Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 3,207: Line 3,207:
<!-- Please add your suggestion to the TOP of this section (after this comment) using either the template provided or a level 4 header with the name of the new/expanded article. -->
<!-- Please add your suggestion to the TOP of this section (after this comment) using either the template provided or a level 4 header with the name of the new/expanded article. -->



====[[Cairo Fire]]====
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
[[File:Cairo Fire 1952 Revoli Cinema.jpg|100x100px|Rivoli Cinema on fire|alt=A crowd of bystanders stands outside a burning building, with black smoke coming out of the windows.]]
</div><!--
-->
{{*mp}}... that the 1952 '''[[Cairo Fire]]''' is the focus of numerous [[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]] because those responsible for it have never been identified?
<!--
-->
<small>Created by [[User:BomBom|BomBom]] ([[User talk:BomBom|talk]]). Self nom at 17:04, 6 February 2011 (UTC)</small>
<!--
*{{DYKmake|[[Cairo Fire]]|BomBom}}
-->
:*<!--Make first comment here-->



{{-}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line.-->


====Robert L. Frye====
====Robert L. Frye====

Revision as of 17:04, 6 February 2011

Template:DYK rules change

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page.

NOTE: This page might load very slowly with Internet Explorer. Regular contributors may like to try Opera, Firefox or Google Chrome instead.

Purge

Instructions

Using a DYK suggestion string (see below examples), list new suggestions in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the bottom. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged. Thanks for participating and please remember to check back for comments on your nomination. Every approved hook will appear on the main page.

DYK criteria

Official criteria: DYK rules and additional guidelines
Unofficial Guide: Learning DYK

How to list a new nomination

For a simplified version of these instructions, see User:Rjanag/Quick DYK.
For a step-by-step guide to filling out the
{{NewDYKnom}} template, see Template:NewDYKnomination/guide.

Please use one of the strings below to post your DYK nomination, using the "author" and "nominator" fields to identify the users who should receive credit for their contributions if the hook is featured on the main page.

  1. Nom without image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= }}
  2. Nom with image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= | image= | caption= }}
    To include more than one new or expanded article in a single hook: |article2= |article3= |article4= | (etc)
    To include more than one author: |author2= |author3= | (etc)
    To include alternate hooks: |ALT1= |ALT2= | (etc)
    To add a comment: |comment=
    To add the article you reviewed: |reviewed=

Do not wikilink the article title, or the author username field; the template will wikilink them automatically. Do wikilink the article title in the hook field, however.
Do not add a section heading if you are using the template; the template will add one for you.
Do not include a signature (~~~~) after the template.
Do not use non-free images in your hook suggestion.

An example of how to use the template is given below. Don't forget to fill out the rollover text, so people know what the image is of! Full details are at {{NewDYKnom}}:

{{subst:NewDYKnom
 | article    = Example
 | status     = new<!--(or)  expanded (or) BLP expanded-->
 | hook       = ... that this [[article]] is an  '''[[example]]''' ''(pictured)''?
 | author     = User
 | nominator  =
 | image      = Example.png
 | rollover   = An example image
 | alttext    = Description of the image
 | comment    =
 | reviewed   = Article you reviewed
}}
  • Note that you should only use one of the above templates for the original hook. If you want to suggest a second, alternative hook for the same article submission, just type it in manually. The above templates output useful code for each submission and if you employ them for alternative hooks, you will mess up the page formatting.
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name}}

How to review a nomination

Any editor who was not involved in writing/expanding or nominating an article may review it by checking to see that the article meets all the DYK criteria (long enough, new enough, no serious editorial or content issues) and the hook is cited. Editors may also alter the suggested hook to improve it, suggest new hooks, or even lend a hand and make edits to the article which the hook applies so that the hook is supported and accurate. For a more detailed discussion of the DYK rules and review process see the additional rules.

If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or note that there is an issue with the article or hook, please use the following symbols to point the issues out:

Symbol Code DYK Ready? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe DYK eligibility requires additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Please consider using {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the nominator's talk page, in case they do not notice that there is an issue.

Backlogged?

This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until an editor reviews it. Since editors are encouraged to review the oldest submissions first (so that those hooks don't grow stale), it may take several days until your submission is reviewed. In the meantime, please consider reviewing another submission (not your own) to help reduce the backlog (see instructions above).

Where is my hook?

If you can't find the hook you submitted to this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is in the queue for display on the main page. You can check whether your hook has been moved to the queue by reviewing the queue listings.

If your hook is not in the queue or already on the main page, it has probably been deleted. Deletion occurs if the hook is more than about eight days old and has unresolved issues for which any discussion has gone stale. If you think your hook has been unfairly deleted, you can query its deletion on the discussion page, but as a general rule deleted hooks will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Nominations

Older nominations

Articles created/expanded on January 17

Quantum dot solar cell

Quantum dot "tandem" solar cell built at the University of Toronto. It appears to be a small brown-red square with sixteen small metal disks arrange in the middle.

Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self nom at 17:35, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the confusing History on this one, it looks like an old article but is actually spawned from another topic that I'll be re-creating. Maury Markowitz (talk) 17:35, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewed Weston-super
  • - Article checks out, sizing checks out, sourcing is of a high quality, and on an important educational topic of encyclopedic value. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 22:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hold on. No OTRS for the image yet. Sourcing is actually not brilliant because this is an active research area, where picking up primary sources is risky - reviews and books would be better. The hook and some parts of the article elaborating it make no sense to me. "any energy above and beyond the bandgap energy is lost" is only half correct. Bulk solar cells materials sensitive to infrared are no news, and quantum dots don't help here. You possible want to say that QDs allow to tune the bandgap in a wide range for one and the same material, but this is not elaborated anywhere. The article gives no any spectral numbers or explains why, say PbS QDs are better than bulk PbS. In summary - great yet unfinished effort, with much work still needed. Materialscientist (talk) 05:57, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(undent) You note above that "the hook... make no sense", but none of the points on the talk page or here elaborate on that point. Can you be specific about what you think it not kosher in the hook so we can fix it? Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:11, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can't "greatly" improve efficiency which is already some 42% (there is a limit); "carefully" is weasel, for "tuning into the infrared" see below. This is all quickfixable; the problem is the article needs rewriting before it can be DYK featured. Materialscientist (talk) 12:17, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The hook doesn't talk about any of the things you mention -- "bandgap", "bulk material", etc. Is there something you feel needs to be changed for the DKY? Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:58, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
See talk page of the article. All mechanisms of the article are about taking low-gap material and make it efficiently absorb high energies, thus tuning into the visible, not vice versa (can't tune QD bandgap toward lower energies). Materialscientist (talk) 12:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK hows this...

Very same problems as with the original hook (haven't checked the last article updates yet). Materialscientist (talk) 13:25, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I based the new hook on the statement above, where you expressed concern about "tuning into the infrared" and "greatly improve". I removed all of these statements. I see I forgot "careful" and I would be happy to drop that if you consider it bad. But is there anything else? This game of 20 questions is growing lengthy. Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't mean to quibble (limited connectivity - traveling) or spam this thread (thus posting comments at the article talk). The article is yet inadequate in describing physics of solar cells and current research, and referencing is short of DYK standards. The hook can be rewritten after the article is fixed. Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article still has problems, but might be acceptable for DYK, without the misleading image (dots there are just contacts). A possible hook could be ALT1 ... that the use of quantum dots instead of bulk materials allows more efficient light absorption in solar cells? It is present in the lede, but is not clearly referenced - which I leave to the nominator if he agrees with the hook. Original hooks are not correct. Materialscientist (talk) 05:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Center for Human Growth

View of the front of the Pacific Center for Human Growth, a white three storey building with steps up to the front door beneath a small portico carrying the name of the Center

Created by Thisbites (talk). Self nom at 02:19, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length checks out. Creation date was actually January 18, not January 17, so that's fine too, but the nomination should be moved. Article looks good but there is no reference for the bit about Will Roscoe and the United Way or the paragraph about Oakland-East Bay Gay Men's Chorus. Also the hook fact is referenced just to the organization's own website (and it would be nice to say more about the Oakland incident, like when it happened if you don't want to include the victim's name). It would be desirable to have a better reference for this fact, especially since it's the hook. Also, note 2's content seems to be exaggerated in the text. I see one anti-gay slur and one swastika mentioned there, not multiple anti-gay graffiti plus the specific word plus multiple swastikas. Perhaps there is another source you were also using? If not, the paragraph needs to match what the source says.Yngvadottir (talk) 18:44, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What hook would you suggest instead?Thisbites (talk) 15:38, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The hook seems fine, it's the referencing needs beefing up. Can you find anything in the Bay Area newspapers substantiating the link between the Center's foundation and the crime in Oakland, and that would enable you to give a smidgen more info about the crime? Similarly can you find press sources for the 2 other pieces of info? Yngvadottir (talk) 16:12, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I note the paragraph on the vandalism has now been changed to fit the source. I went ahead and added additional sources myself. (Which is not to say there aren't more hiding in newspaper indexes.) So now it needs a 2nd reviewer because I'm too involved. But I would judge it ready. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:46, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all the help, no I have not been able to find anything else. I suspect there is more hiding in the Oakland Tribune but their search sucks and I don't have lexus nexus =(Thisbites (talk) 00:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Are we done here yet?Thisbites (talk) 20:51, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I do have access to LexusNexus, if you email me I have 18 newspaper matches that I can send back to you as a PDF (no guarantees they will sort out the DYK issues but they will probably be of use to the article quality). (talk) 21:06, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
sounds great! please doThisbites (talk) 10:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I tried sending you a link by email yesterday, here's a temporary GDoc link - Newspaper sources (talk) 10:22, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I just looked at the new citation added to the sentence linking the crime and the founding but it doesnt mention this center at all.Thelmadatter (talk) 14:48, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ok so how bout we rely on the organization's claim on good faithThisbites (talk) 22:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on January 18

Articles created/expanded on January 22

Death and funeral of Leonid Brezhnev

Leonid Brezhnev, portrait on 1977 stamp
Leonid Brezhnev
  • ... that because Leonid Brezhnev (pictured) had more than 200 decorations, it was decided to break the Soviet custom of featuring only one decoration on cushions during his funeral?

Created by Twilight Chill (talk). Self nom at 22:42, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I still see issues with the article. I did a quick spot check, comparing the "Death and declaration" section of the article with the Time magazine article identified as a source for it. The similarity of the words in "after a faltering appearance or an unexpected absence from a meeting demanded by protocol" (in the source) to "due his faltering appearance and his absence in crucial meetings demanded by protocol" (in the article), together with similarity in overall structure, gives me concern that the Wikipedia article is not sufficiently original. Moreover, a person's physical appearance is not typically described as "faltering"; I believe the statement in the Time article was intended to indicated that he had faltered during public appearances. Also, I find it odd that the Wikipedia article uses all this to indicate that his death was widely expected, when the Time article indicates that his death had come as a surprise, since he had been maintaining a rigorous schedule and had spent 2 hours outdoors in the cold at a public appearance three days previously. Although I did not find sentences copied directly from the source, the coincidence of unusual wording like "faltering appearance" and "demanded by protocol" is troubling, particularly when it looks like the meaning of the source has been lost at the same time the words were kept. --Orlady (talk) 00:35, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Working: I'm working on it. --TIAYN (talk) 12:57, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Egads! How did this article get listed as a Good Article? It's been edited, but the specific concerns I mentioned above still have not been addressed... --Orlady (talk) 14:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've fixed that sentence, I'm looking for others as we speak. --TIAYN (talk) 19:38, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on January 23

Pacific East Mall

Large green arched entrance to the Pacific East Mall

Created by Thisbites (talk). Self nom at 04:21, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified, but the hook is terrible. I suggest making one about the Cerrito Creek controversy. - PM800 (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, I've modified the hook slightly in ALT2. One part of the article needs a citation, so take care of that and it should be fine. - PM800 (talk) 04:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Which part is that?Thisbites (talk) 15:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The part before the "citation needed" tag. - PM800 (talk) 23:55, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I though that not everything needs to be cited, many DYK articles have an uncited sentence or two, especially considering that this is not a claim made in the headline. It should be accepted on good faith, I mean c'mon Asian restaurants at an Asian mall?Thisbites (talk) 00:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • So you don't have a source for the rest of that paragraph? There is a neutrality dispute in the article now, so I guess that will have to be resolved. - PM800 (talk) 07:32, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed I don't have a source stating that there are Asian restaurants and products at an Asian Mall, I thought that would be obvious and could be accepted on good faith.
Note: Friends of the Five Creeks was separately nominated for DYK, so this looks like an opportunity for a double hook. However, Friends of the Five Creeks is currently at AfD. --Orlady (talk) 02:16, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really understand what is being disputed the citations simply explain what the press coverage has reported, The disputor seems like they are related to the mall in some way actually.Thisbites (talk) 20:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not related to the mall. The controversy section is from the FFC perspective and uses an environmental article as a "news" source. It's not NPOV.m.cellophane (talk) 22:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)m.cellophane[reply]
Way to assume good faith, Thisbites. - PM800 (talk) 22:32, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The neutrality dispute seems to be over. I've cleaned up the article somewhat, as the "Location" section with the bus and commuter services information did not need to be included. Someone else will have to review this nomination now. - PM800 (talk) 14:22, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So how bout now?Thisbites (talk) 22:33, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Mohammed Butt

  • ... that in 1984 John Butt became the first, and only, Westerner to graduate from the noted Darul Uloom Deoband Islamic Madrasah since its foundation in 1866?

