Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2021/02

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2021

02 February 2021

Temporary Full protection: Continous edit warring over the past few days. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 15:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 20:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP editor is repeatedly removing information without explaining why. Probably the same person has removed the same passages previously from other IP addresses. I attempted to engage on the latest IP's talk page but no response. Hoping that if page is semi-protected, it will spur them to explain why they are removing passages. Wes sideman (talk) 21:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 20:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism and edit warring by unconfirmed user User:Lanterner12 and two IP’s over the past days. Repeatedly adding content that goes against the consensus reached on talk page, to keep two ethnics separated in two separate articles. Also other non-constructive editing such as removing that the Tigray region lies in Ethiopia or removing other content.Leechjoel9 (talk) 22:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Berig (talk) 20:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 22:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Berig (talk) 20:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Vandalism had started a few days ago. The article was temporarily protected but still under vandalism since temporary protection period ended.

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 20:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent disruption with editing page, vandals keep changing info/wording. Tinton5 (talk) 19:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Berig (talk) 19:54, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Controversial topic leading to persistent vandalism, still clearly needs semi-protection as it had before. Volteer1 (talk) 19:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I second this. IPs and new accounts have been reverted fairly frequently for disruptive editing over the past week, and this issue does not appear to be going away any time soon. I would suggest consideration of a permanent semi-protection, since this is a persistent problem. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Berig (talk) 19:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Problematic user continuously adds information in the "Controversy and criticism" area that isn't correctly sourced, spells names wrong, and comes from a misleading website. 51.37.177.45 (talk) 19:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary. A typo is easily fixed (and now has been), and the source is www.cheatsheet.com, which cites its assertion to video feeds and is used frequently in reality tv articles. This is an editing dispute between the IP editor above and another user, they are welcome to make their respective arguments on the talk page. Zaathras (talk) 22:02, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Names are still spelt wrong and source is still not correctly inserted, CheatSheet also fails to back up any claims with video feed footage. 51.37.177.45 (talk) 12:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Berig (talk) 19:58, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by IPs. —El Millo (talk) 19:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Berig (talk) 20:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of edits today, and quite a lot of them have been vandalism. Belwine💬📜 18:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 19:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  // Timothy :: talk  18:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I bumped the protection level from PC to semi, but kept the rough duration of the previous protection. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 19:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – request upgrade protection. Most IP or new users are vandalism in this page. Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 19:02, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If I did this correctly, it should revert to indef PC protection after the semi-protection expires in May. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 19:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Being moved against consensus of a RM. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism on the name of his character in The Lion King. Cerebral726 (talk) 13:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A step up from the previous protection of two weeks. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP removal of sourced content (sources are in body of article) without consensus to do so. Beyond My Ken (talk) 14:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent, on-going Wikipedia:Disruptive editing over long-term period of time by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP removal of sourced information without consensus to do so, probable PoV edits. Beyond My Ken (talk) 14:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One user has been blocked, but there are others. MelanieN (talk) 02:38, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of persistent IP disruptive editing of WP:BLP article. Smerus (talk) 14:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:43, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – To be used in the parent template. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If you do end up incorporating this template into its parent, request again and you'll get indef. AGK ■ 13:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nubia86 (talk) 15:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Pending changes isn't working; users keep adding unsourced content. —Bruce1eetalk 15:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I've blocked User:Itsminodora, which is likely a sockpuppet of User:Lilithceusan. I will continue to monitor. I don't think protection is needed at this point. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism & Addition of unsourced content. AviationFreak💬 16:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 16:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:06, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – by multiple IPs. Related to the 2021 Myanmar coup d'état. Skjoldbro (talk) 17:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It looks like there's a few students making random edits without any evidence whatsoever. This has happened repeatedly today. AidenTEM (talk) 17:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2 x users blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:SonicClub. Binksternet (talk) 18:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Liz. AGK ■ 13:16, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The last 10 edits have either reverted vandalism or caused vandalism. Eridian314 (talk) 18:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AGK ■ 13:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, by multiple IPs. Skjoldbro (talk) 18:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined AGK ■ 13:22, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The socks returned right after protection expired. Pahunkat (talk) 18:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Hut 8.5. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Newly created account and IP hopping vandal removing referenced material and making legal threats. A brief reprieve may allow them the opportunity to find another hobby. Ifnord (talk) 19:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – RPP due to the topic, history of disruptive editing, and the likely-hood of it to continue. Nigel757 (talk) 01:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nigel757: The page cannot be extended confirmed protection without invoking semi-protection first. Because i see in the history of this page that majority or all of distruption came from IP users and only see good faith edits by non-IP users like autoconfirmed user. 36.68.184.231 (talk) 02:20, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator MissvainMelanieN (talk) 03:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Alivardi (talk) 09:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Un assiolo (talk) 11:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sudden recent high spike of IP vandalism Abcmaxx (talk) 13:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cypriot Chauvinist. New IPs turning up as soon as the previous ones are blocked. FDW777 (talk) 13:05, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 13:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See for yourself. I have no doubt vandalism will continue for the rest of the week. Thanks. Andrew Henderson (talk) 14:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP accounts (very likely affiliated with the subject). The page was temporarily semi-protected during January but the vandals are now again scrubbing reliably sourced content that reflects poorly on the subject. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:38, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:50, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See in that page history [1]. 110.137.165.39 (talk) 15:06, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 18:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Article has been protected for seven years as no IPs have been editing it. The IP who vandalized that page in the past is likely no longer active. - 174.91.132.224 (talk) 14:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: Pinging the protecting administrator. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected The long-term abusive vandal responsible for making the protection necessary used to come back every time protection was lifted, both on this article and others, but we can hope that they have found something else to do with their time now. JBW (talk) 21:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Article has been protected for seven years as no IPs have been editing it. The IP who vandalized that page in the past is likely no longer active. - 174.91.132.224 (talk) 14:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: Pinging the protecting administrator. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected The long-term abusive vandal responsible for making the protection necessary used to come back every time protection was lifted, both on this article and others, but we can hope that they have found something else to do with their time now. JBW (talk) 21:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From ECP to semi protection. The sock has now stopped coming, including in talk page. Can continue ECP if socking resumes, or any other user starts disruption. 2409:4073:4E81:6B31:704A:566E:2FD9:E2F1 (talk) 16:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith: Pinging the protecting administrator. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Malcolmxl5, I'll leave the final decision up to the folks who specialize in RPP, but my inclination would be to keep ECP. The sock who was most recently abusing this page is still active right now, so I suspect any reduction in protection level would just be an invitation for more abuse. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@RoySmith: I rather support it to reduced to semi-protection or pending changes instead. I believe the sock will not come back again to abuse the page as the user was indefinitely blocked. But there is a condition that if the protection level reduces to PC protection, all IP edits must be constructive not become vandalism. 36.76.227.169 (talk) 10:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I am with RoySmith here; just the fact that a sock has stopped editing a pet article for now is not sufficient grouds to reduce a useful protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

03 February 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - In the last 24 hours there has been persistent vandalism originating from IPs along with occasional unsourced claims. Requesting temporary semi-protection to allow proper editing to occur. Yeehaw45 (talk) 17:04, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Oh my yes. The floodgates opened, didn't they?  MelanieN (talk) 22:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Deletion of content. Purplemountainmantalk contribs 18:11, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection. This article has a long history of unconstructive edits. Many users seem to have their own theories about Bathory, and delight in trying to canonise them on the page. The article was protected for one month before (1), but that expired, and the unsourced/poorly sourced additions have started up again. The expiry of SP happened in October, and since then, of the 35 edits to the page, just over 50% of those have been reverted. The editor who was stemming the tide before, Flyer22, is no longer active, so until I or someone can fix it up... eurgh. I think that indefinite semi-protection would be my preferred outcome here, given that it very much halted the disruption before. I'll leave that to the attender to decide, though. Thanks for any help you can give! — ImaginesTigers (talk) 18:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Addition of contentious content sourced to Facebook only. The same incident was also repeatedly added to Erin B. Mee which lead to that article being protected. Sjö (talk) 18:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – also is TFA. Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 19:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NihonjoeMelanieN (talk) 22:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. GustavsGegeris (talk) 13:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Sorry GustavsGegeris but that page doesn’t exist on this Wikipedia. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP doggedly adding redlinked entry with virtually no hits in a Google search, probably a hoax, possibly themselves; completely unresponsive to messages in edit summary, article talk page and user talk page. T*U (talk) 16:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Two weeks for disruptive editing. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Appears to be the same IP-hopper as with Hailee Steinfeld. Please protect for 10 days. Thanks! (If this is a duplicate entry, my apologies; the interface did a weird thing.). Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper insistent on adding unsourced information. Please semi-protect for 10 days. Thanks. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Too much BLP violation by IPs and users. Adding content on the subjects' obscure adult film career in the lead. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP addresses and non-autoconfirmed users over the past few days through addition of unsourced info and edits which are not conforming with MOS, even after reversions. Alex Tenshi (talk|contribs) 16:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper insistent on adding unsourced information. Please semi-protect for 10 days. Thanks. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Too much BLP violation by IPs and users. Adding content on the subjects' obscure adult film career in the lead. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP addresses and non-autoconfirmed users over the past few days through addition of unsourced info and edits which are not conforming with MOS, even after reversions. Alex Tenshi (talk|contribs) 16:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent EW and Vandalism by IP. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:51, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have been vandalizing article for a while now. Pupsterlove02 talkcontribs 16:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of self-published sources by IP. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to "monke" being an internet meme, there are quite a few people trying to add jokes to this article. It should probably last a few months. Eridian314 (talk) 14:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent trolling. They'll find a new ip if you block their current one.Crboyer (talk) 15:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Vandalized by non-autoconfirmed user immediately after protection expired. ― Tartan357 Talk 15:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:29, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated, persistent vandalism. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 19:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 20:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – It has been deleted 10 times. Alcremie (talk) 13:28, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitelyMelanieN (talk) 19:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 14:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Every edit in the last 6 months has been vandalism/reversion. Also, that protection log is no joke. Opal|zukor(discuss) 16:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Moneytrees. For two years. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – It has been deleted 10 times. Alcremie (talk) 13:28, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitelyMelanieN (talk) 19:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 14:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Every edit in the last 6 months has been vandalism/reversion. Also, that protection log is no joke. Opal|zukor(discuss) 16:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Moneytrees. For two years. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Poppified talk 07:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.---Berig (talk) 07:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The protection history is beginning to look epic, and only more long lasting solutions are relevant at this point.--Berig (talk) 07:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism from various IP addresses. Shritwod (talk) 08:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.---Berig (talk) 08:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: seeing what has happened in the edit history, I think it needs at least one month.--Berig (talk) 08:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Poppified talk 07:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.---Berig (talk) 07:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The protection history is beginning to look epic, and only more long lasting solutions are relevant at this point.--Berig (talk) 07:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism from various IP addresses. Shritwod (talk) 08:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.---Berig (talk) 08:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: seeing what has happened in the edit history, I think it needs at least one month.--Berig (talk) 08:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism from various IP addresses. Shritwod (talk) 08:11, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Kichu🐘 Discuss 08:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism has occurred as a result of a controversy Wallen has involved himself in. It is likely this vandalism will continue. Requesting semi-protection for a while to limit the amount of “undoing” editors will likely have to do to revert vandalism. Yeehaw45 (talk) 08:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Page is being subject to IP vandalism constantly removing references to Yugoslavia. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 13:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Xiamatt (talk) 14:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:48, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – If this is highly-visible, it should not expire. (CC) Tbhotch 06:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AGK:--Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected indefinitely. AGK ■ 12:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism from various IP addresses. Shritwod (talk) 08:11, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Kichu🐘 Discuss 08:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism has occurred as a result of a controversy Wallen has involved himself in. It is likely this vandalism will continue. Requesting semi-protection for a while to limit the amount of “undoing” editors will likely have to do to revert vandalism. Yeehaw45 (talk) 08:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Page is being subject to IP vandalism constantly removing references to Yugoslavia. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 13:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Xiamatt (talk) 14:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:48, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – If this is highly-visible, it should not expire. (CC) Tbhotch 06:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AGK:--Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected indefinitely. AGK ■ 12:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Ahmetlii (talk) 09:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Moneytrees. for the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Kichu🐘 Discuss 10:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Article has been in fully-protected since more than two years because of repeated re-creation after WP:AFD and WP:PROMOTIONAL stuff. I find the actor has gained sufficient notability per WP:ENT during the course of time and there exists WP:RS and plan to create the article from this draft. The protecting admin TomStar81 has semi-retired. Thank you. — Amkgp 💬 19:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism from various IP addresses. Shritwod (talk) 08:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 11:51, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism related with 2021 Myanmar coup d'état. Please protect as least 1 week. Thanks. NinjaStrikers «» 08:23, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samwalton9. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Some of the articles of Kerala Blasters players are under persistent vandaliam from IPs Kichu🐘 Discuss 08:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this, and please re-report if vandalism persists. — Newslinger talk 11:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. This is the second time in last 10 days that the page is under vandalism. Requesting protection for a prolonges period Kichu🐘 Discuss 08:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this, and please re-report if vandalism persists. — Newslinger talk 11:38, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of a virtually empty article about the same subject as the target of the redirect. Onel5969 TT me 09:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 11:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Newslinger talk 11:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every edit bar one since the protection was removed on 14 Jan has been vandalism. Qazwsx777 (talk) 09:37, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please re-report if vandalism persists, and thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 11:47, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. MRZQ (talk) 09:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent vandalism over several months. Suonii180 (talk) 10:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This page is constantly vandalised for obvious reasons since January 28th. It was protected once for relentless vandalism the first few days but it seems to linger. Perhaps a few more days/weeks until the short squeeze event is at least not in the "In the news"-main page. Wretchskull (talk) 10:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — Newslinger talk 11:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:47, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 22:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.---Berig (talk) 08:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 05:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.---Berig (talk) 07:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. I say protect it for a month until the league is over. Kichu🐘 Discuss 08:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this, and please re-report if the vandalism persists. — Newslinger talk 11:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism from various IP addresses. Alwinks137 (talk) 09:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 11:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs removing sourced content without explanation [2], [3], [4]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 11:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Newslinger talk 11:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism from various IP addresses. Shritwod (talk) 08:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shritwod this section is for unprotection but you seem to be asking for it to be protected. It was protected by Widr on 29 January 2021. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:04, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I probably just selected the wrong think in Twinkle :) Shritwod (talk) 12:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP editing. Adding of hoax info. Myrabert01 (talk) 16:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.---Berig (talk) 06:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP editing . Adding of hoax info. Myrabert01 (talk) 16:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.---Berig (talk) 06:11, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated edits by IP users adding guest hosts to host parameter in infobox. AldezD (talk) 03:47, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.---Berig (talk) 06:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lightbluerain (Talk | contribs) 18:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.---Berig (talk) 06:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 00:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Berig (talk) 06:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection or indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism by IP's/unregistered users over a long period of time. Helper201 (talk) 00:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Berig (talk) 06:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced Wp: Ball content by IPs. Armegon (talk) 02:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Berig (talk) 06:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lightbluerain (Talk | contribs) 18:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.---Berig (talk) 06:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 00:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Berig (talk) 06:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection or indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism by IP's/unregistered users over a long period of time. Helper201 (talk) 00:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Berig (talk) 06:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced Wp: Ball content by IPs. Armegon (talk) 02:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Berig (talk) 06:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP editing. Adding of hoax info to the article. Myrabert01 (talk) 16:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin, but I'm having trouble seeing which hoax info you're talking about. Could you elaborate so they can better deal with this? Double Plus Ungood (talk) 18:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Berig (talk) 08:28, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP editing. Adding of hoax info on the article. Myrabert01 (talk) 16:47, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Berig (talk) 08:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disrupting IP editing. Adding of hoax info. Myrabert01 (talk) 16:48, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Berig (talk) 08:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP and new user vandalism. Kt Meursault (talk) 03:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 05:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disrupting IP editing. Adding of hoax info. Myrabert01 (talk) 16:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Berig (talk) 08:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: People are watching Phineas and Ferb at Disney+ and have re-discovered aglets. (CC) Tbhotch 18:16, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Berig (talk) 05:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ViperSnake151  Talk  19:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Berig (talk) 05:23, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Appears to be a persistent vandalism target. Aasim (talk) 21:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Berig (talk) 05:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Appears that most IP edits are unconstructive or vandalism over a long term. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 21:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Berig (talk) 05:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I previously brought this article to RPP and semi-protection was granted, but vandalism has started up shortly after the lock was removed. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 07:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely.--Berig (talk) 07:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. MBlaze Lightning 07:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Need to protect fast as vandalism is going out of control Kichu🐘 Discuss 07:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.---Berig (talk) 08:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Kichu🐘 Discuss 07:57, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.---Berig (talk) 08:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Really no reason for IPs to be editing this; it's mostly for MajavahBot. It's one click away from WP:EF/FP which naturally a lot of disruptive users will be reading. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 18:58, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Berig (talk) 06:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Poppified talk 06:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Moneytrees. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – High level of activity regarding undue and not reliably sourced allegations of Mee firing a BIPOC woman. This might be mentioned in WP:RS in the future but right now, IMO, it is a BLP violation to mention it. Sjö (talk) 06:38, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Berig (talk) 07:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 19:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The user in question has been indefinitely blocked, so I don't think this will be an issue going forward. Cheers, Ovinus (talk) 02:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 04:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term disruption from IPs, far too much unreferenced analysis in violation of WP:NOR. Several IP ranges are involved including Special:Contributions/2600:1702:3200:D3B0:0:0:0:0/64, Special:Contributions/2601:4A:8580:754C:0:0:0:0/64, Special:Contributions/2600:1700:E5E0:7CD0:0:0:0:0/64, Special:Contributions/2600:1700:81A0:4A90:0:0:0:0/64 and Special:Contributions/2601:408:C301:3EA0:0:0:0:0/64. Other articles in the same chronological series might need the same ECP status, for instance History of Saturday Night Live (2015–2020). Binksternet (talk) 22:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 04:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For nine months. Fueling cancellation rumors by IP edits. ApprenticeFan work 02:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 04:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This page is a bit of a BLP magnet and editors have repeatedly added poorly sourced or unsourced material about people appearing in sex tapes. Ovinus (talk) 02:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 04:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated additions of unsourced content that can not be verified by single IP despite warnings. Nigel757 (talk) 02:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 04:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Elizium23 (talk) 04:24, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 04:49, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent re-creation of article by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hanoi vandal. Binksternet (talk) 06:24, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 04:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – any admin can add per WP:GS/CRYPTO. ongoing vandalism, article subject is controversial BLP in crypto space. needs lock. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 07:47, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 04:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 08:43, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 04:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPs restoring material by a blocked sockmaster. Liberaldemocrat (talk) 11:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 04:57, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandalism here tends to come in waves. Some are spam or promotional material that requires to be completely deleted from the wiki. Although right now vandalism is low, this page is a disaster waiting to happen. Double Plus Ungood (talk) 14:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 05:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sustained sockpuppetry by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Xayahrainie43. Also if you could block the IP, that'd be great. JBL (talk) 14:56, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 05:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 05:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 22:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Berig (talk) 06:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequently updated with fake info and no, or completely made up sources. Nickx4 (talk) 23:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Berig (talk) 06:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations. Woodroar (talk) 23:20, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Berig (talk) 06:04, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 22:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 05:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Just enough time needed to wear down an ANI nonsense adding vandal who keeps then moving to my talk page. Nate (chatter) 00:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism (in Burmese) by IPs, precipitated by the party's involvement in the 2021 Myanmar coup d'état. ― Tartan357 Talk 01:06, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jevansen (talk) 01:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent and repeated vandalism / corporate promotion from a sock/meatpuppet cluster. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 05:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 03:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – IP user keep changing date of birth without providing reliable source. Paper9oll (📣📝) 12:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 05:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article was up for a rewrite and it was completed on 18 December 2020. Since then some caste POV pushers (IPs and users) started reverting to the old unreliably sourced version [5] [6] [7] [8]. It was protected by Ivanvector on 23 December. But since the expiry of the protection, these IPs and new users have again started reverting to the old unreliable/poorly sourced version [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]. Requesting protection and if possible extended, since some users might gain autoconfirmed rights in the mean time. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:16, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also note how the user makes it clear that they'll use another account to revert war "continuously " here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 05:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Single-purpose editor(s) (User and IP) is engaging in persistent disruptive editing by adding material without sources; has been warned against doing this multiple times. --Bangalamania (talk) 15:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If it's IP vandalism, them only semi-protection is needed, plus a block of the offending user. —C.Fred (talk) 18:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@C.Fred: The offending user (I believe) has used an IP originally but is now using a Wikipedia account. There are other IPs which seem to have hopped onto the article as well. I've tried to raise the issue over at WP:ANEW. --Bangalamania (talk) 19:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bangalamania: I have the page on my watchlist. It seems to have quieted down over the last hour or two. —C.Fred (talk) 19:47, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your edits! I agree that it has, but I worry that this will be a recurring problem if the page is not protected, as it is not the first time an edit war like this has taken place. --Bangalamania (talk) 19:48, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 05:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously protected, there must be something in the news that has sparked a renewed IP interest in vandalism. Ifnord (talk) 20:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Player is having a very good game against his former team and fans are vandalizing the page. 24 hr should do it. Dbrodbeck (talk) 01:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HickoryOughtShirt?4. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same garbage immediately resurfaces. dannymusiceditor oops 04:16, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Kaiser matias. Berig (talk) 04:48, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article subject was recently arrested for domestic violence. When previous protection expired it became a target for vandalism. This article may need long term protection, not necessarily indefinite, but long term. Rockchalk717 04:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 04:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nearly all edits since semi expired in 2019 have been vandalism. PC isn't helping here. agtx 16:41, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:06, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Too much vandalism for PC. 1 year might not be long enough, but we can evaluate in a year. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:06, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Request downgrade of protection from full protection to Extended-Confirmed protection. This title was cut down to a redirect and fully protected seven years ago due to repeated re-creation of articles on the child actor. The subject is no longer a child, and Draft:Dev Joshi has been submitted to AFC. Downgrade to ECP will permit an AFC reviewer to review, and to accept if and only if notable. Protecting admin User:SlimVirgin said to take this request to RFPP. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:58, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Seems reasonable. Always a pleasure, Robert. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP editor is adding information to the page that is not cited and is edit warring with Darkwarriorblake over it. Hopefully protecting the page will encourage them to provide more sources and a section for what they want to add Jericho Morales (talk) 21:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Berig (talk) 20:38, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All recent edits have been vandalism. Steve M (talk) 01:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Berig (talk) 21:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP. Nigel757 (talk) 01:48, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Berig (talk) 21:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Berig (talk) 20:20, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism in the past few days on this page. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 22:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Berig (talk) 21:10, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting semi-protection due to repeated insertion of factually incorrect informating by an anonymous editor who is using varying IP addresses. Dmoore5556 (talk) 23:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Berig (talk) 21:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the news today, being hit hard by silly IP vandalisms. A brief reprieve seems reasonable. Ifnord (talk) 23:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04 February 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Replacing PC protection with semi-protection; article is too heavily edited for PC to work well.  MelanieN (talk) 22:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Part of another round of renaming Grace O'Malley into a non-Irish name. The Banner talk 14:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I see one of the users has started a discussion on the talk page; that's the way to handle this. MelanieN (talk) 22:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism for a few weeks now. Blocking vandal-only account User:UnknownUnderdog would help, but there's also IP vandalism. Fram (talk) 22:16, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GMA Network's programs and others

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing of multiple IP addresses. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 01:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to all seven. MelanieN (talk) 22:16, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ottawa TV station articles

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring between two IPs. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to all four. MelanieN (talk) 22:22, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This visible article has been vandalised a lot. Some edits have disguised themselves as good edits but are subtle vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 15:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 22:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – TFA posted as 10:16 UTC, and there is a high level of IP vandalism after that. 36.68.194.127 (talk) 21:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 22:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Apparently there is a current meme in China encouraged by the government to claim that Kimchi comes from China, they keep vandalizing the article toward that end. M.boli (talk) 05:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Semi-protection: The article is moderately important; and gets high level of WP:VANDALISM and edit-warring from IP users and new accounts—Check the edit history. Danloud (talk) 12:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 20:49, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – And addition of unsourced content. ~ ItsJustLukas talk|Contribs 21:14, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism by IPs since protection expired. ― Tartan357 Talk 21:16, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement--Ymblanter (talk) 21:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Frequent vandalism and disruptive editing. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 02:16, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Diannaa (talk) 14:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IP disruptive unsourced. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Single purpose IP accounts targeting a BLP article. ---Snowded TALK 05:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:16, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sharp rise in vandalism from many IPs. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 19:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hut 8.5 19:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Chinese man is presenting historically unproven evidence, distorting Goguryeo, Baekje, Silla, and Goryeo as China's tributaries. The Three Kingdoms period consists of Goguryeo, Baekje, and Silla. Goguryeo, Baekje, and Silla were independent countries and had never received political intervention from China. Goguryeo, Baekje,Silla and Goryeo used their own era names and engaged in independent politics and diplomacy. Goguryeo, Baekje,Silla and Goryeo continued to wage war with China. These countries fought a lot of wars with China, but they have never been defeated by China before they were destroyed. Goguryeo,Baekje,Silla and Goryeo were not tributary state of China. dreamkid05 (talk) 11:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Requestor has been partially blocked for edit warring and this is a content dispute, not vandalism. We don't use page protection to promote one side in a content dispute. Hut 8.5 12:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Protect for a long time due to vandalism. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 14:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target of the tiktok 'Notable people' vandalism wave. MrOllie (talk) 15:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP/new account BLP vandalism. 108.56.139.120 (talk) 00:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Diannaa (talk) 14:48, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please re-report if the problem resumes at that point — Diannaa (talk) 14:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of disruptive editing from multiple non-autoconfirmed accounts and IPs. Perryprog (talk) 14:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not actually sure what the dispute here is about—I'm not confident I can figure out what the last stable edit was (if there is one), so semi protection might be a bad call. I don't have time right now to investigate further, so I'm leaving this up out of caution. Perryprog (talk) 14:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Semi-protection expired, and vandalism has continued. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 14:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 14:45, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I wonder if this article should go back to semi-protection. Pending changes seems to be a waste of editor time, as the IPs are not adding anything of value. I had a look at the last 50 edits, which goes back to October. Thanks. — Diannaa (talk) 14:37, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., if it persists after one year, we will have to protect indef--Ymblanter (talk) 14:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent Ip and new user vandalism. Skingo12 (talk) 11:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of hoaxes. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 12:41, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: My sincerest apologies if this is the wrong place to state this (I'm still relatively new to this...) - The page was protected with the problematic user's edits in place :/ What can I do about this? 51.37.177.45 (talk) 13:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@51.37.177.45: Does the page suffered a persistent vandalism? I believe this request cannot be invoked as it doesn't have vandalism for 24-hour period. 36.68.194.127 (talk) 13:18, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Berig. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:13, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuous addition of unsourced content. Gilbert.JW (talk) 11:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 12:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is being heavily targeted by Indonesian DOB vandal. The vandal has many target pages and will probably move on to another one if this is protected, but this article's history is becoming a mess. One of the vandal's IP ranges Special:Contributions/36.73.249.117 is currently blocked, but the vandal has so many ranges available that blocking isn't very effective (either). kyykaarme (talk) 06:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent edit warring and unsourced additions. NebulousPhantom (talk) 06:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has been a long-term target of quite a few WP:SPA editors with blatant COI and WP:SPA IPs here only to whitewash this article. Several of us have been fighting this PR onslaught for quite some time and we need some help. Toddst1 (talk) 06:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC). Toddst1 (talk) 06:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the article has never been previously protected, so I applied one year first--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IP addresses. Emirhan Ogun (talk) 21:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple BLPs

