Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎2023 Vilnius summit: removed personal attack by Daikido. We can do better here.
Line 250: Line 250:
}}
}}
*'''Support''' Article has enough sourcing + length in order to pass ITNRD standards. Cheers, ''atque supra''! [[User:Fakescientist8000|Fake]][[User talk:Fakescientist8000|scientist]][[Special:Contributions/Fakescientist8000|8000]] 05:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
*'''Support''' Article has enough sourcing + length in order to pass ITNRD standards. Cheers, ''atque supra''! [[User:Fakescientist8000|Fake]][[User talk:Fakescientist8000|scientist]][[Special:Contributions/Fakescientist8000|8000]] 05:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
*'''Support''', Per above, article is ready for ITN. [[User:Alex-h|Alex-h]] ([[User talk:Alex-h|talk]]) 13:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC)


==== RD: K. Ravindranathan Nair====
==== RD: K. Ravindranathan Nair====

Revision as of 13:42, 11 July 2023

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section - it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Lawrence Wong in 2023
Lawrence Wong

Glossary

  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually - a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Archives

July 11

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports


Global temperature records broken

Proposed image
Articles: Weather of 2023 (talk · history · tag) and List of weather records (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Global temperature records for the day, week and month are broken as a result of global warming and El Niño. (Post)
News source(s): Hottest day, Hottest week, Hottest June, Why so hot?,
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Temperature records for the globe are being broken on a daily basis, the WMO has announced the hottest week on record and last month was the hottest June ever. We have heatwaves all over with more to come as a result of El Niño. But we don't seem to have a single good target article. I've found what I can to make a start but feel that we need the assistance of some weather experts such as Femke, please. Andrew🐉(talk) 07:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support in principle, but currently oppose on quality / update grounds: It's in the news, but the article linked is a general one about weather records, and does not cover the current heat records, except as date entries in tables. Articles should have up-to-date relevant prose to be featured ITN, in my view. Sandstein 08:37, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - in le news. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 09:11, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, kind of surprised there is no ongoing story climate change, as it creates a new content for Wikipedia every single week :) Bart Terpstra (talk) 09:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Climate change is far too broad to be ongoing. No real start or end date, very loose definitions as to what constitutes it. Better to just leave it to the occasional blurb. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 09:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Anthropogenic effects leading to permanent changes in the climate.
And yes, sometimes it's harder to tell, but "record amount of hurricanes" or "warmest XYZ" is almost certainly climate change and would be encyclopedic. (but repetitive 🙂) Bart Terpstra (talk) 09:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Still too broad for ITN. It would practically be ongoing for the next 100 years. Not really what ITN is for. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 11:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. However agree with Sandstein that we should improve the target article. — Czello (music) 09:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Vilnius summit

Article: 2023 Vilnius summit (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ World leaders meet at Vilnius, Lithuania for a NATO summit to discuss Ukraine and Sweden's membership, as well as the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian war. (Post)
News source(s): [1] [2]
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Well, it is a recurring meeting where important world leaders discuss important, pressing issues in the world. So, why not put it on the Main Page? — Prodraxis {talkcontributions} (she/her) 01:15, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wait Until the summit has actually occurred. Currently, the article has nothing detailing what is going on, because it isn't going on. (Side note: the article you put at the top of the ITN candidate template is always bolded.) Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 01:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Our past approach to any such world leader meeting is to see if there are any significant achievements made by the end of the event and then we'll post that. It should be clear that either Ukraine or Sweden joining NATO is very much ITN-quality material, but we need a definitive on that. Masem (t) 01:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Masem, @Fakescientist8000 Ok, understood :) I'm new to this whole ITN thing, and I do certainly agree that Ukraine or Sweden joining NATO would be certainly ITN-worthy. In the meantime, I will continue editing and updating the article. — Prodraxis {talkcontributions} (she/her) 01:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose unless something comes out of it. Banedon (talk) 01:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait Until after the summit, if anything were to come out of it. Editor 5426387 (talk) 03:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support more in the news and influiental than some of the events currently in ITN.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 04:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose These summits are exactly the kind of things that we don't and should never post. If they agreed to admit Sweden in NATO, we can post it when the country actually joins.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:43, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support -- influential and important, and has the potential to finally see Sweden join NATO. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 06:58, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose have we ever posted a local military alliance summit before? I dont see why we should start now. (Personal attack removed) Daikido (talk) 07:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • You should probably strike this comment, accusing users here of canvassing is a direct violation of WP:AGF. Edit: Signing my comment and directly requesting (rather than just suggesting) that you remove your use of an ableist slur at the end of your comment. --2001:8003:1C20:8C00:4048:BA85:DEB4:B3D8 (talk) 07:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Totally agree with Kiril Simeonovski. I've been watching this space for when the inevitable nom would come, and this is not on the ITN level. I'll be back to support a blurb when we Sweden actually joins NATO. cart-Talk 07:43, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support It's in the news and the article is looking good for a new article with 50 editors, 44 citations and lots of content. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. It's important world news, the article is decent, and there's little else to post currently. Bolsonaro, France, etc. are already yesterday's news. Sandstein 08:32, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    We don't make exceptions to what we normally don't post just because the current period in news is slow or stale. That's a slippery slope for several other major exceptions. Masem (t) 12:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose until there's a significant result (Sweden/Ukraine joining). Perhaps consider removing some of the older stuff from the box? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose all talk, but nothing changes as a result. Also since Russia's invasion such meetings are WP:ROUTINE. Abcmaxx (talk) 09:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Covered by ongoing, literally just a meeting of global leaders, like G7. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 09:13, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose routine and meeting is not noteworthy, only potential conclusions would be noteworthy. Bart Terpstra (talk) 09:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Plenty of media coverage [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The summit is already significant for opening a way for Sweden to become a NATO member. It is also significant as unprecedented NATO support for Ukraine is being announced. Mindaur (talk) 09:36, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    3, 7, 8, 10, 13 fail verification, they link to a Ukraine war news feed. it's not a link to an article about the summit.
    6, 9, 11, 12 fails relevance, the news story is Turkey becoming approving of Sweden or something else adjacent, not the summit, the summit is more of an afterthought. Bart Terpstra (talk) 09:45, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 10

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


(Reopened) Ongoing: 2023 Israeli judicial reform protests

Nominator's comments: In Israel, there are weekly largescale protests with over 100'000 participants going on since months. the protests are over a judicial reform which would allow criminally charged politicians such as Benyamin Netanyahu to seize control over the judiciary. Israels President Herzog mediated a dialogue between supporters and opponents to the reform project in March, but Netanyahu pushes forward since late June. The protests are likely escalating as a vote on the reform is expected for tomorrow, Monday and companies will give their employees free to be able to protest. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional oppose - Article hasn't been updated in 10 days. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 09:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have updated it today. Just check the edit history. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, isn't it still July 10th? PrecariousWorlds (talk) 16:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for now Article is lacking the regular/daily updates necessary for an ongoing item. There's nothing on any protests since the 1st of the month. The Kip (talk) 19:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - not getting updates and no longer all that widely covered. nableezy - 19:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Not widely covered, and has not been updated recently. Editor 5426387 (talk) 22:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above. Mount Patagonia (talkcontributions) 00:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The opposes per "not updated" and "per above" are invalid as the article is getting updated. I am contesting the close but I do not know how.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 03:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have reopened the discussion as I have updated the article before and after the nomination. The article also received regular major (more than a 500 bytes) updates in the month of July here, here, here, here, by different editors in the month July. Some even specifically mentioning protests in July. So the votes with arguments like the article has not been updated in 10 days or there is nothing since the 1 of this month and the per above arguments I don't see as valid points to make.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 06:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mirziyoyev remains president of Uzbekistan