Created by Jpb1301 (talk). Self nom at 02:09, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Just past the size criterion (1668 B). "the first, and only, Westerner to graduate from the prestigious Darul Uloom Deoband" has a reference. "prestigious ... Islamic Madrasah in its 145 year history" is not stated. "in 1984" has no reference. Many paras including facts like dates - which require references, do not have them. --Redtigerxyz Talk 12:09, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The foundation date of Darul Uloom Deoband is given in the wikipedia article dealing with that subject. However I concede that there is no citation for that date in that source article. I have therefore amended the nominated article to include a citation for the foundation of Darul Uloom Deoband (even though Darul Uloom Deoband is NOT the subject of the nominated article). The other items referred by the reviewer as needing references are all covered by the three independent references already cited in this article - as would be clear to anyone who read them. I have not noticed in-line citations for every non-contentious statement made in other articles - however I have added them to this article to suit this particular reviewers preference. I have also changed the tag to read "since it was founded in 1866" instead of "in its 145 year history". Josephus (talk) 23:46, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on January 24

SS. Cyril, Methodius, and Raphael's Church (New York City)

5x expanded by User:James Russiello (talk). Self nom at 16:22, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant article is not bolded; hook is 438 characters long, possibly a record! See the rules. Johnbod (talk) 17:15, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not a record by a long shot. Our Lady of Victory's Church (New York City) above has a 542 character hook! Schwede66 17:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Breeding Ground (band)

Created by AirCombat (talk). Self nom at 23:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The hook is much too long, at 236 characters (checked using Microsoft Word, with spaces). Are you able to bring this down under 200 characters? Arctic Night 22:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Suggested more concise hook by third party (191 characters):
Sounds good to me! Thanks Fuhghettaboutit! AC (talk) 02:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:17, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here's another: (199 characters)
ALT2 ... that Breeding Ground, a post-punk Toronto band founded in 1981, opened for popular bands such as Bauhaus, Echo & the Bunnymen and The Stranglers because of their hit single "Happy Now I Know" featuring Molly Johnson on vocals? AC (talk) 03:24, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've struck out the original hook for clarity, and amended the ALT hooks to avoid redirects. I've also linked to Bauhaus (band) rather than the German design school. A reviewer (or the nominator) may want to check whether this problem arises in the article, too. Schwede66 17:49, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Links on the page are alright, thank you for fixing the links AC (talk) 02:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I also just reviewed Ralph Crosthwaite for kicks. He had a good hook and an interesting article. AC (talk) 02:04, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Space policy

Created by Antony-22 (talk). Self nom at 04:25, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: I have only 3 previous DYK credits.
  • Length and dates are fine but article uses only a single source and that is used just once to cite the opening paragraph as a whole. The hook fact must be directly cited, there should be a minimum of one citation per paragraph, and the article is woefully incomplete. It mentions only the United States and European Union but none of the other spacegoing nations. - Dravecky (talk) 10:14, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really understand the rule against using a ref at the end of the paragraph... I mean, I could put the same ref after the relevant sentence too, but that would just look funny. After all, it's all coming from the same source no matter which sentence it is.
I agree, the article is currently a bit minimal. If I added a few more refs and added short sections about Russia and China, which I think covers all the major spacefaring nations, would that be sufficient? Antony–22 (talkcontribs) 05:25, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I have expanded it considerably. Hopefully it is now okay. Antony–22 (talkcontribs) 04:39, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on January 25

Friends of the Five Creeks

Daylighted portion of lower Marin Creek (Village Creek) in the Gill Tract, UC Village area

Created by Thisbites (talk). Self nom at 15:57, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A completely unmerited AfD however, where do we go from hereThisbites (talk) 01:01, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We just need to hold this here until the AfD closes. In the meantime, though, I've discovered that this article is linked in the hook for Pacific East Mall (somewhere above). This looks like an opportunity for a dual hook -- after the AfD closes. --Orlady (talk) 02:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What is a double hook?Thisbites (talk) 20:50, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A double hook is a hook with two DYK articles and thus two emboldened links. For scary-looking n-tiple hooks with n DYK articles and pretty much the whole line in boldface, please see WP:DYK/HoF. Hope this helps. --PFHLai (talk) 08:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ok let's do itThisbites (talk) 22:35, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on January 26

William Stanley Jenkins

Created/expanded by Georgejdorner (talk). Nominated by Self (Georgejdorner) (talk) at 23:07, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I lack the skills to fix this problem. Consider this nomination withdrawn. Georgejdorner (talk) 15:08, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No! The article is too good to pass up. I formatted the references for you. However, one reference, "aerodrome", is a malicious link. Do you have another link that verifies the information? Also, please add some categories to the article so it's complete for DYK. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 19:01, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


U Dhammaloka

Head and shoulders of a 50-year-old European man in Burmese monk's robes

Created by Laurence Cox (talk). Self nom at 09:18, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • One of the fundamental DYK requirements is that an article has at least one inline citation per paragraph. The article has hardcoded notes that refer to a long list of references. In my opinion, that's not good enough, but it should be easy enough for the nominator to convert that to shortened footnotes. I'll notify the nominator (who is a new editor, and who has put a lot of effort into writing that article - very well done!) and will let him know a few other DYK tricks of the trade. Also, I've fixed some hook issues (bold target article; pictured in italics; avoid redirects). I haven't as yet checked the hook fact. The article is new and certainly long/comprehensive enough. Schwede66 22:12, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator response: Hi Schwede66: many thanks for the hook fixes and kind comments on the article! It's good to know I'm not missing the mark entirely. Thanks too for taking the time to put in examples of the footnote model on the Dhammaloka page etc.

I did think about using footnotes for the article but discovered from reading around that multiple referencing approaches are acceptable on Wikipedia. According to Wikipedia:Parenthetical referencing the (author, date) style is "one of the citation styles recommended for Wikipedia, although it is less common than footnotes (or endnotes)". I will think again about using a footnoting style.

Part of the difficulty with this article is that almost every fact about its subject had to be collated from a complex range of often fragmentary data, so that to give chapter and verse for each individual fact as it appears in the article would be to drown the text in a welter of footnotes - or else to go into minute detail beyond general levels of interest. Hence the choice of citations at the end rather than as points are made.

The page Wikipedia:Inline_citation specifies: "An inline citation is any system that allows the reader to associate a given bit of material in an article with the specific reliable source(s) that support it. Inline citations are often at the end of a sentence or paragraph."

If DYK wants footnotes rather than (author, date) referencing in the original article, then obviously I'm happy to withdraw the nomination here. Or if there's a simpler way of associating the (author, date) reference to the final biblio piece, even better.

Either way, many thanks for your time! Laurence —Preceding undated comment added 00:33, 28 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

It's good to see that you've considered this so carefully. My suggestion is that you simply convert the parenthetical references to shortened footnotes, so that should be a very simple job. And thanks for bringing to my attention that this system is indeed one of the acceptable referencing styles. So please see this as a suggestion, rather than a DYK requirement. I (or somebody else) will get onto checking the hook fact. Schwede66 02:52, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it might be useful to indicate where the hook fact can be verified via the sources cited in the article. The fact is that U Dhammaloka was an Irish hobo who became one of the first known western Buddhist monks and was twice tried for sedition. Turner, Cox and Bocking (one of 4 sources cited for "Irish hobo" in the "Early life" section) can be found in pre-print form at http://eprints.nuim.ie/2298/ or via university libraries etc. This is also one of the sources cited for "one of the first known western Buddhist monks" in the "Impact and assessment" section - see the Wikipedia articles on Charles Henry Allan Bennett, Gordon Douglas and Anton Gueth for comparison.

Finally, the "was twice tried for sedition" is referenced (in the "Trial and disappearance" section) primarily in Turner 2010, a formally-published and peer-reviewed journal article but not yet available in open-access (it is of course available in the physical and electronic journal, can be bought individually or indeed I can send a pre-print copy if anyone wants to check that it really does mention the first trial!)

As is probably obvious, the idea of a DYK nomination came after writing the article, or I would have organised the article somewhat differently! But all 3 hook facts are there in the sources mentioned in the article (and it took us 18 months of painstaking archival research to disentangle and verify them for ourselves....)

--Laurence Cox (talk) 18:15, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WGRQ

5x expanded by Dravecky (talk). Self nom at 07:34, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed: Space policy (diff)
  • article should not need cleanup ({{cn}} tag); suggest researching or removing this statement. Otherwise, 5x expansion confirmed, sources are sufficient, hook confirmed. Suggest adding program test authority to your hook. tedder (talk) 23:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tag resolved by deleting unsourced claim. Would prefer to leave the hook as-is to preserve the hint of mystery. (It's what makes the hook "hook-y".) - Dravecky (talk) 21:01, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Stephens (solicitor)

  • ALT1:... that lawyer Mark Stephens fled to the South of France with James Hewitt to avoid the media, after Hewitt's affair with Princess Diana was made public?
  • Comment: I will do some work on the lead tomorrow, but the rest of the article is stable for now

5x expanded by Smartse (talk). Self nom at 23:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Corrected punctuation errors in hooks. Drmies (talk) 04:46, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • As I feared, those particular punctuation errors are found in the article as well. I've gone through a small part of it already, also tweaking other things; the article needs to be proofread completely. Drmies (talk) 04:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for clearing up my mess, English was never my strong point. I've tried to do some more myself - if you want to give me an English lesson then please do ;) I was thinking, should the hook be kept until Feb 7th or 8th (when Assange's case is scheduled to be heard)? SmartSE (talk) 16:30, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wish I had seen it was yours, since you'll be able to block me soon. Anyway, let's just say that the mistakes were already there in the old version. As for Assange--that depends on the hook, of course. Actually, that first hook is a bit lame. The second is less so, but is longer. Can you find anything else that's juicy, maybe something about being a controversial lawyer, so that you can stick Assange in the hook? Or what about that list of 1000 big-shot lawyers? Drmies (talk) 03:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fair enough - some ideas for your fancy: something about the foetus earrings made by Rick Gibson? (This would be a bit wordy as he defended the gallery) Being rendered as a Spitting Image puppet? (only based on what his CV says, although quoted in 2ndry sources). In his first influential case he tried to make the BoE look as "stupid as possible"? He has been called the "patron solicitor of lost causes"? (the quote might be a bit long) Maybe a combo of Assange and how he began his career defending artists' FoE? (Readers might find this interesting, considering the wikileaks freedom of speech issue). The 1000-list is a bit lame for a hook IMO - "one of the 1000 most influential people in London" isn't really very revealing. More input is welcome from anyone. SmartSE (talk) 12:21, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

<--Smartse--excellent suggestion!

"... that Julian Assange's lawyer, Mark Stephens, has been called the patron saint of lost causes? Drmies (talk) 19:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's not quite right, as you've said "saint" not "solicitor" and the quote is "previously lost causes". How about:
This also makes it clear that the lost cause info was before anything to do with Assange. Are we good to use this on the 7th at the time Assange is in court (presumably AM GMT)? SmartSE (talk) 22:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, don't get too Smart with me, or I'll have you desysopped. First of all, since it wasn't a direct quote but a paraphrase (which is better anyway in hooks, in my opinion), it doesn't have to include "previously" (which is kind of awkward anyway). They are lost, they were lost, he takes them up, the "previously" is included. Now, I'll grant you the saint bit--I wish the article had said that. I thought that because of "patron": "patron saint" is a collocation, "patron solicitor" is not so good writing--thumbs down to The Law Gazette, they should have consulted with me. I'd also like to take the year out; I don't think it's necessary, and economy is a virtue.

    How about we meet in the middle: "... was called the patron solicitor of lost causes?" Drmies (talk) 23:40, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sounds reasonable. I've tweaked ALT2 to that. SmartSE (talk) 14:24, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 State of the Union Address

Obamas speech 2011

--BabbaQ (talk) 20:02, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article was heavily expanded on January 26.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:03, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Any more interesting hooks? This is true (except for the date) of pretty much every State of the Union address. Ucucha 20:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
yes added a new one.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:35, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please also address the prose-related tag under the "Summary" heading. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:00, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I see some work has already been done. If the text is in shaped one way or another shouldnt effect this DYK. As it is DYK ready.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:35, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • You shouldn't assume that everyone knows which country you're talking about or who Boehner is or what the president is president of. Alt 1 doesn't answer any of these questions. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:32, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well I have fixed it now.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • DYK tool link does not confirm expansion. I have the following lengths using MS Word.
  • 801 Chars as of 18:56, 19 January 2011
  • 935 chars as of 11:20, 21 January 2011
  • 1090 chars as of 23:05, 25 January 2011
  • 4454 chars as of 18:30, 31 January 2011
  • 4444 chars as of now.

article fails to meet 5x starting from the begining of the 26th, we have a 4.08x expansion.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:36, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bright Lights, Bigger City

Created by Mikoism; nominated by BabbaQ (talk) 19:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Everything seems to check out in terms of creation, size, references, and etc., but the hook seems a bit dull. Is there something more interesting to dredge up? Also, fix the two all-caps reference titles to be title case instead. — KV5Talk • 23:07, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I did a new hook.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I edited the hook for conciseness, spelling, and grammar, and added a link. Alt 1 will be fine once the all-caps reference titles in the article are fixed. — KV5Talk • 02:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
User KimChee made edits necessary. Hope its better now and DYK ready.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:55, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tewkesbury Medieval Festival

Men in steel armour attack each other with pikes while arrows fly overhead.

