Jump to content

Wikipedia:JSTOR

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sturunner (talk | contribs) at 02:19, 21 June 2014 (→Apply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Wikipedia Library

JSTOR
Sign up for free access access to JSTOR's online resources
(accounts available!)

This user has access to JSTOR through The Wikipedia Library.



Account Coordinator: The Interior will be approving accounts and collecting email addresses.

Wikipedia:JSTOR/Nav

JSTOR is one of the largest and most reputable journal archives in the world. This page is to facilitate signups for a pilot collaboration between the Wikimedia Foundation and JSTOR. This pilot provides free access to JSTOR's complete archive to 100 500 active editors for one year, in order to better support the most active and experienced authors of the encyclopedia. Active through June 2015. - see blog post.

Note that some universities provide free alumni access.

To get access

  1. You will need to be an active editor. If you haven't been particularly active lately, preference may be given to another request.
  2. You will need to have a confirmed email address, and be willing to provide this address to someone from the Foundation and to JSTOR (unlike Wikipedia, JSTOR access requires email). Ocaasi is the current contact.
  3. You will need to sign up here, with access given out in the order of signups. Please sign up even if the 500 person limit has been reached, so that overall interest can be measured and we can get a waitlist started. Before you post a request, please check on this page to see whether you already have access through your local public library and/or educational institution.

Please be aware

  • If you are given access but fail to register an account within a reasonable time, you may be asked to relinquish it to another requester.
  • There is no minimum usage requirement, but if you're not really using your account and you're willing to give it to another person on the list, please let the Foundation contact know.
  • You will need to abide by the JSTOR Terms of Service, and should be comfortable with the fine print in the JSTOR Privacy Policy.

Requirements

  • You do not have free online access to these JSTOR products through your local library or university
  • You have your preferences enabled to receive email messages on English Wikipedia; (see Special:Preferences)
  • You have an account that is a minimum of 1 year old
  • You have a minimum of 1000 edits to the encyclopedia
  • You are active in medical content generation, research, and/or verification work

Expectations

Approved editors may
  • Search, view, retrieve, and display portions of restricted content
  • Electronically save portions of restricted content
  • Print out single copies of portions of restricted content
  • Comply with any terms and conditions which appear on the particular pages of the JSTOR website they are accessing
Approved editors will not
  • Share their account logins or passwords with others
  • Mass scrape or mass download JSTOR content
  • Systematically make printed or electronic copies of multiple extracts of restricted content available for any purpose
  • Datamine metadata without permission, in order, for instance, to use metadata for auto-created stub articles
  • Use the access provided through the Pilot for any commercial purpose
Private and confidential information
  • You will need to have a confirmed email address to participate. You understand and agree that your name and email address may be shared with representatives of the Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia Library, and JSTOR. While representatives of the Wikipedia Library are volunteers (not employees or contractors of the Wikimedia Foundation or JSTOR), they have signed confidentiality agreements with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to the personal information they may handle for the Wikipedia Library.

Citation

  • Editors should always provide original citation information, in addition to linking a JSTOR article, per WP:V and WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT
  • Editors should not provide bare links to non-free JSTOR pages
  • Editors should note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
Example
<ref>{{cite web |title=National implementation committee approves funds for Swami Vivekananda values' education project |url=http://www.questia.com/doc/1P3-2131107461.html# |publisher=US Fed News Service, Including US State News |accessdate=14 April 2012 |month=September |year=2010}} {{Subscription required |via=[[JSTOR]]}}</ref>
  • "National implementation committee approves funds for Swami Vivekananda values' education project". US Fed News Service, Including US State News. 2010. Retrieved 14 April 2012. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)  – via JSTOR (subscription required)

