook; the position, yes... the sport, not so much. In my opinion, the mere fact that he was a forward, in any sport, makes it hooky. Adding rugby seems to throw off the rhythm of the hook. Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:38, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ministry of Women and Children's Affairs

Created by Crosstemplejay (talk). Self nom at 15:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Volkswagen Westmoreland Assembly Plant [[28]]

List of sections of Chester city walls and associated structures

A walkway on top of a wall with a parapet and a tower on the left and railings on the right

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 14:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The Chester City Council reference for the hook is weak, as the website does not provide any reputable sources for the statement (also I think they are kind of biased). Did the hook appear in any of the print references?
May I suggest:
  • ALT 1 ... that parts of the Chester city walls (section pictured) were repaired with 3rd-century Roman altars and tombstones?

Has stronger references. Froggerlaura (talk) 18:31, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I should have thought that the Chester City Council website would be considered to be a reliable source. It's not the sort of source that would be expected to provide references for its readers, and as a council website should be OK. But as cover, I've added three more refs. If the hook is still unacceptable, then go for ALT1 if that is preferred. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 20:07, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alexios Palaiologos (despot)

Created by Cplakidas (talk). Self nom at 14:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Despot" is the English form of the title, while megas doux or protostrator are transliterations of the Greek titles. AFAIK, in English, titles are usually capitalized. If you think it necessary, one can always move it to the lower-case form. Constantine 12:11, 1 June 2011 (UTC) I've moved it, the lower-case form seems to be preferred in literature for the title. Constantine 12:17, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is no other Alexios Palaiologos with a Wikipedia article: why have a disambiguator at all? And although I read that despot was a formal rank, and not just a pejorative, I would suggest that as a disambiguator (were it necessary) it is not a very helpful one: nobleman would serve equally well. Kevin McE (talk) 13:07, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There were other people named Alexios Palaiologos, and all of them were "noblemen". The court rank is the usual way of distinguishing between similarly-named Byzantine people, plus a "Despot" is certainly more unique than the generic "nobleman". Constantine 14:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The other people of the same name, and the different ranks by which they are distinguished, were not putative wiki articles at the time of my note above. It has been superceded by redlinking of other names, presumably with the intention of them becoming articles. Of course, for as long as they remain redlinks, the disambiguator remains redundant. Kevin McE (talk) 22:12, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ministry of Tourism (Ghana)

Created by Crosstemplejay (talk). Self nom at 12:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Vitold Belevitch [[29]]

Long enough (barely), hook is supported, date is correct, ready to go. -- Presearch (talk) 19:54, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Waddell Dam

New Waddell Dam in Arizona, USA

5x/nom --NortyNort (Holla) 07:51, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That seems clear enough, but I would write: "both receive and provide", not "both receives and provides", --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The subject of the verb is the dam, which is singular, so Gerda's suggestion is ungrammatical. Perhaps ...receives water from, and provides water to, the Central Arizona Project? would be clearer. Kevin McE (talk) 15:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
English is not my first language, and grammar terms even less familiar, but to my understanding the dam is the subject of the first half sentence, but "both" (both dams, a plural) the subject of the second half. If that is not meant it should be phased differently to avoid misunderstanding. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:51, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The latter part of the hook just refers to the New Waddell Dam, not the one submerged. I see where there could be a misunderstanding and took Kevin's advice, see below.--NortyNort (Holla) 22:57, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MV Empire Dawn

Created by Mjroots (talk). Self nom at 07:26, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hook is not correct, Von Ruckteschell was found not guilty on this charge.
  • The source says "This was the subject of the fifth and final charge Ruckteschell would have to face on his subsequent appearance before a War Crimes Tribunal, but it was a charge of which he was found Not Guilty." - it's towards the bottom of the page. Mjroots (talk) 16:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fil and Filippa: Story of Child Life in the Philippines

Fil and Filippa book cover illustrated by Maud and Miska Petersham

Created/expanded by AnakngAraw (talk). Self nom at 02:54, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you think of something a little more catchy?Tibetan Prayer 10:19, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Selskabet for Oslo Byes Vel