  • ... that in 2003, 25,000 people attended the Tewkesbury Medieval Festival, one of the "ten most bizarre festivals" in England, to watch 2,000 people in medieval garb attack each other with steel weapons (pictured)?

5x expanded by Jappalang (talk). Self nom at 14:14, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The hook is too long, coming in at 220 characters. The DYK maximum is 200, including spaces, and even this is an absolute maximum. I would try to get this down further than that. In addition, I don't like the "watch 2,000 people in medieval garb attack each other with steel weapons" bit. It makes it sound a little stupid - like, "why would they turn up to watch that?" The truth is, it's a re-enactment of a battle, not a free-for-all "watch 2,000 people act all stupid like". Arctic Night 16:29, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • It fits once I changed "the United Kingdom" to "England". Note that "(pictured)" is disputed on whether it counts towards the 200-character limit (see E5 of Additional rules); as it is a demand made when a picture is used, I think it should not be counted. As for sounding stupid, the point of the hook is to make it "short, punchy, catchy, and likely to draw the readers in to wanting to read the article. An interesting hook is more likely to draw in a variety of readers." I think it is more interesting to describe the event without telling people about it ("huh? Why would they do that?" vs "yeah, another re-enactment..."). Regardless, I have included a more mundane ALT hook for consideration. Jappalang (talk) 00:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The hook would have gone over the 200 limit with 'pictured' in it or otherwise. Anyway, for ALT1 - moving admin can make the decision on which hook he or she prefers. Arctic Night 00:40, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Latin Grammy Award for Producer of the Year

5x expanded by Jaespinoza (talk) 07:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC). Self nom at 07:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: Jerome Lambert
  • Cites show Pausini was nominated in 2001 but they're just lists of nominees. There's nothing in the text of the cited articles to show she was the first female performer or, for that matter, that she's female. (Not doubting that, just saying there's nothing here to prove it.) Sure, she was in the second group of nominees ever so it's almost certainly true but the claim in a hook fact must be cited, not merely deduced or inferred. - Dravecky (talk) 22:30, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1: ... that Cuban songwriter Emilio Estefan earned the Latin Grammy Award for Producer of the Year the same year he was named Person of the Year by the Latin Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences? Jaespinoza (talk) 00:27, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ho Tung Gardens

Created and nominated by Ohconfucius ¡digame!) at 04:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ready to go, length, hook and age check out. Racepacket (talk) 12:55, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The history section states that the "The compound was designed [...] in a Chinese Renaissance style." "Chinese Renaissance" links to Chinese architecture, but I find no mention there of "Chinese Renaissance". What does it mean? --Hegvald (talk) 08:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm no expert in architecture, but reading from this document, which the sources appear to have cited from, it seems to be the name given to an architectural style of 'East-meets-West', a "fusion of Eastern and Western construction methods and architectural theory". An alternative name seems to be "Chinese Eclectic". – Ohconfucius ¡digame! 13:36, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on January 27

Amaury Vassili

Created by --BabbaQ (talk) 15:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed:Potomac Curling Club.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:38, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Let's wait a few days, because that image is pending quick deletion if the copyright status remains undetermined. Otherwise, the article, size and hook are okay. Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:23, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And in case it gets deleted we simply post it without the image.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:50, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Williams Champney

Cover of Champney's first novel

Expanded by Kgwo1972 (talk). Self nom at 15:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT hook ... that Elizabeth W. Champney, author of the "Three Vassar Girls" series, took a drawing class from artist J.W. Champney at a finishing school in Massachusetts, and then married him years later when he passed through her hometown of Manhattan, Kansas, on assignment for Scribner's Monthly.

Tourism in Åland

Created by Arctic Night (talk). Self nom at 01:16, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Three of the four sources go to Visit Aland, which is pretty much a primary source, since it is "Åland's official tourist and member organisation". And the final source is just an Excel spreadsheet with statistics on it. While i'm sure that the subject is notable, I am pretty much considering the article to be unreferenced at this point. If you wish for this DYK to go through, please find actual reliable sources on the subject. SilverserenC 01:20, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Interesting argument, although that page comes from the government of the Åland Islands - and the final source comes from the official statistics office of the government of the Åland Islands. The day we start regarding government statistics as unreliable is the day I retire from Wikipedia :D Arctic Night 02:17, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think i'm going to need someone else to give a second opinion on this then, since, yes, it is from a government website, but i'm not sure what the rules are for an article sourced entirely to primary sources. Primary sources are allowed, obviously, but I thought there had to also be secondary coverage involved. I'll ask on the DYK talk page for some answers on that. SilverserenC 02:28, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Since we're now discarding sources published by the Government of the Åland Islands as 'unreliable', I have gone ahead and added some secondary sources to the article - in fact, almost all of the statements on the article now have a secondary source supporting it. These include books, non-government web sites, etc. Arctic Night 17:56, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The original reviewer has declined to revisit this one. I'd appreciate a second set of eyes. Thanks, Arctic Night 01:15, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've removed my review symbol. Can someone else please review this? SilverserenC 06:40, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I should add that the original reviewer's concerns regarding secondary sourcing have now been addressed, as far as I can tell. Everything else seems OK - just waiting on another reviewer to take a look. Arctic Night 11:52, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tourism in Abkhazia

  • ... that despite it being illegal under Georgian law for foreigners to enter Abkhazia without notifying the Georgian government, the territory's Black Sea beaches continue to attract tourists?

Created by Arctic Night (talk). Self nom at 00:08, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Great article, interesting--but that hook, I think, needs better sourcing. This article has 1992-1993 numbers (just over 200,000) and the claim that tourism now is almost back to normal. This article does make the 300,000 claim, but that's hardly a reliable source (and it's in terrible English, also not a confidence booster). I don't think that the 300,000 number is verifiably certain at all, and would propose tweaking or changing the hook. Drmies (talk) 02:26, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks! I've reworded the hook to make the 'success' of tourism more of a general thing. Arctic Night 03:22, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Besides, it would be nice for the hook to clarify that it is illegal under the laws of Georgia (a country that has no de facto authority in Abkhazia) for foreigners to enter the country, not under the laws of Abkhazia. Ucucha 02:33, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've added 'technically', although since de jure Georgia does have sovereignty over Abkhazia, I don't think any further elaboration is necessary. Arctic Night 03:22, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, the governments of Abkhazia and Russia would disagree that it is even "technically" illegal; they'll say that Georgia has no business at all prohibiting people from Abkhazia. Besides, it's not illegal even under Georgian law for foreigners to enter Abkhazia, as long as the Georgian government is informed. Ucucha 03:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Heh, let's not turn this into a debate over who has the right to control Abkhazia! I've clarified the wording of the hook to leave no doubt that it's under Georgian law under certain circumstances. Arctic Night 03:55, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't want to debate that either; my point is that such a debate is possible and bypassing the issue is not neutral. I have no problems with the new wording of the hook. Ucucha 12:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am not sure the hook is actually correct. As far as I know entering Abkhazia is not illegal under Georgian law, as Abkhazia is considered a part of Georgia. But what is illegal is interacting with the Abkhaz government, i.e. getting your passport stamped. It is perfectly possible and as far as I know legal to cross from Georgia into Abkhazia, as long as you avoid a passport stamp. There is no Georgian passport control at the Gali border. In fact, crossing from Russia into Abkhazia and then into Georgia is not possible, as you would illegaly enter Georgia, i.e. without any Georgian passport control. Pantherskin (talk) 13:19, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The Georgian Interior Ministry proclaimed "visiting Abkhazia and South Ossetia without the knowledge of the Georgian authorities" as a criminal offense in late August." - this is directly from the source cited in the article. As far as I can see, it is illegal for foreigners to enter Abkhazia under Georgian law. Arctic Night 19:54, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Indeed, the source cited quite clearly states that Georgia has prohibited visits to either of the two breakaway states without the knowledge of the Georgian government. Unless you (Pantherskin) have a better source, we'll have to stick with that. Ucucha 20:26, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

() *Thanks Ucucha - is anybody willing to actually put a tick on this one now? It's been sitting here at the nomination stage for quite a while... Arctic Night 15:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The state-owned RIA Novosti is probably the worst possible source for such claims about Georgian legislation, give the history of misinformation and propaganda when it comes to Georgia. See for example [7] for a description of what the actual rules are, or similar the travel warning of the UK [8]. There are unfortunately some other issues too - the warning of increased crime for example is more than seven years old, as the source was published in 2003, even before the Rose Revolution. Not clear at all from the article that this is historical information. Pantherskin (talk) 22:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Syaoran (Tsubasa: Reservoir Chronicle)

Created by Tintor2 (talk). Self nom at 19:35, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on January 28

New Ulm Oil Company Service Station

New Ulm Oil Company Service Station

Created by Bobak (talk). Self nom at 05:25, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date verified, comprehensive and well-written. Offline sources can be accepted in good faith, and while lacking exact in line citation one assumes the entire paragragragph is from source. Claim is supported by (albeit faint) architectural drawing.Djflem (talk) 18:30, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Coincidentally, that image was enhanced (contrast) to look even that good. The original was very faint when it was scanned at the MN History Center. Also, the second paragraph of the Structure section starts with "The building was originally designed with windmill blades at the top of each tower, but they were never installed." I don't know why the source chose that exact phrasing, but the original plans in the file certainly illustrated the idea. --Bobak (talk) 03:31, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

St Deiniol's Church, Llanddaniel Fab

A small stone church

Created by Bencherlite (talk). Self nom at 20:59, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date, length, image, and hook ref all verified. Hook slightly reworded for clarity. KimChee (talk) 06:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. BencherliteTalk 06:58, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Should that be "Deiniol Fab" or "St Deiniol Fab"? (Is the "Fab" also a saint like his dad?) --PFHLai (talk) 13:55, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's right as it is - the son was also a saint ([10]), and I hope I've now clarified this in the article. Thanks for pointing this out. BencherliteTalk 07:42, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here I Stand (Usher song)

Two men dressed in brown and black singing in front of stairs, one sitting and playing a keyboard and the other standing

Created by Adabow (talk). Self nom at 10:18, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed: Tomb of Khai Dinh [11]

Length, date and hoook (two different sources) verified. Should be good to go.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Constantine Dalassenos (duke of Antioch)

Created by Cplakidas (talk). Self nom at 00:11, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • - Did you review another article before nominating this one? The new DYK rules suggest that you "indicate at your nomination which nomination you have reviewed and provide a link to the diff for your review," so if you have reviewed an article, I suggest you let us know which one it was. Arctic Night 01:52, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Erm, the DYK rules say that I can put my DYK nom here, and then I have to review another one. I didn't have time to do so immediately. Anyhow, I have reviewed Battle of Grochowiska. Constantine 09:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Right, and us DYK reviewers usually leave some time for the nominators to review something before leaving a note to say they haven't. However, the gap here was nearly two hours... while I accept you may have been doing something else during that time, I couldn't have known that. Arctic Night 20:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interlok

  • ... that the Malay novel Interlok which was originally withdrawn from the syllabus for the subject of Malay literature in Malaysian schools because its contents were deemed too offensive towards Malaysian Indians will be reinstated after parts deemed offensive are amended?

Created by Kawaputra (talk). Self nom at 14:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The hook needs to be less than 200 characters before this can go ahead. Otherwise everything looks okay, the sources check out as well as the normal DYK criteria for size and date created. (talk) 14:47, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Change to a tick based on using one of the alt hooks below. Alt2 might be the more catchy as "controversial" in Alt1 is a bit vague sounding. (talk) 09:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT 1 ... that the controversial Malay novel Interlok will be amended before being included in the syllabus for the subject of Malay literature in Malaysian schools?
ALT 2 ... that some Malaysian Indian groups protested against the inclusion of the Malay novel Interlok in school syllabus in Malaysia claiming that it contained racist words? ќמшמφטтгמtorque 03:07, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lester S. Willson

1st home of Lester and Emma Willson, Bozeman, Montana 1869

Created by Mike Cline (talk). Self nom at 17:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on January 29

2010–11 Xavier Musketeers men's basketball team

5x expanded by Editorofthewiki (talk). Self nom at 02:05, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hamaxitus

Created by Ajcee7 (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 08:54, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aras Dam

Created by NortyNort (talk), Beagel (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 07:22, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • All good. Interesting hook for a dam article. ••pepper 01:22, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wombat State Forest

Created by Rosiestep (talk), Nvvchar (talk), and Melburnian (talk). Self nom at 05:43, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greater Glider (Petauroides volans)

Grand Hotel (New Ulm, Minnesota)