Proposed image
Article: 2023 Uzbek presidential election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Shavkat Mirziyoyev remains the president of Uzbekistan. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In Uzbekistan, Shavkat Mirziyoyev (pictured) is re-elected president.
Alternative blurb II: ​ After an election widely seen as neither free nor fair, Shavkat Mirziyoyev remains the president of Uzbekistan.
Alternative blurb III: Shavkat Mirziyoyev retains his position as the president of Uzbekistan.
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Needs more prose. Wording of proposed blurb to reflect sham election and de facto authoritarian rule. Abcmaxx (talk) 13:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I don't think we should be attempting to WP:RGW by changing the standard election blurb to reflect a sham election. It's an election either way, and I'm not even sure we have prior consensus to have blurbs be the defining line between real vs. fraud elections. Seems like a WP:NPOV issue, too. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 16:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Quality wise, the article needs quite a bit of work in the length department. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 16:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Added altblurb that doesn't violate WP:RGW or WP:NPOV. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 18:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional oppose - Article remains dodgy. Also, the fact that this election was essentially a sham brings down notability. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 16:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I'm not sure what's significant about a dictator staying in power, in an authoritarian one-party nation. Nfitz (talk) 16:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment If this is about the 2023 Uzbek presidential election, this should be reflected in the blurb language. Still ITN/R even if it's a sham election (we post them for Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, etc). Blurb shouldn't be RGW. I'd say I support on notability as it's still a general "election", but that's what ITN/R is for. It's definitely not ready on quality, though. Counted 8 sentences in the article across 3 sections.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 18:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I am not sure if some dictator whom we all knew would win won, see, the DPRK re-elects Kim Jong-Un every five year, did we post about it ever? no, and about Putin being re-elected in 2020? also no, and so on, and so on. Editor 5426387 (talk) 21:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    We actually did post Putin's re-"election" (it was in 2018).  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 22:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, my bad, but you get the point.Editor 5426387 (talk) 03:47, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - we actually have precedent of WP:IAR not posing sham elections like this. --RockstoneSend me a message! 23:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Rockstone35 such as..? Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 23:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support alt2 It is ITNR but I also understand the concern of Rockstone. So alt2 is a possibility to raise awareness on environment the elections were held in. If this alt2 goes against the rules, I support alt3.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 06:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I'm more concerned that the article is in extremely poor shape with absolutely no information on the results and the allegations that the election wasn't free and fair.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. It's technically an election, but it's not in the news, because nobody doubted the outcome and therefore no major media write about it. Sandstein 08:34, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 9

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


RD: Benno C. Schmidt Jr.

Article: Benno C. Schmidt Jr. (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/10/nyregion/benno-schmidt-jr-dead.html
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American academic. Article looks good aside from two uncited things. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Alain Besançon

Article: Alain Besançon (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Le Figaro, Onet
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Sovietologue and expert on the history of Christianity as well as anti-totaliarism. Needs expansion but lots of sources present, German and French Wikipedias may be of use too. Abcmaxx (talk) 10:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Article is far too stubby for ITNRD standards, and the Publications section (which is the majority of the article) is entirely unsourced. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 16:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Ready) RD: Lee Hedges

Article: Lee Hedges (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Advocate
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American football coach. Article looks alright aside from one uncited sentence. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support looks good to me, it's pretty well-cited ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 01:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support some paragraphs could use more citations mid-paragraph rather than just one at the end of a bulk of text / several sentences? Abcmaxx (talk) 13:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Article's quality is good in both the citation and length departments. No reason this should be held up; marking as ready. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 16:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Ready) RD: Luis Suárez

Article: Luis Suárez (footballer, born 1935) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Diario AS; La Gazzetta dello Sport; L'Equipe; The Guardian; Il Post
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Apart from his club and international accolades, Suárez notably won the Ballon d'Or in 1960, and still remains the only Spanish male footballer to have ever done so to this day. The article likely needs to be expanded and lacks a lot of key sources, but the links I've put right above, as well as this beautiful obituary by Diario AS, should help get everything in good shape. The it.wiki page should have some useful sources to retrieve, too! Oltrepier (talk) 14:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose for now. Ballon d'or sounds good but is unsourced. Much more in the article as well. Article needs quite some work.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:21, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Paradise Chronicle I agree, and I'll see what I can do to bring its quality up in the next few days. Oltrepier (talk) 15:42, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose as there are quite a few statements and items listed in Honours that lack citations. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 16:15, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Paradise Chronicle @Fakescientist8000 It was quite a challenge, but I think I've managed to get the whole "Honours" section covered now.
    I'll try to work on the career section now, since it's still pretty skeletal. Also, should I actually cut one or two photos from the article, just to clean it up? Oltrepier (talk) 07:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Oltrepier Excellent job in the Honours section. Now, do you think you could get the one remaining CN tag? If you can do that, consider my !vote a support. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 14:18, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I just wanted to say that I'm hoping to work on the article myself in the next few days, and I've also called for support at WP:FOOTBALL. Oltrepier (talk) 17:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment (pt. 2): following the advice of @Fakescientist8000, I should have helped fill in all of the major citation gaps. I don't know if this is enough for ITN standard, though... Oltrepier (talk) 14:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Good work there. This is ready, I think. Black Kite (talk) 14:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Much better on citations, but some parts feel like cite overkill. Still feels like in needs refinement, but it's certainly good enough for ITN deaths. Govvy (talk) 15:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Govvy It definitely is in need of refinement, lol...
    I'm hoping to help improve it in the next few days/weeks! Oltrepier (talk) 15:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Sufficient for ITN but obviously as a bio could do with many more improvements. Kingsif (talk) 04:28, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 8

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Bill Shipp

Article: Bill Shipp (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://saportareport.com/legendary-georgia-journalist-bill-shipp-dies-at-89/sections/reports/maria_saporta/
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American Journalist. Article looks alright. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Article has enough sourcing + length in order to pass ITNRD standards. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 05:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, Per above, article is ready for ITN. Alex-h (talk) 13:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: K. Ravindranathan Nair

Article: K. Ravindranathan Nair (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Kerala Kaumudi
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indian film producer. Article looks alright though there's a poorly cited filmography. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:21, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak oppose Article has some sourcing issues, although those should be easily fixed. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 01:16, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Adrian Tan

Article: Adrian Tan (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Channel News Asia
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Singaporean lawyer. Article looks good. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:05, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - article seems to meet requirements. Interesting coincidence to have 2 Singaporean lawyers with the same last name on the same day. - Indefensible (talk) 19:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - seems fine.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Article's quality is good enough for ITNRD. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 00:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • PostedBagumba (talk) 05:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Tan Yock Lin

Article: Tan Yock Lin (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Straits Times
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Singaporean law professor. - Indefensible (talk) 16:08, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Article has less than 320 words. Too stubby. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 00:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Özkan Uğur

Article: Özkan Uğur (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.haberturk.com/son-dakika-ozkan-ugur-hayatini-kaybetti-ozkan-ugur-kimdir-kac-yasinda-hastaligi-neydi-ve-neden-oldu-3605827-magazin
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Turkish musician. Article has only one inline citation, but progress can be made ActuallyNeverHappened02 (a place to chalk | a list of stuff i've done) 14:05, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Both the Filmography and Discography sections need citations. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 01:18, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
From my understanding of MOS:FILMOGRAPHY (and the linked WikiProject), sourcing of the filmography section is actually not needed unless it's difficult to confirm, though I've still added sources. WikiProject Discographies says general references are sufficient. ~StyyxTalk? 17:39, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A general reference that supports all the roles in the table is fine, but without that, we do expect each entry to be sourced. Masem (t) 17:42, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Ongoing removal: Russian invasion of Ukraine