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent attempts by IP hopper to use unreliable reference despite consensus against at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 323#House of Parliament raw data for dates of birth of living people and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#House of Parliament raw data for dates of birth of living people. Today's IPs Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent addition of improperly referenced dates of birth for living people FDW777 (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same IP hopper as above section, but on this article they seem to think the subject's favourite biscuit deserves a section of its own. FDW777 (talk) 22:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 22:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism after protection expired. POLITANVM talk 21:28, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Relentless vandalism and disruptive editing. Wretchskull (talk) 21:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Idell (talk) 22:11, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. KyleJoantalk 00:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KyleJoan: This page cannot be extended confirmed protected due to many distruption came from IP users and doesn't prequently happen. See in that page history. 36.68.194.127 (talk) 00:49, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Steve M (talk) 20:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Even though this has been protected before, vandalism and unconstructive edits (mostly by IP-users) persist. There are some chunks of good edits here and there but even some of them are unconstructive or unsourced. Wretchskull (talk) 20:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption by troll with vendetta against Jonathan Pryce. Crboyer (talk) 23:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel (talk) 01:13, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I think we should protect the page, until a new government will be formed. -- Nick.mon (talk) 15:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nick.mon, it looks like this might be a duplicate of my above request. ― Tartan357 Talk 15:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tartan357, definitely, it's my fault! -- Nick.mon (talk) 15:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. Well, I'm not seeing a request above, but this article does not appear to need protection at this time. There is very little vandalism, and there appears to be some constructive editing by IPs. We don't protect pages pre-emptively. But if vandalism becomes a problem, ask again. MelanieN (talk) 20:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
MelanieN, Nick.mon copied and pasted the article name I requested protection for—Myint Swe (general)—and corrected the error after I pointed it out. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:37, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Constant edit warring over the lead with regard to various technicalities ("Is he the first gay Cabinet secretary?" "What about the first confirmed gay Cabinet secretary?" "Has he actually taken office yet?" etc.) with very few people going to the relevant talk page sections. Instead, editors are just opening the page, finding something they think needs to be updated or fixed, and reverting, with no chance of consensus being established. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 15:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AllegedlyHuman, one of the most recent instances was by an admin. I don't think ECP will help there. ― Tartan357 Talk 16:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That seems logical, and in that case, I'd support something stronger. However, that decision is ultimately for whomever decides to close the request. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 16:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
AllegedlyHuman, what would you support? There's no way to protect a page against edits by admins. ― Tartan357 Talk 16:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You're right (I had to pull out the chart again). I did not know that one of the users involved in this was an admin initially, which makes this whole thing even messier. I'm not really sure what's an appropriate course of action to take. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 16:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
AllegedlyHuman, we just have to deal with it through normal discussion on a per-editor basis. I started a talk page section to address the issue. The most we can do to pre-empt erroneous edits by EC editors is to leave a comment in the article text, which I already did. It seems this admin missed it. ― Tartan357 Talk 16:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: AllegedlyHuman, This is one of many questions that actually comes from IP (173.93.21.160), like "Is he the first gay Cabinet secretary", "first openly gay person to serve at a Cabinet level", etc. and that sentences was added by admin. Due to fact that most edit come from extended confirmed users like you as well as admin as mentioned above, the page cannot be ECP and i don't see any users intent to vandalize or distrupt the article except there are "Reverted" tags in they edit. I think you request is a fault. 110.137.165.39 (talk) 16:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. If this gets to be actual edit warring we could full-protect the page, but it isn't to that point yet. Meanwhile you all should use the talk page, with references, so that you can point to a clear consensus for the exact wording. MelanieN (talk) 20:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Salt evasion of Summer Helene. Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05 February 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism related with 2021 Myanmar coup d'état. NinjaStrikers «» 17:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adding content without edit summary, not referenced and potential OR, creating pure pov sections, much of it already covered into History section, the same content added by various IPs so it is maybe sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. Nubia86 (talk) 18:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: IPs edit warring against three different new page reviewers and accusing them of vandalism. signed, Rosguill talk 20:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This looks like logged-out edit warring, so I've left a warning for that as well.Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the past few months. Iaintfaking (talk) 15:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I almost applied pending changes, but there has only really been one bit of vandalism in weeks, and it was reverted almost immediately. Please make a new report if the vandalism/disruption starts up again. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. (CC) Tbhotch 20:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. HunMaster (talk) 10:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jauerback. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism with dynamic IP use talk to !dave 20:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes. Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing over a substantial time. Ashleyyoursmile! 20:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Persistent BLP violations. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Shinyeditbonjour. 20:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dirkbb (talk) 20:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by ShirumakaVn using multiple IPs from South Africa from the range Special:Contributions/105.9.64.0/18. Binksternet (talk) 21:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 07:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like content dispute to me.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There have been several instances of vandalism on this page within the past few days, at least one of which you just hid. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 08:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think is IP 40.133.234.46 that vandalize the page? 36.68.194.127 (talk) 08:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Warned 40.133.234.46 (talk · contribs). — Newslinger talk 09:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Update: another case of IP vandalism, this time containing a racist attack on Bush. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 15:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please re-report if vandalism persists. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 16:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2600:6C40:100:3894:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). Blocked for 1 week. — Newslinger talk 16:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Nearly all edits in the past two months have been by vandals. Scorpions13256 (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued IP vandalism and BLP issues. Page has been protected four times since last May for the same issues. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – ongoing addition of unsourced material to BLP. Joeyconnick (talk) 19:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Shinyeditbonjour. 19:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting permanentSemi-protection: High level of IP vandalism for months now. IP vandals and sometimes new users. Probably the same determined person. Dream Focus 17:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just had to rollback the same person who used a new IP address that never edited Wikipedia before. Special:Contributions/T-stud was blocked for vandalizing it, but only for two weeks despite being an account that hadn't edited for years and only editing that one article. Special:Contributions/2600:1700:C710:E530:5185:A00A:4F16:F22B I rolledback, no edits other than vandalism. Special:Contributions/2600:1700:C710:E530:C83D:BBDF:25C0:6DC1 had to be reverted for the same edits, removing a section of the article they didn't like. Same person just determined. Then unrelated vandals that just post obscene things such as [15]. Of course even regular editors seem to be vandalizing the page such as AdanXX who erased all content and posted an insult about the movie at [16]. Nonsense edits like [17] from an IP address with no other edits ever. Is there a bot that shows how many times ClueBot NG or an editor reverts someone? Most problems are done by IP addresses on that article and it doesn't look like its going to stop. Dream Focus 07:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article is attracting some seriously sub-par edits. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A temporary spurt in disruptive editing. Tomorrow is the 'Kashmir Day' in Pakistan. Kautilya3 (talk) 20:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ashleyyoursmile! 14:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 12:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 12:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated instances of IP vandalism over the last few weeks. MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Politicized vandalism. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ashleyyoursmile! 15:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism; almost every edit to the article has been reverted. Carbrera (talk) 15:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated instances of IP vandalism and unconstructive edits over the last few weeks.Dialectric (talk) 16:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tied to Harry Styles. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 16:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple new accounts and IPs adding same spam link. POLITANVM talk 14:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, likely from same user (on Three Mobile, Dublin) as it's the same text inserted each time. Declangi (talk) 08:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 10:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 80.233.32.0/19 (talk · contribs). Blocked for 6 months. — Newslinger talk 10:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: More Harry Styles-related vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 08:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bongwarrior. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brown Chocolate (talk) 08:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Enterprisey. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brown Chocolate (talk) 09:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bongwarrior. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 09:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator QEDK. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple IP accounts incorrectly changing stats, following the player recently scoring a century. This should not be edited until after the match, which ends in four days. Mrmariomaster 10:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, more to be expected. The footballer has received a doping ban. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GiantSnowman. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption by long-term IP-hopping editor. Citobun (talk) 13:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Citobun reverted edits which he got no reason to revert, e.g. the wikilink to curved platforms. And no I don't hop. 203.218.129.244 (talk) 14:05, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I provided reasons. And you are certainly 168.70.42.84 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), and probably the same person who has recently been adding nonsense to Hong Kong station, Tsing Yi station, Tuen Ma line, etc. Citobun (talk) 14:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
On "168.70.42.84": Yes but that was just because the previous connection was lost and reset. "[P]robably the same person who has recently been adding nonsense to Hong Kong station, Tsing Yi station, Tuen Ma line, etc." No what'd happened? Wrong person? 203.218.129.244 (talk) 14:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 09:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - @AllegedlyHuman: currently just one recent vandal IP - can be handled without protection. I shall watchlist in case of more IPs/accounts heading to the page Nosebagbear (talk) 09:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This is the talk page of an article which User:Atsme had forcibly converted into a redirect to an article on a somehow related but quite different topic. There is no edit war around the article. (There are charges for sockpuppetry for the talk page - that some editors went far enough to strike out some comments while failing to produce any evidence, but the investigations have been inconclusive.) 218.189.215.212 (talk) 14:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, disruption is from the topic starter and all over the place. If they start arguing here again and again, please block.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nosebagbear (talk) 09:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ―sportzpikachu my talkcontribs 08:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Premeditated Chaos. Semi-protected for 2 weeks. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 09:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Another victim of the Harry Styles fan mass vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 08:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 10:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism, apparently all from Iran, but in different ranges. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 08:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Already protected by administrator Nosebagbear. Nosebagbear (talk) 09:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandals have moved here. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 09:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Already protected by administrator Enterprisey. Nosebagbear (talk) 09:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC):[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 09:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Already protected by administrator Enterprisey. Nosebagbear (talk) 09:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC):[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 09:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Enterprisey. Nosebagbear (talk) 09:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC):[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP editors and new accounts after Trump publicly called for his supporters to "get rid of" her and became fixated on "taking her down". Many high-profile articles in American politics are already extended confirmed protected, and recent events have made her a significant target for that kind of disruptive editing. Tataral (talk) 03:05, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tataral: Look at this page history, I don't see any intention to vandalize the article because it was already semi-protected on 31 January. IMO, your request is flawed because i don't see any "Reverted" tags in the article after it was semi-protected and Please read WP:NO-PREEMPT which stats that pages cannot protected pre-emptively. 36.68.194.127 (talk) 03:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The existing semi-protection is working, there is no need for ECP. MelanieN (talk) 21:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

America's Got Talent (season 3)

Extended Semi-protection: Requesting current protection be extended for much longer, in regards to sockpuppets disrupting articles on seasons before and after this season. GUtt01 (talk) 09:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is, but this is a request to extend that protection on that page for a longer period, out of concern that it could be disrupted again when it ends on 9 February 2021. GUtt01 (talk) 09:41, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@GUtt01: You needs to wait until that date to see whether or not distruption resume. If after that date (9 February) distruption resumes, whether IP or new users, you can request the page but only after the initial protection expires. Please read WP:NO-PREEMPT, page protection cannot be used as preemptive measures. 36.68.194.127 (talk) 10:22, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. MelanieN (talk) 21:48, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brown Chocolate (talk) 08:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the larries are raiding here. gobonobo + c 08:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 08:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

America's Got Talent Seasons - Singapore Vandalism

Semi-protection: Repeating same request for semi-protection request. Despite efforts to deal with the sockpuppets of User:Agt2008fan, blocking them whenever they surface, it seems they tried to sneak in once again and vandalize these pages; for the talk page, they continued to insist on forwarding false information about a season's "actual winner". These pages must be semi-protected to halt this disruptive behaviour. GUtt01 (talk) 09:24, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done, configured pending changes for the articles and semi-protected the talk page for three days--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: There has been a few times within the past day or so that were reverted. In addition, this is a highly sensitive article right now and this would likely prevent any vandalism. Wxman28 (talk) 20:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wxman28: I don't see any user that will conduct further vandalism or edit warring. As far as i know, pages cannot be protected preemptively per WP:NO-PREEMPT. Your statement that "this would likely prevent a further vandalism" falls within NO-PREEMPT category because we cannot protected any article as preemptive measures to prevent vandalism or edit warring. Aside from that, semi-protection is be worked as intended. 36.68.194.127 (talk) 20:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lots of experienced users there to fix stuff, and the volume of vandalism is low. If it gets out of hand, make another report. Wug·a·po·des 00:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – or a range block. (CC) Tbhotch 21:45, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2605:a601:ac32:a600::/64 blocked by Cyphoidbomb. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple ips. gobonobo + c 07:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism/disruptive edits from new users. AntonSamuel (talk) 22:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 24.205.128.222 (talk · contribs). Wug·a·po·des 00:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A bunch of sockpuppet accounts from User:INQbnx have been adding a copy-pasted material in this article. This article was semi-protected for one month last October 19 for the same reason. -WayKurat (talk) 02:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Moneytrees. Wug·a·po·des 01:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple IPs adding unsourced information since protection expired a few days ago. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 00:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how that goes. If it becomes unmanageable let me know and I can add semi-protection. I've also granted you reviewer rights so that you can maintain the article effectively. Wug·a·po·des 01:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Wugapodes: Thank you. But i see in edit history, there is no expire time for pending changes protection, which assume to be expire on 5 February 2022. 36.68.194.127 (talk) 01:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks anon! I've just fixed it. Wug·a·po·des 01:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Liz. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Elizium23 (talk) 05:08, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 21:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by one user with different IPs. Robby.is.on (talk) 11:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: not ready to block /20 range --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Requesting protection per request at WT:FOOTY. IP and a new user are having a dispute over the statistics and semi-protection has been requested. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 12:41, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 21:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/edit warring by newly created account. — Hemant Dabral (📞) 13:37, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Report user to the appropriate noticeboard if they persist. Semi-protection would be ineffective as the user is autoconfirmed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:10, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing WP:CALIPH disruption from the fanatics. FDW777 (talk) 23:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected 12 hours. Wug·a·po·des 23:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Perhaps students. Alanscottwalker (talk) 23:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 23:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Freqeunt high levels of IP vandalism and WP:NOTHERE edits for the controversial and sensitive subject. PyroFloe (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There has been no vandalism for over a week. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – incessant IP action -- likely vandalism, "Vita Rastrygina" appears to be a brothel madam in Switzerland. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 15:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism from IPs and unregistered users likely acting in tandem. KidAd talk 17:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 20:07, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MelanieN. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:49, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06 February 2021

Semi-protection: Persistent level of IP vandalism, on-going for weeks now. P 1 9 9   03:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previously ECP for 3 months due to autoconfirmed sock puppets. Warrants longer term ECP. Fuzheado | Talk 14:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPs colocating to the same location using edit summaries such as "stable version" to reintroduce their edits. ShelteredCook (talk) 18:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IPs trying to add their fraudulent website since 21 January 2021. They're doing the same thing to the others languages of this article. --Takagami (talk) 19:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of banned vandal Pcgmsrich. Steve M (talk) 14:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Two sockmasters/one prolific sockmaster edit warring over the article or attempting to troll editors. Pahunkat (talk) 17:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Favonian (talk) 18:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Pahunkat (talk) 17:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Seems to be one of the target pages prone to Holocaust denial spam. Moxy 🍁 04:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The lone problem user is blocked and not enough activity to warrant protection. Fuzheado | Talk 14:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 15:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs regarding adding unsourced voice actors. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 16:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive activity from IPs and new users. Ashleyyoursmile! 18:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and BLP violations. 36.68.194.127 (talk) 21:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Per above. MelanieN (talk) 00:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit dispute from various editors/IPs, unsourced editing. BOVINEBOY2008 10:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 14:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate return of previous editing behaviour, which brought on previous page protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 21:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 06:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Alcremie (talk) 05:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Fuzheado | Talk 08:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Retrofan781 (talk) 23:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP addresses adding unsourced and controversial info. --*Fehufangą✉ Talk page03:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – TEArese and Thereeseee3 keep pushing in the same content, not sure if they are sockpuppet though but both exhibit the same behavior. Hence requesting ECP temporary. Paper9oll (📣📝) 03:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Paper9oll: Two users you mentioned are not yet autoconfirmed. A user can be autoconfirmed if there are 10 edits in the last 4 days. IMO, this article is more likely semi-protected or in another option, block two users and report that to AIV. 36.68.194.127 (talk) 04:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Due to a prank by Abby Govindan claiming to be the creator of the show, many people are rushing to change the creator on Wikipedia. Teo0321 (talk) 05:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks a little too busy for PCP. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Pretty obvious COI edits on the page, pushing a very pro-Speziale view, similar to what's happened in the past. The most recent IP editing the page (68.199.175.46) geolocates to Paterson, NJ, which is where Speziale works. Ravensfire (talk) 19:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @Ravensfire: I think a partial block for the IP if they don't heed your warning would be more effective than semi-protection. I've added the article to my watchlist and will help monitor it for further COI edits.Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ponyo, sounds good - they tend to edit in spurts, so hopefully the notes and warnings they've gotten will do the trick. Ravensfire (talk) 18:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing IP disruption. KidAd talk 01:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Just for today NoahDavid771 (talk) 13:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: TFA Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP user as soon as the previous protection expired. -- Nick.mon (talk) 21:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One day after protection is removed and we are back to disruptive edits by IP's. Bacondrum 01:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Fuzheado | Talk 02:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 02:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 02:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Too easy to misidentify title as a grammar error. Firestar464 (talk) 10:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There is no history of inappropriate page moves (or any page moves) in 17 years. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – unprotect when the editor is blocked. Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 21:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism multiple IPs. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. PCP in place. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: regular IP vandalism / NPOV edits. Seems election-related, and should go away after 2021 Samoan general election in early April --IdiotSavant (talk) 22:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfareMelanieN (talk) 01:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 00:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Block evasion by NOTHERE editor; given that they are engaging in such a temporary page protection seems a warranted preventive measure. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Downgrade to pending changes protection: I believe this request is resonable because Samsara semi-protect this page due to too much vandalism on that page back in 2017 but there are already have pp-pc1 in the page. So, i have question, why this page is indefinite semi-protected but have still have pp-pc1 on it? If yes, why not downgrade to PC protection because i see that there are no vandalism in the last three years. Also, if this page is indefinite semi-protected, why not remove pp-pc1 on it. Thanks. 36.68.194.127 (talk) 02:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment: As I saw, the page was pending changes protected and semi-protected indefinite. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 02:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: That's because there is a bug which removes all PC1 labelling if PC1 is disabled. So in case the semi is ever revoked, we leave the PC1 in place so that its record may be preserved. Samsara 02:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Xiamatt (talk) 22:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Xiamatt (talk) 22:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Xiamatt (talk) 22:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – regular IP disruption and lots of edit warring from an IP and others. Bacondrum 23:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 00:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Shinyeditbonjour. 22:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by anonymous editors; violation of MOS policies. livelikemusic (TALK!) 21:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Too many disruptive edits from IP users over the last six months or so, and particularly recently, so I think the protection level should be changed indefinitely to discourage this behaviour, especially with No Time to Die to be released later in the year. 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 04:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Replacing indefinite PC protection with indefinite semi-protection. The article is way too heavily edited for PC to work well.  MelanieN (talk) 00:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of vandalism. Changing name from Sneed to Chuck. Robvanvee 05:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Is this some kind of internet meme or something? MelanieN (talk) 00:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/HANOI. Jalen Folf (talk) 08:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. The article has required virtually continuous semi-protection for the past several years. MelanieN (talk) 00:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NJD-DE (talk) 20:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are there no administrators watching that board?! --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: MadJack1974GR has been adding text that is libelous onto this BLP article, which, as it happens, concerns a very serious issue of public health. Here is an attempt to distort what the sources actually determined. Here is another attempt by MadJack1974GR and anonymous ISPs to insert text insinuating fraud and other criminal acts committed by the article's subject, citing unreliable sources, e.g. an obscure sports page (!) and various marginal and conspiracist websites in Greece. I suggest a temporary full protection of the page, allowing things to simmer down. I also propose a topic ban about anything related to Covid-19, because, as it is apparent from their talk page, advice & warnings are ignored. (I tried to point out guidelines concerning BLP but all I got back was an angry message.) -The Gnome (talk) 20:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like a new IP has taken up the cause. I will come to your talk page with further suggestions. MelanieN (talk) 22:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – + MOS:PLOT issues. (CC) Tbhotch 20:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite or Longterm semi-protection: Page sees persistent vandalism from IP editors saying it's extinct due to misinformation from a 3 year old pop science article about a different parrot.--Mr Fink (talk) 17:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07 February 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. HurricaneEdgar 15:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 19:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. MPFitz1968 (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blockedMelanieN (talk) 19:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 21:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Protection: Persistent vandalism from fans of a YouTube reviewer. NerdwiththehatTalk 20:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 20:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been recreated a couple of times now. Cupper52 (talk) 11:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Hummerrocket (talk) 18:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. HurricaneEdgar 16:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing and persistent vandalism concerning changing this person's last name from Sneed to "Chuck" that multiple accounts think is ohsoclever and ohsofunny. Related to any WP:BIO article about a person whose last name is Sneed - including Sam Sneed, Troy Sneed, Christine Sneed, R. R. Sneed and so on and so on ad infinitum. Shearonink (talk) 18:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Fuzheado. Favonian (talk) 18:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IPs and new users. Ashleyyoursmile! 17:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP hijinks. Anon user hopping IPs with proxies (from Cote d'Ivoire to Argentina) reverting on the article in violation of the 500/30 ArbCom restriction. Arbitration enforcement – 500/30 restriction: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. This prohibition may be enforced preemptively by the use of extended confirmed protection (ECP), or by other methods such as reverts, pending changes protection, and appropriate edit filters. Since this has to do with the relations between Second Polish Republic and Hitler, it falls under the scope of the restriction. Volunteer Marek 18:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. Favonian (talk) 18:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Months long ongoing vandalism: changing name to "Chuck". Robvanvee 06:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071. FDW777 (talk) 10:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: WingedHussars5000 (talk · contribs). CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 23:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Xiamatt (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Xiamatt (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP adding random stuff in French and vandalizing the article. Paul Vaurie (talk) 01:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism, low level of productive edits. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 20:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 21:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 23:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued disruptive editing after ending of previous block. Alivardi (talk) 12:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and BLP issues. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks (of Pseudo Nihilist) making disruptive edits and engaging in edit warring [18], [19], [20], [21]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs/new users every day since last month. Esiymbro (talk) 03:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protect - short term, sudden & persistent disruptive edits from some ip users. - wolf 04:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since this report, the has been, and is continuing to be repeatedly vandalized by ip-hopping sock. Request immediate protection. - wolf 08:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 05:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Crossroads -talk- 05:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Angeli (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection - persistent IP vandalism - Adolphus79 (talk) 05:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The page needs to continously semi-protected due to fact that vandalism will become more persistent without it. 182.1.230.155 (talk) 05:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive activity, including addition of unsourced content from IPs and new users. Ashleyyoursmile! 06:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Xiamatt (talk) 00:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Xiamatt (talk) 00:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection or WP:PC. Persistent IP whitewashing. Guy (help! - typo?) 01:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 01:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of disruptive editing from non-AC'd accounts and IPs. Currently finding the last stable version. Perryprog (talk) 02:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 18:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent edit warring. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 18:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Fell looks like overkill. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Ahmetlii (talk) 18:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Pinging Oshwah. Idell (talk) 21:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive edits and IP vandalism. This page's protection just expired, and is going back to the same types of IP vandalism that happened from before the protection was in place, by one-edit IP accounts that are putting the same fake characters into the page. ZootyCutie (talk) 23:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: User:Assaf Official did this edit in November, adding stacks of unsourced opinions on a BLP [22]. I reverted in January and he then reverted from an IP address, threatening to get me blocked because I disagreed with him removing references and adding unsourced opinions on a BLP. [23] Semi-protection will mean that Assaf Official will have to use his own account to edit war on this page, instead of using IPs to give a false veneer of consensus 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:30B4:2ED:892D:9950 (talk) 15:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing and vandalism by different IPs. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 16:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Second this request. This article has experienced an onslaught of disruption/vandalism. S0091 (talk) 01:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Idell (talk) 13:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruption by new account/IP. FDW777 (talk) 16:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 01:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. JRDkg (talk) 10:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs changing sourced content, replacing with unsourced content [24] [25] [26]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 13:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 13:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Elizium23 (talk) 01:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 05:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. NedFausa (talk) 23:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 23:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and edit warring. Jonny (talk) 01:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP edits making unsourced changes and replacing straight quotes with curly quotes. Armadillopteryx 03:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over several months. Reduced from extended confirmed protection in January 2021. Recent vandalism. JPA24 (talk) 19:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 20:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Alcremie (talk) 01:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitelyMelanieN (talk) 23:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 15:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 18:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow-moving but persistent track record of IP users adding unsourced statements to this BLP. Geoff | Who, me? 15:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 19:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add this post to the talk page: "Why was the COVID-19 pandemic moved down from the top of "In the news" to "Ongoing"?" 83.9.219.151 (talk) 20:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The most likely answer you will receive is "Because of the following discussion: Wikipedia talk:In the news#COVID-19 banner. It seems to be open though. (CC) Tbhotch 01:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – question has been answered. Favonian (talk) 19:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08 February 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent vandalism by IP editor, adding of unsourced and false information. Repeatedly worned. Seloloving (talk) 04:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. POV-pushers with dynamic IP use talk to !dave 16:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Favonian (talk) 21:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. TigerScientist Chat 17:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 17:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From extended confirmed to auto confirmed. This page don't deserve this high protection. Compare it to Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama. These articles recieve much more views and vandalism than Aoun's, and there all less in protection. --Maudslay II (talk) 13:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The article was protected as an arbitration enforcement, and there's no reason to believe that things have quieted down in that region. Favonian (talk) 17:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AFC/NFC Championship Game