Grand Hotel

Created by Bobak (talk). Self nom at 06:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's there: The building was two stories. The remnants of cornice are visible between the second and third floors. The paragraphs on structure were all cited to the same source. --Bobak (talk) 18:50, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per dyk rules, the hook should have in line citation - even if its the same source for the entire para, can you pl add the citation at the end of the hook as well. Furthermore, the language in the hook is slightly different from whats on the page (still shows the signs of when it was a two story building vs The remnants of a cornice are visible just above the keystones on the second story). I would prefer if the same language was used in both hook and article (I take it that the offline source matches the article in good faith). Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 05:36, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I respectfully disagree with your interpretation of the rules in this instance. The rule says "fact must be mentioned in the article and cited with an inline citation." The fact is mentioned in the article, and it is cited properly via in-line citation; it is not usual to keep using the same citation in succession (except, sometimes, when we're using quotes). We do give our readers credit for understanding that a cornice is part of a roof, this isn't Simple English Wikipedia. --Bobak (talk) 19:59, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • That certainly is the normal rule for citation. However, for dyk there is something more "The hook fact must have an inline citation right after it since the fact is an extraordinary claim; citing the hook fact at the end of the paragraph is not acceptable." (see [12] for more information). Yes, thats my point! Why not use the same word in the hook. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 04:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Again, I disagree with your interpretation of the rules. It isn't an extraordinary claim by any stretch. The fact that you can see the remains of a cornice between the second and third floors of a building that used to be two stories does in fact show signs of when it was a two story building. There is no synthesis. There is no need for stating what you're asking. I've had plenty of AGF hooks approved that didn't require such bureaucratic back-flips. It's clear and plain English. --Bobak (talk) 18:13, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ATG asked me to review this and comment. Standard practice for a DYK hook, even if it's in a paragraph that is one of several with the same running citation, is that it must be cited individually since it is being offered up for potentially greater scrutiny on the Main Page. I have had this rule applied to many of my own hooks and have always complied. Daniel Case (talk) 16:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Limacina helicina

gastropod with wing-like parapodia and translucent shell

Created by Snek01 (talk). Self nom at 19:04, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT images: gastropod with wing-like parapodia and translucent shell gastropod with wing-like parapodia and translucent shell gastropod with wing-like parapodia and translucent shell --Snek01 (talk) 14:16, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Beautiful pictures, nice hook, and a fascinating article, BUT some of the article sentences are copied straight from (for example) Hunt et al. The article should either paraphrase sources or cite them inside quotes. Fix that, and it's GTG. Sharktopustalk 00:04, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No. Article is original and interesting per DYK hook criteria. (Even if you would delete all incorporated free texts, then it will be acceptable for DYK rules.) Referencing is also OK and using free texts is properly credited in the reference section. Consider that it is TOP importance article and this NEW article is already in a quality of "good article". Decide about this "fascinating" article as you wish. --Snek01 (talk) 01:02, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
* I'm new at this, so I asked for a second opinion. Sharktopustalk 01:47, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry for misunderstanding that my accidental wording caused. Feel free to review improved ALT1. --Snek01 (talk) 14:21, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

gastropod with wing-like parapodia and translucent shell

ALT1:... that sea butterflies Limacina helicina and Limacina antarctica (pictured) are keystone species of polar open seas?

--Snek01 (talk) 01:02, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Carex specuicola

Created by IceCreamAntisocial (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 14:52, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reference needs, at absolute minimum, a last access date, and could use a publishing organization to show why it's reliable. — KV5Talk • 22:38, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Better now? --PFHLai (talk) 22:55, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tons. All checks out. — KV5Talk • 23:35, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Castilleja levisecta

Golden paintbrush (Castilleja levisecta), a rare species of broomrape in the Pacific Northwest

Created by IceCreamAntisocial (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 13:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


AGR-14 ZAP

A small jet aircraft in 1960s U.S. Navy colors and rocket pods under the wings sits on the tarmac with mountains in the distance.

Created by The Bushranger (talk). Self nom at 21:09, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Confirmed that its length its appropriate and that the comment is sourced. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Caffo, St Caffo's Church, Llangaffo

A stone church with tower and spire

Created by Bencherlite (talk). Self nom at 07:46, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Fort Henry Bridge

A steel arch bridge with a barge underneath.

5x expanded by Admrboltz (talk). Self nom at 04:11, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Pratt-Read LBE

A low-wing aircraft without visible engines, dark on top and white underneath, with tricycle gear and late-WW2 American markings, sits in front of a Quonset hut.

Created by The Bushranger (talk). Self nom at 03:15, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • looks good to me. AGFing offline source. --Admrboltz (talk) 04:08, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]



List of Pittsburgh Pirates first-round draft picks

Created by Staxringold (talk). Self nom at 07:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on January 30

MV York/ MV Izumi

Created by Ekem (talk). Self nom at 21:52, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Idamalayar Dam in Kerala

Idamalayar Dam

  • ... that a High Level Committee which examined reasons of delay in execution of the Idamalayar Dam project (Dam pictured) in Kerala stated it as a "victim of recurring and long inertial periods of labour unrest"?

5x expanded by Nvvchar (talk). Self nom at 14:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nice expansion. A couple of comments: I suggest to be consistent when discussing how long it took to built the dam,- in the intro it was built in 1985, and in the last section on construction delay it says "The Idamalayar Dam project was started in 1970 and completed after 17 years", while ref # 15 seems to suggest it took 9 years. Then, I had trouble getting to ref # 1 (possibly a temporary problem). The quotation "victim of recurring and long inertial periods of labour unrest" on page 7 of the document (ref # 15) actually refers to another dam, so consider to modify the hook. Ekem (talk) 14:46, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the review. Please see the discussion page of the article for my replies.--Nvvchar. 16:22, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Replies seen and clarifications have been made. All ok now.Ekem (talk) 22:38, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Schenkia sebaeoides

Lavaslope centaury (Schenkia sebaeoides)

5x expanded by IceCreamAntisocial (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 09:51, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, hook reference, date and img checked. Good to go.--Nvvchar. 17:30, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Legality Movement

A man in Generalissmo-appearing garmets looks at the camera, plumed hat by his side

  • Comment: Non-self-nom

Created by OLD ALBANIAN PHOTOS (talk). Nominated by The Bushranger (talk) at 06:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Consolidated XB2Y

A two-seat biplane with 1930s U.S. insignia sits on an airport ramp.

  • ... that the center section of the Consolidated XB2Y (pictured) was cut from a solid steel block?
  • Comment: Non-self-nom

Created by Nigel Ish (talk). Nominated by The Bushranger (talk) at 04:06, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Georgia, Liberia

5x expanded by Donald Albury (talk). Self nom at 02:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The hook does not have a reference. Can you make a box, or is the information not available? 24.170.93.121 (talk) 23:17, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The hook is a summation of the first five sentences in the second paragraph, with three sources cited at the end of the fifth sentence. Why is an infobox needed? -- Donald Albury 11:57, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Way Kambas National Park

Sumatran Rhinoceros in the Way Kambas Sanctuary

5x expanded by Elekhh (talk). Self nom at 12:21, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • 5x checks out, hook checks out. Great work! Nomader (Talk) 21:46, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marojejy National Park

A river cuts through a forest that blankets the base of a mountain range, with a massive mountain range in the background

5x expanded by Visionholder (talk). Self nom at 08:09, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Harman

Created by Killervogel5 (talk). Self nom at 22:35, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Westcott

Black-and-white photo of a man with dark hair and dark eyebrows, wearing a dark blazer and a necktie and lighter-colored trousers, sitting in a chair and holding a cigarette in his left hand.

Created by Orlady (talk). Self nom at 21:48, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews: Focusing on some of the older problematic nominations, I removed Fernald Hall from the page as failed [15], reviewed history of Club Oasis and marked it as failed [16], suggested alternate hook to resolve issue with The Dark Knight Rises [17] and fixed an apparent URL problem in that article [18]. --Orlady (talk) 22:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC) [reply]

ALT sugg. ... that before Ed Westcott photographed J. Robert Oppenheimer in 1946 holding a cigarette (pictured), he first had to give the physicist change to buy a pack of cigarettes?

I disagree with this suggestion. There is no indication that he "had to" give Oppenheimer the cigarette. All indications are that he did it voluntarily. Baldwin Lee (offline source) suggests that the cigarette was Westcott's idea to improve the pose. --Orlady (talk) 22:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hook checks out with source. Can you find Westcott's date of birth? Billy Hathorn (talk) 22:20, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking out the hook source. If I could find Westcott's birthdate, I would have included it in the article. Since he was 20 years old in December 1942, he probably was born in 1922, but an offline source mentions his being 13 in 1934, so he might have born in late 1921. --Orlady (talk) 22:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC) Sonuvagun -- I found his birthdate and added it to the article! --Orlady (talk) 23:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good to go. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 00:48, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zeltnera namophila

Spring-loving centaury (Centaurium namophilum), a rare plant endemic to Ash Meadows

Created by IceCreamAntisocial (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 14:12, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Everything checks out. I was just wondering if it wouldn't be a better idea to go for shortened footnotes in this article considering that the pdf is referenced 13 times.Regstuff (talk) 06:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BEBOLD. :-) --PFHLai (talk) 09:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Grammy Award for Best Rap/Sung Collaboration

A man dressed in black rapping into a microphone on stage

5x expanded by Adabow (talk). Self nom at 10:54, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An inline citation for the claim in the hook would be nice. Stonemason89 (talk) 03:12, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The lead does not need to cite information in the main list. Adabow (talk · contribs) 07:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: Brian K. Zahra[19]

St Twrog's Church, Bodwrog

A small stone church

  • ... that the 15th-century church of St Twrog, Bodwrog, Wales (pictured), has some bull's head decorations, showing its link with a prominent local family of that time?

Created by Bencherlite (talk). Self nom at 08:03, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Tietê Bus Terminal

Created by Jsfouche (talk). Self nom at 07:08, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Article has less than 1500 characters of prose. - PM800 (talk) 08:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have added some more information about the name and the gardens that surround the terminal. Thanks for the help! jsfouche ☽☾Talk 18:21, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • It still has only 1286 characters, by my count. - PM800 (talk) 18:32, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • With this latest expansion, it should be adequate. Which script do you use to count? The one I am using indicates that there are over 1500 characters. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 20:13, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, it's over 1500 char. However, DYK usually requires at least one citation per paragraph, and the "Operations", "Gardens", and "Additional services" sections are now uncited. (And I don't use a script to count, I use this site.) - PM800 (talk) 20:20, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oops! I forgot to add the references. I have done that now. Also, thanks for the info on the counting site. Also, thanks for all your help. This is my first DYK nomination. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 20:48, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • AGF on foreign-language source. - PM800 (talk) 18:17, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sigur Plateau

Working elephant at Theppakadu Elephant camp

Created by Marcus334 (talk). Self nom at 06:13, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Switched image_Marcus334 (Talk) 19:08, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The abbreviated form of citations needs to be expanded so that the reader can identify them.--Wetman (talk) 05:05, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Moved full reference to its first mention, so
16. ^R. Sundararaju, p. 3 and other R. Sundararaju references are easily identified with:
4. ^R. Sundararaju, I.F.S., Chairman of the experts committee, Principal Chief Conservator of Forests & Chief Wildlife Warden, (2009-10-13), REPORT OF THE EXPERT COMMITTEE FORMED IN PURSUANCE OF THE DIRECTION OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN W.P.NO.10098/2008, 2762 & 2839 of 2009., Chennai: Tamil Nadu Forest Department, p. 6, retrieved 2011-1-28
Repitition of full reference for diferent pages of same source is not necessary.
Just go to first citation, clik link and scroll to page indicated.
Otherwise I misunderstood meaning of 'expanded' above and specific clarification needed-Marcus334 (Talk) 01:13, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


John Hines (Australian soldier)

Black and white photograph of a a man wearing military uniform sitting down. He is holding several bank notes and is surrounded by military equipment including a helmet, a rifle, sveral types of ammunition and soldiers' personal equipment

Created by Nick-D (talk). Self nom at 05:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source and hook good, Sadads (talk) 13:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Latin Grammy Award for Best Female Pop Vocal Album

5x expanded by Jaespinoza (talk) 02:35, 30 January 2011 (UTC). Self nom at 02:34, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: Wolfenstein 1D
  • The article has not been 5x expanded yet (636 to 1659). - PM800 (talk) 08:13, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean that I have to add 636 characters? Or that the article was 636 and I have to expand it to 3180? Jaespinoza (talk) 08:34, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • It has to be expanded to 3180 characters, yes. - PM800 (talk) 08:38, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sunny South (clipper)

  • X ... that the Sunny South (also called Emanuela or Manuela), captured in 1860 with a cargo of over 800 slaves, was considered the fastest ship sailing out of Havana, and one of three American-built clipper ships in the 1850s slave trade?

Created by Djembayz (talk). Self nom at 04:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sunny South (clipper) was not linked in hook. I fixed it
First fact improperly referenced. Neither fact can be confirmed without hard copy. It's a well known book. Someone should be able to check.-Marcus334 (Talk) 06:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Original hook, at 232 characters, is over the 200 limit. ALT1 is 198. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 06:46, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT1: ... that the Sunny South, captured in 1860 with a cargo of over 800 slaves, was considered the fastest ship sailing out of Havana, and one of three American-built clipper ships in the 1850s slave trade?
  • Thanks for help-- corrections are needed. Should have waited till the next day and looked it over! Chappelle is not available online but is a standard book. If you can work the name "Manuela" into the DYK, it seems to be the second most commonly found form.
  • Corrected version: ... that the Sunny South, captured in 1860 with a cargo of over 800 slaves, was considered the fastest slaver sailing out of Havana, and one of three American-built clipper ships in the 1850s slave trade?Djembayz (talk) 04:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Commented on Chautla Hacienda. I have less than 5 DYK; still getting up to speed on all this.