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Russian invasion of Ukraine (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item removal (Post)
Nominator's comments: It has been ongoing for almost one and a half years, but it evidently slowed down to the level that there are barely individual events that would merit inclusion, so it is perhaps the right time to revisit its ongoing status. Major territorial changes have not been made for months, airstrikes on Ukrainian cities have become less frequent with much lower casualties, the long-awaited Ukrainian counteroffensive did not make significant progress, people in major Ukrainian cities got used to the fact there is a war in their country and returned to normal life, and male Ukrainians are now allowed to leave the country under a simplified procedure compared to few months back. Moreover, 2023 Ukrainian counteroffensive is part of Russian invasion of Ukraine in the same way the latter is part of Russo-Ukrainian War, so it is highly debatable if "Russian invasion of Ukraine" is the right target. Keeping it unchanged forever makes the impression that we do not care about the dynamics of events. The counteroffensive may hypothetically result in a major breakthrough in the future, but we would probably not post a blurb for it because the outdated "Russian invasion of Ukraine" would be still in ongoing. This is definitely not how ITN should convey information to our readers. A much better approach would be to remove it from ongoing, post a blurb when things escalate again and then move it to ongoing with a more precise target article. At the end, note that we removed the COVID-19 pandemic from ongoing when there were still preventive measures in place and tens of thousands of deaths on a daily basis, so it is clear that this should be removed one day. Better to do it in relatively quiet times. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:44, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose Absolutely not. Still big updates happening, the war is still having a worldwide impact, and there is no signs of it ever slowing down. Just to give another perspective, we had COVID in ongoing for like two or three years before we removed it. TwistedAxe [contact] 12:28, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I get the idea, but its still relevant. I still see it the news, but the big updates may just be "smaller" than say a year ago. Maybe a discussion could be held though that maybe the article should be moved to the more relevant counteroffensive though.
TheCorriynial (talk) 12:40, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose, but change the name - I agree that the war has slowed down, but it has continuously been front-page news for the last year-and-a-half. Go to the main page of any news outlet, I guarantee there's at least one article about the conflict at the top. Removing the COVID-19 Pandemic from ongoing was due to the fact that it was hardly being covered by the news in any major way, and it was becoming more clear by the day that COVID-19 would become endemic, similar to the Flu.
There is no indication that the same will happen with the Russo-Ukrainian War. It has only escalated since the initial invasion, from the missile strikes in Poland, to the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant crisis, to the destruction of the Nova Kakhovka Dam, to the Wagner Rebellion. It is clear that the war is still going on and in increased severity.
Now, I do agree that the item 'Russian invasion of Ukraine' is becoming a little outdated now, and I think changing the ongoing title to 'Russo-Ukrainian War' would be best, though this change will probably need to be reflected in the target articles. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 12:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Workshop: What should the target article in ongoing be?

Considering that there is initially a unanimous opposition to removal but some support for changing the target article, it stands to reason to discuss this in more detail. Potential alternative target articles include:

Feel free to nominate more alternatives. Your opinions are welcome.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:59, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't think the main article should be removed altogether. While nearly all now are aware of the main invasion article, it may still provide general context. We can have those specific trends in parentheses (e.g. amid recent announcement on cluster munitions), like Russian invasion of Ukraine (Ukrainian counteroffensive). There was no such dramatic and protracted precedent in Ongoing before, so showing major spinoffs in parentheses may be warranted. Brandmeistertalk 14:23, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Im actually kinda in this camp, since they suggested this, and it could possibly become a standard that could be used for more things down the road. although I'd probably put either the Ukrainian counteroffensive or the timeline. TheCorriynial (talk) 14:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Either this or Alt 3 seems best. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 06:57, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Alt3. And I decidedly feel that the article title must reflect the criminal and malicious role of russia. Yes, not capitalised. --Ouro (blah blah) 14:43, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think we should keep it as 'Russian Invasion of Ukraine' when the conflict has long transformed past that phase just because we want to make some moral point about the war. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 18:30, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ALT2 - the invasion proper isn’t really ongoing anymore, as Russia’s failed to take substantial territory in recent times and it’s more of an occupation now. The Kip (talk) 16:19, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ALT2 Braganza (talk) 17:37, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There was a discussion back in April by User:Interstellarity to add a timeline to the ongoing entry (at that time, it was Timeline of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (12 November 2022 – present), obviously now renamed). The proposal failed to garner consensus, though a key thing to note is that proposal called for it to be formatted as "Russian invasion of Ukraine (timeline)", whereas this is straight up swapping the main article with the timeline.
As for my vote, per ranked choice !voting,
  1. Alt3: reiterating what I stated in the aforementioned discussion in April, the primary article doesn't really go into details about the actual offensives. If prose is more important, than...
  2. Alt2: which has prose, but focuses on a specific aspect of the war instead of the broader theme.
  3. Alt1: not receiving daily updates.
Knightoftheswords 16:26, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ALT2 It's important to always cover the more broader picture when discussing about something in Ongoing. Alt1 would only cover a small portion of the war, alt3 same thing but using the term "invasion" which really isn't suitable anymore considering it's getting more and more stale on the battlefield. Alt2 sums it up perfectly in my opinion, because it is a war that has been going on for over a year now and would also cover the other alts such as the Ukrainian counteroffensive aswell as the actual "invasion" itself. TwistedAxe [contact] 17:43, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose change The existing article – Russian invasion of Ukraine – is clearly dominant with our readership, having far more readers and the only candidate in the Top 100 for June. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Hm, maybe that article should be renamed to 'Russo-Ukrainian War (2022 - Present)' or something along those lines. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 18:28, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    It was indeed once moved to that title (minus [pun intended] the shorter hyphen) following this discussion, before being moved to the current title following this RM. — Knightoftheswords 23:21, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    And what of it? DarkSide830 (talk) 19:17, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay. To quote GreatCaesarsGhost (talk · contribs) in the discussion I linked in my !vote, when he was going on about his experience reading the mother article, Where is significant fighting happening? Are there skirmishes happening all along the front lines, or is it relatively peaceful? I have no idea.Knightoftheswords 23:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    How many times must we tell you that readership stats genuinely do not matter here? The Kip (talk) 02:05, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    It's not clear what matters here as the alternatives presented are wildly different. ALT1 is forward-looking, ALT2 is a broad historical perspective and ALT3 is a proseline ticker. The readership stats show which of these views is making the most impact and the existing link is clearly dominant. To present more varied perspectives, we would need a navigational template with multiple links as we did for COVID. If we're just presenting one link then it should be the big one that most people are looking for. Andrew🐉(talk) 07:52, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ALT1 or ALT2, but a preference for ALT2 - Per above. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 18:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I can see why people prefer ALT3, as it is pretty much the WP:COMMONNAME at this point, but I do think the nature of the conflict has shifted from the initial Russian invasion of the country to a prolonged occupation grinding down to trench warfare. It'd be equivalent to terming the entire Western Front of WW1 as the 'German invasion of France'.
If I was to cast ranked choice votes like Knight above, it'd be:
  1. Alt2
  2. Alt3
  3. Alt1
PrecariousWorlds (talk) 18:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Alt2 properly describes the overall event occurring. The invasion was always a piece of the larger puzzle, and to be honest it's been the target for way too long. Russia and Ukraine have been at war for over a decade, but I feel like people seem to believe the war only started with the invasion. DarkSide830 (talk) 19:16, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The war started in 2014, but it was added to “Ongoing” b/c of the invasion. I think that linking to the war would be overly broad. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 07:05, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    So? The invasion is part of the larger war. If people want to look at more recent events they can navigate to them from there. DarkSide830 (talk) 18:05, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Alt2 basically describes what is currently happening, the war had stopped being an invasion since the recapturing of Kherson, and the Russo-Ukrainian War is basically what it has been since 2014, so I feel that "Russo-Ukrainian War" is basically the best title, for that the war has been ongoing for 9 years, and this phase of the war has been ongoing for over a year. Editor 5426387 (talk) 19:26, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Russia is still occupying Ukraine, and has done since 2014. If Ukraine was to start defeating Russia on Russian territory such as Belgorod or Moscow then it would be a war in the traditional sense. At the moment Ukraine is merely repelling invaders from its territory. Abcmaxx (talk) 21:30, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Alt 2. The Russo-Ukrainian War has been going on since 2014. Changing the ongoing link to that would be further expanding the scope of the link to not focus on current events. Keeping the link as is or linking to a more-focused timeline sub-article is fine. It seems people are arguing for what the invasion article's name should be, which shouldn't be done at ITN but via a RM. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep current target – Regardless of its title, Russian invasion of Ukraine is the article covering the phase of the war from February 2022 to the present, including the recent counteroffensive and the Wagner rebellion. DecafPotato (talk) 06:08, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose alts. Recentism, the counteroffensive is not really breaking news and a timeline either. The current one is the most accurate in my opinion as the war really takes place in the Ukraine and not in Russia.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The current article is the correct one.  — Amakuru (talk) 08:31, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose proposed changes The current target article is the right one. If it aint broke, don't fix it. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:20, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose any changes. The current link is working just fine. --Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 14:59, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose any changes keeping the russian invasion of ukraine article is perfectly fine for me. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:16, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose any changes per above. I'd be fine with including some of the alts in parentheses, but the current target is the correct one. Davey2116 (talk) 00:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose any changes Everything that could be said has already been said above. Nothing wrong with this target article, but there are issues with using the broader 2014-present war article (too broad) or the current counteroffensive (too narrow).  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 05:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