Created by Eisfbnore (talk). Self nom at 01:46, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of anything remarkable, can we at least be informative for those who don't understand Norwegian: ALT2 ... that Selskabet for Oslo Byes Vel, a non-profit association for the benefit of Norway's capital city, celebrates its 200-year anniversary this year? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin McE (talkcontribs) 13:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. --Eisfbnore talk 13:45, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Palm City, San Diego

5x expanded by RightCowLeftCoast (talk). Self nom at 05:36, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • My count shows an expansion of only 2.4x (from about 785 characters to about 1880) of the prose section in recent days, including headings. Sorry, but text in references doesn't count. If you can get it to 5x within the next 3 days, it may become eligible. SJ Morg (talk) 08:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
*Feel free to disregard and to strike this nomination. There is very little data, that I am aware of to expand it further, without getting into trivia. I had thought that getting it up to over 1500 characters was sufficient, seeing at how it was a stub prior, oh well. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 08:10, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Without me cutting anything, it is still running a few sentences short. If you can expand it, you could also trim a few sentences from the camp thing so that it doesn't have issues in terms of being a parrot page. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • You couldn't have waited a couple of weeks to do that? You've complicated this DYK nomination review without any good reason for doing so, as far as I can see. SJ Morg (talk) 10:41, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vitold Belevitch

Created by Spinningspark (talk). Self nom at 10:16, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hook, Length, date all check out. Good to go.-- CrossTempleJay  → talk 12:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Looking Elk, Juan Mirabal, and Albert Lujan

Created by User:CaroleHenson (talk). Self nom at 00:45, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 1

De Rivaz engine

File:Francois automobile.jpg
Add alt-text!
Add rollover text!

  • ... that the world's first automobile powered by an internal combustion engine was made in 1807?

Created/expanded by Lumos3 (talk). Self nom at 12:38, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Could I suggest a possible ALT:
... that the world's first automobile powered by an internal combustion engine, the De Rivaz engine, was made in 1807?
Same as nominators with the article title.--v/r - TP 16:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Philippine Bar exam bombing

Created by Moray An Par (talk). Self nom at 12:07, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edmund Ser

Created by Asiareports (talk). Nominated by TParis (talk) at 01:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charles River Speedway

A man driving a horse in the early 1900s at a speedway

Created by Ktr101 (talk). Self nom at 00:37, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


2011 New England tornado outbreak

A tornado as viewed from a parking lot

Created by Ktr101 (talk). Self nom at 21:51, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Date and length are all good. The verb "contained" seems out of place. How does this ALT work? ALT1 ...the 2011 New England tornado outbreak (pictured) resulted in Massachusetts' first tornado fatalities since 1995? Canada Hky (talk) 22:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cassel, Nord

Reuze-Papa, one of the giants of Cassel

  • ... that the town of Cassel in France is located on a hill that is said to have been created when two giants (one pictured) tripped while carrying a heap of earth and dropped it?
Expanded about 7x and self-nominated. Prioryman (talk) 22:07, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Antwerp Diamond Heist

Created by Anna Frodesiak (talk). Nominated by E2eamon (talk) at 18:54, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1 ... that the Antwerp Diamond Heist was the largest diamond heist in history? (Short grabs the eye. The visitor clicks. The article tells the story.) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:41, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That looks good. --E♴(talk) 15:24, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article has bare URLs as references, which are not allowed on DYK. That needs to be attended to. I struck out the original hook for clarity. Schwede66 19:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Viriditas (talk) 22:40, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nyon Conference

  • ... that after the Nyon Conference, The Times likened the happy delegates to cricketers, 'reviewing their innings, over by over'?