1973 DeKalb-Peachtree Airport Learjet 24 crash

Created by Wackywace (talk). Self nom at 19:57, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article is over eight times the minimum requirement for length, at 12K plus. The external link citation first listed basically covers the content of the article. The hard copy citations are taken on good faith, as they seem to be covered in linked text of copy. Citation form is acceptable. Hook is cited. All links in hook check out. I would say this article is GOOD TO GO.
Georgejdorner (talk) 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article desperately needs more secondary citations, but it does seem to meet the aircrash standards as a landmark accident in the knowledge of bird hazards to aircraft. - The Bushranger One ping only 16:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Simpson

5x expanded by Raintheone (talk). Self nom at 01:22, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan shell (talk) 02:46, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so. The revision history is not straightforward, but the article has gone through cycles of being quite substantial in the past to getting turned into a redirect and back again. This diff from July 2009 has 7.5 kB of prose. The article currently has 12 kB of prose, i.e. the expansion is less than twofold, and a long way off the required fivefold. Schwede66 17:52, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of a previous AFD meant the article had to be deleted, I created this article to a brand new page, an admin merged previous revision history. So I actually did expand this article, ask an Admin to verify it.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 18:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply. That explains why the page history is so complex. I don't need to have confirmed that the article has previously been deleted; that's ok. But the fact remains - there used to be an article about Bobby Simpson, the new article isn't too different, and so this should be seen as an expansion. The previous benchmark is the previous article, in my opinion, and not a former redirect. I invite comments from others on this, but if others concur, then the expansion is under twofold. Schwede66 19:20, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Storylines section, about half of the article, is very similar to the older version. - PM800 (talk) 19:33, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I used previous storylines as a guide for the new article.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 19:42, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The reason there is a page history is because I merged it after Rain created the article, effectively from nothing. The article was at a different location before, had no references, it was just unencyclopaedic, overly-detailed plot. Now it has well referenced, real-world information. It's very annoying that characters that were previously not notable have articles that is nothing but plot, because when someone works hard to create a new article correctly, it always affects the DYK nomination. –anemoneprojectors– 19:56, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is annoying. However, the fact remains that half of the article was already written. - PM800 (talk) 20:01, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You know what the worst thing is, I typed near enough every word of the with my bear hands. So I know I expanded it. Go compare again, then see, they are not the same. Present tense, the old is past, condensed in the new version, new things added in the new version from things I fount reading a whole annual on Home and Away. Then reading a behind the scenes book which is 150 pages long to get a good idea what was true and what ios not about storylines for this fictional character. Just because the Odd line is similiar sounding, I had no real knowledge of her storylines. Only the odd line mind you.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 20:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Expanded futher, Added a loads more info, edited further, so the the storylines are nothing to with the restored from deletion versions that have tarnished this DYK review, plus it means it was expanded out more than enough.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 21:07, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just for the record, I've had a look in your user space (sorry for being nosey) and this is the first version of the new Bobby Simpson article, and that doesn't look like the July 2009 version before that got deleted. So you appear to have started writing that article from scratch, and not started with a 2009 version that you kept or that somebody restored for you. That certainly increases my level of sympathy that I have for your plight by quite some margin. But it's probably best for others to comment here, too. Schwede66 22:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added even more info now too. I've worked harder to get it up to scratch, following your initial concern. :)RAIN*the*ONE BAM 12:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Offline source AGFed. The big question is whether this is long enough. It now stands at 15kB of prose. If this is seen as an expanded article, the expansion stands at 2. If it is seen as a new article, then it's way beyond the length requirements. I've voiced my opinion above, then stated my sympathies for the situation, invited comment by others (which did not eventuate) and am now giving this the tick (maybe that gets others to comment). Either way, it's a pretty solid effort. Schwede66 00:32, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Dearborn mosque bombing plot

Created by Stonemason89 (talk). Self nom at 03:17, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: Grammy Award for Best Rap/Sung Collaboration Stonemason89 (talk) 03:17, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date, and hook fact verified. A. Parrot (talk) 04:54, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Zliten mosaic

2nd century Roman mosaic with images of gladiators with spears and shields

Created by Empathictrust (talk). Nominated by Zachlipton (talk) at 08:31, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Amended hook to avoid redirects. Schwede66 09:34, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on January 31

Handel Festival Halle

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nom at 22:51, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • for 23 February, Handel's birthday, for which the article was requested. Howard Arman was expanded, but not 5x. - reviewed: #Hamaxitus --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:02, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Shouldn't it be called the Handel Festival, Halle? Ericoides (talk) 14:19, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The older one is called Göttingen International Handel Festival (but you would not find it looking for Handel), also Handel Festival Göttingen. The third one in Germany: Karlsruhe. Talking about the Bach cantatas we went for "the least cluttered". If you have a comma in the name, you have to remember to add one after the apposition. The festival could be called just Handel Festival, because it seems to be The Handel Festival, but that would probably cause trouble in Göttingen and Karlsruhe, smile, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:25, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • forget all that, was moved, not by me. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:21, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The mover's rationale was quite correct, that it might be misconstrued as "hall" (that's what I thought it would be when I clicked on the link...). Ericoides (talk) 11:20, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • In this case (tempted to say The Handel Festival),
ALT1:... that Howard Arman conducted George Frideric Handel's opera Tolomeo in 1996 for the Handel Festival in Halle, where the composer was born on 23 February 1685?

Minuscule 71

5x expanded by Leszek Jańczuk (talk). Self nom at 21:58, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orienta (album)

Created by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 01:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please hold off on reviewing this until I've had a chance to add my "quid pro quo" review. Cbl62 (talk) 01:51, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looks OK. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 12:36, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cercocarpus traskiae

5x expanded by IceCreamAntisocial (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 07:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

W. Scott Heywood

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 21:51, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The hook presented here is a little confusing, specifically "drilled the first oil in his state". I assumed this mean the first oil well in Louisiana, so I made the correction. The source cited wasn't very well written, but I was able to re-confirm with this article from the official Louisiana DNR that provides more information on the event at this page. I've also proposed a tighter alt hook. --Bobak (talk) 05:35, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Proposed ALT1: ... that three decades before he served in the State Senate, W. Scott Heywood drilled the first oil well in the state of Louisiana?"

Reviewed St Ffinan's Church, Llanffinan

  • A good portion of the article has been copied directly from the source.
Source: "They contacted Scott Heywood, a successful wildcatter in Texas, to see if he would be interested in their prospect. Heywood visited the area and noted that the land formations were much the same as those at Spindle Top and conducted his own tests by lighting the bubbles with matches. When it burned with a red flame, showing smoke at the top of the flame, he was convinced that it was petroleum gas. Heywood contracted to drill two wells to a depth of 1000 feet each for an undivided one-half interest in the acreage. The contract also provided that he could organize a company to be called the Jennings Oil Company. A drilling rig was moved from Beaumont to drill the well and drilling began on the Jennings Oil Company- Clement No. 1 on June 15, 1901."
Article: "Knowing of his success as a wildcatter in Texas, the company contacted Heywood to see if he would be interested in their prospect. Heywood visited the area and noted that the land formations were much the same as those at Spindle Top and conducted his own tests by lighting the bubbles with matches. When it burned with a red flame, showing smoke at the top of the flame, he was convinced that it was petroleum gas. Heywood contracted with the existing company to drill two wells to a depth of 1000 feet for an undivided on-half interest in the acreage; the agreement provided that he could organize a company to be called the Jennings Oil Company, which was founded on April 29, 1901. A drilling rig was moved from Beaumont to drill the first well, Clement No. 1, on June 15, 1901." - PM800 (talk) 10:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I did not add the information to which you object. Someone else did. I can rewrite it further if you wish to make it less like the source.Billy Hathorn (talk) 11:44, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
:I rearranged the wording. Billy Hathorn (talk) 05:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine Assembly elections, 1907 and Progresista Party

  • Comment: The article is not done yet I might come up with better hooks.

5x expanded by Howard the Duck (talk). Self nom at 19:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Have you reviewed another nomination to satisfy the reviewing requirement? If so, you are required to indicate this on your nomination, as noted at the top of this page and as discussed at WT:DYK. Arctic Night 20:08, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fantastic, thanks for adding the reviewed nom. However, I would recommend completing the article first in the future (maybe work on it in the user space if the five-day rule is a factor?) to reduce any confusion that may arise. Arctic Night 16:02, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article is somewhat shy of a five-fold expansion, but Howard the Duck has indicated that expansion should continue. Otherwise, length and readability are satisfactory. The DYK-nominated fact is supported by an in-line citation with page reference, to an printed source that can be accepted in good faith. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 20:30, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't DYK articles need to be complete before they can be nominated? I can't find it now, but I think I remember reading it in the rules somewhere... Arctic Night 20:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's nearly a 5-time expansion; indeed 4.51 is closer to 5 than to 4. Recent guidelines encourage reviewers to help with the articles, so continued improvement (and expansion) is allowed, I believe. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 21:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC) ::::(I have seen some articles on current events or continuing television shows be declared ineligible for GA or FA, because they are too unstable, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 22:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]
Isn't it after 5 days before the waiting time ends? I'll finish this later. The book can be found at Google Books. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 03:20, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done expanding and reviewed The Mystery of a Hansom Cab. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 14:22, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I checked the on-line source, which supports the quote. The DYK-checking tool reports that the article has had a 5-fold expansion, which is generous; it is true that it's closer to 5 than to 4. However, there is a problem: The bibliographical information on the source omits standard information, publisher, location. Just fix it and then this is good to go. Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (talk) 01:36, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I simplified the sentence.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (talk) 13:45, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I added another article to the nomination, there are now two boldfaced articles. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 15:32, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

St Ffinan's Church, Llanffinan ‎

A small stone church

Created by Bencherlite (talk). Self nom at 18:22, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Is it possible though to put Wales in the title? The odd wording of the name might cause some not to bother to call it up for a look. Billy Hathorn (talk) 22:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Changed "Anglesey, Wales" to "Welsh county of Anglesey" and piped the church name to remove the parish, to avoid the long run of commas. Better? BencherliteTalk 23:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've amended the hook to avoid a redirect. Schwede66 09:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is no reason to do this, actually. BencherliteTalk 16:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is a recent discussion about redirects on the discussion page. If the redirect was intentional in line with what is on the discussion page, feel free to put it back in. Schwede66 00:35, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, read that already, and still don't see why the redirect needed to be changed, but it's not worth changing back. It's a different matter if it's the hook subject, because that might skew readership stats, but no-one's going to care about readership stats for Anglesey or related redirects. BencherliteTalk 19:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

St Michael's Church, Longstanton

The west end of a stone church seen from a slight angle, showing two large buttresses with a window between, a double bellcote above, and part of the body of the church with its thatched roof

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 17:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


2011 24 Hours of Daytona, Joey Hand, Memo Rojas

A racing driver in a purple-and-white firesuit, black cap and dark glasses broods while waiting in the pits.

  • Reviewed: 1973 DeKalb-Peachtree Airport Learjet 24 crash
  • Comment: Race article was created for ITN, but looks like it won't make the cut there. Also yes, over 200 char hook, but as I recall multiple hooks are given a bit of leeway there?

2011 24 Hours of Daytona, Joey Hand created by The Bushranger (talk). Memo Rojas 2x expanded and sourced (BLP) by The Bushranger (talk). Self nom at 16:50, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've amended the hook to avoid a redirect. Schwede66 09:40, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Blue Ribbon Bacon Festival

Created by Worm That Turned (talk). Self nom at 15:56, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

reviewed Casper the Commuting Cat,Casper (cat) hereWorm 16:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John David Duty

Created by KimChee (talk). Self nom at 07:58, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article is new & long enough, however the hook states "is believed to be the first..." whereas the article states "was the first person". The source used says "[experts] Massie and Dieter both said before Thursday's execution that they believed Duty would be the first". If it is definitely the first it should be stated in the hook, if not it should be less "sure" in the article.— Rod talk 13:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good observation. I moved this "unsure" statement and source, from earlier legal testimony, into the section about the appeals. For the lead (and the hook), I found another source in which the state corrections department asserted with more certainty about Duty being the first after the execution took place. I hope this addresses the issue. KimChee (talk) 22:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Jobe Akeley

  • Reviewed: Zeltnera namophila
  • Comment: Can anybody help me find a photo of this person. There are a lot of photos on the web but I'm not sure of their copyright status. Thanx

Created by Regstuff (talk). Self nom at 06:09, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptian temple

  • ... that ancient Egyptian temples contain architectural elements that symbolize houses, hills, tombs, marshes, and guard towers?