July 7

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Violeta Hemsy de Gainza

Article: Violeta Hemsy de Gainza (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://entrenotas.com.ar/violeta-y-su-legado-en-la-pedagogia-musical/
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Argentine pianist. Article looks alright. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:56, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak oppose as per a few uncited statements in the Early life and education section. Once that is cleared up, consider this !vote a support. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 05:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Kara Puketapu

Article: Kara Puketapu (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Stuff (NZ)
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Maori leader. Aside from one uncited thing the article looks alright. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:33, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - article seems to meet requirements. - Indefensible (talk) 16:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Article has enough sourcing/length to meet ITNRD standards. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 16:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch governmental crisis

Proposed image
Articles: Fourth Rutte cabinet (talk · history · tag) and Mark Rutte (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Dutch coalition government falls apart after failing to reach an agreement on family reunification. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In the Netherlands, Prime Minister Mark Rutte (pictured) announces his resignation following the collapse of the ruling coalition government.
Alternative blurb II: ​ In the Netherlands, after a failure to reach an agreement on capping migration to the country, the ruling coalition government collapses, leading to the resignation of Prime Minister Mark Rutte (pictured).
Alternative blurb III: ​ In the Netherlands, the governing coalition collapses and Prime Minister Mark Rutte (pictured) resigns.
News source(s): NOS, RTL Nieuws, N-TV, Spiegel, DerStandard
Credits:

 Braganza (talk) 19:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - We don't normally post internal political debates and governmental reshuffling like this. If this leads to a sustained political crisis in the Netherlands akin to the one experienced by the UK last year then maybe, but right now, no. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 19:37, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
it is not a reshuffle, the coalition ended and Rutte wants to resign Braganza (talk) 21:35, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(Resigning in this context does not mean he leaves btw) Dajasj (talk) 21:58, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He's still going to be Prime Minister of a caretaker government. While his resignation has bumped up the notability a little, I still think this is not notable for front page news.
Changing my vote to Wait until the next general election. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 12:52, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The event regards one of the main players within the European Union, and considering also for how long Rutte has been in charge and the surprising results of the latest local elections in the Netherlands this crisis could pave the way for huge changes in the country. Fm3dici97 (talk) 20:31, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The cabinet has now collapsed. New elections are in November of this year. The blurb should probably reflect this.[1] Tuzi-bunbun (talk) 21:16, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on Significance. Not the typical sort of political crisis posted to ITN, but certainly seems significant enough nevertheless. Not too hot on the current blurb though. Think we could use a better phrasing then "[falls] apart", and it's worth noting that the article lacks prose and could use much more discussion of the break-down and background thereof. DarkSide830 (talk) 21:51, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional support and adding alt blurb - major political crisis in the Netherlands that could have major ramifications for years to come. Mark Rutte has been in power for a decade, so a resignation defintale means something; we posted the UK version of this last year as Precarious pointed out so it would be systemic bias to not do the same for the Batavians. Oppose on quality however; the article is literally a table wall. — Knightoftheswords (Talk) 22:26, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Have not really seen Batavian used in that sense beyond Jakarta. Gotitbro (talk) 02:08, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
added stub quality on most big issues they faced and {expand dutch}. Bart Terpstra (talk) 02:10, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait until a new PM is appointed per WP:ITNR. Right now, it's just a routine political matter as PrecariousWorlds notes. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:34, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Oppose - wait until elections. The current government will remain in power as a caretaker government until new elections are held, so nothing has actually changed. --RockstoneSend me a message! 23:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Respectfully, the new elections aren't for several months. This isn't a Johnson/Truss or Truss/Sunak situation where the successor is fairly quick;y chosen. The biggest news is the elections have effectively been moved up two years. That is new itself independent of the actual results. DarkSide830 (talk) 01:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I see your perspective and understand it, but I personally don't think that news alone merits a blurb, since we will post the results of the election anyway when the appropriate time comes. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 03:19, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on Boris/Truss precedent This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 23:57, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, mention that this will lead to elections half November at the earliest[2] as a consequence. Bart Terpstra (talk) 00:50, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • So are we going to post the elections in November too now? Is that where this is going? Whenever a parliament disbands, we'll post both events? Seems excessive. --RockstoneSend me a message! 01:03, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support If there is no immediate successor, then this this the time to post. General elections are ITNR, but a decade long PM reigning is also of note. Gotitbro (talk) 02:12, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Looks like the PM has already resigned once already (leading to the '21 elections) and nothing of note came of it. Seeing that this is not a unique event in recent Rutte/Dutch history, I am striking my outright support. Gotitbro (talk) 02:40, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    2021 was only a few months before the election, while the next elections where planned for 2025 Braganza (talk) 05:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support It's in the news now. The article could use some fleshing out but so it goes. Note that it contains a couple of graphs which are broken, saying "Graphs are temporarily unavailable due to technical issues." All graphs were disabled for "security reasons" and have been snafu for months now. "WMF teams are working quickly on a plan..." Andrew🐉(talk) 08:39, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Rutte is major figure, news on his stepping down should be posted. Kirill C1 (talk) 09:04, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Resignation of a government is notable and in the news now. 331dot (talk) 09:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, per above. BilledMammal (talk) 09:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - No doubt about it. Now is not the time to wait while the crisis is in the news and we are at its point of apogee in terms of newsworthiness. Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 11:42, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Who makes the final call? and when? 85.147.66.47 (talk) 00:47, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose not on significance, but the fact that there is really no real coverage of the crisis in either of the given pages. I see one line on the coalition page, and only a brief mention of the issue in the Rutte's lede. This should be a significant discussion of the events leading to this to give context. --Masem (t) 14:36, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    this has been adressed. 85.147.66.47 (talk) 00:33, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wait until new elections are held and new PM is chosen - from my understanding Rutte will remain PM until then. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 15:15, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose misleading blurb wich is not the main reason for the collapse Shadow4dark (talk) 15:17, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree, it was most likely (hearsay) timed to break up on this issue rather than one of the many other issues for optics. Bart Terpstra (talk) 19:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support alt blurb I per all above. TwistedAxe [contact] 17:45, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support this is unusual for us to post on ITN, but this seems significant enough to post due to the fact that the Netherlands is a major player in the EU, and the collapse of the ruling government seems like an pretty important event. Editor 5426387 (talk) 19:29, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support with much more concise added alt3, also because we have little else that's new currently at ITN. Sandstein 20:44, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Why not add "Elections will be held in the fall"? Bart Terpstra (talk) 20:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Normally I’d say wait for the election, but that’s three months away, so let’s go ahead with this. The Kip (talk) 02:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Neither target article Fourth Rutte cabinet or Mark Rutte discusses this news beyond two sentences. TarkusABtalk/contrib 03:40, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait until a new government is formed per ITNR. Governments come and go all the time. We blurb the transition. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:43, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    there wont be a new government, snap elections are the most likeliest possibility Braganza (talk) 10:00, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Then we should post the results of the new elections as per normal. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:21, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Which is months from now while this is in the news right this moment. Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 14:58, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    yeah it's already two days ago Braganza (talk) 15:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support We will post the election as well since it'll be ITN/R, but this is in the news now. There is precedent for this: we posted the resignations of Theresa May and Boris Johnson separately from the installations of their successors (and those were party leadership elections). Davey2116 (talk) 00:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Again, as pointed out before -- there is nil but one sentence in the cabinet article and about three sentences in the lede of Rutte article which is nowhere near enough of a significant update for this, if this is really as significant as many of the support !votes say above. I expect a couple of paragraphs if not more to explain the background, the changes, the process of change, and any possible impacts on Danish and EU region this may have. --Masem (t) 01:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The general rule at ITN (conceding rare exceptions) is that we expect an event under nomination to rate its own article. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    You wish. The lead blurb for over a week now has been about a court ruling on Jair Bolsonaro. That event not only doesn't have a separate article, it doesn't even have a separate section in his article. Andrew🐉(talk) 07:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    To be fair, his biographical article dedicates a portion of the Post-presidency (2023–present) section to it. That's more than can be said about this proposed blurb as of right now.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 07:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    A separate article has never been the case for ITN. We expect a significant update, and while it would seem this type of event could warrant its own article, it is not required as long as we see paragraphs of content about this situation, if it is as severe and important as the !votes above suggest. The lack of any attempt to expand on this is worrisome. Masem (t) 12:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on significance, but oppose on quality until at least one of the target articles has at minimum one paragraph of sourced prose about the news story. If I were a reader clicking on a bolded link in a news blurb about a political crisis, I'd expect to be able to read more about said political crisis. If/when the target article is updated (or if/when a new target article about the political crisis is created), consider my opposition dropped.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 05:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    How's the current state of the article?
    I'll try and expand apology for colonial past, energy and the AZC's tommorow. Bart Terpstra (talk) 00:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. this morning he announced he won't be running again. source. 85.147.66.47 (talk) 09:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • But he will remain as PM in a caretaker role until the elections are held, right? I just don't understand why we would post what is effectively the same story twice. This is like posting someone's election and then their inauguration. --RockstoneSend me a message! 23:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support its infuential news at the moment. Also, the Netherlands are known to be a stable political entity, so a shake up is news.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support alt blurb after improvements Shadow4dark (talk) 21:17, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: Per Rockstone. Just post the election result and the new PM and coalition government getting sworn in when they eventually take place. Until then, the current cabinet is still caretaker government. --StellarHalo (talk) 01:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Milan fire