Created by Grandiose (talk). Self nom at 18:19, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regional Museum of Anthropology and History of Chiapas

Created by Thelmadatter (talk). Self nom at 16:59, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aung Pwint

  • ... that Burmese journalist Aung Pwint was imprisoned on charges of "sending news" and "illegal ownership of a fax machine"?
Review:Loy (spade)

Created by Khazar (talk). Self nom at 16:42, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Loy (spade)

  • Reviewed: 127th (Parachute) Field Ambulance

Created by GainLine (talk). Self nom at 15:52, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Back to back nominations that reference Dashiell Hammett--what are the odds? (see mine just above). Date, length, and hook all check out here. Only two small issues. First, DYK rules require at least one citation per paragraph; the Synge paragraph still needs one. (You might also follow up by mentioning that story turns out to be a lie, if I remember right.) Second, I wonder if you could find a slightly more engaging hook here, like:
ALT1: ... that loy digging is an integral part of Ireland's National Ploughing Championships? Khazar (talk) 16:54, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I also tweaked the original above for clarity and force, but feel free to revert if you disagree. Cheers Khazar (talk) 16:58, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the Playboy ref and added a little more on the killing being untrue. I prefer your tweaked version of the original hook if thats ok? (Mine read a little awkwardly) I feel the famine ref is more likely to pique the interest of an international audience where the ploughing match is something really only of interest to Irish readers. I could suggest:
ALT2 ... that the loy was used for cultivating potatoes during the the Irish Potato Famine?

GainLine 09:20, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go for all three hooks. I'm fine with the original one. Cheers, Khazar (talk) 15:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Koentjaraningrat

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 14:26, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Review to follow. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:26, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Review: Newton Cannon (diff) Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is also ALT1
"... that "father of Indonesian anthropology" Koentjaraningrat joined the student militia as an English and history teacher during the Indonesian National Revolution?"
which may be more interesting. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

127th (Parachute) Field Ambulance


Self nom Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed South American dreadnought race below Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
:  AGF on ref.  Very well constructed article GainLine     16:05, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

South American dreadnought race

Minas Geraes, the first Brazilian dreadnought, firing a full broadside

Created by The ed17 (talk). Self nom at 09:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:11, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lo (film)

5x expanded by MichaelQSchmidt (talk). Self nom at 09:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hjalmar Pettersen, Bibliotheca Norvegica

Created by Eisfbnore (talk). Self nom at 08:52, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Savage bibliography

Created by Cirt (talk). Self nom at 07:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I reviewed Ninay. -- Cirt (talk) 07:23, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carex hirta

Part of a sedge culm, showing two female spikes, with hairy utricles.

Created by Stemonitis (talk). Self nom at 06:37, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1 is the only one I could possibly support, the others are simply binomials and technical language that will not inform the vast majority of readers. ALT1 is also the most boring: perhaps some combination:
I'd be happy with that. It's not easy to make sedges exciting! --Stemonitis (talk) 16:31, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Last hook is fine. Confirm 1877 and the rest is reffed but offline Victuallers (talk) 14:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ricardo Uceda

Reviewed:Villa Gesell

Created by Khazar (talk). Self nom at 05:58, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

White-winged Widowbird

Black bird with white wings on a branch

Created/expanded by BarkingMoon (talk). Self nom at 02:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion was from 388 to 2371 prose per DYKcheck.BarkingMoon (talk) 02:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seems good to go, but first a pair of details. One, the information in the hook should be referenced at the end of the sentence, not at the end of the paragraph. And second, the name in bold is the name of the article, and perhaps the scientific name. Names in other languages are valuable information, but you don't have to bold them, not if that generates whole lines of bolded text. Cambalachero (talk) 02:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added the ref. As for the bolded text, see I did the same thing in another article and no one said anything. So I'd like to know what the real deal is here, I shouldn't have to change style merely because reviewers have different preferences. BarkingMoon (talk) 02:26, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a personal preference, it's something defined at the manual of style (section "Foreign language"). The other reviewer must have overlooked that. Cambalachero (talk) 02:40, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What I usually do is as a biology taxon article grows, I'd place the exhaustive list of names into the taxonomy section, just leaving one or two most widely used in the lead. Many names are archaic, colloquial or esoteric. This way we avoid a sea of bold in the lead, which we are then focussing on to summarise the key points. I will do this in an hour or so.Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:01, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. I just wanted to know what the real standard is. Cas, after you fix this article, I'll mimic the change in the other one. BarkingMoon (talk) 10:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Check it now. BarkingMoon (talk) 21:06, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good to go. By the way, in the future you must add new nominations at the section of the day when the article was started (check the article history, the time may be different than your local time), not at the "today" section. Cambalachero (talk) 21:14, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Death of Selena