Created by A. Parrot (talk). Self nom at 05:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: 2011 Dearborn mosque bombing plot.
Comment: The article is big, but the hook is cited in the "Design and decoration" section (3rd paragraph) and the "Halls and courts" subsection (1st and 2nd paragraphs). A. Parrot (talk) 05:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • AGF for offline hooks-- fantastic article, I love art history and it's a great read. The references weren't easy to find but they're all cited in separate spots. Good to go. Nomader (Talk) 06:37, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've inserted a pipe into the hook to avoid a redirect for the main article. Question - should 'Ancient' be capitalised? Schwede66 05:31, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose not, so I changed it. A. Parrot (talk) 19:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Created by IVX8O8XVI (talk). Nominated by Zachlipton (talk) at 20:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've changed the hooks to avoid redirects. I note that there are multiple cleanup tags in the article; this will have to be sorted before we can proceed with a DYK review. Schwede66 05:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Bonetown

Created by Nomader (talk). Self nom at 21:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Humanist minuscule

Created by Wetman (talk). Self nom at 23:46, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Size ok, date ok, source ok (I will AGF since it is not available online).--Antidiskriminator (talk) 00:34, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article has a stub tag (we don't promote stubs at DYK), but short of just removing that tag, it does read like a stub. If you deduct the direct quote from the prose, it's also short of 1500 bytes. Also, Antiquity needs to be disambiguated. Schwede66 09:46, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I reviewed this nomination according to the criteria, using online counter that says 1696 characters without title and notes. The criteria says: "Articles must have a minimum of 1,500 characters of prose (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, tables etc.)" I am afraid that applying another criteria is not supported by the rules and can create a bad precedent.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 09:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've had another look at the additional rules and you are right. In A2, it excludes blockquotes, but not direct quotes within a sentence. And if it's long enough for DYK purposes, then D11 says that stub tags should ordinarily be removed. I shall go ahead and remove that tag. Schwede66 17:35, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • So many rules that once were guidelines! The revision history now gives 5,478 bytes, but there are very special ways of counting available only to DYK Guardians.--Wetman (talk) 04:45, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • DYK is interested in the size of readable prose only, so the info from the revision history is meaningless. In the column on the left, under 'Toolbox', I have an option called 'Page size' (I assume it's there by default, as I couldn't see where you enable it in preferences). When you click that, it gives you all sorts of page size stats, including readable prose. That's what I use. Schwede66 02:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Current nominations

Articles created/expanded on February 1

Cameroon line

5x expanded by Aymatth2 (talk). Self nom at 01:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oliver Lewis (violinist)

Man dressed in a tailcoat and open-necked white shirt, playing a violin

  • ... that Oliver Lewis (pictured), founding member of the electronic music group Deviations Project, is considered to be the "world's fastest violinist"?

Created by Daicaregos (talk). Self nom at 23:29, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Length, date, reference and hook look ok. Good to go.Alexikoua (talk) 22:38, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


York Lions women's ice hockey

  • ... that on February 11, 2000, the York Lions played in the longest game in the history of Canadian women's ice hockey?

Created by Maple Leaf (talk). Self nom at 23:19, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Joe Cavanagh. Maple Leaf (talk) 23:20, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas' Legion

Created by Clarityfiend (talk). Self nom at 23:03, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Léon Lemartin. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:04, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amber 31422

Created by Ruby2010 talk 06:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC) (UTC) [reply]

Reviewed Herbert Whitfield. Ruby2010 talk 06:52, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

St. James' Episcopal Church (Batavia, New York)

A stone church tower with a level top, gently arched pointed windows and a small wooden door in the base. In front of it are telephone lines and a set of steps.

5x expanded by Daniel Case (talk). Self nom at 06:21, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]



Pipe Dream (musical)

5x expanded by Wehwalt (talk). Self nom at 03:41, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed GT-1 (missile) btw.--Wehwalt (talk) 03:44, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date and hook ref verified, astonishing expansion given the length of the previous version of the article. As I have not seen any DYK rules against profanity in hooks, I presume naughty words are permitted on the main page? KimChee (talk) 11:00, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I used the same word when I had DYK for Checkers speech two years ago (out of the mouth of Nixon, btw). This is a rather bawdy article, I think using this hook sets the right tone. Thanks for the praise.--Wehwalt (talk) 14:23, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but don't put it near the top of the set. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Techno Viking

  • ... that Techno Viking has received more than 20 million clicks on YouTube and given rise to more than 700 responses and remixed versions?

Created by Yngvadottir (talk). Self nom at 17:46, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Princeton Companion to Mathematics

5x expanded by David Eppstein (talk). Self nom at 03:18, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(Note: the Euler Book Prize article is also new, but I haven't bolded it because I'm unsure whether it qualifies: it has >1500 characters of prose, but most of it is in a list.) —David Eppstein (talk) 04:45, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Huejotzingo

5x expanded by Thelmadatter (talk). Self nom at 00:45, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

National Liberation Army (Peru)

Created by HelperMonkey (talk). Self nom at 00:00, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(oddly, you do not seem to have a "Warrior Poet" article to which I can link...very odd) HelperMonkey (talk) 00:00, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment HelperMonkey just registered yesterday; this is the first time s/he has tried for a DYK. Nyttend (talk) 17:18, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sykes (dog)

  • ... that the dog actor Sykes starred in the award winning advert "Every Home Needs a Harvey", viewed over a million times on YouTube?

Created by Miyagawa (talk). Self nom at 23:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Forgot to mention - another one for 15th February here. Miyagawa (talk) 12:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Danford Farm

Created by Nyttend (talk). Self nom at 23:00, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length, date verified. ALT1 hook's offline ref accepted AGF. --Rosiestep (talk) 06:00, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length, date verified. Hook's offline ref accepted AGF. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Cavanagh

5x expanded by Leech44 (talk). Self nom at 22:58, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is correct. Hook is brief and to the point. Good to go. Maple Leaf (talk) 23:19, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Olav Braarud

Created by Eisfbnore (talk). Self nom at 22:45, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edgar Hull

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 21:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1 ... that nearly a half-century after the assassination of Huey Long, the Louisiana physician Edgar Hull disputed a longstanding claim that Long had received inferior medical treatment following the fatal shooting?

Reviewed Laurence Sheil

Grammy Award for Producer of the Year, Classical

5x expanded by Another Believer (talk). Self nom at 21:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Unsure if this is actually 5x expanded within the appropriate time frame. Someone else may want to double check. HstryQT (talk) 15:28, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hymenolepis microstoma

Scolex of the rodent tapeworm, Hymenolepis microstoma

Created by Magdalena ZZ (talk). Nominated by Rockpocket (talk) at 21:16, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The source cited (Olson, 2008) does not say that strobilation occurs in this species. Article length and date are OK. Ucucha 04:04, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've added an additional source that states: "...the juveniles move anteriorly ... where they commence strobilation." Rockpocket 10:10, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Mystery of a Hansom Cab

Created by Cirt (talk). Self nom at 14:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I reviewed Democratic Farmers League of Sweden. -- Cirt (talk) 14:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I rechecked the source. It was worldwide. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 14:33, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It would be more compelling to state that both in the hook and in the article. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 14:53, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done. -- Cirt (talk) 15:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for being incremental, but a hook of this magnitude needs further clarification. Outsold everywhere but when? For how long? –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 15:35, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The hook, and the article, specify this. In the year 1887. -- Cirt (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The way the hook is worded, it appears that it outsold the 1887 publication, as a book may be republished several times. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 15:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that is correct. The quote from the cited secondary source states: "it went on to sell over half a million copies worldwide, outselling Conan Doyle's A Study in Scarlet (1887)". Satisfied? :) -- Cirt (talk) 15:45, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Since the reference fails to say when it outsold the other (it merely gave as the year the other book was published) reword it to "...outsold Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes 1887 novel A Study in Scarlet worldwideHTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 15:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done. -- Cirt (talk) 15:57, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Samaikyandhra Movement

  • ... that the Samaikyandhra Movement is a socio-political movement organized around the need for the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh to remain united and to oppose the secession of Telangana?

--BabbaQ (talk) 13:58, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ballard Bunder Gatehouse

The Gatehouse

Created/expanded by AroundTheGlobe (talk). Self-nominated at 07:20, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • while size and date check, and offline sources will be accepted AGF, the hook is slightly too long (201 chars) and the language is also cumbersome. While the length could probably be fixed, I would like to suggest the following slightly shorter but clearer hook. (I also took liberty to corrected a capitalization issue in the original hook) --Muhandes (talk) 16:53, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good - thanks for the suggestion. Cheers, Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 05:27, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1 good to go, AGF on offline sources. I've stroke out the original. --Muhandes (talk) 05:42, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: Grand Hotel (New Ulm, Minnesota) [24] Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 06:26, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Saxony-Anhalt train accident

5x expanded by C628 (talk). Self nom at 00:24, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Military history of the Aleutian Islands. C628 (talk) 00:24, 2 February 2011 (UTC):[reply]
  • Length, date and source check out. Good work on the article. 03md 00:04, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on February 2

January 31–February 2, 2011 North American winter storm

January 31–February 2, 2011 North American winter storm

Created by AstroHurricane001 (talk). Self nom at 16:39, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hubble Bubble (astronomy)

Hubble Space Telescope image of Type Ia Supernova 1994D (SN1994D) in Galaxy NGC 4526

Created by Sharktopus (talk). Self nom at 04:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Looks good, though the blurb could use a link to Local Void and/or Redshift and/or radial velocity; the article would benefit from a specific reference showing the bubble is centered around Earth. ~AH1(TCU) 16:39, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Leonardville, Namibia

Created by Namiba (talk), Pgallert (talk). Nominated by Pgallert (talk) at 19:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Jackson (audio engineer)

Created by Binksternet (talk). Self nom at 12:07, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rich Representation Language

Created by user:History2007 (talk). Self nom at 23:38, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK check successful. But the hook is neither interesting nor understandable to laypeople. I would recommend something less boring, but can't find anything in the article.  Sandstein  13:20, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, fair enough. The real reason I wrote this article was that it was a very comprehensive design approach and a true pioneering research effort. The challenge for Wikipedia is that if I write a new article about Charlie Sheen's problems yesterday, 10 million people will be interested in it. But on "matters of substance" it is natural that it will not be sexy. To those interested in animation this will be a useful article, so let me think of something. As for the hook explanation, the idea is that most animations work on one character, this dealt with how two or three people interact. What do you consider non-boring about animation? History2007 (talk) 13:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think the subject - basically a programming language for animated movies? - is interesting enough. There is surely some aspect of it that can be explained in nontechnical terms? I find the article itself very difficult to read because it relies heavily on jargon and assumes knowledge of advanced topics in animation. For instance, the text "and to manage much of the animation via words perhaps as voice. Due to the interdependence of components such as facial features on the spoken words" is completely impossible for me to understand. Also, more wikilinks could help to relieve the jargon problem, such as links to semantics.  Sandstein  13:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it was not for movies. And that means I need to clarify a few things. I just built NECA Project 10 minutes ago and it says that one of the applications was three people talking in a e-Showroom, and has a link to a very early demo which showed they were pioneers. The conversation in the showroom changes depending on which car you want to know about. Maybe that will provide ideas too. And yes, I should probably add more links. I guess I am just too used to the technical terms, but Wikilinks should be easy to add. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 13:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How about: ... that the Rich Representation Language, includes commands for displaying a wide range of emotions in the faces of animated characters? History2007 (talk) 13:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That would be a good hook, but this fact would need to be mentioned and cited in the article.  Sandstein  14:09, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fine. And yes, it would need expansion on the emotional features that have not been fully elaborated. I will do that later today and also add more wikilinks etc. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 14:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have now added the hook and its reference to the Speech synthesis and emotive markers section and also added links. Now, let me once again take the opportunity to use this as a soap box to complain about the availability of experts to fix articles within Wikipedia in general. Many of the links I added lead to articles that have "no good tags" on them, e.g. Virtual world (a virtual disaster), Skeletal animation (a skeleton article looking for meat/substance), Computer facial animation (zero references), etc., etc. I have started fixing some of the computer animation articles, but it will probably take most of 2011 to do that. And no one else is in sight. Wikipedia policy needs to change to attract and maintain more experts. I have said this before and let me say it again at every opportunity. History2007 (talk) 23:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Thanks for your improvements and the article is now ready for DYK with the hook "... that the Rich Representation Language includes commands for displaying a wide range of emotions in the faces of animated characters?" (I've omitted a superfluous comma).  Sandstein  08:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. And I am sorry about my unending complaints about the need for fixing "all article". I just wish they were all error free. In general, the articles on mathematics are in fact in much better shape than computing. But hopefully by 2012 I will have fixed animation and by 2013 robotics that also needs help. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 12:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block cellular automaton, Norman Margolus

5x expanded and new article by David Eppstein (talk). Self nom at 22:38, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Block cellular automaton 5x expanded, beginning on Feb 2, Norman Margolus created on Feb 3. --Pgallert (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Date and length verified. "Only" a grey tick because the online sources are all from Margolus, and in his scientific papers he, of course, does not claim to have invented this. The fact that they got published after peer review is an indication, however, that his findings were indeed new. Tweaked the wikilinks in the hook. --Pgallert (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks. One of the sources I was using for the "he invented this" claim, Schiff's book, is not available for preview in Google books, but the other third-party source is available. Here is the direct link, where it says (page 74) "Margolus came up with two different kinds of rules" (and the first of the two is the block automaton). —David Eppstein (talk) 00:44, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Museo Regional del Sureste de Petén

Angular building approached via a wide concrete stairway

Created by Simon Burchell (talk). Self nom at 22:24, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Google Art Project

Digitized version of a 15th century tempera on canvas painting of the Roman Goddess Venus

Created by Mattgirling (talk), Evil Chris! (talk). Self nom at 19:55, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Kimmeridge Oil Field. matt (talk) 21:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am adding a pipe link to Google Art Project, for clarity, and to avoid a redirect. Otherwise, date and length are good. The hook is not sourced correctly: the 7 gigapixel assertion is sent to the Telegraph's Florence Waters but it should be sourced more generally to the Telegraph's Art News. Binksternet (talk) 12:20, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks; sourcing has now been changed. matt (talk) 01:06, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Online source supports hook. Good to go! Binksternet (talk) 03:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GT-1 (missile)

A torpedo, fitted with wings and tail, is mounted under a medium bomber.

  • ... that the GT-1 (pictured on B-25) could deliver a torpedo up to 25 miles (40 km) from its launching aircraft?