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2023 Milan nursing home fire (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In Italy, six people die and 81 are injured in Milan after a fire broke out at a local retirement home. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In Italy, six people are killed in a fire at a nursing home in Milan.
News source(s): NYT - The Guardian - DW - ABC Australia - AP
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Six people have died in a Milanese nursery home. In addition, a whopping 81 are injured. The article needs work. — Knightoftheswords (Talk · Contribs) 18:36, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Although this is tragic, sadly, accidents like this happen all the time, and the article is still a stub. Article will need to be first expanded, then we may talk about whether it is ITN-worthy. Editor 5426387 (talk) 18:51, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose yet again, while tragic, it is unlikely to be a enduring news topic. --Masem (t) 18:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support | Meets standards and has international news coverage. I will remind contributors that there is no MINDEATHS criterion This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 18:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose due to insufficient importance (unless it's discovered that the fire was started deliberately) & the article not being good enough. Jim 2 Michael (talk) 18:58, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Wikipedia is no tabloid.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    What is tabloidy about this? Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 11:21, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Tabloids focus on murders, deaths and local human rights violations. The event is sure tragic, but has no lasting coverage or influence on a wider area. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Unfortunately not notable enough to be covered in ITN. Whilst it is sad, this has no place in being in ITN because of the very little impact it's going to have on anything. TwistedAxe [contact] 17:47, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Namboothiri (artist)

Article: Namboothiri (artist) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Manorama
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indian artist. Article looks almost decent though there does look to be some problems. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:22, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support I’ve added ISBNs to the bibliography, article looks good enough now. Scientia potentia est, -MonarchOfTerror(talk) 03:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 6

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime


RD: Graham Clark (tenor)

Article: Graham Clark (tenor) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Royal Opera House + French + German
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Great internationally known character tenor, 16 seasons in Bayreuth, 15 seasons at the Met, and still had a sad little stub of an article. Rather proud of this expansion. There could be more, but - see below - next is a pianist, hopefully easier. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:13, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Jeffrey Carlson

Article: Jeffrey Carlson (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Yahoo!
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American actor. - Indefensible (talk) 02:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Beverley Salmon

Article: Beverley Salmon (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=2722642&jwsource=cl&fbclid=IwAR2vMtJ2tAWQUrGyDSiWzDlTnB_hWt7v8wTugQVwh3W4f4vhR3fr0AL3_nQ
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Canadian activist. Aside from an uncited section article looks nearly ready. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose both the Community work and Career section have uncited statements. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 01:21, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Mutulu Shakur

Article: Mutulu Shakur (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://newsone.com/4635039/mutulu-shakur-dies/
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American activist and criminal. There are citation issues but they're not so bad. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Article's quality is good enough for ITNRD. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 01:22, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Essop Pahad

Article: Essop Pahad (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.timeslive.co.za/politics/2023-07-06-essop-pahad-close-confidant-of-thabo-mbeki-dies-aged-84/
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: South African politician. Article has some major issues but is almost ready. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:21, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Article has a few uncited statements that need clearing up. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 01:49, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Iván Márquez

Article: Iván Márquez (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/top-farc-dissident-leader-ivan-marquez-dead-sources-2023-07-07/
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Colombian guerrilla leader. Article is almost ready but it has some issues. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:17, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wait sources, most prominently El Pais (one of the better newspapers in the Spanish/Latin american press says there is no confirmation yet. Others say so as well.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

El Tiempo is probably to most conclusive yet, with them claiming to have information abou his death but the Venezuelan Ministry not confirming it.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 11:06, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have expanded the article quite a bit now. Added small sections on him being a teacher, peace nagotiations in 2012-2016 and an assassination attempt after he returned to the arms. But there is still the early years in the FARC, peace negotiations in Mexico and the ones with the Pastrana government around 2000s which are in a poor state. The political career ahead of the FARC might also add some phrases. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 14:36, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Arnaldo Forlani

Article: Arnaldo Forlani (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.lastampa.it/politica/2023/07/06/news/morto_arnaldo_forlani-12927992/
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former prime minister of Italy. Article is very uncited sadly. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Article has major sourcing issues which need to be fixed ASAP. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 05:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Brendan Daly (politician)