... that Selena drove Yolanda Saldivar, who falsely claimed of being rape, to the emergency room, several hours before Saldivar murdered Selena in her Days Inn motel room ? Created/expanded by AJona1992 (talk). Self nom at 00:52, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1 ... that Mexican American singer-songwriter Selena was murdered by an employee who claimed she was seeking help after being raped? I think that is the gist of the proposal Kevin McE (talk) 13:35, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I lack prose, although I am a native English-language speaker, c/e isn't my thing. I have proposed a peer review so I can fix those problems. ALT2 ... that Mexican-American singer-songwriter, Selena was murdered by an employee who claimed she was raped, in order to delay the handover of missing bank statements she had stoled? or something like that? AJona1992 (talk) 14:54, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The image in this hook may be a copyright violation. Nominator born in 1992 and her death was in 1995. ۞ Tbhotch & (ↄ), Problems with my English? 21:51, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the original picture from the DYK because it is a clear copyright violation (copied from Caller.com newspaper archives). The nominator has made numerous similar CV uploads concerning Selena on Commons [34]. Froggerlaura (talk) 03:30, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Below is a freely licensed alternative from commons. Froggerlaura (talk) 04:11, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So is it ready? AJona1992 (talk) 20:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify, is this an acceptable hook? I can't vote since I am no longer neutral to the project.Froggerlaura (talk) 23:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Grave of Selena Quintanilla-Perez in Corpus Christi, Texas.
Grave of Selena Quintanilla-Perez in Corpus Christi, Texas.
  • ... that Mexican-American singer-songwriter Selena (grave pictured) was murdered by an employee who claimed she was seeking help after being raped?
Can it include that she wasn't raped? She only claimed that she was rape in order to delay the missing bank statements Selena had asked for. Doctors found no evidence of rape on Saldivar, when they got back, she shoot Selena, as she tried to exit the room. AJona1992 (talk) 23:57, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 2

Bill Foley

Reviewed: Barrio Boyzz

Created by Khazar (talk). Self nom at 04:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bambang Harymurti

Created by Khazar (talk), Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 03:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BarkingMoon (talk) 18:55, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barrio Boyzz

Created AJona1992 (talk) 02:28, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Date and hook check out, but this is still 250 chars short of the 1500 minimum. (The DYK script checker doesn't count track listings, member lists, etc., but only paragraphed text). Any chance this could be expanded? It'd be nice to get one or two more sources writing about the band, too. Khazar (talk) 04:23, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Doing... Thanks, I'll get right on it! AJona1992 (talk) 11:36, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A duet is a collaboration between two artists: the Barrio Boyzz have 5 members. This is not a duet. Kevin McE (talk) 16:18, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have expanded the article. If there is anything else I need to do, please ask. Well its known as a duet in many Billboard magazines. AJona1992 (talk) 18:55, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Law of Wihtred

Created by Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk). Self nom at 01:13, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli

Created by User:Speciate (talk), User:Glenn (talk), User:Wnt (talk). Nominated by Speciate (talk) at 23:28, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beatrice Mtetwa

Reviewed:Life of Pi (film)

Created by Khazar (talk). Self nom at 22:54, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Life of Pi (film)

Created by Erik (talk). Self nom at 22:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Length, hook, date all check out. Good to go. Khazar (talk) 23:02, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jacqueline Crawley

Jacqueline Crawley

Created by Crusio (talk). Self nom at 20:57, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]



Mimulus michiganensis

  • ... that a biologist discovered a population of the rare and endangered Michigan monkeyflower after he found a specimen used as a garnish on his plate at a restaurant?