Created by The Bushranger (talk). Self nom at 23:13, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Imaginative use of google books snippets. All looks good.--Wehwalt (talk) 03:36, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Damnatio ad bestias

An ancient mosaic showing panthers attacking a man

5x expanded by Materialscientist (talk). Self nom at 12:44, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hook, length is OK. DYK ready.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:10, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy of Leonid Brezhnev

Created by --TIAYN (talk) 19:22, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good and original. I did not see a reference beside the hook information. Billy Hathorn (talk) 17:37, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Date and size both check out. Written citation accepted in good faith - but please add citation to all of the three times it's mentioned in the text - especially in the lead para.--Storye book (talk) 20:25, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK I did it, but TIAYN please check my edits to confirm that all is correct. Thanks.--Storye book (talk) 22:30, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Per guidelines we are not supposed to reference the lead seeing that all info in the lead must be in the main body. --TIAYN (talk) 22:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I see you removed it again. Up to you, but in my experience normal practice has been to attach a citation to the hook in the lead para during DYK exposure only, and then to remove it afterwards. This is because it saves a lot of hassle from reviewers who say they can't find the citation quickly to confirm the hook. So I added the citation to the lead para to speed this article through the DYK process. --Storye book (talk) 12:07, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And you put it back again! I think this is clear for DYK now.--Storye book (talk) 10:27, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lufthansa Flight 592

5x expanded by Mukkakukaku (talk). Self nom at 00:35, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ooooh I like that one. --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 15:42, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Me, too. The sunglasses trade is more interesting than failing to get a student visa. Nice article, btw. Location (talk) 15:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wow, already GA--good work. However, the article does not describe LH592 but only one flight on that route, on one particular day. Suggest a move to a different name, see the article's talk page. --Pgallert (talk) 20:04, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've responded on the talk page but will leave a summary here: naming conventions for aviation articles relating to accidents/incidents/occurrences are named after the flight they occurred on. Flight routes themselves are not notable, and will therefore never have their own articles (and those articles that are created are quickly WP:PRODed. The only exception is when the occurrence gains a popular name, such as Munich air disaster, or when the flight does not have a flight number, such as 2007 Sudan Airways hijacking. See WP:AVINAME. --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 20:12, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hmm, an advice page from a Wikproject. That does not really invalidate more general principles, such as that articles should have names that give a hint to what is covered in them. As a somewhat frequent flyer, I do expect a route description under this name, not an air crash report. To say something never becomes notable is WP:CRYSTAL. I have retracted my question mark as this seems to go far beyond a DYK submission, but maybe the Wikiproject wants to discuss that. Cheers, --Pgallert (talk) 12:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Museum theatre

  • ... that museum theatre encompasses not only first and second person interpretation, but also demonstration, storytelling, and performances?

5x expanded by Herr0183 (talk) et al. Nominated by User:HstryQT at 15:21, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice update to the page! Missvain (talk) 17:20, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Mama Ayesha's Restaurant Presidential Mural

Created by Missvain (talk). Self nom at 17:30, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on February 3

Allenton hippopotamus

Created by Victuallers (talk), Parkywiki (talk). Self nom at 16:28, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Darius Morris

Male basketball player dribbling a basketball with blue uniform #4

Created/expanded by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 23:15, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Augustus Wade Dwight

man in American Civil War unform

Created by W Nowicki (talk). Self nom at 22:25, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Meets DYK, length good, hook citation confirmed. Sharktopustalk 04:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Marionette (Fringe)

Created by Ruby2010 talk 21:16, 5 February 2011 (UTC) [reply]

The hook is referenced in the production section. Ruby2010 talk 21:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Time Capsule (Parks and Recreation)

Created by Hunter Kahn (talk). Nominated by Guerillero (talk) at 06:03, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because this was already nominated I combined the two nominations together. --Guerillero | My Talk 15:31, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeanne Galzy

  • ... that French author Jeanne Galzy (1883-1977) is credited as "one of the pioneers in the writing of lesbian desire and despair"?

Created by LadyofShalott (talk). Nominated by Drmies (talk) at 23:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Only a few edits ago, on this very page, I said I preferred paraphrase in DYK hooks...but I don't rightly know how to paraphrase this very strong phrase. Drmies (talk) 23:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Salmon Commission

Created by The Interior (talk). Self nom at 22:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Looks good on length, date, sources, tagline etc. Could use expansion. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:17, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Potomac Curling Club

Created by GormtheDBA (talk). Self nom at 15:45, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hook, length OK. DYK ready.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Knox: Murder on Trial in Italy

Reviewed:Damnatio ad bestias.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:10, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Léon Lemartin

  • The two references support a record for seven only. A handwritten postcard claims eight, but that is insufficient. There are also other references problems. Those for Jacques de Lesseps, Jeanne Herveux and Paul Wyss do not refer to Lemartin at all. Also, there's a rule that each paragraph has to have at least one reference, and several don't. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fixed hook and article. Removed unsourced claims from hook (deleted 8, 11 and 13), caveated and rephrased them in the article. Also reworked the mentions of Lesseps Herveux and Wyss to match the references. Chienlit (talk) 09:19, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zamfir Arbore

  • Date and (to be sure!) length verified. Online reference checked, and offline references accepted on good faith. - Biruitorul Talk 05:08, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Odell Pollard

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 01:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Richard Boys

Pontyclun railway station

One of the original Llantrisant stations

5x expanded by redrose64 (talk · contribs), Daicaregos (talk · contribs), Ioliver2 (talk · contribs). Nominated by Simply south (talk) at 00:13, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Length, refs and hook are good Chienlit (talk) 13:20, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Richard Boys

Created by Danno uk (talk). Self nom at 22:40, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting and original. The hook, however, is not that specific in the article but implied??? Billy Hathorn (talk) 02:03, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- the accounts of his moral outrage make his role there clear. Nice article Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Caryobruchus gleditsiae

Created by Stemonitis (talk). Self nom at 21:44, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Article length and date check out, hook checks out, don't have access to Nilsson reference but will AGF, the second part of the hook checks out. J04n(talk page) 05:20, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert Whitfield

Created by Daemonic Kangaroo (talk). Self nom at 21:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Correct length and history, with ample sources. Good to go! Ruby2010 talk 06:52, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plutonyl

  • ... that the chemistry of the plutonyl ion resembles the chemistry of the uranyl ion very closely.

Created by Petergans (talk). Self nom at 21:21, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

St Mary's Chapel, Arley

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 20:37, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

William Matthew Scott

Portrait of Will Scott, author. He is dressed in a 1930s suit with dark hair combed straight back

  • ... that children's writer Will Scott (pictured), author of The Cherrys series, wrote 2,000 short stories for adults?

Created by Storye book (talk). Self nom at 20:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


John H. Eastman

Created/expanded by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 17:50, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Creation date and hook are good. However, the article is only 1435 characters long. I also think the wording is a little too close to the source's. - PM800 (talk) 19:54, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how to measure characters. It is 274 words long or 4,800 bytes. There is only the one source available. Billy Hathorn (talk) 00:21, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you don't know how to measure characters, then you should probably learn how. Check the DYK rules page. As for the "one source available" problem, the article is currently too short, so another source with additional information will have to be found from somewhere, I suppose. - PM800 (talk) 02:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is now 1,751 characters, according to the measurement: http://www.javascriptkit.com/script/script2/charcount.shtml Billy Hathorn (talk) 05:55, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, it's long enough now. A few parts need citations, so just take care of that and it should be OK. - PM800 (talk) 06:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

St Michael the Archangel's Church, Booton

The west front of an elaborately designed stone church with slender twin towers, between which are a doorway, a large window and, at the top of the gable, a minaret-like pinnacle

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 11:20, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hook, references, length and date of creation all check out. Picture is licenced Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0. FWIW, I prefer ALT1. (A hook about his "Blessed Girls" would be fun, in the spirit of the church – "very naughty but ... in the right spirit".) -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 21:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Gary Fanelli

Created by Location (talk). Self nom at 06:55, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Date, length, refs all fine. I don't know which hook is preferable, nor have I checked if one is too long, but in any instance they are both backed by sources. Nice entry. Dahn (talk) 12:28, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sewell Ministry, 1856

seated portrait photo of a

Created by Schwede66 (talk). Self nom at 02:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Age, length, references all check out. Ready to go. Moonraker2 (talk) 07:59, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chair (sculpture)

  • ... that a woman lived 42 days on the former world's largest chair in 1960?

Created by Missvain (talk). Self nom at 02:44, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Age, length, and hook all verified. Interesting article! The women was a model, so I'm wondering if it might capture more readers to note that fact. Location (talk) 07:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


  1. Nom with image:

Our Lady of Vilnius Church (New York City)

Our Lady of Vilnius Church, 568-570 Broome Street, NYC (designed 1910 by Harry G. Wiseman)

Created/expanded by James Russiello (talk). Self nom at 16:30, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on February 4

Arnold Cook

Created by Moondyne (talk). Self nom at 02:46, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Me and Juliet

5x expanded by Wehwalt (talk). Self nom at 02:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed Jocotitlán--Wehwalt (talk) 02:37, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Irk Bitig

detail of a manuscript page showing groups of three, four and four red-filled circles above black text written in the Old Turkic script

Created by BabelStone (talk). Self nom at 23:35, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Do Shapeshifters Dream of Electric Sheep?

Created by Ruby2010 talk 21:22, 5 February 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Hook is cited in the cultural references section. Ruby2010 talk 21:22, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewed Otto Redlich. Ruby2010 talk 21:38, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

14th Test Squadron

Reservist from the 14th Test Squadron working with their active duty counterparts The squadron, located at the Mill Valley Air Force Station

14thTS Created by Orygun (talk). Self nom at 03:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC) 14thMWS Created by Orygun (talk). Nominated by Jsayre64 (talk) at 03:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've taken the liberty of merging this with the 14th MWS hook, as nominated by Jsayre64 here, to make/restore a double hook. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Cross de San Sebastián

Created by Sillyfolkboy (talk). Nominated by Pepper (talk) at 01:26, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Just barely reaches size requirements, but with the table and pictures, I'm happy with the overall size. C628 (talk) 21:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1906 French Grand Prix

While three men stand by watching, a fourth man hurries to collect a spare tyre and change it onto his open-topped car.

5x expanded by Apterygial (talk). Self nom at 00:12, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


ASM-A-1 Tarzon

  • Reviewed: Zahra Bahrami
  • Comment: There is a free-use pic in the article, but its use would make the hook less quirky since it would negate the "Tarzon/Tarzan" joke...

Created by The Bushranger (talk). Self nom at 23:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Article checks out, as do sources. The Tarzon/Tarzan pun is a little shaky (I had to read it a couple of times) but no real problem. Apterygial 00:21, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bryant W. Bailey

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 23:07, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed New Georgia, Liberia.

LifeSpring Hospitals

--BabbaQ (talk) 13:28, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Petra (sculpture)

  • ... that Petra, a sculpture of a urinating policewoman, received a German art award in 2011?

Created by Sandstein (talk). Self nom at 13:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1947 BOAC Douglas C-47 crash

Created by Mjroots (talk). Self nom at 12:36, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK criteria met; offline source accepted IGF. But is the date of publication of the relevant ref correct? It says January 2011; should it not be 1947? Otherwise all OK for DYK. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 12:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Art of Urartu, economy of Urartu

Figure of roaring lion

  • ... that the economy and art of Urartu (example pictured) flourished in the 8th century BC only to fall a century later?

Created by Materialscientist (talk). Self nom at 12:01, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Scientist, can I be picky? In the Art article, for instance, I see that footnotes 4 and 6 have periods but the others have not. Do you care to give it some thought? BTW, those articles are great--thanks. Drmies (talk) 18:32, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm doing these one at a time: for Art of Urartu (interesting and well-organized, hook verified). Drmies (talk) 18:46, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • for Economy of Urartu as well, but I'd like to go over it in some detail before it goes to the front page (I'll do that today/tonight). Scientist, let me know of your punctuation ponderings please. In the meantime, thanks for unlocking a culture I didn't even know existed. (Did you make all of it up? If so, good job!) Drmies (talk) 18:48, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm done with my minor edits. Next step, after the front page, GA? If so, punctuation (in citations and image captions) will need another look. Drmies (talk) 19:49, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • That hook is a bit ungrammatical. Am not! Urartu! How about "... that the economy and art of Urartu (example pictured) flourished around 8th century BC, only for the state to fall a century later?