Apply

# Add your username, active areas on Wikipedia, and how you would use access to JSTOR.

  1. For further featured material (articles/lists) and no, I have no access to JSTOR material. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:53, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. For featured and good articles as well as filling out current coverage. I only have access to JSTOR material through an hour or so drive to a university. At the price of gas now, that's $40 or so a trip. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. For featured articles. I have no access to JSTOR, and have missed it sorely in the past. --Noleander (talk) 17:59, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. For work primarily on Mesoamerican articles, both GAs and FAs and adding new content generally. I have no JSTOR access and it is a constant frustration. Simon Burchell (talk) 18:02, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. I do not have access to the JSTOR site. But a fellow editor (will disclose name to contacts if requested) was gracious enoughr to mail me the PDFs I requested, which he told me he acquired through a professor he knew. I Googled jstor domain to find links which I appear to be useful from the abstract or name and mail it to him. The process took about 3 weeks due to non-availability of his friend professor. I contribute to FAs, GAs and DYKs generally realated to Hinduism and India. --Redtigerxyz Talk 18:06, 4 April 2012 (UTC) Update: No access. This wikipedia editor is inactive.--Redtigerxyz Talk 05:50, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. I don't have JSTOR access. I would use it for reviewing and writing if I had it. - Dank (push to talk) 18:39, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    I see that JSTOR may start contacting people about access. I'm still interested. - Dank (push to talk) 17:32, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I do not have access to the JSTOR site. But the extracts I've found have been extremely useful to my articles and I've lost count of how many times I've wished I could access it fully as a resource. I'd love for it to be available to all wikipedia editors and believe it would be invaluable for anybody who requests it in article writing. I would use it for a whole diversity of articles. Today I wished to read the entire article it had on Salomon Schweigger which if I had been able to access it no doubt the article would be more comprehensive.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yes please. I was doing an article just now where a paper in JSTOR clearly had an article full of relevant information. I often get that. Frustrating. Wish I could see the papers. I start a lot of articles (over 2,000 so far) often on academic topics and have no library access. Aymatth2 (talk) 19:32, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. I would love to have JSTOR to help me write Good and Featured articles. I have often bumped up against the lack of access. Binksternet (talk) 20:35, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. My featured articles often require me to beg and borrow JSTOR access from all and sundry (my college doesn't remember me so it's daughter's university, friendly fellow-editors etc). I'd give a lot for my own direct access, especially to music journals. Brianboulton (talk) 20:38, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. I don't have access to JSTOR; my article writing has fallen off as of late - access to JSTOR as a resource will help...Modernist (talk) 20:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Editor since 2007. Write FA and GA quality articles with a technical leaning. JSTOR is good for papers on the history of technology, and I have frequently found the need for JSTOR retrievals, but have no access except through others. If I had access myself it would speed the process up no end and would encourage the retrieval of not-so-obvious sources. If I am given an account, I undertake to make myself available at WP:LIBRARY for the benefit of others. SpinningSpark 21:08, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. I have no direct access to JSTOR and am frequently frustrated when google throws up juicy-looking first pages of articles on my major interests, opera and architecture, e.g. this one, discovered today, on a leading music critic with a rather short WP article. --GuillaumeTell 21:15, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. I have no access to JSTOR and have to go through Wikipedia's resource exchange when I need an article, and although people are always extremely helpful there, it's only fair to use the service judiciously. It would be wonderful to have full access, particularly in the areas of history and politics. I've been editing for over seven years, and focus mainly on writing content (creating and improving), including 10 featured articles. SlimVirgin (talk) 22:45, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. I had access to JSTOR through my University, but I haven't been a student in almost a year because of illness concerns, so I longer have access. JSTOR can be extremely useful for some of the historical journals they have of harder to get biographies. If I go back to studies, I will disactivate the JSTOR account so another editor can use it. Secret account 23:01, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Removing for now because I am getting trial free access, also I think for a year, through "Alumni Oxford" - NOTE: All Oxford alumni should be able to get this& it comes through straight away. No JSTOR access, which would be extremely useful for my work on art history articles. 10 FAs, 189 DYKs, & over 100,000 edits on en:wp, many on subjects with relatively poor book coverage. Johnbod (talk) 00:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    See talk: Oxford have told me alumni access is extended indefinitely - check your college as over 50 now offer free alumni access. Johnbod (talk) 12:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Editor since 2007, sysop since 2009, >400 DYK articles, created >2,000 articles. I'm also a Teahouse host and we're collaborating with new editors on their AfCs. I've been an Online Ambassador, but not this semester, because of my Teahouse commitment. I don't have access to JSTOR and it would be extremely helpful in so far as the articles I work on would be more comprehensive. Thank you. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:33, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Over 7 years on the English Wikipedia with over 40,000 edits; I do not have access to JSTOR, and would use it to find reliable sources for music and literature related articles. —Bruce1eetalk 05:11, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. editor since 2003, 30+ FAs, lack of journal access a continual problem, makes FAC so much harder Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Editor since 2006 (47,000 edits) Access needed for my work on arts related and women's history articles [1]. It's very frustrating that Jstor doesn't allow individual subscription at the moment and I have no institutional access. Voceditenore (talk) 08:35, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Editor since 2005 with over 60,000 edits; I have no access to JSTOR and would like to use one for history and politics articles. –HTD 19:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Since joining, I have spent a small fortune on books and for access to papers for Virus-related and other articles. The quality of my contributions would be enhanced if I had access. Graham Colm (talk) 17:19, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Editor since 2006, 40,000 edits in en:WP, 5,000 in de:WP, 2 FAs, 3 GAs in en:WP. Have come up against that paywall many times when researching articles.--JN466 00:57, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. I borrow Jstor access (which I keep to a minimum) but prefer not to. I have no access myself through a university or local library. It's almost a necessity for literature related pages. Victoria (tk) 01:51, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Editor since 2005, 19K edits in English Wikipedia and 8K edits in Commons. I have no access to JSTOR, and it would be very valuable for work on 16th-19th century artists, textiles, fashion, tapestry, and biographies of Tudor and Elizabethan people. - PKM (talk) 02:38, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. I have no access to JSTOR or any similar resource. Having it would expand my research horizons for natural disaster, meteorology, coastal sciences, and geography related topics, which are my main fields of interest on Wikipedia and in real life. I've been editing for four or five years and have contributed to (written, mostly) at least 40 pieces of featured content (not including pictures etc.) and around 100 GAs. Juliancolton (talk) 03:23, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Editor since 2007, 12,000+ edits including 1FA, 2GA, many references added to existing articles, primarily (but not exclusively) on bird-related topics. Other than abstracts, I have no access to JSTOR's articles — which would be very useful!. MeegsC | Talk 03:55, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Editor since 2008, 10k edits, 7 GAs. I've got my eye on a few series of articles, primarily food and drink, which I've already started working on and hope to progress this year. I do currently have limited JSTOR access through my girlfriend, though that runs out at the end of the month, after which I will have no access. Whilst I would find this very useful, depending on the limitations, please put me lower down the list, as some of the above (and I expect below) are exceptionally good editors who should get it before me. WormTT · (talk) 08:11, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Active in content creation and improvement for 5+ years now. No current access to JSTOR which routinely obstructs my searches for references. Warden (talk) 10:50, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. JSTOR might be the best access that could be provided for those who are looking to reference high quality articles. Four years, 18,000 edits, 3 GAs, 280 article created — all with high quality references (many from JSTOR, requested from other editors, since I have no access). Articles I've created include two on academic journals that are part of a JSTOR subscription: Willdenowia and Kew Bulletin :-). First Light (talk) 15:26, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Editor since 2009; I would be very appreciative of JSTOR access for my source reviewing for FAC. Eisfbnore (下さいて話し) 16:40, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Check out my userpage, particularly "significant contributions" and the dozens of FAs and GAs. I could make very good use of JSTOR access. Parrot of Doom 19:10, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Long time editor and admin; especially interested in JSTOR access for astronomy, technology and general sciences. Loved having it when I was at university in years past. — Huntster (t @ c) 22:58, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. I work with a lot of WP:FRINGE articles and many of these topics are difficult to source. A lot of the time we have to use substandard WP:PARITY sources to counter fringe claims and it's possible that higher quality sources would exist in JSTOR. I am not sure if my campus offers access. SÆdontalk 23:56, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. I write about ancient Egyptian religion (one FA and one GA so far, with plans for many more), and the handful of archaeological journals on JSTOR were a major help to my work. I should not be a high priority—I collected hundreds of articles in 2010 and early 2011, when I had access—but what I'm working on will take a long time, and JSTOR access sometime down the road would help me keep up with developments in Egyptology. A. Parrot (talk) 03:07, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  35. I've never had JSTOR access (since graduated but my uni never offered it), yet would love to tackle more academic-based articles; part of the reason I stick to sports is that more important figures require sources such as this. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 05:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. I do not have currently JSTOR access and would greatly appreciate the access to sources to include in the articles I work on. I've created over 90 articles here so far, including 1 GA and 36 DYKs. I have many more on my to-do list to write, and access to additional sources would be of great help. 28bytes (talk) 05:34, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. I do not have JSTOR access. I have about 45k edits, mainly in article creation and expansion in the field of biology, history and biography. Maias (talk) 06:34, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Please please please JSTOR access! I've been a Wikipedia editor since 2005, have written or expanded about 500 Wikipedia articles, especially in the area of medieval history, and am constantly running into the JSTOR roadblock. Whenever I'm talking to a friend in academia, I almost immediately start groveling for JSTOR help. Which is especially ironic because I may be writing about the topic more than they are! I was recently at an academic conference full of PhDs, and I held my own in my topic area, even though I was only "Independent Scholar" on my nametag, and not associated with a university. I run into the "JSTOR only" roadblock several times a week, and am really tired of having to beg friends to logon for me. So yes, if there's a way I could get JSTOR access, sign me up! --Elonka 20:42, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. I do not have access to JSTOR. I have created 67 articles on ancient Mesopotamian subjects (an area greatly neglected on Wikipedia) and expanded from stub status approximately the same number again, but all these articles could be significantly improved with information gleaned from this source. If access is limited, I could provide a wishlist of specific articles for someone else to obtain and forward.BigEars42 (talk) 09:57, 9 April 2012 (UTC) I would like to point out that I am now up to 89 articles, about the same number of stubs expanded and 1038 edits. I have been editing since May 1, 2011 (15 months), so I definitely deserve a place. BigEars42 (talk) 23:14, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. I do not have access at present; this would help me contribute to public policy and Middle East topics. Neotarf (talk) 18:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. This would be huge for me. In the last eight years, but mainly from 2004 to 2007, I've written several hundred articles on music before 1600, and at least half of the good material for improving them further is only available through JSTOR. I have about 100,000 edits, eight years total on the project, and over 600 articles more or less from scratch, and I've been an admin since 2005. It's very frustrating being an "Independent Scholar"; if JSTOR allowed individual subscriptions I would have bought one years ago. Antandrus (talk) 21:13, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. I do not have access to JSTOR. I work a lot on Victorian biographies, and have ODNB access: it would be helpful to supplement that with JSTOR access to follow up some of the citations in ODNB. Cusop Dingle (talk) 21:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. - I'm an autoreviewer on the English WIkipedia and I have written several articles relating to Military history and this is a topic that JSTOR could help me a lot with. I no longer have access to Credo Reference because I forgot my password and no longer have access to the email I used with Credo to retrieve it. --Ceradon talkcontribs 02:25, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. I do not have access to JSTOR, but from the bit and pieces I have seen I believe will help greatly improve wikipedia. For filling out articles and finding references for de-Orphaning, I've found getting refs quite often helps to fill out orphans and to find how they should be wiki linked to other articles. Blackash have a chat 06:36, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    JSTOR will improve the reliability of Wikipedia, and will provide ASTOR with free advertisement. User:Prosa100 User inactive. [2] Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 19:59, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. I'd definitely find it very useful in editing articles about mediæval European history and European imperialism. The preponderence of paywalled articles in these areas is very frustrating. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OwenBlacker (talk • contribs)