Indefinite semi-protection: Daily disruptive edits by IP vandals. – Sabbatino (talk) 21:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The NFC page has already been protected for a month. To match, the AFC page is now Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amount of IPs attempting to remove information. Greyjoy talk 10:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 20:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Heavy spamming. KH-1 (talk) 12:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 20:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism and addition of unsourced & unconstructive content from new users. Wretchskull (talk) 20:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 20:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and content removal by IP users. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 18:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 20:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: An IP hopper with the IP from the Pittsburgh area has returned and keeps re-adding content that is not supported by the sources. – Sabbatino (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 20:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Ilovecats516 (talk) 19:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment...it appears that there may be WP:SOCK here as well. Wxman28 (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Fuzheado | Talk 20:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ✨ Ed talk!04:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by Premeditated Chaos.—Bagumba (talk) 13:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editor keeps "removing slander" despite having multiple warnings. Roxy the grumpy dog . wooF 14:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of article recently died and there has been lots of vandalism sense then. Mpdmonster (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: There haven't been any disruptive edits since Muboshgu semi-protected the page. Why not see if semi works before upgrading to ECP? Pages are not protected preemptively. ― Tartan357 Talk 17:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semiprotection should be sufficient. It was all IP vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Favonian (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 13:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jimfbleak. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent, on-going disruptive editing and vandalism by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Just for today NoahDavid771 (talk) 15:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071. New sockpuppet turns up the day after the last one was blocked. FDW777 (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and non-confirmed editors adding "Joe Biden" to the page. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Bagumba (talk) 13:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Deceased user. Cupper52 (talk) 09:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from a dynamic IP (hence semi over blocking) over Israel/Palestine eg.. CMD (talk) 11:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 2 years. EdJohnston (talk) 12:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. Donnowin1 (talk) 21:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Donnowin1: It seems that all of distruption come from IP addresses, so temporary semi-protection is more likely to invoked. 36.65.41.159 (talk) 00:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Bagumba. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Repeated modification of article subject's birthplace. Chlod (say hi!) 05:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article needs permanent semi again, every time protection is lifted, the unhelpful drive-by IP additions return. Montanabw(talk) 06:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 06:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Silly season while the Super Bowl is being played Slywriter (talk) 01:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Fuzheado. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Same story as the above Tyrann Mathieu request. Tampabay721 (talk) 01:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Fuzheado. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs keep inserting unsourced content. Some1 (talk) 01:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – 500/30 restriction: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. This prohibition may be enforced preemptively by the use of extended confirmed protection (ECP), or by other methods such as reverts, pending changes protection, and appropriate edit filters. - [[27]]. GizzyCatBella🍁 13:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – 500/30 restriction: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. This prohibition may be enforced preemptively by the use of extended confirmed protection (ECP), or by other methods such as reverts, pending changes protection, and appropriate edit filters. 36.68.194.127 (talk) 14:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – 500/30 restriction: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. This prohibition may be enforced preemptively by the use of extended confirmed protection (ECP), or by other methods such as reverts, pending changes protection, and appropriate edit filters. 36.68.194.127 (talk) 14:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – 500/30 restriction: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. This prohibition may be enforced preemptively by the use of extended confirmed protection (ECP), or by other methods such as reverts, pending changes protection, and appropriate edit filters. 36.68.194.127 (talk) 14:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. There has been persistent vandalism from IP users on this page recently. Shadowrvn728 ❯❯❯ Talk 00:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 00:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Multiple attempts to reference YouTube channel "Triple Jump," resulting from them specifically asking viewers to include them in this game's Wikipedia article as a form of self-promotion. Eddiehimself (talk) 00:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing of WP:BLP. NedFausa (talk) 21:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very brief semi-protection - Being attacked by Nate Speed. Given his usual behaviour (i.e. burning through open proxy IPs) I don't foresee this needing more than 12h, 24h at most. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 21:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ritchie333. Just a note that ANI is probably watched by more admins than any other page on the project and will highly likely be protected before anyone responds here - which is exactly what has happened. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Meters (talk) 21:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 16:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 19:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Elizium23 (talk) 19:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war between IP and brand-new account. Reported by another user to 3RRN last night, but the war is still going on as of this morning. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 19:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A series of related ISP accounts are edit warring trying to remove tags on this corporate PR of an article. Tdslk (talk) 19:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09 February 2021

Indefinite extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. IP Vandal Fans keep deleting paragraphs. NoahDavid771 (talk) 15:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Two for the price of one: Persepolis F.C. protected as well. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or pending changes protection: After the page's recent protection expired, what appears to be the same IP user as before is making the same persistent vandalism, changing the name of the dish in the article to its nonsense literal English translation. Eilidhmax (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 21:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; mass attack. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly visible on the main page and is heavily vandalised. Wretchskull (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Last non constructive edit ws Feb 3. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism on this WP:BLP resumed as soon as the previous page protection ended. Bennv3771 (talk) 16:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 17:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:44, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs persistently adding incorrect information. ― Tartan357 Talk 19:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:06, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not sure what kicked it off but this is the fifth day of continuing IP vandalism of this BLP; am hopeful a brief period of protection will be enough to let vandals move on. Innisfree987 (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of article is in the news due to a reported DUI that led to the injury of a child. This has made the page a target for vandalism. Rockchalk717 02:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IPv6 /64 blocked for one month. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Whatsupkarren (talk) 15:11, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I assume this is a test intended for the sandbox. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unless you have been living under a rock, you probably know that there are quite a few conspiracy theories surrounding the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The revision history reflects this pretty well. Eridian314 (talk) 15:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Recent disruptions have come from one user that has been blocked. Fuzheado | Talk 16:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Recent disruption from ips and new users. Wxman28 (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fuzheado | Talk 14:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Involved in a Ukrainian nationalist dispute with regards to the spelling of Kyiv as Kiev. Repeatedly high level of back-and-forth disruptive editing. – Bangalamania (talk) 22:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fuzheado | Talk 14:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – I forgot to mention this in my listing for Chicken Kiev above, but there have also been disruptive moves of that page to Chicken Kyiv. "Kiev" is by far and large the common name for the dish. Bangalamania (talk) 01:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fuzheado | Talk 14:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 20:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — Newslinger talk 07:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jauerback. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ashleyyoursmile! 15:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jauerback. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: At least three mass deletions as a result of a reddit brigade. This person fails to understand Timothy Leary, his critics, and the nature of an encyclopedia, and has basically called a vigilante brigade. — Smuckola(talk) 16:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 16:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Lots of recent vandalism. TravelAroundOz (talk) 11:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 68.192.11.231 (talk · contribs) blocked as a sockpuppet. Other IP edits appear to be good faith. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:49, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of disruptive edits from IPs, most likely some from the same range. Continuing to change one of the images of a football player with their face visible to a more recent image, wearing a face mask as well. IP(s) have shown no sign to communicate about this change of image via the talk page and shouldn't be necessary, especially with the current one being perfectly fine. Magitroopa (talk) 21:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page protection is likely needed at The Masked Singer (American season 3), as they are doing their disruptive edit warring about images there too. The IPs have also been warned/reverted by another user here. Magitroopa (talk) 05:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both pages protected. Fuzheado | Talk 14:44, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Elizium23 (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit warring. Fuzheado | Talk 14:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending-changes: Persistent vandalism – I was impersonated by IP. Once the block expires, I guarantee that the IP will do it again. TravelAroundOz (talk) 11:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. No history of long term abuse that would justify pending changes. Fuzheado | Talk 14:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – After previous protection expired, multiple IP editors returned to continue trying to add a 4th (illegitimate, unacknowledged) child based on a tiktok accusation. Schazjmd (talk) 14:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous page protection was unsuccessful at deterring the vandalism from returning; as soon as it expired they have returned. Semi-protection should be sufficient, but for a longer period. Vandals are clearly content to create new accounts. Shadowssettle Need a word? 14:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 01:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: vandal has noted their intention to use sockpuppets: "i have bots ready so do u want to play?" AllegedlyHuman (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@AllegedlyHuman: I confirm that is 2600:1700:9B40:7C30:3094:B7CD:F834:5D64 that vandalize the page. It needs to be reported in AIV. 36.65.47.156 (talk) 01:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already have, but thanks. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 01:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:26, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Taunts from IP socks. Crboyer (talk) 05:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Antandrus. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Highly visible featured article (main page). Not only vandalism but also the addition of poorly formatted content by some new users. Wretchskull (talk) 10:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ritchie333. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing reverting of sourced information backward and forwards. Requesting Page Protection to enable the article to reach some kind of stability. Jack Frost (talk) 10:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism after an indefinite semi-protection was stopped last August due to a temporary full protection. –Cupper52Discuss! 11:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Continuously vandalised. Many edits are also poorly formatted, contain factual errors (sometimes deliberate), unreverted subtle vandalism, and some vandalism from new users. There are some good IP edits so I request pending changes instead of semi protection. Wretchskull (talk) 10:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 10:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 10:53, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ashleyyoursmile! 11:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Extended confirmed protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. HurricaneEdgar 08:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 08:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: A.mansouri.edu (talk · contribs) blocked by 331dot. — Newslinger talk 08:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. StoneKommittii (talk) 13:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. NoahDavid771 (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The edit history shows a number of mistaken reverts, and not intentional disruption. FunGun123 (talk · contribs), who made the original edit, has been warned. — Newslinger talk 08:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The trolls going after the user talk page have moved here after that was protected. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:49, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 11:49, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP and non-autoconfirmed user vandalism resumed immediately after protection expired. ― Tartan357 Talk 07:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 07:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Newslinger, there's a similar issue at President of Myanmar. I've added a protection request below. ― Tartan357 Talk 07:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Blocked SwarleyTheLegendStinson (talk · contribs) indefinitely. — Newslinger talk 07:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Xiamatt (talk) 08:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 27.125.249.0/24 was blocked for 3 months. Please consider filing a report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/123.136.107.69 for future incidents involving this editor, and thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 07:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Xiamatt (talk) 08:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 27.125.249.0/24 was blocked for 3 months. Please consider filing a report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/123.136.107.69 for future incidents involving this editor, and thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 07:55, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Xiamatt (talk) 00:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — The Earwig ⟨talk00:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. 27.125.249.0/24 was blocked for 3 months. Please consider filing a report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/123.136.107.69 for future incidents involving this editor, and thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 07:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Xiamatt (talk) 00:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 27.125.249.0/24 was blocked for 3 months. Please consider filing a report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/123.136.107.69 for future incidents involving this editor, and thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 07:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – random vandalism for some reason. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 07:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2600:8800:378B:8600:9E9:4CFF:AD02:B2BE (talk · contribs) has been blocked for 31 hours. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 07:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I.Ps persistently adding false information about the 2019 election. Zindor (talk) 19:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 08:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Alivardi (talk) 20:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 08:55, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent vandalism and unsorced changes after the end of the last protection (a few days ago)--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 10:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 08:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Idell (talk) 13:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 08:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs continuously adding the unsourced term 'Mama' in the lead [28], [29], [30]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 08:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is being targeted by Indonesian DOB vandal. kyykaarme (talk) 09:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 08:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Although this is already fully protected from moving, there is persistent vandalism after three months of protection. Cupper52 (talk) 09:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cupper52: Is this article is semi-protected before? I believe this article should be virtually continously protected. 36.65.41.159 (talk) 09:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@36.65.41.159: A 3 month protection expired recently. Cupper52 (talk) 09:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. According to the protection log, the article was indefinitely semi-protected in 2013. This was superseded by temporary extended confirmed protection in October 2020 and temporary semi-protection in November 2020, the latter of which expired on 5 February. I've restored the indefinite semi-protection. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 08:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism resumed after protection expired. ― Tartan357 Talk 07:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks again for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 07:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Shadow4dark (talk) 01:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 07:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Amaury04:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • More disruption in recent hours. Multiple claims from IPs and non-confirmed (or non-autoconfirmed) accounts that the Disney Channel series is over, without any reliable sources to back it. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 07:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 21:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel (talk) 21:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Elizium23 (talk) 02:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 03:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: AllegedlyHuman, does it is Mcleanm302 that add contentious label to BLP article like this? If it does, it needs to report in WP:AIV or WP:ANI. I will report that user. 36.65.41.159 (talk) 06:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Deor (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Kichu🐘 Discuss 19:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism and abuse after previous protection expired. Bneu2013 (talk) 23:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10 February 2021

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been recreated twice. Cupper52 (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I personally think it's notable enough to just be created, Of course, I am a fan of him, so I have some bias. Eridian314 (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Salted. Should this person become notable enough to sustain and article, there is WP:AFC, the Draft: system or an editor's sandbox available to work an article up in. Mjroots (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Mjroots. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: continued vandalism from IP users Evaders99 (talk) 23:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP and non-autoconfirmed users since the beginning of the year - Dante4786 (talk) 12:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Restart of the editwar what got the template protected earlier. The Banner talk 19:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Preferably for a bit longer this time, one to three months. The Banner talk 20:11, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
POV-pusher now also started with harassing. The Banner talk 09:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:The Banner has been continuously vandalising and POV pushing. Even after this, he blatantly reverted without participating in the talk page discussion. Do not entertain this vandal who has no intention in collaborative editing or consensus building process. He just want to protect the page so that he can revert it back to his version and NOT participate in discussion.--2409:4073:4D80:75B4:D1BF:D423:D9F7:A1CD (talk) 12:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Serious? A discussion with an IP-hopper who is now on a harassment-campaign? That template is about martial art, not about warriors, something you wish to ignore. And red links are valid links, there is no reason for removal, as I have explained already on the talk page of the first IP you have used: User talk:2409:4073:2184:2F44:617A:8FFD:B625:90EE.The Banner talk 13:09, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, this is not the place for discussion. That template is about martial art, not about warriors. Really? Then why do you removes only the martial artists I added but keeps the rest? BTW, martial artists are within the scope of the template. Something you wish to ignore is WP:NAV, which clearly states A navigation template is a grouping of links used in multiple related articles to facilitate navigation between those articles. First you address the issues on the talk page. If you have no answer, then stop edit-warring. 2409:4073:48B:F5DE:B8AE:5F6:A63:D910 (talk) 13:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Such a major city is clearly the target of run-of-the-mill but persistent vandalism which is unlikely to go away for the foreseeable future. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Article has very few edits since 2018, only 1 of which has been vandalism and needed reversion Double Plus Ungood (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also of note: the admin who enforced the protection is deceased (RIP), making a ping or talk page discussion redundant. Double Plus Ungood (talk) 15:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:04, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Used on a few hundred pages. Cupper52 (talk) 20:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)  Done Mjroots (talk) 19:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mjroots. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and persistent edit warring/POV pushing. Unsure how many IPs there actually are, it may just be a handful in a consistent feud who are hopping around. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 22:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:36, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. – DarkGlow (contribstalk) 23:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:35, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Long-term problem.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  07:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 07:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:31, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Xiamatt (talk) 09:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Xiamatt (talk) 09:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071. FDW777 (talk) 09:36, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:25, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring, tendentious editing, and content dispute by some IP users. They just revert edits by registered users and don't use talk page. They could be an IP-hopper or using VPN/proxy. Wario-Man talk 10:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Same status as Ancient North Eurasian. Non-stop edit warring and tendentious editing by IP users. Wario-Man talk 10:25, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Controversial figure who recently featured in a BBC Panorama exposé - page is attracting a lot of driveby disruptive editing as a result. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. AussieWikiDan (talk) 11:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Alivardi (talk) 11:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Almost the instant the last protection expired, the same unhappy editor again began removing material against consensus. The user warned eight or nine hours earlier that this was coming on the article's talk page.[31][32] It's clearly the same editor whose activities led to the previous protection, as it's the user who doesn't seem able (the user has in the past expressed bewilderment over this) to post at the bottom of the talk page, but always posts above the first section header. Largoplazo (talk) 12:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

full protection: High level of vandalism. BWSIT (talk) 13:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden flood of disruptive edits from multiple accounts. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of conspiracy theories NoahDavid771 (talk) 15:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pahunkat (talk) 15:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Resumption of IP "Caste-warring" after expiry of last protection - Arjayay (talk) 15:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Incessant additions of spam links by drive by editors/IPs. StarM 15:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 19:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071. FDW777 (talk) 15:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user seems enamored of a photo of a person and keeps reposting it to this page about a town. Geoff | Who, me? 16:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple IP/new editors adding unsourced BLP vios yesterday and today. Schazjmd (talk) 17:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Retrofan781 (talk) 17:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 18:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by multiple IPs over the past couple weeks. AviationFreak💬 20:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: I want to request semi-protection for this article because of recent edits. The edits that have been reverted the past few days are related to the pronoun used to refer to one of the characters in the film. The story and script of the film refer to the character as "Leon", and "him". There were persistent edits by IPs changing the "his" to "her(s)", and I see other users have been reverting it to the original. Now, I understand this is a sensitive subject for plenty of folks. The part of the article that refers to the real person does refer to the surname of "Eden", and "her" is used instead of "him". I don't really see the need to be constantly reverting edits.--GDuwenHoller! 22:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As a small correction to what I wrote above, I may note that the sections that mention the real person just refer to the subject by surname. There are no mentions of pronouns, which was done intentionally to avoid this type of issues. But it is relevant to the plot section.--GDuwenHoller! 22:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gduwen: Please find evidence that IP conduct the distruptive behavior with replacing pronouns. I believe it cannot be semi-protected. 36.65.47.156 (talk) 22:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The page edit history should be enough evidence in my estimation, if it is not sufficient for other users, I can point to the particular revisions.--GDuwenHoller! 05:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem to be frequent enough to justify full SP (7 february, 30 january, ...), also it appears to be only one particular person (behind a dynamic IP); PC maybe [but unlikely IMHO]? RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the latest one was a registered user with only two contributions. I called for semi-protection because it is something that is going to repeat itself in the future. I just want to bring the article some stability. The whole pronoun discussion is one of those ongoing controversies plenty of people take interest in. If every single time a person does not agree they change them all, then the next person comes and reverts it. It's just chaos. If it is semi-protected, we can at least have some discussion on the talk page and exclude what's been manifesting lately. I'm just interested in a wonderful picture having a good, stable article.--GDuwenHoller! 19:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us see how this would work--Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Over the past few weeks, disruptive editing by unregistered IP users has increased. A temporary semi-protection may help solve the problem. Renerpho (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. NoahDavid771 (talk) 18:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by ip users. Eridian314 (talk) 16:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:49, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Def-o protected, my bot-y friend.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like you’ve ECP, Ponyo, was that intended? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Gah, not at all. Fixed now.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Guy is dead. Plus he's a well known coach.Mewe-Mewe. UwU (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fuzheado | Talk 15:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent addition of unreliable external links (likely spam) from a jumping IP - either a short semi-protection or a rangeblock (if feasible) would be ideal. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 18:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 19:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Consisent back and forth between editors in a content dispute on a WP:BLP page, could use full protection to cool off.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 00:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Please continue to use the talk page to sort out this content dispute. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Fzjanj is engaging in personal attacks and OR; has less than 10 edits. Crossroads -talk- 05:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The behaviour has stopped, or at least paused. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by different IP addresses and newly created accounts. One of the vandal's IP ranges Special:Contributions/92.40.182.0/23 is currently blocked but the vandal seems to have other ranges available.

Emirhan Ogun (talk) 12:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same sock farm attack as 2021 Adelaide International (tennis) and Big Port of Saint Petersburg. Pipsally (talk) 07:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection: Other language article being created repeatedly. Already tagged for speedy deletion.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  09:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: User warned --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IPs. Ashleyyoursmile! 12:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from anonymous users adding false info to cast and plot sections despite repeated warnings and blocks. Spiritoftheeast1993 (talk) 17:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped for the time being, apologies for not reacting on time--Ymblanter (talk) 07:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Wxman28 (talk) 19:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting on time--Ymblanter (talk) 07:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Yeti Dai (talk) 07:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Looks like the subject of a sockfarm attack since Jan. Pipsally (talk) 07:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. or a school project? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and continued mass-removal of content by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 13:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped for the time being--Ymblanter (talk) 06:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 02:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:45, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP user continually adds unsourced grievances relating to covid-19 layoffs despite being removed repeatedly.Asimoth (talk) 02:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry of JarhaJaneNorbe. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JarhaJaneNorbe. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 04:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Elizium23 (talk) 07:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There’s not a lot going on here. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:09, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editing war between IP and a user. GeraldWL 10:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerald Waldo Luis: Does the IP users reported to ANEW or AIV? I believe 83.110.147.61 conducts the edit warring with other user. 36.65.41.159 (talk) 13:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Should it? I believe for now RPP is the best way to halt the war. Given the knowledge both parties have regarding WP policies, I think that by locking, it can send the message indirectly. Either way, I've warned both. GeraldWL 13:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined The participants seem to have stepped away from the page now. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from a dynamic IP. --Maleschreiber (talk) 12:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to be stale now, last IP edit was 12:32, 8 February 2021. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some kind of weird wave of vandalism going on here involving various IPs. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 09:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It’s disruptive editing whatever it is! Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – (or at least long-term temporary) Persistent addition of non-notable locations since these were trimmed away. Pending changes seems appropriate given it's low level activity. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:57, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated IP and SPA addition of un- or poorly-sourced allegations over the past 2 days. This will probably end once this incident exits the news cycle. Jlevi (talk) 22:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: A tour from 2008 is unlikely to generate more sources than it has now, and if someone manages to find enough, an unlock request can be added. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Walter Görlitz: Per Protection policy, full protection cannot be indefintely. 36.65.47.156 (talk) 06:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Though we might consider it to enforce community consensus after two deletion discussions - a form of create protection if you like. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It reads "The protection may be for a specified time or may be indefinite". Temporary should be fine. How about until sometime 2099? Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ha, that would work! I’ve salted indefinitely. It can always be reversed if someone comes up with a suitable draft. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuous addition of unsourced/hoax upcoming TV shows from several IP addresses after the 7-day semi protection on this page expired. -WayKurat (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry resumed after protection expired. Again being targeted by User:HarveyTeenager. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 01:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Used by semi-protected Template:Infobox number/box. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 06:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing We have an IP who keeps adding unsourced sales figures.--Harout72 (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:36, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing after protection expiration. Perhaps, school students. Alanscottwalker (talk) 00:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ilovecats516 (talk) 01:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 04:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism resumed after previous protection expired. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – At least temporary...c'mon, look at all the Sneed->Chuck vandalism at this article, plus many other Sneed-named articles, some of which are now under some sort of edit-protection (see Wikipedia:Edit filter/Requested#Sneed to Chuck vandalism (Thanks to The Simpsons...). Shearonink (talk) 05:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article has suffered vandalism recently (see page history). Besides said vandalism, there are constant edits (and reversion of said edits) adding "Space Age Love Song" to the music clips (apparently, the video is pretty popular on YouTube). Connelly was not on the official video clip of the song, and the one in YouTube contains the song with scenes from the film Career Opportunities.--GDuwenHoller! 21:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 04:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Protection lifted, same vandalism continues. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 04:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Group of individuals collectively, persistently vandalising page. Mxxo2 (talk) 04:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 04:34, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent additions (20 kB) about non Seljukid families such as Karamanids, Perwane, Kharzemhahs and Ottomans (For details please see the talk page)Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 108.18.143.93 (talk · contribs). They've been at this a long time without discussion. Partially-blocked from the article to push them on to the talk page where they can join the discussion you started there.Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Has attracted a lot of vandalism, due to its name and content coverage. Has been previously protected on August 22nd 2020. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel (talk) 00:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See article history. An ip keeps adding offensive images. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 23:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Ohnoitsjamie. Daniel (talk) 00:43, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~ ItsJustLukas talk|Contribs 00:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel (talk) 00:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by IPs. —El Millo (talk) 01:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 03:43, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ilovecats516 (talk) 18:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is a single IP user vandalising who hasn't edited since their last warning; protection is not necessary here. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Previous vandalism from IP user now being made by registered user who has previously been blocked for vandalism. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Chedix (talk · contribs). Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [] 19:18, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 165.16.104.112 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ferret. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To force the person repeatedly adding unacceptably licensed images of Parris under different usernames to engage in discussion. [33][34][35] etc. User seems confused by the Wikimedia interface and maybe thinks that their edits are not working on technical grounds rather than editorial ones when they are reverted and deleted. — Bilorv (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bilorv, by your own admission, this is a WP:COMPETENCE issue, not vandalism. The user has not edited the article since your last comment on their talk page, so I'd advise to let discussion play out. Newbies and Commons go together like matches and gasoline, in my experience - hopefully you'll reach an understanding. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism. Seems to just be ip users, so Pending Changes should be sufficient. Eridian314 (talk) 20:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ilovecats516 (talk) 20:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done What I see is a number of registered users (@SouthernKangaroo:, @Ilovecats516: @Peerzada Mohammad Iflaq: @Babegriev:) restoring unsourced material to the article, including red links of unclear notability and formatting errors. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. NASCARfan0548  22:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11 February 2021