Created by IceCreamAntisocial (talk). Self nom at 18:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Article fulfills DYK criteria and reference for hook checks out. The article is large enough, IMHO, to be split into a few separate sections, but I guess that is not a requirement for DYK. --Crusio (talk) 21:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmad Taufik, Tomy Winata

Note: This hook includes two new articles, Ahmad Taufik and Tomy Winata.
Reviewed: Chris Traeger and White-headed Buffalo-weaver

Created by Khazar (talk) and Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 08:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Traeger

5x expanded by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self nom at 05:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed James Hedges [36]Hunter Kahn 05:03, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • In the spirit of WP:IAR, I am asking for a bit of leniency here on the expansion size. Prior to my edits this article was 3,186 characters long, and is presently about 14,847 characters long. That means it's only about 1,000 characters short of a true 5x expansion. However, I think the article is about as large as its going to get (in fact, I will probably be bringing it to WP:GAN soon) and I don't want to simply add more just to reach the 5x limit. The expansion has been pretty vast and is thoroughly sourced and cited, and I don't think it's out of line to ask a slight exception on those last 1,000 characters. — Hunter Kahn 05:03, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Date and hook check out fine. Perhaps I'll be overruled on this, but I agree that you deserve some leniency on the length, as this article is very well expanded and researched, and particularly as you've included several nice block quotes in boxes that don't count toward the DYK character total. Good to go, I say. Khazar (talk) 08:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis Marks

5x expanison/created by FruitMonkey (talk). Self nom at 15:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Reviewed Noldi Schreck
  • Date and length check out. However, there are some minor issues with referencing. The in-line citation give for the claim that Marks had written episodes of The Beatles is vague. The source given for this claim is an interview with Marks in which he says that the producer "wanted him for the new series" but does not explicitly state he worked on it. So it does not confirm per se that he actually wrote the episodes (nitpicking, I know, but that's what we do around here). His IMDb entry says he wrote 39 episodes of The Beatles (albeit uncredited). Also, there is no in-line citation for the claim that he provided voice for the Green Goblin. The IMDb page does credit him with providing the voice of Green Goblin for a single episode of "Spider Man", so I suggest adding IMDb to both sentences as references. Other than that the nomination is good to go. Timbouctou (talk) 17:44, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks. I've now used the Beatles site twice as it mentions the four writers (including Marks) who put the show together, and I've linked the interview to the Green Goblin line as it states right at the top of the interview in the banner that he was the voice of the GG. FruitMonkey (talk) 18:27, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

James Hedges

headshot of a partially-bald middle-aged man with a white goatee, wearing a suit and tie in front of a brick wall

Created by William S. Saturn (talk). Self nom at 04:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Noldi Schreck

Created by Rosiestep (talk). Self nom at 04:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Needs some work, have contacted the article maker for clarification. FruitMonkey (talk) 14:57, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Requested changes made. Hook, length, date and cites all check out. Good to go. FruitMonkey (talk) 08:15, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

White-headed Buffalo-weaver

White and black bird with orange tail on the ground

5x expanded by BarkingMoon (talk). Self nom at 02:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A 97 to 3005 char prose expansion, 30x. BarkingMoon (talk) 02:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewed Giggle incontinence BarkingMoon (talk) 02:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Asafo Interchange

Created by Crosstemplejay (talk). Self nom at 00:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Volkswagen Westmoreland Assembly Plant [[38]]

Dedi

Created by Nephiliskos (talk). Self nom at 02:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have taken liberty of tweaking proposal for what I guess is a non-native user nominator (capitalise Egyptian, capable for able) Kevin McE (talk) 15:27, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
??? Excuse me, it might be that I misanderstood. But what are you talking about? There are well-setted references in this article. That the sources are`nt of your language doesn`t automatically mean that they are not credible. For those possible doubts please talk with user:AnnekeBart, please.--Nephiliskos (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In the article, the sentence "He is capable of resurrecting decapitated beings" needs to have a source directly after the period.--William S. Saturn (talk) 20:06, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I can place one, no problem. But why this sentence at all? How odd...--Nephiliskos (talk) 20:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Besides: It looks like you misunderstood the text passage.^^ The sentence in question is part of the speech that Djedefhor gives, it needs no citation.--Nephiliskos (talk) 21:01, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I now see that it is part of a quote. Therefore, the citation should go at the end of the quote.--William S. Saturn (talk) 21:42, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dude, the complete section named "The wonder of Dedi" is certified by the books of Erman, Lepper and Liechtheim. It´s absolutely not necessary to cite every single speech or sentence. It´s becoming ridiculous now. --Nephiliskos (talk) 22:17, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For DYK purposes, the statement used for the thread must be cited directly.--William S. Saturn (talk) 22:51, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sadiq al-Ahmar

Created by Lothar von Richthofen (talk). Self nom at 18:59, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 01:12, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Black Bear Ranch

  • ... that the Californian commune Black Bear Ranch was founded using money from both entertainment industry executives and from an LSD deal?