Article: Brendan Daly (politician) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.clarelive.ie/news/home/1242139/sadness-following-passing-of-former-clare-td-and-minister.html
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Irish politican. Nearly there aside from an uncited paragraph. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:59, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support citing concern of the nominator fixed Josey Wales Parley 18:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose As there are still a few unsourced statements in the article. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 05:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Attila Abonyi

Article: Attila Abonyi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://au.sports.yahoo.com/socceroos-great-atilla-abonyi-mourned-100816885.html?guccounter=1
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Hungarian-Australian soccer player. Article is nearly ready aside from a few uncited areas. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:56, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Article has a few uncited statements that need sourcing. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 01:24, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Meta launches Threads

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Threads (app) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In tech, Threads, a competitor app to Twitter by Meta Platforms, gains 30 million users within a day of launching. (Post)
News source(s): France24 - The Guardian - The Independent Irish Independent - El Pais - DW - Le Monde - CBC - ABC Australia - NYT
Credits:
Article updated
Nominator's comments: Meta's Threads, a new app set to compete with Twitter, has accumulated dozens of millions of users within a day of launch. Before anyone rushes to oppose, there is precedent for posting news of this caliber; for example, the incident that lead to this app being launched: Elon's acquisition of Twitter. The success of Threads within the first day (having already accumulated more than 10% of Twitter's userbase) is noteworthy, especially regarding the series of unpopular decisions being made at Twitter under Elon's tenure and the stark differences in how both apps handle things (e.g, freedom of speech). In the linked discussion, people stated that Twitter was a major and critical company, and its seems pretty clear that this will likely become a major and critical competitor and app for many. - Knightoftheswords (Talk · Contribs) 19:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose and snow close — Product announcements aren't suitable for ITN. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 19:17, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I also don't feel like this is "of this caliber" wrt the acquisition of Twitter, considering that was a major platform with a massive dollar amount and, even at the time, was believed to have major implications for a critical platform. I also feel like posting it to ITN would feel... I don't know. I can't get with the idea that we should post it bc it's a reaction to Twitter's dumpster fire, and it feels all routine coverage and it's in vogue to cover every little thing going on related to Twitter right now. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 19:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I didn't rush to it, but I will leisurely oppose at this point because it is way too early to tell that this will be a major competitor to Twitter, even given the massive boom within its first day of launch. I think the notability of this really is, as TenTonParasol, subordinated to the notability of Twitter's major meltdown. Otherwise it's just a new social media service. Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 19:36, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose companies launch new services all the time, and that this is only getting attention due to the nonsense happening at Twitter doesn't make this any more special. Masem (t) 19:39, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support It's in the news as one would expect -- modern journalism seems to be largely driven by Twitter now. And the article is helpful in explaining that this new thing is essentially just an extension of Instagram, which helps me ignore it too. And it's a good trailer for the cage match which sounds much more interesting. Andrew🐉(talk) 19:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    "And it's a good trailer for the cage match which sounds much more interesting" really hits the uncertainty I was expressing earlier. Posting this to ITN feels like, it's not literally promotional or RGW, but it feels inappropriate to me somehow to post it to ITN on the basis of highlighting the "stark differences" between how they're run or as a "trailer" for a different event entirely. An ITN bullet isn't for drumming up attention to other events and issues that aren't the thing at hand, however connected or adjacent those are. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 20:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose due to that good ol' CRYSTAL. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn't. We cant' assume this app will become a real Twitter competitor, and even then such news may not be fitting for ITN. DarkSide830 (talk) 20:09, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose New app launches all the time... big deal. NoahTalk 20:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Johannesburg gas leak

Article: 2023 Boksburg gas leak (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: A gas leak kills 16 people, including 3 children in Boksburg, Johannesburg, South Africa. (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian, Reuters, NY Times, Independent
Credits:

 Ainty Painty (talk) 06:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - this article is currently only 3 sentences long and does not provide any detailed information ~~~ Chanelle821 (talk) 07:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait but leaning oppose on significance. While tragic, it doesn't seem to be the type of event that yet will have any news-worthy tail, and may fail NEVENT. --Masem (t) 12:11, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose article is currently a stub, and this incident does not seen significant for ITN. Editor 5426387 (talk) 16:00, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - fails to meet the requisite significance. It looks like it passes NEVENT by the fact that multiple countries covered it, but I wouldn't hold out hope for any lasting effect. Anarchyte (talk) 13:34, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, Not a notable news for ITN. Alex-h (talk) 13:24, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- I'd support posting this if such a thing happened in the US, or in any other western nation. This is unusual and notable. --RockstoneSend me a message! 06:56, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Brăila Bridge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Brăila Bridge (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Brăila Bridge the third longest suspension bridge in Europe opens. (Post)
News source(s): Romania Insider
Credits:
 EugεnS¡m¡on 16:10, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Not seeing the significance here. NoahTalk 16:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Interesting, but an incremental record that lacks much significance. DarkSide830 (talk) 17:28, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose any "xth largest" where x is not 1st is really not going to cut it for ITN. --Masem (t) 17:43, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Insignificant bridge built with a th, not an st. I'm not too sure this would even make the cut for DYK. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 18:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Not significant enough for ITN, while this certainly is kind of interesting, this is the "Third" longest suspension bridge in Europe, if it was the single longest bridge in the world, then maybe it may be ITN-worthy, but this isn't even the longest in the world, it's not even the longest in Europe. This really seens too insignificant to post. Editor 5426387 (talk) 22:29, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose So Romania opened a new suspension bridge. Kingsif (talk) 00:09, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Third largest bridge doesn't fit notability standards for ITN IMO. Schwinnspeed (talk) 00:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

July 5

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Science and technology


RD: Rob Agerbeek

Article: Rob Agerbeek (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.msn.com/nl-nl/entertainment/nieuws/bekende-jazzpianist-rob-agerbeek-85-overleden/ar-AA1dw9ze?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6ea0508e614f4e0fa41162083f469d19&ei=9
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indo dutch pianist. Article almost looks decent but there are some citation issues. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:32, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Walkiria Terradura

Article: Walkiria Terradura (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.rainews.it/amp/tgr/umbria/articoli/2023/07/addio-alla-partigiana-walkiria-terradura-39f6cabe-4eb5-4bff-8c8e-79c686e98223.html
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Italian partisan. Article looks alright. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:51, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Article has less than 320 words, which in my opinion, is too stubby. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 01:30, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Jacob Larsen (cricketer)

Article: Jacob Larsen (cricketer) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/jacob-larsen-329694
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Danish Cricketer. Article looks alright. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Article has less than 320 words, and is too stubby in my opinion. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 19:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Anthony Gilbert (composer)

Article: Anthony Gilbert (composer) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Schott Slipped Disc
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: British composer, influential teacher in both England and Australia. Article would look decent if it wasn't for a completely uncited discography. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:39, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gerda Arendt went out of their way to update the article to where i think it's good for the main page now. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:20, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I referenced the works, in addition to his website. A discography would be nice, but needs to be written - I think it works as it it is. Today was a tenor, and tomorrow a pianist. We can't get them all to GA state ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Keith Ball

Article: Keith Ball (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.bescotbanter.net/2023/07/keith-ball.html
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: English Footballer. Death announced on this date. Article looks alright. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:35, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Eva Maria Daniels

Article: Eva Maria Daniels (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Variety
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Wasn't reported until July 5th.