Semi-protection: MLB Player is in a potential trade transaction and IPs are jumping the gun on the team edit and trying to atart a revert war. Sawblade5 (talk to me | my wiki life) 02:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected because it's been announced and protection isn't needed any longer. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's vandalising. Devokewater (talk) 15:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Please re-report if disruption picks back up. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection Persistent vandalism - the article was previously under temporary protection but as soon as it expired, the article has been targeted by anonymous contributors pushing POV edits as before.--Polyssotsky (talk) 16:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 20:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 11:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 14:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Idell (talk) 11:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 13:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 14:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. WikiWolf7 (talk) 14:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Macedonian (talk) 07:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism from same range restarted as soon as protection ended. Meters (talk) 11:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 11:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 14:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This had already been protected once on January 16 for a period of one week [36], but the length of time was not long enough and the IP has repeatedly restored unsourced material to the article since the protection was lifted [37]. The IP in question is known as the Hanoi vandal and repeatedly targets articles regarding the albums of Boney M., resulting in numerous AfD processes which have resulted in the albums being deleted or redirected and protection added to prevent restoration – see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Their Most Beautiful Ballads, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ma Baker (album), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Most Beautiful Christmas Songs of the World, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas Time (Boney M. album) and others. Richard3120 (talk) 13:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 14:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all of the IP edits on this article has been WP:VANDALISM. I have been monitoring to the extent I can and I am finding it a tad difficult. Not sure if some sort of protection that requires logged in users to edit can be applied. Thanks. Ktin (talk) 07:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing.  oncamera  (talk page) 08:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple insertions by IPs of actors' roles in the Cast section without providing a reliable source (as this is a future film, secondary sources are required for this information). MPFitz1968 (talk) 08:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP user frequently adding incorrect cast information. Skteosk (talk) 09:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 02:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Robinyoo9 (talk · contribs) blocked by CambridgeBayWeather. for 31 hours and Rmhjyoo indefinite as a sockpuppet CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: These redirect pages has been recreated several times, see the history of both of them, and doesn't need to be edited anymore. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 03:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Vandalism continuing just after lock was lifted. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 05:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined One edit after 14 days protection is not a problem. If it start to get more then we can try a month or so but indefinite is overkill for something that will be forgotten in a few months. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 22:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I see a lot of editing but little to no reverting. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Citobun (talk) 06:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full pretection: Persistent editing war between two users for years.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Hot-button political article which has had tons of POV issues, falsehoods posted, and outright vandalism. I count at least 5 instances of vandalism just in the last 100 edits. PrairieKid (talk) 06:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement--Ymblanter (talk) 07:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your question Ymblanter, but please replace pp-semi to pp-vand because i see there are persistent vandalism in the page. 36.65.47.156 (talk) 07:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am not qualified to distinguish between vandalism (deliberate introduction of false info) or disruptive editing (pushing some info which may be correct but not appropriate for the article) and incompetence (adding false info under understanding it is true) in this case. Any conformed user may change the label. Btw I did not ask any questions.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for suggesting protection to the page PrairieKid, and thanks for temporary protection Ymblanter. I created the page knowing that it was a contentious political issue, but I didn't expect people to be vandalizing the article that quickly or that much. Phillip Samuel (talk) 08:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of fake data and rankings particularly into this article over the last few weeks, like [38][39][40][41][42]. Saying this is getting annoying is an understatement. MPFitz1968 (talk) 03:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Temporary semi-protection: After the end of the last protection, IP's returned to vandalize the page with disruptive editing. An extended semi-protection is needed. Armegon (talk) 03:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FlutterDash344 (talk) 05:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and BLP violations. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 05:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and BLP issues I mentioned earlier to no avail have grown worse. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 05:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. ― Tartan357 Talk 06:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruption by IP editors. Long-term protection requested in view of the abuse pattern. — kashmīrī TALK 22:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: A single purpose IP user keep adding "Category:Pederasty", which the quote is Mehmed had a "reliably attested" passion for his hostage and favourite, Radu the Fair.. which is clearly outside mainstream view. Beshogur (talk) 22:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Anons and wikipedian editors are fighting over the page on whether or not the person in question is transphobic. It has become very political, and there is an endless amount of edit warring between the two sides. Auror Andrachome (talk) 23:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent vandalism Gershonmk (talk) 04:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The newest vandalism is "antisemite"... This needs protection ASAP. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Spencer. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 05:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Adding unsourced content by IPs, there is a conflict of interest. MRZQ (talk) 23:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death, usual nonsense from IPs. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:45, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 01:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute re: upcoming IPO. KH-1 (talk) 01:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KH-1: It is actually IPs that edit warring and combined with vandalism as ClueBot NG involved to reverting edits that tag as "Possible vandalism". So semi-protected would be necessary. 36.65.47.156 (talk) 01:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The eve of CNY is today, and there have been plenty of vandalism on this page already. It is Chinese New Year weekend, and one would expect plenty of vandalism during this weekend. Proposing a temporary protection at least for this festive period. (note to admin:customary CNY is 14 days long, but population with unfettered access to Wikipedia tends to be on holiday only for the first 2-3 days.). – robertsky (talk) 06:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High influx of unsourced changes by anonymous users, likely based on supposed leaks. IceWelder [] 22:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent blanking from ip. JarrahTree 23:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The person is in a controversy with local news. Need Temporary page protection from the anonymous editor. Auramstate (talk) 05:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Auramstate: Do you see any persistent or endless vandalism in the article? I believe this article cannot be protected preemptively per WP:NO-PREEMPT. 36.65.47.156 (talk) 06:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@36.65.47.156: Yes, there are some anonymous users by IP destroyed mentioned article before a week. Please take a look at the article's history. I fix it today.Auramstate (talk) 06:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – 500/30 restriction: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. This prohibition may be enforced preemptively by the use of extended confirmed protection (ECP), or by other methods such as reverts, pending changes protection, and appropriate edit filters. - [[43]]. 36.65.47.156 (talk) 20:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Something very fishy is going on here - a whole bunch of new accounts making their first or very early minor edits on this page then moving on. Pipsally (talk) 07:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined article draftified. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lithuanian diaspora pages

Pending changes: After the protection of Lithuanians page, the IP hopper with the IP from the Pittsburgh area has moved to these pages. Sabbatino (talk) 17:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These pages are getting disrupted by the mentioned IP hopper more than once a day. In addition, the same is happening at Prussian Lithuanians and Lithuanian Canadians. – Sabbatino (talk) 18:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for now. I can't see what's disruptive about those edits so I won't act without further information, but it should be easy to block Special:Contributions/2601:547:4380:ea0::/64 if necessary @Sabbatino:. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Article seems to attract edits from newly created users affiliated with the subject of the article who do not contribute positively, but instead only seem interested in fluffing article for marketing purposes. At least one user crossed into vandalism and has been banned and then immediately a new user popped up and began by making a similar edit. Other project users are attempting to assume good faith when possible, utilizing talk page and citation/clarification needed tags though these requests are actively ignored. Pirmas697 (talk) 19:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized again by the same anonymous editor who keeps adding Dragon Tales and Teletubbies characters to this article about an anime spin-off of a Disney franchise. –WPA (talk) 21:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: SPA repeatedly trying to insert original research that directly contradicts the cited sources and remove reliably sourced content without offering any alternate sources. Cavalryman (talk) 21:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined discuss with the user, then take the matter to ANI or another appropriate venue if necessary. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Citobun (talk) 08:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Appears on a Doodle today so became target for vandalism. Muhandes (talk) 10:04, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined should die down shortly. If it doesn't die off tomorrow, come back. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated daily IP vandalism. Using different IP each time for the same edit. Sokuya (talk) 10:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is move-protected, but there is a persistent effort to vandalize the page by a number of IP editors. Semi is warranted. Geoff | Who, me? 00:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Lofty abyss 00:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dancer1313 (talk) 13:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – 500/30 restriction: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. This prohibition may be enforced preemptively by the use of extended confirmed protection (ECP), or by other methods such as reverts, pending changes protection, and appropriate edit filters. - [[44]]. Wretchskull (talk) 14:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An uninvolved editor reviewed the page during NPP and set it to a redirect. Another editor, possibly or probably a representative of the company is trying to revert it. scope_creepTalk 15:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined the redirect was a unilateral decision for an established article. You need a consensus in an RfC or AfD before protection is appropriate. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended-confirmed-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term edit warring by TheDotECO, JWatTheDotECO, and Jacobmalthouse. 🔥LightningComplexFire🔥 18:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • IMHO this should be VERY temporary - days or a week, two weeks tops, only long enough to determine if page-blocks are justified. If problematic new-account or IP-editing happens, weeks- or months-long semi-protection might be in order. More background is at WP:AN#.eco Dispute and Talk:.eco. Disclaimer: I am very involved in the underlying dispute, please seek neutral input before making any final decision. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:30, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:43, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated editing by anonymous user to delete information consensus has been reached. FantinoFalco (talk) 18:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article subject takes a political stance... cue BLP violations. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Page has experienced heavy vandalism recently WikiWolf7 (talk) 22:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:34, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12 February 2021

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – No IP user has made a constructive edit. Pretty much all are vandalism or reckless and unconstructive. Wretchskull (talk) 09:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Pretty much all IP user edits are vandalism or very unconstructive. Wretchskull (talk) 10:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple IPs committing various vandalism edits, particularly to the notable people section. PrairieKid (talk) 20:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article had been locked in the past multiple times for the addition of copyrighted images. Recently, after the protection expires, IPs again started adding images without proper copyright information, mostly YouTube grabs. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 09:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Xiamatt (talk) 10:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Kichu🐘 Discuss 06:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive and NPOV content. Cassiopeia(talk) 07:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 07:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Poppified talk 05:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent attempts by IPs to whitewash the article and spread misinformation. Bennv3771 (talk) 05:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP hopper making unhelpful edits. ShelteredCook (talk) 06:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — Newslinger talk 06:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP Targets

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, most recent IP is Special:Contributions/209.164.184.192; all pages in this request have most vandalism in the past. Chompy Ace 06:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done, with the exception of a couple that didn't seem to be subject to vandalism over many years. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes, or at least semi-protection: Numerous vand/unref changes, including at least one copvio, uptick probably corresponds to the occasion. Dl2000 (talk) 22:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of extraenous, unencyclopedic content. Blake Gripling (talk) 22:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:37, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Or a rangeblock to 102.66.128.0/20 (talk · contribs). (CC) Tbhotch 01:32, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked 102.66.128.0/20 for 1 month. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:18, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Or a rangeblock to 102.66.128.0/20 (talk · contribs). (CC) Tbhotch 01:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked 102.66.128.0/20 for 1 month. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Or a rangeblock to 102.66.128.0/20 (talk · contribs). (CC) Tbhotch 01:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked 102.66.128.0/20 for 1 month. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Article is seemingly only being edited by sockpuppets (and me, reverting the socks). This could be construed as my being involved if I protected the page myself, so requesting page protection by an uninvolved administrator. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [] 22:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content in 2021. Recommend at least a month on that basis alone. Note that the page has a long protection log, so longer protection may be required. Pending-changes protection should be considered as an alternative as at least one of the editors I reverted is now past 4 days and 10 edits. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: At least one of the recent editors seems to have quit. Probably best to just have a lot of admins watchlist this for the next few weeks and leave it unprotected unless/until disruption continues. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs creating/restoring hoaxes; possibly sockpuppets of User:HarveyTeenager?. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 17:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Longer-term protection — IP vandalism resuming after previous protection expired. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 18:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced POV-pushing resumed immediately after the previous month-long protection expired. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 04:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent unsourced claims of ambiguous sexuality, similar to Velma Dinkley. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 00:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:20, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The range Special:Contributions/2803:7380:C67A:0:0:0:0:0/64 was blocked and now a new user is making the same disruptive edits. Binksternet (talk) 18:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why ask full protection? Semi-protected indefinitely. WP:GS/MJ invoked. El_C 03:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP Users. They might be one person posting from different IPs. They have the same pattern: repetead vandalism by not writing the team's correct name + not using the correct code (or any code) when writing the article. User 93.122.248.30 also vandalised another 2 articles besides this one. One of the articles had to get protection because of him. Besides the vandalism, they barely have any previous edits. Also, they intentionally misspell the name of a turkish team, by writing instead the name of a Romanian journalist - Radu Naum. Dante4786 (talk) 18:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unsourced overwriting of redirect. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 04:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Will120 (talk) 03:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 03:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Poppified talk 03:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. – DarkGlow (contribstalk) 15:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. The article was under temporary protection but only for a few days, and as soon as it expired IP editors started vandalizing again. I think it would be wise to protect it for a few months; the vandalism will pick up again after the final chapter of the manga is published in April 9. Ïvana (talk) 17:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wide margin given to account for publication date, final TV series season. Note: beloved series! El_C 03:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 17:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This is a new article and has already experienced multiple instances of IP vandalism. Like other LGBT-related articles, semi-protection would be appropriate for preventing further persistent vandalism. Garcia1865 (talk) 17:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Indeed, critical LGBT page. Expedited the usual. El_C 03:37, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP thinks that a link to another article is sufficient as a source. A temporary semi-protection seems enough to me. IP is already partial blocked as a sockpuppet of SethRuebens. The Banner talk 18:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite sysop-protection: Was previously extended-confirmed, but an extended-confirmed user created it without my permission. When it was deleted, the protection was removed. Would also like it increased to sysop-protection since extended-confirmed is clearly not enough. Naleksuh (talk) 19:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 03:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversies in the media are leading people to vandalise the article in question. Those issues need to be well written and well-referenced so article needs a temporary page protection. Ampimd (talk) 19:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Temp semis aren't cutting it. Frequent vandalism, almost all of which is racist or far-right in nature. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 21:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. No, they are not, and are unlikely to in the foreseeable future. El_C 03:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Frequent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 21:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 03:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Non-autoconfirmed editor POV-pushing/adding unsourced content immediately after protection expired. ― Tartan357 Talk 21:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism (name-calling in Burmese) resumed immediately after protection expired. ― Tartan357 Talk 21:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs persistently adding incorrect information/vandalizing page. ― Tartan357 Talk 21:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This has been given two one-week semi-protections, and has been immediately vandalised by IPs when it expires. Can we get this for longer than a week? Maybe a month? If it is still happening at that point, then an indefinite protection is probably required. Yosemiter (talk) 01:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Random disruption by IPs and some acocunts. Since this is, broadly construed, now related to post-1992 American politics, ECP seems more appropriate than SP RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RandomCanadian: Just as it contains information about Trump's self-coup doesn't mean that it is related to post-1992 American politics. This article contains information about self-coup that happens around the world, not just the United States. I see in the edit history they actually adding information about coup in Myanmar which they believe is self-coup. So, ECP doesn't apply to this and semi seems to be more appropriated. You don't understand the scoop of post-1992 American politics. 180.242.47.91 (talk) 22:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Anything about Trump (which this is) is inherently within the scope of those sanctions... Doubly so because it has attracted disruptive editing because of Trump... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from IPs accounts for weeks (probably all is the same one because its the same edit each time), and high level in recent days. Number of editors keep revert its edits. Please put Semi-protection on the article. Sokuya (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of racist slurs due to recent media attention. Flat Out (talk) 23:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP hopping vandal persistently changing date. Toasted Meter (talk) 02:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Constant IP hopping. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There isn't enough recent vandalism to justify semi-protection, but maybe PC will help keep things under control. MelanieN (talk) 00:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism: persistent attempts by IPs and others over the past few days, and more sporadic attempts going back to at least Feb 2020, to replace elements of this article (about a British sociologist) with details of an unrelated Tiffany Jenkins (an American blogger and influencer). GrindtXX (talk) 14:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Very high level of IP and user vandalism. Last vandalism case occured on January 28th, 2021, from both a user and IP (Might be the same person). Acronymical (Stay home. Save lives. Stay 2 metres apart.) 16:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Replacing PC protection with semi-protection. Vandalism is too frequent for PC to work well. MelanieN (talk) 00:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Vandalism over the past couple days, multiple IPs. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The 'George MacKay' LTA vandal. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Constant IP hopping. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There isn't enough recent vandalism to justify semi-protection, but maybe PC will help keep things under control. MelanieN (talk) 00:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Very high level of IP and user vandalism. Last vandalism case occured on January 28th, 2021, from both a user and IP (Might be the same person). Acronymical (Stay home. Save lives. Stay 2 metres apart.) 16:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Replacing PC protection with semi-protection. Vandalism is too frequent for PC to work well. MelanieN (talk) 00:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Vandalism over the past couple days, multiple IPs. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The 'George MacKay' LTA vandal. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Grever is Google Doodle of the day. I know it's a good opportunity for people to experience editing Wikipedia, so have been holding off on asking. Either need more eyes or semi. Thanks, Zindor (talk) 18:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC). Zindor (talk) 18:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JBW. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same as before after the protection was "finished". Adding a different height against the listed source. Kante4 (talk) 19:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 21:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent caste warrior editing, removing sourced content that is (for some reason) unacceptable to some individuals. bonadea contributions talk 20:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 20:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 21:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 21:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Every day an article listed as TFA, there is so much high level of IP vandalism than usual. 116.206.35.29 (talk) 21:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13 February 2021

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are manipulating the page by linking fake information without any reliable sources. Hasan (talk) 08:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 16:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. HurricaneEdgar 14:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism and unconstructive edits on a highly visited article. Wretchskull (talk) 17:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 18:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistant disruptive edits by new user Riteinit here and across other localities nearby, who has been reported for alleged socking and for disruptive edits. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 02:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, challenged by the vandal ready to vandalize again. Flix11 (talk) 14:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 16:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive activity from IPs. Ashleyyoursmile! 17:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 18:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent addition of non-free images, YouTube video screen grabs by IPs and users [45] [46] [47] which are possible socks of User:Jagdeep singh bittu. SPI case page here. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:48, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing for the past weeks. An IP has been trying to get his non-notable and unverifiable mate into the Notable People section since November. – Thjarkur (talk) 08:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 16:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 15:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry. Ashleyyoursmile! 09:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Elizium23 (talk) 09:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism as he's now umpiring in the Test match between India and England. Suggest a five-day protection until the match is over. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of five days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Highly visible redirect; shouldn't be retargeted without adequate consensus. Nathan2055talk - contribs 02:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 03:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Referenced material was removed and unsourced information is added to the text. Hankiz 04:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistent subtle vandalism since 1 year back (22 January 2020). Example diff.St.nerol (talk) 12:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP users removing sourced sentence from the lead section vital for maintaining NPOV. — Vaibhavafro💬 18:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 04:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Intersection of two topics which are each disruptive editing magnets; is it really a surprise that this is at RPP yet again?. Crossroads -talk- 05:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – personal attacks and threats from IP-hopping LTA Nate Speed. Meters (talk) 06:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And done. Thaqt was quick. Meters (talk) 06:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator El C. for the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by multiple IPs. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 02:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued High level of IP vandalism. Cult fan base who make regular disruptive edits. Please protect for multiple months. Already protected once. Deltagammaz (talk) 02:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism / spamming. Atlantic306 (talk) 03:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant falsehoods added onto the page. Blue Sky Studios has not yet been shut down, but reversions keep having to be made to remove the fate parameter, despite a message being next to the parameter to not add fate until April. This is almost entirely coming from IP address users. - Kamran Mackey (talk to me · my contributions) 22:20, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KamranMackey: Because almost entire distruption come from IP address users, semi-protected seems be more likely. 36.68.187.181 (talk) 22:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, semi protection is fine by me as well. - Kamran Mackey (talk to me · my contributions) 22:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeat disruptive edits by non registered users. FantinoFalco (talk) 22:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism + edit warring. --Another Believer (Talk) 23:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. you are part of the edit war. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent introduction of factual errors. (CC) Tbhotch 01:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 01:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism with false, doxxed or irrelevant information due to another individual's political controversy.Pizzawithpepperonigoblin (talk) 18:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Pizzawithpepperonigoblin[reply]

Seeing this comment, I figured you were referring to Gina Carano. To anyone else, I'll save you a click: experienced editors are adding information about Pascal's father (not doxxed, provided by Pascal in interviews!) to the "early life and education" section, and inexperienced editors are edit-warring to remove it. (Still worth a semi-protect, IMO, just not for the reasons OP thinks.) AllegedlyHuman (talk) 01:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also note that Tbhotch has now opened a sockpuppet investigation into this user related to this incident. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 02:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I was going to request for Pascal's page to be semi-protected because of persistent vandalism/disruptive editing by what I'm guessing are sockpuppet users, because they keep removing the same info and citing the same reason, that the info is not "relevant" to Pascal. But I see that there's an investigation going on. Also, there was other vandalism on his page, such as one IP user changing his infobox image to that of Burt Reynolds, but I'm not sure if they're all connected. Though I agree with "AllegedlyHuman" that the page should be semi-protected. Clear Looking Glass (talk) 02:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:48, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unconstructive edits from IPs. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. NoahDavid771 (talk) 19:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism - IP users changing team owners and front office personnel to things like "Bobo the Clown" repeatedly. CybeastID (talk) 20:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I already reversed three times today. And there are three different users insisting that the character is a terrorist. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 21:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – One week should be enough. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Big_ArticleReader79 (ongoing SPI). Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User:Kyopa has returned in IP form and is continuing to make changes in spite of being blocked. This may need upgrading to indefinite protection if he resumes after this expires. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 15:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Hummerrocket (talk) 18:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Within one day of the semi-protection being lifted, we're already experiencing IPs that are disruptively editing the page. One IP tried to change the biography subject's birthplace to Cuba (which goes against all sources) and another decided to change his occupation from "activist" to "fascist terrorist". This is a BLP, so we should move swiftly on protecting the page. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 18:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism that is going unnoticed. Scorpions13256 (talk) 15:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by several Russian IP-adresses since 1 Feb 2021. –St.nerol (talk) 16:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And before that date. Johnuniq (talk) 04:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. I think it should be protected for a few months, while the anime is still airing, and after the final chapter of the manga is published in April 9. Ïvana (talk) 17:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Spam magnet for various appliance stores, content farms, and other inappropriate sources. New contributors generally don't provide any helpful content. See, e.g., [48], [49], and [50]. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protection needs to escalate, never protected before. Johnuniq (talk) 04:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An editor and several socks are attempting to add a very long edit, despite several editors removing it. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 11:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protection needs to escalate. Johnuniq (talk) 04:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection - More conspiracy theories. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 04:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — The Earwig ⟨talk04:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP ignoring existing talk page consensus. Usual pathetic nationalist bollocks. DuncanHill (talk) 15:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Pretty much all IP user edits are vandalism. Some edits are vandalism but are unreverted and simply later fixed by an editor. Wretchskull (talk) 15:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: People are trying to re-add content about the woman who glued her hair, which poses a BLP issue. See discussion on talk page. Page has also attracted some vandalism. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 03:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Disruption has already resumed, immediately after the previous month-long protection expired. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:37, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GorillaWarfare: I don't see any distruption outside two users, one IP and one non-confirmed users. Maybe semi-protected will be more working for this article. 36.68.187.181 (talk) 20:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator El C. (CC) Tbhotch 01:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 20:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - TFA has posted today, but yet vandals attacking the article again with wrong information. 36.68.187.181 (talk) 20:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14 February 2021

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IPs and sock accounts. They have just started attacking this page after Sus, Iran was semi-protected. Ashleyyoursmile! 17:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Berig (talk) 18:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: another page that has started getting attacked by IPs and sock accounts like the previous two pages. Ashleyyoursmile! 18:31, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5. Berig (talk) 18:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Among Us-related vandalism, similar to other "Sus" articles named above. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 20:37, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: BLP Policy Violations. Multiple IP users are using this YouTube video as a source to add potentially libelous statements. However, that source is likely unreliable. ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 03:52, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Goad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Long-term or permanent semi-protection: BLP of controversial figure, a frequent target of drive-by vandalism. I protected it for a week, due to IP vandalism, expiring today; the moment the protection came down, an IP was at it again. Needs a longer protection, if not an indefinite one - David Gerard (talk) 13:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely.--Berig (talk) 17:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Distlruptive editing and vandalism by several IP Kichu🐘 Discuss 13:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect the page ASAP because some IP's are removing large content without any consensus and explanationKichu🐘 Discuss 14:43, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 17:37, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent defamation from Scotland IPs and vandalism-only users. Binksternet (talk) 16:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that temporary protection was already enacted at the Nova Twins article for a few days in January [51], at my request and in reference to the same vandal. He/she was originally known as User:Pollymono until that account was blocked, and keeps coming back under different IP addresses. Also, this person is falsely accusing the band of a crime, so allow me to emphasize the BLP issue as noted by Binksternet. Thanks. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:50, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ashleyyoursmile! 17:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 17:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs and newly created accounts. RA0808 talkcontribs 20:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MelanieN. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Despite repeated warnings, A user keeps on adding unreferenced content on the page using various IPs. Hence requesting it to autoconfirmed protected. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 13:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Black Kite. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Conflict of interest editor Struckdheart with no interest in abiding by COI/Verifiability/NPOV now wants to play a game of Whac-a-Mole with IPs like 2409:4054:2190:21a9::26cc:8a1 (Special:Diff/1006721131). The alternative is blocking the IP but I'm confident the person will then just return under another IP. — Bilorv (talk) 16:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – an IP makes not so funny edits. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Kosack. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of dictionary definition (removal of term 'irrational'), related to US white supremacy movement. Johncdraper (talk) 10:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 10:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant substitution of image with irrelevant ones - Arjayay (talk) 13:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Northamerica1000. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by many IPs. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 14:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent short term vandalism, but article would also fall under post-1992 American politics... In any case, once this gets out of the most recent news cycle, the disruption should probably die down so let's start there, hopefully. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. FozzieHey (talk) 12:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BunnyyHop (talk) 12:48, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Semi-protection isn't cutting it as a certain LTA is able to weasel around said protection to vandalise the pages he has a strange fetish with. Blake Gripling (talk) 10:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blakegripling ph: It seems that all of sockpuppet as you concerned is already blocked. See in the user history. 36.68.187.181 (talk)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Beshogur (talk) 13:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 08:48, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Only unprotected 12 hours ago and IPs are already back to adding unsourced and poorly sourced content. SK2242 (talk) 13:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 08:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 18:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 08:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by new accounts. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:50, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 08:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TheWarOfArt (talk) 03:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 08:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet/American animation hoax vandalism

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Anonymous IPv6 users are repeatedly adding fake data in articles pertaining to American and Soviet animation. Ezhuks (talk) 12:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. each--Ymblanter (talk) 09:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to file a report, but seeing this is already here, second above (persistent disruption over the short term: this seemed to have stopped back in June, but it's obviously picking up now). RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 07:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs along with throw away accounts making blpvio changes. The person in the bio is in the news and hence the request. Vikram Vincent 08:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:48, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User:Kyopa is continuing to edit via IP in spite of being blocked. Semi protection is needed maybe indef if he resumes after this one expires. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 12:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. bibliomaniac15 06:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See talk page. – 333-blue at 12:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 08:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 08:50, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:43, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Edit warring ongoing for a long time. ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 09:09, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:37, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive activity from IPs. Ashleyyoursmile! 18:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 07:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edits from IPs in the past two days. – The Grid (talk) 06:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 07:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumption of addition of incorrect content (edits declaring Win Myint is still President) by IP immediately after protection expired. ― Tartan357 Talk 07:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 07:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, disruptive editing and persistent unsourced additions. 2409:4073:2184:A521:C5E6:CD3E:6601:48D5 (talk) 07:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 07:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by unknown IP. Prabhanjan Mutalik (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Content dispute the IP makes a case for their edits in their edit summaries. Please continue discussing --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined For the bot. (CC) Tbhotch 23:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by newly created accounts and IPs. More info here. --Satdeep Gill (talkcontribs 14:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:39, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This page title has been created and then deleted four times at the beginning of this year. Please salt it to prevent further recreations by IP users. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Pages with this title are created by users following Help:Introduction to Wikipedia. It seems the way we pick the titles isn't great; it's random, but only when the help page is purged or the server cache is cleared, so many different users will try to create pages in the same "random" sandbox. In any case, it doesn't make sense to protect them. I'll start a discussion on the talk. — The Earwig talk 22:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is a constant vandalism target. Constant monitoring is a waste of editor resources. Montanabw(talk) 22:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Montanabw:  Done, Semi-protected indefinitely. Been wanting to do that for years! ~Anachronist (talk) 03:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