  46. No current access and would find it very useful, especially for articles related to Scottish history, archaeology, natural history and geology. It's especially frustrating not to be able to expand material in short articles/sections where the existing citation is paywalled and detailed material from elsewhere is hard/impossible to find. Ben MacDui 07:07, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Account since 2004, active since 2006, ~20k edits. Active in content development, particularly around WikiProject Ireland and in British/Irish areas in general. Verification and understanding of particularly complex and nuanced POV issues is a essential in the main area of my contributions. Access to a library of high-quality (and broad ranging) references such as JSTOR would be an enormous contribution to this area. I would be willing to act on behalf of others (i.e. respond to requests) in sourcing and verifying, if granted access. I don't have current access to JSTOR. --RA (talk) 11:37, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  48. I have access to jstor but only by communiting more than an hour to the closest university. JSTOR access is essential for the history articles I usually contribute and a basic source of specialized references. I use it extensively but getting hold of the necessary articles is a nuisance. Some sort of VPN access to a "trusted site" or accounts would definitely help me spped up the process of collecting references.Rowanwindwhistler (talk) 21:35, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  49. I have partial access to JSTOR (science) but that does not include the Irish Studies which would help me in the area of Irish history. I am mainly active at de-wp where I have written c. 100 articles including several with GA status (22.000+ edits in all projects since 2005). Currently, I am ordering these journal articles through interlibrary loans which in case of more obscure Irish journals can take over a month to be delivered. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:47, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  50. My JSTOR access is linked to my university for employment-related tasks, not for Wikipedia, and the diversion of public resources for private pursuits is anathema in Sweden. Furthermore, many journals covering American politics/culture and music, on which I have written c. a dozen articles in the last year, are not included in Swedish-university subscriptions to JSTOR. I don't use automated tools but still am among the top 300 editors on edit-counts in the last 2-3 years, the last time I looked. (I prefer short edits.) I have been the main contributor to one A-class article (mathematics and economics), a couple Good class articles (a US social-democrat who played an important role in two revolutions against authoritarian regimes and DGM), lots of B & C articles, 20 DYKS, etc. I've cleaned up a lot of articles dealing with US politics, Robert Fripp, Ovation guitars, etc. The last months, I've been improving the guitar tunings article, which is seen by more than 1.6 thousand persons daily; I've rewritten and finally referenced all the articles on regular tunings, generating two DYKS; the next step is to clean-up open tunings, for which JSTOR's articles on American culture and music would be helpful. My receiving access to HighBeam led to immediate extensive improvements in DGM and other articles. Thus, I may be considered worthy to pour Sandy's tea or shine PoD's shoes: After the best writers receive JSTOR, I would like to be considered for a B-team subscription.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 21:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC) 15:54, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  51. I've been editing since 2006, have about 140,000 edits, and my focus is on editing medical articles, which typically requires access to full text of journal articles. Along with resigning as FAC delegate so I could focus more on medical articles, I also have recently relocated and have no access to a medical library or to any journal databases. I have also recently begun new page patrolling of medical articles, and while I often encounter what looks like copyvio, I'm unable to doublecheck journal articles. I'd appreciate being considered for this access. Thanks! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:14, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  52. I don't have JSTOR access. If I had it I would use it for reviewing and writing new articles. I've contributed mostly to German Wikipedia since 2005 (some 14,000 edits to this day).--Aschmidt (talk) 21:48, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  53. I don't have JSTOR access but I'm really interested in it. I'm an user and administrator of the German Wikipedia. I would use the access for reviewing and writing articles. I've contributed 42,000 edits and 557 articles since 2006. My interests are mainly in pop culture, criminal history and some historical themes. --Gripweed (talk) 22:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  54. I have not had access to JSTOR since leaving University in 2008, and would find access to it invaluable for checking references in existing Wikipedia articles. I'm an admin in the English Wikipedia with 90,000 edits. I contribute articles mostly on New Zealand topics but I fact check on a wide range of articles.-gadfium 04:08, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  55. I don't have JSTOR access. Editor in de-wp since 2007, 2 FAs, some 70 new articles with a focus on language and social history. Also editing on help and request pages. --Aalfons (talk) 08:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  56. I don't have JSTOR access. Editor since 2004, mainly on history and biography of technology articles. Over 1500 edits. Apwoolrich (talk) 09:19, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Editing since 2004, 100K+ edits. Focus on science articles, especially geology and geography. No access to JSTOR - retired and live out in the boonies. Vsmith (talk) 17:07, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Editor since 2003, 240,000 edits and 8,000 article creations. I mostly work on history, and the main issue in my work is how to improve old encyclopedia material. JSTOR access would be ideal for that: hits on JSTOR pages come up all the time as I do searches. I have very good library access (University Library in Cambridge) but it does not come with JSTOR because I don't have the necessary email address. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:33, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  59. I like JSTOR's preview of page one of most articles but every fact I need to check is on page two. So access would be handy, but I'm also looking forward to the arrival of the arbiters of "need and merit" - that should be excellent fun. Yomanganitalk 15:56, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  60. I work on visual arts articles, and in my research I frequently encounter JSTOR links for art journals and other information. I have no access, and it would be extremely useful to have it. I've been editing for 7 years, and have made over 200,000 edits. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 06:56, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Editor since 2006 (50K edits, over 600 new pages) mostly working on history and other humanities subjects. Have good university library access but currently no JSTOR without a university email account.Dsp13 (talk) 09:36, 19 April 2012 (UTC) Have gained academic access in the interim.Dsp13 (talk) 22:12, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Dsp has academic access but it's not complete, so I restored him in the list per email discussion with him. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 19:59, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Wow, I would be very happy to get access to Jstor. I am working on Lepidoptera species and bump into good sources behind the Jstor paywall on a daily basis. I am active on English wikipedia since April 2006 and have 122,300 edits. I have no access to Jstor myself. Ruigeroeland (talk) 12:34, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  63. I have no JSTOR access but would be interested in for my de.WP article work.--Ziko (talk) 13:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  64. —DerHexer (Talk) 14:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC) Editor since 2005; sysop on German and English Wikipedia, steward, oversight, and sysop on Meta Wiki; 250'000 edits; 900'000 sysop actions; one featured and one good article (dozens written with main topic antiquity), three featured pictures (thousands uploaded); after having finished my Master thesis in summer 2012 I will not anylonger have access to journal archives.[reply]
  65. I have no access to JSTOR, and would find it very useful when working on the subjects related to Russia.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 19, 2012; 15:11 (UTC)
    No JSTOR access, around 4750 edits. Tomtomn00 (talk • contributions) 16:34, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  66. I generally contribute to historical articles, predominantly, but not restricted to the Arab-Israeli conflict. I do not have access to JSTOR or any other scholarly journals (other than requests via WP:RX), so this would be a big help and would greatly improve my editing contributions. Dlv999 (talk) 10:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  67. I contribute to a number of historical and specialist articles that require access to academic sources, and this would be very useful.
    Best Wishes Ankh.Morpork 15:12, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  68. I contribute to middle east history articles and like to improve the quality of the references--Shrike (talk) 16:40, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  69. As a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, I frequently end up working on a very wide variety of articles, which quite often includes a lot of citation fixing, and confirmation, this would be an invaluable resource for many of the obscure articles I often find myself involved in. -- Despayre  tête-à-tête 17:42, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  70. I contribute in a wide range of topic areas including biographies of scientists and Quakers, Arab countries, the Israel-Palestine conflict, and history thereof. I have written several articles which are just short of GA standard, so JSTOR access wouldd be a great help to bring them up to that standard. Havingg said that, if only only 2 or 3 accounts are going to become available, there are plenty of editors above with a better claim than me.--NSH001 (talk) 17:54, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  71. I wrote lots of GAs and FAs while I had access to JSTOR. Now that I don't, I try to soldier on, but the editing process is a lot harder. This would be highly appreciated! Lampman (talk) 05:32, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  72. I have no access to JSTOR. It would be a significant advantage to my reviewing and writing work on WP. Tony (talk) 14:43, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  73. I would like to have access to JSTOR to check content for copyvio or close paraphrasing and to have access to some books.--GoPTCN 16:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  74. I edit a wide range of pharmacology and medicine related articles but I am often stuck to having to rely on brief abstracts for adding content. Access to JSTOR would make my life a whole lot easier editing here on wikipedia. I would be most appreciative to be given access to this resource. :-)--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 11:27, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  75. As a medical student just before graduation, I'm frequently editing articles on medicine-related topics; I'm also editing history-related ones. The JSTOR access, which I now don't have an easy access to, would speedy the writing of articles and especially help in having them sourced. I'm an experienced user with an administrator status and tens of thousands of edits here and in the Slovene Wikipedia, where I've recently started the WikiProject Medicine. --Eleassar my talk 17:05, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  76. No access, I am handicapped so I cannot use University or State libraries any more. As former State Librarian I would know how to make the best out of JSTOR. I am engaged within the German Wikipedia community in Oceanic affairs (2 portals) (ethnography, history, languages and literatures, social developpment), also in Brazil (ethnies, literature - in portuguese), last subject are the Arts (portal), wide range. Kind regards, --Emeritus (talk) 15:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Local access unavailable. I edit many subjects, but mostly law and art-related subjects. Many times searches on Google Scholar for citations on esoterica turn up JSTOR items only, so access would be quite helpful to me as an editor. — Sctechlaw (talk) 08:29, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  78. I frequently need access to articles held on JSTOR, for research and verification purposes. Mainly in Middle East related areas, but also for other articles which I edit. I have no access to a university library or other subscriber. RolandR (talk) 10:38, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  79. I'd be interested to use JSTOR for verification and extension of existing articles as well as writing new ones. I'm primarily active in the fields of mathematics, biographies, history and movies, but essentially I edit in any area where there is need for improvement and I have reliable sources at hand. Since I'm not associated with a university anymore I depend primarily on my own bookshelf, Google Books, Open Access Journals and (free) online material of universities, so JSTOR access would be a great help, since many important journal publications are not available for free online.--Kmhkmh (talk) 05:35, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  80. It would be an excellent resource both for content reviewing and for some of my edits on medical and geopolitical topics. Nageh (talk) 16:13, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  81. For biographical and historical data. Thank you. — Ched :  ?  10:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  82. I would be very interested in this. While I currently have access through my university, I will loose this once I graduate which will be within few months. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 16:13, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
  83. I'd be interested. I've been a fixture for quite some time at a project to reference (or, where necessary, send toward deletion) unreferenced biographies. There are a few categories of such biographies that have been particularly problematic for the effort, one being academics, particularly in fields such as science that don't get mainstream coverage. Many decisions about biographical exclusion or inclusion (err, whether or not to delete a biography) end up getting made on the basis of estimated h-index, often with no editors having actually gotten more than Google Scholar snippets to view in terms of the research that the subject has done, or the research that cites or discusses that subject. This is a problem. As a result, I feel that folks such as myself, as well as regulars at WP:AFD and article sourcing efforts, might be able to make constructive use of such a tool. No existing access, 20K+ edits, admin. --joe deckertalk to me 19:50, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  84. I regularly find that refs relevant to my article construction work are behind the JSTOR paywall, so access would help me improve WP further.  —SMALLJIM  18:11, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  85. I find myself frequently having to pester the good folks at WP:RX, as well as individuals whom I know have JSTOR access, in order to track down sources. Those are used for all sorts of purposes, ranging from creating new articles (I have at present an FA and a few GAs to my name, all more or less solo efforts), through to validation of and additions to sourced content. The verification bit is particularly important as I deal primarily in the India-related sphere and there are often issues regarding English language comprehension that cause academic articles to be unwittingly misrepresented. - Sitush (talk) 10:06, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Editor since 2006 with nearly 40K edits and I am generalist and need as Jstor will be excellent resource for improving ,research and verification purposes.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:06, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  87. I have been an editor since 2008, with 6,218 edits. I primarily edit on articles relating to ethnic groups; JSTOR would help me improve the articles further as academic journals tend to be more up-to-date with present circumstances regarding human rights etc. Furthermore, I tend to write the history, culture (including language(s), religion(s)) and demographics of ethnic groups. Thus, my research is quite extensive. However, at the moment, as I do not have access to an online system which archives academic journals, I cannot improve and expand the articles as much as I would wish to. Having access to JSTOR would also mean that I could verify whether citations are being used and quoted properly. Turco85 (Talk) 10:08, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  88. I focus on GA quality articles and access to JSTOR is very crucial in creating such article. Currently I get access through friends but it would be very convenient for me to have access directly so that I can do my own research without troubling my friends. Kanatonian (talk) 21:22, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  89. I'm starting to believe that I need that access: within a week I had to ask somebody in IRC three times to check something for me. And I don't believe that this situation will change. mabdul 09:36, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Recently I found some very good articles in JSTOR, but I could not read properly since I did not have full access. If it is possible to get access for free or small amount, it'll be helpful for me in writing and improving articles and in my GA reviews (or for the articles I/we are preparing for GA/FA)! --Tito Dutta ✉ 00:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  91. I already have identified a number of specific sources I would like to use to expand an article. There are a lot of high quality papers (especially about mathematics) which can only be accessed via JSTOR, so this would be very beneficial for Wikipedia. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 16:53, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  92. A library account in my area does not include JSTOR access. I used already some older documents from JSTOR (free access) which are great resources as references, or to verify claims from others. I would improve my content work on WP if JSTOR access was available. Thanks, SchreyP (messages) 21:00, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  93. My local library doesn't provide me with JSTOR access. Until now, I always had to ask someone else to send me articles. If possible, I would like to be able to access the articles myself. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:53, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Ich habe keine Zugang zu JSTOR. Ich bin seit 2005 Autor in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia und habe über 50.000 Edits. Liesel (talk) 11:36, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  95. I work in the redaction Biology in German Wikipedia. I discovered a gender gap between female and male botanists and so I compiled a list of female botanists, who have no lemma in German wikipedia. Jstor access would help me to get easier established informations about their life and scientific work. I have about 8000 edits since 2007. I have no access to Jstor --Belladonna2 (talk) 22:35, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Im am writing especially about botany in the German WP including featured articles. Unfortunately I have no access to JSTOR, which would help to get most recent data. --IKAl (talk) 16:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  97. I am writing in the German WP, my local library doesn't provide me with JSTOR access. I have more than 39,000 edits in articles and have written several featured articles in the German WP. Admin in the German WP since 2006. --Benowar (talk) 20:38, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Yes yes yes yes yes. --IShadowed 02:22, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Im an author in the German WP (over 30.000 edits, several featured articles) an some of my working fiels are botany, biology (biotechnology) and sometimes veterinary medicine (especially cat dieseases). A JSTOR account would be a great assistance for article research in this fields. Martin Bahmann (talk) 11:14, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Active in the English and German Wikipedia, (>50.000 edits, ~50 featured articles), no access to JSTOR though it would be of great use for me writing articles in biology. Denis Barthel (talk) 16:13, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  101. My content work is often in very arcane places, such as the history of the Ainu people, and there are very, very few readily available resources. I used to have JSTOR access as a student, but I'm a year out of school now and I've found many situations where I would have greatly benefited from it. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:57, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  102. I edit primarily in Greek and Roman history and literature and find that our coverage of these topics is often horribly hindered by our reliance upon public domain sources which don't present the great advances of the past 100 years. A JSTOR subscription would greatly facilitate my efforts here, and I have, even in cases where I've accessed articles in hard copy, always been sure to include a stable JSTOR link in my citation templates.  davidiad.: 02:32, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  103. JSTOR would be enormously useful for some of the older film articles that I have started working on, since it provides excellent analysis and lots of information that really improves the comprehensiveness of the article. I am not yet in any institution, and the one I am planning to join does not have access to JSTOR, so this would be really helpful to me. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 10:53, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Yes, please. No access to JSTOR through local library or institutions is available. Active editor with 23k edits. This would be a plus. Thanks. Best regards, Cindy(talk to me) 11:16, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Absolutely - I have great difficulty finding sources at the moment for the topics I am most interested in. This would literally increase my editing rate by one and a half orders of magnitude. Egg Centric 11:20, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  106. I'm active in creating and expanding articles related to different sports and multi-sport events specially Asian and Commonwealth Games (also the coordinator of WikiProject Multi-sport events). I've created five featured lists, five GAs and some 27 DYKs. I need JSTOR account because there are a very few sources available for said topics (especially related to third world). Besides that, I'm also active on Hindi Wikipedia (sysop) where also I'm a regular contributor to featured articles, lists and DYKs. — Bill william comptonTalk 12:24, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  107. I enjoy writing Featured Articles. --Dweller (talk) 12:32, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  108. I'm an active contributor since 2004 with over 88,000 edits in several wikipedias and the Commons. I have no acces to JSTOR. Such an access would be very useful for my research in creating and expanding biology articles. JoJan (talk) 13:08, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  109. I don't currently have access to JSTOR, thanks to unpaid library fines (I swear I returned the book, they swear I didn't), so this would be quite useful -- I used my library access quite a bit while it was available. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:30, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  110. I edit actively in many subjects that are underrepresented in Wikipedia, related to women's history, fine art history, and regional history. JSTOR has in the past (when I was a student) proved invaluable to that type of coverage, and can continue to be invaluable if I am able to be provided complimentary access. I was awarded a HighBeam account, and I use it frequently, as well, as prove of concept :) Sarah (talk) 13:33, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Have/Had this when I was a student at UTEP, and it made research into a good many things of interest to me just so much easier. I note for the record that I am on here in a limited (very limited?) capacity these days, but the signpost page said to sign up if we were interested so they could gauge editor interest, so here I am :) TomStar81 (Talk) 14:24, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  112. If indeed only 100 slots are available, I do not want one -- others have a greater need. If, however, the number is increased, I would be most interested. I do a lot of research connected with WP:DRN, and this would help a lot. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:42, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  113. I've got 160 article starts or something like that and am in the top 1500 most active (3/4 edits to mainspace), no access to JSTOR, and write frequently on esoteric topics related to the history and politics of the period 1880 or so to 1930 or so. Access to the journals Labor History, the former Soviet Studies, American Historical Review, etc. would be quite helpful. I've found the very limited content of HiBeam to be of extremely limited use outside of AfD debates, for what it's worth. Carrite (talk) 15:25, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Interested, but only if everyone else on this list is given priority over me. I'd definitely appreciate the full access to this wealth of information. Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 16:22, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  115. I currently have no access to JSTOR, have not edited much recently, and, if given access, will use it for fact-checking and point-making in content disputes. In truth, I will probably read it mostly for recreation and the advance of my own knowledge, from time to time sharing pertinent ideas with Wikipedia. I edit in religion, theology, Biblical studies, and philosophy, and already have a lot of the Philosophy Documentation Center collection/Poiesis (on my own dime!, and it's not cheap), along with limited access to Project Muse (whenever I'm at the House of Studies and not on assignment, which should be again in about a year or two). I don't know if JSTOR contains more journals that are relevant to my disciplines of interest. Hey, I'm honest. St John Chrysostom Δόξατω Θεώ 16:52, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  116. I edit articles related to astronomy and astrophysics, and in particular astrobiology/extraterrestrial intelligence/extrasolar planet articles, although I do edit in other areas of astronomy as well. I would like a JSTOR account because JSTOR publishes the Journal of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, which provides a wealth of information about these topics which I have at times wanted to access. Access to paid sources is all the more important for topics where the vast majority of literature is non-free, such as my article "Cultural impact of extraterrestrial contact." Such is the case in many areas of astrobiology and SETI research. I hope Wikipedia is willing to expand this program to other journals later on. I'm not the most prolific user (I've only made ten articles, including 1 GA and 1 DYK, and I only have ~2,200 edits and 6 months of experience on Wikipedia) but I think that access to JSTOR will help me to add and improve articles in fields which are underrepresented on Wikipedia. Wer900 • talk • coordinationconsensus defined 17:54, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  117. I have no easy access and that results in no access for me. I would add many more citations if I did have access. I live in a major metropolitan area but still it would take me 90 minutes roundtrip to access a library. I have a history of adding content from scholarly sources to Wikipedia and am familiar with JSTOR. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  118. I have no JSTOR access in London, and have long wanted it. I have 45k contributions over 6 years, and often try to improve poorly-cited pages on varied areas including Biblical, Islamic and South Asian topics. Zechariah ben Jehoiada is an example where I could only get the first page from JSTOR without an account. However, I'm currently doing as much on WP admin as contributing, so some of the applications above carry more weight than mine. – Fayenatic London 22:26, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  119. If the number gets bumped up, I could really use JSTOR. After I got HighBeam access, JSTOR became one of the top bottlenecks for me in adding references to articles. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 00:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  120. If the number is bumped up or others are for whatever reason not granted access/withdraw their requests, I could definitely use JSTOR access. I used to contribute more heavily to articles of specific interest but have lately been doing more general clean up. JSTOR would be great for finding reliable sources, general fact checking, and improving upon references used on articles. Instead of either just labeling something as lacking sources or removing it if it seemed questionable I could go find real sources and make the updates myself. For a while now my main strategy is to just hit the random article link and start fixing things, so I would have a wide area of impact. Tagging alone only goes so far. I would probably also do sweeps through history, medical and psychology topics, which are all areas that seem to in general need more work. DreamGuy (talk) 00:49, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Would be quite useful. Courcelles 02:31, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  122. I could definitely use JSTOR access as it would help me references on Wikipedia.  TOW  talk  03:40, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Would be a great compliment to Credo. James (Talk • Contribs) • 4:28pm • 06:28, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  124. I am fairly active with over 20K edits, and would find the access exceedingly useful to verify claims made in articles. Thanks. Collect (talk) 11:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  125. I find that, when editing Wikipedia, I am reading a JSTOR summary about three times a week, but this seldom carries the material needed for the reference. The most recent occasion was today, while seeking to sort out the {{clarify me}} requested in this edit; eventually I found and added the doi for the relevant JSTOR page, but I can't actually read it myself. My edit count is currently >45,000. My email address was authenticated in 2008. --Old Moonraker (talk) 16:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  126. I have never used JSTOR but I apparently have access at the college library I go to a lot. But they tend to limit my time on the computer there.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:21, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  127. I have been active since 2005 and improved many articles, portals, projects, etc. I would find JSTOR access very helpful as I regularly run across references which I could add if I only had access to JSTOR. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:33, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  128. You can pass by me this time around, but if more accounts become available in the future, I'd like to be considered. (Admin, but temporarily more active at Commons than here.) --Philosopher Let us reason together. 02:14, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  129. I am a new editor and have over 1600 edits. I write extensively on Indian culture, cuisine, costumes and everything that is not otherwise covered by the tech loving geeks. I had JSTOR access in university but, now I don't and I really miss having it. If you could give me an account, it would be awesome! thanks :) Noopur28 (talk) 04:33, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Over 20000 edits in 8 & bit years on Wikipedia, including a couple of Good Articles and some involvement in a couple of FAs, Would love to have access to JSTOR to complement the other material I can access. Cheers. --Roisterer (talk) 05:10, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  131. In the last 2 years I've created more than 40 articles -- none of them stubs -- and expanded more than 100. I write and edit mostly about the Indians and the Spanish and French explorers of the American Southwest, including northern Mexico. See my most recent project "Agriculture in the prehistoric Southwest" for an example of the work I do. Having JSTOR readily available would be a big help. Smallchief (talk) 10:22, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  132. To assist with reviewing GA articles which use JSTOR for sources. SilkTork ✔Tea time 12:38, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  133. I've made over 42,000 edits in Wikipedia including 8 GAs. Most of my articles involve a great deal of academic research. But though I've made extensive searches in Wikipedia and tried to get hold of the best books on the subject, lack of access to JSTOR has been a severe drawback for me. There has been many a time when a Google search had led me to a JSTOR site containing the exact article that I might need only to find that I had permission only to view the first page. JSTOR is almost indispensable for me - almost desperate for access.-RaviMy Tea Kadai 17:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  134. I've created around 500 artist bio articles (and referenced about as many unreferenced artist stubs) and use mostly online open access sources. I keep to the 15th-19th centuries because whenever I stray from these areas I get into copyright problems. With JSTOR access I would be able to make contributions for artists born after 1850. I contribute both to the English Wikipedia and to Wikimedia Commons. No GA's, but a couple of DYK's. Jane (talk) 05:58, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  135. It would be an important source for research. Alexander Tendler (talk) 19:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Just put me down on the waiting list. Other editors seem to have a much greater need than me, as I can usually get people to access JSTOR for me, but having JSTOR access myself would make life easier. --Avenue (talk) 05:52, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  137. JSTOR access would be a great boon for me for my own writing, helping others find sources and for verification.