5x expanded by Tom Morris (talk). Self nom at 21:13, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Giammaria Biemmi

Created by Gaius Claudius Nero (talk). Self nom at 22:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 In check ,Candyo32 14:49, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 3

Anselmo Sule

Created by Diego Grez (talk). Self nom at 20:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Black Bishop

Black bird with orange head and neck perched on a stem

5x expanded by BarkingMoon (talk). Self nom at 18:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion of this article was a true team effort by WP:BIRD. I've listed them all as for DYK credit. OK, "chess piece" is n't mentioned in the article, but it's obvious from the text, supported by multiple refs, and has a great quirky factor.BarkingMoon (talk) 18:38, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewed: Bambang Harymurti,BarkingMoon (talk) 18:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Um... I didn't find "chess" nor "piece" anywhere into the article. Where should I begin reviewing? Expansion began on May 30, so that's a yes, but ... the hook... should be changed, maybe. Diego Grez (talk) 20:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
FYI prose went from 222 - 2395 (10.78x). Pls see my comment immediately above about the hook. Do you really want me to put "chess piece" in the article or do you want quirky? That's what this boils down to. Several alternate hooks are possible, such as:
ALT1... that the Black Bishop is larger than most birds in its genus? BarkingMoon (talk) 20:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The hook actually needs to be in the article, somewhere. I did not question the expansion, "that's a yes" I said. with offline source. Diego Grez (talk) 21:04, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The chess piece, black bishop, is not capitalized, so I would not expect the bird, Black Bishop (common bird names are capitalized) to be a chess piece. Snowman (talk) 22:22, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There were one contributor who did four edits helping to fix the page edit history, and he has not been included in the DYK credits. I think that Casliber's single edit (so far) would not normally be enough edits to list him for a DYK credit. SmackBot did one edit too. Snowman (talk) 22:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the DYK using size of the bird is not interesting enough. Snowman (talk) 22:36, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ilyinsko-Podomskoye

Created by Ymblanter (talk). Nominated by Russavia (talk) at 17:55, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ales Bialatski

Reviewed:16113 Ahmed

Created by Khazar (talk). Self nom at 16:17, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Length, date, and hook facts check out. Good job! Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:30, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Kahn

The 21 demands of the Polish labor union, Solidarity
Tom Kahn, testifying on behalf of the AFL-CIO to the US Congress, recommended that U.S. aid require the Communist regime to meet the 21 demands of Solidarity (pictured).

New article by Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk). Self nom at 12:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

16113 Ahmed

  • ... that asteroid 16113 Ahmed was named for a high school student from New York?

Created by Starstriker7 (talk). Self nom at 06:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: Sabda Alam diff --Starstriker7(Talk) 06:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Date, length and hook all good to go. Only one small concern--the sentence "Ahmed was a finalist in the 2002 Intel Science Talent Search" doesn't seem fully backed up by that source. Not an issue for the nom, since the basic statement above is back up, but I thought you might want to know for the article. I always admire your well-research and well-written astrophysics work. Khazar (talk) 16:21, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who Says (Selena Gomez & the Scene song)

5x expanded by Candyo32 (talk). Self nom at 14:37, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Giammaria Biemmi [41] Candyo32 14:51, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The main article for this hook should be bolded, no? Canada Hky (talk) 22:07, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Bolded topic. - AnakngAraw (talk) 02:31, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trial of Lord George Gordon

Created by Ironholds (talk). Self nom at 17:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC) Reviewed Who Says (Selena Gomez & the Scene song). Ironholds (talk) 17:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sharafuddin of Selangor

5x expanded by Yk Yk Yk (talk). Self nom at 19:43, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: Bill Foley [42]. - Yk3 talk · contrib 19:43, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Nathan Beaulieu

5x expanded by Canada Hky (talk). Self nom at 22:31, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: If needed, Beaulieu and Jonathan Huberdeau could be combined into a single hook, but it would be rather dull.