5-year semi-protection: An article about a pejorative term newly popular on the internet has unsurprisingly turned into a magnet for vandalism. – Uanfala (talk) 23:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I support this request. In fact I came here to request semi-protection for this very page. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Semi-protected indefinitely. Some version of an article or redirect at that title was previously indefinitely semi protected. I have applied indefinite semi protection to that article, instead of 5 years, due to the previous protection and the large amount of vandalism. Any admin has my support to reduce this protection length to 5 years. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 00:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Nah. Anything over 3 years is effectively indefinite. I'd say indef-semi is appropriate after 1-year protection has failed to work. Unprotection requests are down below, if it ever comes up. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Highly visible TFA, vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 16:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Only one incident of vandalism since this report was made, handled by a revert, and the article is no longer the TFA. All seems calm at the moment, hopefully it will stay that way. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ashleyyoursmile! 07:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 07:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ashleyyoursmile! 07:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 07:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive addition of the unsourced term 'Mama' immediate after the expiry of the protection template today [52]. Some diffs of the similar vandalism/unsourced addition [53], [54]. I'd like to request a longer protection period this time. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk: You needs to warn 2409:4065:101:2940:2344:F005:E169:646C for its distruptive editing because i found only one IP that adding unsourced content. Aside from this, protection is unlikely at this point just because it has unprotected. 36.68.187.181 (talk) 09:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It is an IP range from Guwahati, Assam, India with Jio as the service provider, you can the older edits in the history. The dynamic IP will change next time, so I find warning them useless. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP vios resumed shortly after previous protection expired. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring / content dispute article is at AfD being repeatedly blanked by a connected editor, either protection or a partial block seems to be needed. I'm not just involved but apparently the cause of the COI editor's displeasure. NB due to a radio button mistake (dumb!), I unintentionally protected it myself for a short while. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 20:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Michael Greiner 21:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: See edit history...not a redirect IPs need to edit. Let's put this under our covid arbitration sanctions. Wikipedia:General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019. Moxy 🍁 21:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Moxy seems to be following me and is refusing to join the discussion I started on the talk page and is instead reverting and requesting protection here. Those actions violate a host of policies, not to mention level of hostility / anti- collegiality. Please help me. I could restore, as Moxy is refusing to talk, but welcome any help or better ideas. --50.201.195.170 (talk) 23:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The page ist targeted by a some IPs. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15 February 2021

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has seen extensive disruptive editing and edit-warring, with a substantial number of edits made by random IP users. The nature of this page also seems to be sensitive due to the subject (Pakistan)'s ongoing territorial dispute with India over Kashmir, due to which there is obvious tug-of-warring from both Indian and Pakistani nationalists on its administrative divisions article; this page has been protected once before, although the period was temporary and the article remains unprotected. I would normally request temporary protection but I believe until the issue of Kashmir is solved, that this page will, without a doubt, be stuck in the same cycle. ➤ Zᴇᴇx.ʀɪᴄᴇ ✪ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 16:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Was going to request the same. The article was relatively stable before it was targeted by sock IPs of a chronic LTA, Zeshan Mahmood (also asking for a ban on the 92.40.172.0/23 range which is being used to sock). Gotitbro (talk) 08:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Gotitbro range blocks are somewhere else. I don't do them. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Samsara 18:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Vandalism from several IP users. Seoltoir22 (talk) 19:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 22:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 22:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unconfirmed reports of death by multiple IPs, nothing in reliable references about it yet. FDW777 (talk) 21:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have found a source - The Times - for the death so protection is probably not needed now. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
death reported --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Moot now. Lectonar (talk) 13:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page sees somewhat frequent vandalism, often antisemitic in nature from new users and IPs. The most recent was from someone aptly named 'GypsyCrusaderChad1488' who edited the page declaring Jeffrey Epstein in (((echoes))) as the leader; labeling his edit summary 'Anti white bastards'. Especially as the ADL has positions on the Israel-Palestine conflict, this should at a minimum be semi-protected indefinitely. Blade Jogger 2049 Talk 22:00, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruptive edits are few and far between; incidents like the above should be dealt with by warning and reporting at AIV. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 13:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism (name-calling in Burmese). ― Tartan357 Talk 05:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC): User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant IP vandalism. The last 25 edits by 24 users were all vandalism, spam, and reverts of same.[55] Guy Macon (talk) 15:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See history. Moxy 🍁 11:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done 73.159.229.5 (talk · contribs) has ceased editing the talk page in favor of opening a case at the dispute resolution noticeboard at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard § Wikipedia:No Nazis. Please re-report if disruption continues on the talk page. — Newslinger talk 12:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Escape Orbit (Talk) 14:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adding content without edit summary, not referenced and potential OR, creating pure pov sections, much of it already covered into History section, the same content added by various IPs so it is maybe sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. Article was protected from 5-8 February, but again the same activities started.Nubia86 (talk) 11:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Xiamatt (talk) 18:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated edits by unregistered users changing gender identifications within the article. Warnings and notices are consistently ignored. Current wording (i.e. using female pronouns) discussed and agreed on WT:VG. -- JascaDucato (talk | contributions) 13:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock-hopping IP and abusive re-registered user continuing to return to page. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Scott The Woz-related vandalism. Again. O.N.R. (talk) 00:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Sudden surge in biased viewpoints in the last month. Eridian314 (talk) 03:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — csc-1 03:20, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 03:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Drollwor (talk · contribs) blocked by Jpgordon. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. – DarkGlow (contribstalk) 19:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Crossroads -talk- 20:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 22:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Tundraspalace (talk) 23:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to have died down; please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 11:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A game designer recently came out as trans (https://twitter.com/Kate_JRayner/status/1360363220918149120), and this page is experiencing IP vandalism over MOS:DEADNAME and MOS:GENDERID regarding the dispute of one of the desinger's names. 72.226.18.6 (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP and user vandalism along with extensive use of abusive words in the infobox.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Among Us-related vandalism to an unrelated Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. episode. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 13:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent of unsourced editing, speculation, editing in contrary to provided sources without explanation. BOVINEBOY2008 10:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Every IP edit in the last year or so has ended up being reverted, there's one in particular that's persistent. Le Deluge (talk) 11:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of reliably sourced content. — Newslinger talk 12:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Flix11 (talk) 15:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by one or more editors, Sometimes there is an attempt at deleting a whole section of the article; sometimes spam; sometimes they try and change the meaning of the article with multiple and subtle edits. The user or users don't use their IP, but create new profiles for the purpose of a single edit, which are then abandoned. Wiki.Jaap.07 (talk) 15:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 10:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 12:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Month long edit wars....best we get all involved in talks over multiple reverts for another month. Moxy 🍁 05:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The page has been protected on 2-3 occasions since December 2020 and IP accounts keep doing the same edits against consensus whenever the protection expires. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 06:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP swapping editor persistently reverting good edits to suit their own point of view with the edit summary "reverting vandalism". Robvanvee 09:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and unexplained content removal, as well as a constant fight over 'Snap' vs 'Blip'. Sir Magnus has spoken! (So can you!) 11:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: There are 300+ articles in Category:College football rivalries in the United States which uses a "Team1–Team2 football rivalry" naming convention. This article is one of a handful of outliers which is appropriately deemed a "series" (rather than a "rivalry"). Only 3 of 79 current article citations invoke "rival" or term variations. This series article has been moved to "rivalry" 5 times by editors[56] and is presently reverted to the correct ("series") location. Move prevention will prevent a 6th move and revert. UW Dawgs (talk) 14:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by multiple IP editors. RA0808 talkcontribs 21:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 21:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Fans adding mention of a film that hasn't started filming yet. Ravensfire (talk) 02:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: I nominated the article for AfD, but I noticed that a 2016 AfD closed as redirect. No notability has been shown with its recreation. I'm seeing if the redirect can be permanently protected. SL93 (talk) 04:09, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – At least until this talk of Benning getting fired dies down, so we won't have swarms of vengeful Canucks fans constantly vandalizing his article. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 05:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. It may not be enough. If it gets worse let me know. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 16:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing IP editors (possibly one or more editors IP hopping). RA0808 talkcontribs 20:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent additions by IPs without sources. Ab207 (talk) 08:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The page was indefinitely PC protected by Ronhjones (no longer active) more than 2 years ago due to vandalism. It looks like the last vandal attempt was last July[57] so I am not convinced that the protection is still necessary. (t · c) buidhe 03:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Lectonar (talk) 11:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This page was indef semi-protected almost 10 years ago by Dabomb87, who is no longer active. The protection comment is "Pending changes trial is over", which really isn't helpful. The logs showed some vandalism 3 years prior to that (in 2008), but there's no discussion in the talk and very little information on why a page about a salamander has been protected for a decade. -- ShinmaWa(talk) 10:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have downgraded to pending-changes protection for 3 months and will watchlist to evaluate. Lectonar (talk) 11:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit 14:38, 13 February 2021. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP and new editor vandalism, all replacing "Biotin" with "Broke", started 9 February. David notMD (talk) 03:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, I protected in the same moment as you did, Deepfriedokra. No harm done. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Don't know what's driving this, but there is a recent flurry of activity to label him as a traitor, snitch, rat, etc. Meters (talk) 04:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Couldn't be due to changing the title of the article to include snitch "informant"? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, that page name change was very recent. The vandalism has being going on for several days. Meters (talk) 04:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Or perhaps Judas and the Black Messiah? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(ec)From my reading of the article the name change was appropriate. Meters (talk) 04:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. More accurate than "activist". Sad, really. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I recently successfully requested a week's protection for this page, noting a high amount of disruptive edits. I thought the edits might have been related to recent coverage of the case, though since the protection has expired the vandalism, unsourced additions and unexplained removals of referenced content have simply recommenced. Note: yesterday I did a major overhaul of the article with over 100 edits, so you have to search through the last 250 changes to find all the offending edits. Accordingly for your convenience I'm listing all instances of vandalism and POV pushing from both IPs and brand new single-purpose accounts in the last five days below. Some individual edits may seem relatively innocuous on the surface but the edits are all unsourced, usually conflict with sourced information, and have been reverted many times. The person(s) making them are well aware they are contested. I'd also like to nominate this article for GA, but that would require it to be stable (and not constantly disrupted by IPs). [58] [59] [60] [61] [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] Damien Linnane (talk) 13:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. – DarkGlow (contribstalk) 19:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persisntent Content blanking and addition of contriversial contents by IP's Kichu🐘 Discuss 04:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page have been edited a few times by unlogged users to falsify the number of executive orders issued by Joe Biden. That info can be easily tracked via this page. https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders. QTHCCAN (talk) 22:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 03:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Disruptive editing As soon a the semi-protection expired, disruptive editing resumed.--Harout72 (talk) 23:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 01:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 03:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost every edit done to this article is either vandalism or reverting vandalism. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 02:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:09, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resumption after last protect expired. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – trolling vandalism. GPinkerton (talk) 02:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16 February 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Kichu🐘 Discuss 16:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Transfer rumours by the look of it. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – by multiple IPs and new users. theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Taking a bit of a hammering today. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Favonian (talk) 18:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protection: Persistent vandalism – Kind of a fly trap for conspiracy wingnuts to add whatever event they think looks bad on their religion/nation/ideology. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 10:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pages hit by LTA

Temporary semi-protection: Pages are being repeatedly hit by WP:LTA/HANOI with multiple IPs over multiple weeks. D💘ggy54321 (xoxo😘) 12:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Gave them all a month as it’s long term abuse. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced additions of spouse to infobox. William Avery (talk) 13:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. TravelAroundOz (talk) 07:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Mest oblast (talk · contribs) blocked by Hut 8.5. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 07:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 11:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, likely as a result of the article hitting the Main Page. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 12:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 13:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 13:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:58, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Excessive vandalism, due to a controversial education bill passed recently in Parliament. --Rodamanth (talk) 05:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY 07:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced and disruptive edits by IPs. Sid95Q (talk) 05:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY 07:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing by WP:SPA. Jingiby (talk) 06:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 07:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protect (again) - page just came off 7-day pp and same pattern of vandalism resumed immediately. - wolf 07:16, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drells after being blocked again 2 days ago is using IP addresses to continue their agenda. This article has been protected several times in the past because of this issue. Robvanvee 07:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Robvanvee: Because LTA ip sock you refer is 186.11.40.104, you need to report that user. 36.76.235.92 (talk) 09:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:16, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - Childish IP vandalism. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism Дмитро Д (talk) 09:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 10:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs and new users adding unsourced content, modifying existing name. [71] [72] [73]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing: IP Vandals have been violating MOS:GENDER. There was a recent Netflix documentary, so this kind of thing is likely for the near future. Possibly (talk) 02:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 02:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks,but I'll just unwatch the article. I'd rather not run around chasing four IP addresses. Possibly (talk) 03:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This should be a redirect to Jessi Slaughter cyberbullying case. Bangalamania (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bangalamania: Do I read that correctly? The subject is an 11-yo girl? Is there a discussion at WP:BLPN saying this page should exist? If so, please link to it. If not, I would not create this page. Are you sure Jessi Slaughter cyberbullying case should have the full name? Has that been discussed somewhere? Johnuniq (talk) 01:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies if the article reads poorly. The subject was 11 years old at the time of the initial controversy in 2010. As they're now adult, the original issue over BLP of a minor (which is why the page was protected ten years ago, as well as the cyberbullying page) is irrelevant, as is the WP:BLP1E, as there have been more recent claims which establish notability imo (more recent accusations of sexual assault and being interviewed as part of Chris Hansen's YouTube documentary, FBI investigations, etc). Sorry I didn't start a discussion at WP:BLPN as I just assumed these rationales had become moot, though I'll admit I'm not an expert on the subject.
I would argue that the cyberbullying page should definitely have the nickname "Jessi Slaughter" in (as this was the name they were notable by at the time, and all the news articles discussing the controversy use it), as well as their post-transition name as this is mentioned for the most recent allegations. Maybe the birthname redirect or even mention in the article isn't necessary, but I think it aids anyone who'd otherwise think Slaughter is Damien's last name now. --Bangalamania (talk) 02:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bangalamania, the article in mention has been deleted Steve M (talk) 02:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. Moot, as proposed target of redirect has been deleted. Favonian (talk) 06:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Article subject just died. Heavy IP vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 21:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edits such as this are good faith. If specific IPs or new accounts vandalise the article, report at WP:AIV. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. -FASTILY 02:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 01:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -FASTILY 02:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 01:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -FASTILY 02:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Removal of content without reason from contributor that appears to have a close connection with its subject.Oyveyistmir (talk) 22:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 01:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Consensus at the talk page is that the material ought to be removed, as it is sourced only to unreliable sources such as the New York Post. I see no evidence in the article's history, or the editing history of the person who removed it twice, to suggest that they have any kind of close connection with the subject.  MelanieN (talk) 01:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, sorry, Fastilly. Edit conflict. At least we both reached the same conclusion: no protection. -- MelanieN (talk) 01:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — Newslinger talk 22:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Newslinger: As an admin, why you not invoking pending changea protection for that article? 36.76.235.92 (talk) 22:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, administrators are not supposed to perform administrative actions (including page protection) in disputes for which they are involved. Although I have only made two edits on the Newslaundry article in September 2020, some of my editing focuses on journalism-related articles and there is a chance that I will make significant changes to the article while it is under pending-changes protection, which would be poor form if I instated the protection. — Newslinger talk 22:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Steve M (talk) 02:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/HANOI; other similar compilation album redirects have been also been indeffed thanks to this vandal; see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/25 Jaar Na Daddy Cool. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock-hopping IP and abusive re-registered user continuing to return to page. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 01:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock-hopping IP and abusive re-registered user continuing to return to page. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 01:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Previously blocked user continues to create new accounts and/or make anonymous edits to these articles in order to force the use of outdated photos of both subjects in the infobox. Refuses to discuss on talk page. NJZombie (talk) 15:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 01:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unconstructive editing by IPs. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 17:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 01:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – There are some (but not as many) vandals, such as the unannounced 3rd season. LucianoTheWindowsFan (talk) 17:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY 01:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There are lots of vandals about the delivery dance. LucianoTheWindowsFan (talk) 17:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY 01:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 20:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY 01:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY 01:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY 01:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ʃx (talk) 01:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: According to the RIP message there, and as the account is globally locked, I assume it's true. (CC) Tbhotch 01:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Also noted on the et.wiki, their home wiki. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. NASCARfan0548  05:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Let's see if that stops 'em --Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This draft has been repeatedly submitted disruptively by an editor who has not answered a conflict of interest question, and by unregistered editors. Please protect so that only established editors can submit or otherwise edit. The album likely is notable, but should be edited and submitted by neutral established editors, not by a fan club. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The draft has already been published at Who Am I? (Pale Waves album). — Newslinger talk 23:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: POV edit, edit warring: I removed the edit because I felt it was not necessary but IP user keeps reverting it, even going past the 3 reverts. 86.9.227.81 (talk) 19:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 240f:112:5047:1::/64 (talk · contribs). Blocked for 1 week. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 23:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Some IPs and new accounts change his ethnicity, origin, and background. Their edits are very similar to this blocked sockpuppet Special:Contributions/MLP050. e.g. the most recent one[74]. Please look at the history of article. Non-stop disruptive changes since 9 Dec 2020 and after the block of sockpuppet. Wario-Man talk 20:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of anon activity and edit warring following McDowell’s win in Daytona 500. United States Man (talk) 05:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To keep incidents from happening again this season (ends in July this year). –Piranha249 (Discuss with me) 16:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I didn't want to protect any longer because there is a lot of productive editing from IPs on that article. MelanieN (talk) 01:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Also including persistent addition of unsourced/able content by IPs. Nightfury 15:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Shinyeditbonjour. 16:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. As there are recent good-faith edits from IPs, protection is not appropriate. Disruptive editors have already been blocked. If vandalism persists, Pending Changes may be an option. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 36.76.235.92 (talk) 21:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hoppers and new accounts making joke edits about his name. Sjö (talk) 20:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP copyvio. This is the probable COI editor User:Mackie1789 who ignored talk page notices and is now using an IP account. The material being added is a WP:COPYVIO among other problems. GreenC 22:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 23:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The pending changes protection isn't deterring vandals. Probably needs an increase. Eridian314 (talk) 23:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please submit another report next year if disruption persists. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 23:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17 February 2021

Five KızılBörü1071 sockpuppet targets

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071 and Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/KızılBörü1071. FDW777 (talk) 14:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actions taken:
Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 17:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. (Copied from post here) "Good Afternoon, fellow Wikipedians. As you all know, Rush Limbaugh has passed away today and there is a massive spike to this page in particular. The main forms of vandalism to this page are changing words, names, blanking, other types of edits, adding pictures of person(s) dabbing, and pictures of genitalia. Therefore, I am requesting that administration change the semi-protection to Extended protection to reduce vandalism. Thank you." WiiBoi (talk) 19:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. (Non-administrator comment)Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 20:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 19:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has become the target of IP vandalism since it was posted as TFA and given that this franchise was very popular. 36.65.38.154 (talk) 15:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by Indonesian DOB vandal continues after previous semi-protection expired yesterday. kyykaarme (talk) 16:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism, reversion of legitimate edits claiming they're vandalism, and page blanking. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 18:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: multiple users are posting photos of dicks on the top of a high-traffic page. Please protect this ASAP. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 19:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:08, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Biography of a living person heavily involved in current events. Persistent IP edits attempting mischaracterisation. Such edits are likely to continue for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. 37.228.231.192 (talk) 12:42, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only see two edits so far this year. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:31, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target for mischief. Crboyer (talk) 15:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has become the target some of persistent vandalism, with some back-and-forth "bad edits" from IP users and outright vandalism. Requesting semi-protection for at least a month until it dies down. NeutralhomerTalk • 15:41 on February 17, 2021 (UTC) 15:41, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BPL violations at Jason Ward (naturalist) are extending to these pages.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: NBA player involved in a reported trade, with BLP edits violating the policy on that topic. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 19:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The trade has been confirmed, so I assume the protections is not anymore needed.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Moot now, see above. Lectonar (talk) 08:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can we please get indef semi protection on this article? It's vandalized constantly by a brigade of folk who don't like what the subject is primarily known for. Jorm (talk) 01:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a public call to disrupt the related AFD https://mobile.twitter.com/deepdhan555/status/1361760523465887744 This page was being vandalised as the subject is currently in the news. Vikram Vincent 13:36, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 14:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:16, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 01:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Fastily: Warn or report which user? Each time they're blocked they use a new IP. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The most recent IP? Blocking takes 2 clicks, 5 seconds, and is easy. Like I said, please make a new AIV report when it happens again. -FASTILY 02:31, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Fastily: Not when no one is "minding the store" at AIV for an hour. What is the purpose of semi-protection, if not situations like this? I'll remind you that the page is a BLP. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Uh no, that's a false dichotomy, and absolutely not what semi-protection is for. Also, I note that the IP in question is currently blocked, and can see no reason why the article needs protection at this time. -FASTILY 02:42, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Fastily: They've used four IPs over the past three days. So I don't waste time with any more reports, how many must they use, before you'd be willing to protect the page? Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – One editor has repeatedly tried to completely change the content and POV of the article, have the article speedy deleted; and label it a hoax. If you look at Talk:Fatima Sheikh it is pretty clear the editor does not care about WP:NPOV. Similar disruptive edits have been made by IPs as well. GPL93 (talk) 02:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 02:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Kichu🐘 Discuss 04:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocked 2 accounts. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I REALLY don't know what the deal with that one Terakazu Ishikawa result is, but the edit history speaks for itself... (And for the record, he really DID fail the Backstream, I've been a member of the Sasuke Maniac Forums for years, so I'm pretty confident I'm right...). Thegreatluigi (talk) 18:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 01:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: I'm the current owner of the LLC which owns the property Encyclopedia Dramatica at .wiki, our domain keeps getting changed out to a wiki not being run under an LLC and has 3x less content than us due to only having public backups and no database. - æ admin 19:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY 01:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent insertion of false symbol for yard by various IP addresses. Jc3s5h (talk) 19:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 01:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For an extended period of time to stop repeated addition of unsourced and erroneous edits from unverified/IP users. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 01:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP user is consistently trying to add content about the 5th series of the show, as though it has already been aired. It hasn't. There are no sources (not that I can find anyway) which provide details of this future series. Pending Changes protection is already in place, but it's not discouraging the user from adding the content. Bazonka (talk) 22:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. A partial-block applied to the range for one month. Let’s see if that plus pending changes protection will curb this behaviour. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page along with Pakistan Muslim League (Z), All Pakistan Muslim League, Islami Jamhoori Ittehad and East Turkestan Liberation Organization constantly gets unsourced information added by a single person using multiple IP's, as a result we can't just block the individual. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 23:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 01:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been vandalized heavily by both IP and logged in users, It would be wise to protect it until the current political climate in the United States cools down. Dellwood546 (talk) 00:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. There hasn't been any IP vandalism since Feb 10. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Closing this as stale. No recent edits to the page, re-report if disruption resumes. FASTILY 01:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism from a user and disruptive editing from an IP. Magitroopa (talk) 17:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already reported the vandalizing user at AIV, but if this request is gotten to before the AIV report, please block, if possible. It is quite clear they are WP:NOTHERE... Magitroopa (talk) 17:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Conny the Cow and an IP have been blocked. All seem quiet now. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Various different IPs keep removing the CSD tag. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done It’s been deleted. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 13:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Oh. Added before I saw the declin --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page have been edited a few times by unlogged users to falsify the number of executive orders issued by Joe Biden. That info can be easily tracked via this page. https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders. The Executive order is already under temporary semi-protection for the same reason. A semi-protection is wide sufficient considering vandals don't even bother to change the values in the "Last" column. QTHCCAN (talk) 16:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: For longer than I prefer, but the LTA nature of the abuse makes it needed --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection (1 month): sockpuppetry Ambergarden (talk) 22:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Being targeted by sockpuppets. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 23:39, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MMA disruption. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18 February 2021