Thanks for the copyedits! These were quick, reworked translations of FAs from ru.wiki (I even forgot to rewrite a few sentences :-). I stopped GA nominating long ago. References are mostly Russian, old and offline, I have no clear preference for their formatting. Yes, my hook is shaky and comments/rewrites are welcome. ALT1 somewhat detracts from the topic. How about ALT2

Given the sources, can we say "in" instead of "around"? (I also threw an article into your hook.) Drmies (talk) 00:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"In" is fine, replaced. Materialscientist (talk) 23:36, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewed Tin-silver-copper. Materialscientist (talk) 23:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kildare Street Club

Stone monkeys playing billiards in the Kildare Street club house, Dublin, of 1860

Created by Moonraker2 (talk). Self nom at 08:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date, length and refs verified. I'd suggest changing the hook so only the word "pictured" is in parentheses (so it would read, for example, "is adorned by whimsical beasts, such as monkeys playing billiards (pictured)?"). Other than that, though, cool article. — Hunter Kahn 06:55, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's a good suggestion, thanks, I've edited it in. Moonraker2 (talk) 16:35, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MXR Dyna Comp

5x expanded by Drmies (talk). Self nom at 02:46, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

JB-4

A missile with jet engine atop sits in a workshop

Created by The Bushranger (talk). Self nom at 02:32, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nice article, hook verified, but I have one question, and I'd like another editor (or a few) to weigh in: Is this a reliable source? In my opinion everything hinges on that. Drmies (talk) 02:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's been questioned before. According to the folks at MILHIST, it is - it cites its sources clearly, and has never been questioned by reviewers when it's been used heavily, even in GA reviews. The consensus at WP:MILHIST is that it's reliable. - - The Bushranger One ping only 02:56, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you could point me that way, or if some of those editors could weigh in, we can settle this very quickly. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:25, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It was queried as part of a set here; nobody weighed in against it. I also used it heavily in this article, which passed GAR here without any sourcing concern; this GA used it even more extensively, again without concern . :) - The Bushranger One ping only 03:32, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, found it. This was also queried at DYK before, too. - The Bushranger One ping only 09:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'm not going to object, but I would like for a seasoned DYK editor to OK it. Drmies (talk) 17:54, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on February 5

Interstate 81 in West Virginia

5x expanded by Admrboltz (talk). Nominated by Imzadi1979 (talk) at 15:47, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hellenic Nomarchy

An oil-painting depicting a man with short hair and moustache, with blue-white clothes.

Self nom at 14:21, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed: Oliver Lewis (violinist)
  • Article length is fine. Reference for hook is good & pic is public domain licensed. Good to go.— Rod talk 15:02, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Domaine Coche-Dury

Created by Camw (talk). Self nom at 03:28, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Length and date correct. Offline cite accepted in good faith. FruitMonkey (talk) 11:53, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Roy John (rugby player)

  • ... that Wales rugby union international Roy John could leap over four feet from a standing start?

5x expanded by FruitMonkey (talk). Self nom at 23:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Is the four feet statistic a calculation between John's height (needs citation, but is given in ref#3) and reaching the crossbar (already cited)? If so, I think the hook should be reworded – I assumed that he could jump 4' horizontally from standing. Suggest alt:
ALT1: ... that from a standing start, Wales rugby union international Roy John could jump up and reach the crossbar set at 3.2 metres (10 ft 6 in) above the ground? matt (talk) 01:27, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Correct on all accounts, I'm more than happy with the alternative hook. FruitMonkey (talk) 11:57, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Baco Blanc

A bottle of 1956 Armagnac made when Baco Blanc was the primary grape variety of the region

  • Reviewed: Earnest Elmo Calkins
  • Comment: Primary refs in lead with Jancis Robinson's grape book (FN#2) and Oz Clarke's (FN#3)

5x expanded by Agne27 (talk). Self nom at 22:57, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Verified 5x expansion, image license suitability and hook length. AGF on the offline sources. Camw (talk) 03:34, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Churchill (athlete)

Created by Jrcla2 (talk). Self nom at 21:38, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Date and length check out, but the part about him being a football All-American lacks an inline citation. You could argue that this is covered by the last sentence of the Oklahoma section, but it doesn't make clear what two sports (he did play baseball, and the main source of the article implies he was actually an All-American in three sports). I think it's worth having another cite in the appropriate place. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 22:53, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, it doesn't lack an inline citation. The sentence "Playing defensive end, and occasionally running back, he was honored as an all-conference performer and was also named an All-American." has a reference, which explicitly states "In football, Churchill lettered in '27, '28, and '29 as an end, but also played tackle and running back when needed. He received All-American honors in 1929, and played in the East-West Shrine Game.". Jrcla2 (talk) 23:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are correct; the basketball-related sentence is uncited, not the football sentence. My mistake. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 01:03, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I added a ref for the basketball portion of the hook. Jrcla2 (talk) 01:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The reference was to the year after he was named a basketball All-American, but I've changed it to the correct year for you. Looks good to go now. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 16:12, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tradition

Tradition, by Olin Levi Warner. Bronze tympanum above main entrance of the Library of Congress Thomas Jefferson Building

5x expanded by Piotrus (talk), Sadads (talk), Ragesoss (talk), and Guerillero (talk) and others. Nominated by Piotrus (talk) at 20:53, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Haven't copyedited the entire article yet (get on it, Sadads!), but the hook is verified and I think the article is good to go. Drmies (talk) 21:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm thinking that the hook should say either "a tradition" or "traditions". I've gone ahead and changed it to "a tradition", feel free to play around with it as necessary. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 21:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be a spoil sport (again), but 3510 > 13098 isn't a 5x expansion. SmartSE (talk) 21:29, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prose size (text only): 15 kB (2273 words) "readable prose size" <- is what I see --Guerillero | My Talk 23:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We split away Traditionalism (religion) from the original article, if you remove those 250 words (which is an independent article and should have been from the start), you start with 474 words and end with 2458 words that is a more than 5 times expansion. That is still a go. Sadads (talk) 23:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Montague James Mathew

How to Ride with Elegance thro' the Streets

Created by Moonraker2 (talk). Self nom at 18:54, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


John DeStefano

5x expanded by GabrielF (talk). Self nom at 17:54, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

:Hook is too long to hold reader's continuity.

There is no personal box. The article is still listed as stub. Good selection of topic, but I think it needs a little more work. Billy Hathorn (talk) 16:42, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

St Nicholas' Church, Buckenham

A stone church with a red tiled roof seen from the southeast with an octagonal west tower

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 17:13, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All checks out. Moonraker2 (talk) 18:53, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Jocotitlán

  • ... that Jocotitlán, Mexico sits at the foot of a small dormant volcano, which could become active again?

5x expanded by Thelmadatter (talk). Self nom at 17:02, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All looks good. I clicked the links and looked at the sources too.--Wehwalt (talk) 01:56, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Akodon spegazzinii

  • ... that because the rodent Akodon spegazzinii is so variable, several populations have been named as separate species?

5x expanded by Ucucha (talk). Self nom at 15:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

St Botolph's Church, Skidbrooke

A stone and brick church seen from the southeast showing, from the far end, a battlemented tower, a nave with clerestory, aisle and porch, and a smaller chancel

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 12:42, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All checks out, ready to go. Moonraker2 (talk) 16:27, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Acromis spinifex

Created by Stemonitis (talk). Self nom at 07:46, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • All looking good. Ucucha 15:08, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mainstream (Lloyd Cole album)

Created by J04n (talk). Self nom at 05:30, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I was walking my bag and I saw that this was posted here. Age, length, and hook all verified; my preference is for the first hook. Great work on a great album! Location (talk) 05:46, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Cleveland commuter rail

  • ... that since the discontinuation of commuter rail in Cleveland, Ohio, there have been at least three proposals for restoring service, but none have progressed beyond studies?

Created by C628 (talk). Self nom at 21:17, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on February 6

Cairo Fire

A crowd of bystanders stands outside a burning building, with black smoke coming out of the windows.

Created by BomBom (talk). Self nom at 17:04, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Robert L. Frye

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 16:24, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT... that in 1972, Republican Robert L. Frye claimed that his Democratic opponent offered him a job to entice Frye to leave the race for Louisiana education superintendent?
Reviewed John DeStefano.

Karkadann

  • ... that the horn of the Karkadann was said to cure epilepsy and open the bowels?

5x expanded by Drmies (talk). Self nom at 03:53, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • It dosen't look like a five fold expansion from my prose counter. (619 B to 2310 B of readable prose) Also there are citation needed templates scattered throughout the article. (I am soure you are going to do this but there is no note of an article your reviewed.) cheers --Guerillero | My Talk 04:28, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're right--I must have not counted the Names section the first time. Hmm. I may have to add a bit--let's puts this on hold. Drmies (talk) 04:38, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm going to assume good faith on the sources as they aren't in English. The one problem is that I think you measured the article from the non-intro, but including the intro, this isn't a 5x expansion. This still needs another seven fifty hundred characters until it will meet that criteria. Keep up the good work though as it is looking good. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:39, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Ham Hill Hillfort

Stone obelisk on grassy area of hill. In the foreground is uneven ground.

Created by Rodw (talk). Self nom at 15:10, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Special occasion holding area

Do not nominate new articles for a special time in this section. Instead, please nominate them in the candidate entries section above under the date the article was created or the expansion began, and indicate your request for a specially-timed appearance on the Main Page.
Note: Articles nominated for a special occasion should be nominated within five days of creation or expansion as usual (with the exception of April Fools' Day 2011 - see Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know). Also, articles should be nominated at least five days before the occasion to give reviewers time to check the nomination.

February 15

Saint Usuge Spaniel

A brown dog with white markings in it's fur.

Created by Miyagawa (talk). Self nom at 22:47, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hook fact checks out and spot check of sources appears mostly ok - I am not certain ref 3 qualifies as a RS, but other sources support its claims. Image is fine, and I made a small change to the hook, noting that the breed was saved from extinction. Resolute 01:12, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - removed ref 3 now, as thinking about it now, you're right.   Miyagawa    talk   10:45, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be possible to keep this for February 15th, as it's the second day of the Westminster Kennel Club show.   Miyagawa    talk   23:42, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So moved to this special occasion holding area. --PFHLai (talk) 00:47, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Obo II

Created by Miyagawa (talk). Self nom at 22:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Would it be possible to keep this for February 15th, as it's the second day of the Westminster Kennel Club show.   Miyagawa    talk   23:43, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looks okay for length, date, and hook, although I'm not crazy about the unfamiliar abbreviation "Ch." I've taken out the "in vitro" sentence since they weren't doing that sort of thing back in the 19th century AFAIK (I assume you mean that Chloe II was impregnated). "in transit" needs to be clarified; I'm guessing it means he was traveling across the Atlantic. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:25, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

20 February, Sexagesima

Nimm, was dein ist, und gehe hin, BWV 144

The workers of the Parable of the Workers in the Vineyard question their wages.

Created/expanded by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nom at 22:50, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • suggested for 6 February, date of the first performance. Reviewed: #Carex lutea --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:14, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • perhaps even better on 20 February, Septugesima of 2011, because Easter is so late. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:44, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Date, length, hook ref all verified. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 23:58, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Bach cantata for the Sunday is nominated above. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:22, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here it is, ready to go. Yoninah (talk) 00:02, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

28 February

Northern Epirote Declaration of Independence

A group of people is gathered in lines: military personel, civilians, clergy. A flag with is waving on the left and a river is seen on the background.

Created/expanded by CrazyMartini (talk), Alexikoua (talk). Self nom at 13:44, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting and clear. Length and date verified. One source in German accepted in good faith. Good to go. Aridd (talk) 21:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 19

Rizal Day

A stone pylon with two gold stars at the sides, below of which are inscribed "A Jose Rizal".

Created/expanded by Howard the Duck (talk). Self nom at 05:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Request: I suggest this appear either on June 19 (Rizal's birth), December 30 (Rizal's execution) or any date from June 15-24 (Daet's Pineapple Festival). –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 05:46, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Size and date are fine. However, the hook is unreferenced. There is a reference at the end of a paragraph containing the hook, several sentences in - this is unsatisfactory. Ideally, each sentence should be referenced; at the very least - the hook one should be. The problem is fixable, and once this is solved the article should be a "go" for DYKing. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 05:54, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't see why. On the other hand, in the case only a para has a ref, it is impossible to trust anything but the last sentence. Consider what will happen when somebody adds more content to the middle, or moves the current one around. I don't think an article with any unreferenced sentence can become a FA, and GA and DYKs require them for most sentences those days, too. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 07:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • You see, that only works if each sentence has a different reference than the previous one (such as FAs and some GAs). If I'd be reusing those two references on every sentence, it's repetitive and unsightly. Where's the DYK rule that every sentence has to be cited? The only relevant rule is rule D2 and it doesn't mention citing every sentence, especially if the entire paragraph is referenced on that/those reference/s.–HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 07:30, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just for the heck of it, I did just that, citing every sentence in the first section, and it now looks unsightly with those repetitive [1][2] after every sentence. I know we should be citing and stuff, but this is not the way to do it if there are only a few references. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 07:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Halloween

Rhacophorus vampyrus

  • ... that the tadpole of the Vampire flying frog Rhacophorus vampyrus has two fang-like hooks in its mouth?

Created by Newone (talk), Ka Faraq Gatri (talk). Nominated by Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) at 14:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment If the article meets DYK criteria, suggest moving it to Special Occasions section and keeping for Halloween. The authors of the paper on which this article is substantially based have stated that they intend to publish a separate paper on the tadpoles of this species so the move would also allow time for any material from this paper (assuming it is published in time) to be incorporated. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 16:56, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's confirmed. I agree that this should be kept for Halloween, especially as "A detailed description of the new tadpole will be published separately." which might be available by October. It's certainly an early start for the Halloween collection, does anyone think it is a problem to save it until then? SmartSE (talk) 23:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
SUPPORT waiting till Halloween, esp. if we can get a good, free picture of the scary tadpoles. --PFHLai (talk) 04:06, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've moved this as there were no objections. If someone wants to make a subpage for it, like we have for April Fools' nominations then feel free. SmartSE (talk) 12:46, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Halloween is just under 10 months away. I can't help thinking that if every vaguely ghoulish or spooky article is saved up that long, it will create a massive backlog (and a precedent for other days). After all, there are only 3-4 sessions of 6 or 7 hooks available for any particular day. Bob talk 22:26, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See also