  • Oppose until expanded. Article has 3 sentences of prose as of right now, and needs to be seriously expanded. ⇒ Lucie Person (talk|contribs) 14:31, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This wikibio has 44 words. This is not acceptable, and must be expanded before we should even consider posting this. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 18:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, Per above. Alex-h (talk) 13:17, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2023 Writers Guild of America strike

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2023 Writers Guild of America strike (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): France24 - CBC - El Pais The Guardian - Los Angeles Times - Reuters - CNBC - CNN - VOA - NYT - WaPo
Credits:
Nominator's comments: This was nominated on May 2 of this year (link) and it failed to gain consensus. Some of opposition stated that they would support an ongoing nomination if it lasted for 9 weeks+, which it is as it began on May 2, 54 weeks ago. Others complained that a temporary agreement will likely be met soon, which hasn't occurred yet. Some stated that it only affected talk shows, which is also now invalid, and a user claimed that if it started delaying several shows, it should go up, which it has (and has also begun to delay several major movies as well) - see the WaPo article linked above. This event has been receiving sustained, international coverage for months now (all of the sources listed above are less than a month old and almost all are from the past week) and has and will have a major effect on the entertainment industry - you can't just dismiss this as "cElEbRiTy GoSsIp." - Knightoftheswords (Talk · Contribs) 22:06, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Article has practically received no updates. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:13, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Ongoing - per List of productions impacted by the 2023 Writers Guild of America strike. This ongoing strike is increasingly disruptive to television and movie production. Article appears updated to me. Jusdafax (talk) 23:12, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose first, article has had no major update recently, secondly, this affects only the entertainment industry of America, and barely has any affects on a worldwide scale, and thirdly, given that this had already been nominated on 2 May, this is not recent news. Editor 5426387 (talk) 23:22, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose While the strike is important here from an entertainment industry POV, its daily events...which are next to nil as negotiations continue...have little coverage and don't really change day to day. The end of the strike would be the proper ITN point. Masem (t) 23:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - My rationale from the previous nomination still holds. --Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 23:35, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - The only daily updates are essentially to add actors to the supporters section. I've expressed skepticism over the appropriateness and encyclopedic value of that section, even. And then totally forgot to follow-up on it. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 01:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Public broadcaster RTÉ involved in scandal

Article: RTÉ secret payment scandal (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Irish national broadcaster RTÉ discloses fraudulent payments to several of its employees, including Ryan Tubridy. (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian The Sun

 TwinBoo (talk) 18:09, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Conditional support - this would be the equivalent of the BBC, PBS/NPR, CBC, Australia's ABC, etc. being exposed for operating a massive slush fund. There is precedent in posting media stories on ITN, most recently the Dominion suit. Big news in Ireland; we shouldn't automatically discount this because it comes from a minor country per WP:ITNCDONT. However, much of the article is in list format. - Knightoftheswords (Talk · Contribs) 18:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait until some point of legal conclusion, such as a govt imposed fine or convictions. --Masem (t) 18:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait, oppose on quality at the moment Orange tag under "Timeline" that needs to be addressed. If it wasn't for the orange tag, I'd suggest we wait per Masem. TwistedAxe [contact] 19:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I don't think this rises to the level of ITN regardless of how major a country it happened in. As far as I can see the controversial payments total less than €1m over a number of years? Obviously big news in Ireland at the moment because of the latest revelations, but this story has been rumbling along for a good part of this year. Black Kite (talk) 19:09, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I'm not seeing much coverage of this outside the UK and Ireland. I do see one article from France last month briefly discussing it, but that's stale. I disagree that we'd be posting this if it was from the CBC or NPR. For CBC, I don't recall anyone ever nominating the Ghomeshi scandal, for example. The use of the word 'fraud' in the blurb seems exaggerated. Nfitz (talk) 19:46, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    ITN does not require widespread or international coverage; that helps with sourcing, but there can be major events outside the angelosphere that are not covered by BBC, NYTimes. etc. I can't tell at this time if this is such an event (would expect my point of conclusion would tell), though. Masem (t) 21:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This is a major news story in Ireland and could possibly be the end of the national broadcaster as currently established. The impact of this is far-reaching in terms of public trust in Ireland. Further significant developments are expected.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.97.116.51 (talk) 00:26, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    That sounds like WP:CRYSTAL --RockstoneSend me a message! 03:10, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per all above. _-_Alsor (talk) 05:58, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, my read of the badly written and poorly laid out article is that the RTÉ was overpaying its top talent, presumably to retain them. Any scandal is the result of the public nature of the funding, or more precisely, the lack thereof. This is a tempest in a teapot, with politicians trying to make the RTÉ look bad so that their decision to cut funding is ignored. Abductive (reasoning) 06:31, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait, Wait for some legal result. Alex-h (talk) 13:16, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Coco Lee

Article: Coco Lee (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): South China Morning Post China Daily
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Chinese-American singer-songwriter, dancer, record producer and actress who died by suicide. Performed “A Love Before Time” from Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon at the oscars. Article needs referencing improvements as it is orange tagged and has several cn tags. Scientia potentia est, -MonarchOfTerror(talk) 15:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Article's sourcing needs fixing, as there is an orange tag and many uncited statements in the article. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 15:46, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Orange tag, additional sources needed. TwistedAxe [contact] 18:58, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Not nearly notable enough for RD Dr Fell (talk) 21:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Dr Fell "Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD." Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 23:08, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional suppport, once the citation issues have been resolved. – robertsky (talk) 10:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support once some more refs added. 2001:BB6:4E52:7D00:8D80:D3C:4CB:CA7D (talk) 12:03, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for now (as updater) as there was a rather large passage that was an exact match with Shenzhen Daily text in English, which suggests there may be other copyvio and close paraphrasing issues throughout. (Started to edit, but still needs proper fixing.) Also...there is a rather large discography/tours section that appears to have no citations at the moment (although the film/television section looks ok). Cielquiparle (talk) 04:05, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Cielquiparle Assuming that this is the Shenzhen Daily article you're referring to, it is dated to 2017. However, looking through the article history, the content has been on Wikipedia since 2012. So I'd guess that the Shenzhen Daily article copied Wikipedia instead. ⇒ Lucie Person (talk|contribs) 00:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      @Lucie Person Awesome. Thanks for tracking that down. Discography section is still a problem though. Cielquiparle (talk) 00:54, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 4

Armed conflicts and attacks

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Sports


RD: John Berylson

Article: John Berylson (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American industrialist and philanthropist who was the owner and chairman of the English football club Millwall F.C. for 16 years. Died in car crash. Article is a bit thin and needs work. Black Kite (talk) 19:14, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose on quality the article is a stub and there are a ton of Citation Needed tags ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 23:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Still too thin (only 266 words of prose) and in need of more sourcing. --PFHLai (talk) 05:52, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Iran joins SCO