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Drells. Binksternet (talk) 03:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Heartfox (talk) 03:31, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, users and IPs continuing to add either unsourced information or add character costumes with names that have yet to be revealed officially (speculation/original research). Magitroopa (talk) 19:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently a Google Doodle. Dolotta (talk) 14:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 22:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 15:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 22:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent editing logged out by User:Mclarenfan17, evading an interaction ban with User:Tvx1. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Disruptive page moves; can't do this myself as I am involved. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:31, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please discuss with the other user on the talk page, and get outside opinions if needed. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – user request. Larry Z Contact me my edits 03:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism and unconstructive edits even with semi-protection on. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 06:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AllegedlyHuman: I see that only one or two users that made unconstructive edits to the article, which all is happened in the last two days. The only unconstructive edit and vandalism that i see today is Corbin85, which has been reported by 2601:188:180:B8E0:8804:65CA:7CE3:366C to AIV, so i don't believe it can be justify its protection. 36.65.38.154 (talk) 07:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This has lasted longer than two days. The edit history for just the last month shows an extensive record of dogmatic edit-warring from multiple registered users. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 07:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Few if any of the users editing in the last month would be prohibited from activity by ECP, so further protection is not useful (or justified). Fuzheado | Talk 12:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Liberaldemocrat (talk) 09:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. No need for protection. Fuzheado | Talk 12:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071 and Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/KızılBörü1071. Page recently semi-protected to deal with this vandal. FDW777 (talk) 20:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Blocked the IP, warned the registered user. I assume the two are the same person. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. User should be blocked as well JlACEer (talk) 02:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done User was blocked. Page otherwise hasn't been vandalized since 2015, so I'm not seeing the need for protection at this point. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Article was locked once last year. IP disruption is becoming significant again, 13 February onward. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 12:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP edit warring over their preferred image. Crossroads -talk- 04:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Probably better addressed with a block if it continues. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of same unsourced or poorly sourced content to body WP:VERIFY and WP:DISRUPT from multiple IPs. Also, persistent change to infobox content again WP:VERIFY and WP:DISRUPT. Page had been protected for 3 days on 5 February 2021‎.--Melbguy05 (talk) 08:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps removing citations claiming defamation and seems to be persisting. Sgerbic (talk) 16:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This appears to be a single user, so I'd recommend pursuing a block if they continue to edit war without discussing. In the meantime, I've warned them. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:25, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This academy trust page was edited by a user with a CoI. That user has been blocked on username grounds. An IP editor has now twice made edits that appear promotional. I have reverted these for the moment and started a discussion on the Talk page but the editor has not engaged. Thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 19:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Would recommend pursuing a block if the user continues to edit war without discussion. Protection seems inappropriate since it's just one IP user. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protect - long term: due to persistent, slow burn WP:NAT-type disruption going back at least a year, involving multiple ips all from the same region targeting the exact same edit. At least one was blocked for a year last summer as a proxy. Perhaps long-term pp will compel some tp engagement. - wolf 00:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing: persistent removal of sourced content by IPs. This page was protected for the same reason on January 27, 2021 ([75]). D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 01:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Essentially all edits for the last two years have been the same vandalism, adding the name of a supposed princess. Either ECP or pending changes may help deter/protect article. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 19:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed seems a little overkill. Semi-protection seems better. This is still pretty strange. Eridian314 (talk) 19:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I extended a partial block on the /34 range that's been responsible for the vandalism of the last year. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 20:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping user keeps inserting the same vandalism. Knuthove (talk) 20:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopping user repeatedly inserts possibly unverifiable and false plot info. George Ho (talk) 20:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous editors are celebrating the death of Rush Limbaugh by posting vile and derogatory remarks. PrinceArchelaus (talk) 22:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree with this, although I would prefer Permanent semi-protection do to the controversial nature of Rush Limbaugh and the fact that the Rush Limbaugh page had to be temporarily upgraded to extended protection because of the same thing. WiiBoi (talk) 02:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite semi-protection seems unwarranted at this point; the page has otherwise not been protected since 2016. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism (pending-changes may be preferable as some IP edits are constructive). — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 22:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 23:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not sure I'm seeing the need for ECP. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 00:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Shadow4dark (talk) 11:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Black Kite. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP and single-edit account edit-warring diff diff diff diff diff. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:46, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch 16:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Numerous IPs trying to whitewash mentions of Nazism and/or Satanism. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 18:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lizen543t4565y6. Amaury18:42, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lizen543t4565y6. Amaury18:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lizen543t4565y6. Amaury18:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. DMCA takedown requests directed at prominent online content creators are all but guaranteed to continue to bring persistent disruption to this page for the foreseeable future. AngryHarpytalk 08:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: Content dispute/edit warring - Presumably chinese users are making misinformed edits without citation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.101.52.104 (talk) 08:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Same as last time, the IP-hopping user from Jordan continues to edit-war over unsourced claims of national origin for the dish, that contradict the existing sources. IamNotU (talk) 09:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by several IP editors. Areaseven (talk) 10:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP-hopping editor. ― Tartan357 Talk 19:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone has an axe to grind about the city and homelessness. Ifnord (talk) 21:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruptive editing. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:10, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of unreferenced and defamatory content. ― Tartan357 Talk 21:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – an earlier request was denied by Fastily, but the issue has persisted through IP edits and while only one account has been involved in the content/POV dispute several other IPs have also been involved. GPL93 (talk) 13:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. FASTILY 21:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated and way WP:TOOSOON for it. Could we protect for 6-12 months, as typically season articles are created 12-18 months in advance (and it's currently 25 months until it'll likely start). Joseph2302 (talk) 20:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued vandalism by sock of blocked IP. ― Tartan357 Talk 21:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:41, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19 February 2021

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The artist's agent or marketing firm is removing content that could be seen as embarrassing in a Christian "market" and has now resorted to editing logged out. This is not the first time. Request both a short lock and permanent ECP. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Continues. Arjeetwins333 (talk) 05:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also warned user. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A number of IPs engaging in a dispute over the supposed ethnicity of this semi-mythical figure for the past week. CMD (talk) 06:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 22:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dennis Bratland (talk) 09:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 22:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive editing. 137.97.79.7 (talk) 09:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cyphoidbomb. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP disruption. Obviously same editor IP hopping to remove a sourced opinion quote they just don't like personally. Reverted every time by multiple editors. oknazevad (talk) 18:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Fuzheado. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Larry Z Contact me my edits 18:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Among Us meme vandalism. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Darth Coracle (talk) 01:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: TFA. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 18:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of uncited material, unexplained blanking, disruptive editing and reverts. Wretchskull (talk) 14:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs, a similar article (List of Kuruluş: Osman characters) has been protected due to this reason. IronManCap (talk) 14:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandalism due to recent event. Pupsterlove02 talkcontribs 15:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by many users. Eridian314 (talk) 16:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree Many of them combines with IP vandalism as well. 110.137.166.20 (talk) 16:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 16:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism, frequent edits involving "Imposter is Sus," etc Owen250708 (talk) 12:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ah, yes, the 'Sus imposter meme'. We’ve had quite a bit of that, it’s not going away. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – So many IP users are adding misinformation on the Kids' Choice Awards. kpgamingz (rant me) 12:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandalism from multiple IPs. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nationalistic disruption? ("She is not Chinese"). Taken a hammering today. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 13:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A BLP that’s been getting a bit of a hammering. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unconstructive edits and vandalism, with serious violations to a BLP-adjacent article. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 13:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level new users edit warring please revert back to pre edit warring. VVikingTalkEdits 14:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Newslinger. Fuzheado | Talk 16:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Change protection level to Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry of Richmondjosephlegisma (talk · contribs). The sockpuppetry account is autoconfirmed and needs the article to be changed to ECP. The sockpuppetry might appear on a day or time. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Richmondjosephlegisma. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 03:36, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 ::@Deepfriedokra: Maybe you edit the wrong request, the protection hasn't changed. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 11:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC) [reply]

@Sean Ethan James D. Querubin: I report the user that has suspect sockpuppet to ANI and let see whether this user blocked because it only deals with one user, so i don't protection can be changed for now. 36.65.38.154 (talk) 13:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The sockpuppet is now blocked, but I think that user will create a new account again to disrupt Wikipedia. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 15:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedFor now; if there is more disruption, please relist Lectonar (talk) 12:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: The page faces vandalism from time to time from unregistered and non autoconfirmed IPs who try to be funny because of Cr1TiKaL's huge fanbase. Cr1TiKaL is also the only Youtuber with an audience as big as his whose Wikipedia page isn't Semi-Protected Heffner000 (talk) 04:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, has previously been protected due to this reason. IronManCap (talk) 14:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism from IPs. TheWarOfArt (talk) 15:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A BLP that has taken a bit of a hammering this week. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A new user, @JaMongKut with are very anti-Hindu attitude trying to "convert" each and every Hindu sites to Buddhist sites without any strong evidence. Looks like he has an agenda to attack Hinduism as he has some personal issues with the religion. If the edits are being corrected, he is basically personal attacking me. He has been changing the articles randomly everywhere on the Wikipedia. Previously he was blocked form the same page called "List of largest Hindu temples" for 1 week. Now he is doing the same thing to the above mentioned page. I would suggest to block this user from editing all the pages, so that he will not be disruptive towards other established users. Naveen Ramanathan (talk) 08:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. The new user appears to be auto-confirmed (4 days old, 10 edits) so semi-protection would be of no benefit. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chompy Ace 05:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High-profile figure in politics, has seen recent vandalism. Should be protected to promote compliance with WP:BLP. CaliIndie (talk) 11:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. AngryHarpytalk 07:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, consistant vandalism due to similarities in article name and aspects of 'Amoung Us' video game. High potential for future vandalism. Augu❤Maugu 💕 07:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:13, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuing efforts at suspected self-promotion of YouTube video who's copyright status is unclear. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 10:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 20:10, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Z Contact me my edits 22:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Move warring against the consensus of a RM on talkpage. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Persistent vandalism with IP editing KNorth192 (talk) 00:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Paintspot Infez (talk) 01:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lots of editing, including by IPs, but not a lot of back and forth. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Arjeetwins333 (talk) 11:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page was semi-protected in the recent past, but as soon as the protection expired, vandalism resumed. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 16:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One in five days is not yet a problem. And most certainly not a cause for indefinite. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: The page is of a famous YouTuber due to which it constantly faces vandalism. Heffner000 (talk) 16:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit War, possible vandalism. Augu❤Maugu 💕 00:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. User:190.151.175.206 blocked by TonyBallioni. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Augu❤Maugu 💕 01:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. User:222.153.51.148 blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:27, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indef semi-protect, or at least very extended... along with Graham Local School District and Graham High School (St. Paris, Ohio), and/or possibly a range block on the IPs in question... continued IP based (and occasional new account) vandalism, appears to be the same person jumping IPs and creating new accounts... has been protected before, but vandalism started back again as soon as protection was lifted... - Adolphus79 (talk) 23:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of someone with inane grudge against star George MacKay. Crboyer (talk) 02:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 03:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 02:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 03:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent addition of badly sourced content by IP adresses. Synthwave.94 (talk) 18:10, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Semi-Protection: Shocked this hasn't already happened, as this article has been the victim of persistent vandalism for the couple weeks since a documentary on the subject premiered on Netflix. PrairieKid (talk) 21:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP hopping vandal for over a year now. Was stopped by previous protection, but continued upon expiry. Knuthove (talk) 23:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 00:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruption from IP and new account on anniversary of his death. FDW777 (talk) 14:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Reverted some vandalism. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs violating the WP:TVUPCOMING guideline. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 14:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: – influx of Ip's making bad edits and vandalizing the page. 🌀CycloneFootball71🏈 |sandbox 16:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Limorina (talk) 17:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article is today's featured article, and has a high level of recent vandalism both by IPs and user accounts. Politicsfan4 (talk) 16:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Pupsterlove02 talkcontribs 19:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been nominated for deletion, but block-evading editor is removing MFD tag. Please semi-protect until MFD is closed. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I guessed you meant Draft:NGC 5582, Robert McClenon. Protected for one week which should be enough time for the MfD to reach a conclusion. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP disruptive editing, which is not going to be any better. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 00:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism on January 24, 2021 and January 26, 2021 by two different IP addresses. If 'not done', please block them (because i'm still don't know how). EdhyRa (talk) 05:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, there is no point in blocking dynamic IPs that are no longer editing.Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is about one of the national political parties in India. As I see almost every national party in India has a semi-protected except this (Bahujan Samaj Party). It must be semi-protected along with IP specific editing. For specific number, IP's, the administrator can have approach Trinity112233 (talk) 07:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC). Trinity112233 (talk) 07:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Trinity112233: This page cannot be protected preemptively per WP:PREEMPT because it needs an evidence that the article has been experience persistent vandalism, which users cannot be handled properly. 36.65.38.154 (talk) 07:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of recent IP vandalism. • SbmeirowTalk17:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Few IP users (or maybe one person, I don’t know) repeatedly adding statements without source. Had given warnings on talk pages but they didn’t reply. They use different IP address each time they edit so I don't know the main IP they actually use to talk to them. I think we should issue page protection from IP users to prevent this. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 04:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs vandalizing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fixed a vandalism to the Wikidata item as well! Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As long as Kennedy maintains a high profile position the article is going to be subject to vandalism. Nemov (talk) 19:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20 February 2021

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Part of the user script contains this template, if the template is replaced {{QD|U1}} by a user, Then the page that references this template will be deleted inexplicably. Alcremie (talk) 10:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined see WP:IAN#Missing_nowiki_tags_in_user_scripts_lead_to_strange_template_creations_and_protection_requests ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Part of the user script contains this template, if the template is replaced {{QD|U1}} by a user, Then the page that references this template will be deleted inexplicably. Alcremie (talk) 10:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined see WP:IAN#Missing_nowiki_tags_in_user_scripts_lead_to_strange_template_creations_and_protection_requests ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Part of the user script contains this template, if the template is replaced {{QD|U1}} by a user, Then the page that references this template will be deleted inexplicably. Alcremie (talk) 10:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined see WP:IAN#Missing_nowiki_tags_in_user_scripts_lead_to_strange_template_creations_and_protection_requests ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. - FitIndia Talk Admin on Commons 17:47, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected After two deletion discussions, any new drafts should go through Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 19:52, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:17, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and newly created user using defamatory language laced with jabs at the person's skin color [76] [77], [78], [79]. The term "Kala Titar" as can be seen in some edits to the lead and infobox means "black partridge". Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Defamatory additions to a BLP. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations (misgendering and MOS:DEADNAME violations) immediately following the expiry of the previous protection. It has been protected many times since July 2020, so I think a longer term protection is necessary. Previous protection was for three months. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:21, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The pages for Mars 2020, Perseverance (rover), and Ingenuity (helicopter) are under a concerted vandalism attack by an entity that is jumping IPs to post pornography (specifically the same dick pic) to the top of the pages. The entity refused to stop while other users were hurriedly reverting their edits until admin applied semi-protection to Mars 2020 and Perseverance (rover), so I'm requesting for Ingenuity (helicopter) to be protected as well. Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Perseverance (rover) also confirms this. Phillip Samuel (talk) 21:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Phillip Samuel: Do you mean Ingenuity (Mars helicopter)? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) I jumped the gun and adjusted the request. Favonian (talk) 13:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Ïvana (talk) 02:51, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:30, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs actively vandalising. DuncanHill (talk) 03:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and BLP violations. Multiple IPs adding porn images to the article. 110.137.166.20 (talk) 13:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:35, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Error title for those making AfC submissions... Aasim (talk) 05:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 07:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steven1029 (talk) 07:21, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A user, Storm598, edited on 10 February 2021, claiming that this faction represents "Conservative Liberalism" without providing a factual citation. His edits was previous reverted but he persisted in inverting. Independent Airman (talk) 07:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, we do not protect articles against a single user--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. William Avery (talk) 20:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 05:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Some people vandalize for no reason/extremely famous mythological character, it should've been semi protected long ago. Holloman123 (talk) 20:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 05:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced edits by multiple users. As some are confirmed, Extended Protection might be needed. Eridian314 (talk) 20:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY 05:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -FASTILY 05:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 23:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY 05:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 02:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -FASTILY 05:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced material. Emk9 (talk) 05:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 05:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Resume of same behaviour stemming from previous page protection; violation of WP:STICKTOTHESOURCE despite talk page discussion. livelikemusic (TALK!) 05:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I left a note on llm's talk page about this, but the issue here is upload warring and lack of discussion. I'm not sure protection would fix the problem here since a month long upload protection still didn't stop the upload warring. Wug·a·po·des 01:04, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done closing as not done per above. -FASTILY 05:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See [80], [81], [82] and [83]. 2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election is near and is more prone to WP:Vandalism and WP:DISRUPT. — Amkgp 💬 14:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. FASTILY 05:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. ~PogingJuan 14:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 05:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism by 62.73.136.123. Check his post history, definetely not here to build an encyclopedia. Beshogur (talk) 15:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 05:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. St.nerol (talk) 16:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 05:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content.  LeoFrank  Talk 16:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 16:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -FASTILY 05:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IronManCap (talk) 17:27, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 05:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: There have been several attempts to add various copyrighted photos of David to this article. This has been going on for months, and I see no indication that it will stop following another attempt today. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 17:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 05:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Pretty sure we all know about the conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11. This has spread onto this page. Eridian314 (talk) 17:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY 05:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – request upgrade protection. Larry Z Contact me my edits 17:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -FASTILY 05:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Misinformation on the shutdown. kpgamingz (rant me) 18:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 05:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism by one person. Capsulecap (talkcontribs) 03:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - Page protection is not appropriate when a single user/IP is involved. This user appears to have stopped editing after they were blocked. Report to ANI if disruption resumes. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 06:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 06:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 07:17, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent spamming of edit requests by IPs and new editors. I've moved many to Talk:Min Aung Hlaing/Archive 1, and they just keep coming. Some have contained vandalism, which I've deleted. ― Tartan357 Talk 08:04, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Capsulecap (talkcontribs) 02:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. following a report at AIV. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – People are saying that he is dead even though I see no evidence of this happening. It is getting bad. Scorpions13256 (talk) 04:17, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 04:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High-risk template with exactly 202 transclusions. Chompy Ace 04:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. FASTILY 05:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Fastily: per the 2018 RfC this template identifies "rough consensus to permanently semiprotect templates with at least around 200-250 transclusions." Currently 202 transclusions. Chompy Ace 05:35, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected -FASTILY 05:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – In-news subject. There is substantial content disruption - addition of copied content, addition of unsourced content & removal of encyclopedic information. Csgir (talk) 10:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pending changes protection should not be used on pages with a high edit rate. Wug·a·po·des 01:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing then and now. 2409:4073:83:EC5C:DC4D:E2C6:CEAA:39FA (talk) 12:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Wug·a·po·des 01:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Highly linked via {{Cite book}} and other citation templates: More than a million links. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Wug·a·po·des 01:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Well-meaning editors continuing inserting copyvio images in an attempt to follow his instructions at https://twitter.com/DrWillKirby/status/1362809200045252615. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Recent news story involving this woman's coverage of "whiteness" at Coca-cola for an anti-racism module is leading to a large number of vandal edits. Emilymab (talk) 22:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by Wugapodes. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Given the current popularity of a game which features an impostor, and seeing the current situation as concerns the page history (this is unlikely to just go away fast); long-term protection seems appropriate. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:37, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is just one of a number of pages being hit by the Sus Imposter meme. Let’s try one month protection and see how that goes. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Article is still getting ongoing mistaken IP edits to the effect that this TV presenter coming out as gay last year logically means that he simultaneously divorced his wife. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. NoahDavid771 (talk) 00:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Football stuff. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism (name-calling in Burmese) by non-autoconfirmed editor and IP resumed immediately after protection expired. ― Tartan357 Talk 02:04, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is not going to go away soon. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism immediately after protection expired. ― Tartan357 Talk 02:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is not going to go away soon. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page is under attack by IP's, as well as being defended by IP's. But now a porno pic is being added for minutes or seconds at a time on a page being viewed at a high rate. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Wbm1058. Wug·a·po·des 01:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated fancruft additions. -- /Alex/21 13:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 01:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-running attempts by shifting IP editors to add the claim that this album is platinum-certified based on sales figures from a newspaper article, despite no evidence of the certification itself; this activity seems to have intensified in recent days. (Latest examples: [84], [85], [86], [87].) YorkshireLad  ✿  (talk) 13:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 42 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 01:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High-risk template with exactly 201 transclusions. Chompy Ace 23:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Wug·a·po·des 01:35, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing continuing within hours of previous protection expiring.
SSSB (talk) 10:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 01:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Article about a president of a country, which gets frequent vandalism by IPs and new accounts. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 15:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:27, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This needs ECP; since the socks are all auto-confirmed sleepers. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 00:03, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21 February 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Massive controversial changes without consensus on the talk page. Editors abusing multiple accounts and IPs to avoid warnings on edit warring. CentreLeftRight 22:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and blocks for sockpuppetry. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. He has an entire team of people adding PR crap into page. Clearly COI editors. I would suggest extended protection due to his PR team ruining the page with fluff and garbage. They delete any mention of Taylor Swift feud even though talk page discussion has determined that it's important to include in the page. Also many Taylor Swift fans have disrupted page in the past. Deltagammaz (talk) 04:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocked a related IPs and ranges, added to my watchlist. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 16:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. too many edit warring and disruptive edits since months and even years. please consider a high protection time. Ahmetlii (talk) 11:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 11:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IPs, some possibly anonymizing proxies. Beyond My Ken (talk) 16:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 12:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediately after previous page protection ended, same IP restarted same campaign of misogynistic content removal. JBL (talk) 12:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and even some unreverted alteration of some numbers, mostly IP and newly logged users. Wretchskull (talk) 13:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., it has not been protected at all since 2018, and I am hesitant to give indefinite pending changes. Let us see what we are going to get.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User 151.24.81.123 keeps adding outdated information and changing links. CillBill (talk) 19:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 151.24.81.123 (talk · contribs) blocked by Malcolmxl5. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor recently off a block is making disruptive changes to the Hobby Lobby article. Bahooka (talk) 21:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 69.47.203.160 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GMA Network regional TV station/program articles

Temporary semi-protection: An IP hopping vandal adds unsourced (possible hoax) information on the mentioned articles for almost a month. They change their IP addresses every day. Some of these articles were already semi-protected before but after the protection expired, the vandal resumed their activity. Kindly consider a one month protection on these articles. -WayKurat (talk) 02:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The problematic editor appears to be a IPv6 (Special:Contributions/2001:4450:83CD:7600::/64) that has been stable since October. I count 420+ edits in their contributions log that have been reverted out of a total of 570+ in that time, a pretty good sign of disruptive editing. There is one short block on their log; another of two weeks will hopefully improve the situation. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. for the bot CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and sockpuppetry over the last 2 plus years by user JoshuaArcilla2 and various IP addresses. User repeatedly adding the same non-notable trivia into article. AbleGus (talk) 04:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Page is coming off a one-week lockdown and already subject to unsourced or biased edits by IPs. TropicAces (talk) 14:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