Jonathan Huberdeau

5x expanded by Canada Hky (talk). Self nom at 22:39, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 4

Daphne Oseña-Paez

Filipina TV host Daphne Oseña-Paez half shot wearing a white blouse.

  • ... that Filipina TV host Daphne Oseña-Paez got her big break by waiting for a network executive in the ABS-CBN parking lot to show him a TV program that she filmed, shot, and edited herself?

Created by Noraft (talk). Self nom at 03:24, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


ALT: ... that Filipina TV host Daphne Oseña-Paez was discovered after showing a program that she filmed, shot, and edited herself to a a network executive in the ABS-CBN parking lot? Please note this article was moved from ɳorɑfʈ Talk!'s userspace on 6/4/11

Chris Smith (footballer born 1981)

  • ... that footballer Chris Smith, just months after signing for York City and yet to make his senior debut, was assaulted by a gang in an unprovoked attack while on a night out?

5x expanded by Mattythewhite (talk). Self nom at 03:19, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Claude Le Péron

Created by Daskill (talk). Self nom at 00:43, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The New Girl in Town

  • ...that The New Girl in Town was scheduled to be released in 1985, however, the album was never finalized by Cara Records, because of copyright control?

Created by AJona1992 (talk) 02:57, 4 June 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Special occasion holding area

Do not nominate new articles for a special time in this section. Instead, please nominate them in the candidate entries section above under the date the article was created or the expansion began, and indicate your request for a specially-timed appearance on the Main Page.
Note: Articles nominated for a special occasion should be nominated within five days of creation or expansion as usual. Also, articles should be nominated at least five days before the occasion to give reviewers time to check the nomination, but no more than six weeks before the occasion. April Fools' Day is an exception to these requirements - see Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know.

June 12 (Pentecost)

Nínay

Bookcover for Pedro A. Paterno's Ninay, the first Filipino novel.

Created/expanded by AnakngAraw (talk). Self nom at 04:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As suggested, fixed refs. Now used the cite web templates in article. - AnakngAraw (talk) 23:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Moved to June 12 per request. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also fixed the image. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:13, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ipomopsis sancti-spiritus

Created by IceCreamAntisocial (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 02:48, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shall we wait for Pentecost? Probably a little too far ahead in future.... --PFHLai (talk) 17:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 11:20, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn't work for me. Readers shouldn't have to click on a link to see the interest. What the hell is it, and how does it relate to the end of the sentence? Tony (talk) 17:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think the idea of DYK is to encourage us to look at the articles. When I did, I noticed the following areas in need of improvement:
  • Sangre de Cristo Mountains: the unit 'meter' is correctly shown as 'm' in tables and parentheses. But 'feet' is written in full when it should be abbreviated.
  • New Mexico: "density of 16 per square mile", "temperature lows in the 20's and into the teens", "1.9 fatalities per million miles", "2,354 route miles", "1000 were the route miles" need conversions. "The 10 Most Populous New Mexico Cities and Towns" needs to be sentence case. "Land Area sq. miles" needs to be sentence case and needs conversions. "tax rate of about 30 mills" and "average millage was about 26.47", I wasn't aware that articles went into such esoteric detail on taxes but if terms like that are essential, they probably need clarification within the text.
I don't know the procedure here but if my comments are off-topic for this page, feel free to ignore them or tell me to take a hike. Lightmouse (talk) 17:49, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lightmouse, your comments are way on-topic. We don't attend enough to the state of the associated articles, which receive huge exposure and need to shine, even in their early stages. Tony (talk)
There's no good reason to deny or force a rewrite of this nomination exclusively due to failings in other articles. Many nominators (including myself) are not up to improving articles that are only tangentially related to the topics that we know. Nyttend (talk) 15:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 18

White dress of Marilyn Monroe

Marilyn Monroe's white dress from the The Seven Year Itch trailer.