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 17:01, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Put me on the waiting list. I would use JSTOR occasionally, though, who knows, I might find it an adventure playground and fecund seedbed for my historical interests. Richard Keatinge (talk) 19:48, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  139. I find myself regularly running into the JSTOR wall when I need references for articles I am editing. Argos'Dad 20:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Regular contributor to articles, would like JSTOR for research. Over 18,000 edits and over 3,000 articles created. Thine Antique Pen 15:33, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  141. I've regularly found JSTOR articles that I'd like to use, but can't due to the paywall. For some reason, authors never seem to put the pertinent information on the sample page... Yunshui 雲‍水 10:05, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  142. See User:Melchoir/Articles for my contributions, including a couple FAs. I still have partial SpringerLink access, but I've lost JSTOR access, and it does slow me down. Getting it back would be tremendous! Melchoir (talk) 09:52, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  143. A number of topics I often contribute to would be assisted by JSTOR access, including math articles and articles on ancient Greek drama, and possibly some tree of life articles. My DYK lists are probably the best evidence of the types of articles I typically work on, including several that eventually went to GA, FA or FL. User:Rlendog/DYK, User:Rlendog/DYK2, User:Rlendog/DYK3. Rlendog (talk) 20:37, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Focusing mostly on biological and paleontological articles, mostly quite obscure subjects and difficult to find outside of journals. 20k edits over about 2 years. I don't know if it's justified though as WP:RX seems to suit me fine for now, so please give preference to others first.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 15:18, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Active since 2005 in german wp, ~24.000 edits de, ~40,000 edits global, topics: biology (insecta, lepidoptera) --Olei (talk) 19:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Active since 2004. More than 25,000 edits chiefly pertaining to the history, culture, and politics of Georgia, the Caucasus, and the Middle East. Started >1,000 new articles. With no access to JSTOR, I'm in a permanent need of many articles it holds.--KoberTalk 10:45, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Editor since 2004 mostly on German Wikipedia, more than 32,000 edits. Focusing mostly on architectural and historic topics, especially French Renaissance, a JSTOR access would be of great use for me. -- Sir Gawain (talk) 21:06, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  148. I have been an editor for almost three years and have more than 8000 edits. I am active in creating and editing articles on a variety of subjects including history, historical biographies, science, geography, photography, civil rights and music. My biggest impediment to contributing more substantially is lack of access to good research material. -- MrX 03:47, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  149. I have been an active editor since March 2009, and have made over 2,500 edits. I work mostly in expanding and providing sources for Roman and Byzantine articles. There have been many occasions when access to a JSTOR article would have been of enormous help during this process. Oatley2112 (talk) 10:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  150. I have been active for more than five years, have 58,000 edits, and have written hundreds of articles, mainly on biblical topics. This would be very useful for accessing religious academic journals. StAnselm (talk) 12:36, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Savidan (talk · contribs) Editor since December 2005. >50,000 edits. I recently graduated from law school and thus no longer have access to all the free resources that I used to. I used to use JSTOR all the time for Wikipedia. Savidan 17:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  152. I spend a lot of my wiki time checking sources JSTOR would be great. J8079s (talk) 19:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  153. I have been around for over 6 years now, with 15,000+ edits. I write mostly about topics related to South Asia and Southeast Asia. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 07:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  154. I coordinate the Israeli WikiProject regarding Beta Israeli heritage and Ethiopian history. Many relevant articles are only accessible via JSTOR. Thanks, ליאור • Lior (talk) 07:19, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  155. I'm an active content creator/'expander' of sorts out here. I've worked on DYKs, GAs, and others in the past and have 17k+ edits. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:21, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  156. I have been for over 3 years now, have 14,000+ edits on Ukrainian Wikipedia, member of the Board of Wikimedia Ukraine, coordinate some Wikimedian Projects, for example, collaboration with 2 Ukrainian universities. There a lot of sources about Ukraine and Ukrainian history on JSTOR that needed for writing good articles. --Kharkivian (talk) 13:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  157. I am active since 2010, over 24,000 edits on zhwiki (3 FAs, 1 FL, 2 GAs, 95 DYKs). And 4,500 edits on enwiki, with 90 articles created. I need access to sources to create and expand chemistry and astronomy articles. --MakecatTalk 01:27, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  158. I have been on Wikipedia 6 years and 30 days. I have made 19,443 edits. I often check for references to add to articles especially those up for deletion if such things can't be found. This would thus be useful to me. I am an active member of the Article Rescue Squadron. Dream Focus 02:41, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  159. I make articles on mathematics in the french part of wikipedia and i have more 5000 edits in mathematics. The most notable article is on the Riemann zeta function. It will be very useful to have access to JSTOR.Claudeh5-fr (talk) 09:11, 17 August 2012 (UTC) http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_Utilisateur:Claudeh5[reply]
  160. I've a total of 35000+ edits on all wikis with 5000+ edits on Hindi Wikipedia and 2000+ edits on English Wikipedia. I've created about 58 new articles on Hindi Wikipedia. I require more sources for articles on both English and Hindi Wikipedia. Editor since 2011. Hindustanilanguage (talk).
  161.  Buaidh  – 124,235 edits and counting – 14:55, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Elitre (talk · contribs · count) I used to access JSTOR at my University library until 2006 and loved it, but I live elsewhere and right now can't access it anymore, so I am requesting an account for my activity on it.wiki. > 20,000 edits there (> 6700 in ns0) in 6 years, major contributor of a FA (1, 2, article stats), user of "Progetto Cococo" (local WikiProject Copyright Cleanup), sysop, OTRS agent. No personal access to reference works except for Credo/HighBeam: I am going to notify the Italian community the same way I did for those accounts, enabling some Italian fellows to get theirs: also, we have a list there so that we can help users with no access. --Elitre (talk) 16:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Auric (talk · contribs · count) I admit I don't use JSTOR often, because important information is not available, or is only available in the google summary. With access, I would certainly use it more often. 8 years with 27904 contributions.Auric (talk) 03:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Fred Bauder (talk · contribs · count) Often encounter the JSTOR paywall. User:Fred Bauder Talk 10:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  165. User:Marokwitz. More than 14,000 edits on Wikipedia, active for over 6 years. Main research interests include terrorism, military history, history of the middle east. Marokwitz (talk) 10:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  166. The Land (talk) 11:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC) - would be immensely useful in researching more articles on naval history (and other topics)[reply]
  167. Sabrebd (talk · contribs) - active on Wikipedia for over three years with over 35,000 edits, including work towards 15 good articles in the areas of history, children's literature and music. Ability to research on articles would be extremely useful.--SabreBD (talk) 21:32, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  168. valepert (talk · contribs · count) requesting an account for my activity on it.wiki. sysop with > 88,000 edits in 6 years, user of "Progetto Cococo" (italian equivalent for WikiProject Copyright Cleanup), I have Credo and HighBeam accounts. --valepert (talk) 19:30, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Cynwolfe (talk · contribs) Used to have JSTOR access and lost it two or three years ago. I'd walk on hot coals to have it again. Since registering in 2006, I've created more than 260 articles and have more than 20,000 edits. I'm active with WikiProject Classical Greece & Rome, and mainly work on articles about the ancient world and mythology. Also European artists and art history, history of scholarship, and the 19th century in Europe and the U.S. Used to be active with WikiProject Women's History, and JSTOR access would help me return to it. Cynwolfe (talk) 02:43, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Carlstak (talk · contribs) Have been editing English Wikipedia since one year ago today. I've made over 2100 edits, created several articles, and added content to a couple hundred. I'm interested in an eclectic variety of subjects, especially history, most particularly that of Spain. Member of WikiProject Spain. Having access to JSTOR's scholarly articles would be immensely useful to my background reading, research, verification, and content writing. Carlstak (talk) 22:24, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Miniapolis (talk · contribs) Registered editor since 2007, with over 9,000 edits. I have just been approved for a Credo Reference account, but have no JSTOR access from my local library. Miniapolis (talk) 17:49, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Spanglej (talk · contribs) No current access. Editor since Feb 2009 with over 15k edits mostly adding poetry content and biography creation/ expansion. Thanks Span (talk) 18:02, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Template:Peter cohen Editor since 2007. I have access to and have used Credo through my local library but do not have access to the other subscription resources on offer vis Wikipedia and am applying for all of these. JSTOR is the one of which I'm most aware as I have often come up against paywalls managed by JSTOR. I have created 17 articles mainly on subjects related to classical music or opera. Seven of these, generally the most recent, have been to dyk, three are now at GA or FL level. My 12K edits also involve getting another article to GA on my own and co-operating on getting a second article I did not create to FA status and a third to GA. With better resources, I would look at getting more material to featured or good status either on my own or in collaboration.--Peter cohen (talk) 19:06, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  174. I've been editing for more than 5 years, mostly on the Wikipedia in Italian (I created 146 new articles there). I focus on and add referenced contents to linguistics, ancient history, music and literature related articles, with almost 55.000 edits on it.wiki (see my record). Access to JSTOR would be great for my referenced editing and content generation. (I got Credo and HighBeam accounts already). --Pequod76 (talk-ita.esp.eng) 02:26, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Mehdiabbasi (talk · contribs) - I'm active in fawiki (Persian) especially focused on philosophical articles. Mehdiabbasi (talk) 07:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Bennylin (talk · contribs) more than 100.000 edits in Indonesian projects (Indonesian wp, Javanese wp, Indonesian wikt primarily). Particularly interested in documents for Wikisource (Indonesian, Javanese, Sundanese, and other languages of Indonesia)
  177. Beyond My Ken (talk · contribs) - editor since 2005, over 100k edits under 3 usernames (see here for explanation), I have frequetly come across JSTOR articles in searching for references, and have been unable to access them except for the abstract. JSTOR access would be excellent. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  178. RashersTierney (talk · contribs) 19 000 edits since 2007. Had college access to JSTOR and found it an invaluable resource for referencing historical articles. Sorely missed. Spend increasing amounts of time checking refs, repairing linkrot etc. RashersTierney (talk) 07:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Rahmatdenas (talk · contribs) Today, I have over 4,000 edits on Indonesian Wikipedia since 2011. This would be very valuable to me in all of areas, has key resources not found elsewhere. Rahmatdenas (talk) 08:33, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Carstor (talk · contribs) Mainly editing on botany articles in German wikipedia, from time to time also in en.wp. In de.wp I've got slightly more than 14000 edits and wrote a bunch of featured/good articles (more on my user page there). An account would help me a lot as I often don't find access to the articles available there. --Carstor (talk) 15:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  181. I'm an en-Wikipedia editor since 2005 with around 13K live edits. Having no academic affiliations I have often found that just when I think I'm getting somewhere in researching / referencing an article, my nose hits the JSTOR login screen. It would be good to be able to progress past that point. AllyD (talk) 11:34, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Since 2009 , about 11,000 edits in fa@wiki Javad|Talk (29 Shahrivar 1391) 06:58, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    This user is blocked 18 months (and after that he announced his retirement) in fa.wp :)Ladsgroupبحث 15:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Over one years activity and +3000 edits in fa@wiki.Mahan (talk) 08:17, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk · contribs) I've been an active editor for a couple years, and have thousands of edits. I don't have access to JSTOR, but I think I could put it to use.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 07:04, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  185. درفش کاویانی (talk · contribs) 14000+ edits over 4+ years. I Working in multilpe in Persian Wikipedia, such as Archaeology and Photography. Have made 4 Featured Articles.Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk)‍ 08:22, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Zozo2kx (talk · contribs) Editor since 2008. I mostly edit on topics related to history/archaeology of the Ancient Near East, and particularly Syria. Better access to sources would be much appreciated. Yazan (talk) 13:18, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Editor since 2006, just shy of 24,000 edits. No access to JSTOR. Access to academic journals would be very helpful in editing biographies of political figures and people and events of significance in the popular culture, particularly of the second half of the 20th century. Tvoz/talk 18:48, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Homoatrox (talk · contribs) Editor since 2008, active primarily in ru-wiki (15,000+ edits). I have written 3 Featured Articles there (proof) about people of Ancient Rome. JSTOR provides access to 58 journals in Classics Studies, and the access to their articles will be very useful. Homoatrox (talk) 19:23, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  189. NarSakSasLee (talk · contribs) I have around 3,000 edits and have been quite active when I do contribute to articles, often finishing them up to a good standard once started. I'd like to use this in order to start contributing more to science and mechanical engineering articles since that's what I'm studying at in Oxford. I haven't found much up to date information on specific engineering breakthroughs aside from the usual articles on news websites. They're not specific enough and only give surface details. Google books is terrible. The information is usually 1-2 years out and again they only give surface details. This would be a great asset in order for me to contribute more to core articles that may be useful for Wikipedia readers. NarSakSasLee (talk) 23:52, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  190. I do not have access to JSTOR. Frequently when I am researching an article I find there are relevant sources on JSTOR, but am unable to use them. TFD (talk) 21:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Have been researching a lot for a new project involving editing all the Carmen Sandiego articles. There are many valuable sources, such as this one, which require this service.--Coin945 (talk) 09:53, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  192. Dedda71 (talk · contribs): editor on the italian wikipedia since 2005, sysop since 2008, and I currently have no access to JSTOR. I need this resource for research and verification. --Dedda71 (talk) 06:20, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Wasted Time R (talk · contribs) Active since early 2005, some 60,000 edits, lead author of some 40 FA or GA articles, most on history or politics. Frequently run across journal papers that need JSTOR access, having it would be most helpful. Wasted Time R (talk) 09:58, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  194. Tom Morris (talk · contribs): I have had JSTOR access for the last few years through my university. I recently decided to stop my graduate studies, and my JSTOR and other academic database access will cease in the next week or so as the new university term starts. With the access I've had so far, I've added lots of references to Wikipedia from JSTOR in philosophy, religion and other humanities areas. I also frequently help with outreach projects, and being able to dig up obscure sources to help other people writing articles at editathons etc. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:08, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Mugginsx (talk · contribs) Active since 2009. There is no access to JSTOR where I live. Mugginsx (talk) 16:39, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  196. Tijfo098 (talk · contribs): I've made about 12K edits since 2010. I have a problem similar to that described by Kiefer.Wolfowitz. Access to humanities journals is quite limited for me, but I edit articles which require that as well, e.g. modern history. Two recent examples where I had to request resource exchange are [3] [4] After receiving the first source, I've revamped the article [5]; it had number of inaccuracies. I'm waiting for the 2nd ref now... Tijfo098 (talk) 13:53, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Kansas Bear (talk · contribs): Currently have made 13K+ edits. Adding references to articles during medieval times from the Indus Valley to England. --Defensor Ursa 01:08, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  198. Bamse (talk · contribs): Active editor with 21k+ edits (mostly article creation related), and no JSTOR access. JSTOR would be helpful to write more articles on Japanese history and art topics. bamse (talk) 10:07, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Shearonink (talk · contribs): Would really appreciate having access to JSTOR. 12,000+ edits, have no access to JSTOR since I am a private individual not affiliated with a university, and have run into the JSTOR stop sign many times. Shearonink (talk) 03:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Update: Since I applied in 2012, I would just like to mention that I now have 16,000+ edit and that I work on a variety of subjects. Having JSTOR access would enable me to check many articles' cited sources that are often beyond paywalls as well as do my own research.Shearonink (talk) 14:29, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  200. Dennis Brown (talk · contribs) admin with 31k edits on a variety of topics, since 2006. No university access at all. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 17:20, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Firsfron (talk · contribs) Active editor with 70,000 edits, including several Featured Articles. I have access to JSTOR from work, but would like access to JSTOR from home. Firsfron of Ronchester 03:23, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  202. Cplakidas (talk · contribs): Active editor since 2005, 80,000 edits on the English Wikipedia, main author of over 70 GA, A-class and FA articles, over 800 articles created. Constantine ✍ 14:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  203. Die Sengerin (talk · contribs): I'm an active editor since February 2011 and hope to upgrade the quality of my editing work through JSTOR-access. --Die Sengerin (talk) 10:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  204. SarahStierch (talk · contribs) - Long time editor and researcher sadly lacking access to JSTOR. SarahStierch (talk) 20:41, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  205. Epipelagic (talk · contribs) - I don't have JSTOR access. I would use it for writing articles if I had it. --Epipelagic (talk) 21:36, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  206. Magnum2008 (talk · contribs) Active in it.wiki since 2008, 2000+ edits, JSTOR access would be useful for my editing in science, history and technology. --Magnum2008 (talk) 22:33, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  207. Cassianto -- I currently don't have JSTOR access. It would prove very useful for reviewing and the many article that I write which include six FA's and nearly 10,000 contributions . -- CassiantoTalk 23:26, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  208. OrangesRyellow (talk · contribs) -- I mainly focus around women's rights in Pakistan and terrorism related articles. Have no JSTOR access now and it would be of great help to me in contributing to these and other areas --OrangesRyellow (talk) 03:16, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Ynhockey (talk · contribs) — I have written dozens of articles on Israeli history and have found myself stuck quite a few times because materials are needed were in JSTOR, which I don't have access to. I expect to be able to contribute significantly with JSTOR access. —Ynhockey (Talk) 08:34, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  210. عباد ديرانية (talk · contribs) I has been editing Wikipedia since over 3 years, and I have over 500 articles on Arabic Wikipedia of which about 30 are Good or Featured articles. I write alot FAs and GAs in most science fields, and mostly write them from zero (without translation from other Wikipedias), so the JSTOR will help me so much in research for sources and writing articles --aad_Dira (talk) 14:30, 21 November 2012 (UTC).[reply]
  211. أبو حمزة (talk · contribs) I'm an editor in ar-wikipedia since over 3 years, and I had wrote more than 800 articles, more than 20000 edits, 10 Featured articles & 11 good articles. I'm interested in history of science & scientists. JSTOR will be very helpful to me -- أبو حمزة (talk) 15:22, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  212. Sarnold17 (talk · contribs) I've been actively editing for two years, and have had to forgo articles on many occasions due to lack of JSTOR access; it would be most helpful to my research.Sarnold17 (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  213. Ceoil (talk · contribs). Here since, sigh, 2006. 20 FAs, 60k edits, mostly art history. Use JSTOR quite a bit, but usually through begging borrowing and, these days, stealing. Ceoil (talk) 21:41, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  214. 蒋龍 (talk · contribs). Active editor since 2004, have about 6,000 edits in ja.wiki. I have no access to JSTOR. I need JSTOR resources for writing articles about biology, history, and arts. show_ryu (talk) 12:42, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  215. Buckshot06 (talk · contribs) Active researcher on (mostly) 20th and 21st century armed forces. Six years on Wikipedia; two featured articles, administrator since 2008. Buckshot06 (talk) 01:36, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  216. Modernist (talk · contribs). Since June 2006 nearly 80,000 edits, on a break now but can use the access when I return...Modernist (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  217. Trevj (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia. Active for 3 years, initially joined 2004. Member WikiProject Computing, WikiProject Bristol. Mainly editing science/technology/business topics, also anything else which takes my fancy. Generally use citation templates. Currently 4284 article space edits (38.79%), creator of 58 articles. Unaware of free online access to JSTOR at or through nearest library, although it operates restricted opening hours anyway (23 hours per week) eliminating this as a useful alternative.
  218. SudoGhost (talk · contribs) - I do not have access to JSTOR, and come across quite a few instances where access would be useful in creating or improving Wikipedia articles. - SudoGhost 00:57, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  219. I would describe myself as "low-priority"-- some people are far more active than I am. But, yes, I would be a more effective wikipedian if I had direct JSTOR access. --HectorMoffet (talk) 10:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  220. ca$e (talk · contribs), currently my university library does provide limited access to certain jstor-journals, but i am missing others gravely, access to which would also help in contributing to wikipedia, where i am mostly involved in work on philosophy in de.wiki, as well as in a range of topics e.g. among religious studies, with >40,000 edits to date
  221. Gadget850 (talk · contribs) Local libraries do not have JSTOR access. --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 12:34, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  222. Jonathunder (talk) Don't have access, but would certainly use it. Jonathunder (talk) 23:31, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  223. UpstateNYer (talk · contribs) Would definitely be useful in my research. Editor since 2006, sysop since 2009. upstateNYer 02:55, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  224. Viswaprabha (talk · contribs) From India. WP editor/mentor/sysop .ml, .sa. etc. Very active in .en and in general, all WM missions. ViswaPrabhaവിശ്വപ്രഭtalk 05:12, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  225. I'm an editor for more than 6 years in the hebrew wikipedia my hebrew contribs. I'm writing mostly scientific articles in fields such biology, local history/archeology, psychics, economy etc.. and sometimes find it hard to obtain reliable sources. A JSTOR account could be very helpful. Assafn
  226. Acroterion (talk · contribs) I've been an editor for six years and lack access to a public or university library with JSTOR access; I work mainly on architectural and military history and public lands management and would welcome the access. Acroterion (talk) 13:05, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  227. User: Alexisthomas13 - would love access to JSTOR.
  228. Since november 2011 I'm an active editor on it.wiki, where I've created approximately seventy articles focused on art, art history and classical studies. A JSTOR access would be useful. [naamar m] 09:55, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
  229. Would be useful. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 04:39, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  230. Over 5 years activity in Russian Wikipedia. 11 Featured articles and 12 good articles. I really need it for further contribution --Алый Король (talk) 04:55, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  231. I currently have jstor access through my university, but I am not going to have it for very much longer. I imagine by the time the list gets this far down, I'll no longer have jstor access through my university or my local library (since I'll be moving to a place with a local library without a subscription.) I use jstor all the time, and would greatly appreciate an account. Kevin Gorman (talk) 08:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  232. User:Hchc2009 I don't currently have access, but would find it very useful for its coverage of medieval history. Hchc2009 (talk) 11:21, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  233. Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) I had access in the past and really miss it. JSTOR is particularly useful for history-related topics, but I would also use it for other articles on their journey to GA or FA status. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 05:09, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  234. Mr. Stradivarius (talk · contribs) JSTOR would be really useful for writing articles on second language acquisition and language education. I don't have any access to JSTOR here in Sapporo. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 12:50, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  235. Grolltech (talk · contribs) I am constantly running up against lack of access to JSTOR, and nearest participating institution is an hour away. Grollτech (talk) 23:19, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  236. JSTOR would really help both my own editing and my work at AFC. Andrew (talk) 18:57, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  237. I need access to JSOR to improve yoga and health related articles to Good and Features quality levels BO | Talk 11:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  238. JSTOR access would allow me to stop mooching off my friends in academia when it comes to writing articles on literature, history and philosophy. GaramondLethe 14:17, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  239. I've had no JSTOR access since I graduated university, and it would help with writing articles on my battleships. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 08:47, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  240. For e.g. much-overdue cleanup of references at Phineas Gage. EEng (talk) 04:53, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  241. Keen to join the waiting list for this access. I've been an editor since 2006 and have created over 200 articles with ~70 DYK credits, some of which are about scientific/medical topics where JSTOR journal access would be very useful. My work in this area has been limited by lack of access to non-free scientific publications and I'm keen to be more active. I have no current means of access. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:53, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  242. Melly42 (talk · contribs) I only have a free Register & Read -Account at JSTOR but It would be great to have access to all Biology, Zoology, and Botany articles at JSTOR. I am neither in an university nor I have the oppurtunity to get access via a library. --Melly42 (talk) 10:05, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  243. I have been an editor and member of the WikiProject:Opera since the autumn of 2005 when I retired and had to the time pursue my interest in opera! I specialise in the primo ottocento era of Italian opera, i.e. 1800 to 1850 approx. plus, of course, all of Verdi's operas. JSTOR is an excellent source of many academic journals which cover many of the rare operas by Rossini, Bellini, and Donizetti, for example. I would love to be able to use it, although I have been known to buy the odd article to supplemenbt my research. My latest work can be seen in the expansion of the articles on Donizetti's Belisario and Maria Stuarda, and Verdi's Un ballo in maschera, all of work of which coincided with rare performances or major presentations by the Met in New York. All were read by a considerable number of people: nearly 8,000 in one day for the Maria Stuarda piece. Currently, I am significantly exapanding the article on L'assedio di Calais, the Donizetti opera to be presented by English Touring Opera in sevral British locations in the Spring 2013. Viva-Verdi (talk) 20:24, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  244. Avi (talk) 05:47, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  245. on Chinese Wikipedia since april 2006; edited topics related to literature and ethnology, 6000+ edits[6]. JSTOR will allow me to find many English sources related to non-Chinese literature. -Haaqfun (talk) 06:48, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  246. Storkk (talk · contribs): I would also like an account for reference verification and citation. Storkk (talk) 01:51, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  247. JSTOR access would help me immensely with references for my editing. I've been an editor since April 2005, and have created over 1100 articles. As my editing drifts into the deeper reaches of history and culture I am increasingly needing academic level papers for verification. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 16:29, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  248. Sp33dyphil (talk · contribs): Editor since February 2010. 33,000+ edits. An account would allow me to improve military history/equipment articles. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 02:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  249. فلورانس (talk · contribs) . hi my Dear wiki Friend i,m patroll,autopatrollers and Rollback in fa.wiki with More than 3416 edits in fa.wiki - i need to this accesse to Development my wiki edit , thanks Florence (talk) 00:16, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    this user is blocked indefinitely for WP:DE in fa.wp :)Ladsgroupبحث 15:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  250. Ankit Maity (talk · contribs) I would love to improve some more articles. --Ankit MaityTalkContribs 11:12, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  251. 4nn1l2 (talk · contribs) I'm an active editor of Persian Wikipedia with more than 9,000 edits. I usually work on important and vital articles rather than wasting my time for music bands or actors! I have promoted 2 articles to GA and then FA status. While I study in one of the most prestigious universities in Iran, due to the recent sanctions against Iran, I have lost my access to digital libraries. I would greatly appreciate it if you let me have access to JSTOR so that I can continue writing good articles for Persian Wikipedia. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:38, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  252. Mike Christie (talk · contribs) I would like JSTOR access for my own content work, and also for working with students, where it would be useful to be able to look at the sources they are using. I have no institutional access. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:47, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  253. Arildnordby (talk · contribs)I have lately expanded a few Wikipedia articles on the techniques and distribution of different manners of execution (Impalement), in particular). I am using Google Books for all its worth, but I would really add to that access to JSTOR as well, primarily for control of source quality, and already performed studies of the highest academic stamdards.Arildnordby (talk) 12:24, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  254. Spanglej (talk · contribs) 19 000 edits over four years, mostly adding content to biographies and literature articles, three good articles. I've never had Jstor access, would be great for biog research. Thanks Span (talk) 17:35, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  255. Justlettersandnumbers (talk · contribs) I have JSTOR access until July 2013 (alumnus perk from a university I once attended). I use it constantly and will miss it badly when it ends. I'd be pleased to be considered for a second or later tranche of editors with access. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:43, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  256. Dan653 (talk · contribs) Need acess to expand articles on Victorian Era articles. Dan653 (talk) 14:47, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  257. Tucoxn (talk · contribs) I would like a JSTOR account if one becomes available. I am an active editor and my e-mail is already confirmed with WMF (diff). I've been editing on English Wikipedia since 2008, but I also edit on French Wikipedia, Fijian Wikipedia, and Simple Wikipedia. I am mainly a researcher and content creator. I currently have over 2,000 edits on English Wikipedia, with over 1,300 unique pages edited and six articles created. When I create a new article, I try to have it listed on the main page, at Did you know? I've also created several articles on Fijian Wikipedia. I write articles on plants, animals, and locations in the Pacific region and notable deceased Americans. I intend to continue a similar pattern of editing. Access to JSTOR would help me because it's difficult to find reliable sources on some of the topics and the libraries in Fiji, where I live, are difficult to access and not well stocked. Further, I am not connected to Fiji National University or the University of the South Pacific, the only places in Fiji that have JSTOR access. Thanks for your consideration! - tucoxn\talk 23:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  258. TheOriginalSoni (talk · contribs) I intend to do some heavy article work on a few vital articles in a few days, and having access to JSTOR will be a huge benefit while working on them. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 06:12, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  259. Glaisher (talk · contribs) I aim to write articles and having free access to JSTOR will be of great help. --Glaisher (talk) 06:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  260. Racconish (talk · contribs) I have used JSTOR and find it to be very useful. I have contributed since 2008 and made over 30,000 contributions to the project. Thanks, — Racconish Tk 11:11, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  261. Pratyya Ghosh (talk · contribs) I'm active in wiki since 2012 January and made 13000+ en wiki and 17000+ edits globally these days. So I think to help my wiki's work JSTOR will be very useful for me. --Pratyya (Hello!) 11:30, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  262. Demostene119 (talk · contribs · count) request an account to work in it-wiki. > 8,000 edits, involved in "Progetto Mineralogia" mineralogy italian project, over 100 mineral species edited. I've got access to Credo and to HigBeam (expired). --Demostene119 (talk) 14:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  263. Taty2007 (talk · contribs) I am an editor on the Spanish and English Wikipedia, with more than 30,500 edits and some good and featured articles on the Spanish Wikipedia. An account with JSTOR will help me expand and improve articles, especially on Art and Literature subjects. Taty2007 (talk) 15:21, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  264. SchroCat (talk · contribs) I am an active content creator who is involved in regularly creating FA, FL and GA level articles: I do not have access to it through any other facility and this would greatly assist my research and editing capability. - SchroCat (talk) 10:51, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  265. Curly Turkey (talk · contribs) I'm an active writer of FAs and GAs, and have been making use of the limited free access. It would be very helpful if I didn't have to deal with the three-item limit, especially since I'm not always sure an article is what I want until I've taken a peek at it. Curly Turkey (gobble) 23:13, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  266. Doc Taxon (talk · contribs): I am active in en:WP:REX and especially active in its German sister project de:WP:BIBA or de:WP:BIBR. I am looking for articles and literature for all the users who need it and for myself, to build well researched articles in English, German and Wikipedia of other languages. Thank you, Doc Taxon (talk) 05:59, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  267. Erik (talk · contribs) I am active with film articles, which are often at the top of search engine results, and am requesting JSTOR access so I can better research film-related topics. Erik (talk | contribs) 14:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  268. Andresisrael (talk · contribs) I'm an editor on the Wikipedia in Spanish since 2010. I create and review articles related to science. If I had access to JSTOR I would use a lot of sources imposible to get from where I live. --Andresisrael (talk) 01:40, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  269. Dereckson (talk · contribs) History, religion and law titles. I've also a particular need to access the Built Environment publication to work on a new "urban life and public space" portal on the French Wikipedia. I don't have JSTOR access. Statistics: 25K contributions on Wikimedia projects, administrator and 16K contributions on fr.wikipedia, account registered in 2005. --Dereckson (talk) 11:48, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  270. The Banner (talk · contribs) Irish history, culinary art (in relation to Michelin stars), geography and music/musicians are my main focus but often hard to get access to. JSTOR can be a valuable route to get access to older ans expensive magazines. For use on both English and Dutch Wikipedia. The Banner talk 19:48, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  271. PumpkinSky (talk · contribs) I have many FAs to my credit on a wide variety of topics. PumpkinSky talk 20:01, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  272. Joy (talk · contribs). FWIW. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:41, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  273. PRODUCER (talk · contribs) Active for nearly five years. Helped in the creation of numerous FA and GA articles. --◅ PRODUCER (TALK) 02:51, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  274. Leutha (talk · contribs) Active for ten years, currently doing work on 16th century history.Leutha (talk) 12:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  275. Smsarmad (talk · contribs) I mostly write articles related to Pakistan. I already have an account at JSTOR but have to keep three items in the shelf for fifteen days for access to any item, blocking access to any other article for that period. Thus would like to have full access. --SMS Talk 13:09, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  276. Jacek555 (talk · contribs) I need JSTOR access for my work at wiki, especially at zoology wikiproject at pl-wiki. Jacek555 (talk) 18:27, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  277. Zanhe (talk · contribs) I've created hundreds of articles on history and archaeology, mainly relying on free sources and my personal collection of books. Having Jstor access would make my job much easier. -Zanhe (talk) 19:08, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  278. Léna (talk · contribs) Mainly active in French Wikipedia : would be used to improve gender studies article. My local university library is not open on week-end and as a computer science PhD student I don't have acess to social science / humanities ressources. Léna (talk) 09:20, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  279. Dougweller (talk · contribs) Most of my article work relates to articles in history and archaeology. I have no access to JSTOR, not even through my library. Dougweller (talk) 18:52, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  280. ColonelHenry (talk · contribs) Would love to have JSTOR access to expand my work on article creation and content improvement, tend to write a lot of articles in poetry, literature, history, and social sciences. My credits include over 11,000 edits on this account, including working to bring several articles to featured and good article status, and one featured list (most of these single-handedly).--ColonelHenry (talk) 21:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  281. Active since 2004 & 22,000 & a bit edits. If I had a dollar everytime I thought to myself "I wish I had a JSTOR account" I could probably get a private JSTOR account. --Roisterer (talk) 00:43, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  282. Froid (talk) I meet the requirements and will fulfill expectations. JSTOR will enhance my contributions to Wikipedia; I've long wanted access, as when conducting research for the purposes of contributing or verification of preexisting content, I frequently encounter sources for which a subscription is required. My stats: First edit Sep 09, 2006 / Unique pages edited: 7,401 / Live edits: 20,734 / Deleted edits: 0 / Total edits (including deleted): 20,734.
  283. KrakatoaKatie I'm an active Wikipedia admin. I have around 20,000 edits; I work on biographies, history, psychology, and on articles needing improvement that I find during admin work. JSTOR access would greatly help in these areas. :-) KrakatoaKatie 10:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  284. I'd like JSTOR access. How do we know if you give us access? Chuck Baggett (talk) 18:27, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  285. JSTOR would be quite useful to me. A pity that the 100 limit is long past. My research is mainly in the fields of history and religion. Esoglou (talk) 19:33, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  286. I have lusted after JSTOR access for years. I live just past the middle of nowhere and have no access anywhere else. My private library which can be seen on LibraryThing (upon request) list 2223 of my books and is not complete. My home library is much better for wikipedia than the local library, the Embudo Valley Library in Dixon New Mexico (hmmm, is it a conflict of interest for me to write an article?) - where I am the head librarian. I edit a lot of art history, but also dabble in other history stuff as well as in music and other somewhat random areas. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 03:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  287. Mayooranathan I am an active Wikipedian in Tamil Wikipedia for 10 years now. I started more than 3,500 articles in Tamil and improved many more. I used to write on Architecture, Town Planning, Arts, Linguistics, History and Technology among others. I am currently residing in UAE where Library facilities are very poor. JSTOR access will be very usefull in my work. Mayooranathan (talk) 09:58, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  288. درفش کاویانی (talk · contribs) 44,000+ edits over 5+ years. I'm active in Persian Wikipedia, Tajik Wikipedia, English Wikipedia and German Wikipedia. I start editing in wikipedia since 14 August 2008. i wrote 7 featured article and 3 good article in Persian Wikipedia. I write about History and Photography. Thanks Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 11:11, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  289. Chamberi I am a French Wikipedian who is involved in the area of Ancient Near East. An access to JSTOR would be very useful to check references and cite reliable sources. I already have an account on Jstor but reading online is not always easy. --Chamberi (talk) 18:59, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  290. Shyamal (talk) Will be glad to make use of it and extend a helping hand at WP:RX Shyamal (talk) 02:41, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  291. JoJan (talk) 16:10, 7 December 2013 (UTC) I've had a JSTOR account, provided by Wikimedia, (still running) and this was helpful for my contributions. I'm a very active contributor with over 107,000 edits over the last 9 years (in several languages and in the Commons), mostly about art but also much about biology (in particular Gastropoda). Without JSTOR I'm running against paywalls. JoJan (talk) 16:10, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  292. I have an intermittant need for JSTOR. For months I will never use it and then I hit the paywall three of four times in an evening. I suspect I am not alone and that we need a system of rolling accounts, that we can apply for when the need arises- that are dropped on 48 hour inactivity. Could negotiation be opened with JSTOR. -- Clem Rutter (talk) 17:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  293. I am interested in JSTOR. I have been doing research for Wikipedia as a certified English-Spanish-English translator and BSc psychologist regarding articles on/for the difussion of science (translation of articles on psychology, sleep research, scientific translations). I have been working as a voluntary Wikipedian at El Colegio de México and UNAM. I am very active in Wikipedia, mainly in Wikipedia in Spanish (currently 15685 editions).--Correogsk or Gustavo (Eritrocito or Heme aquí) 01:51, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  294. CaroleHenson (talk · contribs) - Active since February 5, 2011 with 39,633 live edits, 83% in article space. I have written about visual arts, biographies, history, prehistory articles for Colorado, the US, UK, Asia and other places. I have created new articles and spend a considerable amount of time making unsourced/undersourced articles better.--CaroleHenson (talk) 18:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  295. I would like to be able to use JSTOR for my articles. I do not have access to it through my public library. I am an alumn/a of a university on the list, but I am not a member of the alumni association. Can I please sign up for it? SciGal (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I registered for JSTOR under their Register & Read beta program. SciGal (talk) 00:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  296. I would like access to JSTOR. I am a very active contributor to Wikipedia, particularly in terms of researching and writing articles, and I would use JSTOR to help me do this. My nearest university library is an over 60 mile round trip distance from where I live. Farrtj (talk) 22:43, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  297. The reasons are the same as stated here. --Niklem (talk) 20:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  298. JSTOR access would have helped me on countless occasions. Edwardx (talk) 23:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  299. So many articles to write, so little time! Ironholds (talk) 05:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  300. For over 20 years, I was either a university student or an adjunct professor so I was used to having access to JSTOR. I'm finding that now that I no longer have access to a university library and their resources, I am not contributing to WP at a level I'd like to. If you are considering expanding access to JSTOR, please add me to the list! Liz Read! Talk! 16:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  301. I used to have access to JSTOR but now live in a place where I no longer have access. I want to use JSTOR to get content in order to write Wikipedia articles, especially on academic books reviewed in journal articles. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  302. I have 60,000+ WP edits in diverse areas. My main interest area is Philippine history, but I edit widely. In researching in support of contemplated edits, I often encounter JSTOR article abstracts and am unable to access the article text, and this is sometimes a problem for me in deciding how to proceed. I am physically located on a small island in the Philippines, and have no access to library resources. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:12, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  303. Fenix down (talk · contribs) I'm an editor with 16,000 edits to EnWiki, 80% main space and with 854 articles created. Predominantly editing in Russian Geography, I would use access to this resource to flesh out articles already started with additional information on history, geography, geology, anthropology etc predominantly available only in journals. Appreciate that the accounts are filled at the moment, but happy to be on a waiting list! Fenix down (talk) 09:04, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  304. SMcCandlish (talk · contribs). Not a renewal, but formerly approved for both Credo and Highbeam. Wikipedian for 8+ years. I have a degree in anthropology and applied linguistics, but am not a student nor a professional academic so I don't have journal access any longer. My main journal needs are in life sciences (felinology, herpetology, commercial animal breeding, history of domestication), anthropology/archaeology/history (e.g. history of sport), early modern to contemporary arts, and various other topics (I'm a major contributor to articles on albinism, linguistics, and other subjects that require citation of peer reviewed sources).  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  13:14, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  305. Ssilvers (talk · contribs) - Since 2006 I have created hundreds, and edited thousands, of pages on Wikipedia, especially about musical theatre and comic opera, but also about the environment, the Victorian era and a variety of other topics; I frequently come across JSTOR articles in my searches and would like to be able to access them. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:24, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  306. Madalibi (talk · contribs) – I lost JSTOR access in 2010 after I finished my PhD in East Asian Studies. I have purchased a large number of books to improve Wikipedia over the years, but have little access to articles. I mostly edit articles on China and Chinese history, but I occasionally delve into topics like human evolution, anthropology, the history of Central Asia, UNESCO world heritage sites, etc. My main purpose in editing WP is to create content that will last, and this can only be done by using reliable sources. A JSTOR account would greatly facilitate editing in these and more areas. Madalibi (talk) 09:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  307. Timmyshin (talk · contribs) – Unfortunately I no longer have JSTOR and this hurt some of the articles that I have contributed, mostly in Asian history and entertainment. Timmyshin (talk) 15:10, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  308. OR drohowa (talk · contribs) I have been missing JSTOR access ever since I left college! I would use it to edit on LGBT Content (especially Queer literary theory, Queer identity topics, Queer writers), Feminism and women writers, labor history, GLAM content and my personal favorites, Art Historical content, Contemporary Art, and Archival theory. Thanks! OR drohowa (talk) 21:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  309. Eric Corbett (talk · contribs) – It would be incredibly useful to have access to JSTOR to help in particular with my work on literature and folklore articles. I've been editing since 2006, and have forty-eight featured articles to my credit. Eric Corbett 21:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  310. GaryColemanFan (talk · contribs) - Would be very helpful for some biographical articles I would like to create and expand. I have been a registered editor for over 7 years and have almost 20,000 edits. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:59, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  311. Darkness Shines (talk · contribs) I write a great many articles on human rights abuses, access to JSTOR would be of enormous benefit to me. Darkness Shines (talk) 22:02, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  312. HueSatLum (talk · contribs) – I frequently come across JSTOR articles that would be useful but am frustrated when I can only view the first page. Having access wounded help me immensely in content creation. Thanks, /~huesatlum/ 22:31, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  313. Diannaa (talk · contribs) JSTOR access would be very useful for copyvio work. Thanks for your consideration, -- Diannaa (talk) 22:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  314. You know me ;). I'm going to write as much legal content as possible, essentially, and...I write as much legal content as possible. Ironholds (talk) 22:51, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  315. Britannicus (talk · contribs) In order to better edit articles on British history.--Britannicus (talk) 23:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  316. Newyorkbrad (talk · contribs) Active editor since 2006 (created 100+ pages; admin since 2007, arbitrator since 2008). As I wind down my arbitrator duties and return to more work on the content side, access would be extremely useful. (In the "requirements" section above, it states that applicants must be "active in medical content generation, research, and/or verification work." Medicine isn't one of my specialties or editing interests; can I take it from the other requests above that that requirement is no longer in force?) Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  317. Pharos (talk · contribs) I would like to be able to help shore up historical and humanities topics that have weak coverage in free online sources. Let's dig into the weeds!--Pharos (talk) 00:35, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  318. Shyamal (talk · contribs) I need journal access for my contributions and have little access to good physical libraries. I also provide support to reference seekers at WP:RX. Shyamal (talk) 02:27, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  319. Mion (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2005, 17 k edits, article creation, updating and fact checking mainly, dentistry and energy related articles.Mion (talk) 02:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  320. Gabrielthursday (talk · contribs) - I've been an editor since 2006. While my interests tend to be eclectic, I'd like to have access primarily in order to improve a number of early modern English history articles. Gabrielthursday (talk) 02:46, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  321. Ravpapa - Long-time editor. Most recent articles were Grosse Fuge and rewrite of Ronn Torossian. Recently lost my access to JSTOR through the university library because I didn't take any courses this year. It is an invaluable resource. --Ravpapa (talk) 03:14, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  322. Technical 13 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I'm fairly well known as a templateFu/JavaScript guy, but I also spend a fair amount of time reviewing AfC drafts and being able to save some of the drafts I come across that are short a reference here or there using this resource would be a great benefit to the project. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 03:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  323. Zambelo - I'm primarily active in New Religious Movement-related articles, which suffer from a low amount of scholarly sources. I would improve these articles and increase neutrality by providing a greater range of quality references. Zambelo; talk 04:12, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  324. Dr.K. Access to JSTOR would be useful for improving existing articles which have JSTOR references but with only partial access to the source. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 07:02, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  325. Welsh - long term and frequent editor, mainly improving existing articles across the board, focussing on Wales, railways, redlinks and wikifying new articles. No previous access. welsh (talk) 07:14, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  326. Magioladitis - I am highly active, I create and improve pages for both English and Greek Wikipedia. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:37, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  327. Froaringus (talk · contribs) - I usually edit articles about the history and prehistory of Galicia/Spain/Western Europe. Access to JSTOR would allow me to improve many of those articles. --Froaringus (talk) 10:11, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  328. Iselilja (talk · contribs) 9000+ edits during the last two years, on Norwegian and English Wikipedia, c. 20-25 DYKs at the lattter. I write among things about politics and society where I mostly have relied on newspaper, magazine sources etc and it would be a huge benefit to have access to more academic sources. My contributions so far has been somewhat eclectic, going forward my intention is to become more focused in editing, writing more in-depth articles, and access to Jstor would be most helpful in that effort. Iselilja (talk) 10:29, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  329. Loginnigol (talk · contribs) - Active editor for a couple of years on English and Dutch language Wikipedia. Over 7000 page edits. Contribution in many subjects but particularly arts, science, religion, music and sports. From past experience I have come across JSTOR articles that I wanted to reference but was unable to because of lack of access, which is why I love this this opportunity to sign up. —Loginnigol (talk) 11:25, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  330. Testem (talk · contribs)I mostly edit pharmacology/medicine articles along with some chemistry ones. A lot of my edits are verification so this is not a high priority request. Testem (talk) 11:57, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  331. Richard Keatinge I seldom edit medical articles, but would find JSTOR access very useful for my historical (especially but not only Roman) areas of interest. Richard Keatinge (talk) 12:48, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  332. I don't have JSTOR access. For history and American litterature. Best regards Mike Coppolano (talk) 13:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  333. Active since 2005, 20000+ edits and counting on WP:fr (see [7]). Active area : physics, astrophysics, computer science, musicology. --Jean-Christophe BENOIST (talk) 13:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  334. Not having JSTOR access. Can be so useful for sourcing indeed. --Agamitsudo (talk) 14:07, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  335. No Jstor access (living at 50 kms from the first University lib), more than 16000 edits on WP:fr, mainly active on history of art subjects. Thanks a lot. Mel22 (talk) 14:44, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  336. For historical and religious articles. No JSTOR access. Esoglou (talk) 15:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  337. No JSTOR access. I'm highly active in dispute resolution (I work regularly at 3O, DRN, and am a member of the Mediation Committee) and access to good academic sources is invaluable in helping to resolve content disputes. —TransporterMan (TALK) 15:09, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  338. I've made more than 12,000 edits to 900 plus articles and created about 100 articles in less than 5 years. Subjects I've worked on include American Indians, French and Spanish explorers, missionaries in China, refugees, the Vietnam war, agriculture, and World War II. JSTOR would provide me with a wealth of source material for the articles I edit. Smallchief (talk 15:22, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  339. I have created over 12000 articles and 70,000 edits on Chinese wikipedia since 2008. I do not have JSTOR access. Much appreciated! --Walter Grassroot |talk 15:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  340. I previously had access when at university and found JSTOR to be the most comprehensive of online databases for journals. Sadly I am no longer at university and can't justify the cost of a subscription as a person who is not employed as an academic. I am interested in articles about politics, philosophy and computer science. If I am given access I will use it to refine language used in any such articles I come across (or any random article I might be searching where I feel the language isn't presented in a way that is comprehensible).Alans1977 (talk) 15:42, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  341. Trust Is All You Need (talk · contribs) - I'm active on articles on communism, the institutionalisation of power, one-party systems and ideologies in general. JStor would give me access to sources to improve my work even further; for instance, i've been writing on the Workers' Party of Korea and the Communist Party of China articles (and related topics) recently. If I got access to JStor I could for instance access the article "Integrating Wealth and Power in China: The Communist Party's Embrace of the Private Sector" or "The Making of Chinese Intellectuals: Representations and Organization in the Thought Reform Campaign" (I want to improve articles on the CPC on topics such as ideology, organization, and propaganda) ... Or, for instance I'm interesting in learning (and working on) of the Kim dynasty (about the ruling family of North Korea) and the article "North Korea: From Dictatorship to Dynasty" would be of great help... I've made over 47,000 edits (over 31,000 main page edits) on Wikipedia, created 302 articles and I've been active since 2009. I have partial access to Jstor through the University of Oslo (but only history articles, not political science ones, and its those I want...) --TIAYN (talk) 16:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  342. Active in the automotive field for many years. Newspaper archives would be extremely helpful. No JSTOR access. Thank you. BsBsBs (talk) 16:14, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  343. Active on WP for about two years with over 5000 edits, mostly in the field of classical music, particularly Baroque music, also the history of early Christianity and its clash with the authorities of the Roman empire, saints and martyrs. I have expanded and created numerous articles in these fields. I do not have access to JSTOR and have often wished I did as I have seen many references to articles that would have been very useful to the articles I was working on. Thanks Smeat75 (talk) 16:26, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  344. Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs) - mostly active in copyright cleanup, which does occasionally mean rebuilding articles that have been reduced or deleted for noncompliance. I would not wish to take precedence over a content builder, but could use this to help facilitate that work. Active 7+ years, 120,000+ edits, originated over 400 articles (some of them actually good. :)) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:57, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  345. I mostly write articles about local history these days, but edit articles on any topic I am interested in. I would want to be fairly low priority on this list, but if a spot opens up I'd love to have it. I'd participate on Resource Exchange if given an account. I'm not as active as some of the other editors here (100-200 edits/month). I try to do a fair amount of outreach these days too, and just a few days ago I had a new Wikipedian ask for my help in verfiying a paywalled source. This would help in those situations as well. Zell Faze (talk) 20:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  346. Editor for over nine years and with 39,000+ edits. JSTOR access would allow much greater scope for researching general medieval, medieval economics and medieval demographics articles. Ravenswing 21:13, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  347. FireflySixtySeven (talk · contribs) I am active in content creation; having access to more sources would be very useful when I write/translate articles. FireflySixtySeven (talk) 21:21, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  348. Fuhghettaboutit (talk · contribs) Been bouncing around about 9 years. I spend a lot of time hunting sources for my own work and on behalf of others, for origination, expansion and for verification and have had to make requests at WP:RX for material this would allow me to access directly. Approaching 80K edits (by X's counter) and just had my third featured article promoted. I do not have access to this database through my local library or otherwise.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:39, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  349. Already a few years on WP, also a few thousands of edits, mostly on French pages, I have no access to JSTOR (yet) but would definitely enjoy being able to use some of its great content in order to improve some science oriented articles I'm on. Xentyr (talk) 22:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  350. Jeremy112233 (talk · contribs) I've been a very active Wikipedian for two and a half years, with about 22,000 edits, and spend a great deal of time working on articles in the social sciences. JSTOR is a great resource for researching the reviews of artwork, historical articles, and the history of law in particular--something I spend much time on. I do not have access to JSTOR through any other means. It is an invaluable research in the areas I write about, and would truly be helpful in my research, especially in creating new articles (I have written nearly 500) or adding references to new articles written by others in the New Page Patrol queue so that they meet with Wikipedia rules (something I spend time on). Jeremy112233 (Lettuce-jibber-jabber?) 22:08, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  351. Editor for 9 years with 46,000 edits. I edit and create articles in science and technology, and answer questions at the Reference Desk, and do not have other access to JSTOR articles. Edison (talk) 23:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  352. Psychiatrick (talk · contribs). My active areas on Wikipedia are articles on the history of psychiatry. The access to JSTORE will help me improve them. Psychiatrick (talk) 00:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  353. Boson (talk · contribs) I do not have but frequently feel the need for JSTOR access when editing and verifying history articles. I see the above requirements currently state "You are active in medical content generation, research, and/or verification ". I presume this was erroneously copied from somewhere else. --Boson (talk) 00:33, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  354. Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) I have over 28,000 edits in 2.5 years on WP, working mainly on content generation regarding WWII in Yugoslavia, including nine FAs and 25 GAs. I regularly post on WP:RX asking for access to journal articles for content generation, and JSTOR access would greatly enhance my ability to contribute to WP. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 00:54, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  355. Sturunner (talk · contribs) Almost all of my recent edits are science related. Specifically, the issue of memory processing, retention, & recall of traumatic events is increasingly an issue in child-abuse policy & legal cases. It is impossible to do this area justice w/o JSTOR. I have an honors degree in psychology & in sociology & have managed a biophysics lab. Access would greatly increase the range & speed of my contributions.--Sturunner (talk) 02:19, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:JSTOR&oldid=613762220"