  • As an editor following this article, I find this claim of a "high level of IP vandalism" untrue. Since it got unprotected, IP editing has been extremely light. The only content that had to be removed was TropicAces's removal of reliably-sourced content here which was added by an IP editor who has made productive edits and has been actively participating in discussions on the talk page. Content disputes should be worked out without the need for such protections. I would recommend for diffs to be provided to support the claim behind the request. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 16:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock-hopping anonymous editor with long-term history of abuse. See page history for further proof. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Some vandalism but mostly edits (some unreverted) of disruptively changing dates or facts, and adding information to a WP:FA that is either unsourced or unencyclopedic. Wretchskull (talk) 16:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive additions by IPs to an FA-List article. Gotitbro (talk) 11:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – per Wikipedia:ARBPIA3. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 12:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JRDkg (talk) 13:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:50, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 10:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and excessive false information gets added. 130.105.200.119 (talk) 06:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pamzeis (talk) 07:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. joxinmcdaniel (talk) 08:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. NoahDavid771 (talk) 00:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 04:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unreferenced/poorly referenced content by IPs and new editors. ― Tartan357 Talk 04:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 04:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 05:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by sock puppeteer IPs defcon5 (talk) 06:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:35, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Surge of disruptive editing by random IP users, requesting temporary semi-protection. ➤ Zᴇᴇx.ʀɪᴄᴇ ✪ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 18:37, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – One particular editor feels the need to impose his opinions over a certain section and delete it on his own, despite previous discussions agreeing to its inclusion in the article. Benjamin112 (talk) 21:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 14:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Fatihoztrk950 (talk) 14:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock-hopping anonymous editor with long-term history of abuse. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock-hopping anonymous editor with long-term history of abuse. See page history for further proof. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Sockpuppeters as you complained actually are IPv6 IP users. See in the edit history. 110.137.166.20 (talk) 16:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The return of a long-term contentious editor who edits against consensus and IP-hops when confronted or blocked. In the past they've also targetted other articles, but not as yet this time round. Chaheel Riens (talk) 16:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Two more deletions since the above request:
That's now a total of 10 reversions spread out over 5 different IP addresses. Chaheel Riens (talk) 07:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Too many anon IPs doing "hit and run" edits with unsourced info which then are quickly reverted. Vjmlhds 19:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – DarkGlow (contribstalk) 23:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent POV pushing and vandalism. Firestar464 (talk) 08:47, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Ahmetlii (talk) 09:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: High level of IP and new user edits which violate content policies (particularly verifiability, NPOV, and NOR). The page has a high number of viewers and an edit containing medical advice could be taken seriously even if only up for a few minutes. The disruptive editing has been occurring at this pace since the seemingly accidental removal of permanent semi-protection in 2016. There has been no pushback on asking for protection for the article since I proposed it on the talk page a bit over a month ago. Sorry if this is too long. --Xurizuri (talk) 09:35, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 18:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. No IP edits for 30+ hours‎. Pending changes protection seem to be working. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Frequent unconstructive edits and BLP violations even at the current level of protection. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 23:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I’m not seeing a need here and there would be likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Almost the entire recent edit history is reversion of vandalism from unconfirmed users. Username6892 04:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As you can see from 'history', the document originally contained only "conservative liberalism", but it is being modified to "liberal conservatism" by malicious wiki users. However, only "liberalism" is written in the source. --Storm598 (talk) 08:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Looks like a content dispute and edit warring to me. And those involved appear to be autoconfirmed so semi-protection would be of no benefit. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous IP edits to tables and the infobox that either break accepted consensus or the formatting it; every edit in the past week has been a reverted IP edit. ZappaMatic 21:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs and new editors resumed immediately after protection expired. ― Tartan357 Talk 02:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. NoahDavid771 (talk) 01:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite semi-protection is a big step for an article with no history of protection. Let’s try two weeks and see how it goes after that. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppet account of blocked user User:Greenock125 who has admitted to being said user in their first message on their talk page (User talk:109.157.209.225) keeps expanding this article and will not stop editing. I have reported the matter to two administrators, but the account remains active and unblocked. Please either protect this article per WP:DENY and/or block the user, but this user has jumped to different IPs before and may just re-expand the article. Ss112 08:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruptive editing by block evading editor. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:50, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent unsourced and malformed BLP and trivia claims from single-use IPs and SPAs since previous protection expired on 11 February 2021. [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] Previous protection was for one week. Suggest at least two weeks, if not longer. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 12:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for your efforts on that page User:108.56.139.120. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 14:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. User:Brendanrodgers2005 blocked by ToBeFree. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 14:34, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. User:Brendanrodgers2005 blocked by ToBeFree. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 14:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. User:Brendanrodgers2005 blocked by ToBeFree. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism — This article has constantly been vandalised since February 13. I have reverted at least 5 times. I asked them to stop but they just keep vandalising the article. 3 months' semi-protection is highly recommended in order for this to stop. FlutterDash344 (talk) 23:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 01:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Enough insults from Canadian IPs. Tgeorgescu (talk) 00:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. M.Bitton (talk) 01:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 01:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent vandalism from multiple accounts. Martin Urbanec (talk) 01:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 02:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22 February 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and BLP violations – The band just announced they broke up after 28 years. A lot of editing from the past few hours. – The Grid (talk) 17:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I also add to this Daft Punk member Thomas Bangalter? Also receving active vandalism. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Probably should add Guy-Man if that's the case. – The Grid (talk) 18:15, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. for all 3. Airplaneman (talk) 22:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by IPs. Consider permanent semi-protection. —El Millo (talk) 22:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 22:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandalism. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 22:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 22:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently the subject of a Google Doodle. Dolotta (talk) 14:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: It seems to me this falls under the same premise and conclusion as TFA, so we should keep it open. Samsara 14:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Fences and windows. Wug·a·po·des 21:15, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr Salvus (talk) 14:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly vandalism based on (made up) transfer speculation. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeatedly vandalized today by multiple accounts. MB 19:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JBW. Wug·a·po·des 21:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - To stop IP that writes slanderous posts on Perssons article.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Page consistently experiences promotional additions by unregistered or single-purpose users. This WP:PROMO material is unsourced, of course, though the external link spam and other advertising is bad anyway. Anon423 (talk) 15:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fuzheado | Talk 15:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Daniuu (talk) 17:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism appears to be too slow of a trickle for brief semi-protection to help much, but persistent enough that PC could. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:11, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and or disruptive editing, particularly from IP users. They have persistently changed details/dates/info in her article, especially in her infobox. An IP user even recently put down that the living subject was dead. Clear Looking Glass (talk) 20:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:55, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: continued anonymous libellous IP vandalism insertion of False name & uncited facts. HodderMBooks (talk) 11:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC) Thank you!. As this has happened a number of times of the last few months, is it possible to keep this Article semi protected against vandalism, without a time out?[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There seems to be a number of unregistered editors making disruptive edits to this page, perhaps it may be a wise idea to semi protect the article for the time being? Tommi1986 talk! 16:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC). Tommi1986 talk! 16:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested the protection for the talk page, it was meant for the article page Tommi1986 talk! 16:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have corrected the header. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Che made a joke about Israel on SNL this weekend. That has led to some disruptive editing, and I WP:INVOLVED myself to the point that I shouldn't be the one protecting it. Also, is it enough for the Arab/Israeli DS to be applied?. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Arab/Israeli DS? Doubtful, I think. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Malcolmxl5, eh worth a shot. If it stays really bad, BLP DS perhaps. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:55, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs and new editors making persistent additions of different birth years, with no reliable source to any of them – e.g. [94], [95], [96], [97], [98] – these five dates were added within the past two days!. bonadea contributions talk 18:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple anonymous users keep attempting to make this page a Christian tract about martyrdom even though it's unknown if he ever went back on his renunciation of Christianity. Check the revision history for more details. FOXHOUNDER1014 (talk) 10:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A misfire by Cyberbot. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 13:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 13:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protect this page due to excessive vandalism. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 10:55, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 222.153.51.148 (talk · contribs). CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP users. Not significant enough for semi protection though. TravelAroundOz (talk) 11:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 83.56.23.135 (talk · contribs). CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This is a controversial topic and needs protection from IP disruption. Shadow4dark (talk) 11:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs, some stacked with each other and leading patrollers to miss out on reverting some vandalism edits. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 03:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –MJLTalk 04:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – also sockpuppetry by Suavecito486 and Aliffaizul13. Xiamatt (talk) 04:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. semi will stop none of the current editors. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism attempts for over a month. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kyalinrights/Archive as well. Bennv3771 (talk) 12:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Kyalinrights (talk · contribs) blocked by Samsara. Samsara 14:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 22:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sudden flurry of SPA, adding vandalism such as changing image to that of Hillary Clinton etc. Chaheel Riens (talk) 12:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 12:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 13:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. NoahDavid771 (talk) 13:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 14:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ECP: Persistent disruptive editing and edit warring by new accounts. The article was put under ECP by Mz7 some months ago, now it need ECP again. Wareon (talk) 14:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wareon: does you have any role for edit the article? I don't see anything needs on ECP. This is actually an content dispute that involves edit warring by any users, which is don't sufficient to justify full protection due to low activity of edit warring, which it actually needs to be requested. 110.137.166.20 (talk) 14:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not a content dispute. Non-ECP accounts are edit warring to repeat their rejected edits. Wareon (talk) 14:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In the case of edit warring, you need to considering edit warring noticeboard to anyone who edit warring to restore their rejected edits, including non-ECP users. If they aren't so enough, discuss it on talk page or report that to WP:ANEW. I don't see any edit warring noticeboard regarding this. 110.137.166.20 (talk) 15:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The current semi-protection is doing the job. There was one editor who was edit warring, but they have been blocked. MelanieN (talk) 01:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Looking at edits over past couple of years, the article has been repeatedly disrupted by IP and new users, usually over the same general set of long-resolved issues. Should have pending changes protection limiting edits to extended confirmed users. Montanabw(talk) 19:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) I see one disruptive edit in 2021, and requests for three different types of protection (pending changes, semi-protection, and extended-confirmed protection). I don't see any reason anything needs to be done. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 10:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP unsourced BLP changes, some going back a couple of months (see [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108]). IPs are not participating in talk page discussion. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 11:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent violations of the BLP policy. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 03:07, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lectonar . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 03:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since she made it so far in the championships and eventually won, this article is seeing excessive disruptive additions that have to be reverted. Looks like it's mostly new anon IPs. Could we get a week of protection until the hoopla dies down? If you feel semi is better I'll leave it up to you but my first inclination was ECP. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fyunck(click): Please see edit history, it is IP that distrupt this, maybe it need Temporary semi-protection instead as ECP would be overkill. Pages are not semi-protectted before this.110.137.127.193 (talk) 06:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 04:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism for the last week. A changing series of IP's has repeqtesly changed the same information against the MOS. Koncorde (talk) 08:23, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Horrible accusations about the cause of death from related IPV6 adresses. Sjö (talk) 08:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by IP JJNito197 (talk) 23:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add One IP is blocked, vandal continues with dynamic IPs. –Austronesier (talk) 06:15, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and disruptive editing by different IP addresses. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Was previously protected due to the WP:CALIPH disruption, but protection has since expired. So far as I have noticed, there are no useful contributions coming from the IP editors to this page, only various sorts of abuse, including ethnoreligious slurs in some cases. May as well lock it down. PohranicniStraze (talk) 02:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Block evasion by Special:Contributions/75.86.216.139 and Special:Contributions/2603:6000:8D00:92AA:0:0:0:0/64, using IPs from Wisconsin. The same protection is needed at the following articles: List of The Raccoons episodes, The Raccoons, Wee Sing, Folksy Nina and Me and My Arrow. Binksternet (talk) 21:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. for the talk page and a week for the articles. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Since it got unprotected, there has been a surge of disruptive editing by IP users. Originalchampion (talk) 21:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This is a disambiguation page that doesn't really need editing; it is relentlessly vandalized. Wretchskull (talk) 21:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 21:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:47, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Extensive use of IPs, likely at least some by topic-banned IP, to disrupt the article. See this discussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1049#Race_and_intelligence_block_and_ban_issue. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 18:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's also off-wiki discussion by Sailer: [109] power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:23, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 20:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly visible draft title; protect to encourage creating drafts at more meaningful titles. See also protection history. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 18:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple examples of IP edit vandalism. Starzoner (talk) 18:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war between two editors (I have strictly no involvement in it, beyond warning both of them for edit warring); better to have them discuss what is obviously a very controversial topic on the talk page. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also probably falls under ArbCom/EasternEurope (or at least it is close enough...), fwiw. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No objection if another admin wants to protect, but I'm waiting for one of the editors to make a fourth revert, which could be imminent. I have already issued an alert about ARBEE to one of the parties. EdJohnston (talk) 04:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Evidently two edit warriors misuse the edit summary box as their discussion place. Victor Schmidt (talk) 11:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It appears to be actually one person on one side warring with several others on the other side. I have warned the one person on their talk page. There is active discussion at the talk page, and I don't see a need to full-protect the article - particularly because it would disrupt the indefinite semi-protection currently at that article. MelanieN (talk) 00:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Still no consensus on the talk page and the involved users continue restore/revert their edits. Wario-Man talk 14:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blockedMelanieN (talk) 01:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 20:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fuzheado | Talk 02:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 1) The page is a perpetual magnet for unsourced original complaints and criticisms. 2) An editor who was blocked for disruptive sockpuppetry has been persistently block-evading on this page with socks and IP editing for the past year, with increased frequency since temp protection expired. Jason A. Quest (talk) 14:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. See you again in 6 months, I guess. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 02:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HJ MitchellMelanieN (talk) 01:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continued WP:BLP vandalism at this article after recently coming off protection for same. Same vandalism that has Kaylee Bryant currently protected – indeed, it would be a good idea to extend the latter article's semi-protection as well. --IJBall (contribstalk) 20:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bongwarrior. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by IPs, especially given the recent inclusion of a character based on the article subject in a popular TV series. IronManCap (talk) 22:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MelanieN. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from users such as 2600:8805:d48e:3600:7898:873c:f9da:f217, 2600:8805:d48e:3600:ada5:1ec0:76b0:8a7f, 2600:8805:d481:5c16:ceb:6b25:2868:2282, and 2600:8805:d481:5c16:1906:f2bc:55f9:1408 Spiritoftheeast1993 (talk) 01:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 02:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal target today. JavaHurricane 14:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:08, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant rv by user, latterly transformed into Ip. Andrewgprout (talk) 17:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I have reverted two new editors for unexplained content removal. This appears to be a controversial article in deletion discussion. I don't want to get caught in an edit war with "vandals". Please protect. Thank you. Huggums537 (talk) 10:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BilbyMelanieN (talk) 00:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Shadow4dark (talk) 10:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 11:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator OhnoitsjamieMelanieN (talk) 00:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. – DarkGlow (contribstalk) 13:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page was semi-protected in the recent past, but as soon as the protection expired, vandalism (which dates back to December) resumed. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator The AnomeMelanieN (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – and now the user has resorted to sock-puppetry, creating a new account every time after they get a level IV warning on thier previous account. MBlaze Lightning (talk) 09:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I have to come here and revert unconstructive edits every single day, this page already had page protection sooner ago. Limorina (talk) 09:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of sock IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 10:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A bad actor is continually recommending the page for "speedy deletion."

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The vandalism is by an IP (possibly the person who made this request) who is repeatedly removing "DB-SPAM" tag.  MelanieN (talk) 00:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23 February 2021

Semi-protection: Album by a band whose article received semi-protection on Feb. 14 due to persistent vandalism by someone operating under multiple IP's. Same person has targeted the album too; recommend same protection that the band received. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 02:04, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:06, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continous disruptive editing and vandalism by IPs and new accounts. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 06:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High levels of IP vandalism from multiple IPs. Uses x (talk) 08:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:06, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism that seems to come from someone with multiples IP (the geolocation of two IPs are the same) ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 12:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by anonymous users this month. --*Fehufangą✉ Talk page12:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – NFL player subject of recent news event, article being heavily vandalized. Requesting a very temporary protection. LJF2019 talk 14:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of poorly sourced material and refusal to comply with MOS:COLOR, MOS:DTAB, MOS:TABLE and MOS:ACCESS. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The colours in both versions are horrible and the random bolding violates WP:MOSBOLD. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 23:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Ieiiejjjsjajajqbahahjqjhwhw (talk · contribs) blocked by Connormah. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes.Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 00:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: TheFlawlessMagician (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: TheFlawlessMagician (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High-visibility (over 300 transclusions). (CC) Tbhotch 18:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Tbhotch and CambridgeBayWeather: ???? It only has 24 transclusions across all namespaces. Nardog (talk) 05:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. Nardog. Sorry I misread the list. Removed protection. It's −34.8 °C (−30.6 °F) and the forecast is for −46 °C (−51 °F). My brain is frozen and that's my excuse. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revolution (2021)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP disruptive editing and addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Originalchampion (talk) 22:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Ajshul 😀 (talk) 19:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. If the edit warring resumes let me know. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eridian314 (talk) 20:03, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 209.237.112.146 (talk · contribs) blocked by EvergreenFir. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long history of addition of unsourced content from IP editors. Persistent disruptive editing. Currently a dispute involving 2A04:CEC0::/32, in which they refuse to start a discussion regarding the dispute. Yowashi (talk) 06:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing IP vandalism and abusive edit summaries. KidAdSPEAK 23:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 00:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:04, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The IP editor/s have returned to again disruptively vandalise the page. Previously protected for same disruptive behaviour. Koncorde (talk) 04:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Short duration semi-protection: IP is persistently trying to advertise dnalounge.com. Guy Macon (talk) 04:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A YouTube video that mentions this article is getting recommended and viewed a lot lately, and fans of the TV show "Firefly" keep disrupting the article. The video is from 2014, but I guess YT's algorithms will recommend it for a few more weeks, so we may need semi-protection for a month or so. Chrisahn (talk) 05:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently a target of vandalism by IPs and new accounts. Pupsterlove02 talkcontribs 21:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent IP vandalism. Bacondrum 21:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. --BlameRuiner (talk) 21:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, quacks like block evasion. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Page-protection requested over the persistent WP:DE by a fellow static-IP editor based in Dubaī with a SPA seemingly intent on WP:ADVOCACY of removing all noticed references to the subject's links with Saudī royalty. They're so sloppy, they they recently also name a typo once and hence, got reverted by even "ClueBot" for “vandalism”. However.. Given their seemingly-established WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT conduct, it does seem like they are indubitably WP:SPA who're WP:NOTHERE but WP:POVPUSH. —111.223.26.178 (talk) 20:07, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Looks like a range block might cut it as well. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 20:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and spam linking by multiple IPs and new users. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, block evasion, WP:COI. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism. Likely due to it being part of a meme. Eridian314 (talk) 17:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High levels of IP vandalism. Uses x (talk) 17:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of multiple-IP content-dispute edit warring. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 19:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A02:1811:2C38:4D00::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. [Log 115635048]Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 23:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator MelanieN. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism and deletion of valid information with no edit summaries or discussion on talk page, by new users on a page which is covered by discretionary sanctions. Amirah talk 16:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I see only one current disruptive user, and they are autoconfirmed so semi-protection would not help. I suggest you continue trying to engage the user, or report them if they continue being disruptive.  MelanieN (talk) 00:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JRDkg (talk) 16:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is getting a lot of vandalism recently by unregistered and newly registered users. Tommi1986 talk! 22:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071 and Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/KızılBörü1071. FDW777 (talk) 18:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:51, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WP:TFA. (CC) Tbhotch 19:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should hopefully get us past the problems since it is no longer TFA. MelanieN (talk) 00:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The page was temporarily semi-protected for two weeks before, but since it has become unprotected again the vandalism has raged on. It seems to show no signs of slowing after his controversial actions. I would hope to see this permanently semi-protected now to preserve the editing standard here. Yeehaw45 (talk) 19:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Adding false information and incorrect grammar, mostly to the Plot section. nyxærös 16:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much fake nonsense. kpgamingz (rant me) 16:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Substantial amount of vandalism in recent days by various IPs and new accounts. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – immediate resumption after last protect expired. Dynamic IP hitting this article hard with unsourced info using a fake reference. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Alivardi (talk) 17:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by many users. Eridian314 (talk) 17:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is not frequent enough to justify semi-protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs keeping adding unsourced and/or false information with a couple also messing with the table formatting on top of this. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 15:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:55, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – sock vandalizing this page. Larry Z Contact me my edits 16:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 22:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 23:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cypriot Chauvinist. FDW777 (talk) 12:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{rfpp|nea}} It seems the blocks were effective. I've added it to my watchlist, but if you see similar edits happening again let me know or make another report and we can protect. Wug·a·po·des 21:15, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Drmies. Wug·a·po·des 23:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or Pending changes protection: Persistent IP vandalism since yesterday. Also note that it had previously been granted semi-protection from 6 January 2021 to 6 February 2021 for persistent vandalism. Since the protection expired, the vandalism has appeared again. Phillip Samuel (talk) 19:15, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator MelanieN. 1 month semi. Airplaneman (talk) 22:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Unsourced edits and vandalism by IP users. As a lot of IP edits are good faith, pending changes protection will be sufficient. Eridian314 (talk) 19:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 23:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Samsara 23:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

24 February 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Multiple IPs blanking or adding wrong information based on their opinion. It needs to be quick respond to protect it because the article is TFA. GorillaWarfare, please protect it. 180.243.208.77 (talk) 20:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:GS/MJ. (CC) Tbhotch 21:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:12, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism Originalchampion (talk) 21:57, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper repeatedly removing the same content. Alivardi (talk) 14:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: No doubt, they find this content offensive. Certainly, I could not find where it is sourced from. I'm commented on the talk so I recuse. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Protection won't help here, as this article is rather badly sourced, if at all. More eyes is what this article needs. Lectonar (talk) 14:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 01:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content-dispute, despite talk page discussion, and attempts to WP:OWN. livelikemusic (TALK!) 01:49, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Too early to shut down the article; talk-page discusssion is ongoing, not too much back and forth overall. Better to warn the participants off for edit-warring if this picks up. Lectonar (talk) 14:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – No need for non-autoconfirmed users to edit, and socks have disrupted this page. Steve M (talk) 02:31, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The first argument plays no fiddle in when to protect a page, as many pages have no need to be edited by non-autoconfirmed users. As for the disruption: what better way to find new sockpuppets? Plus: many experienced editors work there. Lectonar (talk) 14:55, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Heavy amount of disruptive editing and edit warring by IP users relating to the character's Chinese controversy in the past twelve hours. –WPA (talk) 03:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 14:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. From multiple IPs. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 03:53, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Do I have to look for DR? RFC? How an article about a metro station can be confused with a language is uncertain, but this is becoming absurd. (CC) Tbhotch 05:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Yes, absurd it may seem, but AIV is the way to go for now (you warned them off already); days between the IPs edits, btw. We won't shut down an article for that. I have watchlisted to boot. Lectonar (talk) 15:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection / WP:SALT as article has been created five times.[110] UW Dawgs (talk) 06:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Yeah, but these (re)creations go back almost 10 years, last attempt was already 2 months ago. No dire need to protect this now. Lectonar (talk) 14:57, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There's currently some unsourced info going around that Fry's is closing at midnight and shutting off the website at "12 am tonight" on February 24th, and people are taking that as gospel to update the article without citations. —FrostyBeep 03:47, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to be confirmed and sourced now, which makes this moot. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. NinjaStrikers «» 14:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page Myanmar Army is constantly being vandalised. Please protect it. EGL1234 08:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:04, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Komaykolow ? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Due to Elon Musk Tweet: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1364180853866131456 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitja i (talkcontribs) 12:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Req: 1 week semi. This is totally obnoxious: Two times so far, [111][112] Anon appended "/Battery" to Shah Rukh Khan's character name in this film. This slashed detail is totally ambiguous. Does he play two characters? Is Battery a nickname? The best I could tell from a Google search, is that two characters use this word as a slang reference to his eyeglasses, so it sounds like an insult or term of endearment. (See this Quora speculation if you care.)

I attempted to explain why this was problematic to the IP editor here, even suggesting that they provide context, but then they hopped IPs and resubmitted it as "and Battery", which is still ambiguous.

Editor may not be able to express themselves, or maybe they're trolling, I don't know, but it doesn't seem constructive to me and I'm hoping a semi will get them to talk. Thanks,Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To be honest, the disruption is too low to warrant any kind of protection, but sometimes pending-changes gets people to talk. Semi-protection just blocks them off. Lectonar (talk) 14:49, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 03:12, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 14:55, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –MJLTalk 04:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User:Saltwaterperpetrator VR is persistently applying disruptive test edits despite a few warnings and several reverts. Jkmartindale (talk) 22:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Saltwaterperpetrator VR (talk · contribs). CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Xoruz (talk) 00:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Augu❤Maugu 💕 02:37, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Very little vandalism except for one IP today, who has been blocked. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: AFA is a far-right organization, causing non-neutral edits from both sides. Eridian314 (talk) 15:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please renew Semi PP, persistent disruptive Editing by Burmese Users. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 16:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:42, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by single-purpose nationalist users. Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 16:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Sockpuppetry. Proxies continue to delete information from the article. NoahDavid771 (talk) 16:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Mxtt.prior (talk) 21:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor - No longer an issue, page has remained without vandalism for over an hour. Mxtt.prior (talk) 23:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent meddling from IP editors — it might even be the same person using multiple IPs (IPv4 and IPv6). Warnings have been issued to users. Please glance at the edit history before dismissing this request. JlACEer (talk) 01:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has been going on for a while. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:36, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs keep adding unsourced content despite being told to source what they're adding, Many thanks, Regards,. –Davey2010Talk 23:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Actors have released false titles for the film on social media, which has resulted in three page moves already to one of the false names. Some short, temporary move protection would be appreciated in the event other users attempt to make the same moves. Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There's an IP user who keeps adding unsourced changes, and refuses to stop, and there's no way to contact this person since they're not a registered editor. Greggens (talk) 00:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dirkbb (talk) 00:57, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism over the last 48 hours. Jack Frost (talk) 01:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 180.243.208.77 (talk) 17:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: WP:TFA. (CC) Tbhotch 20:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • information Note: This following text is from an WP:ANI report requesting protection of the same article by the same author:

    In last than few hours after it was posted as TFA, there is high level of IP vandalism, which involves too many reverts. Even one user adding arabic language text in English Wikipedia, which is not suitable for English Wikipedia. Please protect this article to prevent endless and persistent vandalism here.

    Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 23:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Drmies. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:47, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism, recently most about changing names. Sjö (talk) 19:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:48, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Daniuu (talk) 19:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:49, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term semi protection. User:Namiba 19:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Both anonymous and unanonymous, users are repeatedly butchering the article over their speculation and theorycrafting about its plot. --Lutesque (talk) 19:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection ongoing IP vandalism related to the January 6 US capitol riot. It's in portalspace, so not a lot of watchers. PohranicniStraze (talk) 19:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: steady stream of vandalism from IPs because of some “controversial” family trip during Texas crisis. Trillfendi (talk) 19:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:53, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is a massive edit war going on. Possible sockpuppetry. Scorpions13256 (talk) 20:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not going to end anytime soon. Scorpions13256 (talk) 20:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lebanese politician who apparently jumped vaccination line; multiple new and IP editors vandalizing BLP. Schazjmd (talk) 20:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:55, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 21:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Repeated BLP violations by IP Users, subject is topic of demonstration for days in spain regarding freedom of speech. CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:57, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Longstanding joke that Kurtis Conner is "Mayor of Kurtistown", the name for his YouTube fanbase. (Every time the protection for this or the Kurtis Conner page is removed, the vandalism starts again - I would argue something more permanent for these two pages is necessary). Bangalamania (talk) 22:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Persistent vandalism - continued addition of incorrect information. Suonii180 (talk) 22:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eridian314 (talk) 16:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semiprotection: Vandalized by anons a lot.Tintor2 (talk) 16:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent insertion of a non-free image, mostly by IPs. Lennart97 (talk) 16:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IPs and non-autoconfirmed editor immediately after ECP expired. Recommend restoration of indefinite semi-protection, which was replaced with temporary ECP during the 2020 primaries. ― Tartan357 Talk 23:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC): User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two IP's fighting over images, at least one of which is almost certainly a sock, needs to get stopped. Ravensfire (talk) 15:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Escalating from previous protections. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Editor slandering me on community noticeboard in >10,000 byte rant. Until this is dealt with, I reluctantly have to ask that the page be protected. François Robere (talk) 18:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editor has been quiet for over an hour, so withdrawn. François Robere (talk) 19:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

25 February 2021

Extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. List of United Nations resolutions concerning Israel is already protected accordingly. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 16:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: I am requesting protection for this page because it is not going to be used for 2 months and it would help if someone, for example, was going to mark this as open. ThatDislikedOne (talk) 10:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I think that only Autoconfirmed Users should be able to edit this page for safety reasons and because AutoConfirmed users are more 'experienced'. ThatDislikedOne (talk) 11:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection. ThatDislikedOne (talk) 13:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Governmental Organisation. ThatDislikedOne (talk) 13:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ThatDislikedOne: Please stop requesting the article to be protected without any reason about vandalism or distruptive edits. Articles can only be protected if there are persistent or endless vandalism or distruptive edits. 180.243.208.77 (talk) 13:36, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fuzheado | Talk 15:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ashleyyoursmile! 15:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC) This entire page appears to have been caught in a raid - there has been constant vandalism by four or more IP's and registered users.[reply]

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. GABgab 17:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Keeps getting article hijacked about once every month, as there's a TikToker of the same name. Can we put some long lasting protection e.g. 6 months-1 year, as this is a recurring issue?. Caused by web posts like this. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GABgab 17:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ashleyyoursmile! 16:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GABgab 17:15, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – The issues around deadnaming and pronoun vandalism have continued even since semi-protection was applied, presumably since Levine has been somewhat high-profile since being nominated for a position in the Biden administration. This article falls under the Gender and BLP discretionary sanctions (and probably AP2, but the former is probably more appropriate). GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GorillaWarfare: This article is already semi-protected so i see only one user that engage distruptive edits. One other editors other than that is extended confirmed user also adding distruptive edits. So the pages cannot be ECP because it can not effect, i see just more like that it is a content dispute regarding pronoun he/she, which it doesn't sufficient to justify full protection. 180.243.208.77 (talk) 20:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Two editors have made disruptive edits in two days, despite semiprotection: Rheinamacher (pronoun vandalism) and NapoleonX (deadnaming). It is not a legitimate content dispute, it is a clear violation of our established practices on treatment of trans article subjects, and as a subject under discretionary sanctions would be appropriate to protect more strongly. I am not requesting full protection, I am requesting ECP. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE: NapoleonX is Extended-confirmed user, having join Wikipedia 10 years ago and has more than 5,000 edits. 180.243.208.77 (talk) 23:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for the time being. NapoleonX is extended confirmed, and there was only one disruptive edit by a non-extended-confirmed user, Rheinamacher, since semi-protection has been configured. Feel free to renominate if there is more disruption coming.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of whole sections the last 24 hours by different accounts. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – This user is using this page for promotional content. ThatDislikedOne (talk) 10:54, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ThatDislikedOne: I don't see any vandalism on this page four hours after the user article was created. 180.243.208.77 (talk) 11:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. No need for any type of protection at this time. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection. ThatDislikedOne (talk) 11:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - the userpage has never been created, no need for creation protection now. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. ThatDislikedOne (talk) 11:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. ThatDislikedOne (talk) 11:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm seeing no disruption, or edits, since 2019. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – addition of content not adhering to NPOV by ip users. Eridian314 (talk) 15:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Protected by user:Fuzheado. No need to protect this anymore.
Already protected by administrator Fuzheado. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is an increasing frequency of IP address/new user accounts inserting promotional and unreliably sourced content to this article. Productive edits easily outnumbered by disruptive ones. HiddenLemon // talk 09:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. — Newslinger talk 09:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Escalating from previous lengthy protections. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. An IP range block might do the trick too. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We're getting IP vandals/disruptive IPs fairly frequently over recent days. I suspect that this is because the article might be getting more views as its topics move through the news, and I expect that these sorts of disruptive edits will continue unless the page is protected.

1 2 3. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 17:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High volume of edits not supported by sources. Couple of days protection should suffice. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Requesting this article full protection be removed or at least lowered to ECP. The reason: it shouldn't have been full protected in the first place. The edit warring was between only two editors, only one was EC, neither breached 3RR, it lasted one day, and that day was over two months ago. Full protecting until May in these circumstances is overkill. Thanks. Protecting admin was contacted about it in an ANI thread, see [113]. Levivich harass/hound 17:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Wug·a·po·des 01:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 15:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP edit-warring over a featured article and inserting perjorative terms. ——Serial 15:51, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Rather twisted interpretation. There is no edit warring as the talk page thread is underway, and the IP is not inserting a pejorative term (it’s not pejorative for a start), but returning the wording to that which went through two review processes (PR and FAC). Let the conversation run it’s course, and please don’t try and close it again after just over an hour’s discussion. - 213.205.194.46 (talk) 17:57, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, there is indeed no consensus currently on the talk page concerning the new wording--Ymblanter (talk) 07:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Jalen Folf (talk) 08:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 09:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Wikipedia:GS/MJ. (CC) Tbhotch 18:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 06:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. – DarkGlow (contribstalk) 23:31, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:39, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Someone is creating this page again and again. So I think this page should be protected. DasSoumik (talk) 07:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ymblanter Thank you.