 157.65.118.229 (talk) 23:32, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose I mean... good for Iran I suppose, but I don't see how this has any long-lasting impact in the long term. TwistedAxe [contact] 23:51, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    This could definitely have more significance than a lot of entries here, like if Sweden joins NATO. However article quality is not sufficient for posting on the main page. - Indefensible (talk) 00:03, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't see how this has any more significance than a country abandoning its 200-year long neutrality policy and providing NATO with greater geographical leverage. That, unlike this, has more impact long-term due to possible future conflicts with Russia. TwistedAxe [contact] 01:15, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Definitely could be argued either way. Sweden only has a population of 10 million whereas Iran has over 80 million though, so a lot more people are in the country involved. - Indefensible (talk) 01:48, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    SCO is also not as notable and doesn't have the same geopolitical or economic value as NATO or the EU does. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 17:21, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Last SCO ascension, in 2017, was not posted. Not that this is a vote against, I would just like to provide this context. DarkSide830 (talk) 00:29, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose on quality The orange tag, 7 cn tags and 3 bsn tags should be addressed before we consider posting. Scientia potentia est, -MonarchOfTerror(talk) 00:36, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on significance as this is the largest regional organisation in the world in terms of population, area and total GDP. With all resemblance to the European Union in its early stages, if we could post the accession of new EU member states, any objection to posting accession of new SCO members states on significance would be pure POV.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:03, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose It's amusing to read the SCO's previous condemnation of Iran's policies in the UN. And to note that their main military arm is called RATS ("I can't think of anything worse than a skull ... Um, a rat's..."). Anyway, the headlines that I'm seeing in the news for the SCO summit are more diverse: "At SCO meet, India refuses to back China’s BRI project", "SCO summit: Putin says sanctions making Russia stronger", "SCO Summit: Modi says ‘some countries’ are terror havens as Pakistan PM looks on". I don't get the impression that adding Iran to this club is going increase their "cooperation". It seems about as fraternal and collaborative as Wikipedia... Andrew🐉(talk) 08:19, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • It looks like they're welcoming any authoritarian Eurasian country with anti-Western sentiment to counter Western agenda. Iran is one of them, so they are about to "forget" past sour issues. Brandmeistertalk 15:02, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - This is a nontrivial addition to an ecomomic and defense pact, and I feel that if we posted NATO membership, we ought to do the same for what appears to be a rival organization even if some of the similarities are merely nominal in nature. --Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 12:25, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • "This is a nontrivial addition to an ecomomic and defense pact" - SCO isn't a defense pact. --2001:8003:1C20:8C00:4048:BA85:DEB4:B3D8 (talk) 06:15, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      How about that. In reading the article and its supporting references, I'm surprised to discover that "defense pact" and "defense organization" really are two different things. That'll teach me to learn to read! Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 12:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose on signfiicance = I don't even see this on (the front page of) Al Jazeera news. More subjectively, I have never heard of the SCO so I'm not sure it's a very relevant geopolitical pact. I might subjectively put it below Five Eyes in importance, and I wouldn't even post a (hypothetical) news event for a country joining five eyes, for example. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 16:45, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to gauge the validity of this statement, as it's in the Warsaw Pact article and it's a statement with a CN tag: The USSR's successor Russia and some other post-Soviet states joined the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) in 1992, and the Shanghai Five in 1996, which was renamed the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) after Uzbekistan's addition in 2001. I had imagined SCO as being a parallel to the Warsaw Pact to effectively operate as a counter-NATO organization. Again, if we are posting news stories about membership in NATO (we nominated one particular such event like three or four times at different stages of joining), then why would we withhold similar news items regarding the SCO? Yes, the world's most well-known English-speaking economic superpower is not a member state, but China, India, and Russia are not small powers. To me, this seems like naked Eurocentrism, but perhaps I am missing something. Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 18:08, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The SCO is not a military alliance. There is some military cooperation, but if one country gets invaded the others are not treaty-bound to assist. Therefore it is not the same as the Warsaw Pact or NATO. Banedon (talk) 02:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On the other hand, my first reaction to "I have never heard of the SCO" is "wow, you are ignorant". Banedon (talk) 02:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea what the SCO does. I have never in my life seen it in a news article. It is not relevant, and being the succesor to the more relevant (for its time of course) CSTO does not impart notability. SCO is simply not notable to me at all. I searched for SCO and Shanghai Cooperation Organization on SCMP and Al Jazeera too and didn't get many results - seems like it's not relevant in the non-West either. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 15:22, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The SCO is certainly not the equivalent of NATO or the former Warsaw Pact. It includes Pakistan and India (can anyone really believe they would come to each other's military assistance?) as well as China and India (dito). It's not like the EU either (or ASEAN or Mercosur for that matter), where dozens of treaties have weaved together an economic trading block. In the case of the EU, it goes even further, with member states having handed over part of their sovereignty to the supranational organisation. The SCO is not much more than a talking shop, like so many others in the world, and this news is not particularly relevant. Khuft (talk) 19:03, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would point out that the following: In the case of the EU, it goes even further, with member states having handed over part of their sovereignty to the supranational organisation is not true at all, that is not how the EU works and you should probably strike this bit out. Abcmaxx (talk) 16:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, the ability to regulate your own currency is a part of a country's sovereignty, so he isn't wrong. Plus all the stuff about EU member states having to abide by the Treaty on European Union. AryKun (talk) 18:35, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I guess this is big news for Iran, but this certainly does not have any major impact on the world, and this does not seem significant enough to post. Editor 5426387 (talk) 19:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The SCO has four nuclear powers and half the world's population. Banedon (talk) 02:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Yes I understand its not NATO, nor will it ever likely become a rival organization to NATO in terms of scale or structure. Yes I also understand the significance of Sweden ascending to become a member of NATO after centuries of neutrality, and am not arguing that this news about IRAN is anywhere near as significant. There is no point in comparing the two. But there are many many discussions on this forum about ITN becoming more representative of global news (a noteworthy goal) Including news about an organization that covers 40% of the world's population and 1/3 of the global economy is certainly a step forward in that direction. Schwinnspeed (talk) 15:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
being more global should not be at the cost of giving false equivalency to nominations though. Abcmaxx (talk) 16:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: Considering Iran's foreign policy over the last few decades, joining the SCO is really not a major or surprising development. --StellarHalo (talk) 20:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality and significance the organisation is barely notable, and is basically a poorly made Russian knock-off of a trade block, same as that cheap Gucci handbag at your local flea market isn't the same as the handbag from the Gucci store in central Milan. Russia can only trade with a handful of authoritarian states so choosing Iran out of a choice of countries such as Eritrea, Cuba, or North Korea isn't very surprising or has any geopolitical impact. Article quality is also poor. Abcmaxx (talk) 15:56, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose So Iran, Pakistan, Russia, and China can now discuss... counterterrorism and cybersecurity. This is literally the most pointless Organization I’ve ever seen and has zero economic or military requirements to join; posting a new addition to SAARC or ASEAN would be more worthwhile. AryKun (talk) 03:19, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support on the basis of diversity of coverage. Wikipedia is perfectly positioned to offer a broader perspective than the mainstream media that it's writers and reders consume normlly. It's also notable per above. 85.147.66.47 (talk) 00:43, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Vince Tobin

Article: Vince Tobin (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NFL ESPN NBC Sports
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Gridiron football coach who was former head coach for the Arizona Cardinals. Article needs major sourcing work. Scientia potentia est, -MonarchOfTerror (talk) 04:48, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Orange tag needs to be fixed. The sections "College coaching career", "Pre-NFL coaching" and "NFL coaching" are all completely uncited. TwistedAxe [contact] 11:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, most of the information in the article is unsourced. Suonii180 (talk) 23:06, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Too much footnote-free prose. Please add more REFs. --PFHLai (talk) 05:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Léon Gautier (soldier)

Article: Léon Gautier (soldier) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian France 24
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: French soldier who was France’s last surviving d-day veteran. Article is quite new and needs work, mainly expansion as sourcing seems adequate. Scientia potentia est, -MonarchOfTerror (talk) 01:16, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose for now, as the article quality needs expansion. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 02:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on Merit, Oppose on Quality - This is very notable for RD, and is definitely RD worthy, however, the article is still a stub and will need to be expanded a lot.Editor 5426387 (talk) 05:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality Hate to have to oppose this but the article is a stub. Very sad that the last French D-Day veteran has left us. TwistedAxe [contact] 11:17, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Way too short. If only someone can translate the French wikibio to add some meat to the English wikibio within the next few hours... --PFHLai (talk) 05:45, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents:

  1. ^ "Rutte kondigt ontslag hele kabinet aan • Verkiezingen half november verwacht". nos.nl (in Dutch). 7 July 2023.
  2. ^ nieuwsredactie, Door onze (2023-07-07). "Nieuwe verkiezingen vinden op zijn vroegst half november plaats". NU (in Dutch). Retrieved 2023-07-08.