Created by Dr. Blofeld (talk). Self nom at 15:35, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date and references are all good but for such an iconic dress is a more eye-catching hook not possible? Unless the intention would be to save this hook until the day of the auction? Basement12 (T.C) 16:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For if we save it for the 18th of June: ALT1 "... that the white dress which Marilyn Monroe wore in the 1955 film The Seven Year Itch is up for auction today?" Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's a good idea to save it for June 18. Additionally, the hook could mention the expected auction price of 1 to 2 million dollars. So:
A little shorter: ALT3 "... that the white dress that Marilyn Monroe wore in the 1955 film The Seven Year Itch is up for auction today and may fetch up to two million dollars?" Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source for the alts is fine, I'll check with the Dr that holding the nom for the day of the auction is ok. I guess a problem may arise if the auction is changed for any reason - this will need checking closer to the time - Basement12 (T.C) 12:56, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
They can, but they must be free (i.e. not fair-use). Removing the image. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:42, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How about this one then? Oh, and can we place this DYK into the Special occasion holding area for June 18th? Shearonink (talk) 14:15, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We are waiting for the nom, Dr. Blofeld to agree. As to the picture, I am attempting to make a more complete one out of the public domain trailer. I am not very good with Photoshop, so we'll see if it can pass muster... I am going to assume that it could pass muster at 100px. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:22, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marilyn Monroe's white dress from the The Seven Year Itch trailer.

I finished the image. I think it may be okay at 100px, but at larger resolutions... well, anyways, we seem to have a PD image. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:08, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think it looks great, but I guess it's up to the moving admins to include or not? Shearonink (talk) 15:15, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Glad you like it. It could be refined by anyone who cared enough to make it look decent at a higher resolution. BTW, I contacted Moonriddengirl to ask about the copyright status. While we're at it: ALT4 "... that the white dress that Marilyn Monroe wore in the 1955 film The Seven Year Itch (pictured) is up for auction today and may fetch up to two million dollars?" Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:21, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks great, thumbs-up from me. Paging Dr. Blofeld, paging Dr. Blofeld... --Shearonink (talk) 18:47, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dr. Blofeld has gone missing. I moved this to the special occasion area. Let's go with ALT4, with image, on June 18th. --Orlady (talk) 15:20, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I have requested feedback regarding the copyright status of the image at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. There should be enough time to have it checked, but we may need to go with ALT2 or ALT3 if it is decided that it may not be a public domain image. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:25, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Should that not be, combining both of the ALT4s...

ALT5 is nice too. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:23, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well in the continued absence of Dr. Blofeld i'll give this a tick for alt4/alt5 on the 18 June on the proviso that it'll need to be checked that the auction is still happening - Basement12 (T.C) 07:06, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I contacted the Doctor and he said he's fine with the date. Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if I'm allowed to do this by the rules, but here's a review. Ales Bialatski diff. Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:33, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 19

Rizal Law

José Rizal

  • Comment: Suggest a June 19 date as it is Rizal's 150th birth anniversary.

Created by Howard the Duck (talk). Self nom at 17:44, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 1 (Canada Day)

Declaration of war by Canada

Created by OCNative (talk). Self nom at 11:49, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moving it to Canada Day's section. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:10, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is your ideal DYK. Punchy, short, arresting. Tony (talk) 16:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Tony! OCNative (talk) 00:22, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hockey: Canada's Royal Winter Game

Created by Maxim (talk). Self nom at 21:03, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yay, hockey! Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:09, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wikisource now has the complete copy. Possibly a link to it embedded in the text of the hook, from the anchor "book", or isn't that allowed? The focus of interest barely passes, IMO. What might inject impact into the hook could come from knowing how little was written about any sport in the terms taken by the book. That would require 15 mins of searching on your part. I'd love something like "... hockey]] and one of the most detailed of its day on any sport?" But only if it's true.  :-) Tony (talk) 13:14, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's difficult to judge with regards to a comparison, because only four copies of the book are known to exist. Would something like "... was the first book on ice hockey, but only four copies are known to exist?" work? I think external links are frowned upon in DYK, but maybe Wikisource could be an exception? This would be best answered by someone with more DYK experience. Maxim(talk) 16:58, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Labor Day (5 September 5 2011)