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs repeatedly changing the article to a promotional piece. bonadea contributions talk 18:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 03:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent IP and new account disruption. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. bibliomaniac15 06:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Match protection level with Template:Unsolved. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. bibliomaniac15 06:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wikipedia:GS/MJ. (CC) Tbhotch 18:12, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. bibliomaniac15 06:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and/or vandalism – For several months, an anonymous editor connecting from a series of IP addresses on the BT Group network (according to tracert) has been repeatedly deleting mentions (and the supporting citation to the relevant NYT article) in both articles of Lee and Molina's relationship. --Coolcaesar (talk) 19:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -FASTILY 03:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and/or vandalism - Anonymous IP editor is repeatedly vandalizing lead paragraphs. --Coolcaesar (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 03:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content/bio info to a WP:BLP (i.e. WP:BLP violation) today. Hopefully a few days of semi-protection will settle this down. --IJBall (contribstalk) 22:42, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 03:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 23:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 03:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent Vandalism by changing IP address, adding something about the covid-19 pandemic. L (talk) 23:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY 03:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and reverting reversions, possible sockpuppetry. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 23:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

User(s) blocked. -FASTILY 03:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Evan0512 (talk) 01:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -FASTILY 03:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Augu❤Maugu 💕 01:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 03:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Longer semi-protection: IP disruption came back immediately after the expiry of the previous semi. CMD (talk) 02:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -FASTILY 03:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 02:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 03:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; persistent attempts to whitewash coroner's finding. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 03:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppettry by User:Punjabier, pushing unsourced surname 'Saini' [114], never coming to talk page here. Also made legal threats here, laced with casteist attack, exact words "mistri madi jat da banda", which translates to "craftsman, person belonging to a bad (low) caste". Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -FASTILY 03:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs and a new user (solely for this purpose) is removing the common name from the article lead and infobox (which should match with teh article title) [115] [116] [117]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -FASTILY 03:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and sockpuppetry– Persistent blanking (both logged in and out) by User:Anandsi9999. Alivardi (talk) 11:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 03:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Steve M (talk) 13:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -FASTILY 03:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 1990'sguy (talk) 13:34, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 03:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's adding a wrong height (and there is a source listed). Kante4 (talk) 15:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 03:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. HurricaneEdgar 15:57, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 03:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 03:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism from multiple ips. SleepForever (talk) 17:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. bibliomaniac15 06:15, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Lots of vandalism from IP users. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 03:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 05:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent disruptive changes by anonymous users (IPs). It always happens during this time of the year (during Nowruz festival). 2-month semi-protection will be helpful. Wario-Man talk 03:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 05:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism as the subject is back in the news. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 04:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 05:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from numerous IPs for months. Oqwert (talk) 04:15, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Fuzheado | Talk 05:15, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of promotional vandalism. Some Dude From NCwanna talk? 20:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Chompy Ace 23:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. It seems this page is receiving a high amount of vandalism from IPs and new users Tommi1986 talk! 00:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cullen328. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection removed The official title as been officially revealed to be Spider-Man: No Way Home and this article needs to move there. We've already had a copy paste move. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Moot now the article has been moved. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Ananta5421 block evasion, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ananta5421 MarioJump83! 03:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the pending changes protection is working as intended.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent diruptive editing by Pro-turkish POV newly created account, also page is newly created because of a 3-split made from original article. Deserves protection by the topic itself. Mr.User200 (talk) 21:12, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – The article is stuck in the 2000s. I asked Scott 7 weeks ago, but received no answer. (CC) Tbhotch 22:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scott is not very active so I’ll lower the protection and we can see how it goes. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done The article was semi-protected 11 years ago; we can give PCP a try.Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

26 February 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See [118], [119], [120]. — Amkgp 💬 14:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See [121] (using offensive/incorrect salutation), [122] (adding offensive remarks), [123] (again adding offensive remarks). — Amkgp 💬 14:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See [124], [125], [126] (changing birth dates). — Amkgp 💬 14:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target for vandals, for some reason. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 15:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Amkgp 💬 17:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 17:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant disruptive editing. Xoruz (talk) 03:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 08:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User Talk Of Blocked User. WikiWolf7 (talk) 14:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access disabled. Anything else superfluous. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:00, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant IP vandalism. Carter (talk) 16:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:24, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. High level of vandalism and reverts. 180.243.208.77 (talk) 20:24, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several attempts at vandalism today from different IP editors. Jns4eva (talk) 20:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Silly vandalisms changing owners name by IPs over the past two days. Ifnord (talk) 14:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Maxim. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:43, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Receiving WP:COI edits from the subject's management. – DarkGlow (contribstalk) 16:46, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by ip user who regularly evades blocks. Eridian314 (talk) 17:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse request being vandalised by different IP continously — Amkgp 💬 18:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Kosack (talk) 18:27, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism from ips and unconfirmed accounts. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 18:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs changing the subject's sourced date of birth [127] [128] [129], from 1986 to 1983 or 1984. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think there's some good faith edits buried in that lot from other unconfirmed editors, so PC would be better. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting semi-protection due to persistent disruptive editing from IP editors due to Hasbro's recent decision to make the product gender neutral. Example one , example two , example three , example four, example five (see edit summary). Phuzion (talk) 15:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Steve M (talk) 15:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Renominating per Ymblanter's instruction. The issues around deadnaming and pronoun vandalism have continued even since semi-protection was applied, presumably since Levine has been somewhat high-profile since being nominated for a position in the Biden administration. This article falls under the Gender and BLP discretionary sanctions (and probably AP2, but the former is probably more appropriate). So far there have been three incidents in as many days, two from autoconfirmed and one extended confirmed. This should at least help, if not stop the issue entirely (long-term full-protection is not viable). GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GorillaWarfare It is actually my comment about your previous request that cause this to be declined by Ymblanter. As a admin, why you not invoking the protection themselves, as you done in TFA article Margaret (singer) that i request previously? The administrators needs to be objective not dependent on another admin for upgrading the protection. 180.243.208.77 (talk) 23:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please read about WP:INVOLVED. "The administrators needs to be objective not dependent on another admin for upgrading the protection." is not true at all; admins are supposed to request protection from uninvolved admins on articles they have edited themselves. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:00, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Johnuniq. This request is granted in order to throw out any vandals by users. 180.243.208.77 (talk)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, apparently from an involved party trying to delete detail of a tribunal (details of which are fully referenced). Timothy Titus Talk To TT 09:52, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:52, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Pi zero has sadly died. Discussion can be seen here on Wikibooks. Confirmation has been provided to the Stewards who have locked the account. Can we have the user page protected per usual practice please. Thanks. QuiteUnusual (talk) 10:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected. Favonian (talk) 11:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent whitewashing of a political figure by ValterUdarnik (talk). References and sources lead only to the personal opinion of Anatoly Shariy and don't correspond with facts. EricLewan (talk) 20:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. The talk-page of the user you mentioned is suspiciously red; communication via edit summaries sometimes is not enough. Lectonar (talk) 08:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism by one user who continues to edit lead to add subject's ethnicity despite reversion with explanation of how this violates MOS:Ethnicity. I am sorry, I am unsure how to page-link properly. Apoorva Iyer (talk) 21:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please provide a link to where ethnicity is mentioned in the MOS. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
a user has again done the same thing I mentioned, it seems to be a recurrent thing. This is the rule I was referring to: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Biography#Context. Thank you.

Temporary semi-protection: Flamengo was champion today. I recommend semi protection, if possible. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 05:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I actually don't see much disruption. Lectonar (talk) 08:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 08:00, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by 50.248.124.201. Jacona (talk) 19:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 02:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP addresses who are arbitrarily altering placements based on personal bias and liking to certain contenstants, as opposed to what actually transpired during episodes. Not referring to Talk Page when suggested. Ellis.o22 (talk) 22:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Resumed immediately after last protect expired. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing IP disruption due to recent news stories. KidAdSPEAK 19:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There is a lot of activity but at least some non-autoconfirmed edits were ok. Please request again with more details if needed. Johnuniq (talk) 00:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of unencyclopedic content. Blake Gripling (talk) 15:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 00:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There has been consistent vandalism. There has also been edits that do not follow WP:MOS. Particularly references and external links. 1-6 months. ▼Sharker101517:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman (talk) 00:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Highly visible TFA, vandalised. Wretchskull (talk) 17:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined no longer TFA Airplaneman (talk) 00:12, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive vandalism by the same IP relating to recent events in Armenia. Pizza (talk) 23:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I've warned the user, and they can be blocked if the behavior continues. Blocks are generally preferred to page protection when disruption is coming from a single user. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent wide range IP vandalism on BLP being committed by single actor. StonyBrook (talk) 13:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 23:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has been subject to much section blanking over time by IP editors. There is currently an AfD running. Might it be temp semi protected for the duration of the AfD please, so that we may have a discussion based upon what is present?. Fiddle Faddle 14:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been no disruptive edits since the AFD nom. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 23:54, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. One temporary blocked but he's back with another and still messing with site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dancer1313 (talkcontribs) 20:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 46.34.226.0/24 (talk · contribs). Partially blocked from the Česko Slovenská SuperStar (season 6) article for 4 months. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 23:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP user keep adding his unconfirmed dating news without providing reliable source. Paper9oll (📣📝) 00:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 02:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP attempting to remove referenced material in apparent whitewashing attempt. Ifnord (talk) 01:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page is being filled with negative trivial material in violation of BLP policy by someone involved in one of Marin's legal cases. Wikipedia is not a pillory 142.120.113.160 (talk) 01:53, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This IP (142.120.113.160) needs to be reported in WP:AIV. 180.243.208.77 (talk) 02:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. An argument can be made that the IP is whitewashing or that the IP is removing UNDUE BLP violations. There is nothing relevant on article talk. Please justify what changes should occur there. Johnuniq (talk) 02:43, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs vandalizing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 00:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism- probably as he's been in the news/sports pages in the last few days. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:15, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 00:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent unsourced changes by IPs. Ab207 (talk) 15:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 00:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the previous protection was lifted, IPs have continued to add Trubisky's NVP award despite discussions on the talk page saying otherwise. ZappaMatic 17:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 00:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Still being disrupted. It seems to be a highly charged event causing quite a lot of angry people. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:39, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NinjaRobotPirate. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:12, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: - Same IP vandalism by same proxy as always.BabbaQ (talk) 22:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:12, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to extended confirmed protection - so that a redirect can be created to Sidemen (YouTube group), with it then becoming EC edit protected. The protecting admin (RHaworth) is no longer admin. SK2242 (talk) 00:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done @SK2242: Airplaneman (talk) 00:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending-changes: Persistent vandalism by dynamic IP:s from Russia. St.nerol (talk) 10:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 23:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Caknuck: Oops, I protected the page shortly after you did and did not see your protection. I semi-protected the page for 14 days to match the duration of the disruptive edits. Feel free to readjust if this is too long. @St.nerol: Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 23:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. Just leave it with the longer protection. Cheers, caknuck ° needs to be running more often 00:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and BLP violations. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 00:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 00:08, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Excessive vandalism (also see filter log). Funcrunch (talk) 23:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Bumped from pending changes to semiprotection. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated target of LTA User:ArmanAfifeh. Nathan2055talk - contribs 23:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 00:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated BLP violations. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP range with persistent disruptive edits/edit warring. Magitroopa (talk) 20:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 23:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IrzaKhanz69, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bttowadch, Beyadob Baler is also clearly not a new account (possibly TryToBeFunny?). Pahunkat (talk) 20:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 23:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content. BOVINEBOY2008 10:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 23:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The obsessive Happy Tree Friends fan is at it again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 13:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 23:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism Originalchampion (talk) 08:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. Kosack (talk) 19:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create-protection: Has been created/recreated 3 times in last 24 hours - each time it is moved to draft, another copy is created. - Arjayay (talk) 13:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 23:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 18:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 23:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of persistant vandalism. Mxtt.prior (talk) 21:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 21:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

27 February 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Since the last protection, IP's have returned to vandalize the page. Extended semi-protection is needed. Armegon (talk) 04:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from new and IP users attempting to whitewash. Nmi628 (talk) 20:46, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Came here to ask for the same thing but Nmi628 beat me to it. Jorm (talk) 21:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:38, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:Cydebot (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Remove [[Category:Wikipedia adminbots|{{PAGENAME}}]] and change [[Category:Active Wikipedia bots|{{PAGENAME}}]] to [[Category:Inactive Wikipedia bots|{{PAGENAME}}]] since Cydebot is currently neither an admin nor active. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:03, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:39, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Since the last protection, IP's have returned to vandalize the page. Extended semi-protection is needed. Armegon (talk) 04:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from new and IP users attempting to whitewash. Nmi628 (talk) 20:46, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Came here to ask for the same thing but Nmi628 beat me to it. Jorm (talk) 21:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:38, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:Cydebot (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Remove [[Category:Wikipedia adminbots|{{PAGENAME}}]] and change [[Category:Active Wikipedia bots|{{PAGENAME}}]] to [[Category:Inactive Wikipedia bots|{{PAGENAME}}]] since Cydebot is currently neither an admin nor active. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:03, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:39, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Belwine (talk) 20:38, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Users do not respect BGN/PCGN1996 Romanization standard. SkarmoutsosV (talk) 22:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:16, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. WikiWolf7 (talk) 17:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator AmandaNP. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:49, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – 2lane is already salted and this one keeps getting created as well. This will always be an A7 or G11. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by many IPs. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding request. Too many removals of valid links and sources.

Fiveinchheels (talk) 20:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 20:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 15:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:49, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page was semi-protected, disruption stopped; protection expired, disruption came back. XOR'easter (talk) 15:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Also, sockpuppeteering. Ahmetlii (talk) 16:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator 331dot. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:34, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 15:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:49, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page was semi-protected, disruption stopped; protection expired, disruption came back. XOR'easter (talk) 15:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Also, sockpuppeteering. Ahmetlii (talk) 16:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator 331dot. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:34, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Eridian314 (talk) 18:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. There is not enough edit warring to justify full protection. Also, it would disrupt the existing semi-protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Ongoing non-NPOV / BLP violation additions by IP & new editor. Jack Frost (talk) 08:37, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: High level of POV disruption. The last week saw many disruptive Turkish POV edits on this article which led to the banning of a pro-Turkish editor by administrator Ymblanter, however disruption keeps on and the only solution to this is a full page protection for a little while bit. Thanks. - SilentResident (talk ✉ | contribs ✎) 11:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As mentioned at ANI, this page isn't a candidate for full protection at this time, but due to its sensitive nature, will need to be watched closely, indefinitely (I'm predicting an indef semi in its future). Its import is such that disruption (advocacy) needs to be curtailed especially swiftly and decisively. El_C 15:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 05:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced changes to the release date. Crboyer (talk) 06:03, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism (removal of sourced content). GiantSnowman 08:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:15, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: To allow more editors to keep the chart updated as edit requests have been proven insufficient. Furthermore, most such templates are unprotected anyways without major problems. Alexiscoutinho (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have you asked JzG first as required by the red notice above? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As a note, JzG is not an admin currently. bibliomaniac15 23:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Protection downgraded to semi. I'm sure testing the waters after almost 9 months is fine. No need to bother Guy with this. El_C 08:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Unprotection so that this article can be redirected to the Jessi Slaughter cyberbullying case, which has recently been recreated. This page is the birth name of the cyberbullying victim, and was protected over ten years ago to protect the BLP of a minor - concerns which are no longer relevant now. Bangalamania (talk) 02:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Weird, I only added the redirect to the page, but that seems to have also caused the protection to magically vanish. Poof! El_C 08:15, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Please downgrade protection from full to ECP. A draft has been submitted for review, so that a reviewer is being asked to accept the draft. Protecting admin User:Randykitty says make admin requests via WP:AN/. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:49, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 08:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 21:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 22:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semiprotection: High level of IP vandalism. Guy Macon (talk) 05:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 05:34, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 21:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 22:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semiprotection: High level of IP vandalism. Guy Macon (talk) 05:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 05:34, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Kosack (talk) 19:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, I already have left warnings for the disruptive IP, and they continue regardless. AIV it is for the future. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I did see, if the vandalism persists after a final warning then report the user to AIV. We generally don't protect articles when the disruption is caused by a single user. Kosack (talk) 23:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing unsourced edit warring re DOB. UW Dawgs (talk) 19:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. In any case, the user claiming to speak for Morrison is auto-confirmed so semi-protection would not help. You need to deal with this user in some way, either get him to prove he is speaking for Morrison via some kind of email confirmation, or come up with a reliable source. If he won't do either, you could report him for disruptive editing, but I would urge you to try a non-confrontational approach first. MelanieN (talk) 00:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Immediate resume of sock-puppet abuse stemming from previous page protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 00:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Livelikemusic: This is not sockpuppetry, but actually vandalism from IP users. 180.243.208.77 (talk) 01:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 monts, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Extended confirmed protection does not appear to be necessary. MelanieN (talk) 01:41, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – all 3 images are copyvios + [130] [131] [132] [133] [134]. Assem Khidhr (talk) 20:56, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It looks as if the photo issue has been worked out on the talk page, but some IPs are adding unsourced information. -- MelanieN (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 21:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 23:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There was only one auto-confirmed edit warrior and they have been blocked, but IPs are continuing the fight. MelanieN (talk) 01:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeated target of User:Ali778812 socks; see protection log on Alishamraan. Nathan2055talk - contribs 23:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. I also salted AliAli while I was at it. MelanieN (talk) 01:34, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Immediate resume of sock-puppet abuse stemming from previous page protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 00:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Extended confirmed protection does not appear to be necessary. MelanieN (talk) 01:38, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Given the Supreme Court's ruling there've been quite a few edits which don't need making. SITH (talk) 18:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article is much too heavily edited right now for PC protection to be effective. MelanieN (talk) 00:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Or a rangeblock. (CC) Tbhotch 20:34, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The underlying PC protection will persist after the semi-protection expires. MelanieN (talk) 00:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Incessant addition of badly sourced content by IP adresses. I'm therefore asking for a permanent semi-protection. Synthwave.94 (talk) 20:45, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:27, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch 20:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Way too much disruptive editing for PC to be effective. MelanieN (talk) 00:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – See [135], [136], [137], [138], [139], [140] and [141]. — Amkgp 💬 14:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Problem edits are persistent, but not frequent enough for semi-protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I insist on the request for protection. There is a group of fans who are changing the number of titles to 8, but our supreme court has already decided that 1987 belongs to Sport. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 14:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a content dispute. Work it out on the talk page, with references to show whose version is correct.  MelanieN (talk) 23:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The remakes have recently made headlines. Will cause heavy speculation and edits for the next month or so. puggo (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Kosack (talk) 18:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content disputes leading to mass removal of information. — Amkgp 💬 18:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This only appears to have occured once right now, if the disruption persists please feel free to request again. Kosack (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

28 February 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Rodney Araujo Tell me - My contributions 15:49, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:44, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This page has consistent history, at least over the last year or so, of edit warring, disruptive editing based on personal, unsourced knowledge, and sockpuppetry. Seems to start up as soon as protections are removed again, so maybe it just needs to be indefinitely protected until the antagonists find something else to do. Glorioussandwich (talk) 17:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:38, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ashleyyoursmile! 18:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ashleyyoursmile! 18:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Starting yesterday, large amounts of vandalism and disruptive editing from both IPs and new users. Kncny11 (shoot) 19:53, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 19:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 00:23, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GFOLEY FOUR!16:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous disruptive edits by specifically new users. Laser Victor 2017 ❯❯❯ talk 14:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GFOLEY FOUR!16:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Wretchskull (talk) 14:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GFOLEY FOUR!16:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 18:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – List of red links with no reasonable chance of ever becoming an article. Bot created. The Banner talk 10:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template has not been edited since 2015, you probably mean something else.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Newslinger talk 15:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-administrator comment: Newslinger and Pharaoh of the Wizards, Mb 9702 now was blocked from further editing. I request this via AIV request and not AE sanctions, so duration of block is indefinite. 36.76.234.82 (talk) 14:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for filing the vandalism report. Please note that administrators at AE are able to implement a mixed indefinite block, in which the first year is covered under discretionary sanctions rules, and the remainder is considered a normal block. — Newslinger talk 14:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, Newslinger, but that's too much lacework for my taste; I just blocked per my own admin discretion. I didn't see the AIV report, actually, 36.76.234.82, but it was a good idea to file it. Declining this request, as I think semi will do it now. Bishonen | tålk 15:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Declined as the disruptive autoconfirmed user has been blocked. Bishonen | tålk 15:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP-hopping user who continues to post false information on the article. Areaseven (talk) 15:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 16:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. 2a00:23c8:1195:e200::/64 (talk · contribs) for 4 months. — Newslinger talk 16:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP-hopping user who continues to post false information on the article. Areaseven (talk) 15:48, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 16:11, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. 2a00:23c8:1195:e200::/64 (talk · contribs) for 4 months. — Newslinger talk 16:11, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP-hopping user who continues to post false information on the article. Areaseven (talk) 15:48, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2a00:23c8:1195:e200::/64 (talk · contribs) for 4 months. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 16:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP-hopping user who continues to post false information on the article. Areaseven (talk) 15:49, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2a00:23c8:1195:e200::/64 (talk · contribs) for 4 months. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 16:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversial film in Sri Lanka. Persistent vandalism. Alexcalamaro (talk) 16:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A few days protection. Let’s see how it goes. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:49, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's not good. I'd protect it as quickly as possible. There is a lot of sockpuppetry going on so that they do not reach the fourth warning. Scorpions13256 (talk) 17:38, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 18:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent death - many poor edits and vandalism. Egghead06 (talk) 17:45, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GeneralNotability (talk) 18:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 18:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 16:38, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-time recurrence of disruptive edits (protected four times in the past year) from IP addresses by a permanently blocked user. See the archive at WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Drewpalazzolo for more background. Largoplazo (talk) 16:52, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please re-report next year if the disruption continues. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 15:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP has been trying to convert it into a ?COI? article about someone of dubious notability. Le Deluge (talk) 22:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please re-report next year if the disruption continues. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 15:50, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Sir Joseph (talk) 02:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 15:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandal magnet, what amounts to the parent article at Antifa (United States) is semi-protected indefinitely. FDW777 (talk) 17:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 15:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – This is getting crazy, and there's socking going on. Jorm (talk) 05:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. By Writ Keeper and Acroterion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected by Acroterion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:56, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Long history of IP addresses whitewashing the article, including current activity. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mjroots. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection / extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive removal of redirect. Polyamorph (talk) 10:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent spam: Constant additions of non-notable software products by COI editors. Blablubbs|talk 12:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped four days ago.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 02:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article is under pending changes protection, and all edits for the last weel have been accepted. I do not see any recent unreverted vandalism.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Looks a bit busy for five hours or so on 26-27 Feb but has been quiet since then for about 24 hours. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 22:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A warning for edit-warring has been issued, and the protection should take care of the out-of-the-blue IP combatants. Favonian (talk) 12:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Hello , this page has been deleted seven times.After seventh time deletion this page got salted.The page was last deleted on 10th November 2015.So I am requesting to unprotect this page so that i can create this page.Thank you. Bapinghosh (talk) 08:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Make a draft page first. However, note the draft page has been deleted various times as well. – The Grid (talk) 23:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. In view of its history, this needs to be created in draft space and then go through WP:Articles for creation. Favonian (talk) 11:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Article has been repeatedly recreated since 2009. All deletions of it were via PROD, XFD or CSD. Cupper52 (talk) 09:52, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cupper52, Can you show me more evidence? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Roxanna+Bina only shows two deletion entries. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:52, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ritchie333 See User talk:Roxybina. -Cupper52Discuss! 08:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a request for speedy deletion was made in 2009 and declined: "downgrade speedy to notability as significance has been asserted". The page was deleted in 2020 via PROD and in 2021 via AfD. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:03, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 08:42, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry from sockpuppets of two blocked editors, one of whom remains unblocked, as reported here [142]. IP of a now-blocked range restored the page, and a sock account of BlaccCrab—known for having accounts geolocating to Maryland, US—has reverted on the page twice to attempt to redirect it (November 2020, earlier today). Ss112 10:37, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 10:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly where Mr Porter travelled to during 1988 is the subject of considerable speculation and discussion due to an accusation of a serious crime in 1988 where the list of possible perpetrators includes him, but where the specific person has not been legally named, see for example https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-02-26/pm-senators-afp-told-historical-rape-allegation-cabinet-minister/13197248 Ambrosechapel (talk) 05:53, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Might be worth bringing this up at the BLP noticeboard to get more eyes on it. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done, thank you Malcolmxl5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ambrosechapel (talkcontribs) 07:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Chuq. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No reason for IPs to edit. All recent IP edits have been vandalism. Cindercat 🐱 (Want to talk?) 10:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talkwork) 10:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Requesting move-protection be lifted as the RfC has now concluded and the decision has been made to rename this article. Link here. — Czello 22:34, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done not unprotected, but instead moved. Anarchyte (talkwork) 10:48, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent sockpuppetry by User:RawalJaisal

Temporary semi-protection: Blocked account User:RawalJaisal keeps restoring their edits through an IP. They're clearly the same individual since both have provided the same phone number to be contacted with.[143][144]
Alivardi (talk) 09:37, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done, all protected for various terms--Ymblanter (talk) 08:51, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from new and IP users removing reliably sourced content/whitewashing extremism. Nmi628 (talk) 20:46, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected for a further three months. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:53, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Surprising how much attention that page gets. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:04, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Looks to be on someone's list as a test page. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
They certainly find their way there. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism and addition of unsourced information by numerous anon IPs. Egghead06 (talk) 08:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User Talk Of Blocked User. WikiWolf7 (talk) 17:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The two misbehaving editors on that page are globally locked and I’m not seeing any other reason to protect the page. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. And g-locked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:41, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Anon IP making repeated contentions / non-MOS edits despite two registered editors continuing to make corrections. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by Deepfriedokra. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IP DE.  // Timothy :: talk  00:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:51, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent additions of spam links by IPs and new accounts. – 2.O.Boxing 10:42, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have quietened down since this request was made. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of unsourced opinions & blanking large portions of text. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IP addresses vandalizing. – The Grid (talk) 23:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]